UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2006
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission file number:
001-32312
Novelis Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
98-0442987
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification number)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3399 Peachtree Road NE,
Suite 1500
Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
30326
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
Telephone:
(404) 814-4200
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of September 30, 2006, the registrant had 74,006,375
common shares outstanding.
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial
Statements
Novelis
Inc.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (unaudited)
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
|
$
|
2,172
|
|
|
$
|
4,883
|
|
|
$
|
4,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Impairment charges on long-lived
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses
net
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
2,167
|
|
|
|
4,865
|
|
|
|
4,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision
(benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority
interests share
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
income (loss)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority
interests share
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss) net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
Change in fair value of effective
portion of hedges net
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss) net of tax
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
(93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
share basic
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.92
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.92
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common
share
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information for
2005 only:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the
consolidated and combined results of Novelis from January 6 to
June 30, 2005 increase to Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Net loss attributable to the
combined results of Novelis from January 1 to January 5,
2005 decrease to Owners net investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements
are an integral part of these condensed statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of
allowances of $30 in 2006 and $26 in 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,319
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,112
|
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment net
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Intangible assets net
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Fair value of derivative
instruments net of current portion
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,997
|
|
|
$
|
5,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
2,242
|
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
Long-term debt net of
current portion
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Accrued post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,439
|
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of
consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value;
unlimited number of first preferred and second preferred shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value;
unlimited number of shares authorized; 74,005,649 shares
issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders
equity
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,997
|
|
|
$
|
5,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements
are an integral part of these condensed balance sheets.
3
Novelis
Inc.
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Adjustments to determine net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Net gains on change in fair value
of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Provision for uncollectible
accounts receivable
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Dividends from non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
(Gains) losses on sales of
businesses, investments and assets net
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Impairment charges on long-lived
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities
(net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Accrued post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Disposal of business net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Changes in investment in and
advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums paid to purchase
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
|
4
Novelis
Inc.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(Continued)
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(1,630
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,180
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
Dividends common
shareholders
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Dividends minority
interests
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Net receipts from Alcan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash balances held in foreign currencies
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash
flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Principal payments on capital lease
obligations (included above in principal repayments
third parties)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of
non-cash investing and financing activities relating to the
spin-off transaction and post-closing adjustments (2005
only):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
Short-term borrowings
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Long-term debt related
parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Capital lease obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements
are an integral part of these condensed statements.
5
Novelis
Inc.
(in
millions, except number of common shares, which is in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2005
|
|
|
74,006
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
Activity for the Six Months
Ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Currency translation
adjustment net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Change in fair value of effective
portion of hedges net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Change in minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Dividends on common shares
($0.18 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30,
2006
|
|
|
74,006
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements
are an integral part of this condensed statement.
6
Novelis
Inc.
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Business
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization
and Description of Business
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products where the end-use destination of
the products includes the construction and industrial, beverage
and food cans, foil products and transportation markets. As of
June 30, 2006, we had operations on four continents: North
America; Europe; Asia and South America, through 34 operating
plants and three research facilities in 11 countries. In
addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary
aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that are
integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil.
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Alcan refer to Alcan, Inc.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated and combined
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated and combined financial statements and
accompanying notes in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
August 25, 2006. Unless otherwise specifically identified
as the original
Form 10-K,
any references to the
Form 10-K
made throughout this document shall refer to the
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on August 25, 2006, as amended. The
accompanying (a) consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2005, which has been derived from audited
financial statements, and (b) unaudited condensed
consolidated and combined financial statements have been
prepared pursuant to SEC
Rule 10-01
of
Regulation S-X.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in
annual financial statements prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those
rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures
made are adequate to make the information not misleading.
The unaudited results of operations for the interim periods
shown in these financial statements are not necessarily
indicative of operating results for the entire year. In the
opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated and combined financial statements recognize all
adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to
fairly state our financial position as of June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005; the results of our operations for the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005;
our cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005; and changes in our shareholders equity for the six
months ended June 30, 2006.
Certain reclassifications of prior periods amounts have
been made to conform to the presentation adopted for the current
period.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the Staff of the SEC issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements. SAB No. 108
provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior
year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for
the purpose of determining whether the current years
financial statements are materially misstated.
SAB No. 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2006. We will adopt SAB No. 108 as
of December 31, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of
SAB No. 108 to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
7
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans, which requires a company that sponsors one or more
single-employer defined benefit pension and other postretirement
benefit plans (benefit plans) to recognize in its balance sheet
the funded status of a benefit plan, which is the difference
between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit
obligation, as a net asset or liability, with an offsetting
adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income in
shareholders equity. FASB Statement No. 158 requires
additional financial statement disclosure regarding certain
effects on net periodic benefit cost. FASB Statement
No. 158 requires prospective application and the
recognition and disclosure requirements are effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2006. We will adopt FASB
Statement No. 158 as of December 31, 2006. We are
currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of
FASB Statement No. 158 on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, FASB Statement No. 158 requires that a company
measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations at its
year-end balance sheet date. We currently use our year-end
balance sheet date as our measurement date and, as a result,
that new requirement will not affect us.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB
Statement No. 157 applies to other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for
interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently
evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB
Statement No. 157 on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. FASB Interpretation No. 48 clarifies the accounting
for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements by prescribing a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. FASB Interpretation No. 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of
the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48 on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
pronouncements will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows or do not apply to our operations.
|
|
2.
|
Restructuring
Programs
|
All restructuring provisions and recoveries are included in
Restructuring charges (recoveries) net in the
accompanying condensed consolidated and combined statements of
income (loss) unless otherwise stated
8
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
below. The following table summarizes the changes in our
restructuring liabilities during the six months ended
June 30, 2006 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Exit
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2005
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Provisions net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31,
2006
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Provisions net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30,
2006
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2006, we announced additional actions in the
restructuring of our European operations, with the
reorganization of our plants in Ohle and Ludenscheid, Germany,
including the closing of two non-core business lines located
within those facilities. In connection with the reorganization
of our Ohle and Ludenscheid plants, we incurred costs of
approximately $1 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2006, and expect to incur additional costs of
$5 million (primarily severance) by the end of 2007.
In November 2005, we announced our intent to close our casting
alloy facility in Borgofranco, Italy during March 2006. In 2005,
we recognized charges of $5 million for asset impairments
and $9 million for other exit related costs, including
$6 million for environmental remediation expenses relating
to this plant closing. We have incurred additional costs of
approximately $1 million through June 30, 2006 and
expect all activities (including environmental remediation) to
be complete by 2009.
Subsequent
Event
On August 31, 2006, we announced a proposed restructuring
of our European central management and administration activities
in Zurich, Switzerland, to reduce overhead costs and streamline
support functions. In addition, we are proposing to exit our
Neuhausen research and development center in Switzerland. We
expect to incur approximately $6 million of costs
associated with these proposed actions.
|
|
3.
|
Loss on
Disposal of Business
|
In March 2006, we disposed of our aluminum rolling mill in
Annecy, France for consideration in the amount of one Euro, and
recorded pre-tax charges of $15 million in connection with
the sale, which are included in Other (income)
expenses net in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of income (loss) for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. The charges were comprised primarily of
$8 million representing our investment in and advances to
Annecy, cash payments of $5 million we made in connection
with the disposal of the business, and other cash fees and
expenses we paid of an additional $2 million.
Inventories consist of the following (in millions).
9
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,399
|
|
|
$
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 151,
Inventory Cost, which amends the guidance in Accounting
Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 43, Chapter 4,
Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for
abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs and wasted materials by requiring those items to be
recognized as current period charges. Additionally, FASB
Statement No. 151 requires that fixed production overheads
be allocated to conversion costs based on the normal capacity of
the production facilities. FASB Statement No. 151 is
effective prospectively for inventory costs incurred in fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2005. We adopted FASB
Statement No. 151 on January 1, 2006, and its adoption
did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
5.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment net, consists of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Land and property rights
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
4,564
|
|
|
|
4,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,531
|
|
|
|
5,342
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
|
(3,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,155
|
|
|
$
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent
Event
On August 21, 2006, we entered into a preliminary agreement
to transfer our rights to develop and operate two hydroelectric
power plants in South America with generating capacity of 155
megawatts. This transfer is subject to regulatory approval by
the National Electric Energy Agency prior to execution. We
received an advance cash payment of approximately
$15 million upon signing of the preliminary agreement;
however, this payment must be refunded if the transfer is not
approved. If approved, the transaction will be concluded and we
will recognize a pre-tax gain of approximately $12 million.
10
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Investment
in and Advances to Non-consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
Transactions
|
The following table summarizes the ownership structure and our
ownership percentage of the non-consolidated affiliates we
account for using the equity method. We have no material
investments in affiliates accounted for under the cost method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Affiliate Name
|
|
Ownership Structure
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Consorcio Candonga
|
|
Unincorporated Joint Venture
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Petrocoque S.A. Industria e
Comercio
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
EuroNorca Partners
|
|
General Partnership
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Deutsche Aluminium Verpackung
Recycling GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
France Aluminium Recyclage
S.A.
|
|
Public Limited Company
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
We do not control these affiliates, but have the ability to
exercise significant influence over their operating and
financial policies. The following table summarizes the combined
results of operations of our equity method affiliates (on a 100%
basis, in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
Costs, expenses and provisions for
taxes on income
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in our condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements are transactions and balances arising from business
we conduct with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we
classify as related party transactions and balances. The
following table describes the nature and amounts of transactions
that we had with these non-consolidated related parties during
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Purchases of tolling services,
electricity and inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH (A)
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
Consorcio Candonga (B)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Petrocoque S.A. Industria e
Comercio (C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH (D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We purchase tolling services (the conversion of metal) from
Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our
operations in South America. |
|
(C) |
|
We purchase calcined-coke from Petrocoque S.A. Industria e
Comercio for use in our smelting operations in South America. |
|
(D) |
|
We earn interest income on a loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
11
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The table below describes the period-end account balances that
we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as related
party balances on our accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets (in millions). We have no other material related
party balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Accounts receivable (A)
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Other long-term assets (A)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Accounts payable (B)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The balances represent current and non-current portions of a
loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH and
electricity from Consorcio Candonga. |
We entered into a preliminary agreement to transfer the common
and preferred shares of our 25% interest in Petrocoque S.A.
Industria e Comercio (Petrocoque) to an existing shareholder for
approximately $20 million. In accordance with
Petrocoques by-laws and shareholders agreement, any
transfer of shares is subject to a right of first refusal
whereby the other remaining shareholders can acquire our shares
based on their proportional ownership percentage. If the
remaining shareholders do not exercise their right of first
refusal and the sale is consummated, we anticipate closing this
transaction in November 2006 and recognizing a pre-tax gain of
approximately $14 million.
|
|
7.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Accrued payroll
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
Accrued settlement of legal claim
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
699
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Long-term debt consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Rates(A)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan B,
due 2012
|
|
|
6.88
|
%(B)
|
|
$
|
292
|
|
|
$
|
342
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due 2015
|
|
|
7.25
|
%(C)
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan B,
due 2012
|
|
|
6.88
|
%(B)
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Novelis Switzerland
S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due 2020
(Swiss francs (CHF) 58 million)
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due 2011
(CHF 5 million)
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due 2008
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Bank loan, due 2008 (Korean won
(KRW) 30 billion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Bank loan, due 2007
|
|
|
4.55
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Bank loan, due 2007 (KRW
40 billion)
|
|
|
4.80
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Bank loan, due 2007 (KRW
25 billion)
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Bank loans, due 2008 through 2011
(KRW 1 billion)
|
|
|
4.17
|
%(D)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due 2006 through 2012
|
|
|
2.59
|
%(D)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
2,603
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt net
of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,417
|
|
|
$
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Interest rates are as of June 30, 2006 and exclude the
effects of any related interest rate swaps or amortization of
debt issuance costs. |
|
(B) |
|
The interest rate for the Term Loans does not include any
additional applicable margin discussed below. |
|
(C) |
|
The interest rate for the Senior Notes does not include
additional special interest discussed below. |
|
(D) |
|
Weighted average interest rate. |
Floating
Rate Term Loan B
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we entered into
senior secured credit facilities providing for aggregate
borrowings of up to $1.8 billion. These facilities consist
of: (1) a $1.3 billion seven-year senior secured Term
Loan B facility, bearing interest at London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.75%, all of which was borrowed on
January 10, 2005; and (2) a $500 million
five-year multi-currency revolving credit and letters of credit
facility.
Unamortized debt issuance costs related to the senior secured
credit facilities are included in Other long-term assets
in our accompanying condensed and consolidated balance sheets,
and were $23 million as of June 30, 2006.
13
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Through June 30, 2006, we satisfied the 1% per annum
principal amortization requirement through fiscal year 2010, as
well as $424 million of the principal amortization
requirement for 2011. No further minimum principal payments are
due until 2011. As of June 30, 2006, there was
$798 million outstanding under this facility. Additionally,
in September 2006, we made an additional principal repayment of
$87 million, and as of September 30, 2006, there was
$711 million outstanding under this facility.
Our senior secured credit facilities include customary
affirmative and negative covenants, as well as financial
covenants relating to our maximum total leverage ratio, minimum
interest coverage ratio, and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.
On October 16, 2006, we amended the financial covenants to
our senior secured credit facilities. In particular, we amended
our maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and
minimum fixed charge coverage ratios through the quarter ending
March 31, 2008. If we had not amended these financial
covenants, we would have been in violation of the minimum
interest coverage ratio as of and for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006. We also amended and modified other
provisions of the senior secured credit facilities to permit
more efficient ordinary-course operations, including increasing
the amounts of certain permitted investments and asset-backed
securitizations, permitting nominal quarterly dividends, and the
transfer of an intercompany loan to another subsidiary. In
return for these amendments and modifications, we paid aggregate
fees of approximately $3 million to lenders who consented
to the amendments and modifications, and agreed to continue
paying the higher applicable margins on our senior secured
credit facilities and the higher unused commitment fees on our
revolving credit facilities that were instated with the fourth
waiver and consent agreement dated May 11, 2006. These
increases will continue until such time as the compliance
certificate for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2008
has been delivered.
The amended maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage
and minimum fixed charge coverage ratios for the period ended
June 30, 2006 are 5.25 to 1; 2.5 to 1; and 1 to 1,
respectively. We are in compliance with these financial
covenants for the period ended June 30, 2006. In addition,
as described below, we previously obtained waivers from our
lenders related to our inability to timely file our SEC reports.
7.25% Senior
Notes
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities (Senior
Notes). Unamortized debt issuance costs related to the Senior
Notes are included in Other long-term assets in our
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and were
$25 million as of June 30, 2006.
Under the indenture that governs the Senior Notes, we are
subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to incurring
additional debt and providing additional guarantees, paying
dividends beyond certain amounts and making other restricted
payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain consolidations
or mergers, and certain transactions with affiliates. We were in
compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2006.
However, as discussed below under the caption Impact of
Late SEC Filings on our Debt Agreements, we have received
a notice of default under the indenture related to our failure
to timely file this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
The indenture governing the Senior Notes and the related
registration rights agreement required us to file a registration
statement for the notes and exchange the original, privately
placed notes with registered notes. The registration statement
was declared effective by the SEC on September 27, 2005.
Under the indenture and the related registration rights
agreement, we were required to complete the exchange offer for
the Senior Notes by November 11, 2005. We did not complete
the exchange offer by that date. As a result, we began to accrue
additional special interest at a rate of 0.25% from
November 11, 2005. The indenture and the registration
rights agreement provide that the rate of additional special
interest increases by 0.25% during each subsequent
14
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
90-day
period until the exchange offer closes, with the maximum amount
of additional special interest being 1.00% per year. On
August 8, 2006, the rate of additional special interest
increased to 1.00%. On October 17, 2006, we extended the
offer to exchange the Senior Notes to December 15, 2006. We
expect to file a post-effective amendment to the registration
statement and complete the exchange as soon as practicable
following the date we are current on our reporting requirements.
