UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number:
001-32312
Novelis Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Canada
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
98-0442987
(I.R.S. employer
identification number)
|
|
|
|
3399 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 1500
Atlanta, Georgia
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
30326
(Zip
Code)
|
Telephone:
(404) 814-4200
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of January 31, 2009, the registrant had 77,459,658
common shares outstanding. All of the Registrants
outstanding shares were held indirectly by Hindalco Industries
Ltd., the Registrants parent company.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited) Three Months Ended
December 31, 2008; Three Months Ended December 31,
2007 (Restated); Nine Months Ended December 31, 2008;
May 16, 2007 Through December 31, 2007 (Restated); and
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
as of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008
(Restated)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited) Nine Months Ended December 31, 2008;
May 16, 2007 Through December 31, 2007 (Restated); and
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Shareholders Equity (unaudited) Nine Months Ended
December 31, 2008 (Restated as to opening balance)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (unaudited)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II.
|
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
96
|
|
EX-10.1 |
EX-10.2 |
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
EX-32.2 |
1
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
|
$
|
8,238
|
|
|
$
|
7,103
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
7,645
|
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
|
|
2,782
|
|
|
|
10,476
|
|
|
|
7,169
|
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and minority interests share
|
|
|
(2,028
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(2,238
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interests share
|
|
|
(1,829
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Change in pension and other benefits
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) related to items of other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(1,875
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,013
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
Novelis
Inc.
(in
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $1 as of December 31
and March 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,112
|
|
|
|
3,446
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
|
|
3,357
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
8,371
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
2,540
|
|
|
|
2,560
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,755
|
|
|
|
7,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; unlimited number of shares
authorized; 77,459,658 shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,918
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
8,371
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
Novelis
Inc.
(unaudited)
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments, net
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Foreign exchange remeasurement on non-working capital items, net
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory reserves and adjustments
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sales of property, plant and equipment and
business, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(434
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment and business
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from related parties loans receivable, net
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
4
Novelis
Inc.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in millions) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Dividends minority interests
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities related to the Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock
(See Note 1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,645
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(883
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
Novelis
Inc.
(in
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008 (Restated)
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
3,523
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,918
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
6
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Business
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein to Alcan
refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
Description
of Business and Basis of Presentation
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products where the end-use destination of
the products includes the construction and industrial, beverage
and food cans, foil products and transportation markets. As of
December 31, 2008, we had operations on four continents:
North America; Europe; Asia and South America, through 32
operating plants, one research facility and several
market-focused innovation centers in 11 countries. In addition
to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary
aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that are
integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended March 31, 2008 filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
August 11, 2008. Management believes that all adjustments
necessary for the fair presentation of results, consisting of
normally recurring items, have been included in the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim
periods presented. The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. The principal areas
of judgment relate to derivative financial instruments,
impairment of long-lived assets including goodwill and
intangible assets and income taxes.
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock and Predecessor and Successor
Reporting
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
Our acquisition by Hindalco was recorded in accordance with
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 103, Push Down Basis
of Accounting Required in Certain Limited Circumstances
(SAB 103). In the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets, the consideration and related costs paid by
Hindalco in connection with the acquisition have been
pushed down to us and have been allocated to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement
No. 141, Business Combinations (FASB 141). Due to
the impact of push down accounting, the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements and certain note presentations
for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 are presented
in two distinct periods to indicate the application of two
different bases of accounting between the periods presented:
(1) the period up to, and including, the acquisition date
(April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, labeled
Predecessor) and (2) the period after that date
(May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007, labeled
Successor). The accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements include a black line division which
indicates that the Predecessor and Successor reporting entities
shown are not comparable.
7
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of the prior period amounts and
presentation have been made to conform to the presentation
adopted for the current periods. The following reclassification
and presentation changes were made to the prior periods
condensed consolidated balance sheets to conform to the current
period presentation: Fair value of derivative instruments
were reclassified from Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities to a separate line item. The amount of the
reclassification was $148 million at March 31, 2008.
This reclassification had no effect on total assets, total
shareholders equity, net income (loss) or cash flows as
previously presented.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we reclassified
$6 million from Deferred income tax assets,
$2 million from Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities, and $53 million from Deferred income
tax liabilities to Goodwill due to a
misclassification on the opening balance sheet of the Successor
company. The impact of this reclassification increased total
assets and total liabilities by $55 million, but had no
effect on total shareholders equity, net income (loss) or
cash flows as previously presented and is not considered
material to the March 31, 2008 financial statements.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards have been adopted by us
during the nine months ended December 31, 2008.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we adopted FASB
Staff Position (FSP)
No. FAS 140-4
and FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)-8 (FIN 46(R)-8),
Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers
of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities.
FIN 46(R)-8 calls for enhanced disclosures by public
entities about interests in variable interest entities (VIE) and
provides users of the financial statements with greater
transparency about an enterprises involvement with
variable interest entities. As FIN 46(R)-8 only requires
enhanced disclosures, this FSP will have no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. See Note 8 Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities for these expanded disclosures.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we adopted FASB
Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (FASB 162). FASB 162 defines the order
in which accounting principles that are generally accepted
should be followed. Due to the nature of FASB 162, this standard
will have no impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (FASB 159). FASB 159 permits entities to choose
to measure financial instruments and certain other assets and
liabilities at fair value on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis (the fair value option) with changes in fair
value reported in earnings each reporting period. The fair value
option enables some companies to reduce the volatility in
reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without applying the complex hedge
accounting requirements under FASB Statement No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(FASB 133), to achieve similar results. We already record
our derivative contracts and hedging activities at fair value in
accordance with FASB 133. We did not elect the fair value option
for any other financial instruments or certain other financial
assets and liabilities that were not previously required to be
measured at fair value.
On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (FASB 157), as it relates to
financial assets and financial liabilities. In February 2008,
the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
delayed our required adoption date of FASB 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair
8
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis,
until April 1, 2009. Also in February 2008, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 157-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement
No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address
Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13, which states that FASB
Statement No. 13, Accounting for Leases (FASB 13),
and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value
measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement
under FASB Statement No. 13 are excluded from the
provisions of FASB 157, except for assets and liabilities
related to leases assumed in a business combination that are
required to be measured at fair value under FASB 141 or FASB
Statement No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations.
See Note 16 Fair Value Measurements regarding
our adoption of this standard.
On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Staff Position
No. FIN 39-1,
Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39, (FSP
FIN 39-1).
FSP
FIN 39-1
amends FASB Statement No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts
Related to Certain Contracts, by permitting entities that
enter into master netting arrangements as part of their
derivative transactions to offset in their financial statements
net derivative positions against the fair value of amounts (or
amounts that approximate fair value) recognized for the right to
reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash
collateral under those arrangements. Our adoption of this
standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards have been issued, but
have not yet been adopted by us as of December 31, 2008, as
adoption is not required until future reporting periods.
On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Pensions
and Other Postretirement Benefits (FSP No. 132(R)-1).
FSP No. 132(R)-1 requires that an employer disclose the
following information about the fair value of plan assets:
1) how investment allocation decisions are made, including
the factors that are pertinent to understanding of investment
policies and strategies; 2) the major categories of plans
assets; 3) the inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure the fair value of plan assets; 4) the effect
of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs
on changes in plan assets for the period; and
5) significant concentrations of risk within plan assets.
FSP No. 132(R)-1 will be effective for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2009, with early application permitted.
At initial adoption, application of FSP No. 132(R)-1 would
not be required for earlier periods that are presented for
comparative purposes. We have not yet commenced evaluating the
potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP
No. 132(R)-1 on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP
FAS 142-3).
FSP
FAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing the
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP
FAS 142-3
also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination
of intangible asset useful lives. FSP
FAS 142-3
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We have not yet commenced
evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP
FAS 142-3
on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(FASB 161). FASB 161 changes the disclosure requirements for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about (i) how and
why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for under FASB 133 and its related interpretations and
(iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect an entitys financial position, results of
operations and cash flows. FASB 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after
9
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
November 15, 2008, with early adoption permitted. FASB 161
permits, but does not require, comparative disclosures for
earlier periods upon initial adoption. As FASB 161 only requires
enhanced disclosures, this standard will have no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141
(Revised), Business Combinations (FASB 141(R)). FASB
141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the
acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
FASB 141(R) also requires acquirers to estimate the
acquisition-date fair value of any contingent consideration and
to recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of
contingent consideration in earnings. We will be required to
apply this new standard prospectively to business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of
the annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for
valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
contingencies. FASB 141(R) amends certain provisions of FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, such
that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes
and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that
closed prior to the effective date of FASB 141(R) would also
apply the provisions of FASB 141(R). Early adoption is
prohibited. We are currently evaluating the effects that
FASB 141(R) may have on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
(FASB 160). FASB 160 establishes accounting and reporting
standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly
identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheet
within shareholders equity, but separate from the
parents equity; (ii) the amount of consolidated net
income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling
interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of
the consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes
in a parents ownership interest while the parent retains
its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be
accounted for consistently. FASB 160 applies to fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. We have not yet commenced evaluating the potential
impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB 160 on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do
not apply to our operations.
|
|
2.
|
Impact of
Market Conditions on our Business
|
The deterioration of global economic conditions combined with
rapidly declining aluminum prices from a peak of $3,292 per
tonne in July 2008 to $1,455 per tonne on December 31, 2008
have placed pressure on our short-term liquidity. However, we
believe we have sufficient long-term financing in place, with
only $22 million of our long-term debt due within the next
12 months.
Demand for flat rolled products decreased in our third fiscal
quarter by 13% as compared to the prior year. While we have
begun taking cost reduction measures, due to the capital
intensive nature of our business, we have been unable to make
corresponding short term adjustments to our capacity and fixed
cost structure to fully address these demand issues. These
circumstances decrease cash generated by operations and increase
the effect of timing issues related to our settlement of
aluminum forward contracts versus cash collection from our
customers. Looking forward, we have uncertainty regarding
customer credit due to the weakening demand as a result of the
global recession in certain of our customers end markets,
particularly the construction and automotive markets.
10
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
We enter into derivative instruments to hedge forecasted
purchases and sales of aluminum. Based on the aluminum price
forward curve as of December 31, 2008, we expect
approximately $580 million of cash outflows related to
settlement of these derivative instruments through the end of
fiscal 2010, including $260 million during the fourth
fiscal quarter of 2009. Except for approximately $160 million of
cash outflows related to hedges of our exposure to metal price
ceilings, we expect all of these outflows will be recovered
through collection of customer accounts receivable, typically on
a 30-60 day lag. Accordingly, this difference in timing
will place pressure on our short term liquidity outlook.
In the near term, our forecast indicates our liquidity position
will be tight, but adequate as we settle our outstanding
derivative positions. However, our liquidity needs could
increase due to the unpredictability of current market
conditions and their potential effect on customer credit, future
derivative settlements, future sales volume or other matters. We
cannot be assured that in the event of such deteriorating
conditions we would have adequate liquidity. As a result,
management has undertaken a number of activities to generate
cash in the near term as well implement changes in our cost
structure that will benefit our liquidity in the long-term.
In February 2009, we entered into an unsecured credit facility
of $100 million with a scheduled maturity date of
January 15, 2015 from a company affiliated with the Aditya
Birla group, and we have drawn down $75 million of this
facility to increase our cash position. We have also implemented
cost cutting initiatives, cut capital expenditures, reduced
inventory, and begun to restructure a number of facilities and
overhead staff, which will improve our long-term liquidity
position. Further, we are continuing to explore other possible
near term cash generation activities, including accelerating
certain customer payments to match the timing of the settlement
of forward metal purchases to improve our short-term liquidity
position.
|
|
3.
|
Restatement
of Financial Statements
|
We have restated our consolidated balance sheet as of
March 31, 2008 and our consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income (loss) and of cash flows for
the period from May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007
to correct non-cash accounting errors in our application of
purchase accounting for an equity method investment which led to
a misstatement of our provision for income taxes during the
period we were finalizing our purchase accounting. We also
corrected other miscellaneous adjustments that were deemed to be
not material by management, either individually or in the
aggregate. These adjustments did not have an impact on our
compliance with the financial covenants under our
7.25% Senior Notes or under our New Senior Secured Credit
Facilities (see Note 11 Debt). See our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K/A
filed with the SEC on August 11, 2008 for details of these
corrections, including the effects of the restatement on our
March 31, 2008 balance sheet. Items in the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes
that have been restated are marked accordingly.
11
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The following tables highlight the financial statement effects
related to the above corrections for the period from
May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007. Our condensed
consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for
the three months ended December 31, 2007 is restated as
follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Restatements
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and minority interests share
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interests share
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income before income tax effect
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Our condensed consolidated statement of operations and
comprehensive loss for the period from May 16, 2007 through
December 31, 2007 is restated as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Restatements
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
7,103
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
6,466
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,191
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
7,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for taxes on loss and minority
interests share
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interests share
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income before income tax effect
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the
period from May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007 is
restated as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
As Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Restatements
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(90
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments, net
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of effects from
acquisitions and divestitures):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment and business
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Proceeds from related parties loans receivable, net
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
Dividends minority interests
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Impairment
of Goodwill and Investment in Affiliate
|
In accordance with FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and
Intangible Assets (FASB 142), we evaluate the carrying value
of goodwill for potential impairment annually during the fourth
fiscal quarter of each year or on an interim basis if an event
occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the fair value
of a reporting unit is likely to be below its carrying value.
During the third fiscal quarter of 2009, we concluded that
interim impairment testing was required due to the recent
deterioration in the global economic environment and the
resulting significant decrease in both the market capitalization
of our parent company and the valuation of our publicly traded
7.25% Senior Notes.
We test consolidated goodwill for impairment using a fair value
approach at the reporting unit level. We use our operating
segments as our reporting units and perform our goodwill
impairment test in two steps. Step one compares the fair value
of each reporting unit (operating segment) to its carrying
amount. If step one indicates that an impairment potentially
exists, the second step is performed to measure the amount of
impairment, if any. Goodwill impairment exists when the
estimated fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value.
For purposes of our step one analysis, our estimate of fair
value for each reporting unit is based on a combination of
(1) quoted market prices/relationships (the market
approach), (2) discounted cash flows (the
income approach) and (3) a stock price
build-up
approach (the
build-up
approach). Under the market approach, the fair value of
each reporting unit is determined based upon comparisons to
public companies engaged in similar businesses. Under the income
approach, the fair value of each reporting unit was based on the
present value of estimated future cash flows. The income
approach is dependent on a number of significant management
assumptions including estimated demand in each geographic market
and the discount rate. The discount rate is commensurate with
the risk inherent in the projected cash flows and reflects the
rate of return required by an investor in the current economic
conditions. Under the
build-up
approach, which is a variation of the market approach, we
estimate the fair value of each reporting unit based on the
estimated contribution of each of the reporting units to
Hindalcos total business enterprise value. The estimated
fair value for each reporting unit is within the range of fair
values yielded under each approach. The results of our step one
test indicated a potential impairment.
Due to the complexities involved in determining the implied fair
value of the goodwill of each reporting unit, we have not
finalized our evaluation as of the filing of this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. However, based upon the
work performed to date, we have concluded that an impairment is
probable and can be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, we have
recorded a $1.3 billion charge representing our best
estimate of the impairment of consolidated goodwill for the
quarter ended December 31, 2008. We also evaluated the
carrying value of our investment in Aluminium Norf GmbH for
impairment. This resulted in an impairment charge of
$160 million, which is reported in Equity in net
(income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates on the
condensed consolidated statement of operations.
The table below summarizes goodwill by reporting unit (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Reporting Unit
|
|
2008(A)
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
1,149
|
|
|
$
|
(860
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
183
|
|
South America
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
$
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
(A) |
|
See Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies (Reclassifications) for
discussion of goodwill balance reclassification at
March 31, 2008. |
|
(B) |
|
Other adjustments include: (1) an adjustment in North
America for final payment related to the transfer of pension
plans in Canada for employees who elected to transfer their past
service to Novelis during the quarter ended June 30, 2008
and (2) adjustments in Europe related to tax audits during
the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2008. |
We expect to finalize our goodwill impairment testing during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Any adjustments to our estimates
recorded in the third quarter as a result of completing this
evaluation will be recorded in our financial statements for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009.
We recorded charges of $34 million and $38 million
related to the write down of aluminum inventory to the lower of
cost or market for the three and nine months ended
December 31, 2008, respectively. Inventories consist of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
1,170
|
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment, net, consists of the following
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Land and property rights
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2,461
|
|
|
|
2,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,436
|
|
|
|
3,544
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
2,920
|
|
|
$
|
3,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Total depreciation expense is shown in the table below (in
millions). We capitalized no material amounts of interest on
construction projects related to property, plant and equipment
for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
The components of amortization expense related to intangible
assets are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Total Amortization expense related to intangible assets
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Less: Amortization expense related to intangible assets included
in Cost of goods sold(A)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets included in
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Relates to amortization of favorable energy and other supply
contracts. |
|
|
7.
|
Restructuring
Programs
|
The following table summarizes the activity in our restructuring
reserves (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance Reserves
|
|
|
Related Reserves
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Provisions (recoveries), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Other adjustments
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we recorded
$15 million severance charge related to voluntary and
involuntary separation programs for salaried employees in North
America and Corporate aimed at reducing staff levels.
|
|
8.
|
Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities
|
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised) (FIN 46(R))
addresses the consolidation of business enterprises to which the
usual condition (ownership of a majority voting interest) of
consolidation does not apply. FIN 46(R)
17
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
requires a variable interest entity (VIE) to be consolidated if
a party with an ownership, contractual or other financial
interest in the VIE (1) is obligated to absorb a majority
of the expected losses from the VIEs activities,
(2) is entitled to receive a majority of the VIEs
residual returns (if no party absorbs a majority of the
VIEs losses), or (3) both, even if the company does
not have clear voting control. Variable interests in a variable
interest entity are contractual, ownership, or other interests
in an entity that change with change in the fair value of the
entitys net assets exclusive of variable interests. In
December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FIN 46(R)-8
which requires enhanced disclosures about interests in VIEs.
