UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark one)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2007
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission file number:
001-32312
Novelis Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
98-0442987
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification number)
|
|
|
|
3399 Peachtree Road NE,
Suite 1500
Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
30326
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Telephone:
(404) 814-4200
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o
No þ
As of July 31, 2007, the registrant had 77,459,658 common
shares outstanding.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Loss) (unaudited) May 16, 2007 Through June 30, 2007;
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007 and Three Months
Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) As of June 30, 2007
and March 31, 2007
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) May 16,
2007 Through June 30, 2007; April 1, 2007 Through
May 15, 2007 and Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity (unaudited)
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007 and May 16,
2007 Through June 30, 2007
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls and
Procedures
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submission of
Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
89
|
|
EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE PEO |
EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE PFO |
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE PEO |
EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE PFO |
1
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Gain on change in fair value of
derivative instruments net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision (benefit)
for taxes on loss and minority interests share
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
loss
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority
interests share
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss) net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Change in fair value of effective
portion of hedges net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss) net of tax
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common
share
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
2
Novelis
Inc.
(in
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of
allowances of $ 0 as of June 30,
2007 and $29 as of March 31, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment net
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Intangible assets net
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Fair value of derivative
instruments net of current portion
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
10,823
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
|
2,604
|
|
Long-term debt net of
current portion
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,232
|
|
|
|
|
5,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of
consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value;
unlimited number of shares authorized; 77,459,658 and
75,357,660 shares issued and outstanding as of
June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2007, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders
equity
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
10,823
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
Novelis
Inc.
(unaudited)
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Adjustments to determine net cash
used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Gain on change in fair value of
derivative instruments net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair
value adjustments net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for uncollectible
accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Dividends from non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities
(net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Changes to investment in and
advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
net
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
minority interests
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash balances held in foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash
flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Supplemental schedule of
non-cash investing and financing activities related to the
Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock (Note 2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(2,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and advances to
affiliates
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Predecessor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31,
2007
|
|
|
75,357,660
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
428
|
|
|
$
|
(263
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
Activity April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock from the
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
57,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Conversion of share-based
compensation plans from equity-based plans to liability-based
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Change in fair value of effective
portion of hedges net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 15,
2007
|
|
|
75,415,536
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
|
$
|
(360
|
)
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 16,
2007
|
|
|
75,415,536
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,405
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,405
|
|
Activity May 16, 2007 through
June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Issuance of additional common stock
|
|
|
2,044,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Change in fair value of effective
portion of hedges net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30,
2007
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
5
Novelis
Inc.
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Business
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries as
both Predecessor and Successor unless the context specifically
indicates otherwise. References herein to Hindalco
refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. References herein to
Alcan refer to Alcan, Inc.
Change
in Fiscal Year End
On June 26, 2007, our board of directors approved the
change of our fiscal year end to March 31 from December 31.
On June 28, 2007, we filed a Transition Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant
to
Rule 13a-10
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for transition period
reporting. Accordingly, these condensed consolidated financial
statements present our new fiscal year end of March 31 and the
three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
Description
of Business and Basis of Presentation
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products where the end-use destination of
the products includes the construction and industrial, beverage
and food cans, foil products and transportation markets. As of
June 30, 2007, we had operations on four continents: North
America; Europe; Asia and South America, through 33 operating
plants and three research facilities in 11 countries. In
addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary
aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that are
integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on
March 1, 2007, as amended on April 30, 2007. The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared pursuant to SEC
Rule 10-01
of
Regulation S-X.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in
annual financial statements prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those
rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures
made are adequate to make the information not misleading.
Predecessor
and Successor Reporting
Our acquisition by Hindalco (see Note 2
Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock) was recorded in accordance
with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 103, Topic 5J,
Push Down Basis of Accounting Required in Certain Limited
Circumstances (SAB No. 103). In the accompanying
June 30, 2007 condensed consolidated balance sheet, the
consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in connection
with the acquisition have been pushed down to us and
have been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Statement No. 141, Business Combinations. Due
to the impact of push down accounting, the condensed
consolidated financial statements and certain note presentations
separate the Companys presentations into two distinct
periods, the period up to, and including, the acquisition date
(labeled Predecessor) and the period after that date
(labeled Successor), to indicate the application of
different bases of accounting between the periods presented. The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include
a black line division which indicates that the Predecessor and
Successor reporting entities shown are not comparable.
6
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The unaudited results of operations for the interim periods
shown in these condensed consolidated financial statements,
including the periods shown as Predecessor and Successor, are
not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire
fiscal year. In the opinion of management, the accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements recognize
all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered
necessary to fairly state our financial position as of
June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2007; the results of our
operations and cash flows for (1) the periods from
May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007 and from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007 and (2) the
three months ended June 30, 2006; and changes in our
shareholders equity for the periods from April 1,
2007 through May 15, 2007 and from May 16, 2007
through June 30, 2007.
Reclassifications
and Revisions
Certain reclassifications of the prior period amounts and
presentation have been made to conform to the presentation
adopted for the current periods. The following reclassifications
and presentation changes were made to the prior period condensed
consolidated statement of operations to conform to the current
period presentation: (a) the amounts previously presented
in Restructuring charges net and
Impairment charges on long-lived assets were reclassified
to Other (income) expenses net and
(b) Gain on change in fair value of derivative
instruments net and Sale transaction fees
were reclassified from Other (income)
expenses net to separate line items. These
reclassifications have no effect on total assets, total
shareholders equity, net income (loss) or cash flows as
previously presented.
As a result of the acquisition by Hindalco, and based on the way
our President and Chief Operating Officer (our chief operating
decision-maker) reviews the results of segment operations, we
changed our segment performance measure to Segment Income, as
defined in Note 18 Segment and Major Customer
Information.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In April 2007, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) No.
FIN 39-1,
Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39 (FSP
FIN 39-1).
FSP
FIN 39-1
amends FASB Statement No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related
to Certain Contracts, by permitting entities that enter into
master netting arrangements as part of their derivative
transactions to offset in their financial statements net
derivative positions against the fair value of amounts (or
amounts that approximate fair value) recognized for the right to
reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash
collateral under those arrangements. FSP
FIN 39-1
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, with early adoption permitted. We have not yet commenced
the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP
FIN 39-1
on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities, which provides companies with an option to
report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value.
The new statement establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between
companies that choose different measurement attributes for
similar types of assets and liabilities and requires companies
to provide additional information that will help investors and
other users of financial statements to more easily understand
the effect of a companys choice to use fair value on its
earnings. The new statement also requires entities to display
the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the
company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance
sheet. FASB Statement No. 159 does not eliminate disclosure
requirements included in other accounting standards, including
requirements for disclosures about fair value measurements
included in FASB Statements No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, and No. 107, Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments. FASB Statement No. 159
is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first
fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early
adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal
year provided that the entity makes that choice in the first
120 days
7
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of
FASB Statement No. 157. We have not yet commenced
evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB
Statement No. 159 on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB
Statement No. 157 applies to other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for
interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently
evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB
Statement No. 157 on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
pronouncements will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows, or do not apply to our operations.
|
|
2.
|
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock
|
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary AV Metals Inc.
(Acquisition Sub) pursuant to a plan of arrangement
(Arrangement) entered into on February 10, 2007 and
approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on
May 14, 2007. As a result of the Arrangement, Acquisition
Sub acquired all of the Companys outstanding common shares
at a price of $44.93 per share, and all outstanding stock
options and other equity incentives were terminated in exchange
for cash payments. The aggregate purchase price for the
Companys common shares was $3.4 billion and
immediately following the Arrangement, the common shares of the
Company were transferred from Acquisition Sub to its
wholly-owned subsidiary AV Aluminum Inc. (AV Aluminum). Hindalco
also assumed $2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total
transaction value of $6.2 billion.
On June 22, 2007, we issued 2,044,122 additional common
shares to AV Aluminum for $44.93 per share resulting in an
additional equity contribution of approximately
$92 million. This contribution was equal in amount to
certain payments made by Novelis related to change in control
compensation to certain employees and directors, lender fees and
other transaction costs incurred by the Company. As this
transaction was approved by the Company and executed subsequent
to the Arrangement, the $92 million is not included in the
determination of total consideration.
Purchase
Price Allocation and Goodwill
As a result of the Arrangement, the consideration and
transaction costs paid by Hindalco in connection with the
transaction have been pushed down to us and have
been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 141. The following table
summarizes total consideration paid under the Arrangement (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of all outstanding
75,415,536 shares at $44.93 per share
|
|
$
|
3,388
|
|
Direct transaction costs incurred
by Hindalco
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with FASB Statement No. 141, total
consideration of $3,405 million has been initially
allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based
on our preliminary estimates of fair value, using methodologies
and assumptions that we believe are reasonable. To estimate fair
values, we considered a number of factors, including appraisals
and the application of multiples to discounted cash flow
estimates.
8
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
There is considerable management judgment with respect to cash
flow estimates and appropriate multiples used in determining
fair value.
The following table shows the preliminary allocation of the
total consideration to assets acquired and liabilities assumed
as of the date of the Arrangement (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
3,210
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
879
|
|
Investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
762
|
|
Fair value of derivative
instruments net of current portion
|
|
|
3
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
117
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
10,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,612
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
Long-term debt, including current
portion and short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(2,824
|
)
|
Deferred income tax liabilities,
including current portion
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
Minority interests in equity of
consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(7,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets include (1) $124 million for a
favorable energy supply contract in North America, recorded at
its estimated fair value, (2) $15 million for other
favorable supply contracts in Europe and
(3) $9 million for the estimated value of acquired
in-process research and development projects that had not yet
reached technological feasibility. In accordance with FASB
Statement No. 141, the $9 million of acquired
in-process research and development was expensed upon
acquisition and charged to Research and development expenses
in the period from May 16, 2007 through June 30,
2007.
The preliminary allocation shown above includes a total of
$685 million for the fair value of liabilities associated
with unfavorable sales contracts ($371 million included in
Other long-term liabilities and $314 million
included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities). Of
this amount, $655 million relates to unfavorable sales
contracts in North America. These contracts include a ceiling
over which metal purchase costs cannot contractually be passed
through to certain customers, unless adjusted. Subsequent to the
Arrangement, the fair value of these liabilities are credited to
revenue over the remaining lives of the underlying contracts.
The reduction of these liabilities does not affect our cash
flows.
Certain amounts are subject to change as remaining information
on the fair values is received and valuation analyses are
finalized. Specifically, we continue to evaluate the valuation
and useful lives of the acquired tangible and intangible assets,
the allocation of fair value to our reporting units, and the
income tax implications of the new basis of accounting triggered
by the Arrangement. These final valuations and other
9
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
studies will be performed by Hindalco and Novelis, and the final
fair values and allocations may differ materially from our
preliminary estimates shown above. We expect to complete our
final allocation of the total consideration before
March 31, 2008.
The goodwill resulting from the Arrangement reflects the value
of our in-place workforce, deferred income taxes associated with
the fair value adjustments and potential synergies. The majority
of the push down adjustments, including goodwill, will not
impact our cash flows and are not expected to be deductible for
income tax purposes.
We incurred $32 million of transaction fees and expenses
related to the Arrangement during the period from April 1,
2007 through May 15, 2007. These expenses are included in
Sale transaction fees in our condensed consolidated
statement of operations.
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Results
(Predecessor)
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma results of
operations provided below for the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007 and the three months ended
June 30, 2006 are presented as though the Arrangement had
occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, after giving
effect to purchase accounting adjustments related to
depreciation and amortization of the revalued assets, interest
expense, and other acquisition related adjustments in connection
with the Arrangement. The pro forma results include estimates
and assumptions that management believes are reasonable.
However, pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the
results that would have occurred if the acquisition had been in
effect on the dates indicated, or which may result in future
periods. Pro forma results for the period from May 16, 2007
through June 30, 2007 are not presented since the
Arrangement occurred at the beginning of that period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,327
|
|
|
$
|
2,652
|
|
Loss before provision for taxes
and minority interests share
|
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(118
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
3.
|
Restructuring
Programs
|
We recognized restructuring costs of $1 million in each of
the periods from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007
and May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007, relating
primarily to restructuring actions begun during 2006 in two of
our European facilities.
10
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
All restructuring provisions and recoveries are included in
Other (income) expenses net in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations
unless otherwise stated. The following table summarizes the
activity in our restructuring liabilities (all of which relate
to our Europe operating segment) for the periods from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007 and from
May 16, 2007 to June 30, 2007 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Exit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31,
2007
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
April 1, 2007 through
May 15, 2007 Activity (Predecessor):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 15,
2007
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 through
June 30, 2007 Activity (Successor):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30,
2007
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories consist of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
|
$
|
369
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
5. Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment net, consists of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Land and property rights
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
|
|
|
4,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
|
5,691
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,674
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,235
|
|
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment net
|
|
$
|
3,325
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill
The following table summarizes the components of goodwill by
operating segment (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
Operating Segment
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
2007
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
1,527
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,527
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,341
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Intangible
Assets
The following table summarizes the components of intangible
assets (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
Tradenames
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
15 years
|
Technology
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
15 years
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable energy supply contract
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
9.5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other favorable contracts
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3.3 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
863
|
|
|
|
17.2 years
|
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our favorable energy supply contract and other favorable
contracts are amortized over their estimated useful lives using
methods that reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits
are expected to be consumed. All other intangible assets are
amortized using the straight-line method.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was
$7 million (including $3 million recorded in Cost
of goods sold related to the favorable energy supply and
other favorable contracts) and less than $1 million for the
periods from May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007 and
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, respectively, and
$1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Estimated amortization expense related to intangible assets for
each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows (in
millions). Actual amounts may differ from these estimates due to
such factors as customer turnover, raw material consumption
patterns, impairments, additional intangible asset acquisitions
and other events.
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008 (remaining)
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
2009
|
|
|
59
|
|
2010
|
|
|
57
|
|
2011
|
|
|
53
|
|
2012
|
|
|
52
|
|
13
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Investment
in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
Transactions
|
The following table summarizes the ownership structure and our
ownership percentage of the non-consolidated affiliates in which
we have an investment as of June 30, 2007, and which we
account for using the equity method. We have no material
investments that we account for using the cost method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Affiliate Name
|
|
Ownership Structure
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Consorcio Candonga
|
|
Unincorporated Joint Venture
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
EuroNorca Partners
|
|
General Partnership
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
MiniMRF LLC
|
|
Limited Liability Company
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Deutsche Aluminium Verpackung
Recycling GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
France Aluminium Recyclage
S.A.
|
|
Public Limited Company
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
In November 2006, we sold the common and preferred shares of our
25% interest in Petrocoque S.A. Industria e Comercio
(Petrocoque) to the other shareholders of Petrocoque. Prior to
the sale, we accounted for Petrocoque using the equity method of
accounting. Petrocoques combined results of operations for
the three months ended June 30, 2006 are included in the
table below.
As of June 30, 2007, EuroNorca Partners was inactive and is
in the process of being dissolved. We expect to receive
approximately $2 million once the liquidation proceedings
have been finalized.
We do not control our non-consolidated affiliates, but have the
ability to exercise significant influence over their operating
and financial policies. The following tables summarize the
combined results of operations of our equity method affiliates
(on a 100% basis, in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
Costs, expenses and provisions for
taxes on income
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements are transactions and balances arising from business
we conduct with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we
classify as related party transactions and balances. The
following table describes the nature and amounts of significant
transactions that we had with related parties (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Purchases of tolling services
and electricity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH(A)
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
Consorcio Candonga(B)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We purchase tolling services (the conversion of customer-owned
metal) from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our
operations in South America. |
14
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The following table describes the period-end account balances
that we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as
related party balances in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets (in millions). We have no other
material related party balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Accounts receivable(A)
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Other long-term receivables(A)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Accounts payable(B)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The balances represent current and non-current portions of a
loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH and
electricity from Consorcio Candonga. |
|
|
8.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are comprised of
the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
Accrued settlement of legal claim
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Current portion of unfavorable
sales contracts
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
$
|
767
|
|
|
|
$
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Long-term debt consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan B, due 2012
|
|
|
7.61
|
%(C)
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due 2015
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan B, due 2012
|
|
|
7.59
|
%(C)
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Novelis Switzerland
S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due 2020
(Swiss francs (CHF) 56 million)
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due 2011
(CHF 4 million)
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due 2007
|
|
|
4.55
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Bank loan, due 2007 (Korean won
(KRW) 40 billion)
|
|
|
4.80
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Bank loan, due 2007
(KRW 25 billion)
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Bank loans, due 2008 through 2011
(KRW 1 billion)
|
|
|
3.97
|
%(D)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due 2007 through 2012
|
|
|
2.30
|
%(D)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt net
of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,259
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
2,328
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Interest rates are as of June 30, 2007 and exclude the
effects of accretion/amortization of fair value adjustments as a
result of the Arrangement. |
|
(B) |
|
Debt was recorded at fair value as a result of the Arrangement
(see Note 2 Acquisition of Novelis Common
Stock). |
|
(C) |
|
The interest rate for the Floating rate Term Loan B includes an
increased applicable margin in effect through March 31,
2008. The Floating rate Term Loan B was refinanced on
July 6, 2007. |
|
(D) |
|
Weighted average interest rate. |
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we entered into
senior secured credit facilities (Credit Facilities) providing
for aggregate borrowings of up to $1.8 billion. The Credit
Facilities consisted of (1) a $1.3 billion seven-year
senior secured Term Loan B facility, bearing interest at London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.75% (which was subject to
change based on certain leverage ratios), all of which was
16
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
borrowed on January 10, 2005, and (2) a
$500 million five-year multi-currency revolving credit and
letters of credit facility.
The Credit Facilities included customary affirmative and
negative covenants, as well as financial covenants relating to
our maximum total leverage ratio, minimum interest coverage
ratio, and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Substantially
all of our assets were pledged as collateral under the Credit
Facilities.
The terms of our Credit Facilities required that we deliver
unaudited quarterly and audited annual financial statements to
our lenders within specified periods of time. Due to delays in
certain of our SEC filings for 2005 and 2006, we obtained a
series of five waiver and consent agreements from the lenders
under the facility to extend the various filing deadlines. Fees
paid related to the five waiver and consent agreements totaled
$6 million.
On October 16, 2006, we amended the financial covenants to
our Credit Facilities. In particular, we amended our maximum
total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and minimum fixed
charge coverage ratios through the quarter ending March 31,
2008. The amended maximum total leverage, minimum interest
coverage and minimum fixed charge coverage ratios for the period
ended June 30, 2007 were 8.25 to 1; 1.40 to 1; and 0.70 to
1, respectively. For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we
were not in compliance with these covenants. However, due to the
refinancing of the Credit Facilities on July 6, 2007
(discussed below), we continue to classify the debt outstanding
under the Term Loan as long-term on our condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of June 30, 2007.
