UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number:
001-32312
Novelis Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
98-0442987
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
3399 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 1500
Atlanta, Georgia
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
30326
(Zip Code)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone:
(404) 814-4200
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of January 31, 2010, the registrant had 77,459,658
common shares outstanding. All of the Registrants
outstanding shares were held indirectly by Hindalco Industries
Ltd., the Registrants parent company.
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
|
$
|
8,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
5,049
|
|
|
|
7,645
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
516
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
4,195
|
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
10,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
(2,019
|
)
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(2,230
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(1,823
|
)
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
(1,901
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $4 and $2 as of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,714
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,602
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
2,493
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,522
|
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; unlimited number of shares
authorized; 77,459,658 shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Novelis shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
7,602
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
$
|
(1,901
|
)
|
Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments, net
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Foreign exchange remeasurement of debt
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Inventory reserves and adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Proceeds from related party loans receivable, net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Net proceeds (outflow) from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, third parties
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments, third parties
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Principal payments, related parties
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
193
|
|
Dividends, noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc. Shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
(AOCI)
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
1,509
|
|
Net income attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax provision of $4
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
benefit of $ included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax provision of $5
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
2,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Net change in fair value of effective portion of hedges
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit) related to items of other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
(1,869
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,886
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
$
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Net change in fair value of effective portion of hedges
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
Income tax provision related to items of other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
584
|
|
|
$
|
(2,009
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
6
Novelis
Inc.
|
|
1.
|
BUSINESS
AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein to Rio Tinto
Alcan refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
Description
of Business and Basis of Presentation
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products where the end-use destination of
the products includes the beverage and food can, transportation,
construction and industrial, and foil products markets. As of
December 31, 2009, we had operations on four continents:
North America; Europe; Asia and South America, through 31
operating plants, one research facility and several
market-focused innovation centers in 11 countries. In addition
to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, primary aluminum smelting and
power generation facilities that supply our rolling plants in
Brazil.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009 filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 29,
2009, and updated on
Form 8-K
filed August 5, 2009 to reflect the revised presentation of
noncontrolling interests. Management believes that all
adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results,
consisting of normally recurring items, have been included in
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for
the interim periods presented. Further, in connection with the
preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements,
the Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet
date of December 31, 2009 through February 16, 2010,
the date these financial statements were issued.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. The principal areas
of judgment relate to (1) the fair value of derivative
financial instruments; (2) impairment of goodwill;
(3) impairments of long-lived assets, intangible assets and
equity investments; (4) actuarial assumptions related to
pension and other postretirement benefit plans; (5) income
tax reserves and valuation allowances and (6) assessment of
loss contingencies, including environmental, litigation and
other tax reserves.
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
Consolidation
Policy
Our consolidated financial statements include the assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of all wholly-owned
subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise
control and entities in which we have a controlling financial
interest or are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. We
eliminate all significant intercompany accounts and transactions
from our consolidated financial statements.
7
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
In August 2009, we announced the formation of a joint venture
entity, Evermore Recycling LLC (Evermore), to procure used
beverage cans in North America. We own 55.8% of this limited
liability corporation and have consolidated the results
effective August 11, 2009. The results of Evermore were
immaterial for the three and nine months ended December 31,
2009.
Reclassifications
and Adjustment
Certain reclassifications of prior period amounts and
presentation have been made to conform to the presentation
adopted for the current period. In order to present the impact
of all customer-directed derivatives and associated trading
activities as operating activities, we corrected our
presentation by reclassifying approximately $20 million
from investing activities to operating activities on our
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine
months ended December 31, 2008.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we identified an
immaterial error in our consolidated annual and interim
financial statements included in previously filed
Forms 10-Q
and
Forms 10-K
for fiscal 2008 and 2009. The error relates to deferred income
taxes recorded in connection with purchase accounting in South
America. We believe the correction of this error to be both
quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial to our projected
annual results for fiscal 2010 or to any of our previously
issued financial statements. As a result, we did not adjust any
prior period amounts. There was no impact to income (loss)
before income taxes and noncontrolling interest share or cash
flows from operating activities for any periods. We reflected
the correction of this error in the interim financial statements
for the second quarter of 2010. As of and for the nine months
ended December 31, 2009, the impact of the correction was
an increase to goodwill of $29 million, an increase to
deferred tax liabilities of $25 million and a reduction of
our income tax expense of $4 million. Due to the fact that
our South American subsidiaries are US dollar functional, the
deferred tax liabilities fluctuate with changes in the exchange
rate. This fluctuation is recorded as an increase or decrease to
income tax expense.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards have been adopted by us
during the nine months ended December 31, 2009.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair
Value, (ASU 2009-05). ASU 2009-05 amends Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements. Specifically, ASU 2009-05 provides
clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in
an active market for the identical liability is not available, a
reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or
more of the following methods: (1) a valuation technique
that uses a) the quoted price of the identical liability
when traded as an asset or b) quoted prices for similar
liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets or
(2) a valuation technique that is consistent with the
principles of Topic 820 of the ASC (e.g., an income approach or
market approach). ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that when
estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is
not required to include inputs relating to the existence of
transfer restrictions on that liability. This standard had no
impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB approved its Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) (Codification) as the single source of
authoritative United States accounting and reporting standards
applicable for all non-governmental entities, with the exception
of the SEC and its staff. The Codification which changes the
referencing of accounting standards is effective for interim or
annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. As the
codification is not intended to change or alter existing US
GAAP, this standard had no impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
8
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 855, Subsequent
Events, (prior authoritative literature: FASB Statement
No. 165, Subsequent Events) which establishes
general standards of accounting and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. This
accounting standard requires the disclosure of the date through
which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis
for that date. This standard had no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements) which establishes
accounting and reporting standards that require: (i) the
ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than
the parent to be clearly identified and presented in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet within shareholders
equity, but separate from the parents equity;
(ii) the amount of condensed consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be
clearly identified and presented on the face of the condensed
consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes in a
parents ownership interest while the parent retains its
controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be accounted
for consistently. We adopted this accounting standard effective
April 1, 2009, and applied this standard prospectively,
except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which
have been applied retrospectively.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets) which
amends the factors that should be considered in developing the
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset. The accounting standard
also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination
of intangible asset useful lives. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, (prior authoritative
literature: FASB Staff Position
No. 107-1
and APB Opinion
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments; FASB Staff Position
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly) which
requires disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods. This codification
also provides additional guidance in determining fair value when
the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has
significantly decreased. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 805, Business
Combinations, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations;
FASB Staff Position No. 141(R)-1, Accounting for
Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business
Combination That Arise from Contingencies)
(ASC 805) which establishes principles and
requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination
(i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes
and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination
or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines
what information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. This standard also requires acquirers to
estimate the acquisition-date fair value of any contingent
consideration and to recognize any subsequent changes in the
fair value of contingent consideration in earnings. ASC 805 also
clarifies the initial and subsequent recognition, subsequent
accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising
from contingencies in a business combination. This standard
requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized
at fair value, if the acquisition-date fair value can be
reasonably estimated. We will apply ASC 805 prospectively to
business combinations occurring after March 31, 2009, with
the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on
deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. This standard
amends certain provisions of preexisting tax guidance such that
adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and
acquired
9
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior
to the effective date of this business combination guidance
would also apply the provisions of this standard. This standard
had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 323,
Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures,
(prior authoritative literature: Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue
No. 08-06,
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations) which
addresses questions that have arisen about the application of
the equity method of accounting for investments acquired after
the effective date of newly issued business combination
standards and non-controlling interest standards. This
accounting standard clarifies how to account for certain
transactions involving equity method investments, and is
effective on a prospective basis. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards have been issued, but
have not yet been adopted by us as of December 31, 2009, as
adoption is not required until future reporting periods.
In June 2009, the FASB issued statement No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FASB
167). FASB 167 has not been incorporated by the FASB into the
Codification as the guidance is not yet effective and early
adoption is prohibited. FASB 167 is intended (1) to address
the effects on certain provisions of the accounting standard
dealing with consolidation of variable interest entities, as a
result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose
entity concept in FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for
Transfers of Financial Assets, and (2) to clarify
questions about the application of certain key provisions
related to consolidation of variable interest entities,
including those in which accounting and disclosures do not
always provide timely and useful information about an
enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity.
FASB 167 will be effective for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2009. We do not anticipate this standard will
have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations and cash flows.
In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB issued FSP No. 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan
Assets) which requires that an employer disclose the
following information about the fair value of plan assets:
(1) how investment allocation decisions are made, including
the factors that are pertinent to understanding of investment
policies and strategies; (2) the major categories of plan
assets; (3) the inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure the fair value of plan assets; (4) the effect of
fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on
changes in plan assets for the period; and (5) significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. This pronouncement
will be effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009, with early application permitted. At
initial adoption, application of this standard would not be
required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative
purposes. This standard will have no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do
not apply to our operations.
|
|
2.
|
RESTRUCTURING
PROGRAMS
|
Restructuring charges of $7 million on the condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009, consisted of the following:
(1) $4 million in costs attributable to our Rogerstone
facility, partially offset by a $2 million reduction in
severance costs, (2) $2 million in
10
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
environmental and other costs related to our Borgofranco
facility (3) $4 million in severance costs related to
North America and (4) a $1 million reduction in
severance costs in South America.
The following table summarizes our restructuring accrual
activity by region (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
Provisions, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Impact of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
Restructuring charges in the table above include $2 million
of environmental and other costs at our Borgofranco facility,
net of $1 million reduction in severance costs.
We made the following payments relating to preexisting
restructuring programs in Europe: $27 million in severance
payments, $9 million in payments for environmental
remediation and $3 million of other payments.
At our Rogerstone facility, we also incurred a $2 million
charge related to the write down of aluminum scrap and
approximately $1 million of on-going facility costs related
to the shut-down. The $2 million write down is not included
in the table above as it was reflected as a reduction to the
appropriate balance sheet accounts.
North
America
To consolidate corporate functions and enhance organizational
effectiveness, we announced a plan relocate our North American
headquarters from Cleveland, Ohio to Atlanta, Georgia, where the
Companys corporate offices are located. This move is
expected to occur over the next nine months with a completion
date no later than December 31, 2010. We recorded
$3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 for
severance charges representing one-time termination benefits
under our existing separation program.
Restructuring charges in North America also includes
$1 million in severance costs related to the voluntary and
involuntary separation programs initiated in the third quarter
of fiscal 2009. We made $9 million in severance payments
related to fiscal 2009 plan in the nine months ended
December 31, 2009.
South
America
We made $1 million in severance payments and
$1 million in payments related to other exit costs. We
reduced the remaining $1 million reserve related to
severance in the third quarter. As of December 31, 2009, we
completed all restructuring actions initiated in fiscal 2009.
11
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Inventories consist of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
1,059
|
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
CONSOLIDATION
OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
|
We have a variable interest in Logan Aluminum, Inc. (Logan).
Based upon a previous restructuring program, Novelis acquired
the right to use the excess capacity at Logan. To utilize this
capacity, we installed and have sole ownership of a cold mill at
the Logan facility which enabled us to have the ability to take
the majority share of production and costs. These facts qualify
Novelis as Logans primary beneficiary and this entity is
consolidated for all periods presented. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The following table summarizes the carrying value and
classification of assets and liabilities owned by the Logan
joint venture and consolidated on our condensed consolidated
balance sheets (in millions). There are significant other assets
used in the operations of Logan that are not part of the joint
venture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
(139
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
Net carrying value
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
12
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENT
IN AND ADVANCES TO NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES AND RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
The following table summarizes our share of the condensed
results of operations of our equity method affiliates. These
results include the incremental depreciation and amortization
expense that we record in our equity method accounting as a
result of fair value adjustments we made to our investments in
non-consolidated affiliates due to the Arrangement. These
results include the $160 million impairment charge to
reduce the carrying value of our investment in Aluminium Norf
GmbH (Norf) in the three and nine months ended December 31,
2008. The results for the three months ended December 31,
2009 also include a $10 million after tax benefit from the
refinement of our methodology for recording depreciation and
amortization on the step up in our basis in the underlying
assets of an investee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
Costs, expenses and provisions for taxes on income
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
Impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements are transactions and balances arising from business
we conduct with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we
classify as related party transactions and balances. We earned
less than $1 million of interest income on a loan due from
Norf during each of the periods presented in the table below.
