UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
    EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    Washington, D.C.
    20549
 
    Form 10-Q
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
| (Mark One) |  |  | 
| 
    þ
 |  | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | 
|  |  | For the quarterly period ended
    December 31, 2007 | 
|  |  | or | 
| 
    o
 |  | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | 
|  |  | For the transition period
    from          to          . | 
 
    Commission file number:
    001-32312
 
    Novelis Inc.
    (Exact name of registrant as
    specified in its charter)
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
| Canada (State or other jurisdiction
    of
 incorporation or organization)
 |  | 98-0442987 (I.R.S. employer
 identification number)
 | 
|  |  |  | 
| 3399 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 1500 Atlanta, Georgia
 (Address of principal
    executive offices)
 |  | 30326 (Zip
    Code)
 | 
 
    Telephone:
    (404) 814-4200
    (Registrants telephone
    number, including area code)
 
 
    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
    filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
    preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
    registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
    been subject to such filing requirements for the past
    90 days.  Yes þ     No o
    
 
    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
    accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
    filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
    large accelerated filer, accelerated
    filer and smaller reporting company in
    Rule 12b-2
    of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Large accelerated
    filer þ
    
 |  | Accelerated
    filer o |  | Non-accelerated
    filer o |  | Smaller reporting
    company o | 
 
    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
    (as defined in
    Rule 12b-2
    of the Exchange
    Act).  Yes o     No þ
    
 
    As of January 31, 2008, the registrant had 77,459,658
    common shares outstanding.
 
 
 
 
 
    TABLE OF
    CONTENTS
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | FINANCIAL INFORMATION |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Financial Statements |  |  | 2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
    and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited) Three Months Ended
    December 31, 2007 and 2006; May 16, 2007 Through
    December 31, 2007; April 1, 2007 Through May 15,
    2007; and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2006 |  |  | 2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
    As of December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007 |  |  | 3 |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (unaudited) May 16, 2007 Through December 31, 2007;
    April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007; and Nine Months
    Ended December 31, 2006 |  |  | 4 |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of
    Shareholders Equity (unaudited) April 1, 2007 Through
    May 15, 2007 and May 16, 2007 Through
    December 31, 2007 |  |  | 5 |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
    Statements (unaudited) |  |  | 6 |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of
    Financial Condition and Results of Operations |  |  | 59 |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
    Market Risk |  |  | 94 |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Controls and Procedures |  |  | 98 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | OTHER INFORMATION |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Legal Proceedings |  |  | 100 |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Exhibits |  |  | 102 |  | 
| EX-10.6 AGREEMENT REGARDING TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT | 
| EX-10.7 SEPARATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT | 
| EX-18.1 PREFERABILITY LETTER ISSUED BY PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP | 
| EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER | 
| EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER | 
| EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER | 
| EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER | 
    
    1
 
 
    PART I.
    FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 1. | Financial
    Statements | 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
 
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
    COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (unaudited)
    (in millions, except per share amounts)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months Ended 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | December 31, 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 2,735 |  |  |  | $ | 2,472 |  |  | $ | 7,103 |  |  |  | $ | 1,281 |  |  | $ | 7,530 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
    shown below)
 |  |  | 2,475 |  |  |  |  | 2,386 |  |  |  | 6,466 |  |  |  |  | 1,205 |  |  |  | 7,182 |  | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | 99 |  |  |  |  | 117 |  |  |  | 229 |  |  |  |  | 95 |  |  |  | 318 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 105 |  |  |  |  | 59 |  |  |  | 260 |  |  |  |  | 28 |  |  |  | 175 |  | 
| 
    Research and development expenses
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 34 |  |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 31 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | 47 |  |  |  |  | 57 |  |  |  | 128 |  |  |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | 158 |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | 50 |  |  |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | 72 |  |  |  |  | (20 | ) |  |  | (9 | ) | 
| 
    Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | 9 |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (13 | ) | 
| 
    Sale transaction fees
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net
 |  |  | (11 | ) |  |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | (6 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 2,780 |  |  |  |  | 2,612 |  |  |  | 7,191 |  |  |  |  | 1,375 |  |  |  | 7,836 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income
    (loss) and minority interests share
 |  |  | (45 | ) |  |  |  | (140 | ) |  |  | (88 | ) |  |  |  | (94 | ) |  |  | (306 | ) | 
| 
    Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  | (34 | ) |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | (106 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income (loss) before minority interests share
 |  |  | (49 | ) |  |  |  | (106 | ) |  |  | (92 | ) |  |  |  | (98 | ) |  |  | (200 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | (1 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  |  | (49 | ) |  |  |  | (105 | ) |  |  | (90 | ) |  |  |  | (97 | ) |  |  | (201 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other comprehensive income (loss)  net of tax
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Currency translation adjustment
 |  |  | 40 |  |  |  |  | 63 |  |  |  | 68 |  |  |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | 131 |  | 
| 
    Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges 
    net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (16 | ) |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (39 | ) | 
| 
    Postretirement benefit plans Amortization of net actuarial loss
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Change in minimum pension liability
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other comprehensive income (loss)  net of tax
 |  |  | 40 |  |  |  |  | 63 |  |  |  | 70 |  |  |  |  | 33 |  |  |  | 104 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Comprehensive income (loss)
 |  | $ | (9 | ) |  |  | $ | (42 | ) |  | $ | (20 | ) |  |  | $ | (64 | ) |  | $ | (97 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Dividends per common share
 |  | $ | 0.00 |  |  |  | $ | 0.01 |  |  | $ | 0.00 |  |  |  | $ | 0.00 |  |  | $ | 0.11 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    2
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
 
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
    (in millions, except number of shares)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | As of |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  |  | March 31, 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    ASSETS
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents
 |  | $ | 133 |  |  |  | $ | 128 |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $1 as of
    December 31, 2007 and $29 as of March 31, 2007)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 1,335 |  |  |  |  | 1,350 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | 29 |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 
| 
    Inventories
 |  |  | 1,441 |  |  |  |  | 1,483 |  | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 |  |  | 48 |  |  |  |  | 39 |  | 
| 
    Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
 |  |  | 54 |  |  |  |  | 92 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax assets
 |  |  | 6 |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current assets
 |  |  | 3,046 |  |  |  |  | 3,136 |  | 
| 
    Property, plant and equipment  net
 |  |  | 3,372 |  |  |  |  | 2,106 |  | 
| 
    Goodwill
 |  |  | 2,174 |  |  |  |  | 239 |  | 
| 
    Intangible assets  net
 |  |  | 873 |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 
| 
    Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
 |  |  | 920 |  |  |  |  | 153 |  | 
| 
    Fair value of derivative instruments  net of current
    portion
 |  |  | 10 |  |  |  |  | 55 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax assets
 |  |  | 7 |  |  |  |  | 102 |  | 
| 
    Other long-term assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 92 |  |  |  |  | 105 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | 42 |  |  |  |  | 54 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total assets
 |  | $ | 10,536 |  |  |  | $ | 5,970 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current portion of long-term debt
 |  | $ | 14 |  |  |  | $ | 143 |  | 
| 
    Short-term borrowings
 |  |  | 245 |  |  |  |  | 245 |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 1,323 |  |  |  |  | 1,614 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | 60 |  |  |  |  | 49 |  | 
| 
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 |  |  | 881 |  |  |  |  | 480 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax liabilities
 |  |  | 70 |  |  |  |  | 73 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current liabilities
 |  |  | 2,593 |  |  |  |  | 2,604 |  | 
| 
    Long-term debt  net of current portion
 |  |  | 2,559 |  |  |  |  | 2,157 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax liabilities
 |  |  | 685 |  |  |  |  | 103 |  | 
| 
    Accrued postretirement benefits
 |  |  | 413 |  |  |  |  | 427 |  | 
| 
    Other long-term liabilities
 |  |  | 659 |  |  |  |  | 352 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 6,909 |  |  |  |  | 5,643 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Commitments and contingencies
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates
 |  |  | 150 |  |  |  |  | 152 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Shareholders equity
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Common stock, no par value; unlimited number of shares
    authorized; 77,459,658 and 75,357,660 shares issued and
    outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and March 31,
    2007, respectively
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Additional paid-in capital
 |  |  | 3,497 |  |  |  |  | 428 |  | 
| 
    Accumulated deficit
 |  |  | (90 | ) |  |  |  | (263 | ) | 
| 
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
 |  |  | 70 |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shareholders equity
 |  |  | 3,477 |  |  |  |  | 175 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities and shareholders equity
 |  | $ | 10,536 |  |  |  | $ | 5,970 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    3
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
 
    (unaudited) (in millions)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | December 31, 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (90 | ) |  |  | $ | (97 | ) |  | $ | (201 | ) | 
| 
    Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in)
    operating activities:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 260 |  |  |  |  | 28 |  |  |  | 175 |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | 72 |  |  |  |  | (20 | ) |  |  | (9 | ) | 
| 
    Deferred income taxes
 |  |  | (46 | ) |  |  |  | (18 | ) |  |  | (159 | ) | 
| 
    Amortization of debt issuance costs
 |  |  | 8 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 11 |  | 
| 
    Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments 
    net
 |  |  | (156 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
 |  |  | 9 |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (13 | ) | 
| 
    Dividends from non-consolidated affiliates
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Share-based compensation
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on sales of businesses, investments and
    assets  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (20 | ) | 
| 
    Changes in assets and liabilities (net of effects from
    acquisitions and divestitures):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 76 |  |  |  |  | (21 | ) |  |  | (55 | ) | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Inventories
 |  |  | 190 |  |  |  |  | (76 | ) |  |  | (66 | ) | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | 40 |  | 
| 
    Other long-term assets
 |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | 7 |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | (260 | ) |  |  |  | (62 | ) |  |  | 235 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | 7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 
| 
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 |  |  | (53 | ) |  |  |  | 42 |  |  |  | (65 | ) | 
| 
    Accrued postretirement benefits
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | (37 | ) | 
| 
    Other long-term liabilities
 |  |  | 17 |  |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | 57 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
 |  |  | 31 |  |  |  |  | (230 | ) |  |  | (79 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | (120 | ) |  |  |  | (17 | ) |  |  | (95 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from sales of assets
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36 |  | 
| 
    Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
    affiliates
 |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from loans receivable  net 
    related parties
 |  |  | 12 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 
| 
    Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
 |  |  | 56 |  |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 167 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
 |  |  | (43 | ) |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 139 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock
 |  |  | 92 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of debt
 |  |  | 1,100 |  |  |  |  | 150 |  |  |  | 41 |  | 
| 
    Principal repayments
 |  |  | (1,005 | ) |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (241 | ) | 
| 
    Short-term borrowings  net
 |  |  | (103 | ) |  |  |  | 60 |  |  |  | 97 |  | 
| 
    Dividends
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     common shareholders
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (8 | ) | 
| 
     minority interests
 |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | (2 | ) | 
| 
    Net receipts from Alcan
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
    Debt issuance costs
 |  |  | (37 | ) |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (10 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 |  |  | 46 |  |  |  |  | 201 |  |  |  | (116 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 |  |  | 34 |  |  |  |  | (27 | ) |  |  | (56 | ) | 
| 
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
    foreign currencies
 |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents  beginning of period
 |  |  | 102 |  |  |  |  | 128 |  |  |  | 124 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents  end of period
 |  | $ | 133 |  |  |  | $ | 102 |  |  | $ | 73 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Interest paid
 |  | $ | 122 |  |  |  | $ | 13 |  |  | $ | 125 |  | 
| 
    Income taxes paid
 |  |  | 50 |  |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | 56 |  | 
| 
    Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
    activities related to the Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock
    (Note 2):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Property, plant and equipment
 |  | $ | (1,346 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Goodwill
 |  |  | (1,933 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Intangible assets
 |  |  | (883 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
 |  |  | (775 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Debt
 |  |  | 70 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
    activities related to the spin-off transaction and post closing
    adjustments:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Additional paid-in capital
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | (43 | ) | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    4
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
 
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
    (unaudited)
    (in millions, except number of shares)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Additional 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Other 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Common Stock |  |  | Paid-in 
 |  |  | Accumulated 
 |  |  | Comprehensive 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Shares |  |  | Amount |  |  | Capital |  |  | Deficit |  |  | Income (Loss) |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Predecessor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance as of March 31, 2007
 |  |  | 75,357,660 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 428 |  |  | $ | (263 | ) |  | $ | 10 |  |  | $ | 175 |  | 
| 
    Activity April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net loss
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (97 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (97 | ) | 
| 
    Issuance of common stock from the exercise of stock options
 |  |  | 57,876 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Conversion of share-based compensation plans from equity-based
    plans to liability-based plans
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (7 | ) | 
| 
    Currency translation adjustment
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | 35 |  | 
| 
    Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges 
    net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) | 
| 
    Postretirement benefit plans
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Amortization of net actuarial loss
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  | 75,415,536 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 422 |  |  | $ | (360 | ) |  | $ | 43 |  |  | $ | 105 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
|  | 
| 
    Successor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance as of May 16, 2007
 |  |  | 75,415,536 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 3,405 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 3,405 |  | 
| 
    Activity May 16, 2007 Through December 31, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net loss
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (90 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (90 | ) | 
| 
    Issuance of common stock
 |  |  | 2,044,122 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 92 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 92 |  | 
| 
    Currency translation adjustment
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68 |  |  |  | 68 |  | 
| 
    Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges 
    net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance as of December 31, 2007
 |  |  | 77,459,658 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 3,497 |  |  | $ | (90 | ) |  | $ | 70 |  |  | $ | 3,477 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    5
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)
 
    |  |  | 
    | 1. | Business
    and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 
 
    References herein to Novelis, the
    Company, we, our, or
    us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries as
    both Predecessor and Successor (as defined below) unless the
    context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein to
    Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited.
    References herein to Alcan refer to Rio Tinto Alcan
    Inc.
 
    Change in
    Fiscal Year End
 
    On June 26, 2007, our board of directors approved the
    change of our fiscal year end to March 31 from December 31.
    On June 28, 2007, we filed a Transition Report on
    Form 10-Q
    for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 with the
    United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant
    to
    Rule 13a-10
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for transition period
    reporting. Accordingly, these unaudited condensed consolidated
    financial statements are presented on the basis of our new
    fiscal year end of March 31.
 
    Description
    of Business and Basis of Presentation
 
    Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
    its subsidiaries is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
    products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
    sheet and light gauge products where the end-use destination of
    the products includes the construction and industrial, beverage
    and food cans, foil products and transportation markets. As of
    December 31, 2007, we had operations on four continents:
    North America; Europe; Asia and South America, through 33
    operating plants and three research facilities in 11 countries.
    In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our South
    American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining,
    primary aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that
    are integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil.
 
    These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
    should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated and
    combined financial statements included in our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on
    March 1, 2007, as amended on April 30, 2007. These
    unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
    prepared pursuant to SEC
    Rule 10-01
    of
    Regulation S-X.
    Certain information and note disclosures normally included in
    annual financial statements prepared in accordance with
    generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
    America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those
    rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures
    made herein are adequate to make the information not misleading.
 
    The unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations and
    comprehensive income (loss) and statement of cash flows for the
    nine months ended December 31, 2006 have been derived from
    the audited consolidated financial statements included in our
    previously filed Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006 and from the unaudited
    condensed consolidated financial statements included in our
    previously filed Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q
    for the period ended March 31, 2006, as such nine month
    period was not previously reported.
 
    Predecessor
    and Successor Reporting
 
    Our acquisition by Hindalco (see Note 2 
    Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock) was recorded in accordance
    with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 103, Push Down
    Basis of Accounting Required in Certain Limited Circumstances.
    In the accompanying December 31, 2007 condensed
    consolidated balance sheet, the consideration and related costs
    paid by Hindalco in connection with the acquisition have been
    pushed down to us and have been allocated to the
    assets acquired and liabilities assumed in accordance with
    Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement
    No. 141, Business Combinations. Due to the impact of
    push down accounting, the Companys condensed consolidated
    financial statements and certain note presentations
    
    6
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 are presented
    in two distinct periods to indicate the application of different
    bases of accounting between the periods presented: (1) the
    period up to, and including, the acquisition date (April 1,
    2007 through May 15, 2007, labeled Predecessor)
    and (2) the period after that date (May 16, 2007
    through December 31, 2007, labeled Successor).
    The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
    statements include a black line division which indicates that
    the Predecessor and Successor reporting entities shown are not
    comparable.
 
    The unaudited results of operations for the interim periods
    shown in these condensed consolidated financial statements,
    including the periods shown as Predecessor and Successor, are
    not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire
    fiscal year. In the opinion of management, the accompanying
    unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements recognize
    all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered
    necessary to fairly state our consolidated financial position,
    results of operations, cash flows and changes in
    shareholders equity for the periods presented.
 
    Change in
    Impairment Testing Date
 
    During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, we changed our
    method of applying FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and
    Other Intangible Assets by changing the date of our annual
    testing for goodwill impairment from October 31 to the last day
    in February of each year. We believe the change is preferable in
    the circumstances due to (1) the change in our fiscal year
    end from December 31 to March 31 and (2) our normal
    business process for updating the Companys annual and
    strategic plans, which we finalize each year during our fourth
    fiscal quarter. This change had no impact on our consolidated
    financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
    Reclassifications
    and Revisions
 
    Certain reclassifications of prior periods amounts and
    presentation have been made to conform to the presentation
    adopted for the current periods. The following reclassifications
    and presentation changes were made to the prior periods
    condensed consolidated statements of operations to conform to
    the current period presentation: (a) the amounts previously
    presented in Restructuring charges  net and
    Impairment charges on long-lived assets were reclassified
    to Other (income) expenses  net and
    (b) Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net and Sale transaction fees
    were reclassified from Other (income)
    expenses  net to separate line items. These
    reclassifications have no effect on total assets, total
    shareholders equity, net loss or cash flows as previously
    presented.
 
    As a result of the acquisition by Hindalco, and based on the way
    our President and Chief Operating Officer (our chief operating
    decision-maker) reviews the results of segment operations,
    during the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we changed our
    segment performance measure to Segment Income, as defined in
    Note 18  Segment and Major Customer Information.
 
    Recently
    Issued Accounting Standards
 
    In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141
    (Revised), Business Combinations, (FASB Statement
    No. 141(R)) which establishes principles and
    requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination
    (i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
    identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
    noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes
    and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination
    or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines
    what information to disclose to enable users of the financial
    statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
    business combination. FASB Statement No. 141(R) also
    requires acquirers to estimate the acquisition-date fair value
    of any contingent consideration and to recognize any subsequent
    changes in the fair value of contingent consideration in
    earnings. We will be required to apply this new standard
    prospectively to business
    
    7
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
    beginning of the annual reporting period beginning on or after
    December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for
    valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
    contingencies. FASB Statement No. 141(R) amends certain
    provisions of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
    Income Taxes, such that adjustments made to valuation
    allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies
    associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective
    date of FASB Statement No. 141(R) would also apply the
    provisions of FASB Statement No. 141(R). Early adoption is
    prohibited. We are currently evaluating the effects that FASB
    Statement No. 141(R) may have on our consolidated financial
    position, results of operations and cash flows.
 
    In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160,
    Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
    Statements, which establishes accounting and reporting
    standards that require (i) the ownership interest in
    subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly
    identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheet
    within shareholders equity, but separate from the
    parents equity, (ii) the amount of consolidated net
    income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling
    interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of
    the consolidated statement of operations, and (iii) changes
    in a parents ownership interest while the parent retains
    its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be
    accounted for consistently. FASB Statement No. 160 applies
    to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier
    adoption is prohibited. We have not yet commenced evaluating the
    potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB Statement
    No. 160 on our consolidated financial position, results of
    operations and cash flows.
 
    In April 2007, the FASB issued Staff Position
    No. FIN 39-1,
    Amendment of FASB Interpretation No 39, (FSP
    FIN 39-1).
    FSP
    FIN 39-1
    amends FASB Statement No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts
    Related to Certain Contracts, by permitting entities that
    enter into master netting arrangements as part of their
    derivative transactions to offset in their financial statements
    net derivative positions against the fair value of amounts (or
    amounts that approximate fair value) recognized for the right to
    reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash
    collateral under those arrangements. FSP
    FIN 39-1
    is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
    2007. We have not yet commenced evaluating the potential impact,
    if any, of the adoption of FSP
    FIN 39-1
    on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
    and cash flows.
 
    In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159,
    The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
    Liabilities, which provides companies with an option to
    report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value.
    FASB Statement No. 159 establishes presentation and
    disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons
    between companies that choose different measurement attributes
    for similar types of assets and liabilities and requires
    companies to provide additional information that will help
    investors and other users of financial statements to more easily
    understand the effect of a companys choice to use fair
    value on its earnings. FASB Statement No. 159 also requires
    entities to display the fair value of those assets and
    liabilities for which the company has chosen to use fair value
    on the face of the balance sheet. FASB Statement No. 159
    does not eliminate disclosure requirements included in other
    accounting standards, including requirements for disclosures
    about fair value measurements included in FASB Statements
    No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, and No. 107,
    Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
    FASB Statement No. 159 is effective as of the beginning
    of an entitys first fiscal year beginning after
    November 15, 2007. We have not yet commenced evaluating the
    potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB Statement
    No. 159 on our consolidated financial position, results of
    operations and cash flows.
 
    In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157,
    Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
    establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and
    expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB
    Statement No. 157 applies to other accounting
    pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
    The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued
    for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for
    interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently
    
    8
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB
    Statement No. 157 on our consolidated financial position,
    results of operations and cash flows.
 
    We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
    pronouncements will not have a material impact on our
    consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
    flows, or do not apply to our operations.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 2. | Acquisition
    of Novelis Common Stock | 
 
    On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
    through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary AV Metals Inc.
    (Acquisition Sub) pursuant to a plan of arrangement
    (Arrangement) entered into on February 10, 2007 and
    approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on
    May 14, 2007. As a result of the Arrangement, Acquisition
    Sub acquired all of the Companys outstanding common shares
    at a price of $44.93 per share, and all outstanding stock
    options and other equity incentives were terminated in exchange
    for cash payments. The aggregate purchase price for the
    Companys common shares was $3.4 billion and
    immediately following the Arrangement, the common shares of the
    Company were transferred from Acquisition Sub to its
    wholly-owned subsidiary AV Aluminum Inc. (AV Aluminum). Hindalco
    also assumed $2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total
    transaction value of $6.2 billion.
 
    On June 22, 2007, we issued 2,044,122 additional common
    shares to AV Aluminum for $44.93 per share resulting in an
    additional equity contribution of approximately
    $92 million. This contribution was equal in amount to
    certain payments made by Novelis related to change in control
    compensation to certain employees and directors, lender fees and
    other transaction costs incurred by the Company. As this
    transaction was approved by Hindalco and the Company and
    executed subsequent to the Arrangement, the $92 million is
    not included in the determination of total consideration.
 
    Purchase
    Price Allocation and Goodwill
 
    As a result of the Arrangement, the consideration and
    transaction costs paid by Hindalco in connection with the
    transaction have been pushed down to us and have
    been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in
    accordance with FASB Statement No. 141. The following table
    summarizes total consideration paid under the Arrangement (in
    millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Purchase of all outstanding 75,415,536 shares at $44.93 per
    share
 |  | $ | 3,388 |  | 
| 
    Direct transaction costs incurred by Hindalco
 |  |  | 17 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total consideration
 |  | $ | 3,405 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    In accordance with FASB Statement No. 141, during our
    quarter ended June 30, 2007 we allocated total
    consideration ($3.405 billion) to the assets acquired and
    liabilities assumed based on our initial estimates of fair value
    using methodologies and assumptions that we believed were
    reasonable. During our quarter ended December 31, 2007, we
    revised our initial allocation of the total consideration to
    identifiable assets and liabilities based on refined estimates.
    The revised valuation, which is still preliminary, decreased the
    amount allocated to goodwill by $164 million from our
    initial estimates. The decrease is primarily due to our revised
    assessment of the valuation of the acquired tangible and
    intangible assets, the allocation of fair value to our reporting
    units, remeasurement of postretirement benefits and the income
    tax implications of the new basis of accounting triggered by the
    Arrangement.
    
    9
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    The following table presents a summary of our revised and
    initial allocations of total consideration to assets acquired
    and liabilities assumed at the date of the Arrangement (in
    millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Revised |  |  | Initial |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Assets acquired:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current assets
 |  | $ | 3,210 |  |  | $ | 3,210 |  | 
| 
    Property, plant and equipment
 |  |  | 3,452 |  |  |  | 3,350 |  | 
| 
    Goodwill
 |  |  | 2,177 |  |  |  | 2,341 |  | 
| 
    Intangible assets
 |  |  | 903 |  |  |  | 879 |  | 
| 
    Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
 |  |  | 927 |  |  |  | 762 |  | 
| 
    Fair value of derivative instruments  net of current
    portion
 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 3 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax assets
 |  |  | 111 |  |  |  | 117 |  | 
| 
    Other long-term assets
 |  |  | 110 |  |  |  | 110 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total assets acquired
 |  |  | 10,893 |  |  |  | 10,772 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Liabilities assumed:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable
 |  |  | (1,612 | ) |  |  | (1,612 | ) | 
| 
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 |  |  | (738 | ) |  |  | (738 | ) | 
| 
    Debt, including current portion and short-term borrowings
 |  |  | (2,824 | ) |  |  | (2,824 | ) | 
| 
    Deferred income tax liabilities, including current portion
 |  |  | (1,025 | ) |  |  | (874 | ) | 
| 
    Accrued postretirement benefits
 |  |  | (400 | ) |  |  | (430 | ) | 
| 
    Other long-term liabilities
 |  |  | (736 | ) |  |  | (736 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates
 |  |  | (153 | ) |  |  | (153 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities assumed
 |  |  | (7,488 | ) |  |  | (7,367 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total consideration
 |  | $ | 3,405 |  |  | $ | 3,405 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The goodwill resulting from the Arrangement reflects the value
    of our in-place workforce, deferred income taxes associated with
    the fair value adjustments and potential synergies. The majority
    of the push down adjustments, including goodwill, did not impact
    our cash flows and were not deductible for income tax purposes.
 
    The revised allocation shown above includes a total of
    $685 million for the fair value of liabilities associated
    with unfavorable sales contracts ($371 million included in
    Other long-term liabilities and $314 million
    included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities). Of
    this amount, $655 million relates to unfavorable sales
    contracts in North America. These contracts include a ceiling
    over which metal purchase costs cannot contractually be passed
    through to certain customers, unless adjusted. Subsequent to the
    Arrangement, the fair values of these liabilities are credited
    to Net sales over the remaining lives of the underlying
    contracts. The reduction of these liabilities does not affect
    our cash flows.
 
    Intangible assets include (1) $124 million for a
    favorable energy supply contract in North America, recorded at
    its estimated fair value, (2) $15 million for other
    favorable supply contracts in Europe and
    (3) $9 million for the estimated value of acquired
    in-process research and development projects that had not yet
    reached technological feasibility. In accordance with FASB
    Statement No. 141, the $9 million of acquired
    in-process research and development was expensed upon
    acquisition and charged to Research and development expenses
    in the period from May 16, 2007 through
    December 31, 2007.
    
    10
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    To estimate fair values, we considered a number of factors,
    including the application of multiples to discounted cash flow
    estimates. There is considerable management judgment with
    respect to cash flow estimates and appropriate multiples used in
    determining fair value. Certain amounts are subject to change as
    remaining information on the fair values is received and
    valuation analyses are finalized. Specifically, we continue to
    evaluate the valuation and useful lives of the acquired tangible
    and intangible assets, postretirement benefits and the income
    tax implications of the new basis of accounting triggered by the
    Arrangement. These final valuations and other studies will be
    performed by Hindalco and Novelis, and the final fair values and
    allocations may differ materially from our revised preliminary
    estimates shown above. We expect to complete our final
    allocation of the total consideration before March 31, 2008.
 
    We incurred a total of $64 million in fees and expenses
    related to the Arrangement, of which $32 million was
    incurred in each of the periods from April 1, 2007 through
    May 15, 2007 and the three months ended March 31,
    2007. These fees and expenses are included in Sale
    transaction fees in our condensed consolidated statements of
    operations.
 
    Unaudited
    Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Results
 
    The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma results of
    operations provided below for the three and nine month periods
    ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are presented as though
    the Arrangement had occurred at the beginning of each of the
    nine months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, after giving
    effect to purchase accounting adjustments related to
    depreciation and amortization of the revalued assets and
    liabilities, interest expense and other acquisition related
    adjustments in connection with the Arrangement. The pro forma
    results include estimates and assumptions that management
    believes are reasonable. However, pro forma results are not
    necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred
    if the acquisition had been in effect on the dates indicated, or
    which may result in future periods.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months Ended 
 |  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 2,727 |  |  |  | $ | 2,544 |  |  | $ | 8,417 |  |  |  | $ | 7,777 |  | 
| 
    Loss before provision for taxes and minority interests
    share
 |  | $ | (57 | ) |  |  | $ | (137 | ) |  | $ | (179 | ) |  |  | $ | (279 | ) | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (61 | ) |  |  | $ | (102 | ) |  | $ | (184 | ) |  |  | $ | (174 | ) | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 3. | Restructuring
    Programs | 
 
    We recognized $1 million, $2 million, and
    $1 million in restructuring costs during the three months
    ended December 31, 2007, the period from May 16, 2007
    through December 31, 2007 and the period from April 1,
    2007 through May 15, 2007, respectively, relating primarily
    to restructuring actions begun during 2006 in two of our
    European facilities. There were $1 million in other exit
    related reserves attributable to foreign currency translation
    for each of the three months ended December 31, 2007 and
    the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007.
    
    11
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    All restructuring provisions and recoveries are included in
    Other (income) expenses  net in the
    accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations
    unless otherwise stated. The following table summarizes the
    activity in our restructuring liabilities (all of which relate
    to our Europe operating segment) (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Europe |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Other Exit 
 |  |  | Total 
 |  | 
|  |  | Severance 
 |  |  | Related 
 |  |  | Restructuring 
 |  | 
|  |  | Reserves |  |  | Reserves |  |  | Reserves |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Predecessor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance as of March 31, 2007
 |  | $ | 18 |  |  | $ | 18 |  |  | $ | 36 |  | 
| 
    April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007 Activity:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Provisions  net
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Cash payments
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) | 
| 
    Adjustments  other
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  | 19 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 37 |  | 
|  | 
|  | 
| 
    Successor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007 Activity:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Provisions  net
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Cash payments
 |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (3 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance as of June 30, 2007
 |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 35 |  | 
| 
    July 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007 Activity:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash payments
 |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (6 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance as of September 30, 2007
 |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 16 |  |  |  | 29 |  | 
| 
    October 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 Activity:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Provisions  net
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Cash payments
 |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (4 | ) | 
| 
    Adjustments  other
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance as of December 31, 2007
 |  | $ | 11 |  |  | $ | 16 |  |  | $ | 27 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    Inventories consist of the following (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | As of |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | March 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Finished goods
 |  | $ | 366 |  |  |  | $ | 359 |  | 
| 
    Work in process
 |  |  | 556 |  |  |  |  | 412 |  | 
| 
    Raw materials
 |  |  | 445 |  |  |  |  | 614 |  | 
| 
    Supplies
 |  |  | 76 |  |  |  |  | 120 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 1,443 |  |  |  |  | 1,505 |  | 
| 
    Allowances
 |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  | (22 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Inventories
 |  | $ | 1,441 |  |  |  | $ | 1,483 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    12
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    5.  Property,
    Plant and Equipment
 
    Property, plant and equipment  net consists of the
    following (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | As of |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | March 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Land and property rights
 |  | $ | 254 |  |  |  | $ | 97 |  | 
| 
    Buildings
 |  |  | 838 |  |  |  |  | 895 |  | 
| 
    Machinery and equipment
 |  |  | 2,376 |  |  |  |  | 4,699 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 3,468 |  |  |  |  | 5,691 |  | 
| 
    Accumulated depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | (217 | ) |  |  |  | (3,674 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 3,251 |  |  |  |  | 2,017 |  | 
| 
    Construction in progress
 |  |  | 121 |  |  |  |  | 89 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Property, plant and equipment  net
 |  | $ | 3,372 |  |  |  | $ | 2,106 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant
    and equipment is shown in the table below (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months Ended 
 |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  | Nine Months 
 | 
|  |  | December 31, |  | Through 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  | Ended 
 | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  | December 31, 2006 | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  | Predecessor |  | Successor |  |  | Predecessor |  | Predecessor | 
| 
    Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment
 |  | $ | 94 |  |  |  | $ | 58 |  |  | $ | 235 |  |  |  | $ | 28 |  |  | $ | 173 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 6. | Goodwill
    and Intangible Assets | 
 
    Goodwill
 
    The following table summarizes the balances and activity in
    goodwill by operating segment (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
|  |  | Balance 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Balance 
 |  |  |  | Balance 
 |  |  | Cumulative 
 |  |  | Balance 
 |  | 
|  |  | as of 
 |  |  |  |  |  | as of 
 |  |  |  | as of 
 |  |  | Translation 
 |  |  | as of 
 |  | 
| 
    Operating Segment
 |  | May 16, 2007 |  |  | Adjustments (A) |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | March 31, 2007 |  |  | Adjustment |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  | 
| 
    North America
 |  | $ | 1,527 |  |  | $ | (414 | ) |  | $ | 1,113 |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
| 
    Europe
 |  |  | 389 |  |  |  | 411 |  |  |  | 800 |  |  |  |  | 239 |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 244 |  | 
| 
    Asia
 |  |  | 162 |  |  |  | (162 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    South America
 |  |  | 263 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | 261 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 2,341 |  |  | $ | (167 | ) |  | $ | 2,174 |  |  |  | $ | 239 |  |  | $ | 5 |  |  | $ | 244 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (A) |  | These adjustments include $164 million related to the
    revision of our initial estimates of fair value and allocation
    of the total consideration to assets acquired and liabilities
    assumed in connection with our acquisition by Hindalco recorded
    during the quarter ended December 31, 2007. See
    Note 2  Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock. | 
    
    13
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
 
    Intangible
    Assets
 
    The following table summarizes the components of intangible
    assets (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | As of |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2007 
 |  |  |  | March 31, 2007 
 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
|  |  | Gross 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Net 
 |  |  | Weighted 
 |  |  |  | Gross 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Net 
 |  |  | Weighted 
 |  | 
|  |  | Carrying 
 |  |  | Accumulated 
 |  |  | Carrying 
 |  |  | Average 
 |  |  |  | Carrying 
 |  |  | Accumulated 
 |  |  | Carrying 
 |  |  | Average 
 |  | 
|  |  | Amount |  |  | Amortization |  |  | Amount |  |  | Life |  |  |  | Amount |  |  | Amortization |  |  | Amount |  |  | Life |  | 
| 
    Tradename
 |  | $ | 146 |  |  | $ | (4 | ) |  | $ | 142 |  |  |  | 20 years |  |  |  | $ | 14 |  |  | $ | (6 | ) |  | $ | 8 |  |  |  | 15 years |  | 
| 
    Technology
 |  |  | 167 |  |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | 160 |  |  |  | 15 years |  |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | 15 years |  | 
| 
    Customer relationships
 |  |  | 461 |  |  |  | (14 | ) |  |  | 447 |  |  |  | 20 years |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Favorable energy supply contract
 |  |  | 123 |  |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | 114 |  |  |  | 9.5 years |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other favorable contracts
 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 3.3 years |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 912 |  |  | $ | (39 | ) |  | $ | 873 |  |  |  | 17.3 years |  |  |  | $ | 34 |  |  | $ | (14 | ) |  | $ | 20 |  |  |  | 15 years |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Our favorable energy supply contract and other favorable
    contracts are amortized over their estimated useful lives using
    methods that reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits
    are expected to be consumed. All other intangible assets are
    amortized using the straight-line method.
 