We also amended and modified other provisions of the Credit
Facilities to permit more efficient ordinary-course operations,
including increasing the amounts of certain permitted
investments and receivables securitizations, permitting nominal
quarterly dividends, and the transfer of an intercompany loan to
another subsidiary. In return for these amendments and
modifications, we paid aggregate fees of approximately
$3 million to lenders who consented to the amendments and
modifications, and agreed to continue paying higher applicable
margins on our Credit Facilities, and higher unused commitment
fees on our existing revolving credit facilities that were
instated with a prior waiver and consent agreement in May 2006.
Commitment fees related to the unused portion of the
$500 million revolving credit facility were 0.625% per
annum.
On April 27, 2007, our lenders consented to a further
amendment of our Credit Facilities. The amendment included
permission to increase the Term Loan B facility by
$150 million. We utilized the additional funds available
under the Term Loan B facility to reduce the outstanding balance
of our $500 million revolving credit facility. The
additional borrowing capacity under the revolving credit
facility was used to fund working capital requirements and
certain costs associated with the Arrangement, including the
cash settlement of
share-based
compensation arrangements and lender fees. Additionally, the
amendment included a limited waiver of the change of control
Event of Default (as defined in the senior secured credit
facilities) which effectively extended the requirement to repay
the Credit Facilities to July 11, 2007. We paid fees of
approximately $2 million to lenders who consented to this
amendment.
Since our inception and through June 30, 2007, we satisfied
the 1% per annum principal amortization requirement through
fiscal year 2010, as well as $560 million of the principal
amortization requirement for 2011. As of June 30, 2007, we
had $812 million outstanding under the Term Loan B
facility. This balance was paid in full on July 6, 2007
with the refinancing of the Credit Facilities, as described
below.
Total debt issuance costs of $43 million, including
amendment fees and the waiver and consent agreements discussed
above, had been recorded in Other long-term
assets third parties and were being amortized
over the life of the related borrowing in Interest expense
and amortization of debt issuance costs net
using the effective interest amortization method
for the Term Loans and the straight-line method for the
revolving credit and letters of credit facility. The unamortized
amount of these costs was $26 million as of
17
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
March 31, 2007. We incurred an additional $2 million
in debt issuance costs as described above during the period from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007. As a result of the
Arrangement and the recording of debt at fair value, the total
amount of unamortized debt issuance costs of $28 million
was reduced to zero as of May 15, 2007.
New
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
On May 25, 2007, we entered into a Bank and Bridge
Facilities Commitment with affiliates of UBS and ABN AMRO, to
provide backstop assurance for the refinancing of our existing
indebtedness following the Arrangement. The commitments from UBS
and ABN AMRO, provided by the banks on a 50%-50% basis,
consisted of a senior secured term loan of up to
$1.06 billion; a senior secured asset-based revolving
credit facility of up to $900 million and a commitment to
issue up to $1.2 billion of unsecured senior notes, if
necessary. The commitment contained terms and conditions
customary for facilities of this nature.
In connection with these backstop commitments, we paid fees
totaling $13 million which are included in Other
long-term assets third parties as of
June 30, 2007. Of this amount, $5 million is related
to the unsecured senior notes, which were not refinanced, and
will be written off during the quarter ending September 30,
2007. The remaining $8 million in fees paid have been
credited by the lenders towards fees associated with the new
senior secured credit facilities (described below) and will be
amortized over the lives of the related borrowings.
On July 6, 2007, we entered into new senior secured credit
facilities with a syndicate of lenders led by affiliates of UBS
and ABN AMRO (New Credit Facilities) providing for aggregate
borrowings of up to $1.76 billion. The New Credit
Facilities consist of (1) a $960 million seven-year
Term Loan facility (Term Loan facility) and (2) an
$800 million five year multi-currency asset-based revolving
credit line and letter of credit facility (ABL facility).
Under the Term Loan facility, loans characterized as alternate
base rate (ABR) borrowings bear interest annually at a rate
equal to the alternate base rate (which is the greater of
(a) the base rate in effect on a given day and (b) the
federal funds effective rate in effect on a given day, plus
0.50%) plus the applicable margin and loans characterized as
Eurocurrency borrowings bear interest at an annual rate equal to
the adjusted LIBOR rate for the interest period in effect, plus
the applicable margin.
Under the ABL facility, interest charged is dependent on the
type of loan: (1) any swingline loan or any loan
categorized as an ABR borrowing will bear interest at an annual
rate equal to the alternate base rate (which is the greater of
(a) the base rate in effect on a given day and (b) the
federal funds effective rate in effect on a given day, plus
0.50%) plus the applicable margin; (2) Eurocurrency loans
will bear interest at an annual rate equal to the adjusted LIBOR
rate for the applicable interest period, plus the applicable
margin; (3) loans designated as Canadian base rate
borrowings will bear an annual interest rate equal to the
Canadian base rate (CAPRIME) plus the applicable margin;
(4) loans designated as bankers acceptances (BA) rate loans
will bear interest at the average discount rate offered for
bankers acceptances for the applicable BA interest period
plus the applicable margin and (5) loans designated as Euro
Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR) loans will bear interest
annually at a rate equal to the adjusted EURIBOR rate for the
applicable interest period, plus the applicable margin.
Applicable margins under the ABL facility depend upon excess
availability levels calculated on a quarterly basis. Interest
rates generally reset every three months and interest is payable
on a quarterly basis.
The proceeds from the Term Loan facility of $960 million,
drawn in full at the time of closing, and the initial draw of
$324 million under the ABL facility were used to pay off
the Credit Facilities, pay for debt issuance costs of the New
Credit Facilities and provide for additional working capital.
18
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Mandatory minimum principal amortization payments under the Term
Loan facility are $2.4 million per calendar quarter
beginning September 30, 2007. Additional mandatory
prepayments are required to be made for certain collateral
liquidations, asset sales, debt and preferred stock issuances,
equity issuances, casualty events and excess cash flow (as
defined in the New Credit Facilities). Any unpaid principal
remaining is due in full on July 6, 2014.
Borrowings under the ABL facility are generally based on 85% of
eligible accounts receivable and 75% to 85% of eligible
inventories. Commitment fees of 0.25% to 0.375% are based on
average daily amounts outstanding under the ABL facility during
a fiscal quarter, payable quarterly.
The New Credit Facilities include customary affirmative and
negative covenants. Under the ABL facility, if our excess
availability, as defined under the borrowing, is less than 10%
of the borrowing base, we are required to maintain a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. Substantially all of our
assets are pledged as collateral under the New Credit Facilities.
We incurred debt issuance costs on our New Credit Facilities
totaling $28 million, including the $8 million in fees
previously paid in conjunction with the backstop commitment.
These fees are included in Other long-term assets
third parties and will be amortized over the life of the
related borrowing in Interest expense and amortization of
debt issuance costs net using the
effective interest amortization method for the Term
Loan facility and the straight-line method for the ABL facility.
7.25% Senior
Notes
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities (Senior
Notes). The Senior Notes were priced at par, bear interest at
7.25% and mature on February 15, 2015. Debt issuance costs
totaling $28 million had been included in Other
long-term assets third parties and were being
amortized over the life of the related borrowing in Interest
expense and amortization of debt issuance costs net
using the effective interest amortization
method. The unamortized amount of these costs was
$24 million as of March 31, 2007. As a result of the
Arrangement and the recording of debt at fair value, the total
amount of unamortized debt issuance costs of $23 million
was reduced to zero as of May 15, 2007.
As a result of the Arrangement, the Senior Notes were recorded
at their fair value of $1.474 billion based on their market
price of 105.25% of $1,000 face value per bond as of
May 14, 2007. The incremental fair value of
$74 million is being amortized to interest income over the
remaining life of the Senior Notes in Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs net using
the effective interest amortization method. Due to
the change in the market price of our Senior Notes from 105.25%
as of May 14, 2007 to 102.75% as of June 30, 2007, the
estimated fair value of this debt has decreased $35 million
to $1.439 billion.
Under the indenture that governs the Senior Notes, we are
subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to incurring
additional debt and providing additional guarantees, paying
dividends beyond certain amounts and making other restricted
payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain consolidations
or mergers, and certain transactions with affiliates. We were in
compliance with these covenants for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007.
The indenture governing the Senior Notes and the related
registration rights agreement required us to file a registration
statement for the notes and exchange the original, privately
placed notes for registered notes. Under the indenture and the
related registration rights agreement, we were required to
complete the exchange offer for the Senior Notes by
November 11, 2005. We did not complete the exchange offer
by that date and, as a result, we began to incur additional
special interest at rates ranging from 0.25% to 1.00%. We filed
a post-effective amendment to the registration statement on
December 1, 2006 which was declared effective by
19
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
the SEC on December 22, 2006. We ceased paying additional
special interest effective January 5, 2007, upon completion
of the exchange offer.
Tender
Offer and Consent Solicitation for 7.25% Senior
Notes
Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing our Senior
Notes, we were obligated, within 30 days of closing of the
Arrangement, to make an offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a
price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and
unpaid interest to the date the Senior Notes were purchased.
Consequently, we commenced a tender offer on May 16, 2007,
to repurchase all of the outstanding Senior Notes at the
prescribed price. This offer expired on July 3, 2007 with
holders of approximately $1 million of principal presenting
their Senior Notes pursuant to the tender offer.
Korean
Bank Loans
In November 2004, Novelis Korea Limited (Novelis Korea),
formerly Alcan Taihan Aluminium Limited, entered into a Korean
won (KRW) 40 billion ($40 million) floating rate
long-term loan due November 2007. We immediately entered into an
interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 4.80%.
In December 2004, we entered into a $70 million floating
rate long-term loan due December 2007. We immediately entered
into an interest rate and cross currency swap for this loan
through a 4.55% fixed rate KRW 73 billion loan.
Additionally, in December 2004 we entered into a KRW
25 billion ($25 million) floating rate loan due
December 2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate swap
to fix the interest rate at 4.45%.
In both the periods from May 16, 2007 through June 30,
2007 and from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007,
interest rates on other Korean bank loans for $1 million
(KRW 1 billion) ranged from 3.50% to 5.50%.
Other
Agreements
In May 2007, we terminated a loan and a corresponding
deposit-and-guarantee
agreement for $80 million. We did not include the loan or
deposit amounts in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as
of March 31, 2007 as the agreement included a legal right
of setoff and we had the intent and ability to setoff.
Interest
Rate Swaps
In addition to interest rate swaps on certain Korean bank loans
noted above, as of June 30, 2007, we have one outstanding
interest rate swap to fix the
3-month
LIBOR interest rate at an effective weighted average interest
rate of 3.9% on $100 million of the floating rate Term Loan
B debt expiring on February 3, 2008. We are still obligated
to pay any applicable margin, as defined in our senior secured
credit facilities, as amended, in addition to these interest
rates. This interest swap was terminated on July 3, 2007
resulting in a gain of less than $1 million. As of
June 30, 2007, 61% of our debt was fixed rate and 39% was
variable rate.
Capital
Lease Obligations
In December 2004, we entered into a fifteen-year capital lease
obligation with Alcan for assets in Sierre, Switzerland, which
has an interest rate of 7.5% and calls for fixed quarterly
payments of CHF 1.7 million, which is equivalent to
$1.4 million at the exchange rate as of June 30, 2007.
In September 2005, we entered into a six-year capital lease
obligation for equipment in Switzerland which has an interest
rate of 2.49% and calls for fixed monthly payments of CHF
0.1 million, which is equivalent to $0.1 million at
the exchange rate as of June 30, 2007.
20
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Short
Term Borrowings and Lines of Credit
As of June 30, 2007, our short-term borrowings were
$390 million consisting of (1) $355 million of
short-term loans under our $500 million revolving credit
facility, (2) $25 million in short-term loans in Korea
and (3) $10 million in bank overdrafts. As of
June 30, 2007, $25 million of our $500 million
revolving credit facility was utilized for letters of credit and
we had no availability under this revolving credit facility. As
discussed above, we refinanced our Credit Facilities on
July 6, 2007, providing additional borrowing availability.
As of June 30, 2007, we had an additional $48 million
under letters of credit in Korea not included in our revolving
credit facility. The weighted average interest rate on our total
short-term borrowings was 7.73% and 7.77% as of June 30,
2007 and March 31, 2007, respectively.
|
|
10.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of the following
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net change in foreign currency
translation adjustments
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
Net change in fair value of
effective portion of hedges
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in minimum pension
liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other comprehensive income
adjustments, before income tax effect
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Income tax effect
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax
effects, is comprised of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
Fair value of effective portion of
hedges net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
Net prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Net transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
Effect of
Acquisition by Hindalco
As a result of the Arrangement (see Note 2
Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock), all of our share-based
compensation awards (except for our Recognition Awards) were
accelerated to vest, cancelled and
21
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price per common share
paid by Hindalco in the transaction. We made aggregate cash
payments (including applicable payroll-related taxes) totaling
$72 million to plan participants following consummation of
the Arrangement, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/Units
|
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
|
|
Settled
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock
options)
|
|
|
825,850
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock
appreciation rights)
|
|
|
378,360
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005
|
|
|
1,238,183
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Stock Price Appreciation Unit Plan
|
|
|
299,873
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Deferred Share Unit Plan for
Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
109,911
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Awards
|
|
|
180,400
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense resulting from the accelerated vesting of
plan awards, totaling $45 million is included in
Selling, general and administrative expenses in our
condensed consolidated statement of operations for the period
from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007. We also
recorded a $7 million reduction to our Additional
paid-in capital during the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007 for the conversion of certain of our
share-based compensation plans from equity-based plans to
liability-based plans.
Our Recognition Awards plan remains in place as of June 30,
2007. However, the awards are now payable only in either, at the
option of the executive, (i) Hindalco common shares (if
offered by Hindalco) or (ii) cash.
2006
Stock Options
On October 26, 2006, our board of directors authorized a
grant of an aggregate of 885,170 seven-year non-qualified stock
options under the Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (2006 Incentive
Plan) at an exercise price of $25.53 to certain of our executive
officers and key employees. These options were comprised of
equal portions of premium and non-premium options. Both the
premium and non-premium options were to vest ratably in 25%
annual increments over a four year period measured from
October 26, 2006, and could be exercised, in whole or in
part, once vested. However, while the premium and non-premium
options carry the same exercise price of $25.53, in no event
could the premium options be exercised unless the fair market
value per share, as defined in the 2006 Incentive Plan, on the
business day preceding the exercise date equals or exceeds
$28.59. As a result of the Arrangement, all of our stock options
under the 2006 Incentive Plan were accelerated to vest,
cancelled and settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price
per common share paid by Hindalco in the transaction.
22
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The table below shows the option activity (for both premium and
non-premium options) under our 2006 Incentive Plan for the
period from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
825,850
|
|
|
$
|
25.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settled as a result of the
Arrangement
|
|
|
(825,850
|
)
|
|
$
|
25.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable as of
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Monte Carlo valuation
model to determine the fair value of the premium options
outstanding under the 2006 Incentive Plan. The Monte Carlo model
utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability
of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award and
calculates the fair market value of each award. Because our
trading history was shorter than the expected life of the
options, we used historical stock price volatility data from
comparable companies to supplement our own historical volatility
to determine expected volatility assumptions. The annual
expected dividend yield was based on dividend payments of $0.01
per share per quarter. Risk-free interest rates were based on
U.S. Treasury Strip yields, compounded daily, consistent
with the expected lives of the options. The fair value of the
premium options was being amortized over the requisite service
period of each award, which was originally from one to four
years, subject to acceleration in cases where the employee
elects retirement or is retirement eligible after
October 26, 2007.
Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Black-Scholes valuation
model to determine the fair value of non-premium options issued.
Because our trading history was shorter than the expected life
of the options, we used historical stock price volatility data
from comparable companies to supplement our own historical
volatility to determine expected volatility assumptions. The
annual expected dividend yield was based on dividend payments of
$0.01 per share per quarter. Risk-free interest rates were based
on U.S. Treasury Strip yields, compounded daily, consistent
with the expected lives of the options. Because we did not have
a sufficient history of option exercise or cancellation, we
estimated the expected life of the options based on an extension
of the simplified method as prescribed by SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107, Share-Based
Payment, which allows for the use of a mid-point between the
earliest and latest dates that an award can be exercised.
23
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
No premium or non-premium options under the 2006 Incentive Plan
were granted during the period from April 1, 2007 through
May 15, 2007. Prior to the Arrangement, the fair value of
our premium and non-premium options was estimated using the
following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
42.20 to 46.40%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
44.30%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.16%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.68 to 4.71%
|
Expected life
|
|
1.00 to 4.75 years
|
As a result of the Arrangement, 825,850 premium and non-premium
options under the 2006 Incentive Plan were accelerated to vest
and were settled in cash for approximately $16 million.
Novelis
Conversion Plan of 2005
On January 5, 2005, our board of directors adopted the
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005 (the Conversion Plan) to allow
for 1,372,663 Alcan stock options held by employees of Alcan who
became our employees following our spin-off from Alcan to be
replaced with options to purchase 2,723,914 of our common
shares. As a result of the Arrangement, all of our stock options
under the Conversion Plan were accelerated to vest, cancelled
and settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price per common
share paid by Hindalco in the transaction.
The following table shows the option activity in our Conversion
Plan for the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,296,952
|
|
|
$
|
21.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(57,876
|
)
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
|
$
|
23.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settled as a result of the
Arrangement
|
|
|
(1,238,183
|
)
|
|
$
|
21.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable as of
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Black-Scholes valuation
model to determine the fair value of the options outstanding.
Because we had no trading history at the time of the valuation,
we used historical stock price volatility data from comparable
companies to determine expected volatility assumptions. The
annual expected dividend yield was based on our then current and
anticipated dividend payments. Risk-free interest rates were
based on U.S. Treasury bond yields, compounded daily,
consistent with the expected lives of the options. Because we
did not have a sufficient history of option exercise or
cancellation, we estimated the
24
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
expected life of the options based on the lesser of the expected
term of six years or the remaining life of the option.
No new options under the Conversion Plan were granted since its
adoption in January 2005. The fair value of each option was
estimated using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
30.30%
|
Weighted-average volatility
|
|
30.30%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
1.56%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.88 to 3.73%
|
Expected life
|
|
0.70 to 5.70 years
|
During the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15,
2007, there were 6,548 options that vested. As a result of the
Arrangement, 563,651 options were accelerated to vest with a
total fair value of approximately $4 million, and 1,238,183
options were settled in cash using the $44.93 per common share
transaction price for approximately $29 million.
Under our Conversion Plan for the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007, the total intrinsic value of options
exercised was approximately $1 million and cash received
from options exercised was approximately $1 million. There
were no options exercised during the three months ended
June 30, 2006.