As of December 31, 2008, we have a variable interest in
Logan Aluminum, Inc. (Logan) and consolidate the entity pursuant
to FIN 46(R). All significant intercompany transactions and
balances have been eliminated.
Logan
Organization and Operations
In 1985, Alcan purchased an interest in Logan to provide tolling
services jointly with ARCO Aluminum, Inc. (ARCO). Logan also
produces approximately one-third of the can sheet utilized in
the U.S. can sheet market. According to the joint venture
agreements between Alcan and ARCO, Alcan owned 40 shares of
Class A common stock and ARCO owned 60 shares of
Class B common stock in Logan. Each share provides its
holder with one vote, regardless of class. However, Class A
shareholders have the right to select four directors, and
Class B shareholders have the right to select three
directors. Generally, a majority vote is required for the Logan
board of directors to take action. In connection with our
spin-off from Alcan in January 2005, Alcan transferred all of
its rights and obligations under a joint venture agreement and
subsequent ancillary agreements (collectively, the JV
Agreements) to us. On May 24, 2007, ARCO filed a complaint
against us regarding a perceived dispute over management and
control of Logan following Hindalcos acquisition of
Novelis (see ARCO Aluminum Complaint in
Note 19 Commitments and Contingencies).
Logan processes metal received from Novelis and ARCO and charges
the respective partner a fee to cover expenses. Logan has no
equity and relies on the regular reimbursement of costs and
expenses by Novelis and ARCO to fund its operations. This
reimbursement is considered a variable interest as it
constitutes a form of financing of the activities of Logan.
Other than these contractually required reimbursements, we do
not provide other additional support to Logan. We are obligated
to absorb a majority of the risk of loss; however, Logans
creditors do not have recourse to our general credit.
Primary
Beneficiary
A variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called
the primary beneficiary. Upon consolidation, the primary
beneficiary generally must initially record all of the
VIEs assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests at
fair value. Generally, the primary beneficiary is the reporting
enterprise with a variable interest in the entity that is
obligated to absorb the majority (greater than 50%) of the
VIEs expected loss.
In a 1989 restructuring program, Alcan acquired the right to use
the excess capacity that existed on the hot mill at Logan. To
utilize this excess capacity, in 1992 Alcan installed a cold
mill that ARCO did not participate in. Subsequent to the
installation of the cold mill, we gained the ability to take the
majority share of production and costs, which qualifies Novelis
as Logans primary beneficiary under FIN 46(R).
18
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Carrying
Value
The following table summarizes the carrying value and
classification of assets and liabilities on our condensed
consolidated balance sheets owned by the Logan joint venture and
consolidated under FIN 46(R). There are significant other assets
used in the operations of Logan that are not part of the joint
venture (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
(71
|
)
|
|
$
|
(57
|
)
|
Net carrying value
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Investment
in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
Transactions
|
The following table summarizes the ownership structure and our
ownership percentage of the non-consolidated affiliates in which
we have an investment as of December 31, 2008, and which we
account for using the equity method. We have no material
investments in affiliates that we account for using the cost
method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Affiliate Name
|
|
Ownership Structure
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Consorcio Candonga
|
|
Unincorporated Joint Venture
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
MiniMRF LLC
|
|
Limited Liability Company
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Deutsche Aluminium Verpackung Recycling GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
France Aluminium Recyclage S.A.
|
|
Public Limited Company
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
The following table summarizes the condensed results of
operations of our equity method affiliates (on a 100% basis, in
millions) on a historical basis of accounting. These results do
not include the incremental depreciation and amortization
expense that we record in our equity method accounting, which
arises as a result of the amortization of fair value adjustments
we made to our investments in non-consolidated affiliates due to
the Arrangement. These results also do not include the
$160 million impairment charge to reduce the carrying value
of our investment in Aluminium Norf GmbH. (See
Note 4 Impairment of Goodwill and Investment in
Affiliate.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
439
|
|
|
$
|
384
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Costs, expenses and provisions for taxes on income
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The table below summarizes our incremental depreciation and
amortization expense on our equity method investments due to the
Arrangement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Incremental depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Tax benefit(A)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental depreciation and amortization expense, net
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The tax benefits for the three months ended December 31,
2007 and the period from May 16, 2007 through
December 31, 2007 includes tax benefits associated with
amortization and a statutory tax rate change recorded as part of
our equity method accounting for these investments. There were
no such statutory tax rate changes in the other periods noted in
the table above. |
Included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements are transactions and balances arising from business
we conduct with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we
classify as related party transactions and balances. We earned
less than $1 million of interest income on a loan payable
to us from Aluminium Norf GmbH during each of the periods
presented in the table below. The following table describes the
nature and amounts of significant transactions that we had with
related parties (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Purchases of tolling services and electricity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH(A)
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Consorcio Candonga(B)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases from related parties
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We purchase tolling services (the conversion of customer-owned
metal) from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our
operations in South America. |
The following table describes the period-end account balances
that we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as
related party balances in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets (in millions). We have no other
material related party balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Accounts receivable(A)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
Other long-term receivables(A)
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
Accounts payable(B)
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The balances represent current and non-current portions of a
loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH and
electricity from Consorcio Candonga. |
20
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are comprised of
the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
Accrued settlement of legal claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Current portion of fair value of unfavorable sales contracts
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
597
|
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Rates(A)
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,399
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
1,460
|
|
|
$
|
1,399
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014(E)
|
|
|
3.44
|
%
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014(E)
|
|
|
3.44
|
%(C)
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due January 2020 (Swiss francs (CHF)
52 million)
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 3 million)
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
5.44
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Bank loan, due May 2009 (Korean won (KRW) 10 billion)
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loans, due September 2010 through June 2011 (KRW
400 million)
|
|
|
3.50
|
%(D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due April 2009 through December 2012
|
|
|
1.08
|
%(D)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,504
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
2,562
|
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,482
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
2,540
|
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
2,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Interest rates are as of December 31, 2008 and exclude the
effects of accretion/amortization of fair value adjustments as a
result of the Arrangement. |
|
(B) |
|
Debt was recorded at fair value as a result of the Arrangement. |
|
(C) |
|
Excludes the effect of related interest rate swaps. |
|
(D) |
|
Weighted average interest rate. |
|
(E) |
|
On July 6, 2007, we entered into new senior secured credit
facilities with a syndicate of lenders led by affiliates of UBS
and ABN AMRO (New Senior Secured Credit Facilities) providing
for aggregate borrowings of up to $1.76 billion. The New
Senior Secured Credit Facilities consist of (1) a
$960 million seven-year Term Loan facility (Term Loan
facility) and (2) an $800 million five year
multi-currency asset-based revolving credit line and letter of
credit facility (ABL facility). |
Due to the change in the market price of our 7.25% Senior
Notes from 89.25% of par value as of March 31, 2008 to
57.5% of par value as of December 31, 2008, the estimated
fair value of this debt has decreased $444 million to
$805 million.
Interest
Rate Swaps
During the three months ended December 31, 2007, we entered
into interest rate swaps to fix the variable London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) interest rate for up to $500 million
of our floating rate Term Loan facility at effective weighted
average interest rates and amounts as follows: (i) 4.0% on
$500 million through March 31, 2009 and (ii) 4.0%
on $400 million through March 31, 2010. An interest
rate swap at an interest rate of 4.38% on $100 million of
our Term Loan facility expired on September 30, 2008. We
are still obligated to pay any applicable margin, as defined in
our New Senior Secured Credit Facilities in addition to these
interest rates.
In January 2009, we entered into two interest rate swaps to fix
the variable LIBOR interest rate on an additional
$300 million of our floating Term Loan facility at a rate
of 1.49%, plus any applicable margin. These interest rate swaps
are effective from March 31, 2009 through March 31,
2011.
As of December 31, 2008 approximately 75% of our debt was
fixed rate and approximately 25% was variable rate.
Short-Term
Borrowings and Lines of Credit
As of December 31, 2008, our short-term borrowings were
$292 million consisting of (1) $235 million of
short-term loans under our ABL facility, (2) an
$11 million short-term loan in Italy, (3) a
$24 million short-term loan in Korea and
(4) $22 million in bank overdrafts. As of
December 31, 2008, $35 million of our ABL facility was
utilized for letters of credit and we had $323 million in
remaining availability under this revolving credit facility
before the covenant related restriction discussed below.
The New Senior Secured Credit Facilities include customary
affirmative and negative covenants. Under the ABL facility, if
our excess availability, as defined under the borrowing, is less
than $80 million, we are required to maintain a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. As of December 31,
2008, our fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1 to 1,
resulting in a reduction of availability under our ABL facility
of $80 million.
As of December 31, 2008, we had an additional
$176 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
not included in our revolving credit facility. The weighted
average interest rate on our total short-term borrowings was
4.15% and 4.12% as of December 31, 2008 and March 31,
2008, respectively.
22
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Subsequent
event
In February 2009, we entered into a credit facility of
$100 million with a scheduled maturity date of
January 15, 2015 on an unsecured basis from a company
affiliated with the Aditya Birla group, and we have drawn down
$75 million of this facility.
|
|
12.
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan
In June 2008, our board of directors authorized the Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2009 FY 2012 (2009 LTIP)
covering the performance period from April 1, 2008 through
March 31, 2012. Under the 2009 LTIP, stock appreciation
rights (SARs) are to be granted to certain of our executive
officers and key employees. The SARs will vest at the rate of
25% per year (every
June 19th)
subject to performance criteria (see below), and expire seven
years from the date the plan was authorized by the board. Each
SAR is to be settled in cash based on the difference between the
market value of one Hindalco share on the date of grant compared
to the date of exercise, converted from Indian rupees to the
participants payroll currency at the time of exercise. The
amount of cash paid would be limited to (i) 2.5 times the
target payout if exercised within one year of vesting or
(ii) 3 times the target payout if exercised after one year
of vesting. The SARs do not transfer any shareholder rights in
Hindalco to a participant. SARs that do not vest as a result of
failure to achieve a performance criterion will be cancelled.
Generally, all vested SARs expire 90 days after termination
of employment, except (1) in the case of death or
disability, when any unvested SARs will vest immediately and
expire within one year and (2) in the case of retirement,
when, if retirement occurs more than one year from the grant
date, the SARs would continue to vest and expire three years
following retirement. All awards vest upon a change in control
of the Company (as defined in the 2009 LTIP).
The performance criterion for vesting is based on the actual
overall Novelis Operating Earnings before Interest,
Depreciation, Amortization and Taxes (Operating EBITDA, as
defined in the 2009 LTIP) compared to the target Operating
EBITDA established and approved each fiscal year. The minimum
threshold for vesting each year is 75% of each annual target
Operating EBITDA, at which point 75% of the SARs for that period
would vest, with an equal pro rata amount of SARs vesting
through 100% achievement of the target. This performance
condition has no impact on the fair value of the SARs.
On October 29, 2008, our board of directors approved an
amendment to the 2009 LTIP. The design elements of the amended
2009 LTIP are largely unchanged from the original 2009 LTIP.
However, the amended 2009 LTIP now specifies that (a) the
plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors, (b) all payments shall be made in cash
upon exercise (less applicable withholdings), and (c) the
Compensation Committee has the authority to make adjustments in
the number and price of SARs covered by the plan in order to
prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of employees that
would otherwise result from a change in the capital structure of
the Company (e.g., dividends, stock splits, rights issuances,
reorganizations, liquidation of assets, etc.).
On November 19, 2008, grants totaling 21,534,619 SARs at an
exercise price of 60.50 Indian Rupees ($1.23 at the
December 31, 2008 exchange rate) per SAR were made to our
executive officers and key employees. There were no forfeitures
during the three months ended December 31, 2008.
At December 31, 2008, for outstanding SARs, the average
remaining contractual term is 6.5 years and the aggregate
intrinsic value is zero as the market value of a share of
Hindalco stock was less than the SAR exercise price. No SARs
were exercisable at December 31, 2008.
The fair value of each SAR is based on the difference between
the fair value of a long call and a short call option. The fair
value of each of these call options was determined using the
Black-Scholes valuation method. We used historical stock price
volatility data of Hindalco on the Bombay Stock Exchange to
23
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
determine expected volatility assumptions. The annual expected
dividend yield is based on Hindalco dividend payments of $0.04
(1.85 Indian Rupees) per annum. Risk-free interest rates are
based on treasury yields in India, consistent with the expected
remaining lives of the SARs. Because we do not have a sufficient
history of SAR exercise or cancellation, we estimated the
expected remaining life of the SARs based on an extension of the
simplified method as prescribed by Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment.
The fair value of each SAR under the 2009 LTIP was estimated as
of December 31, 2008 using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
46.9 51.9%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
48.9%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
3.6%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
5.3 5.4%
|
Expected life
|
|
3.5 5.0 years
|
The fair value of the SARs is being recognized over the
requisite performance and service period of each tranche,
subject to the achievement of any performance criterion. As of
December 31, 2008, management believes that the annual
performance criterion for the 2009 fiscal year is unlikely to be
met. Accordingly, no compensation expense for this performance
period has been recorded in the three and nine months ended
December 31, 2008. Additionally, since the performance
criteria for the fiscal years 2010 to 2012 have not yet been
established and therefore, no measurement periods have
commenced, no expense has been recorded for those tranches in
the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2008.
Unrecognized compensation expense related to the non-vested SARs
(assuming all future performance criteria are met except for the
2009 performance period) is $3 million which is expected to
be realized over a weighted average period of 3.5 years.
Recognition
Awards
On September 25, 2006, we entered into Recognition
Agreements and granted Recognition Awards to certain executive
officers and other key employees (Executives) to retain and
reward them for continued dedication towards corporate
objectives. Under the terms of these agreements, Executives who
remained continuously employed by us through the vesting dates
of December 31, 2007 and 2008, were entitled to receive
one-half of their total Recognition Awards on each vesting date.
The number of Recognition Awards payable under the agreements
varied by Executive. As a result of the Arrangement, all
Recognition awards were payable in cash at a value of $44.93 per
share upon vesting.
On December 31, 2007, one-half of the outstanding
Recognition Awards vested and were settled for approximately
$3 million in cash in January 2008. On December 31,
2008, the remaining outstanding Recognition Awards vested and
were settled for approximately $2 million in cash in
January 2009.
Share-Based
Compensation Expense
As a result of our acquisition by Hindalco on May 15, 2007,
all of our share-based compensation awards (except for our
Recognition Awards) were accelerated to vest, cancelled and
settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price per common share
paid by Hindalco in the transaction. Compensation expense
resulting from the accelerated vesting of plan awards, totaling
$45 million is included in Selling, general and
administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated
statement of operations for the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007. Compensation expense of
$1 million was recognized during the period from
May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007.
24
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
For each of the three and nine months ended December 31,
2008 and for the three months ended December 31, 2007,
compensation expense related to share-based awards was less than
$1 million.
|
|
13.
|
Postretirement
Benefit Plans
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost for all of our
significant postretirement benefit plans are shown in the tables
below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Pension Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Amortization prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment/settlement losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Amortization actuarial losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment/settlement losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 6.9% in
fiscal 2009.
25
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Employer
Contributions to Plans
For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to
provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to date,
and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over
periods of 15 years or less. We also participate in savings
plans in Canada and the U.S., as well as defined contribution
pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, Italy,
Switzerland, Malaysia and Brazil. We contributed the following
amounts to all plans (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Funded pension plans
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Unfunded pension plans
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Savings and defined contribution pension plans
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the remainder of fiscal 2009, we expect to contribute an
additional $15 million to our funded pension plans,
$5 million to our unfunded pension plans and
$5 million to our savings and defined contribution plans.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2008, actual returns
for our worldwide funded pension plans were significantly below
our expected rate of return of 6.9% due to adverse conditions in
the equity markets. Continued actual returns below our expected
rate may unfavorably impact the amount and timing of future
contributions to funded plans.
|
|
14.
|
Currency
(Gains) Losses
|
The following currency (gains) losses are included in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net (gain) loss on change in fair value of currency derivative
instruments(A)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
Net (gain) loss on remeasurement of monetary assets and
liabilities(B)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net.
|
|
(B) |
|
Included in Other (income) expenses, net.
|
26
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The following currency gains (losses) are included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets (net of tax
effect and in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment at end of period
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Financial
Instruments and Commodity Contracts
|
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments to manage the risks arising from
fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates, aluminum prices
and energy prices. Such instruments are used for risk management
purposes only. We may be exposed to losses in the future if the
counterparties to the contracts fail to perform. We are
satisfied that the risk of such non-performance is remote, due
to our monitoring of credit exposures. Our ultimate gain or loss
on these derivatives may differ from the amount recognized in
the accompanying December 31, 2008 condensed consolidated
balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions, the
relative costs of the instruments and capacity to hedge. The
duration is always linked to the timing of the underlying
exposure, with the connection between the two being regularly
monitored.