We will cease paying additional special interest once the
exchange offer is completed.
Korean
Bank Loans
In December 2004, Novelis Korea Limited (Novelis Korea),
formerly Alcan Taihan Aluminium Limited, entered into a
$70 million floating rate long-term loan which was
subsequently swapped into a 4.55% fixed rate KRW 73 billion
loan due in December 2007. In February 2005, Novelis Korea
entered into a $50 million floating rate long-term loan
which was subsequently swapped into a 5.30% fixed rate KRW
51 billion loan due in February 2008.
In the first quarter of 2006, we repaid our KRW 30 billion
($30 million) 5.75% fixed rate loan originally due October
2008. In May 2006, a portion of the $50 million (KRW
51 billion) 5.30% fixed rate loan was refinanced into a KRW
19 billion ($20 million) short-term floating rate loan
which was paid in June 2006. We were in compliance with all debt
covenants related to our Korean bank loans as of June 30,
2006.
Interest
Rate Swaps
As of June 30, 2006, we had entered into interest rate
swaps to fix the
3-month
LIBOR interest rate on a total of $200 million of the
floating rate Term Loan B debt at effective weighted
average interest rates and amounts expiring as follows: 3.8% on
$100 million through February 3, 2007; and 3.9% on
$100 million through February 3, 2008. We are still
obligated to pay any applicable margin, as defined in our senior
secured credit facilities, in addition to these interest rates.
As of June 30, 2006, 75% of our debt was fixed rate and 25%
was variable rate.
Impact of
Late SEC Filings on our Debt Agreements
The restatement of our unaudited condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements for the quarters ended
March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005 (filed on
May 16, 2006) resulted in delays in the filing of our
quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (filed on
May 16, 2006), our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (filed on
August 25, 2006), our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (filed on
September 15, 2006) and this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
The terms of our senior secured credit facilities require that
we deliver unaudited quarterly and audited annual financial
statements to our lenders within specified periods of time. Due
to the delays, we obtained a series of waiver and consent
agreements from the lenders under the facility to extend the
various filing deadlines. The fourth waiver and consent
agreement, dated May 10, 2006, extended the
Form 10-Q
filing deadlines for the first, second and third quarters of
2006 to October 31, 2006, November 30, 2006, and
December 29, 2006, respectively. These extended filing
deadlines were subject to acceleration to 30 days after the
receipt of an effective notice of default under the indenture
governing our Senior Notes relating to our inability to timely
file such periodic reports with the SEC. We received an
effective notice of default with respect to this
Form 10-Q
on August 24, 2006. However, on August 11, 2006, we
entered into a fifth waiver and consent agreement which extended
the accelerated filing deadline caused as a result of the
receipt of the effective notice of default with respect to this
Form 10-Q
to October 22, 2006 and extended any accelerated filing
deadlines that would be caused as a result of the receipt of an
effective notice of default under the
15
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Senior Notes with respect to our
Form 10-Q
for the third quarter of 2006 to the earlier of 30 days
after the receipt of any such notice of default and
December 29, 2006 (as applicable).
To date, fees related to the five waiver and consent agreements
total $6 million, including $3 million and
$4 million which were incurred during the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. These fees
are being amortized over the remaining life of the related
borrowing in Interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs net using the effective
interest amortization method. Unamortized fees related to
these waiver and consent agreements are included in Other
long-term assets in our accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets and total $4 million as of June 30,
2006.
The October 16, 2006 amendment to our senior secured credit
facilities extends the higher applicable margins and unused
commitment fee that were instated in connection with the fourth
waiver and consent agreement. Specifically, we agreed to a 1.25%
applicable margin for Term Loans maintained as Base Rate Loans,
a 2.25% applicable margin for Term Loans maintained as
Eurocurrency Rate Loans, a 1.50% applicable margin for Revolver
Loans maintained as Base Rate Loans, a 2.50% applicable margin
for Revolver Loans maintained as Eurocurrency Rate Loans and a
62.5 basis point commitment fee on the unused portion of
the revolving credit facility, until such time as the compliance
certificate for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2008
has been delivered.
Under the indenture governing the Senior Notes, we are required
to deliver to the trustee a copy of our periodic reports filed
with the SEC within the time periods specified by SEC rules. As
a result of an effective notice of default from the trustee on
August 24, 2006 we were required to file this
Form 10-Q
by October 23, 2006 in order to prevent an event of
default. By filing this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
and furnishing a copy to the trustee, we cured this default.
On July 26, 2006, we entered into a Commitment Letter with
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. for backstop financing facilities
in an amount up to $2.855 billion. We paid fees of
approximately $4 million in conjunction with this
commitment. The Commitment Letter was originally set to expire
on October 2, 2006; however, it was amended to expire on
October 31, 2006.
Lines of
Credit /Short Term Borrowings
As of June 30, 2006, $62 million of our
$500 million revolving credit facility was utilized for
short-term loans in the United Kingdom and another
$5 million was utilized for letters of credit. As of
June 30, 2006, we had approximately $300 million
available under our $500 million revolving credit facility.
As of June 30, 2006, the weighted average interest rate on
our short-term borrowings was 6.72% (2.69% as of
December 31, 2005).
Commitment fees related to the unused portion of the
$500 million revolving credit facility, prior to the fourth
waiver and consent agreement dated May 10, 2006, ranged
between 0.375% and 0.5% per annum, depending on certain
financial ratios we achieve. As discussed above, in connection
with the fourth waiver and consent agreement, these commitment
fees increased to 0.625%. Under the terms of the
October 16, 2006 amendment to our senior secured credit
facilities, these higher fees will remain in effect until such
time as the compliance certificate for the fiscal quarter ending
March 31, 2008 has been delivered.
As of June 30, 2006, all of our $25 million unsecured
line of credit facility in Brazil was available for use.
16
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
A summary of the components of other comprehensive income (loss)
is as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net change in foreign currency
translation adjustments
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
(93
|
)
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
(146
|
)
|
Net change in fair value of
effective portion of hedges
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in minimum pension
liability
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other comprehensive income
(loss) adjustments, before income tax effect
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
Income tax effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
(93
|
)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax effects,
consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
Fair value of effective portion of
hedges net
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
On January 1, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement No. 123
(Revised), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision to
FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) requires
the recognition of compensation expense for a share-based award
over an employees requisite service period based on the
awards grant date fair value, subject to adjustment.
We adopted FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) using the
modified prospective method. The modified prospective method
requires companies to record compensation cost beginning with
the effective date based on the requirements of FASB Statement
No. 123 (Revised) for all share-based payments granted
after the effective date. All awards granted to employees prior
to the effective date of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised)
that remain unvested at the adoption date will continue to be
expensed over the remaining service period.
The cumulative effect of the accounting change, net of tax, as
of January 1, 2006 was approximately $1 million, and
was not considered material as to require presentation as a
cumulative effect of accounting change in our condensed
consolidated statements of income (loss). Accordingly, the
expense recognized as a result of adopting FASB Statement
No. 123 (Revised) was included in Selling, general and
administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated
statement of income (loss) in the first quarter of 2006.
Prior to the adoption of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised),
we presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the
exercise of stock options within operating cash flows in the
condensed consolidated and combined statements of cash flows.
Beginning on January 1, 2006, we changed our cash flow
presentation in accordance with FASB Statement No. 123
(Revised), which requires that the cash flows resulting from tax
benefits for deductions in excess of compensation cost
recognized be classified within financing cash flows. During the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, there were
no tax payments made that were reduced by excess tax benefits.
17
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Stock
Options
On January 5, 2005, our board of directors adopted the
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005 (the Conversion Plan) to allow
for all Alcan stock options held by employees of Alcan who
became our employees following our spin-off from Alcan to be
replaced with options to purchase our common shares. While new
options may be granted under the Conversion Plan, none were
granted through June 30, 2006. All options expire ten years
from their date of grant. All converted options that were vested
on the spin-off date continued to be vested. Unvested options as
of the spin-off date vest in four equal annual installments
beginning on January 6, 2006, the first anniversary of the
spin-off date. However, in October 2006 we amended the
Conversion Plan to allow the immediate vesting of all options
upon the death or retirement of the optionee. In the case of an
unsolicited change of control of Novelis, all options will vest
immediately.
As of June 30, 2006, there were 2,650,947 options
outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $21.61, and
877,033 of these options were exercisable at a weighted average
exercise price of $21.26. No new options have been issued since
the adoption of the Conversion plan. As such, no changes have
occurred in our assumptions to measure the options at fair value.
The table below shows our stock option activity for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 (all amounts actual).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
2,704,790
|
|
|
$
|
21.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
|
|
(53,843
|
)
|
|
$
|
21.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
2,650,947
|
|
|
$
|
21.61
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
$
|
(82,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable as of
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
877,033
|
|
|
$
|
21.26
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
281,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We used the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the fair
value of the options outstanding. The fair value of each option
was estimated using the following weighted average assumptions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
1.56%
|
|
|
|
1.56%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
30.30%
|
|
|
|
30.30%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.73%
|
|
|
|
3.73%
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
5.47 years
|
|
|
|
5.47 years
|
|
Total compensation cost recognized for stock options issued to
employees was $1 million for each of the three months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, and $2 million and
$1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. These amounts were included in Selling,
general and administrative expenses.
Compensation
to be Settled in Cash
Upon adoption of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised), we
determined that all of our compensation plans settled in cash
are considered liability based awards. As such, liabilities for
awards under these plans are
18
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
required to be measured at each reporting date until the date of
settlement. Various valuation methods were used to determine the
fair value of these awards, as discussed below.
Prior to January 1, 2006, we applied the intrinsic value
based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for
stock-based compensation plans settled in cash. We incurred a
liability when the vesting of the award became probable under
the guidance provided by FASB Interpretation No. 28,
Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable
Stock Option or Award Plans. When variable plan awards were
granted, we measured compensation expense as the amount by which
the quoted market value of the shares of our stock covered by
the grant exceeded the option price or value specified, by
reference to a market price or otherwise, subject to any
appreciation limitations under the plan. Changes, either
increases or decreases, in the quoted market value of those
shares between the date of grant and the measurement date
resulted in a prospective change in the measurement of
compensation expense for the right or award.
Stock
Price Appreciation Unit Plan
Prior to the spin-off, some Alcan employees who later
transferred to Novelis held Alcan stock price appreciation units
(SPAUs). These units entitled them to receive cash equal to the
excess of the market value of an Alcan common share on the
exercise date of a SPAU over the market value of an Alcan common
share on its grant date. On January 6, 2005, these
employees received 418,777 Novelis SPAUs to replace their
211,035 Alcan SPAUs at a weighted average exercise price of
$22.04. None of the SPAUs have been exercised, but as of
June 30, 2006, 115,419 SPAUs were exercisable at a weighted
average exercise price of $21.53. As of June 30, 2006,
there was $1.7 million of unamortized compensation cost
related to non-vested SPAUs, which is expected to be recognized
over a remaining vesting period of 2.5 years.
Upon adoption of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised), we
changed from the intrinsic value method to the Black-Scholes
valuation model to estimate the fair value of the SPAUs granted
to employees.
The table below shows our SPAU activity for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 (all amounts actual).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
SPAUs
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
SPAUs outstanding as of
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
418,777
|
|
|
$
|
22.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPAUs outstanding as of
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
418,777
|
|
|
$
|
22.04
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
$
|
(190,981
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPAUs exercisable as of
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
115,419
|
|
|
$
|
21.53
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
5,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The fair value of each SPAU outstanding as of June 30, 2006
was estimated using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.19%
|
|
|
0.19%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
39.50 to 43.80%
|
|
|
42.82%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
5.07 to 5.14%
|
|
|
5.08%
|
|
Expected life
|
|
2.62 to 4.87 years
|
|
|
4.34 years
|
|
Total
Shareholder Returns Performance Plan
Some Alcan employees who later transferred to Novelis were
entitled to receive cash awards under the Alcan Total
Shareholder Returns Performance Plan (TSR). TSR was a cash
incentive plan which rewarded eligible employees based on the
relative performance of Alcans common share price and
cumulative dividend yield performance compared to other
corporations included in the Standard & Poors
Industrials Index, measured over three-year periods starting on
October 1, 2002 and 2003. On January 6, 2005, these
employees immediately ceased participating in and accruing
benefits under the TSR. The current three-year performance
periods, namely 2002 to 2005 and 2003 to 2006, were truncated as
of the date of the spin-off. The accrued awards for all of the
TSR participants were converted into 452,667 Novelis restricted
share units (RSUs). At the end of each performance period, each
holder of RSUs will receive net proceeds based on the price of
Novelis common shares at that time, including declared
dividends. On October 15, 2005, an aggregate of
$7 million was paid to employees who held RSUs that had
vested on September 30, 2005. As of June 30, 2006,
there were 120,897 RSUs and related dividends outstanding that
vested on September 30, 2006 and were paid on
October 13, 2006 in the amount of $2.8 million. As of
June 30, 2006, there was $0.4 million of unamortized
compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs, which was expensed
during the third quarter of 2006.
The table below shows our RSU activity for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. RSUs granted represent the unit equivalent
of dividends earned during the period (all amounts actual).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
RSUs outstanding as of
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
119,842
|
|
|
$
|
20.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs outstanding as of
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
120,897
|
|
|
$
|
21.58
|
|
|
$
|
2,608,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
Share Unit Plan For Non-Executive Directors
On January 5, 2005, Novelis established the Deferred Share
Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors under which non-executive
directors receive 50% of their compensation payable in the form
of directors deferred share units (DDSUs) and the other
50% in the form of either cash, additional DDSUs or a
combination of these two (at the individual election of each
non-executive director). The number of DDSUs is determined by
dividing the quarterly amount payable, as elected, by the
average closing prices of a common share on the Toronto Stock
Exchange (TSX) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on the last
five trading days of each
20
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
quarter. Additional DDSUs representing the equivalent of
dividends declared on common shares are credited to each holder
of DDSUs.
The DDSUs are redeemable in cash
and/or in
shares of our common stock following the participants
retirement from the board. The redemption amount is calculated
by multiplying the accumulated balance of DDSUs by the average
closing price of a common share on the TSX and NYSE on the last
five trading days prior to the redemption date.
The table below shows our DDSU activity for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 (all amounts actual).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
DDSUs
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
DDSUs outstanding as of
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
41,862
|
|
|
$
|
20.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
31,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DDSUs outstanding as of
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
73,132
|
|
|
$
|
21.22
|
|
|
$
|
1,551,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
Founders Performance Awards
In March 2005, Novelis established a plan to reward certain key
executives with Performance Share Units (PSUs) if Novelis share
price improvement targets were achieved within specific time
periods. There are three equal tranches of PSUs, and each has a
specific share price improvement target. For the first tranche,
the target applies for the period from March 24, 2005 to
March 23, 2008. For the second tranche, the target applies
for the period from March 24, 2006 to March 23, 2008.
For the third tranche, the target applies for the period from
March 24, 2007 to March 23, 2008. If awarded, a
particular tranche will be paid in cash on the later of six
months from the date the specific share price target is reached
or twelve months after the start of the performance period, and
will be based on the average of the daily stock closing prices
on the NYSE for the last five trading days prior to the payment
date. Upon a participants termination due to retirement,
death or disability, all PSUs awarded prior to the termination
will be paid at the same time as for active participants. For
any other termination, all PSUs will be forfeited.