Recognition
Awards
On September 25, 2006, we entered into Recognition
Agreements and granted Recognition Awards to certain executive
officers and other key employees (Executives) to retain and
reward them for continued dedication towards corporate
objectives. Under the terms of these agreements, Executives who
remain continuously employed by us through the vesting dates of
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008 are entitled
to receive one-half of their total Recognition Awards on each
vesting date.
On February 10, 2007, our board of directors adopted
resolutions to amend the Recognition Awards with the Executives.
As amended, if the Executive remains continuously employed by us
through the vesting dates of December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2008, the Executive is entitled to the awards,
payable at a value of $44.93 per share, in either, at the option
of the Executive, (i) Hindalco common shares (if offered by
Hindalco) or (ii) cash.
The number of Recognition Awards payable under the agreements
varies by Executive. Currently, there are 145,800 shares
subject to award. Prior to the Arrangement and in accordance
with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised),
Share-Based Payment, we valued these awards as of the
issuance date and were recognizing their cost over the requisite
service period of the Executives. As a result of the
Arrangement, the Recognition Awards changed in classification
from an equity-based to a liability-based plan using the $44.93
per common share transaction price as the per share value. This
classification change resulted in additional share-based
compensation expense of $1.3 million during the period from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007.
The table below shows the activity for our Recognition Awards
for the periods from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007 and
from May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007.
25
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Award
|
|
|
|
Recognition
|
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Predecessor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition Awards as of
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
145,800
|
|
|
$
|
23.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition Awards as of
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
145,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition Awards as of
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
145,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007, there was approximately
$1 million and $2 million of unamortized compensation
expense related to each of the two vesting dates for the
Recognition Awards, which is expected to be recognized over the
next 0.5 years and 1.5 years, respectively.
Stock
Appreciation Rights
On October 26, 2006, our board of directors authorized a
grant of 381,090 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) under the 2006
Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $25.53 to certain of our
executive officers and key employees. The terms of the SARs were
identical in all material respects to those of the stock options
issued under the 2006 Incentive Plan, except that the
incremental increase in the value of the SARs was to be settled
in cash rather than shares of Novelis common stock at the
time of exercise. The SARs were comprised of two equal portions:
premium and non-premium SARs. Both the premium and non-premium
SARs vested ratably in 25% annual increments over the four-year
period measured from October 26, 2006, and could be
exercised, in whole or in part, once vested. However, while the
premium and non-premium SARs carried the same exercise price of
$25.53, in no event could the premium SARs be exercised unless
the fair market value per share, as defined in the 2006
Incentive Plan, on the business day preceding the exercise date
equals or exceeds $28.59. As a result of the Arrangement, all of
our SARs under the 2006 Incentive Plan were accelerated to vest,
cancelled and settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price
per common share paid by Hindalco in the transaction.
26
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The table below shows the SARs activity (for both premium and
non-premium SARs) under our 2006 Incentive Plan for the period
from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
|
$
|
25.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(1,640
|
)
|
|
$
|
25.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settled as a result of the
Arrangement
|
|
|
(378,360
|
)
|
|
$
|
25.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs exercisable as of
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Monte Carlo valuation
model to determine the fair value of the premium SARs
outstanding under the 2006 Incentive Plan. The Monte Carlo model
utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability
of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award and
calculates the fair market value of each award. Because our
trading history was shorter than the expected life of the SARs,
we used historical stock price volatility data from comparable
companies to supplement our own historical volatility to
determine expected volatility assumptions. No quarterly or
annual dividend was expected. Risk-free interest rates were
based on U.S. Treasury Strip yields, compounded daily,
consistent with the expected remaining lives of the premium
SARs. The fair value of the premium SARs was being amortized
over the requisite remaining service period of each award, which
was from 0.57 to 3.57 years as of March 31, 2007,
subject to acceleration in cases where the employee elects
retirement or is retirement eligible after October 26, 2007.
Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Black-Scholes valuation
model to determine the fair value of the non-premium SARs
outstanding. Because our trading history was shorter than the
expected life of the SARs, we used historical stock price
volatility data from comparable companies to supplement our own
historical volatility to determine expected volatility
assumptions. No quarterly or annual dividend was expected.
Risk-free interest rates were based on U.S. Treasury Strip
yields, compounded daily, consistent with the expected remaining
lives of the SARs. Because we did not have a sufficient history
of SAR exercise or cancellation, we estimated the expected
remaining life of the SARs based on an extension of the
simplified method as prescribed by
SAB No. 107.
As a result of the Arrangement, 378,360 premium and non-premium
SARs were accelerated to vest and were settled in cash for
approximately $7 million.
Stock
Price Appreciation Unit Plan
Prior to the spin-off, some Alcan employees who later
transferred to Novelis held Alcan stock price appreciation units
(SPAUs). These units entitled them to receive cash equal to the
excess of the market value of an Alcan common share on the
exercise date of a SPAU over the market value of an Alcan common
share on its grant date. On January 6, 2005, these
employees received 418,777 Novelis SPAUs to replace their
211,035 Alcan SPAUs at a weighted average exercise price of
$22.04. All converted SPAUs that were vested at the spin-off
date continued to be vested. Unvested SPAUs were to vest in four
equal annual installments
27
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
beginning on January 6, 2006, the first anniversary of the
spin-off date. As a result of the Arrangement, all of our
SPAUs were accelerated to vest, cancelled and settled in
cash using the $44.93 purchase price per common share paid by
Hindalco in the transaction.
The table below shows the activity in our SPAU Plan for the
period from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
SPAUs
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
SPAUs outstanding as of
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
300,617
|
|
|
$
|
21.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(744
|
)
|
|
$
|
21.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settled as a result of the
Arrangement
|
|
|
(299,873
|
)
|
|
$
|
21.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPAUs outstanding as of
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPAUs exercisable as of
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the Arrangement, we used the Black-Scholes valuation
model to estimate the fair value of SPAUs granted to employees
and to determine the fair value of the SPAUs outstanding.
Because our trading history is shorter than the expected life of
the SPAUs, we used historical stock price volatility data from
comparable companies to supplement our own historical volatility
to determine expected volatility assumptions. No quarterly or
annual dividend was expected. Risk-free interest rates were
based on U.S. Treasury spot rates consistent with the
expected remaining lives of the SPAUs. Because we did not have a
sufficient history of SPAU exercise or cancellation, we
estimated the expected remaining life of the SPAUs based on an
extension of the simplified method as prescribed by
SAB No. 107. As a result of the Arrangement, the
Recognition Awards were valued using the $44.93 per common share
transaction price.
As a result of the Arrangement, 201,495 SPAUs were accelerated
to vest and 299,873 SPAUs were settled in cash using the $44.93
per common share transaction price for approximately
$7 million.
Deferred
Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors
On January 5, 2005, Novelis established the Deferred Share
Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors under which non-executive
directors would receive 50% of their compensation payable in the
form of directors deferred share units (DDSUs) and the
other 50% in the form of either cash, additional DDSUs or a
combination of these two (at the election of each non-executive
director). The number of DDSUs was determined by dividing the
quarterly amount payable, as elected, by the average closing
prices of a common share on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)
(adjusted for the noon exchange rate) and New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) on the last five trading days of each quarter.
Additional DDSUs representing the equivalent of dividends
declared on common shares are credited to each holder of DDSUs.
The number of DDSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2007
included DDSUs issued on April 1, 2007, as the required
service was provided by the period-end.
The DDSUs were redeemable in cash
and/or in
shares of our common stock following the participants
retirement from the board. The redemption amount was calculated
by multiplying the accumulated balance of DDSUs by the average
closing price of a common share on the TSX (adjusted for the
noon exchange rate) and
28
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
NYSE on the last five trading days prior to the redemption date.
As a result of the Arrangement, all of our DDSUs were cancelled
and settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price per common
share paid by Hindalco in the transaction.
The table below shows our DDSU activity for the period from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
DDSUs
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
DDSUs outstanding as of
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
106,578
|
|
|
$
|
44.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised (paid out)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settled as a result of the
Arrangement
|
|
|
(109,911
|
)
|
|
$
|
44.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DDSUs outstanding as of
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the Arrangement, 109,911 DDSUs were settled in
cash using the $44.93 per common share transaction price for
approximately $5 million.
Novelis
Founders Performance Awards
In March 2005 (and amended and restated in March 2006 and
February 2007), Novelis established a plan to reward certain key
executives with Performance Share Units (PSUs) if Novelis common
share price improvement targets were achieved within specific
time periods. There were three equal tranches of PSUs, and each
had a specific share price improvement target. For the first
tranche, the target share price of $23.57 applied for the period
from March 24, 2005 to March 23, 2008. For the second
tranche, the target share price of $25.31 applied for the period
from March 24, 2006 to March 23, 2008. For the third
tranche, the target share price of $27.28 applied for the period
from March 24, 2007 to March 23, 2008. If awarded, a
particular tranche was to be paid in cash on the later of six
months from the date the specific common share price target is
reached or twelve months after the start of the performance
period, and will be based on the average of the daily common
share closing prices on the NYSE for the last five trading days
prior to the payment date.
The liability for the first tranche was accrued over its term,
was valued on March 24, 2006, and was paid in April 2006 in
the aggregate amount of approximately $3 million.
In February 2007, our board of directors recognized that the
applicable share price threshold had been (or would likely be)
met with respect to the second tranche and would probably be met
for the third tranche, but in light of the insiders
awareness of the possibility of a change in control transaction,
they were subject to a trading blackout. Moreover, it was
unlikely that a 15 day open trading window under the
Novelis disclosure and insider trading policies would arise
prior to the Arrangement. Accordingly, on February 10,
2007, our board of directors further amended the PSUs in order
to provide that the applicable threshold for (a) the second
tranche was to be met as of February 28, 2007 and
(b) the third tranche was to be met as of March 26,
2007, for purposes of PSUs to be awarded.
As a result of the Arrangement, the second and third tranches
(represented by 94,450 and 85,950 PSUs, respectively) were
settled in cash using the $44.93 per common share transaction
price for a total of approximately $8 million.
29
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Share-Based
Compensation Expense
Total share-based compensation expense for the periods from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007 and from
May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007 and for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 is presented in the table below
(in millions). These amounts are included in Selling, general
and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Recognition Awards
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock
options)
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock
appreciation rights)
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Stock Price Appreciation Unit Plan
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Total Shareholder Returns
Performance Plan
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Deferred Share Unit Plan for
Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Awards
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Share-Based Compensation
Expense
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
45.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n.a. not applicable as plan was cancelled.
|
|
12.
|
Postretirement
Benefit Plans
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost for all of our
significant postretirement benefit plans are shown in the table
below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Three Month
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization actuarial
losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 7.5% in
fiscal 2008.
30
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Employer
Contributions to Plans
For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to
provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to date,
and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over
periods of 15 years or less. We also participate in savings
plans in Canada and the U.S. as well as defined
contribution pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany,
Malaysia and Brazil. We contributed the following amounts to all
plans, including the Alcan plans that cover our employees (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Funded pension plans
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Unfunded pension plans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Savings and defined contribution
pension plans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the remainder of fiscal 2008, we expect to contribute an
additional $29 million to our funded pension plans,
$13 million to our unfunded pension plans and
$9 million to our savings and defined contribution pension
plans.
|
|
13.
|
Currency
Losses (Gains)
|
The following currency losses (gains) are included in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net loss (gain) on change in fair
value of currency derivative instruments(A)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Net loss (gain) on translation of
monetary assets and liabilities(B)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net currency losses (gains)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Included in Gain on change in fair value of derivative
instruments net.
|
|
(B) |
|
Included in Other (income) expenses net.
|
The following currency gains (losses) are included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets (net of tax
effect and in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Cumulative currency translation
adjustment beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation
adjustment end of period
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Financial
Instruments and Commodity Contracts
|
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments, including forward contracts, to
manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates,
interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such
instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may
be exposed to losses in the future if the counterparties to the
contracts fail to perform. We are satisfied that the risk of
such non-performance is remote, due to our monitoring of credit
exposures. Alcan is the principal counter-party to our aluminum
forward contracts.
Certain contracts are designated as hedges of either net
investment or cash flows. For these contracts we recognize the
change in fair value of the ineffective portion of the hedge as
a gain or loss in our current period results of operations. We
include the change in fair value of the effective and interest
portions of these hedges in Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) within Shareholders equity in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Prior to
Completion of the Arrangement
During the three months ended June 30, 2006 and the period
from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, we applied
hedge accounting to certain of our cross-currency interest swaps
with respect to intercompany loans to several European
subsidiaries and forward exchange contracts. Our Euro and
British pound (GBP) cross-currency interest swaps were
designated as net investment hedges, while our Swiss franc (CHF)
cross-currency interest rate swaps and our Brazilian real (BRL)
forward foreign exchange contracts were designated as cash flow
hedges. As of May 15, 2007, we had $712 million of
cross-currency swaps (Euro 475 million, GBP 62 million
and CHF 35 million) and $99 million of forward foreign
exchange contracts (BRL 229 million). During the period
from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, we
implemented cash flow hedge accounting for an electricity swap,
which was embedded in a supply contract.
During the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15,
2007, the change in fair value of the effective and interest
portions of our net investment hedges was a loss of
$8 million and the change in fair value of the effective
portion of our cash flow hedges was a gain of $7 million.
Impact of
the Arrangement and Purchase Accounting
Concurrent with completion of the Arrangement on May 15,
2007, we dedesignated all hedging relationships. The cumulative
change in fair value of effective and interest portions of these
hedges, previously presented in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) within Shareholders equity
on May 15, 2007, was incorporated in the new basis of
accounting. As a result of purchase accounting, the fair value
of all embedded derivative instruments was allocated to the fair
value of their respective host contracts, reducing the fair
value of embedded derivative instruments to zero.
Subsequent
to Completion of the Arrangement
With exception of the electricity swap, noted above, which was
redesignated as a cash flow hedge on June 1, 2007, hedge
accounting was not applied to any of our financial instruments
or commodity contracts after May 15, 2007 and subsequent
changes in the fair value have been recognized in Gain on
change in fair value of derivative instruments net
in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
The period from May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007,
includes a gain of $2 million before tax for the change in
fair value of the effective portion of our remaining cash flow
hedge. As of June 30, 2007, the amount of effective net
gains to be realized during the next twelve months is not
significant. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through November 2016.
32
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2007 were
as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Fair
|
|
|
|
Maturity Dates
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
2007 through 2011
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
2007 through 2008
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
2007 through 2015
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
2007 through 2009
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
2016
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Embedded derivative instruments
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Less: current portion (A)
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent portion (A)
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Fair
|
|
|
|
Maturity Dates
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
2007 through 2011
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
2007 through 2008
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
2007 through 2015
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
2007 through 2009
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
Aluminum options
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
2016
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Embedded derivative instruments
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
Less: current portion (A)
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent portion (A)
|
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
(85
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The amounts of the current and long-term portions of fair values
under assets are each presented in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. The amounts of the current and
noncurrent portions of fair values under liabilities are
included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
and Other long-term liabilities, respectively, in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
33
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Other
(Income) Expenses Net
|
Other (income) expenses net is comprised of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Restructuring charges
net
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Exchange (gains)
losses net
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We provide for income taxes using the liability method in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting, and FASB Interpretation
No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim
Periods (FIN No. 18), the provision for taxes
on income recognizes our estimate of the effective tax rate
expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year, adjusted for
the impact of any discrete events, which are reported in the
period in which they occur. Each quarter, we re-evaluate our
estimated tax expense for the year and make adjustments for
changes in the estimated tax rate. Additionally, we evaluate the
realizability of our deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis.
Our evaluation considers all positive and negative evidence and
factors, such as the scheduled reversal of temporary
differences, historical and projected future taxable income or
losses, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.
The provision (benefit) for taxes on loss for (1) the
periods from May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007
(Successor) and April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007
(Predecessor) were based on the estimated effective tax rates
applicable for the year ending March 31, 2008, after
considering items specifically related to the interim period and
(2) the three months ended June 30, 2006 was based on
the estimated effective tax rates applicable for the year ended
December 31, 2006, after considering items specifically
related to the interim period.
A reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our
effective tax rates is as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Pre-tax loss before equity in net
income of non-consolidated affiliates and minority
interests share
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian statutory tax rate
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (benefit) at the
Canadian statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in tax rate
resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange translation items
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Exchange remeasurement of deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Expense/income items with no tax
effect net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Tax rate differences on foreign
earnings
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
loss
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
(189
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
143
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Our effective tax rate differs from the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to three factors: (1) pre-tax foreign
currency gains or losses with no tax effect and the tax effect
of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no
pre-tax effect which is shown above as exchange translation
items; (2) changes in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
those losses and (3) differences between the Canadian
statutory and foreign effective tax rates resulting from the
application of an annual effective tax rate to profit and loss
entities in different jurisdictions shown above as tax rate
differences on foreign earnings.
Cash taxes paid for the periods from May 16, 2007 through
June 30, 2007 and April 1, 2007 through May 15,
2007 were $12 million and $9 million, respectively.
Cash taxes paid for the three months ended June 30, 2006
were $7 million.
Adoption
of FASB Interpretation No. 48
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FASB
Interpretation No. 48 clarifies the accounting for income
taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax
position is required to meet before being recognized in the
financial statements. FASB Interpretation No. 48 also
provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. Upon adoption as of January 1,
2007, we increased our reserves for uncertain tax positions by
$1 million. We recognized the increase as a cumulative
effect adjustment to Shareholders equity, as an increase
to our Accumulated deficit. Including this adjustment,
reserves for uncertain tax positions totaled $45 million as
of January 1, 2007. Of this total, $43 million
represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if
recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate in any
future periods.
Tax authorities are currently examining certain prior
years tax returns for
1999-2003.
We are evaluating potential adjustments related to certain items
and we anticipate that it is reasonably possible that settlement
of the examination will result in a payment in the range of up
to $5 million and a corresponding decrease in unrecognized
tax benefits by March 31, 2008.
Separately, we are awaiting a court ruling regarding the
utilization of certain operating losses. We anticipate that it
is reasonably possible that this ruling will result in a
$10 million decrease in unrecognized tax benefits by
March 31, 2008 related to this matter. We have fully funded
this contingent liability through a judicial deposit, which is
included in Other long-term assets third parties
as of January 1, 2007.
With the exception of the ongoing tax examinations described
above, we are no longer subject to any income tax examinations
by any tax authorities for years before 2001. With few
exceptions, tax returns for all jurisdictions for all tax years
after 2000 are subject to examination by taxing authorities.
Our continuing practice and policy is to record potential
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
our Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss). As of
March 31, 2007, we had $1 million accrued for
potential interest on income taxes and no amounts accrued for
potential penalties. For the periods from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007 and from May 16, 2007 through
June 30, 2007, our Provision (benefit) for taxes on loss
included a charge for an additional $0.3 million and
$2 million of potential interest, respectively.
35
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
17.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Primary
Supplier
Alcan is our primary supplier of prime and sheet ingot.
