UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal
year ended March 31,
2010
|
|
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission file number
001-32312
Novelis Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Canada
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
98-0442987
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
3399 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 1500,
Atlanta, GA
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
30326
(Zip
Code)
|
(404) 814-4200
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act of
1933. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 27, 2010, the registrant had 77,459,658 common
shares outstanding. All of the Registrants outstanding
shares were held indirectly by Hindalco Industries Ltd., the
Registrants parent company.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET
DATA
This document contains forward-looking statements that are based
on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections
about the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and
assumptions made by our management. Such statements include, in
particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects
under the headings Item 1. Business,
Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations. Words such as
expect, anticipate, intend,
plan, believe, seek,
estimate and variations of such words and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. Examples of forward-looking statements in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
include, but are not limited to, our expectations with respect
to the impact of metal price movements on our financial
performance; the effectiveness of our hedging programs and
controls; and our future borrowing availability. These
statements are based on beliefs and assumptions of Novelis
management, which in turn are based on currently available
information. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve assumptions and risks and uncertainties
that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or
forecasted in such forward-looking statements. We do not intend,
and we disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
This document also contains information concerning our markets
and products generally, which is forward-looking in nature and
is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which
these markets and product categories will develop. These
assumptions have been derived from information currently
available to us and to the third party industry analysts quoted
herein. This information includes, but is not limited to,
product shipments and share of production. Actual market results
may differ from those predicted. We do not know what impact any
of these differences may have on our business, our results of
operations, financial condition, and cash flow. Factors that
could cause actual results or outcomes to differ from the
results expressed or implied by forward-looking statements
include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash;
|
|
|
|
changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums
associated with such prices) or other materials and raw
materials we use;
|
|
|
|
the capacity and effectiveness of our metal hedging activities;
|
|
|
|
relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of,
our customers, suppliers and other stakeholders;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the
areas in which we maintain production facilities;
|
|
|
|
our ability to access financing to fund current operations and
for future capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates under our floating rate debt;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the relative values of various currencies and the
effectiveness of our currency hedging activities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
factors affecting our operations, such as litigation,
environmental remediation and
clean-up
costs, labor relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment
and other events;
|
|
|
|
economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries
in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in
duties or tariffs;
|
|
|
|
competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as
well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic
and composite materials;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions, including deterioration
in the global economy;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our
products as well as seasonality in certain of our
customers industries;
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting
taxes and tax rates, climate change, environmental, health or
safety compliance;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the
amounts we pay under our principal credit agreement and other
financing agreements; and
|
|
|
|
the effect of taxes and changes in tax rates.
|
The above list of factors is not exhaustive. These and other
factors are discussed in more detail under Item 1A.
Risk Factors and Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
In this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
unless otherwise specified, the terms we,
our, us, Company,
Novelis and Novelis Group refer to
Novelis Inc., a company incorporated in Canada under the
Canadian Business Corporations Act (CBCA) and its subsidiaries.
References herein to Hindalco refer to Hindalco
Industries Limited. In October 2007, Rio Tinto Group purchased
all of the outstanding shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein
to Alcan refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
Exchange
Rate Data
We prepare our financial statements in United States (U.S.)
dollars. As of December 31, 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York ceased the practice of maintaining and publishing
historical exchange rates. From December 31, 2008 onward,
we used the CitiFX Benchmark, published by Citibank, for
exchange rate information published as of 16:00 Greenwich Mean
Time (GMT) (11:00 A.M. Eastern Standard Time).
The following table sets forth exchange rate information
expressed in terms of Canadian dollars per U.S. dollar at
the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in
foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York. As noted above, the years
ended March 31, 2009 and 2010 include exchange data from
Citibank as of 16:00 GMT. The rates set forth below may differ
from the actual rates used in our accounting processes and in
the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
At Period End
|
|
Average Rate(A)
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1.1656
|
|
|
|
1.2083
|
|
|
|
1.2703
|
|
|
|
1.1507
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1.1652
|
|
|
|
1.1310
|
|
|
|
1.1726
|
|
|
|
1.0955
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007(B)
|
|
|
1.1530
|
|
|
|
1.1674
|
|
|
|
1.1852
|
|
|
|
1.1530
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007(B)
|
|
|
1.0976
|
|
|
|
1.1022
|
|
|
|
1.1583
|
|
|
|
1.0976
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008(B)
|
|
|
1.0275
|
|
|
|
1.0180
|
|
|
|
1.1028
|
|
|
|
0.9168
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
1.2579
|
|
|
|
1.1247
|
|
|
|
1.2694
|
|
|
|
0.9938
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
1.0144
|
|
|
|
1.0848
|
|
|
|
1.1881
|
|
|
|
1.0144
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The average of the 16:00 GMT buying rates on the last day of
each month during the period. |
|
(B) |
|
See Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies (Acquisition of Novelis Common
Stock and Predecessor and Successor Reporting) to our
accompanying audited consolidated financial statements. |
All dollar figures herein are in U.S. dollars unless
otherwise indicated.
Commonly
Referenced Data
As used in this Annual Report, aluminum rolled products
shipments or shipments refers to shipments to
third parties of aluminum rolled products. References to
total shipments include aluminum rolled products as
well as certain other non-rolled product shipments, primarily
ingot, scrap and primary remelt. The term aluminum rolled
products is synonymous with the terms flat rolled
products and FRP commonly used by
manufacturers and third party analysts in our industry. All
tonnages are stated in metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric
tonnes.
3
PART I
Overview
We are the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume in fiscal 2010, with total
shipments during that period of approximately 2,854 kt. We are
the only company of our size and scope focused solely on
aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local supply of
technologically sophisticated aluminum products in all of these
geographic regions. We are also the global leader in the
recycling of used aluminum beverage cans. We had net sales of
approximately $8.7 billion for the year ended
March 31, 2010.
Our
History
Organization
and Description of Business
Novelis Inc. was formed in Canada on September 21, 2004. We
produce aluminum sheet and light gauge products for end-use
markets, including beverage and food cans, construction and
industrial, foil products and transportation markets. As of
March 31, 2010, we had operations in 11 countries on four
continents: North America, Europe, Asia and South America,
through 31 operating plants, six research facilities and two
market-focused innovation centers. In addition to aluminum
rolling and recycling, our South American businesses include
bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary aluminum smelting and
power generation facilities that are integrated with our rolling
plants in Brazil.
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
spin-off occurred on January 6, 2005, following approval by
Alcans board of directors and shareholders, and legal and
regulatory approvals. Alcan shareholders received one Novelis
common share for every five Alcan common shares held.
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock and Predecessor and Successor
Reporting
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
Our acquisition by Hindalco was recorded in accordance with
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 103, Push Down Basis
of Accounting Required in Certain Limited Circumstances
(SAB 103). In the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets, the consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
connection with the acquisition have been pushed
down to us and have been allocated to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 141, Business
Combinations (FASB 141), the applicable accounting standard
at the Arrangement date. Due to the impact of push down
accounting, the Companys consolidated financial statements
and certain notes separate the Companys presentation into
two distinct periods to indicate the application of two
different bases of accounting between the periods presented:
(1) the periods up to, and including, the May 15, 2007
acquisition date (labeled Predecessor) and
(2) the periods after that date (labeled
Successor). The accompanying consolidated financial
statements include a black line division which indicates that
the Predecessor and Successor reporting entities shown are not
comparable.
Our
Industry
The aluminum rolled products market represents the global supply
of and demand for aluminum sheet, plate and foil produced either
from sheet ingot or continuously cast roll-stock in rolling
mills operated by independent aluminum rolled products producers
and integrated aluminum companies alike.
4
Aluminum rolled products are semi-finished aluminum products
that constitute the raw material for the manufacture of finished
goods ranging from automotive body panels to household foil.
There are two major types of manufacturing processes for
aluminum rolled products differing mainly in the process used to
achieve the initial stage of processing:
|
|
|
|
|
hot mills that require sheet ingot, a
rectangular slab of aluminum, as starter material; and
|
|
|
|
continuous casting mills that can convert
molten metal directly into semi-finished sheet.
|
Both processes require subsequent rolling, which we call cold
rolling, and finishing steps such as annealing, coating,
leveling or slitting to achieve the desired thicknesses and
metal properties. Most customers receive shipments in the form
of aluminum coil, a large roll of metal, which can be fed into
their fabrication processes.
There are two sources of input material: (1) primary
aluminum, such as molten metal, re-melt ingot and sheet ingot;
and (2) recycled aluminum, such as recyclable material from
fabrication processes, which we refer to as recycled process
material, used beverage cans (UBCs) and other post-consumer
aluminum.
Primary aluminum and sheet ingot can generally be purchased at
prices set on the LME, plus a premium that varies by geographic
region of delivery, alloying material, form (ingot or molten
metal) and purity.
Recycled aluminum is also an important source of input material.
Aluminum is infinitely recyclable and recycling it requires only
approximately 5% of the energy needed to produce primary
aluminum. As a result, in regions where aluminum is widely used,
manufacturers and customers are active in setting up collection
processes in which UBCs and other recyclable aluminum are
collected for re-melting at purpose-built plants. Manufacturers
may also enter into agreements with customers who return
recycled process material and pay to have it re-melted and
rolled into the same product again.
There has been a long-term industry trend towards lighter gauge
(thinner) rolled products, which we refer to as
downgauging, where customers request products with
similar properties using less metal in order to reduce costs and
weight. For example, aluminum rolled products producers and can
fabricators have continuously developed thinner walled cans with
similar strength as previous generation containers, resulting in
a lower cost per unit. As a result of this trend, aluminum
tonnage across the spectrum of aluminum rolled products, and
particularly for the beverage and food cans end-use market, has
declined on a per unit basis, but actual rolling machine hours
per unit have increased. Because the industry has historically
tracked growth based on aluminum tonnage shipped, we believe the
downgauging trend may contribute to an understatement of the
actual growth of revenue attributable to rolling in some end-use
markets. Downgauging and changes in can design help to reduce
total costs on a per can basis and contribute to making aluminum
more competitive with substitute materials.
The industry continues to leverage new technology to develop
aluminum alloys and products that support broader or new
commercial application. Conventional single-alloy products
require customers to choose an alloy based either on the
required core properties such as strength, or the desired
surface characteristics such as extreme corrosion-resistance.
The industry typically uses a clad process to achieve the
combined characteristics of two or three alloys
where sheets of metal are attached to an aluminum ingot and then
rolled. Typically the aluminum ingot provides the strength and
formability while the brazing provides other properties such as
corrosion resistance and finish. Novelis has recently developed
the Novelis
Fusiontm
process which helps achieve the optimal combination of desired
core and surface properties by simultaneously casting multiple
alloy layers into a single aluminum rolling ingot, improving the
potential to customize.
End-use
Markets
Aluminum rolled products companies produce and sell a wide range
of aluminum rolled products, which can be grouped into four
end-use markets based upon similarities in end-use:
(1) beverage and food cans; (2) construction and
industrial; (3) foil products and (4) transportation.
Within each end-use market, aluminum rolled products are
manufactured with a variety of alloy mixtures; a range of
tempers (hardness), gauges (thickness) and widths; and various
coatings and finishes. Large customers typically have customized
needs resulting in the development of close relationships with
their supplying mills and close technical development
relationships.
5
Beverage and Food Cans. Beverage cans are the
single largest aluminum rolled products application, accounting
for approximately 26% of total worldwide shipments in the
calendar year ended December 31, 2009, according to market
data from Commodity Research Unit International Limited (CRU),
an independent business analysis and consultancy group focused
on the mining, metals, power, cables, fertilizer and chemical
sectors. Beverage and food cans is also our largest end-use
market, making up 58% and 56% of total flat rolled product
shipments for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The recyclability of aluminum cans enables them to
be used, collected, melted and returned to the original product
form an unlimited number of times, unlike steel, paper or PET
plastic, which deteriorate with every iteration of recycling.
Aluminum beverage cans also offer advantages in fabricating
efficiency and product shelf life. Fabricators are able to
produce and fill beverage cans at very high speeds, and
non-porous aluminum cans provide longer shelf life than PET
plastic containers. Aluminum cans are light, stackable and use
space efficiently, making them convenient and cost efficient to
ship.
Beverage can sheet is sold in coil form for the production of
can bodies, ends and tabs. The material can be ordered as
rolled, degreased, pre-lubricated, pre-treated
and/or
lacquered. Typically, can makers define their own specifications
for material to be delivered in terms of alloy, gauge, width and
surface finish.
Other applications in this end-use market include food cans and
screw caps for the beverage industry.
Construction and Industrial. Construction is
the largest application within this end-use market. Aluminum
rolled products developed for the construction industry are
often decorative and non-flammable, offer insulating properties,
are durable and corrosion resistant, and have a high
strength-to-weight
ratio. Aluminum siding, gutters, and downspouts comprise a
significant amount of construction volume. Other applications
include doors, windows, awnings, canopies, facades, roofing and
ceilings.
Aluminums ability to conduct electricity and heat and to
offer corrosion resistance makes it useful in a wide variety of
electronic and industrial applications. Industrial applications
include electronics and communications equipment, process and
electrical machinery and lighting fixtures. Uses of aluminum
rolled products in consumer durables include microwaves, coffee
makers, flat screen televisions, air conditioners, pleasure
boats and cooking utensils.
Another industrial application is lithographic sheet. Print
shops, printing houses and publishing groups use lithographic
sheet to print books, magazines, newspapers and promotional
literature. In order to meet the strict quality requirements of
the end-users, lithographic sheet must meet demanding
metallurgical, surface and flatness specifications.
Foil Products. Aluminum, because of its
relatively light weight, recyclability and formability, has a
wide variety of uses in packaging. Converter foil is very thin
aluminum foil, plain or printed, that is typically laminated to
plastic or paper to form an internal seal for a variety of
packaging applications, including juice boxes, pharmaceuticals,
food pouches, cigarette packaging and lid stock. Customers order
coils of converter foil in a range of thicknesses from 6 microns
to 60 microns.
Household foil includes home and institutional aluminum foil
wrap sold as a branded or generic product. Known in the industry
as packaging foil, it is manufactured in thicknesses ranging
from 11 microns to 23 microns. Container foil is used to
produce semi-rigid containers such as pie plates and take-out
food trays and is usually ordered in a range of thicknesses
ranging from 60 microns to 200 microns.
Transportation. Heat exchangers, such as
radiators and air conditioners, are an important application for
aluminum rolled products in the truck and automobile categories
of the transportation end-use market. Original equipment
manufacturers also use aluminum sheet with specially treated
surfaces and other specific properties for interior and exterior
applications. Newly developed alloys are being used in
transportation tanks and rigid containers that allow for safer
and more economical transportation of hazardous and corrosive
materials.
There has been recent growth in certain geographic markets in
the use of aluminum rolled products in automotive body panel
applications, including hoods, deck lids, fenders and lift
gates. These uses typically result from co-operative efforts
between aluminum rolled products manufacturers and their
customers that yield tailor-made solutions for specific
requirements in alloy selection, fabrication procedure, surface
quality
6
and joining. We believe the recent growth in automotive body
panel applications is due in part to the lighter weight, better
fuel economy and improved emissions performance associated with
these applications.
Aluminum rolled products are also used in aerospace
applications, a segment of the transportation market in which we
were not allowed to compete until January 6, 2010, pursuant
to a non-competition agreement we entered into with Alcan in
connection with the spin-off. However, aerospace-related
consumption of aluminum rolled products has historically
represented a relatively small portion of total aluminum rolled
products market shipments.
Aluminum is also used in the construction of ships hulls
and superstructures and passenger rail cars because of its
strength, light weight, formability and corrosion resistance.
Market
Structure
The aluminum rolled products industry is characterized by
economies of scale, significant capital investments required to
achieve and maintain technological capabilities and demanding
customer qualification standards. The service and efficiency
demands of large customers have encouraged consolidation among
suppliers of aluminum rolled products.
While our customers tend to be increasingly global, many
aluminum rolled products tend to be produced and sold on a
regional basis. The regional nature of the markets is influenced
in part by the fact that not all mills are equipped to produce
all types of aluminum rolled products. For instance, only a few
mills in North America, Europe and Asia, and only one mill
in South America produce beverage can body and end stock. In
addition, individual aluminum rolling mills generally supply a
limited range of products for end-use markets, and seek to
maximize profits by producing high volumes of the highest margin
mix per mill hour given available capacity and equipment
capabilities.
Certain multi-purpose, common alloy and plate rolled products
are imported into Europe and North America from producers
in emerging markets, such as Brazil, South Africa, Russia and
China. However, at this time we believe that most of these
producers are generally unable to produce flat rolled products
that meet the quality requirements, lead times and
specifications of customers with more demanding applications. In
addition, high freight costs, import duties, inability to take
back recycled aluminum, lack of technical service capabilities
and long lead-times mean that many developing market exporters
are viewed as second-tier suppliers. Therefore, many of our
customers in the Americas, Europe and Asia do not look to
suppliers in these emerging markets for a significant portion of
their requirements.
Competition
The aluminum rolled products market is highly competitive. We
face competition from a number of companies in all of the
geographic regions and end-use markets in which we operate. Our
primary competitors are as follows:
|
|
|
North America
|
|
Asia
|
|
Alcoa, Inc. (Alcoa)
|
|
Furukawa-Sky Aluminum Corp.
|
Aleris International, Inc. (Aleris)
|
|
Sumitomo Light Metal Company, Ltd.
|
Arco Aluminium, Inc. (a subsidiary of BP plc)
|
|
Southwest Aluminum Co. Ltd.
|
Norandal Aluminum
|
|
Kobe Steel Ltd.
|
Wise Metal Group LLC
|
|
Alcoa
|
Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
|
|
Nanshan Aluminum
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
South America
|
|
Hydro A.S.A.
|
|
Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio
|
Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
|
|
Alcoa
|
Alcoa
|
|
|
Aleris
|
|
|
7
The factors influencing competition vary by region and end-use
market, but generally we compete on the basis of our value
proposition, including price, product quality, the ability to
meet customers specifications, range of products offered,
lead times, technical support and customer service. In some
end-use markets, competition is also affected by
fabricators requirements that suppliers complete a
qualification process to supply their plants. This process can
be rigorous and may take many months to complete. As a result,
obtaining business from these customers can be a lengthy and
expensive process. However, the ability to obtain and maintain
these qualifications can represent a competitive advantage.
In addition to competition from others within the aluminum
rolled products industry, we, as well as the other aluminum
rolled products manufacturers, face competition from
non-aluminum material producers, as fabricators and end-users
have, in the past, demonstrated a willingness to substitute
other materials for aluminum. In the beverage and food cans
end-use market, aluminum rolled products primary
competitors are glass, PET plastic, and in some regions, steel.
In the transportation end-use market, aluminum rolled products
compete mainly with steel and composites. Aluminum competes with
wood, plastic, cement and steel in building products
applications. Factors affecting competition with substitute
materials include price, ease of manufacture, consumer
preference and performance characteristics.
Key
Factors Affecting Supply and Demand
The following factors have historically affected the supply of
aluminum rolled products:
Production Capacity. As in most manufacturing
industries with high fixed costs, production capacity has the
largest impact on supply in the aluminum rolled products
industry. In the aluminum rolled products industry, the addition
of production capacity requires large capital investments and
significant plant construction or expansion, and typically
requires long lead-time equipment orders.
Alternative Technology. Advances in
technological capabilities allow aluminum rolled products
producers to better align product portfolio and supply with
industry demand. As an example, continuous casting offers the
ability to increase capacity in smaller increments than is
possible with hot mill additions. This enables production
capacity to better adjust to small
year-over-year
increases in demand. However, the continuous casting process
results in the production of a more limited range of products.
Trade. Some trade flows do occur between
regions despite shipping costs, import duties and the need for
localized customer support. Higher value-added, specialty
products such as lithographic sheet and some foils are more
likely to be traded internationally, especially if demand in
certain markets exceeds local supply. With respect to less
technically demanding applications, emerging markets with low
cost inputs may export commodity aluminum rolled products to
larger, more mature markets. Accordingly, regional changes in
supply, such as plant expansions, may have some effect on the
worldwide supply of commodity aluminum rolled products.
The following factors have historically affected the demand for
aluminum rolled products:
Economic Growth. We believe that economic
growth is currently the single largest driver of aluminum rolled
products demand. In mature markets, growth in demand has
typically correlated closely with growth in industrial
production.
In emerging markets such as China, growth in demand typically
exceeds industrial production growth largely because of
expanding infrastructures, capital investments and rising
incomes that often accompany economic growth in these markets.
Substitution Trends. Manufacturers
willingness to substitute other materials for aluminum in their
products and competition from substitution materials suppliers
also affect demand. For example, in North America,
competition from PET plastic containers and glass bottles, and
changes in marketing channels and consumer preferences in
beverage containers, have, in recent years, reduced the growth
rate of aluminum can sheet in North America from the high rates
experienced in the 1970s and 1980s. Historically, despite
changes in consumer preferences, North American aluminum
beverage can shipments have remained at approximately
100 billion cans per year since 1994 according to the Can
Manufacturers
8
Institute. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2009,
North American aluminum beverage can shipments have declined by
approximately 1.1% to 96.26 billion cans mainly due to a
decline in demand for carbonated soft drinks.
Cyclicality. A significant share of aluminum
rolled products is used in the production of consumer staples,
which have historically experienced relatively stable demand
characteristics. In addition, most of our aluminum rolled
products sale contracts are priced in two components: a
pass-through aluminum price component based on the LME quotation
and local market premium, plus a margin over metal
or conversion charge based on the cost to roll the product. As a
result, most of the raw material price risk is absorbed by the
customer, reducing the volatility of the producers
profitability and cash flows. Aluminum rolled products companies
also use recycled aluminum, which provides sourcing flexibility
for, and further reduces the volatility of, input material.
These three factors combine to create an industry that has lower
cyclicality than the primary aluminum industry.
Downgauging. Increasing technological and
asset sophistication has enabled aluminum rolling companies to
offer consistent or even improved product strength using less
material, providing customers with a more cost-effective product
as compared to alternatives to aluminum. This continuing trend
reduces raw material requirements, but also effectively
increases rolled products plant utilization rates and
reduces available capacity, because to produce the same number
of units requires more rolling hours to achieve thinner gauges.
As utilization rates increase, revenues rise as our pricing
tends to be based on machine hours used rather than on the
volume of material rolled. On balance, we believe that
downgauging has maintained or enhanced overall market economics
for both users and producers of aluminum rolled products.
Seasonality. Demand for certain aluminum
rolled products is affected by seasonal factors, such as
increases in consumption of beer and soft drinks packaged in
aluminum cans and the use of aluminum sheet used in the
construction and industrial end-use market during summer months.
We typically experience seasonal slowdowns during our third
fiscal quarter resulting in lower shipment volumes as a result
of lower end-product sales of beverages in the northern
hemisphere, declines in overall production output due primarily
to the holidays in North America and Europe, and the seasonal
downturn in construction due to weather.
Our
Business Strategy
Our primary objective is to deliver shareholder and customer
value by being the most innovative and profitable aluminum
rolled products company in the world. We intend to achieve this
objective through the following areas of focus:
Focus
on core operations and optimize our costs
We strive to be the lowest cost producer of world-class aluminum
rolled products by pursuing a standardized focus on our core
operations globally and through the implementation of
cost-reduction and restructuring initiatives. To achieve this
objective, we have standardized our manufacturing processes and
the associated upstream and downstream production elements where
possible while still allowing the flexibility to respond to
local market demands. In addition, we have implemented numerous
restructuring initiatives over the last year, including the
shutdown of facilities, staff rationalization and other
activities, all of which have led to annualized cost savings of
approximately $140 million in fiscal 2010.
Integrate
support functions globally in order to further drive
improvements in our operations
Given our global operating footprint and customer base, we plan
to globally align our support functions, such as finance, human
resources, legal, information technology and supply chain
management. We believe that managing these support functions
centrally can accelerate executive decision-making processes,
which will allow us to adapt our manufacturing processes and
products more quickly and efficiently to respond to changing
market conditions. We think that achieving a seamless alignment
of goals, methods and metrics across the organization will
improve communication and the implementation of strategic
initiatives and,
9
ultimately, service to our customers. Over time, we feel that
these improvements will result in enhanced operating margins and
performance.
Expand
market leadership position through enhanced global and regional
capabilities
We benefit from a global manufacturing footprint, including 31
manufacturing facilities in 11 countries on four continents as
of March 31, 2010, which enables us to service customers
worldwide and provide a strong asset-based
competitive advantage. We are the only company capable of
producing technologically sophisticated, high-end products in
all four major market regions of the world. This competitive
advantage is evident in our position as the number one global
producer of beverage can sheet products. We are able to service
large can sheet customers on a worldwide basis, yet, through our
regional operations we also have the capability to adapt and
cater to the regional preferences and needs of our customers.
For example, we recently upgraded our Yeongju plant in Korea
with technology and processes developed at our other plants
around the world, which has allowed us to capture market share
in the can end market in Asia. Additionally, we have been able
to qualify Novelis plants in one region to provide alternative
supply options and support to customers in a different region.
Focus
on optimizing premium products to drive enhanced
profitability
We plan to continue improving our product mix and margins by
leveraging our world-class assets and technical capabilities. As
a result of the development of Novelis
Fusiontm,
we have demonstrated the required manufacturing know-how and
research and development capabilities to design, develop and
commercialize breakthrough technologies. Products like Novelis
Fusiontm
allow us to defend and enhance our strategic positioning in our
core end-user segments. Additionally, our management approach
helps us systematically identify opportunities to improve the
profitability of our operations through product portfolio
analysis. This ensures that we focus on growing in attractive
market segments, while also taking actions to exit unattractive
ones. For example, in the last four years, we have grown our Can
stock shipments in total by an average of 15% in all regions
except North America where our growth was flat. Through our
continued focus on operating execution, we believe we can cost
effectively deploy proprietary technologies that will contribute
to growth and higher profitability.
Pursue
organic growth in select emerging markets
Our international presence positions us well to capture
additional growth opportunities in targeted aluminum rolled
products in emerging regions, specifically South America and
Asia. We believe South America and Asia have high growth
potential in areas such as beverage cans, industrial products,
construction and electronics. While our manufacturing and
operating presence positions us well to capture this growth, we
would expect to make some incremental capital expenditures or
selective acquisitions to expand our capabilities in these areas.
Our
Operating Segments
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America; Europe; Asia and South America. The following is a
description of our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
North America. Headquartered in Cleveland,
Ohio, this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 11 plants, including two fully dedicated
recycling facilities, in two countries. As announced in February
2010, we will be moving our North American headquarters to
Atlanta, Georgia during fiscal 2011.
|
|
|
|
Europe. Headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 13 plants, including one fully dedicated
recycling facility, in six countries.
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Asia. Headquartered in Seoul, South Korea,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates three plants in two countries.
|
|
|
|
South America. Headquartered in Sao Paulo,
Brazil, this segment comprises bauxite mining, smelting
operations, power generation, carbon products, aluminum sheet
and light gauge products and operates four plants in Brazil.
|
The table below shows Net sales and total shipments by segment.
For additional financial information related to our operating
segments, see Note 19 Segment, Geographical
Area, Major Customer and Major Supplier Information to our
accompanying audited consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
Sales in millions
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
Shipments in kilotonnes
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales(A)
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
2,854
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales(B)
|
|
$
|
3,292
|
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,664
|
|
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales(B)
|
|
$
|
2,975
|
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
|
$
|
3,831
|
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales(B)
|
|
$
|
1,501
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales(B)
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
908
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Consolidated Net sales include the results of our
non-consolidated affiliates on a proportionately consolidated
basis, which is consistent with the way we manage our business
segments. |
|
(B) |
|
Net sales by segment includes intersegment sales. |
We have highly automated, flexible and advanced manufacturing
capabilities in operating facilities around the globe. In
addition to the aluminum rolled products plants, our South
America segment operates bauxite mining, alumina refining,
hydro-electric power plants and smelting facilities. We believe
our facilities have the assets required for efficient production
and are well managed and maintained.
North
America
North America operates 11 aluminum rolled products facilities,
including two fully dedicated recycling facilities as of
March 31, 2010, and manufactures a broad range of aluminum
sheet and light gauge products. End-use markets for this segment
include beverage cans, containers and packaging, automotive and
other transportation applications, building products and other
industrial applications. The majority of North Americas
efforts are directed towards the beverage can sheet market. The
beverage can end-use market is technically demanding to supply
and pricing is competitive. We believe we have a competitive
advantage in this market due to our low-cost and technologically
advanced manufacturing facilities and technical support
capability. Recycling is important in the manufacturing process
and we have five facilities in North America that re-melt
post-consumer aluminum and recycled process material. Most of
the recycled material is from UBCs and the material is cast into
sheet ingot for North Americas two can sheet production
plants (at Logan, Kentucky and Oswego, New York). In August
2009, we entered into a UBC recycling joint venture with Alcoa
11
to create a new independent company, known as Evermore Recycling
LLC (Evermore Recycling). Our equity investment in
Evermore Recycling is 55.8% and Alcoas equity investment
is 44.2%. Evermore Recycling will purchase UBCs from suppliers
for recycling by us and Alcoa and is designed to create value by
increasing efficiency, building stronger supplier relationships
and increasing recycling.
Europe
Europe operates 13 operating plants, including one fully
dedicated recycling facility, as of March 31, 2010, and
manufactures a broad range of sheet and foil products. End-use
markets for this segment include construction and industrial
products, beverage and food can, foil and technical products,
lithographic and automotive. Beverage and food can represent the
largest end-use market in terms of shipment volume by Europe.
Europe has foil and packaging facilities at six locations and,
in addition to six rolled product plants, has distribution
centers in Italy and sales offices in several European
countries. Operations include our 50% joint venture interest in
Aluminum Norf GmbH (Norf), which is the worlds largest
aluminum rolling and remelt facility. Norf supplies high quality
can stock, foilstock and feeder stock for finishing at our other
European operations.
In April 2009, we closed our distribution center in France. In
March 2009, we announced the closure of our aluminum sheet mill
in Rogerstone, South Wales, U.K. The facility ceased operations
in April 2009.
Asia
Asia operates three manufacturing facilities as of
March 31, 2010 and manufactures a broad range of sheet and
light gauge products. End-use markets include beverage and food
cans, foil, electronics and construction and industrial
products. The beverage can market represents the largest end-use
market in terms of volume. Recycling is an important part of our
Korean operations with recycling facilities at both the Ulsan
and Yeongju facilities. Metal from recycled aluminum purchases
represented 31% of Asias total shipments in fiscal 2010.
In June 2008, our plant in Ulsan began the commercial production
of Novelis
Fusiontm.
We believe that Asia is well-positioned to benefit from further
economic development in China as well as other parts of Asia.
South
America
South America operates two rolling plants, two primary aluminum
smelters, bauxite mines and hydro-electric power plants as of
March 31, 2010, all of which are located in Brazil. South
America manufactures aluminum rolled products, including can
stock, automotive and industrial sheet and light gauge for the
beverage and food can, construction and industrial and
transportation and packaging end-use markets. More than 80% of
our shipments for the past two years were in the beverage and
food can market. The primary aluminum operations in South
America include mines and smelters used by our Brazilian
aluminum rolled products operations, with any excess production
being sold on the market in the form of aluminum billets. South
America generates a portion of its own power requirements. In
May 2009, we ceased the production of alumina at our Ouro Preto
facility in Brazil as the sustained decline in alumina prices
has made alumina production economically unfeasible. In light of
the current alumina and aluminum pricing environment, we are
evaluating our primary aluminum business.
In response to the growing demand for our products in South
America, in May 2010 we announced a plan to invest nearly
$300 million to expand our aluminum rolling operations in
Pindamonhangaba, Brazil. The expansion will increase the
plants capacity by more than 50 per cent to
approximately 600,000 metric tonnes of aluminum sheet per year.
The project is expected to come on stream in late 2012.
Financial
Information About Geographic Areas
Certain financial information about geographic areas is
contained in Note 19 Segment, Geographical
Area, Major Customer and Major Supplier Information to our
accompanying audited consolidated financial statements.
Raw
Materials and Suppliers
The raw materials that we use in manufacturing include primary
aluminum, recycled aluminum, sheet ingot, alloying elements and
grain refiners. Our smelters also use alumina, caustic soda and
calcined
12
petroleum coke and resin. These raw materials are generally
available from several sources and are not generally subject to
supply constraints under normal market conditions. We also
consume considerable amounts of energy in the operation of our
facilities.
Aluminum
We obtain aluminum from a number of sources, including the
following:
Primary Aluminum Sourcing. We purchased or
tolled approximately 1,750 kt of primary aluminum in fiscal 2010
in the form of sheet ingot, standard ingot and molten metal,
approximately 50% of which we purchased from Alcan. Following
our spin-off from Alcan, we have continued to purchase aluminum
from Alcan pursuant to metal supply agreements. Our primary
aluminum contracts with Alcan were renegotiated and the amended
agreements took effect on January 1, 2008.
Primary Aluminum Production. We produced
approximately 110 kt of our own primary aluminum requirements in
fiscal 2010 through our smelter and related facilities in Brazil.
Recycled Aluminum Products. We operate
facilities in several plants to recycle post-consumer aluminum,
such as UBCs collected through recycling programs. In addition,
we have agreements with several of our large customers where we
take recycled processed material from their fabricating activity
and re-melt, cast and roll it to re-supply them with aluminum
sheet. Other sources of recycled material include lithographic
plates, where over 90% of aluminum used is recycled, and
products with longer lifespans, like cars and buildings, which
are just starting to become high volume sources of recycled
material. We purchased or tolled approximately 1,000 kt of
recycled material inputs in fiscal 2010.
The majority of recycled material we re-melt is directed back
through can-stock plants. The net effect of all recycling
activities in terms of total shipments of rolled products is
that approximately 34% of our aluminum rolled products
production for fiscal 2010 was made with recycled material.
Energy
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. In fiscal 2010, natural gas and
electricity represented approximately 89% of our energy
consumption by cost. We also use fuel oil and transport fuel.
The majority of energy usage occurs at our casting centers, at
our smelters in South America and during the hot rolling of
aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities require relatively less
energy. We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which
subjects us to market pricing fluctuations. We have in the past
and may continue to seek to stabilize our future exposure to
natural gas prices through the purchase of derivative
instruments. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South
America have historically been more stable than in the United
States.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs.
Our South America segment has its own hydroelectric facilities
that meet approximately 27% of its total electricity
requirements. As a result of supply constraints, electricity
prices in South America have been volatile, with spot prices
increasing dramatically. We have a mixture of self-generated
electricity, long term fixed contracts and shorter term
semi-variable contracts. Although spot prices have returned to
normal levels, we may continue to face challenges renewing our
South American energy supply contracts at effective rates to
enable profitable operation of our full smelter capacity.
Others
We also have bauxite and alumina requirements. We will satisfy
some of our alumina requirements for the near term pursuant to
an alumina supply agreement we have entered into with Alcan.
13
Our
Customers
Although we provide products to a wide variety of customers in
each of the markets that we serve, we have experienced
consolidation trends among our customers in many of our key
end-use markets. In fiscal 2010, approximately 48% of our total
net sales were to our ten largest customers, most of whom we
have been supplying for more than 20 years. To address
consolidation trends, we focus significant efforts at developing
and maintaining close working relationships with our customers
and end-users. Our major customers include:
|
|
|
Agfa-Gevaert N.V.
|
|
Daching Holdings Limited
|
Amcor Limited
|
|
Lotte Aluminum Co. Ltd.
|
Anheuser-Busch InBev
|
|
Kodak Polychrome Graphics GmbH
|
Affiliates of Ball Corporation
|
|
Impress
|
BMW Group
|
|
Pactiv Corporation
|
Can-Pack S.A.
|
|
Rexam Plc
|
Various bottlers of the
Coca-Cola
system
|
|
Ryerson Inc.
|
Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc.
|
|
Tetra Pak Ltd.
|
In our single largest end-use market, beverage can sheet, we
sell directly to beverage makers and bottlers as well as to can
fabricators that sell the cans they produce to bottlers. In
certain cases, we also operate under umbrella agreements with
beverage makers and bottlers under which they direct their can
fabricators to source their requirements for beverage can body,
end and tab stock from us. Among these umbrella agreements is an
agreement with several North American bottlers of
Coca-Cola
branded products, including
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services. Under this agreement, we
shipped approximately 359 kt of beverage can sheet (including
tolled metal) during fiscal 2010. These shipments were made to,
and we received payment from, our direct customers, who are the
beverage can fabricators that sell beverage cans to the
Coca-Cola
associated bottlers. Under the agreement, bottlers in the
Coca-Cola
system may join this agreement by committing a specified
percentage of the can sheet required by their can fabricators to
us.
Purchases by Rexam Plc and its affiliates represented
approximately 16%, 17%, 15% and 14% of our total net sales for
the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009; the period from
May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008; and the period
from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, respectively.
Distribution
and Backlog
We have two principal distribution channels for the end-use
markets in which we operate: direct sales to our customers and
distributors (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
Direct sales as a percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
Distributor sales as a percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Direct
Sales
We supply various end-use markets all over the world through a
direct sales force that operates from individual plants or sales
offices, as well as from regional sales offices in 21 countries.
The direct sales channel typically involves very large,
sophisticated fabricators and original equipment manufacturers.
Longstanding relationships are maintained with leading companies
in industries that use aluminum rolled products. Supply
contracts for large global customers generally range from one to
five years in length and historically there has been a high
degree of renewal business with these customers. Given the
customized nature of products and in some cases, large order
sizes, switching costs are significant, thus adding to the
overall consistency of the customer base.
14
We also use third party agents or traders in some regions to
complement our own sales force. They provide service to our
customers in countries where we do not have local expertise. We
tend to use third party agents in Asia more frequently than in
other regions.
Distributors
We also sell our products through aluminum distributors,
particularly in North America and Europe. Customers of
distributors are widely dispersed, and sales through this
channel are highly fragmented. Distributors sell mostly
commodity or less specialized products into many end-use markets
in small quantities, including the construction and industrial
and transportation markets. We collaborate with our distributors
to develop new end-use markets and improve the supply chain and
order efficiencies.
Backlog
We believe that order backlog is not a material aspect of our
business.
Research
and Development
The table below summarizes our research and development expense
in our plants and modern research facilities, which included
mini-scale production lines equipped with hot mills, can lines
and continuous casters (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
We conduct research and development activities at our plants in
order to satisfy current and future customer requirements,
improve our products and reduce our conversion costs. Our
customers work closely with our research and development
professionals to improve their production processes and market
options. We have approximately 200 employees dedicated to
research and development, located in many of our plants and
research center.
Our
Employees
As of March 31, 2010, we had approximately
11,600 employees. Approximately 5,300 are employed in
Europe, approximately 2,900 are employed in North America,
approximately 1,500 are employed in Asia and approximately 1,900
are employed in South America and other areas. Approximately 69%
of our employees are represented by labor unions and their
employment conditions are governed by collective bargaining
agreements. Collective bargaining agreements are negotiated on a
site, regional or national level, and are of different
durations. We believe that we have good labor relations in all
our operations and have not experienced a significant labor
stoppage in any of our principal operations during the last
decade.
Intellectual
Property
In connection with our spin-off, Alcan has assigned or licensed
to us a number of important patents, trademarks and other
intellectual property rights owned or previously owned by Alcan
and required for our business. Ownership of certain intellectual
property that is used by both us and Alcan is owned by one of
us, and licensed to the other. Certain specific intellectual
property rights, which have been determined to be exclusively
useful to us or which were required to be transferred to us for
regulatory reasons, have been assigned to us with no license
back to Alcan.
We actively review intellectual property arising from our
operations and our research and development activities and, when
appropriate, we apply for patents in the appropriate
jurisdictions, including the United States and Canada. We
currently hold patents and patent applications on approximately
190 different
15
items of intellectual property. While these patents and patent
applications are important to our business on an aggregate
basis, no single patent or patent application is deemed to be
material to our business.
We have applied for or received registrations for the
Novelis word trademark and the Novelis logo
trademark in approximately 50 countries where we have
significant sales or operations. Novelis uses the Aditya Birla
Rising Sun logo under license from Aditya Birla Management
Corporation Private Limited.
We have also registered the word Novelis and several
derivations thereof as domain names in numerous top level
domains around the world to protect our presence on the World
Wide Web.
Environment,
Health and Safety
We own and operate numerous manufacturing and other facilities
in various countries around the world. Our operations are
subject to environmental laws and regulations from various
jurisdictions, which govern, among other things, air emissions,
wastewater discharges, the handling, storage and disposal of
hazardous substances and wastes, the remediation of contaminated
sites, post-mining reclamation and restoration of natural
resources, and employee health and safety. Future environmental
regulations may be expected to impose stricter compliance
requirements on the industries in which we operate. Additional
equipment or process changes at some of our facilities may be
needed to meet future requirements. The cost of meeting these
requirements may be significant. Failure to comply with such
laws and regulations could subject us to administrative, civil
or criminal penalties, obligations to pay damages or other
costs, and injunctions and other orders, including orders to
cease operations.
We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also
known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions
regarding our liability arising from the usage, storage,
treatment or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a
number of sites in the United States, as well as similar
proceedings under the laws and regulations of the other
jurisdictions in which we have operations, including Brazil and
certain countries in the European Union. Many of these
jurisdictions have laws that impose joint and several liability,
without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct,
for the costs of environmental remediation, natural resource
damages, third party claims, and other expenses. In addition, we
are, from time to time, subject to environmental reviews and
investigations by relevant governmental authorities.
We have established procedures for regularly evaluating
environmental loss contingencies, including those arising from
environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we also believe we have made reasonable
estimates for the costs that are likely to be ultimately borne
by us for these environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly,
we have established reserves based on our reasonable estimates
for the currently anticipated costs associated with these
environmental matters. Management has determined that the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters will not, individually or in the aggregate, materially
impair our operations or materially adversely affect our
financial condition.
Our capital expenditures for environmental protection and the
betterment of working conditions in our facilities were
$2 million in fiscal 2010. We expect these capital
expenditures will be approximately $5 million and
$3 million in fiscal 2011 and 2012, respectively. In
addition, expenses for environmental protection (including
estimated and probable environmental remediation costs as well
as general environmental protection costs at our facilities)
were $32 million in fiscal 2010, and are expected to be
$28 million and $42 million in fiscal 2011 and 2012,
respectively. Generally, expenses for environmental protection
are recorded in Cost of goods sold. However, significant
remediation costs that are not associated with on-going
operations are recorded in Other (income) expenses, net.
Available
Information
We are subject to the reporting and information requirements of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act)
and, as a result, we file periodic reports and other information
with the SEC. We
16
make these filings available on our website free of charge, the
URL of which is
http://www.novelis.com,
as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file
such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The SEC maintains
a website
(http://www.sec.gov)
that contains our annual, quarterly and current reports and
other information we file electronically with the SEC. You can
read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the
SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on
the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Information on our website does not constitute part of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this report,
you should consider the following factors, which could
materially affect our business, financial condition or results
of operations in the future. The following factors, among
others, could cause our actual results to differ from those
projected in any forward looking statements we make.
Certain
of our customers are significant to our revenues, and we could
be adversely affected by changes in the business or financial
condition of these significant customers or by the loss of their
business.
Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 48%, 45%,
45%, and 47% of our total net sales for the year ended
March 31, 2010; the year ended March 31, 2009; the
period from May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008; and
the period from April 1, 2007 to May 15, 2007;
respectively, with Rexam Plc, a leading global beverage can
maker, and its affiliates representing approximately 16%, 17%,
15%, and 14%, of our total net sales in the respective periods.
A significant downturn in the business or financial condition of
our significant customers could materially adversely affect our
results of operations and cash flows. In addition, if our
existing relationships with significant customers materially
deteriorate or are terminated in the future, and we are not
successful in replacing business lost from such customers, our
results of operations and cash flows could be adversely
affected. Some of the longer term contracts under which we
supply our customers, including under umbrella agreements such
as those described under Item 1. Business
Our Customers, are subject to renewal, renegotiation or
re-pricing at periodic intervals or upon changes in competitive
supply conditions. Our failure to successfully renew,
renegotiate or re-price such agreements could result in a
reduction or loss in customer purchase volume or revenue, and if
we are not successful in replacing business lost from such
customers, our results of operations and cash flows could be
adversely affected. The markets in which we operate are
competitive and customers may seek to consolidate supplier
relationships or change suppliers to obtain cost savings and
other benefits.