The current and noncurrent portions of derivative assets and the
current portion of derivative liabilities are presented on the
face of our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included
in Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
27
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008
are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
Currency options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Interest rate currency swaps
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
Aluminum options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Embedded derivative instruments
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Heating oil swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(618
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
(996
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(184
|
)
|
|
$
|
(184
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
Interest rate currency swaps
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Aluminum options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Embedded derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
$
|
(201
|
)
|
|
$
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Investment Hedges
We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to
fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and
investments in our European operations. We have designated these
as net investment hedges. The effective portion of gain or loss
on the derivative is included in Other comprehensive income
(loss). The ineffective portion of gain or loss on the
derivative is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net.
The following table summarizes the amount of gain (loss) we
recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss) related
to our net investment hedge derivatives (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
Cash Flow
Hedges
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we have
designated as a cash flow hedge against our exposure to
fluctuating electricity prices. The effective portion of gain or
loss on the derivative is included in
29
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivatives, net
in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive loss.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable rate
debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included
in Other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified
into Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
costs, net in our accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or
losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net in our current period earnings. If
at any time during the life of a cash flow hedge relationship we
determine that the relationship is no longer effective, the
derivative will be de-designated as a cash flow hedge. This
could occur if the underlying hedged exposure is determined to
no longer be probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge
effectiveness determines that the hedge relationship no longer
meets the measures we have established at the inception of the
hedge. Gains or losses recognized to date in Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) would be immediately
reclassified into current period earnings, as would any
subsequent changes in the fair value of any such derivative.
During the next twelve months we expect to realize
$2 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.
The following table summarizes (1) the amount of gain or
(loss) recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI),
(2) the amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from
Accumulated OCI into income and (3) the amount of
gain or (loss) recognized in income (ineffective portion)
related to our cash flow hedge derivatives (in millions).
Three Month Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative
|
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Nine
Month Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on
|
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
30
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and Amount
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on
|
|
|
OCI into Income (Effective
|
|
|
Excluded from Effectiveness
|
|
|
|
Derivative (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
|
Testing)
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain of our operations.
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the LME price of aluminum. These
exposures arise from firm commitments to sell aluminum in future
periods at fixed or capped prices, the forecasted output of our
smelter operations in South America, and the forecasted metal
price lag associated with firm commitments to sell aluminum in
future periods at prices based on the LME.
We have an embedded derivative which arises from a contractual
relationship with a customer that entitles us to pass-through
the economic effect of trading positions that we take with other
third parties on our customers behalf.
We use natural gas swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
energy prices in North America.
While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in
helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging
instruments under FASB 133. The change in fair value of these
derivatives is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair
value of derivative instruments, net in the condensed
consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.
31
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in
current period earnings (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Interest rate currency swaps
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Currency options
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(606
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Aluminum options
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded derivative instruments
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Heating oil swaps
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cross currency swaps
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
(405
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(524
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
FASB 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited
exceptions. Our adoption of FASB 157 on April 1, 2008
resulted in (1) a gain of less than $1 million, which
is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of
derivative instruments, net in our condensed consolidated
statement of operations, (2) a $1 million decrease to
the fair value of effective portion of hedges, net included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and
(3) a $35 million increase to the foreign currency
translation adjustment included in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) during the three months ended
June 30, 2008. These adjustments are primarily due to the
inclusion of nonperformance risk (i.e., credit spreads) in our
valuation models related to certain of our cross-currency swap
derivative instruments (see Note 15 Financial
Instruments and Commodity Contracts).
FASB 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price)
in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. FASB 157 will be the single source in
GAAP for the definition of fair value, except for the fair value
of leased property as defined in FASB 13, for purposes of lease
classification or measurement. FASB 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant
assumptions developed based on market data obtained from
independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an
entitys own assumptions about market participant
assumptions developed based on the best information available in
the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value
hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the
highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the
32
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three
levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB 157 are described
as follows:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities
that we have the ability to access at the measurement date;
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which
there is little or no market data, which require us to develop
our own assumptions based on the best information available as
what market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability.
The following section describes the valuation methodologies we
used to measure our various financial instruments at fair value,
including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy
in which each instrument is generally classified:
Derivative
contracts
For certain of our derivative contracts whose fair values are
based upon trades in liquid markets, such as aluminum forward
contracts and options, valuation model inputs can generally be
verified and valuation techniques do not involve significant
judgment. The fair values of such financial instruments are
generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
The majority of our derivative contracts are valued using
industry-standard models that use observable market inputs as
their basis, such as time value, forward interest rates,
volatility factors, and current (spot) and forward market prices
for foreign exchange rates. We generally classify these
instruments within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Such
derivatives include interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps,
foreign currency forward contracts and certain energy-related
forward contracts (e.g., natural gas).
We classify derivative contracts that are valued based on models
with significant unobservable market inputs as Level 3 of
the valuation hierarchy. These derivatives include certain of
our energy-related forward contracts (e.g., electricity) and
certain foreign currency forward contracts. Models for these
fair value measurements include inputs based on estimated future
prices for periods beyond the term of the quoted prices.
FASB 157 requires that for Level 2 and 3 of the fair value
hierarchy, where appropriate, valuations are adjusted for
various factors such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit
considerations (nonperformance risk).
The following table presents our assets and liabilities that are
measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis
classified under the appropriate level of the fair value
hierarchy as of December 31, 2008 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
Liabilities Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,022
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,052
|
)
|
Financial instruments classified as Level 3 in the fair
value hierarchy represent derivative contracts (primarily
energy-related and certain foreign currency forward contracts)
in which at least one significant unobservable input is used in
the valuation model. We incurred $20 million of unrealized
losses related to Level 3 financial instruments that were
still held as of December 31, 2008. These unrealized losses
are
33
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. The following table presents a
reconciliation of fair value activity for Level 3
derivative contracts on a net basis (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
Instruments(A)
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in earnings(B)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)(C)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Net transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents derivative assets net of derivative liabilities. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(C) |
|
Included in Change in fair value of effective portion of
hedges, net.
|
|
|
17.
|
Other
(Income) Expenses, net
|
Other (income) expenses, net is comprised of the following (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Exchange (gains) losses, net
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on partial reversal of accrued social contribution tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
On September 4, 2008, Novelis, our insurers, and Alcan
entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the insurance
coverage dispute related to the Reynolds boat case. Pursuant to
that settlement agreement, we paid approximately
$13 million to our insurers on September 8, 2008 and
recognized a non-cash pre-tax gain of $26 million upon the
reversal of our previously recorded $39 million liability.
Our insurers returned our letter of credit that had been on
deposit pending the outcome of settlement discussions. |
The Income tax provision (benefit) for the three and nine
months ended December 31, 2008 was based on the estimated
effective tax rates applicable for the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2009, after considering items specifically
related to the interim period. The Income tax provision
(benefit) for the periods from May 16, 2007 through
December 31, 2007 (as restated) and April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007 were based on the
34
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
estimated effective tax rates applicable for the year ended
March 31, 2008, after considering items specifically
related to the interim periods.
A reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our
effective tax rates is as follows (in millions, except
percentages).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Pre-tax loss before equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests share
|
|
$
|
(1,862
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,072
|
)
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian statutory tax rate
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) at the Canadian statutory rate
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(642
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) for taxes on income (loss) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible goodwill impairment
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange translation items
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Expense (income) items not subject to tax
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Enacted statutory tax rate changes
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax rate differences on foreign earnings
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(199
|
)
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
(333
|
)
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
(59
|
)%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
(89
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our effective tax rate differs from the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to the following factors: (1) pre-tax foreign
currency gains or losses with no tax effect and the tax effect
of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no
pre-tax effect, which is shown above as exchange translation
items; (2) the remeasurement of deferred income taxes due
to foreign currency changes, which is shown above as exchange
remeasurement of deferred income taxes; (3) changes in
valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain
jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that
we will not be able to utilize those losses; (4) items of
expense (income) that are not subject to tax;
(5) differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign
effective tax rates applied to entities in different
jurisdictions shown above as tax rate differences on foreign
earnings and (6) non-deductible impairment of goodwill.
As of December 31, 2008, we had a net deferred tax
liability of $242 million, including deferred tax assets of
approximately $378 million for net operating loss and tax
credit carryforwards. The carryforwards begin expiring between
now and the year 2028 with some amounts being carried
forward indefinitely. As of December 31, 2008, valuation
allowances of $120 million had been recorded against net
operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, where
it appeared more likely than not that such benefits will not be
realized. Realization is dependent on generating sufficient
taxable income prior to expiration of the tax attribute
carryforwards.
35
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Although realization is not assured, management believes it is
more likely than not that all the remaining net deferred tax
assets will be realized. In the near term, the amount of
deferred tax assets considered realizable could be reduced if we
do not generate sufficient taxable income in certain
jurisdictions.
Tax
Uncertainties
Adoption
of FASB Interpretation No. 48
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48).
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes, by
prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is
required to meet before being recognized in the financial
statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, our
unrecognized tax benefits decreased $1 million as a result
of foreign exchange translation. Our reserves for uncertain tax
positions totaled $53 million and $61 million as of
December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively. As
of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, the total
amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would
affect the effective income tax rate in future periods based on
anticipated settlement dates was $47 million in both
periods.
Tax authorities are currently examining certain of our prior
years tax returns for
2004-2007.
We are evaluating potential adjustments related to these
examinations and do not anticipate that settlement of the
examinations will result in a material payment.
During the nine month period ended December 31, 2008,
taxing authorities in Germany concluded their audit of the tax
years
1999-2003.
As a result of this settlement, we reduced our unrecognized tax
benefits by $10 million, including cash payments to taxing
authorities of $6 million and a reduction to Goodwill
of $4 million.
Separately, we are awaiting a court ruling regarding the
utilization of certain operating losses. We anticipate that it
is reasonably possible that this ruling will result in a
$10 million decrease in unrecognized tax benefits by
March 31, 2009 related to this matter. We have fully funded
this contingent liability through a judicial deposit, which is
included in Other long-term assets third parties
since January 2007.
With the exception of the ongoing tax examinations described
above, we are not currently under examination by any income tax
authorities for years before 2004. With few exceptions, our tax
returns for all tax years before 2003 are no longer subject to
examination by taxing authorities.
Our continuing practice and policy is to record potential
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
our income tax provision. As of December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2008, we had $11 million and
$14 million (as restated) accrued for potential interest on
income taxes, respectively. For the three and nine months ended
December 31, 2008, our income tax provision included an
additional charge of $1 and $2 million of potential
interest, respectively, which was offset in its entirety by
current period foreign exchange movement. For the three months
ended December 31, 2007 and the periods from May 16,
2007 through December 31, 2007 and from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007, our income tax provision included a
reduction of less than $1 million, charges for an
additional $2 million, and $1 million of potential
interest, respectively.
36
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
19.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Primary
Supplier
Alcan is our primary supplier of metal inputs, including prime
and sheet ingot. The table below shows our purchases from Alcan
as a percentage of our total combined metal purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Purchases from Alcan as a percentage of total metal purchases in
kt(A)
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. |
Legal
Proceedings
Coca-Cola
Lawsuits. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in Georgia
state court. CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and
seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial
and a declaration of its rights under the agreement. The
agreement includes a most favored nations provision
regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS alleges that Novelis
Corporation breached the terms of the most favored
nations provision. The dispute will likely turn on the
facts that are presented to the court by the parties and the
courts finding as to how certain provisions of the
agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in
this litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material.
Novelis Corporation has filed its answer and the parties are
proceeding with discovery.
ARCO Aluminum Complaint. On May 24, 2007,
ARCO filed a complaint against Novelis Corporation and Novelis
Inc. in the United States District Court for the Western
District of Kentucky. ARCO and Novelis are partners in a joint
venture rolling mill located in Logan, Kentucky. In the
complaint, ARCO seeks to resolve a perceived dispute over
management and control of the joint venture following
Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis.
ARCO alleges that its consent was required in connection with
Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis. Failure to obtain
consent, ARCO alleges, has put us in default of the joint
venture agreements, thereby triggering certain provisions in
those agreements. The provisions include a reversion of the
production management at the joint venture to Logan from
Novelis, and a reduction of the board of directors of the entity
that manages the joint venture from seven members (four
appointed by Novelis and three appointed by ARCO) to six members
(three appointed by each of Novelis and ARCO).
ARCO seeks a court declaration that (1) Novelis and its
affiliates are prohibited from exercising any managerial
authority or control over the joint venture,
(2) Novelis interest in the joint venture is limited
to an economic interest only and (3) ARCO has authority to
act on behalf of the joint venture. Or, alternatively, ARCO is
seeking a reversion of the production management function to
Logan Aluminum, and a change in the composition of the board of
directors of the entity that manages the joint venture. Novelis
filed its answer to the complaint on July 16, 2007.
On July 3, 2007, ARCO filed a motion for partial summary
judgment with respect to one of the counts of its complaint
relating to the claim that Novelis breached the JV Agreement by
not seeking ARCOs consent. On July 30, 2007, Novelis
filed a motion to hold ARCOs motion for summary judgment
in abeyance (pending
37
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
further discovery), along with a demand for a jury. On
February 14, 2008, the judge issued an order granting our
motion to hold ARCOs summary judgment motion in abeyance.
Pursuant to this ruling, management and the board of the joint
venture are conducting their activities as normal.
Environmental
Matters
The following describes certain environmental matters relating
to our business. None of the environmental matters include
government sanctions of $100,000 or more.
We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also
known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions
regarding liability arising from the usage, storage, treatment
or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a number of
sites in the United States, as well as similar proceedings under
the laws and regulations of the other jurisdictions in which we
have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the
European Union. Many of these jurisdictions have laws that
impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, for the costs of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses, on those persons who contributed to
the release of a hazardous substance into the environment. In
addition, we are, from time to time, subject to environmental
reviews and investigations by relevant governmental authorities.
As described further in the following paragraph, we have
established procedures for regularly evaluating environmental
loss contingencies, including those arising from such
environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we believe we have made reasonable estimates
of the costs that are likely to be borne by us for these
environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly, we have
established reserves based on our reasonable estimates for the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters. We estimate that the undiscounted remaining
clean-up
costs related to all of our known environmental matters as of
December 31, 2008 will be approximately $38 million.
Of this amount, $20 million is included in Other
long-term liabilities, with the remaining $18 million
included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008. Management has reviewed the
environmental matters, including those for which we assumed
liability as a result of our spin-off from Alcan. As a result of
this review, management has determined that the currently
anticipated costs associated with these environmental matters
will not, individually or in the aggregate, materially impair
our operations or materially adversely affect our financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity.
With respect to environmental loss contingencies, we record a
loss contingency on a non-discounted basis whenever such
contingency is probable and reasonably estimable. The evaluation
model includes all asserted and unasserted claims that can be
reasonably identified. Under this evaluation model, the
liability and the related costs are quantified based upon the
best available evidence regarding actual liability loss and cost
estimates. Except for those loss contingencies where no estimate
can reasonably be made, the evaluation model is fact-driven and
attempts to estimate the full costs of each claim. Management
reviews the status of, and estimated liability related to,
pending claims and civil actions on a quarterly basis. The
estimated costs in respect of such reported liabilities are not
offset by amounts related to cost-sharing between parties,
insurance, indemnification arrangements or contribution from
other potentially responsible parties (PRPs) unless otherwise
noted.
Butler Tunnel Site. Novelis Corporation was a
party in a 1989 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
lawsuit before the U.S. District Court for the Middle
District of Pennsylvania involving the Butler Tunnel Superfund
site, a third-party disposal site. In May 1991, the court
granted summary judgment against Novelis Corporation for alleged
disposal of hazardous waste. After unsuccessful appeals, Novelis
Corporation paid the entire judgment plus interest.
38
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The EPA filed a second cost recovery action against Novelis
Corporation seeking recovery of expenses associated with the
installation of an early warning and response system for
potential future releases from the Butler Tunnel site. In
January 2008, Novelis Corporation and the Department of Justice,
on behalf of the EPA, entered into a consent decree whereby
Novelis Corporation agreed to pay $1.9 million in three
installments in settlement of its liability with the
U.S. government.
Prior to the execution of the Novelis Corporation consent
decree, the EPA entered into consent decrees with the other
Butler Tunnel PRPs to finance and construct the early warning
and response system. On October 30, 2008, the trustee for
the PRPs provided a detailed analysis of the past and future
costs associated with the implementation of the early warning
system and advised us of their intention to file a contribution
action against us. Given the success of these types of civil
claims in environmental cases and our prior adverse court
rulings, we have recognized a liability for $2 million
included in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008, reflecting our portion of the previous
and remaining costs to complete the early warning and response
system.
Brazil
Tax Matters
Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America,
as of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, we had
cash deposits aggregating approximately $29 million and
$36 million, respectively, in judicial depository accounts
pending finalization of the related cases. The depository
accounts are in the name of the Brazilian government and will be
expended towards these legal proceedings or released to us,
depending on the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are
included in Other long-term assets third parties
in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
In addition, we are involved in several disputes with
Brazils Minister of Treasury about various forms of
manufacturing taxes and social security contributions, for which
we have made no judicial deposits but for which we have
established reserves ranging from $6 million to
$82 million as of December 31, 2008. In total, these
reserves approximate $98 million and $111 million as
of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively,
and are included in Other long-term liabilities in our
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
On July 16, 2008, the second instance court in Brazil ruled
in favor of the Ministry of Treasury in the amount of
$5.5 million in one of these tax disputes. On
August 11, 2008, we requested a clarification of the
courts order to better understand the reasoning behind the
decision and prepare our appeal. The request for clarification
suspends the deadline for appeal, which usually must be filed
within 30 days of receiving the order. While we are fully
reserved for these disputed credits, we must make a judicial
deposit of $5.5 million at the time we file the appeal.