    Amortization expense related to intangible assets is shown in
    the table below (in millions) and includes $6 million and
    $14 million included in Cost of goods sold related
    to favorable energy supply and other favorable contracts for the
    three months ended December 31, 2007 and for the period
    from May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007,
    respectively.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | December 31, 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Total Amortization expense related to intangible assets
 |  | $ | 17 |  |  |  | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | 39 |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 2 |  | 
| 
    Less: Amortization expense related to intangible assets included
    in Cost of goods sold
 |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (14 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Amortization expense related to intangible assets included in
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  | $ | 11 |  |  |  | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | 25 |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    14
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Estimated total amortization expense related to intangible
    assets for the remainder of fiscal 2008 and each of the five
    succeeding fiscal years is shown in the table below (in
    millions). Actual amounts may differ from these estimates due to
    such factors as raw material consumption patterns, impairments,
    additional intangible asset acquisitions, remeasurement of
    amounts valued in foreign currencies and other events.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Fiscal Year Ending March 31,
 |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    2008 (remaining three months)
 |  | $ | 16 |  | 
| 
    2009
 |  |  | 61 |  | 
| 
    2010
 |  |  | 59 |  | 
| 
    2011
 |  |  | 55 |  | 
| 
    2012
 |  |  | 54 |  | 
| 
    2013
 |  |  | 54 |  | 
 
    7.  Investment
    in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
    Transactions
 
    The following table summarizes the ownership structure and our
    ownership percentage of the non-consolidated affiliates in which
    we have an investment as of December 31, 2007 and which we
    account for using the equity method. We have no material
    investments that we account for using the cost method.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Ownership 
 |  | 
| 
    Affiliate Name
 |  | Ownership Structure |  | Percentage |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Aluminium Norf GmbH
 |  | Corporation |  |  | 50 | % | 
| 
    Consorcio Candonga
 |  | Unincorporated Joint Venture |  |  | 50 | % | 
| 
    MiniMRF LLC
 |  | Limited Liability Company |  |  | 50 | % | 
| 
    Deutsche Aluminium Verpackung Recycling GmbH
 |  | Corporation |  |  | 30 | % | 
| 
    France Aluminium Recyclage S.A. 
 |  | Public Limited Company |  |  | 20 | % | 
 
    In September 2007, we completed the dissolution of EuroNorca
    Partners, and we received approximately $2 million in the
    completion of liquidation proceedings. No gain or loss was
    recognized on the liquidation.
 
    In November 2006, we sold the common and preferred shares of our
    25% interest in Petrocoque S.A. Industria e Comercio
    (Petrocoque) to the other shareholders of Petrocoque. Prior to
    the sale, we accounted for Petrocoque using the equity method of
    accounting. The results of operations of Petrocoque through the
    date of sale for the three and nine month periods ended
    December 31, 2006 are included in the table below.
    
    15
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    We do not control our non-consolidated affiliates, but have the
    ability to exercise significant influence over their operating
    and financial policies. The following table summarizes (on a
    100% basis, in millions) the condensed and combined results of
    operations of our equity method affiliates, on a historical
    basis of accounting. These results do not include the
    incremental depreciation and amortization expense that we record
    in our equity method accounting, which arises as a result of the
    amortization of fair value adjustments we made to our
    investments in non-consolidated affiliates due to the
    Arrangement. For the three months ended December 31, 2007
    and the period from May 16, 2007 through December 31,
    2007, we recorded incremental depreciation and amortization
    expense of $15 million and $26 million, respectively,
    as part of our equity method accounting for these affiliates.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | December 31, 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 161 |  |  |  | $ | 138 |  |  | $ | 384 |  |  |  | $ | 45 |  |  | $ | 426 |  | 
| 
    Costs, expenses and provisions for taxes on income
 |  |  | 168 |  |  |  |  | 129 |  |  |  | 379 |  |  |  |  | 43 |  |  |  | 397 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (7 | ) |  |  | $ | 9 |  |  | $ | 5 |  |  |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 29 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
    statements are transactions and balances arising from business
    we conduct with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we
    classify as related party transactions and balances. The
    following table describes the nature and amounts of significant
    transactions that we had with related parties (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  |  | May 15, 
 |  |  | December 31, 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Purchases of tolling services and electricity
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Aluminium Norf GmbH(A)
 |  | $ | 77 |  |  |  | $ | 57 |  |  | $ | 182 |  |  |  | $ | 21 |  |  | $ | 175 |  | 
| 
    Consorcio Candonga(B)
 |  | $ | 4 |  |  |  | $ | 4 |  |  | $ | 9 |  |  |  | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | 11 |  | 
| 
    Petrocoque(C)
 |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 1 |  | 
| 
    Interest income
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Aluminium Norf GmbH(D)
 |  | $ |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 1 |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | n.a. |  | not applicable  see (C). | 
|  | 
    | (A) |  | We purchase tolling services (the conversion of customer-owned
    metal) from Aluminium Norf GmbH. | 
|  | 
    | (B) |  | We purchase electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our
    operations in South America. | 
|  | 
    | (C) |  | We purchase calcined-coke from Petrocoque for use in our
    smelting operation in South America. As previously discussed, we
    sold our interest in Petrocoque in November 2006. They are not
    considered a related party subsequent to the quarter ended
    December 31, 2006. | 
|  | 
    | (D) |  | We earn interest income on a loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. | 
    
    16
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
 
    The following table describes the period-end account balances
    that we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as
    related party balances in the accompanying condensed
    consolidated balance sheets (in millions). We have no other
    material related party balances.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | As of |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | March 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable(A)
 |  | $ | 29 |  |  |  | $ | 25 |  | 
| 
    Other long-term receivables(A)
 |  | $ | 42 |  |  |  | $ | 54 |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable(B)
 |  | $ | 60 |  |  |  | $ | 49 |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (A) |  | The balances represent current and non-current portions of a
    loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. | 
|  | 
    | (B) |  | We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH and
    electricity from Consorcio Candonga. | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 8. | Accrued
    Expenses and Other Current Liabilities | 
 
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are comprised of
    the following (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | As of |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | March 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Accrued compensation and benefits
 |  | $ | 122 |  |  |  | $ | 138 |  | 
| 
    Accrued settlement of legal claim
 |  |  | 39 |  |  |  |  | 39 |  | 
| 
    Accrued interest payable
 |  |  | 41 |  |  |  |  | 24 |  | 
| 
    Accrued income taxes
 |  |  | 75 |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 
| 
    Current portion of unfavorable sales contracts
 |  |  | 251 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
 |  |  | 112 |  |  |  |  | 33 |  | 
| 
    Other current liabilities
 |  |  | 241 |  |  |  |  | 237 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 |  | $ | 881 |  |  |  | $ | 480 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    17
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
 
    Debt consists of the following (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | As of |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | December 31, 2007 
 |  |  |  | March 31,
2007 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
|  |  | Interest 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Unamortized 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Rates 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Fair Value 
 |  |  | Carrying 
 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | (A) |  |  | Principal |  |  | Adjustments(B) |  |  | Value |  |  |  | Principal |  | 
| 
    Novelis Inc.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
 |  |  | 6.83 | % |  | $ | 298 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 298 |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
| 
    Floating rate Term Loan B(D)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 259 |  | 
| 
    7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
 |  |  | 7.25 | % |  |  | 1,399 |  |  |  | 69 |  |  |  | 1,468 |  |  |  |  | 1,400 |  | 
| 
    Novelis Corporation
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
 |  |  | 6.83 | %(C) |  |  | 657 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 657 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Floating rate Term Loan B(D)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 449 |  | 
| 
    Novelis Switzerland S.A.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Capital lease obligation, due January 2020 (Swiss francs (CHF)
    54 million)
 |  |  | 7.50 | % |  |  | 48 |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | 44 |  |  |  |  | 46 |  | 
| 
    Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 3 million)
 |  |  | 2.49 | % |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 
| 
    Novelis Korea Limited
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Bank loan, due October 2010
 |  |  | 5.44 | % |  |  | 100 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 100 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Bank loan, due December 2007(F)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 70 |  | 
| 
    Bank loan (Korean won (KRW) 40 billion)(E)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42 |  | 
| 
    Bank loan, due December 2007 (KRW 25 billion)(F)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27 |  | 
| 
    Bank loans, due September 2008 through June 2011 (KRW
    1 billion)
 |  |  | 3.63 | %(G) |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Other
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other debt, due April 2008 through December 2012
 |  |  | 2.21 | %(G) |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total debt
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,508 |  |  |  | 65 |  |  |  | 2,573 |  |  |  |  | 2,300 |  | 
| 
    Less: current portion
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (14 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (14 | ) |  |  |  | (143 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Long-term debt  net of current portion
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 2,494 |  |  | $ | 65 |  |  | $ | 2,559 |  |  |  | $ | 2,157 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (A) |  | Interest rates are as of December 31, 2007 and exclude the
    effects of accretion/amortization of fair value adjustments as a
    result of the Arrangement. | 
|  | 
    | (B) |  | Debt was recorded at fair value as a result of the Arrangement
    (see Note 2  Acquisition of Novelis Common
    Stock). | 
|  | 
    | (C) |  | Excludes the effect of any related interest rate swaps. See
    New Senior Secured Credit Facilities. | 
|  | 
    | (D) |  | The Floating rate Term Loan B was refinanced in July 2007. See
    New Senior Secured Credit Facilities. | 
|  | 
    | (E) |  | The Bank loan was refinanced in August 2007 with a short-term
    borrowing. See Korean Bank Loans. | 
|  | 
    | (F) |  | These two Bank loans were refinanced in October 2007. See
    Korean Bank Loans. | 
|  | 
    | (G) |  | Weighted average interest rate. | 
    
    18
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
 
    New
    Senior Secured Credit Facilities
 
    On May 25, 2007, we entered into a Bank and Bridge
    Facilities Commitment with affiliates of UBS and ABN AMRO, to
    provide backstop assurance for the refinancing of our existing
    indebtedness following the Arrangement. The commitments from UBS
    and ABN AMRO, provided by the banks on a 50%-50% basis,
    consisted of the following: (1) a senior secured term loan
    of up to $1.06 billion; (2) a senior secured
    asset-based revolving credit facility of up to $900 million
    and (3) a commitment to issue up to $1.2 billion of
    unsecured senior notes, if necessary. The commitment contained
    terms and conditions customary for facilities of this nature.
 
    In connection with these backstop commitments, we paid fees
    totaling $14 million, which were included in Other
    long-term assets  third parties as of
    June 30, 2007. Of this amount, $6 million was related
    to the unsecured senior notes, which were not refinanced, and
    was written off during the quarter ended September 30,
    2007. The remaining $8 million in fees paid have been
    credited by the lenders towards fees associated with the new
    senior secured credit facilities (described below) and will be
    amortized over the lives of the related borrowings.
 
    On July 6, 2007, we entered into new senior secured credit
    facilities with a syndicate of lenders led by affiliates of UBS
    and ABN AMRO (New Credit Facilities) providing for aggregate
    borrowings of up to $1.76 billion. The New Credit
    Facilities consist of (1) a $960 million seven-year
    Term Loan facility (Term Loan facility) and (2) an
    $800 million five year multi-currency asset-based revolving
    credit line and letter of credit facility (ABL facility).
 
    Under the Term Loan facility, loans characterized as alternate
    base rate (ABR) borrowings bear interest annually at a rate
    equal to the alternate base rate (which is the greater of
    (a) the base rate in effect on a given day and (b) the
    federal funds effective rate in effect on a given day, plus
    0.50%) plus the applicable margin, and loans characterized as
    Eurocurrency borrowings bear interest at an annual rate equal to
    the adjusted LIBOR rate for the interest period in effect, plus
    the applicable margin.
 
    Under the ABL facility, interest charged is dependent on the
    type of loan: (1) any swingline loan or any loan
    categorized as an ABR borrowing will bear interest at an annual
    rate equal to the alternate base rate (which is the greater of
    (a) the base rate in effect on a given day and (b) the
    federal funds effective rate in effect on a given day, plus
    0.50%), plus the applicable margin; (2) Eurocurrency loans
    will bear interest at an annual rate equal to the adjusted LIBOR
    rate for the applicable interest period, plus the applicable
    margin; (3) loans designated as Canadian base rate
    borrowings will bear an annual interest rate equal to the
    Canadian base rate (CAPRIME), plus the applicable margin;
    (4) loans designated as bankers acceptances (BA) rate loans
    will bear interest at the average discount rate offered for
    bankers acceptances for the applicable BA interest period,
    plus the applicable margin and (5) loans designated as Euro
    Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR) loans will bear interest
    annually at a rate equal to the adjusted EURIBOR rate for the
    applicable interest period, plus the applicable margin.
    Applicable margins under the ABL facility depend upon excess
    availability levels calculated on a quarterly basis.
 
    Generally, for both the Term Loan facility and ABL facility,
    interest rates reset every three months and interest is payable
    on a monthly, quarterly or other periodic basis depending on the
    type of loan.
 
    The proceeds from the Term Loan facility of $960 million,
    drawn in full at the time of closing, and the initial draw of
    $324 million under the ABL facility were used to pay off
    the existing senior secured credit facility (discussed below),
    pay for debt issuance costs of the New Credit Facilities and
    provide for additional working capital. Mandatory minimum
    principal amortization payments under the Term Loan facility are
    $2.4 million per calendar quarter. The first mandatory
    minimum principal amortization payment was made on
    September 28, 2007. Additional mandatory prepayments are
    required to be made in the event of certain collateral
    liquidations, asset sales, debt and preferred stock issuances,
    equity issuances, casualty events and
    
    19
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    excess cash flow (as defined in the New Credit Facilities). Any
    unpaid principal remaining is due in full on July 6, 2014.
 
    Borrowing limits under the ABL facility are generally based on
    85% of eligible accounts receivable and 75% to 85% of eligible
    inventories. Commitment fees of 0.25% to 0.375% are based on
    average daily amounts outstanding under the ABL facility during
    a fiscal quarter, and are payable quarterly.
 
    The New Credit Facilities include customary affirmative and
    negative covenants. Under the ABL facility, if our excess
    availability, as defined under the borrowing, is less than 10%
    of the borrowing base, we are required to maintain a minimum
    fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. Substantially all of our
    assets are pledged as collateral under the New Credit Facilities.
 
    We incurred debt issuance costs on our New Credit Facilities
    totaling $32 million, including the $8 million in fees
    previously paid in conjunction with the backstop commitment.
    These fees are included in Other long-term assets 
    third parties and are being amortized over the life of the
    related borrowing in Interest expense and amortization of
    debt issuance costs  net using the
    effective interest amortization method for the Term
    Loan facility and the straight-line method for the ABL facility.
    The unamortized amount of these costs was $28 million as of
    December 31, 2007.
 
    During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, we entered into
    interest rate swaps to fix the variable LIBOR interest rate for
    up to $600 million of our floating rate Term Loan facility
    at effective weighted average interest rates and amounts
    expiring as follows: (i) 4.1% on $600 million through
    September 30, 2008, (ii) 4.0% on $500 million
    through March 31, 2009 and (iii) 4.0% on
    $400 million through March 31, 2010. We are still
    obligated to pay any applicable margin, as defined in our New
    Credit Facilities, in addition to these interest rates.
 
    On July 3, 2007, we terminated an interest rate swap we had
    to fix the
    3-month
    LIBOR interest rate at an effective weighted average interest
    rate of 3.9% on $100 million of the floating rate Term Loan
    B debt, which was originally scheduled to expire on
    February 3, 2008. The termination resulted in a gain of
    less than $1 million.
 
    As of December 31, 2007 approximately 80% of our debt was
    fixed rate and approximately 20% was variable rate.
 
    Old
    Senior Secured Credit Facilities
 
    In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we entered into
    senior secured credit facilities (Old Credit Facilities)
    providing for aggregate borrowings of up to $1.8 billion.
    The Old Credit Facilities consisted of (1) a
    $1.3 billion seven-year senior secured Term Loan B
    facility, bearing interest at London Interbank Offered Rate
    (LIBOR) plus 1.75% (which was subject to change based on certain
    leverage ratios), all of which was borrowed on January 10,
    2005, and (2) a $500 million five-year multi-currency
    revolving credit and letters of credit facility.
 
    The Old Credit Facilities included customary affirmative and
    negative covenants, as well as financial covenants relating to
    our maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and
    minimum fixed charge coverage ratios. Substantially all of our
    assets were pledged as collateral under the Old Credit
    Facilities.
 
    The terms of our Old Credit Facilities required that we deliver
    unaudited quarterly and audited annual financial statements to
    our lenders within specified periods of time. Due to delays in
    certain of our SEC filings for 2005 and 2006, we obtained a
    series of five waiver and consent agreements from the lenders
    under the facility to extend the various filing deadlines. Fees
    paid related to the five waiver and consent agreements totaled
    $6 million.
    
    20
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    On October 16, 2006, we amended the financial covenants to
    our Old Credit Facilities. In particular, we amended our maximum
    total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and minimum fixed
    charge coverage ratios through the quarter ending March 31,
    2008.
 
    We also amended and modified other provisions of the Old Credit
    Facilities to permit more efficient ordinary-course operations,
    including increasing the amounts of certain permitted
    investments and receivables securitizations, permitting nominal
    quarterly dividends, and the transfer of an intercompany loan to
    another subsidiary. In return for these amendments and
    modifications, we paid aggregate fees of approximately
    $3 million to lenders who consented to the amendments and
    modifications, and agreed to continue paying higher applicable
    margins on our Old Credit Facilities and higher unused
    commitment fees on our revolving credit facilities that were
    instated with a prior waiver and consent agreement in May 2006.
    Commitment fees related to the unused portion of the
    $500 million revolving credit facility were 0.625% per
    annum.
 
    On April 27, 2007, our lenders consented to a further
    amendment of our Old Credit Facilities. The amendment included
    permission to increase the Term Loan B facility by
    $150 million. We utilized the additional funds available
    under the Term Loan B facility to reduce the outstanding balance
    of our $500 million revolving credit facility. The
    additional borrowing capacity under the revolving credit
    facility was used to fund working capital requirements and
    certain costs associated with the Arrangement, including the
    cash settlement of share-based compensation arrangements and
    lender fees. Additionally, the amendment included a limited
    waiver of the change of control Event of Default (as defined in
    the Old Credit Facilities) which effectively extended the
    requirement to repay the Old Credit Facilities to July 11,
    2007. We paid fees of approximately $2 million to lenders
    who consented to this amendment.
 
    Total debt issuance costs of $43 million, including
    amendment fees and the waiver and consent agreements discussed
    above, had been recorded in Other long-term
    assets  third parties and were being amortized
    over the life of the related borrowing in Interest expense
    and amortization of debt issuance costs  net
    using the effective interest amortization method
    for the Term Loans and the straight-line method for the
    revolving credit and letters of credit facility. The unamortized
    amount of these costs was $26 million as of March 31,
    2007. We incurred an additional $2 million in debt issuance
    costs as described above during the period from April 1,
    2007 through May 15, 2007. As a result of the Arrangement
    and the recording of debt at fair value, the total amount of
    unamortized debt issuance costs of $28 million was reduced
    to zero as of May 15, 2007.
 
    7.25% Senior
    Notes
 
    On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
    principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities (Senior
    Notes). The Senior Notes were priced at par, bear interest at
    7.25% and mature on February 15, 2015. Debt issuance costs
    totaling $28 million had been included in Other
    long-term assets  third parties and were being
    amortized over the life of the related borrowing in Interest
    expense and amortization of debt issuance costs  net
    using the effective interest amortization
    method. The unamortized amount of these costs was
    $24 million as of March 31, 2007. As a result of the
    Arrangement and the recording of debt at fair value, the total
    amount of unamortized debt issuance costs of $23 million
    was reduced to zero as of May 15, 2007.
 
    As a result of the Arrangement, the Senior Notes were recorded
    at their fair value of $1.474 billion based on their market
    price of 105.25% of $1,000 face value per bond as of
    May 14, 2007. The incremental fair value of
    $74 million is being amortized to interest income over the
    remaining life of the Senior Notes in Interest expense and
    amortization of debt issuance costs  net using
    the effective interest amortization method. Due to
    the change in the market price of our Senior Notes from 105.25%
    as of May 14, 2007 to 94.25% as of December 31, 2007,
    the estimated fair value of this debt has decreased
    $155 million to
    
    21
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    $1.319 billion (after considering the repurchase of
    approximately $1 million of the Senior Notes pursuant to
    the tender offer discussed below).
 
    Under the indenture that governs the Senior Notes, we are
    subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to incurring
    additional debt and providing additional guarantees, paying
    dividends beyond certain amounts and making other restricted
    payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain consolidations
    or mergers, and certain transactions with affiliates. We were in
    compliance with these covenants for the quarter ended
    December 31, 2007.
 
    The indenture governing the Senior Notes and the related
    registration rights agreement required us to file a registration
    statement for the notes and exchange the original, privately
    placed notes for registered notes. Under the indenture and the
    related registration rights agreement, we were required to
    complete the exchange offer for the Senior Notes by
    November 11, 2005. We did not complete the exchange offer
    by that date and, as a result, we began to incur additional
    special interest at rates ranging from 0.25% to 1.00%. We filed
    a post-effective amendment to the registration statement on
    December 1, 2006 which was declared effective by the SEC on
    December 22, 2006. We ceased paying additional special
    interest effective January 5, 2007, upon completion of the
    exchange offer.
 
    Tender
    Offer and Consent Solicitation for 7.25% Senior
    Notes
 
    Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing our Senior
    Notes, we were obligated, within 30 days of closing of the
    Arrangement, to make an offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a
    price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and
    unpaid interest to the date the Senior Notes were purchased.
    Consequently, we commenced a tender offer on May 16, 2007,
    to repurchase all of the outstanding Senior Notes at the
    prescribed price. This offer expired on July 3, 2007 with
    holders of approximately $1 million of principal presenting
    their Senior Notes pursuant to the tender offer.
 
    Korean
    Bank Loans
 
    In November 2004, Novelis Korea Limited (Novelis Korea),
    formerly Alcan Taihan Aluminium Limited, entered into a Korean
    won (KRW) 40 billion ($40 million) floating rate
    long-term loan due November 2007. We immediately entered into an
    interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 4.80%. In August
    2007, we refinanced this loan with a floating rate short-term
    borrowing in the amount of $40 million due by August 2008.
    We recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of less than
    $1 million in connection with this refinancing.
    Additionally, we immediately entered into an interest rate swap
    and cross currency swap for the new loan through a 3.94% fixed
    rate KRW 38 billion ($38 million) loan.
 
    In December 2004, we entered into (1) a $70 million
    floating rate loan and (2) a KRW 25 billion
    ($25 million) floating rate loan, both due in December
    2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate and cross
    currency swap on the $70 million floating rate loan through
    a 4.55% fixed rate KRW 73 billion ($73 million) loan
    and an interest rate swap on the KRW 25 billion floating
    rate loan to fix the interest rate at 4.45%. On October 25,
    2007, we entered into a $100 million floating rate loan due
    October 2010 and immediately repaid the $70 million loan.
    In December 2007, we repaid the KRW 25 billion loan from
    the proceeds of the $100 million floating rate loan.
    Additionally, we immediately entered into an interest rate swap
    and cross currency swap for the $100 million floating rate
    loan through a 5.44% fixed rate KRW 92 billion
    ($92 million) loan.
    
    22
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Other
    Agreements
 
    In May 2007, we terminated a loan and a corresponding
    deposit-and-guarantee
    agreement for $80 million. We did not include the loan or
    deposit amounts in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as
    of March 31, 2007 as the agreement included a legal right
    of setoff and we had the intent and ability to setoff.
 
    Capital
    Lease Obligations
 
    In December 2004, we entered into a fifteen-year capital lease
    obligation with Alcan for assets in Sierre, Switzerland which
    has an interest rate of 7.5% and calls for fixed quarterly
    payments of CHF 1.7 million, which is equivalent to
    $1.5 million at the exchange rate as of December 31,
    2007.
 
    In September 2005, we entered into a six-year capital lease
    obligation for equipment in Switzerland which has an interest
    rate of 2.49% and calls for fixed monthly payments of CHF
    0.1 million, which is equivalent to $0.1 million at
    the exchange rate as of December 31, 2007.
 
    Short
    Term Borrowings and Lines of Credit
 
    As of December 31, 2007, our short-term borrowings were
    $245 million consisting of (1) $167 million of
    short-term loans under our ABL facility, (2) a
    $40 million short-term loan in Korea and
    (3) $38 million in bank overdrafts. Additionally, as
    of December 31, 2007, $28 million of our ABL facility
    was utilized for letters of credit and we had approximately
    $517 million in remaining availability under this revolving
    credit facility.
 
    As of December 31, 2007, we had an additional
    $143 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
    not included in our ABL facility. The weighted average interest
    rate on our total short-term borrowings was 5.55% and 7.77% as
    of December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007, respectively.
    
    23
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    |  |  | 
    | 10. | Accumulated
    Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | 
 
    Other comprehensive income (loss)  net of tax is
    comprised of the following (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  |  | May 15, 
 |  |  | December 31, 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Net change in foreign currency translation adjustments
 |  | $ | 36 |  |  |  |  | $63 |  |  | $ | 50 |  |  |  | $ | 31 |  |  | $ | 131 |  | 
| 
    Net change in fair value of effective portion of hedges
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  | (16 | ) |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (39 | ) | 
| 
    Postretirement benefit plans:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Amortization of net actuarial loss
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net change in minimum pension liability
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net other comprehensive income adjustments, before income tax
    effect
 |  |  | 37 |  |  |  |  | 67 |  |  |  | 55 |  |  |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 108 |  | 
| 
    Income tax effect
 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | 15 |  |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | (4 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other comprehensive income (loss)
 |  | $ | 40 |  |  |  |  | $63 |  |  | $ | 70 |  |  |  | $ | 33 |  |  | $ | 104 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax
    effects, is comprised of the following (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | As of |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | March 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Foreign currency translation adjustments
 |  | $ | 68 |  |  |  | $ | 144 |  | 
| 
    Fair value of effective portion of hedges  net
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | (43 | ) | 
| 
    Net actuarial loss
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (82 | ) | 
| 
    Net prior service cost
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (8 | ) | 
| 
    Net transition obligation
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
 |  | $ | 70 |  |  |  | $ | 10 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 11. | Share-Based
    Compensation | 
 
    Effect of
    Acquisition by Hindalco
 
    As a result of the Arrangement (see Note 2 
    Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock), all of our share-based
    compensation awards (except for our Recognition Awards) were
    accelerated to vest, cancelled and settled in cash using the
    $44.93 purchase price per common share paid by Hindalco in the
    transaction.
    
    24
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    We made aggregate cash payments (including applicable
    payroll-related taxes) totaling $72 million to plan
    participants following consummation of the Arrangement, as
    follows:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Shares/Units 
 |  |  | Cash Payments 
 |  | 
| 
    Predecessor:
 |  | Settled |  |  | (In millions) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock options)
 |  |  | 825,850 |  |  | $ | 16 |  | 
| 
    Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock appreciation rights)
 |  |  | 378,360 |  |  |  | 7 |  | 
| 
    Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005
 |  |  | 1,238,183 |  |  |  | 29 |  | 
| 
    Stock Price Appreciation Unit Plan
 |  |  | 299,873 |  |  |  | 7 |  | 
| 
    Deferred Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors
 |  |  | 109,911 |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
    Novelis Founders Performance Awards
 |  |  | 180,400 |  |  |  | 8 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 72 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Compensation expense of $45 million resulting from the
    accelerated vesting of plan awards is included in Selling,
    general and administrative expenses in our condensed
    consolidated statement of operations for the period from
    April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007. We also recorded a
    $7 million reduction to our Additional paid-in capital
    during the period from April 1, 2007 through
    May 15, 2007 for the conversion of certain of our
    share-based compensation plans from equity-based plans to
    liability-based plans.
 
    Our Recognition Awards plan remains in place as of
    December 31, 2007. However, the awards are now payable only
    in either, at the option of the Executive (defined below),
    (i) Hindalco common shares (if offered by Hindalco) or
    (ii) cash.
 
    Recognition
    Awards
 
    On September 25, 2006, we entered into Recognition
    Agreements and granted Recognition Awards to certain executive
    officers and other key employees (Executives) to retain and
    reward them for continued dedication towards corporate
    objectives. Under the terms of these agreements, Executives who
    remain continuously employed by us through the vesting dates of
    December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008 are entitled
    to receive one-half of their total Recognition Awards on each
    vesting date.
 
    On February 10, 2007, our board of directors adopted
    resolutions to amend the Recognition Awards with the Executives.
    As amended, if the Executive remains continuously employed by us
    through the vesting dates of December 31, 2007 and
    December 31, 2008, the Executive is entitled to the awards,
    payable at a value of $44.93 per share, in either, at the option
    of the Executive, (i) Hindalco common shares (if offered by
    Hindalco) or (ii) cash.
 
    The number of Recognition Awards payable under the agreements
    varies by Executive. Originally, there were 145,800 shares
    subject to award. Prior to the Arrangement and in accordance
    with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised),
    Share-Based Payment, we valued these awards as of the
    issuance date and were recognizing their cost over the requisite
    service period of the Executives. As a result of the
    Arrangement, the Recognition Awards changed in classification
    from an equity-based to a liability-based plan using the $44.93
    purchase price per common share paid by Hindalco in the
    transaction as the per share value. This classification change
    resulted in additional share-based compensation expense of
    $1.3 million during the period from April 1, 2007
    through May 15, 2007.
 
    One-half of the outstanding Recognition Awards vested on
    December 31, 2007, and were settled for approximately
    $3 million in cash in January 2008.
    
    25
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    The table below shows the activity for our Recognition Awards.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Number of 
 |  |  | Average 
 |  |  | Award 
 |  | 
|  |  | Recognition 
 |  |  | Fair Value at 
 |  |  | Redemption 
 |  | 
|  |  | Awards |  |  | Grant Date |  |  | Price |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Predecessor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Recognition Awards as of March 31, 2007
 |  |  | 145,800 |  |  | $ | 23.15 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Granted
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Vested
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Forfeited/Cancelled
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Recognition Awards as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  | 145,800 |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 44.93 |  | 
|  | 
|  | 
| 
    Successor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Granted
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Vested
 |  |  | (59,050 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Forfeited/Cancelled
 |  |  | (27,700 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Recognition Awards as of December 31, 2007
 |  |  | 59,050 |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 44.93 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    As of December 31, 2007, there was approximately
    $1 million of unamortized compensation expense related to
    the December 31, 2008 vesting date for the Recognition
    Awards, which is expected to be recognized during the twelve
    months ending December 31, 2008.
 
    2006
    Stock Options
 
    On October 26, 2006, our board of directors authorized a
    grant of an aggregate of 885,170 seven-year non-qualified stock
    options under the Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (2006 Incentive
    Plan) at an exercise price of $25.53 to certain of our executive
    officers and key employees. These options were comprised of
    equal portions of premium and non-premium options. Both the
    premium and non-premium options were to vest ratably in 25%
    annual increments over a four year period measured from
    October 26, 2006, and could be exercised, in whole or in
    part, once vested. However, while the premium and non-premium
    options carry the same exercise price of $25.53, in no event
    could the premium options be exercised unless the fair market
    value per share, as defined in the 2006 Incentive Plan, on the
    business day preceding the exercise date equals or exceeds
    $28.59. As a result of the Arrangement, all of our stock options
    under the 2006 Incentive Plan were accelerated to vest,
    cancelled and settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price
    per common share paid by Hindalco in the transaction.
    
    26
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    The table below shows the option activity (for both premium and
    non-premium options) under our 2006 Incentive Plan.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Average 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted 
 |  |  | Remaining 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Average 
 |  |  | Contractual 
 |  |  | Aggregate 
 |  | 
|  |  | Number of 
 |  |  | Exercise 
 |  |  | Term 
 |  |  | Intrinsic 
 |  | 
|  |  | Options |  |  | Price |  |  | (In Years) |  |  | Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Predecessor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Options outstanding as of March 31, 2007
 |  |  | 825,850 |  |  | $ | 25.53 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Granted
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exercised
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Forfeited/Cancelled
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Expired
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Settled as a result of the Arrangement
 |  |  | (825,850 | ) |  | $ | 25.53 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Options outstanding as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Options exercisable as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Monte Carlo valuation
    model to determine the fair value of the premium options
    outstanding under the 2006 Incentive Plan. The Monte Carlo model
    utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability
    of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award and
    calculates the fair market value of each award. Because our
    trading history was shorter than the expected life of the
    options, we used historical stock price volatility data from
    comparable companies to supplement our own historical volatility
    to determine expected volatility assumptions. The annual
    expected dividend yield was based on dividend payments of $0.01
    per share per quarter. Risk-free interest rates were based on
    U.S. Treasury Strip yields, compounded daily, consistent
    with the expected lives of the options. The fair value of the
    premium options was being amortized over the requisite service
    period of each award, which was originally from one to four
    years, subject to acceleration in cases where the employee
    elected retirement or was retirement eligible after
    October 26, 2007.
 
    Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Black-Scholes valuation
    model to determine the fair value of non-premium options issued.
    Because our trading history was shorter than the expected life
    of the options, we used historical stock price volatility data
    from comparable companies to supplement our own historical
    volatility to determine expected volatility assumptions. The
    annual expected dividend yield was based on dividend payments of
    $0.01 per share per quarter. Risk-free interest rates were based
    on U.S. Treasury Strip yields, compounded daily, consistent
    with the expected lives of the options. Because we did not have
    a sufficient history of option exercise or cancellation, we
    estimated the expected life of the options based on an extension
    of the simplified method as prescribed by SEC Staff
    Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107, Share-Based
    Payment, which allows for the use of a mid-point between the
    earliest and latest dates that an award can be exercised.
    
    27
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    No premium or non-premium options under the 2006 Incentive Plan
    were granted during the period from April 1, 2007 through
    May 15, 2007. Prior to the Arrangement, the fair value of
    our premium and non-premium options was estimated using the
    following assumptions:
 
    |  |  |  | 
|  |  | April 1, 2007 
 | 
|  |  | Through 
 | 
|  |  | May 15, 2007 | 
|  |  | Predecessor | 
|  | 
| 
    Expected volatility
 |  | 42.20 to 46.40% | 
| 
    Weighted average volatility
 |  | 44.30% | 
| 
    Dividend yield
 |  | 0.16% | 
| 
    Risk-free interest rate
 |  | 4.68 to 4.71% | 
| 
    Expected life
 |  | 1.00 to 4.75 years | 
 
    As a result of the Arrangement, 825,850 premium and non-premium
    options under the 2006 Incentive Plan were accelerated to vest
    and were settled in cash for approximately $16 million.
 