Our
results and cash flows can be negatively impacted by timing
differences between the prices we pay under purchase contracts
and metal prices we charge our customers.
In some of our contracts there is a timing difference between
the metal prices we pay under our purchase contracts and the
metal prices we charge our customers. As a result, changes in
metal prices impact our results, since during such periods we
bear the additional cost or benefit of metal price changes,
which could have a material effect on our profitability and cash
flows.
Our
operations consume energy and our profitability and cash flows
may decline if energy costs were to rise, or if our energy
supplies were interrupted.
We consume substantial amounts of energy in our rolling
operations, cast house operations and Brazilian smelting
operations. The factors that affect our energy costs and supply
reliability tend to be specific to each of our facilities. A
number of factors could materially adversely affect our energy
position including:
|
|
|
|
|
increases in costs of natural gas;
|
|
|
|
significant increases in costs of supplied electricity or fuel
oil related to transportation;
|
|
|
|
interruptions in energy supply due to equipment failure or other
causes;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to extend energy supply contracts upon expiration
on economical terms; and
|
|
|
|
the inability to pass through energy costs in certain sales
contracts.
|
In addition, global climate change may increase our costs of
energy sources. See Risk Factors We may be
affected by global climate change or by legal, regulatory, or
market responses to such change. If energy costs were to
rise, or if energy supplies or supply arrangements were
disrupted, our profitability and cash flows could decline.
Economic
conditions could negatively affect our financial condition and
results of operations.
Our financial condition and results of operations depend
significantly on worldwide economic conditions. These economic
conditions have deteriorated significantly in many countries and
regions in which we do business. The difficult global market
conditions in 2008 and 2009 resulted in a tightening in the
credit markets, a low level of liquidity in many financial
markets and extreme volatility in fixed income, currency and
equity markets.
We are unable to predict the timing and rate at which industry
variables may recover. Uncertainty about current global economic
conditions poses a risk as our customers may postpone purchases
in response to tighter credit and negative financial news, which
could adversely impact demand for our products. In addition,
there can be no assurance that the actions we have taken or may
take in response to the economic conditions will be sufficient
to counter any continuation or reoccurrence of the downturn or
disruptions. A protracted continuation or worsening of the
global economic downturn or disruptions in the financial markets
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations.
In addition, we use various derivative instruments to manage the
risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates, interest
rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. We may be exposed to
losses in the future if the counterparties to our derivative
instruments fail to honor their agreements.
We are
subject to risks related to our indebtedness.
As of March 31, 2010, we had $2.7 billion of
indebtedness outstanding, including $1.3 billion of senior
unsecured notes (Senior Notes) and borrowings of
$1.2 billion under our senior secured credit facilities
(Credit Agreements). We have two outstanding series of Senior
Notes: 7.25% senior notes due 2015 and 11.5% senior
notes due 2015. The Credit Agreements consist of (i) a
$1.1 billion seven-year Term Loan facility (Term Loan
facility) and (ii) an $800 million five year
multi-currency asset-based revolving credit line and letter of
credit facility (ABL facility). As of March 31, 2010, we
and our subsidiaries may be able to incur additional
indebtedness of up to approximately $300 million, including
secured indebtedness, in the future. Our indebtedness and
interest expense could have consequences to our company and
holders of our Senior Notes, including:
|
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to borrow additional amounts for working
capital, capital expenditures or other general corporate
purposes;
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
industry conditions, including extreme volatility in London
Metal Exchange (LME) prices;
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to capitalize on business opportunities and
to react to competitive pressures and adverse changes in
government regulation; and
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability or increasing the costs to refinance
indebtedness.
|
18
The
covenants in our Credit Agreements and the indentures governing
our Senior Notes impose significant operating restrictions on
us.
The Credit Agreements and the indentures governing the Senior
Notes impose significant operating restrictions on us. These
restrictions limit our ability and the ability of our restricted
subsidiaries, among other things, to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt and provide additional guarantees;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends and make other restricted payments, including
certain investments;
|
|
|
|
create or permit certain liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain asset sales;
|
|
|
|
use the proceeds from the sales of assets and subsidiary stock;
|
|
|
|
create or permit restrictions on the ability of our restricted
subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us;
|
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions; and
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our
assets or the assets of our restricted subsidiaries.
|
In addition, under the ABL facility, if our excess availability
under the ABL facility is less than 10% of the lender
commitments under the ABL facility or 10% of the borrowing base,
we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge ratio of at
least 1 to 1. As of March 31, 2010, our fixed charge
coverage ratio was greater than 2 to 1 and our excess
availability was $603, or 75% of the lender commitments under
the ABL facility.
A
deterioration of our financial position or a downgrade of our
ratings by a credit rating agency could increase our borrowing
costs and our business relationships could be adversely
affected.
A deterioration of our financial position or a downgrade of our
ratings for any reason could increase our borrowing costs and
have an adverse effect on our business relationships with
customers, suppliers and hedging counterparties. From time to
time, we enter into various forms of hedging activities against
currency or metal price fluctuations and trade metal contracts
on the LME. Financial strength and credit ratings are important
to the availability and pricing of these hedging and trading
activities. As a result, any downgrade of our credit ratings may
make it more costly for us to engage in these activities, and
changes to our level of indebtedness may make it more difficult
or costly for us to engage in these activities in the future.
Adverse
changes in currency exchange rates could negatively affect our
financial results and cash flows and the competitiveness of our
aluminum rolled products relative to other
materials.
Our businesses and operations are exposed to the effects of
changes in the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar, the euro,
the British pound, the Brazilian real, the Canadian dollar, the
Korean won and other currencies. We have implemented a hedging
policy that attempts to manage currency exchange rate risks to
an acceptable level based on managements judgment of the
appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and cost;
however, this hedging policy may not successfully or completely
eliminate the effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
results and cash flows.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in
U.S. dollars, but a portion of our earnings and
expenditures are denominated in other currencies, primarily the
euro, the Korean won and the Brazilian real. Changes in exchange
rates will result in increases or decreases in our reported
costs and earnings and may also affect the book value of our
assets located outside the U.S.
19
Most
of our facilities are staffed by a unionized workforce, and
union disputes and other employee relations issues could
materially adversely affect our financial results.
Approximately 69% of our employees are represented by labor
unions under a large number of collective bargaining agreements
with varying durations and expiration dates. We may not be able
to satisfactorily renegotiate our collective bargaining
agreements when they expire. In addition, existing collective
bargaining agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage
at our facilities in the future, and any such work stoppage
could have a material adverse effect on our financial results
and cash flows.
Our
operations have been and will continue to be exposed to various
business and other risks, changes in conditions and events
beyond our control in countries where we have operations or sell
products.
We are, and will continue to be, subject to financial,
political, economic and business risks in connection with our
global operations. We have made investments and carry on
production activities in various emerging markets, including
Brazil, Korea and Malaysia, and we market our products in these
countries, as well as China and certain other countries in Asia,
the Middle East and emerging markets in South America. While we
anticipate higher growth or attractive production opportunities
from these emerging markets, they also present a higher degree
of risk than more developed markets. In addition to the business
risks inherent in developing and servicing new markets, economic
conditions may be more volatile, legal and regulatory systems
less developed and predictable, and the possibility of various
types of adverse governmental action more pronounced. In
addition, inflation, fluctuations in currency and interest
rates, competitive factors, civil unrest and labor problems
could affect our revenues, expenses and results of operations.
Our operations could also be adversely affected by acts of war,
terrorism or the threat of any of these events as well as
government actions such as controls on imports, exports and
prices, tariffs, new forms of taxation, or changes in fiscal
regimes and increased government regulation in the countries in
which we operate or service customers. Unexpected or
uncontrollable events or circumstances in any of these markets
could have a material adverse effect on our financial results
and cash flows.
We
could be adversely affected by disruptions of our
operations.
Breakdown of equipment or other events, including catastrophic
events such as war or natural disasters, leading to production
interruptions in our plants could have a material adverse effect
on our financial results and cash flows. Further, because many
of our customers are, to varying degrees, dependent on planned
deliveries from our plants, those customers that have to
reschedule their own production due to our missed deliveries
could pursue claims against us. We may incur costs to correct
any of these problems, in addition to facing claims from
customers. Further, our reputation among actual and potential
customers may be harmed, resulting in a loss of business. While
we maintain insurance policies covering, among other things,
physical damage, business interruptions and product liability,
these policies would not cover all of our losses.
Our
goodwill and other intangible assets could become impaired,
which could require us to take non-cash charges against
earnings.
We assess, at least annually and potentially more frequently,
whether the value of our goodwill and other intangible assets
has been impaired. Any impairment of goodwill or other
intangible assets as a result of such analysis would result in a
non-cash charge against earnings, which charge could materially
adversely affect our reported results of operations.
A significant and sustained decline in our future cash flows, a
significant adverse change in the economic environment or slower
growth rates could result in the need to perform additional
impairment analysis in future periods. If we were to conclude
that a future write-down of goodwill or other intangible assets
is necessary, then we would record such additional charges,
which could materially adversely affect our results of
operations.
20
As
part of our ongoing evaluation of our operations, we may
undertake additional restructuring efforts in the future which
could in some instances result in significant severance-related
costs, environmental remediation expenses and impairment and
other restructuring charges.
We recorded restructuring charges of $14 million for the
year ended March 31, 2010 and $95 million for the year
ended March 31, 2009. During this two year period, we
announced, among others, the following restructuring actions and
programs:
|
|
|
|
|
a voluntary separation program for salaried employees in North
America and the corporate office aimed at reducing staff levels;
|
|
|
|
cessation of commercial grade alumina at our Ouro Preto facility
in Brazil;
|
|
|
|
the closure of our aluminum sheet mill in Rogerstone, South
Wales, UK;
|
|
|
|
a restructuring plan to streamline operations at our Rugles
facility located in Upper Normandy, France; and
|
|
|
|
a voluntary retirement program in Asia.
|
We may take additional restructuring actions in the future. Any
additional restructuring efforts could result in significant
severance-related costs, environmental remediation expenses,
impairment charges, restructuring charges and related costs and
expenses, which could adversely affect our profitability and
cash flows.
We may
not be able to successfully develop and implement new technology
initiatives in a timely manner.
We have invested in, and are involved with, a number of
technology and process initiatives. Several technical aspects of
these initiatives are still unproven, and the eventual
commercial outcomes cannot be assessed with any certainty. Even
if we are successful with these initiatives, we may not be able
to deploy them in a timely fashion. Accordingly, the costs and
benefits from our investments in new technologies and the
consequent effects on our financial results may vary from
present expectations.
If we
fail to maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting, we may have material misstatements in our financial
statements and we may not be able to report our financial
results in a timely manner.
Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to
provide a report by management in our
Form 10-K
on internal control over financial reporting, including
managements assessment of the effectiveness of such
control. Internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent
limitations, including the possibility of human error, the
circumvention or overriding of controls or fraud. Therefore,
even effective internal controls can provide only some assurance
with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of
financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our
internal controls, we may be unable to provide financial
information in a timely and reliable manner. Any such
difficulties or failure may have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and operating results.
Loss
of our key management and other personnel, or an inability to
attract such management and other personnel, could adversely
impact our business.
We depend on our senior executive officers and other key
personnel to run our business. The loss of any of these officers
or other key personnel could materially adversely affect our
operations. Competition for qualified employees among companies
that rely heavily on engineering and technology is intense, and
the loss of qualified employees or an inability to attract,
retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees required
for the operation and expansion of our business could hinder our
ability to improve manufacturing operations, conduct research
activities successfully and develop marketable products.
21
Future
acquisitions or divestitures may adversely affect our financial
condition.
As part of our strategy for growth, we may pursue acquisitions,
divestitures or strategic alliances, which may not be completed
or, if completed, may not be ultimately beneficial to us. There
are numerous risks commonly encountered in business
combinations, including the risk that we may not be able to
complete a transaction that has been announced, effectively
integrate businesses acquired or generate the cost savings and
synergies anticipated. Failure to do so could have a material
adverse effect on our financial results.
We
could be required to make unexpected contributions to our
defined benefit pension plans as a result of adverse changes in
interest rates and the capital markets.
Most of our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit
pension plans for our employees in the U.S., the U.K. and
Canada, unfunded pension benefits in Germany and lump sum
indemnities payable to our employees in France, Italy, Korea and
Malaysia upon retirement or termination. Our pension plan assets
consist primarily of funds invested in listed stocks and bonds.
Our estimates of liabilities and expenses for pensions and other
postretirement benefits incorporate a number of assumptions,
including expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and
interest rates used to discount future benefits. Our results of
operations, liquidity or shareholders equity in a
particular period could be adversely affected by capital market
returns that are less than their assumed long-term rate of
return or a decline of the rate used to discount future benefits.
If the assets of our pension plans do not achieve assumed
investment returns for any period, such deficiency could result
in one or more charges against our earnings for that period. In
addition, changing economic conditions, poor pension investment
returns or other factors may require us to make unexpected cash
contributions to the pension plans in the future, preventing the
use of such cash for other purposes.
We
face risks relating to certain joint ventures and subsidiaries
that we do not entirely control. Our ability to access cash from
these entities may be more restricted than if such entities were
wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Some of our activities are, and will in the future be, conducted
through entities that we do not entirely control or wholly own.
These entities include our Norf, Germany; Logan, Kentucky; and
Evermore Recycling joint ventures, as well as our majority-owned
Korean and Malaysian subsidiaries. Our Malaysian subsidiary is a
public company whose shares are listed for trading on the Bursa
Malaysia. Under the governing documents, agreements or
securities laws applicable to or stock exchange listing rules
relative to certain of these joint ventures and subsidiaries,
our ability to fully control certain operational matters may be
limited. In addition, we do not solely determine certain key
matters, such as the timing and amount of cash distributions
from these entities. As a result, our ability to access cash
from these entities may be more restricted than if they were
wholly-owned entities.
Hindalco
and its interests as equity holder may conflict with the
interests of the holders of our Senior Notes in the
future.
Novelis is an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of Hindalco. As
a result, Hindalco may exercise control over our decisions to
enter into any corporate transaction or capital restructuring
and has the ability to approve or prevent any transaction that
requires the approval of our shareholder. Hindalco may have an
interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, financings or
other transactions that, in its judgment, could enhance its
equity investment, even though such transactions might involve
risks to us or the holders of our Senior Notes. Additionally,
Hindalco operates in the aluminum industry and may from time to
time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete,
directly or indirectly, with us. Hindalco has no obligation to
provide us with financing and is able to sell their equity
ownership in us at any time.
22
We
have supply agreements with Rio Tinto Alcan for a portion of our
raw materials requirements. If Rio Tinto Alcan is unable to
deliver sufficient quantities of these materials or if it
terminates these agreements, our ability to manufacture products
on a timely basis could be adversely affected.
The manufacture of our products requires sheet ingot that has
historically been, in part, supplied by Rio Tinto Alcan. For the
year ended March 31, 2010, we purchased the majority of our
third party sheet ingot requirements from Rio Tinto Alcans
primary metal group. Our metal supply agreements for the
purchase of sheet ingot from Rio Tinto Alcan have terms and
conditions substantially similar to market terms and conditions
and were amended effective as of January 1, 2008. If Rio
Tinto Alcan is unable to deliver sufficient quantities of this
material on a timely basis or if Rio Tinto Alcan terminates one
or more of these agreements, our production may be disrupted and
our net sales, profitability and cash flows could be materially
adversely affected. Although aluminum is traded on the world
markets, developing alternative suppliers for that portion of
our raw material requirements we expect to be supplied by Rio
Tinto Alcan could be time consuming and expensive.
Our continuous casting operations at our Saguenay Works, Canada
facility depend upon a local supply of molten aluminum from Rio
Tinto Alcan. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, Rio
Tinto Alcans primary metal group supplied most of the
molten aluminum used at Saguenay Works. In connection with the
spin-off, we entered into a metal supply agreement on terms
determined primarily by Rio Tinto Alcan for the continued
purchase of molten aluminum from Rio Tinto Alcan. If this supply
were to be disrupted, our Saguenay Works production could be
interrupted and our net sales, profitability and cash flows
materially adversely affected.
The
adoption of derivatives legislation by Congress could have an
adverse impact on our ability to hedge risks associated with our
business and on the cost of our hedging
activities.
We use
over-the-counter
(OTC) derivatives products to hedge our metal commodity risks
and, to a lesser extent, our interest rate and currency risks.
The U.S. Congress is currently considering legislation to
increase the regulatory oversight of the OTC derivatives markets
and to impose restrictions on certain derivative transactions,
which could affect the use of derivatives in hedging
transactions. Although it is not possible at this time to
predict whether or when Congress may act on derivatives
legislation, any legislative changes that subject us to
additional capital or margin requirements or other restrictions
on our trading and commodity positions could have an adverse
effect on our ability to hedge risks associated with our
business and on the cost of our hedging activities.
We
face significant price and other forms of competition from other
aluminum rolled products producers, which could hurt our results
of operations and cash flows.
Generally, the markets in which we operate are highly
competitive. We compete primarily on the basis of our value
proposition, including price, product quality, ability to meet
customers specifications, range of products offered, lead
times, technical support and customer service. Some of our
competitors may benefit from greater capital resources, have
more efficient technologies, have lower raw material and energy
costs and may be able to sustain longer periods of price
competition. In particular, we face increased competition from
producers in China, which have significantly lower production
costs and pricing. This lower pricing could erode the market
prices of our products in the Chinese market.
In addition, our competitive position within the global aluminum
rolled products industry may be affected by, among other things,
the recent trend toward consolidation among our competitors,
exchange rate fluctuations that may make our products less
competitive in relation to the products of companies based in
other countries (despite the U.S. dollar-based input cost
and the marginal costs of shipping) and economies of scale in
purchasing, production and sales, which accrue to the benefit of
some of our competitors. For example, the price gap between the
Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) and the London Metal Exchange
(LME) may make products manufactured in China with SHFE prices
for aluminum more competitive compared to our products
manufactured in Asia with LME prices for aluminum.
Increased competition could cause a reduction in our shipment
volumes and profitability or increase our expenditures, either
of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
results and cash flows.
23
The
end-use markets for certain of our products are highly
competitive and customers are willing to accept substitutes for
our products.
The end-use markets for certain aluminum rolled products are
highly competitive. Aluminum competes with other materials, such
as steel, plastics, composite materials and glass, among others,
for various applications, including in beverage and food cans
and automotive end-use markets. In the past, customers have
demonstrated a willingness to substitute other materials for
aluminum. For example, changes in consumer preferences in
beverage containers have increased the use of PET plastic
containers and glass bottles in recent years. These trends may
continue. The willingness of customers to accept substitutes for
aluminum products could have a material adverse effect on our
financial results and cash flows.
The
seasonal nature of some of our customers industries could
have a material adverse effect on our financial results and cash
flows.
The construction industry and the consumption of beer and soda
are sensitive to weather conditions and as a result, demand for
aluminum rolled products in the construction industry and for
can feedstock can be seasonal. Our quarterly financial results
could fluctuate as a result of climatic changes, and a prolonged
series of cold summers in the different regions in which we
conduct our business could have a material adverse effect on our
financial results and cash flows.
We are
subject to a broad range of environmental, health and safety
laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate,
and we may be exposed to substantial environmental, health and
safety costs and liabilities.
We are subject to a broad range of environmental, health and
safety laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we
operate. These laws and regulations impose increasingly
stringent environmental, health and safety protection standards
and permitting requirements regarding, among other things, air
emissions, wastewater storage, treatment and discharges, the use
and handling of hazardous or toxic materials, waste disposal
practices, the remediation of environmental contamination,
post-mining reclamation and working conditions for our
employees. Some environmental laws, such as Superfund and
comparable laws in U.S. states and other jurisdictions
worldwide, impose joint and several liability for the cost of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses, without regard to the fault or the
legality of the original conduct.
The costs of complying with these laws and regulations,
including participation in assessments and remediation of
contaminated sites and installation of pollution control
facilities, have been, and in the future could be, significant.
In addition, these laws and regulations may also result in
substantial environmental liabilities associated with divested
assets, third party locations and past activities. In certain
instances, these costs and liabilities, as well as related
action to be taken by us, could be accelerated or increased if
we were to close, divest of or change the principal use of
certain facilities with respect to which we may have
environmental liabilities or remediation obligations. Currently,
we are involved in a number of compliance efforts, remediation
activities and legal proceedings concerning environmental
matters, including certain activities and proceedings arising
under Superfund and comparable laws in U.S. states and
other jurisdictions worldwide in which we have operations,
including Brazil and certain countries in the European Union.
We have established reserves for environmental remediation
activities and liabilities where appropriate. However, the cost
of addressing environmental matters (including the timing of any
charges related thereto) cannot be predicted with certainty, and
these reserves may not ultimately be adequate, especially in
light of potential changes in environmental conditions, changing
interpretations of laws and regulations by regulators and
courts, the discovery of previously unknown environmental
conditions, the risk of governmental orders to carry out
additional compliance on certain sites not initially included in
remediation in progress, our potential liability to remediate
sites for which provisions have not been previously established
and the adoption of more stringent environmental laws. Such
future developments could result in increased environmental
costs and liabilities and could require significant capital
expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, results or cash flows. Furthermore,
the failure to comply with our obligations under
24
the environmental laws and regulations could subject us to
administrative, civil or criminal penalties, obligations to pay
damages or other costs, and injunctions or other orders,
including orders to cease operations. In addition, the presence
of environmental contamination at our properties could adversely
affect our ability to sell property, receive full value for a
property or use a property as collateral for a loan.
Some of our current and potential operations are located or
could be located in or near communities that may regard such
operations as having a detrimental effect on their social and
economic circumstances. Environmental laws typically provide for
participation in permitting decisions, site remediation
decisions and other matters. Concern about environmental justice
issues may affect our operations. Should such community
objections be presented to government officials, the
consequences of such a development may have a material adverse
impact upon the profitability or, in extreme cases, the
viability of an operation. In addition, such developments may
adversely affect our ability to expand or enter into new
operations in such location or elsewhere and may also have an
effect on the cost of our environmental remediation projects.
We use a variety of hazardous materials and chemicals in our
rolling processes, as well as in our smelting operations in
Brazil and in connection with maintenance work on our
manufacturing facilities. Because of the nature of these
substances or related residues, we may be liable for certain
costs, including, among others, costs for health-related claims
or removal or re-treatment of such substances. Certain of our
current and former facilities incorporate asbestos-containing
materials, a hazardous substance that has been the subject of
health-related
claims for occupation exposure. In addition, although we have
developed environmental, health and safety programs for our
employees, including measures to reduce employee exposure to
hazardous substances, and conduct regular assessments at our
facilities, we are currently, and in the future may be, involved
in claims and litigation filed on behalf of persons alleging
injury predominantly as a result of occupational exposure to
substances or other hazards at our current or former facilities.
It is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of these
claims and lawsuits due to the unpredictable nature of personal
injury litigation. If these claims and lawsuits, individually or
in the aggregate, were finally resolved against us, our results
of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
We may
be exposed to significant legal proceedings or
investigations.
From time to time, we are involved in, or the subject of,
disputes, proceedings and investigations with respect to a
variety of matters, including environmental, health and safety,
product liability, employee, tax, personal injury, contractual
and other matters as well as other disputes and proceedings that
arise in the ordinary course of business.
Certain of these matters are discussed in the preceding risk
factor. Any claims against us or any investigations involving
us, whether meritorious or not, could be costly to defend or
comply with and could divert managements attention as well
as operational resources. Any such dispute, litigation or
investigation, whether currently pending or threatened or in the
future, may have a material adverse effect on our financial
results and cash flows.
For example, a lawsuit was commenced against Novelis Corporation
on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC
(CCBSS) in Georgia state court. CCBSS is a
consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
the terms of the most favored nations provision
regarding certain pricing matters under an aluminum can stock
supply agreement between the parties, and seeks monetary damages
in an amount to be determined at trial and a declaration of its
rights under the agreement. The dispute will likely turn on the
facts that are presented to the court by the parties and the
courts finding as to how certain provisions of the
agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in
this litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material.
See Item 3 Legal Proceedings.
25
Product
liability claims against us could result in significant costs or
negatively impact our reputation and could adversely affect our
business results and financial condition.
We are sometimes exposed to warranty and product liability
claims. There can be no assurance that we will not experience
material product liability losses arising from such claims in
the future and that these will not have a negative impact on us.
We generally maintain insurance against many product liability
risks, but there can be no assurance that this coverage will be
adequate for any liabilities ultimately incurred. In addition,
there is no assurance that insurance will continue to be
available on terms acceptable to us. A successful claim that
exceeds our available insurance coverage could have a material
adverse effect on our financial results and cash flows.
We may
be affected by global climate change or by legal, regulatory, or
market responses to such change.
There is a growing sentiment and concern over climate change,
which has led to legislative and regulatory initiatives, such as
cap-and-trade
systems and increased limits on emissions of greenhouse gases.
New laws enacted could directly and indirectly affect our
customers and suppliers (through an increase in the cost of
production or their ability to produce satisfactory products) or
our business (through an impact on our inventory availability,
cost of sales, operations or demand for the products we sell),
which could result in an adverse effect on our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. Compliance with
any new or more stringent laws or regulations, or stricter
interpretations of existing laws, could require additional
expenditures by us, our customers or our suppliers. Also, we
rely on natural gas, electricity, fuel oil and transport fuel to
operate our facilities. Any increased costs of these energy
sources because of new laws could be passed along to us and our
customers and suppliers, which could also have a negative impact
on our profitability.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
Our executive offices are located in Atlanta, Georgia. The
following tables provide information, by operating segment,
about the plant locations, processes and major end-use
markets/applications for the aluminum rolled products, recycling
and primary metal facilities we operated during all or part of
the year ended March 31, 2010. The total number of
operating facilities, research facilities, and innovation
centers used by our operating segments as of March 31, 2010
are shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Research
|
|
|
Innovation
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Centers
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Included above are operating facilities that we jointly own and
operate with third parties. Please see detail below:
North
America
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Berea, Kentucky
|
|
Recycling
|
|
Recycled ingot
|
Burnaby, British Columbia
|
|
Finishing
|
|
Foil containers
|
Fairmont, West Virginia
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil, HVAC material
|
Greensboro, Georgia
|
|
Recycling
|
|
Recycled ingot
|
Kingston, Ontario
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Automotive, construction/industrial
|
Logan, Kentucky(1)
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling, finishing, recycling
|
|
Can stock
|
Oswego, New York
|
|
Novelis Fusion(tm)
casting, hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling, finishing
|
|
Can stock, construction/industrial, semi-finished coil
|
Saguenay, Quebec
|
|
Continuous casting, recycling
|
|
Semi-finished coil
|
Terre Haute, Indiana
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Toronto, Ontario
|
|
Finishing
|
|
Foil, foil containers
|
Warren, Ohio
|
|
Coating
|
|
Can end stock
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We own 40% of the outstanding common shares of Logan Aluminum
Inc. (Logan), but we have made subsequent equipment
investments such that our portion of Logans total machine
hours has provided us more than 60% of Logans total
production. |
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Berlin, Germany
|
|
Converting
|
|
Packaging
|
Bresso, Italy
|
|
Finishing, painting
|
|
Painted sheet, architectural
|
Bridgnorth, United Kingdom
|
|
Foil rolling, finishing, converting
|
|
Foil, packaging
|
Dudelange, Luxembourg
|
|
Continuous casting, foil rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Göttingen, Germany
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing, painting
|
|
Can end, can tab, food can, lithographic, painted sheet
|
Latchford, United Kingdom
|
|
Recycling
|
|
Sheet ingot from recycled metal
|
Ludenscheid, Germany
|
|
Foil rolling, finishing, converting
|
|
Foil, packaging
|
Nachterstedt, Germany
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Automotive, can end, industrial
|
Norf, Germany(1)
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling
|
|
Can stock, foilstock, feeder stock for finishing operations
|
Ohle, Germany
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing, converting
|
|
Foil, packaging
|
Pieve, Italy
|
|
Continuous casting, cold rolling
|
|
Coil for Bresso, industrial
|
Rugles, France
|
|
Continuous casting, foil rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Sierre, Switzerland(2)
|
|
Novelis Fusion(tm)
casting, hot rolling, cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Automotive sheet, industrial
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operated as a 50/50 joint venture between us and Hydro
Aluminium Deutschland GmbH (Hydro). |
|
(2) |
|
We have entered into an agreement with Alcan pursuant to which
Alcan retains access to the plate production capacity, which
represents a portion of the total production capacity of the
Sierre hot mill. |
27
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Bukit Raja, Malaysia(1)
|
|
Continuous casting, cold rolling
|
|
Construction/industrial, heavy and lightgauge foils
|
Ulsan, Korea(2)
|
|
Novelis Fusion(tm)
casting, hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling, finishing
|
|
Can stock, construction/industrial, electronics, foilstock, and
recycled material
|
Yeongju, Korea(3)
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling, casting, finishing
|
|
Can stock, construction/industrial, electronics, foilstock and
recycled material
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ownership of the Bukit Raja plant corresponds to our 58% equity
interest in Aluminium Company of Malaysia Berhad. |
|
(2) |
|
We hold a 68% equity interest in the Ulsan plant. |
|
(3) |
|
We hold a 68% equity interest in the Yeongju plant. |
South
America
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Pindamonhangaba, Brazil
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling
|
|
Construction/industrial, can stock, foilstock, recycled ingot,
foundry ingot, forge stock
|
Utinga, Brazil
|
|
Finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Ouro Preto, Brazil(1)
|
|
Smelting
|
|
Primary aluminum (sheet ingot and billets)
|
Aratu, Brazil
|
|
Smelting
|
|
Primary aluminum (sheet ingot)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In May 2009, we ceased the production of commercial grade
alumina at our Ouro Preto facility in Brazil. |
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are a party to litigation incidental to our business from
time to time. For additional information regarding litigation to
which we are a party, see Note 18 Commitments
and Contingencies to our accompanying audited consolidated
financial statements, which are incorporated by reference into
this item.
28
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
On May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were acquired by
Hindalco through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary AV Metals
Inc. (Acquisition Sub) pursuant to a plan of arrangement (the
Arrangement). Immediately following the Arrangement, Acquisition
Sub transferred our common shares to its wholly-owned subsidiary
AV Aluminum Inc. (AV Aluminum). As of the date of filing, AV
Aluminum is the sole shareholder of record of our shares.
Subsequent to completion of the Arrangement on May 15,
2007, all of our common shares were indirectly held by Hindalco,
and we became a foreign private issuer. We continue to file
periodic reports under section 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 because our Senior Notes are publicly
traded (see Note 10 Debt to our accompanying
audited consolidated financial statements).
No dividends have been declared since October 26, 2006.
Future dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors
and will depend on, among other things, our financial resources,
cash flows generated by our business, our cash requirements,
restrictions under the instruments governing our indebtedness,
being in compliance with the appropriate indentures and
covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness
that would allow us to legally pay dividends and other relevant
factors.
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The selected consolidated financial data presented below as of
and for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009; the
periods May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008 and
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007; the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 were derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements of Novelis Inc. The selected
consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with
our consolidated financial statements for the respective periods
and the related notes included elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
As of May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco; thus, earnings per share data is
not reported. Amounts in the table below are in millions, except
per share amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008(A)
|
|
|
|
2007(A)
|
|
|
2007(B)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(C)
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
2,630
|
|
|
$
|
9,849
|
|
|
$
|
8,363
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder(D)
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(275
|
)
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(C)
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Total assets(A)
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,970
|
|
|
$
|
5,792
|
|
|
$
|
5,476
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
$
|
2,596
|
|
|
$
|
2,559
|
|
|
$
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,300
|
|
|
$
|
2,302
|
|
|
$
|
2,603
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Shareholders/invested equity
|
|
$
|
1,869
|
|
|
$
|
1,419
|
|
|
$
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary. Our acquisition by
Hindalco was recorded in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 103, Push
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
Down Basis of Accounting Required in Certain Limited
Circumstances (SAB 103). In the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets, the consideration and related costs
paid by Hindalco in connection with the acquisition have been
pushed down to us and have been allocated to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement
No. 141, Business Combinations (FASB 141), the
applicable accounting standard at the Arrangement date. Due to
the impact of push down accounting, the Companys
consolidated financial statements and certain notes for the year
ended March 31, 2008 are presented in two distinct periods
to indicate the application of two different bases of accounting
between the periods presented: (1) the period up to, and
including, the acquisition date (April 1, 2007 through
May 15, 2007, labeled Predecessor) and
(2) the period after that date (May 16, 2007 through
March 31, 2008, labeled Successor). The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include a black
line division which indicates that the Predecessor and Successor
reporting entities shown are not comparable. |
|
|
|
The consideration paid by Hindalco to acquire Novelis has been
pushed down to us and allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on our estimates of fair value, using
methodologies and assumptions that we believe are reasonable.
This allocation of fair value results in additional charges or
income to our post-acquisition consolidated statements of
operations. |
|
(B) |
|
On June 26, 2007, our board of directors approved the
change of our fiscal year end to March 31 from December 31.
On June 28, 2007, we filed a Transition Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant
to
Rule 13a-10
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for transition period
reporting. |
|
(C) |
|
The consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2005 include the results for the period from
January 1 to January 5, 2005 prior to our spin-off from
Alcan, in addition to the results for the period from January 6
to December 31, 2005. The combined financial results for
the period from January 1 to January 5, 2005 present
our operations on a carve-out accounting basis. The consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 (and subsequent
periods) and the consolidated results for the period from
January 6 (the date of the spin-off from Alcan) to
December 31, 2005 (and subsequent periods) present our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows as a
stand-alone entity. |
|
|
|
All income earned and cash flows generated by us as well as the
risks and rewards of these businesses from January 1 to
January 5, 2005 were primarily attributed to us and are
included in our consolidated results for the year ended
December 31, 2005, with the exception of losses of
$43 million ($29 million net of tax) arising from the
change in fair market value of derivative contracts, primarily
with Alcan. These
mark-to-market
losses for the period from January 1 to January 5, 2005
were recorded in the consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and were recognized as a
decrease in Shareholders/invested equity. |
|
(D) |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder for the
year ended March 31, 2009 includes non-cash pre-tax
impairment charges of $1.5 billion, pre-tax unrealized
losses on derivatives instruments of $519 million, a
$122 million pre-tax gain on extinguishment of debt and
$95 million in pre-tax restructuring charges. Restructuring
charges, net for the year ended March 31, 2010; the period
May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008; April 1,
2007 through May 15, 2007; the three months ended
March 31, 2007; and the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005 were $14 million; $6 million;
$1 million; $9 million; $19 million; and
$10 million, respectively. For additional discussion on
restructuring actions, see Note 2 Restructuring
Programs in our accompanying audited consolidated financial
statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain non-recurring expenses were incurred related to the
acquisition by Hindalco. The three months ended March 31,
2007 and the period May 16, 2007 through March 31,
2008 each include $32 million of sales transaction fees.
The period May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008 also
includes $45 million of stock compensation expense related
to the Arrangement. |
30
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
OVERVIEW
AND REFERENCES
Novelis is the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and
light gauge products for the beverage and food can,
transportation, construction and industrial, and foil products
markets. As of March 31, 2010, we had operations in 11
countries on four continents: North America, Europe, Asia and
South America, through 31 operating plants, six research
facilities and two market-focused innovation centers. In
addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our
South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina
refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation
facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in
Brazil. We are the only company of our size and scope focused
solely on aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local
supply of technologically sophisticated products in all of these
geographic regions.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements
that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual
results could differ materially from those discussed in these
forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to,
those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report,
particularly in Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and Market Data and Risk Factors.
BACKGROUND
AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
spin-off occurred on January 6, 2005 following approval by
Alcans board of directors and shareholders, and legal and
regulatory approvals. Alcan shareholders received one Novelis
common share for every five Alcan common shares held.
Acquisition
by Hindalco
On May 15, 2007, the company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the companys
common shares was $3.4 billion, and $2.8 billion of
Novelis debt was also assumed for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
As discussed in Note 1 Business and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, the Arrangement was recorded in accordance
with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 103. Accordingly,
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, the
consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in connection
with the acquisition have been pushed down to us and
allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in
accordance with FAS 141, Business Combinations. Due to the
impact of push down accounting, the companys consolidated
financial statements and certain notes separate the
companys presentation into two distinct periods to
indicate the application of two different bases of accounting
between the periods presented: (1) the periods up to, and
including, the May 15, 2007 acquisition date (labeled
Predecessor) and (2) the periods after that date (labeled
Successor). The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include a black line division which indicates that the
Predecessor and Successor reporting entities shown are not
comparable.
Combined
Financial Results of the Predecessor and Successor
For purposes of managements discussion and analysis of the
results of operations in this
Form 10-K,
we combined the results of operations for the period ended
May 15, 2007 of the Predecessor with the period ended
March 31, 2008 of the Successor. We believe the combined
results of operations for the year ended March 31, 2008
provide management and investors with a more meaningful
perspective on Novelis financial and operational
performance than if we did not combine the results of operations
of the Predecessor and the Successor in this manner. Similarly,
we combine the financial results of the Predecessor and the
Successor when discussing segment information and sources and
uses of cash for the year ended March 31, 2008.
31
The combined results of operations are non-GAAP financial
measures, do not include any pro forma assumptions or
adjustments and should not be used in isolation or substitution
of the Predecessors and the Successors results.
Shown below are combining schedules of (i) shipments and
(ii) our results of operations for periods allocable to the
Successor, the Predecessor and the combined presentation for the
year ended March 31, 2008 that we use throughout the
discussion of results from operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Shipments (in kt):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products(1)
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
Ingot products(2)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rolled products include tolling (the conversion of
customer-owned metal). |
|
(2) |
|
Ingot products include primary ingot in Brazil, foundry products
in Korea and Europe, secondary ingot in Europe and other
recyclable aluminum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Results of Operations (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
10,247
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
11,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
HIGHLIGHTS
The global economic downturn had a significant impact on our
business with low levels of shipments in the second half of
fiscal 2009 and first half of fiscal 2010, particularly in the
automotive, construction and industrial markets. As a result of
our efforts to preserve liquidity, cost reductions enacted and
capital spending controls, we were able to achieve pre-tax and
net income of $7.27 million and $405 million,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
We reported pre-tax income of $727 million for fiscal 2010,
which includes $578 million of unrealized gains on
derivatives. The $578 million of unrealized gains includes
a $504 million reversal of previously recognized losses
upon settlement of derivatives and $74 million of
unrealized gains relating to mark to market adjustments on metal
and currency derivatives. Current year results also include
$14 million of restructuring expenses. Net income
attributable to our common shareholder for fiscal 2010 was
$405 million.
|
|
|
|
We reported a pre-tax loss of $2.2 billion for fiscal 2009,
which includes $519 million of unrealized losses on
derivatives. The prior year results also include non-cash
impairment charges of $1.5 billion, $95 million in
restructuring charges and a $122 million gain on a debt
exchange transaction. Net loss attributable to our common
shareholder for fiscal 2009 was $1.9 billion.
|
|
|
|
Shipments of flat rolled products in fiscal 2010 were down 2%
overall as compared to fiscal 2009. However, shipments in our
fourth quarter of 2010 increased in all regions as compared to
the same period a year ago. Fourth quarter increases in North
America, Europe and Asia were the most significant, with 11%,
21% and 50% increases, respectively. Shipments in South America
remained stable during the past year, as this market is heavily
focused on can sheet shipments and was not as significantly
impacted by the economic downturn.
|
|
|
|
We had $1.0 billion of liquidity as of March 31, 2010.
This represents an increase of $636 million as compared to
our liquidity position at March 31, 2009, driven by strong
operational cash flow, the bond issuance and increased gross
borrowing capacity under the ABL.
|
All of these matters are discussed in further detail in
Results of Operations and Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
BUSINESS
AND INDUSTRY CLIMATE
The global economic slowdown negatively impacted our sales and
shipment levels as well as our profitability, operating cash
flows and liquidity. During the second half of fiscal 2009, we
experienced rapidly declining aluminum prices and sharply lower
end-customer demand. However, beverage and food can shipments,
which on an annual basis, represent between 56% and 58% of our
rolled products business, stabilized during the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 at levels which were only moderately below
historical levels. The impacts were more severe in automotive,
construction and industrial markets, although conditions have
33
now also begun to recover in those product categories. On a
regional basis, the impacts were most severe in Europe, Asia and
North America.
Key
Sales and Shipment Trends
(In
millions, excepts Shipments which are in kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,103
|
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,939
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
|
$
|
2,420
|
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
% increase (decrease) in net sales versus comparable previous
year period
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(37
|
)%
|
|
|
(26
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
Rolled product shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
South America
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverage and food cans
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
All other rolled products
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage increase (decrease) in rolled products shipments
versus comparable previous year period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
Europe
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
Asia
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
South America
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverage and food cans
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
All other rolled products
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
(33
|
)%
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
Model and Key Concepts
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (i) a
pass-through aluminum price based on the London Market Exchange
(LME) plus local market premiums and (ii) a
conversion premium price on the conversion cost to
produce the rolled product which reflects, among other factors,
the competitive market conditions for that product.
A key component of our conversion model is the use of derivative
instruments on projected aluminum requirements to preserve our
conversion margin. We enter into forward metal purchases
simultaneous with the sales contracts that contain fixed metal
prices. These forward metal purchases directly hedge the
economic risk of future metal price fluctuation associated with
these contracts. The recognition of unrealized gains and losses
on metal derivative positions typically precedes customer
delivery and revenue recognition under the related fixed forward
priced contracts. The timing difference between the recognition
of unrealized gains and losses on metal derivatives and
recognition of revenue impacts income (loss) before income taxes
and net income (loss). Gains and losses on metal derivative
contracts are not recognized in segment income until
34
realized. Additionally, we sell short-term LME futures contracts
to reduce the cash flow volatility of fluctuating metal prices
associated with the metal price lag.
The average and closing prices based upon the LME for aluminum
for the years ended March 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
versus
|
|
versus
|
London Metal Exchange Prices
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum (per metric tonne, and
presented in U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing cash price as of end of period
|
|
$
|
2,288
|
|
|
$
|
1,366
|
|
|
$
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
(53
|
)%
|
Average cash price during period
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
2,234
|
|
|
$
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
After reaching a peak of $3,292 per tonne in July 2008, aluminum
prices rapidly declined to a low of $1,254 per tonne in February
2009, our fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Prices have steadily
increased since that time, with a closing price of $2,287 on
March 31, 2010.
Rapid changes in LME prices have the following impacts on our
business:
|
|
|
|
|
Our products have a price structure based upon the LME price.
Increases or decreases in the LME price have a direct impact on
net sales, cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization) and working capital on a lag basis.
|
|
|
|
In periods of declining prices, we settle derivative contracts
in cash with brokers in advance from our customers. The lag
between derivative settlement and customer collection typically
ranges from 30 to 60 days, which temporarily impacts our
liquidity. During fiscal 2010, we had net outflows of
$395 million for payments related to the settlement of
derivatives.
|
LME prices increased 67% from the March 31, 2009 closing
price of $1,366 per tonne to $2,288 per tonne at March 31,
2010 which resulted in $122 million of net gains on change
in fair value of metal derivatives during fiscal 2010.
Metal
Price Ceilings
As a result of contracts entered into by Alcan prior to our
spin-off in 2005, we had contracts that contained a ceiling over
which metal prices could not be contractually passed through to
certain customers. The last of these contracts expired on
December 31, 2009, and we entered into a new multi-year
agreement to continue supplying similar volumes to the same
customer. This new agreement became effective January 1,
2010, and does not contain a metal price ceiling.
Contracts with metal price ceilings negatively impacted our
margins when the price we paid for metal was above the ceiling
price contained in these contracts. We calculate and report this
difference to be the difference between the quoted purchase
price on the LME (adjusted for any local premiums and for any
price lag associated with purchasing or processing time) and the
metal price ceiling in our contracts. Cash flows from operations
were also negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted for
any timing difference between customer receipts and vendor
payments, and offset partially by reduced income taxes.
