Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-Q
 
     
(Mark one)    
 
þ
  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
or
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the transition period from          to          .
 
Commission file number: 001-32312
 
Novelis Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 
     
Canada   98-0442987
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. employer
identification number)
     
3399 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 1500
Atlanta, Georgia
 
30326
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
 
Telephone: (404) 814-4200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ     Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ
 
As of April 30, 2007, the registrant had 75,415,336 common shares outstanding.
 
 


 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
                 
  FINANCIAL INFORMATION    
  Financial Statements    
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (unaudited) Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006   2
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
  3
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006
  4
    Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
  5
    Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)   6
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   43
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk   63
  Controls and Procedures   67
             
  OTHER INFORMATION    
  Legal Proceedings   69
  Exhibits   71
 EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE PEO
 EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE PFO
 EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE PEO
 EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE PFO


1


Table of Contents

 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.   Financial Statements
 
Novelis Inc.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (unaudited)
(in millions, except per share amounts)
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Net sales
  $ 2,630     $ 2,319  
                 
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)
    2,447       2,135  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    99       92  
Depreciation and amortization
    58       58  
Research and development expenses
    8       9  
Restructuring charges — net
    9       1  
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
    8       —  
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net
    50       48  
Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates
    (3 )     (3 )
Other (income) expenses — net
    9       (49 )
                 
      2,685       2,291  
                 
Income (loss) before provision for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share
    (55 )     28  
Provision for taxes on income (loss)
    7       102  
                 
Loss before minority interests’ share
    (62 )     (74 )
Minority interests’ share
    (2 )     —  
                 
Net loss
    (64 )     (74 )
                 
Other comprehensive income — net of tax
               
Currency translation adjustment
    11       37  
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges — net
    3       —  
Postretirement benefit plans:
               
Amortization of net actuarial loss
    1       —  
Change in minimum pension liability
    —       (7 )
                 
Other comprehensive income — net of tax
    15       30  
                 
Comprehensive loss
  $ (49 )   $ (44 )
                 
Loss per share:
               
Net loss per share — basic and diluted
  $ (0.85 )   $ (1.00 )
                 
Dividends per common share
  $ —     $ 0.09  
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


2


Table of Contents

Novelis Inc.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
(in millions, except number of shares)
 
                 
    March 31,
    December 31,
 
    2007     2006  
 
ASSETS
Current assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 128     $ 73  
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $29 in both 2007 and 2006)
               
— third parties
    1,350       1,321  
— related parties
    25       21  
Inventories
    1,491       1,391  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    39       42  
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
    92       106  
Deferred income tax assets
    19       9  
                 
Total current assets
    3,144       2,963  
Property, plant and equipment — net
    2,098       2,143  
Goodwill
    239       236  
Intangible assets — net
    20       20  
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
    153       150  
Fair value of derivative instruments — net of current portion
    55       44  
Deferred income tax assets
    102       76  
Other long-term assets
               
— third parties
    105       101  
— related parties
    54       59  
                 
Total assets
  $ 5,970     $ 5,792  
                 
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
               
Current portion of long-term debt
  $ 143     $ 144  
Short-term borrowings
    245       133  
Accounts payable
               
— third parties
    1,614       1,542  
— related parties
    49       44  
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    480       508  
Deferred income tax liabilities
    73       61  
                 
Total current liabilities
    2,604       2,432  
Long-term debt — net of current portion
    2,157       2,158  
Deferred income tax liabilities
    103       81  
Accrued postretirement benefits
    427       425  
Other long-term liabilities
    352       343  
                 
      5,643       5,439  
                 
Commitments and contingencies
               
                 
Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates
    152       158  
                 
Shareholders’ equity
               
Preferred stock, no par value; unlimited number of first preferred and second preferred shares authorized; none issued and outstanding
    —       —  
Common stock, no par value; unlimited number of shares authorized; 75,357,660 and 74,140,335 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively
    —       —  
Additional paid-in capital
    428       398  
Accumulated deficit
    (263 )     (198 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    10       (5 )
                 
Total shareholders’ equity
    175       195  
                 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 5,970     $ 5,792  
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


3


Table of Contents

Novelis Inc.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
(in millions)
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
               
Net loss
  $ (64 )   $ (74 )
Adjustments to determine net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    58       58  
Net gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments
    (30 )     (54 )
Deferred income taxes
    (9 )     82  
Amortization of debt issuance costs
    2       2  
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable
    —       2  
Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates
    (3 )     (3 )
Minority interests’ share
    2       —  
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
    8       —  
Share-based compensation
    2       1  
Gain on sales of businesses, investments and assets — net
    —       14  
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures):
               
Accounts receivable
               
— third parties
    (25 )     (87 )
— related parties
    —       (1 )
Inventories
    (95 )     (140 )
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    3       (15 )
Other long-term assets
    (5 )     (1 )
Accounts payable
               
— third parties
    73       284  
— related parties
    5       1  
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    (22 )     1  
Accrued postretirement benefits
    4       13  
Other long-term liabilities
    9       12  
                 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
    (87 )     95  
                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
Capital expenditures
    (24 )     (21 )
Disposal of business — net
    —       (7 )
Proceeds from sales of assets
    —       2  
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
    1       2  
Proceeds from loans receivable — net — related parties
    1       7  
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
    24       71  
                 
Net cash provided by investing activities
    2       54  
                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
Principal repayments
    (1 )     (112 )
Short-term borrowings — net
    113       6  
Dividends
               
— common shareholders
    —       (7 )
— minority interests
    —       (13 )
Debt issuance costs
    —       (1 )
Proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options
    27       —  
Windfall tax benefit on share-based compensation
    1       —  
                 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    140       (127 )
                 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    55       22  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in foreign currencies
    —       2  
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period
    73       100  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period
  $ 128     $ 124  
                 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
               
Interest paid
  $ 84     $ 76  
Income taxes paid
    18       12  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


4


Table of Contents

Novelis Inc.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)
(in millions, except number of common shares)
 
                                                 
                            Accumulated
       
                Additional
          Other
       
    Common Stock     Paid-in
    Accumulated
    Comprehensive
       
    Shares     Amount     Capital     Deficit     Income (Loss)     Total  
 
Balance as of December 31, 2006
    74,140,335     $ —     $ 398     $ (198 )   $ (5 )   $ 195  
Adjustment for uncertain tax positions
    —       —       —       (1 )     —       (1 )
2007 Activity:
                                               
Net loss
    —       —       —       (64 )     —       (64 )
Issuance of common stock from the exercise of employee stock options
    1,217,325       —       27       —       —       27  
Share-based compensation
    —       —       2       —       —       2  
Currency translation adjustment
    —       —       —       —       11       11  
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges — net
    —       —       —       —       3       3  
Postretirement benefit plans:
                                               
Amortization of net actuarial loss
    —       —       —       —       1       1  
Windfall tax benefit on share-based compensation
    —       —       1       —       —       1  
                                                 
Balance as of March 31, 2007
    75,357,660     $ —     $ 428     $ (263 )   $ 10     $ 175  
                                                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


5


Table of Contents

Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
 
1.   Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Organization and Description of Business
 
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and its subsidiaries, is the world’s leading aluminum rolled products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and light gauge products where the end-use destination of the products includes the construction and industrial, beverage and food cans, foil products and transportation markets. As of March 31, 2007, we had operations on four continents: North America; Europe; Asia and South America, through 33 operating plants and three research facilities in 11 countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil.
 
References herein to “Novelis”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “us” refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein to “Alcan” refer to Alcan, Inc.
 
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 1, 2007.
 
The accompanying (a) condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and (b) unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to SEC Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading.
 
The unaudited results of operations for the interim periods shown in these condensed consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements recognize all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to fairly state our financial position as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006; the results of our operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006; our cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006; and changes in our shareholders’ equity for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
 
Certain reclassifications of prior period amounts have been made to conform to the presentation adopted for the current period.
 
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
 
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The new statement establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities and requires companies to provide additional information that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more easily understand the effect of a company’s choice to use fair value on its earnings. The new statement also requires entities to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. FASB Statement No. 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements included in other accounting standards, including requirements for disclosures about fair value measurements included in FASB


6


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Statements No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, and No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. FASB Statement No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the entity makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157. We have not yet commenced evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB Statement No. 159 on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB Statement No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB Statement No. 157 on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
 
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting pronouncements will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do not apply to our operations.
 
2.   Potential Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock
 
On February 10, 2007, Novelis Inc., Hindalco Industries Limited (Hindalco) and AV Aluminum Inc., an indirect subsidiary of Hindalco, entered into an Arrangement Agreement (the Arrangement Agreement). On March 30, 2007, AV Aluminum Inc. assigned its interest in the Arrangement Agreement to AV Metals Inc. (Acquisition Sub), a subsidiary of Hindalco. Under the Arrangement Agreement, Acquisition Sub will acquire all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Novelis for cash at a per share price of $44.93, without interest and less any required withholding taxes (the Purchase Price), to be implemented by way of a court-approved plan of arrangement (the Arrangement).
 
Pursuant to the Arrangement Agreement, at the effective time of the Arrangement, each common share of Novelis issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than common shares held by (i) Hindalco or Acquisition Sub or any of their affiliates or (ii) any shareholders who properly exercise dissent rights under the Canada Business Corporations Act) will be transferred to Acquisition Sub in exchange for the right to receive the Purchase Price. The acquisition of Novelis is an all-cash transaction which values Novelis at approximately $6 billion, including approximately $2.4 billion of debt. The transaction is not subject to a financing condition.
 
The consummation of the Arrangement is subject to various customary conditions, including Novelis shareholder approval and the receipt of regulatory approvals specified in the Arrangement Agreement and/or until the expiration of all applicable waiting periods, including antitrust approvals under the Competition Act (Canada), the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, the European Union or the relevant antitrust authorities in the applicable European Union member states, as well as approval under the Investment Canada Act and approval by the Agência Nacional de Energia Eléctrica (ANEEL) for the transfer of power generation concessions/authorizations in Brazil. As of May 10, 2007, we have the necessary regulatory approval to proceed with the transaction from all known parties. Subject to final court approval, we expect that the Arrangement will close on May 15, 2007.
 
The Arrangement Agreement contains customary representations and warranties between Novelis and Hindalco and Acquisition Sub. The Arrangement Agreement also contains customary covenants and agreements, including covenants relating to (a) the conduct of Novelis’ business between the date of the signing of


7


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

the Arrangement Agreement and the closing of the Arrangement, (b) solicitation of competing acquisition proposals and (c) the efforts of the parties to cause the Arrangement to be completed. Additionally, Novelis shareholders approved the Arrangement at its special meeting of shareholders on May 10, 2007.
 
The Arrangement Agreement contains certain termination rights and provides that, upon or following the termination of the Arrangement Agreement, under specified circumstances involving a competing acquisition proposal, Novelis may be required to pay Acquisition Sub a termination fee of $100 million or, in certain circumstances, to reimburse costs and expenses of Hindalco and its affiliates, to a maximum of $15 million.
 
In connection with this process, Novelis has incurred or will incur fees and expenses, including a termination fee with an unsuccessful bidder. During the first quarter of 2007, we included expenses of $32 million in Other (income) expenses — net for those costs that have already been incurred and that are not contingent upon closing. Of this amount, $22 million was paid during the first quarter of 2007 and the remaining amounts are expected to be paid during the second quarter of 2007.
 
3.   Disposal of Business
 
In March 2006, we disposed of our aluminum rolling mill in Annecy, France (Annecy) for consideration in the amount of one euro. We recorded a pre-tax charge of $15 million in connection with the sale, which is included in Other (income) expenses — net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations. The charge was comprised primarily of $8 million representing our investment in and advances to Annecy, cash payments of $5 million we made in connection with the disposal of the business, and other cash fees and expenses we paid of an additional $2 million.
 
4.   Restructuring Programs
 
In March 2007, management approved the proposed restructuring of our facilities in Bridgnorth, U.K. These proposed actions are intended to bring the capacity of our U.K. operations in line with local market demand and to reduce the cost of our U.K. operations. Certain production lines will be shut down in the U.K. and volume will be relocated to other European plants. For the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we recognized $8 million in impairment charges on long-lived assets in the U.K. that will no longer be used, and we recognized restructuring charges of approximately $8 million relating primarily to severance costs. We expect all actions related to the Bridgnorth, U.K. restructuring to be completed in early 2008.
 
All restructuring provisions and recoveries are included in Restructuring charges — net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations unless otherwise stated. The following table summarizes our restructuring liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (in millions).
 
                                         
                      Other Exit
       
    Severance Reserves     Related
    Total
 
          Corporate
    Total
    Reserves     Restructuring
 
    Europe     and Other     Severance     Europe     Reserves  
 
Balance as of December 31, 2006
  $ 14     $ 1     $ 15     $ 19     $ 34  
Provisions (recoveries) — net
    9       —       9       —       9  
Cash payments
    (4 )     (1 )     (5 )     (1 )     (6 )
Adjustments — other
    (1 )     —       (1 )     —       (1 )
                                         
Balance as of March 31, 2007
  $ 18     $ —     $ 18     $ 18     $ 36  
                                         


8


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

5.   Inventories
 
Inventories consist of the following (in millions).
 
                 
    March 31, 2007     December 31, 2006  
 
Finished goods
  $ 369     $ 404  
Work in process
    359       283  
Raw materials
    684       626  
Supplies
    128       126  
                 
      1,540       1,439  
Allowances
    (49 )     (48 )
                 
Inventories
  $ 1,491     $ 1,391  
                 
 
6.   Property, Plant and Equipment
 
Property, plant and equipment — net, consists of the following (in millions).
 
                 
    March 31, 2007     December 31, 2006  
 
Land and property rights
  $ 97     $ 97  
Buildings
    895       894  
Machinery and equipment
    4,691       4,673  
                 
      5,683       5,664  
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (3,674 )     (3,608 )
                 
      2,009       2,056  
Construction in progress
    89       87  
                 
Property, plant and equipment — net
  $ 2,098     $ 2,143  
                 
 
7.   Investment in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions
 
The following table summarizes the ownership structure and our ownership percentage of the non-consolidated affiliates in which we have an investment as of March 31, 2007, and which we account for using the equity method. We have no material investments that we account for using the cost method.
 
             
        Ownership
 
Affiliate Name
  Ownership Structure   Percentage  
 
Aluminium Norf GmbH
  Corporation     50 %
Consorcio Candonga
  Unincorporated Joint Venture     50 %
EuroNorca Partners
  General Partnership     50 %
MiniMRF LLC
  Limited Liability Company     50 %
Deutsche Aluminium Verpackung Recycling GmbH
  Corporation     30 %
France Aluminium Recyclage S.A.
  Public Limited Company     20 %


9


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

In November 2006, we sold the common and preferred shares of our 25% interest in Petrocoque S.A. Industria e Comercio (Petrocoque) to the other shareholders of Petrocoque. Prior to the sale, we accounted for Petrocoque using the equity method of accounting. Petrocoque’s combined results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 are included in the table below.
 
As of March 31, 2007, EuroNorca Partners was inactive and is in the process of being dissolved. We expect to receive approximately $2 million once the liquidation proceedings have been finalized.
 
We do not control our non-consolidated affiliates, but have the ability to exercise significant influence over their operating and financial policies. The following table summarizes the combined results of operations of our equity method affiliates (on a 100% basis, in millions).
 
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Net sales
  $ 127     $ 132  
Costs, expenses and provisions for taxes on income
    122       124  
                 
Net income
  $ 5     $ 8  
                 
 
Included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are transactions and balances arising from business we conduct with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we classify as related party transactions and balances. The following table describes the nature and amounts of transactions that we had with related parties during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in millions).
 
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Purchases of tolling services, electricity and inventories
               
Aluminium Norf GmbH (A)
  $ 61     $ 52  
Consorcio Candonga (B)
    3       3  
Petrocoque S.A. Industria e Comercio (C)
    N/A       1  
 
 
(A) We purchase tolling services (the conversion of customer-owned metal) from Aluminium Norf GmbH.
 
(B) We purchase electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our operations in South America.
 
(C) We purchase calcined-coke from Petrocoque S.A. Industria e Comercio (Petrocoque) for use in our smelting operations in South America. As previously discussed, we sold our interest in Petrocoque in November 2006. They are not considered a related party in 2007.
 
The table below describes the period-end account balances that we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as related party balances in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets (in millions). We have no other material related party balances.
 
                 
    March 31, 2007     December 31, 2006  
 
Accounts receivable (A)
  $ 25     $ 21  
Other long-term receivables (A)
    54       59  
Accounts payable (B)
    49       44  
 
 
(A) The balances represent current and non-current portions of a loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH.
 
(B) We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH and electricity from Consorcio Candonga.


10


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
8.   Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are comprised of the following (in millions).
 
                 
    March 31, 2007     December 31, 2006  
 
Accrued compensation and benefits
  $ 138     $ 130  
Accrued settlement of legal claim
    39       39  
Accrued interest payable
    24       56  
Accrued income taxes
    9       17  
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
    33       42  
Other current liabilities
    237       224  
                 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
  $ 480     $ 508  
                 
 
9.   Long-Term Debt
 
Long-term debt consists of the following (in millions).
 
                         
    Interest
    March 31,
    December 31,
 
    Rates(A)     2007     2006  
 
Novelis Inc.
                       
Floating rate Term Loan B, due 2012
    7.61 %(B)   $ 259     $ 259  
7.25% Senior Notes, due 2015
    7.25 %     1,400       1,400  
Novelis Corporation
                       
Floating rate Term Loan B, due 2012
    7.61 %(B)     449       449  
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
                       
Capital lease obligation, due 2020 (Swiss francs (CHF) 56 million)
    7.50 %     46       47  
Capital lease obligation, due 2011 (CHF 4 million)
    2.49 %     4       4  
Novelis Korea Limited
                       
Bank loan, due 2007
    4.55 %     70       70  
Bank loan, due 2007 (Korean won (KRW) 40 billion)
    4.80 %     42       43  
Bank loan, due 2007 (KRW 25 billion)
    4.45 %     27       27  
Bank loans, due 2008 through 2011 (KRW 1 billion)
    4.01 %(C)     1       1  
Other
                       
Other debt, due 2007 through 2012
    2.45 %(C)     2       2  
                         
Total debt
            2,300       2,302  
Less: current portion
            (143 )     (144 )
                         
Long-term debt — net of current portion
          $ 2,157     $ 2,158  
                         
 
 
(A) Interest rates are as of March 31, 2007 and exclude the effects of amortization of debt issuance costs.
 
(B) The interest rate for the Floating rate Term Loan B includes an increased applicable margin in effect through March 31, 2008 and excludes the effect of any related interest rate swaps, as discussed below.
 
(C) Weighted average interest rate.


