As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 21, 2006

Registration No. 333-127139

Registration No. 333-139076

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

Leslie J. Parrette, Jr., Esq.

General Counsel

Novelis Inc.

3399 Peachtree Road, NE, Suite 1500

Atlanta, Georgia 30326

(404) 814-4200

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,

including area code, of agent for service)

 

 

Copies to:

 

John J. Kelley III, Esq.

King & Spalding LLP

1180 Peachtree Street, N.E.

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

(404) 572-4600

 

 * The companies listed on the next page are also included in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 Form S-4 Registration Statement as additional Registrants.

 

** We refer to these entities as the New Registrants under the New Registration Statement.

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to public:  As soon as practicable after the Post-Effective Amendment to this Registration Statement is declared effective.

 

If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box.  o

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the following box and list the Securities Act of 1933 registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act of 1933 registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

 

 

 

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

 

(1) Pursuant to Rule 457(f)(2), the fee is calculated based upon the book value of the 71/4% Senior Notes due 2015.

(2) Previously paid.

(3) Guaranteed by the additional Registrants below.

(4) Pursuant to Rule 457(n) under the Securities Act of 1933, no registration fee is required with respect to the guarantees.

 

The Registrants hereby amend this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrants shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

Pursuant to Rule 429 under the Securities Act of 1933, the prospectus included herein is a combined prospectus relating to the New Registration Statement for the new Registrants identified above as well as Registration Statement No. 333-127139, which was previously filed by Novelis Inc. and the additional Registrants listed below and declared effective by the Securities Exchange Commission.

 

ADDITIONAL REGISTRANTS

 

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED DECEMBER 21, 2006

PROSPECTUS

 

 

$1,400,000,000

 

NOVELIS INC.

Offer to Exchange new 71/4% Senior Notes due 2015 for any and all of its outstanding
71/4% Senior Notes due 2015.

Subject to the Terms and Conditions described in this Prospectus

 

The Exchange Offer will expire at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on January 4, 2007

unless extended

 

 

The Notes

 

We are offering to exchange, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this prospectus and the accompanying letter of transmittal, up to $1,400,000,000 of our new 71/4% Senior Notes due 2015 for any and all of our outstanding 71/4% Senior Notes due 2015. We refer to our outstanding 71/4% Senior Notes due 2015 as the “old notes” and to the new 71/4% Senior Notes due 2015 issued in this offer as the “Notes.” The Notes are substantially identical to the old notes that we issued on February 3, 2005, except for certain transfer restrictions and registration rights provisions relating to the old notes, and will evidence the same continuing indebtedness as the old notes. The CUSIP numbers for the old notes are 67000XAA4, C6780CAA1 and 67000XAC0.

 

Material Terms of the Exchange Offer

 

 

Special Note for Broker-Dealers

 

Each broker-dealer that receives Notes for its own account pursuant to this Exchange Offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such Notes. The letter of transmittal states that by so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with resales of Notes received in exchange for securities where such securities were acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities. We have agreed that, starting on the expiration date and ending on the close of business one year after the expiration date, or such shorter period as will terminate when (i) all of the Notes covered by the Exchange Offer registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part have been distributed pursuant thereto and (ii) an exchanging dealer (meaning any holder of the old notes (which may include the initial purchasers of the old notes) that is a broker-dealer and elects to exchange for Notes any old notes that it acquired for its own account as a result of market-making or other trading activities (but not directly from us or our affiliates)) is no longer required to deliver a prospectus in connection with sales of the Notes, we will make this prospectus available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale. See “Plan of Distribution.”

 

 

Consider carefully the “Risk Factors” beginning on page 12 of this prospectus.

 

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined that this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

 

 

The date of this prospectus is December   , 2006.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus. This prospectus is an offer to exchange only the Notes offered by this prospectus and only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of its date.

 

This prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about us that is not included in or delivered herewith. Such information is available without charge to securityholders upon written or oral request to Investor Relations, Novelis Inc., 3399 Peachtree Road, NE, Suite 1500, Atlanta, Georgia 30326, (404) 814-4200. Securityholders must request such information no later than December 27, 2006, which date is five business days before the date on which they must make their investment decision.

We are subject to the reporting and information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and, as a result, we file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. We make these filings available on our website, the URL of which is http://www.novelis.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Information on our website does not constitute part of this prospectus. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain more information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is http://www.sec.gov.

 

Additionally, this prospectus contains summaries and other information that we believe are accurate as of the date hereof with respect to the terms of specific documents, but we refer you to the actual documents for complete information with respect to those documents, copies of which will be made available without charge to you upon request. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other documents referred to in this prospectus do not purport to be complete. Where reference is made to the particular provisions of a contract or other document, the provisions are qualified in all respects by reference to all of the provisions of the contract or other document.

 

 

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and assumptions made by our management. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under the headings “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Words such as “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “plan”, “believe”, “seek”, “estimate” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements in this prospectus include, but are not limited to, our expectations with respect to the impact of metal price movements on our financial performance, our metal price ceiling exposure, the effectiveness of our hedging programs, and our efforts to improve our financial reporting process and controls. These statements are based on beliefs and assumptions of Novelis’ management, which in turn are based on currently available information. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve assumptions and risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. We do not intend, and we disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

This document also contains information concerning our markets and products generally, which is forward-looking in nature and is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which these markets and product categories will develop. These assumptions have been derived from information currently available to us and to the third-party industry analysts quoted herein. This information includes, but is not limited to product shipments and share of production. Actual market results may differ from those predicted. While we do not know what impact any of these differences may have on our business, our results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and the market price of our securities may be materially adversely affected. Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, among other things:

 

 

 

The above list of factors is not exhaustive. These and other factors are discussed in more detail under “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

We were formed as a Canadian corporation on September 21, 2004. On January 6, 2005 (which we refer to as the separation date), we acquired substantially all of the aluminum rolled products businesses held by Alcan prior to its acquisition of Pechiney in 2003, as well as certain alumina and primary-metal businesses in Brazil formerly owned by Alcan and four rolling facilities in Europe initially acquired by Alcan from Pechiney in 2003. As part of the separation, Alcan’s capital was reorganized and, on January 6, 2005, our common shares were distributed to the then-existing shareholders of Alcan. Throughout this prospectus, we refer to the various steps pursuant to which we acquired our businesses from Alcan and distributed our shares to Alcan’s shareholders as the reorganization and/or spin-off transactions.

 

We describe in this prospectus the businesses we acquired from Alcan pursuant to the reorganization transactions, which are now operated by us, as if they were our businesses for all historical periods described. References to our shipment totals, results of operations and cash flows prior to January 1, 2004 do not include shipments from the facilities transferred to us by Alcan that were initially acquired by Alcan as part of the acquisition of Pechiney in December 2003.

 

In connection with the reorganization transactions, we and certain of our subsidiaries also entered into senior secured credit facilities providing for aggregate loans of up to $1.8 billion. These facilities consist of a $1.3 billion seven-year senior secured Term Loan B facility, all of which we borrowed upon the consummation

of the reorganization transactions, and a $500 million five-year multi-currency revolving credit facility, none of which was borrowed in connection with the reorganization transactions. Our Korean subsidiary also borrowed an aggregate of $200 million of term loan bank debt in Korea under separate credit facilities, which we refer to as the Korean term loans. In addition to these credit facilities, we issued notes to Alcan, which we refer to collectively as the “Alcan Note,” in the aggregate amount of $1.4 billion in respect of our debt owing to Alcan, in connection with the reorganization transactions. The initial borrowings of $1.3 billion under the senior secured credit facilities, the Korean term loans, the Alcan Note and the issuance of the old notes, and the application of the proceeds from the foregoing, are collectively referred to in this prospectus as the financing transactions.

 

The financial information contained in this prospectus is presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP), unless otherwise indicated. All figures are unaudited unless otherwise indicated. All dollar figures are in United States (U.S.) dollars unless otherwise indicated.

 

As used in this prospectus, “total shipments” refers to shipments to third parties of aluminum rolled products as well as ingot shipments, and references to “aluminum rolled products shipments” or “shipments” do not include ingot shipments. All tonnages are stated in metric tonnes. One metric tonne is equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. One kilotonne, or kt, is 1,000 metric tonnes. The term “aluminum rolled products” as used in this prospectus is synonymous with the terms “flat rolled products” and “FRP” commonly used by manufacturers and third-party analysts in our industry.

 

In this prospectus, unless otherwise specified, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “company,” “Group” and “Novelis” refer to Novelis Inc., a company incorporated in Canada under the Canadian Business Corporations Act, or CBCA, and include the businesses transferred to us by Alcan Inc., or Alcan, pursuant to the reorganization transactions described above.

 

Exchange Rate Data

 

We prepare our consolidated and combined financial statements in U.S dollars. The following table sets forth exchange rate information expressed in terms of Canadian dollars per U.S. dollar at the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. You should note the rates set forth below may differ from the actual rates used in our accounting processes and in the preparation of our consolidated and combined financial statements.

 

 

 

 

We are incorporated in Canada under the CBCA. Our registered office, as well as a substantial portion of our assets, are located outside the United States. Also, some of our directors and officers and some of the experts named in this prospectus reside in Canada or other jurisdictions outside the United States and all or a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States. We have agreed in the indenture under which the Notes will be issued to accept service of process in New York City, by an agent designated for such purpose, with respect to any suit, action or proceeding relating to the indenture or the Notes that is brought in any federal or state court located in New York City, and to submit to the jurisdiction of such courts in connection with such suits, actions or proceedings. However, it may be difficult for holders of Notes to effect service of process in the United States on our directors and officers and the experts named in this prospectus who are not residents of the United States or to enforce against them in the United States judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws. Ogilvy Renault LLP, our Canadian counsel, has advised us that, in their opinion, there is doubt as to the enforceability in Canada against us or against our directors, officers and experts who are not residents of the United States, in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts, of liabilities predicated solely upon United States federal securities laws.

The Exchange Offer		We are offering to exchange $1,000 principal amount of our Notes that we have registered under the Securities Act for each $1,000 principal amount of outstanding old notes. In order for us to exchange your old notes, you must validly tender them to us and we must accept them. We will exchange all outstanding old notes that are validly tendered and not validly withdrawn.
Resale of the Notes		Based on interpretations by the staff of the SEC set forth in no-action letters issued to other parties, we believe that you may offer for resale, resell and otherwise transfer your Notes without compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery provisions of the Securities Act if you are not our affiliate, you acquired the Notes issued in the Exchange Offer in the ordinary course of your business, and you are not participating, do not intend to participate and have no arrangement or understanding with any person to participate in the distribution of the Notes we issue to you in the Exchange Offer.
		Each broker-dealer that receives Notes in the Exchange Offer for its own account in exchange for old notes that it acquired as a result of market-making or other trading activities must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale of the Notes issued in the Exchange Offer. See “Plan of Distribution.”