LME prices were below the ceiling price for the first five
months of fiscal 2010 but rose above the ceiling again in
September 2009. In fiscal 2010, we were unable to pass through
$10 million of metal purchase costs associated with sales
under this contract, as compared to fiscal 2009 when we were
unable to pass through $176 million of metal purchase costs
associated with sales under this contract.
In connection with the allocation of purchase price (i.e., total
consideration) paid by Hindalco, we established reserves
totaling $655 million as of May 15, 2007 to record
these sales contracts with metal price ceilings at fair value.
These reserves were accreted into net sales over the term of the
underlying contracts. This accretion had no impact on cash flow.
For fiscal 2010, 2009 and the combined 2008, we recorded
35
accretion of $152 million, $233 million and
$270 million, respectively. With the expiration of the last
contract with a price ceiling, the balance of the reserves was
zero effective December 31, 2009.
Metal
Price Lag
On certain sales contracts, we experience timing differences on
the pass through of changing aluminum prices from our suppliers
to our customers. Additional timing differences occur in the
flow of metal costs through moving average inventory cost values
and cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization). In periods of declining prices, our earnings are
negatively impacted by this timing difference while the opposite
is true in periods of rising prices. We refer to this timing
difference as metal price lag. We sell short-term
LME forward contracts to help mitigate our exposure to metal
price lag.
Foreign
Exchange Impact
Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates also impact our operating
results. The following table presents the exchange rates as of
the end of each period as well as the average of the month-end
exchange rates for each of the past three fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate as of
|
|
Average Exchange Rate
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
1.353
|
|
|
|
1.328
|
|
|
|
1.581
|
|
|
|
1.414
|
|
|
|
1.411
|
|
|
|
1.432
|
|
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.784
|
|
|
|
2.301
|
|
|
|
1.744
|
|
|
|
1.861
|
|
|
|
1.982
|
|
|
|
1.837
|
|
South Korean won per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.014
|
|
|
|
1.258
|
|
|
|
1.028
|
|
|
|
1.085
|
|
|
|
1.134
|
|
|
|
1.025
|
|
The U.S. dollar weakened as compared to the local currency
in all regions during fiscal 2010. In Europe and Asia, the
weakening of the U.S. dollar resulted in foreign exchange
gains as these operations are recorded in local currency. In
North America and Brazil, where the U.S. dollar is the
functional currency due to predominantly U.S. dollar
selling prices and local currency operating costs, we incurred
foreign exchange losses as the U.S. dollar weakened.
In fiscal 2009, the U.S. dollar strengthened as compared to
the local currency in all regions, resulting in foreign exchange
losses in Europe and Asia as these operations are recorded in
local currency, and foreign exchanges gains in Brazil and North
America. See Segment Review for each of the periods
presented below for additional discussion of the impact of
foreign exchange on the results of each region.
Results
of Operations
Year
Ended March 31, 2010 Compared with the Year Ended
March 31, 2009
For the year ended March 31, 2010, we reported net income
attributable to our common shareholder of $405 million on
net sales of $8.7 billion, compared to the year ended
March 31, 2009 when we reported net loss attributable to
our common shareholder of $1.9 billion on net sales of
$10.2 billion. The prior year results include pre-tax
impairment charges totaling $1.5 billion, which reflected
the deterioration in the global economic environment and
resulting decreases in the market capitalization of our parent
company, valuation of our publicly traded debt and related
increase in our cost of capital.
While shipments were flat, Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization) decreased $2.1 billion, or
22%, on a sales reduction of 15%. The decrease in average metal
prices impacted both sales and costs of goods sold, also the
reduction in cost of goods sold reflects the benefit of our
previously announced restructuring actions and cost reduction
initiatives. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $41 million, or 13%, primarily due to the
increase in accrued incentive compensation in the current year
as compared to the prior year when business conditions were
declining.
The current year also includes $578 million in unrealized
gains on derivative instruments, as compared to unrealized
losses of $519 million in the prior year. Additionally, we
recorded an income tax provision of
36
$262 million on our net income in fiscal 2010, as compared
to a $246 million income tax benefit in the prior year.
These items are discussed in further detail below.
Segment
Review
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments based on Segment income. Segment income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment income as earnings before (a) depreciation and
amortization; (b) interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs; (c) interest income; (d) unrealized
gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net; (e) impairment of goodwill;
(f) impairment charges on long-lived assets (other than
goodwill); (g) gain on extinguishment of debt;
(h) noncontrolling interests share;
(i) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Segment income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting (described below);
(k) restructuring charges, net; (k) gains or losses on
disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses, net;
(l) other costs, net; (m) litigation settlement, net
of insurance recoveries; (n) sale transaction fees;
(o) provision or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and
(p) cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax.
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions, except shipments which are in kt). For additional
financial information related to our operating segments. See
Note 19 Segment, Geographical Area and Major
Customer and Major Supplier Information to our accompanying
audited consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,292
|
|
|
$
|
2,975
|
|
|
$
|
1501
|
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
year ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the year ended
March 31, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment Income
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Conversion costs(A)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Other changes(B)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such as
direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage, alloys
and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss. Fluctuations in
this component reflect cost efficiencies during the period as
well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(B) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research and development for all
segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of purchase
accounting and metal price ceiling contracts. Significant
fluctuations in these items are discussed below. |
North
America
As of March 31, 2010, North America manufactured aluminum
sheet and light gauge products through 11 plants, including
two dedicated recycling facilities. Important end-use
applications include beverage cans, containers and packaging,
automotive and other transportation applications, building
products and other industrial applications.
North America experienced a reduction in demand in the second
half of fiscal 2009 as all industry sectors were impacted by the
economic downturn. While shipments for fiscal 2010 were down 4%
as compared to a year ago, fourth quarter 2010 represented an
11% increase over the same period a year ago and a 13% increase
over our seasonally low third quarter. Net sales for fiscal 2010
were down $638 million, or 16%, as compared to fiscal 2009
primarily reflecting lower average LME prices as well as the
reduced volumes discussed above. Prices under certain can
contracts are determined based on a six month price average and
therefore do not reflect the recent increases in LME prices. Can
shipments represent approximately 70% of our flat rolled
shipments in North America.
Segment income for fiscal 2010 was $320 million, up
$238 million as compared to the prior year period. Improved
conversion premiums and product mix, reductions in conversion
costs, favorable metal price lag and favorable impact of foreign
exchange all had a positive impact on segment income. Conversion
cost improvements relate to reductions in a number of cost
categories, including energy, melt loss, production labor and
repairs and maintenance as compared to the prior year period.
Other changes include a $98 million favorable impact
related to metal price ceilings contracts which expired on
December 31, 2009, partially offset by an $81 million
reduction to the net favorable impact of acquisition related
fair value adjustments and a $10 million reduction in the
benefit from used beverage cans.
To consolidate corporate functions and enhance organizational
effectiveness, we announced a plan to relocate our North
American headquarters from Cleveland, Ohio to Atlanta, Georgia,
where the Companys executive offices are located. This
move is expected to occur over the next six months with a
completion date no later than December 31, 2010. In
connection with the relocation of the North American
headquarters, we
38
expect to incur approximately $21 million in restructuring
and other charges to be recorded in fiscal years 2010 and 2011.
Included in these charges are approximately $6 million in
one-time employee termination costs; approximately
$6 million in other employee related costs, including
relocation; approximately $5 million of expense associated
with contract and lease terminations; and approximately
$4 million of expense associated with asset write-downs and
accelerated depreciation. We recorded $4 million in fiscal
2010 related to one-time termination benefits and other employee
related costs.
In response to reductions in demand in fiscal 2009, we announced
a Voluntary Separation Program (VSP) available to salaried
employees in North America and the Corporate office, aimed at
reducing staffing levels. This VSP plan was supplemented by an
Involuntary Severance Program (ISP). Through the VSP and ISP, we
eliminated approximately 120 positions during the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2009 and the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Europe
As of March 31, 2010, our European segment provided
European markets with value-added sheet and light gauge products
through 13 aluminum operating facilities, including one
dedicated recycling facility. Europe serves a broad range of
aluminum rolled product end-use markets in various applications
including can, automotive, lithographic, foil products and
painted products.
Europe experienced a reduction in demand in all industry sectors
with flat rolled shipments and net sales down 12% and 20%,
respectively, compared to the prior year. While shipments for
fiscal 2010 were down compared to a year ago, fourth quarter
2010 represented a 21% increase over the same period a year ago
and a 21% increase over our seasonally low third quarter. Net
sales for fiscal 2010 were down $743 million, as compared
to fiscal 2009 reflecting the volume decrease as well as lower
average LME prices.
Segment income for fiscal 2010 was $247 million, up
$11 million as compared to the prior year. Improved
conversion premium and product mix, reductions in conversion
costs and the favorable impact of foreign exchange more than
offset the impact of volume reduction and the negative metal
price lag. Other changes reflect a favorable impact of
$25 million from fixed forward priced contracts.
In late fiscal 2009, we began a number of restructuring actions
across Europe, including the closure of our plant in Rogerstone,
United Kingdom effective April 2009. The closure of the
Rogerstone plant resulted in the elimination of 440 positions.
Other cost reductions were implemented in 2009 and throughout
2010 through capacity and staff reductions at plants in France,
Germany, Switzerland and Italy.
Asia
As of March 31, 2010, Asia operated three manufacturing
facilities with production balanced between foil, construction
and industrial, and beverage and food can end-use applications.
The Asian economies, fueled by government stimulus programs,
have been recovering rapidly since our first quarter of fiscal
2010. We expect growth in Chinas economy to benefit
export-oriented neighboring countries as they participate in
demand for finished goods and infrastructure projects in China.
Flat rolled shipments are up 19% as compared to the prior year
and have been consistent each quarter this year. We expect
customer demand to continue at these levels for the near term.
Net sales were down 2% as the decrease in the average LME more
than offset volume and conversion premium increases.
Segment income increased from $86 million in fiscal 2009 to
$166 million for fiscal 2010 due to improvements in volume,
conversion premiums and reductions in conversion costs,
partially offset by the unfavorable metal price lag. As shown
above in the Foreign Exchange Impact discussion, the
U.S. dollar strengthened during fiscal 2009, and weakened
during fiscal 2010, resulting in a favorable
year-over-year
foreign exchange impact.
In response to reduced demand in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2009, we eliminated 34 positions in Asia related to a voluntary
retirement program. Also during fiscal 2009, we recorded an
impairment charge of approximately $5 million in Novelis
Korea due to the obsolescence of certain production related
fixed assets.
39
South
America
Our operations in South America manufacture various aluminum
rolled products for the beverage and food can, construction and
industrial and transportation end-use markets. As of
March 31, 2010, our South American operations included
two rolling plants in Brazil along with two smelters, bauxite
mines and power generation facilities. We ceased the production
of commercial grade alumina at our Ouro Preto facility effective
May 2009 as the decline in alumina prices made alumina
production economically unfeasible at this facility. For the
foreseeable future, the plant will purchase alumina through
third parties.
Flat rolled and total shipments were flat as compared to the
prior year period, while net sales decreased 6% as compared to
the prior year due to lower average LME prices, partially offset
by increases in pricing. Can shipments represent over 80% of our
flat rolled shipments in South America.
Segment income for South America decreased $28 million as
compared to the prior year period. This decrease in segment
income is due to a $59 million decrease in the smelter
benefit compared to the prior year period and a $7 million
reduction in the benefit associated with used beverage cans,
included in Other changes in the table above. These reductions
in segment income were partially offset by improvements in
conversion premiums on new contracts and reductions in
conversion costs.
Reconciliation
of segment results to Net income
Costs such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense
and unrealized gains (losses) on changes in the fair value of
derivatives are not utilized by our chief operating decision
maker in evaluating segment performance. The table below
reconciles income from reportable segments to Net income
attributable to our common shareholder for the years ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
South America
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance
40
matters. These expenses have not been allocated to the regions.
Corporate and other costs increased from $57 million to
$90 million primarily due to higher incentive compensation
in fiscal 2010 as compared to the prior period when business
conditions declined.
Depreciation and amortization decreased $55 million from
the prior year period primarily due to certain fixed assets that
became fully depreciated during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt. Taking into account the effect of interest
rate swaps, approximately 26% of our debt was variable rate as
of March 31, 2010.
Unrealized gains on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the mark to market accounting for changes
in the fair value of our derivatives that do not receive hedge
accounting treatment. In fiscal 2010, the $578 million of
unrealized gains consists of (i) $504 million reversal
of previously recognized losses upon settlement of derivatives
and (ii) $74 million of unrealized gains relating to
mark to market adjustments on metal and currency derivatives. We
recorded $519 million of unrealized losses in fiscal 2009.
We recorded a $1.3 billion impairment charge related to
goodwill in fiscal 2009. This charge, along with a
$160 million impairment charge related to our investment in
the Aluminum Norf GmbH (Norf) joint venture, reflected the
global economic environment at the time and the related market
increase in the cost of capital.
The gain on extinguishment of debt related to the purchase of
our 7.25% senior notes with a principal value of
$275 million with the proceeds of an additional term loan
with a face value of $220 million and an estimated fair
value of $165 million. See Liquidity and Capital
Resources below for additional discussion about the
accounting for this purchase.
Restructuring charges in fiscal 2010 primarily relate to
previously announced restructuring actions initiated in fiscal
2009 related to voluntary and involuntary separation programs
for salaried employees in North America, Europe and Corporate
aimed at reducing staff levels. Fiscal 2010 also includes
$4 million related to the relocation of our North American
headquarters to Atlanta, Georgia. Restructuring charges for
fiscal 2009 includes the costs associated with the closure of
our plant in Rogerstone, United Kingdom and the related employee
and environmental costs. See also Segment Review
discussion above as well as Note 2
Restructuring Programs to our accompanying audited consolidated
financial statements.
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation was
$51 million for fiscal 2010 as compared to
$226 million in fiscal 2009. This adjustment typically
relates to depreciation and amortization and income taxes at our
Norf joint venture. Income taxes related to our equity method
investments are reflected in the carrying value of the
investment and not in our consolidated income tax provision. The
adjustment in fiscal 2010 also includes a non-recurring
after-tax benefit of $10 million from the refinement of our
methodology for recording depreciation and amortization on the
step up in our basis in the underlying assets of an investee.
The prior year includes a $160 million pre-tax impairment
charge related to our investment in Norf.
We have experienced significant fluctuations in income tax
expense and the corresponding effective tax rate. The primary
factors contributing to the effective tax rate differing from
the statutory Canadian rate include:
|
|
|
|
|
Our functional currency in Canada and Brazil is the
U.S. dollar and the company holds significant
U.S. dollar denominated debt in these locations. As the
value of the local currencies strengthens and weakens against
the U.S. dollar, unrealized gains or losses are created in
those locations for tax purposes, while the underlying gains or
losses are not recorded in our income statement.
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2009, Canadian legislation was enacted allowing us
to elect to determine our Canadian taxable income in
U.S. dollars. Our election was effective April 1,
2008, and such U.S. dollar taxable gains and losses no
longer exist in Canada as of that date.
|
|
|
|
We have significant net deferred tax liabilities in Brazil that
are remeasured to account for currency fluctuations as the taxes
are payable in local currency.
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
Our income is taxed at various statutory tax rates in varying
jurisdictions. Applying the corresponding amounts of income and
loss to the various tax rates results in differences when
compared to our Canadian statutory tax rate.
|
|
|
|
We record increases and decreases to valuation allowances
primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where
we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able
to utilize those losses.
|
For fiscal 2010, we recorded a $262 million income tax
provision on our pre-tax income of $742 million, before our
equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates,
which represented an effective tax rate of 35%. Our effective
tax rate differs from the expense at the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to the following factors:
(1) $19 million expense for pre-tax foreign currency
gains or losses with no tax effect and the tax effect of
U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no
pre-tax effect, (2) a $38 million expense for exchange
remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) a
$7 million expense for the effects of enacted tax rate
changes on cumulative taxable temporary differences, (4) a
$9 million benefit from differences between the Canadian
statutory and foreign effective tax rates applied to entities in
different jurisdictions and (5) a $10 million benefit
related to a decrease in uncertain tax positions.
For fiscal 2009, we recorded a $246 million income tax
benefit on our pre-tax loss of $2.0 billion, before our
equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates,
which represented an effective tax rate of 12%. Our effective
tax rate differs from the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to the following factors:
(1) $415 million related to a non-deductible goodwill
impairment charge, (2) a $48 million benefit for
exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) a
$61 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
those losses, (4) a $33 million benefit from
differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign effective
tax rates applied to entities in different jurisdictions and
(5) a $2 million expense related to an increase in
uncertain tax positions.
During fiscal 2010, the statute of limitations lapsed with
respect to unrecognized tax benefits related to potential
withholding taxes and cross-border intercompany pricing of
services. As a result, we recognized a reduction in unrecognized
tax benefits of $28 million, including a decrease in
accrued interest of $5 million, recorded as a reduction to
the income tax provisions in the consolidated statement of
operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Year
Ended March 31, 2009 Compared With the Year Ended
March 31, 2008 (Twelve Months Combined
Non-GAAP)
Positive trends in the demand for aluminum products and
inflationary movement in average LME prices during the first six
months of fiscal 2009 were reversed sharply in the second half
of our fiscal year. For the year ended March 31, 2009, we
realized a net loss attributable to our common shareholder of
$1.9 billion on net sales of $10.2 billion, compared
to the year ended March 31, 2008 when we realized a Net
loss attributable to our common shareholder of $117 million
on net sales of $11.2 billion. The reduction in sales is
due to the decrease in the average LME price as well as a
reduction in demand for flat rolled products in most regions
during the last six months of fiscal 2009.
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
decreased $1.0 billion, or 10%, and stayed flat as a
percentage of net sales as compared to the fiscal 2008 period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$96 million, or 23%, primarily due to reductions in
professional fees and employee-related costs, including
incentive compensation associated with the Arrangement. The
fiscal 2009 results include non-cash asset impairment charges
totaling $1.5 billion.
The current year was also impacted by $519 million in
non-cash unrealized losses on derivative instruments and
$95 million in restructuring charges, as compared to
$3 million in unrealized losses for fiscal 2008. These
negative factors were partially offset by a $122 million
gain on the extinguishment of debt. We also recorded an income
tax benefit of $246 million on our net loss in fiscal 2009,
as compared to a $77 million income tax provision in fiscal
2008. These items are discussed in further detail below.
42
Segment
Review (on a combined non-GAAP basis)
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions, except shipments which are in kt).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
4,110
|
|
|
$
|
4,341
|
|
|
$
|
1,829
|
|
|
$
|
1,024
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
year ended March 31, 2008 to the year ended March 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment Income (in millions)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Conversion costs(1)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other changes(2)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such as
direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage, alloys
and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss. Fluctuations in
this component reflect cost efficiencies during the period as
well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(2) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research and development for all
segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of purchase
accounting and metal price ceiling contracts. Significant
fluctuations in these items are discussed below. |
North
America
Net sales for fiscal 2009 were down $171 million, or 4%, as
compared to the fiscal 2008 period due to lower volume and a
lower average LME price. While shipments were down 5% for fiscal
2009 as compared to fiscal 2008, shipments in the second half of
fiscal 2009 were down 16% as compared to the first half of the
year.
43
Segment income for fiscal 2009 was $82 million, down
$160 million as compared to the prior year, due to the
negative impact of metal price lag, conversion costs, volume
decreases and foreign exchange fluctuations related to our
operations in Canada. The negative impact of conversion costs
relates to increases in energy costs and freight as compared to
fiscal 2008.
Other changes reflect $11 million in acquisition-related
stock compensation expense in the fiscal 2008 period, and an
$18 million favorable impact related to metal price ceiling
contracts in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008. Selling,
general and administrative costs were down $22 million as
compared to the prior year as the cost reduction initiatives
have begun to favorably impact results. These favorable changes
were partially offset by a $23 million reduction in the net
favorable impact of acquisition-related fair value adjustments
and a $13 million reduction in the benefit associated with
recycling used beverage cans.
Europe
Flat rolled shipments and net sales decreased 15% and 14%,
respectively, in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. The volume
reduction had a $404 million unfavorable impact on net
sales, with the remaining decrease reflecting the impact of
lower LME prices and a stronger U.S. dollar. Demand for
specialty, painted and light gauge products was down for fiscal
2009 as a result of the weak construction market, as well as
reductions in demand for automotive products. Increases in
beverage can and lithographic shipments in the first six months
of fiscal 2009 were reversed in the second half of the fiscal
year, resulting in
year-over-year
declines in both sectors.
Segment income for fiscal 2009 was $236 million, as
compared to $273 million in the fiscal 2008 period. Volume
and foreign currency remeasurement unfavorably impacted Segment
income but these impacts were partially offset by favorable
conversion premiums, metal price lag and conversion costs. The
favorable impact of conversion costs relates to a reduction in
labor costs, partially offset by increases in energy costs as
compared to the prior year.
Other changes reflect a $13 million net favorable impact of
income and expense items associated with acquisition-related
fair value adjustments and $6 million of stock compensation
expense in the prior year.
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we announced a number of
restructuring actions across Europe, including the closure of
our plant in Rogerstone, United Kingdom effective April 30,
2009. The closure of the Rogerstone plant resulted in the
elimination of 440 positions, and we recorded approximately
$20 million in severance-related costs. We also recorded
$20 million in environmental remediation expenses and
$3 million in other exit related costs related to the
closure of this plant. We also recorded $12 million in
non-cash fixed asset impairments, an $8 million write-down
of parts and supplies, and a $3 million reduction to
reserves associated with unfavorable contracts established as
part of the Arrangement.
Asia
Total shipments and net sales decreased 13% and 16%,
respectively, in fiscal 2009 with the largest shipment
reductions in beverage can products, followed by electronics,
construction and general purpose foil products. The volume
reduction had a $242 million unfavorable impact on net
sales with the remaining decrease reflecting the impact of lower
LME prices.
The improvement in Segment income of $34 million from the
year ended March 31, 2008 to the year ended March 31,
2009 was due to the favorable impact of metal price lag,
improved conversion premiums and product mix, partially offset
by the volume decreases, increases to conversion costs and
foreign currency remeasurement. The conversion cost increases
were primarily related to increases in energy costs as compared
to the fiscal 2008 period.
In response to reduced demand, we eliminated 34 positions in
Asia in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and recorded
approximately $1 million in severance-related costs related
to a voluntary retirement program. Also, during the year ended
March 31, 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of
approximately $5 million in Novelis Korea due to the
obsolescence of certain production related fixed assets.
44
South
America
Total shipments increased 5% in fiscal 2009 over in fiscal 2008,
with rolled products shipments up 7%, but net sales was flat in
fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2008 due to lower LME prices.
Segment income for South America decreased $22 million as
compared to fiscal 2008. Conversion costs increased due to cost
inflation for energy, alumina, alloys and hardeners. Other
changes reflect a $9 million net favorable impact of income
and expense items associated with acquisition-related fair value
adjustments, a $6 million reduction in selling, general and
administrative expenses and $3 million of stock
compensation expense in fiscal 2008. These positive impacts were
partially offset by an $11 million decrease in the smelter
benefit as the benefit from our smelter operations in South
America declines as average LME prices decrease.
On January 26, 2009, we announced that we would cease the
production of alumina at our Ouro Preto facility in May 2009.
This resulted in the reduction of approximately 290 positions,
including 150 employees and 140 contractors, and we
recorded restructuring charges totaling $2 million related
to severance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Other exit
costs include less than $1 million related to the idling of
the refinery. Other activities related to the facility,
including electric power generation and the production of
primary aluminum, will continue unaffected.
Reconciliation
of segment results to Net income
The table below reconciles Income from reportable segments to
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder for the years
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
South America
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Corporate and other(1)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Unrealized losses on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(2)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corporate and Other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. |
45
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Income from reportable segments to net loss
attributable to our common shareholder, the proportional Segment
income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed from
Income from reportable segments, net of our share of their net
after-tax results, which is reported as equity in net (income)
loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed
consolidated statements of operations. See
Note 8 Investment in and Advances to
Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions to
our accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for
further information about these non-consolidated affiliates. |
Corporate and other expenses declined in fiscal 2009 versus
fiscal 2008 primarily due to $22 million of stock
compensation expenses associated with the Arrangement which were
recognized in fiscal 2008 and lower incentive compensation
expenses in fiscal 2009.
Depreciation and amortization increased $36 million
primarily due to the increases in basis of our property, plant
and equipment and intangible assets resulting from the
Arrangement in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt. As of March 31, 2009, approximately 29%
of our debt was variable rate.
Unrealized losses on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the
mark-to-market
accounting for changes in the fair value of our derivatives that
do not receive hedge accounting treatment. In the year ended
March 31, 2009, these unrealized losses increased primarily
attributable to falling LME prices. Our principal exposure to
LME prices is related to derivatives on fixed forward price
contracts. We hedge these contracts by purchasing aluminum
futures contracts and these contracts decrease in value in
periods of declining LME prices.
We recorded a $1.3 billion impairment charge related to
goodwill in fiscal 2009.
The gain on extinguishment of debt related to the purchase of
our 7.25% senior notes with a principal value of
$275 million using the proceeds of an additional term loan
with a face value of $220 million and an estimated fair
value of $165 million. See Liquidity and Capital
Resources below for additional discussion about the
accounting for this purchase.
The adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation includes
a $160 million impairment charge related to our investment
in our Norf joint venture. Excluding this impairment charge, the
adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation increased
from $43 million in fiscal 2008 to $66 million in
fiscal 2009 primarily related to our Norf joint venture due to a
change in the statutory tax rate in Germany that was reflected
in the prior year period. Income taxes related to our equity
method investments, such as Norf, are reflected in the carrying
value of the investment and not in our consolidated income tax
provision.
Other costs, net for fiscal 2009 includes a $26 million
non-cash gain on reversal of a legal accrual, as well as a
$9 million charge for a tax settlement in Brazil. Sale
transaction fees of $32 million associated with the
Arrangement were recorded in fiscal 2008.
For the year ended March 31, 2009, we recorded a
$246 million income tax benefit on our pre-tax loss of
$2.0 billion, before our equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates, which represented an effective tax
rate of 12%. Our effective tax rate differs from the benefit at
the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following
factors: (1) $415 million related to a non-deductible
goodwill impairment charge, (2) a $48 million benefit
for exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) a
$61 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
those losses, (4) a $33 million benefit from
differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign effective
tax rates applied to entities in different jurisdictions and
(5) a $2 million expense related to an increase in
uncertain tax positions.
46
For the year ended March 31, 2008, we recorded a
$77 million income tax provision on our pre-tax loss of
$63 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates, which represented an effective tax
rate of (122)%. Our effective tax rate differs from the benefit
at the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following
factors: (1) a $62 million provision for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) a $30 million increase for exchange remeasurement
of deferred income taxes, (3) a $17 million benefit
from the effects of enacted tax rate changes on cumulative
taxable temporary differences, (4) a $7 million
increase in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses
in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than
not that we will not be able to utilize those losses, and
(5) a $17 million increase in uncertain tax positions
recorded under the provisions of FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48).
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We believe we have adequate liquidity to meet our operational
and capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Our primary
sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, borrowing
availability under our revolving credit facility and cash
generated by operating activities. As described in greater
detail below, we completed a debt offering for $185 million
of new senior notes during the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
During fiscal 2010, our liquidity position increased
$636 million despite continued low levels of demand in the
automotive, construction and industrial markets and net cash
outflows to settle derivative positions. This reflects our
continued efforts to preserve liquidity through cost and capital
spending controls and effective management of working capital.
Risks associated with supplier terms, customer credit and broker
hedging capacity, have been managed successfully with minimal
negative impact on our business. We expect our liquidity
position to continue to improve during fiscal 2011 primarily due
to continued improvements in financial performance including
cash savings from restructuring programs, partially offset by
higher working capital requirements due to higher LME prices.
Significant declines in the price of aluminum in the second half
of fiscal 2009 had a negative impact on our liquidity position
and increased the effect of timing issues related to the
settlement of aluminum forward contracts versus cash collections
from our customers. We enter into derivative instruments to
hedge forecasted purchases and sales of aluminum.
Available
Liquidity
Our estimated liquidity as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 is as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Overdrafts
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Gross availability under the ABL facility
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Borrowing availability limitation due to fixed charge coverage
ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity
|
|
$
|
1,026
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$437 million. Additionally, we had $603 million in
remaining availability under our revolving credit line and
letter of credit facility (ABL Facility). Borrowings under the
ABL Facility are generally based on 85% of eligible accounts
receivable and 65 to 70% of eligible inventories. Under the ABL
Facility, if our excess availability, as defined therein, is
less than 10% of the lender commitments under the ABL Facility
or 10% of our borrowing base, we are required to maintain a
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. As of
March 31, 2009, our fixed charge coverage ratio was less
than 1 to 1, resulting in a reduction of availability under our
ABL Facility of $80 million as of that date.
47
As of March 31, 2010, our fixed charge coverage ratio was
greater than 2 to 1 and we are not subject to this availability
limitation.
The cash and cash equivalents balance above includes cash held
in foreign countries in which we operate. These amounts are
generally available to satisfy the obligations of the Company on
a short-term basis, subject to regulatory requirements, in the
form of a dividend or inter-company loan.
Free
cash flow
Free cash flow (which is a non-GAAP measure) consists of:
(a) net cash provided by (used in) operating activities,
(b) plus net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities and (c) less net proceeds from sales of assets.
Management believes that Free cash flow is relevant to investors
as it provides a measure of the cash generated internally that
is available for debt service and other value creation
opportunities. However, Free cash flow does not necessarily
represent cash available for discretionary activities, as
certain debt service obligations must be funded out of Free cash
flow. Our method of calculating Free cash flow may not be
consistent with that of other companies.
The following table shows the reconciliation from Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities to Free cash flow,
the ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and the change
between periods (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
$
|
(220
|
)
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
1,064
|
|
|
$
|
(391
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Less: Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
355
|
|
|
$
|
(352
|
)
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
|
$
|
(423
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow increased more than $700 million in fiscal
2010 as compared to fiscal 2009, when operations consumed cash
at a higher rate due to slowing business conditions and higher
working capital levels associated with rapidly changing aluminum
prices and the timing of payments made to suppliers, to brokers
to settle derivative positions and the timing of cash receipts
from our customers. The changes of each component of free cash
flow are described in greater detail below.
In 2008, Free cash flow was used primarily to increase our
overall liquidity and pay for costs associated with the
Arrangement. Although our total debt increased from
March 31, 2007 by $82 million, this was more than
offset by an increase in our cash and cash equivalents of
$198 million.
Operating
Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2010
significantly improved as compared to net cash used in the
fiscal 2009 due to higher net income and improved working
capital management, including favorable impacts from customer
forfaiting and extended payment terms from suppliers.
Cash flow from operations for the year ended March 31, 2010
benefitted from cash receipts of $75 million related to
customer-directed derivatives, as compared to $81 million
of cash outflow for the year ended March 31, 2009. We have
an existing beverage can sheet umbrella agreement with certain
North American bottlers (BCS agreement). Pursuant to the BCS
agreement, an agent for the bottlers directs the can fabricators
to source a percentage of their requirements for beverage can
body, end and tab stock from us. Under the BCS agreement, the
bottlers agent has the right to request that we hedge the
exposure to the price the bottlers will ultimately pay for
aluminum. We treat this arrangement as a derivative for
accounting
48
purposes. Upon receiving such requests, we enter into
corresponding derivative instruments indexed to the LME price of
aluminum with third party brokers. We settle the positions with
the brokers at maturity and net settle the economic benefit or
loss arising from the pricing requests, which may not occur for
up to 13 months.
As of March 31, 2010, we had settled approximately
$29 million of net derivative losses for which we had not
yet been reimbursed under the BCS agreement. Collection of these
receivables occurred during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
We have historically maintained forfaiting and factoring
arrangements in Asia and South America that provided additional
liquidity in those segments. The economic conditions negatively
impacted our ability to forfait our customer receivables as well
as our suppliers ability to provide extended payment
terms, which resulted in reductions in operating cash flow at
the end of fiscal 2009 in these regions.
In our discussion of metal price ceilings, we disclosed that
certain customer contracts contained a fixed metal price ceiling
beyond which the cost of aluminum could not be passed through to
the customer. During the years ended March 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008, we were unable to pass through approximately
$10 million, $176 million and $230 million,
respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales
under these contracts. Net cash provided by operating activities
was negatively impacted by the same amount, adjusted for timing
difference between customer receipts and vendor payments and
offset partially by reduced income taxes for the duration of
these contracts. The last metal price ceiling contract expired
on December 31, 2009.
Net cash used in operating activities for fiscal 2008 was
unfavorably impacted by one-time costs associated with or
triggered by the Arrangement including:
(1) $72 million paid in share-based compensation
payments, (2) $42 million paid for sale transaction
fees and (3) $25 million in bonus payments for the
2006 calendar year and the period from January 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007.
Dividends paid to our noncontrolling interests, primarily in our
Asia operating segment, were $13 million, $6 million
and $8 million for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Investing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
used in investing activities (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(202
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Proceeds from related parties loans receivable, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Net proceeds (outflow) from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
$
|
(484
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127
|
)
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
(357
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The majority of our capital expenditures for fiscal 2010, 2009
and 2008 have been for projects devoted to product quality,
technology, productivity enhancement and increased capacity. In
response to the economic downturn, we reduced our capital
spending in the second half of fiscal 2009, with a focus on
preserving maintenance and safety and maintained that level of
spending throughout fiscal 2010. We expect that our total annual
capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 to be between $240 and
$250 million, including approximately $66 million
related to our previously announced expansion in South America.
Capital expenditures in fiscal 2008 relate primarily to the
construction of Novelis
Fusiontm
ingot casting lines in our European and Asian segments as well
as improvements to our Yeongju, Korea hot mill.
49
The majority of proceeds from asset sales in fiscal 2010 relate
to asset sales in Europe. The majority of proceeds from asset
sales in fiscal 2009 and 2008 are from the sale of land in
Kingston, Ontario.
Proceeds from loans receivable, net during all periods are
primarily comprised of payments we received related to a loan
due from our non-consolidated affiliate, Norf.
The settlement of derivative instruments resulted in an outflow
of $395 million in fiscal 2010 as compared to
$24 million in fiscal 2009 and $59 million in cash
contributed in fiscal 2008. The net outflow in fiscal 2010 was
primarily related to metal derivatives. Based on the aluminum
price forward curve as of March 31, 2010, we forecast
approximately $70 million of cash inflows related to the
settlement of metal derivative instruments in fiscal 2011.
Financing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by (used in) financing activities (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
versus
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(896
|
)
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(1,010
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
357
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
(188
|
)
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
(474
|
)
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Agreements and Predecessor Financing
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we entered into
senior secured credit facilities (Old Credit Facilities)
providing for aggregate borrowings of up to $1.8 billion.
The Old Credit Facilities consisted of (1) a
$1.3 billion seven-year senior secured term loan B
facility, bearing interest at London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) plus 1.75% (which was subject to change based on certain
leverage ratios), all of which was borrowed on January 10,
2005, and (2) a $500 million five-year multi-currency
revolving credit and letters of credit facility.
On April 27, 2007, our lenders consented to the sixth
amendment of our Old Credit Facilities. The amendment included
increasing the term loan B facility by $150 million. We
utilized the additional funds available under the term loan B
facility to reduce the outstanding balance of our
$500 million revolving credit facility. The additional
borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility was used
to fund working capital requirements and certain costs
associated with the Arrangement, including the cash settlement
of share-based compensation arrangements and lender fees.
Additionally, the amendment included a limited waiver of the
change of control Event of Default (as defined in the Old Credit
Facilities), which effectively extended the requirement to repay
the Old Credit Facilities to July 11, 2007.
On May 25, 2007, we entered into a Bank and Bridge
Facilities Commitment with affiliates of UBS Securities LLC and
ABN AMRO Incorporated to provide backstop assurance for the
refinancing of our existing indebtedness following the
Arrangement. The commitments from UBS Securities LLC and ABN
AMRO Incorporated, provided by the banks on a 50%-50% basis,
consisted of the following: (1) a senior secured term loan
of up to $1.1 billion; (2) a senior secured
asset-based revolving credit facility of up to
50
$900 million and (3) a commitment to issue up to
$1.2 billion of unsecured senior notes, if necessary. The
commitment contained terms and conditions customary for
facilities of this nature.
On July 6, 2007, we entered into new senior secured credit
facilities with a syndicate of lenders led by affiliates of UBS
Securities LLC and ABN AMRO Incorporated providing for aggregate
borrowings of up to $1.8 billion, consisting of (1) a
$960 million seven-year Term Loan Facility that can be
increased by up to $400 million subject to the satisfaction
of certain conditions and (2) an $800 million
five-year multi-currency ABL Facility. The proceeds from the
Term Loan Facility of $960 million, drawn in full at the
time of closing, and an initial draw of $324 million under
the ABL Facility were used to pay off our Old Credit Facilities,
pay for debt issuance costs of the senior secured credit
facilities and provide for additional working capital. Mandatory
minimum principal amortization payments under the Term Loan
Facility are $2.95 million per calendar quarter. The first
minimum principal amortization payment was made on
September 30, 2007. Additional mandatory prepayments are
required to be made for certain collateral liquidations, asset
sales, debt and preferred stock issuances, equity issuances,
casualty events and excess cash flow (as defined in the senior
secured credit facilities). Any unpaid principal is due in full
on July 6, 2014.
Under the Term Loan Facility, loans characterized as alternate
base rate borrowings bear interest annually at a rate equal to
the alternate base rate (which is the greater of (a) the
base rate in effect on a given day and (b) the federal
funds effective rate in effect on a given day, plus 0.50%) plus
a margin of 1.00%. Loans characterized as Eurocurrency
borrowings bear interest at an annual rate equal to the adjusted
LIBOR rate for the interest period in effect, plus a margin of
2.00%. Generally, for both the Term Loan Facility and ABL
Facility, interest rates reset periodically, and interest is
payable on a periodic basis depending on the type of loan.
Borrowings under the ABL Facility are generally based on 85% of
eligible accounts receivable and 65% to 70% of eligible
inventories. Commitment fees ranging from 0.25% to 0.375% are
based on average daily amounts outstanding under the ABL
Facility during a fiscal quarter and are payable quarterly.
Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral under
the senior secured credit facilities. The senior secured credit
facilities are also guaranteed by substantially all of our
restricted subsidiaries that guarantee our 7.25% Senior
Notes. The senior secured credit facilities also include
customary affirmative and negative covenants. Under the ABL
Facility, if our excess availability, as defined under the ABL
Facility, is less than 10% of the lender commitments under the
ABL Facility or 10% of our borrowing base, we are required to
maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1.
In March 2009, we purchased $275 million of
7.25% senior notes with the net proceeds of an additional
term loan under the Term Loan Facility with a face value of
$220 million. The additional term loan was recorded at a
fair value of $165 million determined using a discounted
cash flow model. The difference between the fair value and the
face value of the new term loan will be accreted over the life
of the term loan using the effective interest method, resulting
in additional non-cash interest expense.
11.5% Senior
Notes
On August 11, 2009, we issued $185 million aggregate
principal face amount of 11.5% senior unsecured notes at an
effective rate of 12.0% (11.5% Senior Notes). The
11.5% Senior Notes rank equally with all of our existing
and future unsecured senior indebtedness. The 11.5% Senior
Notes were issued at a discount resulting in gross proceeds of
$181 million. The net proceeds of this offering were used
to repay a portion of the ABL Facility and $95 million
outstanding under the unsecured credit facility from an
affiliate of the Aditya Birla Group. On January 12, 2010,
we completed the exchange offer required by the registration
rights agreement related to the 11.5% Senior Notes.
7.25% Senior
Notes
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities. The senior
notes were priced at par, bear interest at 7.25% and mature on
February 15, 2015. The 7.25% senior notes are
guaranteed by all of our Canadian and U.S. restricted
subsidiaries, certain of our
51
foreign restricted subsidiaries and our other restricted
subsidiaries that guarantee our senior secured credit facilities
and that guarantee the old notes.
Under the indenture that governs the 7.25% senior notes, we
are subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to
incurring additional debt and providing additional guarantees,
paying dividends beyond certain amounts and making other
restricted payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain
consolidations or mergers, and certain transactions with
affiliates.
Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing our
7.25% senior notes, we were obligated, within 30 days
of closing of the Arrangement, to make an offer to purchase the
7.25% senior notes at a price equal to 101% of their
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date
the 7.25% senior notes were purchased. Consequently, we
commenced a tender offer on May 16, 2007 to repurchase all
of the outstanding 7.25% senior notes at the prescribed
price. This offer expired on July 3, 2007 with holders of
approximately $1 million of principal presenting their
7.25% senior notes pursuant to the tender offer.
As described above, in March 2009, we entered into a transaction
in which we purchased 7.25% senior notes with a face value
of $275 million with the net proceeds of an additional
floating rate term loan with a face value of $220 million.
Short-Term
Borrowings and Lines of Credit
As of March 31, 2010, our short-term borrowings were
$75 million consisting of (1) $61 million of
short-term loans under our ABL facility, (2) an
$8 million short-term loan in Italy and
(3) $6 million in bank overdrafts. As of
March 31, 2010, $17 million of our ABL facility was
utilized for letters of credit and we had $603 million in
remaining availability under this revolving credit facility.
As of March 31, 2010, we had an additional
$138 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
not included in the ABL Facility. The weighted average interest
rate on our total short-term borrowings was 1.71% and 2.75% as
of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
As a result of the Arrangement, we were required to refinance
our existing credit facility in fiscal 2008. Additionally, in
2008 we refinanced debt in Asia due to its scheduled maturity.
See Note 10 Debt to our accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements for additional information
regarding our financing activities.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we also amended our
then existing senior secured credit facilities to increase their
capacity by $150 million. We used these proceeds to reduce
the outstanding balance of our then existing revolving credit
facility, thus increasing our borrowing capacity. This
additional capacity, along with $92 million of cash
received from the issuance of additional shares indirectly to
Hindalco, allowed us to fund general working capital
requirements and certain costs associated with the Arrangement
including the cash settlement of share-based compensation
arrangements and lender fees. In July 2007, we refinanced our
senior secured credit facilities.
Korean
Bank Loans
In November 2004, Novelis Korea Limited (Novelis Korea),
formerly Alcan Taihan Aluminium Limited, entered into a Korean
won (KRW) 40 billion ($40 million) floating rate
long-term loan due November 2007. We immediately entered into an
interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 4.80%. In August
2007, we refinanced this loan with a floating rate short-term
borrowing in the amount of $40 million due by August 2008.
We recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of less than
$1 million in connection with this refinancing.
Additionally, we immediately entered into an interest rate swap
and cross currency swap for the new loan through a 3.94% fixed
rate KRW 38 billion ($38 million) loan.
In December 2004, we entered into (1) a $70 million
floating rate loan and (2) a KRW 25 billion
($25 million) floating rate loan, both due in December
2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate and cross
currency swap on the $70 million floating rate loan through
a 4.55% fixed rate KRW 73 billion ($73 million) loan
and an interest rate swap on the KRW 25 billion floating
rate loan to fix the interest rate at
52
4.45%. In October 2007, we entered into a $100 million
floating rate loan due October 2010 and immediately repaid the
$70 million loan. In December 2007, we repaid the KRW
25 billion loan from the proceeds of the $100 million
floating rate loan. Additionally, we immediately entered into an
interest rate swap and cross currency swap for the
$100 million floating rate loan through a 5.44% fixed rate
KRW 92 billion ($92 million) loan.
We repaid a KRW 10 billion ($8 million) bank loan
during May 2009 and a KRW 50 billion ($43 million)
bank loan during February 2010.
Unsecured
Credit Facility
In February 2009, to assist in maintaining adequate liquidity
levels, we entered into an unsecured credit facility of
$100 million (the Unsecured Credit Facility) with a
scheduled maturity date of January 15, 2015 from an
affiliate of the Aditya Birla group. During fiscal 2010, we drew
an additional $3 million on the Unsecured Credit Facility.
As discussed above, this facility was repaid and retired using
the proceeds from the 11.5% Senior Notes.