11


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
 
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we entered into senior secured credit facilities providing for aggregate borrowings of up to $1.8 billion. These facilities consist of (1) a $1.3 billion seven-year senior secured Term Loan B facility, bearing interest at London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.75% (subject to change based on certain leverage ratios), all of which was borrowed on January 10, 2005 and (2) a $500 million five-year multi-currency revolving credit and letters of credit facility.
 
Since our inception and through March 31, 2007, we satisfied the 1% per annum principal amortization requirement through fiscal year 2010, as well as $514 million of the principal amortization requirement for 2011. No further minimum principal payments are due until 2011. As of March 31, 2007, we had $708 million outstanding under the Term Loan B facility.
 
Our senior secured credit facilities include customary affirmative and negative covenants, as well as financial covenants relating to our maximum total leverage ratio, minimum interest coverage ratio, and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral under our senior secured credit facilities.
 
The terms of our senior secured credit facilities require that we deliver unaudited quarterly and audited annual financial statements to our lenders within specified periods of time. Due to delays in certain of our SEC filings for 2005 and 2006, we obtained a series of five waiver and consent agreements from the lenders under the facility to extend the various filing deadlines. Fees paid related to the five waiver and consent agreements totaled $6 million. These fees are being amortized over the remaining life of the related borrowing in Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net using the “effective interest amortization” method. Unamortized fees related to these waiver and consent agreements are included in Other long-term assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and were $5 million as of both March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
 
On October 16, 2006, we amended the financial covenants to our senior secured credit facilities. In particular, we amended our maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and minimum fixed charge coverage ratios through the quarter ending March 31, 2008. We also amended and modified other provisions of the senior secured credit facilities to permit more efficient ordinary-course operations, including increasing the amounts of certain permitted investments and receivables securitizations, permitting nominal quarterly dividends, and the transfer of an intercompany loan to another subsidiary. In return for these amendments and modifications, we paid aggregate fees of approximately $3 million to lenders who consented to the amendments and modifications, and agreed to continue paying the higher applicable margins on our senior secured credit facilities, and the higher unused commitment fees on our revolving credit facilities that were instated with a prior waiver and consent agreement in May 2006. Specifically, we agreed to a 1.25% applicable margin for Term Loans maintained as Base Rate Loans, a 2.25% applicable margin for Term Loans maintained as Eurocurrency Rate Loans, a 1.50% applicable margin for Revolver Loans maintained as Base Rate Loans, a 2.50% applicable margin for Revolver Loans maintained as Eurocurrency Rate Loans and a 62.5 basis point commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility, until such time as the compliance certificate for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2008 has been delivered.
 
The amended maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and minimum fixed charge coverage ratios for the period ended March 31, 2007 were 8.25 to 1; 1.50 to 1; and 0.70 to 1, respectively. We were in compliance with these covenants for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
 
Total debt issuance costs, including amendment fees discussed above, totaling $34 million have been recorded in Other long-term assets and are being amortized over the life of the related borrowing in Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net using the “effective interest amortization” method for the Term Loans and the straight-line method for the revolving credit and letters of credit facility. The


12


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

unamortized amount of these costs was $22 million and $23 million as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
 
On April 27, 2007, our lenders consented to a further amendment of our senior secured credit facilities in order to (1) provide us with additional liquidity, (2) potentially allow us to avoid more costly bridge financing in connection with the transaction with Hindalco and (3) remove certain technical provisions that are affecting normal-course operations of our business.
 
The amendment specifically includes the following: (1) permission to increase the Term Loan B facility by $150 million; (2) a limited waiver of the change of control Event of Default (as defined in the senior secured credit facilities) to the earliest of (i) the date on which any payments are made with respect to the Senior Notes (other than scheduled interest), (ii) the third business day prior to the sixtieth day following the change of control and (iii) July 7, 2007 if the change of control does not occur on or prior to such date; and (3) a modification of three provisions, to now (a) permit the formation of certain joint ventures, (b) permit the payment of a liquidating cash dividend from a specific 50%-owned partnership and (c) permit a capital contribution between guarantor subsidiaries. In return for these amendments and modifications, we have agreed to pay aggregate fees of approximately $2.5 million to lenders who consent to the amendments and modifications.
 
7.25% Senior Notes
 
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities (Senior Notes). The Senior Notes were priced at par, bear interest at 7.25% and mature on February 15, 2015. Debt issuance costs totaling $28 million have been recorded in Other long-term assets and are being amortized over the life of the related borrowing in Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net using the “effective interest amortization” method. The unamortized amount of these costs was $24 million as of both March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
 
Under the indenture that governs the Senior Notes, we are subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to incurring additional debt and providing additional guarantees, paying dividends beyond certain amounts and making other restricted payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain consolidations or mergers, and certain transactions with affiliates. We were in compliance with these covenants for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
 
The indenture governing the Senior Notes and the related registration rights agreement required us to file a registration statement for the notes and exchange the original, privately placed notes for registered notes. Under the indenture and the related registration rights agreement, we were required to complete the exchange offer for the Senior Notes by November 11, 2005. We did not complete the exchange offer by that date and, as a result, we began to incur additional special interest at rates ranging from 0.25% to 1.00%. We filed a post-effective amendment to the registration statement on December 1, 2006 which was declared effective by the SEC on December 22, 2006. We ceased paying additional special interest effective January 5, 2007, upon completion of the exchange offer.
 
Pursuant to the terms of our Senior Notes, we are obligated, within 30 days of the closing of the Arrangement, to make an offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date the Senior Notes are purchased. In addition, Hindalco and Acquisition Sub have indicated that they may cause us to take other steps to repay, retire or redeem the Senior Notes after the closing of the Arrangement. The closing of the Arrangement does not require the consent or approval of the holders of the Senior Notes.


13


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
As a result of the change in the market price of our 7.25% Senior Notes from 96.25 as of December 31, 2006 to 105.75 as of March 31, 2007, the estimated fair value of this debt has increased $133 million to $1.481 billion.
 
Korean Bank Loans
 
In November 2004, Novelis Korea Limited (Novelis Korea), formerly Alcan Taihan Aluminium Limited, entered into a Korean won (KRW) 40 billion ($40 million) floating rate long-term loan due November 2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 4.80%.
 
In December 2004, we entered into a $70 million floating rate long-term loan due December 2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate and cross currency swap for this loan through a 4.55% fixed rate KRW 73 billion loan.
 
Additionally, in December 2004 we entered into a KRW 25 billion ($25 million) floating rate loan due December 2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 4.45%.
 
In the first quarter of 2007, interest rates on other Korean bank loans for $1 million (KRW 1 billion) ranged from 3.50% to 5.50%.
 
Other Agreements
 
In 2004, we entered into a loan and a corresponding deposit-and-guarantee agreement for up to $90 million. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, this arrangement had a balance of $80 million. We do not include the loan or deposit amounts in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as the agreements include a legal right of setoff and we have the intent and ability to setoff.
 
Interest Rate Swaps
 
In addition to interest rate swaps on certain Korean bank loans noted above, as of March 31, 2007, we have one outstanding interest rate swap to fix the 3-month LIBOR interest rate at an effective weighted average interest rate of 3.9% on $100 million of the floating rate Term Loan B debt expiring on February 3, 2008. On February 3, 2007, an interest rate swap to fix the 3-month LIBOR interest rate at an effective interest rate of 3.8% on an additional $100 million of the floating rate Term Loan B debt expired. We are still obligated to pay any applicable margin, as defined in our senior secured credit facilities, as amended, in addition to these interest rates. As of March 31, 2007, 66% of our debt was fixed rate and 34% was variable rate.
 
Capital Lease Obligations
 
In December 2004, in connection with the spin-off, we entered into a fifteen-year capital lease obligation with Alcan for assets in Sierre, Switzerland, which has an interest rate of 7.5% and calls for fixed quarterly payments of CHF 1.7 million, which is equivalent to $1.4 million at the exchange rate as of March 31, 2007.
 
In September 2005, we entered into a six-year capital lease obligation for equipment in Switzerland which has an interest rate of 2.49% and calls for fixed monthly payments of CHF 0.1 million, which is equivalent to $0.1 million at the exchange rate as of March 31, 2007.
 
Short Term Borrowings and Lines of Credit
 
As of March 31, 2007, our short-term borrowings were $245 million consisting of (1) $241 million in short-term loans in the U.S. and the U.K. under our $500 million revolving credit facility and (2) $4 million in bank overdrafts in Italy. As of March 31, 2007, $25 million of our $500 million revolving credit facility was


14


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

utilized for letters of credit and we had approximately $234 million available under the revolving credit facility.
 
As of March 31, 2007, we had an additional $59 million under letters of credit in Korea not included in our revolving credit facility. The weighted average interest rate on our total short-term borrowings was 7.77% and 7.70% as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
 
Commitment fees related to the unused portion of the $500 million revolving credit facility are 0.625% per annum. Under the terms of the October 16, 2006 amendment to our senior secured credit facilities, this rate will remain in effect until such time as the compliance certificate for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2008 has been delivered.
 
10.   Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Other comprehensive income is comprised of the following (in millions).
 
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustments
  $ 11     $ 41  
Net change in fair value of effective portion of hedges
    7       (7 )
Postretirement benefit plans:
               
Amortization of net actuarial loss
    2       —  
                 
Net other comprehensive income adjustments, before income tax effect
    20       34  
Income tax effect
    (5 )     (4 )
                 
Other comprehensive income
  $ 15     $ 30  
                 
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax effects, is comprised of the following (in millions).
 
                 
    March 31, 2007     December 31, 2006  
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
  $ 144     $ 133  
Fair value of effective portion of hedges — net
    (43 )     (46 )
Net actuarial loss
    (82 )     (83 )
Net prior service cost
    (8 )     (8 )
Net transition obligation
    (1 )     (1 )
                 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 10     $ (5 )
                 
 
11.   Share-Based Compensation
 
On January 1, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised), Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective method. The modified prospective method requires companies to record compensation cost beginning with the effective date based on the requirements of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date. All awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) that remain unvested at the adoption date will continue to be expensed over the remaining service period. The cumulative effect of the accounting change, net of tax, as of January 1, 2006 was approximately $1 million, and was not considered material as to require presentation as a cumulative effect of accounting change in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.


15


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Accordingly, the expense recognized as a result of adopting FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) was included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statement of operations in the first quarter of 2006.
 
Compensation to be Settled in Stock
 
2006 Stock Options
 
On October 26, 2006, our board of directors authorized a grant of an aggregate of 885,170 seven-year non-qualified stock options under the Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (2006 Incentive Plan) at an exercise price of $25.53 to certain of our executive officers and key employees. These options are comprised of equal portions of premium and non-premium options. Both the premium and non-premium options vest ratably in 25% annual increments over a four year period measured from October 26, 2006, and may be exercised, in whole or in part, once vested. However, while the premium and non-premium options carry the same exercise price of $25.53, in no event may the premium options be exercised unless the fair market value per share, as defined in the 2006 Incentive Plan, on the business day preceding the exercise date equals or exceeds $28.59. If the participant retires before October 26, 2007, the options will be forfeited. If the participant retires on or after October 26, 2007, the options will continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule, but must be exercised no later than the third anniversary following the participant’s retirement date. In the event of the participant’s death or disability, all of the options will become immediately vested, but must be exercised no later than the first anniversary following the participant’s termination of employment. All of the options will become immediately vested and exercisable, without regard to the per share price restriction on premium options, upon a change in control of Novelis.
 
The table below shows the option activity (for both premium and non-premium options) under our 2006 Incentive Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (all amounts actual).
 
                                 
                Weighted
       
                Average
       
          Weighted
    Remaining
       
          Average
    Contractual
    Aggregate
 
    Number of
    Exercise
    Term
    Intrinsic
 
    Options     Price     (In Years)     Value  
 
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2006
    858,500     $ 25.53                  
Granted
    —       —                  
Exercised
    —       —                  
Forfeited/Cancelled
    (32,650 )   $ 25.53                  
Expired
    —       —                  
                                 
Options outstanding as of March 31, 2007
    825,850     $ 25.53       6.6     $ 15,344,293  
                                 
Options exercisable as of March 31, 2007
    —     $ —       —     $ —  
                                 
 
We used the Monte Carlo valuation model to determine the fair value of the premium options outstanding under the 2006 Incentive Plan. The Monte Carlo model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award and calculates the fair market value of each award. Because our trading history is shorter than the expected life of the options, we used historical stock price volatility data from comparable companies to supplement our own historical volatility to determine expected volatility assumptions. The annual expected dividend yield is based on dividend payments of $0.01 per share per quarter. Risk-free interest rates are based on U.S. Treasury Strip yields, compounded daily, consistent with the expected lives of the options. The fair value of the premium options is being amortized


16


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

over the requisite service period of each award, which is from 1.0 to 4.0 years, subject to acceleration in cases where the employee elects retirement or is retirement eligible after October 26, 2007.
 
We used the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the fair value of non-premium options issued. Because our trading history is shorter than the expected life of the options, we used historical stock price volatility data from comparable companies to supplement our own historical volatility to determine expected volatility assumptions. The annual expected dividend yield is based on dividend payments of $0.01 per share per quarter. Risk-free interest rates are based on U.S. Treasury Strip yields, compounded daily, consistent with the expected lives of the options. Because we do not have a sufficient history of option exercise or cancellation, we estimated the expected life of the options based on an extension of the “simplified method” as prescribed by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107, Share-Based Payment, which allows for the use of a mid-point between the earliest and latest dates that an award can be exercised.
 
No premium or non-premium options under the 2006 Incentive Plan were granted during the three months ended March 31, 2007. The fair value of our premium and non-premium options was estimated using the following assumptions:
 
     
    Three Months Ended
    March 31, 2007
 
Expected volatility
  42.20 to 46.40%
Weighted average volatility
  44.30%
Dividend yield
  0.16%
Risk-free interest rate
  4.68 to 4.71%
Expected life
  1.00 to 4.75 years
 
As of March 31, 2007, we had $7.0 million in unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested premium and non-premium options under the 2006 Incentive Plan, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years.
 
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005
 
On January 5, 2005, our board of directors adopted the Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005 (the Conversion Plan) to allow for 1,372,663 Alcan stock options held by employees of Alcan who became our employees following our spin-off from Alcan to be replaced with options to purchase 2,723,914 of our common shares. All options expire ten years from their date of grant. All converted options that were vested on the spin-off date continued to be vested. Unvested options as of the spin-off date vest in four equal annual installments beginning on January 6, 2006, the first anniversary of the spin-off date. All of the options will become immediately vested and exercisable upon a change in control of Novelis.


17


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
The following table shows the option activity in our Conversion Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (all amounts actual).
 
                                 
                Weighted
       
                Average
       
          Weighted
    Remaining
       
          Average
    Contractual
    Aggregate
 
    Number of
    Exercise
    Term
    Intrinsic
 
    Options     Price     (In Years)     Value  
 
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2006
    2,514,277     $ 21.84                  
Granted
    —       —                  
Exercised
    (1,217,325 )   $ 21.95                  
Forfeited/Cancelled
    —       —                  
Expired
    —       —                  
                                 
Options outstanding as of March 31, 2007
    1,296,952     $ 21.74       6.2     $ 29,012,758  
                                 
Options exercisable as of March 31, 2007
    725,860     $ 21.67       6.0     $ 16,291,327  
                                 
 
We used the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the fair value of the options outstanding. Because we had no trading history at the time of the valuation, we used historical stock price volatility data from comparable companies to determine expected volatility assumptions. The annual expected dividend yield was based on our then current and anticipated dividend payments. Risk-free interest rates were based on U.S. Treasury bond yields, compounded daily, consistent with the expected lives of the options. Because we did not have a sufficient history of option exercise or cancellation, we estimated the expected life of the options based on the lesser of the expected term of six years or the remaining life of the option.
 
No new options under the Conversion Plan have been granted since its adoption in January 2005. The fair value of each option was estimated using the following assumptions:
 
     
    Three Months
    Ended
    March 31, 2007
 
Expected volatility
  30.30%
Weighted-average volatility
  30.30%
Dividend yield
  1.56%
Risk-free interest rate
  2.88 to 3.73%
Expected life
  0.70 to 5.70 years
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we had 381,009 options vest with a total fair value of $2.6 million.
 
Under our Conversion Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2007, the total intrinsic value of options exercised was $18.5 million; cash received from options exercised was $26.7 million; and the actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from the options exercised was $1.4 million, including $1.1 million of “windfall” tax benefits. There were no options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2006.
 
As of March 31, 2007, we had $1.7 million in unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested options under the 2005 Conversion Plan, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.


18


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
Recognition Awards
 
On September 25, 2006, we entered into Recognition Agreements and granted Recognition Awards to certain executive officers and other key employees (Executives) to retain and reward them for continued dedication towards corporate objectives. Under the terms of these agreements, Executives who remain continuously employed by us through the vesting dates of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008 are entitled to receive one-half of their total Recognition Awards on each vesting date.
 
The number of Recognition Awards payable under the agreements varies by Executive. Currently, there are 145,800 shares subject to award. In accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised), we valued these awards as of the issuance date and are recognizing their cost over the requisite service period of the Executives.
 
The table below shows the activity for our Recognition Awards for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (all amounts actual).
 
                 
          Weighted
 
          Average
 
    Number of
    Grant Date
 
    Shares     Fair Value  
 
Recognition Awards as of December 31, 2006
    145,800     $ 23.15  
Granted
    —       —  
Vested
    —       —  
Forfeited/Cancelled
    —       —  
                 
Recognition Awards as of March 31, 2007
    145,800     $ 23.15  
                 
 
As of March 31, 2007, there was approximately $1.0 million and $1.3 million of unamortized compensation expense related to each of the two vesting dates for the Recognition Awards, which is expected to be recognized over the next 0.75 years and 1.75 years, respectively.
 
As a result of the potential acquisition of our common stock by Hindalco (see Note 2 — Potential Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock), on February 10, 2007, our board of directors adopted resolutions to amend the Recognition Awards with the Executives. As amended, if the transaction is consummated prior to December 31, 2008 and if the Executive remains continuously employed by us through the vesting dates of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008, the Executive is entitled to the awards payable in either, at the option of the Executive, (i) Hindalco common shares (if offered by Hindalco) or (ii) cash.
 