The following table describes the nature and amounts of
significant transactions that we had with these non-consolidated
affiliates (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Purchases of tolling services and electricity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH(A)
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
Consorcio Candonga(B)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases from related parties
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Norf. |
|
(B) |
|
We obtain electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our operations
in South America. |
The following table describes the period-end account balances
that we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as
related party balances in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets (in millions). We have no other
material related party balances with these non-consolidated
affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
Accounts receivable(A)
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Other long-term receivables(A)
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Accounts payable(B)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The balances represent current and non-current portions of a
loan due from Norf. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Norf and electricity from
Consorcio Candonga. |
13
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Debt consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Rates(A)
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Third party debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term borrowings
|
|
|
1.95
|
%
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
2.24
|
%(C)
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
11.5% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
11.50
|
%
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
2.25
|
%(C)
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
813
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due December 2019 (Swiss francs (CHF)
50 million)
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 2 million)
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
2.82
|
%(C)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Bank loan, due February 2010 (Korean won (KRW) 50 billion)
|
|
|
4.14
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Bank loan, due May 2009 (KRW 10 billion)
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due December 2011 through December 2012
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,716
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
2,703
|
|
|
|
2,742
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
Less: Short term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion third
parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,493
|
|
|
$
|
2,419
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured credit facility related party, due January
2015
|
|
|
13.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Interest rates are as of December 31, 2009 and exclude the
effects of accretion/amortization of fair value adjustments as a
result of the Arrangement and the debt exchange completed in
fiscal 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
Debt existing at the time of the Arrangement was recorded at
fair value. Additional floating rate Term Loan with a face value
of $220 million issued in March 2009 was recorded at a fair
value of $165 million. Additional 11.5% Senior Notes
with a face value of $185 million issued in August 2009
were recorded at fair value of $181 million (see
11.5% Senior Notes below). |
|
(C) |
|
Excludes the effect of related interest rate swaps and the
effect of accretion of fair value. |
14
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Principal repayment requirements for our total debt over the
next five years and thereafter (excluding unamortized fair value
adjustments and using rates of exchange as of December 31,
2009 for our debt denominated in foreign currencies) are as
follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
16
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
16
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
16
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
Our senior secured credit facilities consist of (1) a
$1.16 billion seven year term loan facility maturing July
2014 (Term Loan facility) and (2) an $800 million
five-year multi-currency asset-backed revolving credit line and
letter of credit facility (ABL Facility). The senior secured
credit facilities include certain affirmative and negative
covenants. Under the ABL Facility, if our excess availability,
as defined under the borrowing, is less than $80 million,
we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1 to 1. As of December 31, 2009, our fixed charge
coverage ratio is less than 1 to 1, resulting in a reduction of
availability under the ABL Facility of $80 million.
Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral under
the senior secured credit facilities.
11.5% Senior
Notes
On August 11, 2009, Novelis Inc. issued $185 million
aggregate principal face amount of 11.5% senior unsecured
notes at an effective rate of 12.0% (11.5% Senior Notes).
The 11.5% Senior Notes were issued at a discount resulting
in gross proceeds of $181 million. The net proceeds of this
offering were used to repay a portion of the ABL Facility and
$96 million outstanding under an unsecured credit facility
from an affiliate of the Aditya Birla Group.
The 11.5% Senior Notes rank equally with all of our
existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness, and are
guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis,
by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
all of our existing and future Canadian and U.S. restricted
subsidiaries,
|
|
|
|
certain of our existing foreign restricted subsidiaries and
|
|
|
|
our other restricted subsidiaries that guarantee debt in the
future under any credit facilities, provided that the borrower
of such debt is our company or a Canadian or a
U.S. subsidiary.
|
The 11.5% Senior Notes contain certain covenants and events
of default, including limitations on certain restricted
payments, the incurrence of additional indebtedness and the sale
of certain assets. As of December 31, 2009, we are
compliant with these covenants. Interest on the
11.5% Senior Notes is payable on February 15 and August 15
of each year, commencing on February 15, 2010. The notes
will mature on February 15, 2015. On January 12, 2010,
we consummated the exchange offer required by the registration
rights agreement related to the 11.5% Senior Notes.
15
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Short-Term
Borrowings and Lines of Credit
As of December 31, 2009, our short-term borrowings were
$61 million consisting of (1) $49 million of
short-term loans under the ABL Facility, (2) a
$6 million short-term loan in Italy and
(3) $6 million in bank overdrafts. As of
December 31, 2009, $21 million of the ABL Facility was
utilized for letters of credit and we had $475 million in
remaining availability under the ABL Facility before covenant
related restrictions. The weighted average interest rate on our
total short-term borrowings was 1.95% and 2.75% as of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
As of December 31, 2009, we had an additional
$175 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
not included in the ABL Facility.
Interest
Rate Swaps
As of December 31, 2009, we have interest rate swaps to fix
the variable LIBOR interest rate on $920 million of our
floating rate Term Loan facility. We are still obligated to pay
any applicable margin, as defined in our senior secured credit
facilities. Interest rate swaps related to $400 million at
an effective weighted average interest rate of 4.0% expire
March 31, 2010. In January 2009, we entered into two
interest rate swaps to fix the variable LIBOR interest rate on
an additional $300 million of our floating Term Loan
facility at a rate of 1.49%, plus any applicable margin. These
interest rate swaps are effective from March 31, 2009
through March 31, 2011. In April 2009, we entered into an
additional $220 million interest rate swap at a rate of
1.97%, which is effective through April 30, 2012.
We have a cross-currency interest rate swap in Korea to convert
our $100 million variable rate bank loan to KRW
92 billion at a fixed rate of 5.44%. The swap expires
October 2010, concurrent with the maturity of the loan.
As of December 31, 2009 approximately 88% of our debt was
fixed rate and approximately 12% was variable rate.
|
|
7.
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Total compensation expense related to share-based awards for the
respective periods is presented in the table below (in
millions). These amounts are included in Selling, general and
administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements
of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan 2009
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan 2010
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation expense
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan
In June 2009, our board of directors authorized the Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2010 FY 2013 (2010 LTIP)
covering the performance period from April 1, 2009 through
March 31, 2013. The terms of the 2010 LTIP are the same as
the Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2009 FY 2012
(2009 LTIP) approved in June 2008. Under the 2010 LTIP, phantom
stock appreciation rights (SARs) are to be granted to certain of
our executive officers and key employees. The SARs will vest at
the rate of 25% per year, subject to performance criteria (see
below) and expire seven years from their grant date. Each SAR is
to be settled in cash based on the difference between the market
value of one Hindalco share on the date of grant and the market
value on the date of exercise, where market values are
denominated in Indian rupees and converted to
16
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
the participants payroll currency at the time of exercise.
The amount of cash paid is limited to (i) 2.5 times the
target payout if exercised within one year of vesting or
(ii) 3 times the target payout if exercised after one year
of vesting. The SARs do not transfer any shareholder rights in
Hindalco to a participant. The SARs are classified as liability
awards and are remeasured at fair value each reporting period
until the SARs are settled.
The performance criterion for vesting is based on the actual
overall Novelis operating earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, as adjusted (adjusted Operating
EBITDA) compared to the target adjusted Operating EBITDA
established and approved each fiscal year. The minimum threshold
for vesting each year is 75% of each annual target adjusted
Operating EBITDA, at which point 75% of the SARs for that period
would vest, with an equal pro rata amount of SARs vesting
through 100% achievement of the target. Given that the
performance criterion is based on an earnings target in a future
period for each fiscal year, the grant date of the awards for
accounting purposes is generally not established until the
performance criterion has been defined. Accordingly, each of the
four tranches associated with the 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP is
deemed granted when the earnings target is determined.
The tables below show the SARs activity under our 2010 LTIP and
2009 LTIP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
14,075,603
|
(A)
|
|
|
87.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(489,061
|
)
|
|
|
85.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
13,586,542
|
|
|
|
87.68
|
|
|
|
6.48
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
20,606,906
|
(A)
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
6.22
|
|
|
|
(B
|
)
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(9,209,152
|
)
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
11,397,754
|
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
5.46
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents total SARs approved by the Board of Directors for
grant. As noted above, due to the performance criterion based on
a future earnings target, the amount deemed granted for
accounting purposes is limited to the individual tranches
subject to an established earnings target, which includes the
current and prior fiscal years. |
|
(B) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is zero as the market value of a
share of Hindalco stock was less than the SAR exercise price. |
17
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The fair value of each SAR is based on the difference between
the fair value of a long call and a short call option. The fair
value of each of these call options was determined using the
Black-Scholes valuation method. We used historical stock price
volatility data of Hindalco on the Bombay Stock Exchange to
determine expected volatility assumptions. The fair value of
each SAR under the 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP was estimated as of
December 31, 2009 using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
51.9 57.1%
|
|
56.9 65.6%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
54.9%
|
|
61.4%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.84%
|
|
0.84%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
6.66 7.25%
|
|
5.38 6.67%
|
Expected life
|
|
3.5 5.0 years
|
|
1.8 3.5 years
|
The fair value of the SARs is being recognized over the
requisite performance and service period of each tranche,
subject to the achievement of any performance criterion. Since
the performance criteria for fiscal years 2011 through 2013 have
not yet been established and therefore, measurement periods for
SARs relating to those periods have not yet commenced, no
compensation expense for those tranches has been recorded for
the nine months ended December 31, 2009. No SARs were
exercisable at December 31, 2009.
In connection with her separation from the Company, we issued
1,000,000 SARs at an exercise price of 60.50 Indian Rupees to
our former President and Chief Operating Officer. We recorded
$2 million of compensation expense in the third quarter
associated with the exercise of these options on
December 3, 2009.
Unrecognized compensation expense related to the non-vested SARs
(assuming all future performance criteria are met) is
$16 million which is expected to be realized over a
weighted average period of 3.78 years.
|
|
8.
|
POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFIT PLANS
|
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans in the U.S., Canada, Switzerland and the U.K.; unfunded
pension plans in Germany; and unfunded lump sum indemnities in
France, South Korea, Malaysia and Italy. Our other
postretirement obligations (Other Benefits, as shown in certain
tables below) include unfunded healthcare and life insurance
benefits provided to retired employees in Canada, the
U.S. and Brazil.
Components of net periodic benefit cost for all of our
significant postretirement benefit plans are shown in the tables
below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Amortization (gains) losses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Curtailment/settlement (gains) losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment/settlement (gains) losses in the previous table do
not include a $3 million curtailment gain related to Norf,
our non-consolidated affiliate, included in Equity in net
(income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates, for the three and
nine months ended December 31, 2009.
18
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Amortization (gains) losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Curtailment/settlement (gains) losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 6.7% in
fiscal 2010.
Employer
Contributions to Plans
For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to
provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to-date,
and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over
periods of 15 years or less. We also participate in savings
plans in Canada and the U.S., as well as defined contribution
pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, Italy,
Switzerland, Malaysia and Brazil. We contributed the following
amounts to all plans, including the Rio Tinto Alcan plans, that
cover our employees (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Funded pension plans
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Unfunded pension plans
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Savings and defined contribution pension plans
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the remainder of fiscal 2010, we expect to contribute an
additional $24 million to our funded pension plans,
$3 million to our unfunded pension plans and
$6 million to our savings and defined contribution plans.
|
|
9.
|
CURRENCY
(GAINS) LOSSES
|
The following currency (gains) losses are included in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net (gain) loss on change in fair value of currency derivative
instruments(A)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Net (gain) loss on remeasurement of monetary assets and
liabilities(B)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in Other (income) expenses, net. |
19
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following currency gains (losses) are included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. (in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment beginning
of period
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment end of
period
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS AND COMMODITY CONTRACTS
|
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009
are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(112
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
(640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included
in Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. |
Net
Investment Hedges
We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to
fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and
investments in our European operations. We had cross-currency
swaps of Euro 135 million as of December 31, 2009
and March 31, 2009, designated as net investment hedges.
The effective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative is included in Other comprehensive income (loss)
(OCI), as a part of Currency translation adjustments. The
ineffective portion of gain or loss on derivatives is included
in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net.
For our currency exchange contracts designated as net investment
hedges, we recognized a $2 million gain and a
$19 million loss in OCI for the three months and nine
months ended December 31, 2009, respectively. We recognized
gains of $50 and $170 million in OCI for the three and nine
months ended December 31, 2008, respectively.
Cash Flow
Hedges
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we designated as
a cash flow hedge of our exposure to fluctuating electricity
prices. The effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative
is included in OCI and is reclassified when we recognize the
underlying exposure into (Gain) loss on change in fair value of
derivatives, net in our accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations. As of December 31, 2009, the
outstanding portion of this swap includes 1.7 million
megawatt hours through 2017.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable-rate
debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included
in OCI and reclassified when settled into Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs in our accompanying
condensed consolidated statements of operations. We
21
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
had $910 million and $690 million of outstanding
interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges as of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or
losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the
life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the
relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will no
longer be designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if
the underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be
probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness
determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the
criteria we established at the inception of the hedge. Gains or
losses recognized to date in Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) (AOCI) would be immediately reclassified into
current period earnings, as would any subsequent changes in the
fair value of any such derivative.
During the next twelve months we expect to realize
$15 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.
The following table summarizes the impact on AOCI and earnings
of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges (in
millions).