    Novelis
    Conversion Plan of 2005
 
    On January 5, 2005, our board of directors adopted the
    Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005 (the Conversion Plan) to allow
    for 1,372,663 Alcan stock options held by employees of Alcan who
    became our employees following our spin-off from Alcan to be
    replaced with options to purchase 2,723,914 of our common
    shares. As a result of the Arrangement, all of our stock options
    under the Conversion Plan were accelerated to vest, cancelled
    and settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price per common
    share paid by Hindalco in the transaction.
 
    The table below shows the option activity in our Conversion Plan.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Average 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted 
 |  |  | Remaining 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Average 
 |  |  | Contractual 
 |  |  | Aggregate 
 |  | 
|  |  | Number of 
 |  |  | Exercise 
 |  |  | Term 
 |  |  | Intrinsic 
 |  | 
|  |  | Options |  |  | Price |  |  | (In Years) |  |  | Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Predecessor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Options outstanding as of March 31, 2007
 |  |  | 1,296,952 |  |  | $ | 21.74 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Granted
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exercised
 |  |  | (57,876 | ) |  | $ | 20.00 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Forfeited/Cancelled
 |  |  | (893 | ) |  | $ | 23.74 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Expired
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Settled as a result of the Arrangement
 |  |  | (1,238,183 | ) |  | $ | 21.82 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Options outstanding as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Options exercisable as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Black-Scholes valuation
    model to determine the fair value of the options outstanding.
    Because we had no trading history at the time of the valuation,
    we used historical stock price volatility data from comparable
    companies to determine expected volatility assumptions. The
    annual expected dividend yield was based on our then current and
    anticipated dividend payments. Risk-free interest rates were
    based on U.S. Treasury bond yields, compounded daily,
    consistent with the expected lives of the options. Because we
    did not have a sufficient history of option exercise or
    cancellation, we estimated the
    
    28
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    expected life of the options based on the lesser of the expected
    term of Nine years or the remaining life of the option.
 
    No new options under the Conversion Plan were granted since its
    adoption in January 2005. The fair value of each option was
    estimated using the following assumptions:
 
    |  |  |  | 
|  |  | April 1, 2007 
 | 
|  |  | Through 
 | 
|  |  | May 15, 2007 | 
|  |  | Predecessor | 
|  | 
| 
    Expected volatility
 |  | 30.30% | 
| 
    Weighted-average volatility
 |  | 30.30% | 
| 
    Dividend yield
 |  | 1.56% | 
| 
    Risk-free interest rate
 |  | 2.88 to 3.73% | 
| 
    Expected life
 |  | 0.70 to 5.70 years | 
 
    During the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15,
    2007, there were 6,548 options that vested. As a result of the
    Arrangement, 563,651 options were accelerated to vest with a
    total fair value of approximately $4 million, and 1,238,183
    options were settled in cash using the $44.93 per common share
    transaction price for approximately $29 million.
 
    Under our Conversion Plan for the period from April 1, 2007
    through May 15, 2007, the total intrinsic value of options
    exercised was approximately $1 million and cash received
    from options exercised was approximately $1 million. During
    both the three months and nine months ended December 31,
    2006, there were 130,388 and 134,686 options exercised,
    respectively, at a weighted average exercise price of $17.34 and
    $17.37, respectively.
 
    Stock
    Appreciation Rights
 
    On October 26, 2006, our board of directors authorized a
    grant of 381,090 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) under the 2006
    Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $25.53 to certain of our
    executive officers and key employees. The terms of the SARs were
    identical in all material respects to those of the stock options
    issued under the 2006 Incentive Plan, except that the
    incremental increase in the value of the SARs was to be settled
    in cash rather than shares of Novelis common stock at the
    time of exercise. The SARs were comprised of two equal portions:
    premium and non-premium SARs. Both the premium and non-premium
    SARs vested ratably in 25% annual increments over the four-year
    period measured from October 26, 2006, and could be
    exercised, in whole or in part, once vested. However, while the
    premium and non-premium SARs carried the same exercise price of
    $25.53, in no event could the premium SARs be exercised unless
    the fair market value per share, as defined in the 2006
    Incentive Plan, on the business day preceding the exercise date
    equals or exceeds $28.59. As a result of the Arrangement, all of
    our SARs under the 2006 Incentive Plan were accelerated to vest,
    cancelled and settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price
    per common share paid by Hindalco in the transaction.
    
    29
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    The table below shows the SARs activity (for both premium and
    non-premium SARs) under our 2006 Incentive Plan.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Average 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Remaining 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted 
 |  |  | Contractual 
 |  |  | Aggregate 
 |  | 
|  |  | Number of 
 |  |  | Average 
 |  |  | Term 
 |  |  | Intrinsic 
 |  | 
|  |  | SARs |  |  | Exercise Price |  |  | (In Years) |  |  | Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Predecessor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2007
 |  |  | 380,000 |  |  | $ | 25.53 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Granted
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exercised
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Forfeited/Cancelled
 |  |  | (1,640 | ) |  | $ | 25.53 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Expired
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Settled as a result of the Arrangement
 |  |  | (378,360 | ) |  | $ | 25.53 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    SARs outstanding as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    SARs exercisable as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Monte Carlo valuation
    model to determine the fair value of the premium SARs
    outstanding under the 2006 Incentive Plan. The Monte Carlo model
    utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability
    of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award and
    calculates the fair market value of each award. Because our
    trading history was shorter than the expected life of the SARs,
    we used historical stock price volatility data from comparable
    companies to supplement our own historical volatility to
    determine expected volatility assumptions. No quarterly or
    annual dividend was expected. Risk-free interest rates were
    based on U.S. Treasury Strip yields, compounded daily,
    consistent with the expected remaining lives of the premium
    SARs. The fair value of the premium SARs was being amortized
    over the requisite remaining service period of each award, which
    was from 0.57 to 3.57 years as of March 31, 2007,
    subject to acceleration in cases where the employee elects
    retirement or is retirement eligible after October 26, 2007.
 
    Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Black-Scholes valuation
    model to determine the fair value of the non-premium SARs
    outstanding. Because our trading history was shorter than the
    expected life of the SARs, we used historical stock price
    volatility data from comparable companies to supplement our own
    historical volatility to determine expected volatility
    assumptions. No quarterly or annual dividend was expected.
    Risk-free interest rates were based on U.S. Treasury Strip
    yields, compounded daily, consistent with the expected remaining
    lives of the SARs. Because we did not have a sufficient history
    of SAR exercise or cancellation, we estimated the expected
    remaining life of the SARs based on an extension of the
    simplified method as prescribed by
    SAB No. 107.
 
    As a result of the Arrangement, 378,360 premium and non-premium
    SARs were accelerated to vest and were settled in cash for
    approximately $7 million.
 
    Stock
    Price Appreciation Unit Plan
 
    Prior to the spin-off, some Alcan employees who later
    transferred to Novelis held Alcan stock price appreciation units
    (SPAUs). These units entitled them to receive cash equal to the
    excess of the market value of an Alcan common share on the
    exercise date of a SPAU over the market value of an Alcan common
    share on its grant date. On January 6, 2005, these
    employees received 418,777 Novelis SPAUs to replace their
    211,035 Alcan SPAUs at a weighted average exercise price of
    $22.04. All converted SPAUs that were vested
    
    30
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    at the spin-off date continued to be vested. Unvested SPAUs were
    to vest in four equal annual installments beginning on
    January 6, 2006, the first anniversary of the spin-off date.
 
    The table below shows the activity in our SPAU Plan.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Average 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Remaining 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted 
 |  |  | Contractual 
 |  |  | Aggregate 
 |  | 
|  |  | Number of 
 |  |  | Average 
 |  |  | Term 
 |  |  | Intrinsic 
 |  | 
|  |  | SPAUs |  |  | Exercise Price |  |  | (In Years) |  |  | Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Predecessor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    SPAUs outstanding as of March 31, 2007
 |  |  | 300,617 |  |  | $ | 21.94 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Granted
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exercised
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Forfeited/Cancelled
 |  |  | (744 | ) |  | $ | 21.49 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Expired
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Settled as a result of the Arrangement
 |  |  | (299,873 | ) |  | $ | 21.94 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    SPAUs outstanding as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    SPAUs exercisable as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Black-Scholes valuation
    model to estimate the fair value of SPAUs granted to employees
    and to determine the fair value of the SPAUs outstanding.
    Because our trading history is shorter than the expected life of
    the SPAUs, we used historical stock price volatility data from
    comparable companies to supplement our own historical volatility
    to determine expected volatility assumptions. No quarterly or
    annual dividend was expected. Risk-free interest rates were
    based on U.S. Treasury spot rates consistent with the
    expected remaining lives of the SPAUs. Because we did not have a
    sufficient history of SPAU exercise or cancellation, we
    estimated the expected remaining life of the SPAUs based on an
    extension of the simplified method as prescribed by
    SAB No. 107. As a result of the Arrangement, the SPAUs
    were valued using the $44.93 purchase price per common share
    paid by Hindalco in the transaction.
 
    As a result of the Arrangement, 201,495 SPAUs were accelerated
    to vest and 299,873 SPAUs were settled in cash using the $44.93
    per common share transaction price for approximately
    $7 million.
 
    Deferred
    Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors
 
    On January 5, 2005, Novelis established the Deferred Share
    Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors under which non-executive
    directors would receive 50% of their compensation payable in the
    form of directors deferred share units (DDSUs) and the
    other 50% in the form of either cash, additional DDSUs or a
    combination of these two (at the election of each non-executive
    director). The number of DDSUs was determined by dividing the
    quarterly amount payable, as elected, by the average closing
    prices of a common share on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)
    (adjusted for the noon exchange rate) and New York Stock
    Exchange (NYSE) on the last five trading days of each quarter.
    Additional DDSUs representing the equivalent of dividends
    declared on common shares are credited to each holder of DDSUs.
    The number of DDSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2007
    included DDSUs issued on April 1, 2007, as the required
    service was provided by the period-end.
 
    The DDSUs were redeemable in cash
    and/or in
    shares of our common stock following the participants
    retirement from the board. The redemption amount was calculated
    by multiplying the accumulated balance of DDSUs by the average
    closing price of a common share on the TSX (adjusted for the
    noon exchange rate) and NYSE on the last five trading days prior
    to the redemption date. As a result of the Arrangement, all of
    our
    
    31
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    DDSUs were cancelled and settled in cash using the $44.93
    purchase price per common share paid by Hindalco in the
    transaction.
 
    The table below shows the activity in our DDSU Plan.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Aggregate 
 |  | 
|  |  | Number of 
 |  |  | Redemption 
 |  |  | Intrinsic 
 |  | 
|  |  | DDSUs |  |  | Price |  |  | Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Predecessor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    DDSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2007
 |  |  | 106,578 |  |  | $ | 44.09 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Granted
 |  |  | 3,333 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exercised (paid out)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Forfeited
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Expired/Cancelled
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Settled as a result of the Arrangement
 |  |  | (109,911 | ) |  | $ | 44.93 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    DDSUs outstanding as of May 15, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    As a result of the Arrangement, 109,911 DDSUs were settled in
    cash using the $44.93 purchase price per common share paid by
    Hindalco in the transaction for approximately $5 million.
 
    Novelis
    Founders Performance Awards
 
    In March 2005 (and amended and restated in March 2006 and
    February 2007), Novelis established a plan to reward certain key
    executives with Performance Share Units (PSUs) if Novelis common
    share price improvement targets were achieved within specific
    time periods. There were three equal tranches of PSUs, and each
    had a specific share price improvement target. For the first
    tranche, the target share price of $23.57 applied for the period
    from March 24, 2005 to March 23, 2008. For the second
    tranche, the target share price of $25.31 applied for the period
    from March 24, 2006 to March 23, 2008. For the third
    tranche, the target share price of $27.28 applied for the period
    from March 24, 2007 to March 23, 2008. If awarded, a
    particular tranche was to be paid in cash on the later of nine
    months from the date the specific common share price target is
    reached or twelve months after the start of the performance
    period, and will be based on the average of the daily common
    share closing prices on the NYSE for the last five trading days
    prior to the payment date.
 
    The liability for the first tranche was accrued over its term,
    was valued on March 24, 2006, and was paid in April 2006 in
    the aggregate amount of approximately $3 million.
 
    In February 2007, our board of directors recognized that the
    applicable share price threshold had been (or would likely be)
    met with respect to the second tranche and would probably be met
    for the third tranche, but in light of the insiders
    awareness of the possibility of a change in control transaction,
    they were subject to a trading blackout. Moreover, it was
    unlikely that a 15 day open trading window under the
    Novelis disclosure and insider trading policies would arise
    prior to the Arrangement. Accordingly, on February 10,
    2007, our board of directors further amended the PSUs in order
    to provide that the applicable threshold for (a) the second
    tranche was to be met as of February 28, 2007 and
    (b) the third tranche was to be met as of March 26,
    2007, for purposes of PSUs to be awarded.
 
    As a result of the Arrangement, the second and third tranches
    (represented by 94,450 and 85,950 PSUs, respectively) were
    settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price per common share
    paid by Hindalco in the transaction for a total of approximately
    $8 million.
    
    32
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Share-Based
    Compensation Expense
 
    Total share-based compensation expense is presented in the table
    below (in millions). These amounts are included in Selling,
    general and administrative expenses in our condensed
    consolidated statements of operations.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  |  | May 15, 
 |  |  | December 31, 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Recognition Awards
 |  | $ | 0.7 |  |  |  | $ | 0.5 |  |  | $ | 2.0 |  |  |  | $ | 1.5 |  |  | $ | 0.5 |  | 
| 
    Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock options)
 |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | 0.7 |  |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | 14.5 |  |  |  | 0.7 |  | 
| 
    Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock appreciation rights)
 |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | 0.4 |  |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | 5.6 |  |  |  | 0.4 |  | 
| 
    Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005
 |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | 5.0 |  |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | 23.8 |  |  |  | 6.5 |  | 
| 
    Stock Price Appreciation Unit Plan
 |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | 1.9 |  |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | (0.5 | ) |  |  | 3.0 |  | 
| 
    Deferred Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors
 |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | 0.6 |  |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 1.5 |  | 
| 
    Novelis Founders Performance Awards
 |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | (0.1 | ) |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  | 1.2 |  | 
| 
    Total Shareholder Returns Performance Plan
 |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | n.a. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.0 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total share-based compensation expense
 |  | $ | 0.7 |  |  |  | $ | 9.0 |  |  | $ | 2.0 |  |  |  | $ | 45.2 |  |  | $ | 14.8 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | n.a. |  |  not applicable as plan was cancelled. | 
    
    33
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    |  |  | 
    | 12. | Postretirement
    Benefit Plans | 
 
    Components of net periodic benefit cost for our significant
    pension and other postretirement benefit plans are shown in the
    tables below (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
| 
    Pension Benefit Plans
 |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | December 31, 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Service cost
 |  | $ | 11 |  |  |  | $ | 13 |  |  | $ | 29 |  |  |  | $ | 6 |  |  | $ | 32 |  | 
| 
    Interest cost
 |  |  | 12 |  |  |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | 30 |  |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 34 |  | 
| 
    Expected return on assets
 |  |  | (11 | ) |  |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  | (27 | ) |  |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | (29 | ) | 
| 
    Amortization
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     actuarial losses
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
     prior service cost
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Curtailment/settlement losses
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net periodic benefit cost
 |  |  | 13 |  |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 33 |  |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 39 |  | 
| 
    Proportionate share of non-consolidated affiliates
    deferred pension costs, net of $2 million of tax
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total net periodic benefit cost recognized
 |  | $ | 13 |  |  |  | $ | 17 |  |  | $ | 33 |  |  |  | $ | 7 |  |  | $ | 43 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
| Other Postretirement 
 |  | December 31, |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
| 
    Benefit Plans
 |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | December 31, 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Service cost
 |  | $ | 1 |  |  |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 3 |  |  |  | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | 4 |  | 
| 
    Interest cost
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
    Amortization
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     actuarial losses
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net periodic benefit cost
 |  | $ | 3 |  |  |  | $ | 3 |  |  | $ | 8 |  |  |  | $ | 2 |  |  | $ | 10 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 7.5% in
    fiscal 2008.
    
    34
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Employer
    Contributions to Plans
 
    For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to
    provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to date,
    and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over
    periods of 15 years or less. We also participate in savings
    plans in Canada and the U.S. as well as defined
    contribution pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany,
    Malaysia and Brazil. We contributed the following amounts to all
    plans, including the Alcan plans that cover our employees (in
    millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | December 31, 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Funded pension plans
 |  | $ | 10 |  |  |  | $ | 17 |  |  | $ | 25 |  |  |  | $ | 4 |  |  | $ | 30 |  | 
| 
    Unfunded pension plans
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 19 |  | 
| 
    Savings and defined contribution pension plans
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 9 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total contributions
 |  | $ | 18 |  |  |  | $ | 34 |  |  | $ | 45 |  |  |  | $ | 8 |  |  | $ | 58 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    During the remainder of fiscal 2008, we expect to contribute an
    additional $14 million to our funded pension plans,
    $4 million to our unfunded pension plans and
    $4 million to our savings and defined contribution pension
    plans.
 
    In October 2007, we completed the transfer of additional U.K.
    plan assets and liabilities from Alcan to Novelis. Plan
    liabilities assumed exceeded plan assets received by
    $3 million. As of December 31, 2007, there remained an
    outstanding matter related to pension plans in Canada for those
    employees who elected to transfer their past service to Novelis.
    We expect the transfer of pension assets and liabilities in
    Canada will take place by June 30, 2008, and we expect that
    the plan assets transferred will approximate the liabilities
    assumed. To the extent that differences between transferred plan
    assets and liabilities exist, we will record the adjustments to
    goodwill.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 13. | Currency
    Losses (Gains) | 
 
    The following currency losses (gains) are included in the
    accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations (in
    millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | December 31, 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Net loss (gain) on change in fair value of currency derivative
    instruments(A)
 |  | $ | 19 |  |  |  | $ | 6 |  |  | $ | (2 | ) |  |  | $ | (10 | ) |  | $ | 8 |  | 
| 
    Net loss (gain) on translation of monetary assets and
    liabilities(B)
 |  |  | (12 | ) |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | (3 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net currency losses (gains)
 |  | $ | 7 |  |  |  | $ | 13 |  |  | $ | (5 | ) |  |  | $ | (6 | ) |  | $ | 5 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    35
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (A) |  | Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net in the accompanying condensed
    consolidated statements of operations. | 
|  | 
    | (B) |  | Included in Other (income) expenses  net in
    the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. | 
 
    The following currency gains (losses) are included in
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
    accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets (net of tax
    effect and in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | January 1, 2007 
 |  | 
|  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | March 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Cumulative currency translation adjustment  beginning
    of period
 |  | $ |  |  |  |  | $ | 133 |  | 
| 
    Effect of changes in exchange rates
 |  |  | 68 |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cumulative currency translation adjustment  end of
    period
 |  | $ | 68 |  |  |  | $ | 144 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 14. | Financial
    Instruments and Commodity Contracts | 
 
    In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
    non-derivative instruments, including forward contracts, to
    manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates,
    interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such
    instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may
    be exposed to losses in the future if the counterparties to the
    contracts fail to perform. We are satisfied that the risk of
    such non-performance is remote, due to our monitoring of credit
    exposures. Alcan is the principal counterparty to our aluminum
    forward contracts.
 
    Certain contracts are designated as hedges of either net
    investment or cash flows. For these contracts we recognize the
    change in fair value of the ineffective portion of the hedge as
    a gain or loss in our current period results of operations. We
    include the change in fair value of the effective and interest
    portions of these hedges in Accumulated other comprehensive
    income within Shareholders equity in the accompanying
    condensed consolidated balance sheet.
 
    Prior to
    Completion of the Arrangement
 
    Prior to and during the period from April 1, 2007 through
    May 15, 2007, we applied hedge accounting to certain of our
    cross-currency swaps with respect to intercompany loans to
    several European subsidiaries and forward exchange contracts.
    Our Euro and British pound (GBP) cross-currency swaps were
    designated as net investment hedges, while our Swiss franc (CHF)
    cross-currency swaps and our Brazilian real (BRL) forward
    foreign exchange contracts were designated as cash flow hedges.
    As of May 15, 2007, we had $712 million of
    cross-currency swaps (Euro 475 million, GBP 62 million
    and CHF 35 million) and $99 million of forward foreign
    exchange contracts (BRL 229 million). During the period
    from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, we
    implemented cash flow hedge accounting for an electricity swap,
    which was embedded in a supply contract.
 
    During the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15,
    2007, the change in fair value of the effective and interest
    portions of our net investment hedges was a loss of
    $8 million and the change in fair value of the effective
    portion of our cash flow hedges was a gain of $7 million.
 
    Impact of
    the Arrangement and Purchase Accounting
 
    Concurrent with completion of the Arrangement on May 15,
    2007, we dedesignated all hedging relationships. The cumulative
    change in fair value of effective and interest portions of these
    hedges, previously presented in Accumulated other
    comprehensive income within Shareholders equity on
    May 15, 2007, was
    
    36
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    incorporated in the new basis of accounting. As a result of
    purchase accounting, the fair value of all embedded derivative
    instruments was allocated to the fair value of their respective
    host contracts, reducing the fair value of embedded derivative
    instruments to zero.
 
    Subsequent
    to Completion of the Arrangement
 
    We redesignated our electricity swap, noted below, as a cash
    flow hedge on June 1, 2007. We redesignated our Euro, GBP
    and CHF cross-currency swaps, noted above, as net investment
    hedges on September 1, 2007. During the quarter ended
    December 31, 2007, we entered into a series of interest
    rate swaps which we designated as cash flow hedges (see
    Note 9  Debt).
 
    During the three months ended December 31, 2007 and for the
    period from May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007, we
    recognized pre-tax gains of $1 million and $5 million,
    respectively, for the change in fair value of the effective
    portion of our cash flow hedges. As of December 31, 2007,
    we expect to realize $1 million of effective net losses
    during the next twelve months. The maximum period over which we
    have hedged our exposure to cash flow variability is through
    November 2016.
 
    During the three months ended December 31, 2007 and for the
    period from May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007, we
    recognized pre-tax losses of $33 million and
    $5 million, respectively, for the change in fair value of
    the effective portion of our net investment hedges. As of
    December 31, 2007, we expect to realize $5 million of
    effective net losses during the next twelve months. The maximum
    period over which we have hedged our exposure to net investment
    variability is through February 2015.
 
    The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
    contracts as of December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007
    were as follows (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | As of December 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Maturity Dates 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Net Fair 
 |  | 
|  |  | (Fiscal Year) |  | Assets |  |  | Liabilities |  |  | Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Successor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Foreign exchange forward contracts
 |  | 2008 through 2012 |  | $ | 38 |  |  | $ | (59 | ) |  | $ | (21 | ) | 
| 
    Cross-currency swaps
 |  | 2008 through 2015 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | (136 | ) |  |  | (133 | ) | 
| 
    Interest rate currency swaps
 |  | 2009 through 2011 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Interest rate swaps
 |  | 2009 through 2010 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (2 | ) | 
| 
    Aluminum forward contracts
 |  | 2008 through 2010 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | (52 | ) |  |  | (51 | ) | 
| 
    Electricity swap
 |  | 2017 |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | 6 |  | 
| 
    Embedded derivative instruments
 |  | 2008  through 2009 |  |  | 14 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 
| 
    Natural gas swaps
 |  | 2008 through 2010 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total fair value
 |  |  |  |  | 64 |  |  |  | (252 | ) |  |  | (188 | ) | 
| 
    Less: current portion(A)
 |  |  |  |  | 54 |  |  |  | (112 | ) |  |  | (58 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Noncurrent portion(A)
 |  |  |  | $ | 10 |  |  | $ | (140 | ) |  | $ | (130 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    
    37
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | As of March 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Maturity Dates 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Net Fair 
 |  | 
|  |  | (Fiscal Year) |  | Assets |  |  | Liabilities |  |  | Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Predecessor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Foreign exchange forward contracts
 |  | 2008 through 2012 |  | $ | 16 |  |  | $ | (20 | ) |  | $ | (4 | ) | 
| 
    Interest rate swaps
 |  | 2008 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Cross-currency swaps
 |  | 2008 through 2015 |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | (90 | ) |  |  | (84 | ) | 
| 
    Aluminum forward contracts
 |  | 2008 through 2010 |  |  | 60 |  |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | 52 |  | 
| 
    Aluminum options
 |  | 2008 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Electricity swap
 |  | 2017 |  |  | 60 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60 |  | 
| 
    Embedded derivative instruments
 |  | 2008 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Natural gas swaps
 |  | 2008 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total fair value
 |  |  |  |  | 147 |  |  |  | (118 | ) |  |  | 29 |  | 
| 
    Less: current portion(A)
 |  |  |  |  | 92 |  |  |  | (33 | ) |  |  | 59 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Noncurrent portion(A)
 |  |  |  | $ | 55 |  |  | $ | (85 | ) |  | $ | (30 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (A) |  | The amounts of the current and long-term portions of fair values
    under assets are each presented in the accompanying condensed
    consolidated balance sheets. The amounts of the current and
    noncurrent portions of fair values under liabilities are
    included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    and Other long-term liabilities, respectively, in the
    accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 15. | Other
    (Income) Expenses  Net | 
 
    Other (income) expenses  net is comprised of the
    following (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | December 31, 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Exchange (gains) losses  net
 |  | $ | (12 | ) |  |  | $ | 7 |  |  | $ | (3 | ) |  |  | $ | 4 |  |  | $ | (3 | ) | 
| 
    Restructuring charges  net
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 18 |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on sale of equity interest in non-consolidated
    affiliate(A)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (15 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (15 | ) | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on sale of rights to develop and operate
    hydroelectric power plants(B)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (11 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (11 | ) | 
| 
    (Gains) losses on disposals of property, plant and
    equipment  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 
| 
    Other  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net
 |  | $ | (11 | ) |  |  | $ | (9 | ) |  | $ | (7 | ) |  |  | $ | 4 |  |  | $ | (6 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (A) |  | In November 2006, we sold the common and preferred shares of our
    25% interest in Petrocoque to the other shareholders of
    Petrocoque for approximately $20 million. We recognized a
    pre-tax gain of approximately $15 million. | 
|  | 
    | (B) |  | During the fourth quarter of 2006, we sold our rights to develop
    and operate two hydroelectric power plants in South America and
    recorded a pre-tax gain of approximately $11 million. | 
    38
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
 
 
    We provide for income taxes using the liability method in
    accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
    Income Taxes. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 28,
    Interim Financial Reporting, and FASB Interpretation
    No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim
    Periods, the provision for taxes on income recognizes our
    estimate of the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for
    the full fiscal year, adjusted for the impact of any discrete
    events, which are reported in the period in which they occur.
    Each quarter, we re-evaluate our estimated tax expense for the
    year and make adjustments for changes in the estimated tax rate.
    Additionally, we evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax
    assets on a quarterly basis. Our evaluation considers all
    positive and negative evidence and factors, such as the
    scheduled reversal of temporary differences, historical and
    projected future taxable income or losses, and prudent and
    feasible tax planning strategies.
 
    The Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) for
    (1) the three months ended December 31, 2007 and
    (2) the periods from May 16, 2007 through
    December 31, 2007 and from April 1, 2007 through
    May 15, 2007 were based on the estimated effective tax
    rates applicable for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2008,
    after considering items specifically related to the interim
    periods. The Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)
    for the three and nine month periods ended December 31,
    2006 were based on the estimated effective tax rates applicable
    for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, after
    considering items specifically related to the interim periods.
 
    A reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our
    effective tax rates is as follows (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | Three Months Ended 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  |  | May 15, 
 |  |  | December 31, 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Pre-tax loss before equity in net (income) loss of
    non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests share
 |  | $ | (41 | ) |  |  | $ | (144 | ) |  | $ | (79 | ) |  |  | $ | (95 | ) |  | $ | (319 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Canadian statutory tax rate
 |  |  | 33 | % |  |  |  | 33 | % |  |  | 33 | % |  |  |  | 33 | % |  |  | 33 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income taxes (benefit) at the Canadian statutory rate
 |  | $ | (14 | ) |  |  | $ | (47 | ) |  | $ | (26 | ) |  |  | $ | (31 | ) |  | $ | (105 | ) | 
| 
    Increase (decrease) in tax rate resulting from:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exchange translation items
 |  |  | 14 |  |  |  |  | (21 | ) |  |  | 61 |  |  |  |  | 23 |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
    Exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes
 |  |  | 18 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Change in valuation allowances
 |  |  | 14 |  |  |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 54 |  |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 38 |  | 
| 
    Enacted tax rate changes
 |  |  | (32 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (103 | ) |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Expense/income items with no tax effect  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | (19 | ) |  |  |  | (11 | ) |  |  | 10 |  | 
| 
    Tax rate differences on foreign earnings
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (19 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | (59 | ) | 
| 
    Other  net
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 12 |  |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)
 |  | $ | 4 |  |  |  | $ | (34 | ) |  | $ | 4 |  |  |  | $ | 4 |  |  | $ | (106 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Effective tax rate
 |  |  | (10 | )% |  |  |  | 24 | % |  |  | (5 | )% |  |  |  | (4 | )% |  |  | 33 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Our effective tax rate differs from the Canadian statutory rate
    primarily due to the following factors: (1) pre-tax foreign
    currency gains or losses with no tax effect and the tax effect
    of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no
    pre-tax effect, which is shown above as exchange translation
    items; (2) the
    
    39
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    remeasurement of deferred income taxes due to foreign currency
    changes, which is shown above as exchange remeasurement of
    deferred income taxes; (3) changes in valuation allowances
    primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where
    we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able
    to utilize those losses; (4) the effects of enacted tax
    rate changes on cumulative taxable temporary differences and
    (5) differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign
    effective tax rates resulting from the application of an annual
    effective tax rate to profit and loss entities in different
    jurisdictions shown above as tax rate differences on foreign
    earnings.
 
    Cash taxes paid are shown in the table below (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  | Nine Months 
 | 
|  |  | Three Months Ended 
 |  | Through 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  | Ended 
 | 
|  |  | December 31, |  | December 31, 
 |  |  | May 15, 
 |  | December 31, 
 | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 2007 |  |  | 2007 |  | 2006 | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  | Predecessor |  | Successor |  |  | Predecessor |  | Predecessor | 
| 
    Cash taxes paid
 |  | $ | 19 |  |  |  | $ | 44 |  |  | $ | 50 |  |  |  | $ | 9 |  |  | $ | 56 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Adoption
    of FASB Interpretation No. 48
 
    In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
    Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FASB
    Interpretation No. 48 clarifies the accounting for income
    taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax
    position is required to meet before being recognized in the
    financial statements. FASB Interpretation No. 48 also
    provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification,
    interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
    disclosure and transition. Upon adoption as of January 1,
    2007, we increased our reserves for uncertain tax positions by
    $1 million. We recognized the increase as a cumulative
    effect adjustment to Shareholders equity as an increase to
    our Accumulated deficit. Including this adjustment,
    reserves for uncertain tax positions totaled $45 million as
    of January 1, 2007.
 
    During the three months ended December 31, 2007, our
    unrecognized tax benefits increased $7 million as a result
    of tax positions taken during a prior period. Our reserves for
    uncertain tax positions totaled $59 million as of
    December 31, 2007. Of this total, $47 million
    represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if
    recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate in future
    periods based on anticipated settlement dates.
 
    Tax authorities are currently examining certain of our prior
    years tax returns for
    1999-2006.
    We are evaluating potential adjustments related to certain items
    and we anticipate that it is reasonably possible that settlement
    of the examination will result in a payment in the range of up
    to $5 million and a corresponding decrease in unrecognized
    tax benefits by December 31, 2008.
 
    Separately, we are awaiting a court ruling regarding the
    utilization of certain operating losses. We anticipate that it
    is reasonably possible that this ruling will result in a
    $13 million decrease in unrecognized tax benefits by
    December 31, 2008 related to this matter. We have fully
    funded this contingent liability through a judicial deposit,
    which is included in Other long-term assets  third
    parties as of January 1, 2007.
 
    With the exception of the ongoing tax examinations described
    above, we are no longer subject to any income tax examinations
    by any tax authorities for years before 2001. With few
    exceptions, tax returns for all jurisdictions for all tax years
    after 2000 are subject to examination by taxing authorities.
 
    Our continuing practice and policy is to record potential
    interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
    our Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss). As of
    March 31, 2007, we had $8 million accrued for
    potential interest on income taxes and no amounts accrued for
    potential penalties. For the three months ended
    December 31, 2007, our Provision (benefit) for taxes on
    income (loss) included a reduction of less than
    $1 million of potential interest. For the periods from
    May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007 and from
    April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, our Provision
    (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) included charges for an
    additional
    
    40
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    $2 million and less than $1 million of potential
    interest, respectively. As of December 31, 2007, we had
    $10 million accrued for potential interest on income taxes
    and no amounts accrued for potential penalties.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 17. | Commitments
    and Contingencies | 
 
    Primary
    Supplier
 
    Alcan is our primary supplier of prime and sheet ingot. The
    table below shows our purchases from Alcan as a percentage of
    our total combined prime and sheet ingot purchases.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | May 16, 
 |  |  | April 1, 
 |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months 
 |  | 2007 
 |  |  | 2007 
 |  | Nine Months 
 | 
|  |  | Ended 
 |  | Through 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  | Ended 
 | 
|  |  | December 31, |  | December 31, 
 |  |  | May 15, 
 |  | December 31, 
 | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 2007 |  |  | 2007 |  | 2006 | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  | Predecessor |  | Successor |  |  | Predecessor |  | Predecessor | 
| 
    Purchases from Alcan as a percentage of total combined prime and
    sheet ingot purchases in kt(A)
 |  |  | 33 | % |  |  |  | 37 | % |  |  | 35 | % |  |  |  | 34 | % |  |  | 35 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (A) |  | One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
    equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. | 
 
    Legal
    Proceedings
 
    Reynolds Boat Case.  As previously disclosed,
    we and Alcan were defendants in a case in the United States
    District Court for the Western District of Washington, in
    Tacoma, Washington, case number C04-0175RJB. Plaintiffs were
    Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire
    Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a
    jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under implied warranty
    theories, based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and
    Alcan sold certain aluminum products that were ultimately used
    for marine applications and were unsuitable for such
    applications. The jury reached a verdict on May 22, 2006
    against us and Alcan for approximately $60 million, and the
    court later awarded Reynolds and Alcoa approximately
    $16 million in prejudgment interest and court costs.
 
