Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-172199
PROSPECTUS
Novelis Inc.
Offer to Exchange
Up to $1,100,000,000 aggregate
principal amount
of our 8.375% Senior Notes
due 2017
and the guarantees thereof
which have been registered
under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended,
for any and all of our
outstanding
8.375% Senior Notes due
2017 and the guarantees thereof
Up to $1,400,000,000 aggregate
principal amount
of our 8.75% Senior Notes
due 2020
and the guarantees thereof
which have been registered
under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended,
for any and all of our
outstanding
8.75% Senior Notes due
2020 and the guarantees thereof
We are offering to exchange, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in this prospectus and the accompanying
letter of transmittal, (i) up to $1,100,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of our 8.375% Senior Notes due 2017 (the
2017 new notes) and the guarantees thereof which
have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, for any and all of our outstanding 8.375% Senior
Notes due 2017 (the 2017 old notes) and the
guarantees thereof and (ii) up to $1,400,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of our 8.75% Senior Notes due 2020 (the
2020 new notes and together with the 2017 new notes,
the new notes) and the guarantees thereof which have
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
for any and all of our outstanding 8.75% Senior Notes due
2020 (the 2020 old notes and together with the 2020
old notes, the old notes) and the guarantees
thereof. We refer to the old notes and new notes collectively as
the notes.
The New
Notes:
The terms of the new notes are substantially identical to the
old notes, except that some of the transfer restrictions,
registration rights and additional interest provisions relating
to the old notes will not apply to the new notes.
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity: The 2017 new notes will mature on
December 15, 2017, and the 2020 new notes will mature on
December 15, 2020.
|
|
|
|
Interest: The 2017 new notes will bear
interest at the rate of 8.375% per annum, and the 2020 new notes
will bear interest at the rate of 8.75% per annum. Interest on
the new notes will be payable semi-annually in arrears on June
15 and December 15 of each year, commencing June 15, 2011.
|
|
|
|
Guarantees: The new notes will be guaranteed,
jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis, by all of
our existing and future Canadian and U.S. restricted
subsidiaries, certain of our existing foreign restricted
subsidiaries and our other restricted subsidiaries that
guarantee debt in the future under any credit facilities,
provided that the borrower of such debt is our company or a
Canadian or a U.S. subsidiary.
|
|
|
|
Ranking: The new notes and the guarantees will
effectively rank junior to our secured debt and the secured debt
of the guarantors (including debt under our senior secured
credit facilities described herein), to the extent of the value
of the assets securing that debt.
|
|
|
|
Optional Redemption: Prior to
December 15, 2013, in the case of the 2017 new notes, and
prior to December 15, 2015, in the case of the 2020 new
notes, we may redeem all or a portion of the new notes by paying
a make-whole premium. Commencing December 15,
2013, in the case of the 2017 new notes, and commencing
December 15, 2015, in the case of the 2020 new notes, we
may redeem all or a portion of the new notes at specified
redemption prices. We also may redeem all of either series of
the new notes, at any time, in the event of certain changes in
Canadian withholding taxes. In addition, prior to
December 15, 2013, we may redeem up to 35% of each series
of notes from the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a
specified redemption price. The redemption prices are set forth
under Description of the Notes Optional
Redemption.
|
|
|
|
The new notes will not be listed on any securities exchange or
automated quotation system.
|
The
Exchange Offer:
|
|
|
|
|
The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City
time, on April 7, 2011, (which is the 20th business day
following the date of this prospectus), unless we extend the
exchange offer in our sole and absolute discretion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The exchange offer is not subject to any conditions other than
that it not violate applicable law or any applicable
interpretation of the staff of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or the SEC.
|
|
|
|
Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of specified conditions,
we will exchange the new notes for all old notes that are
validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to the expiration of
the exchange offer.
|
|
|
|
Tenders of old notes may be withdrawn at any time before the
expiration of the exchange offer.
|
|
|
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the exchange offer.
|
The exchange offer involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 21.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus is
March 10, 2011
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
Each broker-dealer that receives new notes for its own
account pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it
will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such
new notes. The letter of transmittal states that by so
acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer
will not be deemed to admit that it is an
underwriter within the meaning of the Securities
Act. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from
time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with
resales of new notes received in exchange for old notes where
such old notes were acquired by such broker-dealer as a result
of market-making activities or other trading activities. We have
agreed that, for a period of 180 days after the
consummation of the exchange offer, we will make this prospectus
available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any
such resale. See Plan of Distribution.
This prospectus incorporates important business and financial
information about the Company that is not included or delivered
with this prospectus. We will provide without charge, upon
written or oral request, to each person, including any
beneficial owner, to whom this prospectus is delivered, a copy
of all documents referred to below which have been or may be
incorporated by reference into this prospectus excluding
exhibits to those documents unless they are specifically
incorporated by reference into those documents.
In order to obtain timely delivery, you must request the
information no later than March 31, 2011, which is five
business days before the expiration date of the exchange offer.
Any such request should be directed to us at:
Corporate
Secretary
Novelis Inc.
3560 Lenox Road
Suite 2000
Atlanta, Georgia 30326
(404) 760-4000
ENFORCEABILITY
OF CERTAIN CIVIL LIABILITIES
We are formed in Canada under the Canada Business Corporations
Act, or the CBCA. Our registered office, as well as a
substantial portion of our assets are located outside the United
States. Also, some of our directors, controlling persons and
officers and some of the experts named in this prospectus reside
in Canada or other jurisdictions outside the United States and
all or a substantial portion of their assets are located outside
the United States. We have agreed in the indentures under which
the notes have been or will be issued, as applicable, to accept
service of process in New York City, by an agent designated for
such purpose, with respect to any suit, action or proceeding
relating to the indenture or the notes that is brought in any
federal or state court located in New York City, and to submit
to the jurisdiction of such courts in connection with such
suits, actions or proceedings. However, it may be difficult for
holders of notes to effect service of process in the United
States on our directors, controlling persons, officers and the
experts named in this prospectus who are not residents of the
United States or to enforce against them in the United States
judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the
civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities
laws. In addition, there is doubt as to the enforceability in
Canada against us or against our directors, controlling persons,
officers and experts named in this prospectus who are not
residents of the United States, in original actions or in
actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts, of
liabilities predicated solely upon U.S. federal securities
laws.
INDUSTRY
AND MARKET DATA
The data included in this prospectus regarding markets and the
industry in which we operate, including the size of certain
markets and our position and the position of our competitors
within these markets, are based on reports of government
agencies, independent industry sources such as Commodity
Research Unit International Limited (CRU), an
independent business analysis and consultancy group focused on
the mining, metals, power, cables, fertilizer and chemical
sectors, and our own estimates relying on our managements
knowledge and experience in the markets in which we operate. Our
managements knowledge and experience is based on
information obtained from our customers, distributors,
suppliers, trade and business organizations and other contacts
in the markets in which we operate. We believe these estimates
to be accurate as of the date of this prospectus. However, this
information may prove to be inaccurate because of the method by
which we obtained some of the data for our estimates or because
this information cannot always be verified with complete
certainty due to the limits on the availability and reliability
of raw data, the voluntary nature of the data gathering process
and other limitations and uncertainties. As a result, you should
be aware that market, ranking and other industry data included
in this prospectus, and our estimates and beliefs based on that
data, may not be reliable. Neither we nor the initial purchasers
can guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any such
information contained in this prospectus.
TRADEMARKS
We have proprietary rights to a number of trademarks important
to our business, including Novelis
Fusiontm.
All other trademarks or service marks referred to in this
prospectus are the property of their respective owners and are
not our property.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET
DATA
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are
based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and
projections about us and the industry in which we operate and
beliefs and assumptions made by our management. Such statements
include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies
and prospects under the headings Prospectus Summary,
Business and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Words such as expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, believe,
seek and estimate and variations of such
words and similar expressions are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees
of future performance and involve assumptions and risks and
uncertainties that are difficult to predict, including those
described below. Therefore,
ii
actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is
expressed, implied or forecasted in such forward-looking
statements. We do not intend, and we disclaim any obligation, to
update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise, except as required
by applicable law.
Information in this prospectus concerning our markets and
products generally includes forward-looking statements, which
are based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in
which these markets and product categories will develop. These
assumptions have been derived from information currently
available to us and to the third party industry analysts quoted
in this prospectus. This information includes, but is not
limited to, product shipments and share of production. Actual
market results may differ from those predicted. We do not know
what impact any of these differences may have on our business,
results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ
from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking
statements include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of,
our customers, suppliers and other stakeholders;
|
|
|
|
changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums
associated with aluminum prices) or other materials and raw
materials we use;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the
areas in which we maintain production facilities;
|
|
|
|
our ability to access financing to fund current operations and
for future capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash;
|
|
|
|
deterioration of our ratings by a credit rating agency and our
borrowing costs;
|
|
|
|
changes in the relative values of various currencies and the
effectiveness of our currency hedging activities;
|
|
|
|
union disputes and other employee relations issues;
|
|
|
|
factors affecting our operations, such as litigation (including
product liability claims), environmental remediation and
clean-up
costs, labor relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment
and other events;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions, including deterioration
in the global economy;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments or the
failure of counterparties to our derivative instruments to honor
their agreements;
|
|
|
|
the capacity and effectiveness of our metal hedging activities;
|
|
|
|
availability of production capacity;
|
|
|
|
impairment of our goodwill and other intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
loss of key management and other personnel, or an inability to
attract such management and other personnel;
|
|
|
|
risks relating to future acquisitions or divestitures;
|
|
|
|
our inability to successfully implement our growth initiatives;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the
amounts we pay under our senior secured credit facilities, other
financing agreements and our defined benefit pension plans;
|
|
|
|
risks relating to certain joint ventures and subsidiaries that
we do not entirely control;
|
|
|
|
Hindalcos interests as equity holder, which may conflict
with our interest or your interests as holders of the notes;
|
|
|
|
the effect of new derivatives legislation on our ability to
hedge risks associated with our business;
|
|
|
|
competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as
well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic
and composite materials;
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our
products as well as seasonality in certain of our
customers industries;
|
|
|
|
economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries
in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in
duties or tariffs;
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting
taxes and tax rates, health care reform, climate change,
environmental, health or safety compliance;
|
|
|
|
the effect of taxes and changes in tax rates; and
|
|
|
|
the other factors discussed under Risk Factors.
|
The above list of factors is not exclusive. Some of these and
other factors are discussed in more detail under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Risk
Factors.
iv
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information in this
prospectus and may not contain all of the information that is
important to you. You should carefully read this entire
prospectus, including the information set forth under the
heading Risk Factors and the financial statements
and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this
prospectus, before making an investment decision.
In this prospectus, unless otherwise specified or the context
indicates otherwise, the terms we, our,
us, company and Novelis
refer to Novelis Inc., a company formed in Canada under the
CBCA. References herein to Hindalco refer to
Hindalco Industries Limited, our ultimate parent company. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc., which was subsequently renamed Rio Tinto
Alcan Inc., which we refer to as Rio Tinto Alcan.
References herein to Alcan refer to Alcan, Inc.
prior to its acquisition by the Rio Tinto Group.
References to total shipments refer to shipments
to third parties of aluminum rolled products as well as ingot
shipments, and references to aluminum rolled products
shipments or shipments do not include ingot
shipments. All tonnages are stated in metric tonnes. One metric
tonne is equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. One kilotonne (kt) is
1,000 metric tonnes. One MMBtu is the equivalent of one
decatherm, or one million British Thermal Units. The term
aluminum rolled products is synonymous with the
terms flat rolled products and FRP
commonly used by manufacturers and third party analysts in our
industry. References to $, dollars,
United States dollars, U.S. dollars
or U.S. $ refer to the lawful currency of the
United States of America. References to fiscal years
means a year or a twelve month period ending on March 31 (for
example, fiscal 2010 ended on March 31, 2010).
Our
Company
We are the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, with total flat rolled product shipments
during that period of approximately 2,198 kt. We are the only
company of our size and scope focused solely on aluminum rolled
products markets and capable of local supply of technologically
sophisticated aluminum products in all of the regions in which
we operate. We are also the global leader in the recycling of
used aluminum beverage cans. We had net sales and net income
attributable to our common shareholder of $8.7 billion and
$405 million, respectively, for the year ended
March 31, 2010, and $7.6 billion and $66 million,
respectively, for the nine months ended December 31, 2010.
We produce aluminum sheet and light gauge products for use in
the beverage and food can, transportation, construction and
industrial, and foil product markets. As of December 31,
2010, we had operations on four continents: North America,
Europe, Asia and South America, through 30 operating plants, one
research facility and several market-focused innovation centers
in 11 countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants,
our South American businesses include bauxite mining, primary
aluminum smelting and power generation facilities.
1
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America, Europe, Asia and South America. The following charts
provide the breakdown by operating segment of our net sales and
total flat rolled product shipments for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010:
North
America
North America operates 11 aluminum rolled products facilities,
including two fully dedicated recycling facilities, as of
December 31, 2010, and manufactures a broad range of
aluminum sheet and light gauge products. End-use applications
for this segment include beverage cans, foil and other
packaging, automotive and other transportation applications,
building products and other industrial applications. The largest
end-use market for North America is the beverage can market.
Recycling is an important component in the manufacturing
process, and we have five facilities in North America that
re-melt post-consumer aluminum and recycled process material.
Europe
Europe operates 13 operating plants, including one fully
dedicated recycling facility, as of December 31, 2010, and
manufactures a broad range of sheet and foil products. End-use
applications for this segment include beverage and food cans,
foil and other packaging, construction and industrial products
and automotive and lithographic applications. Beverage and food
can represent the largest end-use application in terms of
shipment volume. Europe has foil and packaging facilities at six
locations and, in addition to six rolled product plants, has
distribution centers in Italy and sales offices in several
European countries.
Asia
Asia operates three manufacturing facilities as of
December 31, 2010 and manufactures a broad range of sheet
and light gauge products. End-use applications for this segment
include beverage and food cans, foil and other packaging,
industrial products (including electronics and construction) and
transportation applications. The beverage can market represents
the largest end-use market in terms of volume. Recycling is an
important part of our Korean operations, with recycling
facilities at both the Ulsan and Yeongju facilities.
South
America
South America operates two rolling plants, a primary aluminum
smelter, bauxite mines and hydro-electric power plants as of
December 31, 2010, all of which are located in Brazil.
South America manufactures various aluminum rolled products,
including can stock, automotive and industrial sheet and light
gauge for the beverage and food can, construction and
industrial, foil and other packaging and transportation
applications. Beverage and food can represent the largest
end-use application in terms of shipment volume. The primary
aluminum operations in South America include mines and smelters
used by our Brazilian aluminum rolled products operations, with
any excess production being sold to the market in the form of
aluminum billets. South America generates a portion of its own
power requirements.
2
Our
Industry
The aluminum rolled products market represents the global supply
of and demand for aluminum sheet, plate and foil produced either
from sheet ingot or continuously cast roll-stock in rolling
mills operated by independent aluminum rolled products producers
and integrated aluminum companies alike. According to CRU,
worldwide consumption of aluminum rolled products in 2008 was
approximately 17,304 kt. In 2009, this declined by 8.5% to
15,833 kt, reflecting the global economic environment.
Furthermore, according to CRU, global consumption for rolled
aluminum recovered to approximately 18,244 kt in 2010, and CRU
estimates that global consumption will increase to 24,417 kt by
2015 representing a compound annual growth rate of 6% from 2010
to 2015.