Upon adoption of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised), we
changed our valuation technique to the Monte Carlo method due to
the fact that the Novelis Founders Performance Awards contain a
market condition for vesting of the award. The Monte Carlo
method utilizes multiple input variables that determine the
probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the
award and calculates the fair value of each award. Key
assumptions used to determine the fair value of PSUs as of
June 30, 2006 were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average expected stock
price volatility
|
|
|
40.00
|
%
|
Annual expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
Weighted average expected stock price volatility is a weighted
measure of the historical volatility and the implied volatility
of the closest to
at-the-money
publicly traded Novelis call options, with weights determined by
the remaining life of the longest term call options. Due to
limited trading activity and the short contractual term of
Novelis call options, we did not give any weight to implied
volatility in the valuation of PSUs. The annual expected
dividend yield is based on historical and anticipated dividend
payments. The risk-free interest rate reflects the
2-year daily
U.S. Treasury yield curve rate as of the valuation date.
The fair value of the PSUs is amortized over the derived service
period of each award, which is up to three years, subject to
21
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
acceleration in the event the vesting condition is met (as
defined above). The liability for the first tranche was accrued
over its term, was valued on March 24, 2006, and was paid
in cash in April 2006 for $3 million.
Recognition
Agreements
On September 25, 2006, we entered into Recognition
Agreements (Agreements) with certain executive officers and
other key employees (Executives) to retain and reward them for
continued dedication towards corporate objectives. Under the
terms of the Agreements, Executives that remain continuously
employed by us through the vesting dates of December 31,
2007 and December 31, 2008 are entitled to receive one-half
of their total awards on each vesting date payable in shares of
Novelis common stock, subject to shareholder approval of the
Novelis Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan (Plan). If the Plan (or a
similar plan) is not approved, the equivalent value of the
awards will be paid in cash.
The number of shares payable under the Agreements varies by
Executive. Currently, there are 145,800 shares subject to
awards. In accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement
No. 123 (Revised), we will value these awards as of the
issuance date and amortize their cost over the requisite service
period of the Executives.
Compensation
Cost
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006,
stock-based compensation expense for arrangements that are
settled in cash, including amounts related to the cumulative
effect of an accounting change, net of tax, from adopting FASB
Statement No. 123 (Revised), was $1 million and
$4 million, respectively, and was included in Selling,
general and administrative expenses. Stock-based
compensation expense for both the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2005 was $2 million.
|
|
11.
|
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost for all of our
significant plans are shown in the table below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actuarial losses
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 7.6% in
2006.
Employer
Contributions to Plans
For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to
provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to date,
and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over
periods of 15 years or less.
22
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
We also participate in savings plans in Canada and the
U.S. as well as defined contribution pension plans in the
United Kingdom, Canada, Malaysia and Brazil.
Our contributions to plans were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Funded pension plans
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
Unfunded pension plans
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Savings and defined contribution
pension plans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
We expect to contribute an additional $14 million to our
funded pension plans and $6 million to our unfunded pension
plans for the remainder of 2006.
We are also a participating employer in the Alcan Swiss Pension
Plan. We have contributed $2 million to this plan through
June 30, 2006 and expect to contribute an additional
$1 million for the remainder of 2006.
|
|
12.
|
Currency
Gains (Losses)
|
The following currency gains (losses) are included in Other
(income) expenses net in our condensed
consolidated and combined statements of income (loss) (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net gains (losses) on change in
fair value of currency derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
Net gains on translation of
monetary assets and liabilities
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following currency gains (losses) are included in
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (net of tax, and in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation
adjustment beginning of period
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
Current period effect of changes
in foreign currency exchange rates gains (losses)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation
adjustment end of period
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Financial
Instruments and Commodity Contracts
|
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments, including forward contracts, to
manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates,
interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such
instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may
be exposed to losses in
23
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
the future if the counterparties to the contracts fail to
perform. We are satisfied that the risk of such non-performance
is currently remote, based on our monitoring of credit exposures.
In the first quarter of 2006 we implemented hedge accounting for
certain of our cross-currency interest rate swaps with respect
to intercompany loans to several European subsidiaries and
forward foreign exchange contracts. As of June 30, 2006, we
had $712 million of cross-currency interest rate swaps
(Euro 475 million, British Pound (GBP) 62 million and
Swiss Franc (CHF) 35 million) and $82 million
($190 million Brazilian real (BRL)) of forward foreign
exchange contracts.
The Euro and GBP cross-currency interest rate swaps have been
designated as net investment hedges, while the CHF
cross-currency interest rates swap has been designated as a cash
flow hedge. The forward foreign exchange contracts have been
designated as cash flow hedges.
For contracts designated as net investment hedges, we recognize
the change in the fair value of the ineffective portion of the
hedge as a gain or loss in our current period results of
operations. We include the change in fair value of the effective
portion of these hedges in Accumulated other comprehensive
loss within Shareholders equity in our
condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the first
and second quarters of 2006, the changes in the fair value of
the effective portion of our net investment hedges were losses
of $7 million and $35 million, respectively.
Accordingly, $42 million of cumulative losses are included
in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of
June 30, 2006.
For contracts designated as cash flow hedges, we recognize the
change in the fair value of the ineffective portion of the hedge
as a gain or loss in our current period results of operations.
We include the change in fair value of the effective portion of
these hedges in Accumulated other comprehensive loss.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the changes in
the fair value of the effective portion of our cash flow hedges
were gains of $1 million, all of which occurred in the
second quarter. Accordingly, $1 million of cumulative gains
are included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as
of June 30, 2006.
As of June 30, 2006, the amount of net gains and losses
expected to be realized during the following twelve months is
$1 million. No cash flow hedges were discontinued during
the six months ended June 30, 2006. The maximum period over
which we have hedged our exposure to cash flow variability is
through February 2015.
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of June 30, 2006, were as follows (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Fair
|
|
|
|
Dates
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
2006 through 2011
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
2006 through 2008
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps
|
|
2006 through 2015
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
2006 through 2009
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
Aluminum call options
|
|
2006
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Fixed price electricity contract
|
|
2016
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
Less: current portion (A)
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The amounts of the current and long-term portions of fair values
under assets are each presented on our condensed consolidated
balance sheets. The amounts of the current and long-term
portions of fair values under liabilities are included in
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and
Other long-term liabilities, respectively, on our
condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of December 31, 2005 were as follows (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Fair
|
|
|
|
Dates
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
2006 through 2011
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
2006 through 2008
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps
|
|
2006 through 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
2006 through 2009
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
80
|
|
Aluminum call options
|
|
2006
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Fixed price electricity contract
|
|
2016
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
244
|
|
Less: current portion (A)
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The amounts of the current and long-term portions of fair values
under assets are each presented on our condensed consolidated
balance sheets. The amounts of the current and long-term
portions of fair values under liabilities are included in
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and
Other long-term liabilities, respectively, on our
condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
|
|
14.
|
Other
(Income) Expenses Net
|
Other (income) expenses net is comprised of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Gains) losses on change in fair
value of derivative instruments net
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange (gains)
losses net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Gains on disposals of fixed
assets net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Other income net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(96
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We provide for income taxes using the liability method in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting, and FASB Interpretation
No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim
Periods, the provision for taxes on
25
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
income recognizes our estimate of the effective tax rate
expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year, adjusted for
the impact of any discrete events, which are reported in the
period in which they occur. Each quarter, we re-evaluate our
estimated tax expense for the year and make adjustments for
changes in the estimated tax rate. Additionally, we evaluate the
realizability of our deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis.
Our evaluation considers all positive and negative evidence and
factors, such as the scheduled reversal of temporary
differences, historical and projected future taxable income or
losses, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. As a
result, the provision (benefit) for taxes on income for the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
were based on the estimated effective tax rates applicable for
the years ending December 31, 2006 and ended
December 31, 2005, respectively, after considering items
specifically related to the interim periods.
A reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our
effective tax rates for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Pre-tax income (loss) before
equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates and minority
interests share
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian statutory tax rate
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (benefit) at the
Canadian statutory tax rate
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Increase (decrease) in tax rate
resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange translation items
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Exchange remeasurement of deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Expense/income items with no tax
effect net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Tax rate differences on foreign
earnings
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Out-of-period
adjustments net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
143
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
745
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, our effective tax
rate is greater than the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate
of 33% due primarily to (1) $24 million of expense for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) a $29 million benefit from differences between the
Canadian statutory and foreign effective tax rates resulting
from the application of an annual effective tax rate to profit
and loss entities in different jurisdictions and (3) an
$8 million benefit from expense/income items with no tax
effect net.
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, our effective tax
rate is greater than the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate
of 33% due primarily to (1) $7 million of expense for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, and
(2) a $5 million benefit from tax rate differences on
foreign earnings.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, our effective tax
rate is greater than the Canadian statutory rate of 33% due
primarily to (1) a $30 million increase in valuation
allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain
jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that
we will not be able to utilize those losses,
26
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
(2) $37 million of expense for (a) pre-tax
foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect,
(b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency
gains or losses with no pre-tax effect and (c) the
remeasurement of deferred income taxes and (3) a
$15 million difference between the Canadian statutory and
foreign effective tax rates resulting from the application of an
annual effective tax rate to profit and loss entities in
different jurisdictions.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, our effective tax
rate is greater than the Canadian statutory rate of 33% due
primarily to (1) a $12 million increase in valuation
allowances, primarily related to tax losses in certain
jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that
we will not be able to utilize those losses, and (2) a
$7 million tax benefit related to
out-of-period
adjustments.
During the second quarter of 2006 we identified errors in our
estimated annualized effective tax rate calculation and
application to our interim results for the first quarter of
2006. As a result of these errors, the provision for taxes on
income was overstated in the first quarter by $8.8 million,
which has been corrected in the second quarter of 2006.
The following table shows the information used in the
calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share (in
millions, except per share amounts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominators:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of
outstanding shares basic
|
|
|
74.01
|
|
|
|
73.99
|
|
|
|
74.01
|
|
|
|
73.99
|
|
Effect of dilutive shares
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted number of outstanding
shares diluted
|
|
|
74.25
|
|
|
|
73.99
|
|
|
|
74.01
|
|
|
|
74.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
share basic
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.92
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.92
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use the treasury stock method to calculate the dilutive
effect of stock options and other common stock equivalents
(dilutive shares) on earnings per share. Diluted earnings per
share recognizes the dilution that would occur if securities or
other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or
converted into common stock. These potential shares include
dilutive stock options and DDSUs.
Options to purchase an aggregate of 2,650,947 of our common
shares were held by our employees as of June 30, 2006. For
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006,
1,328,855 and 740,676 of these options are dilutive,
respectively, at average exercise prices of $19.43 and $17.80,
respectively. These dilutive stock options are equivalent to
160,861 and 106,523 of our common shares for the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
Additionally, there were 87,482 DDSUs that were considered
dilutive shares for both of the 2006 periods presented (see
Note 10 Stock-Based Compensation). A total of
1,910,271 anti-dilutive options were held by our employees as of
June 30, 2006. The dilutive shares described above were not
included in our calculation of diluted loss per share for the
six months ended June 30, 2006 as they would be
anti-dilutive.
27
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Options to purchase an aggregate of 2,719,814 of our common
shares were held by our employees as of June 30, 2005. Of
these, 1,378,671 options to purchase common shares at an average
exercise price of $19.41 per share were dilutive for both
of the 2005 periods presented. These dilutive stock options were
equivalent to 211,108 and 205,840 common shares for the three
months and the six months ended June 30, 2005,
respectively. Additionally, there were 26,732 DDSUs that were
considered dilutive shares for both of the 2005 periods
presented (see Note 10 Stock-Based
Compensation). A total of 1,341,143 anti-dilutive options were
held by our employees as of June 30, 2005.
|
|
17.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Alcan is our primary supplier of prime and sheet ingot.
Purchases from Alcan represented 44% and 43% of our total
combined prime and sheet ingot purchases for the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, and 39%
and 40% of our total combined prime and sheet ingot purchases
for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005,
respectively.
Legal
Proceedings
Reynolds Boat Case. As previously disclosed,
we and Alcan were defendants in a case in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Washington, in
Tacoma, Washington, case number C04-0175RJB. Plaintiffs were
Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire
Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a
jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under warranty theories,
based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and Alcan sold
certain aluminum products that were ultimately used for marine
applications and were unsuitable for such applications. The jury
reached a verdict on May 22, 2006 against us and Alcan for
approximately $60 million, and the court later awarded
Reynolds and Alcoa approximately $16 million in prejudgment
interest and court costs.
The case was settled during July 2006 as among us, Alcan,
Reynolds, Alcoa and their insurers for $71 million. We
contributed approximately $1 million toward the settlement,
and the remaining $70 million was funded by our insurers.
Although the settlement was substantially funded by our
insurance carriers, certain of them have reserved the right to
request a refund from us, after reviewing details of the
plaintiffs damages to determine if they include costs of a
nature not covered under the insurance contracts. Of the
$70 million funded, $39 million is in dispute with and
under further review by certain of our insurance carriers, who
have six months from the date of the settlement to complete
their review. We have agreed to post a letter of credit in the
amount of approximately $10 million in favor of one of
those insurance carriers, while we resolve the questions, if
any, about the extent of coverage of the costs included in the
settlement.
As of December 31, 2005, we recognized a liability included
in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities of
$71 million, the full amount of the settlement, with a
corresponding charge against earnings. We also recognized an
insurance receivable included in Prepaid expenses and other
current assets of $31 million, with a corresponding
increase to earnings. Although $70 million of the
settlement was funded by our insurers, we have only recognized
an insurance receivable to the extent that coverage is not in
dispute. We recognized a charge of $40 million during the
fourth quarter of 2005.
As of June 30, 2006, no changes were made to the receivable
or liability balances that were established as of
December 31, 2005, and there were no additional charges or
recoveries included in our results of operations for the three
months or six months ended June 30, 2006.
While the ultimate resolution of the nature and extent of any
costs not covered under our insurance contracts cannot be
determined with certainty or reasonably estimated at this time,
if there is an adverse outcome with respect to insurance
coverage, and we are required to reimburse our insurers, it
could have a material impact on cash flows in the period of
resolution. Alternatively, the ultimate resolution could be
28
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
favorable such that insurance coverage is in excess of what we
have recognized to date. This would result in our recording a
non-cash gain in the period of resolution, and this non-cash
gain could have a material impact on our results of operations
during the period in which such a determination is made.
Environmental
Matters
Oswego North Ponds. Oswego North Ponds is
currently our largest known single environmental loss
contingency. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, Novelis
Corporation (a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours and formerly
known as Alcan Aluminum Corporation, or Alcancorp) in Oswego,
New York used an oil containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
in its re-melt operations. At the time, Novelis Corporation
utilized a once-through cooling water system that discharged
through a series of constructed ponds and wetlands, collectively
referred to as the North Ponds. In the early 1980s, low levels
of PCBs were detected in the cooling water system discharge and
Novelis Corporation performed several subsequent investigations.
The PCB-containing hydraulic oil, Pydraul, which was eliminated
from use by Novelis Corporation in the early 1970s, was
identified as the source of contamination. In the mid-1980s, the
Oswego North Ponds site was classified as an inactive
hazardous waste disposal site and added to the New York
State Registry. Novelis Corporation ceased discharge through the
North Ponds in mid-2002.
In cooperation with the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New York State
Department of Health, Novelis Corporation entered into a consent
decree in August 2000 to develop and implement a remedial
program to address the PCB contamination at the Oswego North
Ponds site. A remedial investigation report was submitted in
January 2004. The current estimated cost associated with this
remediation is in the range of $12 million to
$26 million. Based upon the report and other factors, we
accrued $19 million as our estimated cost. In addition,
NYSDEC held a public hearing on the remediation plan on
March 13, 2006 and we believe that our estimate of
$19 million is reasonable, and that the remediation plan
will be approved for implementation in 2007.