    The case was settled during July 2006 as among us, Alcan,
    Reynolds, Alcoa and their insurers for $71 million. We
    contributed approximately $1 million toward the settlement,
    and the remaining $70 million was funded by our insurers.
    Although the settlement was substantially funded by our
    insurance carriers, certain of them have reserved the right to
    request a refund from us, after reviewing details of the
    plaintiffs damages to determine if they include costs of a
    nature not covered under the insurance contracts. Of the
    $70 million funded, $39 million is in dispute with and
    under further review by certain of our insurance carriers. In
    the quarter ended December 31, 2006, we posted a letter of
    credit in the amount of approximately $10 million in favor
    of one of those insurance carriers, while we resolve the extent
    of coverage of the costs included in the settlement. On
    October 8, 2007, we received a letter from these insurers
    stating that they have completed their review and they are
    requesting a refund of the $39 million plus interest. We
    reviewed the insurers position, and on January 7,
    2008, we sent a letter to the insurers rejecting their position
    that Novelis is not entitled to insurance coverage for the
    judgment against Novelis.
 
    Since our fiscal 2005 Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    was not filed until August 25, 2006, we recognized a
    liability for the full settlement amount of $71 million on
    December 31, 2005, included in Accrued expenses and
    other current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet,
    with a corresponding charge against earnings. We also recognized
    an insurance receivable included in Prepaid expenses and
    other current assets on our consolidated balance sheet of
    $31 million, with a corresponding increase to earnings.
    Although $70 million of the settlement was funded by our
    insurers, we only recognized an insurance receivable to the
    extent that
    
    41
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    coverage was not in dispute. This resulted in a net charge of
    $40 million during the quarter ended December 31, 2005.
 
    In July 2006, we contributed and paid $1 million to our
    insurers who subsequently paid the entire settlement amount of
    $71 million to the plaintiffs. Accordingly, during the
    quarter ended December 31, 2006 we reversed the previously
    recorded insurance receivable of $31 million and reduced
    our recorded liability by the same amount plus the
    $1 million contributed by us. The remaining liability of
    $39 million represents the amount of the settlement claim
    that was funded by our insurers but is still in dispute with and
    under further review by the parties as described above. The
    $39 million liability is included in Accrued expenses
    and other current liabilities in our condensed consolidated
    balance sheets as of December 31, 2007 and March 31,
    2007.
 
    While the ultimate resolution of the nature and extent of any
    costs not covered under our insurance contracts cannot be
    determined with certainty or reasonably estimated at this time,
    if there is an adverse outcome with respect to insurance
    coverage, and we are required to reimburse our insurers, it
    could have a material impact on our cash flows in the period of
    resolution. Alternatively, the ultimate resolution could be
    favorable, such that insurance coverage is in excess of the net
    expense that we have recognized to date. This would result in
    our recording a non-cash gain in the period of resolution, and
    this non-cash gain could have a material impact on our results
    of operations during the period in which such a determination is
    made.
 
    Coca-Cola
    Lawsuits.  A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
    Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
    Coca-Cola
    Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in state
    court in Georgia. In addition, a lawsuit was commenced against
    Novelis Corporation and Alcan Corporation on April 3, 2007
    by Coca-Cola
    Enterprises Inc., Enterprises Acquisition Company, Inc., The
    Coca-Cola
    Company and The
    Coca-Cola
    Trading Company, Inc. (collectively CCE) in federal court in
    Georgia. Novelis intends to defend these claims vigorously.
 
    CCBSS is a consortium of
    Coca-Cola
    bottlers across the United States, including
    Coca-Cola
    Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
    an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and
    seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial
    and a declaration of its rights under the agreement. The
    agreement includes a most favored nations provision
    regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS alleges that Novelis
    Corporation breached the terms of the most favored nations
    provision. The dispute will likely turn on the facts that are
    presented to the court by the parties and the courts
    finding as to how certain provisions of the agreement ought to
    be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in this litigation, the
    amount of damages would likely be material. Novelis Corporation
    has filed its answer and the parties are proceeding with
    discovery.
 
    The claim by CCE seeks monetary damages in an amount to be
    determined at trial for breach of a prior aluminum can stock
    supply agreement between CCE and Novelis Corporation, successor
    to the rights and obligations of Alcan Aluminum Corporation
    under the agreement. According to its terms, that agreement with
    CCE terminated in 2006. The CCE supply agreement included a
    most favored nations provision regarding certain
    pricing matters. CCE alleges that Novelis Corporations
    entry into a supply agreement with Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached
    the most favored nations provision of the CCE supply
    agreement. If CCE were to prevail in this litigation, the amount
    of damages would likely be material. The dispute will likely
    turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the parties
    and the courts finding as to how certain provisions of the
    supply agreement ought to be interpreted. Novelis Corporation
    has moved to dismiss the complaint and has not yet filed its
    answer. We have not recorded any reserves for these matters.
 
    Anheuser-Busch Litigation.  On
    September 19, 2006, Novelis Corporation filed a lawsuit
    against Anheuser-Busch, Inc. in federal court in Ohio.
    Anheuser-Busch, Inc. subsequently filed suit against Novelis
    Corporation and the Company in federal court in Missouri. On
    January 3, 2007, Anheuser-Busch, Inc.s suit was
    transferred to the Ohio federal court.
    
    42
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Novelis Corporation alleges that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached
    the existing multi-year aluminum can stock supply agreement
    between the parties, and we seek monetary damages and
    declaratory relief. Among other claims, we assert that since
    entering into the supply agreement, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. has
    breached its confidentiality obligations and there has been a
    structural change in market conditions that requires a change to
    the pricing provisions under the agreement.
 
    In its complaint, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. has asked for a
    declaratory judgment that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. is not obligated
    to modify the supply agreement as requested by Novelis
    Corporation, and that Novelis Corporation must continue to
    perform under the existing supply agreement.
 
    On January 18, 2008, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. filed a motion
    for summary judgment. Novelis Corporation will have until
    February 19, 2008 to respond to the motion. Novelis
    Corporation has continued to perform under the supply agreement
    during the litigation.
 
    ARCO Aluminum Complaint.  On May 24, 2007,
    Arco Aluminum Inc. (ARCO) filed a complaint against Novelis
    Corporation and Novelis Inc. in the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Kentucky. ARCO and Novelis are
    partners in a joint venture rolling mill located in Logan,
    Kentucky. In the complaint, ARCO seeks to resolve a perceived
    dispute over management and control of the joint venture
    following Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis.
 
    ARCO alleges that its consent was required in connection with
    Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis. Failure to obtain
    consent, ARCO alleges, has put us in default of the joint
    venture agreements, thereby triggering certain provisions in
    those agreements. The provisions include a reversion of the
    production management at the joint venture to Logan Aluminum
    from Novelis, and a reduction of the board of directors of the
    entity that manages the joint venture from seven members (four
    appointed by Novelis and three appointed by ARCO) to six members
    (three appointed by each of Novelis and ARCO).
 
    ARCO is seeking a court declaration that (1) Novelis and
    its affiliates are prohibited from exercising any managerial
    authority or control over the joint venture,
    (2) Novelis interest in the joint venture is limited
    to an economic interest only and (3) ARCO has authority to
    act on behalf of the joint venture. Or, alternatively, ARCO is
    seeking a reversion of the production management function to
    Logan Aluminum, and a change in the composition of the board of
    directors of the entity that manages the joint venture. Novelis
    filed its answer to the complaint on July 16, 2007.
 
    On July 3, 2007, ARCO filed a motion for partial summary
    judgment with respect to one of the counts of its complaint
    relating to the claim that Novelis breached the joint venture
    agreement by not seeking ARCOs consent. On July 30,
    2007, Novelis filed a motion to hold ARCOs motion for
    summary judgment in abeyance (pending further discovery), along
    with a demand for a jury. Those motions are pending. We intend
    to defend these proceedings vigorously.
 
    Environmental
    Matters
 
    Oswego North Ponds.  As previously disclosed,
    Oswego North Ponds is currently our largest known single
    environmental loss contingency. In the late 1960s and early
    1970s, Novelis Corporation, (formerly known as Alcan Aluminum
    Corporation, or Alcancorp) used an oil containing
    polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in its re-melt operations in
    Oswego, New York. At the time, Novelis Corporation utilized a
    once-through cooling water system that discharged through a
    series of constructed ponds and wetlands, collectively referred
    to as the North Ponds. In the early 1980s, low levels of PCBs
    were detected in the cooling water system discharge and Novelis
    Corporation performed several subsequent investigations. The
    PCB-containing hydraulic oil, Pydraul, which was eliminated from
    use by Novelis Corporation in the early 1970s, was identified as
    the source of contamination. In the mid-1980s, the Oswego North
    Ponds site was classified as an
    
    43
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    inactive hazardous waste disposal site and added to
    the New York State Registry. Novelis Corporation ceased
    discharge through the North Ponds in mid-2002.
 
    In cooperation with the New York State Department of
    Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New York State
    Department of Health, Novelis Corporation entered into a consent
    decree in August 2000 to develop and implement a remedial
    program to address the PCB contamination at the Oswego North
    Ponds site. A remedial investigation report was submitted in
    January 2004. The current estimated cost associated with this
    remediation is in the range of $12 million to
    $26 million. Based upon the report and other factors, we
    accrued $19 million as our estimated cost. In addition,
    NYSDEC held a public hearing on the remediation plan on
    March 13, 2006 and a Consent Order for the implementation
    of the remediation plan was executed by NYSDEC and Novelis
    Corporation, effective January 1, 2007. We believe that our
    estimate of $19 million is reasonable, and that the
    remediation plan will be designed and implemented in fiscal 2008.
 
    Brazil
    Tax Matters
 
    Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazils
    Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America,
    as of December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007, we had
    cash deposits aggregating approximately $34 million and
    $25 million, respectively, in judicial depository accounts
    pending finalization of the related cases. The depository
    accounts are in the name of the Brazilian government and will be
    expended towards these legal proceedings or released to us,
    depending on the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are
    included in Other long-term assets  third parties
    in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
    In addition, we are involved in several disputes with
    Brazils Ministry of Treasury about various forms of
    manufacturing taxes and social security contributions, for which
    we have made no judicial deposits but for which we have
    established individual reserves ranging from $7 million to
    $83 million as of December 31, 2007. In total, these
    reserves approximate $103 million as of December 31,
    2007 and are included in Other long-term liabilities in
    our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
 
    On August 15, 2007, there was a Superior Court of Justice
    ruling in Brazil reducing the statute of limitations from ten
    years to five years for claims relating to the application of
    Brazilian tax credits resulting from previous payments made
    under a social contribution tax. Accordingly, in the nine months
    ended December 31, 2007, we reversed $21 million of
    reserves ($15 million net of tax) relating to the disputed
    application of such credits in 1999 and 2000, as these tax
    credits may no longer be challenged by the government.
 
    Guarantees
    of Indebtedness
 
    We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
    subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Aluminium Norf GmbH, which is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint
    venture that does not meet the requirements for consolidation
    under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised),
    Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. | 
 
    In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
    guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
    of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no
    expiration and have termination notice requirements. Neither we
    nor any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates hold
    any assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the
    potential settlement of these guarantees.
    
    44
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Since we consolidate wholly-owned subsidiaries in our financial
    statements, all outstanding liabilities associated with trade
    accounts payable for these entities are already included in our
    condensed consolidated balance sheets.
 
    The following table discloses information about our obligations
    under guarantees of indebtedness as of December 31, 2007
    (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Maximum Potential 
 |  | Liability Carrying 
 | 
| 
    Type of Entity
 |  | Future Payment |  | Value | 
|  | 
| 
    Wholly-owned subsidiaries
 |  | $ | 85 |  |  | $ | 60 |  | 
| 
    Aluminium Norf GmbH
 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 18. | Segment
    and Major Customer Information | 
 
    Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
    aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
    customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
    areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
    America; Europe; Asia and South America.
 
    As a result of the acquisition by Hindalco, and based on the way
    our President and Chief Operating Officer (our chief operating
    decision-maker) reviews the results of segment operations,
    during the quarter ended June 30, 2007 we changed our
    segment performance measure to Segment Income, as defined below.
    As a result, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified
    to conform to the new segment performance measure.
 
    We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
    operating segments, based on Segment Income, in accordance with
    FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of
    an Enterprise and Related Information. Segment Income
    provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
    line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
    Segment Income as earnings before (a) interest expense and
    amortization of debt issuance costs  net;
    (b) unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of
    derivative instruments  net; (c) realized gains
    (losses) on corporate derivative instruments  net;
    (d) depreciation and amortization; (e) impairment
    charges on long-lived assets; (f) minority interests
    share; (g) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share
    of Segment Income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
    determined on the equity method of accounting;
    (h) restructuring charges  net; (i) gains
    or losses on disposals of property, plant and equipment and
    businesses  net; (j) corporate selling, general
    and administrative expenses; (k) other costs 
    net; (l) litigation settlement  net of insurance
    recoveries; (m) sale transaction fees; (n) provision
    or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and (o) cumulative
    effect of accounting change.
 
    Net sales and expenses are measured in accordance with the
    policies and procedures described in Note 1 
    Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our
    consolidated and combined financial statements included in our
    Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006, as amended on
    April 30, 2007.
 
    We do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB
    Statement No. 133. Accordingly, changes in fair value are
    recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the
    recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the
    contract settlement. In the accompanying condensed consolidated
    statements of operations, changes in fair value of derivative
    instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement
    No. 133 are recognized in (Gain) loss on change in fair
    value of derivative instruments  net. These gains
    or losses may or may not result from cash settlement. For
    Segment Income purposes we only include the impact of the
    derivative gains or losses to the extent they are settled in
    cash (i.e., realized) during that period.
 
    The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
    millions). The Corporate and Other column in the tables below
    includes functions that are managed directly from our corporate
    office, which
    
    45
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    focuses on strategy development and oversees governance, policy,
    legal compliance, human resources and finance matters. It also
    includes consolidating and other elimination accounts.
 
    Selected
    Segment Financial Information
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Adjustment to 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Eliminate 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | North 
 |  |  |  |  |  | South 
 |  | Proportional 
 |  | Corporate 
 |  |  | 
| 
    Total Assets
 |  | America |  | Europe |  | Asia |  | America |  | Consolidation |  | and Other |  | Total | 
|  | 
| 
    December 31, 2007 (Successor)
 |  | $ | 3,847 |  |  | $ | 4,235 |  |  | $ | 1,078 |  |  | $ | 1,456 |  |  | $ | (124 | ) |  | $ | 44 |  |  | $ | 10,536 |  | 
|  | 
|  | 
| 
    March 31, 2007 (Predecessor)
 |  | $ | 1,566 |  |  | $ | 2,543 |  |  | $ | 1,110 |  |  | $ | 821 |  |  | $ | (114 | ) |  | $ | 44 |  |  | $ | 5,970 |  | 
 
    Comparison
    of Three Month Data:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Adjustment to 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Eliminate 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Selected Operating Results 
 |  | North 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | South 
 |  |  | Proportional 
 |  |  | Corporate 
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Three Months Ended December 31, 2007
 |  | America |  |  | Europe |  |  | Asia |  |  | America |  |  | Consolidation |  |  | and Other |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    (Successor)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales (to third parties)
 |  | $ | 995 |  |  | $ | 1,010 |  |  | $ | 483 |  |  | $ | 247 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 2,735 |  | 
| 
    Intersegment sales
 |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Segment Income
 |  |  | 83 |  |  |  | 45 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 34 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 172 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 37 |  |  |  | 57 |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | (23 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 105 |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 63 |  | 
|  | 
|  | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Adjustment to 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Eliminate 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Selected Operating Results 
 |  | North 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | South 
 |  |  | Proportional 
 |  |  | Corporate 
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Three Months Ended December 31, 2006
 |  | America |  |  | Europe |  |  | Asia |  |  | America |  |  | Consolidation |  |  | and Other |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    (Predecessor)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales (to third parties)
 |  | $ | 850 |  |  | $ | 932 |  |  | $ | 457 |  |  | $ | 237 |  |  | $ | (4 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 2,472 |  | 
| 
    Intersegment sales
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 11 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (18 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Segment Income (Loss)
 |  |  | (42 | ) |  |  | 43 |  |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | 44 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 59 |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 19 |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39 |  | 
 
    Comparison
    of Nine Month Data:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Adjustment to 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Eliminate 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Selected Operating Results 
 |  | North 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | South 
 |  |  | Proportional 
 |  |  | Corporate 
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    May 16, 2007 Through December 31, 2007
 |  | America |  |  | Europe |  |  | Asia |  |  | America |  |  | Consolidation |  |  | and Other |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    (Successor)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales (to third parties)
 |  | $ | 2,619 |  |  | $ | 2,695 |  |  | $ | 1,167 |  |  | $ | 622 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 7,103 |  | 
| 
    Intersegment sales
 |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 27 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (47 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Segment Income
 |  |  | 195 |  |  |  | 155 |  |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | 100 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 476 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 97 |  |  |  | 118 |  |  |  | 37 |  |  |  | 42 |  |  |  | (35 | ) |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 260 |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | 63 |  |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | (11 | ) |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 120 |  | 
|  | 
|  | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Adjustment to 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Eliminate 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Selected Operating Results 
 |  | North 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | South 
 |  |  | Proportional 
 |  |  | Corporate 
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
 |  | America |  |  | Europe |  |  | Asia |  |  | America |  |  | Consolidation |  |  | and Other |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    (Predecessor)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales (to third parties)
 |  | $ | 446 |  |  | $ | 510 |  |  | $ | 216 |  |  | $ | 109 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 1,281 |  | 
| 
    Intersegment sales
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Segment Income (Loss)
 |  |  | (24 | ) |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 28 |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 17 |  | 
 
    
    46
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Adjustment to 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Eliminate 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Selected Operating Results 
 |  | North 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | South 
 |  |  | Proportional 
 |  |  | Corporate 
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Nine Months Ended December 31, 2006
 |  | America |  |  | Europe |  |  | Asia |  |  | America |  |  | Consolidation |  |  | and Other |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    (Predecessor)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales (to third parties)
 |  | $ | 2,796 |  |  | $ | 2,794 |  |  | $ | 1,298 |  |  | $ | 654 |  |  | $ | (12 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 7,530 |  | 
| 
    Intersegment sales
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | 43 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (62 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Segment Income (Loss)
 |  |  | (37 | ) |  |  | 191 |  |  |  | 56 |  |  |  | 125 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 335 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 52 |  |  |  | 69 |  |  |  | 41 |  |  |  | 33 |  |  |  | (23 | ) |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 175 |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | 31 |  |  |  | 36 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | (15 | ) |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 95 |  | 
 
    The following table shows the reconciliation from Total Segment
    Income to Net income (loss) (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | Three Months Ended 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  |  | May 15, 
 |  |  | December 31, 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Total Segment Income
 |  | $ | 172 |  |  |  | $ | 59 |  |  | $ | 476 |  |  |  | $ | 32 |  |  | $ | 335 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | (47 | ) |  |  |  | (57 | ) |  |  | (128 | ) |  |  |  | (26 | ) |  |  | (158 | ) | 
| 
    Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net(A)
 |  |  | (24 | ) |  |  |  | (16 | ) |  |  | (126 | ) |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | (151 | ) | 
| 
    Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | (35 | ) |  |  | 39 |  |  |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | (35 | ) | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | (105 | ) |  |  |  | (59 | ) |  |  | (260 | ) |  |  |  | (28 | ) |  |  | (175 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | (1 | ) | 
| 
    Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(B)
 |  |  | (18 | ) |  |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | (44 | ) |  |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | (27 | ) | 
| 
    Restructuring charges  net
 |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (18 | ) | 
| 
    Gains or (losses) on disposal of property, plant, and
    equipment  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (6 | ) | 
| 
    Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | (17 | ) |  |  |  | (39 | ) |  |  | (41 | ) |  |  |  | (35 | ) |  |  | (101 | ) | 
| 
    Other costs  net(C)
 |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 30 |  | 
| 
    Sale transaction fees
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (32 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Benefit (provision) for taxes on income (loss)
 |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  |  | 34 |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | 106 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (49 | ) |  |  | $ | (105 | ) |  | $ | (90 | ) |  |  | $ | (97 | ) |  | $ | (201 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    47
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (A) |  | Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net represents the portion of gains
    (losses) that were not settled in cash during the period. Total
    realized and unrealized gains (losses) are shown in the table
    below and are included in the aggregate each period in (Gain)
    loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments
     net on our condensed consolidated statements of
    operations. | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  |  | Nine Months 
 | 
|  |  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  | Ended 
 | 
|  |  |  | December 31, |  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  | December 31, 
 | 
|  |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  | 2006 | 
|  |  |  | Successor |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  | Predecessor |  | Predecessor | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Realized and included in Segment Income
 |  |  | $ | 28 |  |  |  | $ | (56 | ) |  |  | $ | (15 | ) |  |  | $ | (18 | ) |  | $ | (195 | ) | 
| 
    Realized on corporate derivative instruments
 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  | 35 |  |  |  |  | (39 | ) |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 35 |  | 
| 
    Unrealized
 |  |  |  | 24 |  |  |  |  | 16 |  |  |  |  | 126 |  |  |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | 151 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | $ | 50 |  |  |  | $ | (5 | ) |  |  | $ | 72 |  |  |  | $ | (20 | ) |  | $ | (9 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (B) |  | Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
    Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
    on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
    with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
    GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
    the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
    reconcile Total Segment Income to Net income (loss), the
    proportional Segment Income of these non-consolidated affiliates
    is removed from Total Segment Income, net of our share of their
    net after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net
    (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our
    condensed consolidated statements of operations. See
    Note 7  Investment in and Advances to
    Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions for
    further information about these non-consolidated affiliates. | 
|  | 
    | (C) |  | Other costs  net includes a gain on sale of equity
    interest in non-consolidated affiliates and a gain on sale of
    rights to develop and operate hydroelectric power plants,
    recognized in the three months ended December 31, 2006 (see
    Note 15  Other (Income) Expenses 
    net). | 
 
    Major
    Customer Information
 
    All of our operating segments had net sales to Rexam Plc
    (Rexam), our largest customer. The table below shows our net
    sales to Rexam as a percentage of total net sales.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | Three Months 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  | Nine Months 
 | 
|  |  |  | December 31, |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Through 
 |  | Ended 
 | 
|  |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  | December 31, 2006 | 
|  |  |  | Successor |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Successor |  |  | Predecessor |  | Predecessor | 
| 
    Net sales to Rexam as a percentage of total net sales
 |  |  |  | 15.9 | % |  |  |  | 15.0 | % |  |  |  | 15.2 | % |  |  |  | 13.5 | % |  |  | 14.2 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 19. | Supplemental
    Guarantor Information | 
 
    In connection with the issuance of our Senior Notes, certain of
    our wholly-owned subsidiaries provided guarantees of the Senior
    Notes. These guarantees are full and unconditional as well as
    joint and several. The
    
    48
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    guarantor subsidiaries (the Guarantors) are comprised of the
    majority of our businesses in Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Brazil
    and Switzerland, as well as certain businesses in Germany.
    Certain Guarantors may be subject to restrictions on their
    ability to distribute earnings to Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The
    remaining subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are
    not guarantors of the Senior Notes.
 
    The following information presents consolidating statements of
    operations, consolidating balance sheets and consolidating
    statements of cash flows of the Parent, the Guarantors and the
    Non-Guarantors. Investments include investment in and advances
    to non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net
    assets of divisions included in the Parent, and have been
    presented using the equity method of accounting.
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
 
    Consolidating
    Statement of Operations
    (In millions)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | Three Months Ended December 31, 2007
    (Successor) |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Non- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | Parent |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  |  | $ | 334 |  |  | $ | 2,150 |  |  | $ | 783 |  |  | $ | (532 | ) |  | $ | 2,735 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
    shown below)
 |  |  |  | 335 |  |  |  | 1,929 |  |  |  | 737 |  |  |  | (526 | ) |  |  | 2,475 |  | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 61 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 99 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 91 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 105 |  | 
| 
    Research and development expenses
 |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47 |  | 
| 
    Loss on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | 50 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50 |  | 
| 
    Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates
 |  |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (22 | ) |  |  | 4 |  | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net
 |  |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  | (12 | ) |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (11 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 382 |  |  |  | 2,161 |  |  |  | 786 |  |  |  | (549 | ) |  |  | 2,780 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income (loss) before provision for taxes on income (loss) and
    minority interests share
 |  |  |  | (48 | ) |  |  | (11 | ) |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | (45 | ) | 
| 
    Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)
 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income (loss) before minority interests share
 |  |  |  | (49 | ) |  |  | (13 | ) |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | (49 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  |  | $ | (49 | ) |  | $ | (13 | ) |  | $ | (4 | ) |  | $ | 17 |  |  | $ | (49 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    49
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
 
    Consolidating
    Statement of Operations
    (In millions)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Three Months Ended December 31, 2006
    (Predecessor) |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Non- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 368 |  |  | $ | 2,031 |  |  | $ | 736 |  |  | $ | (663 | ) |  | $ | 2,472 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
    shown below)
 |  |  | 358 |  |  |  | 1,993 |  |  |  | 701 |  |  |  | (666 | ) |  |  | 2,386 |  | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 76 |  |  |  | 16 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 117 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 39 |  |  |  | 16 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59 |  | 
| 
    Research and development expenses
 |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 38 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57 |  | 
| 
    Loss on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | 30 |  |  |  | (35 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (5 | ) | 
| 
    Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates
 |  |  | 40 |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (40 | ) |  |  | (4 | ) | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net
 |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (9 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 475 |  |  |  | 2,104 |  |  |  | 739 |  |  |  | (706 | ) |  |  | 2,612 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Loss before provision (benefit) for taxes on loss and minority
    interests share
 |  |  | (107 | ) |  |  | (73 | ) |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 43 |  |  |  | (140 | ) | 
| 
    Provision (benefit) for taxes on loss
 |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (36 | ) |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (34 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Loss before minority interests share
 |  |  | (105 | ) |  |  | (37 | ) |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | 43 |  |  |  | (106 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net loss
 |  | $ | (105 | ) |  | $ | (37 | ) |  | $ | (6 | ) |  | $ | 43 |  |  | $ | (105 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    50
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
 
    Consolidating
    Statement of Operations
    (In millions)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | May 16, 2007 Through December 31, 2007
    (Successor) |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Non- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 948 |  |  | $ | 5,897 |  |  | $ | 1,938 |  |  | $ | (1,680 | ) |  | $ | 7,103 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
    shown below)
 |  |  | 947 |  |  |  | 5,363 |  |  |  | 1,836 |  |  |  | (1,680 | ) |  |  | 6,466 |  | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | 33 |  |  |  | 148 |  |  |  | 48 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 229 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | 203 |  |  |  | 43 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 260 |  | 
| 
    Research and development expenses
 |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | 87 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 128 |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | (20 | ) |  |  | 73 |  |  |  | 19 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72 |  | 
| 
    Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates
 |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (17 | ) |  |  | 9 |  | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net
 |  |  | (24 | ) |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 11 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (7 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 1,011 |  |  |  | 5,904 |  |  |  | 1,973 |  |  |  | (1,697 | ) |  |  | 7,191 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income (loss) before provision for taxes on income (loss) and
    minority interests share
 |  |  | (63 | ) |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | (35 | ) |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | (88 | ) | 
| 
    Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)
 |  |  | 27 |  |  |  | (24 | ) |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income (loss) before minority interests share
 |  |  | (90 | ) |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | (36 | ) |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | (92 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (90 | ) |  | $ | 17 |  |  | $ | (34 | ) |  | $ | 17 |  |  | $ | (90 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    51
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
 
    Consolidating
    Statement of Operations
    (In millions)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
    (Predecessor) |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Non- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 129 |  |  | $ | 1,020 |  |  | $ | 359 |  |  | $ | (227 | ) |  | $ | 1,281 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
    shown below)
 |  |  | 131 |  |  |  | 961 |  |  |  | 340 |  |  |  | (227 | ) |  |  | 1,205 |  | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 51 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 95 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28 |  | 
| 
    Research and development expenses
 |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26 |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (19 | ) |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (20 | ) | 
| 
    Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates
 |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (29 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) | 
| 
    Sale transaction fees
 |  |  | 32 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32 |  | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net
 |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 226 |  |  |  | 1,040 |  |  |  | 365 |  |  |  | (256 | ) |  |  | 1,375 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Loss before provision for taxes on loss and minority
    interests share
 |  |  | (97 | ) |  |  | (20 | ) |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | (94 | ) | 
| 
    Provision for taxes on loss
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Loss before minority interests share
 |  |  | (97 | ) |  |  | (23 | ) |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | (98 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (97 | ) |  | $ | (23 | ) |  | $ | (6 | ) |  | $ | 29 |  |  | $ | (97 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    52
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
 
    Consolidating
    Statement of Operations
    (In millions)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2006
    (Predecessor) |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Non- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 1,202 |  |  | $ | 6,380 |  |  | $ | 2,149 |  |  | $ | (2,201 | ) |  | $ | 7,530 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
    shown below)
 |  |  | 1,167 |  |  |  | 6,188 |  |  |  | 2,035 |  |  |  | (2,208 | ) |  |  | 7,182 |  | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | 59 |  |  |  | 206 |  |  |  | 53 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 318 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 115 |  |  |  | 49 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 175 |  | 
| 
    Research and development expenses
 |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | 37 |  |  |  | 108 |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 158 |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | 39 |  |  |  | (54 | ) |  |  | 6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (9 | ) | 
| 
    Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates
 |  |  | 84 |  |  |  | (13 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (84 | ) |  |  | (13 | ) | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net
 |  |  | (18 | ) |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (6 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 1,401 |  |  |  | 6,573 |  |  |  | 2,154 |  |  |  | (2,292 | ) |  |  | 7,836 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Loss before provision for taxes on income (loss) and minority
    interests share
 |  |  | (199 | ) |  |  | (193 | ) |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | 91 |  |  |  | (306 | ) | 
| 
    Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | (98 | ) |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (106 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income (loss) before minority interests share
 |  |  | (201 | ) |  |  | (95 | ) |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 91 |  |  |  | (200 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (201 | ) |  | $ | (95 | ) |  | $ | 4 |  |  | $ | 91 |  |  | $ | (201 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    53
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    Consolidating
    Balance Sheet
    
    (In
    millions)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | As of December 31, 2007 (Successor) |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Non- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  | 
| 
    ASSETS
 | 
| 
    Current assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents
 |  | $ | 3 |  |  | $ | 97 |  |  | $ | 33 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 133 |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable  net of allowances
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 37 |  |  |  | 854 |  |  |  | 444 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,335 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | 520 |  |  |  | 234 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | (743 | ) |  |  | 29 |  | 
| 
    Inventories
 |  |  | 63 |  |  |  | 966 |  |  |  | 412 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,441 |  | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 14 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48 |  | 
| 
    Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 49 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | 54 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current assets
 |  |  | 631 |  |  |  | 2,230 |  |  |  | 930 |  |  |  | (745 | ) |  |  | 3,046 |  | 
| 
    Property, plant and equipment  net
 |  |  | 185 |  |  |  | 2,433 |  |  |  | 755 |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | 3,372 |  | 
| 
    Goodwill
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,980 |  |  |  | 194 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,174 |  | 
| 
    Intangible assets  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 873 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 873 |  | 
| 
    Investments
 |  |  | 3,594 |  |  |  | 920 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,594 | ) |  |  | 920 |  | 
| 
    Fair value of derivative instruments  net of current
    portion
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax assets
 |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 
| 
    Other long-term assets
 |  |  | 1,262 |  |  |  | 151 |  |  |  | 131 |  |  |  | (1,410 | ) |  |  | 134 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total assets
 |  | $ | 5,677 |  |  | $ | 8,598 |  |  | $ | 2011 |  |  | $ | (5,750 | ) |  | $ | 10,536 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
 | 
| 
    Current liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current portion of long-term debt
 |  | $ | 3 |  |  | $ | 10 |  |  | $ | 1 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 14 |  | 
| 
    Short-term borrowings
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 170 |  |  |  | 67 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 245 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 394 |  |  |  | 57 |  |  |  | (456 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 72 |  |  |  | 703 |  |  |  | 548 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,323 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | 88 |  |  |  | 200 |  |  |  | 56 |  |  |  | (284 | ) |  |  | 60 |  | 
| 
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 |  |  | 73 |  |  |  | 711 |  |  |  | 103 |  |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | 881 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 70 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current liabilities
 |  |  | 249 |  |  |  | 2,257 |  |  |  | 833 |  |  |  | (746 | ) |  |  | 2,593 |  | 
| 
    Long-term debt  net of current portion
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 1,763 |  |  |  | 694 |  |  |  | 102 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,559 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,147 |  |  |  | 263 |  |  |  | (1,410 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax liabilities
 |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | 674 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 685 |  | 
| 
    Accrued postretirement benefits
 |  |  | 23 |  |  |  | 285 |  |  |  | 105 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 421 |  | 
| 
    Other long-term liabilities
 |  |  | 171 |  |  |  | 469 |  |  |  | 19 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 659 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 2,200 |  |  |  | 5,526 |  |  |  | 1,339 |  |  |  | (2,156 | ) |  |  | 6,909 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Commitments and contingencies
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 150 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 150 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Shareholders equity
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Common stock
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Additional paid-in capital
 |  |  | 3,497 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,497 |  | 
| 
    (Accumulated deficit)/retained earnings/owners net
    investment
 |  |  | (90 | ) |  |  | 3,021 |  |  |  | 545 |  |  |  | (3,566 | ) |  |  | (90 | ) | 
| 
    Accumulated other comprehensive income
 |  |  | 70 |  |  |  | 51 |  |  |  | (23 | ) |  |  | (28 | ) |  |  | 70 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shareholders equity
 |  |  | 3,477 |  |  |  | 3,072 |  |  |  | 522 |  |  |  | (3,594 | ) |  |  | 3,477 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities and shareholders equity
 |  | $ | 5,677 |  |  | $ | 8,598 |  |  | $ | 2,011 |  |  | $ | (5,750 | ) |  | $ | 10,536 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    54
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    Consolidating
    Balance Sheet
    
    (In
    millions)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | As of March 31, 2007 (Predecessor) |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Non- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  | 
| 
    ASSETS
 | 
| 
    Current assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents
 |  | $ | 6 |  |  | $ | 71 |  |  | $ | 51 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 128 |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable  net of allowances
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 36 |  |  |  | 903 |  |  |  | 411 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,350 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | 416 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 58 |  |  |  | (949 | ) |  |  | 25 |  | 
| 
    Inventories
 |  |  | 65 |  |  |  | 1,004 |  |  |  | 417 |  |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 1,483 |  | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39 |  | 
| 
    Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 92 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax assets
 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current assets
 |  |  | 529 |  |  |  | 2,604 |  |  |  | 955 |  |  |  | (952 | ) |  |  | 3,136 |  | 
| 
    Property, plant and equipment  net
 |  |  | 112 |  |  |  | 1,229 |  |  |  | 765 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,106 |  | 
| 
    Goodwill
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 210 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 239 |  | 
| 
    Intangible assets  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 
| 
    Investments
 |  |  | 362 |  |  |  | 153 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (362 | ) |  |  | 153 |  | 
| 
    Fair value of derivative instruments  net of current
    portion
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax assets
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 66 |  |  |  | 35 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 102 |  | 
| 
    Other long-term assets
 |  |  | 1,231 |  |  |  | 160 |  |  |  | 132 |  |  |  | (1,364 | ) |  |  | 159 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total assets
 |  | $ | 2,235 |  |  | $ | 4,314 |  |  | $ | 2,099 |  |  | $ | (2,678 | ) |  | $ | 5,970 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
 | 
| 
    Current liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current portion of long-term debt
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 3 |  |  | $ | 140 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 143 |  | 
| 
    Short-term borrowings
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 241 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 245 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 529 |  |  |  | 61 |  |  |  | (605 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 116 |  |  |  | 938 |  |  |  | 560 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,614 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | 69 |  |  |  | 240 |  |  |  | 84 |  |  |  | (344 | ) |  |  | 49 |  | 
| 
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 |  |  | 63 |  |  |  | 317 |  |  |  | 100 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 480 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current liabilities
 |  |  | 263 |  |  |  | 2,341 |  |  |  | 949 |  |  |  | (949 | ) |  |  | 2,604 |  | 
| 
    Long-term debt  net of current portion
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 1,659 |  |  |  | 496 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,157 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,116 |  |  |  | 248 |  |  |  | (1,364 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 89 |  |  |  | 14 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 103 |  | 
| 
    Accrued postretirement benefits
 |  |  | 19 |  |  |  | 293 |  |  |  | 115 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 427 |  | 
| 
    Other long-term liabilities
 |  |  | 119 |  |  |  | 214 |  |  |  | 19 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 352 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 2,060 |  |  |  | 4,549 |  |  |  | 1,347 |  |  |  | (2,313 | ) |  |  | 5,643 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Commitments and contingencies
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 152 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 152 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Shareholders equity
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Common stock
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Additional paid-in capital
 |  |  | 428 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 428 |  | 
| 
    (Accumulated deficit)/retained earnings/owners net
    investment
 |  |  | (263 | ) |  |  | (458 | ) |  |  | 575 |  |  |  | (117 | ) |  |  | (263 | ) | 
| 
    Accumulated other comprehensive income
 |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 223 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | (248 | ) |  |  | 10 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shareholders equity
 |  |  | 175 |  |  |  | (235 | ) |  |  | 600 |  |  |  | (365 | ) |  |  | 175 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities and shareholders equity
 |  | $ | 2,235 |  |  | $ | 4,314 |  |  | $ | 2,099 |  |  | $ | (2,678 | ) |  | $ | 5,970 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    55
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    Consolidating
    Statement of Cash Flows
    
    (In
    millions)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | May 16, 2007 Through December 31, 2007
    (Successor) |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Non- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  | 
| 
    OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
 |  | $ | 200 |  |  | $ | (142 | ) |  | $ | (27 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 31 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | (90 | ) |  |  | (24 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (120 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from sales of assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 
| 
    Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
    affiliates
 |  |  | (40 | ) |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from loans receivable  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 
| 
    Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
 |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
 |  |  | (33 | ) |  |  | (44 | ) |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | 40 |  |  |  | (43 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock
 |  |  | 92 |  |  |  | 40 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (40 | ) |  |  | 92 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of debt
 |  |  | 300 |  |  |  | 660 |  |  |  | 140 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,100 |  | 
| 
    Principal repayments
 |  |  | (263 | ) |  |  | (602 | ) |  |  | (140 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,005 | ) | 
| 
    Short-term borrowings  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | (37 | ) |  |  | (84 | ) |  |  | 18 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (103 | ) | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | (227 | ) |  |  | 195 |  |  |  | 32 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Dividends
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     minority interests
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) | 
| 
    Debt issuance costs
 |  |  | (37 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (37 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 |  |  | (172 | ) |  |  | 209 |  |  |  | 49 |  |  |  | (40 | ) |  |  | 46 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | 23 |  |  |  | 16 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34 |  | 
| 
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
    foreign currencies
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3 | ) | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents  beginning of period
 |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 74 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 102 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents  end of period
 |  | $ | 3 |  |  | $ | 97 |  |  | $ | 33 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 133 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    56
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    Consolidating
    Statement of Cash Flows
    
    (In
    millions)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
    (Predecessor) |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Non- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  | 
| 
    OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash used in operating activities
 |  | $ | (21 | ) |  | $ | (181 | ) |  | $ | (28 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | (230 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (17 | ) | 
| 
    Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
    affiliates
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
 |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | 23 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
 |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of debt
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 150 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 150 |  | 
| 
    Principal repayments
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) | 
| 
    Short-term borrowings  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | 45 |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | (15 | ) |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Dividends
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     minority interests
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (7 | ) | 
| 
    Debt issuance costs
 |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by financing activities
 |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 169 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 201 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | (31 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (27 | ) | 
| 
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
    foreign currencies
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents  beginning of period
 |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 71 |  |  |  | 51 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 128 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents  end of period
 |  | $ | 8 |  |  | $ | 74 |  |  | $ | 20 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 102 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    57
 
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    NOTES TO
    THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
    
    FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS (unaudited)  (Continued)
 
    Novelis
    Inc.
    