Aluminum rolled products are semi-finished aluminum products
that constitute the raw material in the manufacturing of
finished goods ranging from automotive body panels to household
and converter foil. There are two major types of manufacturing
processes for aluminum rolled products differing mainly in the
process used to achieve the initial stage of processing:
|
|
|
|
|
hot mills that require sheet ingot, a
rectangular slab of aluminum, as starter material; and
|
|
|
|
continuous casting mills that can
convert molten metal directly into semi-finished sheet.
|
Both processes require subsequent rolling, which we call cold
rolling, and finishing steps such as annealing, coating,
leveling or slitting to achieve the desired thicknesses and
metal properties. Most customers receive shipments in the form
of aluminum coil, a large roll of metal, which can be fed into
their fabrication processes.
There are three sources of input material for aluminum rolled
products: (1) primary aluminum, which is primarily in the
form of standard ingot; (2) sheet ingot; and
(3) recycled aluminum, such as recyclable scrap material
from fabrication processes, which we refer to as recycled
process material, used beverage cans (UBCs), other
post-consumer aluminum and molten metal produced from these
sources.
Primary aluminum and sheet ingot can generally be purchased at
prices set on the London Metal Exchange (LME), plus
a premium that varies by geographic region of delivery, form
(ingot or molten metal) and purity.
Recycled aluminum is also an important source of input material.
Aluminum is infinitely recyclable with minimal metal loss, and
recycling requires approximately 5% of the energy needed to
produce primary aluminum and correspondingly emits approximately
5% of the greenhouse gas emitted by primary aluminum production.
As a result, in regions where aluminum is widely used,
manufacturers and customers are active in setting up collection
processes in which UBCs and other recyclable aluminum are
collected for remelting. Manufacturers may also enter into
agreements with customers who return recycled process material
and pay to have it remelted and rolled into the same product.
The market for aluminum rolled products tends to be less subject
to demand cyclicality than the markets for primary aluminum and
sheet ingot, which are more affected by commodity price
cyclicality. A significant share of aluminum rolled products is
used in the production of consumer staples, which have
historically experienced relatively stable demand
characteristics. In addition, most aluminum rolled products sale
contracts are priced in two components: a pass-through aluminum
price component based on the LME quotation and local market
premiums, plus a margin over metal, or conversion
charge, based on the cost to roll the product. As a result, most
of the raw material price risk is absorbed by the customer,
reducing the volatility of the producers profitability and
cash flows. Aluminum rolled products companies also use recycled
aluminum, which provides sourcing flexibility for, and further
reduces the volatility of, input material. These three factors
combine to create an industry that has lower cyclicality than
the primary aluminum industry.
There has been a long-term industry trend towards lighter gauge
(thinner) aluminum rolled products, which we refer to as
downgauging, where customers request products with
similar properties using less metal in order to reduce costs and
weight. For example, aluminum rolled products producers and can
fabricators have continuously developed thinner walled cans with
similar strength as previous generation containers, resulting in
a lower cost per unit. As a result of this trend, aluminum
tonnage across the spectrum
3
of aluminum rolled products, and particularly for the beverage
and food cans end-use market, has declined on a per unit basis,
while actual rolling machine hours per unit have increased.
Because the industry has historically tracked growth based on
aluminum tonnage shipped, we believe the downgauging trend may
contribute to an understatement of the actual growth of revenue
attributable to rolling in some end-use markets.
The rolled aluminum industry continues to leverage new
technology to develop aluminum alloys and products that support
broader or new commercial applications. Conventional
single-alloy products require customers to choose an alloy based
either on the required core properties such as strength or the
desired surface characteristics such as extreme
corrosion-resistance. The industry typically achieves the
combined characteristics of two or three alloys with a clad
process through which sheets of metal are attached to an
aluminum ingot and then rolled. Typically the aluminum ingot
provides the strength and formability while the brazing provides
other properties such as corrosion resistance and finish.
The aluminum rolled products industry is characterized by
economies of scale, significant capital investments required to
achieve and maintain technological capabilities and demanding
customer qualification standards. The service and efficiency
demands of large customers have encouraged consolidation among
suppliers of aluminum rolled products.
While aluminum rolled products customers tend to be increasingly
global, many aluminum rolled products tend to be produced and
sold on a regional basis. The regional nature of the markets is
influenced in part by the fact that not all mills are equipped
to produce all types of aluminum rolled products. For instance,
only a few mills in North America, Europe and Asia, and only one
mill in South America, produce beverage can body and end stock.
In addition, individual aluminum rolling mills generally supply
a limited range of products for end-use markets, and seek to
maximize profits by producing high volumes of the highest margin
mix per mill hour given available capacity and equipment
capabilities.
Certain multi-purpose, common alloy and plate rolled products
are imported into Europe and North America from producers in
emerging markets, such as Brazil, South Africa, Russia and
China. However, at this time we believe that most of these
producers are generally unable to produce flat rolled products
that meet the quality requirements, lead times and
specifications of customers with more demanding applications. In
addition, high freight costs, import duties, inability to take
back recycled aluminum, lack of technical service capabilities
and long lead-times mean that many developing market exporters
are viewed as second-tier suppliers. Therefore, many of our
customers in the Americas, Europe and Asia do not look to
suppliers in these emerging markets for a significant portion of
their requirements.
Aluminum rolled products companies produce and sell a wide range
of aluminum rolled products, which can be grouped into four
primary end-use markets based upon similarities in end-use
markets: (1) beverage and food cans,
(2) transportation, (3) construction and industrial,
and (4) foil products. The following charts provide the
breakdown of end-use markets for our aluminum rolled products
for the year ended March 31, 2010 and CRU data for the
calendar year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
Worldwide
|
End-Use Markets
|
|
End-Use Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Novelis
|
|
Source: CRU
|
4
Beverage
and Food Cans
Beverage and food cans accounted for approximately 26% of total
worldwide shipments in the calendar year ended December 31,
2009, according to CRU. The beverage can end-use market is
technically demanding to supply and pricing is competitive. The
recyclability of aluminum cans enables them to be used,
collected, melted and returned to the original product form many
times, unlike steel, paper or polyethylene terephthalate plastic
(PET plastic), which deteriorate with every
iteration of recycling.
Transportation
The transportation end-use market accounted for approximately
11% of the worldwide aluminum rolled products shipments in the
calendar year ended December 31, 2009, according to CRU.
Heat exchangers for trucks and automobiles, such as radiators
and air conditioners, are an important application for aluminum
rolled products in the transportation end-use market. Original
equipment manufacturers also use aluminum sheet with specially
treated surfaces and other specific properties for interior and
exterior applications. Newly developed alloys are being used in
transportation tanks and rigid containers that allow for safer
and more economical transportation of hazardous and corrosive
materials.
There has been recent growth in certain geographic markets in
the use of aluminum rolled products in automotive body panel
applications, including hoods, deck lids, fenders and lift
gates. We believe the recent growth in automotive body panel
applications is due in part to the lighter weight of aluminum as
compared to steel and other alternative materials, which allows
for better fuel economy and improved emissions performance.
Aluminum is also used in the construction of ships hulls
and superstructures and passenger rail cars because of its
strength, light weight, formability and corrosion resistance.
Construction
and Industrial (including Electronics)
Construction and industrial applications combined account for
approximately 33% of worldwide aluminum rolled products
shipments in the calendar year ended December 31, 2009,
according to CRU. Construction is the largest application within
this end-use market. Aluminum rolled products developed for the
construction industry are often decorative and non-flammable,
offer insulating properties, are durable and corrosion resistant
and have a high
strength-to-weight
ratio. Aluminum siding, gutters and downspouts comprise a
significant amount of construction volume. Other applications
include doors, windows, awnings, canopies, facades, roofing and
ceilings.
Aluminums ability to conduct electricity and heat and to
offer corrosion resistance makes it useful in a wide variety of
industrial applications. Industrial applications include
electronics, consumer durables, electrical machinery and
lighting fixtures. Applications of aluminum rolled products in
the electronics market include panels and components for
light-emitting diode (LED) televisions and liquid crystal
display (LCD) televisions, portable personal computers and
monitors as well as mobile phone cases, CD-ROMs and metal
printed circuit boards. Uses of aluminum rolled products in
consumer durables include microwaves, coffee makers, air
conditioners, pleasure boats and cooking utensils.
Another industrial application is lithographic sheet. Print
shops, printing houses and publishing groups use lithographic
sheet to print books, magazines, newspapers and promotional
literature. In order to meet the strict quality requirements of
the end-users, lithographic sheet must meet demanding
metallurgical, surface and flatness specifications.
Foil
Products
Foil products accounted for approximately 24% of worldwide
aluminum rolled products shipments in the calendar year ended
December 31, 2009, according to CRU. Aluminum, because of
its relatively light weight, recyclability and formability, has
a wide variety of uses in packaging. Converter foil is very thin
aluminum foil, plain or printed, that is typically laminated to
plastic or paper to form an internal seal for a variety of
packaging applications, including juice boxes, pharmaceuticals,
food pouches, cigarette packaging and lid
5
stock. Household foil includes home and institutional aluminum
foil wrap sold as a branded or generic product. Container foil
is used to produce semi-rigid containers such as pie plates and
take-out food trays.
Our
Strengths
We believe that the following key strengths enable us to compete
effectively in the aluminum rolled products market:
Leading
Market Positions
We are the worlds leader in aluminum rolling, producing an
estimated 16% of the worlds flat-rolled aluminum products
during the nine months ended December 31, 2010. Moreover,
we are the number one rolled products producer in Europe and
South America and the number two rolled products producer in
North America and Asia based on shipments. In terms of
end-use markets, we believe that we are the largest global
producer of aluminum rolled products for the beverage can market
with a 39% market share based on shipments, and we are the
worlds leader in the recycling of UBCs, recycling around
40 billion UBCs during fiscal 2010. We also believe that we
are the worlds leader in aluminum automotive sheet based
on shipments.
Premium
Product Portfolio Mix
We focus on high value markets that enable us to maximize
conversion premium growth and profitability rather than focusing
merely on volume growth. Our manufacturing facilities are
equipped to produce higher value product lines, including, among
others, beverage can products as well as products with
automotive body applications and components for the electronics
industry, which require highly engineered, technologically
sophisticated manufacturing processes. Our conversion premium
pricing model for these higher value products also allows us to
pass through risks related to the volatility of aluminum prices
by charging LME aluminum prices plus a conversion premium price
based on the conversion cost to produce our products.
Our premium product portfolio includes stable products that are
less vulnerable to economic cycles and periods of financial
instability, such as products sold to customers in the beverage
can market, which represented 55% of our total volume of
shipments during the nine months ended December 31, 2010.
We also believe our higher value product lines have significant
growth opportunities. Globally, we anticipate continued growth
for can stock, driven by strong demand and positive consumer
preference trends in South America, Asia and Europe, moderated
only by North America, which is a more mature market. Similarly,
we expect that automotive industry growth globally, combined
with an increasing focus on fuel efficiency, will drive demand
for aluminum applications in this industry, such as auto panels,
auto trim, heat shielding and battery cases. In addition, we
believe the growth potential in the electronics sector is linked
to the focus on reducing the weight of electronics products,
reducing their energy consumption, and utilizing materials that
are effective at dissipating heat generated by electronic
components, all of which create a wide range of opportunities
for aluminum products. For example, aluminum products are used
in the manufacture of products such as LED televisions, computer
monitors, notebook computers, digital cameras and mobile phones.
International
Presence and Scale
As of December 31, 2010, we are the only aluminum rolled
products company with operations on four continents. We benefit
from a global manufacturing footprint, including 30
manufacturing facilities across 11 countries, which gives
us a strong asset-based competitive advantage. We
are capable of producing highly engineered, technologically
sophisticated products across our operations to serve global
customers worldwide as well as meet the needs of regional
customers, providing the same quality and consistency of
products at all of our plants. This highly engineered,
competitive advantage is evident in our position as the number
one global producer of beverage can sheet products. We are able
to service large can sheet customers on a worldwide basis, yet,
through our regional operations we also have the capability to
adapt and cater to the regional preferences and needs of our
customers.
6
In addition, we believe our broad geographical presence allows
us to better serve our increasingly global customer base as well
as diversify our sources of cash flow and offset risk across the
different regions. Our size allows us to meet a wide variety of
local and global customer needs, leverage our selling,
administrative, research and development and other general
expenses to improve margins, establish new uses for aluminum
rolled products and access the end-use markets for these
products. Furthermore, in periods where we are operating at or
near production capacity, our global scale gives us the
flexibility to leverage capacity across the Novelis system to
maximize total shipments to our customers.
Technology
Leader with Customer Service Focus
We endeavor to be at the forefront of developing next generation
technologies in the aluminum rolled products industry, and we
are a leader in continuous casting technology, as owner of
technology relating to the two main continuous casting
processes. We have
state-of-the-art
research facilities around the world with approximately
200 employees dedicated to research and development and
customer technical support.
Our beverage can customers require products that meet stringent
specifications, and our Can Technical Services Team is dedicated
to supporting our customers and meeting their product needs. Our
Can Technical Services Team consists of an experienced group of
technical representatives who spend time
on-site at
our customers production lines, offering technological
expertise, technical backup and support for our customers
own innovation activities. We also support our other high value
product lines by providing technological services and working
together with our automotive, electronic and lithographic
customers, among others, to develop solutions to meet their
requirements through our customer solution centers in North
America and Asia as well as other market-focused innovation
centers around the world.
Long Term
Relationships with Market Leaders
We have maintained strong, long-standing supply relationships
with many of our customers, which include leading global players
in our key end-use markets. Our major customers include:
|
|
|
Beverage and Food Cans
|
|
Transportation
|
|
Anheuser-Busch InBev
|
|
Audi Worldwide Company
|
Affiliates of Ball Corporation
|
|
BMW Group International
|
Can-Pack S.A.
|
|
Ford Motor Company
|
Various bottlers of the
Coca-Cola
System
|
|
Hyundai Motor Company
|
Crown Cork & Seal Company
|
|
Jaguar Land Rover
|
Rexam plc
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, Industrial and Other
|
|
Electronics
|
|
Agfa-Gevaert N.V.
|
|
LG
|
Amcor Limited
|
|
Samsung
|
Lotte Aluminum Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
Kodak Polychrome Graphics GmbH
|
|
|
Pactiv Corporation
|
|
|
Ryerson Inc.
|
|
|
Tetra Pak Ltd.
|
|
|
In fiscal 2010, approximately 48% of our net sales were to our
ten largest customers. We endeavor to gain strong customer
loyalty by anticipating and meeting the specific technical
standards demanded by our customers with a high level of
quality, technical support and customer service.
7
Our
Business Strategy
Our primary objective is to deliver shareholder and customer
value through the following areas of focus:
Focus on
Core Operations and Reduce our Costs
We strive to be a low cost producer of world-class aluminum
rolled products by pursuing a standardized focus on our core
operations globally and through the implementation of
cost-reduction and restructuring initiatives. To achieve this
objective, we have standardized our manufacturing processes and
the associated upstream and downstream production elements where
possible while still allowing the flexibility to respond to
local market demands. In addition, we have implemented numerous
restructuring initiatives, including the shutdown of facilities,
staff rationalization and other activities, all of which led to
significant cost savings that we will benefit from for years to
come. We plan to continue to focus on maintaining our low cost
base, even as volumes increase, and intend to persist in the
implementation of ongoing initiatives to improve operational
efficiencies across our plants globally.
Pursue
Organic Growth Through Debottlenecking and Other Initiatives
Across the Novelis System
We are currently operating at or near capacity. To release
additional capacity, increase efficiency and improve margins, we
are continually evaluating debottlenecking opportunities
globally through modifications of and investments in existing
equipment and processes. We believe that through our
debottlenecking initiatives we can release an additional 3% to
4% of capacity annually through fiscal year 2014 with minimal
capital investments.
Our international presence positions us well to capture
additional growth opportunities in targeted aluminum rolled
products. In particular, we believe Asia and South America have
high growth potential in areas such as beverage cans, industrial
products, construction and electronics. While our existing
manufacturing and operating presence positions us well to
capture this growth, we expect to make some incremental capital
expenditures or selective acquisitions to expand our
capabilities in these areas. For example, in response to the
growing demand for our products in South America, in May 2010 we
announced a plan to invest nearly $300 million to expand
our aluminum rolling operations in Brazil to increase capacity
by more than 50% to approximately 600 kt of aluminum sheet per
year. The project is expected to be completed by late 2012.