Interest
Rate Swaps
As of March 31, 2010, we have interest rate swaps to fix
the variable LIBOR interest rate on $520 million of our
floating rate Term Loan Facility. We are still obligated to pay
any applicable margin, as defined in our senior secured credit
facilities. Interest rate swaps related to $400 million at
an effective weighted average interest rate of 4.0% expired
March 31, 2010. In January 2009, we entered into two
interest rate swaps to fix the variable LIBOR interest rate on
an additional $300 million of our floating Term Loan
facility at a rate of 1.49%, plus any applicable margin. These
interest rate swaps are effective from March 31, 2009
through March 31, 2011. In April 2009, we entered into an
additional $220 million interest rate swap at a rate of
1.97%, which is effective through April 30, 2012.
We have a cross-currency interest rate swap in Korea to convert
our $100 million variable rate bank loan to KRW
92 billion at a fixed rate of 5.44%. The swap expires
October 2010, concurrent with the maturity of the loan.
As of March 31, 2010 approximately 74% of our debt was
fixed rate and approximately 26% was variable-rate.
Issuance
of Additional Common Stock
On June 22, 2007, we issued 2,044,122 additional shares to
AV Aluminum for $44.93 per share resulting in an additional
equity contribution of $92 million. This contribution was
equal in amount to certain payments made by Novelis related to
change in control compensation to certain employees and
directors, lender fees and other transaction costs incurred by
the company.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In accordance with SEC rules, the following qualify as
off-balance sheet arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain guarantees or contracts;
|
|
|
|
a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an
unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement
that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that
entity for such assets and
|
|
|
|
any obligation under a material variable interest held by the
registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing,
liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant,
or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development
services with the registrant.
|
The following discussion addresses the applicable off-balance
sheet items for our Company.
53
Derivative
Instruments
See Note 14 Financial Instruments and Commodity
Contracts to our accompanying audited consolidated financial
statements for a full description of derivative instruments.
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including certain
of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and Norf, which is a fifty
percent (50%) owned joint venture that does not meet the
requirements for consolidation.
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no
expiration and have termination notice requirements. Neither we
nor any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds
any assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the
potential settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements, all
liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term debt
facilities for these entities are already included in our
consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness of others as of March 31,
2010 (in millions). We did not have any obligations under
guarantees of indebtedness related to our majority-owned
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Potential Future
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
Value
|
|
Wholly-owned Subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
Other
Arrangements
Forfaiting
of Trade Receivables
Novelis Korea Limited forfaits trade receivables in the ordinary
course of business. These trade receivables are typically
outstanding for 60 to 120 days. Forfaiting is a
non-recourse method to manage credit and interest rate risks.
Under this method, customers contract to pay a financial
institution. The institution assumes the risk of non-payment and
remits the invoice value (net of a fee) to us after presentation
of a proof of delivery of goods to the customer. We do not
retain a financial or legal interest in these receivables, and
they are not included in our consolidated balance sheets.
54
Factoring
of Trade Receivables
Our Brazilian operations factor, without recourse, certain trade
receivables that are unencumbered by pledge restrictions. Under
this method, customers are directed to make payments on invoices
to a financial institution, but are not contractually required
to do so. The financial institution pays us any invoices it has
approved for payment (net of a fee). We do not retain financial
or legal interest in these receivables, and they are not
included in our consolidated balance sheets.
Summary
Disclosures of Forfaited and Factored Financial
Amounts
The following tables summarize our forfaiting and factoring
amounts (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
Receivables forfaited
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Receivables factored
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Forfaiting expense
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Factoring expense
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Forfaited receivables outstanding
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
Factored receivables outstanding
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The amount of forfaited receivables outstanding increased as of
March 31, 2010 as compared to March 31, 2009 primarily
due to the increase in the LME price from March 31, 2009 to
March 31, 2010 which resulted in a larger amount of
receivables available for forfaiting, as well as tightening in
the credit markets.
Other
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in
transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities
(SPEs), which would have been established for the purpose of
facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of March 31,
2010 and 2009, we were not involved in any unconsolidated SPE
transactions.
55
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
We have future obligations under various contracts relating to
debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases,
long-term purchase obligations, and postretirement benefit
plans. The following table presents our estimated future
payments under contractual obligations that exist as of
March 31, 2010, based on undiscounted amounts (in
millions). The future cash flow commitments that we may have
related to derivative contracts are not estimable and are
therefore not included. Furthermore, due to the difficulty in
determining the timing of settlements, the table excludes
$39 million of uncertain tax positions. See
Note 17 Income Taxes to our accompanying
audited consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Debt(A)
|
|
$
|
2,561
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
2,425
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt(B)
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases(C)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Operating leases(D)
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Purchase obligations(E)
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
3,011
|
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
Unfunded pension plan benefits(F)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Other post-employment benefits(F)
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Funded pension plans(F)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,130
|
|
|
$
|
3,347
|
|
|
$
|
3,509
|
|
|
$
|
4,740
|
|
|
$
|
534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Includes only principal payments on our Senior Notes, term
loans, revolving credit facilities and notes payable to banks
and others. These amounts exclude payments under capital lease
obligations. |
|
(B) |
|
Interest on our fixed rate debt is estimated using the stated
interest rate. Interest on our variable-rate debt is estimated
using the rate in effect as of March 31, 2010 and includes
the effect of current interest rate swap agreements. Actual
future interest payments may differ from these amounts based on
changes in floating interest rates or other factors or events.
These amounts include an estimate for unused commitment fees.
Excluded from these amounts are interest related to capital
lease obligations, the amortization of debt issuance and other
costs related to indebtedness. |
|
(C) |
|
Includes both principal and interest components of future
minimum capital lease payments. Excluded from these amounts are
insurance, taxes and maintenance associated with the property. |
|
(D) |
|
Includes the minimum lease payments for non-cancelable leases
for property and equipment used in our operations. We do not
have any operating leases with contingent rents. Excluded from
these amounts are insurance, taxes and maintenance associated
with the properties and equipment. |
|
(E) |
|
Includes agreements to purchase goods (including raw materials
and capital expenditures) and services that are enforceable and
legally binding on us, and that specify all significant terms.
Some of our raw material purchase contracts have minimum annual
volume requirements. In these cases, we estimate our future
purchase obligations using annual minimum volumes and costs per
unit that are in effect as of March 31, 2010. Due to
volatility in the cost of our raw materials, actual amounts paid
in the future may differ from these amounts. Excluded from these
amounts are the impact of any derivative instruments and any
early contract termination fees, such as those typically present
in energy contracts. |
|
(F) |
|
Obligations for postretirement benefit plans are estimated based
on actuarial estimates using benefit assumptions for, among
other factors, discount rates, rates of compensation increases
and healthcare cost trends. Payments for unfunded pension plan
benefits and other post-employment benefits are estimated
through 2020. For funded pension plans, estimating the
requirements beyond fiscal 2011 is not practical, as it depends
on the performance of the plans investments, among other
factors. |
DIVIDENDS
No dividends have been declared since October 26, 2006.
Future dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors
and will depend on, among other things, our financial resources,
cash flows generated by
56
our business, our cash requirements, restrictions under the
instruments governing our indebtedness, being in compliance with
the appropriate indentures and covenants under the instruments
that govern our indebtedness that would allow us to legally pay
dividends and other relevant factors.
ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH AND SAFETY
We strive to be a leader in environment, health and safety
(EHS). Our EHS system is aligned with ISO 14001, an
international environmental management standard, and OHSAS
18001, an international occupational health and safety
management standard. All of our facilities are expected to
implement the necessary management systems to support ISO 14001
and OHSAS 18001 certifications. As of March 31, 2010, all
of our manufacturing facilities worldwide were ISO 14001
certified, 31 facilities were OHSAS 18001 certified and 29 have
dedicated quality improvement management systems.
Our capital expenditures for environmental protection and the
betterment of working conditions in our facilities were
$2 million in fiscal 2010. We expect these capital
expenditures will be approximately $5 million and
$3 million in fiscal 2011 and 2012, respectively. In
addition, expenses for environmental protection (including
estimated and probable environmental remediation costs as well
as general environmental protection costs at our facilities)
were $32 million in fiscal 2010, and are expected to be
$28 million and $42 million in fiscal 2011 and 2012.
Generally, expenses for environmental protection are recorded in
Cost of goods sold. However, significant remediation costs that
are not associated with on-going operations are recorded in
Other (income) expenses, net.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations and
liquidity and capital resources are based on our consolidated
financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP). In connection with the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and
estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses,
and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates
and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other
factors we believe to be relevant at the time we prepared our
consolidated financial statements. On a regular basis, we review
the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to
ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented
fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future
events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty,
actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates,
and such differences could be material.
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in
Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies to our accompanying consolidated financial
statements. We believe the following accounting policies are the
most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our
reported financial results, as they require management to make
difficult, subjective or complex judgments, and to make
estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain. We have reviewed these critical accounting policies
and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our board of
directors.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
We use derivative instruments to manage our exposure to the risk
of fluctuations in our operations and cash flows as a result of
changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates,
energy prices and interest rates. Derivative instruments we use
are primarily commodity forward and option contracts, foreign
currency forward contracts and interest swaps.
We are exposed to changes in aluminum prices through
arrangements where the customer has received a fixed price
commitment from us. We attempt to manage this risk by hedging
future purchases of metal required for these firm commitments.
In addition, we hedge a portion of our future production. To the
extent that these exposures are not fully hedged, we are exposed
to gains and losses when changes occur in the market price of
aluminum. A 10% change in the market value of aluminum as of
March 31, 2010 would result
57
in an increase or decrease in the fair value of our hedges of
specific arrangements and future production by approximately
$12 million.
Short-term exposures to changing foreign currency exchange rates
occur due to operating cash flows denominated in foreign
currencies. We manage this risk with forward currency swap
contracts and currency exchange options. Our most significant
foreign currency exposures relate to the euro, Brazilian real
and the Korean won. We assess market conditions and determine an
appropriate amount to hedge based on pre-determined policies.
To the extent that foreign currency operating cash flows are not
fully hedged, we are exposed to foreign exchange gains and
losses which could impact our earnings and cash flows. A 10%
instantaneous appreciation of all foreign exchange rates against
the U.S. dollar would reduce the fair value of our currency
derivatives by approximately $11 million.
We are exposed to changes in interest rates due to our
financing, investing and cash management activities. We may
enter into interest rate swap contracts to protect against our
exposure to changes in future interest rates, which requires
deciding how much of the exposure to hedge based on our
sensitivity to variable-rate fluctuations.
To the extent that our interest rates on floating rate debt are
not fully hedged, we are exposed to the impacts of changing
interest rates on our interest costs and cash flows. In the
event that we do not hedge a floating rate debt a movement in
market interest rates could impact our interest cost. A 10%
change in the market interest rate as of March 31, 2010
would increase or decrease the fair value of our interest rate
hedges by $1 million. A 12.5 basis point change in
market interest rates as of March 31, 2010 would increase
or decrease our unhedged interest cost on floating rate debt by
approximately $1 million.
The majority of our derivative contracts are valued using
industry-standard models that use observable market inputs as
their basis, such as time value, forward interest rates,
volatility factors, and current (spot) and forward market prices
for foreign exchange rates. See Note 15 Fair
Value of Assets and Liabilities to our accompanying consolidated
audited financial statements for discussion on fair value of
derivative instruments.
Impairment
of Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of the identifiable net assets of acquired companies.
As a result of the Arrangement, we estimated fair value of the
identifiable net assets of acquired companies using a number of
factors, including the application of multiples and discounted
cash flow estimates. We have allocated goodwill to our operating
segments in North America, Europe and South America, which
are also reporting units for purposes of performing our goodwill
impairment testing as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
181
|
|
South America
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is not amortized; instead, it is tested for impairment
annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist.
On an ongoing basis, absent any impairment indicators, we
perform our goodwill impairment testing as of the last day of
February of each year.
We test consolidated goodwill for impairment using a fair value
approach at the reporting unit level. We use our operating
segments as our reporting units and perform our goodwill
impairment test in two steps. Step one compares the fair value
of each reporting unit (operating segment) to its carrying
amount. If step one indicates that the carrying value of the
reporting unit exceeds the fair value, the second step is
performed to measure the amount of impairment, if any.
58
For purposes of our step one analysis, our estimate of fair
value for each reporting unit is based on a combination of
(1) quoted market prices/relationships (the market
approach), (2) discounted cash flows (the income approach)
and (3) a stock price
build-up
approach (the
build-up
approach). The estimated fair value for each reporting unit is
within the range of fair values yielded under each approach. The
approach to determining fair value for all reporting units is
consistent given the similarity of our operations in each region.
Under the market approach, the fair value of each reporting unit
is determined based upon comparisons to public companies engaged
in similar businesses. Under the income approach, the fair value
of each reporting unit is based on the present value of
estimated future cash flows. The income approach is dependent on
a number of significant management assumptions including markets
and market share, sales volumes and prices, costs to produce,
capital spending, working capital changes and the discount rate.
We estimate future cash flows for each of our reporting units
based on our projections for the respective reporting unit.
These projected cash flows are discounted to the present value
using a weighted average cost of capital (discount rate). The
discount rate is commensurate with the risk inherent in the
projected cash flows and reflects the rate of return required by
an investor in the current economic conditions. For our annual
impairment test conducted in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010,
we used a discount rate of 10.3% for all reporting units, a
decrease of 1.7% from the rate used in our prior year impairment
test. An increase or decrease of 0.5% in the discount rate
impacted the estimated fair value by $25-75 million,
depending on the relative size of the reporting unit. The
projections are based on both past performance and the
expectations of future performance and assumptions used in our
current operating plan. We use specific revenue growth
assumptions for each reporting unit, based on history and
economic conditions, ranging from 2.5% to 3.5% growth through
2015.
Under the
build-up
approach, which is a variation of the market approach, we
estimate the fair value of each reporting unit based on the
estimated contribution of each of the reporting units to
Hindalcos total business enterprise value.
We performed our annual testing for goodwill impairment as of
the last day of February 2010 and no goodwill impairment was
identified. The fair values of the reporting units exceeded
their respective carrying amounts as of February 28, 2010
by 94% for North America, by 56% for Europe and by 23% for
South America.
Equity
Investments
We invest in a number of public and privately-held companies,
primarily through joint ventures and consortiums. If they are
not consolidated, these investments are accounted for using the
equity method and include our investment in Norf. As a result of
the Arrangement, investments in and advances to affiliates as of
May 16, 2007 were adjusted to reflect fair value.
We review equity investments for impairment whenever certain
indicators are present suggesting that the carrying value of an
investment is not recoverable. This analysis requires a
significant amount of judgment to identify events or
circumstances indicating that an equity investment may be
impaired. Once an impairment indicator is identified, we must
determine if an impairment exists, and if so, whether the
impairment is other than temporary, in which case the equity
investment would be written down to its estimated fair value.
Impairment
of Intangible Assets
Our other intangible assets of $746 million as of
March 31, 2010 consist of tradenames, technology, customer
relationships and favorable energy and supply contracts and are
amortized over 3 to 20 years. As of March 31, 2010, we
do not have any intangible assets with indefinite useful lives.
We consider the potential impairment of these other intangibles
assets in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) (Codification)
No. 360, Property, Plant and Equipment. For
tradenames and technology, we utilize a relief-from-royalty
method. All other intangible assets are assessed using the
income approach. As a result of these assessments, no impairment
was indicated.
59
Impairment
of Long Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, are reviewed
for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value of the assets contained in our financial
statements may not be recoverable. When evaluating long-lived
assets for potential impairment, we first compare the carrying
value of the asset to the assets estimated future cash
flows (undiscounted and without interest charges). If the
estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of
the asset, we calculate and recognize an impairment loss. If we
recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of
the asset is based on the discounted estimated future cash flows
and will be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived
asset, the new cost basis will be depreciated over the remaining
useful life of that asset.
Our impairment loss calculations require management to apply
judgments in estimating future cash flows to determine asset
fair values, including forecasting useful lives of the assets
and selecting the discount rate that represents the risk
inherent in future cash flows. We recorded impairment charges on
long-lived assets of $1 million, $18 million
(including $17 million classified as Restructuring charges,
net), and $1 million during the years ended March 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and
judgments used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair
values, we may be exposed to additional impairment losses that
could be material to our results of operations.
Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans
We account for our pensions and other postretirement benefits in
accordance with ASC 715, Compensation
Retirement Benefits (ASC 715). Liabilities and expense for
pension plans and other postretirement benefits are determined
using actuarial methodologies and incorporate significant
assumptions, including the rate used to discount the future
estimated liability, the long-term rate of return on plan
assets, and several assumptions related to the employee
workforce (salary increases, medical costs, retirement age, and
mortality).
The actuarial models use an attribution approach that generally
spreads the financial impact of changes to the plan and
actuarial assumptions over the average remaining service lives
of the employees in the plan. Changes in liability due to
changes in actuarial assumptions such as discount rate, rate of
compensation increases and mortality, as well as annual
deviations between what was assumed and what was experienced by
the plan are treated as gains or losses. Gains and losses are
amortized over the groups average future service life of
the employees. The average future service for pension plans and
other postretirement benefit plans is 11.7 and 12.2 years
respectively. The principle underlying the required attribution
approach is that employees render service over their average
remaining service lives on a relatively smooth basis and,
therefore, the accounting for benefits earned under the pension
or non-pension postretirement benefits plans should follow the
same relatively smooth pattern.
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans we have established in the United States, Canada,
Switzerland and the United Kingdom, unfunded pension benefits
primarily in Germany, and unfunded lump sum indemnities payable
upon retirement to employees of businesses in France, Malaysia,
Italy and partially funded lump sum indemnities in South Korea.
Pension benefits are generally based on the employees
service and either on a flat rate for years of service or on the
highest average eligible compensation before retirement. Our
other postretirement benefit obligations include unfunded
healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to retired
employees in Canada, the U.S. and Brazil.
All net actuarial gains and losses are generally amortized over
the expected average remaining service life of the employees.
The costs and obligations of pension and other postretirement
benefits are calculated based on assumptions including the
long-term rate of return on pension assets, discount rates for
pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, expected
service period, salary increases, retirement ages of employees
and healthcare cost trend rates. These assumptions bear the risk
of change as they require significant judgment and they have
inherent uncertainties that management may not be able to
control.
60
The most significant assumption used to calculate pension and
other postretirement obligations is the discount rates used to
determine the present value of benefits. It is based on spot
rate yield curves and individual bond matching models for
pension and other postretirement plans in Canada and the United
States, and on published long-term high quality corporate bond
indices in other countries, at the end of each fiscal year.
Adjustments were made to the index rates based on the duration
of the plans obligations for each country. The weighted
average discount rate used to determine the pension benefit
obligation was 5.5% as of March 31, 2010, compared to 6.0%
and 5.8% for March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
weighted average discount rate used to determine the other
postretirement benefit obligation was 5.6% as of March 31,
2010, compared to 6.2% and 6.1% for March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The weighted average discount rate used to
determine the net periodic benefit cost is the rate used to
determine the benefit obligation in the previous year.
As of March 31, 2010, an increase in the discount rate of
0.5%, assuming inflation remains unchanged, would result in a
decrease of $100 million in the pension and other
postretirement obligations and in a decrease of $12 million
in the net periodic benefit cost. A decrease in the discount
rate of 0.5% as of March 31, 2010, assuming inflation
remains unchanged, would result in an increase of
$100 million in the pension and other postretirement
obligations and in an increase of $12 million in the net
periodic benefit cost. The calculation of the estimate of the
expected return on assets and additional discussion regarding
pension and other postretirement plans is described in
Note 12 Postretirement Benefit Plans to our
accompanying consolidated financial statements. The weighted
average expected return on assets was 6.7% for 2010, 6.9% for
2009, and 7.3% for 2008. The expected return on assets is a
long-term assumption whose accuracy can only be measured over a
long period based on past experience. A variation in the
expected return on assets by 0.5% as of March 31, 2010
would result in a variation of approximately $4 million in
the net periodic benefit cost.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability
method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future
tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. In addition,
deferred tax assets are also recorded with respect to net
operating losses and other tax attribute carryforwards. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are
established when realization of the benefit of deferred tax
assets is not deemed to be more likely than not. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date.
The ultimate recovery of certain of our deferred tax assets is
dependent on the amount and timing of taxable income that we
will ultimately generate in the future and other factors such as
the interpretation of tax laws. This means that significant
estimates and judgments are required to determine the extent
that valuation allowances should be provided against deferred
tax assets. We have provided valuation allowances as of
March 31, 2010 aggregating $219 million against such
assets based on our current assessment of future operating
results, timing and nature of realizing deferred tax
liabilities, tax planning strategies and tax carrybacks.
By their nature, tax laws are often subject to interpretation.
Further complicating matters is that in those cases where a tax
position is open to interpretation, differences of opinion can
result in differing conclusions as to the amount of tax benefits
to be recognized under Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740, Income
Taxes. ASC 740 utilizes a two-step approach for
evaluating tax positions. Recognition (Step 1) occurs when
an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its
technical merits, is more likely than not to be sustained upon
examination. Measurement (Step 2) is only addressed if Step
1 has been satisfied. Under Step 2, the tax benefit is measured
as the largest amount of benefit, determined on a cumulative
probability basis that is more likely than not to be realized
upon ultimate settlement. Consequently, the level of evidence
and documentation necessary to support a
61
position prior to being given recognition and measurement within
the financial statements is a matter of judgment that depends on
all available evidence.
As of March 31, 2010 the total amount of unrecognized
benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income
tax rate in future periods based on anticipated settlement dates
is $39 million. Although management believes that the
estimates and judgments discussed herein are reasonable, actual
results could differ, which could result in gains or losses that
could be material.
Assessment
of Loss Contingencies
We have legal and other contingencies, including environmental
liabilities, which could result in significant losses upon the
ultimate resolution of such contingencies. Environmental
liabilities that are not legal asset retirement obligations are
accrued on an undiscounted basis when it is probable that a
liability exists for past events.
We have provided for losses in situations where we have
concluded that it is probable that a loss has been or will be
incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. A
significant amount of judgment is involved in determining
whether a loss is probable and reasonably estimable due to the
uncertainty involved in determining the likelihood of future
events and estimating the financial statement impact of such
events. If further developments or resolution of a contingent
matter are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments, we
may need to recognize a significant charge in a future period
related to an existing contingency.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
See Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies to our accompanying audited consolidated
financial statements for a full description of recent accounting
pronouncements including the respective expected dates of
adoption and expected effects on results of operations and
financial condition.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing
business operations, including risks from changes in commodity
prices (primarily aluminum, electricity and natural gas),
foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates that could
impact our results of operations and financial condition. We
manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities and derivative
financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments
as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes.
Except where noted, the derivative contracts are
marked-to-market
and the related gains and losses are included in earnings in the
current accounting period.
By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve
risk, including the credit risk of non-performance by
counterparties. All derivative contracts are executed with
counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our
maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in the
accompanying March 31, 2010 consolidated balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions and the
relative costs of the instruments. The duration is always linked
to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection
between the two being regularly monitored.
Commodity
Price Risks
We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of
certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity, natural
gas and transport fuel.
Aluminum
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model that
allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the price of
aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products have a
price structure with
62
two components: (i) a pass through aluminum price based on
the LME plus local market premiums and (ii) a
conversion premium based on the conversion cost to
produce the rolled product and the competitive market conditions
for that product.
A key component of our conversion model is the use of derivative
instruments on projected aluminum requirements to preserve our
conversion margin. We enter into forward metal purchases
simultaneous with the sales contracts that contain fixed metal
prices. These forward metal purchases directly hedge the
economic risk of future metal price fluctuation associated with
these contracts. The recognition of unrealized gains and losses
on metal derivative positions typically precedes customer
delivery and revenue recognition under the related fixed forward
priced contracts. The timing difference between the recognition
of unrealized gains and losses on metal derivatives and
recognition of revenue impacts income (loss) before income taxes
and net income (loss). Gains and losses on metal derivative
contracts are not recognized in segment income until realized.
Metal price lag exposes us to potential losses in periods of
falling aluminum prices. We sell short-term LME futures
contracts to reduce our exposure to this risk. We expect the
gain or loss on the settlement of the derivative to offset the
effect of changes in aluminum prices on future product sales.
These hedges generally generate losses in periods of increasing
aluminum prices.
Sensitivities
We estimate that a 10% decline in LME aluminum prices would
result in a $12 million pre-tax loss related to the change
in fair value of our aluminum contracts as of March 31,
2010.
Energy
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. For the year ended
March 31, 2010, natural gas and electricity represented
approximately 89% of our energy consumption by cost. We also use
fuel oil and transport fuel. The majority of energy usage occurs
at our casting centers, at our smelters in South America and
during the hot rolling of aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities
require relatively less energy.
We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which subjects
us to market pricing fluctuations. We seek to stabilize our
future exposure to natural gas prices through the use of forward
purchase contracts. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South
America have historically been more stable than in the United
States. As of March 31, 2010, we have a nominal amount of
forward purchases outstanding related to natural gas.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs. In South America,
we own and operate hydroelectric facilities that meet
approximately 27% of our total electricity requirements in that
segment. Additionally, we have entered into an electricity swap
in North America to fix a portion of the cost of our electricity
requirements.
We purchase a nominal amount of heating oil forward contracts to
hedge against fluctuations in the price of our transport fuel.
Fluctuating energy costs worldwide, due to the changes in supply
and international and geopolitical events, expose us to earnings
volatility as such changes in such costs cannot immediately be
recovered under existing contracts and sales agreements, and may
only be mitigated in future periods under future pricing
arrangements.
63
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
March 31, 2010, given a 10% decline in spot prices for
energy contracts ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Heating Oil
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risks
Exchange rate movements, particularly the euro, the Brazilian
real and the Korean won against the U.S. dollar, have an
impact on our operating results. In Europe, where we have
predominantly local currency selling prices and operating costs,
we benefit as the euro strengthens, but are adversely affected
as the euro weakens. In Korea, where we have local currency
selling prices for local sales and U.S. dollar denominated
selling prices for exports, we benefit slightly as the won
weakens, but are adversely affected as the won strengthens, due
to a slightly higher percentage of exports compared to local
sales. In Brazil, where we have predominately U.S. dollar
selling prices and metal costs and local currency operating
costs, we benefit as the local currency weakens, but are
adversely affected as the local currency strengthens. Foreign
currency contracts may be used to hedge the economic exposures
at our foreign operations.
It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures
within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the
majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either
forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in
non-functional currencies. Our most significant
non-U.S. dollar
functional currency operating segments are Europe and Asia,
which have the euro and the Korean won as their functional
currencies, respectively. South America is U.S. dollar
functional with Brazilian real transactional exposure.
We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign
operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Net sales and
expenses in our foreign operations foreign currencies are
translated based on an average exchange rate for the period. The
resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
Shareholders equity section of the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
Any negative impact of currency movements on our currency
contracts to hedge foreign currency commitments to purchase or
sell goods and services would be offset by an equal and opposite
favorable exchange impact on the commitments being hedged. For a
discussion of accounting policies and other information relating
to currency contracts, see Note 1 Business and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and
Note 14 Financial Instruments and Commodity
Contracts to our accompanying audited consolidated financial
statements.
64
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
March 31, 2010, given a 10% change in rates ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian real
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Korean won
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Canadian dollar
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
British pound
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Swiss franc
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Loans to and investments in European operations have been hedged
with EUR 135 million of cross-currency swaps. We
designated these as net investment hedges. While this has no
impact on our cash flows, subsequent changes in the value of
currency related derivative instruments that are not designated
as hedges are recognized in Gain (loss) on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in our consolidated statement of
operations.
We estimate that a 10% increase in the value of the euro against
the US Dollar would result in an $18 million potential
pre-tax loss on these derivatives as of March 31, 2010.
Interest
Rate Risks
As of March 31, 2010, including fixed for float swaps,
approximately 74% of our debt obligations were at fixed rates.
Due to the nature of fixed-rate debt, there would be no
significant impact on our interest expense or cash flows from
either a 10% increase or decrease in market rates of interest.
We are subject to interest rate risk related to our floating
rate debt. For every 12.5 basis point increase in the
interest rates on our outstanding variable rate debt as of
March 31, 2010, which includes $631 million of term
loan debt, net of pay fixed interest rate swaps, and other
variable rate debt of $66 million, our annual pre-tax
income would be reduced by approximately $1 million. From
time to time, we have used interest rate swaps to manage our
debt cost. In Korea, we entered into interest rate swaps to fix
the interest rate on various floating rate debt. See
Note 10 Debt to our accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements for further information.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
March 31, 2010, given a 10% change in the benchmark USD
LIBOR interest rate ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Interest Rate Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Asia
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
66
Managements
Responsibility Report
Novelis management is responsible for the preparation,
integrity and fair presentation of the financial statements and
other information used in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and include, where appropriate, estimates based on the
best judgment of management. Financial and operating data
elsewhere in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are consistent with that contained in the accompanying financial
statements.
Novelis policy is to maintain an effective system of
internal control over financial reporting and disclosure
controls and procedures. Such systems are designed to provide
reasonable assurance that the financial information is accurate
and reliable and that Company assets are adequately accounted
for and safeguarded. The Board of Directors oversees the
Companys systems of internal control over financial
reporting and disclosure controls and procedures through its
Audit Committee, which is comprised of directors who are not
employees. The Audit Committee meets regularly with
representatives of the Companys independent registered
public accounting firm and management, including internal audit
staff, to satisfy themselves that Novelis policy is being
followed. The Audit Committee has engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm.
The financial statements have been reviewed by the Audit
Committee and, together with the other required information in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
approved by the Board of Directors. In addition, the financial
statements have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP whose
reports are provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven
Fisher
|
|
|
|
PHILIP MARTENS
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
STEVEN FISHER
Chief Financial Officer
|
May 27, 2010
67
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Novelis Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as
of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income
(loss), shareholders equity and cash flows for the years
ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, and for the
period from May 16, 2007 to March 31, 2008 present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries (Successor) at March 31,
2010 and March 31, 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years ended
March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, and the period from
May 16, 2007 to March 31, 2008 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2010, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Companys management is responsible for these financial
statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to
express opinions on these financial statements and on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial
statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
minority interests (now termed noncontrolling interests) to
conform to ASC 810, Consolidations, in fiscal year
2010.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
May 27, 2010
68
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Novelis Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders
equity and cash flows for the period from April 1, 2007 to
May 15, 2007 present fairly, in all material respects, the
results of operations and cash flows of Novelis Inc. and its
subsidiaries (Predecessor) for the period from April 1,
2007 to May 15, 2007 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We
conducted our audit of these statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
minority interests (now termed noncontrolling interests) to
conform to ASC 810, Consolidations, (ASC
810) effective in fiscal 2010 and retrospectively adjusted
the financial statements for the period April 1, 2007 to
May 15, 2007.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
June 29, 2009, except with respect to our opinion on the
consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the
retrospective application of ASC 810 discussed in
Note 1, as to which the date is August 5, 2009
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
7,190
|
|
|
|
9,251
|
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,946
|
|
|
|
12,345
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
70
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $4 and $2 as of
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; unlimited number of shares
authorized; 77,459,658 shares issued and outstanding as of
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,525
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of our common shareholder
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
71
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
465
|
|
|
$
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Non-cash restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments, net
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Foreign exchange remeasurement on debt
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of effects from
acquisitions and divestitures):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from related party loans receivable, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(1,009
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
72
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity of our Common Shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
(AOCI)
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
75,357,660
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
428
|
|
|
$
|
(263
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity for April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
57,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Conversion of share-based compensation plans from equity-based
plans to liability-based plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax benefit of $4
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
of $ in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 15, 2007
|
|
|
75,415,536
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
|
$
|
(360
|
)
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
73
Novelis
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Continued)
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity of our Common Shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
(AOCI)
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 16, 2007
|
|
|
75,415,536
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,405
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
3,557
|
|
Activity for May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Issuance of additional common stock
|
|
|
2,044,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $ in
AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax benefit of $4
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
Fiscal 2009 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $ in
AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
benefit of $11 included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax benefit of $31
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
Fiscal 2010 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $ in
AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
benefit of $5 included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax provision of
$10 included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,525
|
)
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
74
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) related to items of other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to our common
shareholder
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(2,104
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
531
|
|
|
$
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
75
Novelis
Inc.
|
|
1.
|
BUSINESS
AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein to Alcan
refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
Organization
and Description of Business
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products for the beverage and food can,
transportation, construction and industrial, and foil products
markets. As of March 31, 2010, we had operations on four
continents: North America; South America; Asia; and Europe,
through 31 operating plants and four research facilities in 11
countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our
South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina
refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation
facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil.
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
spin-off occurred on January 6, 2005, following approval by
Alcans board of directors and shareholders, and legal and
regulatory approvals. Alcan shareholders received one Novelis
common share for every five Alcan common shares held.
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock and Predecessor and Successor
Reporting
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
Our acquisition by Hindalco was recorded in accordance with the
business combination accounting standards at that time. In the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets, the consideration and
related costs paid by Hindalco in connection with the
acquisition have been pushed down to us and have
been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
Due to the impact of push down accounting, the Companys
consolidated financial statements and certain notes separate the
Companys presentation into two distinct periods to
indicate the application of two different bases of accounting
between the periods presented: (1) the periods up to, and
including, the May 15, 2007 acquisition date (labeled
Predecessor) and (2) the periods after that
date (labeled Successor). The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include a black line division
which indicates that the Predecessor and Successor reporting
entities shown are not comparable.
Consolidation
Policy
Our consolidated financial statements include the assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of all wholly-owned
subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise
control and entities in which we have a controlling financial
interest or are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. We
eliminate all significant intercompany accounts and transactions
from our consolidated financial statements.
We use the equity method to account for our investments in
entities that we do not control, but where we have the ability
to exercise significant influence over operating and financial
policies. Consolidated net income (loss) attributable to our
common shareholder includes our share of the net earnings
(losses) of these entities. The difference between consolidation
and the equity method impacts certain of our financial ratios
because of the presentation of the detailed line items reported
in the consolidated financial statements for consolidated
entities, compared to a two-line presentation of equity method
investments and net losses.
76
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We use the cost method to account for our investments in
entities that we do not control and for which we do not have the
ability to exercise significant influence over operating and
financial policies. These investments are recorded at the lower
of their cost or fair value.
Use of
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP) requires us to make estimates
and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures
of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. The principal areas of
judgment relate to (1) the fair value of derivative
financial instruments; (2) impairment of goodwill;
(3) impairments of long lived assets, intangible assets and
equity investments; (4) actuarial assumptions related to
pension and other postretirement benefit plans; (5) income
tax reserves and valuation allowances and (6) assessment of
loss contingencies, including environmental and litigation
reserves. Future events and their effects cannot be predicted
with certainty, and accordingly, our accounting estimates
require the exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used
in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements will
change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as
additional information is obtained and as our operating
environment changes. We evaluate and update our assumptions and
estimates on an ongoing basis and may employ outside experts to
assist in our evaluations. Actual results could differ from the
estimates we have used.
Risks
and Uncertainties
We are exposed to a number of risks in the normal course of our
operations that could potentially affect our financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows.
Laws
and regulations
We operate in an industry that is subject to a broad range of
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. These laws and regulations
impose increasingly stringent environmental, health and safety
protection standards and permitting requirements regarding,
among other things, air emissions, wastewater storage, treatment
and discharges, the use and handling of hazardous or toxic
materials, waste disposal practices, the remediation of
environmental contamination, post-mining reclamation and working
conditions for our employees. Some environmental laws, such as
the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, also known as CERCLA or
Superfund, and comparable state laws, impose joint and several
liability for the cost of environmental remediation, natural
resource damages, third party claims, and other expenses,
without regard to the fault or the legality of the original
conduct.
The costs of complying with these laws and regulations,
including participation in assessments and remediation of
contaminated sites and installation of pollution control
facilities, have been, and in the future could be, significant.
In addition, these laws and regulations may also result in
substantial environmental liabilities associated with divested
assets, third party locations and past activities. In certain
instances, these costs and liabilities, as well as related
action to be taken by us, could be accelerated or increased if
we were to close, divest of or change the principal use of
certain facilities with respect to which we may have
environmental liabilities or remediation obligations. Currently,
we are involved in a number of compliance efforts, remediation
activities and legal proceedings concerning environmental
matters, including certain activities and proceedings arising
under U.S. Superfund and comparable laws in other
jurisdictions where we have operations.
We have established reserves for environmental remediation
activities and liabilities where appropriate. However, the cost
of addressing environmental matters (including the timing of any
charges related thereto)
77
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
cannot be predicted with certainty, and these reserves may not
ultimately be adequate, especially in light of potential changes
in environmental conditions, changing interpretations of laws
and regulations by regulators and courts, the discovery of
previously unknown environmental conditions, the risk of
governmental orders to carry out additional compliance on
certain sites not initially included in remediation in progress,
our potential liability to remediate sites for which provisions
have not been previously established and the adoption of more
stringent environmental laws. Such future developments could
result in increased environmental costs and liabilities and
could require significant capital expenditures, any of which
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position
or results of operations or cash flows. Furthermore, the failure
to comply with our obligations under the environmental laws and
regulations could subject us to administrative, civil or
criminal penalties, obligations to pay damages or other costs,
and injunctions or other orders, including orders to cease
operations. In addition, the presence of environmental
contamination at our properties could adversely affect our
ability to sell a property, receive full value for a property or
use a property as collateral for a loan.
Some of our current and potential operations are located or
could be located in or near communities that may regard such
operations as having a detrimental effect on their social and
economic circumstances. Environmental laws typically provide for
participation in permitting decisions, site remediation
decisions and other matters. Concern about environmental justice
issues may affect our operations. Should such community
objections be presented to government officials, the
consequences of such a development may have a material adverse
impact upon the profitability or, in extreme cases, the
viability of an operation. In addition, such developments may
adversely affect our ability to expand or enter into new
operations in such location or elsewhere and may also have an
effect on the cost of our environmental remediation projects.
We use a variety of hazardous materials and chemicals in our
rolling processes, as well as in our smelting operations in
Brazil and in connection with maintenance work on our
manufacturing facilities. Because of the nature of these
substances or related residues, we may be liable for certain
costs, including, among others, costs for health-related claims
or removal or re-treatment of such substances. Certain of our
current and former facilities incorporate asbestos-containing
materials, a hazardous substance that has been the subject of
health-related claims for occupation exposure. In addition,
although we have developed environmental, health and safety
programs for our employees, including measures to reduce
employee exposure to hazardous substances, and conduct regular
assessments at our facilities, we are currently, and in the
future may be, involved in claims and litigation filed on behalf
of persons alleging injury predominantly as a result of
occupational exposure to substances at our current or former
facilities. It is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome
of these claims and lawsuits due to the unpredictable nature of
personal injury litigation. If these claims and lawsuits,
individually or in the aggregate, were finally resolved against
us, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows
could be adversely affected.
Materials
and labor
In the aluminum rolled products industry, our raw materials are
subject to continuous price volatility. We may not be able to
pass on the entire cost of the increases to our customers or
offset fully the effects of higher raw material costs, other
than metal, through productivity improvements, which may cause
our profitability to decline. In addition, there is a potential
time lag between changes in prices under our purchase contracts
and the point when we can implement a corresponding change under
our sales contracts with our customers. As a result, we could be
exposed to fluctuations in raw materials prices, including
metal, since, during the time lag period, we may have to
temporarily bear the additional cost of the change under our
purchase contracts, which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Significant price increases may result in our customers
substituting other materials, such as plastic or glass, for
aluminum or switch to another aluminum rolled products producer,
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
78
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We consume substantial amounts of energy in our rolling
operations, our cast house operations and our Brazilian smelting
operations. The factors that affect our energy costs and supply
reliability tend to be specific to each of our facilities. A
number of factors could materially adversely affect our energy
position including, but not limited to: (a) increases in
the cost of natural gas; (b) increases in the cost of
supplied electricity or fuel oil related to transportation;
(c) interruptions in energy supply due to equipment failure
or other causes and (d) the inability to extend energy
supply contracts upon expiration on economical terms. A
significant increase in energy costs or disruption of energy
supplies or supply arrangements could have a material adverse
impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
Approximately 69% of our employees are represented by labor
unions under a large number of collective bargaining agreements
with varying durations and expiration dates. We may not be able
to satisfactorily renegotiate our collective bargaining
agreements when they expire. In addition, existing collective
bargaining agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage
at our facilities in the future, and any such work stoppage
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
Geographic
markets
We are, and will continue to be, subject to financial,
political, economic and business risks in connection with our
global operations. We have made investments and carry on
production activities in various emerging markets, including
Brazil, Korea and Malaysia, and we market our products in these
countries, as well as China and certain other countries in Asia.
While we anticipate higher growth or attractive production
opportunities from these emerging markets, they also present a
higher degree of risk than more developed markets. In addition
to the business risks inherent in developing and servicing new
markets, economic conditions may be more volatile, legal and
regulatory systems less developed and predictable, and the
possibility of various types of adverse governmental action more
pronounced. In addition, inflation, fluctuations in currency and
interest rates, competitive factors, civil unrest and labor
problems could affect our revenues, expenses and results of
operations. Our operations could also be adversely affected by
acts of war, terrorism or the threat of any of these events as
well as government actions such as controls on imports, exports
and prices, tariffs, new forms of taxation, or changes in fiscal
regimes and increased government regulation in the countries in
which we operate or service customers. Unexpected or
uncontrollable events or circumstances in any of these markets
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
Other
risks and uncertainties
In addition, refer to Note 15 Fair Value of
Assets and Liabilities and Note 18 Commitments
and Contingencies for a discussion of financial instruments and
commitments and contingencies.
Reclassifications
and adjustments
Certain reclassifications of the prior period amounts and
presentation have been made to conform to the presentation
adopted for the current period. In order to present the impact
of all customer-directed derivatives and associated trading
activities as operating activities on the consolidated
statements of cash flows, we corrected our presentation by
reclassifying this activity from investing activities to
operating activities. This resulted in a reduction to operating
cash flow and an increase to investing cash flow of
approximately $16 million and $4 million for the year
ended March 31, 2009 and the period from May 16, 2007
through March 31, 2008, respectively. This reclassification
did not have any impact on total cash or on the balance sheet,
income statement or related disclosures.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we identified an
immaterial error in our consolidated annual and interim
financial statements included in previously filed
Forms 10-Q
and
Forms 10-K
for fiscal 2008 and 2009. The error relates to deferred income
taxes recorded in connection with purchase accounting in South
79
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
America. We believe the correction of this error to be both
quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial to our annual
results for fiscal 2010 or to any of our previously issued
financial statements. As a result, we did not adjust any prior
period amounts. There was no impact to Income (loss) before
income taxes and noncontrolling interests or cash flows from
operating activities for any periods. We reflected the
correction of this error in the interim financial statements for
the second quarter of 2010. As of and for the year ended
March 31, 2010, the impact of the correction was an
increase to goodwill of $29 million, an increase to
deferred tax liabilities of $25 million and a reduction of
our income tax expense of $4 million. Due to the fact that
our South American subsidiaries are US dollar functional, the
deferred tax liabilities fluctuate with changes in the exchange
rate. This fluctuation is recorded as an increase or decrease to
income tax expense.
In the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2009, we
reclassified $19 million from Property, plant and
equipment, net to Intangible assets, net related capitalized
software. The reclassification had no impact on total assets,
total liabilities, total equity, net income (loss) or cash flows
as previously presented.
Revenue
recognition
We recognize sales when the revenue is realized or realizable,
and has been earned. We record sales when a firm sales agreement
is in place, delivery has occurred and collectability of the
fixed or determinable sales price is reasonably assured.
We recognize product revenue, net of trade discounts and
allowances, in the reporting period in which the products are
shipped and the title and risk of ownership pass to the
customer. We generally ship our product to our customers FOB
(free on board) destination point. Our standard terms of
delivery are included in our contracts of sale, order
confirmation documents and invoices. We sell most of our
products under contracts based on a conversion
premium, which is subject to periodic adjustments based on
market factors. As a result, the aluminum price risk is largely
absorbed by the customer. In situations where we offer customers
fixed prices for future delivery of our products, we may enter
into derivative instruments for all or a portion of the cost of
metal inputs to protect our profit on the conversion of the
product. In addition, through December 31, 2009, certain of
our sales contracts provided for a ceiling over which metal
prices could not be contractually passed through to the
customer. We partially mitigate the risk of this metal price
exposure through the purchase of derivative instruments.