Expiration date		The Exchange Offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, January 4, 2007, unless we decide to extend the expiration date. We may extend the expiration date for any reason. If we fail to consummate the Exchange Offer, you will have certain rights against us under the registration rights agreement we entered into as part of the offering of the old notes.

Special procedures for beneficial owners		If you are the beneficial owner of old notes and you registered your old notes in the name of a broker or other institution, and you wish to participate in the exchange, you should promptly contact the person in whose name you registered your old notes and instruct that person to tender the old notes on your behalf. If you wish to tender on your own behalf, you must, prior to completing and executing the letter of transmittal and delivering your outstanding old notes, either make appropriate arrangements to register ownership of the outstanding old notes in your name or obtain a properly completed bond power from the registered holder. The transfer of record ownership may take considerable time.
Guaranteed delivery procedures		If you wish to tender your old notes, but time will not permit your required documents to reach the exchange agent by the expiration date, or you cannot complete the procedure for book-entry transfer,

		you may still tender your old notes pursuant to the procedures described in this prospectus under the heading “The Exchange Offer-How to Use the Guaranteed Delivery Procedures if You Will Not Have Enough Time to Send All Documents to Us.”
Withdrawal rights		You may withdraw the tender of your old notes at any time prior to the expiration date.
Certain Canadian federal and United States federal income tax consequences		An exchange of old notes for Notes should not be subject to United States federal income tax. Similarly, the exchange will not constitute a disposition for Canadian federal income tax purposes. See “Important Canadian Federal and United States Federal Income Tax Considerations.”
Use of proceeds		We will not receive any proceeds from the issuance of Notes pursuant to the Exchange Offer. Old notes that are validly tendered and exchanged will be retired and canceled. We will pay all expenses incident to the Exchange Offer.
Exchange agent		You can reach The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., the exchange agent, at Corporate Trust Operations, Reorganization Unit, 101 Barclay Street 7 East, New York, NY 10286, Attention: Randolph Holder. For more information with respect to the Exchange Offer, you may call the exchange agent on (212) 815-5098; the fax number for the exchange agent is (212) 298-1915 (eligible institutions only).
Dissenter or Appraisal Rights		Holders of old notes will not have dissenters’ or appraisal rights in connection with the Exchange Offer.

Issuer		Novelis Inc., a Canadian corporation
Securities Offered		$1,400,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 71/4% senior notes due 2015.
Maturity		The Notes will mature on February 15, 2015.

Interest rate and Payment Dates		The Notes will bear interest at the rate of 71/4% per annum. Interest on the Notes will be payable semiannually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year commencing February 15, 2007. Interest on the Notes will accrue from the most recent date through which interest has been paid.

Guarantees		The Notes will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis, by all of our existing and future Canadian and U.S. wholly-owned restricted subsidiaries, certain of our existing foreign wholly-owned restricted subsidiaries and our other restricted subsidiaries that guarantee debt in the future under any credit facilities, provided that the borrower of such debt is our company or a Canadian or a U.S. subsidiary. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, on a historical combined basis, our subsidiaries that will not be guarantors at the consummation of this Exchange Offer had sales and operating revenues of $2.1 billion, and, at September 30, 2006, those subsidiaries had assets of $1.9 billion and debt and other liabilities of $1.3 billion (including inter-company balances).
Ranking		The Notes will be:
		• our senior unsecured obligations;
		• effectively junior in right of payment to all of our existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the assets securing that debt, including the $711 million of secured debt under our senior secured credit facilities as of September 30, 2006 (and up to an additional $413 million of revolving credit debt that we may borrow thereunder from time to time), which debt is secured by our assets and the assets of our principal subsidiaries;
		• effectively junior in right of payment to all debt and other liabilities (including trade payables) of any of our subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Notes;
		• equal in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior debt; and
		• senior in right of payment to all of our future subordinated debt.

		The guarantees of each guarantor will be:
		• senior unsecured obligations of that guarantor;
		• effectively junior in right of payment to all existing and future secured debt of that guarantor to the extent of the value of the assets securing that debt, including the debt or guarantee of debt of that guarantor under the senior secured credit facilities, which debt or guarantee will be secured by the assets of that guarantor;
		• equal in right of payment to all of that guarantor’s existing and future senior debt; and
		• senior in right of payment to all of that guarantor’s future subordinated debt.
		At September 30, 2006, Novelis Inc. and the guarantors had $711 million of secured debt. The indenture governing the Notes will permit us, subject to specified limitations, to incur additional debt, some or all of which may be senior debt.
Optional Redemption		Prior to February 15, 2010, we may from time to time redeem all or a portion of the Notes by paying a special “make-whole” premium specified in this prospectus under “Description of Notes — Optional Redemption.”
		At any time on or after February 15, 2010, we may from time to time redeem all or a portion of the Notes at the redemption prices specified in this prospectus under “Description of Notes — Optional Redemption.”
		In addition, at any time prior to February 15, 2008 we may also redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the old notes and the Notes in an amount not to exceed the amount of proceeds of one or more equity offerings, at a price equal to 107.250% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, provided that at least 65% of the original aggregate principal amount of the old notes and the Notes issued remains outstanding after the redemption.
Additional Amounts and Tax Redemption		Any payments made by us with respect to the Notes will be made without withholding or deduction, unless required by law. If we are required by law to withhold or deduct for taxes with respect to a payment to the holders of Notes, we will, subject to certain exceptions, pay the additional amount necessary so that the net amount received by the holder of Notes (other than certain excluded holders) after the withholding is not less than the amount they would have received in the absence of the withholding.
		If we are required to pay additional amounts as a result of changes in laws applicable to tax-related withholdings or deductions in respect of payments on the old notes and Notes but not the guarantees, we will have the option to redeem the old notes and Notes, in whole but not in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the old notes and Notes, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption and any additional amounts that may be then payable.

Covenants		We will issue the Notes under an indenture between us and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, which is the same indenture under which we issued the old notes. The indenture governing the Notes will contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to:
		• incur additional debt and provide additional guarantees;
		• pay dividends beyond certain amounts and make other restricted payments;
		• create or permit certain liens;
		• make certain asset sales;
		• use the proceeds from the sales of assets and subsidiary stock;
		• create or permit restrictions on the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us;
		• engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
		• enter into sale and leaseback transactions;
		• designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries; and
		• consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our assets and the assets of our restricted subsidiaries.
		During any future period in which either Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., or Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have assigned an investment grade credit rating to the Notes and no default or event of default under the indenture has occurred and is continuing, most of the covenants, including our obligation to repurchase Notes following certain asset sales, will be suspended. If either of these ratings agencies then withdraws its ratings or downgrades the ratings assigned to the Notes below the required investment grade rating, or a default or event of default occurs and is continuing, the suspended covenants will again be in effect. If at any time both ratings agencies have assigned an investment grade rating to the Notes, those covenants, including our obligation to repurchase Notes following certain asset sales, will terminate and no longer be applicable regardless of any subsequent changes in the rating of those Notes. See “Description of the Notes — Certain Covenants — Covenant Termination and Suspension.”
		These covenants are subject to a number of important limitations and exceptions. For more details, see “Description of the Notes — Certain Covenants.”
Change of Control		Following a change of control, we will be required to offer to purchase all of the Notes at a purchase price of 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase.
Exchange Offer; Registration Rights		Pursuant to a registration rights agreement among us and the initial purchasers of the old notes, we were required to complete the Exchange Offer of the old notes by November 11, 2005. We did not complete the Exchange Offer by that date. As a result, we

		began to accrue additional special interest at a rate of 0.25% from November 11, 2005. The indenture and the registration rights agreement provide that the rate of additional special interest increases by 0.25% during each subsequent 90-day period until the Exchange Offer closes, with the maximum amount of additional special interest being 1.00% per year. On August 8, 2006, the rate of additional special interest increased to 1.00%. On December 14, 2006, we extended the Exchange Offer to January 4, 2007. We will cease paying additional special interest once the Exchange Offer is completed.

Offering; Transfer Restrictions		The Notes are not being offered for sale and may not be offered or sold directly or indirectly in Canada except in accordance with applicable securities laws of the provinces and territories of Canada. We are not required, and do not intend, to qualify by prospectus in Canada the Notes, and accordingly, the Notes will be subject to restrictions on resale in Canada.
Absence of a Public Market for the Notes		The Notes are a new issue of securities, and currently there is no existing trading market for them. We do not intend to apply for listing of the Notes on any national securities exchange or to arrange for quotation of the Notes on any automated dealer quotation system. The initial purchasers may make a market for the Notes, but they have no obligation to do so. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that a liquid market will develop for the Notes. See “Risk Factors — Risks Related to the Notes — There is no public market for the Notes and we do not know if a market will ever develop or, if a market does develop, whether it will be sustained.”
Amendments and Waivers		Except for specific amendments, the indenture may be amended and any existing default or compliance with any provisions of the indenture may be waived, with the consent of the holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount then outstanding of the old notes and the Notes.
Risk Factors		Investing in the Notes involves substantial risks. You should carefully consider the information set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and the other information included in this prospectus in deciding whether to tender your old notes.
Certain Income Tax Considerations		You should carefully read the information under the heading “Important Canadian Federal and United States Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

	•	our combined statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001; and
	•	our combined balance sheets as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, none of which are included in this prospectus, and which were prepared using historical financial information based on Alcan’s accounting records.

		As of and for the Period Ended September 30,								As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
		2006				2005				2005				2004				2003				2002				2001
		($ in millions, except per share data)
Net sales		$	7,377			$	6,337			$	8,363			$	7,755			$	6,221			$	5,893			$	5,777
Net income (loss)			(170	)			32				90				55				157				(9	)			(137	)
Total assets			5,680				5,264				5,476				5,954				6,316				4,558				4,390
Long-term debt (including current portion)			2,333				2,650				2,603				2,737				1,659				623				514
Other debt			113				35				27				541				964				366				445
Cash and cash equivalents			71				124				100				31				27				31				17
Shareholders’/invested equity			322				404				433				555				1,974				2,181				2,234
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic:
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change		$	(2.30	)		$	0.43			$	1.29			$	0.74			$	2.12			$	1.01			$	(1.85	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change — net of tax			—				—				(0.08	)			—				—				(1.13	)			—
Net income (loss) per share — basic		$	(2.30	)		$	0.43			$	1.21			$	0.74			$	2.12			$	(0.12	)		$	(1.85	)
Diluted:
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change		$	(2.30	)		$	0.43			$	1.29			$	0.74			$	2.11			$	1.00			$	(1.85	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change — net of tax			—				—				(0.08	)			—				—				(1.13	)			—
Net income (loss) per share — diluted		$	(2.30	)		$	0.43			$	1.21			$	0.74			$	2.11			$	(0.13	)		$	(1.85	)
Dividends per common share		$	0.19			$	0.27			$	0.36			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—

		Nine Months
		Ended
		September 30,				Year Ended December 31,
		2006				2005				2004				2003				2002				2001
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(1)(2)			(3	)			2.1	x			3.8	x			5.5	x			3.7	x			(4	)

(1)		Earnings consist of income before the cumulative effect of accounting changes, before fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest) and income taxes, and eliminating undistributed income of persons owned less than or equal to 50% by us. Fixed charges consist of interest expenses and amortization of debt issuance costs and that portion of rental payments which is considered as being representative of the interest factor implicit in our operating leases.
(2)		Includes restructuring and asset impairment charges for certain businesses that we acquired from Alcan in the reorganization transactions of $13 million, $17 million, $95 million, $12 million, $25 million and $208 million which were recorded in relation to these programs for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and in the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
(3)		Due to our net loss in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. We would have needed to generate additional earnings of $141 million to achieve coverage of 1:1.
(4)		Due to our net loss in the year ended December 31, 2001, the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. We would have needed to generate additional earnings of $144 million to achieve coverage of 1:1.