In addition, we are focused on process improvements globally. As
part of our organic growth initiatives, we recently invested in
process optimization improvements at our Yeongju plant in Korea
by implementing technology and processes developed at our other
plants around the world, which has allowed us to significantly
increase production capacity and capture market share in the
beverage can end-use market in Asia.
Focus on
Optimizing Premium Products to Drive Enhanced
Profitability
We plan to continue improving our product mix and margins by
leveraging our world-class assets and technical capabilities.
Our management approach helps us systematically identify
opportunities to improve the profitability of our operations
through product portfolio analysis. This ensures that we focus
on growing in attractive market segments, while also taking
actions to exit unattractive ones. For example, in the last four
years, we have grown our can stock shipments in total by an
average of 15% in all regions except North America, a more
mature market, where we have held a leading market position for
many years. We will continue to focus on capturing the growth in
the beverage can market worldwide as well as growing more
aggressively in the automotive and electronics markets. Through
our continued focus on operating execution, we believe we can
cost effectively deploy proprietary technologies that will
contribute to growth and higher profitability.
Operate
as One Novelis a Fully-Integrated Global
Company
We intend to continue to build on our focused business model to
operate as One Novelis. The term One
Novelis refers to our goal of becoming a truly integrated,
global company driven by a singular focus.
8
An important part of the One Novelis concept is our
highly-focused, pass-through business model that utilizes our
manufacturing excellence, our risk management expertise, our
value-added conversion premium-based pricing, and
importantly our growing ability to leverage our
global assets according to a single, corporate-wide vision. We
believe this integrated approach is the foundation for the
effective execution of our strategy across the Novelis system.
We began the global alignment of our support functions, such as
risk management, finance, human resources, legal, information
technology and supply chain management in fiscal 2009. We
believe that managing these support functions centrally to
operate as One Novelis has and will continue to accelerate
executive decision-making processes, allowing us to adapt our
manufacturing processes and products more quickly and
efficiently to respond to changing market conditions. We intend
to achieve a seamless alignment of goals, methods and metrics
across the organization to improve communication and the
implementation of strategic initiatives and, ultimately, service
to our customers. These initiatives have resulted in enhanced
operating margins and performance and we believe additional
improvements are achievable over time.
9
Our
Corporate Structure
Our
History
Spin-off
from Alcan
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. Novelis
Inc. was formed in Canada on September 21, 2004 prior to
the spin-off. The spin-off occurred on January 6, 2005,
following approval by Alcans board of directors and
shareholders and legal and regulatory approvals. Alcan
shareholders received one Novelis common share for every five
Alcan common shares held.
10
Acquisition
by Hindalco
On May 15, 2007, Novelis was acquired by Hindalco through
an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan of
arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93
per share. The aggregate purchase price for all of Novelis
common shares was $3.4 billion, and $2.8 billion of
Novelis debt was also assumed, for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares have
been indirectly held by Hindalco.
Corporate
Information
Our registered office is located at 191 Evans Avenue, Toronto,
Ontario, M8Z 1J5. Our principal executive offices are located at
3560 Lenox Road, Suite 2000, Atlanta, Georgia 30326, and
our telephone number is
(404) 760-4000.
The URL of our website is
http://www.novelis.com.
Information on our website does not constitute part of this
prospectus, and you should rely only on the information
contained in this prospectus when making a decision as to
whether to invest in the new notes described in this
prospectus.
Hindalco
Hindalco is one of Asias largest integrated producers of
aluminum and a leading producer of copper. Hindalcos stock
is publicly traded on the Bombay Stock Exchange, the National
Stock Exchange of India Limited and the Luxembourg Stock
Exchange. Hindalco is an Indian corporation and headquartered in
Mumbai, India. Hindalco is the flagship company of the Aditya
Birla Group, a $29 billion multinational conglomerate with
operations in 27 countries.
11
The
Exchange Offer
The following summary contains basic information about this
exchange offer. For a more detailed description of the terms and
conditions of the exchange offer, please refer to the section
The Exchange Offer.
|
|
|
The Exchange Offer |
|
We are offering to exchange $1,000 principal amount of the new
notes of each series, which have been registered under the
Securities Act, for each $1,000 principal amount of the old
notes of the same series, which have not been registered under
the Securities Act. We issued the old notes on December 17,
2010. |
|
|
|
In order to exchange your old notes, you must promptly tender
them before the expiration date (as described herein). All old
notes that are validly tendered and not validly withdrawn will
be exchanged. We will issue the new notes on or promptly after
the expiration date. |
|
|
|
You may tender your old notes for exchange in whole or in part
in denominations of $2,000 and integral multiples of $1,000 in
excess thereof; provided that the untendered portion of an old
note must be in a minimum denomination of $2,000. |
|
Registration Rights Agreements |
|
We sold the old notes on December 17, 2010 to Citigroup
Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill
Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, RBS
Securities Inc., UBS Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, HSBC
Securities (USA) Inc., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Natixis
Securities North American Inc., the initial purchasers.
Simultaneously with that sale, we signed registration rights
agreements with the initial purchasers relating to the old notes
that require us to conduct this exchange offer. |
|
|
|
You have the right under the applicable registration rights
agreement to exchange your old notes for new notes. The exchange
offer is intended to satisfy such right. After the exchange
offer is complete, you will no longer be entitled to any
exchange or registration rights with respect to your old notes. |
|
|
|
For a description of the procedures for tendering old notes, see
the section The Exchange Offer Exchange Offer
Procedures. |
|
Consequences of Failure to Exchange |
|
If you do not exchange your old notes for new notes in the
exchange offer, you will still have the restrictions on transfer
provided in the old notes and in the applicable indenture that
governs both the old notes and the new notes. In general, the
old notes may not be offered or sold unless registered or exempt
from registration under the Securities Act, or in a transaction
not subject to the Securities Act and applicable state
securities laws. Upon completion of the exchange offer, we will
have no further obligations to register, and we do not currently
plan to register, the old notes under the Securities Act. See
the section Risk Factors If you do not
exchange your old notes for new notes, your ability to sell your
old notes will be restricted. |
|
|
|
Expiration Date |
|
The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City
time, on April 7, 2011, unless we extend the exchange offer
in our sole |
12
|
|
|
|
|
and absolute discretion. In that case, the expiration date will
be the latest date and time to which we extend the exchange
offer. See the section The Exchange Offer
Expiration Date; Extensions; Amendments. |
|
Conditions to the Exchange Offer |
|
The exchange offer is subject to customary conditions,
including, if in our reasonable judgment: |
|
|
|
the exchange offer, or the making of any exchange by
a holder of old notes, would violate applicable law or any
applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC; or
|
|
|
|
any action or proceeding has been instituted or
threatened in writing in any court or by or before any
governmental agency with respect to the exchange offer that, in
our judgment, would reasonably be expected to impair our ability
to proceed with the exchange offer.
|
|
|
|
We may choose to waive some of these conditions. For more
information, see The Exchange Offer Conditions
to the Exchange Offer. |
|
Procedures for Tendering Old Notes |
|
If you hold old notes through The Depository Trust Company
(DTC) and wish to participate in the exchange offer,
you must comply with the Automated Tender Offer Program
procedures of DTC. See the section The Exchange
Offer Exchange Offer Procedures. If you are
not a DTC participant, you may tender your old notes by
book-entry transfer by contacting your broker, dealer or other
nominee or by opening an account with a DTC participant, as the
case may be. |
|
|
|
By accepting the exchange offer, you will represent to us that,
among other things: |
|
|
|
any new notes that you receive will be acquired in
the ordinary course of your business;
|
|
|
|
you have no arrangement or understanding with any
person or entity, including any of our affiliates, to
participate in the distribution of the new notes;
|
|
|
|
you are not our affiliate as defined in
Rule 405 under the Securities Act, or, if you are an
affiliate, you will comply with any applicable registration and
prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act;
|
|
|
|
if you are not a broker-dealer, that you are not
engaged in, and do not intend to engage in, the distribution of
the new notes; and
|
|
|
|
if you are a broker-dealer that will receive new
notes for your own account in exchange for old notes that were
acquired as a result of market-making activities, that you will
deliver a prospectus, as required by law, in connection with any
resale of the new notes.
|
|
Withdrawal Rights |
|
You may withdraw the tender of your old notes at any time before
the expiration date. To do this, you should deliver a written
notice of your withdrawal to the exchange agent according to the |
13
|
|
|
|
|
withdrawal procedures described in the section The
Exchange Offer Withdrawal Rights. |
|
Exchange Agent |
|
The exchange agent for the exchange offer is The Bank of
New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. The address,
telephone number and facsimile number of the exchange agent are
provided in the section The Exchange Offer
Exchange Agent, as well as in the letter of transmittal. |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
We will not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of the
new notes. See the section Use of Proceeds. |
|
Principal Canadian and U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences |
|
Your participation in the exchange offer generally will not be a
taxable event for Canadian or U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Accordingly, you will not recognize any taxable gain or loss or
any interest income as a result of the exchange. See the section
Principal Canadian and U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Exchange Offer. |
Summary
Description of the New Notes
The summary below describes the principal terms of the new
notes. The terms of the 2017 new notes and 2020 new notes are
identical in all material respects to the terms of the 2017 old
notes and 2020 old notes, respectively, except that some of the
transfer restriction, registration rights and additional
interest provisions relating to the old notes are not applicable
to the new notes. The 2017 new notes and 2020 new notes will
evidence the same debt as the 2017 old notes and 2020 old notes,
respectively, and will be governed by the same respective
indenture. Please read the section entitled Description of
the Notes in this prospectus, which contains a more
detailed description of the terms and conditions of the new
notes.
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
Novelis Inc., a Canadian corporation. |
|
Securities Offered |
|
$1.1 billion aggregate principal amount of
8.375% senior notes due 2017 and $1.4 billion
aggregate principal amount of 8.75% senior notes due 2020. |
|
Maturity Date |
|
The 2017 new notes will mature on December 15, 2017, and
the 2020 new notes will mature on December 15, 2020. |
|
Interest |
|
The 2017 new notes will bear interest at the rate of 8.375% per
annum, and the 2020 new notes will bear interest at the rate of
8.75% per annum. Interest on the new notes will be payable
semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15,
commencing June 15, 2011. |
|
Guarantees |
|
The new notes will be guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a
senior unsecured basis, by all of our existing and future
Canadian and U.S. restricted subsidiaries, certain of our
existing foreign restricted subsidiaries and our other
restricted subsidiaries that guarantee debt in the future under
any credit facilities, provided that the borrower of such debt
is a Canadian or a U.S. subsidiary. For the year ended
March 31, 2010 and the nine months ended December 31,
2010, our subsidiaries that will not be guarantors of the new
notes had net sales of $2.5 billion and $2.2 billion,
respectively. |
|
Ranking |
|
The new notes will be: |
|
|
|
our senior unsecured obligations;
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
effectively junior in right of payment to all of our
existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of
the assets securing that debt, including the debt under the
senior secured credit facilities;
|
|
|
|
effectively junior in right of payment to all debt
and other liabilities (including trade payables) of any of our
subsidiaries that do not guarantee the new notes; and
|
|
|
|
senior in right of payment to all of our future
subordinated debt.
|
|
|
|
The guarantees of each guarantor will be: |
|
|
|
senior unsecured obligations of that guarantor;
|
|
|
|
effectively junior in right of payment to all
existing and future secured debt of that guarantor to the extent
of the value of the assets securing that debt, including the
debt or guarantee of debt of that guarantor under our senior
secured credit facilities, which debt or guarantee is secured by
the assets of that guarantor; and
|
|
|
|
senior in right of payment to all of that
guarantors future subordinated debt.
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, we and the guarantors had
$1.6 billion of secured debt. The indentures governing the
new notes will permit us, subject to specified limitations, to
incur additional debt, which may be secured debt. |
|
Optional Redemption |
|
Prior to December 15, 2013 in the case of the 2017 new
notes and prior to December 15, 2015 in the case of the
2020 new notes, we may, from time to time, redeem all or any
portion of the new notes by paying a special
make-whole premium specified in this prospectus
under Description of the Notes Optional
Redemption. |
|
|
|
Commencing December 15, 2013 in the case of the 2017 new
notes and commencing December 15, 2015 in the case of the
2020 new notes, we may, from time to time, redeem all or any
portion of the new notes at the redemption prices specified in
this prospectus under Description of the Notes
Optional Redemption. |
|
|
|
In addition, at any time and from time to time prior to
December 15, 2013, we may also redeem up to 35% of the
original aggregate principal amount of each series of the new
notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings, at a price
equal to 108.375% of the principal amount thereof in the case of
the 2017 new notes and 108.75% of the principal amount thereof
in the case of the 2020 new notes, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to the redemption date, provided that
at least 65% of the original aggregate principal amount of the
applicable series of new notes issued remains outstanding after
the redemption. |
|
Additional Amounts and Tax Redemption |
|
Any payments made by us or any guarantor with respect to the new
notes will be made without withholding or deduction, unless
required by law. If we or any guarantor would be required by law
to withhold or deduct for taxes with respect to a payment to the
holders of a series of new notes, we or any guarantor, as
applicable, |
15
|
|
|
|
|
will, subject to certain exceptions, pay the additional amounts
necessary so that the net amount received by the holder of new
notes of such series (other than certain excluded holders) after
the withholding or deduction is not less than the amount they
would have received in the absence of such withholding or
deduction. |
|
|
|
If we are required to pay additional amounts as a result of
changes in laws applicable to tax-related withholdings or
deductions in respect of payments on a series of new notes but
not the guarantees, we will have the option to redeem such
series of new notes, in whole but not in part, at a redemption
price equal to 100% of the principal amount of such series of
new notes, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
redemption and any additional amounts that may be then payable. |
|
Certain Covenants |
|
We will issue the new notes under indentures among us, the
guarantors and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as trustee. The indentures governing the new notes will
contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries to: |
|
|
|
incur additional debt and provide additional
guarantees;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends beyond certain amounts and make other
restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
create or permit certain liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain asset sales;
|
|
|
|
use the proceeds from the sales of assets and
subsidiary stock;
|
|
|
|
create or permit restrictions on the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other
distributions to us;
|
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries;
and
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially
all of our assets and the assets of our restricted subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
During any future period in which either Standard &
Poors Rating Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc. (Standard & Poors),
or Moodys Investors Service, Inc.
(Moodys) has assigned an investment grade
credit rating to a series of the new notes and no default or
event of default under the indenture governing such series of
new notes has occurred and is continuing, most of the covenants
under such indenture will be suspended. If either of these
ratings agencies then withdraws its ratings or downgrades the
ratings assigned to such series of new notes below the required
investment grade rating, or a default or event of default occurs
and is continuing, the suspended covenants will again be in
effect with respect to such series of new notes. See
Description of the Notes Certain
Covenants Covenant Suspension. |
16
|
|
|
|
|
These covenants are subject to a number of important limitations
and exceptions. See Description of the Notes
Certain Covenants. |
|
Change of Control Offer |
|
Following a change of control, we will be required to offer to
purchase all of the new notes at a purchase price of 101% of
their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, to the date of purchase. See Description of the
Notes Change of Control Offer. |
|
Transfer Restrictions |
|
The new notes are not being offered for sale or exchange and may
not be offered for sale or exchange directly or indirectly in
Canada except in accordance with applicable securities laws of
the provinces and territories of Canada. We are not required,
and do not intend, to qualify by prospectus in Canada the new
notes, and accordingly, the new notes will be subject to
restriction on resale in Canada. |
|
Risk Factors |
|
Investing in the new notes involves substantial risks. See
Risk Factors for a description of some of the risks
you should consider before investing in the new notes. |
|
Certain Income Tax Considerations |
|
You should carefully read the information under the heading
Principal Canadian and U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Exchange Offer. |
17
Summary
Financial Data
We were acquired by Hindalco through its indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary on May 15, 2007. We refer to the company prior
to the Hindalco acquisition (through May 15, 2007) as
the Predecessor, and we refer to the company after
the Hindalco acquisition (beginning on May 16,
2007) as the Successor. On June 26, 2007,
our board of directors approved the change of our fiscal year
end to March 31 from December 31.