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including certain
of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and Aluminium Norf GmbH, which
is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint venture that does not meet
the requirements for consolidation under FIN 46(R).
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no
expiration and have termination notice requirements. Neither we
nor any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds
any assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the
potential settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our condensed consolidated financial statements,
all liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term
debt facilities for these entities are already included in our
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
39
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness of others as of
December 31, 2008 (in millions). We did not have any
obligations under guarantees of indebtedness related to our
majority-owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Future Payment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
|
|
20.
|
Segment
and Major Customer Information
|
Segment
Information
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America, Europe, Asia and South America. The following is a
description of our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
North America. Headquartered in Cleveland,
Ohio, this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 11 plants, including two fully dedicated
recycling facilities, in two countries.
|
|
|
|
Europe. Headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 14 plants, including one recycling
facility, in six countries.
|
|
|
|
Asia. Headquartered in Seoul, South Korea,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates three plants in two countries.
|
|
|
|
South America. Headquartered in Sao Paulo,
Brazil, this segment comprises bauxite mining, alumina refining,
smelting operations, power generation, carbon products, aluminum
sheet and light gauge products and operates four plants in
Brazil.
|
Adjustment to Eliminate Proportional
Consolidation. The financial information for our
segments includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile the financial information for the segments shown in
the tables below to the relevant GAAP-based measures, we must
remove our proportional share of each line item that we included
in the segment amounts. See Note 9 Investment
in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
Transactions for further information about these
non-consolidated affiliates.
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions). The Corporate and Other column in the tables below
includes functions that are managed directly from our corporate
office, which focuses on strategy development and oversees
governance, policy, legal compliance, human resources and
finance matters. It also includes consolidating and other
elimination accounts.
40
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Selected
Segment Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,156
|
|
|
$
|
3,135
|
|
|
$
|
934
|
|
|
$
|
1,289
|
|
|
$
|
(194
|
)
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
8,371
|
|
March 31, 2008 (Restated)
|
|
$
|
3,957
|
|
|
$
|
4,355
|
|
|
$
|
1,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,485
|
|
|
$
|
(199
|
)
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
Comparison
of Three Month Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
344
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
995
|
|
|
$
|
1,010
|
|
|
$
|
483
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (Restated)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (Restated)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Comparison
of Nine Month Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
3,090
|
|
|
$
|
3,039
|
|
|
$
|
1,311
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,238
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
41
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through December 31, 2007
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
2,619
|
|
|
$
|
2,695
|
|
|
$
|
1,167
|
|
|
$
|
622
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,103
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (Restated)
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (Restated)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
42
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The following table shows the reconciliation from Total Segment
income to Net loss (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Total Segment income
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net(A)
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(672
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(B)
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Restructuring (charges) recoveries, net
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sales of property, plant and equipment and
businesses, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Other costs, net(C)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Income tax (provision) benefit
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net represents the portion of gains (losses) that
were not settled in cash during the period. Total realized and
unrealized gains (losses) are shown in the table below and are
included in the aggregate each period in (Gain) loss on
change in fair value of derivative instruments, net on our
condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
|
(B) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Total Segment income to Net income (loss), the
proportional Segment income of these non-consolidated affiliates
is removed from Total Segment income, net of our share of their
net after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net
(income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our
condensed consolidated statements of operations. See
Note 9 Investment in and Advances to
Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions for
further information about these non-consolidated affiliates. |
|
(C) |
|
Other costs, net includes a $26 million gain on the
reversal of a legal accrual for the Reynolds Boat Case during
the nine months ended December 31, 2008. See
Note 17 Other (Income) Expenses, net. |
43
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
(Gains) losses on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized (gains) losses included in Segment income
|
|
$
|
(63
|
)
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
Realized (gains) losses on corporate derivative instruments
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Unrealized losses
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains) losses on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
524
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information
about Major Customers
All of our operating segments had Net sales to Rexam Plc
(Rexam), our largest customer. The table below shows our net
sales to Rexam as a percentage of total Net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales to Rexam as a percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
21.
|
Supplemental
Guarantor Information
|
In connection with the issuance of our 7.25% Senior Notes,
certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries provided guarantees of
the 7.25% Senior Notes. These guarantees are full and
unconditional as well as joint and several. The guarantor
subsidiaries (the Guarantors) are comprised of the majority of
our businesses in Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Brazil and
Switzerland, as well as certain businesses in Germany. Certain
Guarantors may be subject to restrictions on their ability to
distribute earnings to Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The remaining
subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not
guarantors of the 7.25% Senior Notes.
44
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The following information presents condensed consolidating
statements of operations, balance sheets and statements of cash
flows of the Parent, the Guarantors, and the Non-Guarantors.
Investments include investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net assets
of divisions included in the Parent, and have been presented
using the equity method of accounting.
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Operations
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
|
$
|
1,751
|
|
|
$
|
601
|
|
|
$
|
(430
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,811
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
3,680
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
(2,241
|
)
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests
share
|
|
|
(1,841
|
)
|
|
|
(1,929
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
(2,028
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interests share
|
|
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
|
(1,759
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
(1,829
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,759
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,811
|
|
|
$
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Operations
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
2,211
|
|
|
$
|
783
|
|
|
$
|
(593
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
(593
|
)
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
2,230
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
(639
|
)
|
|
|
2,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests
share
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interests share
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Operations
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2008
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,038
|
|
|
$
|
6,815
|
|
|
$
|
2,204
|
|
|
$
|
(1,819
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
6,389
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
(1,819
|
)
|
|
|
7,645
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,860
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
8,903
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
(3,679
|
)
|
|
|
10,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests
share
|
|
|
(1,917
|
)
|
|
|
(2,088
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
(2,238
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interests share
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
|
(1,786
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,786
|
)
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,860
|
|
|
$
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Operations
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through December 31, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
|
$
|
5,898
|
|
|
$
|
1,938
|
|
|
$
|
(1,681
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
5,361
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
(1,681
|
)
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
5,881
|
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
(1,743
|
)
|
|
|
7,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests
share
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interests share
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Operations
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
(227
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-affiliates
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests
share
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interests share
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
328
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
3,112
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,599
|
)
|
|
|
752
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,508
|
|
|
$
|
6,886
|
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
$
|
(3,489
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
996
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
597
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
2,763
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,540
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
5,533
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
(1,891
|
)
|
|
|
6,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owners net
investment
|
|
|
(1,918
|
)
|
|
|
1,407
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
(1,750
|
)
|
|
|
(1,918
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
(1,598
|
)
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,508
|
|
|
$
|
6,886
|
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
$
|
(3,489
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(810
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
203
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
2,618
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
(823
|
)
|
|
|
3,446
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,357
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
3,629
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3,629
|
)
|
|
|
946
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(1,480
|
)
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,771
|
|
|
$
|
8,824
|
|
|
$
|
2,074
|
|
|
$
|
(5,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
148
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
704
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
2,350
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
(793
|
)
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,560
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
5,715
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
(2,303
|
)
|
|
|
7,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owners net
investment
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
3,075
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
(3,639
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
(3,629
|
)
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,771
|
|
|
$
|
8,824
|
|
|
$
|
2,074
|
|
|
$
|
(5,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2008
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(408
|
)
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
(160
|
)
|
|
$
|
(434
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of new debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through December 31, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(181
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following information should be read together with our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report
for a more complete understanding of our financial condition and
results of operations. The following discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and
beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those
discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that
could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are
not limited to, those discussed below, particularly in
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND
MARKET DATA.
OVERVIEW
AND REFERENCES
Novelis is the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and
light gauge products for the beverage and food can,
transportation, construction and industrial, and foil products
markets. As of December 31, 2008, we had operations on four
continents: North America; South America; Asia and Europe,
through 32 operating plants, one research facility and several
market-focused innovation centers in 11 countries. In addition
to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary
aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that are
integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil. We are the only
company of our size and scope focused solely on aluminum rolled
products markets and capable of local supply of technologically
sophisticated products in all of these geographic regions.
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein to Alcan
refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
References to our
Form 10-K/A
made throughout this document refer to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended March 31, 2008, filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
August 11, 2008.
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
spin-off occurred on January 6, 2005, following approval by
Alcans board of directors and shareholders, and legal and
regulatory approvals. Alcan shareholders received one Novelis
common share for every five Alcan common shares held.
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
As discussed in Note 1 Business and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies in the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements, the Arrangement was recorded
in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 103,
Push Down Basis of Accounting Required in Certain Limited
Circumstances. Accordingly, in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets, the consideration and related costs
paid by Hindalco in connection with the acquisition have been
pushed down to us and have been allocated to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 141, Business Combinations (FASB 141).
Due to the impact of push down accounting, the Companys
condensed consolidated financial statements and certain note
presentations separate the Companys presentation into two
distinct periods to indicate the application of two different
bases of accounting between the periods presented:
55
(1) the period up to, and including, the acquisition date
(April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, labeled
Predecessor) and (2) the period after that date
(May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007, labeled
Successor). The accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements include a black line division which
indicates that the Predecessor and Successor reporting entities
shown are not comparable.
Combined
Financial Results of the Predecessor and
Successor
For purposes of managements discussion and analysis of the
results of operations in this
Form 10-Q,
we combined the results of operations for the period ended
May 15, 2007 of the Predecessor with the period ended
December 31, 2007 of the Successor. We believe the combined
results of operations for the nine months ended
December 31, 2007 provide management and investors with a
more meaningful perspective on Novelis financial and
operational performance than if we did not combine the results
of operations of the Predecessor and the Successor in this
manner. Similarly, we combine the financial results of the
Predecessor and the Successor when discussing our sources and
uses of cash for the nine months ended December 31, 2007.
The combined results of operations are non-GAAP financial
measures, do not include any proforma assumptions or adjustments
and should not be used in isolation or substitution of
Predecessor and Successor results. Shown below are combining
schedules of (1) shipments and (2) our results of
operations for periods allocable to the Successor, Predecessor
and the combined presentation for the nine months ended
December 31, 2007 that we use throughout our MD&A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
Shipments (kt)(A):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products(B)
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
2,234
|
|
Ingot products(C)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
2,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. |
|
(B) |
|
Rolled products include tolling (the conversion of
customer-owned metal). |
|
(C) |
|
Ingot products include primary ingot in Brazil, foundry products
in Korea and Europe, secondary ingot in Europe and other
miscellaneous recyclable aluminum. |
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
Results of Operations (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
7,103
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
8,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
7,670
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance cost, net
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,169
|
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
8,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for taxes on income (loss) and
minority interests share
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interests share
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restatement
As discussed in Note 3 Restatement of
Financial Statements in the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements, we restated our consolidated
balance sheet as of March 31, 2008 and our consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and of
cash flows for the period from May 16, 2007 through
December 31, 2007 to correct non-cash accounting errors in
our application of purchase accounting for an equity method
investment which led to a misstatement of our provision for
income taxes during the period we were finalizing our purchase
accounting. We also corrected other miscellaneous adjustments
that were deemed to be not material by management, either
individually or in the aggregate. These adjustments do not have
an impact on our compliance with the financial covenants under
our 7.25% Senior Notes or under our New Senior Secured
Credit Facilities (see Note 11 Debt to our
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements). The
unaudited interim financial statements for the period from
May 15, 2007 through December 31, 2007, used herein,
have been restated.
HIGHLIGHTS
Significant factors that impacted our business for the three and
nine months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are presented
briefly below. Each is discussed in further detail throughout
the MD&A and Segment Review.
|
|
|
|
|
We reported a net loss of $1.8 billion for the third
quarter of fiscal year 2009, which includes non-cash impairment
charges of $1.5 billion and unrealized losses on
derivatives instruments of $472 million, compared to a loss
of $73 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2008.
For the nine months
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
ended December 31, 2008, our net loss was
$1.9 billion, as compared to $234 million in the
comparative period for fiscal 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments of flat rolled products decreased 13% in the current
quarter to 633 kilotonnes (kt) from 730 kt in the prior
year period. Shipments to automotive, construction and
industrial companies were significantly impacted by the economic
downturn in those industries, while can sheet shipments were
down at the end of the current quarter due to efforts by can
manufacturers to reduce inventory levels. We expect demand for
can sheet shipments to return to historical levels in the
short-term.
|
|
|
|
Inventory levels were effectively managed despite slowing
business conditions.
|
|
|
|
The current quarter includes non-cash asset impairment charges
totaling $1.5 billion which reflects the recent
deterioration in the global economic environment and the related
market increase in the cost of capital.
|
|
|
|
The current quarter also includes a $472 million non-cash
unrealized loss on derivative instruments, compared to a
$24 million loss in the prior year period. As these
derivative instruments are used to hedge forecasted purchases of
aluminum and other commodities and related foreign currency
exposures, this loss primarily reflects the recent unprecedented
drop in the price of aluminum from $3,292 per tonne in
July 2008 to $1,455 per tonne at December 31, 2008.
With the exception of losses associated with metal prices
ceilings, we expect an offsetting benefit once the related sales
volumes have been shipped.
|
|
|
|
The decrease in sales volumes relating to the deterioration of
global economic conditions and the effect of rapidly declining
LME prices on future derivative settlements and the timing of
working capital return have negatively impacted our short-term
liquidity position.
|
BUSINESS
AND INDUSTRY CLIMATE
Global economic trends impact the Company, and there is a large
amount of uncertainty with regard to current economic trends. On
an overall basis, markets in North America, Europe and Asia are
experiencing significant economic downturns. Consumer confidence
is low and credit remains tight in most global markets. The
impact of demand reductions for flat rolled products varies for
each region based upon the nature of the industry sectors in
which we operate. In general, can shipments have remained
relatively stable while construction, automotive and other
industrial production markets have experienced declines in
demand in the current fiscal year.
As customers have reduced their orders, we have taken actions to
adjust our metal intake, cut back on production and reduce fixed
costs. As discussed in further detail in Segment Review, we are
taking the following actions across the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
We continued to aggressively reduce overhead cost. We initiated
a variety of cost reductions and cash preservation actions whose
impact will largely be felt in the coming months.
|
|
|
|
We reduced labor costs in the third fiscal quarter through
extended holiday shutdowns, elimination of overtime, reduced use
of contractors and reduced shifts on some equipment. We also
implemented a salary freeze and a hiring freeze for all but the
most critical positions.
|
|
|
|
We began discussions with labor representatives in North
America, Europe and Asia to negotiate extraordinary cost
reduction strategies, including changed work rules, realignment
of capacity and potential staff reductions.
|
|
|
|
We are in the process of reducing our global headcount in excess
of 10%.
|
|
|
|
We have instituted radical reductions in capital spending with a
focus on preserving maintenance and safety.
|
|
|
|
We sought decreased pricing from suppliers of commodity goods
and services whose prices are dropping due to global demand
conditions.
|
58
The average and closing prices for aluminum (average LME) for
the three and nine months ended December 31, 2007 and 2008
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
London Metal Exchange Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum (per metric tonne, and presented in U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing cash price as of end of period
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
|
$
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
(38.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
|
$
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
(38.3
|
)%
|
Average cash price during the period
|
|
$
|
1,830
|
|
|
$
|
2,444
|
|
|
|
(25.1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,520
|
|
|
$
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
LME prices for aluminum (LME prices) rose to a peak of $3,292
per tonne in July 2008, but have significantly declined since
the high point due to falling demand for primary aluminum over
the past six months. Prices closed at $1,455 per tonne at
December 31, 2008 and continued to decline through the end
of January 2009.
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (i) a
pass-through aluminum price based on the London Metal Exchange
(LME) plus local market premiums and (ii) a
conversion premium price on the conversion cost to
produce the rolled product and the competitive market conditions
for that product.
A key component of the conversion model is the use of
derivatives instruments on projected aluminum requirements to
preserve our conversion margin. We enter into forward metal
purchases simultaneous with the contracts that contain fixed
metal prices. These forward metal purchases directly hedge the
economic risk of future metal price fluctuation associated with
these contracts. We also enter into forward metal purchases,
aluminum futures and options to hedge our exposure to reduce the
risks associated with rising metal prices on our ceiling
contracts. Additionally, we sell short-term LME futures
contracts to reduce the cash flow volatility of fluctuating
metal prices associated with the metal price lag.
Rapid changes in the average LME prices have had the following
impacts on our business:
|
|
|
|
|
As described above, our products have a price structure based
upon the LME price. Decreases in the LME price impact both our
net sales and cost of goods sold.
|
|
|
|
Due to the fact that we do not currently apply hedge accounting
on our metal derivative instruments, the change in the fair
value of these derivative instruments is marked to market and
recorded as an unrealized loss in our statement of operations in
the current period. Conversely, the offsetting benefit from
lower metal costs will not be recognized until the related sales
volume has been shipped.
|
|
|
|
The sudden decline in the LME prices required an evaluation of
the net realizable value of our aluminum inventory, resulting in
an inventory valuation charge of $34 million and
$38 million for the three and nine months ended
December 31, 2008, respectively. This charge is included as
a component of metal price lag in Segment income discussed below.
|
|
|
|
The effect of rapidly declining LME prices on future derivative
settlements has negatively impacted our short-term liquidity
position as our settlements with brokers can occur prior to our
customers payment to us.
|
Metal
Price Ceilings
Sales contracts representing approximately 60 kt and 76 kt for
the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, contained a ceiling over which metal prices could
not be contractually passed through to certain customers, unless
adjusted. For the nine months ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, shipments totaling 192 kt and 235 kt, respectively, were
subject to metal price ceilings. This negatively impacted our
margins and operating cash flows when the price we paid for
metal was above the ceiling price contained in these
59
contracts. We calculate and report this difference to be
approximately the difference between the quoted purchase price
on the LME (adjusted for any local premiums and for any price
lag associated with purchasing or processing time) and the metal
price ceiling in our contracts. Cash flows from operations are
negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted for any timing
difference between customer receipts and vendor payments, and
offset partially by reduced income taxes.