 
    Consolidating
    Statement of Cash Flows
    
    (In
    millions)
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2006
    (Predecessor) |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Non- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Guarantors |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  | 
| 
    OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
 |  | $ | 90 |  |  | $ | (154 | ) |  | $ | 39 |  |  | $ | (54 | ) |  | $ | (79 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | (59 | ) |  |  | (31 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (95 | ) | 
| 
    Cash advance received on pending transfer of rights
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from sales of assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36 |  | 
| 
    Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
    affiliates
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from loans receivable  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  | (12 | ) |  |  | (67 | ) |  |  | (28 | ) |  |  | 137 |  |  |  | 30 |  | 
| 
    Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
 |  |  | (34 | ) |  |  | 202 |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 167 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
 |  |  | (51 | ) |  |  | 113 |  |  |  | (60 | ) |  |  | 137 |  |  |  | 139 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of debt
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1300 |  |  |  | 460 |  |  |  | (1,760 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Principal repayments
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  | (54 | ) |  |  | (96 | ) |  |  | (91 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (241 | ) | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,187 | ) |  |  | (397 | ) |  |  | (1,584 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Short-term borrowings  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     third parties
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 97 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 97 |  | 
| 
     related parties
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Dividends
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
     common shareholders
 |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | (90 | ) |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 93 |  |  |  | (8 | ) | 
| 
     minority interests
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2 | ) | 
| 
    Net receipts from Alcan
 |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
    Debt issuance costs
 |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (10 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 |  |  | (65 | ) |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | (83 | ) |  |  | (116 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
 |  |  | (26 | ) |  |  | (20 | ) |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (56 | ) | 
| 
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
    foreign currencies
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents  beginning of period
 |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 55 |  |  |  | 40 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 124 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents  end of period
 |  | $ | 3 |  |  | $ | 37 |  |  | $ | 33 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 73 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    58
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 2. | Managements
    Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
    Operations | 
 
    FORWARD
    LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
    The following information should be read together with our
    unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and
    accompanying notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report
    for a more complete understanding of our financial condition and
    results of operations. The following discussion contains
    forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and
    beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those
    discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that
    could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are
    not limited to, those discussed below, particularly in
    SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND
    MARKET DATA.
 
    REFERENCES
 
    References herein to Novelis, the
    Company, we, our, or
    us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries as
    both Predecessor and Successor unless the context specifically
    indicates otherwise. References herein to Hindalco
    refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. References herein to
    Alcan refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
 
    References to our
    Form 10-K
    made throughout this document refer to our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006, as amended,
    originally filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
    Commission (SEC) on March 1, 2007, as amended on
    April 30, 2007.
 
    GENERAL
 
    Novelis is the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
    producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and
    light gauge products for the construction and industrial,
    beverage and food cans, foil products and transportation
    markets. As of December 31, 2007, we had operations on four
    continents: North America; South America; Asia and Europe,
    through 33 operating plants and three research facilities in 11
    countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our
    South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina
    refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation
    facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in
    Brazil. We are the only company of our size and scope focused
    solely on aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local
    supply of technologically sophisticated products in all of these
    geographic regions.
 
    Acquisition
    of Novelis Common Stock
 
    On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
    through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary AV Metals Inc.
    (Acquisition Sub) pursuant to a plan of arrangement
    (Arrangement) entered into on February 10, 2007 and
    approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on
    May 14, 2007. As a result of the Arrangement, Acquisition
    Sub acquired all of the Companys outstanding common shares
    at a price of $44.93 per share, and all outstanding stock
    options and other equity incentives were terminated in exchange
    for cash payments. The aggregate purchase price for the
    Companys common shares was $3.4 billion and
    immediately following the Arrangement, the common shares of the
    Company were transferred from Acquisition Sub to its
    wholly-owned subsidiary AV Aluminum Inc. (AV Aluminum). Hindalco
    also assumed $2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total
    transaction value of $6.2 billion.
 
    On June 22, 2007, we issued 2,044,122 additional common
    shares to AV Aluminum for $44.93 per share resulting in an
    additional equity contribution of approximately
    $92 million. This contribution was equal in amount to
    certain payments made by Novelis related to change in control
    compensation to certain employees and directors, lender fees and
    other transaction costs incurred by the Company. As this
    transaction was approved by Hindalco and the Company and
    executed subsequent to the Arrangement, the $92 million
    cash payment is not included in the determination of total
    consideration.
 
    As discussed in Note 1  Business and Summary of
    Significant Accounting Policies in the accompanying condensed
    and consolidated financial statements, the Arrangement was
    recorded in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
    No. 103, Push Down Basis of Accounting Required in
    Certain Limited Circumstances, which states that purchase
    transactions that result in an entity becoming substantially
    wholly-owned establish a new basis of accounting for the
    purchased assets and liabilities. Accordingly, in the
    accompanying
    
    59
 
    December 31, 2007 condensed consolidated balance sheet, the
    consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in connection
    with the acquisition have been pushed down to us and
    have been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
    assumed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
    (FASB) Statement No. 141, Business Combinations. Due
    to the impact of push down accounting, the condensed
    consolidated financial statements and certain note presentations
    for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 separate the
    Companys presentations into distinct periods to indicate
    the application of different bases of accounting between the
    periods presented: (1) the period up to, and including, the
    acquisition date (April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007,
    labeled Predecessor) and (2) the period after
    that date (May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007,
    labeled Successor). The accompanying condensed
    consolidated financial statements and tables included in
    Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
    and Results of Operations (MD&A) include a black line
    division when both Predecessor and Successor periods are
    presented, indicating that the Predecessor and Successor
    entities are not comparable.
 
    CHANGE IN
    FISCAL YEAR END
 
    On June 26, 2007, our board of directors approved the
    change of our fiscal year end to March 31 from December 31.
    This Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q
    for the period ended December 31, 2007 is our third quarter
    filing for our new fiscal year ending March 31, 2008, and
    references to this quarter will be to the third quarter of
    fiscal 2008. Comparisons will be made to the three months ended
    December 31, 2006, which will be referred to as the
    comparable prior year period, the quarter ended
    December 31, 2006 or the three months ended
    December 31, 2006.
 
    NOTE REGARDING
    COMBINED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND SELECTED FINANCIAL AND
    OPERATING INFORMATION DUE TO OUR ACQUISITION BY
    HINDALCO
 
    As discussed above, the Arrangement created a new basis of
    accounting. Under generally accepted accounting principles in
    the United States of America (GAAP), the condensed consolidated
    financial statements for the nine months ended December 31,
    2007 are presented in two distinct periods, as Predecessor and
    Successor entities are not comparable in all material respects.
    However, in our MD&A, in order to facilitate an
    understanding of our results of operations, segment information
    and liquidity and capital resources for the nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 in comparison with the nine months ended
    December 31, 2006, our Predecessor and Successor operating
    results, segment information and cash flows are presented on a
    combined basis. The combined operating results, segment
    information and cash flows are non-GAAP financial measures, do
    not include any pro forma assumptions or adjustments and should
    not be used in isolation or substitution of the Predecessor and
    Successor operating results, segment information or cash flows.
 
    Shown below are combining schedules of (1) shipments and
    (2) our results of operations for periods allocable to the
    Successor, Predecessor and the combined presentation for the
    nine months ended December 31, 2007 that we use throughout
    our MD&A.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Combined |  | 
| 
    Combined Shipments:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Shipments (kt)(A):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rolled products(B)
 |  |  | 1,886 |  |  |  |  | 348 |  |  |  | 2,234 |  | 
| 
    Ingot products(C)
 |  |  | 108 |  |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 123 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shipments
 |  |  | 1,994 |  |  |  |  | 363 |  |  |  | 2,357 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  | (A) | One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
    equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. | 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  | (B) | Rolled products include tolling (the conversion of
    customer-owned metal). | 
|  | 
    |  | (C) | Ingot products include primary ingot in Brazil, foundry products
    in Korea and Europe, secondary ingot in Europe and other
    miscellaneous recyclable aluminum. | 
    
    60
 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Combined |  | 
| 
    Combined Results of Operations ($ in millions)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 7,103 |  |  |  | $ | 1,281 |  |  | $ | 8,384 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
    shown below)
 |  |  | 6,466 |  |  |  |  | 1,205 |  |  |  | 7,671 |  | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | 229 |  |  |  |  | 95 |  |  |  | 324 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 260 |  |  |  |  | 28 |  |  |  | 288 |  | 
| 
    Research and development expenses
 |  |  | 34 |  |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 40 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | 128 |  |  |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | 154 |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | 72 |  |  |  |  | (20 | ) |  |  | 52 |  | 
| 
    Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
 |  |  | 9 |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | 8 |  | 
| 
    Sale transaction fees
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | 32 |  | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net
 |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | (3 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 7,191 |  |  |  |  | 1,375 |  |  |  | 8,566 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income (loss) before provision for taxes on income (loss) and
    minority interests share
 |  |  | (88 | ) |  |  |  | (94 | ) |  |  | (182 | ) | 
| 
    Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 8 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income (loss) before minority interests share
 |  |  | (92 | ) |  |  |  | (98 | ) |  |  | (190 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 3 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (90 | ) |  |  | $ | (97 | ) |  | $ | (187 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    HIGHLIGHTS
 
    Significant highlights, events and factors impacting our
    business during the quarters and nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 and 2006 are presented briefly below.
    Each is discussed in further detail throughout our MD&A.
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Shipments and selected financial information are as follows ($
    in millions): | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Shipments (kt):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rolled products
 |  |  | 730 |  |  |  |  | 729 |  |  |  | 2,234 |  |  |  | 2,219 |  | 
| 
    Ingot products
 |  |  | 42 |  |  |  |  | 38 |  |  |  | 123 |  |  |  | 122 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shipments
 |  |  | 772 |  |  |  |  | 767 |  |  |  | 2,357 |  |  |  | 2,341 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 2,735 |  |  |  | $ | 2,472 |  |  | $ | 8,384 |  |  | $ | 7,530 |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (49 | ) |  |  | $ | (105 | ) |  | $ | (187 | ) |  | $ | (201 | ) | 
| 
    Net increase (decrease) in total debt(A)
 |  | $ | 3 |  |  |  | $ | (11 | ) |  | $ | 208 |  |  | $ | (92 | ) | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  | (A) | Net increase (decrease) in total debt is measured comparing the
    period-end amounts of our total outstanding debt (including
    short-term borrowings) as shown in our condensed consolidated
    balance sheets. For the three and nine months ended
    December 31, 2007, the net increase (decrease) in total
    debt excludes the change in unamortized fair value adjustments
    recorded as part of the Arrangement. | 
    
    61
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Rolled products shipments during the third quarter ended
    December 31, 2007 were flat year over year. Increased
    shipments in South America and Asia were due to increased demand
    in their local can markets which were offset by reductions in
    North America and Europe. North America saw continued shipment
    declines in the automotive, distributor and industrial markets,
    and Europe experienced minor reductions across several product
    lines. Year-to-date, rolled product shipments are up in every
    region except North America primarily as a result of increased
    demand in their respective regional can markets. Compared to the
    prior year, the North American demand for rolled products has
    declined most notably in the industrial and distributor markets
    partially due to a slowdown in housing construction. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | London Metal Exchange (LME) pricing for aluminum (metal) was an
    average of 10.3% and 1.4% lower during the third quarter and
    nine months ended December 31, 2007, respectively, than the
    comparable prior year periods. Cash prices have trended down
    this fiscal year and as of March 31, 2007; June 30,
    2007; September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2007 cash
    prices per metric tonne were $2,792; $2,686; $2,440 and $2,360,
    respectively. This trend negatively impacted our fiscal 2008
    third quarter and nine month results as described more fully
    below under Metal Price Lag. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | During the third quarter of fiscal 2008 and the comparable prior
    year quarter, we were unable to pass through approximately
    $45 million and $125 million, respectively, of metal
    purchase costs associated with sales under contracts with metal
    price ceilings (described more fully below), for a net favorable
    comparable impact of approximately $80 million. | 
 
    During the nine months ended December 31, 2007 and the
    comparable prior year period, we were unable to pass through
    approximately $185 million and $380 million,
    respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales
    under these contracts, for a net favorable comparable impact of
    approximately $195 million.
 
    Net sales for the third quarter and nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 were also favorably impacted by
    $76 million and $205 million, respectively, related to
    the accretion of fair value reserves associated with these
    contracts, as discussed more fully below under Metal Price
    Ceilings.
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2006, net
    loss for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 was
    impacted by the following pre-tax items associated with or
    triggered by the Arrangement: (1) $43 million of
    incremental stock compensation expense,
    (2) $32 million of sale transaction fees and
    (3) $18 million of incremental income associated with
    push-down accounting and the preliminary allocation of purchase
    price. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | During the third quarter of fiscal 2008 and on a year-to-date
    basis, our total debt increased by $3 million and
    $208 million (excluding unamortized fair value adjustments
    recorded as part of the acquisition by Hindalco), respectively.
    The year-to-date increase in debt was driven primarily by our
    need to fund additional working capital requirements as well as
    certain costs associated with or triggered by the Arrangement
    that were in excess of the additional $92 million of equity
    contributed by Hindalco. | 
    
    62
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | As described more fully in Note 2  Acquisition
    of Novelis Common Stock in the accompanying condensed and
    consolidated financial statements, the consideration paid by
    Hindalco to acquire Novelis has been pushed down to us and
    allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based
    on our estimates of fair value, using methodologies and
    assumptions that we believe are reasonable. This allocation of
    fair value results in additional charges or income to our
    post-acquisition consolidated statements of operations. A
    summary of the pre-tax impacts of these items on pre-tax income
    and Segment Income for the third quarter and nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 is shown below (in millions). | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  | December 31, 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Increase (Decrease) to: |  |  | Increase (Decrease) to: |  | 
|  |  | Pre-Tax 
 |  |  | Segment 
 |  |  | Pre-Tax 
 |  |  | Segment 
 |  | 
|  |  | Income |  |  | Income(A) |  |  | Income |  |  | Income(A) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Metal price ceiling contracts
 |  | $ | 76 |  |  | $ | 76 |  |  | $ | 205 |  |  | $ | 205 |  | 
| 
    Other favorable/unfavorable contracts
 |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | (5 | ) | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | (48 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (113 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    In-process research and development
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | (9 | ) | 
| 
    Inventory
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (35 | ) |  |  | (35 | ) | 
| 
    Equity investments
 |  |  | (15 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (26 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Fair value of debt
 |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total impact
 |  | $ | 8 |  |  | $ | 74 |  |  | $ | 18 |  |  | $ | 156 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  | (A) | We use Segment Income to measure the profitability and financial
    performance of our operating segments, as discussed below in
    OPERATING SEGMENT REVIEW. | 
 
    OUR
    BUSINESS
 
    Business
    Model and Key Concepts
 
    Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
    which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
    price of metal to our customers. Nearly all of our products have
    a price structure with two components: (i) a pass-through
    aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and
    (ii) a margin over metal price based on the
    conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the
    competitive market conditions for that product.
 
    Metal
    Price Ceilings
 
    Sales contracts representing approximately 10% of our total
    shipments for both the quarter and nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 and 20% for both of the comparable prior
    year periods, provide for a ceiling over which metal purchase
    costs cannot contractually be passed through to certain
    customers, unless adjusted. This negatively impacts our margins
    when the price we pay for metal is above the ceiling price
    contained in these contracts. During the quarter ended
    December 31, 2007 and the comparable prior year period, we
    were unable to pass through approximately $45 million and
    $125 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs
    associated with sales under these contracts. During the nine
    months ended December 31, 2007 and the comparable prior
    year period, we were unable to pass through approximately
    $185 million and $380 million, respectively, of metal
    purchase costs associated with sales under these contracts. We
    calculate and report this difference to be approximately the
    difference between the quoted purchase price on the LME
    (adjusted for any local premiums and for any price lag
    associated with purchasing or processing time) and the metal
    price ceiling in our contracts. Cash flows from operations are
    negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted for any timing
    difference between customer receipts and vendor payments, and
    offset partially by reduced income taxes.
 
    Based on a December 31, 2007 aluminum price of $2,360 per
    tonne, and our best estimate of a range of shipment volumes, we
    estimate that we will be unable to pass through aluminum
    purchase costs of approximately $38  $40 million
    for the remainder of fiscal 2008 and $240 
    $260 million in the aggregate thereafter.
    
    63
 
 
    In connection with the allocation of purchase price (i.e., total
    consideration) paid by Hindalco, we established reserves
    totaling $655 million as of May 15, 2007 to record
    these contracts at fair value. Fair value effectively represents
    the discounted cash flows of the forecasted metal purchase costs
    in excess of the metal price ceilings contained in these
    contracts. These reserves are being accreted into Net sales over
    the remaining lives of the underlying contracts, and this
    accretion does not impact future cash flows. We recorded total
    accretion of $205 million during the period from
    May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007,
    $76 million of which was recorded during the quarter ended
    December 31, 2007.
 
    We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal
    prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to
    metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our
    internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and
    mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from
    our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans
    (UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply have
    historically provided a benefit as these sources of metal are
    typically less expensive than purchasing aluminum from third
    party suppliers. We refer to these two sources as our internal
    hedges.
 
    Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy
    to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated
    with the metal price ceilings is to purchase futures, call
    options
    and/or
    synthetic call options on projected aluminum volume requirements
    above our assumed internal hedge position. To hedge our exposure
    in 2006, we previously purchased call options at various strike
    prices. We currently purchase forward derivative instruments to
    hedge our exposure to further metal price increases.
 
    Metal
    Price Lag
 
    On certain sales contracts we experience timing differences on
    the pass through of changing aluminum prices based on the
    difference between the price we pay for aluminum and the price
    we ultimately charge our customers after the aluminum is
    processed. Generally, and in the short-term, in periods of
    rising prices our earnings benefit from this timing difference
    while the opposite is true in periods of declining prices, and
    we refer to this timing difference as metal price lag. Metal
    price lag negatively impacted the quarter ended
    December 31, 2007 by approximately $9 million and
    benefited the comparable prior year period by approximately
    $27 million, for a net unfavorable impact of
    $36 million. For the nine months ended December 31,
    2007, metal price lag negatively impacted our results by
    $56 million and favorably impacted the comparable prior
    year period by approximately $67 million, for a net
    unfavorable impact of $121 million. These amounts are
    reported herein without regard to the effects of any derivative
    instruments we purchased to offset this risk as described below.
 
    Generally, and in the short-term, metal price lag impacts cash
    flows negatively in periods of rising metal prices due primarily
    to inventory processing time, while the opposite is true in
    periods of declining prices.
 
    Certain of our sales contracts, most notably in Europe, contain
    fixed metal prices for periods of time such as four to
    thirty-six months. In some cases, this can result in a negative
    (positive) impact on sales, compared to current prices, as metal
    prices increase (decrease) because the prices are fixed at
    historical levels. The positive or negative impact on sales
    under these contracts has not been included in the metal price
    lag effect quantified above, as we enter into forward metal
    purchases simultaneous with the sales contracts thereby
    eliminating the exposure to changing metal prices on sales under
    these contracts. For general metal price lag exposure described
    in the preceding paragraphs, we sell short-term LME forward
    contracts to help mitigate the exposure, although exact offset
    hedging is not achieved.
 
    The sales and Segment Income impacts of the above mentioned
    items are described more fully in the Operations and Segment
    Review where appropriate.
 
    For accounting purposes, we do not treat all derivative
    instruments as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133,
    Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
    For example, we do not treat the derivative instruments
    purchased to mitigate the risks discussed above under metal
    price ceilings and metal price lag as hedges under FASB
    No. 133. In those cases, changes in fair value are
    recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the
    recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the
    contract settlement, and we expect further earnings volatility
    as a result. In the accompanying condensed consolidated
    statements of operations, changes in fair value of derivative
    instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement
    No. 133 are recognized in (Gain) loss on change in fair
    value of derivative instruments  net. These gains or
    losses may or may not result from cash settlement. For Segment
    Income purposes we only include the impact of the derivative
    gains or losses to the extent they are settled in cash during
    that period.
    
    64
 
    Internal
    Controls
 
    We previously reported in our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006 and continue to report
    as of December 31, 2007, that we have a material weakness
    in our internal control over financial reporting as we did not
    maintain effective controls over accounting for income taxes.
    See Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
 
    Spin-Off
    from Alcan
 
    On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
    its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
    pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
    rolled products businesses were managed under two separate
    operating segments within Alcan  Rolled Products
    Americas and Asia; and Rolled Products Europe. On
    January 6, 2005, Alcan and its subsidiaries contributed and
    transferred to Novelis substantially all of the aluminum rolled
    products businesses operated by Alcan, together with some of
    Alcans alumina and primary metal-related businesses in
    Brazil, which are fully integrated with the rolled products
    operations there, as well as four rolling facilities in Europe
    whose end-use markets and customers were similar to ours.
 
    Post-Transaction
    Adjustments
 
    The agreements giving effect to the spin-off provide for various
    post-transaction adjustments and the resolution of outstanding
    matters. On November 8, 2006, we executed a settlement
    agreement with Alcan resolving the working capital and cash
    balance adjustments to our opening balance sheet and issues
    relating to the transfer of U.S. pension assets and
    liabilities from Alcan to Novelis. In October 2007, we completed
    the transfer of U.K. plan assets and liabilities. As of
    December 31, 2007, there remained an outstanding matter
    related to pension plans in Canada for those employees who
    elected to transfer their past service to Novelis. We expect the
    transfer of pension assets and liabilities in Canada will take
    place by June 30, 2008, and we expect that the plan assets
    transferred will approximate the liabilities assumed. To the
    extent that differences between transferred plan assets and
    liabilities exist, we will record the adjustments to goodwill.
 
    Agreements
    between Novelis and Alcan
 
    At the spin-off, we entered into various agreements with Alcan
    including the use of transitional and technical services, the
    supply from Alcan of metal and alumina, the licensing of certain
    of Alcans patents, trademarks and other intellectual
    property rights, and the use of certain buildings, machinery and
    equipment, technology and employees at certain facilities
    retained by Alcan, but required in our business. The terms and
    conditions of the agreements were determined primarily by Alcan
    and may not reflect what two unaffiliated parties might have
    agreed to. Had these agreements been negotiated with
    unaffiliated third parties, their terms may have been more
    favorable, or less favorable, to us. See Item 1. Business
    in our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006 for additional
    information.
 
    OPERATIONS
    AND SEGMENT REVIEW
 
    The following tables present our shipments, our results of
    operations, prices for aluminum, oil and natural gas and key
    currency exchange rates for the quarters and nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the changes from period to
    period.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Shipments (kt):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rolled products, including tolling (the conversion of
    customer-owned metal)
 |  |  | 730 |  |  |  |  | 729 |  |  |  | 0.1 | % |  |  | 2,234 |  |  |  | 2,219 |  |  |  | 0.7 | % | 
| 
    Ingot products, including primary and secondary ingot and
    recyclable aluminum
 |  |  | 42 |  |  |  |  | 38 |  |  |  | 10.5 | % |  |  | 123 |  |  |  | 122 |  |  |  | 0.8 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shipments
 |  |  | 772 |  |  |  |  | 767 |  |  |  | 0.7 | % |  |  | 2,357 |  |  |  | 2,341 |  |  |  | 0.7 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    
    65
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Results of Operations ($ in millions)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 2,735 |  |  |  | $ | 2,472 |  |  |  | 10.6 | % |  | $ | 8,384 |  |  | $ | 7,530 |  |  |  | 11.3 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
    shown below)
 |  |  | 2,475 |  |  |  |  | 2,386 |  |  |  | 3.7 | % |  |  | 7,671 |  |  |  | 7,182 |  |  |  | 6.8 | % | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | 99 |  |  |  |  | 117 |  |  |  | (15.4 | )% |  |  | 324 |  |  |  | 318 |  |  |  | 1.9 | % | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 105 |  |  |  |  | 59 |  |  |  | 78.0 | % |  |  | 288 |  |  |  | 175 |  |  |  | 64.6 | % | 
| 
    Research and development expenses
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  |  | 11 |  |  |  |  | % |  |  | 40 |  |  |  | 31 |  |  |  | 29.0 | % | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | 47 |  |  |  |  | 57 |  |  |  | (17.5 | )% |  |  | 154 |  |  |  | 158 |  |  |  | (2.5 | )% | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivatives 
    net
 |  |  | 50 |  |  |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | (1,100.0 | )% |  |  | 52 |  |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | (677.8 | )% | 
| 
    Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | (200.0 | )% |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | (13 | ) |  |  | (161.5 | )% | 
| 
    Sale transaction fees
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | % |  |  | 32 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | n.m. |  | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net
 |  |  | (11 | ) |  |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | 22.2 | % |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | (50.0 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 2,780 |  |  |  |  | 2,612 |  |  |  | 6.4 | % |  |  | 8,566 |  |  |  | 7,836 |  |  |  | 9.3 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income
    (loss) and minority interests share
 |  |  | (45 | ) |  |  |  | (140 | ) |  |  | (67.9 | )% |  |  | (182 | ) |  |  | (306 | ) |  |  | (40.5 | )% | 
| 
    Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  | (34 | ) |  |  | (111.8 | )% |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | (106 | ) |  |  | (107.5 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income (loss) before minority interests share
 |  |  | (49 | ) |  |  |  | (106 | ) |  |  | (53.8 | )% |  |  | (190 | ) |  |  | (200 | ) |  |  | (5.0 | )% | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | (100.0 | )% |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (400.0 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (49 | ) |  |  | $ | (105 | ) |  |  | (53.3 | )% |  | $ | (187 | ) |  | $ | (201 | ) |  |  | (7.0 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    n.m.  not meaningful
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    London Metal Exchange Prices
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Aluminum (per metric tonne, and presented in U.S. dollars):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Closing cash price as of end of period
 |  | $ | 2,360 |  |  |  | $ | 2,850 |  |  |  | (17.2 | )% |  | $ | 2,360 |  |  | $ | 2,850 |  |  |  | (17.2 | )% | 
| 
    Average cash price during the period
 |  | $ | 2,444 |  |  |  | $ | 2,724 |  |  |  | (10.3 | )% |  | $ | 2,584 |  |  | $ | 2,620 |  |  |  | (1.4 | )% | 
 
    66
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  |  | U.S. Dollar 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  |  | U.S. Dollar 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Strengthen/ 
 |  |  | December 31, |  |  | Strengthen/ 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | (Weaken) |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | (Weaken) |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Federal Reserve Bank of New York Exchange Rates
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Average of the month end rates:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    U.S. dollar per Euro
 |  |  | 1.459 |  |  |  |  | 1.308 |  |  |  | (11.5 | )% |  |  | 1.400 |  |  |  | 1.286 |  |  |  | (8.9 | )% | 
| 
    Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
 |  |  | 1.766 |  |  |  |  | 2.145 |  |  |  | (17.7 | )% |  |  | 1.873 |  |  |  | 2.164 |  |  |  | (13.4 | )% | 
| 
    South Korean won per U.S. dollar
 |  |  | 920 |  |  |  |  | 934 |  |  |  | (1.5 | )% |  |  | 924 |  |  |  | 944 |  |  |  | (2.1 | )% | 
| 
    Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar
 |  |  | 0.979 |  |  |  |  | 1.143 |  |  |  | (14.3 | )% |  |  | 1.033 |  |  |  | 1.124 |  |  |  | (8.1 | )% | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    New York Mercantile Exchange  Energy Price
    Quotations
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Light Sweet Crude
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Average settlement price (per barrel)
 |  | $ | 88.60 |  |  |  | $ | 59.84 |  |  |  | 48.1 | % |  | $ | 73.81 |  |  | $ | 66.21 |  |  |  | 11.5 | % | 
| 
    Natural Gas
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Average Henry Hub contract settlement price (per MMBTU)(A)
 |  | $ | 6.97 |  |  |  | $ | 6.56 |  |  |  | 6.3 | % |  | $ | 6.89 |  |  | $ | 6.64 |  |  |  | 3.8 | % | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  | (A) | One MMBTU is the equivalent of one decatherm, or one million
    British Thermal Units. | 
 
    RESULTS
    OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 COMPARED
    TO THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
 
    Shipments
 
    Rolled products shipments increased in Asia and South America
    due to increased demand in their respective can markets. These
    increases were offset by reductions in Europe and in North
    America. North America experienced shipment declines in the
    automotive, distributor and industrial markets, and Europe
    experienced minor reductions across several product lines.
 
    Net
    sales
 
    Net sales for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 increased
    from the comparable prior year period due primarily to improved
    pricing, lower exposure to metal price ceilings, accretion of
    contract fair value reserves and a strengthening euro. This
    increase was partially offset by lower average LME prices.
 
    Net sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2008 were adversely
    impacted in North America due to price ceilings on certain can
    contracts, which limited our ability to pass through
    approximately $45 million of metal purchase costs. In
    comparison, we were unable to pass through approximately
    $125 million of metal purchase costs in the comparable
    prior year period, for a net favorable impact of approximately
    $80 million. North America net sales were also favorably
    impacted by $76 million related to the accretion of the
    contract fair value reserves, discussed above in Metal Price
    Ceilings.
    67
 
    Costs
    and Expenses
 
    The following table presents our costs and expenses for the
    quarters ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, in
    U.S. dollars and expressed as percentages of net sales.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | % of 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | % of 
 |  | 
|  |  | $ in Millions |  |  | Net Sales |  |  |  | $ in Millions |  |  | Net Sales |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
    shown below)
 |  | $ | 2,475 |  |  |  | 90.5 | % |  |  | $ | 2,386 |  |  |  | 96.5 | % | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | 99 |  |  |  | 3.6 | % |  |  |  | 117 |  |  |  | 4.7 | % | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 105 |  |  |  | 3.8 | % |  |  |  | 59 |  |  |  | 2.4 | % | 
| 
    Research and development expenses
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 0.4 | % |  |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 0.4 | % | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | 47 |  |  |  | 1.7 | % |  |  |  | 57 |  |  |  | 2.3 | % | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments
     net
 |  |  | 50 |  |  |  | 1.8 | % |  |  |  | (5 | ) |  |  | (0.2 | )% | 
| 
    Equity in net income (loss) of non-consolidated affiliates
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 0.1 | % |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | (0.2 | )% | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net
 |  |  | (11 | ) |  |  | (0.4 | )% |  |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | (0.4 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 2,780 |  |  |  | 101.6 | % |  |  | $ | 2,612 |  |  |  | 105.7 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Cost of goods sold.  Metal represents
    approximately 70%  80% of our input costs, and as a
    percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold was adversely
    impacted in both periods due to price ceilings on certain can
    contracts, as discussed above; however, the current year quarter
    benefited from less volume sold under these contracts, as well
    as the accretion of the contract fair value reserves. As a
    percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold also improved as a
    result of pricing improvements across all of the regions,
    partially offset by certain operational cost increases.
 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
    (SG&A).  SG&A decreased primarily as a
    result of corporate costs which were approximately
    $22 million lower. Corporate cost reductions were driven
    primarily by reduced spending on third party consultants at our
    corporate headquarters and lower long-term incentive
    compensation.
 
