UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2006
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from
to .
|
Commission file number:
001-32312
Novelis Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
98-0442987
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification number)
|
|
|
|
3399 Peachtree Road NE,
Suite 1500
Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
30326
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
Telephone:
(404) 814-4200
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 31, 2006, the registrant had 74,005,649 common
shares outstanding.
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
Novelis
Inc.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (unaudited)
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,319
|
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other income net
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for taxes
on income and minority interests share
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority
interests share
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss) net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Change in minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Change in cash flow currency hedge
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss) net of tax
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
share basic
|
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
share diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common
share
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information for
2005 only:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the
consolidated and combined results of Novelis from January 6
to March 31, 2005 increase to Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Net loss attributable to the
combined results of Novelis from January 1 to January 5,
2005 decrease to Owners net investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements
are an integral part of these condensed statements.
2
Novelis
Inc.
(in
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of
allowances of $28 in 2006 and $26 in 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
Property and equipment
net
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Intangible assets net
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Fair value of derivative
instruments net of current portion
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,743
|
|
|
$
|
5,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
Long-term debt net of
current portion
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Accrued post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of
consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value;
unlimited number of first preferred and second preferred shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value;
unlimited number of shares authorized; 74,005,649 shares
issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders
equity
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,743
|
|
|
$
|
5,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements
are an integral part of these condensed balance sheets.
3
Novelis
Inc.
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Adjustments to determine net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Net gains on change in fair market
value of derivatives
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Provision for uncollectible
accounts
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
(Gains) losses on sales of
businesses, investments and assets net
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities
(net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Accrued post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Disposal of business
net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
Changes in investment in and
advances to non-consolidated affiliates net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums paid to purchase
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
|
4
Novelis
Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)(Continued)
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(1,539
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,180
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
Dividends common
shareholders
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Dividends minority
interests
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Net receipts from Alcan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash balances held in foreign currencies
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of
cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Principal payments on capital
lease obligations (included above in principal
repayments third parties)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of
non-cash investing and financing activities relating to the
spin-off transaction and post-closing adjustments (2005
only):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
Short-term borrowings
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Long-term debt related
parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Capital lease obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements
are an integral part of these condensed statements.
5
Novelis
Inc.
(in millions, except number of common shares, which is in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2005
|
|
|
74,006
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
2006 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Change in cash flow currency hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Dividends on common shares ($0.09
per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31,
2006
|
|
|
74,006
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements
are an integral part of this condensed statement.
6
Novelis
Inc.
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Business
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization
and Description of Business
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products where the end-use destination of
the products includes the construction and industrial, beverage
and food cans, foil products and transportation markets. As of
March 31, 2006, we had operations on four continents: North
America; South America; Asia; and Europe, through 34 operating
plants and three research facilities in 11 countries. In
addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary
aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that are
integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil.
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated and combined
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated and combined financial statements and
accompanying notes in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
August 25, 2006. The accompanying (a) consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2005, which has been
derived from audited financial statements, and
(b) unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements have been prepared pursuant to SEC
Rule 10-01
of
Regulation S-X.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in
annual financial statements prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those
rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures
made are adequate to make the information not misleading.
The unaudited results of operations for the interim periods
shown in these financial statements are not necessarily
indicative of operating results for the entire year. In the
opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated and combined financial statements recognize all
adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to
fairly state our consolidated financial position as of
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005; our consolidated
results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2006; and our consolidated and combined results
of operations and cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2005.
Certain reclassifications of prior year amounts have been made
to conform to the presentation adopted for the current
year.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006. FASB
Interpretation No. 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements by prescribing a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. FASB Interpretation No. 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and
transition. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of
the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48 on our financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
pronouncements will not have a material impact on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows or do not apply to
our operations.
7
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Restructuring
Programs
|
All restructuring provisions and recoveries are included in
Restructuring charges (recoveries) net in the
accompanying condensed consolidated and combined statements of
income (loss) unless otherwise stated below. The following table
summarizes our restructuring liabilities for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Exit
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31,
2005
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Provisions net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31,
2006
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2006, we announced additional actions in the
restructuring of our European operations, with the
reorganization of our plants in Ohle and Ludenscheid, Germany,
including the closure of two non-core business lines located
within those facilities. In connection with the reorganization
of our Ohle and Ludenscheid plants, we incurred costs of less
than $1 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2006, and expect to incur additional costs of
$5 million (primarily severance) by the end of 2007.
We announced our intent in November 2005 to close our casting
alloy facility in Borgofranco, Italy in March 2006. In 2005, we
recognized charges of $5 million for asset impairments and
$9 million for other exit related costs, including
$6 million for environmental remediation expenses relating
to this plant closing. We have incurred additional costs of less
than $1 million through June 30, 2006 and expect all
activities (including environmental remediation) to be complete
by 2009.
Subsequent
Event
On August 31, 2006, we announced a proposed restructuring
of our European central management and administration activities
in Zurich, Switzerland, to reduce overhead costs and streamline
support functions. In addition, we are proposing to exit our
Neuhausen research and development center in Switzerland. We
expect to incur $6 million of costs associated with these
proposed actions and expect to save approximately
$10 million annually once complete.
|
|
3.
|
Loss on
Disposal of Business
|
In March 2006, we disposed of our aluminum rolling mill in
Annecy, France for consideration in the amount of one euro, and
recorded pre-tax charges of $15 million in connection with
the sale, which are included in Other income
net in our condensed consolidated statement of income
(loss). The charges were comprised primarily of $8 million
representing our investment in and advances to Annecy, and cash
payments of $5 million in connection with the disposal of
the business and other cash fees and expenses of $2 million.
8
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Inventories consist of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
361
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,268
|
|
|
$
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 151,
Inventory Cost, which amends the guidance in Accounting
Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 43, Chapter 4,
Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for
abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs and wasted materials by requiring those items to be
recognized as current period charges. Additionally, FASB
Statement No. 151 requires that fixed production overheads
be allocated to conversion costs based on the normal capacity of
the production facilities. FASB Statement No. 151 is
effective prospectively for inventory costs incurred in fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2005. We adopted FASB
Statement No. 151 on January 1, 2006; its adoption did
not have a material effect on our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
|
|
5.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment net, consists of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Land and property rights
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
4,487
|
|
|
|
4,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,436
|
|
|
|
5,342
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(3,404
|
)
|
|
|
(3,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
|
$
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent
Event
On August 21, 2006, we entered into a preliminary agreement
to transfer our rights to develop and operate two hydroelectric
power plants in South America with generating capacity of 155
megawatts. This transfer is subject to regulatory approval by
the National Electric Energy Agency prior to execution. We
received an advance cash payment of approximately
$15 million upon signing of the preliminary agreement;
however, this payment must be refunded if the transfer is not
approved. If approved, the transaction will be concluded and we
will recognize a pre-tax gain of approximately $12 million.
9
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
6. Investment
in and Advances to Non-consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
Transactions
The following table summarizes the ownership structure and our
percentage ownership of the non-consolidated affiliates we
account for using the equity method. We have no material
investments we account for under the cost method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Ownership Structure
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
50%
|
Consorcio Candonga
|
|
Unincorporated Joint Venture
|
|
50%
|
Petrocoque S.A. Industria e
Comercio
|
|
Corporation
|
|
25%
|
EuroNorca Partners
|
|
General Partnership
|
|
50%
|
Deutsche Aluminium Verpackung
Recycling GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
30%
|
France Aluminium Recyclage
S.A.
|
|
Public Limited Company
|
|
20%
|
We do not control these affiliates, but have the ability to
exercise significant influence over their operating and
financial policies. The following table summarizes the combined
results of operations of our equity method affiliates (on a 100%
basis, in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Costs, expenses and provision for
taxes on income
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in our condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements are transactions and balances arising from business
we conduct with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we
classify as related party transactions and balances. The
following table describes the nature and amounts of transactions
that we had with these non-consolidated related parties during
the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Purchases of inventory, tolling
services and electricity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH (A)
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Consorcio Candonga (B)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Petrocoque S.A. Industria e
Comercio (C)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH provides tolling services to us. |
|
(B) |
|
Consorcio Candonga supplies electricity to Novelis South America. |
|
(C) |
|
Petrocoque S.A. Industria e Comercio supplies calcined-coke to
our South America smelting operations. |
10
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The table below describes the ending balances that we have with
Aluminium Norf GmbH (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Other receivables (A)
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Long-term receivables (A)
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
Accounts payable (B)
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The balances represent current and non-current portions of a
loan to Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH in the
ordinary course of business. |
|
|
7.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Accrued payroll
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
Accrued settlement of legal claim
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
647
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Long-term debt consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Rates(A)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan B, due 2012
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
342
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due 2015
|
|
|
7.25
|
%(B)
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan B, due 2012
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Novelis Switzerland
S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due 2020
(Swiss francs (CHF) 59 million)
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due 2011
(CHF 5 million)
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due 2008
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Bank loan, due 2008 (Korean won
(KRW) 30 billion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Bank loan, due 2007
|
|
|
4.55
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Bank loan, due 2007 (KRW
40 billion)
|
|
|
4.80
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Bank loan, due 2007 (KRW
25 billion)
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Bank loans, due 2008 through 2011
(KRW 1 billion)
|
|
|
4.06
|
%(C)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due 2006 through 2012
|
|
|
2.68
|
%(C)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,495
|
|
|
|
2,603
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,491
|
|
|
$
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Interest rates are as of March 31, 2006 and exclude the
effects of any related interest rate swaps or amortization of
debt issuance and other costs. |
|
(B) |
|
The interest rate for the Senior Notes does not include
additional special interest discussed below. |
|
(C) |
|
Weighted average interest rate. |
Floating
Rate Term Loan B
In connection with the spin-off transaction, we entered into
senior secured credit facilities providing for aggregate
borrowings of up to $1.8 billion. These facilities consist
of: (1) a $1.3 billion seven-year senior secured Term
Loan B facility, bearing interest at London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.75%, all of which was borrowed on
January 10, 2005; and (2) a $500 million
five-year multi-currency revolving credit and letters of credit
facility.
Unamortized debt issuance costs related to the senior secured
credit facilities were $25 million as of March 31,
2006 and are included in Other long-term assets in our
accompanying condensed and consolidated balance sheet.
Through March 31, 2006, we satisfied the 1% per annum
principal amortization requirement through fiscal year 2010, as
well as $367 million of the principal amortization
requirement for 2011. No further minimum principal payments are
due until 2011. As of March 31, 2006, we had
$855 million outstanding under this facility. Additionally,
in May and June of 2006, we made additional principal repayments
of $40 million and $17 million, respectively, and as
of June 30, 2006, we had $798 million outstanding
under this facility.
12
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The credit agreement relating to the senior secured credit
facilities includes customary affirmative and negative
covenants, as well as financial covenants relating to our
maximum total leverage ratio, minimum interest coverage ratio,
and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. As of March 31,
2006, the maximum total leverage coverage, minimum interest
coverage, and minimum fixed charge coverage ratios were 5 to 1;
3 to 1; and 1.25 to 1, respectively.
As of March 31, 2006, we were in compliance with the
covenants in our senior secured credit facility. However, as
described below, we obtained waivers from our lenders related to
our inability to timely file our SEC reports. In addition,
future operating results substantially below our business plan
or other adverse factors, including a significant increase in
interest rates, could result in our being unable to comply with
our financial covenants. If we do not comply with these
covenants and are unable to obtain waiver from our lenders, we
would be unable to make additional borrowings under these
facilities, our indebtedness under these agreements would be in
default and could be accelerated by our lenders and could cause
a cross-default under our other indebtedness. In particular, we
expect it will be necessary to amend the financial covenants
related to our interest coverage and leverage ratios in order to
align them with our current business outlook for the remainder
of the 2006 fiscal year. In addition, if we incur additional
debt in the future, we may be subject to additional covenants,
which may be more restrictive than those that we are subject to
currently.
7.25% Senior
Notes
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities (Senior
Notes). Unamortized debt issuance costs related to the Senior
Notes were $26 million as of March 31, 2006 and are
included in Other long-term assets in our condensed
consolidated balance sheet.
Under the indenture that governs the Senior Notes, we are
subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to incurring
additional debt and providing additional guarantees, paying
dividends beyond certain amounts and making other restricted
payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain consolidations
or mergers, and certain transactions with affiliates. We were in
compliance with these covenants as of March 31, 2006.
However, as discussed below under the caption Impact of
Late SEC Filings on our Debt Agreements, we have received
notices of default under the indenture related to our failure to
timely file certain SEC reports.
The indenture governing the Senior Notes and the related
registration rights agreement required us to file a registration
statement for the notes and exchange the original, privately
placed notes with registered notes. The registration statement
was declared effective by the SEC on September 27, 2005.
Under the indenture and the related registration rights
agreement, we were required to complete the exchange offer for
the Senior Notes by November 11, 2005. We did not complete
the exchange offer by that date. As a result, we began to accrue
additional special interest at a rate of 0.25% on
November 11, 2005. The indenture and the registration
rights agreement provide that the rate of additional special
interest increases by 0.25% during each subsequent
90-day
period until the exchange offer closes, with the maximum amount
of additional special interest being 1.00% per year. On
August 8, 2006, the rate of additional special interest
increased to 1.00%. On August 14, 2006, we extended the
offer to exchange the Senior Notes to October 20, 2006. We
expect to file a post-effective amendment to the registration
statement and complete the exchange as soon as practicable
following the date we are current on our reporting requirements.
We will cease paying additional special interest once the
exchange offer is completed.
Korean
Bank Loans
In December 2004, Novelis Korea Limited (Novelis Korea),
formerly Alcan Taihan Aluminium Limited, entered into a
$70 million floating rate long-term loan which was
subsequently swapped into a 4.55% fixed rate KRW 73 billion
loan due in December 2007. In February 2005, Novelis Korea
entered into a $50 million
13
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
floating rate long-term loan which was subsequently swapped into
a 5.30% fixed rate KRW 51 billion loan due in February 2008.
In the first quarter of 2006, we repaid our KRW 30 billion
($30 million) 5.75% fixed rate loan originally due October
2008. In May 2006, a portion of the $50 million (KRW
51 billion) 5.30% fixed rate loan was refinanced into a KRW
19 billion ($20 million) short-term floating rate
loan, which was paid in June 2006. We were in compliance with
all debt covenants related to the Korean bank loans as of
March 31, 2006.
Interest
Rate Swaps
As of March 31, 2006, we entered into interest rate swaps
to fix the
3-month
LIBOR interest rate on a total of $200 million of the
floating rate Term Loan B debt at effective weighted
average interest rates and amounts expiring as follows: 3.8% on
$100 million through February 3, 2007; and 3.9% on
$100 million through February 3, 2008. We are still
obligated to pay any applicable margin, as defined in senior
secured credit facilities, in addition to these interest rates.
As of March 31, 2006, our
fixed-to-variable
rate debt ratio was 2.85 to 1.
Impact of
Late SEC Filings on our Debt Agreements
The restatement of our unaudited condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements for the quarters ended
March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005 (filed on
May 16, 2006) resulted in delays in the filing of our
quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (filed on
May 16, 2006), our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (filed on
August 25, 2006), and our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
for the first two quarters of 2006.