During the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
we were unable to pass through approximately $24 million
and $45 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs
associated with sales under these contracts. During the nine
month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we were
unable to pass through approximately $176 million and
$185 million, respectively. As a result of falling LME
prices and based on a December 31, 2008 aluminum price of
$1,455 per tonne, there is no unfavorable revenue or cash flow
impact estimated for the remainder of fiscal 2009.
We employ the following strategies to mitigate the risk
associated with metal price ceilings and rising prices that we
cannot pass through to certain customers:
|
|
|
|
|
We maximize the amount of our internally supplied metal inputs
from our smelting, refining and mining operations in Brazil and
rely on output from our recycling operations which utilize used
beverage cans (UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply
have historically provided an offsetting benefit to the metal
price ceiling contracts. We refer to these two sources as
internal hedges.
|
|
|
|
We entered into derivative instruments to hedge projected
aluminum volume requirements above our assumed internal hedge
position mitigating our exposure to further increases in LME. As
a result of these instruments, we will continue to incur cash
losses related to these contracts even if LME remains below the
ceiling price. As of December 31, 2008 the fair value of
the liability associated with these derivative instruments was
$151 million.
|
In connection with the allocation of the purchase price paid by
Hindalco, we established reserves totaling $655 million as
of May 15, 2007 to record these sales contracts at fair
value. Fair value effectively represents the discounted cash
flows of the forecasted metal purchase costs in excess of the
metal price ceilings contained in these contracts at the date of
our acquisition. These reserves are being accreted into Net
sales over the remaining lives of the underlying contracts. This
accretion will not impact future cash flows. For the three and
nine months ended December 31, 2008, we recorded accretion
of $53 million and $177 million, respectively. The
three and nine months ended December 31, 2007 includes
accretion of $76 million and $205 million,
respectively. As of December 31, 2008, the balance of these
reserves is approximately $208 million.
Metal
Price Lag
On certain sales contracts we experience timing differences on
the pass through of changing aluminum prices based on the
difference between the price we pay for aluminum and the price
we ultimately charge our customers after the aluminum is
processed. Generally, and in the short-term, in periods of
declining prices, our earnings are negatively impacted by this
timing difference while the opposite is true in periods of
rising prices. We refer to this timing difference as metal
price lag. For general metal price lag exposure we sell
short-term LME forward contracts to help mitigate the exposure.
These derivatives create volatility in our statement of
operations due to the fact that we do not qualify for hedge
accounting and due to timing difference in the flow of metal
costs through our moving average inventory cost system.
Certain of our sales contracts, most notably in Europe, contain
fixed metal prices for periods of time ranging from four to
thirty-six months. As metal prices increase or decrease, this
can result in a negative or positive impact on sales, compared
to current prices, because the prices are fixed at historical
levels. However, the positive or negative impact on sales under
these contracts has not been included in the metal price lag
effect quantified above, as we enter into forward metal
purchases simultaneous with the sales contracts thereby
mitigating the exposure to changing metal prices on sales under
these contracts.
60
Foreign
Exchange Impact
Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates also impact our operating
results. The following table presents the average of the month
end exchange rates and changes from the prior year period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
Nine Month Ended
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Strengthen/
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Strengthen/
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Weaken)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Weaken)
|
|
|
U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
1.310
|
|
|
|
1.459
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.450
|
|
|
|
1.400
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
2.248
|
|
|
|
1.766
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
|
1.865
|
|
|
|
1.873
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
South Korean won per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.225
|
|
|
|
0.979
|
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
1.094
|
|
|
|
1.033
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Costs associated with currency exposure primarily related to the
euro and Brazilian real were slightly higher for the nine months
ended December 31, 2008 than in the comparable prior year
period as the average exchange rates for the euro and real
reflected a weaker U.S. dollar. However, during the three
months ended December 31, 2008, the U.S. dollar
strengthened against these currencies. Currency exchange
fluctuations in Asia favorably impacted our quarterly and
year-to-date results as the U.S. dollar significantly
strengthened against the Korean won as costs, such as metal, are
denominated in the U.S. dollar.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Three
Months Ended December 31, 2008 Compared With the Three
Months Ended December 31, 2007
In the three months ended December 31, 2008, we realized a
Net loss of $1.8 billion on Net sales of $2.2 billion.
This represents a 20% decrease in Net sales compared to the
prior year quarter in which we realized a net loss of
$73 million on Net sales of $2.7 billion. The
reduction in sales is due to decreases in demand in North
America, Europe and Asia as well as a 25% decrease in the
average LME price. This reduction in volume for flat rolled
products unfavorably impacted our current year results by
$78 million, when compared to the prior year.
Cost of goods sold decreased $451 million, or 18%, but
increased as a percentage of Net sales as compared to the prior
year period. Volume reductions occurred in all regions except
South American and there was cost inflation in all regions
except for Europe. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased $27 million, or 27%, primarily due to reductions
in employee related costs and professional fees.
The current year results include pre-tax asset impairment
charges totaling $1.5 billion. In accordance with FASB
Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (FASB 142), we performed an interim period goodwill
impairment test due to recent deterioration in the global
economic environment and resulting significant decreases in the
market capitalization of our parent company and valuation of our
publicly traded debt and related increase in the cost of
capital. The impairment charges are discussed in more detail
under Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.
The current year was further impacted by $448 million of
incremental non-cash unrealized losses on derivative instruments
which are used to hedge forecasted purchases of aluminum and
other commodities as well as related foreign currency exposures.
In future periods, we anticipate that a significant portion of
the losses on these hedging instruments, when realized, will be
offset by higher revenues from customers committed to the fixed
forward price, the benefits of lower commodity costs and more
favorable currency relationships.
We recorded an income tax benefit of $199 million in the
three months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to an
income tax expense of $26 million in the prior year.
61
Segment
Review
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America, Europe, Asia and South America.
Segment income provides a measure of our underlying segment
results that is in line with our portfolio approach to risk
management. We define Segment income as earnings before
(a) interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
costs, net; (b) unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair
value of derivative instruments, net; (c) realized gains
(losses) on corporate derivative instruments, net;
(d) depreciation and amortization; (e) impairment
charges on long-lived assets; (f) minority interests
share; (g) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share
of Segment income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting;
(h) restructuring charges, net; (i) gains or losses on
disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses, net;
(j) corporate selling, general and administrative expenses;
(k) other costs, net; (l) litigation settlement, net
of insurance recoveries; (m) sale transaction fees;
(n) provision or benefit for income taxes and
(o) cumulative effect of accounting change.
We utilize derivative instruments to manage our exposure to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and
interest rates. For Segment income purposes we only include the
impact of the derivative gains or losses to the extent they are
settled in cash, or realized, during that period.
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions, except shipments which are in kilotonnes (kt)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
$
|
344
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,011
|
|
|
$
|
486
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
three months ended December 31, 2007 to the three months
ended December 31, 2008 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Segment income
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Segment income three months ended December 31,
2007
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Conversion costs(A)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Other changes(B)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income three months ended December 31,
2008
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such as
direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage, alloys
and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss. Fluctuations in
this component reflect cost efficiencies during the period as
well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(B) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research & development for
all segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of purchase
accounting and can price ceilings. Significant fluctuations in
these items are discussed below. |
North
America
As of December 31, 2008, North America manufactured
aluminum sheet and light gauge products through nine aluminum
rolled products facilities and two dedicated recycling
facilities. Important end-use applications include beverage
cans, containers and packaging, automotive and other
transportation applications, building products and other
industrial applications.
In the third fiscal quarter 2009, North America experienced a
reduction in demand as all industry sectors were impacted by the
ongoing economic downturn, with total shipments and Net sales
down 11% and 10%, respectively. In the can business, current
quarter shipments and sales were down as a result of efforts by
can manufacturers to reduce inventory levels. Shipments to
automotive customers were also down in the third quarter, as the
automotive industry experienced reduced demand with sales of
light vehicles at a
15-year low.
Similarly, the construction and housing markets were down as
both the residential and commercial markets have weakened. We
anticipate that demand for can sheet will recover to historic
levels in our fourth quarter, but demand in the construction and
automotive sectors is expected to remain weak.
Segment income for the 2009 period was down $81 million due
to negative trends in all components. The unfavorable impact of
metal price lag includes a $6 million inventory valuation
adjustment as a result of declining LME prices. Higher
conversion costs relate primarily to increases in energy costs
as compared to the prior year.
Included within the $1 million unfavorable Other changes is
a $24 million reduction in the net favorable impact of
acquisition related fair value adjustments and a $4 million
reduction in the benefit related to recycling used beverage
cans. These unfavorable impacts are offset by a $10 million
reduction in selling, general and administrative expenses and a
$11 million favorable impact of can price ceilings as
volumes subject to these contracts were lower in the current
year quarter.
In response to market conditions, we have made immediate cost
reductions through reductions in overtime and contract labor,
reduced shifts on some equipment and extended holiday shutdowns.
We also took actions to reduce the number of salaried employees
in North America by 12%, although these changes will not have a
positive impact on Segment income until fiscal year 2010.
63
Europe
As of December 31, 2008, our European segment provided
European markets with value-added sheet and light gauge products
through 13 aluminum rolled products facilities and one dedicated
recycling facility. Europe serves a broad range of aluminum
rolled product end-use markets in various applications including
can, automotive, lithographic, foil products and painted
products.
In the third fiscal quarter of 2009, Europe also experienced a
significant reduction in demand in all industry sectors with
total shipments and Net sales down 18% and 27%, respectively
compared to the previous year. Weak building, automotive,
printing, and industrial products markets drove demand downward.
In addition, inventory adjustments in packaging and can
businesses pushed down demand in those sectors. These lower
volumes decreased Net sales by $190 million. The remaining
decrease in Net sales largely reflects the impact of lower LME
prices.
Segment income increased $4 million between the two
periods. Volume and product mix unfavorably impacted the current
year but were partially offset by an improvement in conversion
premiums. The favorable metal price lag impact of
$13 million is net of a $24 million inventory
valuation adjustment as a result of declining LME prices.
Included within Other changes for Europe is a decrease in
selling, general and administrative costs as compared to the
prior year and a favorable impact of income and expense items
associated with the acquisition related fair value adjustments.
In addition to reductions in overtime and contract labor as well
as extended holiday shutdowns at our facilities throughout
Europe, we also initiated discussions with the workers
councils representing several of our European facilities. These
negotiations are addressing various cost reduction strategies,
including realignment or reduction of capacity and potential
staff reductions at our facilities in Rogerstone, United
Kingdom; Rugles, France and Ohle, Germany.
Asia
As of December 31, 2008, Asia operated three manufacturing
facilities with production balanced between foil, construction
and industrial, and beverage and food can end-use applications.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2009, Asia also experienced
downturns in demand and shipments, with the largest reductions
in can products, followed by electronics, construction and
general purpose foil products. Customers in the can and
electronics markets reduced inventory levels to match slowing
demand. Shipments and sales decreased 25% and 29%, respectively.
The reduction in shipments had a $131 million unfavorable
impact on Net sales. The remaining decrease largely reflects the
impact of lower LME prices. Asia anticipates a recovery in the
can market in our fourth quarter as customers reach minimum
inventory levels, but we expect that demand in other industry
sectors will continue to reflect lower demand.
Segment income improved to $55 million in the 2009 period
as compared to $11 million in the prior year, primarily due
to the favorable impact of metal price lag and foreign currency
remeasurement, which more than offset the negative impact of
reduced volume. We were able to quickly address demand
reductions in Asia through a voluntary retirement program and
reductions in our contract labor, however further actions are
being taken to address lower production levels.
For the first time in five years, the metal price gap that
existed between the LME prices for aluminum and the Shangai
Future Exchange (SHFE) reversed in January 2009 such that the
LME price is now lower than the SHFE. As the SHFE-LME gap has
reversed, products manufactured with LME priced aluminum are now
more competitive in the region versus those produced inside
China.
South
America
As of December 31, 2008, South America operated two rolling
plants in Brazil along with two smelters, an alumina refinery,
bauxite mines and power generation facilities. South America
manufactures various aluminum rolled products for the beverage
and food can, construction and industrial and transportation
end-use markets.
64
The economic slowdown impacting the other three regions has so
far not affected the demand for flat rolled canstock in South
America, although the rapid decrease in average LME prices has
impacted the profitability of our aluminum smelting operations.
Total shipments increased 2% over prior year, with rolled
products shipments up 5%. However, Net sales decreased 17% as
compared to the prior year due to lower LME prices and changes
in product mix with can sales representing a larger portion of
total shipments.
Segment income for South America was flat as compared to the
prior year, as the favorable impact of metal price lag and
foreign currency remeasurement were offset by lower conversion
premiums and cost inflation associated with energy, alumina,
alloys and hardeners.
On January 26, 2009, we announced that we will cease the
production of alumina at our Ouro Preto facility effective
March 26, 2009. This will result in the reduction of
approximately 290 jobs, including 150 employees and 140
contractors. The recent dramatic drop in alumina prices has made
alumina production economically unfeasible. In the future, the
plant will purchase alumina through third parties.
Other
Costs and Expenses
Costs such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense
and unrealized gains (losses) on changes in derivative fair
value are not utilized by our chief operating decision maker in
evaluating segment performance. Additionally, many other
functions are managed directly from our corporate office, which
focuses on strategy development and oversees governance, policy,
legal compliance, human resources and finance matters that are
not allocated or managed by the regions. The table below
reconciles total Segment income to Net loss for the three months
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Total Segment income
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Unrealized losses on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Realized gains on corporate derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(A)
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Losses on disposal of property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Income tax (provision) benefit
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Total Segment income to Net loss, the proportional
Segment income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed
from Total Segment income, net of our share of their net
after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net (income)
loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed
consolidated statements of operations. See
Note 9 Investment in and Advances to
Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions for
further information about these non-consolidated affiliates. |
65
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt. Approximately 25% of our debt was variable
rate as of December 31, 2008.
Unrealized losses on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the mark-to-market accounting for changes
in the fair value of our derivatives that do not receive hedge
accounting treatment. In the three months ended
December 31, 2008, these unrealized losses increased
primarily attributable to falling LME prices and the
strengthening U.S. dollar. Our principal exposure to LME
prices is related to derivatives on fixed forward price
contracts. We hedge these contracts by purchasing aluminum
futures contracts and these contracts decrease in value in
periods of declining LME.
We recorded a $1.3 billion impairment charge related to
goodwill in the three months ended December 31, 2008. The
goodwill impairment charge is discussed in more detail under
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.
Minority interests share increased primarily due to net
income generated by our plants in Asia.
The adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation includes
the $160 million impairment charge to our investment in
Aluminium Norf GmbH (Norf). Excluding this impairment charge,
the adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation was flat
on a year-over-year basis.
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
due to a significant reduction in employee related costs in the
current year quarter.
We have experienced significant quarterly fluctuations in income
tax expense and the corresponding effective tax rate. The
primary factors contributing to the effective tax rate differing
from the statutory Canadian rate include:
|
|
|
|
|
Our functional currency in Canada and Brazil is the
U.S. dollar and the company holds significant U.S. dollar
denominated debt in these locations. As the value of the local
currencies strengthens and weakens against the dollar,
unrealized gains or losses are created in those locations for
tax purposes, while the underlying gains or losses are not
recorded in our income statement.
|
|
|
|
We have significant net deferred tax liabilities in Brazil that
are remeasured to account for currency fluctuations as the taxes
are payable in local currency.
|
|
|
|
Our income is taxed at various statutory tax rates in varying
jurisdictions. Applying the corresponding amounts of income and
loss to the various tax rates results in differences when
compared to our Canadian statutory tax rate.
|
|
|
|
Under Canadian law, 50% of capital gains and losses are excluded
from taxable income. We have significant unrealized capital
gains and losses related to currency fluctuations in Canada.
|
|
|
|
We record increases to valuation allowances primarily related to
tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more
likely than not that we will not be able to utilize those losses.
|
|
|
|
We recorded a non-deductible goodwill impairment charge for the
three months ended December 31, 2008.
|
For the three months ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a
$199 million income tax benefit on our pre-tax loss of
$1.9 billion, before our equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests share,
which represented an effective tax rate of 11%. Our effective
tax rate differs from the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to the following factors:
(1) $64 million benefit for exchange translation
items, (2) $30 million benefit for exchange
remeasurement of deferred income taxes,
(3) $23 million increase in valuation allowances,
(4) $22 million increase in expense items not subject
to tax, (5) $11 million expense from tax rate
differences on foreign earnings and (6) $415 million
related to a non-deductible goodwill impairment charge.