    Depreciation and amortization.  As a result of
    the Arrangement, as of May 15, 2007, we recorded increases
    in the basis to our property, plant and equipment and intangible
    assets. This results in higher post-acquisition depreciation and
    amortization and explains the increase shown above.
 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net.  Interest expense declined
    primarily due to penalty interest incurred in the prior year as
    a result of our delayed filings and due to the write-off of a
    backstop commitment fee in the prior year.
 
    Other (income) expenses  net.  The
    reconciliation of the difference between the quarters is shown
    below (in millions):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Other 
 |  | 
|  |  | (Income) 
 |  | 
|  |  | Expenses  Net |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net for the quarter ended
    December 31, 2006 (Predecessor)
 |  | $ | (9 | ) | 
| 
    Exchange gains of $12 million in fiscal 2008 compared to
    losses of $7 million in 2006
 |  |  | (19 | ) | 
| 
    Restructuring charges  net of $1 million in
    fiscal 2008 compared to $6 million in 2006
 |  |  | (5 | ) | 
| 
    Gain on sale of equity interest in non-consolidated affiliate in
    2006 only
 |  |  | 15 |  | 
| 
    Gain on sale of rights to develop and operate hydroelectric
    power plants in 2006 only
 |  |  | 11 |  | 
| 
    Losses on disposals of property, plant and equipment 
    net in 2006 only
 |  |  | (4 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net for the quarter ended
    December 31, 2007 (Successor)
 |  | $ | (11 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    68
 
    Provision
    (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)
 
    For the three months ended December 31, 2007, we recorded a
    $4 million provision for taxes on our pre-tax loss of
    $41 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of
    non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests share,
    which represented an effective tax rate of (10)%. Our effective
    tax rate is greater than the benefit at the Canadian statutory
    rate due primarily to (1) a $32 million benefit from
    the effects of enacted tax rate changes on cumulative taxable
    temporary differences, partially offset by
    (2) $18 million of exchange remeasurement of deferred
    income taxes, (3) $14 million for (a) pre-tax
    foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect and
    (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency
    gains or losses with no pre-tax effect and (4) a
    $14 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
    related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
    it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
    those losses.
 
    For the three months ended December 31, 2006, we recorded a
    $34 million benefit for taxes on our pre-tax loss of
    $144 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of
    non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests share,
    which represented an effective tax rate of 24%. Our effective
    tax rate is less than the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate
    due primarily to (1) a $21 million benefit for
    (a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
    effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
    denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
    (2) a $29 million increase in valuation allowances
    related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
    it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
    those losses, (3) an $18 million expense from
    expense/income items with no tax effect  net and
    (4) a $19 million benefit from differences between the
    Canadian statutory and foreign effective tax rates resulting
    from the application of an annual effective tax rate to profit
    and loss entities in different jurisdictions.
 
    OPERATING
    SEGMENT REVIEW FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 COMPARED
    TO THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
 
    Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
    aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
    customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
    areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
    America; Europe; Asia and South America.
 
    As a result of the acquisition by Hindalco, and based on the way
    our President and Chief Operating Officer (our chief operating
    decision-maker) reviews the results of segment operations,
    during the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we changed our
    segment performance measure to Segment Income, as defined below.
    As a result, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified
    to conform to the new segment performance measure.
 
    We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
    operating segments, based on Segment Income, in accordance with
    FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of
    an Enterprise and Related Information. Segment Income
    provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
    line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
    Segment Income as earnings before (a) interest expense and
    amortization of debt issuance costs  net;
    (b) unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of
    derivative instruments  net; (c) realized gains
    (losses) on corporate derivative instruments  net;
    (d) depreciation and amortization; (e) impairment
    charges on long-lived assets; (f) minority interests
    share; (g) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share
    of Segment Income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
    determined on the equity method of accounting;
    (h) restructuring charges  net; (i) gains
    or losses on disposals of property, plant and equipment and
    businesses  net; (j) corporate selling, general
    and administrative expenses; (k) other costs 
    net; (l) litigation settlement  net of insurance
    recoveries; (m) sale transaction fees; (n) provision
    or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and (o) cumulative
    effect of accounting change  net of tax.
 
    Net sales and expenses are measured in accordance with the
    policies and procedures described in Note 1 
    Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our
    consolidated and combined financial statements included in our
    Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
    We do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB
    Statement No. 133. Accordingly, changes in fair value are
    recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the
    recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the
    contract settlement. In the accompanying condensed consolidated
    statements of operations, changes in fair value of derivative
    instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB
    
    69
 
    Statement No. 133 are recognized in (Gain) loss on change
    in fair value of derivative instruments  net. These
    gains or losses may or may not result from cash settlement. For
    Segment Income purposes we only include the impact of the
    derivative gains or losses to the extent they are settled in
    cash (i.e., realized) during that period.
 
    Reconciliation
 
    The following table presents Segment Income (Loss) by operating
    segment and reconciles Total Segment Income to Net income (loss)
    (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
| 
    Segment Income (Loss)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    North America
 |  | $ | 83 |  |  |  | $ | (42 | ) | 
| 
    Europe
 |  |  | 45 |  |  |  |  | 43 |  | 
| 
    Asia
 |  |  | 10 |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 
| 
    South America
 |  |  | 34 |  |  |  |  | 44 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total Segment Income
 |  |  | 172 |  |  |  |  | 59 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | (47 | ) |  |  |  | (57 | ) | 
| 
    Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net(A)
 |  |  | (24 | ) |  |  |  | (16 | ) | 
| 
    Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | (35 | ) | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | (105 | ) |  |  |  | (59 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(B)
 |  |  | (18 | ) |  |  |  | (9 | ) | 
| 
    Restructuring charges  net
 |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  | (6 | ) | 
| 
    Gains or (losses) on disposal of property, plant, and
    equipment  net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4 | ) | 
| 
    Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | (17 | ) |  |  |  | (39 | ) | 
| 
    Other costs  net(C)
 |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  |  | 26 |  | 
| 
    Benefit (provision) for taxes on income (loss)
 |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  |  | 34 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (49 | ) |  |  | $ | (105 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (A) |  | Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net represents the portion of gains
    (losses) that were not settled in cash during the period. | 
|  | 
    | (B) |  | Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
    Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
    on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
    with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
    GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
    the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
    reconcile Total Segment Income to Net income (loss), the
    proportional Segment Income of these non-consolidated affiliates
    is removed from Total Segment Income, net of our share of their
    net after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net
    (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed
    consolidated statements of operations. See
    Note 7  Investment in and Advances to
    Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions for
    further information about these non-consolidated affiliates. | 
|  | 
    | (C) |  | Other costs  net includes a gain on sale of equity
    interest in non-consolidated affiliates and gains on sale of
    rights to develop and operate hydroelectric power plants,
    recognized in the three months ended December 31, 2006 (see
    Note 15  Other (Income) Expenses 
    net). | 
    
    70
 
 
    OPERATING
    SEGMENT RESULTS
 
    North
    America
 
    As of December 31, 2007, North America manufactured
    aluminum sheet and light gauge products through 10 aluminum
    rolled products facilities and two dedicated recycling
    facilities. Important end-use applications include beverage
    cans, containers and packaging, automotive and other
    transportation applications, building products and other
    industrial applications.
 
    The following table presents key financial and operating
    information for North America ($ in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Shipments (kt):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rolled products
 |  |  | 269 |  |  |  |  | 273 |  |  |  | (1.5 | )% | 
| 
    Ingot products
 |  |  | 13 |  |  |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | (7.1 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shipments
 |  |  | 282 |  |  |  |  | 287 |  |  |  | (1.7 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 995 |  |  |  | $ | 850 |  |  |  | 17.1 | % | 
| 
    Segment Income (Loss)
 |  | $ | 83 |  |  |  | $ | (42 | ) |  |  | (297.6 | )% | 
| 
    Total assets
 |  | $ | 3,847 |  |  |  | $ | 1,476 |  |  |  | 160.6 | % | 
 
    Shipments
 
    Rolled products shipments declined primarily due to reduced
    distributor and industrial demand. Distributors are reducing
    purchases primarily due to a slowdown in the housing market.
 
    Net
    sales
 
    Net sales increased primarily as a result of reduced exposure to
    contracts with price ceilings and unfavorable contract fair
    value accretion as discussed above in Metal Price Ceilings.
    During the third quarter of fiscal 2008, we were unable to pass
    through approximately $45 million of metal purchase costs.
    During the comparable prior year period, we were unable to pass
    through approximately $125 million of metal purchase costs,
    for a net favorable comparable impact of approximately
    $80 million. The third quarter of fiscal 2008 was also
    favorably impacted by $76 million related to the accretion
    of the contract fair value reserves, as discussed in Metal Price
    Ceilings, as well as higher selling prices. These positive
    impacts were partially offset by lower volume and lower average
    LME.
 
    Segment
    Income
 
    As compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2006, Segment
    Income for the third quarter of fiscal 2008 was favorably
    impacted by $80 million as a result of the impact of the
    price ceilings ($156 million including the accretion of the
    contract fair value reserves), described above. Segment Income
    was also positively impacted by higher selling prices of
    approximately $14 million. These and other smaller positive
    factors were partially offset by lower realized gains related to
    the cash settlement of derivatives of approximately
    $36 million and metal price lag of $13 million.
 
    Total
    assets
 
    The consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
    connection with the Arrangement have been pushed down to us and,
    in turn, to each of our reporting units, and have been allocated
    to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
    relative fair values. This increased North America assets by
    approximately $2.5 billion as fair value exceeded
    historical cost. See Note 2  Acquisition of
    Novelis Common Stock in the accompanying condensed and
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    71
 
    Europe
 
    As of December 31, 2007, our European segment provided
    European markets with value-added sheet and light gauge products
    through 13 aluminum rolled products facilities and one dedicated
    recycling facility. Europe serves a broad range of aluminum
    rolled product end-use markets in various applications including
    can, automotive, lithographic, foil products and painted
    products.
 
    The following table presents key financial and operating
    information for Europe ($ in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Shipments (kt):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rolled products
 |  |  | 244 |  |  |  |  | 258 |  |  |  | (5.4 | )% | 
| 
    Ingot products
 |  |  | 13 |  |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 333.3 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shipments
 |  |  | 257 |  |  |  |  | 261 |  |  |  | (1.5 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 1,010 |  |  |  | $ | 932 |  |  |  | 8.4 | % | 
| 
    Segment Income
 |  | $ | 45 |  |  |  | $ | 43 |  |  |  | 4.7 | % | 
| 
    Total assets
 |  | $ | 4,235 |  |  |  | $ | 2,474 |  |  |  | 71.2 | % | 
| 
     
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Shipments
 
    Rolled products shipments increases in can-end and food can
    stock were more than offset by slight reductions in all other
    product lines. Ingot products increased primarily as a result of
    increased scrap sales.
 
    Net
    sales
 
    Net sales increased primarily as a result of the euro
    strengthening against the U.S. dollar and higher selling
    prices. These factors contributed approximately $49 million
    and $17 million, respectively, to net sales in the third
    quarter of fiscal 2008 when compared to the comparable prior
    year period. Reduced tolling and LME timing differences on
    certain contracts also increased sales as compared to the prior
    year.
 
    Segment
    Income
 
    Segment Income was favorably impacted in fiscal 2008 primarily
    by improved pricing and lower operating costs. These factors
    improved Segment Income in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 by
    approximately $17 million and $10 million,
    respectively, as compared to the prior year. These positive
    factors were offset by metal price lag of $23 million.
    Changes in realized gains from derivatives were slightly more
    than offset by exchange impacts as compared to the prior year.
 
    Total
    assets
 
    The consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
    connection with the Arrangement have been pushed down to us and,
    in turn, to each of our reporting units, and have been allocated
    to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
    relative fair values. This increased Europe assets by
    approximately $1.8 billion as fair value exceeded
    historical cost. See Note 2  Acquisition of
    Novelis Common Stock in the accompanying condensed and
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    72
 
    Asia
 
    As of December 31, 2007, Asia operated three manufacturing
    facilities, with production balanced between foil, construction
    and industrial, and beverage and food can end-use applications.
    The following table presents key financial and operating
    information for Asia ($ in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Shipments (kt):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rolled products
 |  |  | 134 |  |  |  |  | 124 |  |  |  | 8.1 | % | 
| 
    Ingot products
 |  |  | 9 |  |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | (30.8 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shipments
 |  |  | 143 |  |  |  |  | 137 |  |  |  | 4.4 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 483 |  |  |  | $ | 457 |  |  |  | 5.7 | % | 
| 
    Segment Income
 |  | $ | 10 |  |  |  | $ | 14 |  |  |  | (28.6 | )% | 
| 
    Total assets
 |  | $ | 1,078 |  |  |  | $ | 1,078 |  |  |  |  | % | 
| 
     
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Shipments
 
    Rolled products shipments increased primarily due to higher
    sales in the can market. Shipments into other markets were
    comparable between periods.
 
    Net
    sales
 
    Net sales increased primarily as a result of higher volume
    offset partially by lower average LME.
 
    Segment
    Income
 
    Segment Income increased by approximately $8 million due to
    volume, price and mix. However, this was more than offset by the
    negative impact of the strengthening Korean won and higher
    realized losses on the cash settlement of derivatives.
 
    Total
    assets
 
    The consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
    connection with the Arrangement have been pushed down to us and,
    in turn, to each of our reporting units, and have been allocated
    to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
    relative fair values. This increased Asia assets by
    approximately $21 million as fair value exceeded historical
    cost. See Note 2  Acquisition of Novelis Common
    Stock in the accompanying condensed and consolidated financial
    statements.
 
    South
    America
 
    As of December 31, 2007, South America operated two rolling
    plants in Brazil along with two smelters, an alumina refinery,
    bauxite mines and power generation facilities. South America
    manufactures various aluminum rolled products, including can
    stock, automotive and industrial sheet and light gauge for the
    beverage and food can, construction and industrial and
    transportation end-use markets.
    
    73
 
    The following table presents key financial and operating
    information for South America ($ in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Quarter Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Shipments (kt):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rolled products
 |  |  | 83 |  |  |  |  | 74 |  |  |  | 12.2 | % | 
| 
    Ingot products
 |  |  | 6 |  |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | (25.0 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shipments
 |  |  | 89 |  |  |  |  | 82 |  |  |  | 8.5 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 247 |  |  |  | $ | 237 |  |  |  | 4.2 | % | 
| 
    Segment Income
 |  | $ | 34 |  |  |  | $ | 44 |  |  |  | (22.7 | )% | 
| 
    Total assets
 |  | $ | 1,456 |  |  |  | $ | 821 |  |  |  | 77.3 | % | 
 
    Shipments
 
    Rolled products shipments increased during the third quarter of
    fiscal 2008 over the comparable prior year period primarily due
    to an increase in can shipments driven by strong market demand.
    This was slightly offset by reductions in shipments in the
    industrial products markets.
 
    Net
    sales
 
    Net sales increased primarily as a result of higher shipments
    and improved pricing, offset partially by lower average LME.
 
    Segment
    Income
 
    Segment Income was favorably impacted during the third quarter
    of fiscal 2008 primarily due to higher selling prices, and
    higher realized gains from derivative settlements. These factors
    improved Segment Income in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 by
    approximately $10 million and $9 million,
    respectively, as compared to the prior year period. These
    positive factors were more than offset by the strengthening of
    the Brazilian real, which reduced Segment Income by
    $15 million, unfavorable metal price lag of
    $13 million and lower LME which negatively impacts this
    region due to its smelter operations.
 
    Total
    assets
 
    The consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
    connection with the Arrangement have been pushed down to us and,
    in turn, to each of our reporting units, and have been allocated
    to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
    relative fair values. This increased South America assets by
    approximately $600 million as fair value exceeded
    historical cost. See Note 2  Acquisition of
    Novelis Common Stock in the accompanying condensed and
    consolidated financial statements.
 
    RESULTS
    OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 (ON A
    COMBINED NON-GAAP BASIS) COMPARED TO THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
    DECEMBER 31, 2006
 
    As discussed above, the Arrangement created a new basis of
    accounting. Under GAAP, the condensed consolidated financial
    statements for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 are
    presented in two distinct periods, as Predecessor and Successor
    entities are not comparable in all material respects. However,
    in order to facilitate an understanding of our results of
    operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 in
    comparison with the nine months ended December 31, 2006,
    our Predecessor and Successor results are presented herein on a
    combined basis. The combined results of operations are non-GAAP
    financial measures and should not be used in isolation or
    substitution of the Predecessor and Successor results.
 
    Shipments
 
    Compared to the prior year, rolled products shipments increased
    on a year to date basis in all regions except North America
    primarily as a result of increased demand in their respective
    regional can markets.
    
    74
 
    Compared to the prior year, North American demand for rolled
    products has declined across all product groups, most notably in
    the industrial and distributor markets, partially due to a
    slowdown in housing construction.
 
    Net
    sales
 
    Higher net sales in the nine months ended December 31, 2007
    resulted primarily from (1) lower exposure to contracts
    with price ceilings (discussed below) in North America,
    (2) improved pricing and (3) a strengthening euro
    against the U.S. dollar. The positive impact of increased
    volume in Europe, South America and Asia was almost entirely
    offset by the decrease in volume in North America. While average
    LME prices were down year-over-year, the effect on sales was
    relatively flat due to the timing of certain contracts priced in
    prior periods.
 
    Net sales for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 were
    adversely impacted in North America due to price ceilings on
    certain can contracts, which limited our ability to pass through
    approximately $185 million of metal purchase costs. In
    comparison, we were unable to pass through approximately
    $380 million of metal purchase costs in the comparable
    prior year period, for a net favorable impact of approximately
    $195 million. In addition, North America net sales were
    favorably impacted by $205 million related to the accretion
    of the unfavorable contract fair value reserves, discussed
    previously in Metal Price Ceilings.
 
    Costs
    and expenses
 
    The following table presents our costs and expenses for the nine
    months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, in
    U.S. dollars and expressed as percentages of net sales.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nine Months Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | % of 
 |  |  |  |  |  | % of 
 |  | 
|  |  | $ in Millions |  |  | Net Sales |  |  | $ in Millions |  |  | Net Sales |  | 
|  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
    shown below)
 |  | $ | 7,671 |  |  |  | 91.5 | % |  | $ | 7,182 |  |  |  | 95.4 | % | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | 324 |  |  |  | 3.9 | % |  |  | 318 |  |  |  | 4.2 | % | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 288 |  |  |  | 3.4 | % |  |  | 175 |  |  |  | 2.3 | % | 
| 
    Research and development expenses
 |  |  | 40 |  |  |  | 0.5 | % |  |  | 31 |  |  |  | 0.4 | % | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | 154 |  |  |  | 1.8 | % |  |  | 158 |  |  |  | 2.1 | % | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments
     net
 |  |  | 52 |  |  |  | 0.6 | % |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | (0.1 | )% | 
| 
    Equity in net income (loss) of non-consolidated affiliates
 |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 0.1 | % |  |  | (13 | ) |  |  | (0.1 | )% | 
| 
    Sale transaction fees
 |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | 0.4 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | % | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net
 |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | (0.0 | )% |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | (0.1 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 8,566 |  |  |  | 102.2 | % |  | $ | 7,836 |  |  |  | 104.1 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Cost of goods sold.  Metal represents
    approximately 70%  80% of our input costs, and as a
    percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold was adversely
    impacted in both periods due to price ceilings on certain can
    contracts, as discussed above; however, the current year period
    benefited from less volume sold under these contracts, as well
    as the accretion of the unfavorable contract fair value
    reserves. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold also
    improved as a result of pricing improvements across all of the
    regions, partially offset by certain operational cost increases.
 
    Selling, general and administrative
    expenses.  Compared to the nine months ended
    December 31, 2006, SG&A for the nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 increased primarily as a result of
    $34 million of incremental long-term incentive compensation
    expense, most of which was triggered by the Arrangement, and a
    strengthening euro. These increases were partially offset by
    lower corporate costs. Corporate costs (excluding long-term
    incentive compensation of $12 million included in the
    $34 million described above) were $37 million
    
    75
 
    lower in the current year to date period primarily as a result
    of $10 million of severance recorded in the prior year to
    date period for certain former executives and a $17 million
    reduction in legal and professional fees (primarily associated
    with the use of third party consultants to assist with our
    financial reporting requirements in the prior year to date
    period).
 
    Depreciation and amortization.  As a result of
    the Arrangement, as of May 15, 2007, we recorded increases
    in the basis to our property, plant and equipment and intangible
    assets. This results in higher post-acquisition depreciation and
    amortization and explains the increase shown above.
 
    Research and development expenses.  Research
    and development expenses increased in fiscal 2008 over the
    comparable prior year period due to a one-time write-off of
    $9 million of in-process research and development costs
    resulting from the Arrangement.
 
    Sale transaction fees.  We incurred
    $32 million of fees and expenses related to the Arrangement
    during the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15,
    2007.
 
    Other income (expenses).  The reconciliation of
    the difference between the nine months ended December 31,
    2007 and 2006 is shown below (in millions):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Other 
 |  | 
|  |  | (Income) 
 |  | 
|  |  | Expenses  Net |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net for the nine months
    ended December 31, 2006 (Predecessor)
 |  | $ | (6 | ) | 
| 
    Exchange losses of $1 million in fiscal 2008 compared to
    gains of $3 million in 2006
 |  |  | 4 |  | 
| 
    Restructuring charges  net of $3 million in
    fiscal 2008 compared to $18 million in 2006
 |  |  | (15 | ) | 
| 
    Gain on sale of equity interest in non-consolidated affiliate in
    2006 only
 |  |  | 15 |  | 
| 
    Gain on sale of rights to develop and operate hydroelectric
    power plants in 2006 only
 |  |  | 11 |  | 
| 
    Losses on disposals of property, plant and equipment 
    net in 2006 only
 |  |  | (6 | ) | 
| 
    Other  net
 |  |  | (6 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other (income) expenses  net for the nine months
    ended December 31, 2007 (Successor)
 |  | $ | (3 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Provision
    (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)
 
    For the nine months ended December 31, 2007, we recorded an
    $8 million provision for taxes on our pre-tax loss of
    $174 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of
    non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests share,
    which represented an effective tax rate of (5)%. Our effective
    tax rate is greater than the benefit at the Canadian statutory
    rate due primarily to (1) $84 million for
    (a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
    effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
    denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
    (2) exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes of
    $28 million, (3) a $67 million increase in
    valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain
    jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that
    we will not be able to utilize those losses, (4) a
    $101 million benefit from the effects of enacted tax rate
    changes on cumulative taxable temporary differences and
    (5) a $30 million benefit from expense/income items
    with no tax effect  net.
 
    For the nine months ended December 31, 2006, we recorded a
    $106 million benefit for taxes on our pre-tax loss of
    $319 million, before our equity in net income of
    non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests share,
    which represented an effective tax rate of 33%. While our
    effective tax rate is equal to the Canadian statutory rate, the
    following items represent the significant components of
    offsetting permanent and timing differences: (1) a
    $59 million benefit from differences between the Canadian
    statutory and foreign effective tax rates resulting from the
    application of an annual effective tax rate to profit and loss
    entities in different jurisdictions, mostly offset by (2) a
    $38 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
    related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
    it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
    those losses and (3) a $10 million expense from
    expense/income items with no tax effect  net.
    
    76
 
    OPERATING
    SEGMENT REVIEW FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 (ON A
    COMBINED NON-GAAP BASIS) COMPARED TO THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
    DECEMBER 31, 2006
 
    As discussed above, the Arrangement created a new basis of
    accounting. Under GAAP, the condensed consolidated financial
    statements for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 are
    presented in two distinct periods, as Predecessor and Successor
    entities are not comparable in all material respects. However,
    in order to facilitate an understanding of our segment
    information for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 in
    comparison with the nine months ended December 31, 2006,
    our Predecessor and Successor segment information is presented
    herein on a combined basis. The combined segment items are
    non-GAAP financial measures and should not be used in isolation
    or substitution of the Predecessor and Successor segment
    information.
 
    Net
    sales
 
    Shown below is the schedule of Net sales by operating segment
    for periods allocable to the Successor, Predecessor and the
    combined presentation for the nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 that we use throughout MD&A (in
    millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  |  | May 15, 
 |  |  | December 31, 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Combined |  | 
| 
    Combined Net sales by Operating Segment:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    North America
 |  | $ | 2,619 |  |  |  | $ | 446 |  |  | $ | 3,065 |  | 
| 
    Europe
 |  |  | 2,695 |  |  |  |  | 510 |  |  |  | 3,205 |  | 
| 
    Asia
 |  |  | 1,167 |  |  |  |  | 216 |  |  |  | 1,383 |  | 
| 
    South America
 |  |  | 622 |  |  |  |  | 109 |  |  |  | 731 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total Net sales
 |  | $ | 7,103 |  |  |  | $ | 1,281 |  |  | $ | 8,384 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    77
 
    Segment
    Income
 
    Shown below is the schedule of our reconciliation from Total
    Segment Income to Net income (loss) by operating segment for
    periods allocable to the Successor, Predecessor and the combined
    presentation for the nine months ended December 31, 2007
    that we use throughout MD&A (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine Months 
 |  | 
|  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  |  | May 15, 
 |  |  | December 31, 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Combined |  | 
| 
    Combined Results by Operating Segment:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Segment Income (Loss)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    North America
 |  | $ | 195 |  |  |  | $ | (24 | ) |  | $ | 171 |  | 
| 
    Europe
 |  |  | 155 |  |  |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | 187 |  | 
| 
    Asia
 |  |  | 26 |  |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 32 |  | 
| 
    South America
 |  |  | 100 |  |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 118 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total Segment Income
 |  |  | 476 |  |  |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | 508 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | (128 | ) |  |  |  | (26 | ) |  |  | (154 | ) | 
| 
    Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | (126 | ) |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | (121 | ) | 
| 
    Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | 39 |  |  |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 36 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | (260 | ) |  |  |  | (28 | ) |  |  | (288 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 3 |  | 
| 
    Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
 |  |  | (44 | ) |  |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | (51 | ) | 
| 
    Restructuring charges  net
 |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (3 | ) | 
| 
    Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | (41 | ) |  |  |  | (35 | ) |  |  | (76 | ) | 
| 
    Other costs  net
 |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | (1 | ) | 
| 
    Sale transaction fees
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (32 | ) |  |  | (32 | ) | 
| 
    Benefit (provision) for taxes on income (loss)
 |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | (8 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (90 | ) |  |  | $ | (97 | ) |  | $ | (187 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    78
 
    Reconciliation
 
    The following table presents Segment Income by operating segment
    and reconciles Total Segment Income to Net income (loss) (in
    millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Segment Income (Loss)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    North America
 |  | $ | 171 |  |  | $ | (37 | ) | 
| 
    Europe
 |  |  | 187 |  |  |  | 191 |  | 
| 
    Asia
 |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | 56 |  | 
| 
    South America
 |  |  | 118 |  |  |  | 125 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total Segment Income
 |  |  | 508 |  |  |  | 335 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
    costs  net
 |  |  | (154 | ) |  |  | (158 | ) | 
| 
    Unrealized losses on change in fair value of derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | (121 | ) |  |  | (151 | ) | 
| 
    Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative
    instruments  net
 |  |  | 36 |  |  |  | (35 | ) | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | (288 | ) |  |  | (175 | ) | 
| 
    Minority interests share
 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | (1 | ) | 
| 
    Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
 |  |  | (51 | ) |  |  | (27 | ) | 
| 
    Restructuring charges  net
 |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | (18 | ) | 
| 
    Gains (losses) on disposal of property, plant, and equipment
     net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (6 | ) | 
| 
    Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | (76 | ) |  |  | (101 | ) | 
| 
    Other costs  net
 |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | 30 |  | 
| 
    Sale transaction fees
 |  |  | (32 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Benefit (provision) for taxes on income (loss)
 |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | 106 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ | (187 | ) |  | $ | (201 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    OPERATING
    SEGMENT RESULTS
 
    North
    America
 
    The following table presents key financial and operating
    information for North America ($ in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Shipments (kt):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rolled products
 |  |  | 826 |  |  |  | 867 |  |  |  | (4.7 | )% | 
| 
    Ingot products
 |  |  | 46 |  |  |  | 56 |  |  |  | (17.9 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shipments
 |  |  | 872 |  |  |  | 923 |  |  |  | (5.5 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 3,065 |  |  | $ | 2,796 |  |  |  | 9.6 | % | 
| 
    Segment Income (Loss)
 |  | $ | 171 |  |  | $ | (37 | ) |  |  | (562.2 | )% | 
 
    Shipments
 
    Rolled products shipments declined due to reduced distributor
    and industrial demand and lower can volumes. Distributor and
    industrial demand has declined primarily due to a slowdown in
    the housing market. Ingot product shipments declined during the
    nine months ended December 31, 2007 due to lower scrap
    sales
    
    79
 
    and improved internal use of primary ingot, excess amounts of
    which were sold to third parties in the nine months ended
    December 31, 2006.
 
    Net
    sales
 
    Net sales increased primarily as a result of reduced exposure to
    contracts with price ceilings and unfavorable contract fair
    value accretion as discussed above in Metal Price Ceilings.
    During the first nine months ended December 31, 2007, we
    were unable to pass through approximately $185 million of
    metal purchase costs. During the comparable prior year period,
    we were unable to pass through approximately $380 million
    of metal purchase costs, for a net favorable comparable impact
    of approximately $195 million. The first nine months of
    fiscal 2008 were also favorably impacted by $205 million
    related to the accretion of the contract fair value reserves, as
    discussed in Metal Price Ceilings. These factors were partially
    offset by approximately $160 million due to lower average
    LME. In addition, price increases were largely offset by a
    reduction in volume and unfavorable mix changes.
 
    Segment
    Income (Loss)
 
    As compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2006,
    Segment Income for the nine months ended December 31, 2007
    was favorably impacted by $195 million as a result of the
    impact of the price ceilings ($400 million including the
    accretion of the contract fair value reserves), described above.
    Segment Income was also positively impacted by approximately
    $43 million due to higher selling prices. These positive
    factors were partially offset by (1) the negative impact of
    metal price lag which unfavorably impacted Segment Income by
    $55 million as compared to the nine months ended
    December 31, 2006, (2) lower realized gains related to
    the cash settlement of derivatives of approximately
    $109 million, (3) lower volume which negatively
    impacted Segment Income by approximately $26 million,
    (4) higher operating expense of approximately
    $20 million, (5) incremental stock compensation
    expense of $11 million as a result of the Arrangement and
    (6) $20 million of additional expenses associated with
    fair value adjustments recorded as a result of the Arrangement.
 
    Europe
 
    The following table presents key financial and operating
    information for Europe ($ in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Shipments (kt):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rolled products
 |  |  | 803 |  |  |  | 789 |  |  |  | 1.8 | % | 
| 
    Ingot products
 |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 150.0 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shipments
 |  |  | 828 |  |  |  | 799 |  |  |  | 3.6 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 3,205 |  |  | $ | 2,794 |  |  |  | 14.7 | % | 
| 
    Segment Income
 |  | $ | 187 |  |  | $ | 191 |  |  |  | (2.1 | )% | 
 
    Shipments
 
    Rolled products shipments increased approximately 29kt in the
    can market. This was partially offset by reductions in the
    distributor and general purpose markets. Shipments into other
    markets were comparable between periods. Ingot product shipments
    have increased as a result of higher scrap sales.
 
    Net
    sales
 
    Net sales increased primarily as a result of
    (1) incremental volume, (2) a strengthening euro
    against the U.S. dollar and (3) higher selling prices.
    These factors contributed approximately
    (1) $90 million, (2) $112 million and
    (3) $37 million, respectively. While average LME was
    lower year over year, net sales increased from contracts priced
    in prior periods. This contributed approximately
    $120 million as compared to the prior year.
    
    80
 
    This did not deliver any Segment Income increase as the metal
    costs were hedged at prior period prices (which were comparably
    higher).
 
    Segment
    Income
 
    Segment Income was favorably impacted in fiscal 2008 primarily
    by higher prices, increased volume and currency benefits. These
    factors improved Segment Income in the nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 by approximately $37 million,
    $13 million and $17 million, respectively, versus the
    comparable prior year period. However, these positive factors
    were more than offset by unfavorable metal price lag,
    share-based compensation expense and expenses associated with
    fair value adjustments recorded as a result of the Arrangement.
    These factors reduced Segment Income in the nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 by approximately
    (1) $55 million, (2) $6 million and
    (3) $10 million, respectively, on a comparable basis.
 
    Asia
 
    The following table presents key financial and operating
    information for Asia ($ in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Shipments (kt):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rolled products
 |  |  | 368 |  |  |  | 353 |  |  |  | 4.2 | % | 
| 
    Ingot products
 |  |  | 31 |  |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | (11.4 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shipments
 |  |  | 399 |  |  |  | 388 |  |  |  | 2.8 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 1,383 |  |  | $ | 1,298 |  |  |  | 6.5 | % | 
| 
    Segment Income
 |  | $ | 32 |  |  | $ | 56 |  |  |  | (42.9 | )% | 
 
    Shipments
 
    Rolled products shipments increased approximately 25kt in the
    can market due to increased demand. This increase was partially
    offset by a decline of shipments in the industrial and light
    gauge markets as a result of continued price pressure from
    Chinese exports, driven by the difference in aluminum metal
    prices on the Shanghai Foreign Exchange and the LME.
 
    Net
    sales
 
    Net sales increased approximately $70 million as a result
    of increased volume. Sales also increased slightly from
    contracts priced in prior periods. This did not deliver any
    Segment Income increase as the metal costs were hedged at prior
    period prices (which were comparably higher).
 
    Segment
    Income
 
    Segment income benefited approximately $6 million from
    increased volume, however this was more than offset by
    operational cost increases of approximately $13 million. In
    addition, Segment Income was negatively impacted by several
    smaller items such as higher realized losses on derivatives,
    currency, and expenses associated with fair value adjustments
    recorded as a result of the Arrangement which aggregated
    approximately $17 million.
    
    81
 
    South
    America
 
    The following table presents key financial and operating
    information for South America ($ in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  | Percent 
 |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Shipments (kt):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rolled products
 |  |  | 237 |  |  |  | 210 |  |  |  | 12.9 | % | 
| 
    Ingot products
 |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | (4.8 | )% | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total shipments
 |  |  | 257 |  |  |  | 231 |  |  |  | 11.3 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net sales
 |  | $ | 731 |  |  | $ | 654 |  |  |  | 11.8 | % | 
| 
    Segment Income
 |  | $ | 118 |  |  | $ | 125 |  |  |  | (5.6 | )% | 
 
    Shipments
 
    Rolled products shipments increased during the nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 over the comparable prior year period
    primarily due to an increase in can shipments driven by strong
    market demand. This was slightly offset by reductions in
    shipments in the industrial products markets.
 