Purchases from Alcan represented 35% and 44% of our total
combined prime and sheet ingot purchases for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Legal
Proceedings
Reynolds Boat Case. As previously disclosed,
we and Alcan were defendants in a case in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Washington, in
Tacoma, Washington, case number C04-0175RJB. Plaintiffs were
Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire
Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a
jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under implied warranty
theories, based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and
Alcan sold certain aluminum products that were ultimately used
for marine applications and were unsuitable for such
applications. The jury reached a verdict on May 22, 2006
against us and Alcan for approximately $60 million, and the
court later awarded Reynolds and Alcoa approximately
$16 million in prejudgment interest and court costs.
The case was settled during July 2006 as among us, Alcan,
Reynolds, Alcoa and their insurers for $71 million. We
contributed approximately $1 million toward the settlement,
and the remaining $70 million was funded by our insurers.
Although the settlement was substantially funded by our
insurance carriers, certain of them have reserved the right to
request a refund from us, after reviewing details of the
plaintiffs damages to determine if they include costs of a
nature not covered under the insurance contracts. Of the
$70 million funded, $39 million is in dispute with and
under further review by certain of our insurance carriers, who
have until October 19, 2007 to complete their review,
unless that review time is extended by mutual agreement. In the
quarter ended September 30, 2006, we posted a letter of
credit in the amount of approximately $10 million in favor
of one of those insurance carriers, while we resolve the
questions, if any, about the extent of coverage of the costs
included in the settlement.
Since our fiscal 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
was not filed until August 25, 2006, we recognized a
liability for the full settlement amount of $71 million on
December 31, 2005, included in Accrued expenses and
other current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet,
with a corresponding charge against earnings. We also recognized
an insurance receivable included in Prepaid expenses and
other current assets on our consolidated balance sheet of
$31 million, with a corresponding increase to earnings.
Although $70 million of the settlement was funded by our
insurers, we only recognized an insurance receivable to the
extent that coverage was not in dispute. This resulted in a net
charge of $40 million during the quarter ended
December 31, 2005.
In July 2006, we contributed and paid $1 million to our
insurers who subsequently paid the entire settlement amount of
$71 million to the plaintiffs. Accordingly, during the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 we reversed the previously
recorded insurance receivable of $31 million and reduced
our recorded liability by the same amount plus the
$1 million contributed by us. The remaining liability of
$39 million represents the amount of the settlement claim
that was funded by our insurers but is still in dispute with and
under further review by certain of our insurance carriers, who
have yet to complete their review as described above. The
$39 million liability is included in Accrued expenses
and other current liabilities in our condensed consolidated
balance sheets as of June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2007.
While the ultimate resolution of the nature and extent of any
costs not covered under our insurance contracts cannot be
determined with certainty or reasonably estimated at this time,
if there is an adverse outcome with respect to insurance
coverage, and we are required to reimburse our insurers, it
could have a material impact on our cash flows in the period of
resolution. Alternatively, the ultimate resolution could be
36
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
favorable, such that insurance coverage is in excess of the net
expense that we have recognized to date. This would result in
our recording a non-cash gain in the period of resolution, and
this non-cash gain could have a material impact on our results
of operations during the period in which such a determination is
made.
Coca-Cola
Lawsuits. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in state
court in Georgia. In addition, a lawsuit was commenced against
Novelis Corporation and Alcan Corporation on April 3, 2007
by Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc, Enterprises Acquisition Company, Inc., The
Coca-Cola
Company and The
Coca-Cola
Trading Company, Inc (collectively CCE) in federal court in
Georgia. Novelis intends to defend these claims vigorously.
CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and
seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial
and a declaration of its rights under the agreement. The
agreement includes a most favored nations provision
regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS alleges that Novelis
Corporation breached the terms of the most favored nations
provision. The dispute will likely turn on the facts that are
presented to the court by the parties and the courts
finding as to how certain provisions of the agreement ought to
be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in this litigation, the
amount of damages would likely be material. Novelis Corporation
has moved to dismiss the complaint and has filed its answer.
The claim by CCE seeks monetary damages in an amount to be
determined at trial for breach of a prior aluminum can stock
supply agreement between CCE and Novelis Corporation, successor
to the rights and obligations of Alcan Aluminum Corporation
under the agreement. According to its terms, that agreement with
CCE terminated in 2006. The CCE supply agreement included a
most favored nations provision regarding certain
pricing matters. CCE alleges that Novelis Corporations
entry into a supply agreement with Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached
the most favored nation provision of the CCE supply
agreement. If CCE were to prevail in this litigation, the amount
of damages would likely be material. The dispute will likely
turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the parties
and the courts finding as to how certain provisions of the
supply agreement ought to be interpreted. Novelis Corporation
has moved to dismiss the complaint and has not yet filed its
answer. We have not recorded any reserves for these matters.
Anheuser-Busch Litigation. On
September 19, 2006, Novelis Corporation filed a lawsuit
against Anheuser-Busch, Inc. in federal court in Ohio.
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. subsequently filed suit against Novelis
Corporation and the Company in federal court in Missouri. On
January 3, 2007, Anheuser-Busch, Inc.s suit was
transferred to the Ohio federal court.
Novelis Corporation alleges that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached
the existing multi-year aluminum can stock supply agreement
between the parties, and we seek monetary damages and
declaratory relief. Among other claims, we assert that since
entering into the supply agreement, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. has
breached its confidentiality obligations and there has been a
structural change in market conditions that requires a change to
the pricing provisions under the agreement.
In its complaint, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. has asked for a
declaratory judgment that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. is not obligated
to modify the supply agreement as requested by Novelis
Corporation, and that Novelis Corporation must continue to
perform under the existing supply agreement.
The Anheuser-Busch, Inc. litigation is currently at the
discovery stage. Novelis Corporation has continued to perform
under the supply agreement during the litigation.
ARCO Aluminum Complaint. On May 24, 2007,
Arco Aluminum Inc. (ARCO) filed a complaint against Novelis
Corporation and Novelis Inc. in the United States District Court
for the Western District of Kentucky.
37
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
ARCO and Novelis are partners in a joint venture rolling mill
located in Logan, Kentucky. In the complaint, ARCO seeks to
resolve a perceived dispute over management and control of the
joint venture following Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis.
ARCO alleges that its consent was required in connection with
Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis. Failure to obtain
consent, ARCO alleges, has put us in default of the joint
venture agreements, thereby triggering certain provisions in
those agreements. The provisions include a reversion of the
production management at the joint venture to Logan Aluminum
from Novelis, and a reduction of the board of directors of the
entity that manages the joint venture from seven members (four
appointed by Novelis and three appointed by ARCO) to six members
(three appointed by each of Novelis and ARCO).
ARCO is seeking a court declaration that (1) Novelis and
its affiliates are prohibited from exercising any managerial
authority or control over the joint venture,
(2) Novelis interest in the joint venture is limited
to an economic interest only and (3) ARCO has authority to
act on behalf of the joint venture. Or, alternatively, ARCO is
seeking a reversion of the production management function to
Logan Aluminum, and a change in the composition of the board of
directors of the entity that manages the joint venture. Novelis
filed its answer to the complaint on July 16, 2007.
On July 3, 2007, ARCO filed a motion for partial summary
judgment with respect to one of the counts of its complaint
relating to the claim that Novelis breached the joint venture
agreement by not seeking ARCOs consent. On July 30,
2007, Novelis filed a motion to hold ARCOs motion for
summary judgment in abeyance (pending further discovery), along
with a jury demand. Those motions are pending. We intend to
defend these proceedings vigorously.
Environmental
Matters
Oswego North Ponds. As previously disclosed,
Oswego North Ponds is currently our largest known single
environmental loss contingency. In the late 1960s and early
1970s, Novelis Corporation, (formerly known as Alcan Aluminum
Corporation, or Alcancorp) used an oil containing
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in its re-melt operations in
Oswego, New York. At the time, Novelis Corporation utilized a
once-through cooling water system that discharged through a
series of constructed ponds and wetlands, collectively referred
to as the North Ponds. In the early 1980s, low levels of PCBs
were detected in the cooling water system discharge and Novelis
Corporation performed several subsequent investigations. The
PCB-containing hydraulic oil, Pydraul, which was eliminated from
use by Novelis Corporation in the early 1970s, was identified as
the source of contamination. In the mid-1980s, the Oswego North
Ponds site was classified as an inactive hazardous waste
disposal site and added to the New York State Registry.
Novelis Corporation ceased discharge through the North Ponds in
mid-2002.
In cooperation with the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New York State
Department of Health, Novelis Corporation entered into a consent
decree in August 2000 to develop and implement a remedial
program to address the PCB contamination at the Oswego North
Ponds site. A remedial investigation report was submitted in
January 2004. The current estimated cost associated with this
remediation is in the range of $12 million to
$26 million. Based upon the report and other factors, we
accrued $19 million as our estimated cost. In addition,
NYSDEC held a public hearing on the remediation plan on
March 13, 2006 and a Consent Order for the implementation
of the remediation plan was executed by NYSDEC and Novelis
Corporation, effective January 1, 2007. We believe that our
estimate of $19 million is reasonable, and that the
remediation plan will be designed and implemented in 2008.
38
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Brazil
Tax Matters
Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in
South America, as of June 30, 2007 and March 31,
2007, we had cash deposits aggregating approximately
$27 million and $25 million, respectively, in judicial
depository accounts pending finalization of the related cases.
The depository accounts are in the name of the Brazilian
government and will be expended towards these legal proceedings
or released to us, depending on the outcome of the legal cases.
These deposits are included in Other long-term
assets third parties in our accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we are
involved in several disputes with Brazils Minister of
Treasury about various forms of manufacturing taxes and social
security contributions, for which we have made no judicial
deposits but for which we have established reserves ranging from
$11 million to $63 million as of June 30, 2007.
In total, these reserves approximate $100 million as of
June 30, 2007 and are included in Other long-term
liabilities in our accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets.
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including:
|
|
|
|
|
certain of our wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH, which is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint
venture that does not meet the requirements for consolidation
under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.
|
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no
expiration and have termination notice requirements. For our
majority-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness guaranteed is for
short-term loan, overdraft and other debt facilities with
financial institutions, some of which have various expiration
dates through the end of calendar year ending December 31,
2007. Other of the guarantees have indefinite terms and expire
upon written notice among the parties. Neither we nor any of our
subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds any assets of
any third parties as collateral to offset the potential
settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our financial statements, all outstanding
liabilities associated with trade accounts payable and
short-term debt facilities for these entities are already
included in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness as of June 30, 2007 (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Potential
|
|
|
Liability Carrying
|
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Future Payment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Majority-owned subsidiaries
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Segment
and Major Customer Information
|
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America; Europe; Asia and South America.
39
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
As a result of the acquisition by Hindalco, and based on the way
our President and Chief Operating Officer (our chief operating
decision-maker) reviews the results of segment operations, we
changed our segment performance measure to Segment Income, as
defined below. As a result, certain prior period amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the new segment performance
measure.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments, based on Segment Income, in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information. Segment Income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment Income as earnings before (a) interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs net;
(b) unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of
derivative instruments net; (c) realized gains
(losses) on corporate derivative instruments net;
(d) depreciation and amortization; (e) impairment
charges on long-lived assets; (f) minority interests
share; (g) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share
of Segment Income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting;
(h) restructuring charges net; (i) gains
or losses on disposals of property, plant and equipment and
businesses net; (j) corporate selling, general
and administrative expenses; (k) other corporate
costs net; (l) sale transaction fees;
(m) litigation settlement net of insurance
recoveries; (n) provision or benefit for taxes on income
(loss) and (o) cumulative effect of accounting change.
Net sales and expenses are measured in accordance with the
policies and procedures described in Note 1
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our
consolidated and combined financial statements included in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
We do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB
Statement No. 133. Accordingly, changes in fair value are
recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the
recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the
contract settlement. In the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations, change in fair value of derivative
instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement
No. 133 are recognized in net income (loss) in Gain on
change in fair value of derivative instruments
net. These gains or losses may or may not result from cash
settlement. For Segment Income purposes we only include the
impact of the derivative gains or losses to the extent they are
settled in cash (i.e., realized) during that period.
The tables below show selected segment financial information as
of June 30, 2007 and 2006, for the periods from
May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007 and from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007 and for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 (in millions). The Corporate and
Other column in the tables below includes functions that are
managed directly from our corporate office, which focuses on
strategy development and oversees governance, policy, legal
compliance, human resources and finance matters. It also
includes consolidating and other elimination accounts.
Selected
Segment Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
$
|
4,524
|
|
|
$
|
3,696
|
|
|
$
|
1,323
|
|
|
$
|
1,321
|
|
|
$
|
(106
|
)
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
10,823
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
(Predecessor)
|
|
$
|
1,566
|
|
|
$
|
2,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,110
|
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
|
$
|
(114
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
5,970
|
|
40
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through June 30, 2007
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
|
$
|
593
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,547
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Income (Loss)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
992
|
|
|
$
|
922
|
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Income
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
41
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
The following table shows the reconciliation from Total Segment
Income to Net income (loss) (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Total Segment Income
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on
change in fair value of derivative instruments net
(A)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Realized gains (losses) on
corporate derivative instruments net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate
proportional consolidation (B)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Restructuring charges
net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Other corporate costs
net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit (provision) for taxes on
loss
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments net represents the portion of gains
(losses) that were not settled in cash during the period.
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) are shown in the table
below and are included in the aggregate each period in Gain
on change in fair value of derivative instruments
net on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Gains (losses) on change in fair
value of derivative instruments net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and included in Segment
Income
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
Realized on corporate derivative
instruments
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on change in fair value of
derivative instruments net
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Total Segment Income to Net income (loss), the
proportional Segment Income of these non-consolidated affiliates
is removed from Total Segment Income, net of our share of their
net after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net
(income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our
condensed consolidated statements of operations. See
Note 7 |
42
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and
Related Party Transactions for further information about these
non-consolidated affiliates. |
Information
about Major Customers
All of our operating segments had net sales to Rexam Plc
(Rexam), our largest customer. Net sales to Rexam represented
15.8%, 11.2% and 12.9% of our total net sales for the
(1) periods from May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007 and
from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007 and (2) the
three months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
|
|
19.
|
Supplemental
Guarantor Information
|
In connection with the issuance of our Senior Notes, certain of
our wholly-owned subsidiaries provided guarantees of the Senior
Notes. These guarantees are full and unconditional as well as
joint and several. The guarantor subsidiaries (the Guarantors)
are comprised of the majority of our businesses in Canada, the
U.S, the U.K, Brazil and Switzerland, as well as certain
businesses in Germany. Certain Guarantors may be subject to
restrictions on their ability to distribute earnings to Novelis
Inc. (the Parent). The remaining subsidiaries (the
Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not guarantors of the Senior
Notes.
The following information presents consolidating statements of
operations, consolidating balance sheets and consolidating
statements of cash flows of the Parent, the Guarantors, and the
Non-Guarantors. Investments include investment in and advances
to non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net
assets of divisions included in the Parent, and have been
presented using the equity method of accounting.
43
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Consolidating
Statement of Operations
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through June 30, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
1,347
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
(464
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Gain on change in fair value of
derivative instruments net
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Equity in net loss of affiliates
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for taxes on
loss and minority interests share
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Provision for taxes on loss
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority
interests share
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Consolidating
Statement of Operations
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
(227
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair
value of derivative instruments net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of
affiliates
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for taxes on
loss and minority interests share
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Provision for taxes on loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority
interests share
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Consolidating
Statement of Operations
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 (Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
$
|
756
|
|
|
$
|
(784
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Gain on change in fair value of
derivative instruments net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Equity in net income of affiliates
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision
(benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority
interests share
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
income (loss)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority
interests share
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Consolidating
Balance Sheet
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007 (Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
Accounts receivable net
of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(838
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
2,741
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
(839
|
)
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment net
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
Intangible assets net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
863
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,202
|
)
|
|
|
758
|
|
Fair value of derivative
instruments net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(1,456
|
)
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,614
|
|
|
$
|
9,437
|
|
|
$
|
2,269
|
|
|
$
|
(6,497
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
2,646
|
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
(838
|
)
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
Long-term debt net of
current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
(1,456
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
6,049
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
(2,294
|
)
|
|
|
7,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of
consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
(Accumulated deficit)/retained
earnings/owners net investment
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
3,352
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
(4,204
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders
equity
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
3,388
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
(4,203
|
)
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,614
|
|
|
$
|
9,437
|
|
|
$
|
2,269
|
|
|
$
|
(6,497
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Consolidating
Balance Sheet
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007 (Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
Accounts receivable net
of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(949
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
2,604
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
(952
|
)
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment net
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Intangible assets net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
Fair value of derivative
instruments net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(1,364
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,235
|
|
|
$
|
4,314
|
|
|
$
|
2,099
|
|
|
$
|
(2,678
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
(949
|
)
|
|
|
2,604
|
|
Long-term debt net of
current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
(1,364
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
4,549
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
(2,313
|
)
|
|
|
5,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of
consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
(Accumulated deficit)/retained
earnings/owners net investment
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders
equity
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,235
|
|
|
$
|
4,314
|
|
|
$
|
2,099
|
|
|
$
|
(2,678
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Consolidating
Statement of Cash Flows
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through June 30, 2007
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Changes to investment in and
advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash balances held in foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Consolidating
Statement of Cash Flows
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(181
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Changes to investment in and
advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash balances held in foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Consolidating
Statement of Cash Flows
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 (Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Changes to investment in and
advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net related parties
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common shareholders
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash balances held in foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following information should be read together with our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report
for a more complete understanding of our financial condition and
results of operations. The following discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and
beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those
discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that
could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are
not limited to, those discussed below, particularly in
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND
MARKET DATA.
GENERAL
Novelis is the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and
light gauge products for the construction and industrial,
beverage and food cans, foil products and transportation
markets. As of June 30, 2007, we had operations on four
continents: North America; South America; Asia and Europe,
through 33 operating plants and three research facilities in 11
countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our
South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina
refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation
facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in
Brazil. We are the only company of our size and scope focused
solely on aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local
supply of technologically sophisticated products in all of these
geographic regions.
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
Industries, Limited (Hindalco) through its indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary AV Metals Inc. (Acquisition Sub) pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (Arrangement) entered into on February 10,
2007 and approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on
May 14, 2007. As a result of the Arrangement, Acquisition
Sub acquired all of the Companys outstanding common shares
at a price of $44.93 per share, and all outstanding stock
options and other equity incentives were terminated in exchange
for cash payments. The aggregate purchase price for the
Companys common shares was $3.4 billion and
immediately following the Arrangement, the common shares of the
Company were transferred from Acquisition Sub to its
wholly-owned subsidiary AV Aluminum Inc. (AV Aluminum). Hindalco
also assumed $2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total
transaction value of $6.2 billion.