For the three months ended December 31, 2007, we recorded a
$26 million (as restated) income tax provision on our
pre-tax loss of $44 million, before our equity in net
(income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates and minority
interests share, which represented an effective tax rate
of (59)% (as restated). Our
66
effective tax rate differs from the benefit at the Canadian
statutory rate primarily due to the following factors:
(1) $12 million (as restated) expense for exchange
translation items, (2) $18 million increase for
exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes,
(3) $14 million (as restated) increase in valuation
allowances, (4) $17 million (as restated) benefit from
the effects of enacted tax rate changes on cumulative taxable
temporary differences, (5) $11 million (as restated)
increase from expense items not subject to tax.
Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2008 Compared With the Nine
Months Ended December 31,
2007
As discussed in Business and Industry Climate above, positive
trends in the demand for aluminum products and inflationary
movement in average LME prices in the first six months of fiscal
2009 reversed sharply in the third fiscal quarter of fiscal 2009.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2008, we realized a
Net loss of $1.8 billion on Net sales of $8.2 billion.
Net sales decreased 2% as compared to the prior year when we
realized a Net loss of $234 million. The reduction in sales
is due to the decrease in demand for flat rolled products which
impacted current year results by $84 million.
Costs of goods sold decreased $25 million, or less than 1%,
but increased slightly as a percentage of Net sales as compared
to the prior year period on an overall basis. Selling, general
and administrative expenses decreased $79 million, or 24%,
primarily due to reductions in professional fees and employee
related costs including incentive compensation.
The current year results include pre-tax asset impairment
charges totaling $1.5 billion. The goodwill impairment
charge is discussed in more detail under Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates.
The current year was also impacted by $551 million in
incremental non-cash unrealized losses on derivative
instruments. Further, in the current year, we recorded an income
tax benefit of $327 million on our Net loss, as compared to
a $77 million income tax provision in the prior year. These
items are discussed in further detail below.
Segment
Review (On a combined non-GAAP basis)
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions, except shipments which are in kt).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,092
|
|
|
$
|
3,048
|
|
|
$
|
1,312
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,238
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,165
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Combined)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,073
|
|
|
$
|
3,207
|
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
|
$
|
(55
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,384
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,234
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
nine months ended December 31, 2007 to the nine months
ended December 31, 2008 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Segment income
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Segment income nine months ended December 31,
2007
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
Conversion costs(A)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Other changes(B)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income nine months ended December 31,
2008
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such as
direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage, alloys
and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss. Fluctuations in
this component reflect cost efficiencies during the period as
well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(B) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research and development for all
segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of purchase
accounting and can price ceilings. Significant fluctuations in
these items are discussed below. |
North
America
Year-to-date shipments for North America were down less than 1%
despite a 9% reduction in the third quarter. Net sales were also
essentially flat year-over-year. Shipments of can sheet were
flat on a year-to-date basis, despite a 7% decline in the
current quarter as a result of efforts by can manufacturers to
reduce inventory levels. Shipments to automotive customers
increased on a year-to-date basis due to market share gains, but
fell in the most recent quarter due to overall automotive
production levels. Shipments in the construction and housing
markets were down as the overall construction market is
experiencing a significant decline.
Segment income for the 2009 period was $45 million, down
$125 million as compared to the prior year. The negative
impact of metal price lag includes a $7 million inventory
valuation charge in the 2009 period as a result of declining LME
prices. The negative impact of conversion costs relates to
increases in energy costs and freight as compared to the prior
year.
Other changes reflect $11 million in stock compensation
expense in the prior year period, a $10 million reduction
in selling, general and administrative costs and a
$9 million benefit on contracts subject to can price
ceilings as compared to the prior year. These favorable changes
were partially offset by a $15 million reduction in the net
favorable impact of acquisition related fair value adjustments
and a $2 million reduction in the benefit associated with
recycling used beverage cans.
Europe
For the nine months ended December 31, 2008, total
shipments and Net sales were both down approximately 5%. Demand
for specialty, painted and light gauge products has been down
all year as a result of the weak construction market, as well as
recent reductions in demand for automotive products. Increases
in can and lithographic shipments in the first six months were
reversed in the last three months, resulting in decreases in
both these industry sectors on a year-to-date basis.
Segment income for the 2009 period was $221 million, as
compared to $187 million in the comparative period of the
prior year. Volume, product mix and foreign currency
remeasurement unfavorably impacted
68
Segment income but these impacts were partially offset by a
number of factors, including favorable conversion premiums. The
favorable metal price lag amount is shown net of a
$24 million write down of inventory to its net realizable
value as a result of declining LME prices. Conversion costs
associated with labor and freight were down reflecting the lower
volume of shipments and extended holiday shutdowns in the third
fiscal quarter of 2009.
Other changes reflect a $13 million net favorable impact of
income and expense items associated with acquisition related
fair value adjustments, a $10 million reduction in selling,
general and administrative costs and $6 million of stock
compensation expense in the prior year.
Asia
For the nine months ended December 31, 2008, rolled product
shipments were down 2%. Net sales were down 6%, with margins
slightly improved as a result of the decrease in low margin
ingot sales. As discussed above, Asia began to see indicators of
downturns in demand and shipments in most of the markets it
serves in the third quarter.
The improvement in Segment income of $50 million was due to
the favorable impact of metal price lag, improved conversion
premiums and product mix, partially offset by the volume
decreases, cost inflation and foreign currency remeasurement.
Cost inflation increases primarily related to increases in
energy costs as compared to the prior year period.
South
America
Total shipments and Net sales increased in South America by 7%
and 5%, respectively, as compared the prior year period. The
economic slowdown impacting the other three regions has not yet
affected demand for flat rolled products in South America, with
shipments of can products and industrial products increasing and
light gauge shipments flat.
Segment income for South America improved $10 million as
compared to the prior year period. Conversion costs increased
due to cost inflation for energy, alumina, alloys and hardeners.
Other changes include a $15 million smelter benefit
realized during the period of rising LME prices earlier in the
year. The benefits from our smelter operations in South America
decline as average LME prices decrease. Also included within
Other changes is a $9 million net favorable impact of
income and expense items associated with acquisition related
fair value adjustments and $3 million of stock compensation
expense in the prior year.
69
Other
Costs and Expenses
As discussed above, certain functions are managed directly from
our corporate office and are not allocated or managed by the
regions. The table below presents reconciles total Segment
income to Net loss for the nine months ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 (in millions), followed by a discussion of
significant changes between periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Total Segment income
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
Unrealized losses on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
(672
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Realized gains losses on corporate derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(A)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Gains on disposal of property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Sales transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Income tax (provision) benefit
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Total Segment income to Net loss, the proportional
Segment income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed
from Total Segment income, net of our share of their net
after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net (income)
loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed
consolidated statements of operations. See
Note 9 Investment in and Advances to
Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions for
further information about these non-consolidated affiliates.
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt. Approximately 25% of our debt was variable
rate as of December 31, 2008.
Unrealized losses on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the mark-to-market accounting for changes
in the fair value of our derivatives that do not receive hedge
accounting treatment. In the nine months ended December 31,
2008, these unrealized losses increased primarily attributable
to falling LME prices. Our principal exposure to LME prices is
related to derivatives on fixed forward price contracts. We
hedge these contracts by purchasing aluminum futures contracts
and these contracts decrease in value in periods of declining
LME.
Realized gains on corporate derivative instruments decreased as
certain off-set hedging programs managed at corporate were
allocated to the regions in fiscal 2009.
70
Depreciation and amortization increased $38 million
primarily due to the increases in bases of our property, plant
and equipment and intangible assets resulting from the
Arrangement in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
We recorded a $1.3 billion impairment charge related to
goodwill in the nine months ended December 31, 2008. The
goodwill impairment charge is discussed in more detail under
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.
The adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation includes
a $160 million impairment charge related to our investment
in Norf. Excluding this impairment charge, the adjustment to
eliminate proportional consolidation decreased from
$24 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2007 to $50 million for the nine months ended
December 31, 2008 primarily related to our Norf joint
venture due to a change in the statutory tax rate in Germany
that was reflected in the prior year period. Income taxes
related to our equity method investments, such as Norf, are
reflected in the carrying value of the investment and not in our
consolidated income tax provision.
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
due to expenses associated with the Arrangement and a decrease
in employee costs in the current year.
Other costs, net for the 2009 fiscal year include a
$26 million gain on reversal of a legal accrual for the
Reynolds Boat Case.
Sales transaction fees associated with the Arrangement were
recorded in the 2008 fiscal year.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a
$333 million income tax benefit on our pre-tax loss of
$2.1 billion before our equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests share,
which represented an effective tax rate of 16%. Our effective
tax rate differs from the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to the following factors:
(1) $77 million benefit for (a) pre-tax foreign
currency gains or losses with no tax effect and (b) the tax
effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses
with no pre-tax effect, (2) a $51 million benefit for
exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) a
$41 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
those losses, (4) a $28 million increase in expense
items not subject to tax, (5) a $57 million benefit
from differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign
effective tax rates applied to entities in different
jurisdictions and (6) $415 million expense related to
a non-deductible goodwill impairment charge.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2007, we recorded a
$77 million (as restated) income tax provision on our
pre-tax loss of $234 million, before our equity in net
(income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates and minority
interests share, which represented an effective tax rate
of (59)% (as restated). Our effective tax rate differs from the
benefit at the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the
following factors: (1) $12 million (as restated) for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) an $18 million increase for exchange remeasurement
of deferred income taxes, (3) a $14 million (as
restated) increase in valuation allowances primarily related to
tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more
likely than not that we will not be able to utilize those
losses, (4) a $17 million benefit (as restated) from
the effects of enacted tax rate changes on cumulative taxable
temporary differences and (5) a $11 million increase
(as restated) from expense/income items with no tax effect, net.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Impact
of Market Conditions on our Business
The deterioration of global economic conditions combined with
rapidly declining aluminum prices from a peak of $3,292 per
tonne in July 2008 to $1,455 per tonne on December 31, 2008
have placed pressure on our short-term liquidity. However, we
believe we have sufficient long-term financing in place, with
only $22 million of our long-term debt due within the next
12 months.
71
Demand for flat rolled products decreased in our third fiscal
quarter by 13% as compared to the prior year. While we have
begun taking cost reduction measures, due to the capital
intensive nature of our business, we have been unable to make
corresponding short term adjustments to our capacity and fixed
cost structure to fully address these demand issues. These
circumstances decrease cash generated by operations and increase
the effect of timing issues related to our settlement of
aluminum forward contracts versus cash collection from our
customers. Looking forward, we have uncertainty regarding
customer credit due to the weakening demand as a result of the
global recession in certain of our customers end markets,
particularly the construction and automotive markets.
We enter into derivative instruments to hedge forecasted
purchases and sales of aluminum. Based on the aluminum price
forward curve as of December 31, 2008, we expect
approximately $580 million of cash outflows related to
settlement of these derivative instruments through the end of
fiscal 2010, including $260 million during the fourth
fiscal quarter of 2009. Except for approximately
$160 million of cash outflows related to hedges of our
exposure to metal price ceilings, we expect all of these
outflows will be recovered through collection of customer
accounts receivable, typically on a 30-60 day lag.
Accordingly, this difference in timing will place pressure on
our short term liquidity outlook.
In the near term, our forecast indicates our liquidity position
will be tight, but adequate as we settle our outstanding
derivative positions. However, our liquidity needs could
increase due to the unpredictability of current market
conditions and their potential effect on customer credit, future
derivative settlements, future sales volume or other matters. We
cannot be assured that in the event of such deteriorating
conditions we would have adequate liquidity. As a result,
management has undertaken a number of activities to generate
cash in the near term as well implement changes in our cost
structure that will benefit our liquidity in the long-term.
In February 2009, we entered into an unsecured credit facility
of $100 million with a scheduled maturity date of
January 15, 2015 from a company affiliated with the Aditya
Birla group, and we have drawn down $75 million of this
facility to increase our cash position. We have also implemented
cost cutting initiatives, cut capital expenditures, reduced
inventory, and begun to restructure a number of facilities and
overhead staff, which will improve our long-term liquidity
position. Further, we are continuing to explore other possible
near term cash generation activities, including accelerating
certain customer payments to match the timing of the settlement
of forward metal purchases to improve our short-term liquidity
position.
Available
Liquidity
Our estimated liquidity as of January 31, 2009,
December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008 is as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
Overdrafts
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Gross availability under the ABL facility
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Borrowing availability limitation due to fixed charge coverage
ratio
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated liquidity
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$176 million. Additionally, we had $323 million in
remaining availability under our revolving credit line and
letter of credit facility (ABL facility), before covenant
restrictions. Under the ABL facility, if our excess
availability, as defined under the borrowing, is less than
$80 million, we are required to maintain a minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. As of December 31, 2008,
our fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1 to 1, resulting
in a reduction of availability under our ABL facility of
$80 million.
Borrowings under the ABL facility are generally based on 85% of
eligible accounts receivable and 70 to 75% of eligible
inventories. Due to continued declines in the average LME, our
borrowing base decreased by
72
$68 million during the month of January. The table above
does not include the new $100 million unsecured borrowing
obtained in February 2009.
Our estimated liquidity decreased during the nine months ended
December 31, 2008 primarily as a result of lower cash on
hand and the utilization of short-term borrowings under our ABL
facility (see Note 11 Debt) to fund our working
capital requirements. We continue to maintain forfaiting and
factoring arrangements in Asia and South America that provide
additional liquidity in those segments. Additionally, in our
Asian Segment, our ability to access available liquidity is
limited by various factors, including restrictions on paying
dividends from our Korean subsidiary to Novelis. Due to these
factors, approximately $65 million of our cash and cash
equivalents balance as of both December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2008 would not be immediately available to
fulfill obligations outside of Korea.
Operating
Activities
Free cash flow (which is a non-GAAP measure) consists of:
(a) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities;
(b) less dividends and capital expenditures and
(c) plus net proceeds from settlement of derivative
instruments (which is net of premiums paid to purchase
derivative instruments). Dividends include those paid by our
less than wholly-owned subsidiaries to their minority
shareholders. Management believes that Free cash flow is
relevant to investors as it provides a measure of the cash
generated internally that is available for debt service and
other value creation opportunities. However, Free cash flow does
not necessarily represent cash available for discretionary
activities, as certain debt service obligations must be funded
out of Free cash flow. We believe the line on our condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows entitled Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities is the most
directly comparable measure to Free cash flow. Our method of
calculating Free cash flow may not be consistent with that of
other companies.
In our discussion of Metal Price Ceilings, we have disclosed
that certain customer contracts contain a fixed aluminum (metal)
price ceiling beyond which the cost of aluminum cannot be passed
through to the customer, unless adjusted. During the nine months
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we were unable to pass
through approximately $176 million and $185 million,
respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales
under these contracts. Net cash provided by operating activities
were negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted for
timing difference between customer receipts and vendor payments
and offset partially by reduced income taxes. As a result of
falling LME prices and based on a December 31, 2008
aluminum price of $1,455 per tonne, there is no unfavorable
revenue impact estimated for the remainder of fiscal 2009 or in
the periods thereafter. However, during the period of rising LME
prices we entered into derivative instruments to hedge our
exposure to further increases in LME. As a result of these
instruments, we will continue to incur cash outflows related to
these contracts even if LME remains below the ceiling price. As
of December 31, 2008 and based on an aluminum price of
$1,455 per tonne, the fair value of the liability associated
with these derivatives was $151 million.
As a result of our acquisition by Hindalco, we established
reserves totaling $655 million as of May 15, 2007 to
record these customer contracts at fair value. Fair value
effectively represents the discounted cash flows of the
forecasted metal purchases in excess of the metal price ceilings
contained in these contracts. These reserves are being accreted
into revenue over the remaining lives of the underlying
contracts, and this accretion will not impact future cash flows.
As of December 31, 2008, the balance of these reserves is
$208 million.
73
The following table shows the reconciliation from Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities to Free cash flow,
the ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and the change
between periods (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(434
|
)
|
|
$
|
(201
|
)
|
|
$
|
(233
|
)
|
Dividends minority interests
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
(366
|
)
|
|
$
|
(272
|
)
|
|
$
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operations consumed cash at a higher rate during the nine
months ended December 31, 2008 compared to the prior year
period due to slowing business conditions in the third quarter
and higher working capital levels associated with rapidly
changing aluminum prices and the timing of payments made to
suppliers, to brokers to settle derivative positions and
ultimate settlement with our customers. Inventory levels were
effectively managed despite slowing business conditions.
During the nine months ended December 31, 2007, net cash
used in operating activities was unfavorably impacted by
one-time costs associated with or triggered by the Arrangement
including: (1) $72 million paid in share-based
compensation payments, (2) $42 million paid for sale
transaction fees and (3) $25 million in bonus payments
for the 2006 calendar year and the period from January 1,
2007 through May 15, 2007.
Dividends paid to our minority interests, primarily in our Asia
operating segment, were $5 million and $8 million
during the nine months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Capital expenditures were slightly higher in the fiscal 2008
period due, in part, to the construction of Novelis
Fusiontm
ingot casting lines in our European and Asian segments as well
as additional planned maintenance activities, improvements to
our Yeongju, Korea hot mill and other ancillary upgrades made in
the first quarter of fiscal 2008. During the third quarter of
fiscal 2009, as a result of the overall economic downturn, we
have made radical reductions to our capital spending, with a
focus on preserving maintenance and safety.
Net proceeds from the settlement of derivative instruments
contributed $180 million to Free cash flow in the nine
months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to
$74 million during the nine months ended December 31,
2007. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we expect to have a
net cash outflow related to the settlement of our net derivative
liabilities.