    Net
    sales
 
    Net sales increased primarily as a result of higher shipments
    and increased LME prices.
 
    Segment
    Income
 
    Segment Income during the nine months ended December 31,
    2007 was favorably impacted primarily by (1) increased
    shipments described above, (2) higher selling prices,
    (3) higher realized gains on the cash settlement of
    derivatives, and (4) favorable social tax reserve
    adjustments. These factors improved Segment Income in the nine
    months ended December 31, 2007 by approximately
    (1) $14 million, (2) $39 million,
    (3) $27 million and (4) $6 million
    respectively. These positive factors were more than offset by
    (1) metal price lag, (2) the strengthening of the
    Brazilian real, (3) higher operating costs and
    (4) incremental expenses associated with fair value
    adjustments recorded as a result of the Arrangement. These
    factors reduced Segment Income by $15 million,
    $42 million, $19 million and $9 million,
    respectively, as compared to the prior year. Mix and lower LME
    also had a slight negative impact on Segment Income as compared
    to the prior year.
 
    LIQUIDITY
    AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
    As discussed above, the Arrangement created a new basis of
    accounting. Under GAAP, the condensed consolidated financial
    statements for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 are
    presented in two distinct periods, as Predecessor and Successor
    entities are not comparable in all material respects. However,
    in order to facilitate an understanding of our liquidity and
    capital resources as of and for the nine months ended
    December 31, 2007 in comparison with the nine months ended
    December 31, 2006, our Predecessor and Successor cash flows
    are presented herein on a combined basis. The combined cash
    flows are non-GAAP financial measures and should not be used in
    isolation or substitution of the Predecessor and Successor cash
    flows.
    
    82
 
    Shown below is a condensed combining schedule of cash flows for
    periods allocable to the Successor, Predecessor and the combined
    presentation for the nine months ended December 31, 2007
    that we use throughout our discussion of liquidity and capital
    resources.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | May 16, 2007 
 |  |  |  | April 1, 2007 
 |  |  | Nine 
 |  | 
|  |  | Through 
 |  |  |  | Through 
 |  |  | Months Ended 
 |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | May 15, 2007 |  |  | December 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | Combined |  | 
| 
    OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
 |  | $ | 31 |  |  |  | $ | (230 | ) |  |  | $(199) |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | (120 | ) |  |  |  | (17 | ) |  |  | (137 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from sales of assets
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 
| 
    Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
    affiliates
 |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 6 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from loans receivable  net 
    related parties
 |  |  | 12 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 
| 
    Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
 |  |  | 56 |  |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 74 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
 |  |  | (43 | ) |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | (41 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock
 |  |  | 92 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 92 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of debt
 |  |  | 1,100 |  |  |  |  | 150 |  |  |  | 1,250 |  | 
| 
    Principal repayments
 |  |  | (1,005 | ) |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (1,006 | ) | 
| 
    Short-term borrowings  net
 |  |  | (103 | ) |  |  |  | 60 |  |  |  | (43 | ) | 
| 
    Dividends  minority interests
 |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | (8 | ) | 
| 
    Debt issuance costs
 |  |  | (37 | ) |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (39 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 |  |  | 46 |  |  |  |  | 201 |  |  |  | 247 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 |  |  | 34 |  |  |  |  | (27 | ) |  |  | 7 |  | 
| 
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
    foreign currencies
 |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | (2 | ) | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents  beginning of period
 |  |  | 102 |  |  |  |  | 128 |  |  |  | 230 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents  end of period
 |  | $ | 133 |  |  |  | $ | 102 |  |  |  | $235 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Operating
    Activities
 
    Free cash flow (which is a non-GAAP measure) consists of
    (a) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities;
    (b) less dividends and capital expenditures; (c) plus
    net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments (which is
    net of premiums paid to purchase derivative instruments).
    Dividends include those paid by our less than wholly-owned
    subsidiaries to their minority shareholders and dividends paid
    by us to our common shareholder(s). Management believes that
    Free cash flow is relevant to investors as it provides a measure
    of the cash generated internally that is available for debt
    service and other value creation opportunities. However, Free
    cash flow does not necessarily represent cash available for
    discretionary activities, as certain debt service obligations
    must be funded out of Free cash flow. We believe the line on our
    condensed consolidated statements of cash flows entitled
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    
    83
 
    is the most directly comparable measure to Free cash flow. Our
    method of calculating Free cash flow may not be consistent with
    that of other companies.
 
    In our discussion of Metal Price Ceilings, we have disclosed
    that certain of our sales contracts contain a fixed aluminum
    (metal) price ceiling beyond which the cost of aluminum cannot
    be passed through to the customer, unless adjusted. During the
    nine months ended December 31, 2007 and the comparable
    prior year period, we were unable to pass through approximately
    $185 million and $380 million, respectively, of metal
    purchase costs associated with sales under these contracts. Net
    cash provided by operating activities is negatively impacted by
    the same amounts, adjusted for any timing difference between
    customer receipts and vendor payments and offset partially by
    reduced income taxes. Based on a December 31, 2007 aluminum
    price of $2,360 per tonne, and our estimate of a range of
    shipment volumes, we estimate that we will be unable to pass
    through aluminum purchase costs of approximately $38 
    $40 million for the remainder of fiscal 2008 and
    $240  $260 million in the aggregate thereafter.
 
    As a result of our acquisition by Hindalco, we established
    reserves totaling $655 million as of May 15, 2007
    representing the fair value of these contracts, and these
    reserves are being accreted into Net sales over the remaining
    lives of the contracts in a manner consistent with the forecast
    used to determine the fair value of the reserves. This accretion
    does not impact cash flow.
 
    The following tables show the reconciliation from Net cash used
    in (provided by) operating activities to Free cash flow, the
    ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and the change
    between periods ($ in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net cash used in (provided by) operating activities
 |  | $ | (199 | ) |  | $ | (79 | ) |  | $ | (120 | ) | 
| 
    Dividends
 |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | (137 | ) |  |  | (95 | ) |  |  | (42 | ) | 
| 
    Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
 |  |  | 74 |  |  |  | 167 |  |  |  | (93 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Free cash flow
 |  | $ | (270 | ) |  | $ | (17 | ) |  | $ | (253 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | As of |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 
 |  |  | March 31, 
 |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2007 |  | Change | 
|  |  | Successor |  |  | Predecessor |  |  | 
| 
    Ending balances of cash and cash equivalents
 |  | $ | 133 |  |  |  | $ | 128 |  |  | $ | 5 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    In the nine months ended December 31, 2007, net cash used
    in (provided by) operating activities was influenced primarily
    by metal purchase costs we were unable to pass through to
    customers due to the price ceilings previously discussed. Other
    items that negatively impacted operating cash flow for the nine
    months ended December 31, 2007 include $72 million
    paid in share-based compensation payments, $42 million paid
    for sale transaction fees and bonus payments totaling
    $25 million for the calendar year ended December 31,
    2006 and the period from January 1, 2007 through
    May 15, 2007, triggered by the Arrangement.
 
    Financing
    Activities
 
    Overview
 
    During the nine months ended December 31, 2007, our total
    debt (including short-term borrowings) increased by
    $208 million (excluding net unamortized fair value
    adjustments of $65 million recorded as part of the
    Arrangement), principally as a result of our need to fund
    additional working capital requirements and certain costs
    associated with the Arrangement, including sale transaction fees
    and share-based compensation payments. During the first quarter
    of fiscal 2008, we also received $92 million in cash from
    the sale of additional common stock to Hindalco.
    
    84
 
    New
    Senior Secured Credit Facilities
 
    On May 25, 2007, we entered into a Bank and Bridge
    Facilities Commitment with affiliates of UBS and ABN AMRO, to
    provide backstop assurance for the refinancing of our existing
    indebtedness following the Arrangement. The commitments from UBS
    and ABN AMRO, provided by the banks on a 50%-50% basis,
    consisted of the following: (1) a senior secured term loan
    of up to $1.06 billion; (2) a senior secured
    asset-based revolving credit facility of up to $900 million
    and (3) a commitment to issue up to $1.2 billion of
    unsecured senior notes, if necessary. The commitment contained
    terms and conditions customary for facilities of this nature.
 
    In connection with these backstop commitments, we paid fees
    totaling $14 million, which were included in Other
    long-term assets  third parties as of
    June 30, 2007. Of this amount, $6 million was related
    to the unsecured senior notes, which were not refinanced, and
    was written off during the quarter ended September 30,
    2007. The remaining $8 million in fees paid have been
    credited by the lenders towards fees associated with the new
    senior secured credit facilities (described below) and will be
    amortized over the lives of the related borrowings.
 
    On July 6, 2007, we entered into new senior secured credit
    facilities with a syndicate of lenders led by affiliates of UBS
    and ABN AMRO (New Credit Facilities) providing for aggregate
    borrowings of up to $1.76 billion. The New Credit
    Facilities consist of (1) a $960 million seven-year
    Term Loan facility (Term Loan facility) and (2) an
    $800 million five year multi-currency asset-based revolving
    credit line and letter of credit facility (ABL facility).
 
    Under the Term Loan facility, loans characterized as alternate
    base rate (ABR) borrowings bear interest annually at a rate
    equal to the alternate base rate (which is the greater of
    (a) the base rate in effect on a given day and (b) the
    federal funds effective rate in effect on a given day, plus
    0.50%) plus the applicable margin, and loans characterized as
    Eurocurrency borrowings bear interest at an annual rate equal to
    the adjusted LIBOR rate for the interest period in effect, plus
    the applicable margin.
 
    Under the ABL facility, interest charged is dependent on the
    type of loan: (1) any swingline loan or any loan
    categorized as an ABR borrowing will bear interest at an annual
    rate equal to the alternate base rate (which is the greater of
    (a) the base rate in effect on a given day and (b) the
    federal funds effective rate in effect on a given day, plus
    0.50%), plus the applicable margin; (2) Eurocurrency loans
    will bear interest at an annual rate equal to the adjusted LIBOR
    rate for the applicable interest period, plus the applicable
    margin; (3) loans designated as Canadian base rate
    borrowings will bear an annual interest rate equal to the
    Canadian base rate (CAPRIME), plus the applicable margin;
    (4) loans designated as bankers acceptances (BA) rate loans
    will bear interest at the average discount rate offered for
    bankers acceptances for the applicable BA interest period,
    plus the applicable margin and (5) loans designated as Euro
    Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR) loans will bear interest
    annually at a rate equal to the adjusted EURIBOR rate for the
    applicable interest period, plus the applicable margin.
    Applicable margins under the ABL facility depend upon excess
    availability levels calculated on a quarterly basis.
 
    Generally, for both the Term Loan facility and ABL facility,
    interest rates reset every three months and interest is payable
    on a monthly, quarterly or other periodic basis depending on the
    type of loan.
 
    The proceeds from the Term Loan facility of $960 million,
    drawn in full at the time of closing, and the initial draw of
    $324 million under the ABL facility were used to pay off
    the existing senior secured credit facility (discussed below),
    pay for debt issuance costs of the New Credit Facilities and
    provide for additional working capital. Mandatory minimum
    principal amortization payments under the Term Loan facility are
    $2.4 million per calendar quarter. The first mandatory
    minimum principal amortization payment was made on
    September 28, 2007. Additional mandatory prepayments are
    required to be made in the event of certain collateral
    liquidations, asset sales, debt and preferred stock issuances,
    equity issuances, casualty events and excess cash flow (as
    defined in the New Credit Facilities). Any unpaid principal
    remaining is due in full on July 6, 2014.
 
    Borrowing limits under the ABL facility are generally based on
    85% of eligible accounts receivable and 75% to 85% of eligible
    inventories. Commitment fees of 0.25% to 0.375% are based on
    average daily amounts outstanding under the ABL facility during
    a fiscal quarter, and are payable quarterly.
    
    85
 
    The New Credit Facilities include customary affirmative and
    negative covenants. Under the ABL facility, if our excess
    availability, as defined under the borrowing, is less than 10%
    of the borrowing base, we are required to maintain a minimum
    fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. Substantially all of our
    assets are pledged as collateral under the New Credit Facilities.
 
    We incurred debt issuance costs on our New Credit Facilities
    totaling $32 million, including the $8 million in fees
    previously paid in conjunction with the backstop commitment.
    These fees are included in Other long-term assets 
    third parties and are being amortized over the life of the
    related borrowing in Interest expense and amortization of
    debt issuance costs  net using the
    effective interest amortization method for the Term
    Loan facility and the straight-line method for the ABL facility.
    The unamortized amount of these costs was $28 million as of
    December 31, 2007.
 
    During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, we entered into
    interest rate swaps to fix the variable LIBOR interest rate for
    up to $600 million of our floating rate Term Loan facility
    at effective weighted average interest rates and amounts
    expiring as follows: (i) 4.1% on $600 million through
    September 30, 2008, (ii) 4.0% on $500 million
    through March 31, 2009 and (iii) 4.0% on
    $400 million through March 31, 2010. We are still
    obligated to pay any applicable margin, as defined in our New
    Credit Facilities, in addition to these interest rates.
 
    On July 3, 2007, we terminated an interest rate swap we had
    to fix the
    3-month
    LIBOR interest rate at an effective weighted average interest
    rate of 3.9% on $100 million of the floating rate Term Loan
    B debt, which was originally scheduled to expire on
    February 3, 2008. The termination resulted in a gain of
    less than $1 million.
 
    As of December 31, 2007 approximately 80% of our debt was
    fixed rate and approximately 20% was variable rate.
 
    Old
    Senior Secured Credit Facilities
 
    In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we entered into
    senior secured credit facilities (Old Credit Facilities)
    providing for aggregate borrowings of up to $1.8 billion.
    The Old Credit Facilities consisted of (1) a
    $1.3 billion seven-year senior secured Term Loan B
    facility, bearing interest at London Interbank Offered Rate
    (LIBOR) plus 1.75% (which was subject to change based on certain
    leverage ratios), all of which was borrowed on January 10,
    2005, and (2) a $500 million five-year multi-currency
    revolving credit and letters of credit facility.
 
    The Old Credit Facilities included customary affirmative and
    negative covenants, as well as financial covenants relating to
    our maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and
    minimum fixed charge coverage ratios. Substantially all of our
    assets were pledged as collateral under the Old Credit
    Facilities.
 
    The terms of our Old Credit Facilities required that we deliver
    unaudited quarterly and audited annual financial statements to
    our lenders within specified periods of time. Due to delays in
    certain of our SEC filings for 2005 and 2006, we obtained a
    series of five waiver and consent agreements from the lenders
    under the facility to extend the various filing deadlines. Fees
    paid related to the five waiver and consent agreements totaled
    $6 million.
 
    On October 16, 2006, we amended the financial covenants to
    our Old Credit Facilities. In particular, we amended our maximum
    total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and minimum fixed
    charge coverage ratios through the quarter ending March 31,
    2008.
 
    We also amended and modified other provisions of the Old Credit
    Facilities to permit more efficient ordinary-course operations,
    including increasing the amounts of certain permitted
    investments and receivables securitizations, permitting nominal
    quarterly dividends, and the transfer of an intercompany loan to
    another subsidiary. In return for these amendments and
    modifications, we paid aggregate fees of approximately
    $3 million to lenders who consented to the amendments and
    modifications, and agreed to continue paying higher applicable
    margins on our Old Credit Facilities and higher unused
    commitment fees on our revolving credit facilities that were
    instated with a prior waiver and consent agreement in May 2006.
    Commitment fees related to the unused portion of the
    $500 million revolving credit facility were 0.625% per
    annum.
    
    86
 
    On April 27, 2007, our lenders consented to a further
    amendment of our Old Credit Facilities. The amendment included
    permission to increase the Term Loan B facility by
    $150 million. We utilized the additional funds available
    under the Term Loan B facility to reduce the outstanding balance
    of our $500 million revolving credit facility. The
    additional borrowing capacity under the revolving credit
    facility was used to fund working capital requirements and
    certain costs associated with the Arrangement, including the
    cash settlement of share-based compensation arrangements and
    lender fees. Additionally, the amendment included a limited
    waiver of the change of control Event of Default (as defined in
    the Old Credit Facilities) which effectively extended the
    requirement to repay the Old Credit Facilities to July 11,
    2007. We paid fees of approximately $2 million to lenders
    who consented to this amendment.
 
    Total debt issuance costs of $43 million, including
    amendment fees and the waiver and consent agreements discussed
    above, had been recorded in Other long-term
    assets  third parties and were being amortized
    over the life of the related borrowing in Interest expense
    and amortization of debt issuance costs  net
    using the effective interest amortization method
    for the Term Loans and the straight-line method for the
    revolving credit and letters of credit facility. The unamortized
    amount of these costs was $26 million as of March 31,
    2007. We incurred an additional $2 million in debt issuance
    costs as described above during the period from April 1,
    2007 through May 15, 2007. As a result of the Arrangement
    and the recording of debt at fair value, the total amount of
    unamortized debt issuance costs of $28 million was reduced
    to zero as of May 15, 2007.
 
    7.25% Senior
    Notes
 
    On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
    principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities (Senior
    Notes). The Senior Notes were priced at par, bear interest at
    7.25% and mature on February 15, 2015. Debt issuance costs
    totaling $28 million had been included in Other
    long-term assets  third parties and were being
    amortized over the life of the related borrowing in Interest
    expense and amortization of debt issuance costs  net
    using the effective interest amortization
    method. The unamortized amount of these costs was
    $24 million as of March 31, 2007. As a result of the
    Arrangement and the recording of debt at fair value, the total
    amount of unamortized debt issuance costs of $23 million
    was reduced to zero as of May 15, 2007.
 
    As a result of the Arrangement, the Senior Notes were recorded
    at their fair value of $1.474 billion based on their market
    price of 105.25% of $1,000 face value per bond as of
    May 14, 2007. The incremental fair value of
    $74 million is being amortized to interest income over the
    remaining life of the Senior Notes in Interest expense and
    amortization of debt issuance costs  net using
    the effective interest amortization method. Due to
    the change in the market price of our Senior Notes from 105.25%
    as of May 14, 2007 to 94.25% as of December 31, 2007,
    the estimated fair value of this debt has decreased
    $155 million to $1.319 billion (after considering the
    repurchase of approximately $1 million of the Senior Notes
    pursuant to the tender offer discussed below).
 
    Under the indenture that governs the Senior Notes, we are
    subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to incurring
    additional debt and providing additional guarantees, paying
    dividends beyond certain amounts and making other restricted
    payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain consolidations
    or mergers, and certain transactions with affiliates. We were in
    compliance with these covenants for the quarter ended
    December 31, 2007.
 
    The indenture governing the Senior Notes and the related
    registration rights agreement required us to file a registration
    statement for the notes and exchange the original, privately
    placed notes for registered notes. Under the indenture and the
    related registration rights agreement, we were required to
    complete the exchange offer for the Senior Notes by
    November 11, 2005. We did not complete the exchange offer
    by that date and, as a result, we began to incur additional
    special interest at rates ranging from 0.25% to 1.00%. We filed
    a post-effective amendment to the registration statement on
    December 1, 2006 which was declared effective by the SEC on
    December 22, 2006. We ceased paying additional special
    interest effective January 5, 2007, upon completion of the
    exchange offer.
    
    87
 
    Tender
    Offer and Consent Solicitation for 7.25% Senior
    Notes
 
    Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing our Senior
    Notes, we were obligated, within 30 days of closing of the
    Arrangement, to make an offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a
    price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and
    unpaid interest to the date the Senior Notes were purchased.
    Consequently, we commenced a tender offer on May 16, 2007,
    to repurchase all of the outstanding Senior Notes at the
    prescribed price. This offer expired on July 3, 2007 with
    holders of approximately $1 million of principal presenting
    their Senior Notes pursuant to the tender offer.
 
    Korean
    Bank Loans
 
    In November 2004, Novelis Korea Limited (Novelis Korea),
    formerly Alcan Taihan Aluminium Limited, entered into a Korean
    won (KRW) 40 billion ($40 million) floating rate
    long-term loan due November 2007. We immediately entered into an
    interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 4.80%. In August
    2007, we refinanced this loan with a floating rate short-term
    borrowing in the amount of $40 million due by August 2008.
    We recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of less than
    $1 million in connection with this refinancing.
    Additionally, we immediately entered into an interest rate swap
    and cross currency swap for the new loan through a 3.94% fixed
    rate KRW 38 billion ($38 million) loan.
 
    In December 2004, we entered into (1) a $70 million
    floating rate loan and (2) a KRW 25 billion
    ($25 million) floating rate loan, both due in December
    2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate and cross
    currency swap on the $70 million floating rate loan through
    a 4.55% fixed rate KRW 73 billion ($73 million) loan
    and an interest rate swap on the KRW 25 billion floating
    rate loan to fix the interest rate at 4.45%. On October 25,
    2007, we entered into a $100 million floating rate loan due
    October 2010 and immediately repaid the $70 million loan.
    In December 2007, we repaid the KRW 25 billion loan from
    the proceeds of the $100 million floating rate loan.
    Additionally, we immediately entered into an interest rate swap
    and cross currency swap for the $100 million floating rate
    loan through a 5.44% fixed rate KRW 92 billion
    ($92 million) loan.
 
    Short
    Term Borrowings and Lines of Credit
 
    As of December 31, 2007, our short-term borrowings were
    $245 million consisting of (1) $167 million of
    short-term loans under our ABL facility, (2) a
    $40 million short-term loan in Korea and
    (3) $38 million in bank overdrafts. Additionally, as
    of December 31, 2007, $28 million of our ABL facility
    was utilized for letters of credit and we had approximately
    $517 million in remaining availability under this revolving
    credit facility.
 
    As of December 31, 2007, we had an additional
    $143 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
    not included in our ABL facility. The weighted average interest
    rate on our total short-term borrowings was 5.55% and 7.77% as
    of December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007, respectively.
 
    Issuance
    of Additional Common Stock
 
    On June 22, 2007, we issued 2,044,122 additional shares to
    AV Aluminum for $44.93 per share resulting in an additional
    equity contribution of $92 million. This contribution was
    equal in amount to certain payments made by Novelis related to
    change in control compensation to certain employees and
    directors, lender fees and other transaction costs incurred by
    the Company.
    
    88
 
    Investing
    Activities
 
    The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
    provided by (used in) investing activities ($ in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nine Months Ended 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | Change |  | 
|  |  | Combined |  |  | Predecessor |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
 |  | $ | 74 |  |  | $ | 167 |  |  | $ | (93 | ) | 
| 
    Capital expenditures
 |  |  | (137 | ) |  |  | (95 | ) |  |  | (42 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from loans receivable  net
 |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | 30 |  |  |  | (18 | ) | 
| 
    Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
    affiliates
 |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from sales of assets
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 36 |  |  |  | (32 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
 |  | $ | (41 | ) |  | $ | 139 |  |  | $ | (180 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Net cash provided by investing activities declined compared to
    the prior year primarily as a result of lower proceeds from the
    settlement of derivative instruments, increased capital
    expenditures in 2007 and proceeds from asset sales in South
    America in the prior year.
 
    The majority of our capital expenditures for the nine months
    ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were for projects devoted
    to product quality, technology, productivity enhancement and
    increased capacity. We estimate that our annual capital
    expenditure requirements for items necessary to maintain
    comparable production, quality and market position levels
    (maintenance capital) will be approximately $120 million,
    and that total annual capital expenditures will be approximately
    $180 to $200 million for all of fiscal 2008.
 
    OFF-BALANCE
    SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
 
    In accordance with SEC rules, the following qualify as
    off-balance sheet arrangements:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | any obligation under certain guarantees or contracts; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an
    unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement
    that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that
    entity for such assets; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | any obligation under certain derivative instruments; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | any obligation under a material variable interest held by the
    registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing,
    liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant,
    or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development
    services with the registrant. | 
 
    The following discussion addresses each of the above items for
    our company.
 
    Derivative
    Instruments
 
    As of December 31, 2007, we have derivative financial
    instruments, as defined by FASB Statement No. 133. See
    Note 14  Financial Instruments and Commodity
    Contracts to our condensed consolidated financial statements
    included in this Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q.
 
    In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
    non-derivative instruments, including forward contracts, to
    manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates,
    interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such
    instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may
    be exposed to losses in the future if the counterparties to the
    contracts fail to perform. We are satisfied that the risk of
    such non-performance is remote, due to our monitoring of credit
    exposures. Alcan is the principal counterparty to our aluminum
    forward contracts.
 
    Certain contracts are designated as hedges of either net
    investment or cash flows. For these contracts we recognize the
    change in fair value of the ineffective portion of the hedge as
    a gain or loss in our current period results of operations. We
    include the change in fair value of the effective and interest
    portions of these hedges in Accumulated other comprehensive
    income within Shareholders equity in the accompanying
    condensed consolidated balance sheet.
    
    89
 
    Prior to
    Completion of the Arrangement
 
    Prior to and during the period from April 1, 2007 through
    May 15, 2007, we applied hedge accounting to certain of our
    cross-currency swaps with respect to intercompany loans to
    several European subsidiaries and forward exchange contracts.
    Our Euro and British pound (GBP) cross-currency swaps were
    designated as net investment hedges, while our Swiss franc (CHF)
    cross-currency swaps and our Brazilian real (BRL) forward
    foreign exchange contracts were designated as cash flow hedges.
    As of May 15, 2007, we had $712 million of
    cross-currency swaps (Euro 475 million, GBP 62 million
    and CHF 35 million) and $99 million of forward foreign
    exchange contracts (BRL 229 million). During the period
    from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, we
    implemented cash flow hedge accounting for an electricity swap,
    which was embedded in a supply contract.
 
    During the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15,
    2007, the change in fair value of the effective and interest
    portions of our net investment hedges was a loss of
    $8 million and the change in fair value of the effective
    portion of our cash flow hedges was a gain of $7 million.
 
    Impact of
    the Arrangement and Purchase Accounting
 
    Concurrent with completion of the Arrangement on May 15,
    2007, we dedesignated all hedging relationships. The cumulative
    change in fair value of effective and interest portions of these
    hedges, previously presented in Accumulated other comprehensive
    income within Shareholders equity on May 15, 2007,
    was incorporated in the new basis of accounting. As a result of
    purchase accounting, the fair value of all embedded derivative
    instruments was allocated to the fair value of their respective
    host contracts, reducing the fair value of embedded derivative
    instruments to zero.
 
    Subsequent
    to Completion of the Arrangement
 
    We redesignated our electricity swap, noted below, as a cash
    flow hedge on June 1, 2007. We redesignated our Euro, GBP
    and CHF cross-currency swaps, noted above, as net investment
    hedges on September 1, 2007. During the quarter ended
    December 31, 2007, we entered into a series of interest
    rate swaps which we designated as cash flow hedges (see
    Note 9  Debt).
 
    During the three months ended December 31, 2007 and for the
    period from May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007, we
    recognized pre-tax gains of $1 million and $5 million,
    respectively, for the change in fair value of the effective
    portion of our cash flow hedges. As of December 31, 2007,
    we expect to realize $1 million of effective net losses
    during the next twelve months. The maximum period over which we
    have hedged our exposure to cash flow variability is through
    November 2016.
 
    During the three months ended December 31, 2007 and for the
    period from May 16, 2007 through December 31, 2007, we
    recognized pre-tax losses of $33 million and
    $5 million, respectively, for the change in fair value of
    the effective portion of our net investment hedges. As of
    December 31, 2007, we expect to realize $5 million of
    effective net losses during the next twelve months. The maximum
    period over which we have hedged our exposure to net investment
    variability is through February 2015.
    
    90
 
    The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
    contracts as of December 31, 2007 were as follows (in
    millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | As of December 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Maturity Dates 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Net Fair 
 |  | 
|  |  | (Fiscal Year) |  | Assets |  |  | Liabilities |  |  | Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Successor:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Foreign exchange forward contracts
 |  | 2008 through 2012 |  | $ | 38 |  |  | $ | (59 | ) |  | $ | (21 | ) | 
| 
    Cross-currency swaps
 |  | 2008 through 2015 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | (136 | ) |  |  | (133 | ) | 
| 
    Interest rate currency swaps
 |  | 2009 through 2011 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Interest rate swaps
 |  | 2009 through 2010 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (2 | ) | 
| 
    Aluminum forward contracts
 |  | 2008 through 2010 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | (52 | ) |  |  | (51 | ) | 
| 
    Electricity swap
 |  | 2017 |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | 6 |  | 
| 
    Embedded derivative instruments
 |  | 2008 through 2009 |  |  | 14 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 
| 
    Natural gas swaps
 |  | 2008 through 2010 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total fair value
 |  |  |  |  | 64 |  |  |  | (252 | ) |  |  | (188 | ) | 
| 
    Less: current portion
 |  |  |  |  | 54 |  |  |  | (112 | ) |  |  | (58 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Noncurrent portion
 |  |  |  | $ | 10 |  |  | $ | (140 | ) |  | $ | (130 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Guarantees
    of Indebtedness
 
    The following table discloses information about our obligations
    under guarantees of indebtedness as of December 31, 2007
    (in millions).
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Maximum 
 |  | Liability 
 | 
|  |  | Potential Future 
 |  | Carrying 
 | 
| 
    Type of Entity
 |  | Payment |  | Value | 
|  | 
| 
    Wholly-owned subsidiaries
 |  | $ | 85 |  |  | $ | 60 |  | 
| 
    Aluminium Norf GmbH
 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    In May 2007, we terminated a loan and a corresponding
    deposit-and-guarantee
    agreement for $80 million. We did not include the loan or
    deposit amounts in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as
    of March 31, 2007 as the agreement included a legal right
    of setoff and we had the intent and ability to setoff.
 
    We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
    to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
    arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
    support to that entity for such assets.
 
    Other
 
    As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in
    transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated
    entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
    referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities
    (SPEs), which would have been established for the purpose of
    facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
    contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of
    December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007, we were not
    involved in any unconsolidated SPE transactions.
 
    CONTRACTUAL
    OBLIGATIONS
 
    We have future obligations under various contracts relating to
    debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases,
    long-term purchase obligations, and postretirement benefit
    plans. During the nine months ended December 31, 2007,
    there were no significant changes to these obligations as
    reported in our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006, other than those
    described below.
 
    Our total debt increased by $208 million during the period
    from April 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 (excluding net
    unamortized fair value adjustments of $65 million recorded
    as part of the acquisition by Hindalco), principally as a result
    of our need to fund additional working capital requirements and
    certain costs associated with the Arrangement, including Sale
    transaction fees and share-based compensation payments.
    
    91
 
    As a result of the amendment to our Old Credit Facilities in
    April 2007, we obtained a limited waiver of the change of
    control Event of Default (as defined in the senior secured
    credit facilities) which effectively extended the requirement to
    repay the Old Credit Facilities to July 11, 2007. As a
    result of the Arrangement, we paid off and terminated the Old
    Credit Facilities on July 6, 2007 through refinancing with
    the New Credit Facilities.
 
    DIVIDENDS
 
    No dividends have been declared on our common stock during
    fiscal 2008. Future dividends are at the discretion of the board
    of directors and will depend on, among other things, our
    financial resources, cash flows generated by our business, our
    cash requirements, restrictions under the instruments governing
    our indebtedness, being in compliance with the appropriate
    indentures and covenants under the instruments that govern our
    indebtedness that would allow us to legally pay dividends and
    other relevant factors.
 
    CRITICAL
    ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
 
    During the nine months ended December 31, 2007, there were
    no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and
    estimates as reported in our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
    RECENT
    ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
 
    In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141
    (Revised), Business Combinations, (FASB Statement
    No. 141(R)) which establishes principles and
    requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination
    (i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
    identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
    noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes
    and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination
    or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines
    what information to disclose to enable users of the financial
    statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
    business combination. FASB Statement No. 141(R) also
    requires acquirers to estimate the acquisition-date fair value
    of any contingent consideration and to recognize any subsequent
    changes in the fair value of contingent consideration in
    earnings. We will be required to apply this new standard
    prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition
    date is on or after the beginning of the annual reporting period
    beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with the exception
    of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and
    acquired tax contingencies. FASB Statement No. 141(R)
    amends certain provisions of FASB Statement No. 109,
    Accounting for Income Taxes, such that adjustments made
    to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
    contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to
    the effective date of FASB Statement No. 141(R) would also
    apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 141(R). Early
    adoption is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the effects
    that FASB Statement No. 141(R) may have on our consolidated
    financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
 
    In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160,
    Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
    Statements, which establishes accounting and reporting
    standards that require (i) the ownership interest in
    subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly
    identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheet
    within shareholders equity, but separate from the
    parents equity, (ii) the amount of consolidated net
    income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling
    interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of
    the consolidated statement of operations, and (iii) changes
    in a parents ownership interest while the parent retains
    its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be
    accounted for consistently. FASB Statement No. 160 applies
    to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier
    adoption is prohibited. We have not yet commenced evaluating the
    potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB Statement
    No. 160 on our consolidated financial position, results of
    operations and cash flows.
 
    In April 2007, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP)
    No. FIN 39-1,
    Amendment of FASB Interpretation No 39, (FSP
    FIN 39-1).
    FSP
    FIN 39-1
    amends FASB Statement No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts
    Related to Certain Contracts, by permitting entities that
    enter into master netting arrangements as part of their
    derivative transactions to offset in their financial statements
    net derivative positions against the fair value of amounts (or
    amounts that approximate fair value) recognized for the right to
    reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash
    collateral under those arrangements. FSP
    FIN 39-1
    is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
    2007. We have not yet commenced evaluating the potential impact,
    if any, of the adoption of FSP
    FIN 39-1
    on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
    and cash flows.
    
    92
 
    In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159,
    The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
    Liabilities, which provides companies with an option to
    report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value.
    The new statement establishes presentation and disclosure
    requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between
    companies that choose different measurement attributes for
    similar types of assets and liabilities and requires companies
    to provide additional information that will help investors and
    other users of financial statements to more easily understand
    the effect of a companys choice to use fair value on its
    earnings. The new statement also requires entities to display
    the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the
    company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance
    sheet. FASB Statement No. 159 does not eliminate disclosure
    requirements included in other accounting standards, including
    requirements for disclosures about fair value measurements
    included in FASB Statements No. 157, Fair Value
    Measurements, and No. 107, Disclosures about Fair
    Value of Financial Instruments. FASB Statement No. 159
    is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first
    fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. We have not
    yet commenced evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the
    adoption of FASB Statement No. 159 on our consolidated
    financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
 
    In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157,
    Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
    establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and
    expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB
    Statement No. 157 applies to other accounting
    pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
    The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued
    for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for
    interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently
    evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB
    Statement No. 157 on our consolidated financial position,
    results of operations and cash flows.
 
    We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
    pronouncements will not have a material impact on our
    consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
    flows, or do not apply to our operations.
 