 

Before tendering old notes in the Exchange Offer, you should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below and all other information contained in this prospectus. The risks described below are the most significant risk factors currently known to us which make an investment in our Notes speculative or risky. If any of these risks occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer, and you could lose part or all of your investment.

 

Risks Related to our Business and the Market Environment

 

Certain of our customers are significant to our revenues, and we could be adversely affected by changes in the business or financial condition of these significant customers or by the loss of their business.

 

Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 43% of our total net sales in 2005, with Rexam Plc and its affiliates representing approximately 12.5% of our total net sales in that year. A significant downturn in the business or financial condition of our significant customers could materially adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, if our existing relationships with significant customers materially deteriorate or are terminated in the future, and we are not successful in replacing business lost from such customers, our results of operations could be adversely affected. Some of the longer term contracts under which we supply our customers, including under umbrella agreements such as those described under “Business — Our Customers,” are subject to renewal, renegotiation or re-pricing at periodic intervals or upon changes in competitive supply conditions. Our failure to successfully renew, renegotiate or re-price such agreements could result in a reduction or loss in customer purchase volume or revenue, and if we are not successful in replacing business lost from such customers, our results of operations could be adversely affected. The markets in which we operate are competitive and customers may seek to consolidate supplier relationships or change suppliers to obtain cost savings and other benefits.

 

Our profitability could be adversely affected by our inability to pass through metal price increases due to metal price ceilings in certain of our sales contracts.

 

Prices for metal are volatile, have recently been impacted by structural changes in the market, and may increase from time to time. Nearly all of our products have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass-through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and (ii) a “margin over metal” price based on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the competitive market conditions for that product. Sales contracts representing approximately 20% of our total shipments during the first nine months of 2006 provide for a ceiling over which metal prices cannot contractually be passed through to our customers, unless adjusted. When applicable, these price ceilings prevent us from passing through the complete increase in metal prices on sales under these contracts and, consequently, we absorb those costs. Without regard to internal or external hedges, we were unable to pass through approximately $350 million of metal price increases associated with sales under these contracts during the first nine months of 2006. Depending on the fluctuations in metal prices for the remainder of 2006 and other factors, we may continue to incur these costs.

 

Our efforts to mitigate risk from our contracts with metal price ceilings may not be effective.

 

We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans (UBCs). Both of these strategies have historically provided a benefit as these sources of metal are typically less expensive than purchasing aluminum from third party suppliers. These two strategies are referred to as our internal hedges. While we believe that our primary aluminum production continues to provide the expected benefits during this sustained period of high LME prices, the recycling operations are providing less internal hedge benefit than we expected. LME metal prices and other market issues have resulted in higher than expected prices of UBCs, thus compressing the internal hedge benefit we receive from this strategy.

Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated with the metal price ceilings is to purchase call options and/or synthetic call options on projected aluminum volume requirements above our assumed internal hedge position. To hedge our exposure in 2006, we previously purchased call options at various strike prices. In September of 2006, we began purchasing synthetic call options, which are purchases of both fixed forward derivative instruments and put options, to hedge our exposure to further metal price increases in 2007.

 

While our metal call options will reduce our overall exposure to metal price ceilings, unless adjusted, the reduced effectiveness of our UBC-related internal hedge will negatively impact our financial results for 2006 and beyond, even as the percentage of our total shipments under contracts with price ceilings decreases to approximately 10% in 2007.

 

Our results can be negatively impacted by timing differences between the prices we pay under purchase contracts and metal prices charged to our customers.

 

In some of our contracts there is a timing difference between the metal prices we pay under our purchase contracts and the metal prices we charge our customers. As a result, changes in metal prices impact our results, since during such periods we bear the additional cost or benefit of metal price changes which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability.

 

Our operations consume energy and our profitability may decline if energy costs were to rise, or if our energy supplies were interrupted.

 

We consume substantial amounts of energy in our rolling operations, our cast house operations and our Brazilian smelting operations. The factors that affect our energy costs and supply reliability tend to be specific to each of our facilities. A number of factors could materially adversely affect our energy position including:

 

 

If energy costs were to rise, or if energy supplies or supply arrangements were disrupted, our profitability could decline.

 

We may not have sufficient cash to pay future dividends and repay indebtedness and we may be limited in our ability to access financing for future capital requirements, which may prevent us from increasing our manufacturing capability, improving our technology or addressing any gaps in our product offerings.

 

Although historically our cash flow from operations has been sufficient to pay dividends, repay indebtedness, satisfy working capital requirements and fund capital expenditure and research and development requirements, in the future we may need to incur additional debt or issue equity in order to fund these requirements as well as to make acquisitions and other investments. To the extent we are unable to raise new capital, we may be unable to increase our manufacturing capability, improve our technology or address any gaps in our product offerings. If we raise funds through the issuance of debt or equity, any debt securities or preferred shares issued will have rights and preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common shares. The terms of the debt securities may impose restrictions on our operations that have an adverse impact on our financial condition. If we raise funds through the issuance of equity, the proportional ownership interests of our shareholders could be diluted.

 

We could face additional adverse consequences as a result of our late SEC filings.

 

Our future success also depends upon the support of our customers, suppliers and investors. Our late SEC filings have resulted in negative publicity and may have a negative impact on the market price of our common stock. The effects of our late SEC filings could cause some of our customers or potential customers to refrain

from purchasing or defer decisions to purchase our products and services. Additionally, current or potential suppliers may re-examine their willingness to do business with us, to develop critical interfaces to our products or to supply products and services if they lose confidence in our ability to fulfill our commitments. Any of these losses could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We will continue to incur additional expenses until we reduce our reliance on third-party consultants to support our financial reporting requirements and have established the appropriate controls to continue to report our results on a timely basis. The expenses incurred in connection with the restatement and review process were approximately $35 million through September 30, 2006. These expenses include professional fees, audit fees, credit waiver and consent fees, additional special interest on our Notes and higher applicable margins on our debt.

 

In addition, as a result of our late SEC filings we will not be eligible to use a “short form” registration statement on Form S-3 or incorporate information by reference into this registration statement on Form S-4, and may not be eligible to use a short form registration statement in the future if we continue to fail to satisfy the conditions required to use short form registration. Our inability to use a short form registration statement may impair our ability or increase the costs and complexity of our efforts to raise funds in the public markets or use our stock as consideration in acquisitions should we desire to do so during this one year period.

 

We will be subject to higher interest rates under the Notes until we can complete a registered Exchange Offer.

 

The indenture governing the Notes and the related registration rights agreement required us to file a registration statement for the notes and exchange the original, privately placed notes for registered notes. The registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on September 27, 2005. Under the indenture and the related registration rights agreement, we were required to complete the Exchange Offer for the Notes by November 11, 2005. We did not complete the Exchange Offer by that date. As a result, we began to accrue additional special interest at a rate of 0.25% from November 11, 2005. The indenture and the registration rights agreement provide that the rate of additional special interest increases by 0.25% during each subsequent 90-day period until the Exchange Offer closes, with the maximum amount of additional special interest being 1.00% per year. On August 8, 2006 the rate of additional special interest increased to 1.00%. On December 14, 2006, we extended the Exchange Offer to January 4, 2007. We will cease paying additional special interest once this Exchange Offer is completed.

 

A deterioration of our financial position or a downgrade of our ratings by a credit rating agency could increase our borrowing costs and our business relationships could be adversely affected.

 

A deterioration of our financial position or a downgrade of our ratings for any reason could increase our borrowing costs and have an adverse effect on our business relationships. From time to time, we enter into various forms of hedging activities against currency or metal price fluctuations and trade metal contracts on the London Metal Exchange, or LME. Financial strength and credit ratings are important to the pricing of these hedging and trading activities. As a result, any downgrade of our credit ratings may make it more costly for us to engage in these activities, and changes to our level of indebtedness may make it more costly for us to engage in these activities in the future.

 

Adverse changes in currency exchange rates could negatively affect our financial results and the competitiveness of our aluminum rolled products relative to other materials.

 

Our businesses and operations are exposed to the effects of changes in the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the British pound, the Brazilian real, the Canadian dollar, the Korean won and other currencies. We have implemented a hedging policy that attempts to manage currency exchange rate risks to an acceptable level based on our management’s judgment of the appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and cost; however, this hedging policy may not successfully or completely eliminate the effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

 

We prepare our consolidated and combined financial statements in U.S. dollars, but a portion of our earnings and expenditures are denominated in other currencies, primarily the Euro, the Korean won and the

Brazilian real. Changes in exchange rates will result in increases or decreases in our reported costs and earnings, and may also affect the book value of our assets located outside the United States and the amount of our equity.

 

Primary aluminum is purchased based upon LME aluminum trading prices denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, and because we generally sell our rolled products on a “margin over metal” price, increases in the relative value of the U.S. dollar against the local currency in which sales are made can make aluminum rolled products less attractive to our customers than substitute materials, such as steel or glass, whose manufacturing costs may be more closely linked to the local currency, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

 

Most of our facilities are staffed by a unionized workforce, and union disputes and other employee relations issues could materially adversely affect our financial results.

 

Approximately three-quarters of our employees are represented by labor unions under a large number of collective bargaining agreements with varying durations and expiration dates. We may not be able to satisfactorily renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements when they expire. In addition, existing collective bargaining agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage at our facilities in the future, and any such work stoppage could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

 

Our operations have been and will continue to be exposed to various business and other risks, changes in conditions and events beyond our control in countries where we have operations or sell products.