Three
Month Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Nine
Month Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in
helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging
instruments. The change in fair value of these derivative
instruments is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the London Metal Exchange (LME) price of
aluminum. These exposures arise from firm commitments to sell
aluminum in future periods at fixed or capped prices, the
forecasted output of our smelter operations in South America and
the
22
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
forecasted metal price lag associated with firm commitments to
sell aluminum in future periods at prices based on the LME. As
of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had 108
kilotonnes (kt) and 180 kt, respectively, of outstanding
aluminum contracts not designated as hedges. We classify cash
settlement amounts associated with these derivatives as part of
investing activities in the condensed consolidated statements of
cash flows.
For certain customers, we enter into contractual relationships
that entitle us to pass-through the economic effect of trading
positions that we take with other third parties on our
customers behalf. We recognize a derivative position with
both the customer and the third party for these types of
contracts and we classify cash settlement amounts associated
with these derivatives as part of operating activities in the
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross-currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain operations. As of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
outstanding currency exchange contracts with a total notional
amount of $1.4 billion that were not designated as hedges.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
interest rates associated with variable-rate debt. As of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
$10 million of outstanding interest rate swaps that were
not designated as hedges.
We use heating oil swaps and natural gas swaps to manage our
exposure to fluctuating energy prices in North America. As of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
0.9 million gallons and 3.4 million gallons,
respectively, of heating oil swaps and 3.3 million MMBTUs
and 3.8 million MMBTUs, respectively, of natural gas that
were not designated as hedges. One MMBTU is the equivalent of
one decatherm, or one million British Thermal Units.
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) associated
with the change in fair value of derivative instruments
recognized in earnings (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
(340
|
)
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
(396
|
)
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
$
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
We record certain assets and liabilities, primarily derivative
instruments, on our condensed consolidated balance sheets at
fair value. We also disclose the fair values of certain
financial instruments, including debt and loans receivable,
which are not recorded at fair value. Our objective in measuring
fair value is to estimate an exit price in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
We consider factors such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and
nonperformance risk, including our own nonperformance risk,
23
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
in measuring fair value. We use observable market inputs
wherever possible. To the extent that observable market inputs
are not available, our fair value measurements will reflect the
assumptions we used. We grade the level of the inputs and
assumptions used according to a three-tier hierarchy:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities that
we have the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which there is
little or no market data, which require us to develop our own
assumptions based on the best information available as what
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The following assets and liabilities are measured and recognized
at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
Liabilities Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(132
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
Liabilities Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(644
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(688
|
)
|
We measure the fair value of the majority of our derivative
contracts using industry-standard models that use observable
market inputs as their basis, such as time value, forward
interest rates, volatility factors, and current (spot) and
forward market prices for foreign exchange rates. We generally
classify these instruments within Level 2 of the valuation
hierarchy. Such derivatives include interest rate swaps,
cross-currency swaps, foreign currency forward contracts and
certain energy-related forward contracts, including natural gas
and heating oil contracts.
We classify the following derivative instruments in Level 3
of the valuation hierarchy. We have a highly customized
electricity contract in a geographic region for which no active
market exists. We value this contract using the observable
market prices of similar contracts for nearby regions. We adjust
these prices to account for geographical differences and
structural differences in the terms of the contract. We also
classify as Level 3 certain foreign exchange forward
contracts between the USD and the KRW for which the remaining
time to maturity on the forward contract extends beyond the
terms of quoted market prices.
We recognized unrealized losses of $2 million related to
Level 3 financial instruments that were still held as of
December 31, 2009. These unrealized gains are included in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net.
24
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table presents a reconciliation of fair value
activity for Level 3 derivative contracts on a net basis
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
Instruments(A)
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
Net realized/unrealized gains included in earnings(B)
|
|
|
17
|
|
Net realized/unrealized gains included in Other comprehensive
income(C)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
11
|
|
Net transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents derivative assets net of derivative liabilities. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(C) |
|
Included in Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges,
net. |
Financial
Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value
The table below presents the estimated fair value of certain
financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis (in millions). The table excludes short-term
financial assets and liabilities for which we believe carrying
value approximates fair value. The fair value of our letters of
credit is based on the availability under such credit agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables from related parties
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.50% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Unsecured credit facility related party, due January
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due December 2019 (CHF 50 million)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 2 million)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Bank loan, due February 2010 (KRW 50 billion)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Bank loan, due May 2009 (KRW 10 billion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due December 2011 through December 2012
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Financial commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
25
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
OTHER
(INCOME) EXPENSES, NET
|
Other (income) expenses, net is comprised of the following (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Exchange (gains) losses, net
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
Gains on the reversal of accrued legal claims
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on tax litigation settlement in Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our
effective tax rates is as follows (in millions, except
percentages).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Pre-tax income (loss) before equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
(1,853
|
)
|
|
$
|
715
|
|
|
$
|
(2,064
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian statutory tax rate
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision at the Canadian statutory rate
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
(640
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) for taxes on income (loss) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
Exchange translation items
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Expense (income) items not subject to tax
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
Enacted statutory tax rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Tax rate differences on foreign earnings
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Uncertain tax positions, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
(196
|
)
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, we had a net deferred tax
liability of $519 million, including deferred tax assets of
approximately $394 million for net operating loss and tax
credit carryforwards. The carryforwards begin expiring in 2010
with some amounts being carried forward indefinitely. As of
December 31, 2009, valuation allowances of
$103 million had been recorded against net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credit
26
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
carryforwards, where it appeared more likely than not that such
benefits will not be realized. Realization is dependent on
generating sufficient taxable income prior to expiration of the
tax attribute carryforwards. Although realization is not
assured, management believes it is more likely than not that all
the remaining net deferred tax assets will be realized. In the
near term, the amount of deferred tax assets considered
realizable could be reduced if we do not generate sufficient
taxable income in certain jurisdictions.
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, we
recognized an increase in unrecognized tax benefits of
$3 million related to tax positions taken in a prior
period. In addition, our income tax provision for the three
months ended December 31, 2009 includes $3 million of
accrued interest on unrecognized tax benefits.
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, we
received a favorable tax ruling resulting in a reduction of our
income tax provision of $4 million.
|
|
14.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Legal
Proceedings
Coca-Cola
Lawsuit. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in Georgia
state court. CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
a soft toll agreement between the parties relating to the supply
of aluminum can stock, and seeks monetary damages in an amount
to be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under
the agreement. The agreement includes a most favored
nations provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS
alleges that Novelis Corporation breached the terms of the
most favored nations provision. The dispute will
likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the
parties and the courts finding as to how certain
provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS
were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would
likely be material. However, we have concluded that a loss from
the CCBSS litigation is not probable and therefore have not
recorded an accrual. In addition, we do not believe that there
is a reasonable possibility of a loss from the lawsuit based on
information available at this time. Novelis Corporation has
filed its answer and the parties are proceeding with discovery
and pre-trial motions.
Environmental
Matters
The following describes certain environmental matters relating
to our business.
We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also
known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions
regarding liability arising from the usage, storage, treatment
or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a number of
sites in the United States, as well as similar proceedings under
the laws and regulations of the other jurisdictions in which we
have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the
European Union. Many of these jurisdictions have laws that
impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, for the costs of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses. In addition, we are, from time to
time, subject to environmental reviews and investigations by
relevant governmental authorities.
As described further in the following paragraph, we have
established procedures for regularly evaluating environmental
loss contingencies, including those arising from such
environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we believe we have made reasonable estimates
of the costs that are likely to be borne by us for these
environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly, we have
established reserves based on our reasonable estimates for the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters. We estimate that the undiscounted remaining
clean-up
costs related to all of our known
27
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
environmental matters as of December 31, 2009 will be
approximately $49 million. Of this amount, $29 million
is included in Other long-term liabilities, with the remaining
$20 million included in Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2009. Management has reviewed the
environmental matters, including those for which we assumed
liability as a result of our spin-off from Rio Tinto Alcan. As a
result of this review, management has determined that the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters will not, individually or in the aggregate, materially
impact our operations or materially adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
With respect to environmental loss contingencies, we record a
loss contingency whenever such contingency is probable and
reasonably estimable. The evaluation model includes all asserted
and unasserted claims that can be reasonably identified. Under
this evaluation model, the liability and the related costs are
quantified based upon the best available evidence regarding
actual liability loss and cost estimates. Except for those loss
contingencies where no estimate can reasonably be made, the
evaluation model is fact-driven and attempts to estimate the
full costs of each claim. Management reviews the status of, and
estimated liability related to, pending claims and civil actions
on a quarterly basis. The estimated costs in respect of such
reported liabilities are not offset by amounts related to
cost-sharing between parties, insurance, indemnification
arrangements or contribution from other potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) unless otherwise noted.
Brazil
Tax Matters
Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America,
as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
cash deposits aggregating approximately $46 million and
$30 million, respectively, in judicial depository accounts
pending finalization of the related cases. The depository
accounts are in the name of the Brazilian government and will be
expended towards these legal proceedings or released to us,
depending on the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are
included in Other long-term assets third parties in
our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In
addition, we are involved in several disputes with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury about various forms of manufacturing taxes
and social security contributions, for which we have made no
judicial deposits but for which we have established reserves
ranging from $7 million to $125 million and
$6 million to $18 million as of December 31,
2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively. In total, these
reserves approximate $146 million and $135 million as
of December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2009,
respectively, and are included in Other long-term liabilities in
our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
On May 28, 2009, the Brazilian government passed a law
allowing taxpayers to settle certain federal tax disputes with
the Brazilian tax authorities, including disputes relating to a
Brazilian national tax on manufactured products, through an
installment program. Under the program, if a company elects to
settle a tax dispute and pay the principal amount due over a
specified payment period (e.g., 60, 120 or 180 months), the
company will receive a discount on the interest and penalties
owed on the disputed tax amount. Novelis joined the installment
program in November of 2009 and notified the Brazilian
government of its election to settle certain federal tax
disputes pursuant to the program.
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including certain
of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and Norf, which is a fifty
percent (50%) owned joint venture that does not meet the
requirements for consolidation.
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no
expiration and have termination notice requirements. Neither we
nor any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates hold
any assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the
potential settlement of these guarantees.
28
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our condensed consolidated financial statements,
all liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term
debt facilities for these entities are already included in our
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness of others as of
December 31, 2009 (in millions). We did not have any
obligations under guarantees of indebtedness related to our
majority-owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
Carrying
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Future Payment
|
|
Value
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Norf
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
|
|
15.
|
SEGMENT,
MAJOR CUSTOMER AND MAJOR SUPPLIER INFORMATION
|
Segment
Information
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America, Europe, Asia and South America.
Adjustment to Eliminate Proportional
Consolidation. The financial information for our
segments includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile the financial information for the segments shown in
the tables below to the relevant GAAP-based measures, we must
remove our proportional share of each line item that we included
in the segment amounts. See Note 5 Investment
in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
Transactions for further information about these
non-consolidated affiliates.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments based on Segment income. Segment income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment income as earnings before (a) depreciation and
amortization; (b) interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs; (c) interest income; (d) unrealized
gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net; (e) impairment of goodwill;
(f) impairment charges on long-lived assets (other than
goodwill); (g) gain on extinguishment of debt;
(h) noncontrolling interests share;
(i) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Segment income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting;
(k) restructuring charges, net; (k) gains or losses on
disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses, net;
(l) other costs, net; (m) litigation settlement, net
of insurance recoveries; (n) sale transaction fees;
(o) provision or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and
(p) cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax.
29
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions).
Selected
Segment Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
America
|
|
Europe
|
|
Asia
|
|
America
|
|
and Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,649
|
|
|
$
|
2,984
|
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
$
|
1,379
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
(327
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,602
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
$
|
1,296
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(234
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
Comparison
of Three Month
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
Europe
|
|
Asia
|
|
America
|
|
and Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
786
|
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
Europe
|
|
Asia
|
|
America
|
|
and Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
$
|
344
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
Comparison
of Nine Month
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
Europe
|
|
Asia
|
|
America
|
|
and Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,375
|
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
$
|
1,098
|
|
|
$
|
691
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
285
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
Europe
|
|
Asia
|
|
America
|
|
and Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,092
|
|
|
$
|
3,048
|
|
|
$
|
1,312
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,238
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
330
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
30
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table shows the reconciliation from income from
reportable segments to Net income attributable to our common
shareholder (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
South America
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Corporate and other(A)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net(B)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
(2,019
|
)
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(2,230
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(1,823
|
)
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
(1,901
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Corporate and other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. It also includes realized gains
(losses) on corporate derivative instruments. |
|
(B) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net represents the portion of gains (losses) that
were not settled in cash during the period. Total realized and
unrealized gains (losses) are shown in the table below and are
included in the aggregate each period in (Gain) loss on change
in fair value of derivative instruments, net on our condensed
consolidated statements of operations. |
31
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses) included in segment income
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
(424
|
)
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
(396
|
)
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
$
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information
about Major Customers and Primary Supplier
The table below shows our net sales to Rexam Plc (Rexam) and
Anheuser-Busch Companies (Anheuser-Busch), our two largest
customers, as a percentage of total Net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Rexam
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Anheuser-Busch
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Rio Tinto Alcan is our primary supplier of metal inputs,
including prime and sheet ingot. The table shows our purchases
from Rio Tinto Alcan as a percentage of our total combined
primary metal purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Purchases from Rio Tinto Alcan as a percentage of total metal
purchases in (kt)
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
16.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of the following
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
Fair value of effective portion of hedges
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Pension and other benefits
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
32
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
17.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
GUARANTOR INFORMATION
|
In connection with the issuance of our 7.25% Senior Notes
and our 11.5% Senior Notes, certain of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries, which are 100% owned within the meaning of
Rule 3-10(h)(1)
of
Regulation S-X,
provided guarantees. These guarantees are full and unconditional
as well as joint and several. The guarantor subsidiaries (the
Guarantors) are comprised of the majority of our businesses in
Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Brazil, Portugal, Luxembourg and
Switzerland, as well as certain businesses in Germany. Certain
Guarantors may be subject to restrictions on their ability to
distribute earnings to Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The remaining
subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not
guarantors of the Senior Notes.
