UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number:
001-32312
Novelis Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Canada
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
98-0442987
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
3399 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 1500
Atlanta, Georgia
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
30326
(Zip
Code)
|
Telephone:
(404) 814-4200
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of October 31, 2009, the registrant had 77,459,658
common shares outstanding. All of the Registrants
outstanding shares were held indirectly by Hindalco Industries
Ltd., the Registrants parent company.
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
3,261
|
|
|
|
5,622
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
120
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $4 and $2 as of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,769
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,754
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; unlimited number of shares
authorized; 77,459,658 shares issued and outstanding as of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Novelis shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
7,754
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
120
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments, net
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange remeasurement of debt
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Proceeds from related party loans receivable, net
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Net proceeds (outflow) from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, third parties
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, related parties
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments, third parties
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Principal payments, related parties
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
263
|
|
Dividends, noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc. Shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
(AOCI)
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
1,509
|
|
Net income attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax provision of $6
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
benefit of $2 included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax provision of $2
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit) related to items of other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
285
|
|
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
Income tax provision related to items of other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
(140
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
6
Novelis
Inc.
|
|
1.
|
BUSINESS
AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein to Rio Tinto
Alcan refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
Description
of Business and Basis of Presentation
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products where the end-use destination of
the products includes the beverage and food can, transportation,
construction and industrial, and foil products markets. As of
September 30, 2009, we had operations on four continents:
North America; Europe; Asia and South America, through 31
operating plants, one research facility and several
market-focused innovation centers in 11 countries. In addition
to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, primary aluminum smelting and
power generation facilities that supply our rolling plants in
Brazil.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009 filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 29,
2009, and updated on
Form 8-K
filed August 5, 2009 to reflect the revised presentation of
noncontrolling interests. Management believes that all
adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results,
consisting of normally recurring items, have been included in
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for
the interim periods presented. Further, in connection with the
preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements,
the Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet
date of September 30, 2009 through November 3, 2009,
the date these financial statements were issued.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. The principal areas of judgment
relate to (1) the fair value of derivative financial
instruments; (2) impairment of goodwill;
(3) impairments of long lived assets, intangible assets and
equity investments; (4) actuarial assumptions related to
pension and other postretirement benefit plans; (5) income
tax reserves and valuation allowances and (6) assessment of
loss contingencies, including environmental and litigation
reserves.
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
Consolidation
Policy
Our consolidated financial statements include the assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of all wholly-owned
subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise
control and entities in which we have a controlling financial
interest or are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. We
eliminate all significant intercompany accounts and transactions
from our financial statements.
7
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
In August 2009, we announced the formation of a joint venture
entity, Evermore Recycling LLC (Evermore), to procure used
beverage cans in North America. We own 55.8% of this limited
liability corporation and have consolidated the results
effective August 11, 2009. The results of Evermore were
immaterial for the three and six months ended September 30,
2009.
Reclassifications
and Adjustment
Certain reclassifications of prior period amounts and
presentation have been made to conform to the presentation
adopted for the current period.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we identified an
immaterial error in our consolidated annual and interim
financial statements included in previously filed
Forms 10-Q
and
Forms 10-K
for fiscal 2008 and 2009. The error relates to deferred income
taxes recorded in connection with purchase accounting in South
America. We believe the correction of this error to be both
quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial to our projected
annual results for fiscal 2010 or to any of our previously
issued financial statements. As a result, we did not adjust any
prior period amounts. There was no impact to income (loss)
before income taxes and noncontrolling interest share or cash
flows from operating activities for any periods. We have
reflected the correction of this error in the interim financial
statements for the second quarter of 2010. As of and for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, the impact of the
correction was an increase to goodwill of $29 million, an
increase to deferred tax liabilities of $25 million and a
reduction of our income tax expense of $4 million. Due to
the fact that our South American subsidiaries are US dollar
functional, the deferred tax liabilities fluctuate with changes
in the exchange rate and are recorded as increases or decreases
to income tax expense.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards have been adopted by us
during the six months ended September 30, 2009.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
approved its Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
(Codification) as the single source of authoritative United
States accounting and reporting standards applicable for all
non-governmental entities, with the exception of the SEC and its
staff. The Codification which changes the referencing of
financial standards is effective for interim or annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. As the codification is not
intended to change or alter existing US GAAP, this standard had
no impact on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 855, Subsequent
Events, (prior authoritative literature: FASB Statement
No. 165, Subsequent Events) which establishes
general standards of accounting and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. This
accounting standard requires the disclosure of the date through
which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis
for that date. This standard had no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements) which establishes
accounting and reporting standards that require: (i) the
ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than
the parent to be clearly identified and presented in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet within shareholders
equity, but separate from the parents equity;
(ii) the amount of condensed consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be
clearly identified and presented on the face of the condensed
consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes in a
parents ownership interest while the parent retains its
controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be accounted
for consistently. We adopted this accounting standard effective
April 1, 2009, and applied this standard prospectively,
except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which
have been applied retrospectively.
8
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets) which
amends the factors that should be considered in developing the
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset. The accounting standard
also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination
of intangible asset useful lives. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, (prior authoritative
literature: FASB Staff Position
No. 107-1
and APB Opinion
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments; FASB Staff Position
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly) which
requires disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods. This codification
also provides additional guidance in determining fair value when
the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has
significantly decreased. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 320,
Investments Debt and Equity
Securities, (prior authoritative literature: FASB Staff
Position
No. 115-2
and FASB Staff Position
No. 124-2,
Recognition of
Other-than-Temporary-Impairments)
which amends the
other-than-temporary
impairment guidance in GAAP for debt and equity securities. This
standard had no impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 805, Business
Combinations, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations;
FASB Staff Position No. 141(R)-1, Accounting for
Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business
Combination That Arise from Contingencies) (ASC
805) which establishes principles and requirements for how
the acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
This standard also requires acquirers to estimate the
acquisition-date fair value of any contingent consideration and
to recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of
contingent consideration in earnings. ASC 805 also clarifies the
initial and subsequent recognition, subsequent accounting, and
disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination. This standard requires that assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that
arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value, if the
acquisition-date fair value can be reasonably estimated. We will
apply ASC 805 prospectively to business combinations occurring
after March 31, 2009, with the exception of the accounting
for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
contingencies. This standard amends certain provisions of
preexisting tax guidance such that adjustments made to valuation
allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies
associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective
date of this business combination guidance would also apply the
provisions of this standard. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 323,
Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures,
(prior authoritative literature: Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue
No. 08-06,
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations) which
addresses questions that have arisen about the application of
the equity method of accounting for investments acquired after
the effective date of newly issued business combination
standards and non-controlling interest standards. This
accounting standard clarifies how to account for certain
transactions involving equity method investments, and is
effective on a prospective basis. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
9
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards have been issued, but
have not yet been adopted by us as of September 30, 2009,
as adoption is not required until future reporting periods.
In June 2009, the FASB issued statement No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FASB
167). FASB 167 has not been incorporated by the FASB into the
Codification as the guidance is not yet effective and early
adoption is prohibited. FASB 167 is intended (1) to address
the effects on certain provisions of the accounting standard
dealing with consolidation of variable interest entities, as a
result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose
entity concept in FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for
Transfers of Financial Assets, and (2) to clarify
questions about the application of certain key provisions
related to consolidation of variable interest entities,
including those in which accounting and disclosures do not
always provided timely and useful information about an
enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity.
FASB 167 will be effective for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2009. We do not anticipate this standard will
have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations and cash flows.
In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB issued FSP No. 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits) which requires that an employer
disclose the following information about the fair value of plan
assets: (1) how investment allocation decisions are made,
including the factors that are pertinent to understanding of
investment policies and strategies; (2) the major
categories of plan assets; (3) the inputs and valuation
techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets;
(4) the effect of fair value measurements using significant
unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period;
and (5) significant concentrations of risk within plan
assets. This pronouncement will be effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2009, with early application
permitted. At initial adoption, application of this standard
would not be required for earlier periods that are presented for
comparative purposes. This standard will have no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do
not apply to our operations.
|
|
2.
|
RESTRUCTURING
PROGRAMS
|
There were no new restructuring actions initiated during fiscal
2010. Restructuring charges of $6 million on the condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended
September 30, 2009, consisted of the following:
(1) $3 million in costs related to our Rogerstone
facility, (2) $1 million in additional severance costs
related to our Rugles facility and (3) $2 million in
other items at other European facilities.
The following table summarizes our restructuring accrual
activity by region (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
Provisions (recoveries), net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Impact of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Europe
Restructuring charges in the table above includes
$1 million in additional severance costs at our Rugles
facility, $1 million of environmental costs at our Borgo
Franco plant and $1 million of other costs related
primarily to the Rogerstone plant closure and the exit of
certain activities at our Rugles and Ohle plants.
We made the following payments relating to preexisting
restructuring programs in Europe: $24 million in severance
payments, $7 million in payments for environmental
remediation and $2 million of other payments related
primarily to contract terminations.
At our Rogerstone facility, we also incurred a $2 million
charge related to the write down of parts and supplies and
approximately $1 million of on-going maintenance expense
related to the shut-down. The $2 million write down is not
included in the table above as it was reflected as a reduction
to the appropriate balance sheet accounts. We expect to incur
approximately $1 million in additional maintenance expenses
at our Rogerstone facility through the end of fiscal 2010.
North
America
We made $6 million in severance payments related to the
voluntary and involuntary separation programs initiated in the
third quarter of fiscal 2009.
South
America
We made $1 million in severance payments and
$1 million in payments related to other exit costs.
Inventories consist of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
CONSOLIDATION
OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
|
We have a variable interest in Logan Aluminum, Inc. (Logan).
Based upon a previous restructuring program, Novelis acquired
the right to use the excess capacity at Logan. To utilize this
capacity, we installed and have sole ownership of a cold mill at
the Logan facility which enabled us to have the ability to take
the majority share of production and costs. These facts qualify
Novelis as Logans primary beneficiary and this entity is
consolidated for all periods presented. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
11
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table summarizes the carrying value and
classification of assets and liabilities owned by the Logan
joint venture and consolidated on our condensed consolidated
balance sheets (in millions). There are significant other assets
used in the operations of Logan that are not part of the joint
venture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
(142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
Net carrying value
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENT
IN AND ADVANCES TO NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES AND RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
The following table summarizes the condensed results of
operations of our equity method affiliates (on a 100% basis, in
millions) on a historical basis of accounting. These results do
not include the incremental depreciation and amortization
expense that we record in our equity method accounting, which
arises as a result of the amortization of fair value adjustments
we made to our investments in non-consolidated affiliates due to
the Arrangement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
Costs, expenses and provisions for taxes on income
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below summarizes our incremental depreciation and
amortization expense on our equity method investments due to the
Arrangement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Incremental depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental depreciation and amortization expense, net
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements are transactions and balances arising from business
we conduct with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we
classify as related party transactions and balances. We earned
less than $1 million of interest income on a loan due from
Aluminium
12
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Norf GmbH during each of the periods presented in the table
below. The following table describes the nature and amounts of
significant transactions that we had with these non-consolidated
affiliates (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Purchases of tolling services and electricity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH(A)
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
Consorcio Candonga(B)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases from related parties
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We obtain electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our operations
in South America. |
The following table describes the period-end account balances
that we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as
related party balances in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets (in millions). We have no other
material related party balances with these non-consolidated
affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Accounts receivable(A)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Other long-term receivables(A)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Accounts payable(B)
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The balances represent current and non-current portions of a
loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH and
electricity from Consorcio Candonga. |
13
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Debt consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Rates(A)
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Third party debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term borrowings
|
|
|
2.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
11.50
|
%
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
2.25
|
%(C)
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
2.27
|
%(C)
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
813
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due December 2019 (Swiss francs (CHF)
50 million)
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 2 million)
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
3.00
|
%(C)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Bank loan, due February 2010 (Korean won (KRW) 50 billion)
|
|
|
3.81
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Bank loan, due May 2009 (KRW 10 billion)
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due December 2011 through December 2012
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,835
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
2,822
|
|
|
|
2,742
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
Less: Short term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion third
parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,600
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,596
|
|
|
$
|
2,419
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured credit facility related party, due January
2015
|
|
|
13.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Interest rates are as of September 30, 2009 and exclude the
effects of accretion/amortization of fair value adjustments as a
result of the Arrangement and the debt exchange completed in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
Debt existing at the time of the Arrangement was recorded at
fair value. Additional floating rate Term Loan with a face value
of $220 million issued in March 2009 was recorded at a fair
value of $165 million. Additional 11.5% Senior Note
with a face value of $185 million issued in August 2009 was
recorded at fair value of $181 million (see
11.5% Senior Notes below). |
|
(C) |
|
Excludes the effect of related interest rate swaps and the
effect of accretion of fair value. |
14
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Principal repayment requirements for our total debt over the
next five years and thereafter (excluding unamortized fair value
adjustments and using rates of exchange as of September 30,
2009 for our debt denominated in foreign currencies) are as
follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
116
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
16
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
16
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5% Senior
Notes
On August 11, 2009, Novelis Inc. issued $185 million
aggregate principal face amount of 11.5% senior unsecured
notes at an effective rate of 12.0% (11.5% Senior Notes).