The summary consolidated financial data of the Successor
presented below as of and for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 and the nine months ended
December 31, 2009 has been derived from the unaudited
financial statements of Novelis Inc. included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The summary consolidated financial data of the
Successor presented below as of and for the years ended
March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 and for the period
May 16, 2007, through March 31, 2008, has been derived
from the audited financial statements of Novelis Inc. included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary consolidated financial
data of the Predecessor presented below for the period
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007 has been derived
from the audited financial statements of Novelis Inc. included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary consolidated financial
data of the Successor presented below as of March 31, 2008
has been derived from the consolidated balance sheets of Novelis
Inc. as of March 31, 2008, which is not included in this
prospectus. The results for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the entire year.
The summary consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes
thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Statement of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
|
|
9,276
|
|
|
|
7,213
|
|
|
|
5,066
|
|
|
|
6,628
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
9,931
|
|
|
|
12,345
|
|
|
|
7,946
|
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
Months
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
(In millions)
|
Statement of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
(220
|
)
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
Months
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
(In millions, except shipments which are in kt)
|
Other Financial and Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
x
|
|
|
6.2
|
x
|
|
|
2.6
|
x
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
$
|
7,602
|
|
|
$
|
7,748
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
4,081
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The acquisition of Novelis by Hindalco on May 15, 2007 was
recorded in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 103, Push Down Basis of Accounting
Required in Certain Limited Circumstances
(SAB 103). In our consolidated balance
sheets, the consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
connection with the acquisition have been pushed
down to us and have been allocated to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 141,
Business Combinations (FASB 141). Due to the
impact of push down accounting, our financial statements and
certain note presentations for the year ended March 31,
2008 included elsewhere in this prospectus are presented in two
distinct periods to indicate the application of two different
bases of accounting between the periods presented: (1) the
period up to, and including, the acquisition date |
19
|
|
|
|
|
(April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, labeled
Predecessor) and (2) the period after that date
(May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008, labeled
Successor). The financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus include a black line division which
indicates that the Predecessor and Successor reporting entities
shown are not comparable. |
The consideration paid by Hindalco to acquire Novelis has been
pushed down to us and allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on our estimates of fair value, using
methodologies and assumptions that we believe are reasonable.
This allocation of fair value results in additional charges or
income to our post-acquisition consolidated statements of
operations.
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Earnings consist of income from continuing operations before the
cumulative effect of accounting changes, before fixed charges
(excluding capitalized interest) and income taxes, and
eliminating undistributed income of persons owned less than 50%
by us. Fixed charges consist of interest expenses and
amortization of debt discount and expense and premium and that
portion of rental payments which is considered as being
representative of the interest factor implicit in our operating
leases. The ratios shown above are based on our consolidated and
combined financial information, which was prepared in accordance
with GAAP. Due to losses incurred in certain of the periods
presented above, the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. The table
below presents the amount of additional earnings required to
bring the fixed charge ratio to 1:1 for each such period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
Months
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
(In millions)
|
Additional earnings required to bring fixed charge ratio to 1:1
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1,996
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
20
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in the new notes involves a high degree of
risk. In addition to the other information contained in this
prospectus, prospective investors should carefully consider the
following risks before investing in the new notes. If any of the
following risks actually occur, our business, financial
condition, operating results, cash flow and market position
could be materially adversely affected, which, in turn, could
adversely affect our ability to pay interest and principal on
the new notes. The risks discussed below also include
forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ
substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking
statements. See Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and Market Data.
Risks
Related to our Business and the Market Environment
Certain
of our customers are significant to our revenues, and we could
be adversely affected by changes in the business or financial
condition of these significant customers or by the loss of their
business.
Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 48%, 48%
and 45% of our total net sales for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010; the year ended March 31, 2010; the
year ended March 31, 2009, respectively, with Rexam Plc, a
leading global beverage can maker, and its affiliates
representing approximately 16%, 16% and 17% of our total net
sales in the respective periods. A significant downturn in the
business or financial condition of our significant customers
could materially adversely affect our results of operations and
cash flows. In addition, if our existing relationships with
significant customers materially deteriorate or are terminated
in the future, and we are not successful in replacing business
lost from such customers, our results of operations and cash
flows could be adversely affected. Some of the longer term
contracts under which we supply our customers, including under
umbrella agreements such as those described under
Business Our Customers, are subject to
renewal, renegotiation or re-pricing at periodic intervals or
upon changes in competitive supply conditions. Our failure to
successfully renew, renegotiate or re-price such agreements
could result in a reduction or loss in customer purchase volume
or revenue, and if we are not successful in replacing business
lost from such customers, our results of operations and cash
flows could be adversely affected. The markets in which we
operate are competitive and customers may seek to consolidate
supplier relationships or change suppliers to obtain cost
savings and other benefits.
Our
results and short term liquidity can be negatively impacted by
timing differences between the prices we pay under purchase
contracts and metal prices we charge our
customers.
Most of our purchase and sales contracts are based on the LME
price for high grade aluminum, and there are typically timing
differences between the pricing periods for purchases and sales
where purchase prices tend to be fixed earlier than sales
prices. This creates a price exposure that we call metal
price lag. To mitigate this exposure, we sell short-term
LME futures contracts to protect the value of priced metal
purchases and inventory until the sale price is established. We
settle these derivative contracts in advance of collecting from
our customers, which impacts our short-term liquidity position.
In addition, from time to time, customers request fixed prices
for longer term sales commitments, and we in turn enter into
futures purchase contracts to hedge against these fixed forward
priced sales to customers. The mismatch between the settlement
of these derivative contracts and the recognition of revenue
from shipments hedged with these derivative contracts also leads
to volatility in our GAAP operating results. The lag between
derivative settlement and customer collection typically ranges
from 30 to 60 days.
Our
operations consume energy and our profitability and cash flows
may decline if energy costs were to rise, or if our energy
supplies were interrupted.
We consume substantial amounts of energy in our rolling
operations, cast house operations and Brazilian smelting
operations. The factors that affect our energy costs and supply
reliability tend to be specific to each of our facilities. A
number of factors could materially adversely affect our energy
position including:
|
|
|
|
|
increases in costs of natural gas;
|
|
|
|
significant increases in costs of supplied electricity or fuel
oil related to transportation;
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
interruptions in energy supply due to equipment failure or other
causes;
|
|
|
|
the inability to extend energy supply contracts upon expiration
on economical terms; and
|
|
|
|
the inability to pass through energy costs in certain sales
contracts.
|
In addition, global climate change may increase our costs for
energy sources, supplies or raw materials. See
We may be affected by global climate change or
by legal, regulatory or market responses to such change.
If energy costs were to rise, or if energy supplies or supply
arrangements were disrupted, our profitability and cash flows
could decline.
A
deterioration of our financial position or a downgrade of our
ratings by a credit rating agency could increase our borrowing
costs and our business relationships could be adversely
affected.
A deterioration of our financial position or a downgrade of our
ratings for any reason could increase our borrowing costs and
have an adverse effect on our business relationships with
customers, suppliers and hedging counterparties. From time to
time, we enter into various forms of hedging activities against
currency or metal price fluctuations and trade metal contracts
on the LME. Financial strength and credit ratings are important
to the availability and pricing of these hedging and trading
activities. As a result, any downgrade of our credit ratings may
make it more costly for us to engage in these activities, and
changes to our level of indebtedness may make it more difficult
or costly for us to engage in these activities in the future.
Adverse
changes in currency exchange rates could negatively affect our
financial results or cash flows and the competitiveness of our
aluminum rolled products relative to other
materials.
Our businesses and operations are exposed to the effects of
changes in the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar, the euro,
the British pound, the Brazilian real, the Canadian dollar, the
Korean won and other currencies. We have implemented a hedging
policy that attempts to manage currency exchange rate risks to
an acceptable level based on managements judgment of the
appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and cost;
however, this hedging policy may not successfully or completely
eliminate the effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
results and cash flows.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in
U.S. dollars, but a portion of our earnings and
expenditures are denominated in other currencies, primarily the
euro, the Korean won and the Brazilian real. Changes in exchange
rates will result in increases or decreases in our operating
results and may also affect the book value of our assets located
outside the U.S.
Most
of our facilities are staffed by a unionized workforce, and
union disputes and other employee relations issues could
materially adversely affect our financial results.
Approximately 69% of our employees are represented by labor
unions under a large number of collective bargaining agreements
with varying durations and expiration dates. We may not be able
to satisfactorily renegotiate our collective bargaining
agreements when they expire. In addition, existing collective
bargaining agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage
at our facilities in the future. For example, we experienced a
work stoppage at our Korean facilities for 12 days in
August 2010. While this work stoppage resulted in a wage
increase of approximately 15% for the workers at our Korean
facilities, it did not have a material impact on our results of
operations. However, any future extended work stoppages could
have a material adverse effect on our financial results and cash
flows.
We
could be adversely affected by disruptions of our
operations.
Breakdown of equipment or other events, including catastrophic
events such as war or natural disasters, leading to production
interruptions at our plants could have a material adverse effect
on our financial results and cash flows. Further, because many
of our customers are, to varying degrees, dependent on planned
deliveries from our plants, those customers that have to
reschedule their own production due to our missed deliveries
could pursue claims against us and reduce their future business
with us. We may incur costs to correct any of these problems, in
addition to facing claims from customers. Further, our
reputation among
22
actual and potential customers may be harmed, resulting in a
loss of business. While we maintain insurance policies covering,
among other things, physical damage, business interruptions and
product liability, these policies would not cover all of our
losses.
Our
operations have been and will continue to be exposed to various
business and other risks, changes in conditions and events
beyond our control in countries where we have operations or sell
products.
We are, and will continue to be, subject to financial,
political, economic and business risks in connection with our
global operations. We have made investments and carry on
production activities in various emerging markets, including
Brazil, Korea and Malaysia, and we market our products in these
countries, as well as China and certain other countries in Asia,
the Middle East and emerging markets in South America. While we
anticipate higher growth or attractive production opportunities
from these emerging markets, they also present a higher degree
of risk than more developed markets. In addition to the business
risks inherent in developing and servicing new markets, economic
conditions may be more volatile, legal and regulatory systems
less developed and predictable, and the possibility of various
types of adverse governmental action more pronounced. In
addition, inflation, fluctuations in currency and interest
rates, competitive factors, civil unrest and labor problems
could affect our revenues, expenses and results of operations.
Our operations could also be adversely affected by acts of war,
terrorism or the threat of any of these events as well as
government actions such as controls on imports, exports and
prices, tariffs, new forms of taxation, or changes in fiscal
regimes and increased government regulation in the countries in
which we operate or service customers. Unexpected or
uncontrollable events or circumstances in any of these markets
could have a material adverse effect on our financial results
and cash flows.
In addition, although relations between the Republic of Korea
(which we refer to as Korea) and the Democratic Peoples
Republic of Korea (which we refer to as North Korea) have been
tense throughout Koreas modern history, North Koreas
recent artillery attack on Koreas Yeonpyeong Island has
vastly increased such tensions. There can be no assurance that
the level of tension on the Korean peninsula will not escalate
in the future. Further attacks may occur on Korea, including on
areas in which we operate, which could have a material adverse
affect on our operations. If military hostilities continue or
increase between North Korea and Korea or the United States, the
region could become further destabilized and our operations
could be halted, and any such hostilities could have a material
adverse effect on our operations.
Economic
conditions could negatively affect our financial condition and
results of operations.
Our financial condition and results of operations depend
significantly on worldwide economic conditions. These economic
conditions deteriorated significantly in many countries and
regions in which we do business during and after the difficult
global capital market conditions in 2008 and 2009, which
resulted in a tightening in the credit markets, a low level of
liquidity in many financial markets and extreme volatility in
fixed income, currency and equity markets.
We are unable to predict the timing and rate at which industry
variables may fully recover or future adverse changes in
worldwide economic conditions. Uncertainty about current or
future global economic conditions poses a risk as our customers
may postpone purchases in response to tighter credit and
negative financial news, which could adversely impact demand for
our products. In addition, there can be no assurance that the
actions we have taken or may take in response to the economic
conditions will be sufficient to counter any continuation or
reoccurrence of the downturn or disruptions. A significant
global economic downturn or disruptions in the financial markets
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations.
Our
results of operations, cash flows and liquidity could be
adversely affected if we were unable to purchase derivative
instruments or if counterparties to our derivative instruments
fail to honor their agreements.
We use various derivative instruments to manage the risks
arising from fluctuations in aluminum prices, exchange rates,
energy prices and interest rates. If for any reason we were
unable to purchase derivative
23
instruments to manage these risks or were unsuccessful in
passing through the costs of our risk management activities, our
results of operations, cash flows and liquidity could be
adversely affected. In addition, we may be exposed to losses in
the future if the counterparties to our derivative instruments
fail to honor their agreements. In particular, deterioration in
the financial condition of our counterparties and any resulting
failure to pay amounts owed to us or to perform obligations or
services owed to us could have a negative effect on our business
and financial condition. Further, if major financial
institutions continue to consolidate and are forced to operate
under more restrictive capital constraints and regulations,
there could be less liquidity in the derivative markets, which
could have a negative effect on our ability to hedge and
transact with creditworthy counterparties.
New
derivatives legislation could have an adverse impact on our
ability to hedge risks associated with our business and on the
cost of our hedging activities.
We use
over-the-counter
(OTC) derivatives products to hedge our metal
commodity risks and, to a lesser extent, our interest rate and
currency risks. Recent legislation has been adopted to increase
the regulatory oversight of the OTC derivatives markets and
impose restrictions on certain derivative transactions, which
could affect the use of derivatives in hedging transactions.
Final regulations pursuant to this legislation defining which
companies will be subject to the legislation have not yet been
adopted. If future regulations subject us to additional capital
or margin requirements or other restrictions on our trading and
commodity positions, they could have an adverse effect on our
ability to hedge risks associated with our business and on the
cost of our hedging activities.
During
many operating periods, we utilize substantially all of our
production capacity, which may put us at a competitive
disadvantage since we may be unable to take on additional
volumes to meet our customers needs or acquire new
business. Therefore, we may lose future business to competitors
with available capacity.
During the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we operated
at or near capacity across our system of plants worldwide. We
anticipate that we will continue to make capital investments in
our facilities to upgrade our technology and processes and
attempt to expand the output capacity of our existing equipment
and facilities, but our capacity expansion may not be sufficient
to match the level of future demand increases. To the extent
other rolled aluminum products manufacturers have available
capacity at levels that exceed ours, we may be at a competitive
disadvantage in our efforts to increase volumes from a current
customer or to win significant new customer opportunities.
Our
goodwill and other intangible assets could become impaired,
which could require us to take non-cash charges against
earnings.
We assess, at least annually and potentially more frequently,
whether the value of our goodwill and other intangible assets
has been impaired. Any impairment of goodwill or other
intangible assets as a result of such analysis would result in a
non-cash charge against earnings, which charge could materially
adversely affect our reported results of operations.
A significant and sustained decline in our future cash flows, a
significant adverse change in the economic environment or slower
growth rates could result in the need to perform additional
impairment analysis in future periods. If we were to conclude
that a write-down of goodwill or other intangible assets is
necessary, then we would record such additional charges, which
could materially adversely affect our results of operations.