The terms of our $1.8 billion senior secured credit
facility require that we deliver unaudited quarterly and audited
annual financial statements to our lenders within specified
periods of time. Due to the delays, we obtained a series of
waiver and consent agreements from the lenders under the
facility to extend the various filing deadlines. The fourth
waiver and consent agreement, dated May 10, 2006, extended
the
Form 10-Q
filing deadlines for the first, second and third quarters of
2006 to October 31, 2006, November 30, 2006, and
December 29, 2006, respectively. These extended filing
deadlines were subject to acceleration to 30 days after the
receipt of an effective notice of default under the indenture
governing our Senior Notes relating to our inability to timely
file such periodic reports with the SEC. We received an
effective notice of default with respect to this
Form 10-Q
on July 21, 2006, causing the deadline for this
Form 10-Q
to accelerate to August 20, 2006. As a result, we entered
into a fifth waiver and consent agreement, dated August 11,
2006, which again extended the filing deadline for this
Form 10-Q
to September 18, 2006. Subsequent to the effective date of
the fifth waiver and consent agreement, we also received an
effective notice of default with respect to our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 on August 24, 2006. The
fifth waiver and consent agreement extended the accelerated
filing deadline caused as a result of the receipt of the
effective notice of default with respect to our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 to October 22, 2006. The
fifth waiver and consent agreement also extends any accelerated
filing deadline caused as a result of the receipt of an
effective notice of default under the Senior Notes with respect
to our
Form 10-Q
for the third quarter of 2006 to the earlier of 30 days
after the receipt of any such notice of default and
December 29, 2006. To date, fees related to the five waiver
and consent agreements total $6 million, of which
$2 million has been incurred as of March 31, 2006,
including $1 million which was incurred during the first
quarter ended March 31, 2006. These fees are being
amortized over the remaining life of the related borrowing in
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
costs net using the effective interest
amortization method. Unamortized fees related to these
waiver and consent agreements of $2 million are included in
Other long-term assets in our accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2006.
Beginning with the fourth waiver and consent agreement, we
agreed to a 50 basis point increase in the applicable margin on
all current and future borrowings outstanding under our senior
secured credit facility, and
14
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
a 12.5 basis point increase in the commitment fee on the
unused portion of our revolving credit facility. These increases
will continue until we inform our lenders that we no longer need
the benefit of the extended filing deadlines granted in the
fifth waiver and consent agreement, at which time the fifth
waiver and consent agreement will expire and obligate us to the
filing requirements set forth in the senior secured credit
facility.
We believe it is probable that we will file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 22, 2006;
however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do
so. If we are unable to file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by the applicable deadline, we
intend to seek additional waivers from the lenders under our
senior secured credit facility to avoid an event of default
under the facility. An event of default under the senior secured
credit facility would entitle the lenders to terminate the
senior secured credit facility and declare all or any portion of
the obligations under the facility due and payable, in which
case we would be required to refinance our debt or negotiate an
alternative restructuring.
Under the indenture governing the Senior Notes, we are required
to deliver to the trustee a copy of our periodic reports filed
with the SEC within the time periods specified by SEC rules. As
a result of our receipt of effective notices of default from the
trustee on July 21, 2006, with respect to this
Form 10-Q
and on August 24, 2006 with respect to our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006, we were required to file this
Form 10-Q
by September 19, 2006, and we will be required to file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 23, 2006 in order
to prevent an event of default. By filing this
Form 10-Q,
we cured the default referenced in the July 21, 2006 notice
from the trustee. We believe it is probable that we will file
our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 22, 2006;
however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do
so. If we fail to file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 23, 2006, the
trustee or holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount
of the Senior Notes may elect to accelerate the maturity of the
Senior Notes, in which case we would be required to refinance
our debt or negotiate an alternative restructuring.
On July 26, 2006, we entered into the Commitment Letter
with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (Citigroup) for backstop
financing facilities totaling approximately $2.855 billion.
The Commitment Letter will terminate on October 2, 2006 by
its terms. However, prior to that time, Citigroup has agreed,
subject to certain terms and conditions, to (a) provide
loans in an amount sufficient to repurchase the Senior Notes,
and (b) in the event that lender approval was not obtained
to allow us to refinance the Senior Notes, to provide us with
replacement senior secured credit facilities.
Unless we are able to negotiate an extension to the Commitment
Letter or enter into a similar arrangement with Citigroup or
another lender, backstop financing will not be available after
October 2, 2006. As a result, if we are unable to timely
file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 or obtain additional waivers or
amendments to the agreements governing our outstanding
indebtedness, we would not have sufficient liquidity to repay
our debt if accelerated. Accordingly, we would be required to
negotiate an alternative restructuring or refinancing of our
debt.
Under any of the refinancing alternatives discussed above, we
would incur significant costs and expenses, including
professional fees and other transaction costs. We also
anticipate that it will be necessary to pay significant waiver
and amendment fees in connection with the potential amendments
to our senior secured credit facility described above. In
addition, if we are successful in refinancing any or all of our
outstanding debt, we are likely to experience an increase in the
applicable interest rates over the life of any new debt, based
on prevailing market conditions and our perceived credit risk.
Any acceleration of the outstanding debt under the senior
secured credit facility would result in a cross-default under
our Senior Notes. Similarly, the occurrence of an event of
default under our Senior Notes would result in a cross-default
under the senior secured credit facility. Further, the
acceleration of outstanding debt under our senior secured credit
facility or our Senior Notes would result in defaults under
other contracts and
15
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
agreements, including certain interest rate and foreign currency
derivative contracts, giving the counterparty to such contracts
the right to terminate. As of June 30, 2006, we had
out-of-the-money
derivatives valued at a maximum of approximately
$86 million that the counterparties would have the ability
to terminate upon the occurrence of an event of default.
We believe it is probable that we will file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 22, 2006.
Accordingly, we continue to classify the senior secured credit
facility and our Senior Notes as long-term debt as of
March 31, 2006.
Lines of
Credit and Short Term Borrowings
As of March 31, 2006, $28 million of our
$500 million revolving credit facility was utilized for a
short-term loan in the United Kingdom and another
$3 million was utilized for letters of credit. Commitment
fees related to the unused portion of the $500 million
revolving credit facility, prior to the fourth waiver and
consent agreement dated May 10, 2006, ranged between 0.375%
and 0.5% per annum, depending on certain financial ratios we
achieved. As discussed above, in connection with the fourth
waiver and consent agreement, these commitment fees increased to
0.625%, where they will remain until the earlier of
December 29, 2006 or such date when we no longer have
delayed SEC filings, and we inform our lenders that we no longer
need the benefit of the extended reporting deadlines provided
through the fifth waiver and consent agreement. Additionally, as
of March 31, 2006, all of our $25 million unsecured
line of credit facility in Brazil was available for use.
As of March 31, 2006, our short-term borrowings were
$32 million consisting of a $28 million short-term
loan in the United Kingdom under our $500 million revolving
credit facility, $1 million in Brazil not under lines of
credit, and $3 million in Italy through local banking
relationships not under lines of credit. As of March 31,
2006, the weighted average interest rate on our short-term
borrowings was 6.18% (2.69% as of December 31, 2005).
|
|
9.
|
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of
income tax effects, consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Cash flow currency hedge
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
A summary of the components of other comprehensive income (loss)
is as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net change in foreign currency
translation adjustments
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
Net change in minimum pension
liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Net change in cash flow currency
hedge
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other comprehensive income
(loss) adjustments, before income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
On January 1, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement No. 123
(Revised), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision to
FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) requires
the recognition of compensation expense for a share-based award
over an employees requisite service period based on the
awards grant date fair value, subject to adjustment.
We adopted FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised) using the
modified prospective method. The modified prospective method
requires companies to record compensation cost beginning with
the effective date based on the requirements of FASB Statement
No. 123 (Revised) for all share-based payments granted
after the effective date. All awards granted to employees prior
to the statements effective date that remain unvested at
the adoption date will continue to be expensed over the
remaining service period.
The cumulative effect of the accounting change as of
January 1, 2006 was approximately $1 million, net of
tax, and is not considered material as to require presentation
as a cumulative effect of accounting change in our condensed
consolidated statement of income (loss) for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. Accordingly, the effect of adopting
this new statement was included in Selling, general and
administrative expenses.
Prior to the adoption of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised),
we presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the
exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the
condensed consolidated and combined statements of cash flows.
Beginning on January 1, 2006, we changed our cash flow
presentation in accordance with FASB Statement No. 123
(Revised), which requires that the cash flows resulting from tax
benefits for deductions in excess of compensation cost
recognized be classified as financing cash flows. During the
first quarter of 2006, there were no tax payments made that were
reduced by excess tax benefits.
Stock
Options
On January 5, 2005, our board of directors adopted the
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005 (the Conversion Plan) to allow
for all Alcan stock options held by employees of Alcan who
became our employees following our spin-off from Alcan to be
replaced with options to purchase our common shares. While new
options may be granted under the Conversion Plan, there were no
new options granted since conversion. The options expire ten
years from the date of grant. All converted options that were
vested on the spin-off date continued to be vested. Unvested
options vest in four equal annual installments beginning on
January 6, 2006, the first anniversary of the spin-off
date. In the case of an unsolicited change in control of
Novelis, all options will become immediately exercisable.
17
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
As of March 31, 2006, 2,686,600 options were outstanding at
a weighted average exercise price of $21.60, and 892,049 of
these options were exercisable at a weighted average price of
$21.24.
The table below lists key categories of stock option activity
for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
2,704,790
|
|
|
$
|
21.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
|
|
(18,190
|
)
|
|
$
|
21.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,686,600
|
|
|
$
|
21.60
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
$
|
(2,774,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable as of
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
892,049
|
|
|
$
|
21.24
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
$
|
(599,312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We used the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the fair
value of the options outstanding. The fair value of each option
was estimated using the following weighted average assumptions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
1.56%
|
|
|
|
1.56%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
30.30%
|
|
|
|
30.30%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.73%
|
|
|
|
3.73%
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
5.47 years
|
|
|
|
5.47 years
|
|
Total compensation cost recognized for stock options issued to
employees was $1 million for each of the three month
periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, and was included in
Selling, general and administrative expenses.
Compensation
to be Settled in Cash
Upon adoption of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised), we
determined that all of our compensation plans settled in cash
are considered liability based awards under the statement. As
such, liabilities for awards under these plans are required to
be measured at each reporting date until the date of settlement.
Various valuation methods were used to determine the fair value
of these awards, and are discussed below.
Prior to January 1, 2006, we applied the intrinsic value
based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for
stock-based compensation plans settled in cash. We incurred a
liability when the vesting of the award became probable under
the guidance provided by FASB Interpretation No. 28,
Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable
Stock Option or Award Plans. When variable plan awards were
granted, we measured compensation expense as the amount by which
the quoted market value of the shares of our stock covered by
the grant exceeded the option price or value specified, by
reference to a market price or otherwise, subject to any
appreciation limitations under the plan. Changes, either
increases or decreases, in the quoted market value of those
shares between the date of grant and the measurement date
resulted in a prospective change in the measurement of
compensation expense for the right or award.
18
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Stock
Price Appreciation Unit Plan
Prior to the spin-off, some Alcan employees who later
transferred to Novelis held Alcan stock price appreciation units
(SPAUs). These units entitled them to receive cash equal to the
excess of the market value of an Alcan common share on the
exercise date of a SPAU over the market value of an Alcan common
share on its grant date. SPAUs vest in four equal annual
installments beginning on January 6, 2006. On
January 6, 2005, these employees received 418,777 Novelis
SPAUs to replace their 211,035 Alcan SPAUs at a weighted average
exercise price of $22.04. None of the SPAUs have been exercised,
but as of March 31, 2006, 115,419 SPAUs were exercisable at
a weighted average price of $21.53. As of March 31, 2006,
there was $1.8 million of unamortized compensation cost
related to non-vested SPAUs, which is expected to be recognized
over a remaining vesting period of 2.8 years.
Upon adoption of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised), we
changed from the intrinsic value method to the Black-Scholes
valuation model to estimate the fair value of the SPAUs granted
to employees. The table below lists key categories of SPAU
activity for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
SPAUs
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
SPAUs outstanding as of
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
418,777
|
|
|
$
|
22.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPAUs outstanding as of
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
418,777
|
|
|
$
|
22.04
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
(613,946
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPAUs exercisable as of
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
115,419
|
|
|
$
|
21.53
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
$
|
(110,744
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each SPAU was estimated as of March 31,
2006 using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.17% to 0.32%
|
|
0.20%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
39.90% to 44.60%
|
|
43.63%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.80% to 4.83%
|
|
4.81%
|
Expected life
|
|
2.74 years to 5.12 years
|
|
4.56 years
|
Total
Shareholder Returns Performance Plan
Some Alcan employees who later transferred to Novelis were
entitled to receive cash awards under the Alcan Total
Shareholder Returns Performance Plan (TSR). TSR was a cash
incentive plan which rewarded eligible employees based on the
relative performance of Alcans common share price and
cumulative dividend yield performance compared to other
corporations included in the Standard & Poors
Industrials Index, measured over three-year periods starting on
October 1, 2002 and 2003. On January 6, 2005, these
employees immediately ceased participating in and accruing
benefits under the TSR. The current three-year performance
19
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
periods, namely 2002 to 2005 and 2003 to 2006, were truncated as
of the date of the spin-off. The accrued awards for all of the
TSR participants were converted into 452,667 Novelis restricted
share units (RSUs). At the end of each performance period, each
holder of RSUs will receive net proceeds based on the price of
Novelis common shares at that time, including declared
dividends. On October 15, 2005, an aggregate of
$7 million was paid to employees who held RSUs that had
vested on September 30, 2005. As of March 31, 2006,
there were 120,373 RSUs and related dividends outstanding that
will vest on September 30, 2006. As of March 31, 2006,
there was $0.7 million of unamortized compensation cost
related to non-vested RSUs, which is expected to be recognized
over a remaining vesting period of 0.5 years.
A summary of the status of our RSUs as of March 31, 2006
and of changes in RSUs outstanding under the plan during the
three months ended March 31, 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
RSUs outstanding as of
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
119,842
|
|
|
$
|
20.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs outstanding as of
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
120,373
|
|
|
$
|
20.57
|
|
|
$
|
2,514,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs vested and exercisable as of
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
Share Unit Plan For Non-Executive Directors
On January 5, 2005, Novelis established the Deferred Share
Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors under which non-executive
directors receive 50% of their compensation payable in the form
of directors deferred share units (DDSUs) and the other
50% in the form of either cash, additional DDSUs or a
combination of these two (at the individual election of each
non-executive director). The number of DDSUs is determined by
dividing the quarterly amount payable, as elected, by the
average closing prices of a common share on the TSX and NYSE on
the last five trading days of each quarter. Additional DDSUs
representing the equivalent of dividends declared on common
shares are credited to each holder of DDSUs.
The DDSUs are redeemable in cash
and/or in
shares of our common stock following the participants
retirement from the board. The redemption amount is calculated
by multiplying the accumulated balance of DDSUs by the average
closing price of a common share on the TSX and NYSE on the last
five trading days prior to the redemption date.