The following information presents condensed consolidating
statements of operations, balance sheets and statements of cash
flows of the Parent, the Guarantors, and the Non-Guarantors.
Investments include investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net assets
of divisions included in the Parent, and have been presented
using the equity method of accounting.
33
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
1,659
|
|
|
$
|
623
|
|
|
$
|
(382
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
|
$
|
1,751
|
|
|
$
|
601
|
|
|
$
|
(430
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,807
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
(2,237
|
)
|
|
|
4,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,836
|
)
|
|
|
(1,918
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
(2,019
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
|
(1,751
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
(1,823
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,751
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,807
|
|
|
$
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
4,936
|
|
|
$
|
1,780
|
|
|
$
|
(1,061
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
4,053
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
(1,061
|
)
|
|
|
5,049
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
131
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
4,427
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
703
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
456
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
(380
|
)
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,038
|
|
|
$
|
6,815
|
|
|
$
|
2,204
|
|
|
$
|
(1,819
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
6,389
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
(1,819
|
)
|
|
|
7,645
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
138
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,857
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,952
|
|
|
|
8,892
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
(3,676
|
)
|
|
|
10,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,914
|
)
|
|
|
(2,077
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
(2,230
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
|
(1,779
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
(1,901
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,779
|
)
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,857
|
|
|
$
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
235
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
(899
|
)
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,714
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2,024
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
|
757
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(1,188
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,948
|
|
|
$
|
6,384
|
|
|
$
|
1,384
|
|
|
$
|
(4,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
425
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
(899
|
)
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,493
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(1,188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
4,683
|
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
|
(2,090
|
)
|
|
|
5,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owners net
investment
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
(2,156
|
)
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Novelis shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,948
|
|
|
$
|
6,384
|
|
|
$
|
1,384
|
|
|
$
|
(4,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(601
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
719
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
5,036
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owners net
investment
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(1,858
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Novelis shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt third party
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt related party
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Principal payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Dividends noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(388
|
)
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
(160
|
)
|
|
$
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of new debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Principal payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following information should be read together with our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report
for a more complete understanding of our financial condition and
results of operations. The following discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and
beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those
discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that
could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are
not limited to, those discussed below, particularly in
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND
MARKET DATA.
OVERVIEW
AND REFERENCES
Novelis is the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and
light gauge products for the beverage and food can,
transportation, construction and industrial, and foil products
markets. As of December 31, 2009, we had operations on four
continents: North America; South America; Asia and Europe,
through 31 operating plants, one research facility and several
market-focused innovation centers in 11 countries. In addition
to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, primary aluminum smelting and
power generation facilities that supply our rolling plants in
Brazil. We are the only company of our size and scope focused
solely on aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local
supply of technologically sophisticated products in all of these
geographic regions.
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein to Rio Tinto
Alcan refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
All tonnages are stated in metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric
tonnes. One MMBTU is the equivalent of one decatherm, or one
million British Thermal Units.
References to our
Form 10-K
made throughout this document refer to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009, filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 29,
2009. We also filed a
Form 8-K
on August 5, 2009 to conform our historical consolidated
financial statements to reflect our adoption as of April 1,
2009 of new accounting guidance related to the presentation of
noncontrolling interests.
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
HIGHLIGHTS
Significant factors that impacted our business for each of the
three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are
presented briefly below. Each is discussed in further detail
throughout the Managements Discussion and Analysis and
Segment Review.
|
|
|
|
|
We reported pre-tax income of $129 million for the three
months ended December 31, 2009, as compared to pre-tax loss
of $2.02 billion for the three months ended
December 31, 2008. The prior year includes non-cash
impairment charges of $1.5 billion, unrealized losses on
derivative instruments of $463 million and restructuring
charges of $15 million. The current quarter results include
$62 million of unrealized gains on derivatives and
$1 million in restructuring charges.
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
We reported pre-tax income of $703 million for the nine
months ended December 31, 2009, as compared to pre-tax loss
of $2.23 billion million for the nine months ended
December 31, 2008. As noted above, the prior year includes
$1.5 billion of impairment charges. Current year results
include $615 million of unrealized gains on derivatives
reflecting gains in metal and currency derivatives as compared
to $664 million of losses in the prior year. The
$615 million of unrealized gains includes a
$489 million reversal of previously recognized losses upon
settlement of derivatives and $126 million of unrealized
gains relating to mark to market adjustments. The results for
the nine months ended December 31, 2008 also include a
$26 million gain on the reversal of a legal claim and
$14 million in restructuring charges, while the nine months
ended December 31, 2009 includes $9 million in gains
related to the reversal of accrued tax and legal claims and
$7 million in restructuring charges.
|
|
|
|
For the first time this year, overall shipments were higher than
the comparable three month period a year ago due to strong
demand in Asia. However, shipments are down 8% from the
comparable nine month period due to more favorable conditions in
the first half of fiscal 2009. Shipments are down 6% from the
second quarter of fiscal year 2010 as our third quarter activity
traditionally reflects market seasonality in the can business,
holiday shutdowns and scheduled maintenance.
|
BUSINESS
AND INDUSTRY CLIMATE
The global economic slowdown negatively impacted our sales and
shipment levels as well as our profitability, operating cash
flows and liquidity. During the last six months of fiscal 2009,
we experienced rapidly declining aluminum prices and sharply
lower end customer demand. However, beverage and food can
shipments, which represent between 50% and 60% of our rolled
products business, stabilized during the first quarter of fiscal
2010 at levels which are only moderately below historical
levels. The impacts were more severe in the construction,
automotive and industrial markets, although conditions have now
also stabilized in those product categories. On a regional
basis, the impacts have been most severe in Europe and North
America.
43
Key
Sales and Shipment Trends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, excepts shipments which are in kt)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,103
|
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,939
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
Percentage increase (decrease) in net sales versus comparable
previous year period
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(37
|
)%
|
|
|
(26
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
Rolled product shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
South America
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverage and food cans
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
All other rolled products
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage increase (decrease)
in rolled products shipments versus
comparable previous year period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
Asia
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
South America
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverage and food cans
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
All other rolled products
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
(33
|
)%
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We took a number of actions to adjust our metal intake, cut back
on production and reduce costs and discretionary spending. These
actions have succeeded in preserving adequate liquidity levels
while lowering our fixed cost structure to a level which allows
us to operate with positive cash flow in the current low demand
environment.
All of these matters are discussed in further detail in
Results of Operations and Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
Business
Model and Key Concepts
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (i) a
pass-through aluminum price based on the London Metal Exchange
(LME) plus local market premiums and (ii) a
conversion premium price on the conversion cost to
produce the rolled product which reflects, among other factors,
the competitive market conditions for that product. Certain of
our sales contracts, most notably in Europe, contain fixed metal
prices for periods of time ranging from four to thirty-six
months.
44
A key component of our conversion model is the use of derivative
instruments on projected aluminum requirements to preserve our
conversion margin. We enter into forward metal purchases
simultaneous with the sales contracts that contain fixed metal
prices. These forward metal purchases directly hedge the
economic risk of future metal price fluctuation associated with
these contracts. The recognition of unrealized gains and losses
on metal derivative positions typically precedes customer
delivery and revenue recognition under the related fixed forward
priced contracts. The timing difference between the recognition
of unrealized gains and losses on metal derivatives and revenue
recognition impacts income (loss) before income taxes and net
income (loss). Gains and losses on metal derivative contracts
are not recognized in segment income until realized.
We also use forward metal purchases, aluminum futures and
options to hedge other exposure to fluctuating metal prices,
including sales contracts with metal price ceilings.
Additionally, we sell short-term LME futures contracts to reduce
our exposure to fluctuating metal prices associated with the
metal price lag.
The average and closing prices based upon the LME for aluminum
for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 and
2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
London Metal Exchange Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum (per metric tonne, and presented in U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing cash price as of beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
|
$
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,365
|
|
|
$
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)%
|
Average cash price during the period
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,830
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,769
|
|
|
$
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
Closing cash price as of end of period
|
|
$
|
2,206
|
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,206
|
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
After reaching a highpoint of $3,292 per tonne in July 2008,
aluminum prices rapidly declined to a low of $1,254 in February
2009, our fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Prices have steadily
increased since that time.
Rapid changes in LME prices have the following impacts on our
business:
|
|
|
|
|
Our products have a price structure based upon the LME price.
Increases or decreases in the LME price have a direct impact on
net sales, cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization) and working capital, albeit on a lag basis.
|
|
|
|
We pay cash to brokers to settle derivative contracts in advance
of billing and collecting cash from our customers, which
negatively impacts our liquidity position. The lag between
derivative settlement and customer collection typically ranges
from 30 to 60 days, which temporarily reduces our liquidity
in periods following declines in LME. During the nine months
ended December 31, 2009, we had net outflows of
$432 million for payments related to the settlement of
derivatives.
|
LME prices have increased 62% from the March 31, 2009
closing price of $1,365 per tonne to $2,206 per tonne at
December 31, 3009 which resulted in $26 million and
$123 million of net gains on change in fair value of metal
derivatives during the three and nine months ended
December 31, 2009, respectively.
Metal
Price Lag
On certain sales contracts we experience timing differences on
the pass through of changing aluminum prices from our suppliers
to our customers. Additional timing differences occur in the
flow of metal costs through moving average inventory cost values
and cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization). In periods of declining prices, our earnings are
negatively impacted by this timing difference while the opposite
is true in periods of rising prices. We refer to this timing
difference as metal price lag. We sell short-term
LME forward contracts to help mitigate our exposure to metal
price lag.
45
Metal
Price Ceilings
Since the spin-off from Alcan in 2005, we had contracts which
contained a ceiling over which metal prices could not be
contractually passed through to certain customers. The last of
these contracts expired on December 31, 2009 and we have
entered into a new multi-year agreement to continue supplying
similar volumes to the same customer. This new agreement became
effective January 1, 2010, and does not contain a metal
price ceiling.
Contracts with metal prices ceilings negatively impacted our
margins when the price we paid for metal was above the ceiling
price contained in these contracts. We calculate and report this
difference to be the difference between the quoted purchase
price on the LME (adjusted for any local premiums and for any
price lag associated with purchasing or processing time) and the
metal price ceiling in our contracts. Cash flows from operations
were also negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted for
any timing difference between customer receipts and vendor
payments, and offset partially by reduced income taxes.
LME prices were below the ceiling price for the first five
months of fiscal 2010, but rose above the ceiling again in
September 2009. For the three and nine months ended
December 31, 2009, we were unable to pass through
$6 million and $10 million, respectively, of metal
purchase costs associated with sales under this contract. For
the three and nine months ended December 31, 2008, we were
unable to pass through approximately $24 and $176 million,
respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales
under this contract.
In connection with the allocation of purchase price (i.e., total
consideration) paid by Hindalco, we established reserves
totaling $655 million as of May 15, 2007 to record
these sales contracts with metal price ceilings at fair value.
These reserves were accreted into net sales over the term of the
underlying contracts. This accretion had no impact on cash flow.
For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009, we
recorded accretion of $45 million and $107 million,
respectively. The three and nine months ended December 31,
2008 included accretion of $53 million and
$125 million, respectively. With the expiration of the last
contract with a price ceiling, the balance of the reserves was
zero at December 31, 2009.