We record tolling revenue when the revenue is realized or
realizable, and has been earned. Tolling refers to the process
by which certain customers provide metal to us for conversion to
rolled product. We do not take title to the metal and, after the
conversion and return shipment of the rolled product to the
customer, we charge them for the value-added conversion cost and
record these amounts in Net sales.
Shipping and handling amounts we bill to our customers are
included in Net sales and the related shipping and handling
costs we incur are included in Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization).
Cost
of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization)
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
includes all costs associated with inventories, including the
procurement of materials, the conversion of such materials into
finished product, and the costs of warehousing and distributing
finished goods to customers. Material procurement costs include
inbound freight charges as well as purchasing, receiving,
inspection and storage costs. Conversion costs include the costs
of direct production inputs such as labor and energy, as well as
allocated overheads from indirect production centers and plant
administrative support areas. Warehousing and distribution
expenses include inside and outside storage costs, outbound
freight charges and the costs of internal transfers.
80
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include selling,
marketing and advertising expenses; salaries, travel and office
expenses of administrative employees and contractors; legal and
professional fees; software license fees; and bad debt expenses.
Cash
and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes investments that are highly
liquid and have maturities of three months or less when
purchased. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents
approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of
these instruments.
We maintain amounts on deposit with various financial
institutions, which may, at times, exceed federally insured
limits. However, management periodically evaluates the
credit-worthiness of those institutions, and we have not
experienced any losses on such deposits.
Accounts
receivable
Our accounts receivable are geographically dispersed. We do not
obtain collateral relating to our accounts receivable. We do not
believe there are any significant concentrations of revenues
from any particular customer or group of customers that would
subject us to any significant credit risks in the collection of
our accounts receivable. We report accounts receivable at the
estimated net realizable amount we expect to collect from our
customers.
Additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts are made by
means of the provision for doubtful accounts. We write-off
uncollectible accounts receivable against the allowance for
doubtful accounts after exhausting collection efforts.
For each of the periods presented, we performed an analysis of
our historical cash collection patterns and considered the
impact of any known material events in determining the allowance
for doubtful accounts. In performing the analysis, the impact of
any adverse changes in general economic conditions was
considered, and for certain customers we reviewed a variety of
factors including: past due receivables; macro-economic
conditions; significant one-time events and historical
experience. Specific reserves for individual accounts may be
established due to a customers inability to meet their
financial obligations, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings
or the deterioration in a customers operating results or
financial position. As circumstances related to customers
change, we adjust our estimates of the recoverability of the
accounts receivable.
Derivative
Instruments
We utilize derivative instruments to manage our exposure to
changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and
interest rates. The fair values of all derivative instruments
are recognized as assets or liabilities at the balance sheet
date. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are
recognized as (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net and included in our consolidated statements of
operations or included in Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) (AOCI) on our consolidated balance sheet, depending on
the nature or use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for
hedge accounting treatment under the provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 815, Derivatives and Hedging.
Gains and losses on derivative instruments qualifying as cash
flow hedges are included, to the extent the hedges are
effective, in AOCI, until the underlying transactions are
recognized as gains or losses and included in our consolidated
statements of operations. Gains and losses on derivative
instruments used as hedges of our net investment in foreign
operations are included, net of taxes, to the extent the hedges
are effective, in AOCI as part of the cumulative translation
adjustment (CTA). The ineffective portions of cash flow hedges
and hedges of net investments in foreign operations, if any, are
recognized as gains or losses and included in our
81
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
consolidated statements of operations, in (Gain) loss on change
in fair value of derivative instruments, net in the current
period.
Inventories
We carry our inventories at the lower of their cost or market
value, reduced by reserves for excess and obsolete items. We use
the average cost method to determine cost.
Property,
plant and equipment
We record land, buildings, leasehold improvements and machinery
and equipment at cost. We record assets under capital lease
obligations at the lower of their fair value or the present
value of the aggregate future minimum lease payments as of the
beginning of the lease term. We depreciate our assets using the
straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful
life of the assets or the lease term, excluding any lease
renewals, unless the lease renewals are reasonably assured. As a
result of the Arrangement, land, building, leasehold
improvements and machinery and equipment as of May 16, 2007
were adjusted to reflect fair value.
The ranges of estimated useful lives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
30 to 40
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
7 to 20
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2 to 25
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
3 to 10
|
|
Equipment under capital lease obligations
|
|
|
6 to 15
|
|
As noted above, our machinery and equipment have useful lives of
2 to 25 years. Most of our large scale machinery, including
hot mills, cold mills, continuous casting mills, furnaces and
finishing mills have useful lives of
15-25 years.
Supporting machinery and equipment, including automation and
work rolls, have useful lives of 2-15 years.
Maintenance and repairs of property and equipment are expensed
as incurred. We capitalize replacements and improvements that
increase the estimated useful life of an asset, and when
material, we capitalize interest on major construction and
development projects while in progress.
We retain fully depreciated assets in property and accumulated
depreciation accounts until we remove them from service. In the
case of sale, retirement or disposal, the asset cost and related
accumulated depreciation balances are removed from the
respective accounts, and the resulting net amount, after
consideration of any proceeds, is included as a gain or loss in
Other (income) expenses, net in our consolidated statements of
operations.
We account for operating leases under the provisions of
ASC 840, Leases. These pronouncements require us to
recognize escalating rents, including any rent holidays, on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease for those lease
agreements where we receive the right to control the use of the
entire leased property at the beginning of the lease term.
Goodwill
We account for goodwill under the guidance in ASC 805 and
ASC 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other
(ASC 350).
82
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We test goodwill for impairment using a fair value approach at
the reporting unit level. We use our operating segments as our
reporting units. We test for impairment at least annually during
the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, unless some triggering
event occurs that would require an impairment assessment.
We use the present value of estimated future cash flows to
establish the estimated fair value of our reporting units as of
the testing dates. This approach includes many assumptions
related to future growth rates, discount factors and tax rates,
among other considerations. Changes in economic and operating
conditions impacting these assumptions could result in goodwill
impairment in future periods. When available and as appropriate,
we use comparative market multiples to corroborate the estimated
fair value. If the carrying amount of a reporting units
goodwill were to exceed its estimated fair value, the second
step of the impairment test must be performed in order to
determine the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step
compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill
with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying
amount of the reporting units goodwill exceeds its implied
fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount
equal to that excess in Impairment of goodwill in our
consolidated statements of operations.
When a business within a reporting unit is disposed of, goodwill
is allocated to the gain or loss on disposition using the
relative fair value methodology of ASC 350.
Long-Lived
Assets and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with ASC 350, we amortize the cost of
intangible assets over their respective estimated useful lives
to their estimated residual value.
Under the guidance in ASC 360, Property, Plant and
Equipment, we assess the recoverability of long-lived assets
(excluding goodwill) and definite-lived intangible assets,
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that we may
not be able to recover the assets carrying amount. We
measure the recoverability of assets to be held and used by a
comparison of the carrying amount of the asset (groups) to the
expected, undiscounted future net cash flows to be generated by
that asset (groups), or, for identifiable intangible assets, by
determining whether the amortization of the intangible asset
balance over its remaining life can be recovered through
undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of impairment of
identifiable intangible assets is based on the present value of
estimated future cash flows. We measure the amount of impairment
of other long-lived assets (excluding goodwill) as the amount by
which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of
the asset, which is generally determined as the present value of
estimated future cash flows or as the appraised value.
Impairments of long-lived assets have been included in
Restructuring charges, net and Other income (expense), net in
the consolidated statement of operations.
If the carrying amount of an intangible asset were to exceed its
fair value, we would recognize an impairment charge in Other
(income) expenses, net in our consolidated statements of
operations. No impairments of other intangible assets have been
identified during any of the periods presented.
We continue to amortize long-lived assets to be disposed of
other than by sale. We carry long-lived assets to be disposed of
by sale in our consolidated balance sheets at the lower of net
book value or the fair value less cost to sell, and we cease
depreciation.
Investment
in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates
Management assesses the potential for
other-than-temporary
impairment of our equity method and cost method investments. We
consider all available information, including the recoverability
of the investment, the earnings and near-term prospects of the
affiliate, factors related to the industry, conditions of the
affiliate, and our ability, if any, to influence the management
of the affiliate. We assess fair value based on valuation
methodologies, as appropriate, including the present value of
estimated future cash flows, estimates of sales
83
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
proceeds, and external appraisals. If an investment is
considered to be impaired and the decline in value is other than
temporary, we record an appropriate write-down.
Guarantees
We account for certain guarantees in accordance with
ASC 460, Guarantees (ASC 460). ASC 460 requires
that a guarantor recognize a liability for the fair value of
obligations undertaken at the inception of a guarantee.
Financing
Costs and Interest Income
We amortize financing costs and premiums, and accrete discounts,
over the remaining life of the related debt using the
effective interest amortization method. The related
income or expense is included in Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs in our consolidated
statements of operations. We record discounts or premiums as a
direct deduction from, or addition to, the face amount of the
financing.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC
820), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. ASC 820 also applies to measurements under
other accounting pronouncements, such as ASC 825, Financial
Instruments (ASC 825) that require or permit fair value
measurements. ASC 825 requires disclosures of the fair
value of financial instruments. Our financial instruments
include: cash and cash equivalents; certificates of deposit;
accounts receivable; accounts payable; foreign currency, energy
and interest rate derivative instruments; cross-currency swaps;
metal option and forward contracts; related party notes
receivable and payable; letters of credit; short-term borrowings
and long-term debt.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, certificates
of deposit, accounts receivable, accounts payable and current
related party notes receivable and payable approximate their
fair value because of the short-term maturity and highly liquid
nature of these instruments. The fair value of our letters of
credit is deemed to be the amount of payment guaranteed on our
behalf by third party financial institutions. We determine the
fair value of our short-term borrowings and long-term debt based
on various factors including maturity schedules, call features
and current market rates. We also use quoted market prices, when
available, or the present value of estimated future cash flows
to determine fair value of short-term borrowings and long-term
debt. When quoted market prices are not available for various
types of financial instruments (such as currency, energy and
interest rate derivative instruments, swaps, options and forward
contracts), we use standard pricing models with market-based
inputs, which take into account the present value of estimated
future cash flows.
Pensions
and Postretirement Benefits
We account for our pensions and other postretirement benefits in
accordance with ASC 715, Compensation
Retirement Benefits (ASC 715). ASC 715 requires us to
recognize the funded status of our benefit plans as a net asset
or liability, with an offsetting adjustment to AOCI in
shareholders equity. The funded status is calculated as
the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the
benefit obligation. Prior to and including the three months
ended March 31, 2007, we used a December 31 measurement
date for our pension and postretirement plans. As a result of
our acquisition by Hindalco and the application of push down
accounting, our pension and postretirement plans were remeasured
as of May 16, 2007. For the years ended March 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008, we used March 31 as the measurement date.
We use standard actuarial methods and assumptions to account for
our pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Pension and
postretirement benefit obligations are actuarially calculated
using managements
84
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
best estimates of expected service periods, salary increases and
retirement ages of employees. Pension and postretirement benefit
expense includes the actuarially computed cost of benefits
earned during the current service period, the interest cost on
accrued obligations, the expected return on plan assets based on
fair market value and the straight-line amortization of net
actuarial gains and losses and adjustments due to plan
amendments. Generally, all net actuarial gains and losses are
amortized over the expected average remaining service lives of
plan participants.
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans in the U.S., Canada, Switzerland and the U.K., unfunded
pension plans in Germany, and unfunded lump sum indemnities in
France, South Korea, Malaysia and Italy. Our other
postretirement obligations include unfunded healthcare and life
insurance benefits provided to retired employees in Canada, the
U.S. and Brazil.
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Affiliates
These financial statements reflect the retrospective application
of ASC 810, Consolidations (ASC 810), subparagraph
10-65-1,
Transition Related to FASB Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51, and
No. 164,
Not-for-Profit
Entities: Mergers and Acquisitions for all periods
presented. ASC 810 establishes accounting and reporting
standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly
identified and presented in the condensed consolidated balance
sheet within shareholders equity, but separate from the
parents equity; (ii) the amount of consolidated net
income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling
interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of
the consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes
in a parents ownership interest while the parent retains
its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be
accounted for consistently.
Our consolidated financial statements include all assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of less-than- 100%-owned
affiliates that we control or for which we are the primary
beneficiary. We record a noncontrolling interest for the
allocable portion of income or loss to which the noncontrolling
interest holders are entitled based upon their ownership share
of the affiliate. Distributions made to the holders of
noncontrolling interests are charged to the respective
noncontrolling interest balance.
Losses attributable to the noncontrolling interest in an
affiliate may exceed our interest in the affiliates
equity. The excess, and any further losses attributable to the
noncontrolling interest, shall be attributed to those interests.
The noncontrolling interest shall continue to be attributed its
share of losses even if that attribution results in a deficit
noncontrolling interest balance. As of March 31, 2010, we
have no such losses.
Environmental
Liabilities
We record accruals for environmental matters when it is probable
that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the
liability can be reasonably estimated, based on current law and
existing technologies. We adjust these accruals periodically as
assessment and remediation efforts progress or as additional
technical or legal information become available. Accruals for
environmental liabilities are stated at undiscounted amounts.
Environmental liabilities are included in our consolidated
balance sheets in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
and Other long-term liabilities, depending on their short- or
long-term nature. Any receivables for related insurance or other
third party recoveries for environmental liabilities are
recorded when it is probable that a recovery will be realized
and are included in our consolidated balance sheets in Prepaid
expenses and other current assets.
Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and
clean-up are
charged to expense. Estimated future incremental operations,
maintenance and management costs directly related to remediation
are accrued in the period in which such costs are determined to
be probable and estimable.
85
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Litigation
Reserves
ASC 450, Contingencies (ASC 450), requires that we
accrue for loss contingencies associated with outstanding
litigation, claims and assessments for which management has
determined it is probable that a loss contingency exists and the
amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We expense
professional fees associated with litigation claims and
assessments as incurred.
Income
Taxes
We provide for income taxes using the asset and liability method
as required by ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740). This
approach recognizes the amount of income taxes payable or
refundable for the current year, as well as deferred tax assets
and liabilities for the future tax consequence of events
recognized in the consolidated financial statements and income
tax returns. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
adjusted to recognize the effects of changes in tax laws or
enacted tax rates. Under ASC 740, a valuation allowance is
required when it is more likely than not that some portion of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Realization is
dependent on generating sufficient taxable income through
various sources.
Share-Based
Compensation
In accordance with ASC 718, Compensation
Stock Compensation (ASC 718), we
recognize compensation expense for a share-based award over an
employees requisite service period based on the
awards grant date fair value, subject to adjustment.
We adopted ASC 718 using the modified prospective method,
which requires companies to record compensation cost beginning
with the effective date based on the requirements of
ASC 718 for all share-based payments granted after the
effective date of ASC 718. All awards granted to employees
prior to the effective date of ASC 718 that remained
unvested at the adoption date continued to be expensed over the
remaining service period. Additionally, we determined that all
of our compensation plans settled in cash are considered
liability based awards. As such, liabilities for awards under
these plans are required to be measured at each reporting date
until the date of settlement. The Black-Scholes model was used
to determine the fair value of these awards.
Cash flows resulting from tax benefits for deductions in excess
of compensation cost recognized are classified within financing
cash flows.
Foreign
Currency Translation
In accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters
(ASC 830), the assets and liabilities of foreign operations,
whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar
(located in Europe and Asia), are translated to
U.S. dollars at the period end exchange rates and revenues
and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the
period. Differences arising from the translation of assets and
liabilities are included in the currency translation adjustment
(CTA) component of AOCI. If there is a reduction in our
ownership in a foreign operation, the relevant portion of the
CTA is recognized in Other (income) expenses, net.
For all operations, the monetary items denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency are remeasured at period-end
exchange rates and transaction gains and losses are included in
Other (income) expenses, net in our consolidated statements of
operations. Non-monetary items are remeasured at historical
rates.
86
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Research
and Development
We incur costs in connection with research and development
programs that are expected to contribute to future earnings, and
charge such costs against income as incurred. Research and
development costs consist primarily of salaries and
administrative costs.
Restructuring
Activities
Restructuring charges, net include employee severance and
benefit costs, impairments of assets, and other costs associated
with exit activities. We apply the provisions of ASC 420,
Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations (ASC 420) relating
to one-time termination benefits. Severance costs accounted for
under ASC 420 are recognized when management with the
proper level of authority has committed to a restructuring plan
and communicated those actions to employees. Impairment losses
are based upon the estimated fair value less costs to sell, with
fair value estimated based on existing market prices for similar
assets. Other exit costs include environmental remediation costs
and contract termination costs, primarily related to equipment
and facility lease obligations. At each reporting date, we
evaluate the accruals for restructuring costs to ensure the
accruals are still appropriate.
Customer
Directed Derivatives
We classify all customer directed derivatives and associated
trading activities as operating activities in our consolidated
statement of cash flows. Cash flows provided by (used in), from
such derivatives, totaled $75 million and
$(81) million in the years ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively, and $9 million for the period from
May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008, respectively.
There were no customer directed derivatives in the period from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards have been adopted by us
during the twelve months ended March 31, 2010.
In June 2009, the FASB approved its Codification as the single
source of authoritative United States accounting and reporting
standards applicable for all non-governmental entities, with the
exception of the SEC and its staff. The Codification which
changes the referencing of accounting standards is effective for
interim or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
As the codification is not intended to change or alter existing
US GAAP, this standard had no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in the Accounting
Standards Update (ASU)
No. 2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU
2010-06).
ASU 2010-06
amends ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements by adding
additional disclosure requirements about items transferring into
and out of levels 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy;
adding separate disclosures about purchase, sales, issuances,
and settlements relative to level 3 measurements; and
clarifying, among other things, the existing fair value
disclosures about the level of disaggregation. This standard had
no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows, but did require certain additional
footnote disclosures.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, which
requires that an employer disclose the following information
about the fair value of plan assets: (1) how investment
allocation decisions are made, including the factors that are
pertinent to understanding of investment policies and
strategies; (2) the major categories of plan assets;
(3) the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the
fair value of plan assets; (4) the effect of fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in
plan assets for the period; and (5) significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. At initial adoption,
application of this standard would not be required for earlier
periods that are presented for
87
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
comparative purposes. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows, but did require certain additional footnote disclosures.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation, which establishes accounting and reporting
standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly
identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheet
within shareholders equity, but separate from the
parents equity; (ii) the amount of condensed
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the
noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented
on the face of the consolidated statement of operations and
(iii) changes in a parents ownership interest while
the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its
subsidiary to be accounted for consistently. We adopted this
accounting standard effective April 1, 2009, and applied
this standard prospectively, except for the presentation and
disclosure requirements, which have been applied retrospectively.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards have been issued, but
have not yet been adopted by us as of March 31, 2010, as
adoption is not required until future reporting periods.
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2009-17,
Consolidations: Improvements to Financial Reporting by
Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. ASU
No. 2009-17
is intended (1) to address the effects on certain
provisions of the accounting standard dealing with consolidation
of variable interest entities, as a result of the elimination of
the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in ASU
No. 2009-16,
Transfers and Servicing: Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets, and (2) to clarify questions about
the application of certain key provisions related to
consolidation of variable interest entities, including those in
which accounting and disclosures do not always provide timely
and useful information about an enterprises involvement in
a variable interest entity. ASU
No. 2009-17
will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2009. We do not anticipate this standard will
have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations and cash flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do
not apply to our operations.
88
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
RESTRUCTURING
PROGRAMS
|
Restructuring charges, net for fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 of
$14 million and $95 million, respectively, includes
$2 million and $22 million, respectively, of non-cash
charges discussed in greater detail below. The following table
summarizes our restructuring accrual activity by region (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
April 1, 2007 to May 15, 2007 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 15, 2007
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 to March 31, 2008 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Fiscal 2009 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions, net
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Fiscal 2010 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
In the second half of fiscal 2009, we initiated a number of
restructuring actions throughout Europe to reduce labor and
overhead costs through capacity and staff reductions. Most
significantly, in March 2009, we announced the closure of our
aluminum sheet mill in Rogerstone, South Wales, U.K. Operations
ceased in April 2009, resulting in the elimination of 440
positions. The total amount expected to be incurred in
connection with this closure is $63 million, of which
$60 million was recorded in the fiscal 2009. We recorded an
additional $3 million of net costs related to on-going
maintenance of the Rogerstone facility, write-down of additional
plant assets and adjustments of reserves established in fiscal
2009. The components
89
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of restructuring charges related to Rogerstone for the year
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Severance related costs
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Environmental remediation expense
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Fixed asset impairments(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Write-down of parts, supplies and scrap(A)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Reduction of reserve associated with unfavorable contract(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
These non-cash items are not included in the restructuring
provision table above but have been reflected as reductions to
the respective balance sheet accounts. |
Also in March 2009, we announced plans to streamline operations
at plants in France and Germany. At our facility in Rugles,
located in Upper Normandy, France, we eliminated approximately
80 positions. The facility continues the operation of its three
major processes, including continuous casting, foil rolling, and
finishing. For the year ended March 31, 2009, we recorded
$9 million in severance-related costs. We also recorded
$1 million in severance costs at our Ohle, Germany facility
related to the elimination of 13 positions.
In fiscal 2010, we made additional staff reductions at plants in
Italy, Switzerland and Germany, resulting in additional one-time
terminations charges of $4 million. We also incurred
$4 million of environmental and other costs at our
Borgofranco facility, which was closed in March 2006.
For the year ended March 31, 2010, we made the following
payments relating to restructuring programs in Europe:
$30 million in severance payments, $10 million in
payments for environmental remediation and $6 million of
other payments.
North
America
In March 2008, management approved the closure of our light
gauge converter products facility in Louisville, Kentucky. The
closure was intended to bring the capacity of our North American
operations in line with local market demand. As a result of the
closure, we recognized approximately $5 million in
restructuring charges during the quarter ended March 31,
2008. Our Louisville facility closed in June 2008.
In November 2008, we announced a Voluntary Separation Program
(VSP) available to salaried employees in North America and the
Corporate office aimed at reducing staff levels. This VSP
supplemented a pre-existing Involuntary Severance Program (ISP).
We eliminated approximately 120 positions and recorded
$16 million in severance-related costs for the VSP and ISP
programs for the year ended March 31, 2009. This program
continued into fiscal 2010, with an additional $1 million
in severance costs recorded under the voluntary and involuntary
separation programs.
To consolidate corporate functions and enhance organizational
effectiveness, we announced a plan to relocate our North
American headquarters from Cleveland, Ohio to Atlanta, Georgia,
where the Companys corporate offices are located. This
move is expected to occur over the next six months with a
completion date no later than December 31, 2010. We
recorded $4 million in fiscal 2010 for severance charges
representing one-time termination benefits under our existing
separation program.
90
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We made $11 million in severance payments related to the
fiscal 2009 plan for the year ended March 31, 2010.
South
America
In January 2009, we announced that we would cease production of
alumina at our Ouro Preto facility in Brazil effective May 2009.
The global economic crisis and the dramatic drop in alumina
prices made alumina production at Ouro Preto economically
unfeasible. For the foreseeable future, the Ouro Preto facility
will purchase alumina through third-parties. Approximately 290
positions were eliminated at Ouro Preto, including
150 employees and 140 contractors. For the year ended
March 31, 2009, we recorded approximately $2 million
in severance-related costs. Other exit costs include less than
$1 million related to the idling of the refinery. Other
activities related to the facility, including electric power
generation and the production of primary aluminum, will continue
unaffected.
We made $1 million in severance payments and
$1 million in payments related to other exit costs. We
reduced the remaining $1 million reserve related to
severance in the third quarter. In December 2009, we completed
all restructuring actions initiated in fiscal 2009.
Asia
In February 2009, we recorded approximately $1 million in
severance-related costs related to a voluntary retirement
program in Asia which eliminated 34 positions. Also, during the
year ended March 31, 2009, we recorded an impairment charge
of approximately $5 million in Novelis Korea due to the
obsolescence of certain production related fixed assets. These
impairment charge is not included in the restructuring provision
table above but was reflected as reductions to the respective
balance sheet account.
Accounts receivable consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
1,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,002
|
|
Other accounts receivable
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable third parties
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts third parties
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
Other accounts receivable related parties
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
1,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts is managements best
estimate of probable losses inherent in the accounts receivable
balance. Management determines the allowance based on known
uncollectible accounts, historical experience and other
currently available evidence. As of March 31, 2010 and
2009, our allowance for doubtful accounts represented
approximately 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively, of gross accounts
receivable.
91
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Additions
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Charged to
|
|
Recovered/
|
|
Foreign Exchange
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
Expense
|
|
(Written-Off)
|
|
and Other
|
|
End of Period
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through
May 15, 2007
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through
March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Forfaiting
and Factoring of Trade Receivables
Novelis Korea Ltd. forfaits trade receivables
in the ordinary course of business. These trade receivables are
typically outstanding for 60 to 120 days. Forfaiting is a
non-recourse method to manage credit and interest rate risks.
Under this method, customers contract to pay a financial
institution. The institution assumes the risk of non-payment and
remits the invoice value (net of a fee) to us after presentation
of a proof of delivery of goods to the customer. We do not
retain a financial or legal interest in these receivables, and
they are excluded from the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. Forfaiting expenses are included in Selling, general and
administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of
operations.
Our Brazilian operations factor, without recourse, certain trade
receivables that are unencumbered by pledge restrictions. Under
this method, customers are directed to make payments on invoices
to a financial institution, but are not contractually required
to do so. The financial institution pays us any invoices it has
approved for payment (net of a fee). We do not retain financial
or legal interest in these receivables, and they are excluded
from the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Factoring
expenses are included in Selling, general and administrative
expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
Summary
Disclosures of Financial Amounts
The following tables summarize amounts relating to our
forfaiting and factoring activities (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
Receivables forfaited
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Receivables factored
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Forfaiting expense
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Factoring expense
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Forfaited receivables outstanding
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
Factored receivables outstanding
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
92
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventories consist of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
1,083
|
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property, plant and equipment, net, consists of the following
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Land and property rights
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
2,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
3,432
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(1,075
|
)
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,582
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
2,635
|
|
|
$
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, there were $242 million of fully
depreciated assets included in our consolidated balance sheet.
Due to the assignment of new fair values as a result of the
Arrangement, we had no fully depreciated assets included in our
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2009.
Total depreciation expense is shown in the table below (in
millions). Capitalized interest related to construction of
property, plant and equipment was immaterial in the periods
presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
337
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
impairments
During the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we recorded
$1 million of impairment charges in each period, which are
included in Other (income) expense, net on the consolidated
statement of operations. During the year ended March 31,
2009, we also recorded impairment charges totaling
$17 million related to assets in Europe and Asia which have
been included in Restructuring charges, net on the consolidated
statement of operations (see Note 2
Restructuring Programs).
During the period from May 16, 2007 through March 31,
2008, we recorded an impairment charge of $1 million in
Novelis Italy due to the obsolescence of certain production
related fixed assets.
93
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Leases
We lease certain land, buildings and equipment under
non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates
through 2015, and we lease assets in Sierre, Switzerland
including a
15-year
capital lease through 2020 from Alcan. Operating leases
generally have five to ten-year terms, with one or more renewal
options, with terms to be negotiated at the time of renewal.
Various facility leases include provisions for rent escalation
to recognize increased operating costs or require us to pay
certain maintenance and utility costs.
The following table summarizes rent expense included in our
consolidated statements of operations (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Rent expense
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2010, for our
operating and capital leases having an initial or remaining
non-cancelable lease term in excess of one year are as follows
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Capital Lease
|
|
Year Ending March 31,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
2012
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2013
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2014
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2015
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: interest portion on capital lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal obligation on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The future minimum lease payments for capital lease obligations
exclude $3 million of unamortized fair value adjustments
recorded as a result of the Arrangement (see
Note 10 Debt).
Assets and related accumulated amortization under capital lease
obligations as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Assets under capital lease obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale
of assets
There were no material sales of fixed assets during the years
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
94
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Asset
Retirement Obligations
The following is a summary of our asset retirement obligation
activity. The period-end balances are included in Other
long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
6.
|
GOODWILL
AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
The following tables summarize the changes in our goodwill (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 Successor
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount(A)
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
1,148
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(860
|
)
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
181
|
|
South America
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,922
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 Successor
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount(A)
|
|
|
Adjustments(C)
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
1,149
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(860
|
)
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
181
|
|
South America
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents goodwill balance, net of prior period accumulated
adjustments and excluding accumulated impairments. |
|
(B) |
|
See Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, Reclassifications and Adjustments. |
|
(C) |
|
For the year ended March 31, 2009, non-impairment
adjustments include: (1) an adjustment in North America for
final payment related to the transfer of pension plans in Canada
for employees who elected to transfer their past service to
Novelis and (2) adjustments in Europe related to tax audits. |
95
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of intangible assets were as follows (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 Successor
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 Successor
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
Technology and software
|
|
|
13 years
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
163
|
|
Customer-related intangible assets
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
416
|
|
Favorable energy supply contract
|
|
|
9.5 years
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
Other favorable contracts
|
|
|
3.3 years
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
(199
|
)
|
|
$
|
746
|
|
|
$
|
937
|
|
|
$
|
(131
|
)
|
|
$
|
806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our favorable energy supply contract and other favorable
contracts are amortized over their estimated useful lives using
methods that reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits
are expected to be consumed. All other intangible assets are
amortized using the straight-line method.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets is as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Total Amortization expense related to intangible assets
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Less: Amortization expense related to intangible assets included
in Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization)(A)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets included in
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Relates to amortization of favorable energy and other supply
contracts. |
Estimated total amortization expense related to intangible
assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as
follows (in millions). Actual amounts may differ from these
estimates due to such factors as customer turnover, raw material
consumption patterns, impairments, additional intangible asset
acquisitions and other events.
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
2012
|
|
|
59
|
|
2013
|
|
|
58
|
|
2014
|
|
|
58
|
|
2015
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
7.
|
CONSOLIDATION
OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
|
We have a variable interest in Logan Aluminum, Inc. (Logan) and
have concluded that we are the primary beneficiary. As a result,
this entity is consolidated pursuant to ASC 810,
Consolidation, in all periods presented. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
96
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Logan
Organization and Operations
In 1985, Alcan purchased an interest in Logan to provide tolling
services jointly with ARCO Aluminum, Inc. (ARCO). Logan produces
approximately one-third of the can sheet utilized in the
U.S. can sheet market. According to the joint venture
agreements between Alcan and ARCO, Alcan owned 40 shares of
Class A common stock and ARCO owned 60 shares of
Class B common stock in Logan. Each share provides its
holder with one vote, regardless of class. However, Class A
shareholders have the right to select four directors, and
Class B shareholders have the right to select three
directors. Generally, a majority vote is required for the Logan
board of directors to take action. In connection with our
spin-off from Alcan in January 2005, Alcan transferred all of
its rights and obligations under a joint venture agreement and
subsequent ancillary agreements (collectively, the JV
Agreements) to us.
Logan processes metal received from Novelis and ARCO and charges
the respective partner a fee to cover expenses. Logan has no
equity and relies on the regular reimbursement of costs and
expenses by Novelis and ARCO to fund its operations. This
reimbursement is considered a variable interest as it
constitutes a form of financing of the activities of Logan.
Other than these contractually required reimbursements, we do
not provide other additional support to Logan. Logans
creditors do not have recourse to our general credit.
Primary
Beneficiary
A variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called
the primary beneficiary. Upon consolidation, the primary
beneficiary generally must initially record all of the
VIEs assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests at
fair value. Generally, the primary beneficiary is the reporting
enterprise with a variable interest in the entity that is
obligated to absorb the majority (greater than 50%) of the
VIEs expected loss.
Based upon a previous restructuring program, Novelis acquired
the right to use the excess capacity at Logan. To utilize this
capacity, we installed and have sole ownership of a cold mill at
the Logan facility which enabled us to have the ability to take
the majority share of production and costs. These facts qualify
Novelis as Logans primary beneficiary under ASC 810.
Carrying
Value
The following table summarizes the carrying value and
classification on our consolidated balance sheets of assets and
liabilities owned by the Logan joint venture and consolidated
under ASC 810 (in millions). There are significant other assets
used in the operations of Logan that are not part of the joint
venture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
Net carrying value
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
97
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
INVESTMENT
IN AND ADVANCES TO NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES AND RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
The following table summarizes the ownership structure and our
ownership percentage of the non-consolidated affiliates in which
we have an investment as of March 31, 2010, and which we
account for using the equity method. We do not control our
non-consolidated affiliates, but have the ability to exercise
significant influence over their operating and financial
policies. We have no material investments that we account for
using the cost method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Affiliate Name
|
|
Ownership Structure
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Consorcio Candonga
|
|
Unincorporated Joint Venture
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
MiniMRF LLC
|
|
Limited Liability Company
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
The following table summarizes our share of the condensed
assets, liabilities and equity of our equity method affiliates.
The results include the unamortized fair value adjustments
relating to our non-consolidated affiliates due to the
Arrangement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes our share of the condensed
results of operations of our equity method affiliates. These
results include the incremental depreciation and amortization
expense that we record in our equity method accounting as a
result of fair value adjustments we made to our investments in
non-consolidated affiliates due to the Arrangement. These
results also include the $160 million impairment charge to
reduce the carrying value of our investment in Aluminium Norf
GmbH for the year ended March 31, 2009. The results for the
year ended March 31, 2010 also include a $10 million
after tax benefit from the refinement of our methodology for
recording depreciation and amortization on the
step-up in
our basis in the underlying assets of an investee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Costs, expenses and provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(172
|
)
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
are transactions and balances arising from business we conduct
with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we classify as
related party transactions and balances. The following table
describes the nature and amounts of transactions that we had
with related parties (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Purchases of tolling services, electricity and inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH(A)
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Consorcio Candonga(B)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases from related parties
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH(C)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We purchase tolling services (the conversion of customer-owned
metal) from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We obtain electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our operations
in South America. |
|
(C) |
|
We earn interest income on a loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
The following table describes the period-end account balances
that we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as
related party balances in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Accounts receivable(A)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Other long-term receivables(A)
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Accounts payable(B)
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The balances represent current and non-current portions of a
loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH and
electricity from Consorcio Candonga. |
99
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
ACCRUED
EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consists of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Current portion of fair value of can ceiling contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Rates(A)
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term borrowings
|
|
|
1.71
|
%
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
2.25
|
%(C)
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
11.5% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
11.50
|
%
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
2.27
|
%(C)
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
813
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due December 2019 (Swiss francs (CHF)
50 million)
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF
2 million)
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
1.25
|
%(C)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Bank loan, due February 2010 (Korean won (KRW) 50 billion)
|
|
|
4.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Bank loan, due May 2009 (KRW 10 billion)
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due December 2011 through December 2012
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,682
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
2,671
|
|
|
|
2,742
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
Less: Short term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion third
parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,491
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,490
|
|
|
$
|
2,419
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured credit facility related party, due January
2015
|
|
|
13.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Interest rates are as of March 31, 2010 and exclude the
effects of accretion/amortization of fair value adjustments as a
result of the Arrangement and the debt exchange completed in
fiscal 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
Debt existing at the time of the Arrangement was recorded at
fair value. Additional floating rate Term Loan with a face value
of $220 million issued in March 2009 was recorded at a fair
value of $165 million. Additional 11.5% Senior Notes
with a face value of $185 million issued in August 2009
were recorded at fair value of $181 million (see
11.5% Senior Notes below). |
|
(C) |
|
Excludes the effect of related interest rate swaps and the
effect of accretion of fair value. |
100
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Principal repayments of our total debt over the next five years
and thereafter (excluding unamortized fair value adjustments and
using rates of exchange as of March 31, 2010 for our debt
denominated in foreign currencies) are as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending March 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
2012
|
|
|
16
|
|
2013
|
|
|
16
|
|
2014
|
|
|
16
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
Our senior secured credit facilities consist of (1) a
$1.15 billion seven year term loan facility maturing July
2014 (Term Loan Facility) and (2) an $800 million
five-year multi-currency asset-backed revolving credit line and
letter of credit facility (ABL Facility). The senior secured
credit facilities include certain affirmative and negative
covenants. Under the ABL Facility, if our excess availability,
as defined under the borrowing, is less than 10% of the lender
commitments under the ABL Facility, we are required to maintain
a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. Substantially
all of our assets are pledged as collateral under the senior
secured credit facilities.
11.5% Senior
Notes
On August 11, 2009, Novelis Inc. issued $185 million
aggregate principal face amount of 11.5% senior unsecured
notes at an effective rate of 12.0% (11.5% Senior Notes).
The 11.5% Senior Notes were issued at a discount resulting
in gross proceeds of $181 million. The net proceeds of this
offering were used to repay a portion of the ABL Facility and
$96 million outstanding under an unsecured credit facility
from an affiliate of the Aditya Birla Group.
The 11.5% Senior Notes rank equally with all of our
existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness, and are
guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis,
by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
all of our existing and future Canadian and U.S. restricted
subsidiaries,
|
|
|
|
certain of our existing foreign restricted subsidiaries and
|
|
|
|
our other restricted subsidiaries that guarantee debt in the
future under any credit facilities, provided that the borrower
of such debt is our company or a Canadian or a
U.S. subsidiary.
|
The 11.5% Senior Notes contain certain covenants and events
of default, including limitations on certain restricted
payments, the incurrence of additional indebtedness and the sale
of certain assets. As of March 31, 2010, we were compliant
with these covenants. Interest on the 11.5% Senior Notes is
payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year and commenced
on February 15, 2010. The notes will mature on
February 15, 2015. On January 12, 2010, we consummated
the exchange offer required by the registration rights agreement
related to the 11.5% Senior Notes.
7.25% Senior
Notes
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities. The senior
notes were priced at par, bear interest at 7.25% and mature on
February 15, 2015. The
101
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
7.25% senior notes are guaranteed by all of our Canadian
and U.S. restricted subsidiaries, certain of our foreign
restricted subsidiaries and our other restricted subsidiaries
that guarantee our senior secured credit facilities and that
guarantee the old notes.
Under the indenture that governs the 7.25% senior notes, we
are subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to
incurring additional debt and providing additional guarantees,
paying dividends beyond certain amounts and making other
restricted payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain
consolidations or mergers, and certain transactions with
affiliates.
Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing our
7.25% senior notes, we were obligated, within 30 days
of closing of the Arrangement, to make an offer to purchase the
7.25% senior notes at a price equal to 101% of their
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date
the 7.25% senior notes were purchased. Consequently, we
commenced a tender offer on May 16, 2007 to repurchase all
of the outstanding 7.25% senior notes at the prescribed
price. This offer expired on July 3, 2007 with holders of
approximately $1 million of principal presenting their
7.25% senior notes pursuant to the tender offer.
In March 2009, we entered into a transaction in which we
purchased 7.25% senior notes with a face value of
$275 million with the net proceeds of an additional
floating rate term loan with a face value of $220 million.
Short-Term
Borrowings and Lines of Credit
As of March 31, 2010, our short-term borrowings were
$75 million consisting of (1) $61 million of
short-term loans under our ABL Facility and (2) $14 million in
bank overdrafts. As of March 31, 2010, $17 million of
our ABL Facility was utilized for letters of credit and we had
$603 million in remaining availability under this revolving
credit facility.
As of March 31, 2010, we had an additional
$138 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
not included in the ABL Facility. The weighted average interest
rate on our total short-term borrowings was 1.71% and 2.75% as
of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Interest
Rate Swaps
As of March 31, 2010, we have interest rate swaps to fix
the variable LIBOR interest rate on $520 million of our
floating rate Term Loan Facility. We are still obligated to pay
any applicable margin, as defined in our senior secured credit
facilities. Interest rate swaps related to $400 million at
an effective weighted average interest rate of 4.0% expired
March 31, 2010. In January 2009, we entered into two
interest rate swaps to fix the variable LIBOR interest rate on
an additional $300 million of our floating Term Loan
facility at a rate of 1.49%, plus any applicable margin. These
interest rate swaps are effective from March 31, 2009
through March 31, 2011. In April 2009, we entered into an
additional $220 million interest rate swap at a rate of
1.97%, which is effective through April 30, 2012.
We have a cross-currency interest rate swap in Korea to convert
our $100 million variable rate bank loan to KRW
92 billion at a fixed rate of 5.44%. The swap expires
October 2010, concurrent with the maturity of the loan.
As of March 31, 2010 approximately 74% of our debt was
fixed rate and approximately 26% was variable-rate.
Korean
Bank Loans
In December 2004, we entered into (1) a $70 million
floating rate loan and (2) a KRW 25 billion
($25 million) floating rate loan, both due in December
2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate and cross
currency swap on the $70 million floating rate loan through
a 4.55% fixed rate KRW 73 billion
102
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($73 million) loan and an interest rate swap on the KRW
25 billion floating rate loan to fix the interest rate at
4.45%. In October 2007, we entered into a $100 million
floating rate loan due October 2010 and immediately repaid the
$70 million loan. In December 2007, we repaid the KRW
25 billion loan from the proceeds of the $100 million
floating rate loan. Additionally, we immediately entered into an
interest rate swap and cross currency swap for the
$100 million floating rate loan through a 5.44% fixed rate
KRW 92 billion ($92 million) loan.
We repaid a KRW 10 billion ($8 million) bank loan
during May 2009 and a KRW 50 billion ($43 million)
bank loan during February 2010.
Capital
Lease Obligations
In December 2004, we entered into a fifteen-year capital lease
obligation with Alcan for assets in Sierre, Switzerland, which
has an interest rate of 7.5% and fixed quarterly payments of CHF
0.8 million, which is equivalent to $0.8 million at
the exchange rate as of March 31, 2010.
In September 2005, we entered into a six-year capital lease
obligation for equipment in Switzerland which has an interest
rate of 2.49% and fixed monthly payments of CHF
0.1 million, which is equivalent to $0.1 million at
the exchange rate as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
11.
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Share-Based
Compensation Expense
Total compensation expense for active and inactive plans related
to share-based awards for the respective periods is presented in
the tables below (in millions). These amounts are included in
Selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated
statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Active Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan 2009
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan 2010
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition Awards(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
One-half of the outstanding Recognition Awards vested on
December 31, 2007. The remaining outstanding Recognition
Awards vested on December 31, 2008. |
103
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Inactive Plans(A):
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock options)
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock appreciation rights)
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
Stock Price Appreciation Unit Plan
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Deferred Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Awards
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Total Shareholder Returns Performance Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inactive Plants Total Share-Based Compensation
Expense
|
|
$
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
As a result of the Arrangement, all of our share-based
compensation awards that were active as of May 15, 2007
(except for our Recognition Awards) were accelerated to vest,
cancelled and settled in cash. |
Active
Plans
Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan
In June 2009, our board of directors authorized the Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2010 FY 2013 (2010 LTIP)
covering the performance period from April 1, 2009 through
March 31, 2013. The terms of the 2010 LTIP are the same as
the Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2009 FY 2012
(2009 LTIP) approved in June 2008. Under the 2010 LTIP, phantom
stock appreciation rights (SARs) are to be granted to certain of
our executive officers and key employees. The SARs will vest at
the rate of 25% per year, subject to performance criteria (see
below) and expire seven years from their grant date. Each SAR is
to be settled in cash based on the difference between the market
value of one Hindalco share on the date of grant and the market
value on the date of exercise, where market values are
denominated in Indian rupees and converted to the
participants payroll currency at the time of exercise. The
amount of cash paid is limited to (i) 2.5 times the target
payout if exercised within one year of vesting or (ii) 3
times the target payout if exercised after one year of vesting.
The SARs do not transfer any shareholder rights in Hindalco to a
participant. The SARs are classified as liability awards and are
remeasured at fair value each reporting period until the SARs
are settled.
The performance criterion for vesting is based on the actual
overall Novelis operating earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, as adjusted (adjusted Operating
EBITDA) compared to the target adjusted Operating EBITDA
established and approved each fiscal year. The minimum threshold
for vesting each year is 75% of each annual target adjusted
Operating EBITDA, at which point 75% of the SARs for that period
would vest, with an equal pro rata amount of SARs vesting
through 100% achievement of the target. Given that the
performance criterion is based on an earnings target in a future
period for each fiscal year, the grant date of the awards for
accounting purposes is generally not established until the
performance criterion has been defined. Accordingly, each of the
four tranches associated with the 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP is
deemed granted when the earnings target is determined.