Compensation to be Settled in Cash
 
Stock Appreciation Rights
 
On October 26, 2006, our board of directors authorized a grant of 381,090 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) under the 2006 Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $25.53 to certain of our executive officers and key employees. The terms of the SARs are identical in all material respects to those of the stock options issued under the 2006 Incentive Plan, except that the incremental increase in the value of the SARs is settled in cash rather than shares of Novelis’ common stock at the time of exercise. The SARs are comprised of two equal portions: premium and non-premium SARs. Both the premium and non-premium SARs vest ratably in 25% annual increments over the four-year period measured from October 26, 2006, and may be exercised, in whole or in part, once vested. However, while the premium and non-premium SARs carry the same exercise price of $25.53, in no event may the premium SARs be exercised unless the fair market value per share, as defined in the 2006 Incentive Plan, on the business day preceding the exercise date equals or exceeds $28.59. If the participant retires before October 26, 2007, the SARs will be forfeited. If the participant retires on or


19


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

after October 26, 2007, SARs will continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule, but must be exercised no later than the third anniversary following the participant’s retirement date. In the event of the participant’s death or disability, all of the SARs will become immediately vested, but must be exercised no later than the first anniversary following the participant’s termination of employment. All of the SARs will become immediately vested and exercisable, without regard to the per share price restriction on premium award shares, upon a change in control of Novelis.
 
The table below shows the SARs activity (for both premium and non-premium SARs) under our 2006 Incentive Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (all amounts actual).
 
                                 
                Weighted
       
                Average
       
                Remaining
       
          Weighted
    Contractual
    Aggregate
 
    Number of
    Average
    Term
    Intrinsic
 
    SARs     Exercise Price     (In Years)     Value  
 
SARs outstanding as of December 31, 2006
    381,090     $ 25.53                  
Granted
    —       —                  
Exercised
    —       —                  
Forfeited/Cancelled
    (1,090 )   $ 25.53                  
Expired
    —       —                  
                                 
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2007
    380,000     $ 25.53       6.6     $ 7,060,400  
                                 
SARs exercisable as of March 31, 2007
    —     $ —       —     $ —  
                                 
 
We used the Monte Carlo valuation model to determine the fair value of the premium SARs outstanding under the 2006 Incentive Plan. The Monte Carlo model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award and calculates the fair market value of each award. Because our trading history is shorter than the expected life of the SARs, we used historical stock price volatility data from comparable companies to supplement our own historical volatility to determine expected volatility assumptions. No quarterly or annual dividend is expected. Risk-free interest rates are based on U.S. Treasury Strip yields, compounded daily, consistent with the expected remaining lives of the premium SARs. The fair value of the premium SARs is being amortized over the requisite remaining service period of each award, which is from 0.57 to 3.57 years, subject to acceleration in cases where the employee elects retirement or is retirement eligible after October 26, 2007.
 
We used the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the fair value of the non-premium SARs outstanding. Because our trading history is shorter than the expected life of the SARs, we used historical stock price volatility data from comparable companies to supplement our own historical volatility to determine expected volatility assumptions. No quarterly or annual dividend is expected. Risk-free interest rates are based on U.S. Treasury Strip yields, compounded daily, consistent with the expected remaining lives of the SARs. Because we do not have a sufficient history of SAR exercise or cancellation, we estimated the expected remaining life of the SARs based on an extension of the “simplified method” as prescribed by SAB No. 107.


20


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
The fair value of each premium and non-premium SAR under the 2006 Incentive Plan was estimated as of March 31, 2007 using the following assumptions:
 
     
Expected volatility
  40.70 to 44.70%
Weighted average volatility
  42.70%
Dividend yield
  None
Risk-free interest rate
  4.51 to 4.59%
Expected life
  0.57 to 4.32 years
 
As of March 31, 2007, we had $7.6 million in unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested premium and non-premium SARs under the 2006 Incentive Plan, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years.
 
Stock Price Appreciation Unit Plan
 
Prior to the spin-off, some Alcan employees who later transferred to Novelis held Alcan stock price appreciation units (SPAUs). These units entitled them to receive cash equal to the excess of the market value of an Alcan common share on the exercise date of a SPAU over the market value of an Alcan common share on its grant date. On January 6, 2005, these employees received 418,777 Novelis SPAUs to replace their 211,035 Alcan SPAUs at a weighted average exercise price of $22.04. All converted SPAUs that were vested at the spin-off date continued to be vested. Unvested SPAUs vest in four equal annual installments beginning on January 6, 2006, the first anniversary of the spin-off date. In a case of a change in control of Novelis, all SPAUs shall become immediately exercisable.
 
The table below shows the activity in our SPAU Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (all amounts actual).
 
                                 
                Weighted
       
                Average
       
                Remaining
       
          Weighted
    Contractual
    Aggregate
 
    Number of
    Average
    Term
    Intrinsic
 
    SPAUs     Exercise Price     (In Years)     Value  
 
SPAUs outstanding as of December 31, 2006
    418,405     $ 22.04                  
Granted
    —       —                  
Exercised
    (117,788 )   $ 22.29                  
Forfeited/Cancelled
    —       —                  
Expired
    —       —                  
                                 
SPAUs outstanding as of March 31, 2007
    300,617     $ 21.94       6.8     $ 6,665,913  
                                 
SPAUs exercisable as of March 31, 2007
    98,378     $ 21.33       6.6     $ 2,240,678  
                                 
 
We used the Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate the fair value of SPAUs granted to employees and to determine the fair value of the SPAUs outstanding. Because our trading history is shorter than the expected life of the SPAUs, we used historical stock price volatility data from comparable companies to supplement our own historical volatility to determine expected volatility assumptions. No quarterly or annual dividend is expected. Risk-free interest rates are based on U.S. Treasury spot rates consistent with the expected remaining lives of the SPAUs. Because we do not have a sufficient history of SPAU exercise or cancellation, we estimated the expected remaining life of the SPAUs based on an extension of the “simplified method” as prescribed by SAB No. 107.


21


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
The fair value of each SPAU was estimated as of March 31, 2007 using the following assumptions:
 
     
Expected volatility
  38.20 to 40.80%
Weighted average volatility
  39.91%
Dividend yield
  None
Risk-free interest rate
  4.51 to 4.56%
Expected life
  2.25 to 4.37 years
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we had 101,119 SPAUs vest with a total fair value of $2.7 million.
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, 117,788 SPAUs were exercised resulting in net payments of $1.7 million in cash to the holders.
 
As of March 31, 2007, there was $0.7 million of unamortized compensation cost related to non-vested SPAUs, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining vesting period of 1.6 years.
 
Deferred Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors
 
On January 5, 2005, Novelis established the Deferred Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors under which non-executive directors receive 50% of their compensation payable in the form of directors’ deferred share units (DDSUs) and the other 50% in the form of either cash, additional DDSUs or a combination of these two (at the election of each non-executive director). The number of DDSUs is determined by dividing the quarterly amount payable, as elected, by the average closing prices of a common share on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) (adjusted for the noon exchange rate) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on the last five trading days of each quarter. Additional DDSUs representing the equivalent of dividends declared on common shares are credited to each holder of DDSUs. The number of DDSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2007 and 2006 includes DDSUs issued on April 1, 2007 and 2006, respectively, as the required service was provided by each period-end.
 
The DDSUs are redeemable in cash and/or in shares of our common stock following the participant’s retirement from the board. The redemption amount is calculated by multiplying the accumulated balance of DDSUs by the average closing price of a common share on the TSX (adjusted for the noon exchange rate) and NYSE on the last five trading days prior to the redemption date. All of the DDSUs will become immediately payable upon a change in control of Novelis.
 
The table below shows our DDSU activity for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (all amounts actual).
 
                         
                Aggregate
 
    Number of
    Redemption
    Intrinsic
 
    DDSUs     Price     Value  
 
DDSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2006
    112,039     $ 27.11          
Granted
    7,060                  
Exercised (paid out)
    (12,521 )                
Forfeited
    —                  
Expired/Cancelled
    —                  
                         
DDSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2007
    106,578     $ 44.09     $ 4,698,535  
                         
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, a total of 12,521 DDSUs were paid out totaling $0.6 million in cash.


22


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
Novelis Founders Performance Awards
 
In March 2005 (and amended and restated in March 2006 and February 2007), Novelis established a plan to reward certain key executives with Performance Share Units (PSUs) if Novelis common share price improvement targets were achieved within specific time periods. There are three equal tranches of PSUs, and each has a specific share price improvement target. For the first tranche, the target share price of $23.57 applies for the period from March 24, 2005 to March 23, 2008. For the second tranche, the target share price of $25.31 applies for the period from March 24, 2006 to March 23, 2008. For the third tranche, the target share price of $27.28 applies for the period from March 24, 2007 to March 23, 2008. If awarded, a particular tranche will be paid in cash on the later of six months from the date the specific common share price target is reached or twelve months after the start of the performance period, and will be based on the average of the daily common share closing prices on the NYSE for the last five trading days prior to the payment date. Upon a participant’s termination due to retirement, death or disability, all PSUs awarded prior to the termination will be paid at the same time as for active participants. For any other termination, all PSUs will be forfeited. Additionally, upon a change in control, all PSUs awarded prior to the change in control event will be paid. However, any PSUs that have not been awarded prior to the change in control will be forfeited. In March 2006, our board of directors amended the PSUs in order to clarify that PSUs would only be awarded under the second and third tranches for performance periods beginning in 2006 and 2007, respectively, if the share price met the applicable threshold for 15 consecutive days during an open trading window.
 
The liability for the first tranche was accrued over its term, was valued on March 24, 2006, and was paid in April 2006 in the aggregate amount of $2.7 million.
 
In February 2007, as a result of the potential acquisition of our common stock by Hindalco, our board of directors recognized that the applicable share price threshold had been (or would likely be) met with respect to the second tranche and would probably be met for the third tranche, but in light of the insiders’ awareness of the possibility of a change in control transaction, they have been subject to a trading blackout. Moreover, it is unlikely that a 15 day open trading window under the Novelis disclosure and insider trading policies will arise prior to the potential closing of the change in control transaction (which is expected to occur during the second quarter of 2007). Accordingly, on February 10, 2007, our board of directors further amended the PSUs in order to provide that the applicable threshold for (a) the second tranche will be met as of February 28, 2007, and (b) the third tranche will be met as of March 26, 2007, for purposes of PSUs to be awarded.
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, a total of 8,500 PSU’s from the third tranche were forfeited. The fair value of each PSU as of March 31, 2007 was estimated to be the average of the daily common share closing prices on the NYSE for the last five trading days of the quarter, or $44.07 per share, since the market conditions for both the second and third tranches (represented by 94,450 and 85,950 PSUs, respectively) were effectively met as a result of the amendment adopted on February 10, 2007 discussed above.


23


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
Compensation Cost
 
Total share-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, including amounts related to the cumulative effect of an accounting change (exclusive of income taxes) from adopting FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) on January 1, 2006 (in the 2006 period), is presented in the table below (in millions). These amounts are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
 
                 
    Three Months
 
    Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Compensation to be Settled in Stock:
               
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan
  $ 0.9     $ —  
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005
    0.3       0.8  
Recognition Awards
    0.5       —  
                 
      1.7       0.8  
                 
Compensation to be Settled in Cash:
               
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (Stock Appreciation Rights)
    1.4       —  
Stock Price Appreciation Unit Plan
    4.4       1.5  
Total Shareholder Returns Performance Plan
    —       (0.8 )
Deferred Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors
    2.2       0.3  
Novelis Founders Performance Awards
    6.0       1.5  
                 
      14.0       2.5  
                 
Total Share-Based Compensation Expense
  $ 15.7     $ 3.3  
                 
 
12.   Postretirement Benefit Plans
 
Components of net periodic benefit cost for all of our significant plans are shown in the table below (in millions).
 
                                 
    Pension Benefits     Other Postretirement Benefits  
    Three Months
    Three Months
 
    Ended
    Ended
 
    March 31,     March 31,  
    2007     2006     2007     2006  
 
Service cost
  $ 12     $ 10     $ 1     $ 1  
Interest cost
    12       10       2       2  
Expected return on assets
    (11 )     (9 )     —       —  
Amortization
                               
— actuarial losses
    1       1       1       —  
— prior service cost
    —       1       —       —  
                                 
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 14     $ 13     $ 4     $ 3  
                                 
 
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 7.5% in 2007.


24


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
Employer Contributions to Plans
 
For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to date, and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over periods of 15 years or less.
 
We also participate in savings plans in Canada and the U.S. as well as defined contribution pension plans in the U.K., Canada, Germany, Malaysia and Brazil.
 
We contributed the following amounts to all plans, including the Alcan plans that cover our employees (in millions).
 
                 
    Three Months
 
    Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Funded pension plans
  $ 10     $ 9  
Unfunded pension plans
    6       3  
Savings and defined contribution pension plans
    3       3  
                 
Total contributions
  $ 19     $ 15  
                 
 
During the remainder of 2007, we expect to contribute an additional $27 million to our funded pension plans, $13 million to our unfunded pension plans and $9 million to our savings and defined contribution plans.
 
13.   Currency Losses (Gains)
 
The following currency losses (gains) are included in Other (income) expenses — net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations (in millions).
 
                 
    Three Months
 
    Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Net loss (gain) on change in fair value of currency derivative instruments
  $ (5 )   $ 16  
Net loss (gain) on translation of monetary assets and liabilities
    6       (5 )
                 
    $ 1     $ 11  
                 
 
The following currency gains (losses) are included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets (net of tax effect, and in millions).
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Cumulative currency translation adjustment — beginning of period
  $ 133     $ (35 )
Effect of changes in exchange rates
    11       37  
                 
Cumulative currency translation adjustment — end of period
  $ 144     $ 2  
                 
 
14.   Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts
 
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and non-derivative instruments, including forward contracts, to manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may be exposed to losses in


25


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

the future if the counterparties to the contracts fail to perform. We are satisfied that the risk of such non-performance is remote, due to our monitoring of credit exposures. Alcan is the principal counter-party to our aluminum forward contracts.
 
During the first quarter of 2006, we implemented hedge accounting for certain of our cross-currency interest swaps with respect to intercompany loans to several European subsidiaries and forward exchange contracts. As of March 31, 2007, we had $712 million of cross-currency swaps (euro 475 million, British pound (GBP) 62 million and Swiss franc (CHF) 35 million) and $97 million of forward foreign exchange contracts (226 million Brazilian real (BRL)).
 
The euro and GBP cross-currency interest swaps have been designated as net investment hedges, while the CHF cross-currency interest rate swaps and the BRL forward foreign exchange contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges.
 
For contracts designated as net investment hedges and cash flow hedges, we recognize the change in fair value of the ineffective portion of the hedge as a gain or loss in our current period results of operations. We include the change in fair value of the effective and interest portions of these hedges in Accumulated other comprehensive loss within Shareholders’ equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the change in fair value of the effective and interest portions of our net investment hedges was a gain of $1 million and the change in fair value of the effective portion of our cash flow hedges was a gain of $6 million.
 
As of March 31, 2007, the amount of effective net gains and losses expected to be realized during the next twelve months is $11 million. No cash flow hedges were discontinued during the three months ended March 31, 2007. The maximum period over which we have hedged our exposure to cash flow variability is through February 2015.
 
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity contracts as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were as follows (in millions).
 
                             
        As of March 31, 2007  
                    Net Fair
 
    Maturity Dates   Assets     Liabilities     Value  
 
Foreign exchange forward contracts
  2007 through 2011   $ 16     $ (20 )   $ (4 )
Interest rate swaps
  2007 through 2008     2       —       2  
Cross-currency swaps
  2007 through 2015     6       (90 )     (84 )
Aluminum forward contracts
  2007 through 2009     60       (8 )     52  
Aluminum options
  2007     1       —       1  
Electricity swap
  2016     60       —       60  
Embedded derivative instruments
  2007     1       —       1  
Natural gas swaps
  2007     1       —       1  
                             
Total fair value
        147       (118 )     29  
Less: current portion (A)
        92       (33 )     59  
                             
Noncurrent portion (A)
      $ 55     $ (85 )   $ (30 )
                             
 


26


Table of Contents

Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

                             
        As of December 31, 2006  
                    Net Fair
 
    Maturity Dates   Assets     Liabilities     Value  
 
Foreign exchange forward contracts
  2007 through 2011   $ 12     $ (20 )   $ (8 )
Interest rate swaps
  2007 through 2008     2       —       2  
Cross-currency swaps
  2007 through 2015     4       (95 )     (91 )
Aluminum forward contracts
  2007 through 2009     67       (12 )     55  
Aluminum options
  2007     2       —       2  
Electricity swap
  2016     47       —       47  
Embedded derivative instruments
  2007     16       —       16  
Natural gas swaps
  2007     —       (2 )     (2 )
                             
Total fair value
        150       (129 )     21  
Less: current portion (A)
        106       (42 )     64  
                             
Noncurrent portion (A)
      $ 44     $ (87 )   $ (43 )
                             
 
 
(A) The amounts of the current and long-term portions of fair values under assets are each presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The amounts of the current and noncurrent portions of fair values under liabilities are included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and Other long-term liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
 
15.   Other (Income) Expenses — Net
 
Other (income) expenses — net is comprised of the following (in millions).
 
                 
    Three Months
 
    Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Gains on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net
  $ (30 )   $ (54 )
Sale transaction fees
    32       —  
Loss on disposal of business
    —       15  
Exchange (gains) losses — net
    6       (5 )
Gains on disposals of property, plant and equipment — net
    —       (1 )
Other (income) expenses — net
    1       (4 )
                 
    $ 9     $ (49 )
                 
 
In connection with the potential acquisition of our common stock by Hindalco as described in Note 2 — Potential Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock, we have incurred or will incur fees and expenses, including a termination fee with an unsuccessful bidder. During the first quarter of 2007, we included expenses of $32 million in Other (income) expenses — net for those costs that have already been incurred, and that are not contingent upon closing. Of this amount, $22 million was paid during the first quarter of 2007 and the remaining amounts are expected to be paid during the second quarter of 2007.
 
16.   Income Taxes
 
We provide for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, and

27


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

FASB Interpretation No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods, the provision for taxes on income recognizes our estimate of the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year, adjusted for the impact of any discrete events, which are reported in the period in which they occur. Each quarter, we re-evaluate our estimated tax expense for the year and make adjustments for changes in the estimated tax rate. Additionally, we evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis. Our evaluation considers all positive and negative evidence and factors, such as the scheduled reversal of temporary differences, historical and projected future taxable income or losses, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. As a result, the provision for taxes on income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were based on the estimated effective tax rates applicable for the year ending December 31, 2007 and the year ended December 31, 2006, respectively, after considering items specifically related to the interim periods.
 
A reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows (in millions).
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Pre-tax income (loss) before equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests’ share
  $ (58 )   $ 25  
                 
Canadian statutory tax rate
    33 %     33 %
                 
Income taxes (benefit) at the Canadian statutory rate
  $ (19 )   $ 8  
Increase (decrease) in tax rate resulting from:
               
Exchange translation items
    6       10  
Exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes
    2       3  
Change in valuation allowances
    23       33  
Expense/income items with no tax effect — net
    1       3  
Tax rate differences on foreign earnings
    (6 )     44  
Other — net
    —       1  
                 
Provision for taxes on income (loss)
  $ 7     $ 102  
                 
Effective tax rate
    (12 )%     408 %
                 
 
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, our effective tax rate is less than the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate due primarily to (1) a $23 million increase in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize those losses, (2) a $6 million benefit from differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign effective tax rates resulting from the application of an annual effective tax rate to profit and loss entities in different jurisdictions and (3) $8 million for (a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect, (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, and (c) the remeasurement of deferred income taxes.
 