Indirect
Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others
We have issued indirect guarantees of the indebtedness of others
and we recognize a liability for the fair value of obligations
assumed under such guarantees. Currently, we only issue indirect
guarantees for the indebtedness of others. The guarantees may
cover the following entities:
|
|
|
|
|
wholly-owned subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
variable interest entities consolidated under FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (Revised), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities; and
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH, which is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint
venture that does not meet the consolidation tests under FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (Revised).
|
In all cases, the indebtedness guaranteed is for trade payables
to third parties.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned subsidiaries and variable
interest entities in our financial statements, all liabilities
associated with trade payables for these entities are already
included in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
29
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table discloses our obligations under indirect
guarantees of indebtedness of others as of June 30, 2006
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Potential
|
|
|
Liability Carrying
|
|
|
Assets Held for
|
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Future Payment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Segment,
Geographical Area and Major Customer Information
|
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America; Europe; Asia and South America.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments, based on Regional Income, in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information. Regional Income
provides a measure of our underlying regional segment results
that is in line with our portfolio approach to risk management.
We define Regional Income as income before (a) interest
expense and amortization of debt issuance costs;
(b) unrealized gains and losses due to changes in the fair
value of derivative instruments; (c) depreciation and
amortization; (d) impairment charges on long-lived assets;
(e) minority interests share; (f) adjustments to
reconcile our proportional share of Regional Income from
non-consolidated affiliates to income as determined on the
equity method of accounting; (g) restructuring (charges)
recoveries net; (h) gains or losses on
disposals of fixed assets and businesses; (i) corporate
selling, general and administrative expenses; (j) gains and
losses on corporate derivative instruments and exchange items;
(k) litigation settlement net of insurance
recoveries; (l) provision or benefit for taxes on income;
and (m) cumulative effect of accounting change
net of tax.
Net sales and expenses are measured in accordance with the
policies and procedures described in Note 1
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our
consolidated and combined financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2005, except the operating segments
include our proportionate share of net sales, expenses, assets
and liabilities of our non-consolidated affiliates accounted for
using the equity method, since they are managed within each
operating segment.
We do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB
Statement No. 133. Accordingly, changes in fair value are
recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the
recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the
contract settlement. In our condensed consolidated statements of
income (loss), changes in fair value of derivative instruments
not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133
are recognized in Other (income) expenses
net. These gains or losses may or may not result from cash
settlement. For Regional Income purposes we only include the
impact of the derivative gains or losses to the extent they are
settled in cash in that period.
30
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Selected
Segment Financial Information
The following tables present selected segment financial
information as of and for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Three
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
992
|
|
|
$
|
922
|
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
5,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Three
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
841
|
|
|
$
|
833
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,172
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,459
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
5,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Six
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
1,887
|
|
|
$
|
1,748
|
|
|
$
|
847
|
|
|
$
|
410
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,883
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
5,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Six
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
1,664
|
|
|
$
|
1,639
|
|
|
$
|
697
|
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,284
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,459
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
5,365
|
|
31
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table presents the reconciliations from Total
Regional Income to Net income (loss) for the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Total Regional Income
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
Unrealized losses due to changes
in the fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate
proportional consolidation (A)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Restructuring (charges)
recoveries net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Impairment charges on long-lived
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on disposals of
fixed assets and businesses net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses (B)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Gains and losses on corporate
derivative instruments and exchange items
net (B)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Benefit (provision) for taxes on
income (loss)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Regional
Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Total Regional Income to Net income, the proportional
Regional Income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed
from Total Regional Income, net of our share of their net
after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net income
of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed consolidated
and combined statements of income (loss). See
Note 6 Investment in and Advances to
Non-consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions to
our condensed consolidated and combined financial statements for
further information. |
|
(B) |
|
These items are managed by our corporate office, which focuses
on strategy development and oversees governance, policy, legal
compliance, human resources and finance matters. |
Information
about Major Customers
All of our operating segments had net sales to Rexam Plc
(Rexam), our largest customer and our only customer accounting
for more than 10% of our total net sales. Net sales to Rexam and
the percentages of our total net sales for the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales to Rexam (in millions)
|
|
$
|
331
|
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
$
|
663
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
19.
|
Supplemental
Guarantor Information
|
In connection with the issuance of our Senior Notes, certain of
our wholly-owned subsidiaries provided guarantees of the Senior
Notes. These guarantees are full and unconditional as well as
joint and several. The guarantor subsidiaries (the Guarantors)
comprise the majority of our businesses in Canada, the United
States, the United Kingdom, Brazil and Switzerland, as well as
certain businesses in Germany. Certain Guarantors may be subject
to restrictions on their ability to distribute earnings to
Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The remaining subsidiaries (the
Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not guarantors of the Senior
Notes.
The following information presents condensed consolidating and
combined statements of income (loss) for the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, condensed
consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, and condensed consolidating and combined
statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005 of the Parent, the Guarantors, and the
Non-Guarantors. Investments include investment in and advances
to non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net
assets of divisions included in the Parent, and have been
presented using the equity method of accounting.
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
$
|
756
|
|
|
$
|
(784
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Equity in net income of affiliates
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other income net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
(752
|
)
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision
(benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority
interests share
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
income (loss)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority
interests share
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating and Combining Statement of Income (Loss)
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
$
|
1,778
|
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
|
$
|
(547
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Impairment charges on long-lived
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Equity in net income of affiliates
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
|
|
2,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision
(benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority
interests share
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
income (loss)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority
interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income (Loss)
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
789
|
|
|
$
|
4,133
|
|
|
$
|
1,429
|
|
|
$
|
(1,468
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
(1,458
|
)
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Equity in net income of affiliates
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
4,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for
taxes on income (loss) and minority interests share
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
Provision for taxes on income
(loss)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority
interests share
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating and Combining Statement of Income
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
|
$
|
3,521
|
|
|
$
|
1,256
|
|
|
$
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
3,195
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Impairment charges on long-lived
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Equity in net income of affiliates
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
(1,084
|
)
|
|
|
4,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision (benefit)
for taxes on income and minority interests share
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
income
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority
interests share
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
Accounts receivable net
of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,319
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
(789
|
)
|
|
|
3,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment net
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
Intangible assets net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
151
|
|
Fair value of derivative
instruments net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(1,299
|
)
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,523
|
|
|
$
|
4,210
|
|
|
$
|
1,987
|
|
|
$
|
(2,723
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
2,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt net of
current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
(1,299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Accrued post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
4,176
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
(2,078
|
)
|
|
|
5,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of
consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Retained earnings/owners net
investment
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
(448
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders
equity
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
(645
|
)
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,523
|
|
|
$
|
4,210
|
|
|
$
|
1,987
|
|
|
$
|
(2,723
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Accounts receivable net
of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment net
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Intangible assets net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(729
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
Fair value of derivative
instruments net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,488
|
|
|
$
|
3,803
|
|
|
$
|
1,845
|
|
|
$
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt net of
current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,742
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Accrued post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
3,674
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
(1,931
|
)
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of
consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Owners net investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders
equity
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
(729
|
)
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,488
|
|
|
$
|
3,803
|
|
|
$
|
1,845
|
|
|
$
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
(158
|
)
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
Disposal of business
net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
Changes in investment in and
advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of new debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends preference
shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends common
shareholders
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Dividends minority
interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash balances held in foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating and Combining Statement of Cash Flows
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
240
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
(86
|
)
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
(990
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Share repurchase
intercompany
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums paid to purchase
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
(1,581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(1,276
|
)
|
|
|
(1,443
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,810
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
Share repurchase
intercompany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends preference
shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends common
shareholders
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Dividends minority
interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Net receipts from (payments to)
Alcan
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
(1,095
|
)
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash balances held in foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following information should be read together with our
unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this
quarterly report for a more complete understanding of our
financial condition and results of operations. The following
discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our
plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ
materially from those discussed in these forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these
differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed
below, particularly in SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET DATA.
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Alcan refer to Alcan, Inc.
GENERAL
Novelis is the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and
light gauge products for the construction and industrial,
beverage and food cans, foil products and transportation
markets. As of June 30, 2006, we had operations on four
continents: North America; Europe; Asia and South America,
through 34 operating plants and three research facilities in 11
countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our
South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina
refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation
facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in
Brazil. We are the only company of our size and scope focused
solely on aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local
supply of technically sophisticated products in all of these
geographic regions.
Unless otherwise specifically identified as the original
Form 10-K, any references to the
Form 10-K
made throughout this document shall refer to the
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on August 25, 2006, as amended.
HIGHLIGHTS
Significant highlights, events and factors impacting our
business during the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2006 are presented briefly below. Each is
discussed in further detail throughout Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (MD&A).
|
|
|
|
|
We had net sales of $2.6 billion and net income of
$6 million, or $0.08 per share for our quarter ended
June 30, 2006, compared to net sales of $2.2 billion
and no net income or earnings per share (breakeven results) for
the second quarter of 2005. We had net sales of
$4.9 billion and a net loss of $68 million, or $(0.92)
per share for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared
to net sales of $4.3 billion and net income of
$22 million, or $0.30 per share for the six months
ended June 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
Total rolled products shipments increased from 730 kilotonnes
(kt) in the second quarter of 2005 to 753kt in the second
quarter of 2006, while ingot products shipments declined from
71kt to 47kt in those same periods. Total rolled products
shipments increased from 1,443kt for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 to 1,494kt for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, while ingot products shipments declined from
128kt to 88kt in those same periods.
|
|
|
|
Through strong operating cash flows, we reduced our total debt
by $44 million during the second quarter of 2006 and by
$147 million through the six months ended June 30,
2006, which was in excess of our required principal payment
obligations.
|
|
|
|
London Metal Exchange (LME) pricing for aluminum (metal) was an
average of 48% higher during the second quarter of 2006 than the
same period for 2005, and an average of 37% higher during the
six months ended June 30, 2006 than the same period for
2005.
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the second quarter and six months ended
June 30, 2006 increased 18% and 14%, respectively, compared
to the same 2005 periods due mainly to the rise in LME prices.
However, the benefit of higher LME prices on our net sales was
limited by metal price ceilings in sales contracts representing
approximately 20% of our estimated total shipments. During the
second quarter and first six months of 2006, we were unable to
pass through approximately $140 million and
$235 million, respectively, of metal price increases
associated with sales under these contracts. The metal price
ceilings are discussed in more detail below.
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter and first six months of 2006, we
incurred expenses of approximately $13 million and
$23 million, respectively, associated with the restatement
of our condensed consolidated and combined financial statements
for our first and second quarters of 2005 (filed May 16,
2006) and our review process, and as a result of our
delayed filings. In addition, we had previously incurred
approximately $7 million during the fourth quarter of 2005,
for a total of approximately $30 million in expenses
through June 30, 2006, and we expect to continue to incur
these expenses until, among other things, we are current with
our filings with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). The restatement and review process and delayed
filings are discussed in more detail below.
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter and six months ended June 30,
2006, we recognized pre-tax gains of $41 million and
$95 million, respectively, related to changes in fair value
of derivative instruments. These amounts are included in Other
(income) expenses net. Regional Income includes
approximately $76 million and $131 million of
cash-settled derivative gains for the second quarter and six
months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. These derivative
instruments and the related accounting are discussed in more
detail below.
|
|
|
|
For the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006,
our provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) was ($20) and
$82 million, respectively. These amounts exceeded the
provision (benefit) at the Canadian statutory rate due primarily
to (1) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and the tax effect of foreign currency gains or losses
with no pre-tax effect, (2) changes in valuation allowances
and (3) foreign rate differences. Cash taxes paid during
the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 were
$7 million and $19 million, respectively.
|
For the remainder of 2006, we expect to record an income tax
benefit based on our estimated pre-tax loss.
METAL
PRICE CEILINGS
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (i) a
pass-through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market
premiums and (ii) a margin over metal price
based on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and
the competitive market conditions for that product.
Sales contracts representing approximately 20% of our estimated
total shipments for 2006 provide for a ceiling over which metal
prices cannot contractually be passed through to certain
customers, unless adjusted. As a result, we are unable to pass
through the complete increase in metal prices for sales under
these contracts and this negatively impacts our margins when the
metal price is above the ceiling price. During the second
quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, we were unable
to pass through approximately $140 million and
$235 million, respectively, of metal price increases
associated with sales under these contracts.
We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal
prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to
metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our
internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and
mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from
our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans
(UBCs). Both of these strategies have historically provided a
benefit as these sources of metal are typically less expensive
than purchasing aluminum from third party suppliers. These two
strategies are referred to as our internal hedges. While we
believe that our primary
42
aluminum production continues to provide the expected benefits
during this sustained period of high LME prices, the recycling
operations are providing less internal hedge benefit than we
expected. LME metal prices and other market issues have resulted
in higher than expected prices of UBCs, thus compressing the
internal hedge benefit we receive from this strategy.
Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy
to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated
with the metal price ceilings is to purchase call options
and/or
synthetic call options on projected aluminum volume requirements
above our assumed internal hedge position. To hedge our exposure
in 2006, we previously purchased call options at various strike
prices. In September of 2006, we began purchasing synthetic call
options, which are purchases of both fixed forward derivative
instruments and put options, to hedge our exposure to further
metal price increases in 2007.
For accounting purposes, we do not treat all derivative
instruments as hedges under Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. Accordingly, changes in
fair value are recognized immediately in earnings, which results
in the recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of
the contract settlement, and we expect further earnings
volatility as a result. In our condensed consolidated statements
of income (loss), changes in fair value of derivative
instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement
No. 133 are recognized in Other (income)
expenses net. These gains or losses may or may not
result from cash settlement. For Regional Income purposes we
only include the impact of the derivative gains or losses to the
extent they are settled in cash in that period.
At current prices, we have not fully covered our exposure
relative to the metal price ceilings with the three hedging
strategies described above. This is primarily a result of
(i) not being able to purchase affordable call options or
fixed forward derivative instruments with strike prices that
directly coincide with the metal price ceilings and
(ii) our recycling operations are providing less internal
hedge than we previously expected, as the spread between UBC
prices and LME prices has not increased at the levels we
projected internally. We do expect incremental improvement in
2007 over 2006, however, as our net sales under contracts with
price ceilings decreases to approximately 10% of total estimated
shipments in 2007.
METAL
PRICE LAG
On certain contracts we experience timing differences on the
pass through of changing aluminum prices based on the difference
in the price we pay for aluminum and the price we ultimately
charge our customers after the aluminum is processed. Generally,
and in the short-term, in periods of rising prices we benefit
from this timing difference while the opposite is true in
periods of declining prices. We refer to this timing difference
as metal price lag, and as a result of rising prices during the
second quarter and first six months of 2006, we realized pre-tax
benefits of $35 million and $77 million, respectively.
During the third quarter of 2006, we began selling short-term
LME futures contracts to reduce the cash flow volatility of
fluctuating metal prices.
In Europe, certain contracts contain fixed metal prices for
periods of time such as one to three years. In some cases, this
can result in a negative impact on net sales as metal prices
increase because the prices are fixed at historical levels. We
enter into forward metal purchases simultaneously with these
contracts that directly hedge the economic risk of future metal
price fluctuation. This impact has been included in the metal
price lag effect described above, without regard to the fixed
forward instruments purchased to offset this risk. The net sales
and Regional Income impacts are described more fully in the
Operations and Segment Review for our Europe operating segment.