104
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The tables below show the SARs activity under our 2010 LTIP and
2009 LTIP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD in
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
14,169,492
|
(A)
|
|
|
87.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(489,061
|
)
|
|
|
85.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
13,680,431
|
|
|
|
87.68
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD in
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
20,606,906
|
(A)
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
6.22
|
|
|
|
(B
|
)
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(9,235,507
|
)
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
11,371,399
|
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents total SARs approved by the Board of Directors for
grant. As noted above, due to the performance criterion based on
a future earnings target, the amount deemed granted for
accounting purposes is limited to the individual tranches
subject to an established earnings target, which includes the
current and prior fiscal years. |
|
(B) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is zero as the market value of a
share of Hindalco stock was less than the SAR exercise price. |
The fair value of each SAR is based on the difference between
the fair value of a long call and a short call option. The fair
value of each of these call options was determined using the
Black-Scholes valuation method. We used historical stock price
volatility data of Hindalco on the Bombay Stock Exchange to
determine expected volatility assumptions. The fair value of
each SAR under the 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP was estimated as of
March 31, 2010 using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
53.50 - 59.10%
|
|
45.17 - 60.80%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
56.13%
|
|
54.78%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.74%
|
|
0.74%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
6.86 - 7.44%
|
|
4.67 - 6.72%
|
Expected life
|
|
3.24 - 4.74 years
|
|
0.63 - 3.00 years
|
The fair value of the SARs is being recognized over the
requisite performance and service period of each tranche,
subject to the achievement of any performance criterion. Since
the performance criteria for fiscal years 2011 through 2013 have
not yet been established and therefore, measurement periods for
SARs relating to those periods have not yet commenced, no
compensation expense for those tranches has been recorded for
the year ended March 31, 2010. No SARs were exercisable at
March 31, 2010.
105
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with her separation from the Company, we issued
1,000,000 SARs at an exercise price of 60.50 Indian Rupees to
our former President and Chief Operating Officer. We recorded
$2 million of compensation expense in the third quarter for
fiscal 2010 associated with the exercise of these options on
December 3, 2009 which is not included in the shared based
compensation table above.
Unrecognized compensation expense related to the non-vested SARs
(assuming all future performance criteria are met) is
$17 million which is expected to be realized over a
weighted average period of 3.51 years.
Recognition
Awards
In September 2006, we entered into Recognition Agreements and
granted Recognition Awards to certain executive officers and
other key employees (Executives) to retain and reward them for
continued dedication towards corporate objectives. Under the
terms of these agreements, Executives who remained continuously
employed by us through the vesting dates of December 31,
2007 and December 31, 2008 were entitled to receive
one-half of their total Recognition Awards on each vesting date.
The number of Recognition Awards payable under the agreements
varied by Executive. As a result of the Arrangement, the
Recognition Awards changed from an equity-based to a
liability-based plan using the $44.93 per common share
transaction price as the per share value. This change resulted
in additional share-based compensation expense of
$1.3 million during the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007.
One-half of the outstanding Recognition Awards vested on
December 31, 2007, and were settled for approximately
$3 million in cash in January 2008. The remaining
outstanding Recognition Awards vested on December 31, 2008,
and were settled for approximately $2 million in cash in
January 2009.
Inactive
Plans
As previously mentioned, as a result of the Arrangement, all of
our share-based compensation awards (except for our Recognition
Awards) were accelerated to vest, cancelled and settled in cash
using the $44.93 purchase price per common share paid by
Hindalco in the transaction. The following tables summarize the
activity and assumptions used to estimate fair value of the
material cancelled plans.
Novelis
2006 Incentive Plan
In October 2006, our shareholders approved the Novelis 2006
Incentive Plan (2006 Incentive Plan) to effectively replace the
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005 and Stock Price Appreciation
Unit Plan (both described below). Under the 2006 Incentive Plan,
up to an aggregate number of 7,000,000 shares of Novelis
common stock were authorized to be issued in the form of stock
options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted shares,
restricted share units, performance shares and other share-based
incentives.
2006
Stock Options
In October 2006, our board of directors authorized a grant of an
aggregate of 885,170 seven-year non-qualified stock options
under the 2006 Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $25.53 to
certain of our executive officers and key employees.
106
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Prior to the Arrangement, the fair value of our premium and
non-premium options was estimated using the following
assumptions for the year ended December 31, 2006, the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and the period from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007
(Predecessor):
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
42.20 to 46.40%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
44.30%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.16%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.68 to 4.71%
|
Expected life
|
|
1.00 to 4.75 years
|
As a result of the Arrangement, 825,850 premium and non-premium
options under the 2006 Incentive Plan were accelerated to vest
and were settled in cash for approximately $16 million.
Stock
Appreciation Rights
In October 2006, our board of directors authorized a grant of
381,090 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) under the 2006
Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $25.53 to certain of our
executive officers and key employees.
The fair value of premium and non-premium SARs under the 2006
Incentive Plan was estimated using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
40.70 to 44.70%
|
|
40.80 to 45.40%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
42.70%
|
|
43.10%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
None
|
|
0.14%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.51 to 4.59%
|
|
4.67 to 4.71%
|
Expected life
|
|
0.57 to 4.32 years
|
|
0.83 to 4.57 years
|
As a result of the Arrangement, 378,360 premium and non-premium
SARs were accelerated to vest and were settled in cash for
approximately $7 million.
Novelis
Conversion Plan of 2005
In January 2005, our board of directors adopted the Novelis
Conversion Plan of 2005 (the Conversion Plan) to allow for
1,372,663 Alcan stock options held by employees of Alcan who
became our employees following our spin-off from Alcan to be
replaced with options to purchase 2,723,914 of our common shares.
The fair value of each option was estimated using the following
assumptions for the year ended December 31, 2006, the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and the period from April 1
through May 15, 2007:
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
30.30%
|
Weighted-average volatility
|
|
30.30%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
1.56%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.88 to 3.73%
|
Expected life
|
|
0.70 to 5.70 years
|
As a result of the Arrangement, 563,651 options were accelerated
to vest with a total fair value of approximately $4 million
and a total of 1,238,183 options were settled in cash using the
$44.93 purchase price per common share paid by Hindalco in the
transaction for approximately $29 million.
107
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFIT PLANS
|
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans in the U.S., Canada, Switzerland and the U.K.; unfunded
pension plans in Germany; unfunded lump sum indemnities in
France, Malaysia and Italy; and partially funded lump sum
indemnities in South Korea. Our other postretirement obligations
(Other Benefits, as shown in certain tables below) include
unfunded healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to
retired employees in Canada, the U.S. and Brazil.
Some of our employees participated in defined benefit plans that
were previously managed by Alcan in Canada and the U.K. In
Switzerland, we continue to participate in the Rio Tinto Alcan
defined benefit and defined contribution plans. The pension
asset transfers of $49 million and $94 million and the pension
liability transfers of $48 million and $95 million for fiscal
years 2009 and 2008, respectively, relate to pension transfers
from Alcan.
Employer
Contributions to Plans
For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to
provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to date,
and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over
periods of 15 years or less. We also participate in savings
plans in Canada and the U.S., as well as defined contribution
pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, Italy,
Switzerland, Malaysia and Brazil. We contributed the following
amounts to all plans, including the Rio Tinto Alcan plans that
cover our Swiss employees (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Funded pension plans
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Unfunded pension plans
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Savings and defined contribution pension plans
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal year 2011, we expect to contribute
$41 million to our funded pension plans, $12 million
to our unfunded pension plans and $18 million to our
savings and defined contribution plans.
Investment
Policy and Asset Allocation
The companys overall investment strategy is to achieve a
mix of approximately 50% of investments for long-term growth
(equities, real estate) and 50% for near-term benefit payments
(debt securities, other) with a wide diversification of asset
categories, investment styles, fund strategies and fund
managers. Since most of the defined benefit plans are closed to
new entrants, we expect this strategy to gradually shift more
investments toward near-term benefit payments.
Each of our funded pension plans is governed by an Investment
Fiduciary, who establishes an investment policy appropriate for
the pension plan. The Investment Fiduciary is responsible for
selecting the asset allocation for each plan, monitoring
investment managers, monitoring returns versus benchmarks and
108
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
monitoring compliance with the investment policy. The targeted
allocation ranges by asset class, and the actual allocation
percentages for each class are listed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate as of
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
Allocation Ranges
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
35 - 60
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
35 - 55
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
Real estate
|
|
|
0 - 25
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
0 - 15
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Benefit
Obligations, Fair Value of Plan Assets, Funded Status and
Amounts Recognized in Financial Statements
The following tables present the change in benefit obligation,
change in fair value of plan assets and the funded status for
pension and other benefits (in millions), including the Swiss
Pension Plan effective May 16, 2007. Other Benefits in the
tables below include unfunded healthcare and life insurance
benefits provided to retired employees in Canada, Brazil and the
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members contributions
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amendments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers/mergers
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailments/termination benefits
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Currency (gains) losses
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,154
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of funded plans
|
|
$
|
976
|
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
$
|
680
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of unfunded plans
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,154
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers/mergers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailments/termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Currency (gains) losses
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of funded plans
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of unfunded plans
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members contributions
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers/mergers
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency gains (losses)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status at end of period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets less the benefit obligation of funded plans
|
|
$
|
(171
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(189
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of unfunded plans
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(349
|
)
|
|
$
|
(167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As included on consolidated balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(349
|
)
|
|
$
|
(167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The postretirement amounts recognized in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), before tax effects, are presented
in the table below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total postretirement amounts recognized in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss (income)
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated amounts that will be amortized from Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost
in fiscal 2011 are $10 million for pension benefits and
$ million for other postretirement benefits,
primarily related to net actuarial loss.
Accumulated
Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation
and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with an
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets as of
March 31, 2010 and 2009 are presented in the table below
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
847
|
|
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
615
|
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
111
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future
Benefit Payments
Expected benefit payments to be made during the next ten fiscal
years are listed in the table below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
2012
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
2013
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
2014
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
2015
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
2016 through 2019
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components
of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the respective
periods are listed in the table below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actuarial losses
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior service cost
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment/settlement losses
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Proportionate share of non-consolidated affiliates
deferred pension costs, net of tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit costs recognized
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actuarial losses
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment/termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit costs recognized
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Actuarial
Assumptions and Sensitivity Analysis
The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations and net periodic benefit costs for the respective
periods are listed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
In selecting the appropriate discount rate for each plan, we
generally used a country-specific, high-quality corporate bond
index, adjusted to reflect the duration of the particular plan.
In the U.S. and Canada, the discount rate was calculated by
matching the plans projected cash flows with similar
duration high-quality corporate bonds to develop a present
value, which was then interpolated to develop a single
equivalent discount rate.
In estimating the expected return on assets of a pension plan,
consideration is given primarily to its target allocation, the
current yield on long-term bonds in the country where the plan
is established, and the historical risk premium of equity or
real estate over long-term bond yields in each relevant country.
The approach is consistent with the principle that assets with
higher risk provide a greater return over the long-term. The
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 6.8% in
fiscal 2011.
We provide unfunded healthcare and life insurance benefits to
our retired employees in Canada, the U.S. and Brazil, for
which we paid $7 million in each period for the years ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively; $6 million for
the period from May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008;
and $1 million for the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007. The assumed healthcare cost trend
used for measurement purposes is 7.5% for fiscal 2011,
decreasing gradually to 5% in 2015 and remaining at that level
thereafter.
113
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A change of one percentage point in the assumed healthcare cost
trend rates would have the following effects on our other
benefits (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% Increase
|
|
|
1% Decrease
|
|
|
Sensitivity Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on service and interest costs
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Effect on benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
In addition, we provide post-employment benefits, including
disability, early retirement and continuation of benefits
(medical, dental, and life insurance) to our former or inactive
employees, which are accounted for on the accrual basis in
accordance ASC No. 712, Compensation Retirement
Benefits. Other long-term liabilities on our consolidated
balance sheets includes $19 million and $20 million as
of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for these
benefits.
Fair
Value of Plan Assets
The following pension plan assets are measured and recognized at
fair value on a recurring basis (in millions). Please see
Note 15 Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
for description of the fair value hierarchy. The US pension plan
assets are invested exclusively in commingled funds and
classified in Level 2. The foreign pension plan assets are
invested in both direct investments (Levels 1 and
2) and commingled funds (Level 2).
US
Pension Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Cap Equity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
Small/Mid Cap Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
International Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Pension Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
CURRENCY
LOSSES (GAINS)
|
The following currency losses (gains) are included in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net (gain) loss on change in fair value of currency derivative
instruments(A)
|
|
$
|
(72
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
Net (gain) loss on remeasurement of monetary assets and
liabilities(B)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net currency (gain) loss
|
|
$
|
(87
|
)
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in Other (income) expenses, net. |
The following currency gains (losses) are included in AOCI, net
of tax (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment beginning
of period
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment end of
period
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS AND COMMODITY CONTRACTS
|
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments to manage the risks arising from
fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates, aluminum prices
and energy prices. Such instruments are used for risk management
purposes only. We may be exposed to losses in the future if the
counterparties to the contracts fail to perform. We are
satisfied that the risk of such non-performance is remote due to
our monitoring of credit exposures. Our ultimate gain or loss on
these derivatives may differ from the amount recognized in the
accompanying March 31, 2010 consolidated balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions, the
relative costs of the instruments and capacity to hedge. The
duration is always linked to the timing of the underlying
exposure, with the connection between the two being regularly
monitored.
The current and noncurrent portions of derivative assets and the
current portion of derivative liabilities are presented on the
face of our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The
noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included in
Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
115
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 are
as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
(640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net
Investment Hedges
We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to
fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and
investments in our European operations. We had cross-currency
swaps of Euro 135 million as of March 31, 2010
and 2009, designated as net investment hedges. The effective
portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is
included in Other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI). Prior to
the Arrangement, the effective portion on the derivative was
included in Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges,
net. After the completion of the Acquisition, the effective
portion on the derivative is included in Currency translation
adjustments. The ineffective portion of gain or loss on the
derivative is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of
derivative instruments, net.
The following table summarizes the amount of gain (loss) we
recognized in OCI related to our net investment hedge
derivatives (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
Cash Flow
Hedges
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we designated as
a cash flow hedge of our exposure to fluctuating electricity
prices. The effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative
is included in OCI and is reclassified when we recognize the
underlying exposure into (Gain) loss on change in fair value of
derivatives, net in our accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. As of March 31, 2010, the outstanding portion
of this swap includes 1.6 million megawatt hours through
2017.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable-rate
debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included
in OCI and reclassified when settled into Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs in our accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. We had $510 million
and $690 million of outstanding interest rate swaps
designated as cash flow hedges as of March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or
losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the
life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the
relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will no
longer be designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if
the underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be
probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness
determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the
criteria we established at the inception of the hedge. Gains or
losses recognized to date in AOCI would be immediately
reclassified into current period earnings, as would any
subsequent changes in the fair value of any such derivative.
During the next twelve months we expect to realize
$14 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.
117
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the impact on AOCI and earnings
of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and Amount
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and Amount
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and Amount
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in
helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging
instruments. The change in fair value of these derivative
instruments is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations.
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the London Metal Exchange (LME) price of
aluminum. These exposures arise from firm commitments to sell
aluminum in future periods at fixed prices, the forecasted
output of our smelter operations in South America and the
forecasted metal price lag associated with firm commitments to
sell aluminum in future periods at prices based on the LME. As
of March 31, 2010 and 2009, we had 55 kt and 180 kt,
respectively, of outstanding aluminum contracts not designated
as hedges. We classify cash settlement amounts associated with
these derivatives as part of investing activities in the
consolidated statements of cash flows.
For certain customers, we enter into contractual relationships
that entitle us to pass-through the economic effect of trading
positions that we take with other third parties on our
customers behalf. We recognize a derivative position with
both the customer and the third party for these types of
contracts and we classify cash
118
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
settlement amounts associated with these derivatives as part of
operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash
flows.
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross-currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain operations. As of
March 31, 2010 and 2009, we had outstanding currency
exchange contracts with a total notional amount of
$1.4 billion that were not designated as hedges.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
interest rates associated with variable-rate debt. As of
March 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $10 million of
outstanding interest rate swaps that were not designated as
hedges.
We use heating oil swaps and natural gas swaps to manage our
exposure to fluctuating energy prices in North America. As of
March 31, 2010 we had no outstanding heating oil swaps that
were not designated as hedges. As of March 31, 2009, we had
3.4 million gallons of heating oil swaps that were not
designated as hedges. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, we had
4.2 million MMBTUs and 3.8 million MMBTUs,
respectively, of natural gas swaps that were not designated as
hedges. One MMBTU is the equivalent of one decatherm, or one
million British Thermal Units.
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) associated
with the change in fair value of derivative instruments
recognized in earnings (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
(561
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
(556
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
FAIR
VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
|
We record certain assets and liabilities, primarily derivative
instruments, on our consolidated balance sheets at fair value.
We also disclose the fair values of certain financial
instruments, including debt and loans receivable, which are not
recorded at fair value. Our objective in measuring fair value is
to estimate an exit price in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. We consider factors
such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and nonperformance risk,
including our own nonperformance risk, in measuring fair value.
We use observable market inputs wherever possible. To the extent
that observable market inputs are
119
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
not available, our fair value measurements will reflect the
assumptions we used. We grade the level of the inputs and
assumptions used according to a three-tier hierarchy:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities
that we have the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which
there is little or no market data, which require us to develop
our own assumptions based on the best information available as
what market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability.
The following section describes the valuation methodologies we
used to measure our various financial instruments at fair value,
including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy
in which each instrument is generally classified:
Derivative
Contracts
For certain of our derivative contracts whose fair values are
based upon trades in liquid markets, such as aluminum forward
contracts and options, valuation model inputs can generally be
verified and valuation techniques do not involve significant
judgment. The fair values of such financial instruments are
generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
The majority of our derivative contracts are valued using
industry-standard models that use observable market inputs as
their basis, such as time value, forward interest rates,
volatility factors, and current (spot) and forward market prices
for foreign exchange rates. We generally classify these
instruments within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Such
derivatives include interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps,
foreign currency forward contracts and certain energy-related
forward contracts (e.g., natural gas).
We classify derivative contracts that are valued based on models
with significant unobservable market inputs as Level 3 of
the valuation hierarchy. These derivatives include certain of
our energy-related forward contracts (e.g., electricity) and
certain foreign currency forward contracts. Models for these
fair value measurements include inputs based on estimated future
prices for periods beyond the term of the quoted prices.
For Level 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy, where
appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors such as
liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit considerations
(nonperformance risk).
As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the company did not have any
Level 1 financial instruments.
The following tables present our derivative assets and
liabilities which are measured and recognized at fair value on a
recurring basis classified under the appropriate level of the
fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(545
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Level 2 Instruments
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
(644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Level 3 Instruments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
(160
|
)
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognized unrealized gains of $2 million related to
Level 3 financial instruments that were still held as of
March 31, 2010. These unrealized gains are included in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net.
The following table presents a reconciliation of fair value
activity for Level 3 derivative contracts on a net basis
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
Instruments(A)
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in earnings(B)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in Other comprehensive
income (loss)(C)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Net transfers from Level 3 to Level 2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in earnings(B)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in Other comprehensive
income (loss)(C)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Net transfers from Level 3 to Level 2
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents derivative assets net of derivative liabilities. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(C) |
|
Included in Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges,
net. |
121
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Financial
Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value
The table below presents the estimated fair value of certain
financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis (in millions). The table excludes short-term
financial assets and liabilities for which we believe carrying
value approximates fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables from related parties
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt third parties (excluding short term
borrowings)
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
Total debt related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
16.
|
OTHER
(INCOME) EXPENSES, NET
|
Other (income) expenses, net is comprised of the following (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Exchange (gains) losses, net
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claims(A)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on Brazilian tax settlement
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposals of property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We recognized a $26 million gain on the reversal of a
previously recorded legal accrual upon settlement during the
year ended March 31, 2009. |
We are subject to Canadian and United States federal, state, and
local income taxes as well as other foreign income taxes. The
domestic (Canada) and foreign components of our Income (loss)
before income taxes (and after removing our Equity in net
(income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates) are as follows (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Domestic (Canada)
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
Foreign (all other countries)
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income (loss) before equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
$
|
742
|
|
|
$
|
(1,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of the Income tax provision (benefit) are as
follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Current provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic (Canada)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign (all other countries)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic (Canada)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Foreign (all other countries)
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
(246
|
)
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our
effective tax rates are shown below (in millions, except
percentages).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Pre-tax income (loss) before equity in net (income) loss on
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
$
|
742
|
|
|
$
|
(1,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Statutory tax rate
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) at the Canadian statutory rate
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
(619
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) for taxes on income (loss) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange translation items
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Tax credits and other allowances
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense (income) items not subject to tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Enacted tax rate changes
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax rate differences on foreign earnings
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
(246
|
)
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
228
|
%
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our effective tax rate differs from the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to the following factors: (1) non-deductible
impairment of goodwill; (2) pre-tax foreign currency gains
or losses with no tax effect and the tax effect of
U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no
pre-tax effect, which is shown above as exchange translation
items; (3) the remeasurement of deferred income taxes due
to foreign currency changes, which is shown above as exchange
remeasurement of deferred income taxes; (4) changes in
valuation allowances
123
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where
we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able
to utilize those losses; (5) the effects of enacted tax
rate changes on cumulative taxable temporary differences;
(6) differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign
effective tax rates applied to entities in different
jurisdictions shown above as tax rate differences on foreign
earnings and (7) increases or decreases in uncertain tax
positions recorded under the provisions of ASC 740,
Income Taxes (ASC 740).
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan we entered into a tax
sharing and disaffiliation agreement that provides
indemnification if certain factual representations are breached
or if certain transactions are undertaken or certain actions are
taken that have the effect of negatively affecting the tax
treatment of the spin-off. It further governs the disaffiliation
of the tax matters of Alcan and its subsidiaries or affiliates
other than us, on the one hand, and us and our subsidiaries or
affiliates, on the other hand. In this respect it allocates
taxes accrued prior to the spin-off and after the spin-off as
well as transfer taxes resulting therefrom. It also allocates
obligations for filing tax returns and the management of certain
pending or future tax contests and creates mutual collaboration
obligations with respect to tax matters.
We enjoy the benefits of favorable tax holidays in various
jurisdictions; however, the net impact of these tax holidays on
our income tax provision (benefit) is immaterial.
Deferred
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes recognize the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the carrying
amounts used for income tax purposes, and the impact of
available net operating loss (NOL) and tax credit carryforwards.
These items are stated at the enacted tax rates that are
expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or
recovered.
Our deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax
liabilities are as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions not currently deductible for tax purposes
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
Tax losses/benefit carryforwards, net
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
Inventory valuation reserves
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,023
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,023
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
Less: Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
ASC 740 requires that we reduce our deferred income tax assets
by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of the
available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or a
portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. After
consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative,
management concluded that it is more likely than not that we
will not realize a portion of our deferred tax assets and that
valuation allowances of $223 million and $228 million
were necessary as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
as described below.
As of March 31, 2010, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $368 million (tax effected)
and tax credit carryforwards of $36 million, which will be
available to offset future taxable income and tax liabilities,
respectively. The carryforwards began expiring in 2010 with some
amounts being carried forward indefinitely. As of March 31,
2010, valuation allowances of $88 million and
$17 million had been recorded against net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, respectively, where
it appeared more likely than not that such benefits will not be
realized. The net operating loss carryforwards are predominantly
in the U.S., the U.K., Canada, France, Italy, Luxembourg and
Brazil.
As of March 31, 2009, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $354 million (tax effected)
and tax credit carryforwards of $36 million, which will be
available to offset future taxable income and tax liabilities,
respectively. The carryforwards begin expiring in 2009 with some
amounts being carried forward indefinitely. As of March 31,
2009, valuation allowances of $117 million and
$17 million had been recorded against net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, respectively, where
it appeared more likely than not that such benefits will not be
realized. The net operating loss carryforwards are predominantly
in the U.S., the U.K., Canada, France, Italy, and Luxembourg.
Our valuation allowance decreased $5 million (net) during
the year ended March 31, 2010. Although realization is not
assured, management believes it is more likely than not that all
the remaining net deferred tax assets will be realized. In the
near term, the amount of deferred tax assets considered
realizable could be reduced if we do not generate sufficient
taxable income in certain jurisdictions.
We have undistributed earnings in our foreign subsidiaries. For
those subsidiaries where the earnings are considered to be
permanently reinvested, no provision for Canadian income taxes
has been recorded. Upon repatriation of those earnings, in the
form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to both
Canadian income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign
taxes paid) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign
countries. For those subsidiaries where the earnings are not
considered permanently reinvested, taxes have been provided as
required. The determination of the unrecorded deferred income
tax liability for temporary differences related to investments
in foreign subsidiaries and foreign corporate joint ventures
that are considered to be permanently reinvested is not
considered practicable.
Tax
Uncertainties
As of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, the total
amount of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would
affect the effective income tax rate in future periods based on
anticipated settlement dates is $39 million and
$46 million, respectively. It is reasonably possible that
the expiration of the statutes of limitations or examinations by
taxing authorities will result in a decrease in the unrecognized
tax benefits of $1 million related to cross-border
intercompany pricing of services rendered in various
jurisdictions by March 31, 2011.
Separately, we are awaiting a court ruling regarding the
utilization of certain operating losses. We anticipate that it
is reasonably possible that this ruling will result in a
$14 million decrease in unrecognized tax benefits by
March 31, 2011 related to this matter. We have fully funded
this contingent liability through a judicial deposit, which is
included in Other long-term assets third parties
since January 2007.
Tax authorities are currently examining certain of our tax
returns for fiscal years 2004 through 2008. We are evaluating
potential adjustments and we do not anticipate that settlement
of the examinations will result in
125
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
a material payout. With few exceptions, tax returns for all
jurisdictions for all tax years before 2003 are no longer
subject to examination by taxing authorities.
During the year ended March 31, 2010, the statute of
limitations lapsed with respect to unrecognized tax benefits
related to potential withholding taxes and cross-border
intercompany pricing of services. As a result, we recognized a
reduction in unrecognized tax benefits of $28 million,
including a decrease in accrued interest of $5 million,
recorded as a reduction to the income tax provisions in the
consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income
(loss).
Our continuing practice and policy is to record potential
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
our Income tax provision (benefit). As of March 31, 2010
and March 31, 2009, we had $14 million and
$12 million accrued for potential interest on income taxes,
respectively. For the periods from May 16, 2007 through
March 31, 2008; and from April 1, 2007 through
May 15, 2007, our Income tax provision included a charge
for an additional $5 million and $0.4 million of
potential interest, respectively.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current period
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions based on tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions based on tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statute Lapses
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes Payable
Our consolidated balance sheets include income taxes payable of
$70 million and $85 million as of March 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively. Of these amounts, $25 million and
$33 million are reflected in Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities as of March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
|
18.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we assumed a number
of liabilities, commitments and contingencies mainly related to
our historical rolled products operations, including liabilities
in respect of legal claims and environmental matters. As a
result, we may be required to indemnify Alcan for claims
successfully brought against Alcan or for the defense of legal
actions that arise from time to time in the normal course of our
rolled products business including commercial and contract
disputes, employee-related claims and tax disputes (including
several disputes with Brazils Ministry of Treasury
regarding various forms of manufacturing taxes and social
security contributions). In addition to these assumed
liabilities and contingencies, we may, in the future, be
involved in, or subject to, other disputes, claims and
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business,
including some that we assert against others, such as
environmental, health and safety, product liability, employee,
tax, personal injury and other matters. Where appropriate, we
have established reserves in respect of these matters (or, if
required, we have posted cash guarantees). While the ultimate
resolution of, and liability and costs related to, these matters
cannot be
126
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
determined with certainty due to the considerable uncertainties
that exist, we do not believe that any of these pending actions,
individually or in the aggregate, will materially impair our
operations or materially affect our financial condition or
liquidity. The following describes certain legal proceedings
relating to our business, including those for which we assumed
liability as a result of our spin-off from Alcan.
Legal
Proceedings
Coca-Cola
Lawsuit. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in Georgia
state court. CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
the most favored nations provision regarding certain
pricing matters under an aluminum can stock supply agreement
between the parties, and seeks monetary damages in an amount to
be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under the
agreement. The dispute will likely turn on the facts that are
presented to the court by the parties and the courts
finding as to how certain provisions of the agreement ought to
be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in this litigation, the
amount of damages would likely be material. However, we have
concluded that a loss from the CCBSS litigation is not probable
and therefore have not recorded an accrual. In addition, we do
not believe there is a reasonable possibility of a loss from the
lawsuit based on information available at this time. Novelis
Corporation and CCBSS have filed motions for summary judgment,
and each party has filed a response to the other partys
motion. No trial date has been set.
Environmental
Matters
We own and operate numerous manufacturing and other facilities
in various countries around the world. Our operations are
subject to environmental laws and regulations from various
jurisdictions, which govern, among other things, air emissions,
wastewater discharges, the handling, storage and disposal of
hazardous substances and wastes, the remediation of contaminated
sites, post-mining reclamation and restoration of natural
resources, and employee health and safety. Future environmental
regulations may be expected to impose stricter compliance
requirements on the industries in which we operate. Additional
equipment or process changes at some of our facilities may be
needed to meet future requirements. The cost of meeting these
requirements may be significant. Failure to comply with such
laws and regulations could subject us to administrative, civil
or criminal penalties, obligations to pay damages or other
costs, and injunctions and other orders, including orders to
cease operations. We expect that our total expenditures for
capital improvements regarding environmental control facilities
for the year ending March 31, 2011 will be approximately
$5 million.
We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also
known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions
regarding liability arising from the usage, storage, treatment
or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a number of
sites in the United States, as well as similar proceedings under
the laws and regulations of the other jurisdictions in which we
have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the
European Union. Many of these jurisdictions have laws that
impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, for the costs of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses. In addition, we are, from time to
time, subject to environmental reviews and investigations by
relevant governmental authorities.
With respect to environmental loss contingencies, we record a
loss contingency whenever such contingency is probable and
reasonably estimable. The evaluation model includes all asserted
and unasserted claims that can be reasonably identified. Under
this evaluation model, the liability and the related costs are
quantified based upon the best available evidence regarding
actual liability loss and cost estimates. Except for those loss
contingencies where no estimate can reasonably be made, the
evaluation model is fact-driven and
127
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
attempts to estimate the full costs of each claim. Management
reviews the status of, and estimated liability related to,
pending claims and civil actions on a quarterly basis. The
estimated costs in respect of such reported liabilities are not
offset by amounts related to cost-sharing between parties,
insurance, indemnification arrangements or contribution from
other potentially responsible parties (PRPs) unless otherwise
noted.
As described further in the following paragraph, we have
established procedures for regularly evaluating environmental
loss contingencies, including those arising from such
environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we believe we have made reasonable estimates
of the costs that are likely to be borne by us for these
environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly, we have
established reserves based on our reasonable estimates for the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters. We estimate that the undiscounted remaining
clean-up
costs related to all of our known environmental matters as of
March 31, 2010 will be approximately $54 million. Of
this amount, $38 million is included in Other long-term
liabilities, with the remaining $16 million included in
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010. Management
has reviewed the environmental matters, including those for
which we assumed liability as a result of our spin-off from Rio
Tinto Alcan. As a result of this review, management has
determined that the currently anticipated costs associated with
these environmental matters will not, individually or in the
aggregate, materially impact our operations or materially
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
Brazil
Tax Matters
Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America,
as of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, we had cash
deposits aggregating approximately $45 million and
$30 million, respectively, in judicial depository accounts
pending finalization of the related cases. The depository
accounts are in the name of the Brazilian government and will be
expended towards these legal proceedings or released to us,
depending on the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are
included in Other long-term assets third parties in
our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In
addition, we are involved in several disputes with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury about various forms of manufacturing taxes
and social security contributions, for which we have made no
judicial deposits but for which we have established reserves
ranging from $7 million to $123 million as of
March 31, 2010. In total, these reserves approximate
$149 million and $135 million, as of March 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively, and are included in Other long-term
liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
On May 28, 2009, the Brazilian government passed a law
allowing taxpayers to settle certain federal tax disputes with
the Brazilian tax authorities, including disputes relating to a
Brazilian national tax on manufactured products, through an
installment program. Under the program, if a company elects to
settle a tax dispute and pay the principal amount due over a
specified payment period (e.g., 60, 120 or 180 months), the
company will receive a discount on the interest and penalties
owed on the disputed tax amount. Novelis joined the installment
program in November of 2009 and notified the Brazilian
government of its election to settle certain federal tax
disputes pursuant to the program. On May 3, 2010, the
Brazilian government enacted legislation permitting us to select
a payment period under the installment program, and we will make
our formal selection in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011.
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including certain
of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and Aluminium Norf GmbH, which
is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint venture that does not meet
the requirements for consolidation.
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no
expiration and have termination
128
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
notice requirements. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries or
non-consolidated affiliates holds any assets of any third
parties as collateral to offset the potential settlement of
these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements, all
liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term debt
facilities for these entities are already included in our
consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness as of March 31, 2010 (in
millions). We did not have obligations under guarantees of
indebtedness related to our majority-owned subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
Carrying
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Future Payment
|
|
Value
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
|
|
19.
|
SEGMENT,
GEOGRAPHICAL AREA, MAJOR CUSTOMER AND MAJOR SUPPLIER
INFORMATION
|
Segment
Information
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America; Europe; Asia and South America.
The following is a description of our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
North America. Headquartered in Cleveland,
Ohio, this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 11 plants, including two fully dedicated
recycling facilities, in two countries.
|
|
|
|
Europe. Headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 13 plants, including one recycling
facility, in six countries.
|
|
|
|
Asia. Headquartered in Seoul, South Korea,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates three plants in two countries.
|
|
|
|
South America. Headquartered in Sao Paulo,
Brazil, this segment comprises bauxite mining, alumina refining,
smelting operations, power generation, carbon products, aluminum
sheet and light gauge products and operates four plants in
Brazil.
|
Net sales and expenses are measured in accordance with the
policies and procedures described in Note 1
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
For Segment income purposes we only include the impact of the
derivative gains or losses to the extent they are settled in
cash (i.e., realized) during that period.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments based on Segment income. Segment income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment income as earnings before (a) depreciation and
amortization; (b) interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs; (c) interest income; (d) unrealized
gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net; (e) impairment of goodwill;
129
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(f) impairment charges on long-lived assets (other than
goodwill); (g) gain on extinguishment of debt;
(h) noncontrolling interests share;
(i) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Segment income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting (described below);
(k) restructuring charges, net; (k) gains or losses on
disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses, net;
(l) other costs, net; (m) litigation settlement, net
of insurance recoveries; (n) sale transaction fees;
(o) provision or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and
(p) cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax.
Adjustment to eliminate proportional
consolidation. The financial information for our
segments includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile the financial information for the segments shown in
the tables below to the GAAP-based measure, we must remove our
proportional share of each line item that we included in the
segment amounts. See Note 8 Investment in and
Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
Transactions for further information about these
non-consolidated affiliates.
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions).
Selected
Segment Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,292
|
|
|
$
|
2,975
|
|
|
$
|
1,501
|
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
384
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
262
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
101
|
|
Total assets as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,726
|
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
(192
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
439
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
Total assets as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
$
|
1,296
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(234
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
130
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,664
|
|
|
$
|
3,831
|
|
|
$
|
1,612
|
|
|
$
|
908
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
375
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
Total assets as of March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,957
|
|
|
$
|
4,355
|
|
|
$
|
1,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,485
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
(199
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
131
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table shows the reconciliation from income from
reportable segments to Net income (loss) attributable to our
common shareholder (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
Europe
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
South America
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Corporate and other(A)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net(B)
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Corporate and other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. It also includes realized gains
(losses) on corporate derivative instruments. |
|
(B) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net represents the portion of gains (losses) that
were not settled in cash during the period. Total realized and
unrealized gains (losses) are shown in the table below and are
included in the aggregate each period in (Gain) loss on change
in fair value of derivative instruments, net on our consolidated
statements of operations. |
132
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Realized gains (losses) included in Segment income
|
|
$
|
(385
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative instruments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
(556
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographical
Area Information
We had 31 operating facilities in 11 countries as of
March 31, 2010. The tables below present Net sales and
Long-lived assets by geographical area (in millions). Net sales
are attributed to geographical areas based on the origin of the
sale. Long-lived assets are attributed to geographical areas
based on asset location and exclude investments in and advances
to our non-consolidated affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,134
|
|
|
$
|
3,685
|
|
|
$
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
Asia and Other Pacific
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net sales
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,736
|
|
|
$
|
1,902
|
|
Asia and Other Pacific
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
3,992
|
|
|
$
|
4,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Information
about Major Customers and Primary Supplier
The table below shows our net sales to Rexam Plc (Rexam) and
Anheuser-Busch InBev (Anheuser-Busch), our two largest
customers, as a percentage of total Net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Rexam
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Anheuser-Busch
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Rio Tinto Alcan is our primary supplier of metal inputs,
including prime and sheet ingot. The table below shows our
purchases from Alcan as a percentage of our total combined metal
purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Purchases from Alcan as a percentage of total combined metal
purchases in kt(A)(B)
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchased approximately 50% of prime and sheet ingot and
molten metal from Alcan for the year end March 31, 2010. |
|
|
20.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
|
AOCI consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
Fair value of effective portion of hedges
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Pension and other benefits
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AOCI
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table shows non-cash investing and financing
activities related to the Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities related to the Agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
(1,344
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(1,625
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
Debt
|
|
|
66
|
|
The table below presents select operating results (in millions)
and dividends per common share information by period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
|
$
|
2,420
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,103
|
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,939
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(1,823
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
GUARANTOR INFORMATION
|
In connection with the issuance of our 7.25% Senior Notes
and our 11.5% Senior Notes, certain of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries, which are 100% owned within the meaning of
Rule 3-10(h)(1)
of
Regulation S-X,
provided guarantees. These guarantees are full and unconditional
as well as joint and several. The guarantor subsidiaries (the
Guarantors) are comprised of the majority of our businesses in
Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Brazil, Portugal, Luxembourg and
Switzerland, as well as certain businesses in Germany. Certain
Guarantors may be subject to restrictions on their ability to
distribute earnings to Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The remaining
subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not
guarantors of the Senior Notes.
The following information presents condensed consolidating
statements of operations, balance sheets and statements of cash
flows of the Parent, the Guarantors, and the Non-Guarantors.
Investments include investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net assets
of divisions included in the Parent, and have been presented
using the equity method of accounting.
136
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
$
|
6,906
|
|
|
$
|
2,468
|
|
|
$
|
(1,550
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
5,827
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
(1,550
|
)
|
|
|
7,190
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
175
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
6,387
|
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
|
|
(1,154
|
)
|
|
|
7,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
727
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
465
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
(396
|
)
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,186
|
|
|
$
|
8,421
|
|
|
$
|
2,647
|
|
|
$
|
(2,077
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
7,679
|
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
|
|
(2,077
|
)
|
|
|
9,251
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,890
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
10,431
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
(3,967
|
)
|
|
|
12,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
|
|
(2,010
|
)
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
(1,773
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,773
|
)
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,890
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,300
|
|
|
$
|
8,266
|
|
|
$
|
2,701
|
|
|
$
|
(2,302
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
7,504
|
|
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
|
(2,302
|
)
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
191
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
8,113
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
(2,219
|
)
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
(227
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(1,045
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
197
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
(1,057
|
)
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,998
|
)
|
|
|
709
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(1,139
|
)
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,914
|
|
|
$
|
6,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
(4,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
110
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
436
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
1,885
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
(1,057
|
)
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
(2,198
|
)
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(1,525
|
)
|
|
|
1,818
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
(2,167
|
)
|
|
|
(1,525
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of our common shareholder
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
1,689
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
(1,998
|
)
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
1,689
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(1,998
|
)
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,914
|
|
|
$
|
6,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
(4,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(601
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
719
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
5,036
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(1,858
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of our common shareholder
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
(123
|
)
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
(223
|
)
|
|
$
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,009
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(181
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A(T).
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls
and procedures, as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act, include controls and procedures designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the
reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including the Principal
Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Any system of controls, however well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute,
assurance that the objectives of the system are met.
As required by Securities and Exchange Commission rules, we have
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with
the participation of our management, including our Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. Based on this
evaluation, our management, including our Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
March 31, 2010.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act, as amended. The Companys internal
control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the Companys
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the Company;
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the
Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the Company; and
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,
2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria
established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control Integrated Framework. Based on its
assessment, management has concluded that, as of March 31,
2010, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting was effective based on those criteria.
The effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2010 has been audited
by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
147
Remediation
of Previously Disclosed Material Weakness
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of
deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such
that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the Companys annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
In July 2008, we identified non-cash errors relating to our
purchase accounting for an equity method investee, including
related income tax accounts. As a result of our identification
of these errors, our Audit Committee and management concluded on
August 1, 2008, that our previously issued consolidated
financial statements for our fiscal year ended March 31,
2008, should no longer be relied upon. Upon conducting a review
of these accounting errors, management determined that as of
March 31, 2008, we had a material weakness with respect to
the application of purchase accounting for an equity method
investee, including the related income tax accounts. This
material weakness was disclosed in our amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008, and our quarterly
report on
form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2008. Management has
concluded based on the remediation actions described below, that
this material weakness did not exist at March 31, 2010.
In order to remediate the material weakness, we have performed
the following:
1. We conducted a full review of the purchase accounting
for the Hindalco acquisition, including a review of the
valuation approach, as well as the related accounting for equity
method investees and related income tax accounts. This review
was conducted by the Principal Financial Officer, corporate and
regional financial officers, corporate and regional tax
personnel, and the companys external valuation expert.
2. We re-evaluated all accounting and financial reporting
controls for purchase accounting and equity method investees,
including related income tax accounts.
3. We conducted training sessions for key financial and tax
personnel regarding equity method accounting and related income
tax accounting matters.
4. We transitioned certain purchase accounting
responsibilities to our regional financial personnel, including
tax personnel, and developed procedures to monitor the ongoing
activity of the equity-method investee.
As of March 31, 2010, management believes that the
additional control procedures that have been implemented have
fully remediated the material weakness.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the most recently completed
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
148
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
Our
Directors
Our Board of Directors is currently comprised of
5 directors. All of our directors were appointed by our
sole shareholder, Hindalco. Our directors terms will
expire at each annual shareholders meeting provided that if an
election of directors is not held at an annual meeting of the
shareholders, the directors then in office shall continue in
office or until their successors shall be elected. Biographical
details for each of our directors are set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Director Since
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Kumar Mangalam Birla
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
42
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Askaran Agarwala(B)
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
76
|
|
Director
|
D. Bhattacharya(A)(B)
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
61
|
|
Director and Vice Chairman of the Board
|
Clarence J. Chandran(A)(B)
|
|
January 6, 2005
|
|
61
|
|
Director
|
Donald A. Stewart(A)
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
63
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Member of our Audit Committee. |
|
(B) |
|
Member of our Compensation Committee. |
Mr. Kumar Mangalam Birla was elected as the Chairman
of the Board of Directors of Novelis on May 15, 2007.
Mr. Birla is the Chairman of Hindalco which is among
Indias largest business houses, an industry leader in
aluminum and copper. He is also the Chairman of Aditya Birla
Groups leading blue-chip companies: Grasim, UltraTech
Cement, Aditya Birla Nuvo and Idea Cellular and
globally Novelis, Aditya Birla Chemicals (Thailand)
Limited, Indo Phil Textile Mills Inc. Mr. Birla also serves
as director on the board of the Groups international
companies spanning Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Egypt, and
Canada. Additionally, Mr. Birla serves on the board of the
G.D. Birla Medical Research & Education Foundation,
and is a Chancellor of the Birla Institute of
Technology & Science, Pilani. He is a member of the
London Business Schools Asia Pacific Advisory Board. He is
a Member and Chairman of the Staff
Sub-Committee
of Central Board of Reserve Bank of India. Mr. Birlas
past affiliations include service on the boards of Indian
Aluminum Company Limited, Maruti Udyog Limited, Indo Gulf
Fertilisers Limited and Tata Steel Limited. Mr. Birla
brings to the board significant global leadership experience
acquired through his service as a director of numerous
corporate, professional and regulatory entities in various
regions of the world. Mr. Birla provides valuable insight
into the business and political conditions in which we conduct
our global operations.