The 11.5% Senior Notes were issued at a discount resulting
in gross proceeds of $181 million. The net proceeds of this
offering were used to repay a portion of the ABL Facility and
$96 million outstanding under the unsecured credit facility
from an affiliate of the Aditya Birla Group.
The 11.5% Senior Notes rank equally with all of our
existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness, and are
guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis,
by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
all of our existing and future Canadian and U.S. restricted
subsidiaries,
|
|
|
|
certain of our existing foreign restricted subsidiaries and
|
|
|
|
our other restricted subsidiaries that guarantee debt in the
future under any credit facilities, provided that the borrower
of such debt is our company or a Canadian or a
U.S. subsidiary.
|
The 11.5% Senior Notes contain certain covenants and events
of default, including limitations on certain restricted
payments, the incurrence of additional indebtedness and the sale
of certain assets. As of September 30, 2009, we are
compliant with these covenants. Interest on the
11.5% Senior Notes is payable on February 15 and August 15
of each year, commencing on February 15, 2010. The notes
will mature on February 15, 2015.
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
Our senior secured credit facilities consist of (1) a
$1.16 billion seven year term loan facility maturing July
2014 (Term Loan facility) and (2) an $800 million
five-year multi-currency asset-backed revolving credit line and
letter of credit facility (ABL Facility). The senior secured
credit facilities include certain affirmative and negative
covenants. Under the ABL Facility, if our excess availability,
as defined under the borrowing, is less than $80 million,
we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1 to 1. As of September 30, 2009, our fixed charge
coverage ratio is less than 1 to 1, resulting in a reduction of
availability under the ABL Facility of $80 million.
Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral under
the senior secured credit facilities.
Short-Term
Borrowings and Lines of Credit
As of September 30, 2009, our short-term borrowings were
$177 million consisting of (1) $166 million of
short-term loans under the ABL Facility, (2) a
$4 million short-term loan in Italy and
(3) $7 million in bank
15
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
overdrafts. As of September 30, 2009, $31 million of
the ABL Facility was utilized for letters of credit and we had
$400 million in remaining availability under the ABL
Facility before covenant related restrictions. The weighted
average interest rate on our total short-term borrowings was
2.09% and 2.75% as of September 30, 2009 and March 31,
2009, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009, we had an additional
$122 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
not included in the ABL Facility.
Interest
Rate Swaps
As of September 30, 2009, we have interest rate swaps to
fix the variable LIBOR interest rate on $920 million of our
floating rate Term Loan facility. We are still obligated to pay
any applicable margin, as defined in our senior secured credit
facilities. Interest rate swaps related to $400 million at
an effective weighted average interest rate of 4.0% expire
March 31, 2010. In January 2009, we entered into two
interest rate swaps to fix the variable LIBOR interest rate on
an additional $300 million of our floating Term Loan
facility at a rate of 1.49%, plus any applicable margin. These
interest rate swaps are effective from March 31, 2009
through March 31, 2011. In April 2009, we entered into an
additional $220 million interest rate swap at a rate of
1.97%, which is effective through April 30, 2012.
We have a cross-currency interest rate swap in Korea to convert
our $100 million variable rate bank loan to KRW
92 billion at a fixed rate of 5.44%. The swap expires
October 2010, concurrent with the maturity of the loan.
As of September 30, 2009 approximately 84% of our debt was
fixed rate and approximately 16% was variable rate.
|
|
7.
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Total compensation expense related to share-based awards for the
respective periods is presented in the table below (in
millions). These amounts are included in Selling, general and
administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements
of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Novelis Long-Tem Incentive Plan 2009
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Novelis Long-Tem Incentive Plan 2010
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation expense
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan
In June 2009, our board of directors authorized the Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2010 FY 2013 (2010 LTIP)
covering the performance period from April 1, 2009 through
March 31, 2013. The terms of the 2010 LTIP are the same as
the Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2009 FY 2012
(2009 LTIP) approved in June 2008. Under the 2010 LTIP, phantom
stock appreciation rights (SARs) are to be granted to certain of
our executive officers and key employees. The SARs will vest at
the rate of 25% per year, subject to performance criteria (see
below) and expire seven years from their grant date. Each SAR is
to be settled in cash based on the difference between the market
value of one Hindalco share on the date of grant and the market
value on the date of exercise, where market values are
denominated in Indian rupees and converted to the
participants payroll currency at the time of exercise. The
amount of cash paid is limited to (i) 2.5 times the target
payout if exercised within one year of vesting or (ii) 3
times the target payout if exercised after one
16
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
year of vesting. The SARs do not transfer any shareholder rights
in Hindalco to a participant. The SARs are classified as
liability awards and are remeasured at fair value each reporting
period until the SARs are settled.
The performance criterion for vesting is based on the actual
overall Novelis operating earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, as adjusted (adjusted Operating
EBITDA) compared to the target adjusted Operating EBITDA
established and approved each fiscal year. The minimum threshold
for vesting each year is 75% of each annual target adjusted
Operating EBITDA, at which point 75% of the SARs for that period
would vest, with an equal pro rata amount of SARs vesting
through 100% achievement of the target. Given that the
performance criterion is based on an earnings target in a future
period for each fiscal year, the grant date of the awards for
accounting purposes is generally not established until the
performance criterion has been defined. Accordingly, each of the
four tranches associated with the 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP is
deemed granted when the earnings target is determined.
The tables below show the SARs activity under our 2010 LTIP and
2009 LTIP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B
|
)
|
Granted
|
|
|
13,459,711
|
(A)
|
|
|
85.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
13,459,711
|
|
|
|
85.79
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
20,606,906
|
(A)
|
|
|
60.05
|
|
|
|
6.22
|
|
|
|
(B
|
)
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(9,041,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
11,565,111
|
|
|
|
60.05
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents total SARs approved by the Board of Directors for
grant. As noted above, due to the performance criterion based on
a future earnings target, the amount deemed granted for
accounting purposes is limited to the individual tranches
subject to an established earnings target, which includes the
current and prior fiscal years. |
|
(B) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is zero as the market value of a
share of Hindalco stock was less than the SAR exercise price. |
The fair value of each SAR is based on the difference between
the fair value of a long call and a short call option. The fair
value of each of these call options was determined using the
Black-Scholes valuation method. We used historical stock price
volatility data of Hindalco on the Bombay Stock Exchange to
17
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
determine expected volatility assumptions. The fair value of
each SAR under the 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP was estimated as of
September 30, 2009 using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
49.9 56.4%
|
|
54.0 57.1%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
53.0%
|
|
55.9%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
1.05%
|
|
1.05%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
6.8 7.1%
|
|
6.61 6.93%
|
Expected life
|
|
3.7 5.2 years
|
|
3.2 4.2 years
|
The fair value of the SARs is being recognized over the
requisite performance and service period of each tranche,
subject to the achievement of any performance criterion. Since
the performance criteria for fiscal years 2011 through 2013 have
not yet been established and therefore, measurement periods for
SARs relating to those periods have not yet commenced, no
compensation expense for those tranches has been recorded for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. No SARs were
exercisable at September 30, 2009.
Unrecognized compensation expense related to the non-vested SARs
(assuming all future performance criteria are met) is
$14 million which is expected to be realized over a
weighted average period of 4.16 years.
|
|
8.
|
POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFIT PLANS
|
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans in the U.S., Canada, Switzerland and the U.K., unfunded
pension plans in Germany, and unfunded lump sum indemnities in
France, South Korea, Malaysia and Italy. Our other
postretirement obligations (Other Benefits, as shown in certain
tables below) include unfunded healthcare and life insurance
benefits provided to retired employees in Canada, the
U.S. and Brazil.
Components of net periodic benefit cost for all of our
significant postretirement benefit plans are shown in the tables
below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Amortization (gains) losses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Curtailment/settlement losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Amortization (gains) losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Curtailment/settlement losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 6.7% in
fiscal 2010.
Employer
Contributions to Plans
For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to
provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to date,
and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over
periods of 15 years or less. We also participate in savings
plans in Canada and the U.S., as well as defined contribution
pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, Italy,
Switzerland, Malaysia and Brazil. We contributed the following
amounts to all plans, including the Rio Tinto Alcan plans, that
cover our employees (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Funded pension plans
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Unfunded pension plans
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Savings and defined contribution pension plans
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the remainder of fiscal 2010, we expect to contribute an
additional $33 million to our funded pension plans,
$6 million to our unfunded pension plans and
$9 million to our savings and defined contribution plans.
|
|
9.
|
CURRENCY
(GAINS) LOSSES
|
The following currency (gains) losses are included in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net (gain) loss on change in fair value of currency derivative
instruments(A)
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Net (gain) loss on remeasurement of monetary assets and
liabilities(B)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in Other (income) expenses, net. |
The following currency gains (losses) are included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
March 31,2009
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment beginning
of period
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment end of
period
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS AND COMMODITY CONTRACTS
|
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009
are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
(640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included
in Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. |
20
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Net
Investment Hedges
We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to
fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and
investments in our European operations. We had cross-currency
swaps of Euro 135 million as of September 30,
2009 and March 31, 2009, designated as net investment
hedges. The effective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative is included in Other comprehensive income (loss)
(OCI), as a part of Currency translation adjustments. The
ineffective portion of gain or loss on derivatives is included
in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net.
For our currency exchange contracts designated as net investment
hedges, we recognized a $5 million loss and a
$21 million loss in OCI for the three months and six months
ended September 30, 2009, respectively. We recognized gains
of $81 and $120 million in OCI for the three and six months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Cash Flow
Hedges
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we have
designated as a cash flow hedge of our exposure to fluctuating
electricity prices. The effective portion of gain or loss on the
derivative is included in OCI and reclassified when settled into
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivatives, net in our
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. As
of September 30, 2009, the outstanding portion of this swap
includes 1.8 million megawatt hours through 2017.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable-rate
debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included
in OCI and reclassified when settled into Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs in our accompanying
condensed consolidated statements of operations. We had
$910 million and $690 million of outstanding interest
rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges as of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or
losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the
life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the
relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will no
longer be designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if
the underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be
probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness
determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the
measures we have established at the inception of the hedge.
Gains or losses recognized to date in AOCI would be immediately
reclassified into current period earnings, as would any
subsequent changes in the fair value of any such derivative.
During the next twelve months we expect to realize
$23 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.
21
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table summarizes the impact on AOCI and earnings
of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges (in
millions).
Three
Month Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Six Month
Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in
helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging
instruments. The change in fair value of these derivative
instruments is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the London Metal Exchange (LME) price of
aluminum. These exposures arise from firm commitments to sell
aluminum in future periods at fixed or capped prices, the
forecasted output of our smelter operations in South America and
the forecasted metal price lag associated with firm commitments
to sell aluminum in future periods at prices based on the LME.
In addition, transactions with certain customers meet the
definition of a derivative under US GAAP and are recognized as
assets or liabilities at fair value on the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30,
2009 and March 31, 2009, we had 225 kilotonnes (kt) and 294
kt, respectively, of outstanding aluminum contracts not
designated as hedges.
We recognize a derivative position which arises from a
contractual relationship with a customer that entitles us to
pass-through the economic effect of trading positions that we
take with other third parties on our customers behalf.
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross-currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain operations. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
outstanding currency exchange contracts with a total notional
amount of $1.5 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively,
not designated as hedges.
22
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
interest rates associated with variable-rate debt. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
$11 million and $10 million, respectively, of
outstanding interest rate swaps that were not designated as
hedges.
We use heating oil swaps and natural gas swaps to manage our
exposure to fluctuating energy prices in North America. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
2.4 million gallons and 3.4 million gallons,
respectively, of heating oil swaps and 4.3 million MMBTUs
and 3.8 million MMBTUs, respectively, of natural gas that
were not designated as hedges. One MMBTU is the equivalent of
one decatherm, or one million British Thermal Units.
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in
earnings (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
(181
|
)
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
We record certain assets and liabilities, primarily derivative
instruments, on our balance sheet at fair value. We also
disclose the fair values of certain financial instruments,
including debt and loans receivable, that are not recorded at
fair value. Our objective in measuring fair value is to estimate
an exit price in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. We consider factors such
as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and nonperformance risk,
including our own nonperformance risk, in measuring fair value.