RESTATEMENT
AND REVIEW AND DELAYED FILINGS
We restated our condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements for our quarters ended March 31, 2005 and
June 30, 2005. The restatement and review process included
an extensive review of the contingencies, reserves and
adjustments made to create our opening balance sheet as of
January 6, 2005.
43
During the second quarter and for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, we incurred expenses of approximately
$13 million and $23 million, respectively, associated
with the restatement and review process and as a result of our
delayed filings. We had previously incurred approximately
$7 million during the fourth quarter of 2005 for a total of
approximately $30 million in expenses through June 30,
2006. These expenses include professional fees, audit fees,
credit waiver and consent fees, and additional special interest
on our $1.4 billion 7.25% senior unsecured debt
securities due 2015 (Senior Notes), which we will continue to
incur until, among other things, we are current with our SEC
filings and complete our registered exchange offer for our
Senior Notes.
As a result of the restatement and review process, certain
filings were delayed, including this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
INTERNAL
CONTROLS
The financial restatement and review we commenced in fiscal 2005
that continued into fiscal 2006 identified the need for
substantial improvement in our financial accounting and control
personnel, processes and reporting. We previously reported and
continue to report that we have material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting and that our
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the
end of fiscal 2005 and the second quarter of 2006. We are
working to remediate these weaknesses to enable us to timely and
accurately prepare and file our reports with the SEC. We expect
to continue to implement significant process improvements and
add substantially to our permanent financial and accounting
staff throughout the coming quarters. See Item 4.
Controls and Procedures.
SPIN-OFF
FROM ALCAN
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
rolled products businesses were managed under two separate
operating segments within Alcan Rolled Products
Americas and Asia; and Rolled Products Europe. On
January 6, 2005, Alcan and its subsidiaries contributed and
transferred to Novelis substantially all of the aluminum rolled
products businesses operated by Alcan, together with some of
Alcans alumina and primary metal-related businesses in
Brazil, which are fully integrated with the rolled products
operations there, as well as four rolling facilities in Europe
whose end-use markets and customers were similar to ours.
Post-Transaction
Adjustments
The agreements giving effect to the spin-off provide for various
post-transaction adjustments and the resolution of outstanding
matters, which are expected to be carried out by the parties
during 2006. These adjustments, for the most part, have been and
will be recognized as changes to shareholders equity and
include items such as working capital, pension assets and
liabilities, and adjustments to opening balance sheet accounts.
Agreements
between Novelis and Alcan
At the spin-off, we entered into various agreements with Alcan
including the use of transitional and technical services, the
supply of Alcans metal and alumina, the licensing of
certain of Alcans patents, trademarks and other
intellectual property rights, and the use of certain buildings,
machinery and equipment, technology and employees at certain
facilities retained by Alcan, but required in our business. The
terms and conditions of the agreements were determined primarily
by Alcan and may not reflect what two unaffiliated parties might
have agreed to. Had these agreements been negotiated with
unaffiliated third parties, their terms may have been more
favorable, or less favorable, to us.
44
OPERATIONS
AND SEGMENT REVIEW
The following discussion and analysis is based on our condensed
consolidated and combined statements of income (loss), which
reflect our results of operations for the quarter and six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, as prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States of America (GAAP).
The following tables present our shipments, our operating
results and certain other information relevant to our business
for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, as well as the percent change from period to period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Periods Ended June 30,
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Shipments in
kilotonnes (A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products, including tolling
(the conversion of customer-owned metal)
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Ingot products, including primary
and secondary ingot and recyclable aluminum (B)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)%
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. |
|
(B) |
|
Ingot products shipments include primary ingot in Brazil,
foundry products sold in Korea and Europe, secondary ingot in
Europe and other miscellaneous recyclable aluminum sales made
for logistical purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
|
$
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,883
|
|
|
$
|
4,284
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
300
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
Impairment charges on long-lived
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
Equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
570
|
%
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
300
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
2,167
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
4,865
|
|
|
|
4,222
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision
(benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority
interests share
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)%
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)%
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
income (loss)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
173
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority
interests share
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)%
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
n.m.
|
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
(409
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n.m. calculation not meaningful
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
London Metal Exchange
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum (per metric tonne, and
presented in U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing cash price as of
June 30,
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
$
|
1,716
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
Average cash price during
the quarters ended June 30,
|
|
$
|
2,652
|
|
|
$
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Average cash price during
the six months ended June 30,
|
|
$
|
2,534
|
|
|
$
|
1,844
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
Strengthen/
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Strengthen/
|
|
Periods Ended June 30,
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Weaken)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Weaken)
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New
York Exchange Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average of the month end rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
1.275
|
|
|
|
1.246
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
1.241
|
|
|
|
1.278
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
2.185
|
|
|
|
2.430
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
2.176
|
|
|
|
2.525
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
South Korean won per
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Canadian dollar per
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.113
|
|
|
|
1.245
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
1.131
|
|
|
|
1.236
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Periods Ended June 30,
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
New York Mercantile
Exchange Energy Price Quotations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light Sweet Crude
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average settlement price (per
barrel)
|
|
$
|
67.25
|
|
|
$
|
46.49
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
$
|
64.86
|
|
|
$
|
45.52
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Henry Hub contract
settlement price (per MMBTU)
|
|
$
|
6.78
|
|
|
$
|
6.73
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
$
|
7.88
|
|
|
$
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
One MMBTU is the equivalent of one decatherm, or one million
BTUs (British Thermal Units). |
46
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 COMPARED
TO THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
Shipments
We had increased shipments of rolled products in the second
quarter of 2006 compared to 2005 due primarily to increased
orders in the North American and South American can markets of
11kt and 9kt, respectively. The increase in can market shipments
in South America was partially offset by lower shipments of
industrial products and foil products in that segment. The
remainder of the global increase in rolled products shipments
was in Europe where sales into all product groups other than
foil increased.
The reduction in ingot products shipments was attributable
primarily to our European operations where primary re-melt sales
declined by 18kt. In addition, the closing of our Borgofranco
casting alloys business in the first quarter of 2006 resulted in
11kt of lower shipments in the second quarter of 2006, as
compared to the second quarter of 2005.
Net
sales
Higher net sales in the second quarter of 2006 compared to 2005
resulted primarily from the increase in LME metal prices, which
were 48% higher on average during the second quarter of 2006
compared to the same 2005 quarter. Metal represents
approximately 60% 70% of the sales value of our
products. Net sales was adversely impacted in North America due
to price ceilings on certain can contracts, which limited our
ability to pass through approximately $140 million of metal
price increases in the second quarter of 2006. In comparison, we
were unable to pass through approximately $20 million of
metal price increases in the second quarter of 2005.
Costs and
expenses
The following table presents our costs and expenses for the
quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, in dollars and
expressed as percentages of net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization)
|
|
$
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
93.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
90.2
|
%
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
%
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
Other (income)
expenses net
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
100.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,167
|
|
|
|
99.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold. Metal represents
approximately 70% 80% of our input costs, and the
increase in cost of goods sold in dollar terms is primarily due
to the impact of higher LME prices. As a percentage of net
sales, cost of goods sold was adversely impacted due to price
ceilings on certain can contracts, which limited our ability to
pass through approximately $140 million of metal price
increases during the second quarter of 2006 as described above.
In comparison, we were unable to pass through approximately
$20 million of metal price increases during the second
quarter of 2005. Further, during the second quarter of 2006 we
experienced
47
adverse impacts from higher energy and transportation costs in
all regions except South America, compared to the same period in
2005.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(SG&A). SG&A in 2006 exceeds 2005 due
primarily to higher corporate costs, which included
approximately $8 million of legal and professional fees
incurred as a result of the restatement and review process and
delayed filings, and $4 million related to severance for
certain corporate executives.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
costs net. Interest expense increased
quarter over quarter primarily as a result of (1) penalty
interest we incurred during the second quarter of 2006 due to
the late filing of our financial statements and (2) higher
interest rates on our remaining variable rate debt, which were
partially offset by lower interest expense due to reduced debt
levels in 2006 compared to 2005.
Other (income) expenses net. The
reconciliation of the difference between the quarters is shown
below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(Income)
|
|
|
|
Expenses Net
|
|
|
Other (income)
expenses net for the quarter ended June 30,
2005
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains of $41 million on the
change in fair value of derivative instruments in 2006, compared
to losses of $7 million in 2005
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of fixed
assets net in 2005 of $10 million
|
|
|
10
|
|
Exchange gains of $5 million
in 2006 compared to losses of $17 million in 2005
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income)
expenses net for the quarter ended June 30,
2006
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
(Benefit) for Taxes on Income (Loss)
For the second quarter of 2006, we recorded a $20 million
benefit for taxes on our pre-tax loss of $14 million,
before equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates and
minority interests share, which represented an effective
tax rate of 143%. Our effective tax rate is greater than the
Canadian statutory rate of 33% due primarily to
(1) $24 million of expense for (a) pre-tax
foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect and
(b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency
gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, (2) a
$29 million benefit from differences between the Canadian
statutory and foreign effective tax rates resulting from the
application of an annual effective tax rate to profit and loss
entities in different jurisdictions and (3) an
$8 million benefit from expense/income items with no tax
effect net.
For the second quarter of 2005, we had no provision for taxes on
our pre-tax income of $3 million, before equity in net
income of non-consolidated affiliates and minority
interests share.
Net
Income
We reported net income of $6 million for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006, or $0.08 per share, compared to no net
income or earnings per share (breakeven results) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005.
OPERATING
SEGMENT REVIEW FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 COMPARED
TO THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
Regional
Income
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America; Europe; Asia and South America.
48
Our chief operating decision-maker uses regional financial
information in deciding how to allocate resources to an
individual segment, and in assessing performance of the segment.
Novelis chief operating decision-maker is its chief
executive officer.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments, based on Regional Income, in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information. Regional Income
provides a measure of our underlying regional segment results
that is in line with our portfolio approach to risk management.
We define Regional Income as income before (a) interest
expense and amortization of debt issuance costs;
(b) unrealized gains and losses due to changes in the fair
value of derivative instruments; (c) depreciation and
amortization; (d) impairment charges on long-lived assets;
(e) minority interests share; (f) adjustments to
reconcile our proportional share of Regional Income from
non-consolidated affiliates to income as determined on the
equity method of accounting; (g) restructuring (charges)
recoveries net; (h) gains or losses on
disposals of fixed assets and businesses; (i) corporate
selling, general and administrative expenses; (j) gains and
losses on corporate derivative instruments and exchange items;
(k) litigation settlement net of insurance
recoveries; (l) provision or benefit for taxes on income;
and (m) cumulative effect of accounting change
net of tax.
We do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB
Statement No. 133. Accordingly, changes in fair value are
recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the
recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the
contract settlement. In our condensed consolidated and combined
statements of income (loss), changes in fair value of derivative
instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement
No. 133 are recognized in Other (income)
expenses net. These gains or losses may or may not
result from cash settlement. For Regional Income purposes we
only include the impact of the derivative gains or losses to the
extent they are settled in cash in that period.
Reconciliation
The following table presents Regional Income by operating
segment and reconciles Total Regional Income to Net income (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
South America
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Regional Income
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Unrealized losses due to changes
in the fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate
proportional consolidation (A)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Restructuring (charges)
recoveries net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Impairment charges on long-lived
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Gains on disposals of fixed assets
and businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses (B)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Gains on corporate derivative
instruments and exchange items net (B)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Benefit for taxes on income (loss)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Regional
Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Total Regional Income to Net income (loss), the
proportional Regional Income of these non-consolidated
affiliates is removed from Total Regional Income, net of our
share of their net after-tax results, which is reported as
Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates on our
consolidated and combined statements of income (loss). See
Note 6 Investment in and Advances to
Non-consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions to
our condensed consolidated and combined financial statements for
further information about these non-consolidated affiliates. |
|
(B) |
|
These items are managed by our corporate office, which focuses
on strategy development and oversees governance, policy, legal
compliance, human resources and finance matters. |
OPERATING
SEGMENT RESULTS
North
America
As of June 30, 2006, North America manufactured aluminum
sheet and light gauge products through 10 aluminum rolled
products facilities and two dedicated recycling facilities.
Important end-use applications include beverage cans, containers
and packaging, automotive and other transportation applications,
building products and other industrial applications.
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for North America for the quarters ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
992
|
|
|
$
|
841
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
(28.6
|
)%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,617
|
|
|
$
|
1,459
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
Shipments
Rolled products shipments increased by 11kt due to increased
orders in the can market in the second quarter of 2006 and by
4kt as we increased our customer base in the original equipment
(OEM)/distributor market. In the light gauge finstock market, we
experienced a movement from automotive to non-automotive
shipments as we continued to optimize our product portfolio.
Net
sales
Net sales increases in the second quarter of 2006 compared to
2005 were driven primarily by metal prices, which were 48%
higher on average in the second quarter of 2006 compared to
2005, and higher shipments discussed above. Increases in metal
prices are largely passed through to customers. However, the
pass through of metal price increases to our customers was
limited in cases where metal price ceilings were exceeded. This
factor unfavorably impacted North America net sales in the
second quarter of 2006 by approximately $140 million. In
2005 we were unable to pass through approximately
$20 million of metal price increases for a net
quarter-over-quarter
unfavorable impact of $120 million.
50
Regional
Income
As described above, the net unfavorable impact of metal price
ceilings was $120 million which reduced 2006 Regional
Income as compared to 2005. This was offset by $45 million
of gains from the cash settlement of call options recognized
during the second quarter of 2006 and $49 million from the
benefit of metal price lag in 2006. Additionally, higher UBC
spreads, increased volume and operational improvements
contributed approximately $26 million to Regional Income in
2006 as compared to 2005. These improvements were partially
offset by higher energy and transportation costs of
$10 million.
Total
assets
Total assets increased primarily due to the increase in metal
prices, which impacted both inventories and accounts receivable.
Europe
As of June 30, 2006, Europe provided European markets with
value-added sheet and light gauge products through its 14
plants, including one recycling facility. Europe serves a broad
range of aluminum rolled product end-use markets in various
applications including can, automotive, lithographic and painted
products.
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for Europe for the quarters ended June 30, 2006
and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(90.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
922
|
|
|
$
|
833
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,501
|
|
|
$
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
Shipments
Rolled products shipments increased slightly during the second
quarter of 2006 compared to the same quarter of 2005. Increased
shipments in all product groups other than foil more than offset
an 11kt decline in foil and a 7kt decline in shipments due to
the sale of our Annecy plant in March 2006. Ingot products
shipments decreased 11kt due to the closing of our Borgofranco
facility during the first quarter of 2006, with the remaining
decline in ingot products shipments due to lower primary re-melt
sales.
Net
sales
Net sales increased primarily as a result of the 48% increase in
average LME metal price, which was partially offset by the
reduction in shipments described above and by unfavorable metal
price lag.
Regional
Income
Compared to 2005, Regional Income was impacted in the second
quarter of 2006 by a number of factors. First, as compared to
2005, Regional Income in 2006 was unfavorably impacted by
$29 million due to sales to certain customers at previously
fixed forward prices. This negative impact was directly offset
by $29 million of cash-settled derivative gains related to
forward LME purchases entered into
back-to-back
with the customer contracts. Metal price lag related to
inventory processing time favorably impacted 2006 by
approximately $11 million. Second, 2006 was favorably
impacted by the closing of our Borgofranco facility, which
incurred losses of $3 million in 2005, currency benefits of
$5 million and other operational improvements of
51
approximately $13 million. These benefits were partially
offset by higher energy costs of approximately $7 million
in 2006 as compared to 2005.
Total
assets
Total assets increased primarily due to the increase in metal
prices, which impacted both inventories and accounts receivable.