Askaran Agarwala has served as a Director of Hindalco
since July 2004. He was Chairman of the Business Review Council
of the Aditya Birla Group from October 2003 to March 2010. From
1982 to October 2003, he was President of Hindalco.
Mr. Agarwala serves on the Compensation Committee of the
Novelis Board of Directors. Mr. Agarwala also serves as a
director of several other companies including Aditya Birla
Chemicals (India) Limited formerly known as Bihar
Caustic & Chemicals Ltd., Tanfac Industries Ltd., and
Birla Insurance Advisory Services Limited. He is a Trustee of
G.D. Birla Medical Research and Education Foundation, Vaibhav
Medical and Education Foundation, Sarla Basant Birla Memorial
Trust and Aditya Vikram Birla Memorial Trust. Mr. Agarwala
has served as a director of Renusagar Engineering &
Power Services Limited, Rosa Power Supply Company Ltd., Aditya
Birla Science & Technology Limited and Bina Power
Supply Company Limited. Mr. Agarwalas past and
current service as a director of several companies and industry
associations in the metals and manufacturing industries adds a
valuable perspective to the board. Having served as president of
our parent company, Hindalco Industries, Mr. Agarwala also
brings a depth of understanding of our business and operations.
Mr. Debnaryan Bhattacharya has served as Managing
Director of Hindalco since 2004 and has served as a Director of
Hindalco since April 2004. Mr. Bhattacharya is Vice
Chairman of Novelis and serves on the Audit and Compensation
Committees of the Novelis Board of Directors. He is the Chairman
of Utkal Alumina
149
International Limited and of Aditya Birla Minerals Limited in
Australia. Mr. Bhattacharya also serves as a Director of
Birla Management Centre Services Limited, Dahej Harbour and
Infrastructure Limited, Minerals & Minerals Limited,
Aditya Birla Power Company Limited, and Pidilite Industries
Limited. In addition, he has served as a director of Aditya
Birla Science & Technology Limited.
Mr. Bhattacharyas extensive knowledge of the aluminum
and metals industries provides a valuable resource to the
company in the setting and implementation of its operating
business plans as the company considers various strategic
alternatives. Mr. Bhattacharya brings to the board a high
degree of financial literacy.
Clarence J. Chandran has been a director of the Company
since 2005. Mr. Chandran serves on the Compensation and
Audit Committees of the Novelis Board of Directors, and acts as
the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Chandran
serves as Chairman of The Walsingham Fund. He is a director of
Marfort Deep Sea Technologies Inc. and is a past director of
Alcan Inc. and MDS Inc. Mr. Chandran served as Chairman of
Conros Corporation (private mass market consumer products
company) from 2001 to 2006. He retired as Chief Operating
Officer of Nortel Networks Corporation (communications) in 2001.
Mr. Chandran is a member of the Board of Visitors of the
Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University.
Mr. Chandran has acquired years of significant experience
through his leadership and management of companies with
international business operations. Mr. Chandran brings to
the board his deep knowledge in the areas of technology, sales
and global operations.
Donald A. Stewart is Chief Executive Officer and a
Director of Sun Life Financial Inc. and Sun Life Assurance
Company of Canada, a leading international financial services
company. Mr. Stewart serves on the Audit Committee of the
Novelis Board of Directors and serves as its Chairman. From 1987
to 1992, Mr. Stewart held overall responsibility for Sun
Lifes information technology function. He was appointed
Chief Executive Officer of Sun Life Trust Company in
September 1992. In 1996, he was appointed President and Chief
Operating Officer, and in 1998 Chief Executive Officer of Sun
Life. Mr. Stewart also serves a director of the Canadian
Life and Health Insurance Association and is a member of The
Geneva Association. His past affiliations include service as a
director of CI Financial Corp. Mr. Stewart brings extensive
financial management and operating experience to the board. In
addition, as the current CEO of Sun Life, Mr. Stewart
brings to the board significant leadership experience.
Our
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information for persons currently
serving as executive officers of our company. Biographical
details for each of our executive officers are also set forth
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Alexandre Almeida
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis South America
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis North America
|
Antonio Tadeu Coelho Nardocci
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Europe
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Asia
|
Eric Drummond
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Chief People and Communications Officer
|
Nicholas Madden
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Procurement Officer
|
Erwin Mayr
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer
|
Randal Miller
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer
|
Robert Nelson
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
|
Leslie J. Parrette, Jr.
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Compliance Officer and
Corporate Secretary
|
150
Philip Martens was appointed President and Chief
Operating Officer effective May 8, 2009. Mr. Martens
most recently served as Senior Vice President and President,
Light Vehicle Systems, ArvinMeritor Inc. from September 2006 to
January 2009. He was also President and CEO designate, Arvin
Innovation. Prior to that, he served as President and Chief
Operating Officer of Plastech Engineered Products from 2005 to
2006. From 1987 to 2005, he held various engineering and
leadership positions at Ford Motor Company, most recently
serving as Group Vice President of Product Creation.
Mr. Martens holds a degree in mechanical engineering from
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and an
M.B.A. from the University of Michigan. In 2003,
Mr. Martens received a Doctorate in Automotive Engineering
from Lawrence Technological University for his extensive
contributions to the global automotive industry.
Steven Fisher is our Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. Mr. Fisher joined Novelis in February
2006 as Vice President, Strategic Planning and Corporate
Development. He was appointed Chief Financial Officer in May
2007 following the acquisition of Novelis by Hindalco.
Mr. Fisher served as Vice President and Controller for
TXU Energy, the non-regulated subsidiary of TXU Corp. from July
2005 to February 2006. Prior to joining TXU Energy,
Mr. Fisher served in various senior finance roles at
Aquila, Inc., an international electric and gas utility and
energy trading company, including Vice President, Controller and
Strategic Planning, from 2001 to 2005. He is also a member of
the board of directors of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. since
2009. Mr. Fisher is a graduate of the University of Iowa in
1993, where he earned a B.B.A. in Finance and Accounting. He is
a Certified Public Accountant.
Alexandre Almeida is a Senior Vice President and
President, Novelis South America. Prior to this appointment in
August 2008, Mr. Almeida had served as Chief Financial
Officer of Novelis South America beginning in January 2005.
Formerly, he was Managing Director of Alcan Composites Brasil
Ltda. from 2003 to 2005 and was previously Chief Operating
Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Líder Taxi Aereo
S.A., a leading business aviation company in Latin America.
Mr. Almeida holds a degree in Metallurgical Engineering and
a Masters Degree in Computer Science from Universidade Federal
de Minas Gerais, and also a postgraduate degree in Finance
Administration from João Pinheiro Foundation.
Jean-Marc Germain is a Senior Vice President and
President Novelis North America. Mr. Germain was Vice
President Global Can for Novelis Inc. from January 2007 until
May 2008 when he was appointed Senior Vice President and the
President of our North American operations. He was previously
Vice President and General Manager of Light Gauge Products for
Novelis North America from September 2004 to December 2006, and
prior to that Mr. Germain held a number of senior positions
with Alcan Inc. and Pechiney S.A. From January 2004 to August
2004 he served as co-lead of the Integration Leadership Team for
the Alcan and Pechiney merger, which occurred in 2004. Prior to
that, he served as Senior Vice President & General
Manager Foil, Strip and Specialties Division for Pechiney from
September 2001 to December 2003. Before his time at Alcan and
Pechiney, Mr. Germain worked for GE Capital and
Bain & Company. Mr. Germain is a graduate from
École Polytechnique in Paris, France.
Antonio Tadeu Coelho Nardocci has served as our Senior
Vice President and President, Novelis Europe since June 2009. He
previously served as our Senior Vice President, Strategy,
Innovation and Technology from August 2008 to June 2009, and as
Senior Vice President and President of our South American
operations from February 2005 to August 2008. Prior to our
spin-off from Alcan, Mr. Nardocci held a number of
leadership positions with Alcan, most recently serving as
President of Rolled Products South America from March 2002 until
January 2005. Mr. Nardocci graduated from the University of
São Paulo in Brazil with a degree in metallurgy.
Mr. Nardocci is a member of the board of the European
Aluminium Association.
Thomas Walpole is a Senior Vice President and the
President, Novelis Asia. Mr. Walpole was our
Vice President and General Manager, Can Products Business
Unit from January 2005 until February 2006. Mr. Walpole
joined Alcan in 1979 and has held various senior management
roles. Mr. Walpole held international positions within
Alcan in Europe and Asia until 2004. He began as Vice President,
Sales, Marketing & Business Development for Alcan
Taihan Aluminum Ltd. and most recently was President of the
Litho/Can and Painted Products for the European region.
Mr. Walpole graduated from State University of
New York at Oswego with a B.S. in Accounting, and holds an
M.B.A. from Case Western Reserve University.
151
Eric Drummond has served as our Chief People and
Communications Officer since November 2009. Prior to joining our
company, he served as Vice President, Global Human Resources for
the National Basketball Association from April 2007 to November
2009. Before that, Mr. Drummond served in various
leadership positions with Ingersoll-Rand, PepsiCo, and Coors
Brewing, and The NBA. He is a member of the board of Michigan
State University and the University of Colorado.
Mr. Drummond holds a B.S., Employment and International
Relations and a Masters degree, Labor and Industrial Relations,
from Michigan State University.
Nicholas Madden is our Vice President and Chief
Procurement Officer. Prior to this role, which he assumed in
October 2006, Mr. Madden served as President of Novelis
Europes Can, Litho and Recycling business unit beginning
in October 2004. He was Vice President of Metal Management and
Procurement for Alcans Rolled Products division in Europe
from December 2000 until September 2004 and was also responsible
for the secondary recycling business. Mr. Madden holds a
B.Sc. (Hons) degree in Economics and Social Studies from
University College in Cardiff, Wales.
Erwin Mayr has served as our Senior Vice President and
Chief Strategy Officer since October 2009. He previously held a
number of leadership positions within our European operations,
including Business Unit President, Advanced Rolled Products,
from 2002 until 2009. Prior to joining our company in 2002,
Mr. Mayr was an associate partner with the consulting firm
Monitor Group. Mr. Mayr earned his Ph.D., Physics from Ulm
University (Germany).
Randal P. Miller is our Vice President,
Treasurer. Prior to joining Novelis in July 2008,
Mr. Miller served as Vice President and Treasurer of
Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling from May 2006 to November
2007 where he was responsible for all treasury, banking, and
capital markets activities for Transocean and its subsidiaries.
From 2001 to 2006, Mr. Miller served as Vice President
Finance, Treasurer of Aquila, Inc. Mr. Miller earned his
B.S.B.A. from Iowa State University and M.B.A from the
University of Missouri Kansas City.
Robert Nelson is our Vice President, Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer. Mr. Nelson served as the Acting
Controller of Novelis Inc. beginning in July 2008 and was
appointed Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer in November 2008. Previously, he worked for
22 years at Georgia Pacific, one of the worlds
leading manufacturers of tissue, pulp, paper, packaging, and
building products. Mr. Nelson served in a variety of
corporate and operational financial roles at Georgia Pacific,
most recently as Vice President and Controller from 2004 to
2006. Prior to that, he was Vice President Finance, Consumer
Products & Packaging. Mr. Nelson earned a degree
in Accountancy from the University of Illinois
Urbana Champaign and is a Certified Public
Accountant in the State of Georgia.
Leslie J. Parrette, Jr. rejoined our company in
October 2009 to serve as our Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Compliance Officer, and he was appointed Corporate
Secretary in February 2010. Before rejoining our company,
Mr. Parrette served as Senior Vice President, Legal Affairs
and General Counsel for WESCO International, Inc. (formerly
Westinghouse Electric Supply Co.) (electrical product
distribution) from March 2009 until October 2009. From March
2005 until March 2009, he served as our Senior Vice President,
General Counsel, Secretary and Compliance Officer. Prior to
that, Mr. Parrette served as Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary for Aquila, Inc. (gas and electric
utility; energy trading) from July 2000 until February 2005.
Mr. Parrette holds an A.B. in Sociology from Harvard
College and received his J.D. from Harvard Law School.
Board of
Directors and Corporate Governance Matters
We are committed to our corporate governance practices, which we
believe are essential to our success and to the enhancement of
shareholder value. Our Senior Notes are publicly traded in the
U.S., and, accordingly, we make required filings with
U.S. securities regulators. We make these filings available
on our website at www.novelis.com as soon as reasonably
practicable after they are electronically filed. We are subject
to a variety of corporate governance and disclosure
requirements. Our corporate governance practices meet applicable
regulatory requirements to ensure transparency and effective
governance of the Company.
152
Our Board of Directors annually reviews corporate governance
practices in light of developing requirements in this field. As
new provisions come into effect, our Board of Directors will
reassess our corporate governance practices and implement
changes as and when appropriate. The following is an overview of
our corporate governance practices.
Novelis
Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors currently has five members, all of whom
are appointed by our sole shareholder. Our Board of Directors
has the responsibility for stewardship of Novelis Inc.,
including the responsibility to ensure that we are managed in
the interest of our sole shareholder, while taking into account
the interests of other stakeholders. Our Board of Directors
supervises the management of our business and affairs and
discharges its duties and obligations in accordance with the
provisions of: (1) our articles of incorporation and
bylaws; (2) the charters of its committees and
(3) other applicable legislation and company policies.
Our corporate governance practices require that, in addition to
certain statutory duties, the following matters be subject to
our Board of Directors approval: (1) capital
expenditure budgets and significant investments and divestments;
(2) our strategic and value-maximizing plans; (3) the
number of directors within the limits provided by our by-laws
and (4) any matter which may have the potential for
substantial impact on our Company. Our Board of Directors
reviews the composition and size of our Board of Directors once
a year. Senior management makes regular presentations to our
Board of Directors on the main areas of our business.
Corporate
Governance
Holders of our Senior Notes and other interested parties may
communicate with the Board of Directors, a committee or an
individual director by writing to Novelis Inc., 3399 Peachtree
Road NE, Suite 1500, Atlanta, GA 30326, Attention:
Corporate Secretary Board Communication. All such
communications will be compiled by the Corporate Secretary and
submitted to the appropriate director or board committee. The
Corporate Secretary will reply or take other actions in
accordance with instructions from the applicable board contact.
Committees
of Our Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors has established two standing committees:
the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. Each
committee is governed by its own charter.
According to their authority as set out in their charters, our
Board of Directors and each of its committees may engage outside
advisors at the expense of Novelis.
Audit
Committee and Financial Experts
Our Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee.
Messrs. Stewart, Bhattacharya and Chandran are the members
of the Audit Committee. Mr. Stewart, an independent
director, has been identified as an audit committee
financial expert as that term is defined in the rules and
regulations of the SEC.
Our Audit Committees main objective is to assist our Board
of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities for
the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and
independence of our independent registered public accounting
firm and the performance of both our internal audit function and
our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the
Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for,
among other matters:
|
|
|
|
|
evaluating and compensating our independent registered public
accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
making recommendations to the Board of Directors and
shareholders relating to the appointment, retention and
termination of our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
discussing with our independent registered public accounting
firm their qualifications and independence from management;
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing with our independent registered public accounting firm
the scope and results of their audit;
|
|
|
|
pre-approving all audit and permissible non-audit services to be
performed by our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
review areas of potential significant financial risk and the
steps taken to monitor and manage such exposures;
|
|
|
|
overseeing the financial reporting process and discussing with
management and our independent registered public accounting firm
the interim and annual financial statements that we file with
the SEC; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and monitoring our accounting principles, accounting
policies and disclosure, internal control over financial
reporting and disclosure controls and procedures.
|
Compensation
Committee
Our Compensation Committee establishes our general compensation
philosophy and oversees the development and implementation of
compensation policies and programs. It also reviews and approves
the level of
and/or
changes in the compensation of individual executive officers
taking into consideration individual performance and competitive
compensation practices. The committees specific roles and
responsibilities are set out in its charter. Our Compensation
Committee periodically reviews the effectiveness of our overall
management organization structure and succession planning for
senior management, reviews recommendations for the appointment
of executive officers, and reviews annually the development
process for high potential employees.
Code
of Conduct and Guidelines for Ethical Behavior
Novelis has adopted a Code of Conduct for the Board of Directors
and Senior Managers and maintains a Code of Ethics for Senior
Financial Officers that applies to our senior financial officers
including our principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer, or persons performing
similar functions. We also maintain a Code of Conduct that
governs all of our employees. Copies of the Code of Conduct for
the Board of Directors and Senior Managers and the Code of
Ethics for Senior Financial Officers are available on our
website at www.novelis.com. We will promptly disclose any future
amendments to these codes on our website as well as any waivers
from these codes for executive officers and directors. Copies of
these codes are also available in print from our Corporate
Secretary upon request.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
This section provides a discussion of the background and
objectives of our compensation programs for senior management,
as well as a discussion of all material elements of the
compensation of each of the named executive officers for fiscal
2010 identified in the following table. The named executive
officers are determined in accordance with SEC rules and include
(1) the persons that served as our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer during any part of
fiscal 2010, and (2) the three other highest paid executive
officers that were employed on March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
Former President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis North America
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Asia
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Europe
|
154
Compensation
Committee and Role of Management
The Compensation Committee of our board of directors (the
Committee) has the responsibility for approving the compensation
programs for our named executive officers and making decisions
regarding specific compensation to be paid or awarded to them.
The Committee acts pursuant to a charter approved by our board,
which is reviewed annually.
Our Chief People and Communications Officer serves as the
management liaison officer for the Committee. Our human
resources and legal departments provide assistance to the
Committee in connection with administration of the
Committees responsibilities.
Our named executive officers have no direct role in setting
their own compensation. The Committee, however, normally meets
with our management team to evaluate performance against
pre-established goals and management makes recommendations to
the board regarding budgets, which affect certain goals. Our
President and Chief Operating Officer also makes recommendations
regarding compensation matters related to other named executive
officers and provides input regarding executive compensation
programs and policies generally.
Management also assists the Committee by providing information
needed or requested by the Committee (such as our performance
against budget and objectives, historic compensation,
compensation expense, our policies and programs, and peer
companies) and by providing input and advice regarding
compensation programs and policies and their impact on the
Company and its executives.
Objectives
and Design of Our Compensation Program
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract,
retain, and reward talented executives who can contribute to our
long-term success and thereby build value for our shareholder.
The program is organized around three fundamental principles:
|
|
|
|
|
Provide Total Direct Compensation Opportunities That Are
Competitive with Similar Positions at Comparable
Companies: To enable us to attract, motivate and
retain qualified executives, total direct compensation
opportunities for each executive (base pay, annual short-term
incentives and long-term incentives) are targeted at levels to
be competitive with similar positions at comparable companies.
The Company strives to create a total direct compensation
package that is at the median of the peer companies described
below.
|
|
|
|
A Substantial Portion of Total Direct Compensation Should Be
at Risk Because It Is Performance-Based: We
believe executives should be rewarded for their performance.
Consequently, a substantial portion of an executives total
direct compensation should be at risk, with amounts actually
paid dependent on performance against pre-established objectives
for the individual and us. The portion of an individuals
total direct compensation that is based upon these performance
objectives should increase as the individuals business
responsibilities increase.
|
|
|
|
A Substantial Portion of Total Direct Compensation Should be
Delivered in the Form of Long-Term Performance Based
Awards: We believe a long-term stake in the
sustained performance of Novelis effectively aligns executive
and shareholder interests and provides motivation for enhancing
shareholder value. As a result, we may provide long-term
performance based awards, which are generally paid in cash.
|
The Committee recognizes that the engagement of strong talent in
critical functions may entail recruiting new executives at times
and involve negotiations with individual candidates. As a
result, the Committee may determine in a particular situation
that it is in our best interests to negotiate compensation
packages that deviate from the principles set forth above.
155
In fiscal 2010, the Committee and the board, elected not to use
the services of a compensation consultant, but instead chose to
evaluate our compensation programs based on generally available
market data including the following:
1. Market data provided by the Hay Group (a global human
resource consulting firm) for the following peer group of
companies: Air Products, Alcan, Altria Group Philip
Morris USA, Anheuser Busch, Arcelor Mittal, Ashland Inc., Bayer,
BHP Billiton, Caterpillar, Coca Cola Enterprises Inc.,
Dow Chemical Company, Eastman Chemical, Eaton Industries
Manufacturing GmbH, Hilti Corporation, Ingersoll Rand,
Kennametal, PPG Industries, Praxair Inc., Sab Miller, Saint
Gobain and Volkswagen Group.
2. Market data provided by Hay Group for companies of size
US$1Bn+ in revenues in the sectors of Manufacturing and
Materials. This information was provided for all levels of the
organization.
3. Data from several compensation surveys published by
leading global human resources consulting firms.
Elements
of Our Compensation Program
Our compensation program consists of the following key elements:
|
|
|
|
|
Base Pay
|
|
|
|
Short-Term (Annual) Incentives
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentives
|
|
|
|
Employee Benefits
|
The Committee periodically compares the competitiveness of these
key elements to that of companies in our peer group and to the
market data provided by the Hay Group, Hewitt Associates and
other human resources consulting firms. Our general goal is to
be at or near the 50th percentile among our peer group. In
fiscal 2010, this review revealed that the total direct
compensation opportunity for our executive officers was at our
target, without significant variation by position and by element
of compensation.
Base Pay. Based on market practices, the
Committee believes it is appropriate that some portion of total
direct compensation be provided in a form that is fixed and
liquid. Base salary for our named executive officers is
generally reviewed by the Committee in the first quarter of each
fiscal year and any increases are effective on July 1. In
setting base salary, the Committee is mindful of its overall
goal for allocation of total compensation to this element and
the median base salary for comparable positions at companies in
our peer group and as confirmed by additional market data.
Short-Term (Annual) Incentives. We believe
having an annual incentive opportunity is necessary to attract,
retain and reward key management. Our general philosophy is that
annual cash incentives should be based on achievement of
company-wide and business unit goals as appropriate for the
named executive officer. The Committee also retains the
discretion to adjust, up or down, annual cash incentives earned
based on the Committees subjective assessment of
individual performance. Annual incentives should be consistent
with the strategic goals set by the board, and the performance
benchmarks should be sufficiently ambitious so as to provide
meaningful incentive to our executive officers.
Annual
Incentive Plan 2009 2010
Our Committee and board, after input from management, approved
the Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) 2009
2010 to provide short-term incentives for fiscal 2010. The
performance benchmarks for the year were tied to four key
components: (1) Normalized Operating Earnings Before
Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
performance; (2) Operating Free Cash Flow performance;
(3) satisfaction of certain EHS objectives; and
(4) Individual Performance against objectives.
156
|
|
|
|
|
Normalized Operating EBITDA is our key financial metric
for business profitability. It is calculated by removing the
following four items from Operating EBITDA (or Segment Income as
reported in our external US GAAP financial statements):
|
(1) Metal Price Lag We remove from
Operating EBITDA the impacts from timing differences in the
pass-through of metal price changes to our customers, net of
realized derivative instruments.
(2) Re-measurement of Working Capital and
Debt We remove from Operating EBITDA the impacts
from re-measuring to current exchange rates any monetary assets
and liabilities which are denominated in a currency other than
the functional currency of the reporting unit, net of realized
derivative instruments.
(3) Purchase Accounting We remove from
Operating EBITDA the impacts from purchase accounting
amortizations, primarily related to the asset basis
step-up and
contracts which were adjusted to fair value on the date Novelis
was acquired by Hindalco.
(4) Can Price Ceilings We remove from
Operating EBITDA the impacts from sales contracts with metal
price ceilings, net of realized derivative instruments. (Note:
Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, this adjustment
will no longer be required since Novelis no longer has sales
contracts with metal price ceilings.)
The potential payout attributable to Normalized Operating EBITDA
performance could have ranged from: (1) 0% of target if
fiscal 2010 performance did not exceed the performance
threshold; (2) 100% of target if fiscal 2010 results met
the business plan target; and (3) up to a maximum of 200%
of target if fiscal 2010 results met or exceeded the high end
business plan target. For fiscal 2010, there was one
discretionary adjustment. During fiscal 2010, our South America
region increased its accounts receivable factoring programs from
a planned level of $18 million to $35 million at the
request of the corporate office. The adjustment removes the
$17 million unplanned benefit from the Operating Free Cash
Flow results, since this is a non-operational cash flow. The
related factoring expense of $0.8 million is also added
back to Normalized Operating EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Free Cash Flow is our key financial metric for
business cash generation. At a region level, it is calculated as
(1) Operating EBITDA (2) minus Capital Expenditures
(3) plus (minus) net cash inflows (outflows) for Working
Capital and Other Assets/Liabilities. For the total-company
metric, we also include net cash inflows (outflows) for
(4) Interest, (5) Taxes, (6) Dividends,
(7) Corporate Expenses, (8) Restructuring Charges and
(9) Proceeds from Asset Sales.
|
We also remove from Operating Free Cash Flow the impacts from
timing differences in the pass-through of metal price changes to
our customers, net of realized derivative instruments (which we
refer to as the metal price lag) and make an
adjustment to Operating Free Cash Flow to moderate the cash flow
impact of LME prices on year end metal inventory values. Our
formula varies based on the relative positions of actual and
budgeted LME prices in the fourth quarter, as a means of
aligning this adjustment with our desired inventory management
practices. The potential payout attributable to operating free
cash flow performance could have ranged from: (1) 0% of
target if fiscal 2010 performance did not exceed the performance
threshold; (2) 100% of target if fiscal 2010 results met
the business plan target; and (3) up to 200% of target if
fiscal 2010 results met or exceeded the high end business plan
target. For fiscal 2010, there was one discretionary adjustment.
During fiscal 2010, our South America region increased its
accounts receivable factoring programs from a planned level of
$18 million to $35 million at the request of the
corporate office. The adjustment removes the $17 million
unplanned benefit from the Operating Free Cash Flow results,
since this is a non-operational cash flow.
|
|
|
|
|
EHS objectives included Recordable Case Rates, Lost Time
Injury and Illness Case Rates and certain Strategic EHS
Initiatives. The Recordable Case Rate establishes targets for
reducing the level of workplace accidents resulting in an injury
requiring more than first aid treatment. The Lost Time Injury
and Illness Case Rate establishes targets for reducing the level
of workplace injuries or illnesses resulting in lost time of one
shift or more. The Strategic EHS Initiatives establish targets
for the
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
completion of environmental initiatives that lead to significant
reductions in water emissions, energy or waste aligned with site
specific issues, and, establish targets for the completion of
occupational health and safety initiatives that reduce site
specific risks and exposures.
|
The potential payout attributable to satisfying EHS objectives
also ranged from 0% to 200% of target and was measured against
continuous improvement targets for recordable cases and lost
time injuries and illness as well as the completion of strategic
EHS initiatives.
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance objectives are also established in
recognition of each individuals unique job
responsibilities. The potential payout attributable to
Individual Performance also ranged from 0% to 200% of target as
measured against individual performance targets.
|
The table below shows for each named executive officer, other
than Ms. Brooks who was not eligible for bonus for fiscal
2010, the target AIP bonus amount, the applicable performance
objectives and relevant weightings, target and actual
performance for each goal and the amount earned based on actual
performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement
|
|
|
|
|
as a % of
|
|
Target
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Actual
|
|
as a % of
|
|
Bonus
|
Name
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus ($)(A)
|
|
Objectives
|
|
Weighting
|
|
Performance (C)
|
|
Performance (C)
|
|
Target
|
|
Payoff ($)
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
398,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
504,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
147.9
|
%
|
|
|
27,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
18,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5.81
|
|
|
|
190.5
|
%
|
|
|
48,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,123,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
213,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
147.9
|
%
|
|
|
14,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
10,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5.81
|
|
|
|
190.5
|
%
|
|
|
25,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120.0
|
%
|
|
|
40,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
66,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Normalized Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
231.1
|
|
|
$
|
312.3
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
105.1
|
|
|
$
|
227.3
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
0.995
|
|
|
|
192.2
|
%
|
|
|
12,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
6,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
16,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120.0
|
%
|
|
|
25,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement
|
|
|
|
|
as a % of
|
|
Target
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Actual
|
|
as a % of
|
|
Bonus
|
Name
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus ($)(A)
|
|
Objectives
|
|
Weighting
|
|
Performance (C)
|
|
Performance (C)
|
|
Target
|
|
Payoff ($)
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
49,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Normalized Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
103.3
|
|
|
$
|
159.9
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
62,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
62,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
152.5
|
|
|
$
|
229.8
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
62,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
|
12,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
|
31,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci(B)
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
42,040
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
26,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
33,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
147.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5.81
|
|
|
|
190.5
|
%
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
201,367
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
63,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe Normalized Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
176.0
|
|
|
|
186.4
|
|
|
|
114.9
|
%
|
|
|
46,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
80,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
122.4
|
|
|
|
135.9
|
|
|
|
124.4
|
%
|
|
|
50,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Europe EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
12,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
161.1
|
%
|
|
|
9,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
178.5
|
%
|
|
|
14,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
20,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
All amounts earned in currencies other than U.S. dollars are
reflected in this table and in the entire Compensation
Discussion and Analysis as U.S. dollars as adjusted by the
exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
Mr. Nardocci receives AIP bonus consideration for two
months for his corporate role and for ten months for his role in
Europe. |
|
(C) |
|
Dollars ($) and Euros () in millions. |
In fiscal 2010, the Committee did not see the need to exercise
its discretion to adjust annual cash incentives earned under the
2010 AIP based on a subjective review of individual performance
159
Long-Term Incentives. The Committee believes
that a substantial portion of each executives total direct
compensation opportunity should be based on long-term
performance. The awards should align the interests of our
executives and our shareholder. The opportunity to receive
long-term incentive compensation by an executive in a given year
is generally determined by reference to the market for long-term
incentive compensation among our peer group companies group and
as confirmed by additional market data. The Committee is also
mindful of long-term incentive awards made in prior years and
takes such awards into account in determining the amount of
current-year awards.
Long-Term
Incentive Plan Fiscal 2008 Fiscal 2010
(2008 LTIP)
For the 2008 LTIP covering fiscal years 2008 through 2010, the
Committee granted awards that are cash-based awards, 80% of
which is based on economic profit performance and 20% of which
is based on EBITDA performance related to innovation projects,
which provided the best link between the interests of executives
and our shareholder.
The Committee met during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to
evaluate and approve fiscal 2010 payouts for the 2008 LTIP. The
Committee determined that maximum awards were payable for fiscal
2010 for economic profit performance and determined that awards
of 174.4% of target were payable for innovation EBITDA
performance, and, determined that no awards were payable for
cumulative economic profit performance. Ms. Brooks was not
eligible for payments under this plan for fiscal 2010.
Mr. Martens was not an employee at the time that grants
were made under this plan.
The following amounts were earned under this plan in fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eligible for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP
|
|
Based on
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
2010
|
|
Approved
|
|
Approved
|
Name
|
|
Grant ($)
|
|
Results ($)
|
|
Level
|
|
Payout ($)
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
124.8
|
%
|
|
|
336,960
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
215,000
|
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
|
|
124.8
|
%
|
|
|
160,992
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
124.8
|
%
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
124.8
|
%
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
Long-term
Incentive Plan Fiscal 2009 Fiscal 2012
(2009 LTIP)
For the 2009 LTIP covering fiscal years 2009 through 2012, the
board of directors redesigned the prior years LTIP with
the intent of providing a more direct line of sight for
participants to Company performance as measured by the increase
in the price of Hindalco shares. The 2009 LTIP was formally
approved by the directors on June 19, 2008.
Awards under the 2009 LTIP consist of performance-based stock
appreciation rights (SARs), with the value of one
SAR being equivalent to the increase in value of one Hindalco
share. The SARs will vest 25% each year for four years, subject
to performance criteria being fulfilled. The performance
criterion will be based on Operating EBIDTA performance for
Novelis each year. The vesting threshold will be 75% performance
versus target each year, at which point 75% of SARs due that
year, would vest. There would be a straight line vesting up to
100% of performance. After the SARs have vested, they can be
exercised at times decided by the employee. The value realized
is dependent on the stock price of Hindalco at the time of
exercise; however, the value will be restricted to a maximum of
2.5 times the target opportunity if the SARs are exercised
within one year of vesting. The maximum will be 3 times for SARs
exercised more than one year after vesting.
In the event a participant resigns, unvested SARs will lapse and
vested SARs must be exercised within 90 days. If an
employee retires more than one year from the date of grant, SARs
will continue to vest and must be exercised no later than the
third anniversary of retirement. In the event of death or
disability, there will be immediate vesting of all SARs with one
year to exercise. Upon a change in control, there would be
immediate vesting and cash-out of SARs.
160
The following grants were made to our named executive officers,
except for Mr. Martens who was not an employee at the time
the grants were made, under the 2009 LTIP. Target Operating
EBITDA for fiscal 2010 was exceeded and the second tranche of
SARs will fully vest on June 19, 2010, for fiscal 2010 as
shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
2009-2012
|
|
|
|
on June 19,
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP
|
|
Number of
|
|
2010
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
SARs
|
|
Based on
|
|
SARs Forfeited/
|
Name
|
|
Grant ($)
|
|
Granted
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
Canceled
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
|
2,231,000
|
|
|
|
3,919,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,919,938
|
(A)
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
878,516
|
|
|
|
219,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
878,516
|
|
|
|
219,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
614,961
|
|
|
|
153,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
614,961
|
|
|
|
153,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
These SARs were cancelled upon Ms. Brooks termination. |
Long-term
Incentive Plan Fiscal 2010 Fiscal 2013
(2010 LTIP)
The 2010 LTIP covering fiscal years 2010 through 2013 was
approved by the board of directors on June 25, 2009. The
2010 LTIP is identical to the 2009 LTIP except that the
performance measure is Normalized Operating EBITDA instead of
Operating EBITDA.
The following grants were made to our named executive officers,
except for Ms. Brooks who was not employed at the time of
the grant, under the 2010 LTIP. Target Normalized Operating
EBITDA for fiscal 2010 was exceeded and the first tranche of
SARs will fully vest on June 25, 2010 for fiscal 2010 as
shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs Vesting on
|
|
|
|
|
2010-2013
|
|
|
|
June 25,
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP
|
|
Number of
|
|
2010
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
SARs
|
|
Based on
|
|
SARs Forfeited/
|
Name
|
|
Grant ($)
|
|
Granted
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
Canceled
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,340,005
|
|
|
|
585,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
|
|
|
153,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
|
|
|
153,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
409,501
|
|
|
|
102,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
|
|
|
153,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual
Retention Agreements July 1, 2009
On July 1, 2009 we entered into individual retention
arrangements with all named executive officers except
Mr. Martens and Ms. Brooks. The agreements provide for
cash payments to the named executive officers on July 1,
2010, July 1 2011 and July 1, 2012, unless the named
executive officer voluntarily terminates or is terminated for
cause prior to those dates. The arrangements also provide for
the grant of phantom restricted shares, with one share equal to
the value of one Hindalco share. The phantom restricted shares
will vest on July 1, 2012, unless the named executive
officer voluntarily terminates or is terminated for cause prior
to that date; provided that the maximum payout may not exceed
two times the original value of the phantom restricted shares.
161
The cash amounts payable under the retention arrangements are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1,
|
|
July 1,
|
|
July 1,
|
|
|
2010 ($)
|
|
2011 ($)
|
|
2012 ($)
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
70,067
|
|
|
|
70,067
|
|
|
|
70,067
|
|
The phantom restricted share opportunity (payable in cash) is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of Phantom
|
|
|
Original
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Value ($)
|
|
Shares
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
103,667
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
74,871
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
114,000
|
|
|
|
65,656
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
154,020
|
|
|
|
88,704
|
|
Employee
Benefits
Following our spinoff from Alcan, we adopted the Novelis Pension
Plan and the Novelis Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the
Novelis SERP), which provide benefits identical to the benefits
provided under the Alcancorp Pension Plans. Executives who were
participants in the Alcancorp Pension Plan participate in the
Novelis Pension Plan and Novelis SERP (collectively referred to
as the U.S. Pension Plan). Executives who were not
participants in the Alcancorp Pension Plan or who were hired on
or after January 1, 2005 do not participate in the
U.S. Pension Plan. Ms. Brooks and Messrs. Germain
and Walpole are all participants in the U.S. Pension Plan.
Additional Pension Benefits: In addition to
her participation in the U.S. Pension Plan described above,
Ms. Brooks will receive from us a supplemental pension
equal to the excess of the pension she would have received from
her employer prior to joining Alcan had she been covered by her
prior employers pension plan until her separation or
retirement from Novelis, over the sum of her pension from the
U.S. Pension Plan and the pension rights actually accrued
with her previous employer. The supplemental pension will be
$1,363 per month beginning at age 55 (July 1, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
Savings Plan and Non-Qualified Defined Contribution
Plan: All U.S. based executives are eligible
to participate in our tax qualified savings plan. We match up to
4.5% of pay (up to the IRS compensation limit; $245,000 for
calendar year 2010) for participants who contribute 6% of
pay or more to the savings plan. In addition, U.S. based
executives hired on or after January 1, 2005 are eligible
to share in our discretionary contributions. Discretionary
contributions are first made to the qualified plan (up to the
IRS compensation limit) and any excess amounts are made to our
non-qualified defined contribution plan. For fiscal 2010, we
made a discretionary contribution equal to 5% of pay.
Mr. Martens and Mr. Fisher are the only named
executive officers eligible for a discretionary contribution for
the period.
|
|
|
|
Brazil Defined Contribution Pension Plan: All
Brazil employees are eligible to participate in a defined
contribution pension plan. Employees can contribute from 0-12%
of base salary. Independent of any employee contribution, the
company will contribute 0.7% of base pay up to 1 plan unit
($1,486 in 2010) and 14% (10% if hired on or after
July 1, 2003) of pay in excess of 1 plan unit.
Mr. Nardocci was the only named executive eligible for the
Brazil Pension Plan.
|
|
|
|
Perquisites: As noted in our Summary
Compensation Table, we provide our officers with certain
perquisites consistent with market practice. We do not view
perquisites as a significant element of our comprehensive
compensation structure.
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Welfare
Benefits: Executives are entitled to participate
in our employee benefit plans (including medical, dental,
disability, and life insurance benefits) on the same basis as
other employees.
|
Employment-Related
Agreements
Each of our named executive officers during fiscal 2010 was
covered by an employment or letter agreement setting forth the
general terms of his or her employment as well as various other
employment related agreements.
See Employment-Related Agreements and Certain Employee Benefit
Plans below for a discussion of these agreements.
Timing of
Compensation Decisions
The Committee develops an annual agenda to assist it in
fulfilling its responsibilities. Generally, in the first quarter
of each fiscal year, the Committee (1) reviews prior year
performance and authorizes the distribution of short-term
incentive and long-term incentive pay-outs, if any, for the
prior year, (2) establishes performance criteria for the
current year short-term incentive program, (3) reviews base
pay and annual short-term incentive targets for executives, and
(4) recommends to the board of directors the form of award
and performance criteria for the current cycle of the long-term
incentive program.
Long-term incentive awards are generally considered and approved
by the Committee during the first quarter of each fiscal year,
although the Committee may deviate from this practice when
appropriate under the circumstances.
Compensation
Risk Assessment
In fiscal 2010, the Committee reviewed the Companys
executive compensation policies and practices, and determined
that the Companys executive compensation programs are not
reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the
Company. The Committee also reviewed the Companys
compensation programs for certain design features which have
been identified by experts as having the potential to encourage
excessive risk-taking, including: (i) too much focus on
equity; (ii) compensation mix overly weighted toward annual
incentives; (iii) uncapped payouts; (iv) unreasonable
goals or thresholds; or (v) steep payout cliffs at certain
performance levels that may encourage short-term decisions to
meet payout thresholds. Based on its review, the Committee
determined that, for all employees, the Companys
non-executive compensation programs do not encourage excessive
risk and instead encourage behaviors that support sustainable
value creation.
Compensation
Committee Report
The Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing
Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on
the Committees review of and discussions with management,
the Committee recommended to the board of directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2010.
The foregoing report is provided by the following directors, who
constitute the Committee:
Mr. Clarence J. Chandran, Chairman
Mr. Debnarayan Bhattacharya
Mr. Askaran Agarwala
163
Summary
Compensation Table
The table below sets forth information regarding compensation
for our named executive officers for fiscal 2008 through 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Plan
|
|
Pension
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Value
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(A)
|
|
($)(B)
|
|
($)(C)
|
|
($)(D)
|
|
($)(E)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
173,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,808
|
|
|
|
13,412
|
|
|
|
1,149,860
|
|
Former President and
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
731,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,104
|
|
|
|
2,231,000
|
|
|
|
113,850
|
|
|
|
344,054
|
|
|
|
90,666
|
|
|
|
3,721,924
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
672,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
896,739
|
|
|
|
10,466,761
|
|
|
|
1,096,223
|
|
|
|
97,640
|
|
|
|
92,991
|
|
|
|
13,322,926
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
670,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,123,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,350
|
|
|
|
4,132,958
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
911,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,428
|
|
|
|
2,142,410
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,370
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
46,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,657
|
|
|
|
1,081,602
|
|
Financial Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
334,538
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
171,780
|
|
|
|
386,927
|
|
|
|
361,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,732
|
|
|
|
1,358,152
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
325,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
542,142
|
|
|
|
40,886
|
|
|
|
86,333
|
|
|
|
1,649,405
|
|
Senior Vice President and
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
318,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,140
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
15,422
|
|
|
|
24,847
|
|
|
|
126,681
|
|
|
|
1,025,715
|
|
President of Novelis North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
524,977
|
|
|
|
369,297
|
|
|
|
425,936
|
|
|
|
2,069,210
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
281,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,033
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
26,177
|
|
|
|
221,833
|
|
|
|
539,251
|
|
|
|
1,470,544
|
|
and President of Novelis Asia
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,752
|
|
|
|
981,865
|
|
|
|
210,890
|
|
|
|
59,765
|
|
|
|
607,032
|
|
|
|
2,347,304
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
457,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,020
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
611,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,327
|
|
|
|
2,101,275
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and President of Novelis Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
For the year ended March 31, 2010, these stock awards
represent the grant date fair value of the phantom restricted
shares granted on July 1, 2009 under the Individual
Retention Agreements. For the phantom restricted shares, the
fair value is calculated by using the market value of the
corresponding number of Hindalco shares on the date of grant. |
|
(B) |
|
For the years ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010,
includes the grant date fair value of the SARs granted under the
2009 LTIP and 2010 LTIP. For the year ended March 31, 2010
fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes value on the
date of grant of $0.8547 per SAR. Also represents the grant date
fair value of the SARs granted to Ms. Brooks under her
Separation Release Agreement. |
|
(C) |
|
For the year ended March 31, 2010, these represent awards
earned under the Novelis fiscal 2010 Annual Incentive Plan and
payments under the 2008 LTIP for fiscal 2010 results. |
|
(D) |
|
Represents the aggregate change in actuarial present value of
the named executive officers accumulated benefit under our
qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans during
fiscal 2010. Assumptions used in the calculation of these
amounts are included in Note 12 to our audited consolidated
financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2010. |
|
(E) |
|
The amounts shown in the All Other Compensation Column reflect
the values from the table below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
|
|
|
|
Relocation and
|
|
|
|
Perquisites and
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Contribution
|
|
Group
|
|
Hosing Related
|
|
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
Plans
|
|
Life
|
|
Payments
|
|
Child Tuition
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
Payments ($)
|
|
($) (A)
|
|
Insurance ($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Reimbursement ($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,083
|
(B)
|
|
|
13,412
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,442
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
259,672
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,261
|
(D)
|
|
|
338,350
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,417
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,349
|
(E)
|
|
|
75,428
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,244
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,252
|
|
|
|
22,381
|
(F)
|
|
|
86,333
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
421,324
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425,936
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,444
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
232,494
|
(H)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,785
|
(I)
|
|
|
353,327
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents matching contribution (and discretionary
contributions in the case of Mr. Martens and
Mr. Fisher) made to our tax qualified and non-qualified
defined contribution plans. |
164
|
|
|
(B) |
|
Includes executive flex allowance, car allowance, and other
perquisites, each of which individually had an aggregate
incremental cost less than $25,000. |
|
(C) |
|
Includes (i) home sale closing costs of $42,500;
(ii) relocation allowance of $60,000; (iii) home
purchase closing costs of $20,596; (iv) Temporary Living of
$26,345 and (v) tax payments of $110,231. |
|
(D) |
|
Includes executive flex allowance, car allowance and home
security, each of which individually had an aggregate
incremental cost less than $25,000. |
|
(E) |
|
Includes executive flex allowance, car allowance and home
security, each of which individually had an aggregate
incremental cost less than $25,000. |
|
(F) |
|
Includes executive flex allowance, car allowance and other
perquisites, each of which individually had an aggregate
incremental cost less than $25,000. |
|
(G) |
|
Includes: (i) an Expatriate Premium of $119,503;
(ii) Employer paid Korean Tax Deposit of $130,024;
(iii) Employer provided housing of $97,330;
(iv) Employer paid car/driver for Korean assignment of
$55,221; (v) travel reimbursement of $5,577;(vi) club dues
of $10,939 and (vii) tax advice of $2,730. |
|
(H) |
|
Includes: (i) an Expatriate Premium of $19,548, household
goods move of $2,313 and relocation allowances of $210,633. |
|
(I) |
|
Includes health care expenses, company car allowance and home
security each of which individually had an aggregate incremental
cost less than $25,000. |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2010
The table below sets forth information regarding grants of
plan-based awards made to our named executive officers for the
year ended March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payout
|
|
Estimated Future Payout
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards(A)
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Martha Brooks
|
|
|
05/08/2009(B
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672,345
|
|
|
|
1,801,168
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
06/25/2009(C
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
1,260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
06/25/2009(C
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
1,575,000
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/2009(D
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
06/25/2009(C
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
|
|
422,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
1,575,000
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/2009(D
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
06/25/2009(C
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
|
|
313,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/2009(D
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,000
|
|
|
|
228,000
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
06/25/2009(C
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,407
|
|
|
|
486,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
1,575,000
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/2009(D
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,020
|
|
|
|
308,040
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
This grant was made under the Novelis Annual Incentive Plan
(AIP) for the year ended March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
This grant was made under the terms of Ms. Brooks
Separation Release Agreement. |
|
(C) |
|
These grants were made under the 2010 LTIP in the form of SARs. |
|
(D) |
|
These grants were made under the individual retention agreements
in the form of phantom restricted shares. |
165
Employment-Related
Agreements and Certain Employee Benefit Plans
Each of our named executive officers was subject to an
employment or letter agreement during fiscal 2010. The terms of
each such agreement is summarized below.