24
As
part of our ongoing evaluation of our operations, we may
undertake additional restructuring efforts in the future which
could in some instances result in significant severance-related
costs, environmental remediation expenses and impairment and
other restructuring charges.
We recorded restructuring charges of $35 million for the
nine months ended December 31, 2010, $14 million for
the year ended March 31, 2010 and $95 million for the
year ended March 31, 2009. During these periods, we
announced, among others, the following restructuring actions and
programs:
|
|
|
|
|
the relocation of our North American headquarters from
Cleveland, Ohio to Atlanta, Georgia;
|
|
|
|
a voluntary separation program for salaried employees in North
America and the corporate office aimed at reducing staff levels;
|
|
|
|
cessation of commercial grade alumina production at our Ouro
Preto facility in Brazil;
|
|
|
|
the closure of our aluminum sheet mill in Rogerstone, South
Wales, U.K.;
|
|
|
|
a restructuring plan to streamline operations at our Rugles
facility located in Upper Normandy, France;
|
|
|
|
a voluntary retirement program in Asia;
|
|
|
|
the shutdown of our Aratu facility located in Candeias,
Brazil; and
|
|
|
|
proposed cessation of foil rolling activities and part of the
packaging business at our facility located in Bridgnorth, U.K.
by the end of April 2011.
|
We may take additional restructuring actions in the future. Any
additional restructuring efforts could result in significant
severance-related costs, environmental remediation expenses,
impairment charges, restructuring charges and related costs and
expenses, which could adversely affect our profitability and
cash flows.
We may
not be able to successfully develop and implement new technology
initiatives in a timely manner.
We have invested in, and are involved with, a number of
technology and process initiatives. Several technical aspects of
these initiatives are still unproven, and the eventual
commercial outcomes cannot be assessed with any certainty. Even
if we are successful with these initiatives, we may not be able
to deploy them in a timely fashion. Accordingly, the costs and
benefits from our investments in new technologies and the
consequent effects on our financial results may vary from
present expectations.
Loss
of our key management and other personnel, or an inability to
attract such management and other personnel, could adversely
impact our business.
We depend on our senior executive officers and other key
personnel to run our business. The loss of any of these officers
or other key personnel could materially adversely affect our
operations. Competition for qualified employees among companies
that rely heavily on engineering and technology is intense, and
the loss of qualified employees or an inability to attract,
retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees required
for the operation and expansion of our business could hinder our
ability to improve manufacturing operations, conduct research
activities successfully and develop marketable products.
Future
acquisitions or divestitures may adversely affect our financial
condition.
As part of our strategy for growth, we may pursue acquisitions,
divestitures or strategic alliances, which may not be completed
or, if completed, may not be ultimately beneficial to us. There
are numerous risks commonly encountered in strategic
transactions, including the risk that we may not be able to
complete a transaction that has been announced, effectively
integrate businesses acquired or generate the cost savings and
synergies anticipated. Failure to do so could have a material
adverse effect on our financial results.
25
Capital
investments in debottlenecking or other organic growth
initiatives may not produce the returns we
anticipate.
A significant element of our strategy is to invest in
opportunities to increase the production capacity of our
operating facilities through modifications of and investments in
existing facilities and equipment and to evaluate other
investments in organic growth in our target markets. These
projects involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including the
risk that actual capital investment requirements exceed
projected levels, that our forecasted demand levels prove to be
inaccurate, that we do not realize the production increases or
other benefits anticipated, that we experience scheduling delays
in connection with the commencement or completion of the
project, that the project disrupts existing plant operations
causing us to temporarily lose a portion of our available
production capacity, or that key management devotes significant
time and energy focused on one or more initiatives that divert
attention from other business activities.
We
could be required to make unexpected contributions to our
defined benefit pension plans as a result of adverse changes in
interest rates and the capital markets.
Most of our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit
pension plans for our employees in the U.S., the U.K. and
Canada, unfunded pension benefits in Germany and lump sum
indemnities payable to our employees in France, Italy, Korea and
Malaysia upon retirement or termination. Our pension plan assets
consist primarily of funds invested in listed stocks and bonds.
Our estimates of liabilities and expenses for pensions and other
postretirement benefits incorporate a number of assumptions,
including expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and
interest rates used to discount future benefits. Our results of
operations, liquidity or shareholders equity in a
particular period could be adversely affected by capital market
returns that are less than their assumed long-term rate of
return or a decline of the rate used to discount future benefits.
If the assets of our pension plans do not achieve assumed
investment returns for any period, such deficiency could result
in one or more charges against our earnings for that period. In
addition, changing economic conditions, poor pension investment
returns or other factors may require us to make unexpected cash
contributions to the pension plans in the future, preventing the
use of such cash for other purposes.
We
face risks relating to certain joint ventures and subsidiaries
that we do not entirely control. Our ability to access cash from
these entities may be more restricted than if these entities
were wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Some of our activities are, and will in the future be, conducted
through entities that we do not entirely control or wholly own.
These entities include our Norf, Germany; Logan, Kentucky; and
Evermore Recycling joint ventures, as well as our majority-owned
Korean and Malaysian subsidiaries. Our Malaysian subsidiary is a
public company whose shares are listed for trading on the Bursa
Malaysia. Under the governing documents, agreements or
securities laws applicable to or stock exchange listing rules
relative to certain of these joint ventures and subsidiaries,
our ability to fully control certain operational matters may be
limited. In addition, we do not solely determine certain key
matters, such as the timing and amount of cash distributions
from these entities. As a result, our ability to access cash
from these entities may be more restricted than if they were
wholly-owned entities. Further, in some cases we do not have
rights to prevent a joint venture partner from selling its joint
venture interests to a third party.
In addition, our Korean subsidiary incurred a loss from capital
reduction in connection with the cancellation of treasury
shares, which reduced its retained earnings to a level that will
prevent the declaration of any dividends by our Korean
subsidiary based on earnings generated by our Korean business
during the calendar year ending December 31, 2010. This
will limit our ability to access cash flows from our Asian
operations in the short-term.
26
Hindalco
and its interests as equity holder may conflict with our
interest or your interests as holders of the notes in the
future.
Novelis is an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of Hindalco. As
a result, Hindalco may exercise control over our decisions to
enter into any corporate transaction or capital restructuring
and has the ability to approve or prevent any transaction that
requires the approval of our shareholders, regardless of whether
or not holders of the notes believe that any such transactions
are in their own best interests. The interests of Hindalco and
the actions it is able to undertake as our sole shareholder may
differ or adversely affect your interests as holders of the
notes. Hindalco may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions,
divestitures, financings or other transactions that, in its
judgment, could enhance its equity investment, even though such
transactions might involve risks to holders of the notes. For
example, Hindalco could cause us to make acquisitions that
increase the amount of indebtedness that is secured, or to sell
revenue-generating assets, impairing our ability to make
payments under the notes. Hindalco may be able to strongly
influence or effectively control our decisions as long as they
own a significant portion of our equity, even if such amount is
less than 50%. Additionally, Hindalco operates in the aluminum
industry and may from time to time acquire and hold interests in
businesses that compete, directly or indirectly, with us.
Hindalco may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be
complementary to our business, and as a result, those
acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. Hindalco
has no obligation to provide us with financing and is able to
sell their equity ownership in us at any time.
If we
are unable to obtain sufficient quantities of primary aluminum,
recycled aluminum, sheet ingot and other raw materials used in
the production of our products, our ability to produce and
deliver products or to manufacture products on a timely basis
could be adversely affected.
We rely on a limited number of suppliers for our raw materials
requirements. Based on CRU estimates, aluminum demand levels
were expected to increase over 15% from December 31, 2009
levels through the end of 2010. Increasing aluminum demand
levels have caused supply constraints in the industry. Further
increases in demand levels could exacerbate these supply issues.
If we are unable to obtain sufficient quantities of primary
aluminum, recycled aluminum, sheet ingot and other raw materials
used in the production of our rolled aluminum products due to
supply constraints in the future, our ability to produce and
deliver products or to manufacture products on a timely basis
could be adversely affected.
Our sheet ingot requirements have historically been, in part,
supplied by Rio Tinto Alcan pursuant to agreements with us. For
the year ended March 31, 2010, we purchased the majority of
our third party sheet ingot requirements from Rio Tinto
Alcans primary metal group. If Rio Tinto Alcan or any
other significant supplier of sheet ingot is unable to deliver
sufficient quantities of this material on a timely basis, our
production may be disrupted and our net sales, profitability and
cash flows could be materially adversely affected. Although
aluminum is traded on the world markets, developing alternative
suppliers of sheet ingot could be time consuming and expensive.
In addition, our continuous casting operations at our Saguenay
Works, Canada facility depend upon a local supply of molten
aluminum from Rio Tinto Alcan. For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2010, Rio Tinto Alcans primary metal group
supplied most of the molten aluminum used at Saguenay Works. If
this supply were to be disrupted, our Saguenay Works production
could be interrupted and our net sales, profitability and cash
flows materially adversely affected.
We
face significant price and other forms of competition from other
aluminum rolled products producers, which could hurt our results
of operations and cash flows.
Generally, the markets in which we operate are highly
competitive. We compete primarily on the basis of our value
proposition, including price, product quality, ability to meet
customers specifications, range of products offered, lead
times, technical support and customer service. Some of our
competitors may benefit from greater capital resources, have
more efficient technologies, have lower raw material and energy
costs and may be able to sustain longer periods of price
competition. In particular, we face increased competition from
27
producers in China, which have significantly lower production
costs and pricing. This lower pricing could erode the market
prices of our products in the Chinese market and elsewhere.
In addition, our competitive position within the global aluminum
rolled products industry may be affected by, among other things,
the recent trend toward consolidation among our competitors,
exchange rate fluctuations that may make our products less
competitive in relation to the products of companies based in
other countries (despite the U.S. dollar-based input cost
and the marginal costs of shipping) and economies of scale in
purchasing, production and sales, which accrue to the benefit of
some of our competitors. For example, the price gap between the
Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) and the LME may
make products manufactured in China with SHFE prices for
aluminum more competitive compared to our products manufactured
in Asia with LME prices for aluminum.
Increased competition could cause a reduction in our shipment
volumes and profitability or increase our expenditures, either
of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
results and cash flows.
The
end-use markets for certain of our products are highly
competitive and customers are willing to accept substitutes for
our products.
The end-use markets for certain aluminum rolled products are
highly competitive. Aluminum competes with other materials, such
as steel, plastics, composite materials and glass, among others,
for various applications, including in beverage and food cans
and automotive end-use markets. In the past, customers have
demonstrated a willingness to substitute other materials for
aluminum. For example, changes in consumer preferences in
beverage containers have increased the use of PET plastic
containers and glass bottles in recent years. These trends may
continue. The willingness of customers to accept substitutes for
aluminum products could have a material adverse effect on our
financial results and cash flows.
The
seasonal nature of some of our customers industries could
have a material adverse effect on our financial results and cash
flows.
The construction industry and the consumption of beer and soda
are sensitive to weather conditions and as a result, demand for
aluminum rolled products in the construction industry and for
can feedstock can be seasonal. Our quarterly financial results
could fluctuate as a result of climatic changes, and a prolonged
series of cold summers in the different regions in which we
conduct our business could have a material adverse effect on our
financial results and cash flows.
We are
subject to a broad range of environmental, health and safety
laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate,
and we may be exposed to substantial environmental, health and
safety costs and liabilities.
We are subject to a broad range of environmental, health and
safety laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we
operate. These laws and regulations impose increasingly
stringent environmental, health and safety protection standards
and permitting requirements regarding, among other things, air
emissions, wastewater storage, treatment and discharges, the use
and handling of hazardous or toxic materials, waste disposal
practices, the remediation of environmental contamination,
post-mining reclamation and working conditions for our
employees. Some environmental laws, such as Superfund and
comparable laws in U.S. states and other jurisdictions
worldwide, impose joint and several liability for the cost of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses, without regard to the fault or the
legality of the original conduct.
The costs of complying with these laws and regulations,
including participation in assessments and remediation of
contaminated sites and installation of pollution control
facilities, have been, and in the future could be, significant.
In addition, these laws and regulations may also result in
substantial environmental liabilities associated with divested
assets, third party locations and past activities. In certain
instances, these costs and liabilities, as well as related
action to be taken by us, could be accelerated or increased if
we were to close, divest of or change the principal use of
certain facilities with respect to which we may have
environmental liabilities or remediation obligations. Currently,
we are involved in a number of compliance
28
efforts, remediation activities and legal proceedings concerning
environmental matters, including certain activities and
proceedings arising under Superfund and comparable laws in
U.S. states and other jurisdictions worldwide in which we
have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the
European Union.
We have established reserves for environmental remediation
activities and liabilities where appropriate. However, the cost
of addressing environmental matters (including the timing of any
charges related thereto) cannot be predicted with certainty, and
these reserves may not ultimately be adequate, especially in
light of potential changes in environmental conditions, changing
interpretations of laws and regulations by regulators and
courts, the discovery of previously unknown environmental
conditions, the risk of governmental orders to carry out
additional compliance on certain sites not initially included in
remediation in progress, our potential liability to remediate
sites for which provisions have not been previously established
and the adoption of more stringent environmental laws. Such
future developments could result in increased environmental
costs and liabilities and could require significant capital
expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, results or cash flows. Furthermore,
the failure to comply with our obligations under the
environmental laws and regulations could subject us to
administrative, civil or criminal penalties, obligations to pay
damages or other costs, and injunctions or other orders,
including orders to cease operations. In addition, the presence
of environmental contamination at our properties could adversely
affect our ability to sell property, receive full value for a
property or use a property as collateral for a loan.
Some of our current and potential operations are located or
could be located in or near communities that may regard such
operations as having a detrimental effect on their social and
economic circumstances. Environmental laws typically provide for
participation in permitting decisions, site remediation
decisions and other matters. Concern about environmental justice
issues also may affect our operations. Should such community
objections be presented to government officials, the
consequences of such a development may have a material adverse
impact upon the profitability or, in extreme cases, the
viability of an operation. In addition, such developments may
adversely affect our ability to expand or enter into new
operations in such location or elsewhere and may also have an
effect on the cost of our environmental remediation projects.
We use a variety of hazardous materials and chemicals in our
rolling processes, as well as in our smelting operations in
Brazil and in connection with maintenance work on our
manufacturing facilities. Because of the nature of these
substances or related residues, we may be liable for certain
costs, including, among others, costs for health-related claims
or removal or re-treatment of such substances. Certain of our
current and former facilities incorporate asbestos-containing
materials, a hazardous substance that has been the subject of
health-related claims for occupational exposure. In addition,
although we have developed environmental, health and safety
programs for our employees, including measures to reduce
employee exposure to hazardous substances, and conduct regular
assessments at our facilities, we are currently, and in the
future may be, involved in claims and litigation filed on behalf
of persons alleging injury predominantly as a result of
occupational exposure to substances or other hazards at our
current or former facilities. It is not possible to predict the
ultimate outcome of these claims and lawsuits due to the
unpredictable nature of personal injury litigation. If these
claims and lawsuits, individually or in the aggregate, were
finally resolved against us, our results of operations and cash
flows could be adversely affected.
We may
be exposed to significant legal proceedings or
investigations.
From time to time, we are involved in, or the subject of,
disputes, proceedings and investigations with respect to a
variety of matters, including environmental, health and safety,
product liability, employee, tax, personal injury, contractual
and other matters as well as other disputes and proceedings that
arise in the ordinary course of business. Certain of these
matters are discussed in the preceding risk factor. Any claims
against us or any investigations involving us, whether
meritorious or not, could be costly to defend or comply with and
could divert managements attention as well as operational
resources. Any such dispute, litigation or investigation,
whether currently pending or threatened or in the future, may
have a material adverse effect on our financial results and cash
flows.