Foreign
Exchange Impact
Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates also impact our operating
results. The following tables present the exchange rates as of
the beginning and end of each period as well as the average
month end exchange rates for the three and nine months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate as of
|
|
|
Average Exchange Rate
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
1.435
|
|
|
|
1.328
|
|
|
|
1.470
|
|
|
|
1.429
|
|
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.743
|
|
|
|
2.301
|
|
|
|
1.774
|
|
|
|
1.874
|
|
South Korean won per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.048
|
|
|
|
1.258
|
|
|
|
1.060
|
|
|
|
1.098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate as of
|
|
|
Average Exchange Rate
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
1.392
|
|
|
|
1.581
|
|
|
|
1.310
|
|
|
|
1.450
|
|
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
2.313
|
|
|
|
1.744
|
|
|
|
2.248
|
|
|
|
1.865
|
|
South Korean won per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.224
|
|
|
|
1.028
|
|
|
|
1.225
|
|
|
|
1.094
|
|
46
The U.S. dollar weakened in the first six months of our
fiscal year, but strengthened as compared to the local currency
in all regions during the three months ended December 31,
2009. In Europe and Asia, strengthening of the U.S. dollar
resulted in foreign exchange losses in the most recent quarter
as these operations are recorded in local currency. In Brazil,
where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, we
incurred small foreign exchange gains as the U.S. dollar
weakened as we have predominantly U.S. dollar selling
prices and local currency operating costs. See Segment Review
for the additional discussion of the impact of foreign exchange
on the results of each region.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
For the three months ended December 31, 2009, we reported
net income attributable to our common shareholder of
$68 million on net sales of $2.11 billion, compared to
the three months ended December 31, 2008 when we reported
net loss attributable to our common shareholder of
$1.81 billion on net sales of $2.18 billion. The prior
year results include pre-tax impairment charges totaling
$1.5 billion, which reflected the deterioration in the
global economic environment and resulting decreases in the
market capitalization of our parent company and valuation of our
publicly traded debt and related increase in our cost of capital.
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
decreased $235 million, or 12%, which reflects metal price
lag, cost deflation and the benefit of our previously announced
restructuring actions. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $26 million, or 36%, primarily due to
the reduction of accrued incentive compensation in the prior
year period as business conditions declined.
The three months ended December 31, 2009 was impacted by
$62 million in unrealized gains on derivative instruments,
as compared to losses of $463 million in the three months
ended December 31, 2008. We also recorded an income tax
provision of $48 million in the three months ended
December 31, 2009, as compared to a $196 million
income tax benefit in the prior year. These items are discussed
in further detail below.
Segment
Review
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America, Europe, Asia and South America.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments based on Segment income. Segment income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment income as earnings before (a) depreciation and
amortization; (b) interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs; (c) interest income; (d) unrealized
gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net; (e) impairment of goodwill;
(f) impairment charges on long-lived assets (other than
goodwill); (g) gain on extinguishment of debt;
(h) noncontrolling interests share;
(i) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Segment income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting;
(k) restructuring charges, net; (k) gains or losses on
disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses, net;
(l) other costs, net; (m) litigation settlement, net
of insurance recoveries; (n) sale transaction fees;
(o) provision or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and
(p) cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax.
47
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions, except shipments which are in kt). For additional
financial information related to our operating segments, see
Note 15 Segment, Major Customer and Major
Supplier Information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
786
|
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
$
|
344
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
three months ended December 31, 2008 to three months ended
December 31, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment income
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Segment income three months ended December 31,
2008
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Conversion costs(A)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Other changes(B)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income three months ended December 31,
2009
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such
as direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage,
alloys and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss.
Fluctuations in this component reflect cost efficiencies during
the period as well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(B) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research and development for all
segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of purchase
accounting and metal price ceiling contracts. Significant
fluctuations in these items are discussed below. |
North
America
As of December 31, 2009, North America manufactured
aluminum sheet and light gauge products through 11 plants,
including two dedicated recycling facilities. Important end-use
applications include beverage cans, containers and packaging,
automotive and other transportation applications, building
products and other industrial applications.
North America experienced a reduction in demand in the second
half of fiscal 2009 as all industry sectors were impacted by the
economic downturn. Shipments in the third quarter of fiscal 2010
were flat as compared to a year ago, and down as compared to the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 due to market seasonality. Net
sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were down
$112 million, or 12%, as compared to the third quarter of
fiscal 2009 as prices under certain can contracts are determined
based on a six month price average and therefore do
48
not reflect the recent increases in LME prices. Can shipments
represent approximately 70% of our flat rolled shipments in
North America.
Segment income for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 period was
$99 million, up $98 million as compared to the prior
year period. Favorable metal price lag, reductions in conversion
costs and improved conversion premiums had a positive impact on
segment income. Conversion cost improvements relate to
reductions in all major cost categories, including energy, melt
loss, production labor, operating expenses and repairs and
maintenance as compared to the prior year period. Other changes
include a $20 million favorable impact related to can price
ceilings, partially offset by a $8 million reduction to the
net favorable impact of acquisition related fair value
adjustments and a $5 million increase in selling, general
and administrative costs.
To consolidate corporate functions and enhance organizational
effectiveness, we announced a plan relocate our North American
headquarters from Cleveland, Ohio to Atlanta, Georgia, where the
Companys corporate offices are located. This move is
expected to occur over the next nine months with a completion
date no later than December 31, 2010. In connection with
the relocation of the North American headquarters, we expect to
incur approximately $21 million in restructuring and other
charges to be recorded in fiscal years 2010 and 2011. Included
in these charges are approximately $6 million in one-time
employee termination costs; approximately $6 million in
other employee related costs, including relocation;
approximately $5 million of expense associated with
contract and lease terminations; and approximately
$4 million of expense associated with asset write-downs and
accelerated depreciation. We recorded $3 million in the
third quarter of fiscal 2010 for severance charges representing
one-time termination benefits under our existing separation
program.
Europe
As of December 31, 2009, our European segment provided
European markets with value-added sheet and light gauge products
through 12 aluminum rolled products facilities and one dedicated
recycling facility. Europe serves a broad range of aluminum
rolled product end-use markets in various applications including
can, automotive, lithographic, foil products and painted
products.
Europe has also experienced a reduction in demand in all
industry sectors with flat rolled shipments and net sales down
5% and 1%, respectively, compared to the prior year. Flat rolled
shipments were down 7% as compared to the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 due to market seasonality and the traditionally low
level of activity in the month of December related to scheduled
plant maintenance and holiday shutdowns.
Segment income for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was
$60 million, up $12 million as compared to
$48 million in the same period of the prior year. Favorable
conversion premiums, metal price lag and small reductions in
conversion costs offset volume reductions for flat rolled
products and the negative impact of foreign exchange
remeasurement. Other changes reflect a favorable impact of
$16 million from fixed forward priced contracts and a
$1 million reduction in selling, general and administrative
costs.
Asia
As of December 31, 2009, Asia operated three manufacturing
facilities with production balanced between foil, construction
and industrial, and beverage and food can end-use applications.
The Asian economies, fueled by government stimulus programs,
have been recovering rapidly since our first quarter of fiscal
2010. We expect growth in Chinas economy to benefit
export-oriented neighboring countries as they participate in
demand for finished goods and infrastructure projects in China.
Flat rolled shipments are up 26% as compared to the prior year
period and have been consistent each quarter this year. We
expect customer demand to continue at these levels for the near
term. Net sales increased $46 million, or 13%, reflecting
the higher volume and improved pricing.
Segment income decreased from $55 million in the third
quarter of fiscal 2009 to $39 million for the third quarter
of fiscal 2010 due to unfavorable metal price lag and foreign
exchange remeasurement, partially offset by the improvements in
volume, conversion premiums and reductions in conversion costs.
49
South
America
Our operations in South America manufacture various aluminum
rolled products for the beverage and food can, construction and
industrial and transportation end-use markets. Our South
American operations included two rolling plants in Brazil along
with two smelters, bauxite mines and power generation facilities
as of December 31, 2009. We ceased the production of
commercial grade alumina at our Ouro Preto facility effective
May 2009 as the decline in alumina prices made alumina
production economically unfeasible. For the foreseeable future,
the plant will purchase alumina through third parties.
Total shipments were flat as compared to the prior year period,
with rolled products shipments down 3%, while net sales
increased 15% as compared to the prior year due to pricing
improvements and increased sales by our primary business. Flat
rolled shipments in South America for the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 were down 10% as compared to the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 due to market seasonality, but can production has
been stable with shipments constant each quarter this fiscal
year. Can shipments represent between 80 and 85% of our flat
rolled shipments in South America.
Segment income for South America decreased $9 million as
compared to the prior year period. This decrease in segment
income is due to a $10 million decrease in the smelter
benefit compared to the prior year period and a $4 million
reduction in the benefit associated with used beverage cans,
included in Other changes in the table above. The benefits from
our smelter operations in South America decline as average LME
prices decrease. While the average LME prices increased in the
third quarter over prior year, the increase occurred during the
month of December when activity was lower.
Reconciliation
of segment results to Net income
Costs such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense
and unrealized gains (losses) on changes in the fair value of
derivatives are not utilized by our chief operating decision
maker in evaluating segment performance. The table below
reconciles income from reportable segments to Net income
attributable to our common shareholder for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
South America
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
(2,019
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(1,823
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
Depreciation and amortization decreased $14 million from
the prior year period due to the reductions in depreciation on
fixed assets. Certain fair value adjustments recorded in
connection with the Arrangement were fully amortized during the
first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt. Approximately 12% of our debt was variable
rate as of December 31, 2009.
Unrealized gains on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the mark to market accounting for changes
in the fair value of our derivatives that do not receive hedge
accounting treatment. For the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the
$62 million of unrealized gains consists of
(1) $21 million reversal of previously recognized
losses upon settlement of derivatives and
(2) $41 million of unrealized gains relating to mark
to market adjustments on metal and currency derivatives. We
recorded $463 million of unrealized losses for the third
quarter of fiscal 2009.
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation was
$2 million of income for the third quarter of fiscal 2010
as compared to a $174 million loss in the third quarter of
fiscal 2009. This adjustment typically relates to depreciation
and amortization and income taxes at our Aluminium Norf GmbH
(Norf) joint venture. Income taxes related to our equity method
investments are reflected in the carrying value of the
investment and not in our consolidated income tax provision. The
adjustment for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 includes a
non-recurring after-tax benefit of $10 million from the
refinement of our methodology for recording depreciation and
amortization on the step up in our basis in the underlying
assets of an investee. The prior year includes a
$160 million pre-tax impairment charge related to our
investment in Norf.
Restructuring charges in the third quarter of fiscal 2009
related to voluntary and involuntary separation programs for
salaried employees in North America and Corporate aimed at
reducing staff levels. The $1 million in restructuring
expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 relates to
$3 million of severance expense associated with the
relocation of our North American headquarters, partially offset
by small adjustments to accruals made for previously announced
restructuring. See Note 2 Restructuring
Programs.
We have experienced significant fluctuations in income tax
expense and the corresponding effective tax rate. The primary
factors contributing to the effective tax rate differing from
the statutory Canadian rate include:
|
|
|
|
|
Our functional currency in Canada and Brazil is the
U.S. dollar and the company holds significant
U.S. dollar denominated debt in these locations. As the
value of the local currencies strengthens and weakens against
the U.S. dollar, unrealized gains or losses are created in
those locations for tax purposes, while the underlying gains or
losses are not recorded in our income statement.
|
During the year ended March 31, 2009, Canadian legislation
was enacted allowing us to elect to determine our Canadian
taxable income in U.S. dollars. Our election was effective
April 1, 2008, and such U.S. dollar taxable gains and
losses no longer exist in Canada as of that date.
|
|
|
|
|
We have significant net deferred tax liabilities in Brazil that
are remeasured to account for currency fluctuations as the taxes
are payable in local currency.
|
|
|
|
Our income is taxed at various statutory tax rates in varying
jurisdictions. Applying the corresponding amounts of income and
loss to the various tax rates results in differences when
compared to our Canadian statutory tax rate.
|
For the three months ended December 31, 2009, we recorded a
$48 million income tax provision on our pre-tax income of
$121 million, before our equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates and noncontrolling interests, which
represented an effective tax rate of 40%. Our effective tax rate
differs from the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the
following factors: (1) $2 million benefit for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) $5 million expense for exchange remeasurement of
deferred income taxes, (3) $3 million increase in
valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain
jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that
we will not be able to utilize those losses and
(4) $6 million expense from an increase in our reserve
for uncertain tax positions.
51
For the three months ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a
$196 million income tax benefit on our pre-tax loss of
$1.9 billion, before our equity in net loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and noncontrolling interests, which
represented an effective tax rate of 11%. Our effective tax rate
differs from the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the
following factors: (1) $64 million benefit for
exchange translation items, (2) $30 million benefit
for exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) a
$23 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
those losses, (4) $22 million increase in expense
items not subject to tax, (5) $11 million expense from
tax rate differences on foreign earnings and
(6) $415 million related to a non-deductible goodwill
impairment charge.
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, we
recognized an increase in unrecognized tax benefits of
$3 million related to tax positions taken in a prior
period. In addition, our income tax provision for the three
months ended December 31, 2009 includes $3 million of
accrued interest on unrecognized tax benefits.