20
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
A summary of the status of our DDSUs as of March 31, 2006
and of changes in DDSUs outstanding under the plan during the
three months ended March 31, 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
DDSUs
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
DDSUs outstanding as of
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
41,862
|
|
|
$
|
20.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
15,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DDSUs outstanding as of
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
57,307
|
|
|
$
|
20.42
|
|
|
$
|
1,170,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DDSUs vested and exercisable as of
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
57,307
|
|
|
$
|
20.42
|
|
|
$
|
1,170,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
Founders Performance Awards
In March 2005, Novelis established a plan to reward certain key
executives with Performance Share Units (PSUs) if Novelis share
price improvement targets were achieved within specific time
periods. There are three equal tranches of PSUs, and each has a
specific share price improvement target. For the first tranche,
the target applies for the period March 24, 2005 to
March 23, 2008. For the second tranche, the target applies
for the period March 24, 2006 to March 23, 2008. For
the third tranche, the target applies for the period
March 24, 2007 to March 23, 2008. If awarded, a
particular tranche will be paid in cash on the later of six
months from the date the specific share price target is reached
or twelve months after the start of the performance period, and
will be based on the average of the daily stock closing prices
on the NYSE for the last five trading days prior to the payment
date. Upon a participants termination due to retirement,
death or disability, all PSUs awarded prior to the termination
will be paid at the same time as for active participants. For
any other termination, all PSUs will be forfeited.
Upon adoption of FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised), we
changed our valuation technique to the Monte Carlo method due to
the fact that the Novelis Founders Performance Awards contain a
market condition for vesting of the award. The Monte Carlo
method utilizes multiple input variables that determine the
probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the
award and calculates the fair market value of each award. Key
assumptions used to determine the fair value of the awards as of
March 31, 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Expected Stock
Price Volatility
|
|
|
40.00
|
%
|
Annual Expected Dividend Yield
|
|
|
1.73
|
%
|
Risk-Free Interest Rate
|
|
|
4.84
|
%
|
Weighted average expected stock price volatility is a weighted
measure of the historical volatility and the implied volatility
of the closest to
at-the-money
publicly traded Novelis call options, with weights determined by
the remaining life of the longest term call options. The annual
expected dividend yield is based on historical and anticipated
dividend payments. The risk-free interest rate reflects the
2-year daily
U.S. Treasury yield curve rate as of the grant date. The
fair value of the PSUs is amortized over the derived service
period of each award, which is up to three years, subject to
acceleration in the event the vesting condition is met (as
defined above).
The liability for the first tranche was accrued over its term,
was valued on March 24, 2006, and was paid in cash in April
2006 for $3 million.
21
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Compensation
Cost
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, stock-based
compensation expense for arrangements that are settled in cash,
including amounts related to the cumulative effect of an
accounting change from adopting FASB Statement No. 123
(Revised), was $3 million and was included in Selling,
general and administrative expenses. Stock-based
compensation expense for the three months ended March 31,
2005 was negligible.
|
|
11.
|
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost for all of our
significant plans are shown in the table below
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Employment
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actuarial losses
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior service
cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment/settlement gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 7.6% in
2006.
Employer
Contributions to Pension Plans
Our policy is to fund an amount required to provide for
contractual benefits attributed to service to date, and amortize
unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over periods of
15 years or less. For the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005, we contributed $9 million and
$10 million, respectively, to the funded pension plans and
$3 million and $3 million, respectively, to the
unfunded pension plans. We expect to contribute an additional
$18 million to the funded pension plans and $9 million
to the unfunded pension plans for the remainder of 2006.
We also participate in savings plans in Canada and the
U.S. as well as defined contribution pension plans in the
United Kingdom, Canada, Malaysia and Brazil. We made
contributions of $3 million and $2 million to these
plans for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
22
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
Currency
Gains and Losses
|
The following currency gains (losses) are included in Other
income net in our condensed consolidated and
combined statements of income (loss) (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net gains (losses) on change in
fair market value of currency derivatives
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
Net gains on translation of
monetary assets and liabilities
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following currency gains (losses) are recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cumulative translation
adjustment beginning of period
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation
adjustment end of period
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Financial
Instruments and Commodity Contracts
|
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments, including forward contracts, to
manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates,
interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such
instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may
be exposed to losses in the future if the counterparties to the
contracts fail to perform. We are satisfied that the risk of
such non-performance is remote, due to our monitoring of credit
exposures.
In the first quarter of 2006, we implemented hedge accounting
for $712 million of cross-currency interest rate swaps
(Euro 475 million, British Pound (GBP) 62 million and
CHF 35 million) with respect to intercompany loans to
several European subsidiaries. The Euro and GBP swaps have been
designated as net investment hedges, while the CHF
cross-currency interest rate swap has been designated as a cash
flow hedge. We also implemented hedge accounting for
$69 million (158 million Brazilian real (BRL)) of our
forward foreign exchange contracts, which have been designated
as cash flow hedges.
For contracts designated as net investment hedges, a net loss of
$7 million has been included in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss within Shareholders equity
in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
March 31, 2006.
For contracts designated as cash flow hedges, we recognize gains
and losses in earnings in the current period for the change in
fair market value of the ineffective portion of the hedge. We
exclude the losses on forward points related to these hedges
from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, and include such
amounts in Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
costs net. We include the change in fair market
value of the effective portion of these hedges in Accumulated
other comprehensive loss. For the three months ended
March 31, 2006, changes in fair market value of cash flow
hedges were negligible. As of March 31, 2006, the amount of
net gains and losses expected to be realized in earnings during
the following twelve months is negligible. No cash flow hedges
were discontinued during the three months ended March 31,
2006. The maximum period over which we have hedged our exposure
to cash flow variability is through February 2015.
23
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of March 31, 2006, were as follows (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Fair
|
|
|
|
Dates
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
2006 through 2011
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
2006 through 2008
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Cross-currency interest swaps
|
|
2006 through 2015
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
2006 through 2009
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
97
|
|
Aluminum call options
|
|
Matures in 2006
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Fixed price electricity contract
|
|
Matures in 2016
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
221
|
|
Less: current portion (A)
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Current portion of assets are presented on our condensed
consolidated balance sheet. Current portion of liabilities are
included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Remaining
long-term portions of fair values under assets are presented on
our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Remaining long-term
portions of fair values under liabilities are included in
Other long-term liabilities on our condensed consolidated
balance sheet. |
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of December 31, 2005 were as follows (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Fair
|
|
|
|
Dates
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
2006 through 2011
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
2006 through 2008
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Cross-currency interest swaps
|
|
2006 through 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
2006 through 2009
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
80
|
|
Aluminum call options
|
|
Matures in 2006
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Fixed price electricity contract
|
|
Matures in 2016
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
244
|
|
Less: current portion (A)
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Current portion of assets are presented on our condensed
consolidated balance sheet. Current portion of liabilities are
included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Remaining
long-term portions of fair values under assets are presented on
our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Remaining long-term
portions of fair values under liabilities are included in
Other long-term liabilities on our condensed consolidated
balance sheet. |
24
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table presents the components of Other
income net (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net gains on change in fair market
value of derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of business
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange gains net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Gain on disposals of fixed
assets net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We provide for income taxes using the liability method in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting, and FASB Interpretation
No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim
Periods, the provision for income taxes recognizes our
estimate of the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for
the full fiscal year, adjusted for the impact of any discrete
events, which are reported in the period in which they occur. We
re-evaluate our estimated tax expense for the year and make
adjustments for changes in the estimated tax rate for the year
each quarter. Additionally, we evaluate the realizability of our
deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis. Our evaluation
considers all positive and negative evidence and factors, such
as the scheduled reversal of temporary differences, historical
and projected future taxable income or loss, and prudent and
feasible tax planning strategies. As a result, the provisions
for taxes on income for the quarters ended March 31, 2006
and 2005 were based on the estimated effective tax rates
applicable for the years ending December 31, 2006 and ended
December 31, 2005, respectively, after considering items
specifically related to the interim periods.
25
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
A reconciliation of the Canadian statutory income tax rates to
our effective income tax rates for the periods presented is as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Pre-tax income before equity in
net income of non-consolidated affiliates and minority
interests share
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian statutory tax rate
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes at the Canadian
statutory tax rate
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Increase (decrease) in tax rate
resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange translation items
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Exchange remeasurement of deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Expense/income items with no tax
effect
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Tax rate differences on foreign
earnings
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Withholding tax in connection with
the spin-off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Out-of-period
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
408
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our provision for taxes on income of $102 million
represented an effective tax rate of 408% for the first quarter
of 2006 compared to a provision for taxes on income of
$30 million and an effective tax rate of 55% for the first
quarter of 2005. Our effective tax rate for the first quarter of
2006 is greater than the Canadian statutory rate of 33% due to
(1) a $33 million increase in valuation allowances
primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where
we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able
to utilize those losses, (2) $13 million for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect, (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated
currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect and (c) the
remeasurement of deferred income taxes and (3) a
$44 million difference between the Canadian Statutory and
foreign effective tax rates resulting from the application of an
annual effective tax rate to profit and loss entities in
different jurisdictions. In the first quarter of 2005, an
$11 million benefit from foreign exchange translation items
was offset by an $11 million increase in valuation
allowances. As these items offset each other, the primary
reasons why our effective tax rate in the first quarter of 2005
is greater than the Canadian statutory rate of 33% is due to
expenses with no income tax effect and withholding taxes in
connection with the spin-off. Cash taxes paid during the first
quarter of 2006 and 2005 were $12 million and
$4 million, respectively.
26
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table shows the information used in the
calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in
millions, except per share amounts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominators:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of
outstanding shares (basic)
|
|
|
74.01
|
|
|
|
73.99
|
|
Effect of dilutive shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted number of outstanding
shares (diluted)
|
|
|
74.01
|
|
|
|
74.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
share basic
|
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
share diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use the treasury stock method to calculate the dilutive
effect of stock options and other common stock equivalents
(dilutive shares). Diluted earnings per share recognizes the
dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to
issue common stock were exercised or converted into common
stock. These potential shares include dilutive stock options and
Director Deferred Share Units (DDSUs).
Options to purchase an aggregate of 2,686,600 of our common
shares were held by our employees as of March 31, 2006. For
the three months ended March 31, 2006, 741,999 of these
options are dilutive, at an average exercise price of $17.78.
These dilutive stock options are equivalent to 63,803 of our
common shares for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Additionally, there were 72,885 DDSUs that were considered
dilutive shares for the three months ended March 31, 2006
(see Note 10 Stock Based Compensation). Of the
72,885 DDSUs, 15,578 were granted on April 1, 2006 for
the period ended March 31, 2006. Anti-dilutive options of
1,944,601 were held by our employees as of March 31, 2006.
The dilutive shares described above were not included in our
calculation of diluted loss per share as they would be
anti-dilutive.
Options to purchase an aggregate of 2,723,914 of our common
shares were held by our employees as of March 31, 2005. Of
these, 1,382,771 options to purchase common shares at an average
exercise price of $19.41 per share were dilutive for the
period presented. These dilutive stock options are equivalent to
201,033 Novelis common shares. Additionally, there are 14,025
DDSUs that were granted on April 1, 2005 for the period
ended March 31, 2005 and included as dilutive shares.
Anti-dilutive Novelis options of 1,341,143 were held by our
employees as of March 31, 2005.
|
|
17.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Alcan is our primary supplier of prime and sheet ingot.
Purchases from Alcan represented 41% of our total combined prime
and sheet ingot purchases for both of the three month periods
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.
27
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Legal
Proceedings
Reynolds Boat Case. As previously disclosed,
we and Alcan Inc. were defendants in a case in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Washington, in
Tacoma, Washington, case number C04-0175RJB. Plaintiffs were
Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire
Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a
jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under warranty theories,
based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and Alcan sold
certain aluminum products that were ultimately used for marine
applications and were unsuitable for such applications. The jury
reached a verdict on May 22, 2006 against us and Alcan for
approximately $60 million, and the court later awarded
Reynolds and Alcoa approximately $16 million in prejudgment
interest and court costs.
The case was settled during July 2006 as among us, Alcan,
Reynolds, Alcoa and their insurers for $71 million. We
contributed approximately $1 million toward the settlement,
and the remaining $70 million was funded by our insurers.
Although the settlement was substantially funded by our
insurance carriers, certain of them have reserved the right to
request a refund from us, after reviewing details of the
plaintiffs damages to determine if they include costs of a
nature not covered under the insurance contracts. Of the
$70 million funded, $39 million is in dispute with,
and under further review by, certain of our insurance carriers,
who have six months to complete their review. We have agreed to
post a letter of credit in the amount of approximately
$10 million in favor of one of those insurance carriers,
while we resolve the questions, if any, about the extent of
coverage of the costs included in the settlement.
As of December 31, 2005, we recognized a liability included
in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities of
$71 million, the full amount of the settlement, with a
corresponding charge to earnings. We also recognized an
insurance receivable included in Prepaid expenses and other
current assets of $31 million with a corresponding
increase to earnings. Although $70 million of the
settlement was funded by our insurers, we have only recognized
an insurance receivable to the extent that coverage is not in
dispute. We recognized the net loss of $40 million during
the fourth quarter of 2005.
As of March 31, 2006, no changes were made to the
receivable or liabilities balances that were established as of
December 31, 2005, and there were no additional charges or
recoveries included in our results of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2006.
While the ultimate resolution of the nature and extent of any
costs not covered under our insurance contracts cannot be
determined with certainty or reasonably estimated at this time,
if there is an adverse outcome with respect to insurance
coverage, and we are required to reimburse our insurers, it
could have a material impact on cash flows in the period of
resolution. Alternatively, the ultimate resolution could be
favorable such that insurance coverage is in excess of what we
have recognized to date. This would result in our recording a
non-cash gain in the period of resolution, and this non-cash
gain could have a material impact on our results of operations
during the period in which such a determination is made.
Environmental
Matters
Oswego North Ponds. Oswego North Ponds is
currently our largest known single environmental loss
contingency. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, Novelis
Corporation (a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours and formerly
known as Alcan Aluminum Corporation, or Alcancorp) in Oswego,
New York used an oil containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
in its re-melt operations. At the time, Novelis Corporation
utilized a once-through cooling water system that discharged
through a series of constructed ponds and wetlands, collectively
referred to as the North Ponds. In the early 1980s, low levels
of PCBs were detected in the cooling water system discharge and
Novelis Corporation performed several subsequent investigations.
The PCB-containing hydraulic oil, Pydraul, which was eliminated
from use by Novelis Corporation in the early 1970s, was
identified as the source of contamination. In the mid-1980s, the
Oswego North Ponds site was classified as an
28
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
inactive hazardous waste disposal site and added to
the New York State Registry. Novelis Corporation ceased
discharge through the North Ponds in mid-2002.
In cooperation with the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New York State
Department of Health, Novelis Corporation entered into a consent
decree in August 2000 to develop and implement a remedial
program to address the PCB contamination at the Oswego North
Ponds site. A remedial investigation report was submitted in
January 2004. The current estimated cost associated with this
remediation is in the range of $12 million to
$26 million. Based upon the report and other factors, we
accrued $19 million as our estimated cost. In addition,
NYSDEC held a public hearing on the remediation plan on
March 13, 2006 and we believe that our estimate of
$19 million is reasonable, and that the remediation plan
will be approved for implementation in 2007.