Agreement
with Martha Finn Brooks
On May 8, 2009, we entered into a separation and release
agreement with Ms. Brooks, regarding the terms of her
departure from the Company. The Agreement became effective on
May 15, 2009, seven days from the date of execution.
Pursuant to the Agreement, Ms. Brooks received a goodwill
incentive consisting of 1,000,000 stock appreciation rights of
Hindalco common stock (SARs) at an exercise price of INR 60.50.
Each SAR was equivalent to one Hindalco share. The SARs, which
vested on May 8, 2009, could be exercised, in whole or in
part, at any time during a three year exercise period commencing
May 8, 2009. Ms. Brooks elected to exercise all of her
SARs on December 3, 2009 for a value of $1,801,168.
Additionally, we agreed to indemnify Ms. Brooks under our
director and officer insurance policies and released her from
future claims relating to her employment with Novelis.
Ms. Brooks was granted the goodwill incentive, in part, as
an acknowledgement that she voluntarily delayed her retirement
with the Company (a) until her successor could be
identified and (b) to facilitate an efficient leadership
transition. Additionally, as further consideration for the
goodwill incentive, Ms. Brooks: provided a release to
Novelis waiving any and all claims she may have against us;
agreed to provide continued cooperation with any pending or
future litigation, proceeding or hearing; and agreed to not
disclose any proprietary information obtained while working at
Novelis. Ms. Brooks also agreed to provide general
consulting services to Novelis for up to 10 hours a month
for a period of six months. Should she provide more than
10 hours of consulting per month, Ms. Brooks will be
paid at an hourly rate of $625 subject to a maximum of $5,000
per day.
Agreement
with Philip Martens
On April 16, 2009, the board of directors appointed Philip
Martens to succeed Ms. Brooks as President and Chief
Operating Officer, effective May 8, 2009. On that date, the
board ratified the employment agreement between Mr. Martens
and the Company dated April 11, 2009. Pursuant to this
employment agreement, Mr. Martens will receive an annual
base salary of $700,000, an annual short term target bonus
percentage of 90% of his base salary (i.e., $630,000), and an
annualized long term incentive target opportunity of $2,000,000.
However, during his first year of employment, Mr. Martens
will receive not less than 50% of the target of his annual short
term target bonus for the fiscal 2010 (i.e., $315,000).
Mr. Martens will receive benefits and perquisites
customarily provided to our executives. He will be entitled to
receive two years annual base salary and target short term
incentive opportunity (less any other severance payments) as
severance pay if he is terminated involuntarily except for
cause, death, disability, or retirement. Other severance
benefits described in his employment agreement include a lump
sum payment to assist him with post-employment medical
continuation coverage, life insurance benefits, and retirement
benefits.
As part of the employment agreement, Mr. Martens agreed to
a non-competition provision, prohibiting him from competing with
the Company during his employment and for a period of
24 months thereafter. He also agreed to not solicit
(a) the Companys customers and suppliers or
(b) its employees during his employment and for a period of
24 months thereafter.
His employment agreement also states that Mr. Martens will
receive an agreement providing employment protection in the
event of a change in control of the Company. Accordingly, the
Company and Mr. Martens entered into a Change in Control
Agreement dated as of April 16, 2009 (the CIC Agreement).
The CIC Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of
(i) April 15, 2011, unless a change in control event
occurs on or before such date, or (ii) 24 months
following the date of a change in control event. Pursuant to the
CIC
166
Agreement, he will be entitled to the following payments if the
Company terminates his employment other than for cause, or if he
resigns for good reason, within 24 months after a change in
control event:
|
|
|
|
|
a lump sum cash amount equal to two times the sum of
(1) his annual base salary plus (2) his target short
term incentive opportunity for the calendar year in which the
change in control occurs; the lump sum cash amount will be
reduced by the amount of severance payments, if any, paid or
payable to him other than pursuant to the CIC Agreement to avoid
duplication of payments;
|
|
|
|
other benefits described in the CIC Agreement including a lump
sum payment to assist him with post-employment medical
continuation coverage, life insurance benefits, and retirement
benefits; and
|
|
|
|
a gross-up
reimbursement for any excise tax liability imposed by
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.
|
Such payments shall not be made if his employment terminates
because of death, disability, or retirement.
Agreement
with Steven Fisher
Mr. Fisher currently serves as our Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer (effective May 16,
2007) with a base salary of $450,000 in fiscal 2010 under
the terms of his employment agreement. Mr. Fisher is
eligible for all of our executive long-term and short-term
incentive plans and is entitled to certain executive
perquisites. He is also eligible for our broad-based employee
benefit and health plans.
Agreement
with Jean-Marc Germain
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Germain
dated April 28, 2008. He currently serves as our Senior
Vice President and President of Novelis North America (effective
May 15, 2008) with a base salary of $325,000 in fiscal
2010. Mr. Germain is eligible for all of our executive
long-term and short-term incentive plans and is entitled to
certain executive perquisites. He is also eligible for certain
tuition reimbursements for the education of his children through
the end of the 2009 2010 school year. He is also
eligible for our broad-based employee benefit and health plans.
Agreement
with Thomas Walpole
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Walpole
effective as of February 1, 2007, pursuant to which he
serves as our Senior Vice President and President of Novelis
Asia with a base salary of $285,000 in fiscal 2010. Under his
agreement, Mr. Walpole is entitled to an expatriate premium
and relocation allowance, each in amount equal to 10% of his
base salary (net after tax). Mr. Walpole is also eligible
for our executive long-term and short-term incentive plans and
certain executive perquisites as well as our broad-based
employee benefit and health plans. During the term of his Korean
assignment, Mr. Walpole is provided with a fully furnished
home which is paid for by Novelis Korea Limited and is entitled
to certain other relocation benefits the value of which is
included in the Summary Compensation Table.
Agreement
with Tadeu Nardocci
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Nardocci
effective as of June 8, 2009, pursuant to which he serves
as our Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Europe
with a base salary of $390,954. Under his agreement,
Mr. Nardocci is entitled to an expatriate premium in amount
equal to 10% of his base salary (net after tax).
Mr. Nardocci is also eligible for our executive long-term
and short-term incentive plans and certain executive perquisites
as well as our broad-based employee benefit and health plans.
During the term of his European assignment, Mr. Nardocci is
provided with certain other relocation benefits the value of
which is included in the Summary Compensation Table.
167
Change
in Control Agreements
We entered into a Change in Control Agreement with
Mr. Martens on April 16, 2009 as described above. On
June 25, 2009 we entered into substantially similar
agreements with Messrs. Fisher, Germain, Walpole and
Nardocci.
Severance
Compensation Agreements
On June 25, 2009, we entered into Severance Compensation
Agreements with Messrs. Fisher, Germain, Walpole and
Nardocci. Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, the
executive will be entitled to receive 18 months annual base
salary (less any other severance payments) as severance pay if
he is involuntarily terminated other than for cause, death,
disability or retirement. Additional severance benefits include
a 12-month
lump sum payment to assist with post-employment medical
continuation coverage unless eligible for retiree medical
coverage, as well as life insurance and retirement benefits for
12 months. Each agreement also contains a non-competition
and non-solicitation provision which prohibits the executive
from competing with us or soliciting our customers, suppliers or
employee for a period of 18 months following termination.
Outstanding
Equity Awards as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAR Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
SAR Exercise
|
|
|
Name
|
|
SARs Exercisable
|
|
SARs Unexercisable
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
SAR Expiration Date
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,340,005
|
(A)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2016
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
(A)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,887
|
(B)
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
(A)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,887
|
(B)
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,501
|
(A)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,221
|
(B)
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
(A)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,221
|
(B)
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
SARs issued in fiscal 2010 are payable in cash based on the
stock performance of Hindalco Industries Limited, listed on the
National Stock Exchange in Mumbai, India. Novelis is a
subsidiary of Hindalco Industries Limited. The Exercise price of
85.79 Indian Rupees converted to US$ based on the closing
exchange rate on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
SARs issued in fiscal 2009 are payable in cash based on the
stock performance of Hindalco Industries Limited, listed on the
National Stock Exchange in Mumbai, India. Novelis is a
subsidiary of Hindalco Industries Limited. The Exercise price of
60.5 Indian Rupees converted to US$ based on the closing
exchange rate on March 31, 2010. |
168
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested in 2010
The table below sets forth the information regarding stock
options that were exercised or were cancelled and paid out
during fiscal 2010 and stock awards that vested and were paid
out during fiscal 2010. Ms. Brooks exercised all of her
vested SARs on December 3, 2009. There were no other SARs
that were vested during fiscal 2010 and none available for
exercise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
Realized on
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
Realized on
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
Vesting or
|
|
Vesting or
|
Name
|
|
Cancellation
|
|
Cancellation ($)
|
|
Cancellation
|
|
Cancellation ($)
|
|
Martha Brooks
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,801,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
Benefits in Fiscal 2010
The table below sets forth information regarding the present
value as of March 31, 2010 of the accumulated benefits of
our named executive officers under our defined benefit pension
plans (both qualified and non-qualified). U.S. executives
who were hired on or after January 1, 2005 are not eligible
to participate in our defined benefit pension plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Present
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Value of
|
|
During
|
|
|
|
|
Credited
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Last
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name(A)
|
|
Service
|
|
Benefit ($) (B)
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
Novelis Pension Plan
|
|
|
6.917
|
|
|
|
158,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis SERP
|
|
|
6.917
|
|
|
|
1,001,716
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
Not eligible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
Not eligible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
Novelis Pension Plan
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
|
52,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis SERP
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
|
36,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
Novelis Pension Plan
|
|
|
30.833
|
|
|
|
961,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis SERP
|
|
|
30.833
|
|
|
|
767,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
Not eligible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
See Compensation Discussion and Analysis Elements of
Our Compensation, Employee Benefits for a discussion of these
plans. |
|
(B) |
|
See Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended March 31, 2010, for a
discussion of the assumptions used in the calculation of these
amounts. |
|
(C) |
|
Includes an amount of $163,360 as the present value of
accumulated benefit under the Cummins Minimum Pension Guarantee
as outlined as part of Ms. Brooks employment
agreement. |
The following table shows estimated retirement benefits,
expressed as a percentage of eligible earnings, payable upon
normal retirement at age 65:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years of Service
|
|
|
10
|
|
15
|
|
20
|
|
25
|
|
30
|
|
35
|
|
U.S. Pension Plan
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
169
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation
This table summarizes the fiscal 2010 Novelis contributions and
earnings for Messrs. Martens and Fisher to the Defined
Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elective
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
Balance at Last
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Distributions
|
|
Fiscal Year End
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,542
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,630
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,579
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,630
|
|
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
This section provides an estimate of the payments and benefits
that would be paid to certain of our named executive officers,
at March 31, 2010, upon voluntary or involuntary
termination of employment. This section, however, does not
reflect any payments or benefits that would be paid to our
salaried employees generally, including for example accrued
salary and vacation pay; regular pension benefits under our
qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans; normal
distribution of account balances under our qualified and
non-qualified defined contribution plans; or normal retirement,
death or disability benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip Martens(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Us without
|
|
Change in
|
|
Death or
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive ($)
|
|
Us for Cause($)
|
|
Cause ($)
|
|
Control ($)
|
|
Disability($)
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,660,000
|
(D)
|
|
|
2,660,000
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,525
|
(F)
|
|
|
77,525
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Lump sum cash payment for continuation of health coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,310
|
(H)
|
|
|
27,310
|
(I)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,260
|
(J)
|
|
|
1,260
|
(K)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,396,095
|
|
|
|
5,396,095
|
|
|
|
2,630,000
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $53,846
at March 31, 2010). Mr. Martens was not eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2010
assuming the SARs under the 2010 LTIP valued at the target
amount. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Employment Agreement. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Employment Agreement. |
170
|
|
|
(G) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(H) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Employment Agreement, this
amount is intended to assist the executive in paying
post-employment health coverage and is equal to 12 months
times the COBRA premium rate in effect at March 31, 2010,
grossed up for applicable taxes using an assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(I) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement,
this amount is intended to assist the executive in paying
post-employment health coverage and is equal to 12 months
times the COBRA premium rate in effect at March 31, 2010,
grossed up for applicable taxes using an assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(J) |
|
The executives Employment Agreement provides that the
executive will be entitled to one additional year of coverage
under our group life insurance plan. |
|
(K) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Us without
|
|
Change in
|
|
Death or
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive ($)
|
|
Us for Cause ($)
|
|
Cause ($)
|
|
Control ($)
|
|
Disability ($)
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
336,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336,960
|
|
|
|
1,236,960
|
|
|
|
1,236,960
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
(D)
|
|
|
1,575,000
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,400
|
(F)
|
|
|
50,400
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Lump sum cash payment for continuation of health coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,310
|
(H)
|
|
|
27,310
|
(I)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
716
|
(J)
|
|
|
716
|
(K)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
674,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427,886
|
|
|
|
3,227,886
|
|
|
|
1,574,460
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $34,615
at March 31, 2010). Mr. Fisher was not eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) under LTIP Plans (2008 at actual, 2009 and 2010 at
target) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to 1.5 times the executives base
salary and would be payable pursuant to the executives
Severance Compensation Agreement. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Severance Compensation Agreement. |
|
(G) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(H) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Severance Compensation
Agreement, this amount is intended to assist the executive in
paying post-employment health coverage and is equal to
12 months times the COBRA |
171
|
|
|
|
|
premium rate in effect at March 31, 2010, grossed up for
applicable taxes using an assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(I) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement,
this amount is intended to assist the executive in paying
post-employment health coverage and is equal to 12 months
times the COBRA premium rate in effect at March 31, 2010,
grossed up for applicable taxes using an assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(J) |
|
The executives Severance Compensation Agreement provides
that the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
(K) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Us without
|
|
Change in
|
|
Death or
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive ($)
|
|
Us for Cause ($)
|
|
Cause ($)
|
|
Control ($)
|
|
Disability ($)
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
|
|
211,500
|
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
160,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,992
|
|
|
|
1,060,992
|
|
|
|
1,060,992
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,500
|
(D)
|
|
|
1,072,500
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,465
|
(F)
|
|
|
52,465
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Lump sum cash payment for continuation of health coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,310
|
(H)
|
|
|
27,310
|
(I)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516
|
(J)
|
|
|
516
|
(K)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
372,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940,033
|
|
|
|
2,425,283
|
|
|
|
1,272,242
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $25,000
at March 31, 2010). Mr. Germain was not eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) under LTIP Plans (2008 at actual, 2009 and 2010 at
target) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to 1.5 times executives base salary
and would be paid pursuant to the executives Severance
Compensation Agreement. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Severance Compensation Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table
for pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(G) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table for
pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(H) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Severance Compensation
Agreement, this amount is intended to assist the executive in
paying post-employment health coverage and is equal to
12 months times the COBRA premium rate in effect at
March 31, 2010, grossed up for applicable taxes using an
assumed tax rate of 40%. |
172
|
|
|
(I) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement,
this amount is intended to assist the executive in paying
post-employment health coverage and is equal to 12 months
times the COBRA premium rate in effect at March 31, 2010,
grossed up for applicable taxes using an assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(J) |
|
The executives Severance Compensation Agreement provides
that the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
(K) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Us without
|
|
Change in
|
|
Death or
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive($)
|
|
Us for Cause($)
|
|
Cause($)
|
|
Control ($)
|
|
Disability($)
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
|
|
855,860
|
|
|
|
855,860
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510,625
|
(D)
|
|
|
883,500
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,323
|
(F)
|
|
|
64,323
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
(H)
|
|
|
2,198
|
(I)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
400,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977,256
|
|
|
|
1,962,631
|
|
|
|
1,012,610
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $21,923
at March 31, 2010). Mr. Walpole was eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) under LTIP Plans (2008 at actual, 2009 and 2010 at
target) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to the benefit payable under the Novelis
Severance Pay Plan. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Severance Compensation Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table
for pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(G) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table for
pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(H) |
|
The executives Severance Compensation Agreement provides
that the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
173
|
|
|
(I) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Termination by
|
|
Us without
|
|
Change in
|
|
Death or
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive ($)
|
|
Us for Cause ($)
|
|
Cause ($)
|
|
Control ($)
|
|
Disability ($)
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
|
243,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,407
|
|
|
|
243,407
|
|
|
|
243,407
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
|
|
1,030,860
|
|
|
|
1,030,860
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586,432
|
(D)
|
|
|
1,251,054
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,444
|
(F)
|
|
|
88,444
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
(H)
|
|
|
1,544
|
(I)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
486,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163,187
|
|
|
|
2,615,309
|
|
|
|
1,274,267
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $45,110
at March 31, 2010). Mr. Nardocci was eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) under LTIP Plans (2008 at actual, 2009 and 2010 at
target) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to 1.5 times executives base salary
and would be paid pursuant to the executives Severance
Compensation Agreement. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Severance Compensation Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table
for pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(G) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table for
pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(H) |
|
The executives Severance Compensation Agreement provides
that the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
(I) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
Director
Compensation for Directors for Fiscal 2010
The Chairman of our board of directors is entitled to receive
cash compensation equal to $250,000 per year, and the Chair of
our Audit Committee is entitled to receive $175,000 per year.
Each of our other directors is entitled to receive compensation
equal to $150,000 per year, plus an additional $5,000 if he is a
member of our Audit Committee. Directors fees are paid in
quarterly installments.
On July 8, 2008, our Chairman of the board, Mr. Birla,
informed the company that due to current and foreseeable
business conditions, he was foregoing the payment of his Novelis
director fees until further notice. On November 5, 2008,
Mr. Stewart informed the board that he was also foregoing
his Novelis director fees with effective date of July 1,
2008 until further notice. All directors, however, will continue
to receive
174
reimbursement for
out-of-pocket
expenses associated with attending board and Committee meetings.
The table below sets forth the total compensation received by
our non-employee directors for the year ended March 31,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
Name
|
|
Paid in Cash ($)
|
|
Kumar Mangalam Birla
|
|
|
|
|
D. Bhattacharya
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
Askaran K. Agarwala
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Clarence J. Chandran
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
Donald A. Stewart
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
In fiscal 2010, only Independent Directors served on the
Committee. Clarence J. Chandran was the Chairman of the
Committee. The other Committee members during all or part of the
year were Mr. D. Bhattacharya and Mr. Askaran
Agarwala. During fiscal 2010, none of our executive officers
served as:
|
|
|
|
|
a member of the Committee (or other board committee performing
equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee,
the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose
executive officers served on our Committee;
|
|
|
|
a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers
served on our Committee; or
|
|
|
|
a member of the Committee (or other board committee performing
equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee,
the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose
executive officers served as one of our directors.
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Shareholder Matters
|
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary AV Metals Inc.
(Acquisition Sub) pursuant to a plan of arrangement (the
Arrangement) entered into on February 10, 2007 and approved
by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on May 14, 2007.
Subsequent to completion of the Arrangement on May 15,
2007, all of our common shares were indirectly held by Hindalco.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions and Director
Independence
|
In accordance with our Audit Committee charter, we maintain
various policies and procedures that govern related party
transactions. Pursuant to our Code of Conduct for the Board of
Directors and Senior Managers, senior managers and directors of
the Company (a) must avoid any action that creates or
appears to create, a conflict of interest between their own
interest and the interest of the Company, (b) cannot usurp
corporate opportunities, and (c) must deal fairly with
third parties. This policy is available on our website at
www.novelis.com. In addition, we have enacted procedures to
monitor related party transactions by (x) identifying
possible related parties through questions in our director and
officer questionnaires, (y) determining whether we receive
payments from or make payments to any of the identified related
parties, and (z) if we determine payments are made or
received, researching the nature of the interactions between the
Company and the related parties and ensuring that the related
person does not have an interest in the transaction with the
related party. The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing
and approving the terms and conditions of all potential related
party transactions that involve the Company, one of our
directors or executive officers or any of their immediate family
members.
On February 12, 2009, we entered into an unsecured credit
facility of $100 million with an interest rate of 13% and a
scheduled maturity date of January 15, 2015, from a company
affiliated with Hindalco. Our Chairman, Kumar Mangalam Birla,
serves as Chairman of Hindalco, and two of our other directors,
175
Debnaryan Bhattacharya and Askaran Agarwala, are also directors
of Hindalco; thus, we consider the unsecured credit facility to
be a related party transaction. The largest aggregate amount of
principal outstanding under the facility was $94 million,
and the amount of interest paid with respect to the facility was
$2 million. The facility was repaid in August 2009 using
proceeds from the issuance of our 11.5% Senior Notes.
On December 11, 2009, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Novelis
UK Limited, entered into an agreement with Hindalco to sell
certain equipment previously used in the operation of our
aluminum sheet mill in Rogerstone, South Wales, U.K., which
ceased operations in April 2009. The equipment purchase
agreement requires Hindalco to pay Novelis UK Limited a purchase
price of $17 million, and the transaction is anticipated to
close in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The purchase price
for the equipment is based on a third-party valuation, and we
believe the terms of this transaction are comparable to the
terms that would have been reached with a third party on an
arms-length basis. Because of the relationship three of our
directors have with Hindalco, we consider the equipment sale to
be a related party transaction. We have not entered into any
other related party transactions since March 31, 2009 that
meet the requirements for disclosure in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
See Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and
Corporate Governance Board of Directors and
Corporate Governance Matters for additional information
regarding the independence of our Board of Directors.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has served as our independent
registered public accounting firm since our spin-off from Alcan
on January 6, 2005. The following table shows fees and
expenses paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for services
rendered for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Audit fees(1)
|
|
$
|
5,304,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,381,200
|
|
Audit-Related Fees(2)
|
|
|
209,500
|
|
|
|
40,300
|
|
Tax Fees(3)
|
|
|
529,300
|
|
|
|
1,092,100
|
|
All Other Fees(4)
|
|
|
71,500
|
|
|
|
41,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,114,300
|
|
|
$
|
7,555,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represent fees for professional services rendered and expenses
incurred for the audit of the Companys annual financial
statements, review of financial statements included in the
Companys
Form 10-Qs
and services that are normally provided by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with statutory and
regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal periods. |
|
(2) |
|
Represent fees for assurance related services that are
reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of
our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under
Audit Fees. These services include certain advisory
services related to internal controls. |
|
(3) |
|
Represent fees for services related to transfer pricing studies
and review of our U.S. tax returns. |
|
(4) |
|
Represent fees for an on-line research tool and review of an
accounting system implementation. |
Pre-Approval
of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services
The charter of the Audit Committee provides that the Committee
is responsible for the pre-approval of all audit and permissible
non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors.
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of
services provided by the independent auditors. The policy gives
detailed guidance to management as to the specific services that
are eligible for general pre-approval and provides specific cost
limits for certain services on an annual basis. Pursuant to the
policy and the Audit
176
Committee charter, the Audit Committee has granted to its
chairman the authority to address any requests for pre-approval
of individual services.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
1.
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
None.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited,
AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of
February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 13, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Novelis Inc. Amended and Restated Bylaws, adopted as of
July 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 25, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis Inc. and CIBC
Mellon Trust Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 30, 2005
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Shareholder Rights Agreement between
Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, dated as of
February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed February 13, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Specimen Certificate of Novelis Inc. Common Shares (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Registration Statement
on
Form 10-12B
filed on December 27, 2004 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Indenture, relating to the 71/4% Senior Notes due 2015,
dated as of February 3, 2005, between the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of
New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Note for 71/4% Senior Notes due 2015 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement
on
Form S-4
filed on August 3, 2005 (File
No. 333-127139))
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, between the Company, Novelis Finances
USA LLC, Novelis South America Holdings LLC, Aluminum Upstream
Holdings LLC and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to our
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to our Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed on December 1, 2006 (File
No. 333-127139))
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, among the Company, Novelis No. 1
Limited Partnership, and the Bank of New York
Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, dated as of May 14,
2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, among the Company, Novelis Luxembourg
SA, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as
trustee, dated as of January 29, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.8 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, among the Company, Bellona-Trading
Internacional, Sociedade Unipessoal, LDA, and The Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, dated as of
June 26, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.9 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, among the Company, Novelis Services
Limited, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company
N.A., as trustee, dated as of July 10, 2008 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
4
|
.11
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, among the Company, Novelis PAE SAS, and
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company N.A., as trustee,
dated as of September 16, 2008 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.11 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.12
|
|
Indenture, relating to the 111/2% Senior Notes due 2015,
dated as of August 11, 2009, between the Company, the
guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of
New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to our
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on September 11, 2009 (File
No. 333-161892))
|
|
4
|
.13
|
|
Form of Note for
111/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12
to our Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on September 11, 2009 (File
No. 333-161892))
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
$800 million asset-based lending credit facility (ABL
Facility) dated as of July 6, 2007 among Novelis
Inc., Novelis Corporation as U.S. Borrower, the other U.S.
Subsidiaries of Novelis Inc., Novelis UK Ltd, Novelis AG, AV
Aluminum Inc. as parent guarantor, the other guarantors party
thereto, with the lenders party thereto, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as
U.S./European issuing bank, swingline lender and administrative
agent, LaSalle Business Credit, LLC, as collateral agent and
funding agent, UBS Securities LLC, as syndication agent, Bank of
America, N.A., National City Business Credit, Inc. and CIT
Business Credit Canada Inc., as documentation agents, ABN AMRO
Bank N.V. Canada Branch, as Canadian issuing bank, Canadian
funding agent and Canadian administrative agent, and ABN AMRO
Incorporated and UBS Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and
joint book managers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 9, 2007
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
$960 million term loan facility (Term Loan
Facility) dated as of July 6, 2007 among Novelis
Inc., Novelis Corporation as U.S. Borrower, AV Aluminum Inc., as
Holdings, and the other guarantors party thereto, with the
lenders party thereto, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as
administrative agent and as collateral agent, UBS Securities
LLC, as syndication agent, ABN AMRO Incorporated, as
documentation agent, and UBS Securities LLC and ABN AMRO
Incorporated as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 9, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Intercreditor Agreement dated as of July 6, 2007 by and
among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation, Novelis PAE
Corporation, Novelis Finances USA LLC, Novelis South America
Holdings LLC, Aluminum Upstream Holdings LLC, Novelis UK Ltd,
Novelis AG, AV Aluminum Inc., and the subsidiary guarantors
party thereto, as grantors, ABN AMRO BANK N.V., as revolving
credit administrative agent ABN AMRO Bank N.A., acting through
its Canadian branch, as revolving credit Canadian administrative
agent and as revolving credit Canadian funding agent,
La Salle Business Credit, LLC, as revolving credit
collateral agent and as revolving credit funding agent, and UBS
AG, Stamford Branch, as Term Loan administrative agent, and Term
Loan collateral agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 9, 2007
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Security Agreement made by Novelis Inc., as Canadian Borrower,
Novelis Corporation, as U.S. Borrower and the guarantors from
time to time party thereto in favor of UBS AG, Stamford branch,
as collateral agent dated as of July 6, 2007 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 9, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Security Agreement made by Novelis Inc., as Canadian Borrower,
Novelis Corporation, Novelis PAE Corporation, Novelis Finances
USA LLC, Novelis South America Holdings LLC, Aluminum Upstream
Holdings LLC, as U.S. Borrowers and the guarantors from time to
time party thereto in favor of La Salle Business Credit,
LLC, as collateral agent dated as of July 6, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 9, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.6**
|
|
Amended and Restated Metal Supply Agreement between Novelis
Inc., as Purchaser, and Alcan Inc., as Supplier, for the supply
of re-melt aluminum ingot (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.7**
|
|
Amended and Restated Molten Metal Supply Agreement between
Novelis Inc., as Purchaser, and Alcan Inc., as Supplier, for the
supply of molten metal to Purchasers Saguenay Works
facility (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.8**
|
|
Amended and Restated Metal Supply Agreement between Novelis
Inc., as Purchaser, and Alcan Inc., as Supplier, for the supply
of sheet ingot in North America (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.9**
|
|
Amended and Restated Metal Supply Agreement between Novelis
Inc., as Purchaser, and Alcan Inc., as Supplier, for the supply
of sheet ingot in Europe (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.10*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Martha Finn Brooks (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.33 to our Registration Statement on
Form 10-12B
filed by Novelis Inc. on December 22, 2004
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.11*
|
|
Employment Arrangement between Steven Fisher and Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 21, 2007 and our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on August 15, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.12*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated October 20, 2006, by and between
Novelis Inc. and Thomas Walpole (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 26, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Antonio Tadeu Coelho Nardocci dated as
of November 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.16 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Arnaud de Weert (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 3, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement between Novelis Inc. and
certain executive officers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 27, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.16*
|
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement between Novelis Inc. and
certain executive officers and key employees (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 27, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.17*
|
|
Form of Recognition Agreement between Novelis Inc. and certain
executive officers and key employees (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.3 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 27, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.18*
|
|
Form of Amendment to Recognition Agreements (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed May 8, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.19*
|
|
Form of SAR Award (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 1, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.20*
|
|
Novelis Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 1, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.21*
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 1, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.22*
|
|
Form of Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal
2008-2010
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.23*
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between Novelis Inc. and Members of
the Board of Directors of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 21, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.24*
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between Novelis Inc. and certain
executive officers dated as of June 27, 2007 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 28, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.25*
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Novelis Founders Performance Awards
Plan dated March 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.26*
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Novelis Founders
Performance Awards Plan (incorporated by reference to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed May 8, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.27*
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award Notification for Martha
Brooks dated March 31, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 21, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.28*
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award Notification for Thomas
Walpole dated March 31, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.36 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.29*
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award Notification for Antonio
Tadeu Coelho Nardocci dated March 31, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.37 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.30*
|
|
Form of Novelis Annual Incentive Plan for 2007 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.31*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Jean-Marc Germain dated as of
April 28, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 14, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.32*
|
|
Form of Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal
2009-2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 14, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.33*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Alexandre Moreira Martins de Almeida
dated as of August 8, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 10, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.34*
|
|
Amended Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal
2009-2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on February 17, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.35*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Philip Martens, dated as of
April 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.36 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Joinder Agreement, among Novelis No. 1 Limited Partnership,
its Subsidiaries listed on the Pledge and Security Agreement
dated as of January 7, 2005, and Citicorp North America,
Inc., as administrative agent, dated as of May 14, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Joinder Agreement, among Novelis PAE S.A.S. and UBS AG, Stamford
Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent, dated as
of September 12, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.38 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Joinder Agreement, among Novelis PAE S.A.S. and LaSalle Business
Credit, LLC, as funding agent, dated as of September 12,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Joinder Agreement, among Bellona-Trading Internacional, Sociedad
Unipessoal, LDA and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative
agent and as collateral agent, dated as of June 11, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009
(File No. 001-32312)).
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Joinder Agreement, among Novelis Services Limited, UBS AG,
Stamford Branch, as administrative agent and as collateral
agent, and LaSalle Business Credit, LLC, as funding agent and as
collateral agent, dated as of July 16, 2008 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312)).
|
|
10
|
.41*
|
|
Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal Years
2010-2013
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.42*
|
|
Novelis Annual Incentive Plan for Fiscal Year 2010 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.43*
|
|
Form Change in Control Agreement (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.44*
|
|
Form Severance Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.45*
|
|
Termination of Employment Agreement between Novelis AG and
Arnaud deWeert, dated June 26, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.46*
|
|
Change in Control Agreement between Novelis and Philip Martens,
dated April 16, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 3, 2009
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.47*
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement between Novelis and Martha
Brooks, dated May 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 3, 2009
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.48*
|
|
Employment Agreement between Novelis Inc. and Antonio Tadeu
Coelho Nardocci (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on September 9, 2009
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
11
|
.1
|
|
Statement regarding computation of per share earnings
(incorporated by reference to Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data Note 19
Earnings per Share to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements)
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of subsidiaries of Novelis Inc.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
|
** |
|
Confidential treatment requested for certain portions of this
Exhibit, which portions have been omitted and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
181
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
NOVELIS INC.
Name: Philip Martens
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Date: May 27, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Philip
Martens
Philip
Martens
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
Date: May 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven
Fisher
Steven
Fisher
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
Date: May 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
Nelson
Robert
Nelson
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
Date: May 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kumar
Mangalam Birla
Kumar
Mangalam Birla
|
|
(Chairman of the Board of Directors)
|
|
Date: May 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Askaran
Agarwala
Askaran
Agarwala
|
|
(Director)
|
|
Date: May 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Debnarayan
Bhattacharya
Debnarayan
Bhattacharya
|
|
(Director)
|
|
Date: May 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Clarence
J. Chandran
Clarence
J. Chandran
|
|
(Director)
|
|
Date: May 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Donald
A. Stewart
Donald
A. Stewart
|
|
(Director)
|
|
Date: May 27, 2010
|
182
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited,
AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10,
2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 13, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 7, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Novelis Inc. Amended and Restated Bylaws, adopted as of
July 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 25, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis Inc. and CIBC
Mellon Trust Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 30, 2005
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Shareholder Rights Agreement between
Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, dated as of
February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed February 13, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Specimen Certificate of Novelis Inc. Common Shares (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Registration Statement
on
Form 10-12B
filed on December 27, 2004 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Indenture, relating to the
71/4% Senior
Notes due 2015, dated as of February 3, 2005, between the
Company, the guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and
The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Note for
71/4% Senior
Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
our Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on August 3, 2005 (File
No. 333-127139))
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, between the Company, Novelis Finances
USA LLC, Novelis South America Holdings LLC, Aluminum Upstream
Holdings LLC and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to our
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to our Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed on December 1, 2006 (File
No. 333-127139))
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, among the Company, Novelis No. 1
Limited Partnership, and the Bank of New York
Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, dated as of May 14,
2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, among the Company, Novelis Luxembourg
SA, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as
trustee, dated as of January 29, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.8 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, among the Company, Bellona-Trading
Internacional, Sociedade Unipessoal, LDA, and The Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, dated as of
June 26, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.9 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, among the Company, Novelis Services
Limited, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company
N.A., as trustee, dated as of July 10, 2008 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.11
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, among the Company, Novelis PAE SAS, and
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company N.A., as trustee,
dated as of September 16, 2008 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.11 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.12
|
|
Indenture, relating to the
111/2% Senior
Notes due 2015, dated as of August 11, 2009, between the
Company, the guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to our
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on September 11, 2009 (File
No. 333-161892))
|
|
4
|
.13
|
|
Form of Note for
111/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12
to our Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed on September 11, 2009 (File
No. 333-161892))
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
$800 million asset-based lending credit facility (ABL
Facility) dated as of July 6, 2007 among Novelis
Inc., Novelis Corporation as U.S. Borrower, the other U.S.
Subsidiaries of Novelis Inc., Novelis UK Ltd, Novelis AG, AV
Aluminum Inc. as parent guarantor, the other guarantors party
thereto, with the lenders party thereto, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as
U.S./European issuing bank, swingline lender and administrative
agent, LaSalle Business Credit, LLC, as collateral agent and
funding agent, UBS Securities LLC, as syndication agent, Bank of
America, N.A., National City Business Credit, Inc. and CIT
Business Credit Canada Inc., as documentation agents, ABN AMRO
Bank N.V. Canada Branch, as Canadian issuing bank, Canadian
funding agent and Canadian administrative agent, and ABN AMRO
Incorporated and UBS Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and
joint book managers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 9, 2007
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
$960 million term loan facility (Term Loan
Facility) dated as of July 6, 2007 among Novelis
Inc., Novelis Corporation as U.S. Borrower, AV Aluminum Inc., as
Holdings, and the other guarantors party thereto, with the
lenders party thereto, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as
administrative agent and as collateral agent, UBS Securities
LLC, as syndication agent, ABN AMRO Incorporated, as
documentation agent, and UBS Securities LLC and ABN AMRO
Incorporated as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 9, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Intercreditor Agreement dated as of July 6, 2007 by and
among Novelis Inc., Novelis Corporation, Novelis PAE
Corporation, Novelis Finances USA LLC, Novelis South America
Holdings LLC, Aluminum Upstream Holdings LLC, Novelis UK Ltd,
Novelis AG, AV Aluminum Inc., and the subsidiary guarantors
party thereto, as grantors, ABN AMRO BANK N.V., as revolving
credit administrative agent ABN AMRO Bank N.A., acting through
its Canadian branch, as revolving credit Canadian administrative
agent and as revolving credit Canadian funding agent,
La Salle Business Credit, LLC, as revolving credit
collateral agent and as revolving credit funding agent, and UBS
AG, Stamford Branch, as Term Loan administrative agent, and Term
Loan collateral agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 9, 2007
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Security Agreement made by Novelis Inc., as Canadian Borrower,
Novelis Corporation, as U.S. Borrower and the guarantors from
time to time party thereto in favor of UBS AG, Stamford branch,
as collateral agent dated as of July 6, 2007 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 9, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Security Agreement made by Novelis Inc., as Canadian Borrower,
Novelis Corporation, Novelis PAE Corporation, Novelis Finances
USA LLC, Novelis South America Holdings LLC, Aluminum Upstream
Holdings LLC, as U.S. Borrowers and the guarantors from time to
time party thereto in favor of La Salle Business Credit,
LLC, as collateral agent dated as of July 6, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 9, 2007
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.6**
|
|
Amended and Restated Metal Supply Agreement between Novelis
Inc., as Purchaser, and Alcan Inc., as Supplier, for the supply
of re-melt aluminum ingot (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.7**
|
|
Amended and Restated Molten Metal Supply Agreement between
Novelis Inc., as Purchaser, and Alcan Inc., as Supplier, for the
supply of molten metal to Purchasers Saguenay Works
facility (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.8**
|
|
Amended and Restated Metal Supply Agreement between Novelis
Inc., as Purchaser, and Alcan Inc., as Supplier, for the supply
of sheet ingot in North America (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.9**
|
|
Amended and Restated Metal Supply Agreement between Novelis
Inc., as Purchaser, and Alcan Inc., as Supplier, for the supply
of sheet ingot in Europe (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.10*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Martha Finn Brooks (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.33 to our Registration Statement on
Form 10-12B
filed by Novelis Inc. on December 22, 2004
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.11*
|
|
Employment Arrangement between Steven Fisher and Novelis Inc.
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 21, 2007 and our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on August 15, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.12*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated October 20, 2006, by and between
Novelis Inc. and Thomas Walpole (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 26, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Antonio Tadeu Coelho Nardocci dated as
of November 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.16 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Arnaud de Weert (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 3, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement between Novelis Inc. and
certain executive officers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 27, 2006
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.16*
|
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement between Novelis Inc. and
certain executive officers and key employees (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 27, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.17*
|
|
Form of Recognition Agreement between Novelis Inc. and certain
executive officers and key employees (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.3 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 27, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.18*
|
|
Form of Amendment to Recognition Agreements (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed May 8, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.19*
|
|
Form of SAR Award (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 1, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.20*
|
|
Novelis Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 1, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.21*
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 1, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.22*
|
|
Form of Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal
2008-2010
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.23*
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between Novelis Inc. and Members of
the Board of Directors of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 21, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.24*
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between Novelis Inc. and certain
executive officers dated as of June 27, 2007 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 28, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.25*
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Novelis Founders Performance Awards
Plan dated March 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 20, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.26*
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Novelis Founders
Performance Awards Plan (incorporated by reference to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed May 8, 2007 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.27*
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award Notification for Martha
Brooks dated March 31, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 21, 2006 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.28*
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award Notification for Thomas
Walpole dated March 31, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.36 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.29*
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Award Notification for Antonio
Tadeu Coelho Nardocci dated March 31, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.37 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.30*
|
|
Form of Novelis Annual Incentive Plan for 2007 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 19, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.31*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Jean-Marc Germain dated as of
April 28, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 14, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.32*
|
|
Form of Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal
2009-2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 14, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.33*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Alexandre Moreira Martins de Almeida
dated as of August 8, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 10, 2008 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.34*
|
|
Amended Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal
2009-2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on February 17, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.35*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Philip Martens, dated as of
April 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.36 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Joinder Agreement, among Novelis No. 1 Limited Partnership,
its Subsidiaries listed on the Pledge and Security Agreement
dated as of January 7, 2005, and Citicorp North America,
Inc., as administrative agent, dated as of May 14, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Joinder Agreement, among Novelis PAE S.A.S. and UBS AG, Stamford
Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent, dated as
of September 12, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.38 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Joinder Agreement, among Novelis PAE S.A.S. and LaSalle Business
Credit, LLC, as funding agent, dated as of September 12,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Joinder Agreement, among Bellona-Trading Internacional, Sociedad
Unipessoal, LDA and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative
agent and as collateral agent, dated as of June 11, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009
(File No. 001-32312)).
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Joinder Agreement, among Novelis Services Limited, UBS AG,
Stamford Branch, as administrative agent and as collateral
agent, and LaSalle Business Credit, LLC, as funding agent and as
collateral agent, dated as of July 16, 2008 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 29, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312)).
|
|
10
|
.41*
|
|
Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal Years
2010-2013
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.42*
|
|
Novelis Annual Incentive Plan for Fiscal Year 2010 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.43*
|
|
Form Change in Control Agreement (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.44*
|
|
Form Severance Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009 (File
No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.45*
|
|
Termination of Employment Agreement between Novelis AG and
Arnaud deWeert, dated June 26, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 1, 2009
(File No. 001-32312))
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.46*
|
|
Change in Control Agreement between Novelis and Philip Martens,
dated April 16, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 3, 2009
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.47*
|
|
Separation and Release Agreement between Novelis and Martha
Brooks, dated May 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 3, 2009
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
10
|
.48*
|
|
Employment Agreement between Novelis Inc. and Antonio Tadeu
Coelho Nardocci (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on September 9, 2009
(File No. 001-32312))
|
|
11
|
.1
|
|
Statement regarding computation of per share earnings
(incorporated by reference to Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data Note 19
Earnings per Share to the Consolidated and Combined Financial
Statements)
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of subsidiaries of Novelis Inc.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
|
** |
|
Confidential treatment requested for certain portions of this
Exhibit, which portions have been omitted and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
187