 

We are, and will continue to be, subject to financial, political, economic and business risks in connection with our global operations. We have made investments and carry on production activities in various emerging markets, including Brazil, Korea and Malaysia, and we market our products in these countries, as well as China and certain other countries in Asia. While we anticipate higher growth or attractive production opportunities from these emerging markets, they also present a higher degree of risk than more developed markets. In addition to the business risks inherent in developing and servicing new markets, economic conditions may be more volatile, legal and regulatory systems less developed and predictable, and the possibility of various types of adverse governmental action more pronounced. In addition, inflation, fluctuations in currency and interest rates, competitive factors, civil unrest and labor problems could affect our revenues, expenses and results of operations. Our operations could also be adversely affected by acts of war, terrorism or the threat of any of these events as well as government actions such as controls on imports, exports and prices, tariffs, new forms of taxation, or changes in fiscal regimes and increased government regulation in the countries in which we operate or service customers. Unexpected or uncontrollable events or circumstances in any of these markets could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

 

We could be adversely affected by disruptions of our operations.

 

Breakdown of equipment or other events, including catastrophic events such as war or natural disasters, leading to production interruptions in our plants could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Further, because many of our customers are, to varying degrees, dependent on planned deliveries from our plants, those customers that have to reschedule their own production due to our missed deliveries could pursue financial claims against us. We may incur costs to correct any of these problems, in addition to facing claims from customers. Further, our reputation among actual and potential customers may be harmed, potentially resulting in a loss of business. While we maintain insurance policies covering, among other things, physical damage, business interruptions and product liability, these policies may not cover all of our losses and we could incur uninsured losses and liabilities arising from such events, including damage to our reputation, loss of customers and suffer substantial losses in operational capacity, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

We may not be able to successfully develop and implement new technology initiatives in a timely manner.

 

We have invested in, and are involved with, a number of technology and process initiatives. Several technical aspects of these initiatives are still unproven and the eventual commercial outcomes cannot be assessed with any certainty. Even if we are successful with these initiatives, we may not be able to deploy them in a timely fashion. Accordingly, the costs and benefits from our investments in new technologies and the consequent effects on our financial results may vary from present expectations.

 

Loss of our key management and other personnel, or an inability to attract such management and other personnel, could impact our business.

 

We depend on our senior executive officers and other key personnel to run our business. The loss of any of these officers or other key personnel could materially adversely affect our operations. Competition for qualified employees among companies that rely heavily on engineering and technology is intense, and the loss of qualified employees or an inability to attract, retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees required for the operation and expansion of our business could hinder our ability to improve manufacturing operations, conduct research activities successfully and develop marketable products.

 

If we fail to establish and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we may have material misstatements in our financial statements and we may not be able to report our financial results in a timely manner.

 

Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of December 31, 2005, March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006 and in each case concluded that they were not effective at a reasonable level as a result of the material weaknesses described below. The following material weaknesses disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 were identified in connection with the restatement of our unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial statements for the interim periods ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005:

 

 

These material weaknesses continued to exist as of September 30, 2006. In addition, in the interim period ended September 30, 2006, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were also not effective as a result of the continued existence of these material weaknesses, and error in identifying one of our four most highly compensated executive officers, other than the chief executive officer, in our original Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

The material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting noted above contributed to the restatements to our unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 and for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005. We cannot be certain that any remedial measures we take will ensure that we implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future. Any failure to implement new or improved controls or difficulties encountered in their implementation could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In particular, if the material weaknesses referred to above are not remediated, they could result in a misstatement of our accounts and disclosures that could result in a material misstatement to our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. In addition, if our disclosure controls and procedures continue to be ineffective, future errors in our SEC reports may not be prevented.

In connection with our remediation efforts, we underwent changes in several key financial management positions in 2005 and 2006. Our inability or difficulty in integrating new financial management into our company could hinder our ability to timely file our reports with the SEC, and to remediate and improve our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures.

 

We were not required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 404) and related SEC rules and regulations to perform an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. We are, however, required to perform such an evaluation for the year ending December 31, 2006 and such evaluation will be based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). We cannot assure you that the material weaknesses referred to above will be remediated prior to December 31, 2006, or that we will not uncover additional material weaknesses as of December 31, 2006. Any such failure would also adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual auditor reports regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting under Section 404.

 

We may not be able to adequately protect proprietary rights to our technology.

 

Although we attempt to protect our proprietary technology and processes and other intellectual property through patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements and other measures, these measures may not be adequate to protect our intellectual property. Because of differences in intellectual property laws throughout the world, our intellectual property may be substantially less protected in various international markets than it is in the United States and Canada. Failure on our part to adequately protect our intellectual property may materially adversely affect our financial results. Furthermore, we may be subject to claims that our technology infringes the intellectual property rights of another. Even if without merit, those claims could result in costly and prolonged litigation, divert management’s attention and could materially adversely affect our business. In addition, we may be required to enter into licensing agreements in order to continue using technology that is important to our business, or we may be unable to obtain license agreements on terms that are acceptable to us or at all.

 

Past and future acquisitions or divestitures may adversely affect our financial condition.

 

We have grown partly through the acquisition of other businesses including businesses acquired by Alcan in its 2000 acquisition of the Alusuisse Group Ltd. and its 2003 acquisition of Pechiney, both of which were integrated aluminum companies. As part of our strategy for growth, we may continue to pursue acquisitions, divestitures or strategic alliances, which may not be completed or, if completed, may not be ultimately beneficial to us. There are numerous risks commonly encountered in business combinations, including the risk that we may not be able to complete a transaction that has been announced, effectively integrate businesses acquired or generate the cost savings and synergies anticipated. Failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

 

We could be required to make unexpected contributions to our defined benefit pension plans as a result of adverse changes in interest rates and the capital markets.

 

Most of our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension plans for our employees in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada, unfunded pension benefits in Germany, and lump sum indemnities payable to our employees in France, Italy, Korea and Malaysia upon retirement or termination. Our pension plan assets consist primarily of listed stocks and bonds. Our estimates of liabilities and expenses for pensions and other post-retirement benefits incorporate a number of assumptions, including expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and interest rates used to discount future benefits. Our results of operations, liquidity or shareholders’ equity in a particular period could be adversely affected by capital market returns that are less than their assumed long-term rate of return or a decline of the rate used to discount future benefits.

If the assets of our pension plans do not achieve assumed investment returns for any period, such deficiency could result in one or more charges against our earnings for that period. In addition, changing economic conditions, poor pension investment returns or other factors may require us to make unexpected cash contributions to the pension plans in the future, preventing the use of such cash for other purposes.

 

In addition to existing defined benefit pension plans, we have elected in the spin-off agreements in 2005 to assume pension liabilities from the United States, United Kingdom and Canadian pension plans that we currently share with Alcan. The pension assets and liability transfer is expected to be completed by the end of 2006, subject to a true-up adjustment in 2007.

 

We face risks relating to certain joint ventures and subsidiaries that we do not entirely control. Our ability to generate cash from these entities may be more restricted than if such entities were wholly owned subsidiaries.

 

Some of our activities are, and will in the future be, conducted through entities that we do not entirely control or wholly own. These entities include our Norf, Germany and Logan, Kentucky joint ventures, as well as our majority- owned Korean and Malaysian subsidiaries. Our Malaysian subsidiary is a public company whose shares are listed for trading on the Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad. Under the governing documents or agreements or securities laws applicable to or stock exchange listing rules relative to certain of these joint ventures and subsidiaries, our ability to fully control certain operational matters may be limited. In addition, we do not solely determine certain key matters, such as the timing and amount of cash distributions from these entities. As a result, our ability to generate cash from these entities may be more restricted than if they were wholly owned entities.

 

Risks Related to Operating Our Business Following Our Spin-off from Alcan

 

We have a limited operating history as an independent company and we may be unable to successfully operate as an independent company in the future.

 

Prior to the spin-off, our business was operated by Alcan primarily within two business groups of its broader corporate organization rather than as a stand-alone company. Alcan performed corporate functions related to our business prior to the spin-off and continued to provide us with transitional services pursuant to agreements entered into in connection with the spin-off. As of September 30, 2006, all but three of these agreements had either expired by their terms or been terminated.

 

The substantial majority of our regional and corporate level managers involved in core business operations are former Alcan employees. Similarly, a number of our accounting and finance personnel are former Alcan employees. We also continue to utilize significant third-party consultants and advisors in connection with our accounting and finance functions. We are still in the process of recruiting accounting and finance personnel and do not yet have permanent resources in place sufficient to prepare our financial statements and the required regulatory filings without reliance on these third-party contractors.

 

If we are unable to hire the appropriate accounting and finance personnel, we may be unable to timely satisfy our SEC reporting obligations. Further, if we are unable to hire the appropriate personnel, we may not be able to remediate previously disclosed material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which could result in material misstatements to our annual consolidated and combined or interim unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial statements in future periods that would not be prevented or detected.

 

Our agreements with Alcan do not reflect the same terms and conditions to which two unaffiliated parties might have agreed.

 

The allocation of assets, liabilities, rights, indemnifications and other obligations between Alcan and us under the separation and ancillary agreements we entered into with Alcan do not reflect what two unaffiliated parties might have otherwise agreed. Had these agreements been negotiated with unaffiliated third parties, their terms may have been more favorable, or less favorable, to us.

We have supply agreements with Alcan for a portion of our raw materials requirements. If Alcan is unable to deliver sufficient quantities of these materials or if it terminates these agreements, our ability to manufacture products on a timely basis could be adversely affected.

 

The manufacture of our products requires sheet ingot that has historically been, in part, supplied by Alcan. In 2005, we purchased the majority of our third party sheet ingot requirements from Alcan’s primary metal group. In connection with the spin-off, we entered into metal supply agreements with Alcan upon terms and conditions substantially similar to market terms and conditions for the continued purchase of sheet ingot from Alcan. If Alcan is unable to deliver sufficient quantities of this material on a timely basis or if Alcan terminates one or more of these agreements, our production may be disrupted and our net sales and profitability could be materially adversely affected. Although aluminum is traded on the world markets, developing alternative suppliers for that portion of our raw material requirements we expect to be supplied by Alcan could be time consuming and expensive.

 

Our continuous casting operations at our Saguenay Works, Canada facility depend upon a local supply of molten aluminum from Alcan. In 2005, Alcan’s primary metal group supplied approximately 176kt of such material to us, representing all of the molten aluminum used at Saguenay Works in 2005. In connection with the spin-off, we entered into a metal supply agreement on terms determined primarily by Alcan for the continued purchase of molten aluminum from Alcan. If this supply were to be disrupted, our Saguenay Works production could be interrupted and our net sales and profitability materially adversely affected.

 

We may lose key rights if a change in control of our voting shares were to occur.

 

Our separation agreement with Alcan provides that if we experience a change in control in our voting shares during the five years following the spin-off and if the entity acquiring control does not agree with Alcan not to compete in the plate and aerospace products markets, Alcan may terminate any or all of certain agreements we currently have with Alcan. The termination of any of these agreements could deprive any potential acquirer of certain services, resources or rights necessary to the conduct of our business. Replacement of these assets could be difficult or impossible, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business operations, net sales and profitability. In addition, the potential termination of these agreements could prevent us from entering into future business transactions such as acquisitions or joint ventures at terms favorable to us or at all.