Asia
As of June 30, 2006, Asia operated three manufacturing
facilities, with production balanced between foil, construction
and industrial, and beverage and food can end-use applications.
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for Asia for the quarters ended June 30, 2006
and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Shipments
Rolled products shipments were flat quarter over quarter while
ingot products shipments were higher due to increased regional
automotive demand.
Net
sales
Net sales for the second quarter of 2006 were higher than in
2005, as we experienced higher metal prices that we largely
passed through to our customers.
Regional
Income
Regional Income benefited from metal price lag of
$5 million and higher volume in 2006 as compared to 2005.
However, these benefits were equally offset by higher
employment, energy, and non-aluminum metal costs, combined with
unfavorable currency fluctuations.
South
America
As of June 30, 2006, South America operated two rolling
plant facilities in Brazil along with two smelters, an alumina
refinery, a bauxite mine and power generation facilities. South
America manufactures various aluminum rolled products, including
can stock, automotive and industrial sheet and light gauge for
the beverage/food can, construction and industrial and
transportation end-use markets.
52
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for South America for the quarters ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
83.3
|
%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
|
$
|
761
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Shipments
Total South America second quarter 2006 shipments increased due
to local can market growth, which was up 9kt, partly offset by
lower industrial products and foil shipments.
Net
sales
The main drivers for the rise in net sales for the second
quarter of 2006 over 2005 were the increase in LME prices, which
are passed through to customers, higher shipping volume and a
reduction in tolling sales.
Regional
Income
In the second quarter of 2006, we benefited from rising LME
metal prices because approximately 85% of our raw material input
cost comes from our smelter, which has little to no correlation
with LME metal price movements. This in combination with a
slight negative impact from metal price lag resulted in a
quarter over quarter benefit of $12 million. Regional
Income for the second quarter of 2006 was also positively
impacted by a $5 million physical inventory adjustment and
a slight benefit from cash-settled derivative gains.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
Shipments
We had increased shipments of rolled products in all four of our
operating regions in the six months ended June 30, 2006
compared to the 2005 period. The largest increase was in North
America, up 20kt, driven by increased orders in the can market.
We also experienced increased shipments in the can market in
Europe totaling 8kt and smaller increases in all other product
groups, except our foil business which lost volume. In South
America, can shipments increased by 14kt, which was partially
offset by small reductions in shipments of industrial products
to export markets and shipments of foil products. In Asia,
shipments were up modestly on increased demand in can and light
gauge products.
We experienced a decline in ingot shipments in three of our
operating regions in 2006 compared to 2005. The main decrease
was in Europe, driven by lower primary re-melt shipments and the
closing of our Borgofranco casting alloys business in the first
quarter of 2006.
Net
sales
Higher net sales in the six months ended June 30, 2006
compared to the same 2005 period was primarily the result of an
increase in LME metal pricing, which was 37% higher on average
during the first six months of 2006 than the comparable 2005
period. Metal represents approximately 60% 70% of
the sales value of our products. Net sales for the first six
months of 2006 was adversely impacted in North America due to
price ceilings on certain can contracts, which limited our
ability to pass through approximately $235 million of
53
metal price increases. During the comparable time period in 2005
we were unable to pass through approximately $45 million of
metal price increases for a net unfavorable impact of
$190 million.
Costs
and expenses
The following table presents our costs and expenses for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, in dollars and
expressed as percentages of net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization)
|
|
$
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
93.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
89.7
|
%
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
Other income net
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,865
|
|
|
|
99.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,222
|
|
|
|
98.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold. Metal represents
approximately 70% 80% of our input costs, and the
increase in cost of goods sold in dollar terms is primarily due
to the impact of higher LME prices. As a percentage of net
sales, cost of goods sold for the first six months of 2006 was
adversely impacted due to price ceilings on certain can
contracts, which limited our ability to pass through
approximately $235 million of metal price increases as
described above. During the comparable period in 2005, we were
unable to pass through approximately $45 million of metal
price increases. Further, we experienced adverse impacts from
higher energy and transportation costs in all regions and
unfavorable exchange rate impacts, most notably in South America.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(SG&A). Included in SG&A for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 are Novelis
start-up
costs of approximately $5 million which do not recur in
2006. Excluding these
start-up
costs, SG&A has increased during the first six months of
2006 as compared to the same time period in 2005 primarily
because of higher corporate costs that include $16 million
of legal and professional fees incurred in connection with the
restatement and review process and delayed filings in 2006, and
$4 million of severance associated with certain corporate
executives.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
costs net. In 2005, we expensed
$11 million in debt issuance fees on undrawn credit
facilities during our first quarter, used to back up the Alcan
notes we received in January 2005 as part of the spin-off.
Excluding the debt issuance fees, interest expense increased in
the six months ended June 30, 2006 over 2005 primarily as a
result of (1) penalty interest we incurred during 2006 due
to the late filing of our financial statements and
(2) higher interest rates on our remaining variable rate
debt, which was partially offset by lower interest expense as a
result of reduced debt levels.
54
Other income net. The
reconciliation of the difference between the periods is shown
below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Income Net
|
|
|
Other income net
for the six months ended June 30, 2005
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains of $95 million on the
change in fair value of derivative instruments in 2006, compared
to $17 million in 2005
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of business in
2006 of $15 million
|
|
|
15
|
|
Gain on disposal of fixed assets
in 2006 of $1 million compared to gains of $11 million
in 2005
|
|
|
10
|
|
Exchange gains of $10 million
in 2006 compared to losses of $5 million in 2005
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income net
for the six months ended June 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for Taxes on Income
Our provision for taxes on income of $82 million
represented an effective tax rate of 745% for the six months
ended June 30, 2006, compared to a provision for taxes on
income of $30 million and an effective tax rate of 52% for
the comparable six months of 2005.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, our effective tax
rate is greater than the Canadian statutory rate of 33% due
primarily to (1) a $30 million increase in valuation
allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain
jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that
we will not be able to utilize those losses,
(2) $37 million of expense for (a) pre-tax
foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect,
(b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency
gains or losses with no pre-tax effect and (c) the
remeasurement of deferred income taxes and (3) a
$15 million difference between the Canadian statutory and
foreign effective tax rates resulting from the application of an
annual effective tax rate to profit and loss entities in
different jurisdictions.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, our effective tax
rate is greater than the Canadian statutory rate of 33% due
primarily to a $12 million increase in valuation
allowances, primarily related to tax losses in certain
jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that
we will not be able to utilize those losses, partially offset by
$7 million in tax benefits related to
out-of-period
adjustments.
Net
Income (Loss)
We reported a net loss of $68 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006, or $(0.92) per share, compared to net
income of $22 million, or $0.30 per share for the six
months ended June 30, 2005. Net income for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 included our consolidated net income of
$51 million for the period from January 6, 2005 (the
effective date of the spin-off) to June 30, 2005, and a
combined loss of $29 million on the
mark-to-market
of derivative instruments, primarily with Alcan, for the period
from January 1 to January 5, 2005, prior to the
spin-off.
55
OPERATING
SEGMENT REVIEW FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
Reconciliation
The following table presents Regional Income by operating
segment and reconciles Total Regional Income to Net income
(loss) (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
South America
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Regional Income
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
Unrealized losses due to changes
in the fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate
proportional consolidation (A)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Restructuring (charges)
recoveries net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Impairment charges on long-lived
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on disposals of
fixed assets and businesses
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses (B)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Gains and losses on corporate
derivative instruments and exchange items
net (B)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Regional
Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Total Regional Income to Net income (loss), the
proportional Regional Income of these non-consolidated
affiliates is removed from Total Regional Income, net of our
share of their net after-tax results, which is reported as
Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates on
our consolidated and combined statements of income (loss). See
Note 6 Investment in and Advances to
Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions to
our condensed consolidated and combined financial statements for
further information. |
|
(B) |
|
These items are managed by our corporate office, which focuses
on strategy development and oversees governance, policy, legal
compliance, human resources and finance matters. |
56
OPERATING
SEGMENT RESULTS
North
America
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for North America for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,887
|
|
|
$
|
1,664
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,617
|
|
|
$
|
1,459
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
Shipments
Shipments increased by 23kt due to increased orders in the can
market during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and foil
shipments increased by 3kt as we increased our market share. The
remaining difference is primarily explained by lower shipments
into the light gauge finstock and sheet automotive and
distributor markets as we rationalized our product mix in these
markets.
Net
sales
North America net sales increases in the six months ended
June 30, 2006 compared to 2005 were driven primarily by
metal prices, which were 37% higher on average in 2006 compared
to 2005. Increases in metal prices are largely passed through to
customers. However, the pass through of metal price increases to
our customers was limited in cases where metal price ceilings
were exceeded. This factor unfavorably impacted North America
net sales in the six months ended June 30, 2006 by
approximately $235 million. During the comparable period of
2005, we were unable to pass through approximately
$45 million of metal price increases for a net unfavorable
impact of $190 million.
Regional
Income
As described above, the net unfavorable impact of metal price
ceilings was $190 million which reduced 2006 Regional
Income as compared to 2005. This was partially offset by
$91 million of gains from the cash settlement of call
options recognized during the six months ended June 30,
2006 and $85 million from the benefit of metal price lag in
2006. Higher UBC spreads, increased volume, and operational
improvements favorably impacted the first half of 2006 by
$31 million as compared to 2005 which was partially offset
by $21 million of higher energy and transportation costs.
Total
assets
Total assets increased primarily due to the increase in metal
prices, which impacted both inventories and accounts receivable.
57
Europe
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for Europe for the six months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(78.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,748
|
|
|
$
|
1,639
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,501
|
|
|
$
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
Shipments
Rolled products shipments increased due to higher can shipments
of 8kt, combined with increases of 4kt in each of the painted,
automotive sheet and plain markets driven by strong market
demand. We also recorded higher shipments of 2kt in both the
platestock and lithographic markets, and we increased hot rolled
and cold rolled coil shipments, an intermediate product, by a
total of 23kt. However, these increases were partially offset by
lower foilstock shipments of 21kt and the sale of our Annecy
operation in March 2006, which reduced shipments in the six
months of 2006 by 10kt. Ingot products shipments declined due to
lower re-melt shipments of 26kt and lower casting alloys
shipments of 16kt due to the closing of our Borgofranco facility.
Net
sales
Net sales increased primarily as a result of the 37% increase in
average LME metal price which was partially offset by the
reduction in total shipments described above and unfavorable
metal price lag. Further, the weakening of the Euro, which was
down 3% on average in the six months ended June 30, 2006
compared to 2005, had the effect of reducing net sales when
converted into U.S. dollars.
Regional
Income
Compared to 2005, Regional Income was impacted in 2006 by a
number of factors. First, as compared to 2005, Regional Income
was unfavorably impacted by $40 million due to sales to
certain customers at previously fixed forward prices. This
negative impact was directly offset by $40 million of
cash-settled derivative gains related to forward LME purchases
entered into
back-to-back
with the customer contracts. Metal price lag related to
inventory processing time favorably impacted 2006 by
approximately $21 million. Second, compared to 2005, the
first six months of 2006 were favorably impacted by
$25 million related to mix and other operational
improvements. Third, Europe incurred approximately
$5 million of Novelis
start-up
costs in 2005 that did not recur in 2006. Finally, these
benefits were partially offset by an $18 million increase
in energy costs and unfavorable currency effects of
$5 million in 2006 as compared to 2005.
Total
assets
Total assets increased primarily due to the increase in metal
prices, which impacted both inventories and accounts receivable.
58
Asia
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for Asia for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
847
|
|
|
$
|
697
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Shipments
Rolled products shipments in the six months ended June 30,
2006 increased over 2005 driven by increased demand for can and
industrial products. Ingot products shipments were higher due to
increased regional automotive demand.
Net
sales
Net sales increased primarily as a result of the 37% increase in
average LME metal price which was largely passed through to
customers and due to the increase in volume described above.
Regional
Income
Regional Income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was
lower than the same period in 2005, due primarily to higher
employment, energy, and non-aluminum metal costs and unfavorable
currency fluctuations.
South
America
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for South America for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
410
|
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
|
$
|
761
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Shipments
Can shipments for the six months ended June 30, 2006
increased by 14kt over 2005, with the main driver being local
market growth. This growth was slightly offset by small
reductions in shipments in the foil and industrial products
markets.
59
Net
sales
The main drivers for the rise in net sales for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 over 2005 were the increase in LME
prices, which are passed through to customers, higher shipping
volume and by a reduction in tolling sales in 2006 compared to
2005.
Regional
Income
In the six months ended June 30, 2006, we benefited from
rising LME metal prices in two ways. First, the output from our
smelters, representing approximately 85% of our raw material
input cost, has little to no correlation with LME metal price
movements. Second, we experienced favorable metal price lags
resulting from price increases. These two impacts favorably
impacted Regional Income by approximately $26 million.
Other impacts to Regional Income include a stronger Brazilian
real, which was on average 14% higher in the six months
ended June 30, 2006 compared to 2005. This unfavorably
impacted Regional Income by $20 million as the majority of
sales are in U.S. dollars while local manufacturing costs
are incurred in Brazilian real. In addition, we recognized
expenses of approximately $5 million in 2005 associated
with certain labor claims which unfavorably impacted Regional
Income in the prior year. We also experienced higher energy
costs of $4 million in the first half of 2006 but these
costs were more than offset by a $5 million gain from the
cash settlement of derivatives, a positive physical inventory
adjustment of $5 million and other cost reductions.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our liquidity and available capital resources are impacted by
operating, financing and investing activities.
Operating
Activities
Free cash flow (which is a non-GAAP measure) consists of
(a) Net cash provided by operating activities;
(b) less dividends and capital expenditures; (c) less
premiums paid to purchase derivative instruments; and
(d) net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments.
Dividends include those paid by our less than wholly-owned
subsidiaries to their minority shareholders and dividends paid
by us to our common shareholders. Management believes that Free
cash flow is relevant to investors as it provides a measure of
the cash generated internally that is available for debt service
and other value creation opportunities. However, Free cash flow
does not necessarily represent cash available for discretionary
activities, as certain debt service obligations must be funded
out of Free cash flow. We believe the line on our condensed
consolidated and combined statement of cash flows entitled
Net cash provided by operating activities is the
most directly comparable measure to Free cash flow. Our method
of calculating Free cash flow may not be consistent with that of
other companies.
The following tables show the reconciliation from Net cash
provided by operating activities to Free cash flow for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the June 30,
2006 and December 31, 2005 balances of cash and cash
equivalents (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
(172
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Premiums paid to purchase
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
Net cash provided by operating activities was $59 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2006, $172 million
less than the $231 million provided in the comparable 2005
period. For a discussion of the factors in our operating results
that impact Net cash provided by operating activities, including
other non-cash items, refer to the discussion in Operating
Segment Review for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005.
Changes in assets and liabilities contributed $30 million
to Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2006, which was $128 million less than
the comparable 2005 period, when changes in assets and
liabilities contributed net cash of $158 million. Included
within the $30 million in changes in assets and liabilities
for 2006 were positive net cash flows of $453 million from
a net increase in trade payables and other current liabilities,
substantially offset by negative net cash flows of
$436 million from a net increase in accounts receivable and
inventories. All other changes in assets and liabilities
provided positive net cash flows of $13 million.
Free cash flow was $133 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, $88 million less than the comparable
2005 period, directly attributable to the decrease in net cash
provided by operating activities, more than half of which was
offset by an increase in cash flows from derivative instrument
activity.