    SPECIAL
    NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET
    DATA
 
    This document contains forward-looking statements that are based
    on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections
    about the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and
    assumptions made by our management. Such statements include, in
    particular, statements about our plans, strategies and
    prospects. Words such as expect,
    anticipate, intend, plan,
    believe, seek, estimate and
    variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to
    identify such forward-looking statements. Examples of
    forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q
    include, but are not limited to, our expectations with respect
    to the impact of metal price movements on our financial
    performance, our metal price ceiling exposure and the
    effectiveness of our hedging programs and controls. These
    statements are based on beliefs and assumptions of Novelis
    management, which in turn are based on currently available
    information. These statements are not guarantees of future
    performance and involve assumptions and risks and uncertainties
    that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and
    results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or
    forecasted in such forward-looking statements. We do not intend,
    and we disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking
    statements, whether as a result of new information, future
    events or otherwise.
 
    This document also contains information concerning our markets
    and products generally, which is forward-looking in nature and
    is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which
    these markets and product categories will develop. These
    assumptions have been derived from information currently
    available to us and to the third party industry analysts quoted
    herein. This information includes, but is not limited to,
    product shipments and share of production. Actual market results
    may differ from those predicted. While we do not know what
    impact any of these differences may have on our business, our
    results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and the
    market price of our securities may be materially adversely
    affected. Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to
    differ from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking
    statements include, among other things:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums
    associated with such prices) or other materials and raw
    materials we use; | 
    
    93
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | the effect of metal price ceilings in certain of our sales
    contracts; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | the effectiveness of our metal hedging activities, including our
    internal used beverage cans (UBC) and smelter hedges; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of,
    our customers, suppliers and our ultimate parent, Hindalco; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the
    areas in which we maintain production facilities; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | our ability to access financing for future capital requirements; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | continuing obligations and other relationships resulting from
    our spin-off from Alcan; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in the relative values of various currencies; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | factors affecting our operations, such as litigation,
    environmental remediation and
    clean-up
    costs, labor relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment
    and other events; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries
    in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in
    duties or tariffs; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as
    well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic
    and composite materials; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in general economic conditions; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | our ability to improve and maintain effective internal control
    over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures
    in the future; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in the fair value of derivative instruments; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our
    products as well as seasonality in certain of our
    customers industries; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting
    taxes, environmental, health or safety compliance; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the
    amounts we pay under our principal credit agreement and other
    financing agreements; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | the effect of taxes and changes in tax rates. | 
 
    The above list of factors is not exhaustive. Some of these and
    other factors are discussed in more detail under
    Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006, as amended, and filed
    with the SEC and are specifically incorporated by reference into
    this filing.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 3. | Quantitative
    and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 
 
    We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing
    business operations, including risks from changes in commodity
    prices (aluminum, electricity and natural gas), foreign currency
    exchange rates and interest rates that could impact our results
    of operations and financial condition.
 
    We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
    regular operating and financing activities and derivative
    financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments
    as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes.
    Except where noted, the derivative contracts are
    marked-to-market and the related gains and losses are included
    in earnings in the current accounting period.
 
    By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve
    risk, including the credit risk of non-performance by
    counterparties. All derivative contracts are executed with
    counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our
    maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in our
    accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
    December 31, 2007.
 
    The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
    instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
    from period to period depending on market conditions and the
    relative costs of the
    
    94
 
    instruments. The duration is always linked to the timing of the
    underlying exposure, with the connection between the two being
    regularly monitored.
 
    Commodity
    Price Risks
 
    We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of
    certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity and
    natural gas.
 
    Aluminum
 
    Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
    which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
    price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
    have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass
    through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market
    premiums and (ii) a margin over metal price
    based on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and
    the competitive market conditions for that product.
 
    In situations where we offer customers fixed prices for future
    delivery of our products, we may enter into derivative
    instruments for the metal inputs in order to protect the profit
    on the conversion of the product. Consequently, the gain or loss
    resulting from movements in the price of aluminum on these
    contracts would generally be offset by an equal and opposite
    impact on the net sales and purchases being hedged.
 
    In addition, sales contracts representing approximately 10% of
    our total shipments for the nine months ended December 31,
    2007 provide for a ceiling over which metal purchase costs
    cannot contractually be passed through to certain customers,
    unless adjusted. As a result, we are unable to pass through the
    complete metal purchase costs for sales under these contracts
    and this negatively impacts our margins when the metal price is
    above the ceiling price. These contracts expire at varying times
    and our estimated remaining exposure approximates 10% of
    estimated shipments in the remainder of fiscal 2008.
 
    However, as previously discussed, in connection with the
    allocation of purchase price arising from the Arrangement, we
    established reserves totaling $655 million as of
    May 15, 2007 to record these sales contracts at fair value.
    Fair value effectively represents the discounted cash flows of
    the forecasted metal purchase costs in excess of the metal price
    ceilings contained in these contracts. These reserves are being
    accreted into Net sales over the remaining lives of the
    underlying contracts, and this accretion will not impact future
    cash flows. During the period from May 16, 2007 through
    December 31, 2007, we recorded accretion of
    $205 million.
 
    We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal
    prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to
    metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our
    internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and
    mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from
    our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans
    (UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply have
    historically provided a benefit as these sources of metal are
    typically less expensive than purchasing aluminum from third
    party suppliers. We refer to these two sources as our internal
    hedges.
 
    Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy
    to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated
    with the metal price ceilings is to purchase futures, call
    options
    and/or
    synthetic call options on projected aluminum volume requirements
    above our assumed internal hedge position. To hedge our exposure
    in 2006, we previously purchased call options at various strike
    prices. We currently purchase forward derivative instruments to
    hedge our exposure to further metal price increases.
 
    During the quarter ended December 31, 2006, we sold
    short-term LME futures contracts to reduce the cash flow
    volatility of fluctuating metal prices associated with metal
    price lag. In Europe, we enter into forward metal purchases
    simultaneous with the contracts that contain fixed metal prices.
    These forward metal purchases directly hedge the economic risk
    of future metal price fluctuation associated with these
    contracts. The positive or negative impact on sales under these
    contracts has been included in the metal price lag effect
    described above, without regard to the fixed forward instruments
    we purchased to offset this risk.
    
    95
 
    Sensitivities
 
    The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
    gain (loss) in the fair values of these derivative instruments
    as of December 31, 2007, assuming a 10% decline in the
    three-month LME price.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Pre-Tax 
 | 
|  |  | Decline in 
 |  | Loss in 
 | 
|  |  | Rate/Price |  | Fair Value | 
|  |  |  |  | ($ in millions) | 
|  | 
| 
    Aluminum Forward Contracts
 |  |  | 10 | % |  | $ | (85 | ) | 
 
    Electricity
    and Natural Gas
 
    We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
    of our aluminum rolled products. In the nine months ended
    December 31, 2007, natural gas and electricity represented
    approximately 70% of our energy consumption by cost. We also use
    fuel oil and transport fuel. The majority of energy usage occurs
    at our casting centers, at our smelters in South America and
    during the hot rolling of aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities
    require relatively less energy. We purchase our natural gas on
    the open market, which subjects us to market pricing
    fluctuations. Recent natural gas pricing changes in the United
    States have increased our energy costs. We seek to stabilize our
    future exposure to natural gas prices through the use of forward
    purchase contracts. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South
    America have historically been more stable than in the United
    States. As of December 31, 2007, we have a nominal amount
    of forward purchases outstanding related to natural gas.
 
    A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
    to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
    A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
    prices, which affords relatively stable costs. In South America,
    we own and operate hydroelectric facilities that meet
    approximately 25% of our total electricity requirements in that
    region. Additionally, we have entered into an electricity swap
    in North America to fix a portion of the cost of our electricity
    requirements.
 
    Rising energy costs worldwide, due to the volatility of supply
    and international and geopolitical events, expose us to reduced
    profits as such changes in such costs cannot immediately be
    recovered under existing contracts and sales agreements, and may
    only be mitigated in future periods under future pricing
    arrangements.
 
    Sensitivities
 
    The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
    loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
    December 31, 2007, assuming a 10% decline in spot prices
    for energy contracts.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Pre-Tax 
 | 
|  |  | Decline in 
 |  | Loss in 
 | 
|  |  | Rate/Price |  | Fair Value | 
|  |  |  |  | ($ in millions) | 
|  | 
| 
    Electricity
 |  |  | 10 | % |  | $ | (6 | ) | 
| 
    Natural Gas
 |  |  | 10 | % |  |  | (4 | ) | 
 
    Foreign
    Currency Exchange Risks
 
    Exchange rate movements, particularly the euro, the Canadian
    dollar, the Brazilian real and the Korean won against the
    U.S. dollar, have an impact on our operating results. In
    Europe, where we have predominantly local currency selling
    prices and operating costs, we benefit as the euro strengthens,
    but are adversely affected as the euro weakens. In Korea, where
    we have local currency selling prices for local sales and
    U.S. dollar denominated selling prices for exports, we
    benefit slightly as the won weakens, but are adversely affected
    as the won strengthens, due to a slightly higher percentage of
    exports compared to local sales. In Canada and Brazil, where we
    have predominately U.S. dollar selling prices and local
    currency operating costs, we benefit as the local currencies
    weaken, but are adversely affected as the local currencies
    strengthen. Foreign currency contracts may be used to hedge the
    economic exposures at our foreign operations.
 
    It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures
    within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the
    majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either
    forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in
    non-functional currencies. Our most significant
    non-U.S. dollar
    functional
    
    96
 
    currency operating segments are Europe and Asia, which have the
    euro and the Korean won as their functional currencies,
    respectively. South America is U.S. dollar functional with
    Brazilian real transactional exposure.
 
    We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign
    currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign
    operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange
    rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting
    translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
    Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Shareholders
    equity section of the accompanying condensed consolidated
    balance sheets. Net sales and expenses in our foreign
    operations foreign currencies are translated into varying
    amounts of U.S. dollars depending upon whether the
    U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens against other
    currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may either
    positively or negatively affect our net sales and expenses from
    foreign operations as expressed in U.S. dollars.
 
    Any negative impact of currency movements on the currency
    contracts that we have entered into to hedge foreign currency
    commitments to purchase or sell goods and services would be
    offset by an equal and opposite favorable exchange impact on the
    commitments being hedged. For a discussion of accounting
    policies and other information relating to currency contracts,
    see Note 1  Business and Summary of Significant
    Accounting Policies and Note 17  Financial
    Instruments and Commodity Contracts to our consolidated and
    combined financial statements included in our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
    Sensitivities
 
    The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
    loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
    December 31, 2007, assuming a 10% increase (decrease) in
    the foreign currency/U.S. dollar exchange rate.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Pre-Tax 
 |  | 
|  |  | Increase (Decrease) in 
 |  |  | Loss in 
 |  | 
|  |  | Exchange Rate |  |  | Fair Value |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | ($ in millions) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Euro
 |  |  | 10 | % |  | $ | (15 | ) | 
| 
    Korean won
 |  |  | 10 | % |  |  | (19 | ) | 
| 
    Brazilian real
 |  |  | 10 | % |  |  | (22 | ) | 
| 
    Canadian dollar
 |  |  | (10 | )% |  |  | (1 | ) | 
| 
    British pound
 |  |  | 10 | % |  |  | (2 | ) | 
| 
    Swiss franc
 |  |  | 10 | % |  |  | (26 | ) | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Pre-Tax 
 |  | 
|  |  | Increase (Decrease) in 
 |  |  | Loss in 
 |  | 
|  |  | Exchange Rate |  |  | Fair Value |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | ($ in millions) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Other cross-currency exchange rates
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Swiss franc measured against the euro
 |  |  | (10 | )% |  | $ | (31 | ) | 
| 
    British pound measured against the euro
 |  |  | (10 | )% |  |  | (21 | ) | 
 
    Loans to and investments in European operations have been hedged
    by cross-currency swaps (euro 475 million, GBP
    62 million, CHF 35 million). Loans from European
    operations have been hedged by cross-currency principal only
    swaps (euro 111 million). Principal only swaps totaling
    euro 91 million were accounted for as cash flow hedges
    through May 15, 2007. Concurrent with the completion of the
    Arrangement on May 15, 2007, we dedesignated these hedging
    relationships. On September 1, 2007, we redesignated our
    cross-currency swaps as net investment hedges. While this has no
    impact on our cash flows, subsequent changes in the value of
    currency related derivative instruments that are not designated
    as hedges are recognized in Gain (loss) on change in fair value
    of derivative instruments  net in our condensed
    consolidated statement of operations.
    
    97
 
    The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
    loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
    December 31, 2007, assuming a 10% increase in rates.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Pre-Tax 
 |  | 
|  |  | Increase in 
 |  |  | Loss in 
 |  | 
|  |  | Rate |  |  | Fair Value |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | ($ in millions) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Euro
 |  |  | 10 | % |  | $ | (83 | ) | 
| 
    British pound
 |  |  | 10 | % |  |  | (15 | ) | 
| 
    Swiss franc
 |  |  | 10 | % |  |  | (4 | ) | 
 
    Interest
    Rate Risks
 
    We are subject to interest rate risk related to our floating
    rate debt. For every 12.5 basis point increase in the
    interest rates on our outstanding variable rate debt as of
    December 31, 2007, which includes $355 million of Term
    Loan debt and other variable rate debt of $205 million, our
    annual pre-tax income would be reduced by approximately
    $1 million.
 
    As of December 31, 2007, approximately 80% of our debt
    obligations were at fixed rates. Due to the nature of fixed-rate
    debt, there would be no significant impact on our interest
    expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase or decrease in
    market rates of interest.
 
    From time to time, we have used interest rate swaps to manage
    our debt cost. In Korea, we entered into interest rate swaps to
    fix the interest rate on various floating rate debt. See
    Note 9  Debt to our accompanying condensed
    consolidated financial statements for further information.
 
    Sensitivities
 
    The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
    loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
    December 31, 2007, assuming a 10% decrease in rates.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Pre-Tax 
 |  | 
|  |  | Decrease in 
 |  |  | Loss in 
 |  | 
|  |  | Rate |  |  | Fair Value |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | ($ in millions) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Interest Rate Swap Contracts
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    North America
 |  |  | (10 | )% |  | $ | (5 | ) | 
| 
    Asia
 |  |  | (10 | )% |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 4. | Controls
    and Procedures | 
 
    Evaluation
    of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
    Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other
    procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance
    that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed
    or submitted under the United States Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is (1) recorded,
    processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
    specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and
    (2) accumulated and communicated to management, including
    the principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
    as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
    disclosure.
 
    In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q
    for the period ended December 31, 2007, members of
    management, at the direction (and with the participation) of our
    Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
    performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
    operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in
    Rule 13a-15(e)
    under the Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2007. Based on
    that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal
    financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
    procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2007, as a
    result of the continued existence of a material weakness in our
    accounting for income taxes, as described in our Annual Report
    on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006. Notwithstanding this
    material weakness, management has concluded that the condensed
    consolidated financial statements included in this report
    present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position
    and results of operations and cash flows for
    
    98
 
    the periods presented in conformity with accounting principles
    generally accepted in the United States of America
 
    Changes
    in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
    On October 22, 2007, Novelis Inc. announced that Robert M.
    Patterson was appointed Vice President Treasury and Planning and
    Jeffrey Schwaneke was appointed Vice President and Controller
    (Principal Accounting Officer). Mr. Patterson was formerly
    Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) and
    replaces Orville Lunking as Treasurer who left Novelis to pursue
    other opportunities.
 
    On October 1, 2007, the Company hired Michael Pashos as
    Vice President of Global Tax. With his guidance, the Company
    will continue to evaluate the current mix of internal and
    external staffing in the area of income taxes and may make
    further changes as necessary to most effectively and accurately
    handle the Companys accounting for income taxes.
    Additionally, during February 2008, the Company hired a Director
    and two Managers of tax who will assist Mr. pashos with tax
    planning, accounting and audit support.
 
    There have been no other changes in our internal control over
    financial reporting (as defined in
    Rule 13a-15(f)
    under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this report
    that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
    materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
    Remediation
    Plan for Material Weakness Existing as of December 31,
    2007
 
    We outlined our plan to remediate the material weakness in
    accounting for income taxes in Item 9A. Controls and
    Procedures of our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006, which was filed on
    March 1, 2007 (and amended on April 30, 2007), and
    there have been no additional remedial measures implemented
    since. While we believe that the measures enumerated in our
    Annual Report will ultimately allow us to remediate this
    material weakness, we concluded as of December 31, 2007,
    that there continues to be more than a remote likelihood that a
    material misstatement of our annual or interim financial
    statements related to accounting for income taxes will not be
    prevented or detected. Management believes it is prudent to
    observe and test these controls over a longer period of time
    prior to concluding that this weakness has been remediated. We
    are increasing our internal staffing in the area of income taxes
    and may make further changes as necessary to remediate this
    material weakness as quickly as possible. In addition, we will
    continue to provide training to our tax personnel and
    specifically focus on areas where adjustments and errors have
    been previously identified.
    
    99
 
 
    PART II.
    OTHER INFORMATION
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 1. | Legal
    Proceedings | 
 
    Reynolds Boat Case.  As previously disclosed,
    we and Alcan were defendants in a case in the United States
    District Court for the Western District of Washington, in
    Tacoma, Washington, case number C04-0175RJB. Plaintiffs were
    Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire
    Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a
    jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under implied warranty
    theories, based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and
    Alcan sold certain aluminum products that were ultimately used
    for marine applications and were unsuitable for such
    applications. The jury reached a verdict on May 22, 2006
    against us and Alcan for approximately $60 million, and the
    court later awarded Reynolds and Alcoa approximately
    $16 million in prejudgment interest and court costs.
 
    The case was settled during July 2006 as among us, Alcan,
    Reynolds, Alcoa and their insurers for $71 million. We
    contributed approximately $1 million toward the settlement,
    and the remaining $70 million was funded by our insurers.
    Although the settlement was substantially funded by our
    insurance carriers, certain of them have reserved the right to
    request a refund from us, after reviewing details of the
    plaintiffs damages to determine if they include costs of a
    nature not covered under the insurance contracts. Of the
    $70 million funded, $39 million is in dispute with and
    under further review by certain of our insurance carriers. In
    the quarter ended December 31, 2006, we posted a letter of
    credit in the amount of approximately $10 million in favor
    of one of those insurance carriers, while we resolve the extent
    of coverage of the costs included in the settlement. On
    October 8, 2007, we received a letter from these insurers
    stating that they have completed their review and they are
    requesting a refund of the $39 million plus interest. We
    reviewed the insurers position, and on January 7,
    2008, we sent a letter to the insurers rejecting their position
    that Novelis is not entitled to insurance coverage for the
    judgment against Novelis.
 
    Since our fiscal 2005 Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    was not filed until August 25, 2006, we recognized a
    liability for the full settlement amount of $71 million on
    December 31, 2005, included in Accrued expenses and other
    current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet, with a
    corresponding charge against earnings. We also recognized an
    insurance receivable included in Prepaid expenses and other
    current assets on our consolidated balance sheet of
    $31 million, with a corresponding increase to earnings.
    Although $70 million of the settlement was funded by our
    insurers, we only recognized an insurance receivable to the
    extent that coverage was not in dispute. This resulted in a net
    charge of $40 million during the quarter ended
    December 31, 2005.
 
    In July 2006, we contributed and paid $1 million to our
    insurers who subsequently paid the entire settlement amount of
    $71 million to the plaintiffs. Accordingly, during the
    quarter ended December 31, 2006 we reversed the previously
    recorded insurance receivable of $31 million and reduced
    our recorded liability by the same amount plus the
    $1 million contributed by us. The remaining liability of
    $39 million represents the amount of the settlement claim
    that was funded by our insurers but is still in dispute with and
    under further review by the parties as described above. The
    $39 million liability is included in Accrued expenses and
    other current liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance
    sheets as of December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007.
 
    While the ultimate resolution of the nature and extent of any
    costs not covered under our insurance contracts cannot be
    determined with certainty or reasonably estimated at this time,
    if there is an adverse outcome with respect to insurance
    coverage, and we are required to reimburse our insurers, it
    could have a material impact on our cash flows in the period of
    resolution. Alternatively, the ultimate resolution could be
    favorable, such that insurance coverage is in excess of the net
    expense that we have recognized to date. This would result in
    our recording a non-cash gain in the period of resolution, and
    this non-cash gain could have a material impact on our results
    of operations during the period in which such a determination is
    made.
 
    Coca-Cola
    Lawsuits.  A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
    Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
    Coca-Cola
    Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in state
    court in Georgia. In addition, a lawsuit was commenced against
    Novelis Corporation and Alcan Corporation on April 3, 2007
    by Coca-Cola
    Enterprises Inc., Enterprises Acquisition Company, Inc., The
    Coca-Cola
    Company and The
    Coca-Cola
    Trading Company, Inc. (collectively CCE) in federal court in
    Georgia. Novelis intends to defend these claims vigorously.
 
    CCBSS is a consortium of
    Coca-Cola
    bottlers across the United States, including
    Coca-Cola
    Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
    an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and
    seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial
    and a declaration of its rights under the
    
    100
 
    agreement. The agreement includes a most favored
    nations provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS
    alleges that Novelis Corporation breached the terms of the most
    favored nations provision. The dispute will likely turn on the
    facts that are presented to the court by the parties and the
    courts finding as to how certain provisions of the
    agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in
    this litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material.
    Novelis Corporation has filed its answer and the parties are
    proceeding with discovery.
 
    The claim by CCE seeks monetary damages in an amount to be
    determined at trial for breach of a prior aluminum can stock
    supply agreement between CCE and Novelis Corporation, successor
    to the rights and obligations of Alcan Aluminum Corporation
    under the agreement. According to its terms, that agreement with
    CCE terminated in 2006. The CCE supply agreement included a
    most favored nations provision regarding certain
    pricing matters. CCE alleges that Novelis Corporations
    entry into a supply agreement with Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached
    the most favored nations provision of the CCE supply
    agreement. If CCE were to prevail in this litigation, the amount
    of damages would likely be material. The dispute will likely
    turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the parties
    and the courts finding as to how certain provisions of the
    supply agreement ought to be interpreted. Novelis Corporation
    has moved to dismiss the complaint and has not yet filed its
    answer. We have not recorded any reserves for these matters.
 
    Anheuser-Busch Litigation.  On
    September 19, 2006, Novelis Corporation filed a lawsuit
    against Anheuser-Busch, Inc. in federal court in Ohio.
    Anheuser-Busch, Inc. subsequently filed suit against Novelis
    Corporation and the Company in federal court in Missouri. On
    January 3, 2007, Anheuser-Busch, Inc.s suit was
    transferred to the Ohio federal court.
 
    Novelis Corporation alleges that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached
    the existing multi-year aluminum can stock supply agreement
    between the parties, and we seek monetary damages and
    declaratory relief. Among other claims, we assert that since
    entering into the supply agreement, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. has
    breached its confidentiality obligations and there has been a
    structural change in market conditions that requires a change to
    the pricing provisions under the agreement.
 
    In its complaint, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. has asked for a
    declaratory judgment that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. is not obligated
    to modify the supply agreement as requested by Novelis
    Corporation, and that Novelis Corporation must continue to
    perform under the existing supply agreement.
 
    On January 18, 2008, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. filed a motion
    for summary judgment. Novelis Corporation will have until
    February 19, 2008 to respond to the motion. Novelis
    Corporation has continued to perform under the supply agreement
    during the litigation.
 
    ARCO Aluminum Complaint.  On May 24, 2007,
    Arco Aluminum Inc. (ARCO) filed a complaint against Novelis
    Corporation and Novelis Inc. in the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Kentucky. ARCO and Novelis are
    partners in a joint venture rolling mill located in Logan,
    Kentucky. In the complaint, ARCO seeks to resolve a perceived
    dispute over management and control of the joint venture
    following Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis.
 
    ARCO alleges that its consent was required in connection with
    Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis. Failure to obtain
    consent, ARCO alleges, has put us in default of the joint
    venture agreements, thereby triggering certain provisions in
    those agreements. The provisions include a reversion of the
    production management at the joint venture to Logan Aluminum
    from Novelis, and a reduction of the board of directors of the
    entity that manages the joint venture from seven members (four
    appointed by Novelis and three appointed by ARCO) to six members
    (three appointed by each of Novelis and ARCO).
 
    ARCO is seeking a court declaration that (1) Novelis and
    its affiliates are prohibited from exercising any managerial
    authority or control over the joint venture,
    (2) Novelis interest in the joint venture is limited
    to an economic interest only and (3) ARCO has authority to
    act on behalf of the joint venture. Or, alternatively, ARCO is
    seeking a reversion of the production management function to
    Logan Aluminum, and a change in the composition of the board of
    directors of the entity that manages the joint venture. Novelis
    filed its answer to the complaint on July 16, 2007.
 
    On July 3, 2007, ARCO filed a motion for partial summary
    judgment with respect to one of the counts of its complaint
    relating to the claim that Novelis breached the joint venture
    agreement by not seeking ARCOs consent. On July 30,
    2007, Novelis filed a motion to hold ARCOs motion for
    summary judgment in abeyance (pending further discovery), along
    with a demand for a jury. Those motions are pending. We intend
    to defend these proceedings vigorously.
    
    101
 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Exhibit 
 |  |  | 
| 
    No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 2 | .1 |  | Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited,
    AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10, 2007
    (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report
    on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007) (File No. 001-32316) | 
|  | 3 | .1 |  | Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis
    Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K
    filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File No. 001-32312)) | 
|  | 3 | .2 |  | By-law No. 1 of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to
    Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on November 17,
    2004 (File No. 001-32312)) | 
|  | 4 | .1 |  | Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis and CIBC Mellon
    Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
    Form 10-K filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File No.
    001-32312)) | 
|  | 4 | .2 |  | Indenture, relating to the Notes, dated as of February 3, 2005,
    between the Company, the guarantors named on the signature pages
    thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
    (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report
    on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2005 (File No. 001-32312)) | 
|  | 4 | .3 |  | Form of Note for
    71/4% Senior
    Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
    Form S-4 filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File No.
    331-127139)) | 
|  | 4 | .4 |  | First Amendment to the Shareholder Rights Agreement between
    Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, dated as of February
    10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
    Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007) (File No. 001-32312) | 
|  | 10 | .1 |  | $800 million asset-based lending credit facility (ABL
    Facility) dated as of July 6, 2007 among Novelis Inc.,
    Novelis Corporation as U.S. Borrower, the other U.S.
    Subsidiaries of Novelis Inc., Novelis UK Ltd, Novelis AG, AV
    Aluminum Inc. as parent guarantor, the other guarantors party
    thereto, with the lenders party thereto, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as
    U.S./European issuing bank, swingline lender and administrative
    agent, LaSalle Business Credit, LLC, as collateral agent and
    funding agent, UBS Securities LLC, as syndication agent, Bank of
    America, N.A., National City Business Credit, Inc. and CIT
    Business Credit Canada Inc., as documentation agents, ABN AMRO
    Bank N.V. Canada Branch, as Canadian issuing bank, Canadian
    funding agent and Canadian administrative agent, and ABN AMRO
    Incorporated and UBS Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and
    joint book managers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
    to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
    September 30, 2007 filed on November 9, 2007) (File No.
    001-32312) | 
|  | 10 | .2 |  | $960 million term loan facility (Term Loan Facility)
    dated as of July 6, 2007 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation
    as U.S. Borrower, AV Aluminum Inc., As Holdings, and the other
    guarantors party thereto, with the lenders party thereto, UBS
    AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative agent and as collateral
    agent, UBS Securities LLC, as syndication agent, ABN AMRO
    Incorporated, as documentation agent, and UBS Securities LLC and
    ABN AMRO Incorporated as joint lead arrangers and joint book
    managers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our
    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
    2007 filed on November 9, 2007) (File No. 001-32312) | 
|  | 10 | .3 |  | Intercreditor Agreement dated as of July 6, 2007 by and among
    Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation, Novelis PAE Corporation,
    Novelis Finances USA LLC, Novelis South America Holdings LLC,
    Aluminum Upstream Holdings LLC, Novelis UK Ltd, Novelis AG, AV
    Aluminum Inc., and the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, as
    grantors, ABN AMRO BANK N.V., as revolving credit administrative
    agent ABN AMRO Bank N.A., acting through its Canadian branch, as
    revolving credit Canadian administrative agent and as revolving
    credit Canadian funding agent, La Salle Business Credit,
    LLC, as revolving credit collateral agent and as revolving
    credit funding agent, and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Term Loan
    administrative agent, and Term Loan collateral agent
    (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly
    Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007
    filed on November 9, 2007) (File No. 001-32312) | 
|  | 10 | .4 |  | Security Agreement made by Novelis Inc., as Canadian Borrower,
    Novelis Corporation, as U.S. Borrower and the guarantors from
    time to time party thereto in favor of UBS AG, Stamford branch,
    as collateral agent dated as of July 6, 2007 (incorporated by
    reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
    for the period ended September 30, 2007 filed on November 9,
    2007) (File No. 001-32312) | 
    
    102
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Exhibit 
 |  |  | 
| 
    No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 10 | .5 |  | Security Agreement made by Novelis Inc., as Canadian Borrower,
    Novelis Corporation, Novelis PAE Corporation, Novelis Finances
    USA LLC, Novelis South America Holdings LLC, Aluminum Upstream
    Holdings LLC, as U.S. Borrowers and the guarantors from time to
    time party thereto in favor of La Salle Business Credit,
    LLC, as collateral agent dated as of July 6, 2007 (incorporated
    by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form
    10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 filed on November
    9, 2007) (File No. 001-32312) | 
|  | 10 | .6 |  | Agreement Regarding Termination of Employment between Novelis
    Inc. and David Godsell dated as of November 12, 2007 | 
|  | 10 | .7 |  | Separation and Release Agreement between Novelis Inc. and David
    Godsell dated November 12, 2007 | 
|  | 18 | .1 |  | Preferability Letter Issued by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | 
|  | 31 | .1 |  | Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer | 
|  | 31 | .2 |  | Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer | 
|  | 32 | .1 |  | Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer | 
|  | 32 | .2 |  | Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer | 
    103
 
    SIGNATURES
 
    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
    its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
    NOVELIS INC.
 
    Steven Fisher
    Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer)
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  | By: | /s/  Jeffrey
    Schwaneke | 
    Jeffrey Schwaneke
    Vice President and Controller
    (Principal Accounting Officer)
 
    Date: February 8, 2008
    
    104
 
    EXHIBIT INDEX
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Exhibit 
 |  |  | 
| 
    No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 2 | .1 |  | Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited,
    AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10, 2007
    (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report
    on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007) | 
|  | 3 | .1 |  | Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis
    Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K
    filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File No. 001-32312)) | 
|  | 3 | .2 |  | By-law No. 1 of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to
    Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on November 17,
    2004 (File No. 001-32312)) | 
|  | 4 | .1 |  | Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis and CIBC Mellon
    Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
    Form 10-K filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File No.
    001-32312)) | 
|  | 4 | .2 |  | Indenture, relating to the Notes, dated as of February 3, 2005,
    between the Company, the guarantors named on the signature pages
    thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
    (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report
    on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2005
    (File No. 001-32312)) | 
|  | 4 | .3 |  | Form of Note for
    71/4% Senior
    Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
    Form S-4 filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File No.
    331-127139)) | 
|  | 4 | .4 |  | First Amendment to the Shareholder Rights Agreement between
    Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, dated as of February
    10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
    Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007) (incorporated by reference
    to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007)
    (File No. 001-32312) | 
|  | 10 | .1 |  | $800 million asset-based lending credit facility (ABL
    Facility) dated as of July 6, 2007 among Novelis Inc.,
    Novelis Corporation as U.S. Borrower, the other U.S.
    Subsidiaries of Novelis Inc., Novelis UK Ltd, Novelis AG, AV
    Aluminum Inc. as parent guarantor, the other guarantors party
    thereto, with the lenders party thereto, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as
    U.S./European issuing bank, swingline lender and administrative
    agent, LaSalle Business Credit, LLC, as collateral agent and
    funding agent, UBS Securities LLC, as syndication agent, Bank of
    America, N.A., National City Business Credit, Inc. and CIT
    Business Credit Canada Inc., as documentation agents, ABN AMRO
    Bank N.V. Canada Branch, as Canadian issuing bank, Canadian
    funding agent and Canadian administrative agent, and ABN AMRO
    Incorporated and UBS Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and
    joint book managers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
    to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
    September 30, 2007 filed on November 9, 2007) (File No.
    001-32312) | 
|  | 10 | .2 |  | $960 million term loan facility (Term Loan Facility)
    dated as of July 6, 2007 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation
    as U.S. Borrower, AV Aluminum Inc., As Holdings, and the other
    guarantors party thereto, with the lenders party thereto, UBS
    AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative agent and as collateral
    agent, UBS Securities LLC, as syndication agent, ABN AMRO
    Incorporated, as documentation agent, and UBS Securities LLC and
    ABN AMRO Incorporated as joint lead arrangers and joint book
    managers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our
    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
    2007 filed on November 9, 2007) (File No. 001-32312) | 
|  | 10 | .3 |  | Intercreditor Agreement dated as of July 6, 2007 by and among
    Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation, Novelis PAE Corporation,
    Novelis Finances USA LLC, Novelis South America Holdings LLC,
    Aluminum Upstream Holdings LLC, Novelis UK Ltd, Novelis AG, AV
    Aluminum Inc., and the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, as
    grantors, ABN AMRO BANK N.V., as revolving credit administrative
    agent ABN AMRO Bank N.A., acting through its Canadian branch, as
    revolving credit Canadian administrative agent and as revolving
    credit Canadian funding agent, La Salle Business Credit,
    LLC, as revolving credit collateral agent and as revolving
    credit funding agent, and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Term Loan
    administrative agent, and Term Loan collateral agent
    (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly
    Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007
    filed on November 9, 2007) (File No. 001-32312) | 
|  | 10 | .4 |  | Security Agreement made by Novelis Inc., as Canadian Borrower,
    Novelis Corporation, as U.S. Borrower and the guarantors from
    time to time party thereto in favor of UBS AG, Stamford branch,
    as collateral agent dated as of July 6, 2007 (incorporated by
    reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
    for the period ended September 30, 2007 filed on November 9,
    2007) (File No. 001-32312) | 
    
    105
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Exhibit 
 |  |  | 
| 
    No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 10 | .5 |  | Security Agreement made by Novelis Inc., as Canadian Borrower,
    Novelis Corporation, Novelis PAE Corporation, Novelis Finances
    USA LLC, Novelis South America Holdings LLC, Aluminum Upstream
    Holdings LLC, as U.S. Borrowers and the guarantors from time to
    time party thereto in favor of La Salle Business Credit,
    LLC, as collateral agent dated as of July 6, 2007 (incorporated
    by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form
    10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 filed on November
    9, 2007) (File No. 001-32312) | 
|  | 10 | .6 |  | Agreement Regarding Termination of Employment between Novelis
    Inc. and David Godsell dated as of November 12, 2007 | 
|  | 10 | .7 |  | Separation and Release Agreement between Novelis Inc. and David
    Godsell dated November 12, 2007 | 
|  | 18 | .1 |  | Preferability Letter Issued by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | 
|  | 31 | .1 |  | Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer | 
|  | 31 | .2 |  | Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer | 
|  | 32 | .1 |  | Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer | 
|  | 32 | .2 |  | Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer | 
    106