Indirect
Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others
We have issued indirect guarantees of the indebtedness of others
and we recognize a liability for the fair value of obligations
assumed under such guarantees. Currently, we only issue indirect
guarantees for the indebtedness of others. The guarantees may
cover the following entities:
|
|
|
|
|
wholly-owned subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
variable interest entities consolidated under FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (Revised), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities; and
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH, which is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint
venture which does not meet the consolidation tests under FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (Revised).
|
In all cases, the indebtedness guaranteed is for trade payables
to third parties.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned subsidiaries and variable
interest entities in our financial statements, all liabilities
associated with trade payables for these entities are already
included in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses our obligations under indirect
guarantees of indebtedness as of March 31, 2006 (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Potential
|
|
Liability Carrying
|
|
Assets Held for
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Future Payment
|
|
Value
|
|
Collateral
|
|
Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Segment,
Geographical Area and Major Customer Information
|
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments. The
operating segments are Novelis North America (NNA), Novelis
Europe (NE), Novelis Asia (NA) and Novelis South America (NSA).
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments based on Regional Income, in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information. Regional Income
provides a measure of our underlying regional segment results
that is in line with our portfolio approach to risk management.
We define Regional Income as income before (a) interest
expense and amortization of debt issuance costs;
(b) unrealized gains and losses due to changes in the fair
market value of derivative instruments; (c) depreciation
and amortization; (d) impairment charges on long-lived
assets; (e) minority interests share;
(f) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Regional
29
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as determined
on the equity method of accounting (proportional share to equity
accounting adjustments); (g) restructuring (charges)
recoveries net; (h) gains or losses on
disposals of fixed assets and businesses; (i) corporate
selling, general and administrative expenses: (j) gains and
losses on corporate derivative instruments and exchange items;
(k) litigation settlement net of insurance
recoveries; (l) gains on the monetization of cross-currency
interest rate swaps; (m) provision for taxes on income; and
(n) cumulative effect of accounting change net
of tax.
We do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB
Statement No. 133. Accordingly, changes in fair market
value are recognized immediately in earnings, which results in
the recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of
the contract settlement. In our condensed consolidated and
combined statements of income (loss), changes in fair value of
derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB
Statement No. 133 are recognized in Other
Income net. These gains or losses may or may not
result from cash settlement. For Regional Income purposes, we
only include the impact of the derivative gains or losses in a
particular period to the extent they are settled in cash in that
period.
Selected
Segment Financial Information
The following tables present selected segment financial
information as of and for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Three
|
|
North
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Accounting
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,319
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
2,296
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Three
|
|
North
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Accounting
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended March 31, 2005
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales (to third parties)
|
|
$
|
823
|
|
|
$
|
806
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
2,440
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
5,601
|
|
30
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table presents the reconciliations from Total
Regional Income to Net income (loss) for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 (in millions).
Segment
Reconciliation from Total Regional Income to Net income
(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Total Regional Income
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Unrealized gains due to changes in
the fair market value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate
proportional consolidation (A)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Restructuring (charges)
recoveries net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Gains (losses) on disposals of
fixed assets and businesses net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses (B)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Gains on corporate derivative
instruments and exchange items (B)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Regional
Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Total Regional Income to Net income, the proportional
Regional Income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed
from Total Regional Income, net of our share of their net
after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net income
of non-consolidated affiliates on our consolidated and
combined statements of income. See Note 6
Investment in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and
Related Party Transactions to our condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements for further information about
these non-consolidated affiliates. |
|
(B) |
|
These items are managed by our corporate office, which focuses
on strategy development and oversees governance, policy, legal
compliance, human resources and finance matters. |
Information
about Major Customers
All of our operating segments had net sales to Rexam Plc
(Rexam), our largest customer and our only customer accounting
for more than 10% of our total net sales. Net sales to Rexam (in
millions) and the related percentages of our total net sales for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Net sales to Rexam (in millions)
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
19.
|
Supplemental
Guarantor Information
|
In connection with the issuance of our Senior Notes, certain of
our wholly-owned subsidiaries provided guarantees of the Senior
Notes. These guarantees are full and unconditional as well as
joint and several. The guarantor subsidiaries (the Guarantors)
comprise the majority of our businesses in Canada, the United
States, the United Kingdom, Brazil and Switzerland, as well as
certain businesses in Germany. Certain Guarantors may be subject
to restrictions on their ability to distribute earnings to
Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The remaining subsidiaries (the
Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not guarantors of the Senior
Notes.
The following information presents condensed consolidating and
combined statements of income for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, condensed consolidating balance
sheets as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and
condensed consolidating and combined statements of cash flows
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 of the
Parent, the Guarantors, and the Non-Guarantors. Investments
include investments in non-consolidated affiliates as well as
investments in net assets of divisions included in the Parent
and have been presented using the equity method of accounting.
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income (Loss)
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
|
$
|
(684
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
1,822
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
(677
|
)
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of
affiliates
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other (income) expense
net
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision
(benefit) for taxes on income and minority interests share
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
income
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority
interests share
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating and Combining Statement of Income
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
1,743
|
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
|
$
|
(574
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Equity in net income of affiliates
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other (income) expense
net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision (benefit)
for taxes on income and minority interests share
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
Provision (benefit) for taxes on
income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority
interests share
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
876
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
2,270
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
(744
|
)
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
Property and equipment
net
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Intangible assets net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Investments in and advances to
affiliates
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(622
|
)
|
|
|
148
|
|
Fair value of derivative
instruments net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,460
|
|
|
$
|
4,006
|
|
|
$
|
1,887
|
|
|
$
|
(2,610
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
1,711
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
Long-term debt net of
current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Accrued post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,077
|
|
|
|
3,945
|
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of
consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Owners net investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
(480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders
equity
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,460
|
|
|
$
|
4,006
|
|
|
$
|
1,887
|
|
|
$
|
(2,610
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Current portion of fair value of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
Property and equipment
net
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Intangible assets net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Investments in and advances to
affiliates
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(729
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
Fair value of derivative
instruments net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,488
|
|
|
$
|
3,803
|
|
|
$
|
1,845
|
|
|
$
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
Long-term debt net of
current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,742
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Accrued post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
3,674
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
(1,931
|
)
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in equity of
consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Owners net investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders
equity
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
(729
|
)
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,488
|
|
|
$
|
3,803
|
|
|
$
|
1,845
|
|
|
$
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
(112
|
)
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Disposal of business
net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Changes in investment in and
advances to non-consolidated affiliates net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends preference
shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends common
shareholders
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Dividends minority
interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash balances held in foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND
COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Novelis
Inc.
Condensed
Consolidating and Combined Statement of Cash Flows
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from (advances on) loans
receivable net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
(990
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
Share repurchase
intercompany
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums paid to purchase
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
(593
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
(1,541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
(1,385
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,719
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
Share repurchase
intercompany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preference shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends common
shareholders
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Dividends minority
interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Net receipts from (payments to)
Alcan
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash balances held in foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Cash and cash
equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following information should be read together with our
unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this
quarterly report for a more complete understanding of our
financial condition and results of operations. The following
discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our
plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ
materially from those discussed in these forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these
differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed
below, particularly in SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET DATA.
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Alcan refer to Alcan, Inc.
GENERAL
Novelis is the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and
light gauge products for the construction and industrial,
beverage and food cans, foil products and transportation
markets. As of March 31, 2006, we had operations on four
continents: North America; South America; Asia and Europe,
through 34 operating plants and three research facilities in
11 countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products
plants, our South American businesses include bauxite mining,
alumina refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation
facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in
Brazil. We are the only company of our size and scope focused
solely on aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local
supply of technically sophisticated products in all of these
geographic regions.
HIGHLIGHTS
Significant highlights, events and factors impacting our
business during the first quarter of 2006 are presented briefly
below. Each is discussed in further detail throughout
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (MD&A).
|
|
|
|
|
We had net sales of $2.3 billion and a net loss of
$74 million, or $(1.00) per share for our quarter ended
March 31, 2006, compared to net sales of $2.1 billion
and net income of $22 million, or $0.30 per share for
the first quarter of 2005.
|
|
|
|
Total rolled product shipments increased from 713 kilotonnes
(kt) in the first quarter of 2005 to 741 kt in the first quarter
of 2006, while ingot products shipments declined from 57 kt to
41 kt in those same periods.
|
|
|
|
London Metal Exchange (LME) pricing for aluminum (metal) was an
average of 27% higher during the first quarter of 2006 than
during the same period for 2005. This trend continued through
the first six months of 2006, during which time LME aluminum
pricing was an average of 39% higher than during the same period
for 2005.
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the first quarter of 2006 increased 10% compared
to 2005 due mainly to the rise in LME prices. However, the
benefit of higher LME prices on our net sales was limited by
metal price ceilings in sales contracts representing
approximately 20% of our business. During the first quarter of
2006, we were unable to pass through approximately
$95 million of metal price increases associated with sales
under these contracts. The metal price ceilings are discussed in
more detail below.
|
|
|
|
Through strong operating cash flows, we reduced our total debt
by $103 million during the first quarter of 2006, which was
in excess of our required principal payment obligations.
|
|
|
|
During the first and second quarters of 2006, we incurred
expenses of approximately $10 million and $13 million,
respectively, associated with the restatement of our first and
second quarters of 2005 (re-filed on May 16, 2006), our
review process and as a result of our delayed filings. In
addition, we had
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
previously incurred approximately $7 million during the
fourth quarter of 2005 for a total of $30 million in
expenses through June 30, 2006, and we expect to continue
to incur these expenses until we are current with our filings
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The restatement and review process and delayed filings are
discussed in more detail below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2006, we recognized pre-tax income
of $54 million related to changes in fair value of
derivative instruments. These derivative instruments and the
related accounting are discussed in more detail below.
|
|
|
|
We recognized $102 million of tax expense during the first
quarter of 2006 for an effective tax rate of 408%. Our effective
tax rate is greater than the Canadian statutory rate of 33% due
to (1) a $33 million increase in valuation allowances
primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where
we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able
to utilize those losses, (2) $13 million of exchange
translation and remeasurement items, and (3) a
$44 million difference between the Canadian statutory and
foreign effective tax rates resulting from the application of an
annual effective tax rate to profit and loss entities in
different jurisdictions. Of the $102 million of tax expense
during the first quarter, approximately $10 million is
current tax expense. Cash taxes paid during the first quarter of
2006 were $12 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate that we will incur a net loss for the year, and this
is described in more detail in our Business Outlook below. Based
on our estimated pre-tax loss for the year, we expect income tax
expense to decline by year-end.
|
METAL
PRICE CEILINGS
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass
through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market
premiums and (ii) a margin over metal price
based on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and
the competitive market conditions for that product.
Sales contracts representing approximately 20% of our estimated
net sales for 2006 provide for a ceiling over which metal prices
cannot contractually be passed through to certain customers,
unless adjusted. As a result, we are unable to pass through the
complete increase in metal prices for sales under these
contracts and this negatively impacts our margins when the metal
price is above the ceiling price. During the first and second
quarters of 2006, we were unable to pass through approximately
$95 million and $140 million, respectively, of metal
price increases associated with sales under these contracts.
We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal
prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to
metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our
internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and
mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from
our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans
(UBCs). Both of these strategies have historically provided a
benefit as these sources of metal are typically less expensive
than purchasing aluminum from third party suppliers. These two
strategies are referred to as our internal hedges. While we
believe that our primary aluminum production continues to
provide the expected benefits during this sustained period of
high LME prices, the recycling operations are providing less
internal hedge benefit than we expected. LME metal prices and
other market issues have resulted in higher than expected prices
of UBCs, thus compressing the internal hedge benefit we receive
from this strategy.
Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy
to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated
with the metal price ceilings is to purchase call options
and/or fixed
forward derivative instruments on projected aluminum volume
requirements above our assumed internal hedge position. To hedge
our exposure in 2006, we previously purchased call options at
various strike prices. In September of 2006, we began purchasing
fixed forward derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to
further price increases in 2007.
39
For accounting purposes, we do not treat all derivative
instruments as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. Accordingly, changes in fair market value
are recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the
recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the
contract settlement, and we expect further earnings volatility
as a result.
At current prices, we have not fully covered our exposure
relative to the metal price ceilings with the three hedging
strategies described above. This is primarily a result of
(i) not being able to purchase affordable call options or
fixed forward derivatives with strike prices that directly
coincide with the metal price ceilings and (ii) our
recycling operations are providing less internal hedge than we
previously expected, as the spread between UBC prices and LME
prices has not increased at the levels we projected internally.
We expect incremental improvement in 2007 over 2006, however, as
we expect our total net sales under contracts with price
ceilings to decrease to approximately 10%.
METAL
PRICE LAG
On certain contracts we experience timing differences on the
pass through of changing aluminum prices based on the difference
in the price we pay for aluminum and the price we ultimately
charge our customers after the aluminum is processed. Generally,
in periods of rising prices we benefit from this timing
difference, while the opposite is true in periods of declining
prices. We refer to this timing difference as metal price lag,
and as a result of rising prices during the first quarter of
2006, we realized a pre-tax benefit of $53 million.
RESTATEMENT
AND REVIEW
We restated our condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements for our quarters ended March 31, 2005 and
June 30, 2005. The restatement and review process included
an extensive review of the contingencies, reserves and
adjustments made to create the Companys opening balance
sheet as of January 6, 2005.
During the first and second quarters of 2006, we incurred
expenses of approximately $10 million and $13 million,
respectively, associated with the restatement and review process
and as a result of our delayed filings. We had previously
incurred approximately $7 million during the fourth quarter
of 2005 for a total of $30 million in expenses through
June 30, 2006. These expenses include professional fees,
audit fees, credit waiver and consent fees, and additional
special interest on our $1.4 billion 7.25% senior
unsecured debt securities due 2015 (Senior Notes), which we will
continue to incur until, among other things, we are current with
our SEC filings and complete our registered exchange offer for
our Senior Notes.
LATE
FILINGS
As a result of the restatement and review process, certain
filings were delayed, including this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
and our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2006.
Because of the receipt of a notice of default from the trustee
for the holders of our Senior Notes relating to our failure to
timely file our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2006 and similar requirements
in waivers and related covenants under our senior secured credit
facility, we must file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 22, 2006 to avoid
an event of default under our Senior Notes and senior secured
credit facility. We believe it is probable that will file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 22, 2006.
BUSINESS
OUTLOOK
We participate in markets with relative stability, which
provides us with a firm foundation for the utilization of our
assets around the world. While unprecedented high metal and
energy prices and metal price ceilings in certain North American
contracts will impact our earnings and cash flows, we made
considerable progress in paying down our debt in 2005, and we
expect to continue to do so in 2006. We currently expect to pay
down approximately $150 million to $200 million of
debt in 2006.
40
While we continue to generate positive cash flow and pay down
debt, we expect to incur a net loss for the year ending
December 31, 2006, due primarily to:
|
|
|
|
|
the effects of unfavorable movements in metal prices and foreign
currency exchange rates beyond our ability to mitigate such
exposures;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair market value of our derivatives; and
|
|
|
|
the substantial expenses we incurred and will continue to incur
in connection with our restatement and remediation efforts (as
described in Item 4. Controls and Procedures),
including substantial waiver and consent fees paid to certain of
our lenders as well as additional special interest on our Senior
Notes.
|
We expect to see incremental improvement in 2007 as a result of
our metal price ceiling exposure decreasing to approximately 10%
of our total net sales. In addition, we expect that future
corporate costs will be lower as we reduce our reliance on
third-party consultants and eliminate certain non-recurring
costs incurred in connection with the restatement and review
process. Finally, we are working aggressively to become current
with our SEC filings and improve our financial reporting
processes and controls which should yield further savings as we
make permanent investments in financial accounting personnel and
reporting systems.