Financing
Activities
In the six months ended June 30, 2006, we reduced our total
debt by a net amount of $147 million, paying down
$137 million on our Floating rate Term Loan B; paying off
in full our KRW 30 billion ($30 million) 5.75% fixed
rate loan originally due October 2008; and paying down
$20 million of our $50 million 5.30% loan due in
February 2008. We borrowed an additional $34 million on our
$500 million revolving credit facility during the six
months ended June 30, 2006. From December 31, 2005 to
June 30, 2006, changes in foreign exchange rates had the
effect of increasing our KRW denominated debt and our CHF
denominated capital lease obligations by $6 million.
We have not finalized our financial results for the third
quarter of 2006. Accordingly, the calculation of our borrowing
availability under our $500 million revolving credit
facility as of September 30, 2006 is not available, but
based on currently available information, we believe our
availability will be less than the approximately
$300 million available as of June 30, 2006. However,
we believe that this lower availability will still be sufficient
to satisfy our working capital requirements throughout the
remainder of the 2006 fiscal year.
To date, we have paid fees related to the five waiver and
consent agreements under the credit agreement relating to our
senior secured credit facilities of approximately
$6 million, which are being amortized over the remaining
life of the debt.
Our senior secured credit facilities include customary
affirmative and negative covenants, as well as financial
covenants relating to our maximum total leverage ratio, minimum
interest coverage ratio, and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.
On October 16, 2006, we amended the financial covenants to
our senior secured credit facilities. In particular, we amended
our maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and
minimum fixed charge coverage ratios through the quarter ending
March 31, 2008. If we had not amended these financial
covenants, we would have been in violation of the minimum
interest coverage ratio as of and for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006. We also amended and modified other
provisions of the senior secured credit facilities to permit
more efficient ordinary-course operations, including increasing
the amounts of certain permitted investments and asset-backed
securitizations, permitting nominal quarterly dividends, and the
transfer of an intercompany loan to another subsidiary. In
return for these amendments and modifications, we paid aggregate
fees of approximately $3 million to lenders who consented
to the amendments and modifications, and agreed to continue
paying the higher applicable margins on our senior secured
credit facilities and the higher unused commitment fees on our
revolving credit facilities that were instated with the fourth
waiver and consent agreement dated May 11, 2006. These
increases will continue until such time as the compliance
certificate for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2008
has been delivered.
61
The amended maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage
and minimum fixed charge coverage ratios for the period ended
June 30, 2006 are 5.25 to 1; 2.5 to 1; and 1 to 1,
respectively. We are in compliance with these financial
covenants as of June 30, 2006. In addition, as described
below, we previously obtained waivers from our lenders related
to our inability to timely file our SEC reports.
Under the indenture that governs the Senior Notes, we are
subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to incurring
additional debt and providing additional guarantees, paying
dividends beyond certain amounts and making other restricted
payments, sales and transfer of assets, certain consolidations
or mergers and certain transactions with affiliates. Further, as
discussed below under the caption Impact of Late SEC
Filings on our Debt Agreements, we have received a notice
of default under the indenture related to our failure to timely
file this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
As of June 30, 2006, we had entered into interest rate
swaps to fix the
3-month
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) interest rate on a total
of $200 million of the floating rate Term Loan B debt
at effective weighted average interest rates and amounts
expiring as follows: 3.8% on $100 million through
February 3, 2007; and 3.9% on $100 million through
February 3, 2008. We are still obligated to pay any
applicable margin, as defined in senior secured credit
facilities, in addition to these interest rates. As of
June 30, 2006, 75% of our debt was at fixed rates and 25%
was at variable rates.
In the first quarter of 2006, we repaid our KRW 30 billion
($30 million) 5.75% fixed rate loan originally due October
2008. In May 2006, a portion of the $50 million (KRW
51 billion) 5.30% fixed rate loan was refinanced into a KRW
19 billion ($20 million) short-term floating rate loan
with an interest rate of 4.21% which was due and paid on
June 30, 2006. We were in compliance with all debt
covenants related to our Korean bank loans as of June 30,
2006.
Standard & Poors Ratings Service and Moodys
Investors Services currently assign our Senior Notes a rating of
B and B2, respectively. Moodys Investors Services
downgraded our Senior Notes from B1 to B2 in September 2006. Our
credit ratings may be subject to further revision or withdrawal
at any time by the credit rating agencies, and each rating
should be evaluated independently of any other rating. We cannot
ensure that a rating will remain in effect for any given period
of time or that a rating will not be lowered or withdrawn
entirely by a credit rating agency if, in its judgment,
circumstances so warrant. If the credit rating agencies
downgrade our ratings, we would likely be required to pay a
higher interest rate in future financings, incur increased
margin deposit requirements, and our potential pool of investors
and funding sources could decrease.
Investing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by investing activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments, less premiums paid to purchase
derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
Payments related to disposal of
business
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Changes in investment in and
advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the first six months of 2005, $364 million of the
proceeds from loans receivable net represents
proceeds received from Alcan related to the spin-off to retire
loans due to Novelis entities.
62
The majority of our capital expenditures for both the 2006 and
2005 periods were invested in projects devoted to product
quality, technology, productivity enhancements and undertaking
small projects to increase capacity.
The following table presents additional information regarding
our capital expenditures, depreciation and reinvestment rate for
the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. Reinvestment
rate is defined as capital expenditures expressed as a
percentage of depreciation and amortization expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Reinvestment rate
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Impact
of Late SEC Filings on our Debt Agreements
The restatement of our unaudited condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements for the quarters ended
March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005 (filed on
May 16, 2006) and our review process resulted in
delays in the filing of our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (filed on
May 16, 2006), our 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(filed on August 25, 2006) our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the first quarter of 2006 (filed September 15,
2006) and this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
The terms of our $1.8 billion senior secured credit
facilities require that we deliver unaudited quarterly and
audited annual financial statements to our lenders within
specified periods of time. Due to the delays, we obtained a
series of waiver and consent agreements from the lenders under
the facility to extend the various filing deadlines. The fourth
waiver and consent agreement, dated May 10, 2006, extended
the
Form 10-Q
filing deadlines for the first, second and third quarters of
2006 to October 31, 2006, November 30, 2006, and
December 29, 2006, respectively. These extended filing
deadlines were subject to acceleration to 30 days after the
receipt of an effective notice of default under the indenture
governing our Senior Notes relating to our inability to timely
file such periodic reports with the SEC. We received an
effective notice of default with respect to this
Form 10-Q
on August 24, 2006. However, on August 11, 2006 we
entered into a fifth waiver and consent agreement which extended
the accelerated filing deadline caused as a result of the
receipt of the effective notice of default with respect to this
Form 10-Q
to October 22, 2006 and extended any accelerated filing
deadlines that would be caused as a result of the receipt of an
effective notice of default under the Senior Notes with respect
to our
Form 10-Q
for the third quarter of 2006 to the earlier of 30 days
after the receipt of any such notice of default and
December 29, 2006 (as applicable).
The October 16, 2006 amendment to our senior secured credit
facilities extends the higher applicable margins and unused
commitment fee that were instated in connection with the fourth
waiver and consent agreement. Specifically, we agreed to a 1.25%
applicable margin for Term Loans maintained as Base Rate Loans,
a 2.25% applicable margin for Term Loans maintained as
Eurocurrency Rate Loans, a 1.50% applicable margin for Revolver
Loans maintained as Base Rate Loans, a 2.50% applicable margin
for Revolver Loans maintained as Eurocurrency Rate Loans and a
62.5 basis point commitment fee on the unused portion of
the revolving credit facility, until such time as the compliance
certificate for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2008
has been delivered.
On July 26, 2006, we entered into a Commitment Letter with
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (Citigroup) for backstop financing
facilities in an amount up to $2.855 billion. We paid fees
of approximately $4 million in conjunction with this
commitment. The Commitment Letter was originally set to expire
on October 2, 2006; however, it was amended to expire on
October 31, 2006.
63
Senior
Notes
Under the indenture governing the Senior Notes, we are required
to deliver to the trustee a copy of our periodic reports filed
with the SEC within the time periods specified by SEC rules. As
a result of our receipt of an effective notice of default from
the trustee on August 24, 2006 we were required to file
this
Form 10-Q
by October 23, 2006 in order to prevent an event of
default. By filing this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
and furnishing a copy to the trustee, we cured this default.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Derivative
Instruments
As of June 30, 2006, we have derivative financial
instruments, as defined by FASB Statement No. 133. See
Note 13 Financial Instruments and Commodity
Contracts to our condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements.
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments, including forward contracts, to
manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates,
interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such
instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may
be exposed to losses in the future if the counterparties to the
contracts fail to perform. We are satisfied that the risk of
such non-performance is currently remote, based on our
monitoring of credit exposures.
In the first quarter of 2006 we implemented hedge accounting for
certain of our cross-currency interest rate swaps with respect
to intercompany loans to several European subsidiaries and
forward foreign exchange contracts. As of June 30, 2006, we
had $712 million of cross-currency interest rate swaps
(Euro 475 million, British Pound (GBP) 62 million and
Swiss Franc (CHF) 35 million) and $82 million
($190 million Brazilian real (BRL)) of forward foreign
exchange contracts.
The Euro and GBP cross-currency interest rate swaps have been
designated as net investment hedges, while the CHF
cross-currency interest rates swap has been designated as a cash
flow hedge. The forward foreign exchange contracts have been
designated as cash flow hedges.
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of June 30, 2006 were as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Fair
|
|
|
|
Dates
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
2006 through 2011
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
2006 through 2008
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps
|
|
2006 through 2015
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
2006 through 2009
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
Aluminum call options
|
|
2006
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Fixed price electricity contract
|
|
2016
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others
The following table discloses our obligations under indirect
guarantees of indebtedness of others as of June 30, 2006
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Potential Future
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Held for
|
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Payment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2004, we entered into a loan and a corresponding
deposit-and-guarantee
agreement for up to $90 million. As of June 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005, this arrangement had a balance of
$80 million. We do not include the loan or deposit amounts
in our consolidated balance sheets as the agreements include a
legal right of setoff.
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
Other
Arrangements
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in
transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities
(SPEs), which would have been established for the purpose of
facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of June 30,
2006 and December 31, 2005, we are not involved in any
unconsolidated SPE transactions.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
We have future obligations under various contracts relating to
debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases,
long-term purchase obligations, and post-retirement benefit
plans. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, there
were no significant changes to these obligations as reported in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
DIVIDENDS
The following table shows information regarding dividends
declared on our common shares during 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declaration Date
|
|
Record Date
|
|
Dividend/Share
|
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
February 23, 2006
|
|
March 8, 2006
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
March 23, 2006
|
April 27, 2006
|
|
May 20, 2006
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
June 20, 2006
|
August 28, 2006
|
|
September 7, 2006
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
September 25, 2006
|
Future dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors
and will depend on, among other things, our financial resources,
cash flows generated by our business, our cash requirements,
restrictions under the instruments governing our indebtedness,
being in compliance with the appropriate indentures and
covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness
that would allow us to legally pay dividends and other relevant
factors.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, there were no
significant changes to our critical accounting policies and
estimates as reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
65
RECENT
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In September 2006, the Staff of the SEC issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements. SAB No. 108
provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior
year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for
the purpose of determining whether the current years
financial statements are materially misstated.
SAB No. 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2006. We will adopt SAB No. 108 as
of December 31, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of
SAB No. 108 to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans, which requires a company that sponsors one or more
single-employer defined benefit pension and other postretirement
benefit plans (benefit plans) to recognize in its balance sheet
the funded status of a benefit plan, which is the difference
between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit
obligation, as a net asset or liability, with an offsetting
adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income in
shareholders equity. FASB Statement No. 158 requires
additional financial statement disclosure regarding certain
effects on net periodic benefit cost. FASB Statement
No. 158 requires prospective application and the
recognition and disclosure requirements are effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2006. We will adopt FASB
Statement No. 158 as of December 31, 2006. We are
currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of
FASB Statement No. 158 on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, FASB Statement No. 158 requires that a company
measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations at its
year-end balance sheet date. We currently use our year-end
balance sheet date as our measurement date and, as a result,
that new requirement will not affect us.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB
Statement No. 157 applies to other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for
interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently
evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB
Statement No. 157 on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. FASB Interpretation No. 48 clarifies the accounting
for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements by prescribing a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. FASB Interpretation No. 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and
transition. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of
the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48 on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
pronouncements will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows or do not apply to our operations.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET
DATA
This document contains forward-looking statements that are based
on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections
about the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and
assumptions made by our management. Such statements include, in
particular, statements about our plans, strategies and
prospects. Words such as expect,
anticipate, intend, plan,
believe, seek, estimate and
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to
identify such forward-looking statements. Examples of
forward-looking statements in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
include, but are not limited to, our expectations with respect
to the impact of metal price movements on our financial
performance, our metal price ceiling
66
exposure, the effectiveness of our hedging programs, our
business outlook for 2006, our efforts to return to a normal SEC
reporting cycle by the end of 2006 and our efforts to improve
our financial reporting processes and controls. These statements
are based on beliefs and assumptions of Novelis
management, which in turn are based on currently available
information. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve assumptions and risks and uncertainties
that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or
forecasted in such forward-looking statements. We do not intend,
and we disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
This document also contains information concerning our markets
and products generally, which is forward-looking in nature and
is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which
these markets and product categories will develop. These
assumptions have been derived from information currently
available to us and to the third-party industry analysts quoted
herein. This information includes, but is not limited to product
shipments and share of production. Actual market results may
differ from those predicted. While we do not know what impact
any of these differences may have on our business, our results
of operations, financial condition, cash flow and the market
price of our securities may be materially adversely affected.
Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ
from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking
statements include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash;
|
|
|
|
relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of,
our customers and suppliers;
|
|
|
|
changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums
associated with such prices) or other materials and raw
materials we use;
|
|
|
|
the effect of metal price ceilings in certain of our sales
contracts;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully negotiate with our customers to
remove or limit metal price ceilings in our contracts;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our metal hedging activities, including our
internal used beverage can and smelter hedges;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the
areas in which we maintain production facilities;
|
|
|
|
our ability to access financing for future capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
continuing obligations and other relationships resulting from
our spin-off from Alcan;
|
|
|
|
changes in the relative values of various currencies;
|
|
|
|
factors affecting our operations, such as litigation,
environmental remediation and
clean-up
costs, labor relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment
and other events;
|
|
|
|
economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries
in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in
duties or tariffs;
|
|
|
|
competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as
well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic
and composite materials;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to improve and maintain effective internal control
over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures
in the future;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our
products as well as seasonality in certain of our
customers industries;
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting
taxes, environmental, health or safety compliance;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the
amounts we pay under our principal credit agreement and other
financing agreements; and
|
|
|
|
the continued cooperation of regulatory authorities (including
the Toronto Stock Exchange and New York Stock Exchange) with
respect to extensions of our 2006 SEC filing deadlines.
|
The above list of factors is not exhaustive. Some of these and
other factors are discussed in more detail under
Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC
and are specifically incorporated by reference into this filing.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing
business operations, including risks from changes in commodity
prices (aluminum, electricity and natural gas), foreign currency
exchange rates and interest rates that could impact our results
of operations and financial condition.
We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities and derivative
financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments
as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes.
Except where noted, the derivative contracts are
marked-to-market
and the related gains and losses are included in earnings in the
current accounting period. Typically, gains and losses on these
contracts are offset by the opposite effect of movements in the
underlying business transactions.
By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve
risk, including the credit risk of non-performance by
counterparties. All derivative contracts are executed with
counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our
maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized on our
balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions and the
relative costs of the instruments. The duration is always linked
to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection
between the two being regularly monitored.
Commodity
Price Risks
We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of
certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity and
natural gas.
Aluminum
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass
through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market
premiums and (ii) a margin over metal price
based on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and
the competitive market conditions for that product.