We use observable market inputs wherever possible. To the extent
that observable market inputs are not available, our fair value
measurements will reflect the assumptions we used. We grade the
level of the inputs and assumptions used according to a
three-tier hierarchy:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities that
we have the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which there is
little or no market data, which require us to develop our own
assumptions based on the best information available as what
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
23
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following assets and liabilities are measured and recognized
at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Level 1(A)
|
|
Level 2(B)
|
|
Level 3(C)
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
Liabilities Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Level 1(A)
|
|
Level 2(B)
|
|
Level 3(C)
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
Liabilities Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(644
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(688
|
)
|
We measure the fair value of the majority of our derivative
contracts using industry-standard models that use observable
market inputs as their basis, such as time value, forward
interest rates, volatility factors, and current (spot) and
forward market prices for foreign exchange rates. We generally
classify these instruments within Level 2 of the valuation
hierarchy. Such derivatives include interest rate swaps,
cross-currency swaps, foreign currency forward contracts and
certain energy-related forward contracts, including natural gas
and heating oil contracts.
We classify the following derivative instruments in Level 3
of the valuation hierarchy. We have a highly customized
electricity contract in a geographic region for which no active
market exists. We value this contract using the observable
market prices of similar contracts for nearby regions. We adjust
these prices to account for geographical differences and
structural differences in the terms of the contract. We also
classify as Level 3 certain foreign exchange forward
contracts between the USD and the BRL, and the USD and the KRW,
for which the remaining time to maturity on the forward contract
extends beyond the terms of quoted market prices.
We incurred unrealized losses of $5 million related to
Level 3 financial instruments that were still held as of
September 30, 2009. These unrealized losses are included in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net.
The following table presents a reconciliation of fair value
activity for Level 3 derivative contracts on a net basis
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
Instruments(A)
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
Net realized/unrealized gains included in earnings(B)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Net realized/unrealized gains included in Other comprehensive
income(C)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
7
|
|
Net transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents derivative assets net of derivative liabilities. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(C) |
|
Included in Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges,
net. |
24
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Financial
Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value
The table below presents the estimated fair value of certain
financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis (in millions). The table excludes short-term
financial assets and liabilities for which we believe carrying
value approximates fair value. The fair value of our letters of
credit is based on the availability under such credit agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 ,2009
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables from related parties
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.50% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Unsecured credit facility related party, due January
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due December 2019 (CHF 50 million)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 2 million)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Bank loan, due February 2010 (KRW 50 billion)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Bank loan, due May 2009 (KRW 10 billion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due December 2011 through December 2012
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Financial commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
12.
|
OTHER
(INCOME) EXPENSES, NET
|
Other (income) expenses, net is comprised of the following (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Exchange (gains) losses, net
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
(Gain) loss on reversal of accrued legal claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Gain on tax litigation settlement in Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
A reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our
effective tax rates is as follows (in millions, except
percentages).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Pre-tax income before equity in net loss of non-consolidated
affiliates and noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
|
$
|
(274
|
)
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian statutory tax rate
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision at the Canadian statutory rate
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) for taxes on income (loss) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange translation items
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Expense (income) items not subject to tax
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Enacted statutory tax rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Tax rate differences on foreign earnings
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
Uncertain tax positions, net
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
(168
|
)
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
|
$
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, we had a net deferred tax
liability of $488 million, including deferred tax assets of
approximately $403 million for net operating loss and tax
credit carryforwards. The carryforwards begin expiring in 2010
with some amounts being carried forward indefinitely. As of
September 30, 2009, valuation allowances of
$111 million had been recorded against net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, where it appeared
more likely than not that such benefits will not be realized.
Realization is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income
prior to expiration of the tax attribute carryforwards. Although
realization is not assured, management believes it is more
likely than not that all the remaining net deferred tax assets
will be realized. In the near term, the amount of deferred tax
assets considered realizable could be reduced if we do not
generate sufficient taxable income in certain jurisdictions.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the
statute of limitations lapsed with respect to unrecognized tax
benefits related to potential withholding taxes and cross-border
intercompany pricing of services. As a result, we recognized a
reduction in unrecognized tax benefits of $28 million,
including a decrease in accrued interest of $5 million,
recorded as a reduction to the income tax provision in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations.
|
|
14.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Legal
Proceedings
Coca-Cola
Lawsuit. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in Georgia
state court. CCBSS is a
26
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
a soft toll agreement between the parties relating to the supply
of aluminum can stock, and seeks monetary damages in an amount
to be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under
the agreement. The agreement includes a most favored
nations provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS
alleges that Novelis Corporation breached the terms of the
most favored nations provision. The dispute will
likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the
parties and the courts finding as to how certain
provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS
were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would
likely be material. However, we have concluded that a loss from
the CCBSS litigation is not probable and therefore have not
recorded an accrual. In addition, we do not believe that there
is a reasonable possibility of a loss from the lawsuit based on
information available at this time. Novelis Corporation has
filed its answer and the parties are proceeding with discovery.
Environmental
Matters
The following describes certain environmental matters relating
to our business.
We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also
known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions
regarding liability arising from the usage, storage, treatment
or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a number of
sites in the United States, as well as similar proceedings under
the laws and regulations of the other jurisdictions in which we
have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the
European Union. Many of these jurisdictions have laws that
impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, for the costs of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses. In addition, we are, from time to
time, subject to environmental reviews and investigations by
relevant governmental authorities.
As described further in the following paragraph, we have
established procedures for regularly evaluating environmental
loss contingencies, including those arising from such
environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we believe we have made reasonable estimates
of the costs that are likely to be borne by us for these
environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly, we have
established reserves based on our reasonable estimates for the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters. We estimate that the undiscounted remaining
clean-up
costs related to all of our known environmental matters as of
September 30, 2009 will be approximately $49 million.
Of this amount, $31 million is included in Other long-term
liabilities, with the remaining $18 million included in
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009.
Management has reviewed the environmental matters, including
those for which we assumed liability as a result of our spin-off
from Rio Tinto Alcan. As a result of this review, management has
determined that the currently anticipated costs associated with
these environmental matters will not, individually or in the
aggregate, materially impair our operations or materially
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
With respect to environmental loss contingencies, we record a
loss contingency whenever such contingency is probable and
reasonably estimable. The evaluation model includes all asserted
and unasserted claims that can be reasonably identified. Under
this evaluation model, the liability and the related costs are
quantified based upon the best available evidence regarding
actual liability loss and cost estimates. Except for those loss
contingencies where no estimate can reasonably be made, the
evaluation model is fact-driven and attempts to estimate the
full costs of each claim. Management reviews the status of, and
estimated liability related to, pending claims and civil actions
on a quarterly basis. The estimated costs in respect of such
reported liabilities are not offset by amounts related to
cost-sharing between parties, insurance, indemnification
arrangements or contribution from other potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) unless otherwise noted.
27
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Brazil
Tax Matters
Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America,
as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
cash deposits aggregating approximately $44 million and
$30 million, respectively, in judicial depository accounts
pending finalization of the related cases. The depository
accounts are in the name of the Brazilian government and will be
expended towards these legal proceedings or released to us,
depending on the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are
included in Other long-term assets third parties in
our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In
addition, we are involved in several disputes with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury about various forms of manufacturing taxes
and social security contributions, for which we have made no
judicial deposits but for which we have established reserves
ranging from $8 million to $121 million as of
September 30, 2009. In total, these reserves approximate
$142 million as of September 30, 2009 and are included
in Other long-term liabilities in our accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet.
On May 28, 2009, the Brazilian government passed a law
allowing taxpayers to settle certain federal tax disputes with
the Brazilian tax authorities, including disputes relating to a
Brazilian national tax on manufactured products, through an
installment program. Pursuant to the installment plan, companies
can elect to (a) pay the principal amount of the disputed
tax amounts over a near-term period (e.g., 1-60 monthly
installments) and receive a
35-45%
discount on the interest and
80-100%
discount on the penalties owed, (b) pay the principal and
interest over a medium-term period (e.g.,
60-120 monthly
installments) and receive a
30-35%
discount on the interest and
70-80%
discount on the penalties owed, or (c) pay the full amount
of the disputed tax amounts, including interest and penalties,
over a longer-term period (e.g.,
120-180 monthly
installments) and receive a
25-30%
discount on the interest and
60-70%
discount on the penalties owed. Novelis joined the installment
plan and now has until November 30, 2009 to choose, in
addition to IPI repayment terms, the tax disputes that it will
elect to settle.
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including certain
of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and Aluminium Norf GmbH, which
is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint venture that does not meet
the requirements for consolidation.
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no
expiration and have termination notice requirements. Neither we
nor any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds
any assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the
potential settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our condensed consolidated financial statements,
all liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term
debt facilities for these entities are already included in our
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness of others as of
September 30, 2009 (in millions). We did not have any
obligations under guarantees of indebtedness related to our
majority-owned subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Future Payment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
28
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
SEGMENT,
MAJOR CUSTOMER AND MAJOR SUPPLIER INFORMATION
|
Segment
Information
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America, Europe, Asia and South America.
Adjustment to Eliminate Proportional
Consolidation. The financial information for our
segments includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile the financial information for the segments shown in
the tables below to the relevant GAAP-based measures, we must
remove our proportional share of each line item that we included
in the segment amounts. See Note 5 Investment
in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
Transactions for further information about these
non-consolidated affiliates.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments based on Segment income. Segment income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment income as earnings before (a) depreciation and
amortization; (b) interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs; (c) interest income; (d) unrealized
gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net; (e) impairment of goodwill;
(f) impairment charges on long-lived assets (other than
goodwill); (g) gain on extinguishment of debt;
(h) noncontrolling interests share;
(i) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Segment income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting;
(k) restructuring charges, net; (k) gains or losses on
disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses, net;
(l) other costs, net; (m) litigation settlement, net
of insurance recoveries; (n) sale transaction fees;
(o) provision or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and
(p) cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax.
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions).
Selected
Segment Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
|
$
|
881
|
|
|
$
|
1,422
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
(308
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,745
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
$
|
1,296
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(234
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
Comparison
of Three Month
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
822
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
29
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,111
|
|
|
$
|
1,097
|
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
Comparison
of Six Month
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,589
|
|
|
$
|
1,400
|
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
192
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
|
$
|
2,315
|
|
|
$
|
968
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
223
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
30
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table shows the reconciliation from income from
reportable segments to Net income attributable to our common
shareholder (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
South America
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Corporate and other(A)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net(B)
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Restructuring recoveries (charges), net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Corporate and other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. It also includes realized gains
(losses) on corporate derivative instruments. |
|
(B) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net represents the portion of gains (losses) that
were not settled in cash during the period. Total realized and
unrealized gains (losses) are shown in the table below and are
included in the aggregate each period in (Gain) loss on change
in fair value of derivative instruments, net on our condensed
consolidated statements of operations. |
31
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses) included in segment income
|
|
$
|
(174
|
)
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
(402
|
)
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information
about Major Customers and Primary Supplier
The table below shows our net sales to Rexam Plc (Rexam) and
Anheuser-Busch Companies (Anheuser-Busch), our two largest
customers, as a percentage of total Net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Rexam
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Anheuser-Busch
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Rio Tinto Alcan is our primary supplier of metal inputs,
including prime and sheet ingot. The table shows our purchases
from Rio Tinto Alcan as a percentage of our total combined
primary metal purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Purchases from Rio Tinto Alcan as a percentage of total
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
16.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
Fair value of effective portion of hedges
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Pension and other benefits
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
32
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
17.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
GUARANTOR INFORMATION
|
In connection with the issuance of our 7.25% Senior Notes
and our 11.5% Senior Notes, certain of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries, which are 100% owned within the meaning of
Rule 3-10(h)(1)
of
Regulation S-X,
provided guarantees. These guarantees are full and unconditional
as well as joint and several. The guarantor subsidiaries (the
Guarantors) are comprised of the majority of our businesses in
Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Brazil, Portugal, Luxembourg and
Switzerland, as well as certain businesses in Germany. Certain
Guarantors may be subject to restrictions on their ability to
distribute earnings to Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The remaining
subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not
guarantors of the Senior Notes.
The following information presents condensed consolidating
statements of operations, balance sheets and statements of cash
flows of the Parent, the Guarantors, and the Non-Guarantors.
Investments include investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net assets
of divisions included in the Parent, and have been presented
using the equity method of accounting.