INTERNAL
CONTROLS
The financial restatement and review we commenced in fiscal 2005
and continued into fiscal 2006 identified the need for
substantial improvement in our financial accounting and control
personnel, processes and reporting. We previously reported and
continue to report that we have material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting and that our
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the
end of fiscal 2005 and the first quarter of 2006. We are working
to remediate these weaknesses to enable us to timely and
accurately prepare and file our reports with the SEC. We expect
to implement significant process improvements and add
substantially to our permanent financial and accounting staff
throughout the coming quarters. See Item 4
Controls and Procedures.
SPIN-OFF
FROM ALCAN
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
rolled products businesses were managed under two separate
operating segments within Alcan Rolled Products
Americas and Asia; and Rolled Products Europe. On
January 6, 2005, Alcan and its subsidiaries contributed and
transferred to Novelis substantially all of the aluminum rolled
products businesses operated by Alcan, together with some of
Alcans alumina and primary metal-related businesses in
Brazil, which are fully integrated with the rolled products
operations there, as well as four rolling facilities in Europe
whose end-use markets and customers were similar to ours.
Post-Transaction
Adjustments
The agreements giving effect to the spin-off provide for various
post-transaction adjustments and the resolution of outstanding
matters, which are expected to be carried out by the parties
during 2006. These adjustments, for the most part, have been and
will be recognized as changes to shareholders equity and
include items such as working capital, pension assets and
liabilities, and adjustments to opening balance sheet accounts.
Agreements
between Novelis and Alcan
At the spin-off, we entered into various agreements with Alcan
including the use of transitional and technical services, the
supply of Alcans metal and alumina, the licensing of
certain of Alcans patents, trademarks and other
intellectual property rights, and the use of certain buildings,
machinery and equipment, technology and employees at certain
facilities retained by Alcan, but required in our business. The
terms and conditions of the agreements were determined primarily
by Alcan and may not reflect what two unaffiliated parties might
have agreed to. Had these agreements been negotiated with
unaffiliated third parties, their terms may have been more
favorable, or less favorable, to us.
41
OPERATIONS
AND SEGMENT REVIEW
The following discussion and analysis is based on our condensed
consolidated and combined statements of income (loss), which
reflect our results of operations for the quarters ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, as prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP).
The following tables present our shipments, our operating
results and certain other information relevant to our business
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, as well as
the percentage changes from period to period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Shipments in
kilotonnes (A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products, including tolling
(the conversion of customer-owned metal)
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Ingot products, including primary
and secondary ingot and recyclable aluminum (B)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(28
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. |
|
(B) |
|
Ingot products shipments include primary ingot in Brazil,
foundry products sold in Korea and Europe, secondary ingot in
Europe and other miscellaneous recyclable aluminum sales made
for logistical purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,319
|
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Cost and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
Equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Other income net
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for taxes
on income and minority interests share
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)%
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
240
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority
interests share
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(374
|
)%
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
(436
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
London Metal Exchange
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum (per
tonne, and presented in dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing cash price as of
March 31,
|
|
$
|
2,513
|
|
|
$
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Average cash price for the
quarters ended March 31,
|
|
$
|
2,420
|
|
|
$
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
Strengthen/
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Weaken)
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New
York Exchange Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average of the month end rates for
first quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
1.207
|
|
|
|
1.310
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
2.166
|
|
|
|
2.621
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
South Korean won (000s) per
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
Canadian dollar per
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.150
|
|
|
|
1.226
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
New York Mercantile
Exchange Energy Quotations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light Sweet Crude
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average settlement price (per
barrel)
|
|
$
|
62.48
|
|
|
$
|
44.56
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Henry Hub contract
settlement price (per MMBTU) (A)
|
|
$
|
8.97
|
|
|
$
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
An MMBTU is the equivalent of one decatherm, or one million BTUs
(British Thermal Units). |
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006 COMPARED
TO THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2005
Shipments
We had increased shipments of rolled products in the first
quarter of 2006 compared to 2005 in all four of our operating
regions. The largest increase was in Europe, up 13 kt, driven by
continued strength in the can market which was up 7 kt, and
smaller increases in all other product groups, except our foil
business which continues to lose volume. We also experienced
increased shipments in the can market in North America totaling
12 kt. Foil shipments at Novelis North America increased by 3 kt
as we increased our market share. These factors more than offset
the effect of lower shipments to our distributors of 11 kt in
2006 compared to 2005, as our distributors had been increasing
inventory levels during the first quarter of 2005, but not in
2006. In South America, can shipments increased by 4 kt. This
increase in can volume offset lower shipments of industrial
products to export markets.
Ingot products shipments were 28% lower in the first quarter of
2006 compared to 2005. Most of the decrease was driven by lower
volume from our Borgofranco casting alloys business in our
European operating region, which we closed in the first quarter
of 2006.
Net
sales
Higher net sales in the first quarter of 2006 compared to 2005
resulted primarily from the increase in LME metal prices, which
were 27% higher on average during the first quarter of 2006
compared to the comparable 2005 quarter. Metal represents
approximately 60% 70% of the sales value of our
products. Net sales was adversely impacted in North America due
to price ceilings on certain can contracts, which limited our
ability to pass through approximately $95 million of metal
price increases.
43
Costs and
expenses
The following table presents our costs and expenses for the
quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, in dollars and
expressed as percentages of net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown below)
|
|
$
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
92.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
89.2
|
%
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
(recoveries) net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs net
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
Other income net
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
98.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
97.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold. Metal represents
approximately 70% 80% of our input costs, and the
increase in cost of goods sold in dollar terms is primarily due
to the impact of higher LME prices. As a percentage of sales,
cost of goods sold was adversely impacted due to price ceilings
on certain can contracts, which limited our ability to pass
through approximately $95 million of metal price increases.
Further, we experienced adverse impacts from higher energy and
transportation costs in all regions and unfavorable exchange
rate impacts, most notably in South America.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(SG&A). Included in SG&A for 2005 are
Novelis
start-up
costs of approximately $4 million, which do not recur in
2006, and in 2006, we incurred approximately $10 million of
incremental costs in connection with the restatement and review
process. This increase was partially offset by lower SG&A in
Europe, resulting mainly from our closure of two administration
centers in 2005 and lower office rental costs following the
relocation of our European head office.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
costs net. In 2005, we expensed
$11 million in debt issuance fees on undrawn credit
facilities, used to back up the Alcan notes we received in
January 2005 as part of the spin-off. Excluding the debt
issuance fees, interest expense increased quarter over quarter
primarily as a result of (1) penalty interest we incurred
during the first quarter of 2006 due to the late filing of our
financial statements and (2) higher interest rates on our
remaining variable rate debt.
Other income net. The
reconciliation of the difference between the quarters is shown
below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Income Net
|
|
|
Other income net
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elements comprising the difference
in Other income net:
|
|
|
|
|
Gains of $54 million on the
change in fair market value of derivatives in 2006, compared to
$24 million in 2005
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of business in
2006 of $15 million
|
|
|
15
|
|
Exchange gains of $5 million
in 2006 compared to gains of $12 million in 2005
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total elements comprising the
difference in Other income net
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income net
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
Provision
for Taxes on Income
Our provision for taxes on income of $102 million
represented an effective tax rate of 408% for the first quarter
of 2006 compared to a provision for taxes on income of
$30 million and an effective tax rate of 55% for the first
quarter of 2005. Our effective tax rate for the first quarter of
2006 is greater than the Canadian statutory rate of 33% due to
(1) a $33 million increase in valuation allowances
primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where
we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able
to utilize those losses, (2) $13 million of exchange
translation and remeasurement items, and (3) a
$44 million difference between the Canadian statutory and
foreign effective tax rates resulting from the application of an
annual effective tax rate to profit and loss entities in
different jurisdictions. In the first quarter of 2005, an
$11 million benefit from foreign exchange translation items
was offset by an $11 million increase in valuation
allowances. As these items offset each other, the primary
reasons why our effective tax rate in the first quarter of 2005
is greater than the Canadian statutory rate of 33% is due to
expenses with no income tax effect and withholding taxes in
connection with the spin-off. Cash taxes paid during the first
quarter of 2006 and 2005 were $12 million and
$4 million, respectively.
Net
Income
We reported a net loss of $74 million for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006, or $(1.00) per share, compared to net
income of $22 million and earnings per share of $0.30 for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005. Net income for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 included our consolidated net
income of $51 million for the period from January 6,
2005 (the effective date of the spin-off) to March 31,
2005, and a combined loss of $29 million on the
mark-to-market
of derivatives, primarily with Alcan, for the period from
January 1 to January 5, 2005, prior to the spin-off.
OPERATING
SEGMENT REVIEW FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006
COMPARED TO THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2005
Regional
Income
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments. The
operating segments are Novelis North America (NNA), Novelis
Europe (NE), Novelis Asia (NA) and Novelis South America (NSA).
Our chief operating decision-maker uses regional financial
information in deciding how to allocate resources to an
individual segment, and in assessing performance of the segment.
Novelis chief operating decision-maker is its chief
executive officer.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments based on Regional Income, in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information. Regional Income
provides a measure of our underlying regional segment results
that is in line with our portfolio approach to risk management.
We define Regional Income as income before (a) interest
expense and amortization of debt issuance costs;
(b) unrealized gains and losses due to changes in the fair
market value of derivative instruments; (c) depreciation
and amortization; (d) impairment charges on long-lived
assets; (e) minority interests share;
(f) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Regional Income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting (proportional
share to equity accounting adjustments); (g) restructuring
(charges) recoveries net; (h) gains or losses
on disposals of fixed assets and businesses; (i) corporate
selling, general and administrative expenses: (j) gains and
losses on corporate derivative instruments and exchange items;
(k) litigation settlement net of insurance
recoveries; (l) gains on the monetization of cross-currency
interest rate swaps; (m) provision for taxes on income; and
(n) cumulative effect of accounting change net
of tax.
We do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB
Statement No. 133. Accordingly, changes in fair market
value are recognized immediately in earnings, which results in
the recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of
the contract settlement. In our condensed consolidated and
combined
45
statements of income (loss), changes in fair value of derivative
instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement
No. 133 are recognized in Other Income net.
These gains or losses may or may not result from cash
settlement. For Regional Income purposes, we only include the
impact of the derivative gains or losses in a particular period
to the extent they are settled in cash in that period.
Reconciliation
The following table presents Regional Income by operating
segment and reconciles Total Regional Income to Net income
(loss) (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis North America
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
Novelis Europe
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Novelis Asia
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Novelis South America
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Regional Income
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Unrealized gains due to changes in
the fair market value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Minority interests share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate
proportional consolidation (A)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Restructuring (charges)
recoveries net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Gains (losses) on disposals of
fixed assets and businesses
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses (B)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Gains on corporate derivative
instruments and exchange items (B)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Regional
Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Total Regional Income to Net income (loss), the
proportional Regional Income of these non-consolidated
affiliates is removed from Total Regional Income, net of our
share of their net after-tax results, which is reported as
Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates on
our consolidated and combined statements of income (loss). See
Note 6 Investment in and Advances to
Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions to
our condensed consolidated and combined financial statements for
further information about these non-consolidated affiliates. |
|
(B) |
|
These items are managed by our corporate office, which focuses
on strategy development and oversees governance, policy, legal
compliance, human resources and finance matters. |
OPERATING
SEGMENT RESULTS
Novelis
North America
As of March 31, 2006, Novelis North America manufactures
aluminum sheet and light gauge products through 10 aluminum
rolled products facilities and two dedicated recycling
facilities. Important end-use
46
applications for NNA include beverage cans, containers and
packaging, automotive and other transportation applications,
building products and other industrial applications.
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for NNA for the quarters ended March 31, 2006
and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(10.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
|
$
|
823
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
Shipments
Shipments increased by 12 kt in the can market in the first
quarter of 2006 and foil shipments increased by 3 kt as we
increased our market share. These factors more than offset the
effect of lower shipments to our distributors of 11 kt in 2006
compared to 2005, as our distributors had been increasing
inventory levels during the first quarter of 2005, but not in
2006.
Net
sales
NNA net sales increases in the first quarter of 2006 compared to
2005 were driven primarily by metal prices, which were 27%
higher on average in the first quarter of 2006 compared to 2005.
Increases in metal prices are largely passed through to
customers. However, the pass through of metal price increases to
our customers was limited in cases where metal price ceilings
were exceeded. This factor unfavorably impacted NNA net sales in
the first quarters of 2006 and 2005 by approximately
$95 million and $25 million, respectively, resulting
in a quarter over quarter unfavorable impact of $70 million.
Regional
Income
The net $70 million unfavorable impact described above had
a corresponding negative impact on Regional Income. This was
offset by $48 million of gains from the cash settlement of
call options recognized during the first quarter of 2006 and
$36 million from the benefit of metal price lag in 2006.
The remaining unfavorable difference in the quarter over quarter
results is primarily explained by higher energy and
transportation costs incurred in 2006 as compared to 2005.
Total
assets
Total assets increased in 2006 over 2005 due to the increase in
metal prices, which impacted both inventory value and accounts
receivable.
Novelis
Europe
As of March 31, 2006, Novelis Europe provided European
markets with value-added sheet and light gauge products through
its 14 plants, including one recycling facility. NE serves a
broad range of aluminum rolled product end-use markets in
various applications including can, automotive, lithographic and
painted products.
47
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for NE for the quarters ended March 31, 2006
and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Total Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(60.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
806
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,296
|
|
|
|
2,440
|
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
Shipments
Increases in can shipments of 7 kt, combined with increases of 2
kt in both the lithographic market and platestock, were offset
by lower foilstock shipments of 6 kt, and the sale of our Annecy
operation in March 2006, which reduced shipments in the quarter
by 3 kt, along with lower casting alloys shipments of 5 kt. The
decrease in casting alloys shipments in the first quarter of
2006 is due to the ramp down in production as we moved towards
the cessation of production at the end of the first quarter. The
aluminum beverage can market continues to grow by approximately
5% annually in Europe, which is attributable, in part, to growth
in new aluminum lines in Eastern Europe and line conversions
from steel to aluminum in Western Europe. Additionally, the
enactment of European Union (E.U.) packaging waste legislation,
under which 50% of all one-way beverage containers must be
recycled by 2007, supports the usage of aluminum cans over other
beverage packages.
Net
sales
The 27% increase in average LME metal price was offset by an
increase in the amount of tolling business we undertook in the
first quarter of 2006. Further, the weakening of the Euro, which
was down 8% on average in the first quarter of 2006 compared to
2005, had the effect of reducing net sales when converted into
U.S. dollars.
Regional
Income
Regional Income was favorably impacted in the first quarter of
2006 by $10 million from the benefit of metal price lag as
compared to 2005. This was offset by an $11 million
increase in energy and transportation costs in 2006 as compared
to 2005. The negative impact of unfavorable currency movement
was more than offset by other operational improvements and lower
selling, general and administrative costs in 2006 as compared to
2005.