29
Product
liability claims against us could result in significant costs or
negatively impact our reputation and could adversely affect our
business results and financial condition.
We are sometimes exposed to warranty and product liability
claims. There can be no assurance that we will not experience
material product liability losses arising from individual suits
or class actions alleging product liability defects or related
claims in the future and that these will not have a negative
impact on us. We generally maintain insurance against many
product liability risks, but there can be no assurance that this
coverage will be adequate for any liabilities ultimately
incurred. In addition, there is no assurance that insurance will
continue to be available on terms acceptable to us. A successful
claim that exceeds our available insurance coverage could have a
material adverse effect on our financial results and cash flows.
We may
be affected by global climate change or by legal, regulatory, or
market responses to such change.
There is a growing concern over climate change, which has led to
new and proposed legislative and regulatory initiatives, such as
cap-and-trade
systems and additional limits on emissions of greenhouse gases.
New laws enacted could directly and indirectly affect our
customers and suppliers (through an increase in the cost of
production or their ability to produce satisfactory products) or
our business (through an impact on our inventory availability,
cost of sales, operations or demand for the products we sell),
which could result in an adverse effect on our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. Compliance with
any new or more stringent laws or regulations, or stricter
interpretations of existing laws, could require additional
expenditures by us, our customers or our suppliers. Also, we
rely on natural gas, electricity, fuel oil and transport fuel to
operate our facilities. Any increased costs of these energy
sources because of new laws could be passed along to us and our
customers and suppliers, which could also have a negative impact
on our profitability.
We may
see increased costs arising from health care
reform.
In March 2010, the United States government enacted
comprehensive health care reform legislation which, among other
things, includes guaranteed coverage requirements, eliminates
pre-existing condition exclusions and annual and lifetime
maximum limits, restricts the extent to which policies can be
rescinded and imposes new and significant taxes on health
insurers and health care benefits. The legislation imposes
implementation effective dates beginning in 2010 and extending
through 2020, and many of the changes require additional
guidance from government agencies or federal regulations.
Therefore, due to the phased-in nature of the implementation and
the lack of interpretive guidance, it is difficult to determine
at this time what impact the health care reform legislation will
have on our financial results. Possible adverse effects of the
health reform legislation include increased costs, exposure to
expanded liability and requirements for us to revise ways in
which we provide healthcare and other benefits to our employees.
In addition, our results of operations, financial position and
cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
Income
tax payments may ultimately differ from amounts currently
recorded by the Company. Future tax law changes may materially
increase the Companys prospective income tax
expense.
We are subject to income taxation in many jurisdictions in the
U.S. as well as numerous foreign jurisdictions. Judgment is
required in determining our worldwide income tax provision and
accordingly there are many transactions and computations for
which our final income tax determination is uncertain. We are
routinely audited by income tax authorities in many tax
jurisdictions. Although we believe the recorded tax estimates
are reasonable, the ultimate outcome from any audit (or related
litigation) could be materially different from amounts reflected
in our income tax provisions and accruals. Future settlements of
income tax audits may have a material effect on earnings between
the period of initial recognition of tax estimates in the
financial statements and the point of ultimate tax audit
settlement. Additionally, it is possible that future income tax
legislation in any jurisdiction to which we are subject may be
enacted that could have a material impact on our worldwide
income tax provision beginning with the period that such
legislation becomes effective.
30
If we
fail to maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting, we may have material misstatements in our financial
statements and we may not be able to report our financial
results in a timely manner.
Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to
provide a report by management in our
Form 10-K
on internal control over financial reporting, including
managements assessment of the effectiveness of such
control. Internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent
limitations, including the possibility of human error, the
circumvention or overriding of controls or fraud. Therefore,
even effective internal controls can provide only some assurance
with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of
financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our
internal controls, we may be unable to provide financial
information in a timely and reliable manner. Any such
difficulties or failure may have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and operating results.
Risks
Related to the Notes
Our
substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our business and
therefore make it more difficult for us to fulfill our
obligations under the notes.
We are highly leveraged. As of December 31, 2010, we had
$4.1 billion of indebtedness outstanding. Our substantial
indebtedness and interest expense could have important
consequences to our company and holders of notes, including:
|
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to borrow additional amounts for working
capital, capital expenditures or other general corporate
purposes;
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
industry conditions, including volatility in LME prices;
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to capitalize on business opportunities and
to react to competitive pressures and adverse changes in
government regulation; and
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability or increasing the costs to refinance
indebtedness.
|
Despite
the level of our indebtedness, we may still incur significantly
more indebtedness. This could further increase the risks
associated with our indebtedness.
Despite our current level of indebtedness, we and our
subsidiaries may be able to incur significant additional
indebtedness, including secured indebtedness, in the future.
Although our senior secured credit facilities and the indentures
governing the notes contain restrictions on our and our
subsidiaries ability to incur additional indebtedness,
these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and
exceptions, and, under certain circumstances, the indebtedness
incurred in compliance with such restrictions could be
substantial. If new indebtedness is added to our and our
subsidiaries current debt levels, the related risks that
we and they face would be increased and we may not be able to
meet all our debt obligations, including repayment of the notes,
in whole or in part.
We may
not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all our
indebtedness, including the notes, and may be forced to take
other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness,
which may not be successful.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our
debt obligations depends on our financial condition and
operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic
and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business
and other factors beyond our control. We may not be able to
maintain such a level of cash flows from operating activities
sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any,
and interest on our indebtedness, including the notes.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund
our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or
delay investments and capital expenditures, or to sell assets,
seek additional capital or
31
restructure or refinance our indebtedness, including the notes.
Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on
the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition
at such time. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher
interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous
covenants, which could further restrict our business operations.
The terms of existing or future debt instruments and the
indentures governing the notes may restrict us from adopting
some of these alternatives. In addition, any failure to make
payments of interest and principal on our outstanding
indebtedness on a timely basis would likely result in a
reduction of our credit rating, which could harm our ability to
incur additional indebtedness. These alternative measures may
not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled
debt service obligations.
The
covenants in our senior secured credit facilities and the
indentures governing the notes impose significant operating and
financial restrictions on us.
Our senior secured credit facilities and the indentures
governing the notes impose significant operating and financial
restrictions on us. These restrictions limit our ability and the
ability of our restricted subsidiaries, among other things, to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt and provide additional guarantees;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends and make other restricted payments, including
certain investments;
|
|
|
|
create or permit certain liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain asset sales;
|
|
|
|
use the proceeds from the sales of assets and subsidiary stock;
|
|
|
|
create or permit restrictions on the ability of our restricted
subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us;
|
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions; and
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our
assets or the assets of our restricted subsidiaries.
|
In addition, under our $800 million five-year
multi-currency asset-backed revolving credit line and letter of
credit facility (the ABL Facility), if (a) our
excess availability under the ABL Facility is less than the
greater of (i) 12.5% of the lesser of (x) the total
ABL Facility commitment at any time and (y) the then
applicable borrowing base and (ii) $90 million, at any
time or (b) any event of default has occurred and is
continuing, we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio of at least 1.1 to 1 until (1) such excess
availability has subsequently been at least the greater of
(i) 12.5% of the lesser of (x) the total ABL Facility
commitments at such time and (y) the then applicable
borrowing base for 30 consecutive days and
(ii) $90 million and (2) no default is
outstanding during such 30 day period.
Further, under our $1.5 billion six-year term loan facility
(the Term Loan Facility) we may not permit our total
net leverage ratio as of the last day of our four consecutive
quarters ending with any fiscal quarter to exceed ratios
expected to begin at 4.75 to 1 and stepping down periodically at
specified levels over the life of the facility. See
Description of Other Indebtedness Senior
Secured Credit Facilities Covenants.
If we
default on our obligations to pay our other indebtedness, we may
not be able to make payments on the notes.
Any default under the agreements governing our indebtedness,
including a default under our senior secured credit facilities,
that is not waived by the required lenders or holders of such
indebtedness, and the remedies sought by the holders of such
indebtedness, could prevent us from paying principal, premium,
if any, and interest on the notes and substantially decrease the
market value of the notes. If we are unable to generate
sufficient cash flow or are otherwise unable to obtain funds
necessary to meet required payments of principal,
32
premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness, or if we
otherwise fail to comply with the various covenants, including
financial and operating covenants, in the agreements governing
our indebtedness, including the covenants contained in our
senior secured credit facilities, we would be in default under
the terms of the agreements governing such indebtedness. In the
event of such default:
|
|
|
|
|
the lenders under our senior secured credit facilities could
elect to terminate their commitments thereunder, declare all the
funds borrowed thereunder to be due and payable and, if not
promptly paid, institute foreclosure proceedings against our
assets;
|
|
|
|
even if those lenders do not declare a default, they may be able
to cause all of our available cash to be used to repay their
loans; and
|
|
|
|
such default could cause a cross-default or cross-acceleration
under our other indebtedness.
|
As a result of such default and any actions the lenders may take
in response thereto, we could be forced into bankruptcy or
liquidation.
If our operating performance declines, we may in the future need
to obtain waivers from the required lenders under our senior
secured credit facilities to avoid being in default. If we
breach our covenants under our senior secured credit facilities
and seek a waiver, we may not be able to obtain a waiver from
the required lenders. If this occurs, we could be in default
under our senior secured credit facilities, the lenders could
exercise their rights, as described above, and we could be
forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.
While
the indentures governing the notes contain restrictions on our
ability to make restricted payments, there are a number of
exceptions to these restrictions.
Although the indentures governing the notes contain restrictions
on our ability to make restricted payments, we are able to make
such restricted payments under certain circumstances under the
indentures, including, but not limited to, up to
$150 million per fiscal year in restricted payments, with
unused amounts carrying over to future fiscal years (provided
our Total Liquidity (as defined below under Description of
the Notes) is equal to or greater than $750 million
and certain other requirements, are satisfied) and unlimited
restricted payments when our Net Total Leverage Ratio (as
defined below under Description of the Notes) does
not exceed 3.0 to 1. If we make significant restricted payments
in the future, there will be less available cash to service our
indebtedness, which will increase the risk that we may not be
able to meet all our debt obligations, including repayment of
the notes.
We are
primarily a holding company and depend on our subsidiaries to
generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service
obligations, including payments on the notes.
We are primarily a holding company and a large portion of our
assets is the capital stock of our subsidiaries and the equity
interests in our joint ventures. As a holding company, we
conduct substantially all of our business through our
subsidiaries and joint ventures. Consequently, our cash flow and
ability to service our debt obligations, including the notes,
are dependent upon the earnings of our subsidiaries and joint
ventures and the distribution of those earnings to us, or upon
loans, advances or other payments made by these entities to us.
The ability of these entities to pay dividends or make other
loans, advances or payments to us will depend upon their
operating results and will be subject to applicable laws and
contractual restrictions contained in the instruments governing
their debt, and we may not exercise sufficient control to cause
distributions to be made to us. Although our senior secured
credit facilities and the indentures governing the notes each
limit the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to enter into
consensual restrictions on their ability to pay dividends and
make other payments to us, these limitations do not apply to our
existing joint ventures or unrestricted subsidiaries and the
limitations are also subject to important exceptions and
qualifications.
The ability of our subsidiaries to generate sufficient cash flow
from operations to allow us to make scheduled payments on our
debt obligations, including the notes, will depend on their
future financial performance, which will be affected by a range
of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are
outside of our control. We cannot assure you that the cash flow
and earnings of our operating subsidiaries and the amount that
they are able to distribute to us as dividends or otherwise will
be adequate for us to
33
service our debt obligations, including the notes. If our
subsidiaries do not generate sufficient cash flow from
operations to satisfy our debt obligations, including payments
on the notes, we may have to undertake alternative financing
plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our debt, selling
assets, reducing or delaying capital investments or seeking to
raise additional capital. We cannot assure you that any such
alternative refinancing would be possible, that any assets could
be sold, or, if sold, of the timing of the sales and the amount
of proceeds realized from those sales, that additional financing
could be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all, or that
additional financing would be permitted under the terms of our
various debt instruments then in effect. Our inability to
generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations,
or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable
terms, would have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flow, as well as on
our ability to satisfy our obligations on the notes.
Your
right to receive payments on the notes is effectively junior in
right of payment to all existing and future secured indebtedness
of ours or the guarantors up to the value of the collateral
securing such indebtedness.
Our obligations under the notes are unsecured. The notes are
effectively junior to all existing and future secured
indebtedness of ours or the guarantors up to the value of the
collateral securing such indebtedness. For example, the notes
and the related guarantees effectively rank junior to
$1.6 billion of secured debt under our senior secured
credit facilities at December 31, 2010, which debt is
secured by our assets and the assets of our principal
subsidiaries. Although the indentures contain restrictions on
our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to
create or incur liens to secure indebtedness, these restrictions
are subject to important limitations and exceptions that permit
us to secure a substantial amount of additional indebtedness.
Accordingly, in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or
reorganization affecting us or any guarantor, your rights to
receive payment will be effectively subordinated to those of
secured creditors up to the value of the collateral securing
such indebtedness. Holders of the notes will participate ratably
with all holders of our unsecured indebtedness that is deemed to
be of the same class as the notes, and potentially with all of
our other general creditors, based upon the respective amounts
owed to each holder or creditor, in our remaining assets. In any
of the foregoing events, we cannot assure you that there will be
sufficient assets to pay amounts due on the notes. As a result,
holders of the notes may receive less, ratably, than holders of
secured indebtedness. In addition, if the secured lenders were
to declare a default with respect to their loans and enforce
their rights with respect to their collateral, there can be no
assurance that our remaining assets would be sufficient to
satisfy our other obligations, including our obligations with
respect to the notes.
Your
right to receive payments on the notes could be adversely
affected if any of our non-guarantor subsidiaries declares
bankruptcy, liquidates or reorganizes.
Some, but not all, of our subsidiaries guarantee the notes. As a
result, you are creditors of only our company and our
subsidiaries that do guarantee the notes. In the case of
subsidiaries that are not guarantors, all the existing and
future liabilities of those subsidiaries, including any claims
of trade creditors, debtholders and preferred shareholders, are
effectively senior to the notes and related guarantees. Subject
to limitations in our senior secured credit facilities and the
indentures governing the notes, non-guarantor subsidiaries may
incur additional indebtedness in the future (and may incur other
liabilities without limitation). In the event of a bankruptcy,
liquidation or reorganization of any of our non-guarantor
subsidiaries, their creditors will generally be entitled to
payment of their claims from the assets of those subsidiaries
before any assets are made available for distribution to us. For
the year ended March 31, 2010 and the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, our subsidiaries that are not guarantors
of the notes had sales and operating revenues of
$2.5 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively.
We may
be unable to repurchase the notes upon a change of
control.
Upon the occurrence of specific kinds of change of control
events, we will be required to offer to repurchase all
outstanding notes. The source of funds for any such purchase of
the notes will be our available cash or cash generated from our
subsidiaries operations or other sources, including
borrowings, sales of assets or sales of equity. We may not be
able to repurchase the notes upon a change of control because we
may not
34
have sufficient financial resources to repurchase all such notes
that are tendered upon a change of control. Accordingly, we may
not be able to satisfy our obligations to repurchase the notes
unless we are able to refinance or obtain waivers under our
senior secured credit facilities. Our failure to repurchase the
notes upon a change of control would cause a default under the
indentures governing the notes and a cross default under our
senior secured credit facilities.
Also, we can not assure you that a repurchase of the notes
following such a change in control would be permitted pursuant
to any of our indebtedness agreements that would be in effect at
the time of such change in control, which could cause our other
indebtedness to be accelerated. Our senior secured credit
facilities provide that certain change of control events will
constitute a default that permits lenders to accelerate the
maturity of borrowings thereunder. If we cannot obtain a waiver
of such default or seek to refinance such indebtedness, this
could result in the acceleration of such indebtedness. Any
future indebtedness agreement may contain similar provisions. If
such indebtedness were to be accelerated, we may not have
sufficient funds to repurchase the notes and repay such
indebtedness.