33
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
1,743
|
|
|
$
|
606
|
|
|
$
|
(386
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
301
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
214
|
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
(158
|
)
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
2,482
|
|
|
$
|
767
|
|
|
$
|
(679
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
2,364
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
3,277
|
|
|
$
|
1,157
|
|
|
$
|
(679
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
2,622
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
3,261
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
87
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
2,857
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
574
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
375
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
(305
|
)
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
|
$
|
1,603
|
|
|
$
|
(1,389
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
4,741
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
(1,389
|
)
|
|
|
5,622
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
5,223
|
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
171
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
(907
|
)
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,769
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,993
|
)
|
|
|
764
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(1,220
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,940
|
|
|
$
|
6,516
|
|
|
$
|
1,420
|
|
|
$
|
(4,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
428
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
(907
|
)
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
(1,220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,057
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
(2,129
|
)
|
|
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owners net
investment
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
(2,122
|
)
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Novelis shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
(1,993
|
)
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,940
|
|
|
$
|
6,516
|
|
|
$
|
1,420
|
|
|
$
|
(4,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(601
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
719
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
5,036
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owners net
investment
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(1,858
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Novelis shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt third party
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt related party
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Principal payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(272
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(109
|
)
|
|
$
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following information should be read together with our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report
for a more complete understanding of our financial condition and
results of operations. The following discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and
beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those
discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that
could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are
not limited to, those discussed below, particularly in
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND
MARKET DATA.
OVERVIEW
AND REFERENCES
Novelis is the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and
light gauge products for the beverage and food can,
transportation, construction and industrial, and foil products
markets. As of September 30, 2009, we had operations on
four continents: North America; South America; Asia and
Europe, through 31 operating plants, one research facility and
several market-focused innovation centers in 11 countries. In
addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, primary aluminum smelting and
power generation facilities that supply our rolling plants in
Brazil. We are the only company of our size and scope focused
solely on aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local
supply of technologically sophisticated products in all of these
geographic regions.
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein to Rio Tinto
Alcan refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
All tonnages are stated in metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric
tonnes. One MMBTU is the equivalent of one decatherm, or one
million British Thermal Units.
References to our
Form 10-K
made throughout this document refer to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009, filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 29,
2009. We also filed a
Form 8-K
on August 5, 2009 to conform our historical consolidated
financial statements to reflect our adoption as of April 1,
2009 of new accounting guidance related to the presentation of
noncontrolling interests.
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
HIGHLIGHTS
Significant factors that impacted our business for each of the
three and six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are
presented briefly below. Each is discussed in further detail
throughout the Managements Discussion and Analysis and
Segment Review.
|
|
|
|
|
We reported pre-tax income of $301 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to pre-tax
loss of $272 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. Current quarter results include
$254 million of unrealized gains on derivatives as compared
to $221 million of losses in the prior year. The
$254 million of unrealized gains includes a
$169 million reversal of previously recognized losses upon
settlement of derivatives and $85 million of unrealized
gains relating
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
to mark to market adjustments on metal and currency derivatives.
The results for the three months ended September 30, 2008
also include a $26 million gain on the reversal of a legal
claim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We reported pre-tax income of $574 million for the six
months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to pre-tax
loss of $211 million for the six months ended
September 30, 2008. Current results include
$553 million of unrealized gains on derivatives as compared
to $201 million of losses in the prior year. The
$553 million of unrealized gains includes a
$410 million reversal of previously recognized losses upon
settlement of derivatives and $143 million of unrealized
gains relating to mark to market adjustments on metal and
currency derivatives. The results for the six months ended
September 30, 2008 also include a $26 million gain on
the reversal of a legal claim.
|
|
|
|
Shipments of flat rolled products were 8% and 12% less than the
comparable three and six month periods a year ago, which was
before the global economic slowdown. However, flat rolled
shipments for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 were up in all
regions over the first quarter of fiscal 2010, with the most
significant increases in South America and Europe. Shipments of
flat rolled products were 14% higher than the low levels
experienced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
We continue to effectively manage inventory levels. Metal
inventories as of September 30, 2009 totaled 325 kt, up 9%
from an inventory level of 299 kt as of March 31, 2009.
|
BUSINESS
AND INDUSTRY CLIMATE
The global economic slowdown has negatively impacted our sales
and shipment levels as well as our profitability, operating cash
flows and liquidity. During the last six months of fiscal 2009,
we experienced rapidly declining aluminum prices and sharply
lower end customer demand. However, beverage and food can
shipments, which represent between 50% and 60% of our rolled
products business, stabilized during the first quarter of fiscal
2010 at levels which are only moderately below historical
levels. The impacts were more severe in the construction,
automotive and industrial markets, although conditions have now
also stabilized in those product categories. On a regional
basis, the impacts were most severe in Europe, Asia and North
America.
43
Key
Sales and Shipment Trends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments which are in kt)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,103
|
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,939
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
Percentage increase (decrease) in net sales versus comparable
previous year period
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(37
|
)%
|
|
|
(26
|
)%
|
Rolled product shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
South America
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverage and food cans
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
All other rolled products
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage increase (decrease)
in rolled products shipments versus
comparable previous year period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
Europe
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
Asia
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
South America
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverage and food cans
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
All other rolled products
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
(33
|
)%
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have taken a number of actions to adjust our metal intake,
cut back on production and reduce costs and discretionary
spending. These actions have succeeded in preserving adequate
liquidity levels while lowering our fixed cost structure to a
level which allows us to operate with positive cash flow in the
current low demand environment.
While there continues to be some level of uncertainty with
regard to the timing and pace of global economic recovery, we
are seeing signs of recovery in Asia, North America and Europe.
We expect to see gradual improvement in profitability and
liquidity levels during the remainder of fiscal 2010 and do not
believe we are exposed to significant further downside risk
versus the demand levels experienced in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009.
All of these matters are discussed in further detail in
Results of Operations and Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
Business
Model and Key Concepts
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (i) a
pass-through aluminum price based on the London Metal Exchange
(LME) plus local
44
market premiums and (ii) a conversion premium
price on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product which
reflects, among other factors, the competitive market conditions
for that product.
A key component of our conversion model is the use of derivative
instruments on projected aluminum requirements to preserve our
conversion margin. We enter into forward metal purchases
simultaneous with the sales contracts that contain fixed metal
prices. These forward metal purchases directly hedge the
economic risk of future metal price fluctuation associated with
these contracts. The recognition of unrealized gains and losses
on metal derivative positions typically precedes customer
delivery and revenue recognition under the related fixed forward
priced contracts. The timing difference between the recognition
of unrealized gains and losses on metal derivatives and revenue
recognition impacts income (loss) before income taxes and net
income (loss). Gains and losses on metal derivative contracts
are not recognized in segment income until realized.
We also enter into forward metal purchases, aluminum futures and
options to hedge our exposure to rising metal prices and sales
contracts with metal price ceilings. Additionally, we sell
short-term LME futures contracts to reduce our exposure to
fluctuating metal prices associated with the metal price lag.
The average and closing prices based upon the LME for aluminum
for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
London Metal Exchange Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum (per metric tonne, and presented in U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing cash price as of beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,616
|
|
|
$
|
3,075
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,365
|
|
|
$
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)%
|
Average cash price during the period
|
|
$
|
1,805
|
|
|
$
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,623
|
|
|
$
|
2,865
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)%
|
Closing cash price as of end of period
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
|
$
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
|
$
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
LME prices for aluminum (LME prices) have significantly declined
since the high point of $3,292 per tonne in July 2008. Prices
closed at $1,850 per tonne on September 30, 2009, after
hitting a low of $1,254 per tonne in February 2009. Rapid
changes in LME prices have the following impacts on our business:
|
|
|
|
|
Our products have a price structure based upon the LME price.
Increases or decreases in the LME price have a direct impact on
net sales, cost of goods sold and working capital.
|
|
|
|
We pay cash to brokers to settle derivative contracts in advance
of billing and collecting cash from our customers, which
negatively impacts our liquidity position. The lag between
derivative settlement and customer collection typically ranges
from 30 to 60 days, which temporarily reduces our liquidity
in periods following declines in LME. During the six months
ended September 30, 2009, we had net outflows of
$416 million for payments related to the settlement of
derivatives.
|
LME prices have increased 36% from the March 31, 2009
closing price of $1,365 per tonne to $1,850 per tonne at
September 30, 3009 which resulted in $49 million and
$97 million of net gains on change in fair value of metal
derivatives during the three and six months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively.
Metal
Price Ceilings
We have one remaining sales contract which contains a ceiling
over which metal prices cannot be contractually passed through
to a certain customer. This contract, which expires on
December 31, 2009, negatively impacts our margins and
operating cash flows when the price we pay for metal is above
the ceiling price contained in this contract. We calculate and
report this difference to be approximately the difference
between the quoted purchase price on the LME (adjusted for any
local premiums and for any price lag associated with purchasing
or processing time) and the metal price ceiling in our
contracts. Cash flows from
45
operations are negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted
for any timing difference between customer receipts and vendor
payments, and offset partially by reduced income taxes.
We recently entered into a new multi-year agreement to continue
supplying similar volumes to the same customer upon the
expiration of the contract containing the metal price ceiling.
This new agreement becomes effective January 1, 2010, and
does not contain a metal price ceiling.
LME prices remained below the ceiling price for the first five
months of fiscal 2010. However, due to increases in LME during
the month of September 2009, we were unable to pass through
$4 million of metal purchase costs associated with sales
under this contract for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2009. For the three and six months ended
September 30, 2008, we were unable to pass through
approximately $74 and $152 million, respectively, of metal
purchase costs associated with sales under this contract. Based
upon a September 30, 2009 aluminum price of $1,850 and our
best estimate of shipment volumes, we estimate that we will be
unable to pass through additional aluminum purchase costs of
approximately $4 million through December 31, 2009
when this contract expires.
In periods in which we are affected by the metal price ceiling,
we employ the following actions to manage and mitigate the risks
associated with metal price ceilings and rising prices that we
cannot pass through to certain customers:
|
|
|
|
|
We maximize the amount of our internally supplied metal inputs
from our smelting, refining and mining operations in Brazil and
rely on output from our recycling operations which utilize used
beverage cans (UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply
have historically provided an offsetting benefit to the metal
price ceiling contracts. We refer to these two sources as
internal hedges.
|
|
|
|
We entered into derivative instruments to hedge projected
aluminum volume requirements above our assumed internal hedge
position, mitigating our exposure to further increases in LME
prices. As a result of these instruments, we will continue to
incur cash losses related to these contracts even if LME prices
remain below the ceiling price. As of September 30, 2009
the fair value of the liability associated with these derivative
instruments was $14 million.
|
In connection with the allocation of purchase price (i.e., total
consideration) paid by Hindalco, we established reserves
totaling $655 million as of May 15, 2007 to record
these contracts at fair value. These reserves are being accreted
into net sales over the remaining lives of the underlying
contracts. This accretion has no impact on cash flow. For the
three and six months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded
accretion of $52 million and $107 million,
respectively. The three and six months ended September 30,
2008 included accretion of $61 million and
$125 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2009,
the balance of these reserves is approximately $45 million
which will be amortized into sales during the third quarter of
fiscal 2010.
Metal
Price Lag
On certain sales contracts we experience timing differences on
the pass through of changing aluminum prices from our suppliers
to our customers. Additional timing differences occur in the
flow of metal costs through moving average inventory cost values
and cost of goods sold. In periods of declining prices, our
earnings are negatively impacted by this timing difference while
the opposite is true in periods of rising prices. We refer to
this timing difference as metal price lag. We sell
short-term LME forward contracts to help mitigate our exposure
to metal price lag.
Certain of our sales contracts, most notably in Europe, contain
fixed metal prices for periods of time ranging from four to
thirty-six months. We typically enter into forward metal
purchases simultaneous with these sales contracts.
46
Foreign
Exchange Impact
Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates also impact our operating
results. The following tables present the exchange rates as of
the beginning and end of each period as well as the average
month end exchange rates for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate as of
|
|
|
Average Exchange Rate
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
1.462
|
|
|
|
1.328
|
|
|
|
1.438
|
|
|
|
1.328
|
|
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.781
|
|
|
|
2.301
|
|
|
|
1.841
|
|
|
|
1.932
|
|
South Korean won per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.073
|
|
|
|
1.258
|
|
|
|
1.084
|
|
|
|
1.115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate as of
|
|
|
Average Exchange Rate
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
1.408
|
|
|
|
1.581
|
|
|
|
1.478
|
|
|
|
1.520
|
|
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.923
|
|
|
|
1.744
|
|
|
|
1.708
|
|
|
|
1.673
|
|
South Korean won per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.060
|
|
|
|
1.028
|
|
|
|
1.050
|
|
|
|
1.028
|
|
The U.S. dollar weakened as compared to the local currency
in all regions during the three and six months ended
September 30, 2009. In Europe and Asia, the weakening of
the U.S. dollar resulted in foreign exchange gains as these
operations are recorded in local currency. In Brazil, where the
U.S. dollar is the functional currency due to predominantly
U.S. dollar selling prices and local currency operating
costs, we incurred foreign exchange losses as the
U.S. dollar weakened. See Segment Review for the additional
discussion of the impact of foreign exchange on the results of
each region.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we reported
net income attributable to our common shareholder of
$195 million on net sales of $2.2 billion, compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2008 when we reported
net loss attributable to our common shareholder of
$104 million on net sales of $3.0 billion. The
reduction in sales is due to 35% lower average LME prices as
well as lower shipments for flat rolled products in Europe and
North America. Flat rolled product shipments increased over the
prior year in both Asia and South America.