 

We could incur significant tax liability, or be liable to Alcan, if certain transactions occur which violate tax-free spin-off rules.

 

Under Section 55 of the Income Tax Act (Canada), we and/or Alcan will recognize a taxable gain on our spin-off from Alcan if, among other specified circumstances, (1) within three years of our spin-off from Alcan, we engage in a subsequent spin-off or split-up transaction under Section 55, (2) a shareholder who (together with non-arm’s length persons and certain other persons) owns 10% or more of our common shares or Alcan common shares, disposes to a person unrelated to such shareholder of any such shares (or property that derives 10% or more of its value from such shares or property substituted therefor) as part of the series of transactions which includes our spin-off from Alcan, (3) there is a change in control of us or of Alcan that is part of the series of transactions that includes our spin-off from Alcan, (4) we sell to a person unrelated to us (otherwise than in the ordinary course of operations) as part of the series of transactions that includes our spin-off from Alcan, property acquired in our spin-off from Alcan that has a value greater than 10% of the value of all property received in the spin-off from Alcan, (5) within three years of our spin-off from Alcan, Alcan completes a split-up (but not spin-off) transaction under Section 55, (6) Alcan makes certain acquisitions of property before and in contemplation of our spin-off from Alcan, (7) certain shareholders of Alcan and certain other persons acquired shares of Alcan (other than in specified permitted transactions) in contemplation of our spin-off from Alcan, or (8) Alcan sells to a person unrelated to it (otherwise than in the ordinary course of operations) as part of the series of transactions or events which includes our spin-off from Alcan, property retained by Alcan on the spin-off that has value greater than 10% of the value of all property retained by Alcan on our spin-off from Alcan. We would generally be required to indemnify Alcan for tax liabilities incurred by Alcan under the tax sharing and disaffiliation agreement if Alcan’s tax liability arose because of

(i) a breach of our representations, warranties or covenants in the tax sharing and disaffiliation agreement, (ii) certain acts or omissions by us (such as a transaction described in (1) above), or (iii) an acquisition of control of us. Alcan would generally be required to indemnify us for tax under the tax sharing and disaffiliation agreement if our tax liability arose because of (i) a breach of Alcan’s representations, warranties or covenants in the tax sharing and disaffiliation agreement, or (ii) certain acts or omissions by Alcan (such as a transaction described in (5) above). These liabilities and the related indemnity payments could be significant and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

 

Our U.S. subsidiary, Novelis Corporation, has agreed under the tax sharing and disaffiliation agreement to certain restrictions that are intended to preserve the tax-free status of the spin-off transaction in the United States for United States federal income tax purposes. These restrictions will, among other things, limit generally for two years from the spin-off date Novelis Corporation’s ability to issue or sell shares or other equity-related securities, to sell its assets outside the ordinary course of business, and to enter into any other corporate transaction that would result in a person acquiring, directly or indirectly, a majority of Novelis Corporation, including an interest in Novelis Corporation through holding our shares. If we breach any of these covenants, we generally will be required to indemnify Alcan Corporation, the intermediate holding company for Alcan’s U.S. operations, for the United States federal income tax resulting from a failure of the spin-off transactions in the United States to be tax-free for United States federal income tax purposes. These liabilities and the related indemnity payments could be significant and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

 

These potential liabilities could prevent us from entering into business transactions at favorable terms to us or at all.

 

We may be required to satisfy certain indemnification obligations to Alcan, or may not be able to collect on indemnification rights from Alcan.

 

In connection with the spin-off, we and Alcan agreed to indemnify each other for certain liabilities and obligations related to, in the case of our indemnity, the business transferred to us, and in the case of Alcan’s indemnity, the business retained by Alcan. These indemnification obligations could be significant. We cannot determine whether we will have to indemnify Alcan for any substantial obligations in the future or the outcome of any disputes over spin-off matters. We also cannot be assured that if Alcan has to indemnify us for any substantial obligations, Alcan will be able to satisfy those obligations.

 

We may have potential business conflicts of interest with Alcan with respect to our past and ongoing relationships that could harm our business operations.

 

A number of our commercial arrangements with Alcan that existed prior to the spin-off transaction, our spin-off arrangements and our post-spin-off commercial agreements with Alcan could be the subject of differing interpretation and disagreement in the future. These agreements may be resolved in a manner different from the manner in which disputes were resolved when we were part of the Alcan group. This could in turn affect our relationship with Alcan and ultimately harm our business operations.

 

Our agreement not to compete with Alcan in certain end-use markets may hinder our ability to take advantage of new business opportunities.

 

In connection with the spin-off, we agreed not to compete with Alcan for a period of five years from the spin-off date in the manufacture, production and sale of certain products for use in the plate and aerospace markets. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to pursue successfully new business opportunities, which could limit our potential sources of revenue and growth. See “Business — Arrangements Between Novelis and Alcan — Separation Agreement.”

Our historical financial information may not be representative of results we would have achieved as an independent company or our future results.

 

The historical financial information in our combined financial statements prior to January 6, 2005 has been derived from Alcan’s consolidated financial statements and does not necessarily reflect what our results of operations, financial position or cash flows would have been had we been an independent company during the periods presented. For this reason, as well as the inherent uncertainties of our business, the historical financial information does not necessarily indicate what our results of operations, financial position and cash flows will be in the future.

 

We expect to spend significant amounts of time and resources building a new brand identity.

 

Prior to our spin-off from Alcan, we marketed our products under the Alcan name, which has a strong reputation within the markets we serve. We have now adopted new trademarks and trade names to reflect our new company name. Although we are continuing to engage in significant marketing activities and intend to spend significant amounts of time and resources to develop a new brand identity, potential customers, business partners and investors generally may not associate Alcan’s reputation and expertise with our products and services. Furthermore, our name change also may cause difficulties in recruiting qualified personnel. If we fail to build brand recognition, we may not be able to maintain the leading market positions that we have developed while we were part of Alcan, which could harm our financial results.

 

As we build our information technology infrastructure and complete the transition of our data to our own systems, we could experience temporary interruptions in business operations and incur additional costs.

 

We have created our own, or have engaged third parties to provide, information technology infrastructure and systems to support our critical business functions, including accounting and reporting, in order to replace many of the systems Alcan provided to us. We may incur temporary interruptions in business operations as we finalize the transition from Alcan’s existing operating systems, databases and programming languages that support these functions to our own systems. Our failure to complete this transition successfully and cost-effectively could disrupt our business operations and have a material adverse effect on our profitability. In addition, our costs for the operation of these systems may be higher than the amounts reflected in our historical combined financial statements.

 

Risks Related to Our Industry

 

We face significant price and other forms of competition from other aluminum rolled products producers, which could hurt our results of operations.

 

Generally, the markets in which we operate are highly competitive. We compete primarily on the basis of our value proposition, including price, product quality, ability to meet customers’ specifications, range of products offered, lead times, technical support and customer service. Some of our competitors may benefit from greater capital resources, have more efficient technologies, or have lower raw material and energy costs and may be able to sustain longer periods of price competition.

 

In addition, our competitive position within the global aluminum rolled products industry may be affected by, among other things, the recent trend toward consolidation among our competitors, exchange rate fluctuations that may make our products less competitive in relation to the products of companies based in other countries (despite the U.S. dollar based input cost and the marginal costs of shipping) and economies of scale in purchasing, production and sales, which accrue to the benefit of some of our competitors.

 

Increased competition could cause a reduction in our shipment volumes and profitability or increase our expenditures, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

The end-use markets for certain of our products are highly competitive and customers are willing to accept substitutes for our products.

 

The end-use markets for certain aluminum rolled products are highly competitive. Aluminum competes with other materials, such as steel, plastics, composite materials and glass, among others, for various applications, including in beverage/food cans and automotive end-use applications. In the past, customers have demonstrated a willingness to substitute other materials for aluminum. For example, changes in consumer preferences in beverage containers have increased the use of polyethylene terephthalate plastic (PET) containers and glass bottles in recent years. These trends may continue. The willingness of customers to accept substitutes for aluminum products could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

 

A downturn in the economy could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

 

Certain end-use applications for aluminum rolled products, such as construction and industrial and transportation applications, experience demand cycles that are highly correlated to the general economic environment, which is sensitive to a number of factors outside our control. A recession or a slowing of the economy in any of the geographic segments in which we operate, including China where significant economic growth is expected, or a decrease in manufacturing activity in industries such as automotive, construction and packaging and consumer goods, could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. We are not able to predict the timing, extent and duration of the economic cycles in the markets in which we operate.

 

The seasonal nature of some of our customers’ industries could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

 

The construction industry and the consumption of beer and soda are sensitive to climatic conditions and as a result, demand for aluminum rolled products in the construction industry and for can feedstock can be seasonal. Our quarterly financial results could fluctuate as a result of climatic changes, and a prolonged series of cold summers in the different regions in which we conduct our business could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

 

We are subject to a broad range of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate, and we may be exposed to substantial environmental, health and safety costs and liabilities.

 

We are subject to a broad range of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. These laws and regulations impose increasingly stringent environmental, health and safety protection standards and permitting requirements regarding, among other things, air emissions, wastewater storage, treatment and discharges, the use and handling of hazardous or toxic materials, waste disposal practices, and the remediation of environmental contamination and working conditions for our employees. Some environmental laws, such as Superfund and comparable laws in U.S. states and other jurisdictions world-wide, impose joint and several liability for the cost of environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third-party claims, and other expenses, without regard to the fault or the legality of the original conduct, on those persons who contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the environment.

 

The costs of complying with these laws and regulations, including participation in assessments and remediation of contaminated sites and installation of pollution control facilities, have been, and in the future could be, significant. In addition, these laws and regulations may also result in substantial environmental liabilities associated with divested assets, third-party locations and past activities. In certain instances, these costs and liabilities, as well as related action to be taken by us, could be accelerated or increased if we were to close, divest of or change the principal use of certain facilities with respect to which we may have environmental liabilities or remediation obligations. Currently, we are involved in a number of compliance efforts, remediation activities and legal proceedings concerning environmental matters, including certain activities and proceedings arising under Superfund and comparable laws in U.S. states and other jurisdictions world-wide.

We have established reserves for environmental remediation activities and liabilities where appropriate. However, the cost of addressing environmental matters (including the timing of any charges related thereto) cannot be predicted with certainty, and these reserves may not ultimately be adequate, especially in light of potential changes in environmental conditions, changing interpretations of laws and regulations by regulators and courts, the discovery of previously unknown environmental conditions, the risk of governmental orders to carry out additional compliance on certain sites not initially included in remediation in progress, our potential liability to remediate sites for which provisions have not been previously established and the adoption of more stringent environmental laws. Such future developments could result in increased environmental costs and liabilities and could require significant capital expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results. Furthermore, the failure to comply with our obligations under the environmental laws and regulations could subject us to administrative, civil or criminal penalties, obligations to pay damages or other costs, and injunctions or other orders, including orders to cease operations. In addition, the presence of environmental contamination at our properties could adversely affect our ability to sell property, receive full value for a property or use a property as collateral for a loan.