On June 22, 2007, we issued 2,044,122 additional common
shares to AV Aluminum for $44.93 per share resulting in an
additional equity contribution of approximately
$92 million. This contribution was equal in amount to
certain payments made by Novelis related to change in control
compensation to certain employees and directors, lender fees and
other transaction costs incurred by the Company. As this
transaction was approved by the Company and executed subsequent
to the Arrangement, the $92 million cash payment is not
included in the determination of total purchase price.
As discussed in Note 1 Business and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies in the accompanying condensed
and consolidated financial statements, the Arrangement was
recorded in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 103, Topic 5J, Push Down Basis of
Accounting Required in Certain Limited Circumstances
(SAB No. 103), which states that purchase
transactions that result in an entity becoming substantially
wholly-owned establish a new basis of accounting for the
purchased assets and liabilities. Accordingly, in the
accompanying June 30, 2007 condensed consolidated balance
sheet, the consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
connection with the acquisition have been pushed
down to us and have been allocated to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 141, Business
Combinations. Due to the impact of push down accounting, the
condensed consolidated financial statements and certain note
presentations separate the Companys presentations into two
distinct periods, the period up to, and including, the
acquisition date (labeled Predecessor) and the
period after that date (labeled Successor), to
indicate the application of different bases of accounting
between the periods presented. The accompanying condensed
consolidated
52
financial statements include a black line division which
indicates that the Predecessor and Successor reporting entities
shown are not comparable.
REFERENCES
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries as
both Predecessor and Successor unless the context specifically
indicates otherwise. References herein to Hindalco
refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. References herein to
Alcan refer to Alcan, Inc.
References to our
Form 10-K
made throughout this document shall refer to our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, as amended,
originally filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on March 1, 2007, as amended on
April 30, 2007.
CHANGE IN
FISCAL YEAR END
On June 26, 2007, our board of directors approved the
change of our fiscal year end to March 31 from December 31.
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period from April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007 is
our first quarter filing for our new fiscal year ending
March 31, 2008, and references to this quarter will be to
the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Comparisons will be made to
the three months ended June 30, 2006, which will be
referred to as the comparable prior year period, the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 or the three months ended June 30,
2006.
NOTE REGARDING
COMBINED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND SELECTED FINANCIAL AND
OPERATING INFORMATION DUE TO THE ACQUISITION
As discussed above, the Arrangement created a new basis of
accounting. Under generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States of America (GAAP), the condensed consolidated
financial statements for the three months ended June 30,
2007 are presented in two distinct periods, as Predecessor and
Successor entities are not comparable in all material respects.
However, in order to facilitate an understanding of our results
of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2007 in
comparison with the three months ended June 30, 2006, in
this section, our Predecessor results and our Successor results
are presented and discussed on a combined basis. The combined
results of operations are non-GAAP financial measures, do not
include any pro-forma assumptions or adjustments and should not
be used in isolation or substitution of the Predecessor and
Successor results.
Shown below are combining schedules of (1) shipments and
(2) our results of operations for periods allocable to the
Successor, Predecessor and the combined presentation for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 that we use throughout our
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
Combined Shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments (kt(A)):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
Ingot products(B)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds.
|
|
|
|
|
(B)
|
Ingot products shipments include primary ingot in Brazil,
foundry products sold in Korea and Europe, secondary ingot in
Europe and other miscellaneous recyclable aluminum sales.
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
Combined Results of Operations
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Gain on change in fair value of
derivative instruments net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Other expenses net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
2,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for taxes on
loss and minority interests share
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Provision for taxes on loss
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority
interests share
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HIGHLIGHTS
Significant highlights, events and factors impacting our
business during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006 are presented briefly below. Each is discussed in further
detail throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
54
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments and selected financial information are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,828
|
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(151
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Increase in total debt(A)
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
Excluding unamortized fair value adjustments of $66 million
as of June 30, 2007 recorded as part of the acquisition by
Hindalco.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products shipments increased in Europe driven by strong
demand across the product lines and in the can market in South
America. These gains were offset by lower shipments in North
America and Asia. North America experienced lower demand
from distributors due to the slowdown in the housing market. In
addition, North America can sheet shipments were negatively
impacted by a labor strike at one of our large customers during
the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Asia had lower shipments in
industrial and light gauge markets as a result of continued
price pressure from Chinese exports.
|
|
|
|
London Metal Exchange (LME) pricing for aluminum (metal) was an
average of 4.1% higher during the first quarter of fiscal 2008
than the comparable prior year period.
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 increased from
the comparable prior year period due primarily to increased
prices, lower exposure to metal price ceilings and a rise in LME
prices. The benefit of higher LME prices was limited by metal
price ceilings in sales contracts representing approximately 10%
of our total shipments in the fiscal 2008 quarter and 20% of our
total shipments in the comparable prior year period. During the
first quarter of fiscal 2008 and the comparable prior year
period, we were unable to pass through approximately
$80 million and $140 million, respectively, of metal
purchase costs associated with sales under these contracts for a
net favorable comparable impact of approximately
$60 million. The first quarter of fiscal 2008 was also
positively impacted by $44 million related to the accretion
of fair value reserves associated with these contracts as
discussed more fully below under Metal Price Ceilings.
|
|
|
|
Compared to the prior year quarter ending June 30, 2006,
net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 was negatively
impacted by the following items associated with or triggered by
the Arrangement: (1) $43 million (pre-tax) of
incremental stock compensation expense,
(2) $32 million (pre-tax) of sale transaction fees,
(3) $19 million (pre-tax) of incremental expenses
(described below) associated with push down accounting and the
preliminary fair value allocation of purchase price. Other items
negatively impacting the first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared
to the quarter ended June 30, 2006 include metal price lag
described below and $60 million of additional income tax
expense.
|
|
|
|
Our total debt increased $248 million (excluding
unamortized fair value adjustments of $66 million recorded
as part of the acquisition by Hindalco) during the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 as a result of our need to fund additional
working capital requirements and certain costs associated with
the Arrangement, including sale transaction fees and share-based
compensation.
|
|
|
|
As described more fully in Note 2 Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock in the accompanying condensed and
consolidated financial statements, the consideration paid by
Hindalco to acquire Novelis have been pushed down to us and
initially allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
on our preliminary estimates of fair value, using methodologies
and assumptions that we believe are reasonable. This preliminary
allocation of fair value results in additional charges or income
to the post-acquisition consolidated statement of operations. A
summary of the pre-tax impacts of these items on the first
quarter of fiscal 2008 is shown below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) to:
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income(A)
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Favorable/unfavorable contracts
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
In-process research and
development write-off
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of debt
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax impact
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
We use Segment Income to measure the profitability and financial
performance of our operating segments, as discussed below in
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
2007 (THREE MONTHS COMBINED NON-GAAP) COMPARED TO THE QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 30, 2006.
|
OUR
BUSINESS
Business
Model and Key Concepts
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of metal to our customers. Nearly all of our products have
a price structure with two components: (i) a pass-through
aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and
(ii) a margin over metal price based on the
conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the
competitive market conditions for that product.
METAL
PRICE CEILINGS
Sales contracts representing approximately 10% and 20% of our
total shipments for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and the
comparable prior year period, respectively, provide for a
ceiling over which metal purchase costs cannot contractually be
passed through to certain customers, unless adjusted. This
negatively impacts our margins when the price we pay for metal
is above the ceiling price contained in these contracts. During
the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and the comparable prior year
period, we were unable to pass through approximately
$80 million and $140 million, respectively, of metal
purchase costs associated with sales under these contracts. We
calculate and report this difference to be approximately the
difference between the quoted purchase price on the LME
(adjusted for any local premiums and for any price lag
associated with purchasing or processing time), and the metal
price ceiling in our contracts. Cash flows from operations are
negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted for any timing
difference between customer receipts and vendor payments.
In connection with the preliminary allocation of purchase price
(i.e., total consideration) paid by Hindalco, we established
reserves totaling $655 million as of May 15, 2007 to
record these contracts at fair value. Fair value effectively
represents the discounted cash flows of the forecasted metal
purchase costs in excess of the metal price ceilings contained
in these contracts. These reserves are being accreted into
revenue over the remaining lives of the underlying contracts,
and this accretion will not impact future cash flows. During the
period from May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007, we
recorded accretion of $44 million.
56
The contracts with metal price ceilings expire at varying times
and our estimated remaining exposure approximates 10% of
estimated shipments in the remaining three quarters of fiscal
2008. Based on a June 30, 2007 aluminum price of $2,686 per
tonne, and our best estimate of a range of shipment volumes, we
estimate that we will be unable to pass through aluminum
purchase costs of approximately $175
$185 million for the remainder of fiscal 2008 and
$395 $415 million in the aggregate thereafter.
Under these scenarios, and ignoring working capital timing, we
expect that cash flows from operations will be impacted
negatively by these same amounts, offset partially by reduced
income taxes.
METAL
PRICE LAG
On certain sales contracts we experience timing differences on
the pass through of changing aluminum prices based on the
difference in the price we pay for aluminum and the price we
ultimately charge our customers after the aluminum is processed.
Generally, and in the short-term, in periods of rising prices
our earnings benefit from this timing difference while the
opposite is true in periods of declining prices, and we refer to
this timing difference as metal price lag. Metal price lag
negatively impacted the first quarter of fiscal 2008 by
$4 million and benefited the comparable prior year period
by approximately $77 million, for a net unfavorable impact
of $81 million.
Generally, and in the short-term, metal price lag impacts cash
flows negatively in periods of rising metal prices due primarily
to inventory processing time, while the opposite is true in
periods of declining prices.
In Europe, certain of our sales contracts contain fixed metal
prices for periods of time such as four to thirty-six months. In
some cases, this can result in a negative (positive) impact on
sales as metal prices increase (decrease) because the prices are
fixed at historical levels. The positive or negative impact on
sales under these contracts has been included in the metal price
lag effect quantified above, without regard to fixed forward
instruments purchased to offset this risk as described below.
RISK
MITIGATION
We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal
prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to
metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our
internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and
mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from
our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans
(UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply have
historically provided a benefit as these sources of metal are
typically less expensive than purchasing aluminum from third
party suppliers. We refer to these two sources as our internal
hedges.
Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy
to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated
with the metal price ceilings is to purchase futures, call
options
and/or
synthetic call options on projected aluminum volume requirements
above our assumed internal hedge position. To hedge our exposure
in 2006, we previously purchased call options at various strike
prices. In September of 2006, we began purchasing both fixed
forward derivative instruments and put options, thereby creating
synthetic call options, to hedge our exposure to further metal
price increases. We have not entered into any synthetic call
options beyond December 31, 2007.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, we began
selling short-term LME forward contracts to reduce the cash flow
volatility of fluctuating metal prices associated with metal
price lag. In Europe, we enter into forward metal purchases
simultaneous with the contracts that contain fixed metal prices.
These forward metal purchases directly hedge the economic risk
of future metal price fluctuation associated with these
contracts. The positive or negative impact on sales under these
contracts has been included in the metal price lag effect
described above, without regard to the fixed forward instruments
purchased to offset this risk. The net sales and Segment Income
impacts are described more fully in the Operations and Segment
Review for our Europe operating segment.
For accounting purposes, we do not treat all derivative
instruments as hedges under Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. In those cases, changes
in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings, which
results in the recognition of
57
fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the contract
settlement, and we expect further earnings volatility as a
result. In the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations, changes in fair value of derivative instruments not
accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133 are
recognized in Gain on change in fair value of derivative
instruments net. These gains or losses may or may
not result from cash settlement. For Segment Income purposes we
only include the impact of the derivative gains or losses to the
extent they are settled in cash during that period.
INTERNAL
CONTROLS
We previously reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and continue to report
as of June 30, 2007, that we have a material weakness in
our internal control over financial reporting as we did not
maintain effective controls over accounting for income taxes.
See Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
SPIN-OFF
FROM ALCAN
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
rolled products businesses were managed under two separate
operating segments within Alcan Rolled Products
Americas and Asia; and Rolled Products Europe. On
January 6, 2005, Alcan and its subsidiaries contributed and
transferred to Novelis substantially all of the aluminum rolled
products businesses operated by Alcan, together with some of
Alcans alumina and primary metal-related businesses in
Brazil, which are fully integrated with the rolled products
operations there, as well as four rolling facilities in Europe
whose end-use markets and customers were similar to ours.
Post-Transaction
Adjustments
The agreements giving effect to the spin-off provide for various
post-transaction adjustments and the resolution of outstanding
matters. On November 8, 2006, we executed a settlement
agreement with Alcan resolving the working capital and cash
balance adjustments to the opening balance sheet and issues
relating to the transfer of U.S. pension assets and
liabilities from Alcan to Novelis. As of June 30, 2007
there remains an outstanding matter related to two pension plans
for those employees who elected to transfer their past service
to Novelis, one in Canada and one in the U.K. We expect this
transfer will take place by December 2007, and we expect that
the plan assets transferred will approximate the liabilities
assumed. To the extent that they are different, we will record a
purchase price adjustment.
Agreements
between Novelis and Alcan
At the spin-off, we entered into various agreements with Alcan
including the use of transitional and technical services, the
supply from Alcan of metal and alumina, the licensing of certain
of Alcans patents, trademarks and other intellectual
property rights, and the use of certain buildings, machinery and
equipment, technology and employees at certain facilities
retained by Alcan, but required in our business. The terms and
conditions of the agreements were determined primarily by Alcan
and may not reflect what two unaffiliated parties might have
agreed to. Had these agreements been negotiated with
unaffiliated third parties, their terms may have been more
favorable, or less favorable, to us. See Item 1. Business
in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 for additional
information.
58
OPERATIONS
AND SEGMENT REVIEW
The following tables present our shipments, our results of
operations, prices for aluminum, oil and natural gas and key
currency exchange rates for the three months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006, as well as the percentage changes from period to
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products, including tolling
(the conversion of customer-owned metal)
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Ingot products, including primary
and secondary ingot and recyclable aluminum
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(19.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,828
|
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
90.0
|
%
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
Gain on change in fair value of
derivatives net
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(17.1
|
)%
|
Equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(475.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,942
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision (benefit)
for taxes on loss and minority interests share
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1,040.0
|
%
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
loss
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(300.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority
interests share
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(1,640.0
|
)%
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(175.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(151
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
(2,616.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n.m. not meaningful
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
London Metal Exchange
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum (per metric tonne, and
presented in U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing cash price as of end of
quarter
|
|
$
|
2,686
|
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
Average cash price during the
quarter
|
|
$
|
2,761
|
|
|
$
|
2,652
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Strengthen/
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Weaken)
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New
York Exchange Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average of the month end rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
1.354
|
|
|
|
1.275
|
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)%
|
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.961
|
|
|
|
2.185
|
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)%
|
South Korean won per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.080
|
|
|
|
1.113
|
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Mercantile
Exchange Energy Price Quotations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light Sweet Crude
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average settlement price (per
barrel)
|
|
$
|
61.69
|
|
|
$
|
67.25
|
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)%
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Henry Hub contract
settlement price (per MMBTU) (A)
|
|
$
|
7.55
|
|
|
$
|
6.78
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
One MMBTU is the equivalent of one decatherm, or one million
British Thermal Units (BTUs).
|
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 (THREE MONTHS
COMBINED NON-GAAP) COMPARED TO THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
2006
Shipments
Rolled products shipments increased in Europe driven by strong
demand across the product lines and in the can market in South
America. These gains were offset by lower shipments in North
America and Asia. North America experienced lower demand from
distributors primarily due to the slowdown in the housing market
and in addition, can sheet shipments were negatively impacted by
a labor strike at one of our large customers during the first
quarter of fiscal 2008. Asia had lower shipments in industrial
and light gauge markets as a result of continued price pressure
from Chinese exports.
Net
sales
Higher net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 resulted
primarily from (1) the increase in LME metal pricing, which
was 4.1% higher on average during the first quarter of fiscal
2008 than the comparable prior year period, (2) lower
exposure to contracts with price ceilings (discussed below) in
North America and (3) increased prices in North America and
Europe, offset partially by lower volume in North America. Metal
represents approximately 60% 70% of the sales value
of our products.
60
Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 were adversely
impacted in North America due to price ceilings on certain can
contracts, which limited our ability to pass through
approximately $80 million of metal purchase costs. In
comparison, we were unable to pass through approximately
$140 million of metal purchase costs in the comparable
prior year period, for a net favorable impact of approximately
$60 million. North America net sales were further
positively impacted by $44 million related to the accretion
of the contract fair value reserves discussed more fully above
in Metal Price Ceilings.
Costs and
expenses
The following table presents our costs and expenses for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, in
U.S. dollars and expressed as percentages of net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
$ in Millions
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
$ in Millions
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization)
|
|
$
|
2,641
|
|
|
|
93.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
93.9
|
%
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Gain on change in fair value of
derivative instruments net
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
Equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,942
|
|
|
|
104.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
100.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold. Metal represents
approximately 70% 80% of our input costs, and the
increase in cost of goods sold in U.S. dollar terms is
primarily due to the impact of higher LME prices. Cost of goods
sold was adversely impacted in both periods due to price
ceilings on certain can contracts, as discussed above.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(SG&A). Compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2006, during the first quarter of fiscal 2008
SG&A increased primarily as a result of $43 million of
incremental stock compensation expense as a result of the
Arrangement, offset partially by reduced spending on third party
consultants at our corporate headquarters.
Depreciation and amortization. As a result of
the Arrangement, as of May 15, 2007, we recorded increases
in the basis to our property, plant and equipment and intangible
assets with finite lives. This results in higher
post-acquisition depreciation and amortization and explains the
increase shown above.
Research and development expenses. Research
and development expenses increased in the first quarter of
fiscal 2008 due to a one-time write-off of $9 million of
in-process research and development costs resulting from the
Arrangement.
Sale transaction fees. We incurred
$32 million of fees and expenses related to the Arrangement
during the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15,
2007.
Other (income) expenses
net. Exchange losses of $11 million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to exchange gains of
$4 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 account
for the majority of the change in Other (income)
expenses net.
61
Provision
(benefit) for taxes on loss
For the three months ended June 30, 2007, we recorded a
$40 million provision for taxes on our pre-tax loss of
$109 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests share,
which represented an effective tax rate of (37)%. Our effective
tax rate is less than the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate
due primarily to (1) $43 million for (a) pre-tax
foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect and
(b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency
gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, (2) a
$34 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
those losses, (3) a $15 million benefit from
expense/income items with no tax effect net,
(4) a $6 million expense from the remeasurement of
deferred income taxes and (5) a $4 million expense
from differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign
effective tax rates resulting from the application of an annual
effective tax rate to profit and loss entities in different
jurisdictions.