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
decreased $1.1 billion, or 38%, which reflects lower in
metal costs along with the benefit of our previously announced
restructuring actions, shown in part through reductions in
conversion costs for each region. Selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased $6 million, or 7%,
primarily due to reductions in selling costs and professional
fees.
The three months ended September 30, 2009 was impacted by
$254 million in unrealized gains on derivative instruments,
as compared to losses of $221 million in the three months
ended September 30, 2008. We also recorded an income tax
provision of $87 million in the three months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to a $168 million
income tax benefit in the prior year. These items are discussed
in further detail below.
47
Segment
Review
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America, Europe, Asia and South America.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments, based on Segment income. Segment income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment income as earnings before (a) depreciation and
amortization; (b) interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs; (c) interest income; (d) unrealized
gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net; (e) impairment of goodwill;
(f) impairment charges on long-lived assets (other than
goodwill); (g) gain on extinguishment of debt;
(h) noncontrolling interests share;
(i) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Segment income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting;
(k) restructuring charges, net; (k) gains or losses on
disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses, net;
(l) other costs, net; (m) litigation settlement, net
of insurance recoveries; (n) sale transaction fees;
(o) provision or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and
(p) cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax.
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions, except shipments which are in kt). For additional
financial information related to our operating segments, see
Note 15 Segment, Major Customer and Major
Supplier Information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
822
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,111
|
|
|
$
|
1,097
|
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 to three months ended
September 30, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment Income
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Segment income three months ended September 30,
2008
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Conversion costs(A)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Other changes(B)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income three months ended September 30,
2009
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such
as direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage,
alloys and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss.
Fluctuations in this component reflect cost efficiencies during
the period as well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(B) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research and development for all
segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of purchase
accounting and metal price ceiling contracts. Significant
fluctuations in these items are discussed below. |
North
America
As of September 30, 2009, North America manufactured
aluminum sheet and light gauge products through 11 plants,
including two dedicated recycling facilities. Important end-use
applications include beverage cans, containers and packaging,
automotive and other transportation applications, building
products and other industrial applications.
North America experienced a reduction in demand in the second
half of fiscal 2009 as all industry sectors were impacted by the
economic downturn. While shipments in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 were slightly higher than the first quarter of
fiscal 2010, they have not yet returned to historical levels,
with shipments down 12% as compared to the second quarter of
fiscal 2009. Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2010
were down $289 million, or 26%, as compared to the second
quarter of fiscal 2009 due to lower average LME prices as well
as the lower shipments. The can business remains relatively
stable, but shipments of most other products are below the prior
year level.
Segment income for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 period was
$75 million, up $73 million as compared to the prior
year period. Reductions in conversion costs, and improved
conversion premiums and net favorable metal price lag all had a
positive impact on segment income, more than offsetting volume
reductions. Conversion cost improvements primarily relate to
reduction in energy, melt loss, labor costs, freight and repairs
and maintenance as compared to the prior year period. Other
changes include a $9 million reduction to the net favorable
impact of acquisition related fair value adjustments, partially
offset by a $6 million higher benefit associated with used
beverage cans.
Europe
As of September 30, 2009, our European segment provided
European markets with value-added sheet and light gauge products
through 12 aluminum rolled products facilities and one dedicated
recycling facility. Europe serves a broad range of aluminum
rolled product end-use markets in various applications including
can, automotive, lithographic, foil products and painted
products.
Europe has also experienced a significant reduction in demand in
all industry sectors with flat rolled shipments and net sales
down 20% and 33%, respectively, compared to the prior year. The
volume reduction had a $134 million unfavorable impact on
net sales, with the remaining decrease reflecting the impact of
lower LME prices. However, flat rolled products in Europe
increased 10% over the first quarter of fiscal 2010 as we begin
to see signs of economic recovery in Europe.
Segment income for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was
$60 million, flat as compared to $62 million in the
same period of the prior year. Volume and metal price lag
unfavorably impacted segment income but these impacts were
partially offset by favorable conversion premiums, reductions in
conversion costs and foreign exchange remeasurement. The
favorable impact of conversion costs relates to decreases in
labor and energy costs, as well as a reduction in repair and
maintenance expense and freight as compared to the prior year
period. Other changes reflect a favorable impact of
$3 million from fixed forward priced contracts and a
$2 million reduction in selling, general and administrative
costs.
49
Asia
As of September 30, 2009, Asia operated three manufacturing
facilities with production balanced between foil, construction
and industrial, and beverage and food can end-use applications.
We have seen a recovery in demand in Asia, driven mostly from
China and Korea, with flat rolled shipments up 14% as compared
to the prior year period and 7% as compared to the first quarter
of fiscal 2010. We expect customer demand to continue at these
levels. Net sales decreased $76 million, or 17%, reflecting
the impact of lower LME prices.
Segment income increased from a loss of $3 million for the
second quarter of fiscal 2009 to $48 million for the second
quarter of fiscal 2010 due to improvements in conversion
premiums, reductions in conversion costs and foreign exchange
remeasurement, partially offset by unfavorable metal price lag.
Conversion cost improvements primarily relate to reduction in
energy and labor costs compared to the prior year period.
South
America
Our operations in South America manufacture various aluminum
rolled products for the beverage and food can, construction and
industrial and transportation end-use markets. Our South
American operations included two rolling plants in Brazil along
with two smelters, bauxite mines and power generation facilities
as of September 30, 2009. We ceased the production of
commercial grade alumina at our Ouro Preto facility effective
May 2009 as the sustained decline in alumina prices has made
alumina production economically unfeasible. For the foreseeable
future, the plant will purchase alumina through third parties.
Total shipments increased 9% over the prior year period, with
rolled products shipments up 7%, while net sales decreased 16%
as compared to the prior year due to lower LME prices, partially
offset by higher conversion premiums. Flat rolled shipments in
South America for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were also up
15% as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010, can
production has been stable with shipments constant year over
year. Can shipments represent between 80 and 85% of our flat
rolled shipments in South America.
Segment income for South America decreased $12 million as
compared to the prior year period. This decrease in segment
income is due to a $22 million decrease in the smelter
benefit compared to the prior year period and an $8 million
reduction in the benefit associated with used beverage cans,
included in Other changes in the table above. The benefits from
our smelter operations in South America decline as average LME
prices decrease. While LME prices increased during the second
quarter, the average is still 35% below the prior year
comparative period.
50
Reconciliation
of segment results to Net income
Costs such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense
and unrealized gains (losses) on changes in the fair value of
derivatives are not utilized by our chief operating decision
maker in evaluating segment performance. The table below
reconciles income from reportable segments to Net income
attributable to our common shareholder for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
South America
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Restructuring recoveries (charges), net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization decreased $15 million from
the prior year period due to the reductions in depreciation on
fixed assets, primarily in Europe. Certain fair value
adjustments recorded in connection with the Arrangement were
fully amortized by the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt. Approximately 16% of our debt was variable
rate as of September 30, 2009.
Unrealized gains on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the mark to market accounting for changes
in the fair value of our derivatives that do not receive hedge
accounting treatment. For the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the
$254 million of unrealized gains for the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 consists of (1) $169 million reversal of
previously recognized losses upon settlement of these
derivatives and (2) $85 million of unrealized gains
relating to mark to market adjustments. We recorded
$221 million of unrealized losses for the second quarter of
fiscal 2009.
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation of
$17 million for the second quarter for fiscal 2010 was flat
as compared to $18 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2009. This adjustment primarily relates to depreciation and
amortization and income taxes at our Aluminium Norf GmbH joint
venture. Income taxes related to our equity method investments
are reflected in the carrying value of the investment and not in
our consolidated income tax provision.
Restructuring charges in the second quarter of fiscal 2009
relate to additional expenses associated with previously
announced restructuring actions in Europe. See
Note 2 Restructuring Programs.
51
Other costs, net for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 includes
a $26 million non-cash gain on reversal of a legal accrual.
We have experienced significant fluctuations in income tax
expense and the corresponding effective tax rate. The primary
factors contributing to the effective tax rate differing from
the statutory Canadian rate include:
|
|
|
|
|
Our functional currency in Canada and Brazil is the
U.S. dollar and the company holds significant
U.S. dollar denominated debt in these locations. As the
value of the local currencies strengthens and weakens against
the U.S. dollar, unrealized gains or losses are created in
those locations for tax purposes, while the underlying gains or
losses are not recorded in our income statement.
|
During the year ended March 31, 2009, Canadian legislation
was enacted allowing us to elect to determine our Canadian
taxable income in U.S. dollars. Our election was effective
April 1, 2008, and such U.S. dollar taxable gains and
losses no longer exist in Canada as of that date.
|
|
|
|
|
We have significant net deferred tax liabilities in Brazil that
are remeasured to account for currency fluctuations as the taxes
are payable in local currency.
|
|
|
|
Our income is taxed at various statutory tax rates in varying
jurisdictions. Applying the corresponding amounts of income and
loss to the various tax rates results in differences when
compared to our Canadian statutory tax rate.
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded
an $87 million income tax provision on our pre-tax income
of $311 million, before our equity in net loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and noncontrolling interests, which
represented an effective tax rate of 28%. Our effective tax rate
differs from the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the
following factors: (1) $8 million expense for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) $13 million expense for exchange remeasurement of
deferred income taxes, (3) $5 million benefit from
expense/income items with no tax effect and
(4) $26 million benefit from a decrease in uncertain
tax positions.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded
a $168 million income tax benefit on our pre-tax loss of
$274 million, before our equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates and noncontrolling interests, which
represented an effective tax rate of 61%. Our effective tax rate
differs from the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the
following factors: (1) $22 million benefit for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) $41 million benefit for exchange remeasurement of
deferred income taxes and (3) a $54 million benefit
for differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign
effective tax rates applied to entities in different
jurisdictions.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the
statute of limitations lapsed with respect to unrecognized tax
benefits related to potential withholding taxes and cross-border
intercompany pricing of services. As a result, we recognized a
reduction in unrecognized tax benefits of $28 million,
including a decrease in accrued interest of $5 million,
recorded as a reduction to the income tax provision in the
consolidated statement of operations. In addition, as disclosed
in Note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements, our income tax provision for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 reflects the correction of a prior
period error which reduces our income tax provision by
$5 million.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
For the six months ended September 30, 2009, we reported
net income attributable to our common shareholder of
$338 million on net sales of $4.1 billion, compared to
the six months ended September 30, 2008 when we reported
net loss attributable to our common shareholder of
$80 million on net sales of $6.1 billion. The
reduction in sales is due to 43% lower average LME prices as
well as lower shipments of flat rolled products primarily in
Europe and North America.
52
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
decreased $2.4 billion, or 42%, which primarily reflects
lower metal costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased $12 million, or 7%, primarily due to reductions
in selling costs and professional fees.
The six months ended September 30, 2009 was impacted by
$553 million in unrealized gains on derivative instruments,
as compared to $201 million of losses in the six months
ended September 30, 2008. We also recorded an income tax
provision of $199 million in the six months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to a $133 million
income tax benefit in the prior year. These items are discussed
in further detail below.
Segment
Review
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions, except shipments which are in kt). For additional
financial information related to our operating segments, see
Note 15 Segment, Major Customer and Major
Supplier Information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,589
|
|
|
$
|
1,400
|
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,343
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
|
$
|
2,315
|
|
|
$
|
968
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
six months ended September 30, 2008 to six months ended
September 30, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment Income
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Segment income six months ended September 30,
2008
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Conversion costs(A)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Other changes(B)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income six months ended September 30,
2009
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such as
direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage, alloys
and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss. Fluctuations in
this component reflect cost efficiencies during the period as
well as cost inflation (deflation). |
53
|
|
|
(B) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research and development for all
segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of purchase
accounting and metal price ceiling contracts. Significant
fluctuations in these items are discussed below. |
North
America
North America experienced a reduction in demand in the six
months ended September 30, 2009 as most industry sectors
were impacted by the economic downturn. In the six months ended
September 30, 2009, shipments decreased by 12% to 512 kt as
compared to the prior year period. Net sales for the six months
ended September 30, 2009 were down $605 million, or
28%, as compared to the prior year period due to a lower average
LME price as well as lower shipments. The can business remains
relatively stable, but shipments of most other products are
below the prior year level.
Segment income for the six months ended September 30, 2009
was $132 million, up $88 million as compared to the
prior year period. Reductions in conversion costs, and improved
conversion premiums and net favorable metal price lag all had a
positive impact on segment income, more than offsetting volume
reductions. Conversion cost improvements primarily relate to
reduction in energy, melt loss, labor costs, freight and repairs
and maintenance as compared to the prior year period. Other
changes include a $18 million reduction to the net
favorable impact of acquisition related fair value adjustments,
partially offset by a $7 million reduction in selling,
general and administrative expenses and $8 million higher
benefit from used beverage cans.