 

Some of our current and potential operations are located or could be located in or near communities that may regard such operations as having a detrimental effect on their social and economic circumstances. Environmental laws typically provide for participation in permitting decisions, site remediation decisions and other matters. Concern about environmental justice issues may affect our operations. Should such community objections be presented to government officials, the consequences of such a development may have a material adverse impact upon the profitability or, in extreme cases, the viability of an operation. In addition, such developments may adversely affect our ability to expand or enter into new operations in such location or elsewhere and may also have an effect on the cost of our environmental remediation projects.

 

We use a variety of hazardous materials and chemicals in our rolling processes, as well as in our smelting operations in Brazil and in connection with maintenance work on our manufacturing facilities. Because of the nature of these substances or related residues, we may be liable for certain costs, including, among others, costs for health-related claims or removal or re-treatment of such substances. Certain of our current and former facilities incorporate asbestos-containing materials, a hazardous substance that has been the subject of health-related claims for occupation exposure. In addition, although we have developed environmental, health and safety programs for our employees, including measures to reduce employee exposure to hazardous substances, and conduct regular assessments at our facilities, we are currently, and in the future may be, involved in claims and litigation filed on behalf of persons alleging injury predominantly as a result of occupational exposure to substances or other hazards at our current or former facilities. It is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of these claims and lawsuits due to the unpredictable nature of personal injury litigation. If these claims and lawsuits, individually or in the aggregate, were finally resolved against us, our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.

 

We may be exposed to significant legal proceedings or investigations.

 

From time to time, we are involved in, or the subject of, disputes, proceedings and investigations with respect to a variety of matters, including environmental, health and safety, product liability, employee, tax, contractual and other matters as well as other disputes and proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Certain of these matters are discussed in the preceding risk factor and certain others are discussed below under “Business — Legal Proceedings.” Any claims against us or any investigations involving us, whether meritorious or not, could be costly to defend or comply with and could divert management’s attention as well as operational resources. Any such dispute, litigation or investigation, whether currently pending or threatened or in the future, may have a material adverse effect on our financial results and cash flows.

 

Product liability claims against us could result in significant costs or negatively impact our reputation and could adversely affect our business results and financial condition.

 

We are sometimes exposed to warranty and product liability claims. There can be no assurance that we will not experience material product liability losses arising from such claims in the future and that these will not have a negative impact on our net sales and profitability. We generally maintain insurance against many

product liability risks but there can be no assurance that this coverage will be adequate for any liabilities ultimately incurred. In addition, there is no assurance that insurance will continue to be available on terms acceptable to us. A successful claim that exceeds our available insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and cash flows.

 

Risks Related to the Notes

 

If you fail to exchange properly your old notes for the Notes, you will continue to hold notes subject to transfer restrictions.

 

We will only issue Notes in exchange for old notes that you timely and properly tender. Therefore, you should allow sufficient time to ensure timely delivery of the old notes and you should carefully follow the instructions on how to tender your old notes set forth under “The Exchange Offer — How to Tender Your Old Notes” and in the letter of transmittal that you will receive with this prospectus. Neither we nor the exchange agent are required to tell you of any defects or irregularities with respect to your tender of old notes.

 

If you do not exchange your old notes for Notes in the Exchange Offer, the old notes you hold will continue to be subject to the existing transfer restrictions. In general, you may not offer or sell the old notes except pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, under an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. We do not intend to register any old notes for resale under the Securities Act. If you continue to hold any old notes after the Exchange Offer is completed, you may have trouble selling them because of the restrictions on transfer of the old notes.

 

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness. Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our business and therefore make it more difficult for us to fulfill our obligations under the Notes.

 

As of September 30, 2006, we had total indebtedness of $2.4 billion, including the $711 million of debt outstanding under the senior secured credit facilities that we and certain of our subsidiaries entered into in connection with the spin-off transaction. Following the spin-off transaction and the financing transactions, our businesses are operating with significantly more indebtedness and higher interest expenses than they did when they were part of Alcan.

 

Our substantial indebtedness and interest expense could have important consequences to our company and you, including:

 

 

Although we are highly leveraged, the indenture relating to the Notes and the senior secured credit facilities will permit us to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future, including up to an additional $500 million that we or certain of our subsidiaries may borrow under the revolving credit facilities that are

part of the senior secured credit facilities. If we or our subsidiaries incur additional debt, the risks we now face as a result of our leverage could intensify.

 

We are a holding company and depend on our subsidiaries to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service obligations, including payments on the Notes.

 

We are a holding company and a large portion of our assets are the capital stock of our subsidiaries and joint ventures. As a holding company, we conduct substantially all of our business through our subsidiaries and joint ventures. Consequently, our cash flow and ability to service our debt obligations, including the Notes, are dependent upon the earnings of our subsidiaries and joint ventures and the distribution of those earnings to us, or upon loans, advances or other payments made by these entities to us. The ability of these entities to pay dividends or make other loans, advances or payments to us will depend upon their operating results and will be subject to applicable laws and contractual restrictions contained in the instruments governing their debt, and we may not exercise sufficient control to cause distributions to be made to us. Although our senior secured credit facilities and the indenture each limit the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to enter into consensual restrictions on their ability to pay dividends and make other payments to us, these limitations do not apply to our existing joint ventures or unrestricted subsidiaries and the limitations are also subject to important exceptions and qualifications.

 

The ability of our subsidiaries to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to allow us to make scheduled payments on our debt obligations, including the Notes, will depend on their future financial performance, which will be affected by a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside of our control. We cannot assure you that the cash flow and earnings of our operating subsidiaries and the amount that they are able to distribute to us as dividends or otherwise will be adequate for us to service our debt obligations, including the Notes. If our subsidiaries do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy our debt obligations, including payments on the Notes, we may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our debt, selling assets, reducing or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise additional capital. We cannot assure you that any such alternative refinancing would be possible, that any assets could be sold, or, if sold, of the timing of the sales and the amount of proceeds realized from those sales, that additional financing could be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all, or that additional financing would be permitted under the terms of our various debt instruments then in effect. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as on our ability to satisfy our obligations on the Notes.

 

The covenants in the senior secured credit facilities and the indenture governing the Notes impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us. If we default under these covenants, we may not be able to make payments on the Notes.

 

The senior secured credit facilities and the indenture governing the Notes impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries, among other things, to:

 

 

 

The senior secured credit facility also contains various affirmative covenants, including financial covenants, with which we are required to comply.

 

Although we currently expect to be able to comply with these covenants, operating results substantially below our business plan or other adverse factors, including a significant increase in interest rates, could result in our being unable to comply with our financial covenants. If we do not comply with these covenants and are unable to obtain waivers from our lenders, we would be unable to make additional borrowings under these facilities, our indebtedness under these agreements would be in default and could be accelerated by our lenders and could cause a cross-default under our other indebtedness, including the Notes. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not be able to repay our indebtedness or borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. In addition, if we incur additional debt in the future, we may be subject to additional covenants, which may be more restrictive than those that we are subject to now.

 

Most of the covenants in the indenture will be suspended during any future period that we have an investment grade rating from one rating agency, and during any such period you will not have the benefit of those covenants. In addition, certain covenants will be terminated if we have an investment grade rating from both rating agencies.

 

Most of the covenants in the indenture, as well as our obligation to offer to repurchase Notes following certain asset sales, will be suspended if the Notes obtain an investment grade rating from either one of these two rating agencies and we are not in default under the indenture. If such a suspension occurs, the protections afforded to you by the covenants that have been suspended will not be restored until the investment grade rating assigned by either Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s to the Notes should subsequently decline and as a result the Notes do not carry an investment grade rating from one rating agency. In addition, most of these covenants, as well as our obligation to offer to repurchase Notes following certain asset sales, will be terminated permanently if at any time the Notes receive an investment grade rating from both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s and we are not in default under the indenture. If this termination occurs, the protections afforded to you by the terminated covenants will not be later restored, regardless of any subsequent change in the Notes’ ratings. See “Description of Notes — Certain Covenants — Covenant Termination and Suspension.”

 

Your right to receive payments on the Notes is effectively junior in right of payment to all existing and future secured indebtedness of ours or the guarantors up to the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness.

 

The Notes will be effectively junior to all existing and future secured indebtedness of ours or the guarantors up to the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. For example, the Notes and the related guarantees will effectively rank junior in right of payment to all of our existing and future secured debt, including the $711 million of secured debt under our senior secured credit facilities as of September 30, 2006 (and up to an additional $413 million of revolving credit debt that we may borrow thereunder from time to time), which debt is secured by our assets and the assets of our principal subsidiaries. Although the indenture contains restrictions on our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to create or incur liens to secure indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to important limitations and exceptions that permit us to secure a substantial amount of additional indebtedness. Accordingly, in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization affecting us or any guarantors, your rights to receive payment will be effectively subordinated to those of secured creditors up to the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness.

Your right to receive payments on the Notes could be adversely affected if any of our non-guarantor subsidiaries declares bankruptcy, liquidates, or reorganizes.

 

Some, but not all of our subsidiaries will guarantee the Notes. As a result, you will only be creditors of our company and those of our subsidiaries that do guarantee the Notes. In the case of subsidiaries that are not guarantors, all the existing and future liabilities of those subsidiaries, including any claims of trade creditors, debtholders and preferred stockholders, will be effectively senior to the Notes and related guarantees. Subject to limitations in the senior secured credit facilities and the indenture, non-guarantor subsidiaries may incur additional indebtedness in the future (and may incur other liabilities without limitation). In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of our non-guarantor subsidiaries, their creditors will generally be entitled to payment of their claims from the assets of those subsidiaries before any assets are made available for distribution to us. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, our subsidiaries that will not be guarantors of the Notes at the consummation of this Exchange Offer had sales and operating revenues of $2.1 billion and as of September 30, 2006, those subsidiaries had total assets of $1.9 billion and total debt and other liabilities of $1.3 billion (including inter-company balances).

 

We may be unable to repay or repurchase the Notes upon a change in control or sale of significant assets.

 

There is no sinking fund with respect to the Notes, and the entire outstanding principal amount of the Notes will become due and payable at their respective maturity dates unless we elect to redeem the Notes earlier, as described in “Description of the Notes — Optional Redemption.” If we experience a change in control, as that term is defined in “Description of the Notes,” or if we or our subsidiaries dispose of significant assets under circumstances described in “Description of Notes — Certain Covenants — Limitation on Asset Sales,” we may be required to make an offer to repurchase all of your Notes prior to maturity. We cannot assure you that we will have sufficient funds or be able to arrange for additional financing to repay the Notes at maturity or to repurchase Notes tendered to us following a change in control or asset sale.