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, our effective tax rate is greater than the Canadian statutory rate due primarily to (1) a $44 million difference between the Canadian statutory and foreign effective tax rates resulting from the application of an annual effective tax rate to profit and loss entities in different jurisdictions, (2) a $33 million increase in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize those losses and


28


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

(3) $13 million for (a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect, (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, and (c) the remeasurement of deferred income taxes.
 
Cash taxes paid during the first quarter of 2007 and 2006 were $18 million and $12 million, respectively.
 
Adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48
 
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.  FASB Interpretation No. 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FASB Interpretation No. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Upon adoption as of January 1, 2007, we increased our reserves for uncertain tax positions by $1 million. We recognized the increase as a cumulative effect adjustment to Shareholders’ equity, as an increase to our Accumulated deficit. Including this adjustment, reserves for uncertain tax positions totaled $45 million as of January 1, 2007. Of this total, $43 million represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate in any future periods.
 
Tax authorities are currently examining certain prior years’ tax returns for 1999-2003. We are evaluating potential adjustments related to certain items and we anticipate that it is reasonably possible that settlement of the examination will result in a payment in the range of up to $5 million and a corresponding decrease in unrecognized tax benefits by December 31, 2007.
 
Separately, we are awaiting a court ruling regarding the utilization of certain operating losses. We anticipate that it is reasonably possible that this ruling will result in a $10 million decrease in unrecognized tax benefits by December 31, 2007 related to this matter. We have fully funded this contingent liability through a judicial deposit, which is included in Other long-term assets — third parties as of January 1, 2007.
 
With the exception of the ongoing tax examinations described above, we are no longer subject to any income tax examinations by any tax authorities for years before 2001. With few exceptions, tax returns for all jurisdictions for all tax years after 2000 are subject to examination by taxing authorities.
 
Our continuing practice and policy is to record potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in our Provision for taxes on income. As of January 1, 2007, we had $7 million accrued for potential interest on income taxes and no amounts accrued for potential penalties. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, our Provision for taxes on income (loss) included a charge for an additional $1 million of potential interest.
 
17.   Loss Per Share
 
We use the treasury stock method to calculate the dilutive effect of stock options and other common stock equivalents (potentially dilutive shares), which recognizes the dilution of earnings per share that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. These potentially dilutive shares include dilutive stock options, DDSUs and Recognition Awards. As we incurred a net loss for each of the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the potentially dilutive shares described below were not included in our calculation of diluted loss per share, as they would be anti-dilutive.
 
Options to purchase an aggregate of 2,122,802 of our common shares were held by our employees and former employees as of March 31, 2007. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, all of these options were potentially dilutive at an average exercise price of $23.21. Additionally, there were 106,578 DDSUs and 145,800 Recognition Awards that were considered potentially dilutive shares for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (see Note 11 — Share-Based Compensation).


29


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
Options to purchase an aggregate of 2,686,600 of our common shares were held by our employees and former employees as of March 31, 2006. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, 741,999 of these options were potentially dilutive at an average exercise price of $17.78. Additionally, there were 72,885 DDSUs that were considered potentially dilutive shares for the three months ended March 31, 2006. A total of 1,944,601 anti-dilutive options were held by our employees as of March 31, 2006 and were not included in our calculation of diluted loss per share because their exercise prices were greater than our average stock price during the quarter.
 
The following table shows the information used in the calculation of basic and diluted loss per share.
 
                 
    Three Months
 
    Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Numerator:
               
Net loss (in millions)
  $ (64 )   $ (74 )
                 
Denominator:
               
Weighted average number of outstanding shares — basic
    74,928,318       74,005,649  
Effect of dilutive shares
    —       —  
                 
Weighted average number of outstanding shares — diluted
    74,928,318       74,005,649  
                 
Loss per share:
               
Net loss per share — basic and diluted
  $ (0.85 )   $ (1.00 )
                 
 
18.   Commitments and Contingencies
 
Primary Supplier
 
Alcan is our primary supplier of prime and sheet ingot. Purchases from Alcan for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 represented 45% and 41%, respectively, of our total combined prime and sheet ingot purchases.
 
Legal Proceedings
 
Reynolds Boat Case.  As previously disclosed, we and Alcan were defendants in a case in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, in Tacoma, Washington, case number C04-0175RJB. Plaintiffs were Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under implied warranty theories, based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and Alcan sold certain aluminum products that were ultimately used for marine applications and were unsuitable for such applications. The jury reached a verdict on May 22, 2006 against us and Alcan for approximately $60 million, and the court later awarded Reynolds and Alcoa approximately $16 million in prejudgment interest and court costs.
 
The case was settled during July 2006 as among us, Alcan, Reynolds, Alcoa and their insurers for $71 million. We contributed approximately $1 million toward the settlement, and the remaining $70 million was funded by our insurers. Although the settlement was substantially funded by our insurance carriers, certain of them have reserved the right to request a refund from us, after reviewing details of the plaintiffs’ damages to determine if they include costs of a nature not covered under the insurance contracts. Of the $70 million funded, $39 million is in dispute with and under further review by certain of our insurance carriers, who have until July 20, 2007 to complete their review, unless that review time is extended by mutual agreement. In the


30


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

third quarter of 2006, we posted a letter of credit in the amount of approximately $10 million in favor of one of those insurance carriers, while we resolve the questions, if any, about the extent of coverage of the costs included in the settlement.
 
As of December 31, 2005, we recognized a liability for the full amount of the settlement, included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet of $71 million, with a corresponding charge against earnings. We also recognized an insurance receivable included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets on our consolidated balance sheet of $31 million, with a corresponding increase to earnings. Although $70 million of the settlement was funded by our insurers, we only recognized an insurance receivable to the extent that coverage was not in dispute. We recognized a net charge of $40 million during the fourth quarter of 2005.
 
In July 2006, we contributed and paid $1 million to our insurers who subsequently paid the entire settlement amount of $71 million to the plaintiffs. Accordingly, during the third quarter of 2006 we reversed the previously recorded insurance receivable of $31 million and reduced our recorded liability by the same amount plus the $1 million contributed by us. The remaining liability of $39 million represents the amount of the settlement claim that was funded by our insurers but is still in dispute with and under further review by certain of our insurance carriers, who have yet to complete their review as described above. The $39 million liability is included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
 
While the ultimate resolution of the nature and extent of any costs not covered under our insurance contracts cannot be determined with certainty or reasonably estimated at this time, if there is an adverse outcome with respect to insurance coverage, and we are required to reimburse our insurers, it could have a material impact on our cash flows in the period of resolution. Alternatively, the ultimate resolution could be favorable, such that insurance coverage is in excess of the net expense that we have recognized to date. This would result in our recording a non-cash gain in the period of resolution, and this non-cash gain could have a material impact on our results of operations during the period in which such a determination is made.
 
Coke Lawsuits.  A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis Corporation on February 15, 2007 by Coca-Cola Bottler’s Sales and Services Company LLC (“CCBSS”) in state court in Georgia. In addition, a lawsuit was commenced against Novelis Corporation and Alcan Corporation on April 3, 2007 by Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc, Enterprises Acquisition Company, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company and The Coca-Cola Trading Company, Inc (collectively, “CCE”) in federal court in Georgia. Novelis intends to defend these claims vigorously. Novelis believes that it has good defenses, although there can be no certainty with respect to the outcome of the litigation.
 
CCBSS is a consortium of Coca-Cola bottlers across the United States, including Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under the agreement. The agreement includes a “most favored nations” provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached the terms of the most favored nations provision. The dispute will likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the parties and the court’s finding as to how certain provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material. Novelis Corporation has not yet filed its response to the complaint. On February 20, 2007, Novelis Corporation removed the CCBSS litigation to the federal court in Georgia. On March 6, 2007, CCBSS moved to remand the case back to the Georgia state court. That motion is pending.
 
The claim by CCE seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial for breach of a prior aluminum can stock supply agreement between CCE and Novelis Corporation, successor to the rights and


31


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

obligations of Alcan Aluminum Corporation under the agreement. According to its terms, that agreement with CCE terminated in 2006. The CCE supply agreement included a “most favored nations” provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCE alleges that Novelis Corporation’s entry into a supply agreement with Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached the “most favored nation” provision of the CCE supply agreement. If CCE were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material. The dispute will likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the parties and the court’s finding as to how certain provisions of the supply agreement ought to be interpreted. Novelis Corporation has not yet filed its response to the complaint.
 
Anheuser-Busch Litigation.  On September 19, 2006, Novelis Corporation filed a lawsuit against Anheuser-Busch, Inc. in federal court in Ohio. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. subsequently filed suit against Novelis Corporation and the Company in federal court in Missouri. On January 3, 2007, Anheuser-Busch, Inc.’s suit was transferred to the Ohio federal court.
 
Novelis Corporation alleges that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached the existing multi-year aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and we seek monetary damages and declaratory relief. Among other claims, we assert that since entering into the supply agreement, there has been a structural change in market conditions that requires a change to the pricing provisions under the agreement.
 
In its complaint, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. has asked for a declaratory judgment that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. is not obligated to modify the supply agreement as requested by Novelis Corporation, and that Novelis Corporation must continue to perform under the existing supply agreement.
 
The Anheuser-Busch, Inc. litigation is currently at the discovery stage. Novelis Corporation has continued to perform under the supply agreement during the litigation.
 
Environmental Matters
 
Oswego North Ponds.  As previously disclosed, Oswego North Ponds is currently our largest known single environmental loss contingency. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, Novelis Corporation (a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours and formerly known as Alcan Aluminum Corporation, or Alcancorp) in Oswego, New York used an oil containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in its re-melt operations. At the time, Novelis Corporation utilized a once-through cooling water system that discharged through a series of constructed ponds and wetlands, collectively referred to as the North Ponds. In the early 1980s, low levels of PCBs were detected in the cooling water system discharge and Novelis Corporation performed several subsequent investigations. The PCB-containing hydraulic oil, Pydraul, which was eliminated from use by Novelis Corporation in the early 1970s, was identified as the source of contamination. In the mid-1980s, the Oswego North Ponds site was classified as an “inactive hazardous waste disposal site” and added to the New York State Registry. Novelis Corporation ceased discharge through the North Ponds in mid-2002.
 
In cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New York State Department of Health, Novelis Corporation entered into a consent decree in August 2000 to develop and implement a remedial program to address the PCB contamination at the Oswego North Ponds site. A remedial investigation report was submitted in January 2004. The current estimated cost associated with this remediation is in the range of $12 million to $26 million. Based upon the report and other factors, we accrued $19 million as our estimated cost. In addition, NYSDEC held a public hearing on the remediation plan on March 13, 2006 and a Consent Order for the implementation of the remediation plan was executed by NYSDEC and Novelis Corporation, effective January 1, 2007. We believe that our estimate of $19 million is reasonable, and that the remediation plan will be designed and implemented in 2007 or 2008.


32


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
Brazil Tax Matters
 
Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazil’s Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America, as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had cash deposits aggregating approximately $25 million and $20 million, respectively, in judicial depository accounts pending finalization of the related cases. The depository accounts are in the name of the Brazilian government and will be expended towards these legal proceeding or released to us, depending on the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are included in Other long-term assets in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we are involved in several disputes with Brazil’s Minister of Treasury about various forms of manufacturing taxes and social security contributions, for which we have made no judicial deposits but for which we have established reserves ranging from less than $1 million to approximately $54 million as of March 31, 2007. In total, these reserves approximate $88 million and are included in Other long-term liabilities in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
 
Guarantees of Indebtedness
 
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including:
 
  •  certain of our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries; and
 
  •  Aluminium Norf GmbH, which is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint venture that does not meet the requirements for consolidation under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.
 
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no expiration and have termination notice requirements. For our majority-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness guaranteed is for short-term loan, overdraft and other debt facilities with financial institutions, which are currently scheduled to expire during the first half of 2007. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds any assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the potential settlement of these guarantees.
 
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries in our financial statements, all outstanding liabilities associated with trade accounts payable and short-term debt facilities for these entities are already included in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
 
The following table discloses information about our obligations under guarantees of indebtedness as of March 31, 2007 (in millions).
 
                 
    Maximum Potential
    Liability Carrying
 
Type of Entity
  Future Payment     Value  
 
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
  $ 76     $ 60  
Majority-owned subsidiaries
    3       —  
Aluminium Norf GmbH
    13       —  
 
19.   Segment and Major Customer Information
 
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical areas and are organized under four operating segments: North America; Europe; Asia and South America.
 
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our operating segments, based on Regional Income, in accordance with FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of an Enterprise and


33


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Related Information. Regional Income provides a measure of our underlying regional segment results that is in line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define Regional Income as income before (a) interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs; (b) gains and losses on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net; (c) depreciation and amortization; (d) impairment charges on long-lived assets; (e) minority interests’ share; (f) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of Regional Income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as determined on the equity method of accounting; (g) restructuring (charges) recoveries — net; (h) gains (losses) on disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses — net; (i) corporate selling, general and administrative expenses; (j) other corporate costs — net; (k) litigation settlement — net of insurance recoveries; (l) provision or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and (m) cumulative effect of accounting change — net of tax.
 
Net sales and expenses are measured in accordance with the policies and procedures described in Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated and combined financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, except the operating segments include our proportionate share of net sales, expenses, assets and liabilities of our non-consolidated affiliates accounted for using the equity method, since they are managed within each operating segment.
 
We do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133. Accordingly, changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the contract settlement. In the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations, change in fair value of derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133 are recognized in Other (income) expenses — net. These gains or losses may or may not result from cash settlement. For Regional Income purposes we only include the impact of the derivative gains or losses to the extent they are settled in cash during that period.
 
In the third quarter of 2006, we added a line to our Regional Income reconciliation to improve the disclosure of gains or losses resulting from cash settlement of derivative instruments that have been included in Regional Income. Accordingly, the first quarter of 2006 has been revised to conform to the current period presentation.
 
The tables below show selected segment financial information as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in millions). The Corporate and Other column in the tables below includes functions that are managed directly from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human resources and finance matters. It also includes consolidating and other elimination accounts.
 
Selected Segment Financial Information
 
                                                         
                            Adjustment to
             
                            Eliminate
             
As of and for the Three
  North
                South
    Proportional
    Corporate
       
Months Ended March 31, 2007
  America     Europe     Asia     America     Consolidation     and Other     Total  
 
Net sales (to third parties)
  $ 925     $ 1,057     $ 413     $ 235     $ —     $ —     $ 2,630  
Intersegment sales
    —       1       3       12       —       (16 )     —  
Regional Income (Loss)
    (17 )     86       17       56       —       —       142  
Depreciation and amortization
    16       24       14       11       (8 )     1       58  
Capital expenditures
    9       11       3       4       (4 )     1       24  
Total assets
    1,566       2,543       1,110       821       (114 )     44       5,970  
 


34


Table of Contents

Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

                                                         
                            Adjustment to
             
                            Eliminate
             
As of and for the Three
  North
                South
    Proportional
    Corporate
       
Months Ended March 31, 2006
  America     Europe     Asia     America     Consolidation     and Other     Total  
 
Net sales (to third parties)
  $ 895     $ 826     $ 394     $ 209     $ (5 )   $ —     $ 2,319  
Intersegment sales
    —       —       3       7       —       (10 )     —  
Regional Income
    58       57       25       41       —       —       181  
Depreciation and amortization
    18       23       14       11       (9 )     1       58  
Capital expenditures
    8       9       1       4       (3 )     2       21  
Total assets
    1,600       2,296       1,038       798       (87 )     98       5,743  
 
The following table shows the reconciliation from Total Regional Income to Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in millions).
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Total Regional Income
  $ 142     $ 181  
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
    (54 )     (51 )
Gains on cash settlement of derivative instruments — net, included in Regional Income
    (33 )     (53 )
Gains on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net
    30       54  
Depreciation and amortization
    (58 )     (58 )
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
    (8 )     —  
Minority interests’ share
    (2 )     —  
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation (A)
    (9 )     (8 )
Restructuring charges — net
    (9 )     (1 )
Loss on disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses — net
    —       (14 )
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses
    (26 )     (26 )
Other corporate costs — net (B)
    (30 )     4  
Provision for taxes on income (loss)
    (7 )     (102 )
                 
Net loss
  $ (64 )   $ (74 )
                 
 
 
(A) Our financial information for our segments (including Regional Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent with the way we manage our business segments. However, under GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to reconcile Total Regional Income to Net loss, the proportional Regional Income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed from Total Regional Income, net of our share of their net after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. See Note 7 — Investment in and Advances to Non-consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions for further information about these non-consolidated affiliates.
 
(B) During the first quarter of 2007, we incurred expenses of $32 million in connection with the potential acquisition of our common stock by Hindalco as described in Note 2 — Potential Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock.

35


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

 
Information about Major Customers
 
All of our operating segments had net sales to Rexam Plc (Rexam), our largest customer. Net sales to Rexam and the percentages of our total net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
 
Net sales to Rexam (in millions)
  $ 407     $ 332  
                 
Percentage of total net sales
    15.5 %     14.3 %
                 


36


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

20.   Supplemental Guarantor Information
 
In connection with the issuance of our Senior Notes, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries provided guarantees of the Senior Notes. These guarantees are full and unconditional as well as joint and several. The guarantor subsidiaries (the Guarantors) are comprised of the majority of our businesses in Canada, the U.S, the U.K, Brazil and Switzerland, as well as certain businesses in Germany. Certain Guarantors may be subject to restrictions on their ability to distribute earnings to Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The remaining subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not guarantors of the Senior Notes.
 
The following information presents consolidating statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, consolidating balance sheets as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and consolidating statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 of the Parent, the Guarantors, and the Non-Guarantors. Investments include investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net assets of divisions included in the Parent, and have been presented using the equity method of accounting.
 
Novelis Inc.
 