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded a
$20 million benefit for taxes on our pre-tax loss of
$14 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests share,
which represented an effective tax rate of 143%. Our effective
tax rate is greater than the Canadian statutory rate due
primarily to (1) $24 million for (a) pre-tax
foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect and
(b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency
gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, (2) a
$29 million benefit from differences between the Canadian
statutory and foreign effective tax rates resulting from the
application of an annual effective tax rate to profit and loss
entities in different jurisdictions and (3) an
$8 million benefit from expense/income items with no tax
effect net.
Net
loss
We reported a net loss of $151 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007 compared to net income of
$6 million for the prior year quarter ended June 30,
2006.
OPERATING
SEGMENT REVIEW FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 (THREE MONTHS
COMBINED NON-GAAP) COMPARED TO THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
2006
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America; Europe; Asia and South America.
As a result of the acquisition by Hindalco, and based on the way
our President and Chief Operating Officer (our chief operating
decision-maker) reviews the results of segment operations, we
changed our segment performance measure to Segment Income, as
defined below. As a result, certain prior period amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the new segment performance
measure.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments, based on Segment Income, in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information. Segment Income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment Income as earnings before (a) interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs net;
(b) unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of
derivative instruments net; (c) realized gains
(losses) on corporate derivative instruments net;
(d) depreciation and amortization; (e) impairment
charges on long-lived assets; (f) minority interests
share; (g) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share
of Segment Income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting;
(h) restructuring charges net; (i) gains
or losses on disposals of property, plant and equipment and
businesses net; (j) corporate selling, general
and administrative expenses; (k) other corporate
costs net; (l) sale transaction fees;
(m) litigation settlement net of
62
insurance recoveries; (m) provision or benefit for taxes on
income (loss) and (o) cumulative effect of accounting
change net of tax.
Net sales and expenses are measured in accordance with the
policies and procedures described in Note 1
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our
consolidated and combined financial statements included in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
We do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB
Statement No. 133. Accordingly, changes in fair value are
recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the
recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the
contract settlement. In the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations, change in fair value of derivative
instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement
No. 133 are recognized in net income (loss) in Gain on
change in fair value of derivative instruments
net. These gains or losses may or may not result from
cash settlement. For Segment Income purposes we only include the
impact of the derivative gains or losses to the extent they are
settled in cash (i.e., realized) during that period.
As discussed above, the Arrangement created a new basis of
accounting. Under GAAP, the condensed consolidated financial
statements for the three months ended June 30, 2007 are
presented in two distinct periods, as Predecessor and Successor
entities are not comparable in all material respects. However,
in order to facilitate an understanding of our results of
operations for the three months ended June 30, 2007 in
comparison with the three months ended June 30, 2006, in
this section, our Predecessor results and our Successor results
are presented and discussed on a combined basis. The combined
results of operations are non-GAAP financial measures and should
not be used in isolation or substitution of the Predecessor and
Successor results.
Net
sales
Shown below is the schedule of Net sales by operating segment
for periods allocable to the Successor, Predecessor and the
combined presentation for the three months ended June 30,
2007 that we use throughout our Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
Combined Net sales by Operating
Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
South America
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
Segment
Income
Shown below is the schedule of our reconciliation from Total
Segment Income to Net loss by operating segment for periods
allocable to the Successor, Predecessor and the combined
presentation for the three months ended June 30, 2007 that
we use throughout our Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
Combined Results by Operating
Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Europe
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
South America
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Segment Income
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on
change in fair value of derivative instruments net(A)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Realized gains (losses) on
corporate derivative instruments net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Adjustment to eliminate
proportional consolidation(B)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Restructuring charges
net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Other corporate costs
net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Provision for taxes on loss
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments net represents the portion of gains
(losses) that were not settled in cash during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
(B)
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Total Segment Income to Net loss, the proportional
Segment Income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed
from Total Segment Income, net of our share of their net
after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net (income)
loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed
consolidated statements of operations. See
Note 7 Investment in and Advances to
Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions for
further information about these non-consolidated affiliates.
|
64
Reconciliation
The following table presents Segment Income (Loss) by operating
segment and reconciles Total Segment Income to Net income (loss)
for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Segment Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
South America
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Segment Income
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on
change in fair value of derivative instruments net
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Realized gains (losses) on
corporate derivative instruments net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate
proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Restructuring charges
net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Other corporate costs
net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit (provision) for taxes on
income (loss)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(151
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
SEGMENT RESULTS
North
America
As of June 30, 2007, North America manufactured aluminum
sheet and light gauge products through 10 aluminum rolled
products facilities and two dedicated recycling facilities.
Important end-use applications include beverage cans, containers
and packaging, automotive and other transportation applications,
building products and other industrial applications.
65
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for North America for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(36.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
$
|
992
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
Segment Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
(104.3
|
)%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
179.8
|
%
|
Shipments
Rolled products shipments declined by approximately 8kt due to
lower can volume and 12kt due to reduced distributor demand.
Distributors are reducing purchases primarily due to a slowdown
in the housing market. In addition, North America can sheet
shipments were negatively impacted by a labor strike at one of
our large customers during the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Ingot product shipments declined during the first quarter of
fiscal 2008 due to lower scrap sales and improved internal use
of primary ingot, excess amounts of which were sold to third
parties in 2006.
Net
sales
Net sales increased primarily as a result of (1) reduced
exposure to contracts with price ceilings, (2) higher metal
prices, which were 4.1% higher on average in the first quarter
of fiscal 2008 compared to the comparable prior year period and
(3) higher selling prices. These factors contributed
approximately (1) $104 million (including
$44 million due to the accretion of fair value reserves),
(2) $32 million and (3) $11 million,
respectively, to net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2008
when compared to the comparable prior year period. These
positive impacts were partially offset by lower shipments
resulting in a $115 million reduction in net sales
comparatively.
Increases in metal prices are largely passed through to
customers, however, the pass through of metal price increases to
our customers was limited in cases where metal price ceilings
were exceeded. This factor unfavorably impacted North America
net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 by approximately
$80 million. During the comparable prior year period, we
were unable to pass through approximately $140 million of
metal purchase costs, for a net favorable comparable impact of
approximately $60 million. The first quarter of fiscal 2008
was also positively impacted by $44 million related to the
accretion of the contract fair value reserves discussed more
fully under Metal Price Ceilings.
Segment
Income
As compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006,
Segment Income for the quarter was favorably impacted by
$104 million as a result of the impact of the price
ceilings, net of the accretion of the contract fair value
reserves, described above. Segment Income was also positively
impacted by approximately $11 million due to higher selling
prices. These positive factors were more than offset by
(1) the negative impact of metal price lag which
unfavorably impacted Segment Income by $51 million as
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006,
(2) lower realized gains related to the cash settlement of
derivatives of approximately $43 million, (3) lower
volume which negatively impacted Segment Income by approximately
$18 million, (4) incremental stock compensation
expense of $10 million as a result of the Arrangement and
(5) $16 million of additional expenses associated with
fair value adjustments recorded as a result of the Arrangement.
66
Total
Assets
The consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
connection with the Arrangement have been pushed down to us and,
in turn, to each of our reporting units, and have been allocated
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
relative fair values. This increased North America assets by
approximately $3.0 billion as fair value exceeded
historical cost. See Note 2 Acquisition of
Novelis Common Stock in the accompanying condensed and
consolidated financial statements.
Europe
As of June 30, 2007, our European segment provided European
markets with value-added sheet and light gauge products through
its 13 aluminum rolled products facilities and one dedicated
recycling facility. Europe serves a broad range of aluminum
rolled product end-use markets in various applications including
can, automotive, lithographic and painted products.
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for Europe for the three months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,103
|
|
|
$
|
922
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
Segment Income
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,696
|
|
|
$
|
2,501
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
%
|
Shipments
Rolled products shipments increased due to broad increases in
demand for can, foil and automotive products, partially offset
by reductions in sales into the plain market due to product line
optimization.
Net
sales
Net sales increased primarily as a result of incremental volume,
the 4.1% increase in average LME metal prices and currency
benefits. These factors contributed approximately
$76 million, $68 million and $27 million,
respectively, to net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2008
when compared to the comparable prior year period.
Segment
Income
Segment Income was favorably impacted in fiscal 2008 primarily
by increased volume, prices and currency benefits as the euro
strengthened against the U.S. dollar and operational
improvements. These factors improved Segment Income in the first
quarter of fiscal 2008 approximately $11 million,
$11 million, $5 million and $6 million,
respectively, versus the comparable prior year period. These
positive factors were more than offset by unfavorable metal
price lag, lower realized gains on derivative instruments,
higher stock compensation and expenses associated with fair
value adjustments recorded as a result of the Arrangement. These
factors reduced Segment Income in the first quarter of fiscal
2008 approximately $15 million, $11 million,
$6 million, and $6 million respectively, as compared
to the comparable prior year period.
67
Total
assets
The consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
connection with the Arrangement have been pushed down to us and,
in turn, to each of our reporting units, and have been allocated
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
relative fair values. This increased Europe assets by
approximately $1.0 billion as fair value exceeded
historical cost. See Note 2 Acquisition of
Novelis Common Stock in the accompanying condensed and
consolidated financial statements.
Asia
As of June 30, 2007, Asia operated three manufacturing
facilities, with production balanced between foil, construction
and industrial, and beverage and food can end-use applications.
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for Asia for the three months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Segment Income
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
(84.6
|
)%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,323
|
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
Shipments
Rolled products shipments declined primarily due to lower sales
in the industrial and light gauge markets as a result of
continued price pressure from Chinese exports, driven by the
difference in aluminum metal prices on the Shanghai Foreign
Exchange and the LME.
Net
sales
Net sales increased primarily as a result of the 4.1% increase
in average LME metal prices, which was largely passed through to
customers, offset partially by lower shipments.
Segment
Income
Segment Income declined by approximately $9 million due to
unfavorable metal price lag, $9 million due to expenses
associated with fair value adjustments recorded as a result of
the Arrangement and $4 million due to higher costs and
unfavorable exchange rate changes. Lower volume and unfavorable
mix impacts were offset by higher realized gains on derivatives.
Total
assets
The consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
connection with the Arrangement have been pushed down to us and,
in turn, to each of our reporting units, and have been allocated
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
relative fair values. This increased Asia assets by
approximately $298 million as fair value exceeded
historical cost. See Note 2 Acquisition of
Novelis Common Stock in the accompanying condensed and
consolidated financial statements.
68
South
America
As of June 30, 2007, South America operated two rolling
plants in Brazil along with two smelters, an alumina refinery,
bauxite mines and power generation facilities. South America
manufactures various aluminum rolled products, including can
stock, automotive and industrial sheet and light gauge for the
beverage and food can, construction and industrial and
transportation end-use markets.
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for South America for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
Segment Income
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
(11.4
|
)%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,321
|
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
|
|
64.5
|
%
|
Shipments
Rolled products shipments increased during the first quarter of
fiscal 2008 over the comparable prior year period primarily due
to an increase in can shipments driven by strong market demand.
This was slightly offset by reductions in shipments in the
industrial products markets.
Net
sales
Net sales increased primarily as a result of higher shipments
and higher LME prices, offset partially by an increase in tolled
metal.
Segment
Income
Segment Income favorably impacted the first quarter of fiscal
2008 primarily by increased shipments described above and higher
selling prices. These factors improved Segment Income in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008 by approximately $8 million
and $11 million, respectively, as compared to the prior
year period. These positive factors were offset by metal price
lag which was less favorable than the prior year period by
approximately $6 million, the strengthening of the
Brazilian real which reduced Segment Income by $7 million,
$7 million of incremental expenses associated with fair
value adjustments recorded as a result of the Arrangement and
other cost increases of $4 million.
Total
assets
The consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
connection with the Arrangement have been pushed down to us and,
in turn, to each of our reporting units, and have been allocated
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
relative fair values. This increased South America assets by
approximately $471 million as fair value exceeded
historical cost. See Note 2 Acquisition of
Novelis Common Stock in the accompanying condensed and
consolidated financial statements.
69
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Shown below is a condensed combining schedule of cash flows for
periods allocable to the Successor, Predecessor and the combined
presentation for the three months ended June 30, 2007 that
we use throughout our discussion of Liquidity and Capital
Resources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
$
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Changes to investment in and
advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
net
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Dividends minority
interests
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash balances held in foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
Free cash flow (which is a non-GAAP measure) consists of
(a) Net cash provided by operating activities;
(b) less dividends and capital expenditures; (c) less
premiums paid to purchase derivative instruments; (d) plus
net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments.
Dividends include those paid by our less than wholly-owned
subsidiaries to their minority shareholders and dividends paid
by us to our common shareholders. Management believes that Free
cash flow is relevant to investors as it provides a measure of
the cash generated internally that is available for debt service
and other value creation opportunities. However, Free cash flow
does not necessarily represent cash available for discretionary
activities, as certain debt service obligations must be funded
out of Free cash flow. We believe the line on our condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows entitled Net cash
used in operating activities is the most directly
comparable measure to Free cash flow. Our method of calculating
Free cash flow may not be consistent with that of other
companies.
70
In our discussion of Metal Price Ceilings, we have disclosed
that certain customer contracts contain a fixed aluminum (metal)
price ceiling beyond which the cost of aluminum cannot be passed
through to the customer. During the first quarter of fiscal 2008
and the comparable prior year period, we were unable to pass
through approximately $80 million and $140 million,
respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales
under theses contracts. Net cash provided by operating
activities is negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted
for any timing difference between customer receipts and vendor
payments. Based on a June 30, 2007 aluminum price of $2,686
per tonne, and our estimate of a range of shipment volumes, we
estimate that we will be unable to pass through aluminum
purchase costs of approximately $175
$185 million for the remainder of fiscal 2008 and
$395 $415 million in the aggregate thereafter.
Under these scenarios, and ignoring working capital timing, we
expect that cash flows from operations will be impacted
negatively by these same amounts, offset partially by reduced
income taxes. As a result of our acquisition by Hindalco, we
established reserves totaling $655 million as of
May 15, 2007 representing the fair value of these
contracts, and these reserves will be accreted into revenue over
the remaining lives of the contracts in a manner consistent with
the forecast used to determine the fair value of the reserves.
This accretion does not impact cash flow.
The following tables show the reconciliation from Net cash used
in operating activities to Free cash flow for the first fiscal
quarter of 2008 and the comparable prior year period and the
ending balances of cash and cash equivalents as of June 30,
2007 and March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
$
|
(274
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(238
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
(274
|
)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, net cash used in operating
activities was influenced primarily by higher metal prices,
which contributed to our net loss of $151 million, as a
result of being unable to pass through approximately
$80 million of metal purchase costs due to the price
ceilings previously discussed. Further, higher metal prices
resulted in an increase in working capital of approximately
$80 million due to inventory processing time and the time
delay between vendor payments and customer receipts. Other items
that negatively impacted operating cash flow for the first
quarter of fiscal 2008 include $72 million paid in
share-based compensation payments, $42 million paid for
sale transaction fees and bonus payments totaling
$25 million for the calendar year ended December 31,
2006 and the period from January 1, 2007 through
May 15, 2007, triggered by the Arrangement.
Financing
Activities
Overview
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, our total debt
increased by $248 million (excluding unamortized fair value
adjustments of $66 million recorded as part of the
Arrangement), principally as a result of our need to fund
additional working capital requirements and certain costs
associated with the Arrangement, including sale transaction fees
and share-based compensation payments. During the first quarter
of fiscal 2008, we also received $92 million in cash from
the sale of additional common stock to Hindalco.
71
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we entered into
senior secured credit facilities (Credit Facilities) providing
for aggregate borrowings of up to $1.8 billion. The Credit
Facilities consisted of (1) a $1.3 billion seven-year
senior secured Term Loan B facility, bearing interest at London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.75% (which was subject to
change based on certain leverage ratios), all of which was
borrowed on January 10, 2005 and (2) a
$500 million five-year multi-currency revolving credit and
letters of credit facility.
The Credit Facilities included customary affirmative and
negative covenants, as well as financial covenants relating to
our maximum total leverage ratio, minimum interest coverage
ratio, and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Substantially
all of our assets were pledged as collateral under the Credit
Facilities.
The terms of our Credit Facilities required that we deliver
unaudited quarterly and audited annual financial statements to
our lenders within specified periods of time. Due to delays in
certain of our SEC filings for 2005 and 2006, we obtained a
series of five waiver and consent agreements from the lenders
under the facility to extend the various filing deadlines. Fees
paid related to the five waiver and consent agreements totaled
$6 million.
On October 16, 2006, we amended the financial covenants to
our Credit Facilities. In particular, we amended our maximum
total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and minimum fixed
charge coverage ratios through the quarter ending March 31,
2008. The amended maximum total leverage, minimum interest
coverage and minimum fixed charge coverage ratios for the period
ended June 30, 2007 were 8.25 to 1; 1.40 to 1; and 0.70 to
1, respectively. For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we
were not in compliance with these covenants. However, due to the
refinancing of the Credit Facilities on July 6, 2007
(discussed below), we continue to classify the debt outstanding
under the Term Loan as long-term on our condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of June 30, 2007.
We also amended and modified other provisions of the Credit
Facilities to permit more efficient ordinary-course operations,
including increasing the amounts of certain permitted
investments and receivables securitizations, permitting nominal
quarterly dividends, and the transfer of an intercompany loan to
another subsidiary. In return for these amendments and
modifications, we paid aggregate fees of approximately
$3 million to lenders who consented to the amendments and
modifications, and agreed to continue paying higher applicable
margins on our Credit Facilities, and higher unused commitment
fees on our existing revolving credit facilities that were
instated with a prior waiver and consent agreement in May 2006.
Commitment fees related to the unused portion of the
$500 million revolving credit facility were 0.625% per
annum.
On April 27, 2007, our lenders consented to a further
amendment of our Credit Facilities. The amendment included
permission to increase the Term Loan B facility by
$150 million. We utilized the additional funds available
under the Term Loan B facility to reduce the outstanding balance
of our $500 million revolving credit facility. The
additional borrowing capacity under the revolving credit
facility was used to fund working capital requirements and
certain costs associated with the Arrangement, including the
cash settlement of share-based compensation arrangements and
lender fees. Additionally, the amendment included a limited
waiver of the change of control Event of Default (as defined in
the senior secured credit facilities) which effectively extended
the requirement to repay the Credit Facilities to July 11,
2007. We paid fees of approximately $2 million to lenders
who consented to this amendment.
Since our inception and through June 30, 2007, we satisfied
the 1% per annum principal amortization requirement through
fiscal year 2010, as well as $560 million of the principal
amortization requirement for 2011. As of June 30, 2007, we
had $812 million outstanding under the Term Loan B
facility. This balance was paid in full on July 6, 2007
with the refinancing of the Credit Facilities, as described
below.