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, we
received a favorable tax ruling resulting in a reduction of our
income tax provision of $4 million.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
COMPARED TO THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
For the nine months ended December 31, 2009, we reported
net income attributable to our common shareholder of
$406 million on net sales of $6.25 billion, compared
to the nine months ended December 31, 2008 when we reported
net loss attributable to our common shareholder of
$1.89 billion on net sales of $8.24 billion. The
reduction in sales is due to 30% lower average LME prices as
well as lower shipments in Europe and North America.
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
decreased $2.6 billion, or 34%, which primarily reflects
lower shipments and metal costs; and the benefit of previously
announced restructuring actions. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased $14 million, or 6%,
primarily due to the increase in accrued incentive compensation
in the current year as compared to the prior year when business
conditions were declining.
The nine months ended December 31, 2009 was impacted by
$615 million in unrealized gains on derivative instruments,
as compared to $664 million of losses in the nine months
ended December 31, 2008. We also recorded an income tax
provision of $247 million in the nine months ended
December 31, 2009, as compared to a $329 million
income tax benefit in the prior year. These items are discussed
in further detail below.
Segment
Review
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions, except shipments which are in kt). For additional
financial information related to our operating segments, see
Note 15 Segment, Major Customer and Major
Supplier Information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,375
|
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
$
|
1,098
|
|
|
$
|
691
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,092
|
|
|
$
|
3,048
|
|
|
$
|
1,312
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,238
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,165
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
nine months ended December 31, 2008 to nine months ended
December 31, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment income
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Segment income nine months ended December 31,
2008
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Conversion costs(A)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Other changes(B)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income nine months ended December 31,
2009
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such
as direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage,
alloys and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss.
Fluctuations in this component reflect cost efficiencies during
the period as well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(B) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research and development for all
segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of purchase
accounting and metal price ceiling contracts. Significant
fluctuations in these items are discussed below. |
North
America
North America has experienced a reduction in demand as most
industry sectors were impacted by the economic downturn. In the
nine months ended December 31, 2009, shipments decreased by
8% as compared to the prior year period. Net sales for the nine
months ended December 31, 2009 were down $717 million,
or 23%, as compared to the prior year period due to a lower
average LME price as well as lower shipments.
Segment income for the nine months ended December 31, 2009
was $231 million, up $186 million as compared to the
prior year period. Reductions in conversion costs, improved
conversion premiums and net favorable metal price lag all had a
positive impact on segment income, more than offsetting volume
reductions. Conversion cost improvements primarily relate to
reduction in energy, melt loss, labor costs and repairs and
maintenance as compared to the prior year period. Other changes
include a favorable $58 million impact of can price ceiling
contracts, offset by a $26 million reduction to the net
favorable impact of acquisition related fair value adjustments,
and $29 million reduction in the benefit from used beverage
cans.
Europe
Europe has experienced a significant reduction in demand in all
industry sectors with flat rolled shipments and net sales down
20% and 30%, respectively, compared to the prior year. The
volume reduction had a
53
$366 million unfavorable impact on net sales, with the
remaining decrease reflecting the impact of lower LME prices.
Segment income for the nine months ended December 31, 2009
was $153 million, down from $221 million in the
comparative period of the prior year. Volume and metal price lag
unfavorably impacted segment income but these impacts were
partially offset by favorable conversion premiums, reductions in
conversion costs and foreign exchange remeasurement. The
favorable impact of conversion costs relates to decreases in
labor and energy costs, as well as a reduction in repair and
maintenance expense and freight as compared to the prior year
period.
Asia
As discussed above, we have seen a recovery in demand in Asia,
driven mostly from China and Korea, with flat rolled shipments
for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 up 12% as
compared to the prior year period. We expect customer demand to
continue at these levels. Net sales decreased $214 million,
or 16%, reflecting the impact of lower LME prices, partially
offset by increases in conversion premiums.
Segment income increased to $125 million for the nine
months ended December 31, 2009 from $83 million in the
prior year period due to improvements in conversion premiums,
conversion costs and foreign exchange remeasurement, partially
offset by unfavorable metal price lag. Conversion cost
improvements primarily relate to reduction in energy, labor
costs and freight as compared to the prior year period.
South
America
Shipments were flat as compared to the prior year period, and
net sales down 14% as compared to the prior year due to lower
LME prices, partially offset by higher conversion premiums and
improved product mix. Can shipments represent between 80 and 85%
of our flat rolled shipments in South America and can production
has been stable with shipments constant year over year.
Segment income for South America decreased $57 million as
compared to the prior year period. This decrease in segment
income is due to a $61 million decrease in the smelter
benefit compared to the prior year period and an
$18 million reduction in the benefit associated with used
beverage cans, included in Other changes in the table above. The
benefits from our smelter operations in South America decline as
average LME prices decrease. While LME prices increased during
the third quarter, the average is still 30% below the prior year
comparative period. Foreign exchange also had an unfavorable
impact on segment income due to the weakening dollar, partially
offset by favorable conversion premiums.
54
Reconciliation
of segment results to Net income
Costs such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense
and unrealized gains (losses) on changes in the fair value of
derivatives are not utilized by our chief operating decision
maker in evaluating segment performance. The table below
reconciles income from reportable segments to Net income
attributable to our common shareholder for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
South America
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(2,230
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
(1,901
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization decreased $45 million from
the prior year period due to the reductions in depreciation on
fixed assets. Certain fair value adjustments recorded in
connection with the Arrangement were fully amortized during the
first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt. Approximately 12% of our debt was variable
rate as of December 31, 2009.
Unrealized gains on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the mark to market accounting for changes
in the fair value of our derivatives that do not receive hedge
accounting treatment. In the nine months ended December 31,
2009, the $615 million of unrealized gains consists of
(1) $489 million reversal of previously recognized
losses upon settlement of these derivatives and
(2) $126 million of unrealized gains relating to mark
to market adjustments. For the nine months ended
December 31, 2008 we recorded $664 million of
unrealized losses.
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation was
$31 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2009 as compared to $210 million in the prior year period.
The prior year amount includes a $160 million pre-tax
impairment charge related to our investment in Norf. The
remainder of the difference primarily relates to the reduction
in depreciation and amortization on the step up in our basis in
the underlying assets of the investees.
Restructuring charges in the nine months ended December 31,
2009 relate to $3 million of severance expense associated
with the relocation of our North American headquarters as well
as a net $4 million of additional expense associated with
previously announced restructuring actions in Europe and North
America.
55
Restructuring charges in fiscal 2009 primarily related to
voluntary and involuntary separation programs for salaried
employees in North America and Corporate. See Note 2
Restructuring Programs.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2009, we recorded a
$247 million income tax provision on our pre-tax income of
$715 million, before our equity in net loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and noncontrolling interests, which
represented an effective tax rate of 35%. Our effective tax rate
differs from the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the
following factors: (1) $18 million expense for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) $41 million expense for exchange remeasurement of
deferred income taxes, (3) $6 million increase in
valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain
jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that
we will not be able to utilize those losses, (4) $6 million
benefit from expense/income items with no tax,
(5) $7 million benefit from differences between the
Canadian statutory and foreign effective tax rates applied to
entities in different jurisdictions and
(6) $19 million benefit from a decrease in uncertain
tax positions.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a
$329 million income tax benefit on our pre-tax loss of
$2.1 billion before our equity in net loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and noncontrolling interests, which
represented an effective tax rate of 16%. Our effective tax rate
differs from the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to the following factors:
(1) $77 million benefit for (a) pre-tax foreign
currency gains or losses with no tax effect and (b) the tax
effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses
with no pre-tax effect, (2) a $51 million benefit for
exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) a
$41 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
those losses, (4) a $28 million increase in expense
items not subject to tax, (5) a $57 million benefit
from differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign
effective tax rates applied to entities in different
jurisdictions and (6) $415 million expense related to
a non-deductible goodwill impairment charge.
During the nine months ended December 31, 2009, the statute
of limitations lapsed with respect to unrecognized tax benefits
related to potential withholding taxes and cross-border
intercompany pricing of services. As a result, we recognized a
reduction in unrecognized tax benefits of $28 million,
including a decrease in accrued interest of $5 million,
recorded as a reduction to the income tax provision in the
consolidated statement of operations. In addition, as disclosed
in Note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements, our income tax provision for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009 reflects the correction of a prior period
error which reduces our income tax provision by $5 million.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We believe we have adequate liquidity to meet our operational
and capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Our primary
sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, borrowing
availability under our revolving credit facility and cash
generated by operating activities. As described in greater
detail below, we completed a debt offering for $185 million
of new senior notes during the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
During the first nine months of fiscal 2010, our liquidity
position increased $244 million despite continued low
levels of demand in the automotive, construction and industrial
markets and net cash outflows to settle derivative positions.
This reflects our continued efforts to preserve liquidity
through cost and capital spending controls and effective
management of working capital. Risks associated with supplier
terms, customer credit and broker hedging capacity, while still
present to some degree, have been managed successfully to date
with minimal negative impact on our business. We expect our
liquidity position to continue to improve during fiscal 2010
primarily due to reduced continued improvements in financial
performance and cash savings from restructuring programs,
partially offset by higher working capital requirements due to
higher LME prices.
Significant declines in the price of aluminum in the second half
of fiscal 2009 had a negative impact on our liquidity position
and increased the effect of timing issues related to the
settlement of aluminum forward contracts versus cash collections
from our customers. We enter into derivative instruments to
hedge forecasted purchases and sales of aluminum. Based on the
aluminum price forward curve as of December 31, 2009, we
56
forecast approximately $27 million of cash inflows related
to the settlement of metal derivative instruments through the
remainder of fiscal 2010.
We have an existing beverage can sheet umbrella agreement with
certain North American bottlers (BCS agreement). Pursuant to the
BCS agreement, an agent for the bottlers directs the can
fabricators to source a percentage of their requirements for
beverage can body, end and tab stock from us.
Under the BCS agreement, the bottlers agent has the right
to request that we hedge the exposure to the price the bottlers
will ultimately pay for aluminum. We treat this arrangement as a
derivative for accounting purposes. Upon receiving such
requests, we enter into corresponding derivative instruments
indexed to the LME price of aluminum with third party brokers.
We settle the positions with the brokers at maturity and net
settle the economic benefit or loss arising from the pricing
requests, which may not occur for up to 13 months.
As of December 31, 2009, we had settled $54 million of
net derivative losses for which we had not yet been reimbursed
under the BCS agreement. Based on the current aluminum price
forward curve, we do not anticipate any further negative impact
on our liquidity as a result of this arrangement. We believe
that collection on these receivables is reasonably certain based
on the credit worthiness of the bottlers, with $30 million
paid in January 2010.
Available
Liquidity
Our estimated liquidity as of December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2009 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Overdrafts
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Gross availability under the ABL facility
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Borrowing availability limitation due to fixed charge coverage
ratio
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated liquidity
|
|
$
|
634
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$252 million. Additionally, we had $475 million in
remaining availability under our revolving credit line and
letter of credit facility (ABL Facility), before covenant
restrictions. Borrowings under the ABL Facility are generally
based on 85% of eligible accounts receivable and 65 to 70% of
eligible inventories. Under the ABL Facility, if our excess
availability, as defined therein, is less than $80 million,
we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1 to 1. As of December 31, 2009, our fixed charge
coverage ratio is less than 1 to 1, resulting in a reduction of
availability under our ABL Facility of $80 million.
The cash and cash equivalents balance above includes cash held
in foreign countries in which we operate. These amounts are
generally available on a short-term basis, subject to regulatory
requirements, in the form of a dividend or inter-company loan.
Operating
Activities
Free cash flow (which is a non-GAAP measure) consists of:
(a) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities;
(b) plus net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities, less (c) proceeds from sales of assets.
Management believes that Free cash flow is relevant to investors
as it provides a measure of the cash generated internally that
is available for debt service and other value creation
opportunities. However, Free cash flow does not necessarily
represent cash available for discretionary activities, as
certain debt service obligations must be funded out of Free cash
flow. Our method of calculating Free cash flow may not be
consistent with that of other companies.
57
The following table shows the Free cash flow for each of the
nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the change
between periods as well as the ending balances of cash and cash
equivalents (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
$
|
(414
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,044
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
Less: Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
(326
|
)
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities for the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 significantly improved as compared to net
cash used in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 due to higher
net income and improved working capital management, including
favorable impacts from customer forfaiting and extended payment
terms from suppliers. Cash flow for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009 benefitted from cash payments of
$39 million related to customer-directed derivatives, as
compared to $12 million for the nine months ended
December 31, 2008.
In our discussion of Metal Price Ceilings, we disclosed that a
customer contract contained a fixed metal price ceiling beyond
which the cost of aluminum could not be passed through to the
customer. For the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, we were unable to pass through approximately
$10 million and $176 million, respectively, of metal
purchase costs associated with sales under this contract. Net
cash provided by operating activities was negatively impacted by
the same amount, adjusted for timing difference between customer
receipts and vendor payments and offset partially by reduced
income taxes for the duration of this contract. This contract
expired on December 31, 2009.