Consolidating Statement of Operations
(In millions)
 
                                         
    Three Months Ended March 31, 2007  
                Non-
             
    Parent     Guarantors     Guarantors     Eliminations     Consolidated  
 
Net sales
  $ 378     $ 2,228     $ 723     $ (699 )   $ 2,630  
                                         
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)
    374       2,094       675       (696 )     2,447  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    10       69       20       —       99  
Depreciation and amortization
    3       38       17       —       58  
Research and development expenses
    5       2       1       —       8  
Restructuring charges — net
    —       9       —       —       9  
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
    —       8       —       —       8  
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net
    7       39       4       —       50  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates
    14       (3 )     —       (14 )     (3 )
Other (income) expenses — net
    29       (20 )     —       —       9  
                                         
      442       2,236       717       (710 )     2,685  
                                         
Income (loss) before provision for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share
    (64 )     (8 )     6       11       (55 )
Provision for taxes on income (loss)
    —       5       2       —       7  
                                         
Income (loss) before minority interests’ share
    (64 )     (13 )     4       11       (62 )
Minority interests’ share
    —       —       (2 )     —       (2 )
                                         
Net income (loss)
  $ (64 )   $ (13 )   $ 2     $ 11     $ (64 )
                                         


37


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.
 
Consolidating Statement of Operations
(In millions)
 
                                         
    Three Months Ended March 31, 2006  
                Non-
             
    Parent     Guarantors     Guarantors     Eliminations     Consolidated  
 
Net sales
  $ 370     $ 1,960     $ 673     $ (684 )   $ 2,319  
                                         
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)
    355       1,822       635       (677 )     2,135  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    13       63       16       —       92  
Depreciation and amortization
    4       38       16       —       58  
Research and development expenses
    6       3       —       —       9  
Restructuring charges (recoveries) — net
    —       —       1       —       1  
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net
    11       32       5       —       48  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates
    31       (3 )     —       (31 )     (3 )
Other (income) expenses — net
    17       (68 )     2       —       (49 )
                                         
      437       1,887       675       (708 )     2,291  
                                         
Income (loss) before provision for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share
    (67 )     73       (2 )     24       28  
Provision for taxes on income (loss)
    7       70       25       —       102  
                                         
Income (loss) before minority interests’ share
    (74 )     3       (27 )     24       (74 )
Minority interests’ share
    —       —       —       —       —  
                                         
Net income (loss)
  $ (74 )   $ 3     $ (27 )   $ 24     $ (74 )
                                         


38


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.
 
Consolidating Balance Sheet
(In millions)
 
                                         
    As of March 31, 2007  
                Non-
             
    Parent     Guarantors     Guarantors     Eliminations     Consolidated  
 
ASSETS
Current assets
                                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 6     $ 71     $ 51     $ —     $ 128  
Accounts receivable — net of allowances
                                       
— third parties
    36       903       411       —       1,350  
— related parties
    416       500       58       (949 )     25  
Inventories
    65       1,008       421       (3 )     1,491  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    3       26       10       —       39  
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
    —       88       4       —       92  
Deferred income tax assets
    3       12       4       —       19  
                                         
Total current assets
    529       2,608       959       (952 )     3,144  
Property, plant and equipment — net
    112       1,225       761       —       2,098  
Goodwill
    —       29       210       —       239  
Intangible assets — net
    —       18       2       —       20  
Investments
    362       153       —       (362 )     153  
Fair value of derivative instruments — net of current portion
    —       55       —       —       55  
Deferred income tax assets
    1       66       35       —       102  
Other long-term assets
    1,231       160       132       (1,364 )     159  
                                         
Total assets
  $ 2,235     $ 4,314     $ 2,099     $ (2,678 )   $ 5,970  
                                         
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
                                       
Current portion of long-term debt
  $ —     $ 3     $ 140     $ —     $ 143  
Short-term borrowings
                                       
— third parties
    —       241       4       —       245  
— related parties
    15       529       61       (605 )     —  
Accounts payable
                                       
— third parties
    116       938       560       —       1,614  
— related parties
    69       240       84       (344 )     49  
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    63       317       100       —       480  
Deferred income tax liabilities
    —       73       —       —       73  
                                         
Total current liabilities
    263       2,341       949       (949 )     2,604  
Long-term debt — net of current portion
                                       
— third parties
    1,659       496       2       —       2,157  
— related parties
    —       1,116       248       (1,364 )     —  
Deferred income tax liabilities
    —       89       14       —       103  
Accrued postretirement benefits
    19       293       115       —       427  
Other long-term liabilities
    119       214       19       —       352  
                                         
      2,060       4,549       1,347       (2,313 )     5,643  
                                         
Commitments and contingencies
                                       
                                         
Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates
    —       —       152       —       152  
                                         
Shareholders’ equity
                                       
Preferred stock
    —       —       —       —       —  
Common stock
    —       —       —       —       —  
Additional paid-in capital
    428       —       —       —       428  
(Accumulated deficit)/retained earnings/owner’s net investment
    (263 )     (458 )     575       (117 )     (263 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    10       223       25       (248 )     10  
                                         
Total shareholders’ equity
    175       (235 )     600       (365 )     175  
                                         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 2,235     $ 4,314     $ 2,099     $ (2,678 )   $ 5,970  
                                         


39


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.
 
Consolidating Balance Sheet
(In millions)
 
                                         
    As of December 31, 2006  
                Non-
             
    Parent     Guarantors     Guarantors     Eliminations     Consolidated  
 
ASSETS
Current assets
                                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 3     $ 37     $ 33     $ —     $ 73  
Accounts receivable — net of allowances
                                       
— third parties
    40       864       417       —       1,321  
— related parties
    399       414       52       (844 )     21  
Inventories
    56       963       372       —       1,391  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    2       30       10       —       42  
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments
    —       102       4       —       106  
Deferred income tax assets
    2       1       6       —       9  
                                         
Total current assets
    502       2,411       894       (844 )     2,963  
Property, plant and equipment — net
    114       1,253       776       —       2,143  
Goodwill
    —       28       208       —       236  
Intangible assets — net
    —       18       2       —       20  
Investments
    409       150       —       (409 )     150  
Fair value of derivative instruments — net of current portion
    —       44       —       —       44  
Deferred income tax assets
    17       22       37       —       76  
Other long-term assets
    1,224       161       129       (1,354 )     160  
                                         
Total assets
  $ 2,266     $ 4,087     $ 2,046     $ (2,607 )   $ 5,792  
                                         
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
                                       
Current portion of long-term debt
  $ —     $ 3     $ 141     $ —     $ 144  
Short-term borrowings
                                       
— third parties
    —       129       4       —       133  
— related parties
    7       502       63       (572 )     —  
Accounts payable
                                       
— third parties
    108       914       520       —       1,542  
— related parties
    47       207       62       (272 )     44  
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    96       320       92       —       508  
Deferred income tax liabilities
    —       60       1       —       61  
                                         
Total current liabilities
    258       2,135       883       (844 )     2,432  
Long-term debt — net of current portion
                                       
— third parties
    1,659       497       2       —       2,158  
— related parties
    —       1,107       247       (1,354 )     —  
Deferred income tax liabilities
    16       49       16       —       81  
Accrued postretirement benefits
    21       296       108       —       425  
Other long-term liabilities
    117       204       22       —       343  
                                         
      2,071       4,288       1,278       (2,198 )     5,439  
                                         
Commitments and contingencies
                                       
                                         
                                         
Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates
    —       —       158       —       158  
                                         
                                         
Shareholders’ equity
                            —          
Preferred stock
    —       —       —       —       —  
Common stock
    —       —       —       —       —  
Additional paid-in capital
    398       —       —       —       398  
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owner’s net investment
    (198 )     (410 )     585       (175 )     (198 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    (5 )     209       25       (234 )     (5 )
                                         
Total shareholders’ equity
    195       (201 )     610       (409 )     195  
                                         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 2,266     $ 4,087     $ 2,046     $ (2,607 )   $ 5,792  
                                         


40


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.
 
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(In millions)
 
                                         
    Three Months Ended March 31, 2007  
                Non-
             
    Parent     Guarantors     Guarantors     Eliminations     Consolidated  
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
                                       
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
  $ (30 )   $ (55 )   $ 50     $ (52 )   $ (87 )
                                         
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
                                       
Capital expenditures
    (2 )     (16 )     (6 )     —       (24 )
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
    —       1       —       —       1  
Proceeds from loans receivable — net
                                       
— related parties
    —       1       —       —       1  
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
    —       24       —       —       24  
                                         
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
    (2 )     10       (6 )     —       2  
                                         
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                                       
Principal repayments
    —       (1 )     —       —       (1 )
Short-term borrowings — net
                                       
— third parties
    —       113       —       —       113  
— related parties
    7       5       (12 )     —       —  
Dividends
                                       
— common shareholders
    —       (38 )     (14 )     52       —  
Proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options
    27       —       —       —       27  
Windfall tax benefit on share-based compensation
    1       —       —       —       1  
                                         
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    35       79       (26 )     52       140  
                                         
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    3       34       18       —       55  
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period
    3       37       33       —       73  
                                         
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period
  $ 6     $ 71     $ 51     $ —     $ 128  
                                         


41


Table of Contents

 
Novelis Inc.
 
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.
 
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(In millions)
 
                                         
    Three Months Ended March 31, 2006  
                Non-
             
    Parent     Guarantors     Guarantors     Eliminations     Consolidated  
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
                                       
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 14     $ 145     $ 48     $ (112 )   $ 95  
                                         
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
                                       
Capital expenditures
    (3 )     (13 )     (5 )     —       (21 )
Disposal of business — net
    (7 )     —       —       —       (7 )
Proceeds from sales of assets
    —       2       —       —       2  
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
    —       2       —       —       2  
Proceeds from loans receivable — net
                                       
— related parties
    60       7       —       (60 )     7  
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
    —       77       (6 )     —       71  
                                         
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    50       75       (11 )     (60 )     54  
                                         
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                                       
Principal repayments
                                       
— third parties
    (29 )     (51 )     (32 )     —       (112 )
— related parties
    —       (60 )     —       60       —  
Short-term borrowings — net
                                       
— third parties
    —       6       —       —       6  
— related parties
    —       3       (3 )     —       —  
Dividends
                                       
— preference shares
    —       (12 )     —       12       —  
— common shareholders
    (7 )     (85 )     (15 )     100       (7 )
— minority interests
    —       —       (13 )     —       (13 )
Debt issuance costs
    (1 )     —       —       —       (1 )
                                         
Net cash used in financing activities
    (37 )     (199 )     (63 )     172       (127 )
                                         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    27       21       (26 )     —       22  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in foreign currencies
    —       —       2       —       2  
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period
    2       34       64       —       100  
                                         
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period
  $ 29     $ 55     $ 40     $ —     $ 124  
                                         


42


Table of Contents

 
Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
The following information should be read together with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report for a more complete understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below, particularly in “SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET DATA.”
 
References herein to “Novelis”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “us” refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein to “Alcan” refer to Alcan, Inc.
 
References to our Form 10-K made throughout this document shall refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as amended, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 1, 2007.
 
GENERAL
 
Novelis is the world’s leading aluminum rolled products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and light gauge products for the construction and industrial, beverage and food cans, foil products and transportation markets. As of March 31, 2007, we had operations on four continents: North America; South America; Asia and Europe, through 33 operating plants and three research facilities in 11 countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil. We are the only company of our size and scope focused solely on aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local supply of technologically sophisticated products in all of these geographic regions.
 
Potential Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock
 
As previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, on February 10, 2007, Novelis Inc., Hindalco Industries Limited (Hindalco) and AV Aluminum Inc., an indirect subsidiary of Hindalco, entered into an Arrangement Agreement (the Arrangement Agreement). On March 30, 2007, AV Aluminum Inc. assigned its interest in the Arrangement Agreement to AV Metals Inc. (Acquisition Sub), a subsidiary of Hindalco. Under the Arrangement Agreement, Acquisition Sub will acquire all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Novelis for cash at a per share price of $44.93, without interest and less any required withholding taxes (the Purchase Price), to be implemented by way of a court-approved plan of arrangement (the Arrangement).
 
Pursuant to the Arrangement Agreement, at the effective time of the Arrangement, each common share of Novelis issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than common shares held by (i) Hindalco or Acquisition Sub or any of their affiliates or (ii) any shareholders who properly exercise dissent rights under the Canada Business Corporations Act) will be transferred to Acquisition Sub in exchange for the right to receive the Purchase Price. The acquisition of Novelis is an all-cash transaction which values Novelis at approximately $6 billion, including approximately $2.4 billion of debt. The transaction is not subject to a financing condition.
 
The consummation of the Arrangement is subject to various customary conditions, including Novelis shareholder approval and the receipt of regulatory approvals specified in the Arrangement Agreement and/or until the expiration of all applicable waiting periods, including antitrust approvals under the Competition Act (Canada), the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, the European Union or the relevant antitrust authorities in the applicable European Union member states, as well as approval under the Investment Canada Act and approval by the Agência Nacional de Energia Eléctrica (ANEEL) for the transfer


43


Table of Contents

of power generation concessions/authorizations in Brazil. As of May 10, 2007, we have the necessary regulatory approval to proceed with the transaction from all known parties. Subject to final court approval, we expect that the Arrangement will close on May 15, 2007.
 
The Arrangement Agreement contains customary representations and warranties between Novelis and Hindalco and Acquisition Sub. The Arrangement Agreement also contains customary covenants and agreements, including covenants relating to (a) the conduct of Novelis’ business between the date of the signing of the Arrangement Agreement and the closing of the Arrangement, (b) solicitation of competing acquisition proposals and (c) the efforts of the parties to cause the Arrangement to be completed. Additionally, Novelis shareholders approved the Arrangement at its special meeting of shareholders on May 10, 2007.
 
The Arrangement Agreement contains certain termination rights and provides that, upon or following the termination of the Arrangement Agreement, under specified circumstances involving a competing acquisition proposal, Novelis may be required to pay Acquisition Sub a termination fee of $100 million or, in certain circumstances, to reimburse costs and expenses of Hindalco and its affiliates, to a maximum of $15 million.
 
In connection with this process, Novelis has incurred or will incur fees and expenses, including a termination fee with an unsuccessful bidder. During the first quarter of 2007, we included expenses of $32 million in Other (income) expenses — net, for those costs that have already been incurred and that are not contingent upon closing. Of this amount, $22 million was paid during the first quarter of 2007 and the remaining amounts are expected to be paid during the second quarter of 2007.
 
HIGHLIGHTS
 
Significant highlights, events and factors impacting our business during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are presented briefly below. Each is discussed in further detail throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
  •  Shipments and selected financial information are as follows:
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2007     2006  
    ($ in millions)  
 
Shipments (kt (A)):
               
Rolled products
    732       741  
Ingot products (B)
    40       41  
                 
Total shipments
    772       782  
                 
Net Sales
  $ 2,630     $ 2,319  
Net Loss
  $ (64 )   $ (74 )
Increase (Decrease) in Total Debt (C)
  $ 110     $ (103 )
 
 
(A) One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds.
 
  (B)  Ingot products shipments include primary ingot in Brazil, foundry products sold in Korea and Europe, secondary ingot in Europe and other miscellaneous recyclable aluminum sales.
 
  (C)  Change in total debt since December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
• Rolled products shipments decreased in 2007 in North America and Asia, offset partially by increases in Europe and South America. In North America, shipments declined due to reduced demand from the original equipment manufacturers (OEM)/distributor market and lower automotive demand with U.S. manufacturers. In Asia, shipments declined as Chinese export competition eroded sales in the industrial and light gauge markets. European shipments increased into the can and foil markets while South America benefited from higher can shipments.


44


Table of Contents

 
• London Metal Exchange (LME) pricing for aluminum (metal) was an average of 16% higher during the first quarter of 2007 than the same period for 2006.
 
• Net sales for the first quarter ended March 31, 2007 increased from the same period for 2006 primarily due to the rise in LME prices. However, the benefit of higher LME prices was limited by metal price ceilings in sales contracts representing approximately 10% of our total shipments in 2007 and 20% of our total shipments in 2006. During the first quarters of 2007 and 2006, we were unable to pass through approximately $80 million and $95 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales under these contracts. The metal price ceilings are discussed in more detail below.
 
• Our total debt increased by $110 million during the first quarter of 2007, principally as a result of increased short-term borrowings necessary to fund working capital requirements driven by higher metal prices. Our cumulative debt reduction since our inception in January 2005 is $406 million, or 14%.
 
• During the first quarters of 2007 and 2006 we recognized pre-tax gains of $30 million and $54 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of derivative instruments. These amounts are included in Other (income) expenses — net in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Regional Income includes approximately $33 million and $53 million of cash-settled derivative gains for our first quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These derivative instruments and the related accounting are discussed in more detail below.
 
OUR BUSINESS
 
Business Model and Key Concepts
 
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model, which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the price of metal to our customers. Nearly all of our products have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass-through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and (ii) a “margin over metal” price based on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the competitive market conditions for that product.
 
METAL PRICE CEILINGS
 
Sales contracts representing approximately 10% and 20% of our total shipments for the first quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively, provide for a ceiling over which metal purchase costs cannot contractually be passed through to certain customers, unless adjusted. This negatively impacts our margins when the price we pay for metal is above the ceiling price contained in these contracts. During the first quarters of 2007 and 2006, we were unable to pass through approximately $80 million and $95 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales under these contracts. We calculate and report this difference to be approximately the difference between the quoted purchase price on the LME (adjusted for any local premiums and for any price lag associated with purchasing or processing time), and the metal price ceiling in our contracts. Cash flows from operations are negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted for any timing difference between customer receipts and vendor payments.
 
The contracts with metal price ceilings expire at varying times and our estimated remaining exposure approximates 10% of estimated shipments in 2007. Based on a March 31, 2007 aluminum price of $2,792 per tonne, and our best estimate of a range of shipment volumes, we estimate that we will be unable to pass through aluminum purchase costs of approximately $185 — $225 million for the remainder of 2007 and $460 — $525 million in the aggregate thereafter. Under these scenarios, and ignoring working capital timing, we expect that cash flows from operations will be impacted negatively by these same amounts, offset partially by reduced income taxes.
 
METAL PRICE LAG
 
On certain sales contracts we experience timing differences on the pass through of changing aluminum prices based on the difference in the price we pay for aluminum and the price we ultimately charge our customers after the aluminum is processed. Generally, and in the short-term, in periods of rising prices our earnings benefit from this timing difference while the opposite is true in periods of declining prices, and we


45


Table of Contents

refer to this timing difference as metal price lag. Metal price lag benefited the first quarters of 2007 and 2006 by approximately $8 million and $53 million, respectively.
 
Generally, and in the short-term, metal price lag impacts cash flows negatively in periods of rising metal prices due primarily to inventory processing time, while the opposite is true in periods of declining prices.
 
In Europe, certain of our sales contracts contain fixed metal prices for periods of time such as four to thirty-six months. In some cases, this can result in a negative (positive) impact on sales as metal prices increase (decrease) because the prices are fixed at historical levels. The positive or negative impact on sales under these contracts has been included in the metal price lag effect quantified above, without regard to fixed forward instruments purchased to offset this risk as described below.
 