74
Investing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
(107
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Proceeds from related parties loans receivable, net
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As discussed above, the majority of our capital expenditures for
the nine months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were for
projects devoted to product quality, technology, productivity
enhancement and increased capacity. Capital expenditures were
slightly higher in the fiscal 2008 period due, in part, to the
construction of Novelis
Fusiontm
ingot casting lines in our European and Asian Segments as well
as additional planned maintenance activities, improvements to
our Yeongju, Korea hot mill and other ancillary upgrades made in
the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we radically reduced
our capital spending with a focus on maintenance and safety. As
a result of these reductions, our total annual capital
expenditures will be approximately $140
$150 million for the fiscal year 2009.
Proceeds from loans receivable, net during both periods are
primarily comprised of payments we received related to a loan
due from our non-consolidated affiliate, Aluminium Norf GmbH.
Financing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by financing activities (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
(1,242
|
)
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
|
|
995
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
236
|
|
Dividends minority interests
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we amended our then
existing senior secured credit facilities to increase its
capacity by $150 million. We used these proceeds to reduce
the outstanding balance of our then existing revolving credit
facility, thus increasing our borrowing capacity. This
additional capacity, along with $92 million of cash
received from the issuance of additional shares indirectly to
Hindalco, allowed us to fund general working capital
requirements and certain costs associated with the Arrangement
including the cash
75
settlement of share-based compensation arrangements and lender
fees. In July 2007, we refinanced our New Senior Secured
Credit Facilities, as discussed below.
During the nine months ended December 31, 2008, we
increased our short-term borrowings under our new revolving
credit facility to provide for general working capital
requirements.
Dividends paid to our minority interests, primarily in our Asia
operating segment, during the nine months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $5 million and
$8 million, respectively.
New
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
On July 6, 2007, we entered into new senior secured credit
facilities with a syndicate of lenders led by affiliates of UBS
and ABN AMRO (New Senior Secured Credit Facilities) providing
for aggregate borrowings of up to $1.76 billion. The New
Senior Secured Credit Facilities consist of (1) a
$960 million seven-year Term Loan facility (Term Loan
facility) and (2) an $800 million five year
multi-currency asset-based revolving credit line and letter of
credit facility (ABL facility).
We incurred debt issuance costs on our New Senior Secured Credit
Facilities totaling $32 million. These fees are included in
Other long-term assets third parties and are being
amortized over the life of the related borrowing in Interest
expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net using the
effective interest amortization method for the Term
Loan facility and the straight-line method for the ABL facility.
The unamortized amount of these costs was $23 million as of
December 31, 2008.
Interest
Rate Swaps
During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, we entered into
interest rate swaps to fix the variable London Interbank Offered
Rate (LIBOR) interest rate for up to $500 million of our
floating rate Term Loan facility at effective weighted average
interest rates and amounts as follows: (i) 4.0% on
$500 million through March 31, 2009 and (ii) 4.0%
on $400 million through March 31, 2010. An interest
rate swap at an interest rate of 4.38% on $100 million of
our Term Loan facility expired on September 30, 2008. We
are still obligated to pay any applicable margin, as defined in
our New Senior Secured Credit Facilities, in addition to these
interest rates.
In January 2009, we entered into two interest rate swaps to fix
the variable LIBOR interest rate on an additional
$300 million of our floating Term Loan facility at a rate
of 1.49%, plus any applicable margin. These interest rate swaps
are effective from March 31, 2009 through March 31,
2011.
As of December 31, 2008 approximately 75% of our debt was
fixed rate and approximately 25% was variable rate.
Short-Term
Borrowings and Letters of Credit
As of December 31, 2008, our short-term borrowings were
$292 million consisting of (1) $235 million of
short-term loans under our ABL facility, (2) an
$11 million short-term loan in Italy, (3) a
$24 million short-term loan in Korea and
(4) $22 million in bank overdrafts. As of
December 31, 2008, $35 million of our ABL facility was
utilized for letters of credit and we had $323 million in
remaining availability under this revolving credit facility
before $80 million in covenant restrictions.
As of December 31, 2008, we had an additional
$176 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
not included in our revolving credit facility. The weighted
average interest rate on our total short-term borrowings was
4.15% and 4.12% as of December 31, 2008 and March 31,
2008, respectively.
Subsequent
event
In February 2009, we entered into a credit facility of
$100 million with a scheduled maturity date of
January 15, 2015 on an unsecured basis from a company
affiliated with the Aditya Birla group, and we have drawn down
$75 million of this facility.
76
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In accordance with SEC rules, the following qualify as
off-balance sheet arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain guarantees or contracts;
|
|
|
|
a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an
unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement
that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that
entity for such assets and
|
|
|
|
any obligation under a material variable interest held by the
registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing,
liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant,
or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development
services with the registrant.
|
The following discussion addresses the applicable off-balance
sheet items for our Company.
Derivative
Instruments
As of December 31, 2008, we have derivative financial
instruments, as defined by FASB 133. See
Note 15 Financial Instruments and Commodity
Contracts to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments to manage the risks arising from
fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates, aluminum prices
and energy prices. Such instruments are used for risk management
purposes only. We may be exposed to losses in the future if the
counterparties to the contracts fail to perform. We are
satisfied that the risk of such non-performance is remote, due
to our monitoring of credit exposures. Our maximum potential
loss may exceed the amount recognized in the accompanying
December 31, 2008 condensed consolidated balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions, the
relative costs of the instruments and capacity to hedge. The
duration is always linked to the timing of the underlying
exposure, with the connection between the two being regularly
monitored.
The current and noncurrent portions of derivative assets are
presented on the face of our accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets. The noncurrent portions of derivative
liabilities are included in Other long-term liabilities, in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
77
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008
are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
Currency options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Interest rate currency swaps
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
Aluminum options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Embedded derivative instruments
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Heating oil swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(618
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
(996
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(184
|
)
|
|
$
|
(184
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
Interest rate currency swaps
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Aluminum options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Embedded derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
$
|
(201
|
)
|
|
$
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Investment Hedges
We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to
fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and
investments in our European operations. We have designated these
as net investment hedges. The effective portion of gain or loss
on the derivative is included in Other comprehensive income
(loss). The ineffective portion of gain or loss on the
derivative is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of
derivative instruments, net.
The following table summarizes the amount of gain (loss) we
recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss) related to our
net investment hedge derivatives (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
Cash Flow
Hedges
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we have
designated as a cash flow hedge against our exposure to
fluctuating electricity prices. The effective portion of gain or
loss on the derivative is included in Other comprehensive income
(loss) and reclassified into (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivatives, net in our accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable rate
debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included
in Other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into
Interest
79
expense and amortization of debt issuance costs, net in our
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss.
For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or
losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the
life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the
relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will be
de-designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if the
underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be
probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness
determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the
measures we have established at the inception of the hedge.
Gains or losses recognized to date in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) would be immediately reclassified
into current period earnings, as would any subsequent changes in
the fair value of any such derivative.
During the next twelve months we expect to realize
$2 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.
The following table summarizes the (1) the amount of gain
or (loss) recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI),
(2) the amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from
Accumulated OCI into income and (3) the amount of gain or
(loss) recognized in income (ineffective portion) related to our
cash flow hedge derivatives (in millions).
Three
Month Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on
|
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Nine
Month Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on
|
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized
|
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
|
Portion and Amount
|
|
|
|
in OCI on Derivative
|
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate Swaps
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain of our operations.
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the LME price of aluminum. These
exposures arise from firm commitments to sell aluminum in future
periods at fixed or capped prices, the forecasted output of our
smelter operations in South America, and the forecasted metal
price lag associated with firm commitments to sell aluminum in
future periods at prices based on the LME.
We have an embedded derivative which arises from a contractual
relationship with a customer that entitles us to pass-through
the economic effect of trading positions that we take with other
third parties on their behalf.
We use natural gas swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
energy prices in North America.
While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in
helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging
instruments under FASB 133. The change in fair value of these
derivatives is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in the condensed consolidated
statement of operations and comprehensive loss.
81
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in
current period earnings (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Interest rate currency swaps
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Currency options
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(606
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Aluminum options
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded derivative instruments
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Heating oil swaps
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cross currency swaps
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
(405
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(524
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including certain
of our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries and
Aluminium Norf GmbH, which is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint
venture that does not meet the requirements for consolidation
under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
have annual terms subject to renewal while others have no
expiration and have termination notice requirements. For our
majority-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness guaranteed is for
short-term loan, overdraft and other debt facilities with
financial institutions, which are currently scheduled to expire
during the first half of fiscal 2009. Neither Novelis Inc. nor
any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds any
assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the
potential settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our condensed consolidated financial statements,
all liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term
debt facilities for these entities are already included in our
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness of others as of
December 31, 2008 (in millions). We did not have any
obligations under guarantees of indebtedness related to our
majority-owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
Potential Future
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Wholly-owned Subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
82
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
Other
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in
transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities
(SPEs), which would have been established for the purpose of
facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of
December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, we are not
involved in any unconsolidated SPE transactions.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
We have future obligations under various contracts relating to
debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases,
long-term purchase obligations, postretirement benefit plans and
uncertain tax positions. Based on a price drop of approximately
50% on the closing LME price for aluminum between March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2008, we estimate that our purchase
obligations for raw materials covering the remainder of the 2009
fiscal year and through the periods covered by the table
disclosed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the period ended March 31, 2008 have decreased
approximately $6 billion. Additionally, there were no
significant changes to the other categories listed in the
aforementioned table.
DIVIDENDS
No dividends have been declared since October 26, 2006.
Future dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors
and will depend on, among other things, our financial resources,
cash flows generated by our business, our cash requirements,
restrictions under the instruments governing our indebtedness,
being in compliance with the appropriate indentures and
covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness
that would allow us to legally pay dividends and other relevant
factors.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
During the nine months ended December 31, 2008, there were
no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and
estimates as reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended March 31, 2008 except as discussed below.
Impairment
of Goodwill and Investment in Affiliate
In accordance with FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and
Intangible Assets (FASB 142), we evaluate the carrying value
of goodwill for potential impairment annually during the fourth
fiscal quarter of each year or on an interim basis if an event
occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the fair value
of a reporting unit is likely to be below its carrying value.
During the third fiscal quarter of 2009, we concluded that
interim impairment testing was required due to the recent
deterioration in the global economic environment and the
resulting significant decrease in both the market capitalization
of our parent company and the valuation of our publicly traded
7.25% Senior Notes.
We test consolidated goodwill for impairment using a fair value
approach at the reporting unit level. We use our operating
segments as our reporting units and perform our goodwill
impairment test in two steps. Step one compares the fair value
of each reporting unit (operating segment) to its carrying
amount. If step one indicates that an impairment potentially
exists, the second step is performed to measure the amount of
impairment, if any. Goodwill impairment exists when the
estimated fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value.
For purposes of our step one analysis, our estimate of fair
value for each reporting unit is based on a combination of
(1) quoted market prices/relationships (the market
approach), (2) discounted cash flows (the
income approach) and (3) a stock price
build-up
approach (the
build-up
approach). Under the market
83
approach, the fair value of each reporting unit is determined
based upon comparisons to public companies engaged in similar
businesses. Under the income approach, the fair value of each
reporting unit was based on the present value of estimated
future cash flows. The income approach is dependent on a number
of significant management assumptions including estimated demand
in each geographic market and the discount rate. The discount
rate is commensurate with the risk inherent in the projected
cash flows and reflects the rate of return required by an
investor in the current economic conditions. We have used a
discount rate of 12%, an increase of approximately 3% from the
rate used in our prior year impairment test. An increase or
decrease of 0.5% in the discount rate impacted the estimated
fair value by $25-75 million, depending on the relative
size of the reporting unit. Under the
build-up
approach, which is a variation of the market approach, we
estimate the fair value of each reporting unit based on the
estimated contribution of each of the reporting units to
Hindalcos total business enterprise value. The estimated
fair value for each reporting unit is within the range of fair
values yielded under each approach. The results of our step one
test indicated a potential impairment.
Due to the complexities involved in determining the implied fair
value of the goodwill of each reporting unit, we have not
finalized our evaluation as of the filing of this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. However, based upon the
work performed to date, we have concluded that an impairment is
probable and can be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, we have
recorded a $1.3 billion charge representing our best
estimate of the impairment of consolidated goodwill for the
quarter ended December 31, 2008. We also evaluated the
carrying value of our investment in Aluminium Norf GmbH for
impairment. This resulted in an impairment charge of
$160 million, which is reported in Equity in net
(income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates on the
condensed consolidated statement of operations.
The table below summarizes goodwill by reporting unit (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Unit
|
|
March 31, 2008(A)
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
1,149
|
|
|
$
|
(860
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
183
|
|
South America
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
$
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
See Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies (Reclassifications) for
discussion of goodwill balance reclassification at
March 31, 2008. |
|
(B) |
|
Other adjustments include: (1) an adjustment in North
America for final payment related to the transfer of pension
plans in Canada for employees who elected to transfer their past
service to Novelis during the quarter ended June 30, 2008
and (2) adjustments in Europe related to tax audits during
the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2008. |
We expect to finalize our goodwill impairment testing during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Any adjustments to our estimate
recorded in the third quarter as a result of completing this
evaluation will be recorded in our financial statements for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Impairment
of Intangible Assets
Our other intangible assets of $816 million at
December 31, 2008 consist principally of tradenames,
technology, customer related intangible assets and a favorable
energy supply contact, which are subject to amortization. We
considered the potential impairment of these other intangibles
assets in accordance with FASB Statement No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets. For tradenames and technology, we utilized a
relief-from-royalty method. All other intangible assets were
assessed using the income approach. As a result of these
assessments, no impairment was indicated.
84
Impairment
of Other Assets
As a result of triggering events occurring during the quarter,
we assessed our other significant long-lived assets including
land, buildings and machinery and equipment using the income
approach. As a result of these assessments, no impairment was
indicated.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards have been adopted by us
during the nine months ended December 31, 2008.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we adopted FASB
Staff Position (FSP)
No. FAS 140-4
and FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)-8 (FIN 46(R)-8),
Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers
of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities.
FIN 46(R)-8 calls for enhanced disclosures by public
entities about interests in variable interest entities (VIE) and
provide users of the financial statements with greater
transparency about an enterprises involvement with
variable interest entities. As FIN 46(R)-8 only requires
enhanced disclosures, this FSP will have no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. See Note 8 Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities for these expanded disclosures.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we adopted FASB
issued Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (FASB 162). FASB 162 defines
the order in which accounting principles that are generally
accepted should be followed. Due to the nature of FASB 162, this
standard will have no impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (FASB 159). FASB 159 permits entities to choose
to measure financial instruments and certain other assets and
liabilities at fair value on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis (the fair value option) with changes in fair
value reported in earnings each reporting period. The fair value
option enables some companies to reduce the volatility in
reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without applying the complex hedge
accounting requirements under FASB Statement No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(FASB 133), to achieve similar results. We already record
our derivative contracts and hedging activities at fair value in
accordance with FASB 133. We did not elect the fair value option
for any other financial instruments or certain other financial
assets and liabilities that were not previously required to be
measured at fair value.
On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (FASB 157), as it relates to
financial assets and financial liabilities. In February 2008,
the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
delayed our required adoption date of FASB 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on at least an annual basis, until April 1,
2009. Also in February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 157-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement
No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address
Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13, which states that FASB
Statement No. 13, Accounting for Leases (FASB 13),
and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value
measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement
under FASB Statement No. 13 are excluded from the
provisions of FASB 157, except for assets and liabilities
related to leases assumed in a business combination that are
required to be measured at fair value under FASB 141 or FASB
Statement No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations.
See Note 14 Fair Value Measurements regarding
our adoption of this standard.
On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Staff Position
No. FIN 39-1,
Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39, (FSP
FIN 39-1).
FSP
FIN 39-1
amends FASB Statement No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts
Related to Certain Contracts, by permitting entities that
enter into master netting arrangements as part of their
derivative transactions to offset in their financial statements
net derivative positions against the fair value of amounts (or
85
amounts that approximate fair value) recognized for the right to
reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash
collateral under those arrangements. Our adoption of this
standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards have been issued, but
have not yet been adopted by us as of December 31, 2008, as
adoption is not required until future reporting periods.
On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Pensions
and Other Postretirement Benefits (FSP No. 132(R)-1).
FSP No. 132(R)-1 requires that an employer disclose the
following information about the fair value of plan assets:
1) how investment allocation decisions are made, including
the factors that are pertinent to understanding of investment
policies and strategies; 2) the major categories of plans
assets; 3) the inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure the fair value of plan assets; 4) the effect of
fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on
changes in plan assets for the period; and 5) significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. FSP No. 132(R)-1
will be effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009, with early application permitted. At
initial adoption, application FSP No. 132(R)-1 would not be
required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative
purposes. We have not yet commenced evaluating the potential
impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP No. 132(R)-1 on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP
FAS 142-3).
FSP
FAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing the
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP
FAS 142-3
also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination
of intangible asset useful lives. FSP
FAS 142-3
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We have not yet commenced
evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP
FAS 142-3
on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(FASB 161). FASB 161 changes the disclosure requirements for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about (i) how and
why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for under FASB 133 and its related interpretations and
(iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect an entitys financial position, results of
operations and cash flows. FASB 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008, with early adoption permitted.