 

There is no public market for the Notes and we do not know if a market will ever develop or, if a market does develop, whether it will be sustained.

 

The Notes are a new issue of securities and there is no existing trading market for the Notes. Although the initial purchasers have informed us that they intend to make a market in the Notes, they have no obligation to do so and may discontinue making a market at any time without notice. In addition, any market making activity will be subject to the limits imposed by the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and may be limited during the pendency of any registration statement. As a result, we cannot assure you that a liquid market will develop for the Notes, that you will be able to sell your Notes at a particular time or that the prices that you receive when you sell the Notes will be favorable. If a liquid market is established, various factors could have a material adverse effect on the trading of the Notes, including fluctuations in prevailing interest rates. We do not intend to apply for listing or quotation of the Notes on any securities exchange or stock market.

 

Historically, the market for non-investment grade debt has been subject to substantial volatility. We cannot assure you that the market for the Notes will be free from similar volatility.

 

In Canada, you may only transfer the Notes in a transaction exempt from the applicable securities laws of the provinces or territories of Canada.

 

We are relying on exemptions from applicable Canadian provincial securities laws to offer the Notes. The Notes may not be sold directly or indirectly in Canada except in accordance with applicable securities laws of the provinces and territories of Canada. We are not required, and do not intend, to qualify by prospectus in Canada the Notes, and accordingly, the Notes will be subject to restrictions on resale in Canada.

In addition, holders of the Notes who are not residents of the United States remain subject to any restrictions imposed by the jurisdictions in which that holder is resident.

 

Changes in our credit ratings or the financial and credit markets could adversely affect the market prices of the Notes.

 

The future market prices of the Notes will be affected by a number of factors, including:

 

 

The condition of the financial and credit markets and prevailing interest rates have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations could have an adverse effect on the prices of the Notes. In addition, credit rating agencies continually revise their ratings for companies that they follow, including us. We cannot assure you that credit rating agencies will continue to rate the Notes or that they will maintain their ratings on the Notes. A negative change in our rating could have an adverse effect on the market prices of the Notes.

 

Fraudulent conveyance laws and other legal restrictions may permit courts to void or subordinate our subsidiaries’ guarantees of the Notes in specific circumstances, which would prevent or limit payment under the guarantees.

 

Federal, state and foreign statutes may allow courts, under specific circumstances, to void or subordinate any or all of our subsidiaries’ guarantees of the Notes. If any guarantees are voided or subordinated, our noteholders might be required to return payments received from our subsidiaries. The criteria for application of such fraudulent conveyance and other statutes vary, but, in general, under United States federal bankruptcy law, comparable provisions of state fraudulent conveyance laws and applicable Canadian federal or provincial law, a guarantee could be set aside or subordinated if, among other things, the guarantor, at the time it provided the guarantee:

 

 

Under certain Canadian federal and provincial statutes, a rebuttable presumption of the guarantor’s intent to prefer one creditor or hinder another may arise depending on the period of time that has elapsed between the assumption of the guarantee and the date of the guarantor’s insolvency.

The definition and test for insolvency will vary depending upon the law of the jurisdiction that is being applied. Generally, however, a guarantor would be considered insolvent if, at the time the guarantor provided the guarantee:

 

 

The tests for fraudulent conveyance, including the criteria for insolvency, will vary depending upon the law of the jurisdiction that is being applied. We cannot be sure which tests and standards a court would apply to determine whether or not the guarantors were solvent at the relevant time or, regardless of the tests and standards, whether the issuance of the guarantee would be voided or subordinated to the guarantor’s other debt.

 

If a court voids any or all of our subsidiaries’ guarantees or holds them unenforceable, you would cease to be a creditor of the guarantors to the extent such guarantees are voided or held unenforceable and would instead be a creditor solely of us, and if the court subordinates the guarantee to other obligations of the guarantor your ability to recover on the guarantee will be adversely affected.

 

U.S. investors in the Notes may have difficulties enforcing civil liabilities.

 

We are incorporated in Canada under the CBCA. Our registered office, as well as a substantial portion of our assets, are located outside the United States. Also, some of our directors and officers and some of the experts named in this prospectus reside in Canada or in other jurisdictions outside the United States and all or a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States. We have agreed in the indenture under which the Notes will be issued to accept service of process in New York City, by an agent designated for such purpose, with respect to any suit, action or proceeding relating to the indenture or the Notes that is brought in any federal or state court located in New York City, and to submit to the jurisdiction of such courts in connection with such suits, actions or proceedings. However, it may be difficult for holders of Notes to effect service of process within the United States on our directors and officers and the experts named in this prospectus who are not residents of the United States or to enforce against them in the United States judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws. In addition, there is doubt as to the enforceability in Canada of liabilities against us or against our directors, officers and experts who are not residents of the United States, in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts predicated solely upon United States federal securities laws.

 

Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency laws may impair the enforcement of remedies under the Notes.

 

The rights of the trustee under the indenture pursuant to which the Notes will be issued to enforce remedies could be significantly impaired by the restructuring provisions of applicable Canadian federal bankruptcy, insolvency and other restructuring legislation if the benefit of such legislation is sought with respect to us. For example, both the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) contain provisions enabling an insolvent person to obtain a stay of proceedings against its creditors and others and to prepare and file a proposal to be voted on by the various classes of its affected creditors. A restructuring proposal, if accepted by the requisite majorities of each affected class of creditors, and if approved by the relevant Canadian court, would be binding on all creditors within each affected class that did not vote to accept the proposal. Moreover, this legislation permits the insolvent debtor to retain possession and administration of its property, subject to court oversight, even though it may be in default under the applicable debt instrument during the period the stay against proceedings remains in place.

The powers of the court under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) and particularly under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) have been exercised broadly to protect a restructuring entity from actions taken by creditors and other parties. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether payments under the Notes would be made during any proceedings in bankruptcy, insolvency or other restructuring, whether or when the trustee for the Notes could exercise its rights under the Notes indenture or whether, and to what extent, holders of Notes would be compensated for any delays in payment, if any, of principal, interest and costs, including the fees and disbursements of the trustee for the Notes.

 

 

This Exchange Offer is intended to satisfy our obligations under the registration rights agreement, dated February 3, 2005, by and among us, the subsidiary guarantors and the initial purchasers of the old notes. We will not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of the Notes in the Exchange Offer. We will pay all expenses incidental to the Exchange Offer. We will receive in exchange for the Notes the old notes in like principal amount. We will retire and cancel all of the old notes tendered in the Exchange Offer.

 

The following table shows our ratios of earnings to fixed charges for the period and years indicated:

 

 

 

 

The table below sets forth our cash and cash equivalents, and capitalization as of September 30, 2006. You should read the following table in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the audited annual consolidated combined financial statements, the unaudited interim consolidated and combined financial statements and the related accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

 

 

Our ability to issue additional equity is constrained because our issuance of additional shares may cause the reorganization transactions to be taxable to us or to Alcan until January 5, 2007. Under the separation agreement and other agreements relating to tax matters, we may be required to indemnify Alcan for any such tax.

 

You should read the following selected consolidated and combined financial data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated and combined financial statements.

 

The data presented below is derived from our unaudited consolidated and combined statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, our consolidated and combined statements of income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 and our combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2004, all of which are included elsewhere in this prospectus, along with:

 

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated and combined statements of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2006 are derived from our unaudited interim consolidated and combined financial statements which are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2005 is derived from our unaudited interim consolidated and combined financial statements which are not included in this prospectus.

 

The consolidated and combined financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 include the results for the period from January 1 to January 5, 2005 prior to our spin-off from Alcan, in addition to the results for the period from January 6 to December 31, 2005. The combined financial results for the period from January 1 to January 5, 2005 present our operations on a carve-out accounting basis. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 and the consolidated results for the period from January 6 (the date of the spin-off from Alcan) to December 31, 2005 present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as a stand-alone entity.

 

The unaudited consolidated and combined financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 include the results for the period from January 1 to January 5, 2005 prior to our spin-off from Alcan, in addition to the results for the period from January 6 to September 30, 2005. The combined financial results for the period from January 1 to January 5, 2005 present our operations on a carve-out accounting basis. The unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2005 and the consolidated results for the period from January 6 (the date of the spin-off from Alcan) to September 30, 2005 present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as a stand-alone entity.

 

All income earned and cash flows generated by us as well as the risks and rewards of these businesses from January 1 to January 5, 2005 were primarily attributed to us and are included in our consolidated and combined results for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2005, with the exception of losses of $43 million ($29 million after tax) arising from the change in fair value of derivative contracts, primarily with Alcan. These mark-to-market losses for the period from January 1 to January 5, 2005 were recorded in the consolidated and combined statements of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2005 and are reflected as a decrease in Owner’s net investment.

 

Our historical combined financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001 have been derived from the accounting records of Alcan using the historical results of operations and historical basis of assets and liabilities of the businesses subsequently transferred to us. Management believes the assumptions underlying the historical combined financial statements are reasonable. However, the historical combined financial statements included herein may not necessarily reflect what our results of operations, financial position and cash flows would have been had we been a stand-alone company during the periods presented. Alcan’s investment in the Novelis businesses, presented as Owner’s net investment in the historical

combined financial statements, includes the accumulated earnings of the businesses as well as cash transfers related to cash management functions performed by Alcan.

 

 

As a result of our adoption of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised), Share-Based Payment on January 1, 2006, we are required to recognize compensation expense for a share-based award over an employee’s requisite service period based on the award’s grant date fair value, subject to adjustment. We adopted FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) using the modified prospective method. The modified prospective method requires companies to record compensation cost beginning with the effective date based on the requirements of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date. All awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) that remain unvested at the adoption date will continue to be expensed over the remaining service period. The cumulative effect of the accounting change, net of tax, as of January 1, 2006 was approximately $1 million, and was not considered material as to require presentation as a cumulative effect of accounting change in the accompanying condensed consolidated and combined statements of operations for the period ended September 30, 2006. Accordingly, the expense recognized as a result of adopting FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) was included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statement of operations in the first quarter of 2006.

 

As a result of our adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 47 as of December 31, 2005, we identified conditional retirement obligations primarily related to environmental contamination of equipment and buildings at certain of our plants and administrative sites. Upon adoption, we recognized assets of $6 million with offsetting accumulated depreciation of $4 million, and an asset retirement obligation of $11 million. We also

recognized a charge in 2005 of $9 million ($6 million after tax), which is classified as a Cumulative effect of accounting change — net of tax in the accompanying statements of income.

 

In December 2003, Alcan acquired Pechiney. A portion of the acquisition cost relating to four plants that are included in our company was allocated to us and accounted for as additional invested equity. The net assets of the Pechiney plants are included in the combined financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and forward, and the results of operations and cash flows are included in the consolidated and combined financial statements beginning January 1, 2004.