In situations where we offer customers fixed prices for future
delivery of our products, we may enter into derivative
instruments for the metal inputs in order to protect the profit
on the conversion of the product. Consequently, the gain or loss
resulting from movements in the price of aluminum on these
contracts would generally be offset by an equal and opposite
impact on the net sales and purchases being hedged.
In addition, sales contracts representing approximately 20% of
our total shipments for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2006 provide for a ceiling over which metal prices
cannot contractually be passed through to certain customers,
unless adjusted. As a result, we are unable to pass through the
complete increase in metal prices for sales under these
contracts and this negatively impacts our margins when the metal
price is above the ceiling price.
68
We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal
prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to
metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our
internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and
mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from
our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans
(UBCs). Both of these strategies have historically provided a
benefit as these sources of metal are typically less expensive
than purchasing aluminum from third party suppliers. These two
strategies are referred to as our internal hedges. While we
believe that our primary aluminum production continues to
provide the expected benefits during this sustained period of
high LME prices, the recycling operations are providing less
internal hedge benefit than expected. LME metal prices and other
market issues have resulted in higher than expected prices of
UBCs, thus compressing the internal hedge benefit we receive
from this strategy.
Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy
to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated
with the metal price ceilings is to purchase call options
and/or fixed
forward derivative instruments on projected aluminum volume
requirements above our assumed internal hedge position. To hedge
our exposure in 2006, we previously purchased call options at
various strike prices. In September of 2006, we began purchasing
synthetic call options, which are purchases of both fixed
forward derivative instruments and put options, to hedge our
exposure to further price increases in 2007.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
June 30, 2006 given a 10% change in the three-month LME
price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Rate/Price
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Aluminum Call Options
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
Aluminum Forward Contracts
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
|
Electricity
and Natural Gas
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. In 2005, natural gas and
electricity represented approximately 70% of our energy
consumption by cost. We also use fuel oil and transport fuel.
The majority of energy usage occurs at our casting centers, at
our smelters in South America and during the hot rolling of
aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities require relatively less
energy. We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which
subjects us to market pricing fluctuations. Recent natural gas
pricing changes in the United States have increased our energy
costs. We seek to stabilize our future exposure to natural gas
prices through the use of forward purchase and futures
contracts. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South America
have historically been more stable than in the United States. As
of June 30, 2006, we have no outstanding derivative
instruments related to natural gas.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs. In South America,
we have our own hydroelectric facilities that meet approximately
25% of our total electricity requirements for smelting
operations. We have an existing long-term supply contract for
certain electricity costs at fixed rates.
Rising energy costs worldwide, due to the volatility of supply
and international geopolitical events, expose us to reduced
operating profits as changes cannot immediately be recovered
under existing contracts and sales agreements, and may only be
mitigated in future periods under future pricing arrangements.
69
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
June 30, 2006 given a 10% change in spot prices for energy
contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Rate/Price
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risks
Exchange rate movements, particularly involving the Euro, the
Canadian dollar, the Brazilian real and the Korean won against
the U.S. dollar, have an impact on our operating results.
In Europe and Korea, where we have predominantly local currency
selling prices and operating costs, we benefit as the Euro
strengthens, but are adversely affected as the Euro weakens. In
Korea, where we have local currency selling prices for local
sales and U.S. dollar denominated selling prices for
exports, we benefit slightly as the won weakens but are
adversely affected as the won strengthens, due to a slightly
higher percentage of exports compared to local sales. In Canada
and Brazil, where we have predominantly U.S. dollar selling
prices and local currency operating costs, we benefit as the
local currencies weaken but are adversely affected as the local
currencies strengthen. Foreign currency contracts may be used to
hedge the economic exposures at our foreign operations.
It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures
within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the
majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either
forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in
non-functional currencies. Our most significant
non-U.S. dollar
functional currency operating segments are Europe and Asia,
which have the Euro and the Korean won as their functional
currencies, respectively. South America is U.S. dollar
functional with Brazilian real transactional exposure.
We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign
operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Shareholders
equity section of our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Net
sales and expenses in our foreign operations foreign
currencies are translated into varying amounts of
U.S. dollars depending upon whether the U.S. dollar
weakens or strengthens against other currencies. Therefore,
changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively
affect our net sales and expenses from foreign operations as
expressed in U.S. dollars.
Any negative impact of currency movements on the currency
contracts that we have entered into to hedge foreign currency
commitments to purchase or sell goods and services would be
offset by an equal and opposite favorable exchange impact on the
commitments being hedged. For a discussion of accounting
policies and other information relating to currency contracts,
see Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies to our consolidated and combined financial
statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 and
Note 13 Financial Instruments and Commodity
Contracts to our condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements included in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
June 30, 2006 given a 10% change in rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Currency measured against the
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Korean won
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
|
Brazilian real
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
|
70
Loans and investments in European operations have been hedged by
cross-currency interest rate swaps (Euro 475 million, GBP
62 million, CHF 35 million). The CHF swap is
designated as a cash flow hedge and the remaining swaps are
designated as net investment hedges. Loans from European
operations have been hedged by cross-currency principal-only
swaps (Euro 89 million). The principal-only swaps are
accounted for as cash flow hedges.
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of the cross-currency interest rate swaps as of
June 30, 2006 given a 10% change in rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Currency measured against the
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
Interest
Rate Risks
We are subject to interest rate risk related to our floating
rate debt. For every 12.5 basis point increase in the
interest rates on the $598 million of variable rate Term
Loan B debt that has not been swapped into fixed interest
rates as of June 30, 2006, our annual net income would be
reduced by $0.5 million.
As of June 30, 2006, approximately 75% of our debt
obligations were at fixed rates. Due to the nature of fixed-rate
debt, there would be no significant impact on our interest
expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase or decrease in
market rates of interest.
From time to time, we have used interest rate swaps to manage
our debt cost. We have entered into interest rate swaps to fix
the interest rate on $200 million of our floating rate Term
Loan B facility, which is part of our senior secured
facility. In Korea, we entered into interest rate swaps to fix
the interest rate on various floating rate debt.
See Note 8 Long-Term Debt to our condensed
consolidated and combined financial statements in this quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for further information.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
June 30, 2006 given a 10% change in rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap
contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other
procedures that are designed to ensure that the information
required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is
(1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and
(2) accumulated and communicated to management, including
the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2006, members of management,
at the direction (and with the participation) of our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer, performed an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our
71
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act), as of June 30, 2006 and concluded
that they were not effective as of June 30, 2006 as a
result of (1) the continued existence of material
weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting
described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, and (2) the
error in identifying one of our four most highly compensated
executive officers, other than the chief executive officer, in
our original 2005
Form 10-K.
Notwithstanding the material weaknesses, management has
concluded that our unaudited condensed consolidated and combined
financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States of America
(GAAP). Accordingly, and to the best of managements
knowledge, the unaudited condensed consolidated and combined
financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
fairly present in all material respects our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented
in accordance with GAAP.
Remediation
measures for identified material weaknesses
Management, with Audit Committee oversight, has taken actions to
remediate the material weaknesses described in our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005. These include but are
not limited to the following:
1. We hired a new chief financial officer on July 17,
2006, appointed a new chief accounting officer on June 29,
2006 and hired a new chief internal auditor on January 9,
2006. We continue to seek and recruit additional full-time
resources to strengthen our accounting and finance staff.
2. In May 2006, we engaged outside consultants, other than our
independent registered public accounting firm, to assist us with
accounting for income taxes, specifically the calculation of
income taxes payable, deferred income tax assets and liabilities
and related income tax provision. In that same month, and with
the assistance of our outside consultants, we began providing
formal income tax training to our finance, accounting and tax
professionals. In addition, we have implemented a formal income
tax accounting preparation and review process.
3. We also engaged outside consultants, other than our
independent registered public accounting firm, to assist us with
our analysis of complex accounting transactions, the
implementation of new accounting pronouncements and related
reporting.
4. In May 2006, we enhanced our process to oversee the
preparation and review of our public filings for accuracy and
completeness. This includes the implementation of detailed
reporting packages prepared by segment or plant management and
reviewed by corporate management and its outside consultants
where appropriate.
5. Led by our chief accounting officer, we implemented a formal
analytical review process in May 2006 whereby significant
balance sheet and or income statement account fluctuations are
identified, investigated and explained. These procedures assist
with the identification of non-routine or non-systematic
transactions
and/or the
improper or inconsistent application of our policies and
procedures. This includes the timely and accurate reporting of
accrued expenses.
6. We have also implemented enhanced reporting procedures and
cross functional discussions within and among our legal,
accounting and finance departments to improve the accuracy,
completeness and timeliness of reporting of legal matters,
non-routine transactions and control deficiencies. For example,
the chief accounting officer holds bi-weekly calls with regional
finance leadership to update them on new accounting
pronouncements, discuss control deficiencies or new non-routine
transactions and address any reporting or accounting concerns on
a timely basis.
We believe that these actions will assist us with the
remediation of the identified material weaknesses. However, we
have not completed our documentation and testing of the
corrective processes and procedures as we will be required to do
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Section 404) and related SEC rules and regulations.
We cannot assure you that these material weaknesses will be
remediated prior to the conclusion of this evaluation, or that
we will not uncover additional material weaknesses.
72
Changes
in internal control over financial reporting and related
matters
As announced on August 29, 2006, our board of directors
replaced Brian Sturgell, our president and chief executive
officer. Immediately thereafter, William T. Monahan, the
chairman of our board of directors, assumed the role of interim
chief executive officer, and will continue to serve as interim
chief executive officer until a successor has been selected and
is in place. Our executive team will now report directly to
Mr. Monahan. In light of Mr. Monahans interim
chief executive officer responsibilities, the board of directors
has formed a temporary office of the chairman that is comprised
of Mr. Monahan and directors Clarence J. Chandran and
Edward A. Blechschmidt. Mr. Sturgell will be available to
advise the office of the chairman until a successor has been
selected and is in place.
As announced on June 28, 2006, we appointed Rick Dobson as
our new senior vice president and chief financial officer. Prior
to joining our company, Mr. Dobson was the chief financial
officer of Aquila, Inc., a Kansas City, Missouri based operator
of electricity and natural gas distribution utilities, since
2002.
On March 20, 2006, we announced that Robert M. Patterson
joined Novelis as a senior finance professional;
Mr. Patterson later assumed the responsibilities of vice
president, controller and chief accounting officer in the second
quarter of 2006 once our previous controller completed her work
for us.
As described above, there were changes in our internal control
over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006.
73
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Reynolds Boat Case. As previously disclosed,
we and Alcan were defendants in a case in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Washington, in
Tacoma, Washington, case number C04-0175RJB. Plaintiffs were
Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire
Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a
jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under warranty theories,
based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and Alcan sold
certain aluminum products that were ultimately used for marine
applications and were unsuitable for such applications. The jury
reached a verdict on May 22, 2006 against us and Alcan for
approximately $60 million, and the court later awarded
Reynolds and Alcoa approximately $16 million in prejudgment
interest and court costs.
The case was settled during July 2006 as among us, Alcan,
Reynolds, Alcoa and their insurers for $71 million. We
contributed approximately $1 million toward the settlement,
and the remaining $70 million was funded by our insurers.
Although the settlement was substantially funded by our
insurance carriers, certain of them have reserved the right to
request a refund from us, after reviewing details of the
plaintiffs damages to determine if they include costs of a
nature not covered under the insurance contracts. Of the
$70 million funded, $39 million is in dispute with and
under further review by certain of our insurance carriers, who
have six months from the date of the settlement to complete
their review. We have agreed to post a letter of credit in the
amount of approximately $10 million in favor of one of
those insurance carriers, while we resolve the questions, if
any, about the extent of coverage of the costs included in the
settlement.
As of December 31, 2005, we recognized a liability included
in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities of
$71 million, the full amount of the settlement, with a
corresponding charge against earnings. We also recognized an
insurance receivable included in Prepaid expenses and other
current assets of $31 million with a corresponding
increase to earnings. Although $70 million of the
settlement was funded by our insurers, we have only recognized
an insurance receivable to the extent that coverage is not in
dispute. We recognized a charge of $40 million during the
fourth quarter of 2005.
As of June 30, 2006, no changes were made to the receivable
or liabilities balances that were established as of
December 31, 2005, and there were no additional charges or
recoveries included in our results of operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2006.
While the ultimate resolution of the nature and extent of any
costs not covered under our insurance contracts cannot be
determined with certainty or reasonably estimated at this time,
if there is an adverse outcome with respect to insurance
coverage, and we are required to reimburse our insurers, it
could have a material impact on cash flows in the period of
resolution. Alternatively, the ultimate resolution could be
favorable such that insurance coverage is in excess of what we
have recognized to date. This would result in our recording a
non-cash gain in the period of resolution, and this non-cash
gain could have a material impact on our results of operations
during the period in which such a determination is made.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles
of Incorporation of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-law No. 1 of Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on November 17, 2004
(File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Shareholder Rights Agreement
between Novelis and CIBC Mellon Trust Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Specimen Certificate of Novelis
Inc. Common Shares (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on
December 27, 2004 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Indenture, relating to the Notes,
dated as of February 3, 2005, between the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of
New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of February 3, 2005, among the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto, Citigroup
Global Markets Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
and UBS Securities LLC, as Representatives of the Initial
Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Note for
71/4% Senior
Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the
Form S-4
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File
No. 331-127139))
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Employment Agreement of Arnaud de
Weert (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on April 3, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Agreement Concerning Transition
from Employment between Novelis and Geoff Batt dated
March 31, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis on April 6, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Third Waiver, dated as of
April 12, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on April 18, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Fourth Waiver, dated as of
May 10, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on May 16, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Transition Agreement, dated
June 15, 2006, by and between Jo-Ann Longworth and Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement,
dated June 15, 2006, by and between Jo-Ann Longworth and
Novelis Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46
to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Transition Agreement, dated
June 27, 2006, by and between Geoff Batt and Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement,
dated June 27, 2006, by and between Geoff Batt and Novelis
Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Offer Letter, dated June 20,
2006, by and between Rick Dobson and Novelis Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Addendum to Rick Dobson Offer
Letter, dated June 20, 2006, by and between Rick Dobson and
Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to
the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
75
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NOVELIS INC.
Rick Dobson
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert
M. Patterson
|
Robert M. Patterson
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: October 19, 2006
76
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles
of Incorporation of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-law No. 1 of Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on November 17, 2004
(File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Shareholder Rights Agreement
between Novelis and CIBC Mellon Trust Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Specimen Certificate of Novelis
Inc. Common Shares (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on
December 27, 2004 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Indenture, relating to the Notes,
dated as of February 3, 2005, between the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of
New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of February 3, 2005, among the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto, Citigroup
Global Markets Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
and UBS Securities LLC, as Representatives of the Initial
Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Note for
71/4% Senior
Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the
Form S-4
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File
No. 331-127139))
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Employment Agreement of Arnaud de
Weert (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on April 3, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Agreement Concerning Transition
from Employment between Novelis and Geoff Batt dated
March 31, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis on April 6, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Third Waiver, dated as of
April 12, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on April 18, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Fourth Waiver, dated as of
May 10, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on May 16, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Transition Agreement, dated
June 15, 2006, by and between Jo-Ann Longworth and Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement,
dated June 15, 2006, by and between Jo-Ann Longworth and
Novelis Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46
to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Transition Agreement, dated
June 27, 2006, by and between Geoff Batt and Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement,
dated June 27, 2006, by and between Geoff Batt and Novelis
Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Offer Letter, dated June 20,
2006, by and between Rick Dobson and Novelis Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Addendum to Rick Dobson Offer
Letter, dated June 20, 2006, by and between Rick Dobson and
Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to
the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
77