RISK MITIGATION
 
We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans (UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply have historically provided a benefit as these sources of metal are typically less expensive than purchasing aluminum from third party suppliers. We refer to these two sources as our internal hedges. While we believe that our primary aluminum production continues to provide the expected benefits during this sustained period of high LME prices, the recycling operations are providing less internal hedge benefit than they have historically. LME metal prices and other market issues have resulted in higher than expected prices of UBCs thus compressing the internal hedge benefit we receive from UBCs.
 
Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated with the metal price ceilings is to purchase call options and/or synthetic call options on projected aluminum volume requirements above our assumed internal hedge position. To hedge our exposure in 2006, we previously purchased call options at various strike prices. In September of 2006, we began purchasing both fixed forward derivative instruments and put options, thereby creating synthetic call options, to hedge our exposure to further metal price increases in 2007. We have not entered into any synthetic call options beyond 2007.
 
During the third quarter of 2006, we began selling short-term LME forward contracts to reduce the cash flow volatility of fluctuating metal prices associated with metal price lag. In Europe, we enter into forward metal purchases simultaneous with the contracts that contain fixed metal prices. These forward metal purchases directly hedge the economic risk of future metal price fluctuation associated with these contracts. The positive or negative impact on sales under these contracts has been included in the metal price lag effect described above, without regard to the fixed forward instruments purchased to offset this risk. The net sales and Regional Income impacts are described more fully in the Operations and Segment Review for our Europe operating segment.
 
For accounting purposes, we do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.  In those cases, changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the contract settlement, and we expect further earnings volatility as a result. In the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations, changes in fair value of derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133 are recognized in Other (income) expenses — net. These gains or losses may or may not result from cash settlement. For Regional Income purposes we only include the impact of the derivative gains or losses to the extent they are settled in cash during that period.
 
INTERNAL CONTROLS
 
We previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and continue to report as of March 31, 2007, that we have a material weakness in our internal control over


46


Table of Contents

financial reporting as we did not maintain effective controls over accounting for income taxes. See Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
 
SPIN-OFF FROM ALCAN
 
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The rolled products businesses were managed under two separate operating segments within Alcan — Rolled Products Americas and Asia; and Rolled Products Europe. On January 6, 2005, Alcan and its subsidiaries contributed and transferred to Novelis substantially all of the aluminum rolled products businesses operated by Alcan, together with some of Alcan’s alumina and primary metal-related businesses in Brazil, which are fully integrated with the rolled products operations there, as well as four rolling facilities in Europe whose end-use markets and customers were similar to ours.
 
Post-Transaction Adjustments
 
The agreements giving effect to the spin-off provide for various post-transaction adjustments and the resolution of outstanding matters. On November 8, 2006, we executed a settlement agreement with Alcan resolving the working capital and cash balance adjustments to the opening balance sheet and issues relating to the transfer of U.S. pension assets and liabilities from Alcan to Novelis. As of March 31, 2007 there remains an outstanding matter related to two pension plans for those employees who elected to transfer their past service to Novelis, one in Canada and one in the U.K. We expect this transfer will take place during the second quarter of 2007, and we expect that the plan assets transferred will approximate the liabilities assumed. To the extent that they are different, we will record an adjustment to Additional paid-in capital as a post-transaction adjustment.
 
Agreements between Novelis and Alcan
 
At the spin-off, we entered into various agreements with Alcan including the use of transitional and technical services, the supply from Alcan of metal and alumina, the licensing of certain of Alcan’s patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights, and the use of certain buildings, machinery and equipment, technology and employees at certain facilities retained by Alcan, but required in our business. The terms and conditions of the agreements were determined primarily by Alcan and may not reflect what two unaffiliated parties might have agreed to. Had these agreements been negotiated with unaffiliated third parties, their terms may have been more favorable, or less favorable, to us. See Item 1. Business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for additional information.
 
OPERATIONS AND SEGMENT REVIEW
 
The following discussion and analysis is based on our condensed consolidated statements of operations, which reflect our results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, as prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP).
 
The following tables present our shipments, our results of operations, prices for aluminum, oil and natural gas and key currency exchange rates for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, as well as the percentage changes from period to period.
 
                         
    First Quarter     Percent
 
    2007     2006     Change  
 
Shipments (kt)
                       
Rolled products, including tolling (the conversion of customer-owned metal)
    732       741       (1.2 )%
Ingot products, including primary and secondary ingot and recyclable aluminum
    40       41       (2.4 )%
                         
Total shipments
    772       782       (1.3 )%
                         


47


Table of Contents

                         
    First Quarter     Percent
 
    2007     2006     Change  
    ($ in millions)        
 
Results of Operations
                       
Net sales
  $ 2,630     $ 2,319       13.4 %
                         
Cost and expenses
                       
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)
    2,447       2,135       14.6 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    99       92       7.6 %
Depreciation and amortization
    58       58       — %
Research and development expenses
    8       9       (11.1 )%
Restructuring charges — net
    9       1       800.0 %
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
    8       —       n.m.  
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net
    50       48       4.2 %
Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates
    (3 )     (3 )     — %
Other (income) expenses — net
    9       (49 )     (118.4 )%
                         
      2,685       2,291       17.2 %
                         
Income (loss) before provision for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share
    (55 )     28       (296.4 )%
Provision for taxes on income (loss)
    7       102       (93.1 )%
                         
Loss before minority interests’ share
    (62 )     (74 )     (16.2 )%
Minority interests’ share
    (2 )     —       n.m.  
                         
Net loss
  $ (64 )   $ (74 )     (13.5 )%
                         
 
n.m. = not meaningful
 
                         
                Percent
 
    2007     2006     Change  
 
London Metal Exchange Prices
                       
Aluminum (per metric tonne, and presented in U.S. dollars):
                       
Closing cash price as of March 31,
  $ 2,792     $ 2,513       11.1 %
Average cash price during the quarters ended March 31,
  $ 2,800     $ 2,420       15.7 %
 
                         
                U.S. Dollar
 
    First Quarter     Strengthen/
 
    2007     2006     (Weaken)  
 
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Exchange Rates
                       
Average of the month end rates for the first quarter:
                       
U.S. dollar per Euro
    1.320       1.207       (9.4 )%
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
    2.100       2.166       (3.0 )%
South Korean won per U.S. dollar
    941       967       (2.7 )%
Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar
    1.167       1.150       1.5 %
 
                         
    First Quarter     Percent
 
    2007     2006     Change  
 
New York Mercantile Exchange — Energy Price Quotations
                       
Light Sweet Crude
                       
Average settlement price (per barrel)
  $ 57.54     $ 62.48       (7.9 )%
Natural Gas
                       
Average Henry Hub contract settlement price (per MMBTU) (A)
  $ 6.77     $ 8.97       (24.5 )%
 
       _ _
 
(A) One MMBTU is the equivalent of one decatherm, or one million British Thermal Units (BTUs).


48


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 COMPARED TO THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006
 
Shipments
 
Rolled products shipments decreased in 2007 in North America and Asia, offset partially by increases in Europe and South America. In North America, shipments declined due to reduced demand from the OEM/distributor market and lower automotive demand with U.S. manufacturers. In Asia, shipments declined as Chinese export competition eroded sales in the industrial and light gauge markets. European shipments increased into the can and foil markets while South America benefited from higher can shipments.
 
Net sales
 
Higher net sales in the first quarter of 2007 resulted primarily from the increase in LME metal pricing, which was 16% higher on average during the first quarter of 2007 than the comparable 2006 quarter. Metal represents approximately 60% — 70% of the sales value of our products. Net sales for the first quarter of 2007 were adversely impacted in North America due to price ceilings on certain can contracts, which limited our ability to pass through approximately $80 million of metal purchase costs. In comparison, we were unable to pass through approximately $95 million of metal purchase costs in the first quarter of 2006, for a net favorable impact of approximately $15 million.
 
Costs and expenses
 
The following table presents our costs and expenses for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, in U.S. dollars and expressed as percentages of net sales.
 
                                 
    First Quarter  
    2007     2006  
          % of
          % of
 
    $ in millions     net sales     $ in millions     net sales  
 
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
  $ 2,447       93.0 %   $ 2,135       92.1 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    99       3.8 %     92       4.0 %
Depreciation and amortization
    58       2.2 %     58       2.5 %
Research and development expenses
    8       0.3 %     9       0.4 %
Restructuring charges — net
    9       0.3 %     1       — %
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
    8       0.3 %     —       — %
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net
    50       1.9 %     48       2.0 %
Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates
    (3 )     (0.1 )%     (3 )     (0.1 )%
Other (income) expenses — net
    9       0.3 %     (49 )     (2.1 )%
                                 
    $ 2,685       102.0 %   $ 2,291       98.8 %
                                 
 
Cost of goods sold.  Metal represents approximately 70% — 80% of our input costs, and the increase in cost of goods sold in U.S. dollar terms is primarily due to the impact of higher LME prices. Cost of goods sold was adversely impacted in both periods due to price ceilings on certain can contracts, which limited our ability to pass through approximately $80 million of metal purchase costs during the first quarter of 2007 as described above. In comparison, we were unable to pass through approximately $95 million of metal purchase costs during the first quarter of 2006.
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A).  Compared to the prior year, SG&A increased approximately $13 million as a result of increased share-based compensation expense driven by the increase in our share price. Many of our compensation plans must be revalued every quarter using the current stock price as one valuation variable, and at the end of the first quarter of 2007 our shares were trading at $44.11 as compared to a year ago when they were trading at $20.57. This increase in SG&A was partially offset by


49


Table of Contents

lower corporate spending on third party consultants, as well as reductions in Europe due to previously implemented restructuring actions.
 
Restructuring.  In March 2007, management approved the proposed restructuring of our facilities in Bridgnorth, U.K. These proposed actions are intended to bring the capacity of our U.K. operations in line with local market demand and to reduce the cost of our U.K. operations. Certain production lines will be shut down in the U.K. and volume will be relocated to other European plants. For the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we recorded $8 million in impairment charges on long-lived assets in the U.K. that will no longer be used, and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $8 million relating primarily to severance costs. We expect all actions related to the Bridgnorth, U.K. restructuring to be completed in early 2008.
 
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net.  Interest expense increased in the first quarter of 2007, compared to the first quarter of 2006, primarily as a result of higher short-term borrowings, offset slightly by the absence of penalty interest and waiver fees that were incurred during the first quarter of 2006.
 
Other (income) expenses — net.  The reconciliation of the difference between the quarters is shown below (in millions):
 
         
    Other
 
    (Income)
 
    Expenses — Net  
 
Other (income) expenses — net for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
  $ (49 )
Sale transaction fees in 2007
    32  
Gains of $30 million on the change in fair value of derivative instruments in 2007, compared to gains of $54 million in 2006
    24  
Loss on disposal of business in 2006 of $15 million
    (15 )
Exchange losses of $6 million in 2007 compared to gains of $5 million in 2006
    11  
Other — net
    6  
         
Other (income) expenses — net for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
  $ 9  
         
 
In connection with the potential acquisition of Novelis common stock by Hindalco as described above, we have incurred or will incur fees and expenses, including a termination fee with an unsuccessful bidder. During the first quarter of 2007, we included expenses of $32 million in Other (income) expenses — net, shown above as sale transaction fees, for those costs that have already been incurred and that are not contingent upon closing. Of this amount, $22 million was paid during the first quarter of 2007 and the remaining amounts are expected to be paid during the second quarter of 2007.
 
Provision for taxes on income (loss)
 
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we recorded a $7 million provision for taxes on our pre-tax loss of $58 million, before our equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests’ share, which represented an effective tax rate of (12)%. Our effective tax rate is less than the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate due primarily to (1) a $23 million increase in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize those losses, (2) a $6 million benefit from differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign effective tax rates resulting from the application of an annual effective tax rate to profit and loss entities in different jurisdictions and (3) $8 million for (a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect, (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, and (c) the remeasurement of deferred income taxes.
 
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, we recorded a $102 million provision for taxes on our pre-tax income of $25 million, before our equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests’ share, which represented an effective tax rate of 408%. Our effective tax rate is greater than the Canadian statutory rate due primarily to (1) a $44 million difference between the Canadian statutory and


50


Table of Contents

foreign effective tax rates resulting from the application of an annual effective tax rate to profit and loss entities in different jurisdictions, (2) a $33 million increase in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize those losses and (3) $13 million for (a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect, (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, and (c) the remeasurement of deferred income taxes.
 
Net loss
 
We reported a net loss of $64 million, or basic and diluted loss per share of $(0.85) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, compared to a net loss of $74 million, or basic and diluted loss per share of $(1.00) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
 
OPERATING SEGMENT REVIEW FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 COMPARED TO THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006
 
Regional Income
 
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical areas and are organized under four operating segments: North America; Europe; Asia; and South America.
 
Our chief operating decision-maker uses regional financial information in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment, and in assessing performance of each segment. Novelis’ chief operating decision-maker is its chief executive officer.
 
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our operating segments, based on Regional Income, in accordance with FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Regional Income provides a measure of our underlying regional segment results that is in line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define Regional Income as income before (a) interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs; (b) gains and losses on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net; (c) depreciation and amortization; (d) impairment charges on long-lived assets; (e) minority interests’ share; (f) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of Regional Income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as determined on the equity method of accounting; (g) restructuring (charges) recoveries — net; (h) gains (losses) on disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses — net; (i) corporate selling, general and administrative expenses; (j) other corporate costs — net; (k) litigation settlement — net of insurance recoveries; (l) provision or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and (m) cumulative effect of accounting change — net of tax.
 
We do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133. Accordingly, changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the contract settlement. In the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations, changes in fair value of derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133 are recognized in Other (income) expenses — net. These gains or losses may or may not result from cash settlement. For Regional Income purposes we only include the impact of the derivative gains or losses to the extent they are settled in cash during that period.
 
In the third quarter of 2006, we added a line to our Regional Income reconciliation to improve the disclosure of gains or losses resulting from cash settlement of derivative instruments that have been included in Regional Income. Accordingly, the first quarter of 2006 has been revised to conform to the current period presentation.


51


Table of Contents

Reconciliation
 
The following table presents Regional Income (Loss) by operating segment and reconciles Total Regional Income to Net loss (in millions).
 
                 
    First Quarter  
    2007     2006  
 
Regional Income (Loss)
               
North America
  $ (17 )   $ 58  
Europe
    86       57  
Asia
    17       25  
South America
    56       41  
                 
Total Regional Income
    142       181  
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
    (54 )     (51 )
Gains on cash settlement of derivative instruments — net, included in Regional Income
    (33 )     (53 )
Gains on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net
    30       54  
Depreciation and amortization
    (58 )     (58 )
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
    (8 )     —  
Minority interests’ share
    (2 )     —  
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation (A)
    (9 )     (8 )
Restructuring charges — net
    (9 )     (1 )
Losses on disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses — net
    —       (14 )
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses
    (26 )     (26 )
Other corporate costs — net (B)
    (30 )     4  
Provision for taxes on income (loss)
    (7 )     (102 )
                 
Net loss
  $ (64 )   $ (74 )
                 
 
 
(A) Our financial information for our segments (including Regional Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent with the way we manage our business segments. However, under GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to reconcile Total Regional Income to Net loss, the proportional Regional Income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed from Total Regional Income, net of our share of their net after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. See Note 7 — Investment in and Advances to Non-consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions to our condensed consolidated financial statements for further information about these non-consolidated affiliates.
 
(B) During the first quarter of 2007, we incurred expenses of $32 million in connection with the potential acquisition of our common stock by Hindalco as described in Note 2 — Potential Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock in the accompanying condensed and consolidated financial statements.
 
OPERATING SEGMENT RESULTS
 
  North America
 
As of March 31, 2007, North America manufactured aluminum sheet and light gauge products through 10 aluminum rolled products facilities and two dedicated recycling facilities. Important end-use applications include beverage cans, containers and packaging, automotive and other transportation applications, building products and other industrial applications.


52


Table of Contents

The following table presents key financial and operating information for North America for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
 
                         
    First Quarter     Percent
 
    2007     2006     Change  
    ($ in millions)  
 
Shipments (kt):
                       
Rolled products
    268       289       (7.3 )%
Ingot products
    18       17       5.9 %
                         
Total shipments
    286       306       (6.5 )%
                         
Net sales
  $ 925     $ 895       3.4 %
Regional Income (Loss)
  $ (17 )   $ 58       (129.3 )%
Total assets
  $ 1,566     $ 1,600       (2.1 )%
 
Shipments
 
Rolled products shipments decreased primarily due to a slowdown in the housing market thereby reducing sales to the OEM/distributor market and lower automotive demand with U.S. manufacturers.
 
Net sales
 
Net sales increased primarily as a result of higher metal prices, which were 16% higher on average in the first quarter of 2007 compared to 2006, offset partially by lower shipments. Increases in metal prices are largely passed through to customers, however, the pass through of metal price increases to our customers was limited in cases where metal price ceilings were exceeded. This factor unfavorably impacted North America net sales in the first quarter of 2007 by approximately $80 million. During the first quarter of 2006, we were unable to pass through approximately $95 million of metal purchase costs, for a net favorable comparable impact of approximately $15 million.
 
Regional Income
 
As compared to the first quarter of 2006, Regional Income for 2007 was negatively impacted by the following three factors. First, the benefit we received from metal price lag during the first quarter of 2007 was approximately $53 million less than the benefit we received during the first quarter of 2006. Second, lower volume in 2007 reduced Regional Income by approximately $24 million. Third and finally, realized gains from the cash-settlement of derivatives in 2007 were approximately $39 million lower than the comparable period in 2006. These negative impacts were partially offset by the following items. First and as described above, the negative impact of metal price ceilings during the first quarter of 2007 was approximately $15 million less than in the first quarter of 2006 resulting in a favorable impact when comparing quarterly results year over year. Second and third, price increases of approximately $13 million and other operational cost savings of approximately $13 million improved Regional Income in 2007.
 
  Europe
 
As of March 31, 2007, our European segment provided European markets with value-added sheet and light gauge products through its 13 aluminum rolled products facilities and one dedicated recycling facility. Europe serves a broad range of aluminum rolled product end-use markets in various applications including can, automotive, lithographic and painted products.


53


Table of Contents

The following table presents key financial and operating information for Europe for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
 
                         
    First Quarter     Percent
 
    2007     2006     Change  
    ($ in millions)  
 
Shipments (kt):
                       
Rolled products
    282       266       6.0 %
Ingot products
    5       8       (37.5 )%
                         
Total shipments
    287       274       4.7 %
                         
Net sales
  $ 1,057     $ 826       28.0 %
Regional Income
  $ 86     $ 57       50.9 %
Total assets
  $ 2,543     $ 2,296       10.8 %
 
Shipments
 
Rolled products shipments increased primarily due to increases in the can and foil markets. Strong demand in the can market was driven by conversion of steel lines to aluminum and market share gains. Ingot shipments declined due to the closure of our Borgofranco facility during the first quarter of 2006.
 