Investing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
$
|
(107
|
)
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Net proceeds (outflow) from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Proceeds from related parties loans receivable, net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
(484
|
)
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the overall economic downturn, we reduced our
capital spending beginning in the second half of fiscal 2009. We
expect that our total annual capital expenditures for fiscal
2010 to be between $90 and $100 million for items necessary
to maintain comparable production, quality and market position
levels (maintenance capital).
The settlement of derivative instruments resulted in an outflow
of $432 million in the nine months ended December 31,
2009 as compared to $160 million in cash contributed in the
prior year period. The net outflow in fiscal 2010 was primarily
related to metal derivatives. Based on the aluminum price
forward curve as of December 31, 2009, we forecast
approximately $27 million of cash inflows related to the
settlement of metal derivative instruments through the remainder
of fiscal 2010. We expect these outflows will be recovered
through collection of customer accounts receivable, typically on
a 30 to 60 day lag.
58
The majority of proceeds from asset sales in the nine months
ended December 31, 2009 relate to asset sales in Europe
while proceeds in fiscal 2009 related to the sale of land in
Kingston, Ontario.
Proceeds from loans receivable, net during all periods are
primarily comprised of payments we received related to a loan
due from our non-consolidated affiliate, Aluminium Norf GmbH.
Financing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by (used in) financing activities (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, third parties
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Principal payments, third parties
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Principal payments, related parties
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
Dividends, noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 11, 2009, we issued $185 million aggregate
principal face amount of 11.5% senior unsecured notes at an
effective rate of 12.0% (11.5% Senior Notes). The
11.5% Senior Notes rank equally with all of our existing
and future unsecured senior indebtedness. The 11.5% Senior
Notes were issued at a discount resulting in gross proceeds of
$181 million. The net proceeds of this offering were used
to repay a portion of the ABL Facility and $95 million
outstanding under the unsecured credit facility from an
affiliate of the Aditya Birla Group. On January 12, 2010,
we consummated the exchange offer required by the registration
rights agreement related to the 11.5% Senior Notes.
As of December 31, 2009, our short-term borrowings were
$61 million consisting of (1) $49 million of
short-term loans under the ABL Facility, (2) a
$6 million short-term loan in Italy and
(3) $6 million in bank overdrafts. As of
December 31, 2009, $21 million of the ABL Facility was
utilized for letters of credit and we had $475 million in
remaining availability under the ABL Facility before covenant
related restrictions. The weighted average interest rate on our
total short-term borrowings was 1.95% and 2.75% as of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
In February 2009, to assist in maintaining adequate liquidity
levels, we entered into an unsecured credit facility of
$100 million (the Unsecured Credit Facility) with a
scheduled maturity date of January 15, 2015 from an
affiliate of the Aditya Birla group. During the nine months
ended December 31, 2009, we drew an additional
$3 million on the Unsecured Credit Facility. As discussed
above, this facility was repaid and retired using the proceeds
from the 11.5% Senior Notes.
As proceeds from the 11.5% Senior Notes was used to repay
existing debt, our borrowing level has remained constant for the
first nine months of fiscal 2010. During the first nine months
of fiscal 2009, we increased our short-term borrowings under the
ABL Facility to provide for general working capital requirements
in a rising aluminum price environment.
As of December 31, 2009, we had an additional
$175 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
not included in the ABL Facility.
59
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In accordance with SEC rules, the following qualify as
off-balance sheet arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain guarantees or contracts;
|
|
|
|
a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an
unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement
that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that
entity for such assets; and
|
|
|
|
any obligation under a material variable interest held by the
registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing,
liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant,
or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development
services with the registrant.
|
The following discussion addresses the applicable off-balance
sheet items for our Company.
Derivative
Instruments
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009
are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(112
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
(640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included
in Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. |
Net
Investment Hedges
We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to
fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and
investments in our European operations. We had cross-currency
swaps of Euro 135 million as of December 31, 2009
and March 31, 2009, designated as net investment hedges.
The effective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative is included in Other comprehensive income (loss)
(OCI), as a part of Currency translation adjustments. The
ineffective portion of gain or loss on derivatives is included
in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net.
For our currency exchange contracts designated as net investment
hedges, we recognized a $2 million gain and a
$19 million loss in OCI for the three months and nine
months ended December 31, 2009, respectively. We recognized
gains of $50 and $170 million in OCI for the three and nine
months ended December 31, 2008, respectively.
Cash Flow
Hedges
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we designated as
a cash flow hedge of our exposure to fluctuating electricity
prices. The effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative
is included in OCI and is reclassified when we recognize the
underlying exposure into (Gain) loss on change in fair value of
derivatives, net in our accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations. As of December 31, 2009, the
outstanding portion of this swap includes 1.7 million
megawatt hours through 2017.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable-rate
debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included
in OCI and reclassified when settled into Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs in our accompanying
condensed consolidated statements of operations. We had
$910 million and $690 million of outstanding interest
rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges as of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
61
For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or
losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the
life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the
relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will no
longer be designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if
the underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be
probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness
determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the
criteria we established at the inception of the hedge. Gains or
losses recognized to date in AOCI would be immediately
reclassified into current period earnings, as would any
subsequent changes in the fair value of any such derivative.
During the next twelve months we expect to realize
$15 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.
The following table summarizes the impact on AOCI and earnings
of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges (in
millions).
Three Month Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Nine
Month Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in
helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging
instruments. The change in fair value of these derivative
instruments is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the London Metal Exchange (LME) price of
aluminum. These exposures arise from firm commitments to sell
aluminum in future periods at fixed or capped prices, the
forecasted output of our smelter operations in South America and
the forecasted metal price lag associated with firm commitments
to sell aluminum in future periods at prices based on the LME.
As of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had 108
kilotonnes (kt) and 180 kt, respectively, of outstanding
aluminum contracts not designated as hedges. We classify cash
settlement amounts associated with these derivatives as part of
investing activities in the condensed consolidated statements of
cash flows.
62
For certain customers, we enter into contractual relationships
that entitle us to pass-through the economic effect of trading
positions that we take with other third parties on our
customers behalf. We recognize a derivative position with
both the customer and the third party for these types of
contracts and we classify cash settlement amounts associated
with these derivatives as part of operating activities in the
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross-currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain operations. As of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
outstanding currency exchange contracts with a total notional
amount of $1.4 billion not designated as hedges.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
interest rates associated with variable-rate debt. As of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
$10 million of outstanding interest rate swaps that were
not designated as hedges.
We use heating oil swaps and natural gas swaps to manage our
exposure to fluctuating energy prices in North America. As of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
0.9 million gallons and 3.4 million gallons,
respectively, of heating oil swaps and 3.3 million MMBTUs
and 3.8 million MMBTUs, respectively, of natural gas that
were not designated as hedges. One MMBTU is the equivalent of
one decatherm, or one million British Thermal Units.
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in
earnings (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
(340
|
)
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
(396
|
)
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
$
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including:
|
|
|
|
|
certain of our wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH, which is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint
venture that does not meet the requirements for consolidation.
|
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
have annual terms subject to renewal while others have no
expiration and have termination notice requirements. For our
majority-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness guaranteed is for
short-term loan, overdraft and other debt facilities with
financial institutions, which are currently scheduled to expire
during the first half of fiscal 2010. Neither Novelis Inc. nor
any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds any
assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the
potential settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our condensed consolidated financial statements,
all liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term
debt facilities for these entities are already included in our
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
63
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness of others as of
December 31, 2009 (in millions). We did not have any
obligations under guarantees of indebtedness related to our
majority-owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Potential Future
|
|
Carrying
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Payment
|
|
Value
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
Other
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in
transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities
(SPEs), which would have been established for the purpose of
facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we are not
involved in any unconsolidated SPE transactions.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
We have future obligations under various contracts relating to
debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases,
long-term purchase obligations, postretirement benefit plans and
uncertain tax positions. As a result of our debt offering in
August 2009, we have updated our debt repayment schedule
presented in Note 6 to the consolidated financial
statements. During the nine months ended December 31, 2009,
there were no other significant changes to these obligations as
reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009.
DIVIDENDS
No dividends have been declared since October 26, 2006.
Future dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors
and will depend on, among other things, our financial resources,
cash flows generated by our business, our cash requirements,
restrictions under the instruments governing our indebtedness,
being in compliance with the appropriate indentures and
covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness
that would allow us to legally pay dividends and other relevant
factors.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
During the three months ended December 31, 2009, there were
no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and
estimates as reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards have been adopted by us
during the nine months ended December 31, 2009.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair
Value, (ASU 2009-05). ASU 2009-05 amends Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements. Specifically, ASU 2009-05 provides
clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in
an active market for the identical liability is not available, a
reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or
more of the following methods: (1) a valuation technique
that uses a) the quoted price of the identical liability
when traded
64
as an asset or b) quoted prices for similar liabilities or
similar liabilities when traded as assets or (2) a
valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of
Topic 820 of the ASC (e.g. an income approach or market
approach). ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that when estimating the
fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to
include inputs relating to the existence of transfer
restrictions on that liability. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB approved its Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) (Codification) as the single source of
authoritative United States accounting and reporting standards
applicable for all non-governmental entities, with the exception
of the SEC and its staff. The Codification which changes the
referencing of financial standards is effective for interim or
annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. As the
codification is not intended to change or alter existing US
GAAP, this standard had no impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 855, Subsequent
Events, (prior authoritative literature: FASB Statement
No. 165, Subsequent Events) which establishes
general standards of accounting and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. This
accounting standard requires the disclosure of the date through
which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis
for that date. This standard had no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements) which establishes
accounting and reporting standards that require: (i) the
ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than
the parent to be clearly identified and presented in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet within shareholders
equity, but separate from the parents equity;
(ii) the amount of condensed consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be
clearly identified and presented on the face of the condensed
consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes in a
parents ownership interest while the parent retains its
controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be accounted
for consistently. We adopted this accounting standard effective
April 1, 2009, and applied this standard prospectively,
except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which
have been applied retrospectively.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets) which
amends the factors that should be considered in developing the
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset. The accounting standard
also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination
of intangible asset useful lives. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, (prior authoritative
literature: FASB Staff Position
No. 107-1
and APB Opinion
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments; FASB Staff Position
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly) which
requires disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods. This codification
also provides additional guidance in determining fair value when
the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has
significantly decreased. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 805, Business
Combinations, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations;
FASB Staff Position No. 141(R)-1, Accounting for
Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business
Combination That Arise from Contingencies)
(ASC 805) which establishes principles and
requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination
(i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes
and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination
or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines
what information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. This standard also requires acquirers to
estimate the acquisition-date fair value of any contingent
65
consideration and to recognize any subsequent changes in the
fair value of contingent consideration in earnings. ASC 805 also
clarifies the initial and subsequent recognition, subsequent
accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising
from contingencies in a business combination. This standard
requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized
at fair value, if the acquisition-date fair value can be
reasonably estimated. We will apply ASC 805 prospectively to
business combinations occurring after March 31, 2009, with
the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on
deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. This standard
amends certain provisions of preexisting tax guidance such that
adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and
acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that
closed prior to the effective date of this business combination
guidance would also apply the provisions of this standard. This
standard had no impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 323,
Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures,
(prior authoritative literature: Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue
No. 08-06,
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations) which
addresses questions that have arisen about the application of
the equity method of accounting for investments acquired after
the effective date of newly issued business combination
standards and non-controlling interest standards. This
accounting standard clarifies how to account for certain
transactions involving equity method investments, and is
effective on a prospective basis. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards have been issued, but
have not yet been adopted by us as of September 30, 2009,
as adoption is not required until future reporting periods.
In June 2009, the FASB issued statement No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(FASB 167). FASB 167 has not been incorporated by the FASB
into the Codification as the guidance is not yet effective and
early adoption is prohibited. FASB 167 is intended (1) to
address the effects on certain provisions of the accounting
standard dealing with consolidation of variable interest
entities, as a result of the elimination of the qualifying
special-purpose entity concept in FASB Statement No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, and
(2) to clarify questions about the application of certain
key provisions related to consolidation of variable interest
entities, including those in which accounting and disclosures do
not always provided timely and useful information about an
enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity.
FASB 167 will be effective for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2009. We do not anticipate this standard will
have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations and cash flows.