FASB 161 permits, but does not require, comparative disclosures
for earlier periods upon initial adoption. As FASB 161 only
requires enhanced disclosures, this standard will have no impact
on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141
(Revised), Business Combinations (FASB 141(R)). FASB
141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the
acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
FASB 141(R) also requires acquirers to estimate the
acquisition-date fair value of any contingent consideration and
to recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of
contingent consideration in earnings. We will be required to
apply this new standard prospectively to business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of
the annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for
valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
contingencies. FASB 141(R) amends certain provisions of FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, such
that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes
and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that
closed prior to the effective date of FASB 141(R) would also
apply the
86
provisions of FASB 141(R). Early adoption is prohibited. We are
currently evaluating the effects that FASB 141(R) may have
on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
(FASB 160) which establishes accounting and reporting
standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly
identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheet
within shareholders equity, but separate from the
parents equity; (ii) the amount of consolidated net
income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling
interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of
the consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes
in a parents ownership interest while the parent retains
its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be
accounted for consistently. FASB 160 applies to fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. We have not yet commenced evaluating the potential
impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB 160 on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do
not apply to our operations.
87
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET
DATA
This document contains forward-looking statements that are based
on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections
about the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and
assumptions made by our management. Such statements include, in
particular, statements about our plans, strategies and
prospects. Words such as expect,
anticipate, intend, plan,
believe, seek, estimate and
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to
identify such forward-looking statements. Examples of
forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
include, but are not limited to, our expectations with respect
to the impact of metal price movements on our financial
performance, our metal price ceiling exposure, the effectiveness
of our hedging programs and controls, and the negative impact of
global economic conditions on our short-term liquidity position.
These statements are based on beliefs and assumptions of
Novelis management, which in turn are based on currently
available information. These statements are not guarantees of
future performance and involve assumptions and risks and
uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual
outcomes and results may differ materially from what is
expressed, implied or forecasted in such forward-looking
statements. We do not intend, and we disclaim any obligation, to
update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
This document also contains information concerning our markets
and products generally, which is forward-looking in nature and
is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which
these markets and product categories will develop. These
assumptions have been derived from information currently
available to us and to the third party industry analysts quoted
herein. This information includes, but is not limited to,
product shipments and share of production. Actual market results
may differ from those predicted. While we do not know what
impact any of these differences may have on our business, our
results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and the
market price of our securities may be materially adversely
affected. Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to
differ from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking
statements include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash;
|
|
|
|
changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums
associated with such prices) or other materials and raw
materials we use;
|
|
|
|
the effect of metal price ceilings in certain of our sales
contracts;
|
|
|
|
the capacity and effectiveness of our metal hedging activities,
including our internal used beverage cans (UBC) and smelter
hedges;
|
|
|
|
relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of,
our customers, suppliers and our ultimate parent, Hindalco;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the
areas in which we maintain production facilities;
|
|
|
|
our ability to access financing for future capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
continuing obligations and other relationships resulting from
our spin-off from Alcan;
|
|
|
|
changes in the relative values of various currencies;
|
|
|
|
factors affecting our operations, such as litigation,
environmental remediation and
clean-up
costs, labor relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment
and other events;
|
|
|
|
economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries
in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in
duties or tariffs;
|
|
|
|
competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as
well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic
and composite materials;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions, including further
deterioration in the global economy;
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to improve and maintain effective internal control
over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures
in the future;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our
products as well as seasonality in certain of our
customers industries;
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting
taxes, environmental, health or safety compliance;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the
amounts we pay under our principal credit agreement and other
financing agreements; and
|
|
|
|
the effect of taxes and changes in tax rates.
|
The above list of factors is not exhaustive. Some of these and
other factors are discussed in more detail under
Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing
business operations, including risks from changes in commodity
prices (aluminum, electricity and natural gas), foreign currency
exchange rates and interest rates that could impact our results
of operations and financial condition.
We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities and derivative
financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments
as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes.
Except where noted, the derivative contracts are
marked-to-market and the related gains and losses are included
in earnings in the current accounting period.
By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve
risk, including both our credit risk of non- performance and the
credit risk of non-performance by counterparties. All derivative
contracts are executed with counterparties that, in our
judgment, are creditworthy. Our maximum potential loss may
exceed the amount recognized in the accompanying
December 31, 2008 condensed consolidated balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions and the
relative costs of the instruments. The duration is always linked
to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection
between the two being regularly monitored.
Commodity
Price Risks
We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of
certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity and
natural gas.
Aluminum
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass
through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market
premiums and (ii) a conversion premium based on
the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the
competitive market conditions for that product.
In situations where we offer customers fixed prices for future
delivery of our products, we may enter into derivative
instruments for the metal inputs in order to protect the profit
on the conversion of the product. Consequently, the gain or loss
resulting from movements in the price of aluminum on these
contracts would generally be offset by an equal and opposite
impact on the net sales and purchases being hedged.
In addition, sales contracts representing 192 kt and 235 kt for
the nine months ended December 31, 2008, respectively,
provide for a ceiling over which metal prices could not
contractually be passed through to a
89
customer, unless adjusted. As a result, we are unable to pass
through the complete increase in metal prices for sales under
these contracts and this negatively impacts our margins when the
metal price is above the ceiling price. As a result of falling
LME prices and based on a December 31, 2008 aluminum price
of $1,455 per tonne, there is no unfavorable revenue or cash
flow impact estimated for the remainder of fiscal 2009.
We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal
prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to
metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our
internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and
mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from
our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans
(UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply have
historically provided an offsetting benefit to the can ceiling
contracts. We refer to these two sources as our internal hedges.
Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy
to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated
with the metal price ceilings is to purchase derivative
instruments on projected aluminum volume requirements above our
assumed internal hedge position. We currently purchase aluminum
futures and options to hedge our exposure to further metal price
increases.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we sold
short-term LME futures contracts to reduce the cash flow
volatility of fluctuating metal prices associated with metal
price lag. We enter into forward metal purchases simultaneous
with the contracts that contain fixed metal prices. These
forward metal purchases directly hedge the economic risk of
future metal price fluctuation associated with these contracts.
The positive or negative impact on sales under these contracts
has been included in the metal price lag effect described above,
without regard to the fixed forward instruments we purchased to
offset this risk.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
gain (loss) in the fair values of these derivative instruments
as of December 31, 2008, given a 10% increase in the
three-month LME price ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Rate/Price
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Aluminum Forward Contracts
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
Aluminum Options
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Energy
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. In the nine months ended
December 31, 2008, natural gas and electricity represented
approximately 70% of our energy consumption by cost. We also use
fuel oil and transport fuel. The majority of energy usage occurs
at our casting centers, at our smelters in South America and
during the hot rolling of aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities
require relatively less energy.
We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which subjects
us to market pricing fluctuations. We seek to stabilize our
future exposure to natural gas prices through the use of forward
purchase contracts. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South
America have historically been more stable than in the
United States. As of December 31, 2008, we have a
nominal amount of forward purchases outstanding related to
natural gas.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs. In South America,
we own and operate hydroelectric facilities that meet
approximately 25% of our total electricity requirements in that
segment. Additionally, we have entered into an electricity swap
in North America to fix a portion of the cost of our electricity
requirements.
We purchase a nominal amount of heating oil forward contracts to
hedge against fluctuations in the price of our transport fuel.
90
Fluctuating energy costs worldwide, due to the changes in supply
and international and geopolitical events, expose us to earnings
volatility as such changes in such costs cannot immediately be
recovered under existing contracts and sales agreements, and may
only be mitigated in future periods under future pricing
arrangements.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2008, given a 10% increase in spot prices for
energy contracts ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Rate/Price
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Heating Oil
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risks
Exchange rate movements, particularly the euro, the Canadian
dollar, the Brazilian real and the Korean won against the
U.S. dollar, have an impact on our operating results. In
Europe, where we have predominantly local currency selling
prices and operating costs, we benefit as the euro strengthens,
but are adversely affected as the euro weakens. In Korea, where
we have local currency selling prices for local sales and
U.S. dollar denominated selling prices for exports, we
benefit slightly as the won weakens, but are adversely affected
as the won strengthens, due to a slightly higher percentage of
exports compared to local sales. In Canada and Brazil, where we
have predominately U.S. dollar selling prices and local
currency operating costs, we benefit as the local currencies
weaken, but are adversely affected as the local currencies
strengthen. Foreign currency contracts may be used to hedge the
economic exposures at our foreign operations.
It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures
within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the
majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either
forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in
non-functional currencies. Our most significant
non-U.S. dollar
functional currency operating segments are Europe and Asia,
which have the euro and the Korean won as their functional
currencies, respectively. South America is U.S. dollar
functional with Brazilian real transactional exposure.
We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign
operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
Shareholders equity section of the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Net sales and expenses in our
foreign operations foreign currencies are translated into
varying amounts of U.S. dollars, and these changes in
exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our
net sales and expenses from foreign operations as expressed in
U.S. dollars.
Any negative impact of currency movements on the currency
contracts that we have entered into to hedge foreign currency
commitments to purchase or sell goods and services would be
offset by an equal and opposite favorable exchange impact on the
commitments being hedged. For a discussion of accounting
policies and other information relating to currency contracts,
see Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies and Note 15 Financial
Instruments and Commodity Contracts to our accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements.
91
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2008, given a 10% increase in rates ($ in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
|
Increase in
|
|
|
(Loss) in
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
Korean won
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Brazilian real
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
|
British pound
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
|
Canadian dollar
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
|
Swiss franc
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
Loans to and investments in European operations have been hedged
by cross-currency swaps (euro 135 million).
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2008, assuming a 10% increase in rates ($ in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
Increase in
|
|
|
Loss in
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
Interest
Rate Risks
As of December 31, 2008, approximately 75% of our debt
obligations were at fixed rates. Due to the nature of fixed-rate
debt, there would be no significant impact on our interest
expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase or decrease in
market rates of interest.
We are subject to interest rate risk related to our floating
rate debt. For every 12.5 basis point increase in the
interest rates on our outstanding variable rate debt as of
December 31, 2008, which includes $446 million of term
loan debt and other variable rate debt of $257 million, our
annual pre-tax income would be reduced by approximately
$1 million.
From time to time, we have used interest rate swaps to manage
our debt cost. We currently have interest rate swaps on
$500 million of our floating rate Term loan facilities to
fix the interest rate. In Korea, we entered into interest rate
swaps to fix the interest rate on various floating rate debt.
See Note 11 Debt to our accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements for further information.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2008 given a 10% increase in rates ($ in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
92
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other
procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed
or submitted under the United States Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is (1) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and
(2) accumulated and communicated to management, including
the principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2008, members of
management, at the direction (and with the participation) of our
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2008. Based on
that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as
of December 31, 2008, because of the material weakness in
our internal control over financial reporting discussed below.
Notwithstanding the material weakness described below, our
management has concluded that the Companys unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
report are fairly stated, in all material respects, in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America (GAAP).
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this report
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Material
Weakness Existing as of December 31, 2008 and Remediation
Plan
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of
control deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim
consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis. As of December 31, 2008, we did
not maintain effective controls over the application of purchase
accounting for an equity method investee including related
income tax accounts. Specifically, our controls did not ensure
the accuracy of our purchase accounting adjustments for an
equity method investee, resulting in an error in our provision
for income taxes during the period we were finalizing our
purchase accounting. This control deficiency resulted in
adjustments affecting the period May 15, 2007 through
March 31, 2008 identified in Note 3
Restatement of Financial Statements in the consolidated and
combined financial statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
filed with the SEC on August 11, 2008 (see
Note 3 Restatement of Financial Statements to
the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements).
Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a material
misstatement of the accounts identified in
Note 3 Restatement of Financial Statements to
the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
that would result in a material misstatement of the
Companys annual or interim consolidated financial
statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly,
management has determined that this control deficiency
constitutes a material weakness.
93
Our plan for remediating this material weakness includes the
following:
1. We conducted a full review of the purchase accounting
for the Hindalco acquisition, including a review of the
valuation approach, as well as the related accounting for equity
method investees and related income tax accounts. This review
was conducted by the Principal Financial Officer, corporate and
regional financial officers, corporate and regional tax
personnel, and the companys external valuation expert.
2. Management is re-evaluating all accounting and financial
reporting controls for purchase accounting and equity method
investees, including related income tax accounts.
3. Training sessions are being conducted for key financial
and tax personnel regarding equity method accounting and related
income tax accounting matters.
4. Management is transitioning certain purchase accounting
responsibilities to our regional financial personnel, including
tax personnel, and developing procedures to monitor the ongoing
activity in the regions.
94
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Coca-Cola
Lawsuits. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in Georgia
state court. CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and
seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial
and a declaration of its rights under the agreement. The
agreement includes a most favored nations provision
regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS alleges that Novelis
Corporation breached the terms of the most favored
nations provision. The dispute will likely turn on the
facts that are presented to the court by the parties and the
courts finding as to how certain provisions of the
agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in
this litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material.
Novelis Corporation has filed its answer and the parties are
proceeding with discovery.
ARCO Aluminum Complaint. On May 24, 2007,
ARCO filed a complaint against Novelis Corporation and Novelis
Inc. in the United States District Court for the Western
District of Kentucky. ARCO and Novelis are partners in a joint
venture rolling mill located in Logan, Kentucky. In the
complaint, ARCO seeks to resolve a perceived dispute over
management and control of the joint venture following
Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis.
ARCO alleges that its consent was required in connection with
Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis. Failure to obtain
consent, ARCO alleges, has put us in default of the JV
Agreements, thereby triggering certain provisions in those
agreements. The provisions include a reversion of the production
management at the joint venture to Logan from Novelis, and a
reduction of the board of directors of the entity that manages
the joint venture from seven members (four appointed by Novelis
and three appointed by ARCO) to six members (three appointed by
each of Novelis and ARCO).
ARCO seeks a court declaration that (1) Novelis and its
affiliates are prohibited from exercising any managerial
authority or control over the joint venture,
(2) Novelis interest in the joint venture is limited
to an economic interest only and (3) ARCO has authority to
act on behalf of the joint venture. Or, alternatively, ARCO is
seeking a reversion of the production management function to
Logan Aluminum, and a change in the composition of the board of
directors of the entity that manages the joint venture. Novelis
filed its answer to the complaint on July 16, 2007.
On July 3, 2007, ARCO filed a motion for partial summary
judgment with respect to one of the counts of its complaint
relating to the claim that Novelis breached the joint venture
agreement by not seeking ARCOs consent. On July 30,
2007, Novelis filed a motion to hold ARCOs motion for
summary judgment in abeyance (pending further discovery), along
with a demand for a jury. On February 14, 2008, the judge
issued an order granting our motion to hold ARCOs summary
judgment motion in abeyance. Pursuant to this ruling, management
and the board of the joint venture are conducting their
activities as normal.
Economic
conditions could continue to materially adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
Our financial condition and results of operations depend
significantly on worldwide economic conditions. These economic
conditions have recently deteriorated significantly in many
countries and regions in which we do business, and may remain
depressed for the foreseeable future. Uncertainty about current
global economic conditions poses a risk as our customers may
postpone purchases in response to tighter credit and negative
financial news, which could adversely impact demand for our
products. These and other economic factors have, and may
continue to have, a significant impact on our financial
condition and results of operations.
The current financial turmoil affecting the banking system and
financial markets and the possibility that additional financial
institutions may consolidate or go out of business has resulted
in a tightening in the credit
95
markets, a low level of liquidity in many financial markets, and
extreme volatility in fixed income, credit, currency and equity
markets. There could be a number of follow-on effects from the
credit crisis on our business, including the insolvency of key
suppliers or their inability to obtain credit to finance
development
and/or
manufacture products resulting in product delays and the
inability of customers to purchase our products or pay for
products they have already received. If conditions become more
severe or continue longer than we anticipate, or if we are
unable to adequately respond to unforeseeable changes in demand
resulting from economic conditions, our financial condition and
results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
In addition, we use various derivative instruments to manage the
risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates, interest
rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. The current financial
turmoil affecting the banking system and financial markets could
affect whether the counterparties to our derivative instruments
are able to honor their agreements. We may be exposed to losses
in the future if the counterparties to our derivative
instruments fail to honor their agreements. Our maximum
potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in the
accompanying December 31, 2008 condensed consolidated
balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited,
AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10,
2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 13, 2007)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws, adopted as of July 24, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on July 25, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis and CIBC Mellon
Trust Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Indenture, relating to the Notes, dated as of February 3,
2005, between the Company, the guarantors named on the signature
pages thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.,
as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of Note for 7
1/4% Senior
Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the
Form S-4
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File
No. 331-127139))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
First Amendment to the Shareholder Rights Agreement between
Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, dated as of
February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
file on February 13, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated November 6, 2008 between Novelis
Inc. and Robert Nelson
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Amended Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for fiscal
2009-2012
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
96
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NOVELIS INC.
Steven Fisher
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Robert P. Nelson
Vice President, Finance and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: February 17, 2009
97
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited,
AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10,
2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 13, 2007)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws, adopted as of July 24, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on July 25, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis and CIBC Mellon
Trust Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Indenture, relating to the Notes, dated as of February 3,
2005, between the Company, the guarantors named on the signature
pages thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.,
as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of Note for 7
1/4% Senior
Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the
Form S-4
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File
No. 331-127139))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
First Amendment to the Shareholder Rights Agreement between
Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, dated as of
February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
file on February 13, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated November 6, 2008 between Novelis
Inc. and Robert Nelson
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Amended Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for fiscal
2009-2012
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
98