Total debt issuance costs of $43 million, including
amendment fees and the waiver and consent agreements discussed
above, had been recorded in Other long-term assets
third parties and were being amortized over the life of the
related borrowing in Interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs net using the effective
interest amortization method for the Term Loans and the
straight-line method for the
72
revolving credit and letters of credit facility. The unamortized
amount of these costs was $26 million as of March 31,
2007. We incurred an additional $2 million in debt issuance
costs as described above during the period from April 1,
2007 through May 15, 2007. As a result of the Arrangement
and the recording of debt at fair value, the total amount of
unamortized debt issuance costs of $28 million was reduced
to zero as of May 15, 2007.
New
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
On May 25, 2007, we entered into a Bank and Bridge
Facilities Commitment with affiliates of UBS and ABN AMRO, to
provide backstop assurance for the refinancing of our existing
indebtedness following the Arrangement. The commitments from UBS
and ABN AMRO, provided by the banks on a 50%-50% basis,
consisted of a senior secured term loan of up to
$1.06 billion; a senior secured asset-based revolving
credit facility of up to $900 million; and a commitment to
issue up to $1.2 billion of unsecured senior notes, if
necessary. The commitment contains terms and conditions
customary for facilities of this nature.
In connection with these backstop commitments, we paid fees
totaling $13 million which are included in Other long-term
assets third parties as of June 30, 2007. Of
this amount, $5 million is related to the unsecured senior
notes, which were not refinanced, and will be written off during
the quarter ending September 30, 2007. The remaining
$8 million in fees paid has been credited by the lenders
towards fees associated with the new senior secured credit
facilities (described below) and will be amortized over the
lives of the related borrowings.
On July 6, 2007, we entered into new senior secured credit
facilities with a syndicate of lenders led by affiliates of UBS
and ABN AMRO (New Credit Facilities) providing for aggregate
borrowings of up to $1.76 billion. The New Credit
Facilities consist of (1) a $960 million seven-year
Term Loan facility (Term Loan facility) and (2) an
$800 million five-year multi-currency asset-based revolving
credit line and letter of credit facility (ABL facility).
Under the Term Loan facility, loans characterized as alternate
base rate (ABR) borrowings bear interest annually at a rate
equal to the alternate base rate (which is the greater of
(a) the base rate in effect on a given day and (b) the
federal funds effective rate in effect on a given day, plus
0.50%) plus the applicable margin and loans characterized as
Eurocurrency borrowings bear interest at an annual rate equal to
the adjusted LIBOR rate for the interest period in effect, plus
the applicable margin.
Under the ABL facility, interest charged is dependent on the
type of loan: (1) any swingline loan or any loan
categorized as an ABR borrowing will bear interest at an annual
rate equal to the alternate base rate (which is the greater of
(a) the base rate in effect on a given day and (b) the
federal funds effective rate in effect on a given day, plus
0.50%) plus the applicable margin; (2) Eurocurrency loans
will bear interest at an annual rate equal to the adjusted LIBOR
rate for the applicable interest period, plus the applicable
margin; (3) loans designated as Canadian base rate
borrowings will bear an annual interest rate equal to the
Canadian base rate (CAPRIME) plus the applicable margin;
(4) loans designated as bankers acceptances (BA) rate
loans will bear interest at the average discount rate offered
for bankers acceptances for the applicable BA interest
period plus the applicable margin and (5) loans designated
as Euro Inter-Bank Offered Rate (EURIBOR) loans will bear
interest annually at a rate equal to the adjusted EURIBOR rate
for the applicable interest period, plus the applicable margin.
Applicable margins under the ABL facility depend upon excess
availability levels calculated on a quarterly basis. Interest
rates generally reset every three months and interest is payable
on a quarterly basis.
The proceeds from the Term Loan facility of $960 million,
drawn in full at the time of closing, and the initial draw of
$324 million under the ABL facility were used to pay off
the Credit Facilities, pay for debt issuance costs of the New
Credit Facilities and provide for additional working capital.
Mandatory minimum principal amortization payments under the Term
Loan facility are $2.4 million per calendar quarter
beginning September 30, 2007. Additional mandatory
prepayments are required to be made for certain collateral
liquidations, asset sales, debt and preferred stock issuances,
equity issuances, casualty
73
events and excess cash flow (as defined in the New Credit
Facilities). Any unpaid principal remaining is due in full on
July 6, 2014.
Borrowings under the ABL facility are generally based on 85% of
eligible accounts receivable and 75% to 85% of eligible
inventories. Commitment fees of 0.25% to 0.375% are based on
average daily amounts outstanding under the ABL facility during
a fiscal quarter and are payable quarterly.
The New Credit Facilities include customary affirmative and
negative covenants. Under the ABL facility, if our excess
availability, as defined under the borrowing, is less than 10%
of the borrowing base, we are required to maintain a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. Substantially all of our
assets are pledged as collateral under the New Credit Facilities.
We incurred debt issuance costs on our New Credit Facilities
totaling $28 million, including the $8 million in fees
previously paid in conjunction with the backstop commitment.
These fees are included in Other long-term assets
third parties and will be amortized over the life of the related
borrowing in Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
costs net using the effective interest
amortization method for the Term Loan facility and the
straight-line method for the ABL facility.
7.25% Senior Notes
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities (Senior
Notes). The Senior Notes were priced at par, bear interest at
7.25% and mature on February 15, 2015. Debt issuance costs
totaling $28 million had been included in Other long-term
assets third parties and were being amortized over
the life of the related borrowing in Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs net using the
effective interest amortization method. The
unamortized amount of these costs was $24 million as of
March 31, 2007. As a result of the Arrangement and the
recording of debt at fair value, the total amount of unamortized
debt issuance costs of $23 million was reduced to zero as
of May 15, 2007.
As a result of the Arrangement, the Senior Notes were recorded
at their fair value of $1.474 billion based on their market
price of 105.25% of $1,000 face value per bond as of
May 14, 2007. The incremental fair value of
$74 million is being amortized to interest income over the
remaining life of the related borrowing in Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs net using the
effective interest amortization method. This
amortization does not affect our consolidated cash flows. Due to
the change in the market price of our Senior Notes from 105.25%
as of May 14, 2007 to 102.75% as of June 30, 2007, the
estimated fair value of this debt has decreased $35 million
to $1.439 billion.
Under the indenture that governs the Senior Notes, we are
subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to incurring
additional debt and providing additional guarantees, paying
dividends beyond certain amounts and making other restricted
payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain consolidations
or mergers, and certain transactions with affiliates. We were in
compliance with these covenants for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007.
The indenture governing the Senior Notes and the related
registration rights agreement required us to file a registration
statement for the notes and exchange the original, privately
placed notes for registered notes. Under the indenture and the
related registration rights agreement, we were required to
complete the exchange offer for the Senior Notes by
November 11, 2005. We did not complete the exchange offer
by that date and, as a result, we began to incur additional
special interest at rates ranging from 0.25% to 1.00%. We filed
a post-effective amendment to the registration statement on
December 1, 2006 which was declared effective by the SEC on
December 22, 2006. We ceased paying additional special
interest effective January 5, 2007, upon completion of the
exchange offer.
Tender
Offer and Consent Solicitation for 7.25% Senior
Notes
Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing our Senior
Notes, we were obligated, within 30 days of closing of the
Arrangement, to make an offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a
price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and
unpaid interest to the date the Senior Notes were purchased.
Consequently,
74
we commenced a tender offer on May 16, 2007, to repurchase
all of the outstanding Senior Notes at the prescribed price.
This offer expired on July 3, 2007 with holders of
approximately $1 million of principal presenting their
Senior Notes pursuant to the tender offer.
Interest
Rate Swaps
In addition to interest rate swaps on certain Korean bank loans
noted above, as of June 30, 2007, we have one outstanding
interest rate swap to fix the
3-month
LIBOR interest rate at an effective weighted average interest
rate of 3.9% on $100 million of the floating rate Term Loan
B debt expiring on February 3, 2008. We are still obligated
to pay any applicable margin, as defined in our senior secured
credit facilities, as amended, in addition to these interest
rates. This interest swap was terminated on July 3, 2007
resulting in a gain of less than $1 million. As of
June 30, 2007, 61% of our debt was fixed rate and 39% was
variable rate.
Issuance
of Additional Common Stock
On June 22, 2007, we issued 2,044,122 additional shares to
AV Aluminum for $44.93 per share resulting in an additional
equity contribution of $92 million. This contribution was
equal in amount to certain payments made by Novelis related to
change in control compensation to certain employees and
directors, lender fees and other transaction costs incurred by
the Company.
Investing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by investing activities for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Changes to investment in and
advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the settlement of derivative instruments
explain the majority of the difference in quarter over prior
year quarter net cash provided by investing activities.
The majority of our capital expenditures for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 and the three months ended June 30, 2006
were for projects devoted to product quality, technology,
productivity enhancement and increased capacity.
We estimate that our annual capital expenditure requirements for
items necessary to maintain comparable production, quality and
market position levels (maintenance capital) will be
approximately $120 million, and that total annual capital
expenditures will be approximately $200 million in fiscal
2008.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In accordance with SEC rules, the following qualify as
off-balance sheet arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain guarantees or contracts;
|
|
|
|
a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an
unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement
that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that
entity for such assets;
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain derivative instruments; and
|
|
|
|
any obligation under a material variable interest held by the
registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing,
liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant,
or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development
services with the registrant.
|
The following discussion addresses each of the above items for
our company.
Derivative
Instruments
As of June 30, 2007, we have derivative financial
instruments, as defined by FASB Statement No. 133. See
Note 14 Financial Instruments and Commodity
Contracts to our condensed consolidated financial statements
included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments, including forward contracts, to
manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates,
interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such
instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may
be exposed to losses in the future if the counterparties to the
contracts fail to perform. We are satisfied that the risk of
such non-performance is remote, due to our monitoring of credit
exposures. Alcan is the principal counter-party to our aluminum
forward contracts.
Certain contracts are designated as hedges of either net
investment or cash flows. For these contracts we recognize the
change in fair value of the ineffective portion of the hedge as
a gain or loss in our current period results of operations. We
include the change in fair value of the effective and interest
portions of these hedges in Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) within Shareholders equity in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Prior to
Completion of the Arrangement
During the three months ended June 30, 2006 and the period
from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, we applied
hedge accounting to certain of our cross-currency interest swaps
with respect to intercompany loans to several European
subsidiaries and forward exchange contracts. Our Euro and
British pound (GBP) cross-currency interest swaps were
designated as net investment hedges, while our Swiss franc (CHF)
cross-currency interest rate swaps and our Brazilian real (BRL)
forward foreign exchange contracts were designated as cash flow
hedges. As of May 15, 2007, we had $712 million of
cross-currency swaps (Euro 475 million, GBP 62 million
and CHF 35 million) and $99 million of forward foreign
exchange contracts (BRL 229 million). During the period
from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, we
implemented cash flow hedge accounting for an electricity swap,
which was embedded in a supply contract.
During the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15,
2007, the change in fair value of the effective and interest
portions of our net investment hedges was a loss of
$8 million and the change in fair value of the effective
portion of our cash flow hedges was a gain of $7 million.
Impact of
the Arrangement and Purchase Accounting
Concurrent with completion of the Arrangement on May 15,
2007, we dedesignated all hedging relationships. The cumulative
change in fair value of effective and interest portions of these
hedges, previously presented in Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) within Shareholders equity on May 15,
2007, was incorporated in the new basis of accounting. As a
result of purchase accounting, the fair value of all embedded
derivative instruments was allocated to the fair value of their
respective host contracts, reducing the fair value of embedded
derivative instruments to zero.
Subsequent
to Completion of the Arrangement
With exception of the electricity swap, noted above, which was
redesignated as a cash flow hedge on June 1, 2007, hedge
accounting was not applied to any of our financial instruments
or commodity contracts
76
after May 15, 2007 and subsequent changes in the fair value
have been recognized in Gain on change in fair value of
derivative instruments net in our condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
The period from May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007
includes a gain of $2 million before tax for the change in
fair value of the effective portion of our remaining cash flow
hedge. As of June 30, 2007, the amount of effective net
gains to be realized during the next twelve months is not
significant. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through November 2016.
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of June 30, 2007 were as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Fair
|
|
|
|
Maturity Dates
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
2007 through 2011
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
2007 through 2008
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Cross-currency swaps
|
|
2007 through 2015
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
2007 through 2009
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
2016
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Embedded derivative instruments
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent portion
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness as of June 30, 2007 (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
Potential Future
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Payment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Wholly-owned Subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Majority-owned Subsidiaries
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2007, we terminated a loan and a corresponding
deposit-and-guarantee
agreement for $80 million. We did not include the loan or
deposit amounts in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as
of March 31, 2007 as the agreement included a legal right
of setoff and we had the intent and ability to setoff.
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
Other
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in
transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities
(SPEs), which would have been established for the purpose of
facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of June 30,
2007 and March 31, 2007, we are not involved in any
unconsolidated SPE transactions.
77
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
We have future obligations under various contracts relating to
debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases,
long-term purchase obligations, and postretirement benefit
plans. During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, there were
no significant changes to these obligations as reported in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, other than those
described below.
Our total debt increased by $248 million (excluding
unamortized fair value adjustments of $66 million recorded
as part of the acquisition by Hindalco), principally as a result
of our need to fund additional working capital requirements and
certain costs associated with the Arrangement, including Sale
transaction fees and share-based compensation payments.
As a result of the amendment to our Credit Facilities in April
2007, we obtained a limited waiver of the change of control
Event of Default (as defined in the senior secured credit
facilities) which effectively extended the requirement to repay
the Credit Facilities to July 11, 2007. As a result of the
Arrangement, we paid off and terminated the Credit Facilities on
July 6, 2007 through refinancing with the New Credit
Facilities.
DIVIDENDS
No dividends have been declared on our common stock during
fiscal 2008. Future dividends are at the discretion of the board
of directors and will depend on, among other things, our
financial resources, cash flows generated by our business, our
cash requirements, restrictions under the instruments governing
our indebtedness, being in compliance with the appropriate
indentures and covenants under the instruments that govern our
indebtedness that would allow us to legally pay dividends and
other relevant factors.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, there were no
significant changes to our critical accounting policies and
estimates as reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In April 2007, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) No.
FIN. 39-1,
Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39, (FSP
FIN 39-1).
FSP
FIN 39-1
amends FASB Statement No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related
to Certain Contracts, by permitting entities that enter into
master netting arrangements as part of their derivative
transactions to offset in their financial statements net
derivative positions against the fair value of amounts (or
amounts that approximate fair value) recognized for the right to
reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash
collateral under those arrangements. FSP
FIN 39-1
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, with early adoption permitted. We have not yet commenced
evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP
FIN 39-1
on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities, which provides companies with an option to
report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value.
The new statement establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between
companies that choose different measurement attributes for
similar types of assets and liabilities and requires companies
to provide additional information that will help investors and
other users of financial statements to more easily understand
the effect of a companys choice to use fair value on its
earnings. The new statement also requires entities to display
the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the
company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance
sheet. FASB Statement No. 159 does not eliminate disclosure
requirements included in other accounting standards, including
requirements for disclosures about fair value measurements
included in FASB Statements No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, and No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments. FASB Statement No. 159 is
effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal
year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is
permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year
provided that the entity makes that choice in the first
120 days
78
of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of
FASB Statement No. 157. We have not yet commenced
evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB
Statement No. 159 on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB
Statement No. 157 applies to other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for
interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently
evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB
Statement No. 157 on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
pronouncements will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows, or do not apply to our operations.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET
DATA
This document contains forward-looking statements that are based
on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections
about the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and
assumptions made by our management. Such statements include, in
particular, statements about our plans, strategies and
prospects. Words such as expect,
anticipate, intend, plan,
believe, seek, estimate and
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to
identify such forward-looking statements. Examples of
forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
include, but are not limited to, our expectations with respect
to the impact of metal price movements on our financial
performance, our metal price ceiling exposure and the
effectiveness of our hedging programs and controls. These
statements are based on beliefs and assumptions of Novelis
management, which in turn are based on currently available
information. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve assumptions and risks and uncertainties
that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or
forecasted in such forward-looking statements. We do not intend,
and we disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
This document also contains information concerning our markets
and products generally, which is forward-looking in nature and
is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which
these markets and product categories will develop. These
assumptions have been derived from information currently
available to us and to the third party industry analysts quoted
herein. This information includes, but is not limited to,
product shipments and share of production. Actual market results
may differ from those predicted. While we do not know what
impact any of these differences may have on our business, our
results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and the
market price of our securities may be materially adversely
affected. Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to
differ from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking
statements include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash;
|
|
|
|
changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums
associated with such prices) or other materials and raw
materials we use;
|
|
|
|
the effect of metal price ceilings in certain of our sales
contracts;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our metal hedging activities, including our
internal used beverage can (UBC) and smelter hedges;
|
|
|
|
relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of,
our customers, suppliers and our ultimate parent, Hindalco;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the
areas in which we maintain production facilities;
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to access financing for future capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
continuing obligations and other relationships resulting from
our spin-off from Alcan;
|
|
|
|
changes in the relative values of various currencies;
|
|
|
|
factors affecting our operations, such as litigation,
environmental remediation and
clean-up
costs, labor relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment
and other events;
|
|
|
|
economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries
in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in
duties or tariffs;
|
|
|
|
competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as
well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic
and composite materials;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to improve and maintain effective internal control
over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures
in the future;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our
products as well as seasonality in certain of our
customers industries;
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting
taxes, environmental, health or safety compliance; and
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the
amounts we pay under our principal credit agreement and other
financing agreements.
|
The above list of factors is not exhaustive. Some of these and
other factors are discussed in more detail under
Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 as amended and filed
with the SEC and are specifically incorporated by reference into
this filing.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing
business operations, including risks from changes in commodity
prices (aluminum, electricity and natural gas), foreign currency
exchange rates and interest rates that could impact our results
of operations and financial condition.
We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities and derivative
financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments
as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes.
Except where noted, the derivative contracts are
marked-to-market and the related gains and losses are included
in earnings in the current accounting period.
By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve
risk, including the credit risk of non-performance by
counterparties. All derivative contracts are executed with
counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our
maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in our
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2007.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions and the
relative costs of the instruments. The duration is always linked
to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection
between the two being regularly monitored.
Commodity
Price Risks
We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of
certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity and
natural gas.
80
Aluminum
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass
through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market
premiums and (ii) a margin over metal price
based on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and
the competitive market conditions for that product.
In situations where we offer customers fixed prices for future
delivery of our products, we may enter into derivative
instruments for the metal inputs in order to protect the profit
on the conversion of the product. Consequently, the gain or loss
resulting from movements in the price of aluminum on these
contracts would generally be offset by an equal and opposite
impact on the net sales and purchases being hedged.