In addition, the change of control provision and other covenants
in the indentures governing the notes do not cover all corporate
reorganizations, mergers, amalgamations or similar transactions
and may not provide you with protection in a transaction,
including a highly leveraged transaction, unless such
transaction constitutes a change of control under the indentures
governing the notes.
Most
of the covenants in the indentures applicable to a series of
notes will be suspended during any future period that we have an
investment grade rating from one rating agency with respect to
such series of notes, and during any such period you will not
have the benefit of those covenants if you hold such series of
notes.
Most of the covenants in the indentures governing a series of
notes, as well as our obligation to offer to repurchase such
series of notes following certain asset sales or upon a change
of control, will be suspended if that series of notes obtains an
investment grade rating from either one of Moodys or
Standard & Poors and we are not in default under
the applicable indenture. If such a suspension occurs, the
protections afforded to you by the covenants that have been
suspended will not be restored until the investment grade rating
assigned by either Moodys or Standard &
Poors, as the case may be, to the series of notes should
subsequently decline and as a result such series of notes does
not carry an investment grade rating from one rating agency. See
Description of the Notes Certain
Covenants Covenant Suspension.
Changes
in our credit ratings or the financial and credit markets could
adversely affect the market prices of the notes.
The future market prices of the notes will be affected by a
number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our ratings with major credit rating agencies;
|
|
|
|
the prevailing interest rates being paid by companies similar to
us; and
|
|
|
|
the overall condition of the financial and credit markets.
|
The condition of the financial and credit markets and prevailing
interest rates have fluctuated in the past and are likely to
fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations could have an
adverse effect on the trading prices of the notes. In addition,
credit rating agencies continually revise their ratings for
companies that they follow, including us. We cannot assure you
that credit rating agencies will continue to rate the notes or
that they will maintain their ratings on the notes. The
withdrawal of a rating or a negative change in our rating could
have an adverse effect on the market prices of the notes.
35
Fraudulent
conveyance laws and other legal restrictions may permit courts
to void or subordinate the notes or our subsidiaries
guarantees of the notes in specific circumstances, which would
prevent or limit payment under the notes or the guarantees.
Certain limitations contained in the guarantees, which are
designed to avoid this result, may render the guarantees
worthless.
The notes are guaranteed by a number of our subsidiaries. Also,
we made a distribution of $1.7 billion of the proceeds of
the old notes to our parent company. Federal, state and foreign
statutes may allow courts, under specific circumstances, to void
or subordinate the notes or any or all of our subsidiaries
guarantees of the notes. If the notes or any guarantees are
voided or subordinated, our noteholders might be required to
return payments received from us or our subsidiaries. The
criteria for application of such fraudulent conveyance and other
statutes vary, but, in general, under United States federal
bankruptcy law, comparable provisions of state fraudulent
conveyance laws and applicable Canadian federal or provincial
law, the notes or a guarantee could be set aside or subordinated
if, among other things, we or the guarantor, as applicable, at
the time we issued the notes or the guarantor provided the
guarantee:
|
|
|
|
|
incurred debt represented by the notes or the guarantee with the
intent of hindering, defeating, delaying or defrauding current
or future creditors or of giving one creditor a preference over
others; or
|
|
|
|
received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair
consideration for incurring the notes or the guarantee, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
was insolvent, on the eve of insolvency, or was rendered
insolvent by reason of the incurrence of the notes or the
guarantee;
|
|
|
|
was engaged, or about to engage, in a business or transaction
for which the assets remaining with it constituted unreasonably
small capital to carry on such business;
|
|
|
|
conducted itself in a manner that was oppressive or unfairly
prejudicial to or that unfairly disregarded the interests of
creditors and certain other interested parties;
|
|
|
|
intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond
its ability to pay as those debts matured; or
|
|
|
|
was a defendant in an action for money damages, or had a
judgment for money damages entered against it, if, in either
case, after final judgment the judgment was unsatisfied.
|
Under certain Canadian federal and provincial statutes, a
rebuttable presumption of an entitys intent to prefer one
creditor or hinder another may arise depending on the period of
time that has elapsed between the assumption of the obligation
and the date of the entitys insolvency.
A court might find that the issuer of the notes did not receive
reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for the notes
and did not substantially benefit directly or indirectly from
the issuance of the notes to the extent that the proceeds from
the issuance of the notes are used to make a distribution to the
issuers shareholders. In addition, a court would likely
find that a guarantor did not receive reasonably equivalent
value or fair consideration for its guarantee to the extent such
guarantor did not substantially benefit directly or indirectly
from the issuance of its guarantee. As a general matter, value
is given for an obligation if, in exchange for the obligation,
property is transferred or an antecedent debt is secured or
satisfied.
The definition and test for insolvency will vary depending upon
the law of the jurisdiction that is being applied. Generally,
however, an entity would be considered insolvent if, at the time
the it incurred indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
the sum of its debts and liabilities, including contingent
liabilities, was greater than its assets at fair valuation;
|
|
|
|
the present fair saleable value of its assets was less than the
amount required to pay the probable liability on its total
existing debts and liabilities, including contingent
liabilities, as they became absolute and matured; or
|
|
|
|
it could not pay or has ceased paying its debts generally as
they become due.
|
36
The tests for fraudulent conveyance, including the criteria for
insolvency, will vary depending upon the law of the jurisdiction
that is being applied. We cannot be sure which tests and
standards a court would apply to determine whether or not we or
the guarantors were solvent at the relevant time or, regardless
of the tests and standards, whether the issuance of the notes or
the guarantee would be voided or subordinated to our or the
guarantors other debt.
If a court were to find that the issuance of the notes or
incurrence of the guarantee was a fraudulent transfer or
conveyance or should be set aside on other grounds, the court
could void the payment obligations under the notes or such
guarantee or further subordinate the notes or such guarantee to
presently existing and future indebtedness of the issuer or the
related guarantor, as the case may be, or require the holders of
the notes to repay any amounts received with respect to the
notes or such guarantee.
Each guarantee contains a provision intended to limit the
guarantors liability to the maximum amount that it could
incur without causing its guarantee to be a fraudulent transfer.
However, this provision may automatically reduce the
guarantors obligations to an amount that effectively makes
the guarantee worthless and, in any case, this provision may not
be effective to protect a guarantee from being avoided under
fraudulent transfer laws. For example, in a recent Florida
bankruptcy case, a similar provision was found to be ineffective
to protect similar guarantees.
Because
each subsidiary guarantors liability under its guarantee
may be reduced to zero, avoided or released under certain
circumstances, you may not receive any payments from some or all
of the subsidiary guarantors.
You have the benefit of the guarantees of the subsidiary
guarantors. However, the guarantees by the subsidiary guarantors
are limited to the maximum amount that the subsidiary guarantors
are permitted to guarantee under applicable law. As a result, a
subsidiary guarantors liability under its guarantee could
be reduced to zero, depending upon the amount of other
obligations of such subsidiary guarantor. Further, under the
circumstances discussed more fully above, a court under federal
or state fraudulent conveyance and transfer statutes and
applicable Canadian federal or provincial law could void the
obligations under a guarantee or further subordinate it to all
other obligations of the subsidiary guarantor. In addition, you
will lose the benefit of a particular guarantee if it is
released under certain circumstances described under
Description of the Notes Subsidiary
Guarantees.
U.S.
investors in the notes may have difficulties enforcing civil
liabilities.
We are formed in Canada under the CBCA. Our registered office,
as well as a substantial portion of our assets, is located
outside the United States. Also, some of our directors,
controlling persons and officers and some of the experts named
in this prospectus reside in Canada or other jurisdictions
outside the United States and all or a substantial portion of
their assets are located outside the United States. We have
agreed in the indentures under which the notes have been or will
be issued, as applicable, to accept service of process in New
York City, by an agent designated for such purpose, with respect
to any suit, action or proceeding relating to the indentures or
the notes that is brought in any federal or state court located
in New York City, and to submit to the jurisdiction of such
courts in connection with such suits, actions or proceedings.
However, it may be difficult for holders of notes to effect
service of process in the United States on our directors,
controlling persons, officers and the experts named in this
prospectus who are not residents of the United States or to
enforce against them in the United States judgments of courts of
the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions
of the U.S. federal securities laws. In addition, there is
doubt as to the enforceability in Canada against us or against
our directors, controlling persons, officers and experts named
in this prospectus who are not residents of the United States,
in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgments
of United States courts, of liabilities predicated solely upon
U.S. federal securities laws.
Canadian
bankruptcy and insolvency laws may impair the enforcement of
remedies under the notes.
The rights of the trustee under the indentures pursuant to which
the notes have been or will be issued, as applicable, to enforce
remedies could be significantly impaired by the restructuring
provisions of applicable
37
Canadian federal bankruptcy, insolvency and other restructuring
legislation if the benefit of such legislation is sought with
respect to us
and/or any
of the guarantors. For example, both the Bankruptcy and
Insolvency Act (Canada) and the Companies Creditors
Arrangement Act (Canada) contain provisions enabling an
insolvent person to obtain a stay of proceedings against its
creditors and others and to prepare and file a proposal to be
voted on by the various classes of its affected creditors. A
restructuring proposal, if accepted by the requisite majorities
of each affected class of creditors, and if approved by the
relevant Canadian court, would be binding on all creditors
within each affected class whether or not such creditor voted to
accept the proposal. Moreover, this legislation permits the
insolvent debtor to retain possession and administration of its
property, subject to court oversight, even though it may be in
default under the applicable debt instrument during the period
the stay against proceedings remains in place.
The powers of the court under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act
(Canada) and particularly under the Companies Creditors
Arrangement Act (Canada) have been exercised broadly to protect
a restructuring entity from actions taken by creditors and other
parties. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether payments under
the notes would be made during any proceedings in bankruptcy,
insolvency or other restructuring, whether or when the trustee
for the notes could exercise its rights under the notes
indentures or whether, and to what extent, holders of notes
would be compensated for any delays in payment, if any, of
principal, interest and costs, including the fees and
disbursements of the trustee for the notes. Typically, the stay
of proceedings would prevent payments from being made under the
notes or the guarantees and the trustee from exercising its
rights while the insolvent company is under court protection.
Risks
Related to the Exchange Offer
If you
do not exchange your old notes for new notes, your ability to
sell your old notes will be restricted.
If you do not exchange your old notes for new notes in the
exchange offer, you will continue to be subject to the
restrictions on transfer described in the legend on your old
notes. The new notes, like the old notes, will remain subject to
restrictions on resale in Canada. The restrictions on transfer
of your old notes arise because we issued the old notes in a
transaction not subject to the registration requirements of the
Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. In general,
you may only offer to sell the old notes if they are registered
under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or
offered or sold pursuant to an exemption from those
requirements. If you are still holding any old notes after the
expiration date of the exchange offer and the exchange offer has
been consummated, you will not be entitled to have those old
notes registered under the Securities Act or to any similar
rights under the registration rights agreement, subject to
limited exceptions, if applicable. After the exchange offer is
completed, we will not be required, and we do not intend, to
register the old notes under the Securities Act. In addition, if
you do exchange your old notes in the exchange offer for the
purpose of participating in a distribution of the new notes, you
may be deemed to have received restricted securities and, if so,
will be required to comply with the registration and prospectus
delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with
any resale transaction. To the extent old notes are tendered and
accepted in the exchange offer, the trading market, if any, for
the old notes would be adversely affected.
Your
ability to transfer the new notes may be limited by the absence
of an active trading market, and there is no assurance that any
active trading market will develop for the new
notes.
There is no established public market for the new notes. We do
not intend to list the new notes on any securities exchange or
automated quotation system. We cannot assure you that an active
market for the new notes will develop or, if developed, that it
will continue. Historically, the market for non-investment grade
debt, such as the new notes, has been subject to disruptions
that have caused substantial volatility in the prices of
securities similar to the new notes. We cannot assure you that
the market, if any, for the new notes will be free from similar
disruptions, and any such disruptions may adversely affect the
prices at which you may sell your new notes.
38
THE
EXCHANGE OFFER
Purpose
of the Exchange Offer
We have entered into registration rights agreements with the
initial purchasers of the old notes, in which we agreed to file
one or more registration statements with the SEC relating to an
offer to exchange the old notes for new notes. The registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part was filed in
compliance with this obligation. We also agreed to use our
commercially reasonable efforts to cause a registration
statement to be declared effective under the Securities Act by
December 17, 2011, to offer the new notes in exchange for
the old notes as soon as practicable after the effectiveness of
the registration statement and to keep the exchange offer
registration statement effective for not less than 30 days
after the date notice of the exchange offer is mailed to holders
of the old notes. If we do not comply with certain of our
obligations under the registration rights agreements, we will
incur additional interest expense. The new notes will have terms
substantially identical to the old notes except that the new
notes will not contain terms with respect to transfer
restrictions in the United States and registration rights and
additional interest payable for the failure to comply with
certain obligations. Old notes consisting of $1,100,000,000
aggregate principal amount of our 8.375% Senior Notes due
2017 and $1,400,000,000 aggregate principal amount of our
8.75% Senior Notes due 2020 were issued on
December 17, 2010.
Under the circumstances set forth below, we will promptly file a
shelf registration statement with the SEC covering resales of
the old notes or the new notes, as the case may be, use our
commercially reasonable efforts to cause the shelf registration
statement to be declared effective under the Securities Act and
use our commercially reasonable efforts to keep the shelf
registration statement effective until the earliest of
(i) the time when the notes covered by the registration
statement can be sold pursuant to Rule 144A under the
Securities Act without any limitations, (ii) two
(2) years and (iii) the date on which all notes
registered under the shelf registration statement are disposed
of in accordance therewith. These circumstances include:
|
|
|
|
|
applicable interpretations of the staff of the SEC do not permit
us to effect the exchange offer;
|
|
|
|
for any other reason we do not consummate the exchange offer by
December 17, 2011;
|
|
|
|
any initial purchaser so requests with respect to the old notes
that are not eligible to be exchanged for new notes in the
exchange offer and held by it following consummation of the
exchange offer; or
|
|
|
|
certain holders are not eligible to participate in the exchange
offer or may not resell the new notes acquired by them in the
exchange offer to the public without delivering a prospectus.
|
Each holder of old notes that wishes to exchange such old notes
for transferable new notes in the exchange offer will be
required to make the following representations:
|
|
|
|
|
any new notes to be received by it will be acquired in the
ordinary course of its business;
|
|
|
|
it has no arrangement or understanding with any person to
participate in the distribution (within the meaning of
Securities Act) of the new notes;
|
|
|
|
it is not our affiliate, as defined in Rule 405
under the Securities Act, or, if it is an affiliate, that it
will comply with applicable registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act; and
|
|
|
|
if such holder is not a broker-dealer, that it is not engaged
in, and does not intend to engage in, the distribution of the
new notes; and
|
|
|
|
if such holder is a broker-dealer that will receive new notes
for its own account in exchange for old notes that were acquired
by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or
other trading activities, that it will deliver a prospectus in
connection with any resale of such new notes.
|
In addition, each broker-dealer that receives new notes for its
own account in exchange for old notes, where such old notes were
acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making
activities or other trading activities, must, in the absence of
an exemption, comply with the registration and prospectus
delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with
secondary resales of new notes and cannot rely on the
39
position of the SEC staff set forth in Exxon Capital
Holdings Corporation, Morgan Stanley &
Co., Incorporated or similar no-action letters. See
Plan of Distribution.