Novelis
Asia
As of March 31, 2006, Novelis Asia operates three
manufacturing facilities, with production balanced between foil,
construction and industrial, and beverage/food can end-use
applications.
48
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for NA for the quarters ended March 31, 2006
and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)%
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
Shipments
NA total shipments in the first quarter of 2006 increased over
2005, which was due in a large part to increasing can stock
shipments of 3 kt, driven by strong export demand.
Net
sales
NA net sales for the first quarter of 2006 were higher than in
2005, as shipments of rolled products increased and we
experienced higher metal prices that we largely passed through
to our customers.
Regional
Income
NA Regional Income for the first quarter of 2006 was lower than
2005, due primarily to higher employment, energy, and
non-aluminum metal costs, combined with unfavorable currency
fluctuations that reduced Regional Income in 2006.
Novelis
South America
As of March 31, 2006, Novelis South America operates two
rolling plant facilities in Brazil along with two smelters, an
alumina refinery, a bauxite mine and power generation
facilities. NSA manufactures various aluminum rolled products,
including can stock, automotive and industrial sheet and light
gauge for the beverage/food can, construction and industrial and
transportation end-use markets.
The following table presents key financial and operating
information for NSA for the quarters ended March 31, 2006
and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
Regional Income
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
Total assets
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
49
Shipments
Total NSA first quarter 2006 shipments increased by 7% over
2005, with the main driver being the local can market growth,
which was up 4 kt.
Net
sales
The main drivers for the rise in net sales for the first quarter
of 2006 over 2005 were the increase in LME prices, which are
passed through to customers and higher shipping volume, offset
by a reduction in tolling sales.
Regional
Income
In the first quarter of 2006, we benefited from rising LME metal
prices in two ways. First, the output from our smelters,
representing approximately 85% of our raw material input cost,
has no correlation with LME metal price movements. Second, we
experienced metal price lags resulting from price increases.
These two impacts favorably impacted Regional Income by
approximately $19 million. Other impacts to Regional Income
include a stronger Brazilian real, which was on average 17%
higher in the first quarter of 2006 compared to 2005. This
unfavorably impacted Regional Income by $21 million as the
majority of sales are in U.S. dollars while local
manufacturing costs are incurred in Brazilian real. In addition,
NSA recognized expense of approximately $5 million in the
first quarter of 2005 associated with certain labor claims,
which unfavorably impacted Regional Income. We also experienced
higher energy costs in the first quarter of 2006 over 2005, but
these costs were largely offset by a $3 million gain from
the cash settlement of derivatives.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our liquidity and available capital resources are impacted by
operating, financing and investing activities.
Operating
Activities
Free cash flow (which is a non-GAAP measure) consists of
(a) Net cash provided by operating activities;
(b) less dividends and capital expenditures; (c) less
premiums paid to purchase derivative instruments; and
(d) net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments.
Dividends include those paid by our less than wholly-owned
subsidiaries to their minority shareholders and dividends paid
by us to our common shareholders. Management believes that free
cash flow is relevant to investors as it provides a measure of
the cash generated internally that is available for debt service
and other value creation opportunities. However, free cash flow
does not necessarily represent cash available for discretionary
activities, as certain debt service obligations must be funded
out of free cash flow. We believe the line on our condensed
consolidated and combined statement of cash flows entitled
Net cash provided by operating activities is the
most directly comparable measure to free cash flow. Our method
of calculating free cash flow may not be consistent with that of
other companies.
The following tables show the reconciliation from Net cash
provided by operating activities to Free cash flow for the
quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 31, 2005, and the
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 balances of cash
and cash equivalents (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Premiums paid to purchase
derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of
derivative instruments
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Change
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $95 million
for the first quarter of 2006, $15 million less than the
$110 million provided in 2005. For a discussion of the
factors in our operating results that impact Net cash provided
by operating activities, including other non-cash items, refer
to the discussion in Operating Segment Review for the
Quarter Ended March 31, 2006 Compared to the Quarter Ended
March 31, 2005.
Changes in assets and liabilities contributed $67 million
to Net cash provided by operating activities for the first
quarter of 2006, which was $9 million less than 2005, when
changes in assets and liabilities contributed net cash of
$76 million. Included within the $67 million in
changes in assets and liabilities for 2006 were positive net
cash flows of $286 million from a net increase in trade
payables and other current liabilities, partially offset by
negative net cash flows of $228 million from a net increase
in accounts receivable and inventories. All other changes in
assets and liabilities provided positive net cash flows of
$9 million.
Free cash flow was $138 million for the first quarter of
2006, $51 million more than 2005, directly attributable to
the increase in proceeds from the settlement of derivative
instruments of $52 million from the first quarter of 2006
compared to 2005.
Financing
Activities
In the first quarter of 2006, we reduced our debt by
$103 million, paying down $80 million on our Floating
rate Term Loan B and paying off in full our KRW
30 billion ($30 million) 5.75% fixed rate loan
originally due October 2008.
We have not finalized our financial results for the second
quarter of 2006. Accordingly, the calculation of our borrowing
availability as of June 30, 2006 is not available, but
based on currently available information, we believe our
availability will be less than the approximately
$469 million available as of March 31, 2006. However,
we believe the lower availability under our senior secured
credit facility will still be sufficient to satisfy our working
capital requirements throughout the remainder of the 2006 fiscal
year. To date, we have paid fees related to the five waiver and
consent agreements of approximately $6 million, of which
$2 million has been incurred as of March 31, 2006,
including $1 million which was incurred during the first
quarter ended March 31, 2006. These fees are being
amortized over the remaining life of the debt.
The credit agreement relating to the senior secured credit
facilities includes customary affirmative and negative
covenants, as well as financial covenants. As of March 31,
2006, the maximum total leverage, minimum interest coverage, and
minimum fixed charge coverage ratios were 5 to 1; 3 to 1; and
1.25 to 1, respectively. As of March 31, 2006, we were
in compliance with all the financial covenants in our senior
secured credit facilities. However, as described below, we
obtained waivers from our lenders related to our inability to
timely file our SEC reports. In addition, future operating
results substantially below our business plan or other adverse
factors, including a significant increase in interest rates,
could result in our being unable to comply with our financial
covenants. If we do not comply with these covenants and are
unable to obtain waiver from our lenders, we would be unable to
make additional borrowings under these facilities, our
indebtedness under these agreements would be in default and
could be accelerated by our lenders and could cause a
cross-default under our other indebtedness. In particular, we
expect it will be necessary to amend the financial covenants
related to our interest coverage and leverage ratios in order to
align them with our current business outlook for the remainder
of the 2006 fiscal year. In addition, if we incur additional
debt in the future, we may be subject to additional covenants,
which may be more restrictive than those that we are subject to
currently.
Under the indenture that governs the Senior Notes, we are
subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to incurring
additional debt and providing additional guarantees, paying
dividends beyond certain amounts and making other restricted
payments, sales and transfer of assets, certain consolidations
or mergers and certain transactions with affiliates. As
discussed below under the caption Impact of Late SEC
Filings on our Debt Agreements, we have received notices
of default under the indenture related to our failure to timely
file certain SEC reports.
51
As of March 31, 2006, we had entered into interest rate
swaps to fix the
3-month
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) interest rate on a total
of $200 million of the floating rate Term Loan B debt
at effective weighted average interest rates and amounts
expiring as follows: 3.8% on $100 million through
February 3, 2007; and 3.9% on $100 million through
February 3, 2008. We are still obligated to pay any
applicable margin, as defined in senior secured credit
facilities, in addition to these interest rates. As of
March 31, 2006, our
fixed-to-variable
rate debt ratio was 2.85 to 1.
In the first quarter of 2006, we repaid our KRW 30 billion
($30 million) 5.75% fixed rate loan originally due October
2008. We were in compliance with all debt covenants related to
the Korean bank loans as of March 31, 2006. In May 2006, a
portion of the $50 million (KRW 51 billion) 5.30%
fixed rate loan was refinanced into a KRW 19 billion
($20 million) short-term floating rate loan, which was paid
in June 2006. We were in compliance with all debt covenants
related to our Korean bank loans as of March 31, 2006.
Standard & Poors Ratings Service and Moodys
Investors Services currently assign our Senior Notes a rating of
B and B2, respectively. Moodys Investors Services
downgraded our Senior Notes from B1 to B2 in September 2006. Our
credit ratings may be subject to further revision or withdrawal
at any time by the credit rating agencies, and each rating
should be evaluated independently of any other rating. We cannot
ensure that a rating will remain in effect for any given period
of time or that a rating will not be lowered or withdrawn
entirely by a credit rating agency if, in its judgment,
circumstances so warrant. If the credit rating agencies
downgrade our ratings, we would likely be required to pay a
higher interest rate in future financings, incur increased
margin deposit requirements, and our potential pool of investors
and funding sources could decrease.
Investing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by investing activities for the quarters ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Proceeds from loans
receivable net
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
$
|
(372
|
)
|
Proceeds from settlement of
derivatives, less premiums paid to purchase derivatives
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Payments related to disposal of
business
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
|
$
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the first quarter of 2005, $360 million of the proceeds
from loans receivable net represents proceeds
received from Alcan related to the spin-off, to retire loans due
to Novelis entities.
The majority of our capital expenditures for both the 2006 and
2005 first quarter were invested in projects devoted to product
quality, technology, productivity enhancements and undertaking
small projects to increase capacity.
The following table presents additional information regarding
our capital expenditures, depreciation and reinvestment rate for
the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. Reinvestment
rate is defined as capital expenditures expressed as a
percentage of depreciation and amortization expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Reinvestment rate
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
52
Impact
of Late SEC Filings on our Debt Agreements
The restatement of our unaudited condensed consolidated and
combined financial statements for the quarters ended
March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005 (filed on
May 16, 2006) and our review process resulted in
delays in the filing of our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (filed on
May 16, 2006), our 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(filed on August 25, 2006) and our quarterly reports
on
Form 10-Q
for the first two quarters of 2006.
Senior
Secured Credit Facility
The terms of our $1.8 billion senior secured credit
facility require that we deliver unaudited quarterly and audited
annual financial statements to our lenders within specified
periods of time. Due to the delays, we obtained a series of
waiver and consent agreements from the lenders under the
facility to extend the various filing deadlines. The fourth
waiver and consent agreement, dated May 10, 2006, extended
the
Form 10-Q
filing deadlines for the first, second and third quarters of
2006 to October 31, 2006, November 30, 2006, and
December 29, 2006, respectively. These extended filing
deadlines were subject to acceleration to 30 days after the
receipt of an effective notice of default under the indenture
governing our Senior Notes relating to our inability to timely
file such periodic reports with the SEC. We received an
effective notice of default with respect to this
Form 10-Q
on July 21, 2006, causing the deadline for this
Form 10-Q
to accelerate to August 20, 2006. As a result, we entered
into a fifth waiver and consent agreement, dated August 11,
2006, which again extended the filing deadline for this
Form 10-Q
to September 18, 2006. Subsequent to the effective date of
the fifth waiver and consent agreement, we also received an
effective notice of default with respect to our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 on August 24, 2006. The
fifth waiver and consent agreement extended the accelerated
filing deadline caused as a result of the receipt of the
effective notice of default with respect to our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 to October 22, 2006. The
fifth waiver and consent agreement also extends any accelerated
filing deadline caused as a result of the receipt of an
effective notice of default under the Senior Notes with respect
to our
Form 10-Q
for the third quarter of 2006 to the earlier of 30 days
after the receipt of any such notice of default and
December 29, 2006.
Beginning with the fourth waiver and consent agreement, we
agreed to a 50 basis point increase in the applicable margin on
all current and future borrowings outstanding under our senior
secured credit facility, and a 12.5 basis point increase in
the commitment fee on the unused portion of our revolving credit
facility. These increases will continue until we inform our
lenders that we no longer need the benefit of the extended
filing deadlines granted in the fifth waiver and consent
agreement, at which time the fifth waiver and consent agreement
will expire and obligate us to the filing requirements set forth
in the senior secured credit facility.
We believe it is probable that we will file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 22, 2006;
however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do
so. If we are unable to file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by the applicable deadline, we
intend to seek additional waivers from the lenders under our
senior secured credit facility to avoid an event of default
under the facility. An event of default under the senior secured
credit facility would entitle the lenders to terminate the
senior secured credit facility and declare all or any portion of
the obligations under the facility due and payable, in which
case we would be required to refinance our debt or negotiate an
alternative restructuring.
Senior
Notes
Under the indenture governing the Senior Notes, we are required
to deliver to the trustee a copy of our periodic reports filed
with the SEC within the time periods specified by SEC rules. As
a result of our receipt of effective notices of default from the
trustee on July 21, 2006 with respect to this
Form 10-Q
and on August 24, 2006 with respect to our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006, we were required to file this
Form 10-Q
by September 19, 2006 and we will be required to file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 23, 2006 in order
to prevent an event of default. By filing the
Form 10-Q,
we cured the default referenced in the July 21, 2006 notice
from the trustee. We believe it is probable that we will file
our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 22, 2006;
however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do
so. If we fail to file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 23, 2006, the
53
trustee or holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount
of the Senior Notes may elect to accelerate the maturity of the
Senior Notes, in which case we would be required to refinance
our debt or negotiate an alternative restructuring.
Commitment
Letter
On July 26, 2006, we entered into the Commitment Letter
with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (Citigroup) for backstop
financing facilities totaling approximately $2.855 billion.
The Commitment Letter will terminate on October 2, 2006 by
its terms. However, prior to that time, Citigroup has agreed,
subject to certain terms and conditions, to (a) provide
loans in an amount sufficient to repurchase the Senior Notes,
and (b) in the event that lender approval was not obtained
to allow us to refinance the Senior Notes, to provide us with
replacement senior secured credit facilities.
Unless we are able to negotiate an extension to the Commitment
Letter or enter into a similar arrangement with Citigroup or
another lender, backstop financing will not be available after
October 2, 2006. As a result, if we are unable to timely
file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 or obtain additional waivers or
amendments to the agreements governing our outstanding
indebtedness, we would not have sufficient liquidity to repay
our debt if accelerated. Accordingly, we would be required to
negotiate an alternative restructuring or refinancing of our
debt.
We also intend to commence negotiations with our lenders, either
separately or in connection with the potential amendments
discussed above, in order to modify certain financial covenants
under our senior secured credit facility. In particular, we
expect it will be necessary to amend the financial covenant
related to our interest coverage and leverage ratios in order to
align this covenant with our current business outlook for the
remainder of the 2006 fiscal year.
Refinancing
and Amendment Risks
Under any of the refinancing alternatives discussed above, we
would incur significant costs and expenses, including
professional fees and other transaction costs. We also
anticipate that it will be necessary to pay significant waiver
and amendment fees in connection with the potential amendments
to our senior secured credit facility described above. In
addition, if we are successful in refinancing any or all of our
outstanding debt, we are likely to experience an increase in the
applicable interest rates over the life of any new debt, based
on prevailing market conditions and our perceived credit risk.
Any acceleration of the outstanding debt under the senior
secured credit facility would result in a cross-default under
our Senior Notes. Similarly, the occurrence of an event of
default under our Senior Notes would result in a cross-default
under the senior secured credit facility. Further, the
acceleration of outstanding debt under our senior secured credit
facility or our Senior Notes would result in defaults under
other contracts and agreements, including certain interest rate
and foreign currency derivative contracts, giving the
counterparty to such contracts the right to terminate. As of
June 30, 2006, we had
out-of-the-money
derivatives valued at a maximum of approximately
$86 million that the counterparties would have the ability
to terminate upon the occurrence of an event of default.