Net sales
 
Net sales increased primarily as a result of a 16% increase in average LME metal prices, incremental volume and currency benefits. These factors contributed approximately $125 million, $60 million and $45 million, respectively, to net sales when compared to 2006.
 
Regional Income
 
Regional Income was favorably impacted in 2007 primarily by increased volume, operational improvements and currency benefits as the euro strengthened against the U.S. dollar. These factors improved Regional Income approximately $17 million, $10 million and $9 million, respectively, as compared to 2006. These positive factors were partially offset by unfavorable sales mix.
 
Total assets
 
Total assets increased primarily due to the increase in metal prices and currency, which impacted both inventories and accounts receivable.
 
Asia
 
As of March 31, 2007, Asia operated three manufacturing facilities, with production balanced between foil, construction and industrial, and beverage and food can end-use applications.


54


Table of Contents

The following table presents key financial and operating information for Asia for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
 
                         
    First Quarter     Percent
 
    2007     2006     Change  
    ($ in millions)  
 
Shipments (kt):
                       
Rolled products
    107       118       (9.3 )%
Ingot products
    10       10       — %
                         
Total shipments
    117       128       (8.6 )%
                         
Net sales
  $ 413     $ 394       4.8 %
Regional Income
  $ 17     $ 25       (32.0 )%
Total assets
  $ 1,110     $ 1,038       6.9 %
 
Shipments
 
Rolled products shipments declined primarily due to lower sales in the industrial and light gauge markets as a result of continued price pressure from Chinese exports, driven by the difference in aluminum metal prices on the Shanghai Foreign Exchange and the LME.
 
Net sales
 
Net sales increased primarily as a result of the 16% increase in average LME metal prices, which was largely passed through to customers, offset partially by lower shipments.
 
Regional Income
 
Regional Income declined by approximately $8 million due to lower volume as described above and unfavorable product mix.
 
  South America
 
As of March 31, 2007, South America operated two rolling plants in Brazil along with two smelters, an alumina refinery, bauxite mines and power generation facilities. South America manufactures various aluminum rolled products, including can stock, automotive and industrial sheet and light gauge for the beverage and food can, construction and industrial and transportation end-use markets.
 
The following table presents key financial and operating information for South America for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
 
                         
    First Quarter     Percent
 
    2007     2006     Change  
    ($ in millions)  
 
Shipments (kt):
                       
Rolled products
    75       68       10.3 %
Ingot products
    7       6       16.7 %
                         
Total shipments
    82       74       10.8 %
                         
Net sales
  $ 235     $ 209       12.4 %
Regional Income
  $ 56     $ 41       36.6 %
Total assets
  $  821     $  798          2.9 %


55


Table of Contents

Shipments
 
Rolled products shipments increased during the first quarter of 2007 over 2006 primarily due to an increase in can shipments driven by exports and strong market demand. This was slightly offset by reductions in shipments in the industrial products markets.
 
Net sales
 
Net sales increased as a result of higher LME prices and shipments, offset partially by an increase in tolled metal.
 
Regional Income
 
For the first quarter of 2007, we benefited from rising LME prices due to the output from our smelters, as our smelter raw material input cost has little or no correlation with LME metal price movements. This factor favorably impacted Regional Income by approximately $11 million. Increased shipments added approximately $4 million to Regional Income.
 
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
Our liquidity and available capital resources are impacted by operating, financing and investing activities.
 
Operating Activities
 
Free cash flow (which is a non-GAAP measure) consists of (a) Net cash provided by operating activities; (b) less dividends and capital expenditures; (c) less premiums paid to purchase derivative instruments; (d) plus net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments. Dividends include those paid by our less than wholly-owned subsidiaries to their minority shareholders and dividends paid by us to our common shareholders. Management believes that Free cash flow is relevant to investors as it provides a measure of the cash generated internally that is available for debt service and other value creation opportunities. However, Free cash flow does not necessarily represent cash available for discretionary activities, as certain debt service obligations must be funded out of Free cash flow. We believe the line on our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows entitled “Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities” is the most directly comparable measure to Free cash flow. Our method of calculating Free cash flow may not be consistent with that of other companies.
 
In our discussion of Metal Price Ceilings, we have disclosed that certain customer contracts contain a fixed aluminum (metal) price ceiling beyond which the cost of aluminum cannot be passed through to the customer. During the first quarters of 2007 and 2006, we were unable to pass through approximately $80 million and $95 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales under theses contracts. Net cash provided by operating activities is negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted for any timing difference between customer receipts and vendor payments. Based on a March 31, 2007 aluminum price of $2,792 per tonne, and our best estimate of a range of shipment volumes, we estimate that we will be unable to pass through aluminum purchase costs of approximately $185 — $225 million for the remainder of 2007 and $460 — $525 million in the aggregate thereafter. Under these scenarios, and ignoring working capital timing, we expect that cash flows from operations will be impacted negatively by these same amounts, offset partially by reduced income taxes. While we were in compliance with our financial covenants for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, if such results occur as described above, and no further risk mitigation steps are taken, it may be necessary to seek relief from our financial covenants in the future.
 
For the second, third and fourth quarters of 2007, we have partially mitigated this impact by purchasing fixed forward contracts priced at approximately $2,560 per tonne. At a price of $2,792 per tonne, we would expect to generate positive cash flows of approximately $9 million from these derivative instruments, which would increase cash flows from investing activities.


56


Table of Contents

 
The following tables show the reconciliation from Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities to Free cash flow for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 and the ending balances of cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (in millions).
 
                         
    First Quarter        
    2007     2006     Change  
    ($ in millions)  
 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
  $ (87 )   $ 95     $ (182 )
Dividends
    —       (7 )     7  
Capital expenditures
    (24 )     (21 )     (3 )
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
    24       71       (47 )
                         
Free cash flow
  $ (87 )   $ 138     $ (225 )
                         
 
                         
    March 31,
    December 31,
       
    2007     2006     Change  
 
Ending cash and cash equivalents
  $ 128     $ 73     $ 55  
                         
 
In the first quarter of 2007, net cash used in operating activities was influenced primarily by higher metal prices which contributed to our net loss of $64 million, as a result of being unable to pass through approximately $80 million of metal purchase costs due to the price ceilings previously discussed. Further, higher metal prices result in an increase in working capital due to inventory processing time and the time delay between vendor payments and customer receipts. Finally, net cash from operations during the first quarter of 2007 was negatively impacted by approximately $22 million of sales transaction fees. See Note 2 — Potential Acquisition of Novelis Common Shares in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
While metal prices were also increasing during the first quarter of 2006, we were able to improve working capital through better payables management and reductions in inventory turns that more than offset the metal price ceiling impacts, resulting in positive cash flow provided by operating activities during that time.
 
Financing Activities
 
Overview
 
At the spin-off, we had $2.951 billion of short-term borrowings, long-term debt and capital lease obligations. During the first quarter of 2007, our total debt increased by $110 million, principally as a result of increased short-term borrowings necessary to fund working capital requirements driven by higher metal prices. Our cumulative debt reduction since our inception in January 2005 is $406 million, or 14%. During the first quarter of 2007, we also received $27 million in cash from the exercise of employee stock options previously granted under our stock compensation plans.
 
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
 
We have approximately $234 million available under our $500 million revolving credit facility and there was $708 million outstanding under our Term Loan B facility as of March 31, 2007.
 
As of March 31, 2007, we have paid fees of approximately $6 million related to five waiver and consent agreements under the credit agreement in connection with our senior secured credit facilities, which are being amortized over the remaining life of the debt. The waiver and consent agreements were obtained as a result of our inability to timely file certain of our SEC reports.
 
On October 16, 2006, we amended the financial covenants to our senior secured credit facilities. In particular, we amended our maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and minimum fixed charge coverage ratios through the quarter ending March 31, 2008. We also amended and modified other provisions of the senior secured credit facilities to permit more efficient ordinary-course operations, including increasing


57


Table of Contents

the amounts of certain permitted investments and receivables securitizations, permitting nominal quarterly dividends, and the transfer of an intercompany loan to another subsidiary. In return for these amendments and modifications, we paid aggregate fees of approximately $3 million to lenders who consented to the amendments and modifications, and agreed to continue paying the higher applicable margins on our senior secured credit facilities, and the higher unused commitment fees on our revolving credit facilities that were instated with a prior waiver and consent agreement in May 2006. Specifically, we agreed to a 1.25% applicable margin for Term Loans maintained as Base Rate Loans, a 2.25% applicable margin for Term Loans maintained as Eurocurrency Rate Loans, a 1.50% applicable margin for Revolver Loans maintained as Base Rate Loans, a 2.50% applicable margin for Revolver Loans maintained as Eurocurrency Rate Loans and a 62.5 basis point commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility, until such time as the compliance certificate for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2008 has been delivered.
 
The amended maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and minimum fixed charge coverage ratios for the period ended March 31, 2007 were 8.25 to 1; 1.50 to 1; and 0.70 to 1, respectively. We were in compliance with these covenants for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
 
On April 27, 2007, our lenders consented to a further amendment of our senior secured credit facilities in order to (1) provide us with additional liquidity, (2) potentially allow us to avoid more costly bridge financing in connection with the transaction with Hindalco and (3) remove certain technical provisions that are affecting normal-course operations of our business.
 
The amendment specifically includes the following: (1) permission to increase the Term Loan B facility by $150 million; (2) a limited waiver of the change of control Event of Default (as defined in the senior secured credit facilities) to the earliest of (i) the date on which any payments are made with respect to the Senior Notes (other than scheduled interest), (ii) the third business day prior to the sixtieth day following the change of control and (iii) July 7, 2007 if the change of control does not occur on or prior to such date; and (3) a modification of three provisions, to now (a) permit the formation of certain joint ventures, (b) permit the payment of a liquidating cash dividend from a specific 50%-owned partnership and (c) permit a capital contribution between guarantor subsidiaries. In return for these amendments and modifications, we have agreed to pay aggregate fees of approximately $2.5 million to lenders who consent to the amendments and modifications.
 
7.25% Senior Notes
 
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities (Senior Notes). The Senior Notes were priced at par, bear interest at 7.25% and mature on February 15, 2015.
 
Under the indenture that governs the Senior Notes, we are subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to incurring additional debt and providing additional guarantees, paying dividends beyond certain amounts and making other restricted payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain consolidations or mergers, and certain transactions with affiliates. We were in compliance with these covenants for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
 
The indenture governing the Senior Notes and the related registration rights agreement required us to file a registration statement for the notes and exchange the original, privately placed notes for registered notes. Under the indenture and the related registration rights agreement, we were required to complete the exchange offer for the Senior Notes by November 11, 2005. We did not complete the exchange offer by that date and, as a result, we began to incur additional special interest at rates ranging from 0.25% to 1.00%. We filed a post-effective amendment to the registration statement on December 1, 2006 which was declared effective by the SEC on December 22, 2006. We ceased paying additional special interest effective January 5, 2007, upon completion of the exchange offer.
 
As previously discussed, on February 10, 2007, Novelis Inc., Hindalco and AV Aluminum Inc., an indirect subsidiary of Hindalco, entered into an Arrangement Agreement. On March 30, 2007, AV Aluminum Inc. assigned its interest in the Arrangement Agreement to AV Metals Inc. (Acquisition Sub), a subsidiary of Hindalco. Under the Arrangement Agreement, Acquisition Sub will acquire all of the issued and outstanding


58


Table of Contents

common shares of Novelis for a cash at a per share price of $44.93, without interest and less any required withholding taxes, to be implemented by way of a court-approved plan of arrangement.
 
Pursuant to the terms of our Senior Notes, we are obligated, within 30 days of the closing of the Arrangement, to make an offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date the Senior Notes are purchased. In addition, Hindalco and Acquisition Sub have indicated that they may cause us to take other steps to repay, retire or redeem the Senior Notes after the closing of the Arrangement. The closing of the Arrangement does not require the consent or approval of the holders of the Senior Notes.
 
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Service and Moody’s Investors Services currently assign our Senior Notes a rating of B and B2, respectively. Our credit ratings may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the credit rating agencies, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. We cannot ensure that a rating will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a credit rating agency if, in its judgment, circumstances so warrant. If the credit rating agencies downgrade our ratings, we would likely be required to pay a higher interest rate in future financings, incur increased margin deposit requirements, and our potential pool of investors and funding sources could decrease.
 
For more information about the Senior Notes and the indenture governing the Senior Notes, see Note 9 — Long-Term Debt in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
Interest Rate Swaps
 
As of March 31, 2007, we have one outstanding interest rate swap to fix the 3-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) interest rate at an effective weighted average interest rate of 3.9% on $100 million of the floating rate Term Loan B debt expiring on February 3, 2008. On February 3, 2007, an interest rate swap to fix the 3-month LIBOR interest rate at an effective interest rate of 3.8% on an additional $100 million of the floating rate Term Loan B debt expired. We are still obligated to pay any applicable margin, as defined in our senior secured credit facilities, as amended, in addition to these interest rates. As of March 31, 2007, 66% of our debt was fixed rate and 34% was variable rate.
 
Investing Activities
 
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash provided by investing activities for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
 
                         
    First Quarter        
    2007     2006     Change  
    ($ in millions)  
 
Proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments, less premiums paid to purchase derivative instruments
  $ 24     $ 71     $ (47 )
Capital expenditures
    (24 )     (21 )     (3 )
Proceeds from loans receivable — net
    1       7       (6 )
Payments related to disposal of business
    —       (7 )     7  
Changes in investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
    1       2       (1 )
Proceeds from sales of assets
    —       2       (2 )
                         
Net cash provided by investing activities
  $ 2     $ 54     $ (52 )
                         
 
Proceeds from the settlement of derivative instruments explain the majority of the difference in quarter over prior year quarter net cash provided by investing activities.
 
The majority of our capital expenditures for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were for projects devoted to product quality, technology, productivity enhancement and increased capacity.
 
We estimate that our annual capital expenditure requirements for items necessary to maintain comparable production, quality and market position levels (maintenance capital) will be between $100 million and $120 million, and that total annual capital expenditures will be between $170 million and $180 million in 2007.


59


Table of Contents

 
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
 
In accordance with SEC rules, the following qualify as off-balance sheet arrangements:
 
  •  any obligation under certain guarantees or contracts;
 
  •  a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that entity for such assets;
 
  •  any obligation under certain derivative instruments; and
 
  •  any obligation under a material variable interest held by the registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with the registrant.
 
The following discussion addresses each of the above items for our company.
 
Derivative Instruments
 
As of March 31, 2007, we have derivative financial instruments, as defined by FASB Statement No. 133. See Note 14 — Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
 
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and non-derivative instruments, including forward contracts, to manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may be exposed to losses in the future if the counterparties to the contracts fail to perform. We are satisfied that the risk of such non-performance is remote, due to our monitoring of credit exposures.
 
During the first quarter of 2006, we implemented hedge accounting for certain of our cross-currency interest swaps with respect to intercompany loans to several European subsidiaries and forward exchange contracts. As of March 31, 2007, we had $712 million of cross-currency swaps (euro 475 million, British pound (GBP) 62 million and Swiss franc (CHF) 35 million) and $97 million of forward foreign exchange contracts (226 million Brazilian real (BRL)).
 
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity contracts as of March 31, 2007 were as follows (in millions).
 
                             
        As of March 31, 2007  
                    Net Fair
 
    Maturity Dates   Assets     Liabilities     Value  
 
Foreign exchange forward contracts
  2007 through 2011   $ 16     $ (20 )   $ (4 )
Interest rate swaps
  2007 through 2008     2       —       2  
Cross-currency swaps
  2007 through 2015     6       (90 )     (84 )
Aluminum forward contracts
  2007 through 2009     60       (8 )     52  
Aluminum options
  2007     1       —       1  
Electricity swap
  2016     60       —       60  
Embedded derivative instruments
  2007     1       —       1  
Natural gas swaps
  2007     1       —       1  
                             
Total fair value
        147       (118 )     29  
Less: current portion
        92       (33 )     59  
                             
Noncurrent portion
      $ 55     $ (85 )   $ (30 )
                             


60


Table of Contents

Guarantees of Indebtedness
 
The following table discloses information about our obligations under guarantees of indebtedness as of March 31, 2007 (in millions).
 
                 
    Maximum
    Liability
 
    Potential Future
    Carrying
 
Type of Entity
  Payment     Value  
 
Wholly-owned Subsidiaries
  $ 76     $ 60  
Majority-owned Subsidiaries
    3       —  
Aluminium Norf GmbH
    13       —  
 
In 2004, we entered into a loan and a corresponding deposit-and-guarantee agreement for up to $90 million. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, this arrangement had a balance of $80 million. We do not include the loan or deposit amounts in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as the agreements include a legal right of setoff and we have the intent and ability to setoff.
 
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that entity for such assets.
 
Other
 
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities (SPEs), which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we are not involved in any unconsolidated SPE transactions.
 
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
 
We have future obligations under various contracts relating to debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases, long-term purchase obligations, and postretirement benefit plans. During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, there were no significant changes to these obligations as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, other than those described below.
 
Our long-term debt increased by $110 million during the first quarter of 2007, principally as a result of increased short-term borrowings necessary to fund working capital requirements driven by higher metal prices.
 
DIVIDENDS
 
No dividends have been declared on our common stock during 2007. Future dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our financial resources, cash flows generated by our business, our cash requirements, restrictions under the instruments governing our indebtedness, being in compliance with the appropriate indentures and covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness that would allow us to legally pay dividends and other relevant factors.
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
 
During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, there were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
 
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The new statement establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different


61


Table of Contents

measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities and requires companies to provide additional information that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more easily understand the effect of a company’s choice to use fair value on its earnings. The new statement also requires entities to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. FASB Statement No. 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements included in other accounting standards, including requirements for disclosures about fair value measurements included in FASB Statements No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, and No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. FASB Statement No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the entity makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157. We have not yet commenced evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB Statement No. 159 on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB Statement No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB Statement No. 157 on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
 
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting pronouncements will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do not apply to our operations.
 