In addition, sales contracts representing approximately 10% of
our total shipments for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
provide for a ceiling over which metal purchase costs cannot
contractually be passed through to certain customers, unless
adjusted. As a result, we are unable to pass through the
complete metal purchase costs for sales under these contracts
and this negatively impacts our margins when the metal price is
above the ceiling price. These contracts expire at varying times
and our estimated remaining exposure approximates 10% of
estimated shipments in the remainder of fiscal 2008.
However, as previously discussed, in connection with the
allocation of purchase price arising from the Arrangement, we
established reserves totaling $655 million as of
May 15, 2007 to record these sales contracts at fair value.
Fair value effectively represents the discounted cash flows of
the forecasted metal purchase costs in excess of the metal price
ceilings contained in these contracts. These reserves are being
accreted into revenue over the remaining lives of the underlying
contracts, and this accretion will not impact future cash flows.
During the period from May 16, 2007 through June 30,
2007, we recorded accretion of $44 million.
We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal
prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to
metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our
internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and
mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from
our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans
(UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply have
historically provided a benefit as these sources of metal are
typically less expensive than purchasing aluminum from third
party suppliers. We refer to these two sources as our internal
hedges.
Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy
to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated
with the metal price ceilings is to purchase futures, call
options
and/or
synthetic call options on projected aluminum volume requirements
above our assumed internal hedge position. To hedge our exposure
in 2006, we previously purchased call options at various strike
prices. In September of 2006, we began purchasing both fixed
forward derivative instruments and put options, thereby creating
synthetic call options, to hedge our exposure to further metal
price increases. We have not entered into any synthetic call
options beyond December 31, 2007.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, we began
selling short-term LME futures contracts to reduce the cash flow
volatility of fluctuating metal prices associated with metal
price lag.
In Europe, we enter into forward metal purchases simultaneous
with the contracts that contain fixed metal prices. These
forward metal purchases directly hedge the economic risk of
future metal price fluctuation associated with these contracts.
The positive or negative impact on sales under these contracts
has been included in the metal price lag effect described above,
without regard to the fixed forward instruments purchased to
offset this risk.
81
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
gain (loss) in the fair values of these derivative instruments
as of June 30, 2007, assuming a 10% decline in the
three-month LME price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
Decline in
|
|
|
Loss in
|
|
|
|
Rate/Price
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ In millions)
|
|
|
Aluminum Forward Contracts
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
Aluminum Put Options
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity
and Natural Gas
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. In the first quarter of fiscal
2008, natural gas and electricity represented approximately 70%
of our energy consumption by cost.
We also use fuel oil and transport fuel. The majority of energy
usage occurs at our casting centers, at our smelters in South
America and during the hot rolling of aluminum. Our cold rolling
facilities require relatively less energy. We purchase our
natural gas on the open market, which subjects us to market
pricing fluctuations. Recent natural gas pricing changes in the
United States have increased our energy costs. We seek to
stabilize our future exposure to natural gas prices through the
use of forward purchase contracts. Natural gas prices in Europe,
Asia and South America have historically been more stable than
in the United States. As of June 30, 2007, we have a
nominal amount of forward purchases outstanding related to
natural gas.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs. In South America,
we have our own hydroelectric facilities that meet approximately
25% of that regions total electricity requirements.
Additionally, we have entered into an electricity swap in North
America to fix a portion of the cost of our electricity
requirements.
Rising energy costs worldwide, due to the volatility of supply
and international and geopolitical events, expose us to reduced
profits as such changes in such costs cannot immediately be
recovered under existing contracts and sales agreements, and may
only be mitigated in future periods under future pricing
arrangements.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
June 30, 2007, assuming a 10% decline in spot prices for
energy contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
Decline in
|
|
|
Loss in
|
|
|
|
Rate/Price
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ In millions)
|
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risks
Exchange rate movements, particularly the euro, the Canadian
dollar, the Brazilian real and the Korean won against the
U.S. dollar, have an impact on our operating results. In
Europe, where we have predominantly local currency selling
prices and operating costs, we benefit as the euro strengthens,
but are adversely affected as the euro weakens. In Korea, where
we have local currency selling prices for local sales and
U.S. dollar denominated selling prices for exports, we
benefit slightly as the won weakens, but are adversely affected
as the won strengthens, due to a slightly higher percentage of
exports compared to local sales. In Canada and Brazil, where we
have predominately U.S. dollar selling prices and local
currency operating costs, we benefit
82
as the local currencies weaken, but are adversely affected as
the local currencies strengthen. Foreign currency contracts may
be used to hedge the economic exposures at our foreign
operations.
It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures
within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the
majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either
forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in
non-functional currencies. Our most significant
non-U.S. dollar
functional currency operating segments are Europe and Asia,
which have the euro and the Korean won as their functional
currencies, respectively. South America is U.S. dollar
functional with Brazilian real transactional exposure.
We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign
operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Shareholders
equity section of the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets. Net sales and expenses in our foreign
operations foreign currencies are translated into varying
amounts of U.S. dollars depending upon whether the
U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens against other
currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may either
positively or negatively affect our net sales and expenses from
foreign operations as expressed in U.S. dollars.
Any negative impact of currency movements on the currency
contracts that we have entered into to hedge foreign currency
commitments to purchase or sell goods and services would be
offset by an equal and opposite favorable exchange impact on the
commitments being hedged. For a discussion of accounting
policies and other information relating to currency contracts,
see Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies and Note 17 Financial
Instruments and Commodity Contracts to our consolidated and
combined financial statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
June 30, 2007, assuming a 10% increase (decrease) in the
foreign currency/U.S. dollar exchange rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in
|
|
|
Loss in
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ In millions)
|
|
|
Currency measured against the
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
Korean won
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Brazilian real
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Canadian dollar
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
British pound
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Swiss franc
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Loans to and investments in European operations have been hedged
by cross-currency interest swaps (euro 475 million, GBP
62 million, CHF 35 million). Loans from European
operations have been hedged by cross-currency principal only
swaps (euro 111 million). Principal only swaps totaling
euro 91 million were accounted for as cash flow hedges
through May 15, 2007. Concurrent with the completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, we dedesignated these hedging
relationships. While this has no impact of our cash flows,
subsequent changes in the value of currency related derivative
instruments are recognized in Gain on change in fair value of
derivative instruments net in our condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
83
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
June 30, 2007, assuming a 10% change in rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Loss in
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ In millions)
|
|
|
Currency measured against the
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
British pound
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
Swiss franc
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
Interest
Rate Risks
We are subject to interest rate risk related to our floating
rate debt. For every 12.5 basis point increase in the
interest rates on our outstanding variable rate debt as of
June 30, 2007, which includes $712 million of Term
Loan B debt (after the effect of $100 million that has been
swapped into fixed rates) and other variable rate debt of
$390 million, our annual pre-tax income would be reduced by
approximately $1 million.
As of June 30, 2007, approximately 61% of our debt
obligations were at fixed rates. Due to the nature of fixed-rate
debt, there would be no significant impact on our interest
expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase or decrease in
market rates of interest.
From time to time, we have used interest rate swaps to manage
our debt cost. We have entered into an interest rate swap to fix
the interest rate on $100 million of our floating rate Term
Loan B facility, which is part of our senior secured facility.
In Korea, we entered into interest rate swaps to fix the
interest rate on various floating rate debt. See
Note 9 Long-Term Debt to our accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements for further
information.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax
loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
June 30, 2007, assuming a 10% change in rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Loss in
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ In millions)
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap
Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other
procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed
or submitted under the United States Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is (1) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and
(2) accumulated and communicated to management, including
the principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2007, members of management,
at the direction (and with the participation) of our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, performed an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Exchange Act), as of June 30, 2007. Based on that
evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that
84
our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of
June 30, 2007, as a result of the continued existence of a
material weakness in our accounting for income taxes, as
described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. Notwithstanding this
material weakness, management has concluded that the condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this report
present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position
and results of operations and cash flows for the periods
presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Immediately following the consummation of the Arrangement on
May 15, 2007, the new board of directors appointed Martha
Finn Brooks as President and Chief Operating Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) and Steven Fisher as Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company.
Mr. Fisher replaced Rick Dobson as Chief Financial Officer
who remains with the Company in an advisory role until
August 15, 2007. There have been no other changes in our
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this report
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Remediation
Plan for Material Weakness Existing as of June 30,
2007
We outlined our plan to remediate the material weakness in
accounting for income taxes in Item 9A. Controls and
Procedures of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, which was filed on
March 1, 2007 (and amended on April 30, 2007), and
there have been no additional remedial measures implemented
since. While we believe that the measures enumerated in our
Annual Report will ultimately allow us to remediate this
material weakness, we concluded as of June 30, 2007, that
there continues to be more than a remote likelihood that a
material misstatement of our annual or interim financial
statements related to accounting for income taxes will not be
prevented or detected. Management believes it is prudent to
observe and test these controls over a longer period of time
prior to concluding that this weakness has been remediated. We
are further considering our current mix of internal and external
staffing in the area of income taxes and may make further
changes as necessary to remediate this material weakness as
quickly as possible. In addition, we will continue to provide
training to our tax personnel and specifically focus on areas
where adjustments and errors have been previously identified.
85
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Reynolds Boat Case. As previously disclosed,
we and Alcan were defendants in a case in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Washington, in
Tacoma, Washington, case number C04-0175RJB. Plaintiffs were
Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire
Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a
jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under implied warranty
theories, based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and
Alcan sold certain aluminum products that were ultimately used
for marine applications and were unsuitable for such
applications. The jury reached a verdict on May 22, 2006
against us and Alcan for approximately $60 million, and the
court later awarded Reynolds and Alcoa approximately
$16 million in prejudgment interest and court costs.
The case was settled during July 2006 as among us, Alcan,
Reynolds, Alcoa and their insurers for $71 million. We
contributed approximately $1 million toward the settlement,
and the remaining $70 million was funded by our insurers.
Although the settlement was substantially funded by our
insurance carriers, certain of them have reserved the right to
request a refund from us, after reviewing details of the
plaintiffs damages to determine if they include costs of a
nature not covered under the insurance contracts. Of the
$70 million funded, $39 million is in dispute with and
under further review by certain of our insurance carriers, who
have until October 19, 2007 to complete their review,
unless that review time is extended by mutual agreement. In the
quarter ended September 30, 2006, we posted a letter of
credit in the amount of approximately $10 million in favor
of one of those insurance carriers, while we resolve the
questions, if any, about the extent of coverage of the costs
included in the settlement.
Since our fiscal 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
was not filed until August 25, 2006, we recognized a
liability for the full settlement amount of $71 million on
December 31, 2005, included in Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet, with a
corresponding charge against earnings. We also recognized an
insurance receivable included in Prepaid expenses and other
current assets on our consolidated balance sheet of
$31 million, with a corresponding increase to earnings.
Although $70 million of the settlement was funded by our
insurers, we only recognized an insurance receivable to the
extent that coverage was not in dispute. This resulted in a net
charge of $40 million during the quarter ended
December 31, 2005.
In July 2006, we contributed and paid $1 million to our
insurers who subsequently paid the entire settlement amount of
$71 million to the plaintiffs. Accordingly, during the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 we reversed the previously
recorded insurance receivable of $31 million and reduced
our recorded liability by the same amount plus the
$1 million contributed by us. The remaining liability of
$39 million represents the amount of the settlement claim
that was funded by our insurers but is still in dispute with and
under further review by certain of our insurance carriers, who
have yet to complete their review as described above. The
$39 million liability is included in Accrued expenses and
other current liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2007.
While the ultimate resolution of the nature and extent of any
costs not covered under our insurance contracts cannot be
determined with certainty or reasonably estimated at this time,
if there is an adverse outcome with respect to insurance
coverage, and we are required to reimburse our insurers, it
could have a material impact on our cash flows in the period of
resolution. Alternatively, the ultimate resolution could be
favorable, such that insurance coverage is in excess of the net
expense that we have recognized to date. This would result in
our recording a non-cash gain in the period of resolution, and
this non-cash gain could have a material impact on our results
of operations during the period in which such a determination is
made.
Coca-Cola
Lawsuits. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in state
court in Georgia. In addition, a lawsuit was commenced against
Novelis Corporation and Alcan Corporation on April 3, 2007
by Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc, Enterprises Acquisition Company, Inc., The
Coca-Cola
Company and The
Coca-Cola
Trading Company, Inc (collectively CCE) in federal court in
Georgia. Novelis intends to defend these claims vigorously.
86
CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and
seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial
and a declaration of its rights under the agreement. The
agreement includes a most favored nations provision
regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS alleges that Novelis
Corporation breached the terms of the most favored nations
provision. The dispute will likely turn on the facts that are
presented to the court by the parties and the courts
finding as to how certain provisions of the agreement ought to
be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in this litigation, the
amount of damages would likely be material. Novelis Corporation
has moved to dismiss the complaint and has filed its answer.
The claim by CCE seeks monetary damages in an amount to be
determined at trial for breach of a prior aluminum can stock
supply agreement between CCE and Novelis Corporation, successor
to the rights and obligations of Alcan Aluminum Corporation
under the agreement. According to its terms, that agreement with
CCE terminated in 2006. The CCE supply agreement included a
most favored nations provision regarding certain
pricing matters. CCE alleges that Novelis Corporations
entry into a supply agreement with Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached
the most favored nation provision of the CCE supply
agreement. If CCE were to prevail in this litigation, the amount
of damages would likely be material. The dispute will likely
turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the parties
and the courts finding as to how certain provisions of the
supply agreement ought to be interpreted. Novelis Corporation
has moved to dismiss the complaint and has not yet filed its
answer. We have not recorded any reserves for these matters.
Anheuser-Busch Litigation. On
September 19, 2006, Novelis Corporation filed a lawsuit
against Anheuser-Busch, Inc. in federal court in Ohio.
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. subsequently filed suit against Novelis
Corporation and the Company in federal court in Missouri. On
January 3, 2007, Anheuser-Busch, Inc.s suit was
transferred to the Ohio federal court.
Novelis Corporation alleges that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached
the existing multi-year aluminum can stock supply agreement
between the parties, and we seek monetary damages and
declaratory relief. Among other claims, we assert that since
entering into the supply agreement, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. has
breached its confidentiality obligations and there has been a
structural change in market conditions that requires a change to
the pricing provisions under the agreement.
In its complaint, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. has asked for a
declaratory judgment that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. is not obligated
to modify the supply agreement as requested by Novelis
Corporation, and that Novelis Corporation must continue to
perform under the existing supply agreement.
The Anheuser-Busch, Inc. litigation is currently at the
discovery stage. Novelis Corporation has continued to perform
under the supply agreement during the litigation.
ARCO Aluminum Complaint. On May 24, 2007,
Arco Aluminum Inc. (ARCO) filed a complaint against Novelis
Corporation and Novelis Inc. in the United States District Court
for the Western District of Kentucky. ARCO and Novelis are
partners in a joint venture rolling mill located in Logan,
Kentucky. In the complaint, ARCO seeks to resolve a perceived
dispute over management and control of the joint venture
following Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis.
ARCO alleges that its consent was required in connection with
Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis. Failure to obtain
consent, ARCO alleges, has put us in default of the joint
venture agreements, thereby triggering certain provisions in
those agreements. The provisions include a reversion of the
production management at the joint venture to Logan Aluminum
from Novelis, and a reduction of the board of directors of the
entity that manages the joint venture from seven members (four
appointed by Novelis and three appointed by ARCO) to six members
(three appointed by each of Novelis and ARCO).
ARCO is seeking a court declaration that (1) Novelis and
its affiliates are prohibited from exercising any managerial
authority or control over the joint venture,
(2) Novelis interest in the joint venture is limited
to an economic interest only and (3) ARCO has authority to
act on behalf of the joint venture. Or, alternatively, ARCO is
seeking a reversion of the production management function to
Logan Aluminum, and a change in
87
the composition of the board of directors of the entity that
manages the joint venture. Novelis filed its answer to the
complaint on July 16, 2007.
On July 3, 2007, ARCO filed a motion for partial summary
judgment with respect to one of the counts of its complaint
relating to the claim that Novelis breached the joint venture
agreement by not seeking ARCOs consent. On July 30,
2007, Novelis filed a motion to hold ARCOs motion for
summary judgment in abeyance (pending further discovery), along
with a jury demand. Those motions are pending. We intend to
defend these proceedings vigorously.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
On May 10, 2007, the Company held a special shareholder
meeting at which a majority of the shareholders approved the
statutory arrangement pursuant to section 192 of the Canada
Business Corporations Act, whereby AV Metals inc. (Acquisition
Sub), a subsidiary of Hindalco Industries Limited (Hindalco),
was authorized by the shareholders to acquire all of the
outstanding common stock of Novelis for US$44.93 per share.
Specifically, 37,230,945 shares (or 99.8% of votes cast)
voted in favor and 72,511 shares (or 0.19% of votes cast)
voted against approving the statutory plan of arrangement. The
acquisition of Novelis by Hindalco through Acquisition Sub was
completed on May 15, 2007.
88
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Arrangement Agreement by and among
Hindalco Industries Limited, AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc.,
dated as of February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 13, 2007)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles
of Incorporation of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-law No. 1 of Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on November 17, 2004
(File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Shareholder Rights Agreement
between Novelis and CIBC Mellon Trust Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Indenture, relating to the Notes,
dated as of February 3, 2005, between the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of
New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of Note for
71/4% Senior
Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the
Form S-4
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File
No. 331-127139))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
First Amendment to the Shareholder
Rights Agreement between Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon
Trust Company, dated as of February 10, 2007
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
file on February 13, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of amendment to Recognition
Agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on May 8, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and
Restated Novelis Founders Performance Awards Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on May 8, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Amendment and waiver to the Credit
Agreement dated May 9, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 14, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement
between Novelis Inc. and Members of the Board of Directors of
Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 21, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement
between Novelis Inc. and certain executive officers dated as of
June 27, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 28, 2007)
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
89
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NOVELIS INC.
Steven Fisher
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert
M. Patterson
|
Robert M. Patterson
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: August 9, 2007
90
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Arrangement Agreement by and among
Hindalco Industries Limited, AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc.,
dated as of February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 13, 2007)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles
of Incorporation of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-law No. 1 of Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on November 17, 2004
(File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Shareholder Rights Agreement
between Novelis and CIBC Mellon Trust Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Indenture, relating to the Notes,
dated as of February 3, 2005, between the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of
New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of Note for
71/4% Senior
Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the
Form S-4
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File
No. 331-127139))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
First Amendment to the Shareholder
Rights Agreement between Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon
Trust Company, dated as of February 10, 2007
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
file on February 13, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of amendment to Recognition
Agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on May 8, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and
Restated Novelis Founders Performance Awards Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on May 8, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Amendment and waiver to the Credit
Agreement dated May 9, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 14, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement
between Novelis Inc. and Members of the Board of Directors of
Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 21, 2007)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement
between Novelis Inc. and certain executive officers dated as of
June 27, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 28, 2007)
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
91