We believe it is probable that we will file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006 by October 22, 2006.
Accordingly, we continue to classify the senior secured credit
facility and our Senior Notes as long-term debt as of
March 31, 2006.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Derivative
Instruments
As of March 31, 2006, we have derivative financial
instruments, as defined by FASB Statement No. 133. See
Note 13 Financial Instruments and Commodity
Contracts to our condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements.
54
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments, including forward contracts, to
manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates,
interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such
instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may
be exposed to losses in the future if the counterparties to the
contracts fail to perform. We are satisfied that the risk of
such non-performance is remote, due to our monitoring of credit
exposures.
In the first quarter of 2006, we implemented hedge accounting
for $712 million of cross-currency interest rate swaps
(Euro 475 million, British Pound (GBP) 62 million and
Swiss Franc (CHF) 35 million) with respect to intercompany
loans to several European subsidiaries. The Euro and GBP swaps
have been designated as net investment hedges, while the CHF
cross-currency interest rate swap has been designated as a cash
flow hedge. We also implemented hedge accounting for
$69 million (158 million Brazilian real (BRL)) of our
forward foreign exchange contracts, which have been designated
as cash flow hedges.
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of March 31, 2006 were as follows (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Fair
|
|
|
|
Dates
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
2006 through 2011
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
2006 through 2008
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Cross-currency interest swaps
|
|
|
2006 through 2015
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
|
2006 through 2009
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
97
|
|
Aluminum call options
|
|
|
Matures in 2006
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Fixed price electricity contract
|
|
|
Matures in 2016
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
221
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness
The following table discloses our obligations under indirect
guarantees of indebtedness as of March 31, 2006 (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Liability
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Potential Future
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Held for
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Payment
|
|
Value
|
|
Collateral
|
|
Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2004, we entered into a loan and a corresponding
deposit-and-guarantee
agreement for up to $90 million. As of March 31, 2006
and December 31, 2005, this arrangement had a balance of
$80 million. We do not include the loan or deposit amounts
in our consolidated balance sheets as the agreements include a
legal right of setoff.
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
Other
Arrangements
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in
transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities
(SPEs), which would have been established for the purpose of
facilitating off-balance
55
sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited
purposes. As of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
we are not involved in any unconsolidated SPE transactions.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
We have future obligations under various contracts relating to
debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases,
long-term purchase obligations, and post-retirement benefit
plans. During the quarter ended March 31, 2006, there were
no significant changes to these obligations as reported in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
DIVIDENDS
The following table shows information regarding dividends
declared on our common shares during 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declaration Date
|
|
Record Date
|
|
Dividend/Share
|
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
February 23, 2006
|
|
March 8, 2006
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
March 23, 2006
|
April 27, 2006
|
|
May 20, 2006
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
June 20, 2006
|
August 28, 2006
|
|
September 7, 2006
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
September 25, 2006
|
Future dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors
and will depend on, among other things, our financial resources,
cash flows generated by our business, our cash requirements,
restrictions under the instruments governing our indebtedness,
being in compliance with the appropriate indentures and
covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness
that would allow us to legally pay dividends and other relevant
factors.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
During the quarter ended March 31, 2006, there were no
significant changes to our critical accounting policies and
estimates as reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. FASB Interpretation No. 48 clarifies the accounting
for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements by prescribing a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. FASB Interpretation No. 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and
transition. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of
the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48 on our financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
pronouncements will not have a material impact on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows or do not apply to
our operations.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET
DATA
This document contains forward-looking statements that are based
on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections
about the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and
assumptions made by our management. Such statements include, in
particular, statements about our plans, strategies and
prospects. Words such as expect,
anticipate, intend, plan,
believe, seek, estimate and
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to
identify such forward-looking statements. Examples of
forward-looking statements in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
include, but are not limited to, our expectations with respect
to the impact of metal price movements on our financial
performance, our metal price ceiling exposure, the effectiveness
of our hedging programs, our business outlook for 2006, our
efforts to return to a normal SEC reporting cycle by the end of
2006, our efforts to improve our financial reporting processes
and controls and our plans for refinancing our debt in the event
we are unable to timely file our
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter of 2006. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve assumptions
56
and risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict.
Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially
from what is expressed, implied or forecasted in such
forward-looking statements. We do not intend, and we disclaim
any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
This document also contains information concerning our markets
and products generally, which is forward-looking in nature and
is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which
these markets and product categories will develop. These
assumptions have been derived from information currently
available to us and to the third-party industry analysts quoted
herein. This information includes, but is not limited to product
shipments and share of production. Actual market results may
differ from those predicted. While we do not know what impact
any of these differences may have on our business, our results
of operations, financial condition, cash flow and the market
price of our securities may be materially adversely affected.
Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ
from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking
statements include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash;
|
|
|
|
relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of,
our customers and suppliers;
|
|
|
|
changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums
associated with such prices) or other materials and raw
materials we use;
|
|
|
|
the effect of metal price ceilings in certain of our sales
contracts;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully negotiate with our customers to
remove or limit metal price ceilings in our contracts;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our metal hedging activities, including our
internal used beverage can (UBC) and smelter hedges;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the
areas in which we maintain production facilities;
|
|
|
|
our ability to access financing for future capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
continuing obligations and other relationships resulting from
our spin-off from Alcan, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
changes in the relative values of various currencies;
|
|
|
|
factors affecting our operations, such as litigation, labor
relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment and other
events;
|
|
|
|
economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries
in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in
duties or tariffs;
|
|
|
|
competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as
well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic
and composite materials;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to improve and maintain effective internal control
over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures
in the future;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair market value of derivatives;
|
|
|
|
cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our
products as well as seasonality in certain of our
customers industries;
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting
taxes, environmental, health or safety compliance;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the
amounts we pay under our principal credit agreement and other
financing agreements;
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
the continued cooperation of debt holders and regulatory
authorities with respect to extensions of our 2006 SEC filing
deadlines, the payment of special interest due to our failure to
timely file our SEC reports and the payment of fees in
connection with any related waivers or amendments of covenants
in our principal debt agreements; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to refinance our outstanding debt, if necessary.
|
The above list of factors is not exhaustive. Some of these and
other factors are discussed in more detail under
Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing
business operations, including risks from changes in commodity
prices (aluminum, electricity and natural gas), foreign currency
exchange rates and interest rates that could impact our results
of operations and financial condition.
We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities and derivative
financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments
as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes.
Except where noted, the derivative contracts are
marked-to-market
and the related gains and losses are included in earnings in the
current accounting period. Typically, gains and losses on these
contracts are offset by the opposite effect of movements in the
underlying business transactions.
By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve
risk, including the credit risk of non-performance by
counterparties. All derivative contracts are executed with
counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our
maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized on our
balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions and the
relative costs of the instruments. The duration is always linked
to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection
between the two being regularly monitored.
Commodity
Price Risks
We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of
certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity and
natural gas.
Aluminum
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass
through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market
premiums and (ii) a margin over metal price
based on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and
the competitive market conditions for that product.
In situations where we offer customers fixed prices for future
delivery of our products, we may enter into derivative
instruments for the metal inputs in order to protect the profit
on the conversion of the product. Consequently, the gain or loss
resulting from movements in the price of aluminum on these
contracts would generally be offset by an equal and opposite
impact on the net sales and purchases being hedged.
In addition, sales contracts representing approximately 20% of
our net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 provide
for a ceiling over which metal prices cannot contractually be
passed through to certain customers, unless adjusted. As a
result, we are unable to pass through the complete increase in
metal prices for sales under these contracts and this negatively
impacts our margins when the metal price is above the ceiling
price.
58
We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal
prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to
metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our
internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and
mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from
our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans
(UBCs). Both of these strategies have historically provided a
benefit as these sources of metal are typically less expensive
than purchasing aluminum from third party suppliers. These two
strategies are referred to as our internal hedges. While we
believe that our primary aluminum production continues to
provide the expected benefits during this sustained period of
high LME prices, the recycling operations are providing less
internal hedge benefit than expected. LME metal prices and other
market issues have resulted in higher than expected prices of
UBCs, thus compressing the internal hedge benefit we receive
from this strategy.
Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy
to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated
with the metal price ceilings is to purchase call options on
projected aluminum volume requirements above our assumed
internal hedge position. The purchase of derivative instruments
can be very costly, therefore we balance this cost with the
benefits obtained by the particular instrument.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair market values of these derivative instruments as of
March 31, 2006, given a 10% change in the three-month LME
price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Rate/Price
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Aluminum Call Options
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
38.9
|
|
Aluminum Forward Contracts
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
Electricity
and Natural Gas
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. In 2005, natural gas and
electricity represented approximately 70% of our energy
consumption by cost. We also use fuel oil and transport fuel.
The majority of energy usage occurs at our casting centers, at
our smelters in South America and during the hot rolling of
aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities require relatively less
energy. We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which
subjects us to market pricing fluctuations. Recent natural gas
pricing changes in the United States have increased our energy
costs. We seek to stabilize our future exposure to natural gas
prices through the use of forward purchase contracts. Natural
gas prices in Europe, Asia and South America have historically
been more stable than in the United States.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs. Novelis South
America has its own hydroelectric facilities that meet
approximately 25% of its total electricity requirements for
smelting operations. We seek to stabilize our future exposure to
natural gas prices through the use of forward purchase contracts.
Rising energy costs worldwide, due to the volatility of supply
and international geopolitical events, expose us to reduced
operating profits as changes cannot immediately be recovered
under existing contracts and sales agreements, and may only be
mitigated in future periods under future pricing arrangements.
We have an existing long-term supply contract for certain
electricity costs at fixed rates and have hedged our natural gas
needs through forward contracts.
59
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair market values of these derivative instruments as of
March 31, 2006, given a 10% change in spot prices for
energy contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Rate/Price
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
13.5
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risks
Exchange rate movements, particularly involving the euro, the
Canadian dollar, the Brazilian real and the Korean won against
the U.S. dollar, have an impact on our operating results.
In Europe, where we have predominantly local currency selling
prices and operating costs, we benefit as the euro strengthens
but are adversely affected as the euro weakens. In Korea, where
we have local currency selling prices for local sales and
U.S. dollar denominated selling prices for exports, we
benefit slightly as the won weakens but are adversely affected
as the won strengthens, due to a slightly higher percentage of
exports compared to local sales. In Canada and Brazil, where we
have predominantly U.S. dollar selling prices and local currency
operating costs, we benefit as the local currencies weaken but
are adversely affected as the local currencies strengthen.
Foreign currency contracts may be used to hedge the economic
exposures at our foreign operations.
Any negative impact of currency movements on the currency
contracts that we have entered into to hedge foreign currency
commitments to purchase or sell goods and services would be
offset by an equal and opposite favorable exchange impact on the
commitments being hedged. For a discussion of accounting
policies and other information relating to currency contracts,
see Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies to our consolidated and combined financial
statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 and
Note 13 Financial Instruments and Commodity
Contracts to our condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures
within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the
majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either
forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in
non-functional currencies. Our most significant
non-U.S. dollar
functional currency operating segments are Novelis Europe and
Novelis Asia, which have the Euro and the Korean won as their
functional currencies, respectively. Novelis South America is
U.S. dollar functional with Brazilian real transactional
exposure.
We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign
operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Shareholders
equity section of our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Net
sales and expenses in our foreign operations foreign
currencies are translated into varying amounts of
U.S. dollars depending upon whether the U.S. dollar
weakens or strengthens against other currencies. Therefore,
changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively
affect our net sales and expenses from foreign operations as
expressed in U.S. dollars.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair market values of these derivative instruments as of
March 31, 2006, given a 10% change in rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Currency measured against the
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
40.9
|
|
Korean won
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
Brazilian real
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
60
Loans and investments in European operations have been hedged by
cross-currency interest rate swaps (Euro 475 million,
GBP 62 million, CHF 35 million). During the first
quarter of 2006, the CHF swap was designated as a cash flow
hedge and the remaining swaps were designated as net investment
hedges. Loans from European operations have been hedged by
cross-currency principal-only swaps (Euro 89 million). The
principal-only swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges.
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair market values of these derivative instruments as of
March 31, 2006, given a 10% change in rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Currency measured against the
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
83.9
|
|
Interest
Rate Risks
We are subject to interest rate risk related to our floating
rate debt. For every 12.5 basis point increase in the
interest rates on the $655 million of variable rate Term
Loan B debt that has not been swapped into fixed interest
rates as of March 31, 2006, our annual net income would be
reduced by $0.5 million.
As of March 31, 2006, approximately 74% of our debt
obligations were at fixed rates. Due to the nature of fixed-rate
debt, there would be no significant impact on our interest
expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase or decrease in
market rates of interest.
From time to time, we have used interest rate swaps to manage
our debt cost. We have entered into interest rate swaps to fix
the interest rate on $200 million of our floating rate Term
Loan B facility, which is part of our senior secured
facility. In Korea, we entered into interest rate swaps to fix
the interest rate on various floating rate debt. See
Note 8 Long-Term Debt to our condensed
consolidated and combined financial statements in this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for further information.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair market values of these derivative instruments as of
March 31, 2006, given a 10% change in rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Interest Rate Swap
contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
As a result of the restatement of our unaudited condensed
consolidated and combined financial statements for the quarters
ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005, we delayed the
filing of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 and our quarterly
reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30,
2006. The delay in filing these financial statements is a direct
result of the time needed to complete our recent financial
review and restatement, which we concluded on May 16, 2006.
In connection with the identification of errors requiring us to
restate our unaudited condensed consolidated and combined
financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2005
and June 30, 2005, the Audit Committee engaged special
legal counsel and accounting advisors to assist management in
conducting a full review of matters relating to reserves and
contingencies as well as adjustments made to arrive at our
opening balance sheet entries as of January 6, 2005. This
review identified additional accounting errors in our unaudited
condensed consolidated and combined financial statements. The
review uncovered no evidence of fraud, intentional misconduct or
concealment on the part of us, our officers or employees.
61
Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures
In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2006, members of management,
at the direction (and with the participation) of our
interim chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in
Rule 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange
Act)), as of March 31, 2006 and concluded that they were
not effective as a result of the material weaknesses described
below that were identified in connection with the restatement of
our unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial
statements for the interim periods ended March 31, 2005 and
June 30, 2005. Disclosure controls and procedures are
controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that
the information required to be disclosed in reports filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act, is (1) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms and
(2) accumulated and communicated to management, including
the interim chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Material
weaknesses
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of
control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected.
We were not required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Section 404) and related SEC rules and
regulations to perform an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005. We are, however, required to perform
such an evaluation for the year ending December 31, 2006
and such evaluation will be based on the criteria set forth in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). We cannot assure you that the material weaknesses
described below will be fully remediated prior to the conclusion
of this evaluation, or that we will not uncover additional
material weaknesses as of December 31, 2006.