Europe
Europe has also experienced a significant reduction in demand in
all industry sectors with flat rolled shipments and net sales
down 26% and 40%, respectively, compared to the prior year. The
volume reduction had a $311 million unfavorable impact on
net sales, with the remaining decrease reflecting the impact of
lower LME prices.
Segment income for the six months ended September 30, 2009
was $93 million, down from $173 million in the
comparative period of the prior year. Volume and metal price lag
unfavorably impacted segment income but these impacts were
partially offset by favorable conversion premiums, reductions in
conversion costs and foreign exchange remeasurement. The
favorable impact of conversion costs relates to decreases in
labor and energy costs, as well as a reduction in repair and
maintenance expense and freight as compared to the prior year
period.
Asia
As discussed above, we have seen a recovery in demand in Asia,
driven mostly from China and Korea, with flat rolled shipments
for the six months ended September 30, 2009 up 5% as
compared to the prior year period. We expect customer demand to
continue at these levels. Net sales decreased $260 million,
or 27%, reflecting the impact of lower LME prices.
Segment income increased to $86 million for the six months
ended September 30, 2009 from $28 million in the prior
year period due to improvements in conversion premiums,
conversion costs and foreign exchange remeasurement, partially
offset by unfavorable metal price lag. Conversion cost
improvements primarily relate to reduction in energy, labor
costs, and repairs and maintenance as compared to the prior year
period.
South
America
Total shipments increased 2% over the prior year period, with
rolled products shipments essentially flat and net sales down
23% as compared to the prior year due to lower LME prices,
partially offset by higher conversion premiums. Can shipments
represent between 80 and 85% of our flat rolled shipments in
South America and can production has been stable with shipments
constant year over year.
54
Segment income for South America decreased $48 million as
compared to the prior year period. This decrease in segment
income is due to a $51 million decrease in the smelter
benefit compared to the prior year period and a $13 million
reduction in the benefit associated with used beverage cans,
included in Other changes in the table above. The benefits from
our smelter operations in South America decline as average LME
prices decrease. While LME prices increased during the second
quarter, the average is still 43% below the prior year
comparative period. These negative impacts were partially offset
by favorable conversion premiums.
Reconciliation
of segment results to Net income
Costs such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense
and unrealized gains (losses) on changes in the fair value of
derivatives are not utilized by our chief operating decision
maker in evaluating segment performance. The table below
reconciles income from reportable segments to Net income
attributable to our common shareholder for the six months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
South America
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Restructuring recoveries (charges), net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization decreased $31 million from
the prior year period due to the reductions in depreciation on
fixed assets, primarily in Europe. Certain fair value
adjustments recorded in connection with the Arrangement were
fully amortized in the six months ended September 30, 2009.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt. Approximately 16% of our debt was variable
rate as of September 30, 2009.
Unrealized gains on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the mark to market accounting for changes
in the fair value of our derivatives that do not receive hedge
accounting treatment. In the six months ended September 30,
2009, the $553 million of unrealized gains consists of
(1) $410 million reversal of previously recognized
losses upon settlement of these derivatives and
(2) $143 million of unrealized gains relating to mark
to market adjustments. For the six months ended
September 30, 2008 we recorded $201 million of
unrealized losses.
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation of
$33 million for the six months ended September 30,
2009 was flat as compared to $36 million in the prior year
period. This adjustment primarily relates to
55
depreciation and amortization and income taxes at our Aluminium
Norf GmbH joint venture. Income taxes related to our equity
method investments are reflected in the carrying value of the
investment and not in our consolidated income tax provision.
Restructuring charges in the six months ended September 30,
2009 relate to additional expenses associated with previously
announced restructuring actions in Europe. See
Note 2 Restructuring Programs.
For the six months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded a
$199 million income tax provision on our pre-tax income of
$594 million, before our equity in net loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and noncontrolling interests, which
represented an effective tax rate of 34%. Our effective tax rate
differs from the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the
following factors: (1) $20 million expense for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) $36 million expense for exchange remeasurement of
deferred income taxes, (3) $4 million benefit from
expense/income items with no tax, (4) $9 million
benefit from differences between the Canadian statutory and
foreign effective tax rates applied to entities in different
jurisdictions and (5) $25 million benefit from a
decrease in uncertain tax positions.
For the six months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a
$133 million income tax benefit on our pre-tax loss of
$211 million, before our equity in net loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and noncontrolling interests, which
represented an effective tax rate of 63%. Our effective tax rate
differs from the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the
following factors: (1) $13 million benefit for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) $21 million benefit for exchange remeasurement of
deferred income taxes and (3) a $68 million benefit
for differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign
effective tax rates applied to entities in different
jurisdictions.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We believe we have adequate liquidity to meet our operational
and capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Our primary
sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, borrowing
availability under our revolving credit facility and cash
generated by operating activities. As described in greater
detail below, we completed a debt offering for $185 million
of new senior notes during the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
During the first six months of fiscal 2010, our liquidity
position increased $165 million despite continued low
levels of demand in the automotive, construction and industrial
markets and net cash outflows to settle derivative positions.
This reflects our continued efforts to preserve liquidity
through cost and capital spending controls and effective
management of working capital. Risks associated with supplier
terms, customer credit and broker hedging capacity, while still
present to some degree, have been managed successfully to date
with minimal negative impact on our business. We expect our
liquidity position to continue to improve during fiscal 2010
primarily due to reduced cash outflows for metal derivatives and
cash savings from restructuring programs.
Significant declines in the price of aluminum in the second half
of fiscal 2009 had a negative impact on our liquidity position
and increased the effect of timing issues related to the
settlement of aluminum forward contracts versus cash collections
from our customers. We enter into derivative instruments to
hedge forecasted purchases and sales of aluminum. Based on the
aluminum price forward curve as of September 30, 2009, we
forecast approximately $98 million of cash outflows related
to the settlement of metal derivative instruments through the
remainder of fiscal 2010. Except for approximately
$26 million of cash outflows related to hedges of our
exposure to metal price ceilings, we expect all of these
outflows will be recovered through collection of customer
accounts receivable, typically on a 30 to 60 day lag.
We have an existing beverage can sheet umbrella agreement with
certain North American bottlers (BCS agreement). Pursuant to the
BCS agreement, an agent for the bottlers directs the can
fabricators to source a percentage of their requirements for
beverage can body, end and tab stock from us.
Under the BCS agreement, the bottlers agent has the right
to request that we hedge the exposure to the price the bottlers
will ultimately pay for aluminum. We treat this arrangement as a
derivative for accounting
56
purposes. Upon receiving such requests, we enter into
corresponding derivative instruments indexed to the LME price of
aluminum with third party brokers. We settle the positions with
the brokers at maturity and net settle the economic benefit or
loss arising from the pricing requests, which may not occur for
up to 13 months.
As of September 30, 2009, we had settled $118 million
of net derivative losses for which we had not yet been
reimbursed under the BCS agreement. Based on the current
aluminum price forward curve, we do not anticipate any further
negative impact on our liquidity as a result of this
arrangement. We believe that collection on these receivables is
reasonably certain based on the credit worthiness of the
bottlers.
Available
Liquidity
Our estimated liquidity as of September 30, 2009 and
March 31, 2009 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Overdrafts
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Gross availability under the ABL facility
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Borrowing availability limitation due to fixed charge coverage
ratio
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated liquidity
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$246 million. Additionally, we had $400 million in
remaining availability under our revolving credit line and
letter of credit facility (ABL Facility), before covenant
restrictions. Borrowings under the ABL Facility are generally
based on 85% of eligible accounts receivable and 65 to 70% of
eligible inventories. Under the ABL Facility, if our excess
availability, as defined therein, is less than $80 million,
we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1 to 1. As of September 30, 2009, our fixed charge
coverage ratio is less than 1 to 1, resulting in a reduction of
availability under our ABL Facility of $80 million.
The cash and cash equivalents balance above includes cash held
in foreign countries in which we operate. These amounts are
generally available on a short-term basis, subject to regulatory
requirements, in the form of a dividend or inter-company loan.
Operating
Activities
Free cash flow (which is a non-GAAP measure) consists of:
(a) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities;
(b) plus net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities, less (c) proceeds from sales of assets.
Management believes that Free cash flow is relevant to investors
as it provides a measure of the cash generated internally that
is available for debt service and other value creation
opportunities. However, Free cash flow does not necessarily
represent cash available for discretionary activities, as
certain debt service obligations must be funded out of Free cash
flow. Our method of calculating Free cash flow may not be
consistent with that of other companies.
57
The following table shows the Free cash flow for each of the six
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the change
between periods as well as the ending balances of cash and cash
equivalents (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
|
$
|
(390
|
)
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
Less: Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
(340
|
)
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities for the first six
months of fiscal 2010 significantly improved as compared to net
cash used in the last six months of fiscal 2009 due to higher
net income and improved working capital management, including
favorable impacts from customer forfaiting and extended payment
terms from suppliers.
In our discussion of Metal Price Ceilings, we disclosed that a
customer contract contains a fixed metal price ceiling beyond
which the cost of aluminum cannot be passed through to the
customer. For the six months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, we were unable to pass through approximately
$4 million and $152 million, respectively, of metal
purchase costs associated with sales under this contract. Net
cash provided by operating activities was negatively impacted by
the same amount, adjusted for timing difference between customer
receipts and vendor payments and offset partially by reduced
income taxes. Based upon a September 30, 2009 aluminum
price of $1,850 and our best estimate of shipment volumes, we
estimate that we will be unable to pass through aluminum
purchase costs of approximately $4 million through
December 31, 2009 when this contract expires.
Investing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
(70
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Proceeds from related parties loans receivable, net
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net proceeds (outflow) from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
(442
|
)
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the overall economic downturn, we reduced our
capital spending beginning in the second half of fiscal 2009. We
expect that our total annual capital expenditures for fiscal
2010 to be between $90 and $100 million for items necessary
to maintain comparable production, quality and market position
levels (maintenance capital).
The settlement of derivative instruments resulted in an outflow
of $416 million in the six months ended September 30,
2009 as compared to $94 million in cash contributed in the
prior year period. The net outflow in fiscal 2010 was primarily
related to metal derivatives. Based on the aluminum price
forward curve as of September 30, 2009, we forecast
approximately $98 million of cash outflows related to the
settlement of metal derivative instruments through the remainder
of fiscal 2010. Except for approximately $26 million of
cash outflows related to hedges of our exposure to metal price
ceilings, we expect all of these outflows will be recovered
through collection of customer accounts receivable, typically on
a 30 to 60 day lag.
58
The majority of proceeds from asset sales in the six months
ended September 30, 2009 relate to asset sales in Europe
while the first quarter of fiscal 2009 related to sale of land
in Kingston, Ontario.
Proceeds from loans receivable, net during all periods are
primarily comprised of payments we received related to a loan
due from our non-consolidated affiliate, Aluminium Norf GmbH.
Financing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by (used in) financing activities (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, third parties
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, related parties
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Principal payments, third parties
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Principal payments, related parties
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
Dividends, noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 11, 2009, we issued $185 million aggregate
principal face amount of 11.5% senior unsecured notes at an
effective rate of 12.0% (11.5% Senior Notes). The
11.5% Senior Notes rank equally with all of our existing
and future unsecured senior indebtedness. The 11.5% Senior
Notes were issued at a discount resulting in gross proceeds of
$181 million. The net proceeds of this offering were used
to repay a portion of the ABL Facility and $94 million
outstanding under the unsecured credit facility from an
affiliate of the Aditya Birla Group.
As of September 30, 2009, our short-term borrowings were
$177 million consisting of (1) $166 million of
short-term loans under our ABL Facility, (2) a
$4 million short-term loan in Italy and
(3) $7 million in bank overdrafts. As of
September 30, 2009, $31 million of our ABL Facility
was utilized for letters of credit and we had $400 million
in remaining availability under this revolving credit facility
before covenant related restrictions. The weighted average
interest rate on our total short-term borrowings was 2.09% and
2.75% as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009,
respectively.
In February 2009, to assist in maintaining adequate liquidity
levels, we entered into an unsecured credit facility of
$100 million (the Unsecured Credit Facility) with a
scheduled maturity date of January 15, 2015 from an
affiliate of the Aditya Birla group. During the six months ended
September 30, 2009, we drew an additional $3 million
on the Unsecured Credit Facility. As discussed above, this
facility was repaid and retired using the proceeds from the
11.5% Senior Notes.
As proceeds from the 11.5% Senior Notes was used to repay
existing debt, our borrowing level has remained constant for the
first six months of fiscal 2010. During the first six months of
fiscal 2009, we increased our short-term borrowings under the
ABL Facility to provide for general working capital requirements
in a rising aluminum price environment.