 

On January 1, 2002, we adopted FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under this standard, goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite life are no longer amortized but are carried at the lower of their carrying value or fair value and are tested for impairment on an annual basis. An impairment of $84 million was identified in the goodwill balance as of January 1, 2002, and was charged to income as a cumulative effect of accounting change in 2002 upon adoption of the new accounting standard. The amount of goodwill amortization was $3 million in 2001.

 

Alcan implemented restructuring programs that included certain businesses we acquired from it in the spin-off transaction. Subsequent to the spin-off, we implemented additional restructuring programs. Restructuring charges related to those programs and impairment charges on long-lived assets, included in our results of operations for the periods presented are as follows (in millions).

 

 

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

The following information should be read together with the selected consolidated and combined financial data and our consolidated and combined financial statements and accompanying notes, included elsewhere in this prospectus, for a more complete understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this prospectus, particularly in “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Market Data” and “Risk Factors.”

 

References herein to “Novelis”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “us” refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein to “Alcan” refer to Alcan, Inc.

 

GENERAL

 

Novelis is the world’s leading aluminum rolled products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and light gauge products for the construction and industrial, beverage and food cans, foil products and transportation markets. As of September 30, 2006, we had operations on four continents: North America; Europe; Asia and South America, through 34 operating plants and three research facilities in 11 countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil. We are the only company of our size and scope focused solely on aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local supply of technically sophisticated products in all of these geographic regions.

 

HIGHLIGHTS

 

Significant highlights, events and factors impacting our business during nine months ended September 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005 are presented briefly below. Each is discussed in further detail throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A).

 

 

 

METAL PRICE CEILINGS

 

Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model, which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass-through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and (ii) a “margin over metal” price based on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the competitive market conditions for that product.

 

Sales contracts representing approximately 20% of our estimated total shipments for 2006 provide for a ceiling over which metal prices cannot contractually be passed through to certain customers, unless adjusted. As a result, we are unable to pass through the complete increase in metal prices for sales under these contracts and this negatively impacts our margins when the metal price is above the ceiling price. We calculate and report this impact to be approximately the difference between the quoted purchase price on the LME (adjusted for any local premiums and for any price lag associated with purchasing or processing time), and the metal price ceiling in our contracts.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005, we were unable to pass through approximately $350 million and approximately $75 million, respectively, of metal price increases associated with sales under these contracts. We estimate that during the fourth quarter of 2006 we will be unable to pass through an additional $130 million under these contracts. Based on an aluminum price of $2,700 per tonne, and our best estimate of a range of shipment volumes, we estimate that we will be unable

to pass through aluminum purchase costs of approximately $230-$255 million in 2007 and $380-$430 million in the aggregate thereafter.

 

Under the scenarios presented above, cash flows from operations will be negatively impacted by the amount of metal purchase price that we are unable to pass through to our customers, adjusted for the timing of customer receipts and vendor payments. Ignoring the working capital timing, we estimate that cash flows from operations will be negatively impacted by the $480 million of metal prices we will be unable to pass through in the current year. Based on an aluminum price of $2,700 per tonne, and our best estimate of a range of shipment volumes, we estimate that operating cash flows will be negatively impacted by $230-$255 million in 2007 and $380-$430 million in the aggregate thereafter. We believe that under these scenarios, the impact of the metal price ceilings will not cause us to be in default of the financial covenants of our credit facility and our senior notes in either the short-term or long-term.

 

We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans (UBCs). Both of these strategies have historically provided a benefit as these sources of metal are typically less expensive than purchasing aluminum from third party suppliers. We refer to these two strategies as our internal hedges. While we believe that our primary aluminum production continues to provide the expected benefits during this sustained period of high LME prices, the recycling operations are providing less internal hedge benefit than we expected. LME metal prices and other market issues have resulted in higher than expected prices of UBCs, thus compressing the internal hedge benefit we receive from this strategy.

 

Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated with the metal price ceilings is to purchase call options and/or synthetic call options on projected aluminum volume requirements above our assumed internal hedge position. To hedge our exposure in 2006, we previously purchased call options at various strike prices. In September of 2006, we began purchasing synthetic call options, which are purchases of both fixed forward derivative instruments and put options, to hedge our exposure to further metal price increases in 2007. For 2007, the fixed forward contracts are priced at $2,500 per tonne, and at an aluminum price of $2,700 per tonne we would expect to generate positive cash flows of approximately $10 million from these derivatives, which would increase cash flows from investing activities.

 

For accounting purposes, we do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.  Accordingly, changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the contract settlement, and we expect further earnings volatility as a result. In the accompanying condensed consolidated and combined statements of operations, changes in fair value of derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133 are recognized in Other (income) expenses — net. These gains or losses may or may not result from cash settlement. For Regional Income purposes we only include the impact of the derivative gains or losses to the extent they are settled in cash during that period.

 

In the recent past, we have observed a structural shift in aluminum prices, which have risen to unprecedented, sustained levels and reacted suddenly upward and downward based on market events. Before this recent rise in prices, the long-term historical average price for aluminum was approximately $1,500 per tonne. We do not try to predict aluminum prices, but market consensus indicates that it is unlikely that they will return to this level in the short-term. In the long-term we use the LME forward curve model as a reasonable approximation of what aluminum prices may be in the future, however, the LME is a marketplace and there can be considerable variability in actual prices from forward prices. As we migrate away from the contracts with metal price ceilings and toward a pure conversion model, the price of aluminum should not influence our bottom-line results in the long-run, other than its effect on ultimate customer demand, although there are short-term implications of sudden increases or decreases in price as a result of our internal processing time.

 

At an aluminum price of $2,700 per tonne, we have not fully covered our exposure relative to the metal price ceilings with the three hedging strategies described above. This is primarily a result of (i) not being able to purchase affordable call options or fixed forward derivative instruments with strike prices that directly coincide with the metal price ceilings and (ii) our recycling operations are providing less internal hedge than we previously expected, as the spread between UBC prices and LME prices has not increased at the levels we projected internally. We do expect incremental improvement in 2007 over 2006, however, as our net sales under contracts with price ceilings decreases to approximately 10% of total estimated shipments in 2007.

 

METAL PRICE LAG

 

On certain sales contracts we experience timing differences on the pass through of changing aluminum prices based on the difference in the price we pay for aluminum and the price we ultimately charge our customers after the aluminum is processed. Generally, and in the short-term, in periods of rising prices our earnings benefit from this timing difference while the opposite is true in periods of declining prices. We refer to this timing difference as metal price lag. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we have benefited from metal price lag by approximately $43 million.

 

Generally, and in the short-term, metal price lag impacts cash flows negatively in periods of rising metal prices due primarily to inventory processing time, while the opposite is true in periods of declining prices. During the third quarter of 2006, we began selling short-term LME futures contracts to reduce the cash flow volatility of fluctuating metal prices, but we have not fully mitigated this short-term risk.

 

In Europe, certain of our sales contracts contain fixed metal prices for periods of time such as four to thirty-six months. In some cases, this can result in a negative (positive) impact on sales as metal prices increase (decrease) because the prices are fixed at historical levels. We enter into forward metal purchases simultaneous with these contracts that directly hedge the economic risk of future metal price fluctuation. The positive or negative impact on sales under these contracts has been included in the metal price lag effect described above, without regard to the fixed forward instruments purchased to offset this risk. The sales and Regional Income impacts are described more fully in the Operations and Segment Review for our Europe operating segment.

 

RESTATEMENT AND REVIEW AND DELAYED FILINGS

 

We restated our condensed consolidated and combined financial statements for our quarters ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005 as filed on May 16, 2006. The restatement and review process included an extensive review of the contingencies, reserves and adjustments made to create our opening balance sheet as of January 6, 2005.

 

As a result of the restatement and review process, certain filings were delayed, including our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006.

 

INTERNAL CONTROLS

 

The financial restatement and review we commenced in fiscal 2005 that continued into fiscal 2006 identified the need for substantial improvement in our financial accounting and control personnel, processes and reporting. We previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and continued to report as of September 30, 2006 that we have material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. The following material weaknesses were identified in connection with the restatement of our unaudited condensed

consolidated and combined financial statements for the interim periods ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005:

 

 

These material weaknesses continued to exist as of September 30, 2006. In addition, in the interim period ended September 30, 2006, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were also not effective as a result of the continued existence of these material weaknesses, and error in identifying one of our four most highly compensated executive officers, other than the chief executive officer, in our original Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

We are working to remediate these weaknesses to enable us to timely and accurately prepare and file our reports with the SEC. We expect to continue to implement significant process improvements and add substantially to our permanent financial and accounting staff throughout the coming quarters.

 

SPIN-OFF FROM ALCAN

 

On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The rolled products businesses were managed under two separate operating segments within Alcan — Rolled Products Americas and Asia; and Rolled Products Europe. On January 6, 2005, Alcan and its subsidiaries contributed and transferred to Novelis substantially all of the aluminum rolled products businesses operated by Alcan, together with some of Alcan’s alumina and primary metal-related businesses in Brazil, which are fully integrated with the rolled products operations there, as well as four rolling facilities in Europe whose end-use markets and customers were similar to ours.

 

Post-Transaction Adjustments

 

The agreements giving effect to the spin-off provide for various post-transaction adjustments and the resolution of outstanding matters. On November 8, 2006, Alcan and we executed a settlement agreement resolving the material working capital and cash balance adjustments to the opening balance sheet and issues relating to the transfer of U.S. pension assets and liabilities from Alcan to Novelis. Excluding pension assets and liability transfers, the net impact of the settlement was a payment to Novelis of approximately $4 million. The pension assets and liability transfer is expected to be completed by year end, subject to a true-up adjustment in 2007.

 

Agreements between Novelis and Alcan

 

At the spin-off, we entered into various agreements with Alcan including the use of transitional and technical services, the supply of Alcan’s metal and alumina, the licensing of certain of Alcan’s patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights, and the use of certain buildings, machinery and equipment, technology and employees at certain facilities retained by Alcan, but required in our business. The terms and conditions of the agreements were determined primarily by Alcan and may not reflect what two unaffiliated parties might have agreed to. Had these agreements been negotiated with unaffiliated third parties, their terms may have been more favorable, or less favorable, to us.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

Our combined financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 and all prior reporting periods were prepared on a carve-out accounting basis, and represented an allocation by Alcan of the assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, cash flows and changes in the components of invested equity of the businesses to be transferred to us on January 6, 2005. See Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant

Accounting Policies to our consolidated and combined financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

OPERATIONS AND SEGMENT REVIEW

 

The following discussion and analysis is based on our consolidated and combined statements of operations which reflect our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, as prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP).

 

The following tables present our shipments, our results of operations and the LME prices for aluminum for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.