In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB issued FSP No. 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan
Assets) which requires that an employer disclose the
following information about the fair value of plan assets:
(1) how investment allocation decisions are made, including
the factors that are pertinent to understanding of investment
policies and strategies; (2) the major categories of plan
assets; (3) the inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure the fair value of plan assets; (4) the effect of
fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on
changes in plan assets for the period; and (5) significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. This pronouncement
will be effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009, with early application permitted. At
initial adoption, application of this standard would not be
required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative
purposes. This standard will have no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do
not apply to our operations.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET
DATA
This document contains forward-looking statements that are based
on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections
about the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and
assumptions made by our
66
management. Such statements include, in particular, statements
about our plans, strategies and prospects. Words such as
expect, anticipate, intend,
plan, believe, seek,
estimate and variations of such words and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. Examples of forward-looking statements in this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
include, but are not limited to, our expectations with respect
to the impact of metal price movements on our financial
performance, our metal price ceiling exposure and the
effectiveness of our hedging programs and controls. These
statements are based on beliefs and assumptions of Novelis
management, which in turn are based on currently available
information. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve assumptions and risks and uncertainties
that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or
forecasted in such forward-looking statements. We do not intend,
and we disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
This document also contains information concerning our markets
and products generally, which is forward-looking in nature and
is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which
these markets and product categories will develop. These
assumptions have been derived from information currently
available to us and to the third party industry analysts quoted
herein. This information includes, but is not limited to,
product shipments and share of production. Actual market results
may differ from those predicted. While we do not know what
impact any of these differences may have on our business, our
results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and the
market price of our securities may be materially adversely
affected. Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to
differ from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking
statements include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash;
|
|
|
|
changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums
associated with such prices) or other materials and raw
materials we use;
|
|
|
|
the capacity and effectiveness of our metal hedging activities,
including our internal used beverage cans (UBCs) and smelter
hedges;
|
|
|
|
relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of,
our customers, suppliers and other stakeholders;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the
areas in which we maintain production facilities;
|
|
|
|
our ability to access financing for future capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
continuing obligations and other relationships resulting from
our spin-off from Rio Tinto Alcan;
|
|
|
|
changes in the relative values of various currencies and the
effectiveness of our currency hedging activities;
|
|
|
|
factors affecting our operations, such as litigation,
environmental remediation and
clean-up
costs, labor relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment
and other events;
|
|
|
|
the impact of restructuring efforts in the future;
|
|
|
|
economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries
in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in
duties or tariffs;
|
|
|
|
competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as
well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic
and composite materials;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions including further
deterioration in the global economy, particularly sectors in
which our customers operate;
|
|
|
|
our ability to improve and maintain effective internal control
over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures
in the future;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments;
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our
products as well as seasonality in certain of our
customers industries;
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting
taxes, environmental, health or safety compliance;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the
amounts we pay under our principal credit agreement and other
financing agreements; and
|
|
|
|
the effect of taxes and changes in tax rates.
|
The above list of factors is not exhaustive. Some of these and
other factors are discussed in more detail under
Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, in our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing
business operations, including risks from changes in commodity
prices (primarily aluminum, electricity and natural gas),
foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates that could
impact our results of operations and financial condition. We
manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities and derivative
financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments
as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes.
Except where noted, the derivative contracts are
marked-to-market
and the related gains and losses are included in earnings in the
current accounting period.
By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve
risk, including the credit risk of non-performance by
counterparties. All derivative contracts are executed with
counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our
maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in the
accompanying December 31, 2009 condensed consolidated
balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions and the
relative costs of the instruments. The duration is always linked
to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection
between the two being regularly monitored.
Commodity
Price Risks
We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of
certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity and
natural gas.
Aluminum
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model that
allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the price of
aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products have a
price structure with two components: (i) a pass through
aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and
(ii) a conversion premium based on the
conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the
competitive market conditions for that product.
When we enter into agreements with our customers that fix the
selling price of our products for future delivery, we are
exposed to rising aluminum prices. We may not be able to
purchase the aluminum necessary to fulfill the order at the same
price which we have committed to our customer. We hedge this
risk by purchasing LME futures contracts. We expect the gain or
loss on the settlement of the derivative to offset increases or
decreases in the purchase price of aluminum. These hedges, which
comprise the majority of our aluminum derivatives, generate
losses in periods of decreasing aluminum prices.
Metal price lag exposes us to potential losses in periods of
falling aluminum prices. We sell short-term LME futures
contracts to reduce our exposure to this risk. We expect the
gain or loss on the settlement of the
68
derivative to offset the effect of changes in aluminum prices on
future product sales. These hedges generally generate losses in
periods of increasing aluminum prices.
Sensitivities
We estimate that a 10% decline in LME aluminum prices would
result in a $23 million pre-tax loss related to the change
in fair value of our aluminum contracts as of December 31,
2009.
Energy
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. In the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, natural gas and electricity represented
approximately 89% of our energy consumption by cost. We also use
fuel oil and transport fuel. The majority of energy usage occurs
at our casting centers, at our smelters in South America and
during the hot rolling of aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities
require relatively less energy.
We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which subjects
us to market pricing fluctuations. We seek to stabilize our
future exposure to natural gas prices through the use of forward
purchase contracts. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South
America have historically been more stable than in the United
States. As of December 31, 2009, we have a nominal amount
of forward purchases outstanding related to natural gas.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs. In South America,
we own and operate hydroelectric facilities that meet
approximately 25% of our total electricity requirements in that
segment. Additionally, we have entered into an electricity swap
in North America to fix a portion of the cost of our electricity
requirements.
We purchase a nominal amount of heating oil forward contracts to
hedge against fluctuations in the price of our transport fuel.
Fluctuating energy costs worldwide, due to the changes in supply
and international and geopolitical events, expose us to earnings
volatility as such changes in such costs cannot immediately be
recovered under existing contracts and sales agreements, and may
only be mitigated in future periods under future pricing
arrangements.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2009, given a 10% decline in spot prices for
energy contracts ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Heating Oil
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risks
Exchange rate movements, particularly the euro, the Brazilian
real and the Korean won against the U.S. dollar, have an
impact on our operating results. In Europe, where we have
predominantly local currency selling prices and operating costs,
we benefit as the euro strengthens, but are adversely affected
as the euro weakens. In Korea, where we have local currency
selling prices for local sales and U.S. dollar denominated
selling prices for exports, we benefit slightly as the won
weakens, but are adversely affected as the won strengthens, due
to a slightly higher percentage of exports compared to local
sales. In Brazil, where we have predominately U.S. dollar
selling prices, metal costs and local currency operating costs,
we benefit as the local
69
currency weakens, but are adversely affected as the local
currency strengthens. Foreign currency contracts may be used to
hedge the economic exposures at our foreign operations.
It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures
within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the
majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either
forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in
non-functional currencies. Our most significant
non-U.S. dollar
functional currency operating segments are Europe and Asia,
which have the euro and the Korean won as their functional
currencies, respectively. South America is U.S. dollar
functional with Brazilian real transactional exposure.
We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign
operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
Shareholders equity section of the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Net sales and expenses in our
foreign operations foreign currencies are translated into
varying amounts of U.S. dollars depending upon whether the
U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens against other
currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may either
positively or negatively affect our net sales and expenses from
foreign operations as expressed in U.S. dollars.
Any negative impact of currency movements on the currency
contracts that we have entered into to hedge foreign currency
commitments to purchase or sell goods and services would be
offset by an equal and opposite favorable exchange impact on the
commitments being hedged. For a discussion of accounting
policies and other information relating to currency contracts,
see Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies and Note 11 Financial
Instruments and Commodity Contracts.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2009, given a 10% change in rates ($ in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian real
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Korean won
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Canadian dollar
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
British pound
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
Swiss franc
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Loans to and investments in European operations have been hedged
with EUR 135 million of cross-currency swaps. We
designated these as net investment hedges. While this has no
impact on our cash flows, subsequent changes in the value of
currency related derivative instruments that are not designated
as hedges are recognized in Gain (loss) on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in our condensed consolidated
statement of operations.
We estimate that a 10% increase in the value of the euro against
the US Dollar would result in an $18 million potential
pre-tax loss on these derivatives as of December 31, 2009.
Interest
Rate Risks
As of December 31, 2009, approximately 88% of our debt
obligations were at fixed rates. Due to the nature of fixed-rate
debt, there would be no significant impact on our interest
expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase or decrease in
market rates of interest.
We are subject to interest rate risk related to our floating
rate debt. For every 12.5 basis point increase in the
interest rates on our outstanding variable rate debt as of
December 31, 2009, which includes $234 million of term
loan debt and other variable rate debt of $97 million, our
annual pre-tax income would be reduced by
70
approximately $1 million. From time to time, we have used
interest rate swaps to manage our debt cost. In Korea, we
entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate on
various floating rate debt. See Note 6 Debt for
further information.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2009, given a 10% change in the benchmark USD
LIBOR interest rate ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Interest Rate Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other
procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed
or submitted under the United States Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is (1) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and
(2) accumulated and communicated to management, including
the principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2009, members of
management, at the direction (and with the participation) of our
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2009. Based on
that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as
of December 31, 2009, because of the material weakness in
our internal control over financial reporting discussed below.
Notwithstanding the material weakness described below, our
management has concluded that the Companys unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
report are fairly stated, in all material respects, in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America (GAAP).
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we implemented a new
enterprise resource planning (ERP) system in our South America
region that replaced the majority of business and financial
systems in that region. Given the high degree of integration
among the various modules of this software application, the new
ERP system will provide a platform for standardizing and
improving business and financial processes and controls across
the region. We have updated our control documentation to reflect
the new system and the related impact on our business processes,
and we believe that we have designed adequate controls into and
around the new system. In addition, we conducted a physical
inventory observation to validate cut-off of sales and cost of
goods sold for the third quarter period, and we performed
significant procedures to review and reconcile financial
activity for the third quarter.
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act), other than the item noted above, during
the period covered by this report that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
71
Material
Weakness Existing as of December 31, 2009 and Remediation
Plan
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of
control deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. As of December 31, 2009, we did not maintain
effective controls over the application of purchase accounting
for an equity method investee including related income tax
accounts. Specifically, our controls did not ensure the accuracy
and validity of our purchase accounting adjustments for an
equity method investee. This control deficiency resulted in
adjustments affecting the period May, 15, 2007 through
March 31, 2008 identified in Note 3
Restatement of Financial Statements in the consolidated and
combined financial statements included in our
Form 10-K/A
filed with the SEC on August 11, 2008. During the execution
of our remediation plan in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we
identified an immaterial error as described in Note 1
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Reclassifications and Adjustment which
impacted our consolidated and interim financial statements
included in previously filed
Forms 10-Q
and
Forms 10-K
for fiscal 2008 and 2009.
Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a material
misstatement of our Investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates and Equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates in the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements that would result in a
material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim
consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or
detected. Accordingly, management has determined that this
control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.
Our plan for remediating this material weakness includes the
following:
1. We conducted a full review of the purchase accounting
for the Hindalco acquisition, including a review of the
valuation approach, as well as the related accounting for equity
method investees and related income tax accounts. This review
was conducted by the Principal Financial Officer, corporate and
regional financial officers, corporate and regional tax
personnel, and the Companys external valuation expert.
This aspect of our remediation plan has been completed.
2. Management re-evaluated all accounting and financial
reporting controls for purchase accounting and equity method
investees, including related income tax accounts. This aspect of
our remediation plan has been completed.
3. Training sessions were conducted for key financial and
tax personnel regarding equity method accounting and related
income tax accounting matters. This aspect of our remediation
plan has been completed.
4. Management has transitioned certain purchase accounting
responsibilities to our regional financial personnel, including
tax personnel, and is developing procedures to monitor the
ongoing activity of this entity. This aspect of our remediation
plan is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2010.
72
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Coca-Cola
Lawsuit. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in Georgia
state court. CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
a soft toll agreement between the parties relating to the supply
of aluminum can stock, and seeks monetary damages in an amount
to be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under
the agreement. The agreement includes a most favored
nations provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS
alleges that Novelis Corporation breached the terms of the
most favored nations provision. The dispute will
likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the
parties and the courts finding as to how certain
provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS
were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would
likely be material. However, we have concluded that a loss from
the CCBSS litigation is not probable and therefore have not
recorded an accrual. In addition, we do not believe that there
is a reasonable possibility of a loss from the lawsuit based on
information available at this time. Novelis Corporation has
filed its answer and the parties are proceeding with discovery
and pre-trial motions.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited,
AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10,
2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 13, 2007) (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws, adopted as of July 24, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on July 25, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Indenture, relating to the
111/2% Senior
Notes due 2015, dated as of August 11, 2009, between
Novelis Inc., the guarantors named on the signature pages
thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 17, 2009).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of
111/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.1).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
73
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NOVELIS INC.
Steven Fisher
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Authorized Officer)
Robert P. Nelson
Vice President Finance Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: February 16, 2010
74
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited,
AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10,
2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 13, 2007) (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws, adopted as of July 24, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on July 25, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Indenture, relating to the
111/2% Senior
Notes due 2015, dated as of August 11, 2009, between
Novelis Inc., the guarantors named on the signature pages
thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 17, 2009).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of
111/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.1).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
75