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET DATA
 
This document contains forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and assumptions made by our management. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects. Words such as “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “plan”, “believe”, “seek”, “estimate” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to, our expectations with respect to the impact of metal price movements on our financial performance, our metal price ceiling exposure, the effectiveness of our hedging programs and controls and our expectations regarding the potential acquisition of our common stock by Hindalco. These statements are based on beliefs and assumptions of Novelis’ management, which in turn are based on currently available information. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve assumptions and risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. We do not intend, and we disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
 
This document also contains information concerning our markets and products generally, which is forward-looking in nature and is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which these markets and product categories will develop. These assumptions have been derived from information currently available to us and to the third party industry analysts quoted herein. This information includes, but is not limited to, product shipments and share of production. Actual market results may differ from those predicted. While we do not know what impact any of these differences may have on our business, our results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and the market price of our securities may be materially adversely affected. Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, among other things:
 
  •  the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash;


62


Table of Contents

 
  •  changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums associated with such prices) or other materials and raw materials we use;
 
  •  the effect of metal price ceilings in certain of our sales contracts;
 
  •  the effectiveness of our metal hedging activities, including our internal used beverage can (UBC) and smelter hedges;
 
  •  relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of, our customers and suppliers;
 
  •  fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the areas in which we maintain production facilities;
 
  •  our ability to access financing for future capital requirements;
 
  •  continuing obligations and other relationships resulting from our spin-off from Alcan;
 
  •  changes in the relative values of various currencies;
 
  •  factors affecting our operations, such as litigation, environmental remediation and clean-up costs, labor relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment and other events;
 
  •  economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in duties or tariffs;
 
  •  competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic and composite materials;
 
  •  changes in general economic conditions;
 
  •  our ability to improve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures in the future;
 
  •  changes in the fair value of derivative instruments;
 
  •  cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our products as well as seasonality in certain of our customers’ industries;
 
  •  changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting taxes, environmental, health or safety compliance;
 
  •  changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the amounts we pay under our principal credit agreement and other financing agreements; and
 
  •  the risk that the potential acquisition of our common stock by Hindalco may not be completed in a timely manner or at all.
 
The above list of factors is not exhaustive. Some of these and other factors are discussed in more detail under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as amended and filed with the SEC and are specifically incorporated by reference into this filing.
 
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business operations, including risks from changes in commodity prices (aluminum, electricity and natural gas), foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates that could impact our results of operations and financial condition.
 
We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through regular operating and financing activities and derivative financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes. Except where noted, the derivative contracts are marked-to-market and the related gains and losses are included in earnings in the current accounting period.


63


Table of Contents

 
By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve risk, including the credit risk of non-performance by counterparties. All derivative contracts are executed with counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2007.
 
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary from period to period depending on market conditions and the relative costs of the instruments. The duration is always linked to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection between the two being regularly monitored.
 
Commodity Price Risks
 
We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity and natural gas.
 
Aluminum
 
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model, which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and (ii) a “margin over metal” price based on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the competitive market conditions for that product.
 
In situations where we offer customers fixed prices for future delivery of our products, we may enter into derivative instruments for the metal inputs in order to protect the profit on the conversion of the product. Consequently, the gain or loss resulting from movements in the price of aluminum on these contracts would generally be offset by an equal and opposite impact on the net sales and purchases being hedged.
 
In addition, sales contracts representing approximately 10% of our total shipments for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 provide for a ceiling over which metal purchase costs cannot contractually be passed through to certain customers, unless adjusted. As a result, we are unable to pass through the complete metal purchase costs for sales under these contracts and this negatively impacts our margins when the metal price is above the ceiling price. These contracts expire at varying times and our estimated remaining exposure approximates 10% of estimated shipments in the remainder of 2007.
 
We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans (UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply have historically provided a benefit as these sources of metal are typically less expensive than purchasing aluminum from third party suppliers. We refer to these two sources as our internal hedges. While we believe that our primary aluminum production continues to provide the expected benefits during this sustained period of high LME prices, the recycling operations are providing less internal hedge benefit than they have historically. LME metal prices and other market issues have resulted in higher than expected prices of UBCs thus compressing the internal hedge benefit we receive from UBCs.
 
Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated with the metal price ceilings is to purchase call options and/or synthetic call options on projected aluminum volume requirements above our assumed internal hedge position. To hedge our exposure in 2006, we previously purchased call options at various strike prices. In September of 2006, we began purchasing both fixed forward derivative instruments and put options, thereby creating synthetic call options, to hedge our exposure to further metal price increases in 2007. We have not entered into any synthetic call options beyond 2007.
 
During the third quarter of 2006, we began selling short-term LME futures contracts to reduce the cash flow volatility of fluctuating metal prices associated with metal price lag.


64


Table of Contents

 
In Europe, we enter into forward metal purchases simultaneous with the contracts that contain fixed metal prices. These forward metal purchases directly hedge the economic risk of future metal price fluctuation associated with these contracts. The positive or negative impact on sales under these contracts has been included in the metal price lag effect described above, without regard to the fixed forward instruments purchased to offset this risk.
 
Sensitivities
 
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax gain (loss) in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of March 31, 2007, assuming a 10% decline in the three-month LME price.
 
                 
        Pre-Tax
    Decline in
  Loss in
    Rate/Price   Fair Value
        ($ In millions)
 
Aluminum Forward Contracts
    10 %   $ (42 )
Aluminum Put Options
    10 %     —  
 
Electricity and Natural Gas
 
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery of our aluminum rolled products. In the first quarter of 2007, natural gas and electricity represented approximately 70% of our energy consumption by cost. We also use fuel oil and transport fuel. The majority of energy usage occurs at our casting centers, at our smelters in South America and during the hot rolling of aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities require relatively less energy. We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which subjects us to market pricing fluctuations. Recent natural gas pricing changes in the United States have increased our energy costs. We seek to stabilize our future exposure to natural gas prices through the use of forward purchase contracts. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South America have historically been more stable than in the United States. As of March 31, 2007, we have a nominal amount of forward purchases outstanding related to natural gas.
 
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate. A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated prices, which affords relatively stable costs. In South America, we have our own hydroelectric facilities that meet approximately 25% of that region’s total electricity requirements. Additionally, we have entered into an electricity swap in North America to fix a portion of the cost of our electricity requirements.
 
Rising energy costs worldwide, due to the volatility of supply and international and geopolitical events, expose us to reduced profits as such changes in such costs cannot immediately be recovered under existing contracts and sales agreements, and may only be mitigated in future periods under future pricing arrangements.
 
Sensitivities
 
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of March 31, 2007, assuming a 10% decline in spot prices for energy contracts.
 
                 
        Pre-Tax
    Decline in
  Loss in
    Rate/Price   Fair Value
        ($ In millions)
 
Electricity
    10 %   $ (12 )
Natural Gas
    10 %     (1 )
 
Foreign Currency Exchange Risks
 
Exchange rate movements, particularly the euro, the Canadian dollar, the Brazilian real and the Korean won against the U.S. dollar, have an impact on our operating results. In Europe, where we have predominantly local currency selling prices and operating costs, we benefit as the euro strengthens, but are adversely affected


65


Table of Contents

as the euro weakens. In Korea, where we have local currency selling prices for local sales and U.S. dollar denominated selling prices for exports, we benefit slightly as the won weakens, but are adversely affected as the won strengthens, due to a slightly higher percentage of exports compared to local sales. In Canada and Brazil, where we have predominately U.S. dollar selling prices and local currency operating costs, we benefit as the local currencies weaken, but are adversely affected as the local currencies strengthen. Foreign currency contracts may be used to hedge the economic exposures at our foreign operations.
 
It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in non-functional currencies. Our most significant non-U.S. dollar functional currency operating segments are Europe and Asia, which have the euro and the Korean won as their functional currencies, respectively. South America is U.S. dollar functional with Brazilian real transactional exposure.
 
We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Shareholders’ equity section of the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Net sales and expenses in our foreign operations’ foreign currencies are translated into varying amounts of U.S. dollars depending upon whether the U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens against other currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our net sales and expenses from foreign operations as expressed in U.S. dollars.
 
Any negative impact of currency movements on the currency contracts that we have entered into to hedge foreign currency commitments to purchase or sell goods and services would be offset by an equal and opposite favorable exchange impact on the commitments being hedged. For a discussion of accounting policies and other information relating to currency contracts, see Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 17 — Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts to our consolidated and combined financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
Sensitivities
 
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of March 31, 2007, assuming a 10% increase (decrease) in the foreign currency/U.S. dollar exchange rate.
 
                 
          Pre-Tax
 
    Increase (Decrease) in
    Loss in
 
    Exchange Rate     Fair Value  
          ($ In millions)  
 
Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
               
Euro
    10 %   $ (56 )
Korean won
    (10 )%     (25 )
Brazilian real
    10 %     (20 )
Canadian dollar
    10 %     (9 )
 
Loans to and investments in European operations have been hedged by cross-currency interest swaps (euro 475 million, GBP 62 million, CHF 35 million). Loans from European operations have been hedged by cross-currency principal only swaps (euro 111 million). Principal only swaps totaling euro 91 million are accounted for as cash flow hedges.


66


Table of Contents

 
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of March 31, 2007, assuming a 10% change in rates.
 
                 
        Pre-Tax
    Change in
  Loss in
    Rate   Fair Value
        ($ In millions)
 
Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
               
Euro
    10 %   $ (67 )
 
Interest Rate Risks
 
We are subject to interest rate risk related to our floating rate debt. For every 12.5 basis point increase in the interest rates on our outstanding variable rate debt as of March 31, 2007, which includes $608 million of Term Loan B debt (after the effect of $100 million that has been swapped into fixed rates) and other variable rate debt of $246 million, our annual income before provision for taxes on income would be reduced by approximately $1 million.
 
As of March 31, 2007, approximately 66% of our debt obligations were at fixed rates. Due to the nature of fixed-rate debt, there would be no significant impact on our interest expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase or decrease in market rates of interest.
 
From time to time, we have used interest rate swaps to manage our debt cost. We have entered into an interest rate swap to fix the interest rate on $100 million of our floating rate Term Loan B facility, which is part of our senior secured facility. In Korea, we entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate on various floating rate debt. See Note 9 — Long-Term Debt to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for further information.
 
Sensitivities
 
The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of March 31, 2007, assuming a 10% change in rates.
 
                 
          Pre-Tax
 
    Change in
    Loss in
 
    Rate     Fair Value  
          ($ In millions)  
 
Interest Rate Swap Contracts
               
North America
    (10 )%   $ —  
Asia
    (10 )%     —  
 
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, members of management, at the direction (and with the participation) of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of March 31, 2007. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2007, as a result of the continued existence of a material weakness in our accounting for income taxes, as described in our Annual Report on


67


Table of Contents

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Notwithstanding this material weakness, management has concluded that the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
Remediation Plan for Material Weakness Existing as of March 31, 2007
 
We outlined our plan to remediate the material weakness in accounting for income taxes in Item 9A. Controls and Procedures of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which was filed on March 1, 2007, and there have been no additional remedial measures implemented since. While we believe that the measures enumerated in our Annual Report will ultimately allow us to remediate this material weakness, we concluded as of March 31, 2007, that there continues to be more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements related to accounting for income taxes will not be prevented or detected. Management believes it is prudent to observe and test these controls over a longer period of time prior to concluding that this weakness has been remediated. We are further considering our current mix of internal and external staffing in the area of income taxes and may make further changes as necessary to remediate this material weakness as quickly as possible. In addition, we will continue to provide training to our tax personnel and specifically focus on areas where adjustments and errors have been previously identified.


68


Table of Contents

 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.   Legal Proceedings
 
Reynolds Boat Case.  As previously disclosed, we and Alcan were defendants in a case in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, in Tacoma, Washington, case number C04-0175RJB. Plaintiffs were Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under implied warranty theories, based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and Alcan sold certain aluminum products that were ultimately used for marine applications and were unsuitable for such applications. The jury reached a verdict on May 22, 2006 against us and Alcan for approximately $60 million, and the court later awarded Reynolds and Alcoa approximately $16 million in prejudgment interest and court costs.
 
The case was settled during July 2006 as among us, Alcan, Reynolds, Alcoa and their insurers for $71 million. We contributed approximately $1 million toward the settlement, and the remaining $70 million was funded by our insurers. Although the settlement was substantially funded by our insurance carriers, certain of them have reserved the right to request a refund from us, after reviewing details of the plaintiffs’ damages to determine if they include costs of a nature not covered under the insurance contracts. Of the $70 million funded, $39 million is in dispute with and under further review by certain of our insurance carriers, who have until July 20, 2007 to complete their review, unless that review time is extended by mutual agreement. In the third quarter of 2006, we posted a letter of credit in the amount of approximately $10 million in favor of one of those insurance carriers, while we resolve the questions, if any, about the extent of coverage of the costs included in the settlement.
 
As of December 31, 2005, we recognized a liability for the full amount of the settlement, included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet of $71 million, with a corresponding charge against earnings. We also recognized an insurance receivable included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets on our consolidated balance sheet of $31 million, with a corresponding increase to earnings. Although $70 million of the settlement was funded by our insurers, we only recognized an insurance receivable to the extent that coverage was not in dispute. We recognized a net charge of $40 million during the fourth quarter of 2005.
 
In July 2006, we contributed and paid $1 million to our insurers who subsequently paid the entire settlement amount of $71 million to the plaintiffs. Accordingly, during the third quarter of 2006 we reversed the previously recorded insurance receivable of $31 million and reduced our recorded liability by the same amount plus the $1 million contributed by us. The remaining liability of $39 million represents the amount of the settlement claim that was funded by our insurers but is still in dispute with and under further review by certain of our insurance carriers, who have yet to complete their review as described above. The $39 million liability is included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
 
While the ultimate resolution of the nature and extent of any costs not covered under our insurance contracts cannot be determined with certainty or reasonably estimated at this time, if there is an adverse outcome with respect to insurance coverage, and we are required to reimburse our insurers, it could have a material impact on our cash flows in the period of resolution. Alternatively, the ultimate resolution could be favorable, such that insurance coverage is in excess of the net expense that we have recognized to date. This would result in our recording a non-cash gain in the period of resolution, and this non-cash gain could have a material impact on our results of operations during the period in which such a determination is made.
 
Coke Lawsuits.  A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis Corporation on February 15, 2007 by Coca-Cola Bottler’s Sales and Services Company LLC (“CCBSS”) in state court in Georgia. In addition, a lawsuit was commenced against Novelis Corporation and Alcan Corporation on April 3, 2007 by Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc, Enterprises Acquisition Company, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company and The Coca-Cola Trading Company, Inc (collectively, “CCE”) in federal court in Georgia. Novelis intends to defend these claims vigorously. Novelis believes that it has good defenses, although there can be no certainty with respect to the outcome of the litigation.


69


Table of Contents

CCBSS is a consortium of Coca-Cola bottlers across the United States, including Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under the agreement. The agreement includes a “most favored nations” provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached the terms of the most favored nations provision. The dispute will likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the parties and the court’s finding as to how certain provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material. Novelis Corporation has not yet filed its response to the complaint. On February 20, 2007, Novelis Corporation removed the CCBSS litigation to the federal court in Georgia. On March 6, 2007, CCBSS moved to remand the case back to the Georgia state court. That motion is pending.
 
The claim by CCE seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial for breach of a prior aluminum can stock supply agreement between CCE and Novelis Corporation, successor to the rights and obligations of Alcan Aluminum Corporation under the agreement. According to its terms, that agreement with CCE terminated in 2006. The CCE supply agreement included a “most favored nations” provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCE alleges that Novelis Corporation’s entry into a supply agreement with Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached the “most favored nation” provision of the CCE supply agreement. If CCE were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material. The dispute will likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the parties and the court’s finding as to how certain provisions of the supply agreement ought to be interpreted. Novelis Corporation has not yet filed its response to the complaint.
 
Anheuser-Busch Litigation.  On September 19, 2006, Novelis Corporation filed a lawsuit against Anheuser-Busch, Inc. in federal court in Ohio. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. subsequently filed suit against Novelis Corporation and the Company in federal court in Missouri. On January 3, 2007, Anheuser-Busch, Inc.’s suit was transferred to the Ohio federal court.
 
Novelis Corporation alleges that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached the existing multi-year aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and we seek monetary damages and declaratory relief. Among other claims, we assert that since entering into the supply agreement, there has been a structural change in market conditions that requires a change to the pricing provisions under the agreement.
 
In its complaint, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. has asked for a declaratory judgment that Anheuser-Busch, Inc. is not obligated to modify the supply agreement as requested by Novelis Corporation, and that Novelis Corporation must continue to perform under the existing supply agreement.
 
The Anheuser-Busch, Inc. litigation is currently at the discovery stage. Novelis Corporation has continued to perform under the supply agreement during the litigation.


70


Table of Contents

 
Item 6.   Exhibits
 
         
Exhibit
   
No.
 
Description
 
  2 .1   Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited, AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007)
  3 .1   Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
  3 .2   By-law No. 1 of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on November 17, 2004 (File No. 001-32312))
  4 .1   Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis and CIBC Mellon Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 10-K filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
  4 .2   Specimen Certificate of Novelis Inc. Common Shares (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on December 27, 2004 (File No. 001-32312))
  4 .3   Indenture, relating to the Notes, dated as of February 3, 2005, between the Company, the guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
  4 .4   Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 3, 2005, among the Company, the guarantors named on the signature pages thereto, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and UBS Securities LLC, as Representatives of the Initial Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
  4 .5   Form of Note for 71/4% Senior Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-4 filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File No. 331-127139))
  4 .6   First Amendment to the Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, dated as of February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K file on February 13, 2007)
  10 .1   Letter Agreement between Novelis Inc. and Edward A. Blechschmidt dated as of January 16, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on form 8-K filed on January 19, 2007)
  31 .1   Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  31 .2   Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
  32 .1   Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  32 .2   Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer


71


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
NOVELIS INC.
 
  By: 
/s/  Rick Dobson
Rick Dobson
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
  By: 
/s/  Robert M. Patterson
Robert M. Patterson
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 
Date: May 10, 2007


72


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
 
         
Exhibit
   
No.
 
Description
 
  2 .1   Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited, AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007)
  3 .1   Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
  3 .2   By-law No. 1 of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on November 17, 2004 (File No. 001-32312))
  4 .1   Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis and CIBC Mellon Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 10-K filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
  4 .2   Specimen Certificate of Novelis Inc. Common Shares (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on December 27, 2004 (File No. 001-32312))
  4 .3   Indenture, relating to the Notes, dated as of February 3, 2005, between the Company, the guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
  4 .4   Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 3, 2005, among the Company, the guarantors named on the signature pages thereto, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and UBS Securities LLC, as Representatives of the Initial Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
  4 .5   Form of Note for 71/4% Senior Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-4 filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File No. 331-127139))
  4 .6   First Amendment to the Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, dated as of February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K file on February 13, 2007)
  10 .1   Letter Agreement between Novelis Inc. and Edward A. Blechschmidt dated as of January 16, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on form 8-K filed on January 19, 2007)
  31 .1   Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  31 .2   Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
  32 .1   Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  32 .2   Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer


73