As of September 30, 2009, we had an additional
$122 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
not included in our revolving credit facility.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In accordance with SEC rules, the following qualify as
off-balance sheet arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain guarantees or contracts;
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an
unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement
that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that
entity for such assets; and
|
|
|
|
any obligation under a material variable interest held by the
registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing,
liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant,
or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development
services with the registrant.
|
The following discussion addresses the applicable off-balance
sheet items for our Company.
Derivative
Instruments
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009
are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
(640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included
in Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. |
Net
Investment Hedges
We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to
fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and
investments in our European operations. We had cross-currency
swaps of Euro 135 million as of September 30,
2009 and March 31, 2009, designated as net investment
hedges. The effective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative is included in Other comprehensive income (loss)
(OCI), as a part of Currency translation adjustments. The
ineffective portion of gain or loss on derivatives is included
in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net.
For our currency exchange contracts designated as net investment
hedges, we recognized a $5 million loss and a
$21 million loss in OCI for the three months and six months
ended September 30, 2009, respectively. We recognized gains
of $81 and $120 million in OCI for the three and six months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Cash Flow
Hedges
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we have
designated as a cash flow hedge of our exposure to fluctuating
electricity prices. The effective portion of gain or loss on the
derivative is included in OCI and reclassified when settled into
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivatives, net in our
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. As
of September 30, 2009, the outstanding portion of this swap
includes 1.8 million megawatt hours through 2017.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable-rate
debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included
in OCI and reclassified when settled into Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs in our accompanying
condensed consolidated statements of operations. We had
$910 million and $690 million of outstanding interest
rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges as of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
61
For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or
losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the
life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the
relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will no
longer be designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if
the underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be
probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness
determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the
measures we have established at the inception of the hedge.
Gains or losses recognized to date in AOCI would be immediately
reclassified into current period earnings, as would any
subsequent changes in the fair value of any such derivative.
During the next twelve months we expect to realize
$23 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.
The following table summarizes the impact on AOCI and earnings
of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges (in
millions).
Three
Month
Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Six
Month
Comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in
helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging
instruments. The change in fair value of these derivative
instruments is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the London Metal Exchange (LME) price of
aluminum. These exposures arise from firm commitments to sell
aluminum in future periods at fixed or capped prices, the
forecasted output of our smelter operations in South America and
the forecasted metal price lag associated with firm commitments
to sell aluminum in future periods at prices based on the LME.
In addition, transactions with certain customers meet the
definition of a derivative and are recognized as assets or
liabilities at fair value on the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2009 and
March 31, 2009, we had 225 kilotonnes (kt) and 294 kt,
respectively, of outstanding aluminum contracts not designated
as hedges.
62
We recognize a derivative position which arises from a
contractual relationship with a customer that entitles us to
pass-through the economic effect of trading positions that we
take with other third parties on our customers behalf.
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross-currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain operations. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
outstanding currency exchange contracts with a total notional
amount of $1.5 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively,
not designated as hedges.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
interest rates associated with variable-rate debt. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
$11 million and $10 million, respectively, of
outstanding interest rate swaps that were not designated as
hedges.
We use heating oil swaps and natural gas swaps to manage our
exposure to fluctuating energy prices in North America. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
2.4 million gallons and 3.4 million gallons,
respectively, of heating oil swaps and 4.3 million MMBTUs
and 3.8 million MMBTUs, respectively, of natural gas that
were not designated as hedges. One MMBTU is the equivalent of
one decatherm, or one million British Thermal Units.
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in
current period earnings (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
(181
|
)
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including:
|
|
|
|
|
certain of our wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH, which is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint
venture that does not meet the requirements for consolidation.
|
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
have annual terms subject to renewal while others have no
expiration and have termination notice requirements. For our
majority-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness guaranteed is for
short-term loan, overdraft and other debt facilities with
financial institutions, which are currently scheduled to expire
during the first half of fiscal 2010. Neither Novelis Inc. nor
any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds any
assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the
potential settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our condensed consolidated financial statements,
all liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term
debt facilities for these entities are already included in our
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
63
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness of others as of
September 30, 2009 (in millions). We did not have any
obligations under guarantees of indebtedness related to our
majority-owned subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Potential Future
|
|
Carrying
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Payment
|
|
Value
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
Other
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in
transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities
(SPEs), which would have been established for the purpose of
facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we are not
involved in any unconsolidated SPE transactions.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
We have future obligations under various contracts relating to
debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases,
long-term purchase obligations, postretirement benefit plans and
uncertain tax positions. As a result of our debt offering in
August 2009, we have updated our debt repayment schedule
presented in Note 6 to the consolidated financial
statements. During the six months ended September 30, 2009,
there were no other significant changes to these obligations as
reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009.
DIVIDENDS
No dividends have been declared since October 26, 2006.
Future dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors
and will depend on, among other things, our financial resources,
cash flows generated by our business, our cash requirements,
restrictions under the instruments governing our indebtedness,
being in compliance with the appropriate indentures and
covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness
that would allow us to legally pay dividends and other relevant
factors.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, there
were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies
and estimates as reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards have been adopted by us
during the six months ended September 30, 2009.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
approved its Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
(Codification) as the single source of authoritative United
States accounting and reporting standards applicable for all
non-governmental entities, with the exception of the SEC and its
staff. The Codification which changes the referencing of
financial standards is effective for interim or annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. As the codification is not
intended to change or alter existing US GAAP, this standard had
no impact on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
64
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 855, Subsequent
Events, (prior authoritative literature: FASB Statement
No. 165, Subsequent Events) which establishes
general standards of accounting and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. This
accounting standard requires the disclosure of the date through
which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis
for that date. This standard had no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements) which establishes
accounting and reporting standards that require: (i) the
ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than
the parent to be clearly identified and presented in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet within shareholders
equity, but separate from the parents equity;
(ii) the amount of condensed consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be
clearly identified and presented on the face of the condensed
consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes in a
parents ownership interest while the parent retains its
controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be accounted
for consistently. We adopted this accounting standard effective
April 1, 2009, and applied this standard prospectively,
except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which
have been applied retrospectively.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets) which
amends the factors that should be considered in developing the
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset. The accounting standard
also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination
of intangible asset useful lives. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, (prior authoritative
literature: FASB Staff Position
No. 107-1
and APB Opinion
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments; FASB Staff Position
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly) which
requires disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods. This codification
also provides additional guidance in determining fair value when
the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has
significantly decreased. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 320,
Investments Debt and Equity
Securities, (prior authoritative literature: FASB Staff
Position
No. 115-2
and FASB Staff Position
No. 124-2,
Recognition of Other-than-Temporary-Impairments) which
amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP for
debt and equity securities. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 805, Business
Combinations, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations;
FASB Staff Position No. 141(R)-1, Accounting for
Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business
Combination That Arise from Contingencies) (ASC
805) which establishes principles and requirements for how
the acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
This standard also requires acquirers to estimate the
acquisition-date fair value of any contingent consideration and
to recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of
contingent consideration in earnings. ASC 805 also clarifies the
initial and subsequent recognition, subsequent accounting, and
disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination. This standard requires that assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that
arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value, if the
acquisition-date fair value can be reasonably estimated. We will
apply ASC 805 prospectively to business combinations occurring
after March 31, 2009, with the exception of the accounting
for valuation allowances on deferred
65
taxes and acquired tax contingencies. This standard amends
certain provisions of preexisting tax guidance such that
adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and
acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that
closed prior to the effective date of this business combination
guidance would also apply the provisions of this standard. This
standard had no impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 323,
Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures,
(prior authoritative literature: Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue
No. 08-06,
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations) which
addresses questions that have arisen about the application of
the equity method of accounting for investments acquired after
the effective date of newly issued business combination
standards and non-controlling interest standards. This
accounting standard clarifies how to account for certain
transactions involving equity method investments, and is
effective on a prospective basis. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards have been issued, but
have not yet been adopted by us as of September 30, 2009,
as adoption is not required until future reporting periods.
In June 2009, the FASB issued statement No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FASB
167). FASB 167 has not been incorporated by the FASB into the
Codification as the guidance is not yet effective and early
adoption is prohibited. FASB 167 is intended (1) to address
the effects on certain provisions of the accounting standard
dealing with consolidation of variable interest entities, as a
result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose
entity concept in FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for
Transfers of Financial Assets, and (2) to clarify
questions about the application of certain key provisions
related to consolidation of variable interest entities,
including those in which accounting and disclosures do not
always provided timely and useful information about an
enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity.
FASB 167 will be effective for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2009. We do not anticipate this standard will
have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations and cash flows.
In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB issued FSP No. 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits) which requires that an employer
disclose the following information about the fair value of plan
assets: (1) how investment allocation decisions are made,
including the factors that are pertinent to understanding of
investment policies and strategies; (2) the major
categories of plan assets; (3) the inputs and valuation
techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets;
(4) the effect of fair value measurements using significant
unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period;
and (5) significant concentrations of risk within plan
assets. This pronouncement will be effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2009, with early application
permitted. At initial adoption, application of this standard
would not be required for earlier periods that are presented for
comparative purposes. This standard will have no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do
not apply to our operations.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET
DATA
This document contains forward-looking statements that are based
on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections
about the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and
assumptions made by our management. Such statements include, in
particular, statements about our plans, strategies and
prospects. Words such as expect,
anticipate, intend, plan,
believe, seek, estimate and
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to
identify such forward-looking statements. Examples of
forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
include, but are not limited to, our expectations with respect
to the impact of metal price movements on our financial
performance, our metal price ceiling exposure and the
effectiveness of our hedging programs and controls. These
statements are based on beliefs
66
and assumptions of Novelis management, which in turn are
based on currently available information. These statements are
not guarantees of future performance and involve assumptions and
risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict.
Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially
from what is expressed, implied or forecasted in such
forward-looking statements. We do not intend, and we disclaim
any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
This document also contains information concerning our markets
and products generally, which is forward-looking in nature and
is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which
these markets and product categories will develop. These
assumptions have been derived from information currently
available to us and to the third party industry analysts quoted
herein. This information includes, but is not limited to,
product shipments and share of production. Actual market results
may differ from those predicted. While we do not know what
impact any of these differences may have on our business, our
results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and the
market price of our securities may be materially adversely
affected. Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to
differ from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking
statements include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash;
|
|
|
|
changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums
associated with such prices) or other materials and raw
materials we use;
|
|
|
|
the effect of metal price ceilings in certain of our sales
contracts;
|
|
|
|
the capacity and effectiveness of our metal hedging activities,
including our internal used beverage cans (UBCs) and smelter
hedges;
|
|
|
|
relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of,
our customers, suppliers and other stakeholders;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the
areas in which we maintain production facilities;
|
|
|
|
our ability to access financing for future capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
continuing obligations and other relationships resulting from
our spin-off from Rio Tinto Alcan;
|
|
|
|
changes in the relative values of various currencies and the
effectiveness of our currency hedging activities;
|
|
|
|
factors affecting our operations, such as litigation,
environmental remediation and
clean-up
costs, labor relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment
and other events;
|
|
|
|
the impact of restructuring efforts in the future;
|
|
|
|
economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries
in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in
duties or tariffs;
|
|
|
|
competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as
well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic
and composite materials;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions including further
deterioration in the global economy, particularly sectors in
which our customers operate;
|
|
|
|
our ability to improve and maintain effective internal control
over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures
in the future;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our
products as well as seasonality in certain of our
customers industries;
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting
taxes, environmental, health or safety compliance;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the
amounts we pay under our principal credit agreement and other
financing agreements; and
|
|
|
|
the effect of taxes and changes in tax rates.
|
The above list of factors is not exhaustive. Some of these and
other factors are discussed in more detail under
Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q,
in our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing
business operations, including risks from changes in commodity
prices (primarily aluminum, electricity and natural gas),
foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates that could
impact our results of operations and financial condition. We
manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities and derivative
financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments
as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes.
Except where noted, the derivative contracts are
marked-to-market and the related gains and losses are included
in earnings in the current accounting period.
By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve
risk, including the credit risk of non-performance by
counterparties. All derivative contracts are executed with
counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our
maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in the
accompanying June 30, 2009 condensed consolidated balance
sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions and the
relative costs of the instruments. The duration is always linked
to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection
between the two being regularly monitored.
Commodity
Price Risks
We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of
certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity and
natural gas.
Aluminum
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model that
allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the price of
aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products have a
price structure with two components: (i) a pass through
aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and
(ii) a conversion premium based on the
conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the
competitive market conditions for that product.