While we were not required to conduct a Section 404
evaluation, as of December 31, 2005, we identified the
following material weaknesses, which continued to exist as of
March 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of sufficient resources in our accounting and finance
organization. We lacked a sufficient complement
of personnel with a level of financial reporting expertise
commensurate with our financial reporting requirements, which
resulted in our not maintaining effective controls over the
financial statement close and reporting process. Specifically,
as a result of our separation from Alcan, which involved a
series of complex transactions, including corporate
restructurings and refinancing activities, we lacked sufficient
resources to properly perform the quarterly and annual financial
statement close processes, including the review of certain
account reconciliations and financial statement preparation and
disclosures. Further, we did not maintain an effective internal
audit function. Following our separation from Alcan, there was a
lack of leadership of the internal audit function and lack of
independence of internal audit personnel from the finance and
accounting function due to the lines of reporting, which
impacted the effectiveness of the monitoring of our internal
control over financial reporting. This control deficiency
contributed to the material weaknesses discussed below.
|
|
|
|
Inadequate monitoring of non-routine and non-systematic
transactions. We did not have effective controls
in place to monitor and accurately record non-routine and
non-systematic transactions. Specifically, the accounting for
the spin-related capital and debt transactions required to
form Novelis was not adequately monitored to ensure that
these transactions were appropriately accounted for in
accordance with GAAP. This control deficiency primarily affected
Additional paid-in capital, Currency translation adjustment and
Provision for taxes on income.
|
|
|
|
Accounting for accrued expenses. We did not
maintain effective controls over the completeness and accuracy
of certain of our accrued liabilities and related expense
accounts, in particular, the ongoing monitoring of developments
affecting our accrued liabilities. Specifically, lines of
communication between our internal legal department and external
counsel in Brazil were inadequate to timely identify and
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
accurately report new developments in legal proceedings to
ensure they were accounted for in accordance with GAAP. In
addition, we did not maintain effective controls to ensure that
liabilities related to Brazilian labor claims were accurately
presented and appropriately reviewed to ensure recognition in
the proper period in accordance with GAAP. These matters
primarily affected Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities, Other long-term liabilities, Cost of goods sold and
Other income net.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting for Income Taxes. We did not
maintain effective controls over the completeness, accuracy,
presentation and disclosure of our accounting for income taxes,
including the determination of income tax expense, income taxes
payable and deferred income tax assets and liabilities.
Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls to
(1) timely record additional income taxes related to the
deemed disposal of goodwill, (2) account for income taxes
on the currency translations related to intercompany loans to
our European subsidiaries, (3) ensure that proper
allocation of currency gains/losses between capital and
operating were used in calculating the quarterly effective tax
rate, and (4) account for certain Brazilian tax loss
carryforwards. This control deficiency affected Provision for
taxes on income, Accrued income taxes, Deferred income tax
liabilities and Accumulated other comprehensive loss.
|
|
|
|
Accounting for derivative transactions. We did
not maintain effective controls over the evaluation,
documentation and accounting for derivative transactions,
including transactions that we attempted to qualify for hedge
accounting, in compliance with GAAP, which affected the
accounting for Fair value of derivative contracts, Cost of goods
sold, Other income net, and Other comprehensive loss.
|
The above control deficiencies resulted in the need for the
restatement of our unaudited condensed consolidated and combined
financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2005
and June 30, 2005, audit adjustments to the quarter ended
September 30, 2005, the year ended December 31, 2005,
and the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the delay of the
filing of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 and this quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q.
In addition, we have delayed the filing of our quarterly report
on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2006. Furthermore, these
control deficiencies could result in a misstatement in the
aforementioned account balances or disclosures that would result
in a material misstatement to our annual or interim financial
statements that would not be prevented or detected.
Notwithstanding the above material weaknesses, management has
concluded that our unaudited condensed consolidated and combined
financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated and combined
financial statements included in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
fairly present in all material respects our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented
in accordance with GAAP.
Remediation
efforts
Management, with Audit Committee oversight, has begun
implementing the following actions to remediate the material
weaknesses and deficiencies in disclosure controls and
procedures described above:
1. Efforts to strengthen accounting and finance
department through additional professional
staff. We have hired a number of additional
professional staff over the past several months with the skills
and experience needed for a global public company of our size
and complexity, including an individual with expertise in and
responsibility for derivative accounting. We will continue to
seek to strengthen our accounting and finance department and
strive to appropriately balance the allocation of full-time
staff and consultants. As previously announced, in the second
quarter of 2006, we hired Rick Dobson as our new senior vice
president and chief financial officer and Robert M. Patterson as
our new vice president, controller and chief accounting officer.
The development of adequate corporate level accounting and
finance oversight is still ongoing. We are still recruiting
accounting and finance personnel and do not yet have permanent
resources in place sufficient to close our books without
significant reliance on third-party contractors.
2. Hiring of chief internal auditor. In
January 2006, a new chief internal auditor was hired. The new
chief internal auditor reports to our Audit Committee and has
been charged with the responsibility of improving the overall
effectiveness of the internal audit function. In addition, the
new chief internal
63
auditor has been charged with strengthening the internal audit
department and overseeing our Section 404 evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, which will include
evaluating and recommending improvements in the existing system
of internal control at both the corporate and business group
level and establishing a mechanism to monitor the effectiveness
of internal controls on an ongoing basis.
3. Use of outside consultants and
advisors. While we ultimately intend to reduce
our reliance on outside consultants, for the near term we have
engaged additional outside consultants and advisors to assist
management in oversight and preparation of our financial
statements, periodic reports filed with the SEC and related
matters. As we strengthen our accounting and finance department,
we intend to transition more of these functions to full-time
staff.
4. Increased communication internally and with outside
advisors. We have increased communication by and
among senior management, external advisors and other third
parties relevant to the disclosure process. Specifically, our
interim chief executive officer will regularly meet with his
management team to review operational developments and regularly
receive written departmental reports from his executive team.
Further, the board of directors receives timely and regular
updates on issues of importance.
5. Enhanced efforts to identify non-routine
transactions. We have initiated bi-weekly
meetings with regional finance leaders to identify non-routine
transactions and their related accounting treatment at an early
stage. Additionally, each quarter our controller distributes a
list of non-routine transactions to members of management for
their review and verification.
6. Disclosure controls and procedures
improvements. With respect to the preparation of
periodic reports to be filed with the SEC, we have instituted
formal meetings of key personnel involved in the process and
developed detailed checklists and timetables with appropriate
responsibilities and structural processes. In addition, we are
utilizing a system of uniform document management (e.g.,
numbering, dating, and red-lining drafts) and improved
coordination of the drafting process with respect to our
earnings releases and periodic reports.
7. Corporate level review. Several
corporate level accounting and finance review practices have
been implemented to improve oversight into regional accounting
issues, including quarterly balance sheet and income statement
analytical reviews, quarterly reviews of legal matters, income
taxes, derivatives, currency translation adjustments, and roll
forward analyses of key balance sheet and income statement
accounts and financial statement disclosures. We have also
implemented enhanced reporting procedures within our legal,
accounting and finance departments to improve the accuracy,
completeness and timeliness of reporting of legal matters,
non-routine transactions and control deficiencies.
Management will consider the design and operating effectiveness
of these actions and will make additional changes it determines
appropriate.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Changes
in internal control over financial reporting and related
matters
As announced on August 29, 2006, our board of directors
replaced Brian Sturgell, our president and chief executive
officer. Immediately thereafter, William T. Monahan, the
chairman of our board of directors, assumed the role of interim
chief executive officer, and will continue to serve as interim
chief executive officer until a successor has been selected and
is in place. Our executive team will now report directly to
Mr. Monahan. In light of Mr. Monahans interim
chief executive officer responsibilities, the board of directors
has formed a temporary office of the chairman that is comprised
of Mr. Monahan and directors Clarence J. Chandran and
Edward A. Blechschmidt. Mr. Sturgell will be available to advise
the office of the chairman until a successor has been selected
and is in place.
64
As announced on June 28, 2006, we appointed Rick Dobson as
our new senior vice president and chief financial officer. Prior
to joining our company, Mr. Dobson was the chief financial
officer of Aquila, Inc., a Kansas City, Missouri based operator
of electricity and natural gas distribution utilities, since
2002.
On March 20, 2006, we announced that Robert M. Patterson
joined Novelis as a senior finance professional;
Mr. Patterson later assumed the responsibilities of vice
president, controller and chief accounting officer in the second
quarter of 2006 once our previous controller completed her work
for us.
While we expect a smooth transition in the leadership of our
accounting and finance organization, we cannot assure you that
the departure of our previous president and chief executive
officer, previous chief financial officer and previous
controller will not lead to one or more material changes in our
internal control over financial reporting during a future period.
Other than the remedial measures described above that impacted
our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended March 31, 2006, there were no other changes in our
internal control over financial reporting that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended March 31, 2006.
65
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Reynolds Boat Case. As previously disclosed,
we and Alcan Inc. were defendants in a case in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Washington, in
Tacoma, Washington, case number C04-0175RJB. Plaintiffs were
Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire
Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a
jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under warranty theories,
based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and Alcan sold
certain aluminum products that were ultimately used for marine
applications and were unsuitable for such applications. The jury
reached a verdict on May 22, 2006 against us and Alcan for
approximately $60 million, and the court later awarded
Reynolds and Alcoa approximately $16 million in prejudgment
interest and court costs.
The case was settled during July 2006 as among us, Alcan,
Reynolds, Alcoa and their insurers for $71 million. We
contributed approximately $1 million toward the settlement,
and the remaining $70 million was funded by our insurers.
Although the settlement was substantially funded by our
insurance carriers, certain of them have reserved the right to
request a refund from us, after reviewing details of the
plaintiffs damages to determine if they include costs of a
nature not covered under the insurance contracts. Of the
$70 million funded, $39 million is in dispute with,
and under further review by, certain of our insurance carriers,
who have six months to complete their review. We have agreed to
post a letter of credit in the amount of approximately
$10 million in favor of one of those insurance carriers,
while we resolve the questions, if any, about the extent of
coverage of the costs included in the settlement.
As of December 31, 2005, we recognized a liability included
in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities of
$71 million, the full amount of the settlement, with a
corresponding charge against earnings. We also recognized an
insurance receivable included in Prepaid expenses and other
current assets of $31 million with a corresponding
increase to earnings. Although $70 million of the
settlement was funded by our insurers, we have only recognized
an insurance receivable to the extent that coverage is not in
dispute. We recognized the net loss of $40 million during
the fourth quarter of 2005.
As of March 31, 2006, no changes were made to the
receivable or liabilities balances that were established as of
December 31, 2005, and there were no additional charges or
recoveries included in our results of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2006.
While the ultimate resolution of the nature and extent of any
costs not covered under our insurance contracts cannot be
determined with certainty or reasonably estimated at this time,
if there is an adverse outcome with respect to insurance
coverage, and we are required to reimburse our insurers, it
could have a material impact on cash flows in the period of
resolution. Alternatively, the ultimate resolution could be
favorable such that insurance coverage is in excess of what we
have recognized to date. This would result in our recording a
non-cash gain in the period of resolution, and this non-cash
gain could have a material impact on our results of operations
during the period in which such a determination is made.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles
of Incorporation of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-law No. 1 of Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on November 17, 2004
(File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Shareholder Rights Agreement
between Novelis and CIBC Mellon Trust Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File No.
001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Specimen Certificate of Novelis
Inc. Common Shares (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on
December 27, 2004 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Indenture, relating to the Notes,
dated as of February 3, 2005, between the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of
New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of February 3, 2005, among the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto, Citigroup
Global Markets Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
and UBS Securities LLC, as Representatives of the Initial
Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Note for
71/4% Senior
Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the
Form S-4
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File
No. 331-127139))
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Second Waiver, dated as of
February 9, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on February 14, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Brian Sturgell dated March 31, 2005, as
amended and restated as of March 14, 2006 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File No.
001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Martha Brooks dated March 31, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Chris Bark-Jones dated March 31, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Jack Morrison dated March 31,
2005(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Pierre Arseneault dated March 31, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Geoff Batt dated March 31, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance
Awards Plan, as amended and restated as of March 14, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Description of Retention Payment
for Geoff Batt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8
to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Employment Agreement of Arnaud de
Weert (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on April 3, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Agreement Concerning Transition
from Employment between Novelis and Geoff Batt dated
March 31, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis on April 6, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Third Waiver, dated as of
April 12, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on April 18, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Fourth Waiver, dated as of
May 10, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on May 16, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Transition Agreement, dated
June 15, 2006, by and between Jo-Ann Longworth and Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement,
dated June 15, 2006, by and between Jo-Ann Longworth and
Novelis Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46
to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Transition Agreement, dated
June 27, 2006, by and between Geoff Batt and Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement,
dated June 27, 2006, by and between Geoff Batt and Novelis
Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Offer Letter, dated
February 24, 2006, by and between Robert M. Patterson and
Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to
the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Offer Letter, dated June 20,
2006, by and between Rick Dobson and Novelis Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Addendum to Rick Dobson Offer
Letter, dated June 20, 2006, by and between Rick Dobson and
Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to
the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Fifth Waiver, dated as of
August 11, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 17, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
68
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NOVELIS INC.
Rick Dobson
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert
M. Patterson
|
Robert M. Patterson
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: September 15, 2006
69
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles
of Incorporation of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-law No. 1 of Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on November 17, 2004
(File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Shareholder Rights Agreement
between Novelis and CIBC Mellon Trust Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File No.
001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Specimen Certificate of Novelis
Inc. Common Shares (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10 filed by Novelis Inc. on
December 27, 2004 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Indenture, relating to the Notes,
dated as of February 3, 2005, between the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of
New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of February 3, 2005, among the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto, Citigroup
Global Markets Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
and UBS Securities LLC, as Representatives of the Initial
Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Note for
71/4% Senior
Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the
Form S-4
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File
No. 331-127139))
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Second Waiver, dated as of
February 9, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on February 14, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Brian Sturgell dated March 31, 2005, as
amended and restated as of March 14, 2006 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File No.
001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Martha Brooks dated March 31, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Chris Bark-Jones dated March 31, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Jack Morrison dated March 31,
2005(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Pierre Arseneault dated March 31, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award
Notification for Geoff Batt dated March 31, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance
Awards Plan, as amended and restated as of March 14, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Description of Retention Payment
for Geoff Batt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8
to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Employment Agreement of Arnaud de
Weert (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on April 3, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Agreement Concerning Transition
from Employment between Novelis and Geoff Batt dated
March 31, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis on April 6, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Third Waiver, dated as of
April 12, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on April 18, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Fourth Waiver, dated as of
May 10, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on May 16, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Transition Agreement, dated
June 15, 2006, by and between Jo-Ann Longworth and Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement,
dated June 15, 2006, by and between Jo-Ann Longworth and
Novelis Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46
to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Transition Agreement, dated
June 27, 2006, by and between Geoff Batt and Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement,
dated June 27, 2006, by and between Geoff Batt and Novelis
Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Offer Letter, dated
February 24, 2006, by and between Robert M. Patterson and
Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to
the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Offer Letter, dated June 20,
2006, by and between Rick Dobson and Novelis Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Addendum to Rick Dobson Offer
Letter, dated June 20, 2006, by and between Rick Dobson and
Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to
the
Form 10-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 25, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Fifth Waiver, dated as of
August 11, 2006, under the Credit Agreement dated
January 7, 2005 among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis AG, Citigroup
North America, Inc. and the issuers and lenders a party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on August 17, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
|
71