When we enter into agreements with our customers that fix the
selling price of our products for future delivery, we are
exposed to rising aluminum prices. We may not be able to
purchase the aluminum necessary to fulfill the order at the same
price which we have committed to our customer. We hedge this
risk by purchasing LME futures contracts. We expect the gain or
loss on the settlement of the derivative to offset increases or
decreases in the purchase price of aluminum. These hedges, which
comprise the majority of our aluminum derivatives, generate
losses in periods of decreasing aluminum prices.
Metal price lag exposes us to potential losses in periods of
falling aluminum prices. We sell short-term LME futures
contracts to reduce our exposure to this risk. We expect the
gain or loss on the settlement of the derivative to offset the
effect of changes in aluminum prices on future product sales.
These hedges generally generate losses in periods of increasing
aluminum prices.
68
In addition, we have a sales contract which contains a ceiling
over which metal prices cannot be contractually passed through
to a certain customer. As a result, we were unable to pass
through the complete increase in metal prices for sales under
this contract and this negatively impacted our margins when the
metal price was above the ceiling price. As result of falling
LME prices and based upon a September 30, 2009 aluminum
price of $1,852 per tonne, we estimate a $4 million
unfavorable revenue and cash flow impact through
December 31, 2009 when these contracts expire.
We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal
prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to
metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our
internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and
mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from
our recycling operations which utilize UBCs. Both of these
sources of aluminum supply have historically provided a benefit
as these sources of metal are typically less expensive than
purchasing aluminum from third party suppliers. We refer to
these two sources as our internal hedges.
Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy
to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated
with the metal price ceilings is to purchase derivative
instruments on projected aluminum volume requirements above our
assumed internal hedge position. We purchased forward derivative
instruments to hedge our exposure to further metal price
increases.
Sensitivities
We estimate that a 10% decline in LME aluminum prices would
result in a $24 million pre-tax loss related to the change
in fair value of our aluminum contracts as of September 30,
2009.
Energy
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. In the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, natural gas and electricity represented
approximately 89% of our energy consumption by cost. We also use
fuel oil and transport fuel. The majority of energy usage occurs
at our casting centers, at our smelters in South America and
during the hot rolling of aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities
require relatively less energy.
We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which subjects
us to market pricing fluctuations. We seek to stabilize our
future exposure to natural gas prices through the use of forward
purchase contracts. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South
America have historically been more stable than in the United
States. As of September 30, 2009, we have a nominal amount
of forward purchases outstanding related to natural gas.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs. In South America,
we own and operate hydroelectric facilities that meet
approximately 25% of our total electricity requirements in that
segment. Additionally, we have entered into an electricity swap
in North America to fix a portion of the cost of our electricity
requirements.
We purchase a nominal amount of heating oil forward contracts to
hedge against fluctuations in the price of our transport fuel.
Fluctuating energy costs worldwide, due to the changes in supply
and international and geopolitical events, expose us to earnings
volatility as such changes in such costs cannot immediately be
recovered under existing contracts and sales agreements, and may
only be mitigated in future periods under future pricing
arrangements.
69
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2009 given a 10% decline in spot prices for
energy contracts ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Heating Oil
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risks
Exchange rate movements, particularly the euro, the Brazilian
real and the Korean won against the U.S. dollar, have an
impact on our operating results. In Europe, where we have
predominantly local currency selling prices and operating costs,
we benefit as the euro strengthens, but are adversely affected
as the euro weakens. In Korea, where we have local currency
selling prices for local sales and U.S. dollar denominated
selling prices for exports, we benefit slightly as the won
weakens, but are adversely affected as the won strengthens, due
to a slightly higher percentage of exports compared to local
sales. In Brazil, where we have predominately U.S. dollar
selling prices, metal costs and local currency operating costs,
we benefit as the local currency weakens, but are adversely
affected as the local currency strengthens. Foreign currency
contracts may be used to hedge the economic exposures at our
foreign operations.
It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures
within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the
majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either
forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in
non-functional currencies. Our most significant
non-U.S. dollar
functional currency operating segments are Europe and Asia,
which have the euro and the Korean won as their functional
currencies, respectively. South America is U.S. dollar
functional with Brazilian real transactional exposure.
We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign
operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
Shareholders equity section of the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Net sales and expenses in our
foreign operations foreign currencies are translated into
varying amounts of U.S. dollars depending upon whether the
U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens against other
currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may either
positively or negatively affect our net sales and expenses from
foreign operations as expressed in U.S. dollars.
Any negative impact of currency movements on the currency
contracts that we have entered into to hedge foreign currency
commitments to purchase or sell goods and services would be
offset by an equal and opposite favorable exchange impact on the
commitments being hedged. For a discussion of accounting
policies and other information relating to currency contracts,
see Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies and Note 11 Financial
Instruments and Commodity Contracts.
70
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2009 given a 10% change in rates ($ in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian real
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Korean won
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Canadian dollar
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
British pound
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Swiss franc
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Loans to and investments in European operations have been hedged
with EUR 135 million of cross-currency swaps. We
designated these as net investment hedges. While this has no
impact on our cash flows, subsequent changes in the value of
currency related derivative instruments that are not designated
as hedges are recognized in Gain (loss) on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in our condensed consolidated
statement of operations.
We estimate that a 10% increase in the value of the euro against
the US Dollar would result in a $17 million potential
pre-tax loss on these derivatives as of September 30, 2009.
Interest
Rate Risks
As of September 30, 2009, approximately 84% of our debt
obligations were at fixed rates. Due to the nature of fixed-rate
debt, there would be no significant impact on our interest
expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase or decrease in
market rates of interest.
We are subject to interest rate risk related to our floating
rate debt. For every 12.5 basis point increase in the
interest rates on our outstanding variable rate debt as of
September 30, 2009, which includes $240 million of
term loan debt and other variable rate debt of
$214 million, our annual pre-tax income would be reduced by
approximately $1 million.
From time to time, we have used interest rate swaps to manage
our debt cost. In Korea, we entered into interest rate swaps to
fix the interest rate on various floating rate debt. See
Note 6 Debt for further information.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2009 given a 10% change in the benchmark USD
LIBOR interest rate ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Interest Rate Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Asia
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other
procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed
or submitted under the United States Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is (1) recorded,
processed,
71
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
rules and forms of the SEC and (2) accumulated and
communicated to management, including the principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2009, members of
management, at the direction (and with the participation) of our
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Exchange Act), as of September 30, 2009. Based on
that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as
of September 30, 2009, because of the material weakness in
our internal control over financial reporting discussed below.
Notwithstanding the material weakness described below, our
management has concluded that the Companys unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
report are fairly stated, in all material respects, in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America (GAAP).
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this report
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Material
Weakness Existing as of September 30, 2009 and Remediation
Plan
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of
control deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. As of September 30, 2009, we did not maintain
effective controls over the application of purchase accounting
for an equity method investee including related income tax
accounts. Specifically, our controls did not ensure the accuracy
and validity of our purchase accounting adjustments for an
equity method investee. This control deficiency resulted in
adjustments affecting the period May, 15, 2007 through
March 31, 2008 identified in Note 3
Restatement of Financial Statements in the consolidated and
combined financial statements included in our
Form 10-K/A
filed with the SEC on August 11, 2008. During the execution
of our remediation plan, we identified an error as described in
Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies Reclassifications and Adjustment
which impacted our consolidated and interim financial statements
included in previously filed
Forms 10-Q
and
Forms 10-K
for fiscal 2008 and 2009.
Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a material
misstatement of our Investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates and Equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates in the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements that would result in a
material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim
consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or
detected. Accordingly, management has determined that this
control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.
Our plan for remediating this material weakness includes the
following:
1. We conducted a full review of the purchase accounting
for the Hindalco acquisition, including a review of the
valuation approach, as well as the related accounting for equity
method investees and related income tax accounts. This review
was conducted by the Principal Financial Officer, corporate and
regional financial officers, corporate and regional tax
personnel, and the Companys external valuation expert.
This aspect of our remediation plan has been completed.
72
2. Management re-evaluated all accounting and financial
reporting controls for purchase accounting and equity method
investees, including related income tax accounts. This aspect of
our remediation plan has been completed.
3. Training sessions were conducted for key financial and
tax personnel regarding equity method accounting and related
income tax accounting matters. This aspect of our remediation
plan has been completed.
4. Management is transitioning certain purchase accounting
responsibilities to our regional financial personnel, including
tax personnel, and developing procedures to monitor the ongoing
activity of this entity. This aspect of our remediation plan has
not yet been completed.
73
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Coca-Cola
Lawsuit. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in Georgia
state court. CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
a soft toll agreement between the parties relating to the supply
of aluminum can stock, and seeks monetary damages in an amount
to be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under
the agreement. The agreement includes a most favored
nations provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS
alleges that Novelis Corporation breached the terms of the
most favored nations provision. The dispute will
likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the
parties and the courts finding as to how certain
provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. However, we
have concluded that a loss from the CCBSS litigation is not
probable and therefore have not recorded an accrual. In
addition, we do not believe that there is a reasonable
possibility of a loss from the lawsuit based on information
available at this time. If CCBSS were to prevail in this
litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material.
Novelis Corporation has filed its answer and the parties are
proceeding with discovery.
Our goodwill and other intangible assets could become
further impaired, which may require us to take significant
non-cash charges against earnings.
We assess, at least annually and potentially more frequently,
whether the value of our goodwill and other intangible assets
has been impaired. Any impairment of goodwill or other
intangible assets as a result of such analysis would result in a
non-cash charge against earnings, which charge could materially
adversely affect our reported results of operations.
In fiscal 2009, we recorded a $1.34 billion goodwill
impairment charge due to the deterioration in the global
economic environment and the resulting decrease in both the
market capitalization of our parent company and the valuation of
our publicly traded 7.25% senior notes. Subsequent to that
impairment charge, our remaining goodwill balance as of
March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 was
$582 million, allocated to our reporting units as follows:
North America $288 million; Europe
$181 million; South America $113 million.
The fair value of the reporting units exceeded their respective
carrying amounts in our most recent impairment test by 12% for
North America, by 9% for Europe and by 36% for South America.
A significant and sustained decline in our future cash flows, a
significant adverse change in the economic environment or slower
growth rates could result in the need to perform additional
impairment analysis in future periods. If we were to conclude
that a future write-down of goodwill or other intangible assets
is necessary, then we would record such additional charges,
which could materially adversely affect our results of
operations.
The covenants in our Credit Agreements and the indenture
governing our Senior Notes impose significant operating
restrictions on us.
The Credit Agreements and the indenture governing the Senior
Notes impose significant operating restrictions on us. These
restrictions limit our ability and the ability of our restricted
subsidiaries, among other things, to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt and provide additional guarantees;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends beyond certain amounts and make other restricted
payments;
|
|
|
|
create or permit certain liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain asset sales;
|
|
|
|
use the proceeds from the sales of assets and subsidiary stock;
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
create or permit restrictions on the ability of our restricted
subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us;
|
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our
assets or the assets of our restricted subsidiaries.
|
The Credit Agreements also contains various affirmative
covenants, with which we are required to comply.
Although we currently expect to comply with these covenants, we
may be unable to comply with these covenants in the future. If
we do not comply with these covenants and are unable to obtain
waivers from our lenders, we would be unable to make additional
borrowings under these facilities, our indebtedness under these
agreements would be in default and could be accelerated by our
lenders and could cause a cross-default under our other
indebtedness, including our Senior Notes. If our indebtedness is
accelerated, we may not be able to repay our indebtedness or
borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. In addition, if we
incur additional debt in the future, we may be subject to
additional covenants, which may be more restrictive than those
that we are subject to now.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited,
AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007) (File No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws, adopted as of July 24, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K filed
by Novelis Inc. on July 25, 2008 (File No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Indenture, relating to the 11
1/2% Senior
Notes due 2015, dated as of August 11, 2009, between Novelis
Inc., the guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of 11
1/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.1).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2009,
among Novelis Inc., the guarantors named on the signature pages
thereto and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as
representative of the initial purchasers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on August 17, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Employment Agreement between Novelis Inc. and Antonio Tadeu
Coelho Nardocci (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
our Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on September 9, 2009).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
75
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NOVELIS INC.
Steven Fisher
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Authorized Officer)
Robert P. Nelson
Vice President Finance Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: November 3, 2009
76
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited,
AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007) (File No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K
filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws, adopted as of July 24, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K filed
by Novelis Inc. on July 25, 2008 (File No. 001-32312))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Indenture, relating to the 11
1/2% Senior
Notes due 2015, dated as of August 11, 2009, between Novelis
Inc., the guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of 11
1/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.1).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2009,
among Novelis Inc., the guarantors named on the signature pages
thereto and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as
representative of the initial purchasers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on August 17, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Employment Agreement between Novelis Inc. and Antonio Tadeu
Coelho Nardocci (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
our Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on September 9, 2009).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
77