Resale of
New Notes
Based on interpretations of the SEC staff set forth in no-action
letters issued to unrelated third parties, we believe that new
notes issued in the exchange offer in exchange for old notes may
be offered for resale, resold and otherwise transferred by any
exchange note holder without compliance with the registration
and prospectus delivery provisions of the Securities Act, if:
|
|
|
|
|
such holder is not an affiliate of ours within the
meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act;
|
|
|
|
such new notes are acquired in the ordinary course of the
holders business; and
|
|
|
|
the holder does not intend to participate in the distribution of
such new notes.
|
Any holder who tenders in the exchange offer with the intention
of participating in any manner in a distribution of the new
notes:
|
|
|
|
|
cannot rely on the position of the staff of the SEC set forth in
Exxon Capital Holdings Corporation or similar
interpretive letters; and
|
|
|
|
must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act in connection with a
secondary resale transaction.
|
If, as stated above, a holder cannot rely on the position of the
staff of the SEC set forth in Exxon Capital Holdings
Corporation or similar interpretive letters, any effective
registration statement used in connection with a secondary
resale transaction must contain the selling security holder
information required by Item 507 of
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act.
This prospectus may be used for an offer to resell, for the
resale or for other retransfer of new notes only as specifically
set forth in this prospectus. With regard to broker-dealers,
only broker-dealers that acquired the old notes as a result of
market-making activities or other trading activities may
participate in the exchange offer. Each broker-dealer that
receives new notes for its own account in exchange for old
notes, where such old notes were acquired by such broker-dealer
as a result of market-making activities or other trading
activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus
in connection with any resale of the new notes. Please read the
section captioned Plan of Distribution for more
details regarding these procedures for the transfer of new
notes. We have agreed that, for a period of 180 days after
the exchange offer is consummated, we will make this prospectus
available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any
resale of the new notes.
Terms of
the Exchange Offer
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
prospectus, we will accept for exchange any old notes properly
tendered and not withdrawn prior to the expiration date. We will
issue $1,000 principal amount of new notes of each series in
exchange for each $1,000 principal amount of old notes of the
same series surrendered under the exchange offer; provided that
the minimum principal amount of a new note must be $2,000. Old
notes may be tendered only in denominations of $2,000 and
integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof; provided that
the untendered portion of an old note must be in a minimum
principal amount of $2,000.
The respective forms and terms of the new notes will be
substantially identical to the respective forms and terms of the
old notes except the new notes will be registered under the
Securities Act, will not bear legends restricting their transfer
in the United States and will not provide for any additional
interest upon our failure to fulfill our obligations under the
applicable registration rights agreement to file, and cause to
become effective, a registration statement and to consummate the
exchange offer. The new notes of a series will evidence the same
debt as the old notes of that series. The new notes will be
issued under and entitled to the benefits of the same indenture
that authorized the issuance of the outstanding old notes.
Consequently, the old and new notes issued under their
respective indenture will be treated as a single class of debt
securities under that indenture.
40
The exchange offer is not conditioned upon any minimum aggregate
principal amount of old notes being tendered for exchange.
As of the date of this prospectus, $1,100,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of the 2017 old notes and $1,400,000,000
aggregate principal amount of the 2020 old notes are
outstanding. There will be no fixed record date for determining
registered holders of old notes entitled to participate in the
exchange offer.
We intend to conduct the exchange offer in accordance with the
provisions of the registration rights agreements, the applicable
requirements of the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and the
rules and regulations of the SEC. Old notes that are not
tendered for exchange in the exchange offer will remain
outstanding and continue to accrue interest and will be entitled
to the rights and benefits such holders have under the indenture
relating to the old notes.
We will be deemed to have accepted for exchange properly
tendered old notes when we have given oral (confirmed in
writing) or written notice of the acceptance to the exchange
agent. The exchange agent will act as agent for the tendering
holders for the purposes of receiving the new notes from us and
delivering new notes to such holders. Subject to the terms of
the registration rights agreements, we expressly reserve the
right to amend or terminate the exchange offer, and not to
accept for exchange any old notes not previously accepted for
exchange, upon the occurrence of any of the conditions specified
below under the caption Conditions to the
Exchange Offer.
Holders who tender old notes in the exchange offer will not be
required to pay brokerage commissions or fees, or transfer taxes
with respect to the exchange of old notes. We will pay all
charges and expenses, other than those transfer taxes described
below, in connection with the exchange offer. It is important
that you read the section labeled Fees and
Expenses below for more details regarding fees and
expenses incurred in the exchange offer.
Pursuant to the terms of the registration rights agreements, we
are not required to make a registered exchange offer in any
province or territory of Canada or to accept old notes
surrendered by residents of Canada in the registered exchange
offer unless the distribution of new notes pursuant to such
offer can be effected pursuant to exemptions from the
registration and prospectus requirements of the applicable
securities laws of such province or territory and, as a
condition to the exchange of the old notes pursuant to a
registered exchange offer, such holders of old notes in Canada
are required to make certain representations to us, including a
representation that they are entitled under the applicable
securities laws of such province or territory to acquire the new
notes without the benefit of a prospectus qualified under such
securities laws.
We are relying on exemptions from applicable Canadian provincial
securities laws to offer the new notes. The new notes may not be
sold directly or indirectly in Canada except in accordance with
applicable securities laws of the provinces and territories of
Canada. We are not required, and do not intend, to qualify the
new notes by prospectus in Canada, and accordingly, the new
notes will be subject to restrictions on resale in Canada.
Expiration
Date; Extensions; Amendments
The exchange offer for the old notes will expire at
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on April 7, 2011,
unless we extend the exchange offer in our sole and absolute
discretion.
In order to extend the exchange offer, we will notify the
exchange agent orally (and confirmed in writing) or in writing
of any extension. We will notify in writing or by public
announcement the registered holders of old notes of the
extension no later than 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on
the business day after the previously scheduled expiration date.
We reserve the right, in our reasonable discretion:
|
|
|
|
|
to delay accepting for exchange any old notes in connection with
the extension of the exchange offer;
|
|
|
|
to extend the exchange offer or to terminate the exchange offer
and to refuse to accept old notes not previously accepted if any
of the conditions set forth below under
Conditions to the Exchange
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
Offer have not been satisfied, by giving oral (confirmed
in writing) or written notice of such delay, extension or
termination to the exchange agent; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject to the terms of the registration rights agreements, to
amend the terms of the exchange offer in any manner, provided
that in the event of a material change in the exchange offer,
including the waiver of a material condition, we will extend the
exchange offer period, if necessary, so that at least five
business days remain in the exchange offer following notice of
the material change.
|
Any such delay in acceptance, extension, termination or
amendment will be followed as promptly as practicable by written
notice or public announcement thereof to the registered holders
of old notes. If we amend the exchange offer in a manner that we
determine to constitute a material change, we will promptly
disclose such amendment in a manner reasonably calculated to
inform the holders of old notes of such amendment, provided that
in the event of a material change in the exchange offer,
including the waiver of a material condition, we will extend the
exchange offer period, if necessary, so that at least five
business days remain in the exchange offer following notice of
the material change. If we terminate this exchange offer as
provided in this prospectus before accepting any old notes for
exchange or if we amend the terms of this exchange offer in a
manner that constitutes a fundamental change in the information
set forth in the registration statement of which this prospectus
forms a part, we will promptly file a post-effective amendment
to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a
part. In addition, we will in all events comply with our
obligation to make prompt payment for all old notes properly
tendered and accepted for exchange in the exchange offer.
Without limiting the manner in which we may choose to make
public announcements of any delay in acceptance, extension,
termination or amendment of the exchange offer, we shall have no
obligation to publish, advertise, or otherwise communicate any
such public announcement, other than by issuing a timely press
release to a financial news service.
Conditions
to the Exchange Offer
Despite any other term of the exchange offer, we will not be
required to accept for exchange, or exchange any new notes for,
any old notes, and we may terminate the exchange offer as
provided in this prospectus before accepting any old notes for
exchange if in our reasonable judgment:
|
|
|
|
|
the exchange offer, or the making of any exchange by a holder of
old notes, would violate applicable law or any applicable
interpretation of the staff of the SEC; or
|
|
|
|
any action or proceeding has been instituted or threatened in
writing in any court or by or before any governmental agency
with respect to the exchange offer that, in our judgment, would
reasonably be expected to impair our ability to proceed with the
exchange offer.
|
In addition, we will not be obligated to accept for exchange the
old notes of any holder that has not made:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations described under Purpose of
the Exchange Offer, Exchange Offer
Procedures and Plan of Distribution; and
|
|
|
|
such other representations as may be reasonably necessary under
applicable SEC rules, regulations or interpretations to make
available to us an appropriate form for registration of the new
notes under the Securities Act.
|
We expressly reserve the right, at any time or at various times
on or prior to the scheduled expiration date of the exchange
offer, to extend the period of time during which the exchange
offer is open. Consequently, in the event we extend the period
the exchange offer is open, we may delay acceptance of any old
notes by giving written notice or public announcement of such
extension to the registered holders of the old notes. During any
such extensions, all old notes previously tendered will remain
subject to the exchange offer, and we may accept them for
exchange unless they have been previously withdrawn. We will
return any old notes that we do not accept for exchange for any
reason without expense to their tendering holder promptly after
the expiration or termination of the exchange offer.
42
We expressly reserve the right to amend or terminate the
exchange offer on or prior to the scheduled expiration date of
the exchange offer, and to reject for exchange any old notes not
previously accepted for exchange, upon the occurrence of any of
the conditions to termination of the exchange offer specified
above. We will give written notice or public announcement of any
extension, amendment, non-acceptance or termination to the
registered holders of the old notes as promptly as practicable.
In the case of any extension, such notice will be issued no
later than 9:00 a.m., New York City time on the business
day after the previously scheduled expiration date.
These conditions are for our sole benefit and we may, in our
reasonable discretion, assert them regardless of the
circumstances that may give rise to them or waive them in whole
or in part at any or at various times except that all conditions
to the exchange offer must be satisfied or waived by us prior to
the expiration of the exchange offer. If we fail at any time to
exercise any of the foregoing rights, that failure will not
constitute a waiver of such right. Each such right will be
deemed an ongoing right that we may assert at any time or at
various times prior to the expiration of the exchange offer. Any
waiver by us will be made by written notice or public
announcement to the registered holders of the notes and any such
waiver shall apply to all the registered holders of the notes.
In addition, we will not accept for exchange any old notes
tendered, and will not issue new notes in exchange for any such
old notes, if at such time any stop order is threatened in
writing or in effect with respect to the registration statement
of which this prospectus constitutes a part or the qualification
of an indenture under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as
amended (the Trust Indenture Act).
Exchange
Offer Procedures
Only a holder of old notes may tender such old notes in the
exchange offer. If you are a DTC participant that has old notes
which are credited to your DTC account by book-entry and which
are held of record by DTCs nominee, as applicable, you may
tender your old notes by book-entry transfer as if you were the
record holder. Because of this, references herein to registered
or record holders include DTC participants.
If you are not a DTC participant, you may tender your old notes
by book-entry transfer by contacting your broker, dealer or
other nominee or by opening an account with a DTC participant,
as the case may be.
To tender old notes in the exchange offer:
|
|
|
|
|
You must comply with DTCs Automated Tender Offer Program
(ATOP) procedures described below;
|
|
|
|
The exchange agent must receive a timely confirmation of a
book-entry transfer of the old notes into its account at DTC
through ATOP pursuant to the procedure for book-entry transfer
described below, along with a properly transmitted agents
message, before the expiration date.
|
Participants in DTCs ATOP program must electronically
transmit their acceptance of the exchange by causing DTC to
transfer the old notes to the exchange agent in accordance with
DTCs ATOP procedures for transfer. DTC will then send an
agents message to the exchange agent. With respect to the
exchange of the old notes, the term agents
message means a message transmitted by DTC, received by
the exchange agent and forming part of the book-entry
confirmation, which states that:
|
|
|
|
|
DTC has received an express acknowledgment from a participant in
its ATOP that is tendering old notes that are the subject of the
book-entry confirmation;
|
|
|
|
the participant has received and agrees to be bound by the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in this
prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
we may enforce the agreement against such participant.
|
Delivery of an agents message will also constitute an
acknowledgment from the tendering DTC participant that the
representations described above in this prospectus are true and
correct and when received by the exchange agent will form a part
of a confirmation of book-entry transfer in which you
acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms of the letter of
transmittal. We will determine in our sole discretion all
43
questions as to the validity, form, eligibility, including time
of receipt, and acceptance of tendered old notes and such
determination will be final and binding.
In addition, each broker-dealer that receives new notes for its
own account in exchange for old notes, where such old notes were
acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making
activities or other trading activities, must acknowledge that it
will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such
new notes. See Plan of Distribution.
Guaranteed
Delivery Procedures
If you desire to tender outstanding notes pursuant to the
exchange offer and (1) time will not permit your letter of
transmittal, certificates representing such outstanding notes
and all other required documents to reach the exchange agent on
or prior to the expiration date, or (2) the procedures for
book-entry transfer (including delivery of an agents
message) cannot be completed on or prior to the expiration date,
you may nevertheless tender such notes with the effect that such
tender will be deemed to have been received on or prior to the
expiration date if all the following conditions are satisfied:
|
|
|
|
|
you must effect your tender through an eligible guarantor
institution;
|
|
|
|
a properly completed and duly executed notice of guaranteed
delivery, substantially in the form provided by us herewith, or
an agents message with respect to guaranteed delivery that
is accepted by us, is received by the exchange agent on or prior
to the expiration date as provided below; and
|
|
|
|
a book-entry confirmation of the transfer of such notes into the
exchange agents account at DTC as described above,
together with a letter of transmittal (or a manually signed
facsimile of the letter of transmittal) properly completed and
duly executed, with any signature guarantees and any other
documents required by the letter of transmittal or a properly
transmitted agents message, are received by the exchange
agent within three New York Stock Exchange, Inc. trading days
after the expiration date.
|
The notice of guaranteed delivery (unless part of an
agents message) may be sent by hand delivery, facsimile
transmission or mail to the exchange agent and must include a
guarantee by an eligible guarantor institution in the form set
forth in the notice of guaranteed delivery.
Book-Entry
Transfer
The exchange agent will make a request to establish an account
with respect to the old notes at DTC for purposes of the
exchange offer promptly after the date of this prospectus; and
any financial institution participating in DTCs system may
make book-entry delivery of old notes by causing DTC to transfer
such old notes into the exchange agents account at DTC in
accordance with DTCs procedures for transfer.
Withdrawal
Rights
Except as otherwise provided in this prospectus, you may
withdraw your tender of old notes at any time before
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date.
To withdraw a tender of old notes in the exchange offer, the
exchange agent must receive a letter or facsimile notice of
withdrawal at its address set forth below under
Exchange agent before the time indicated
above. Any notice of withdrawal must:
|
|
|
|
|
specify the name of the person who deposited the old notes to be
withdrawn;
|
|
|
|
identify the old notes to be withdrawn including the certificate
number or numbers (if applicable) and aggregate principal amount
of old notes to be withdrawn or, in the case of old notes
transferred by book-entry transfer, the name and number of the
account at DTC to be credited and otherwise comply with the
procedures of the relevant book-entry transfer facility; and
|
|
|
|
specify the name in which the old notes being withdrawn are to
be registered, if different from that of the person who
deposited the notes.
|
44
We will determine in our sole discretion all questions as to the
validity, form and eligibility, including time of receipt, of
notices of withdrawal. Our determination will be final and
binding on all parties. Any old notes withdrawn in this manner
will be deemed not to have been validly tendered for purposes of
the exchange offer. We will not issue new notes for such
withdrawn old notes unless the old notes are validly retendered.
We will return to you any old notes that you have tendered but
that we have not accepted for exchange without cost promptly
after withdrawal, rejection of tender or termination of the
exchange offer. You may retender properly withdrawn old notes by
following one of the procedures described above at any time
before the expiration date.
Exchange
Agent
We have appointed The Bank of New York Mellon
Trust Company, N.A. as exchange agent for the exchange
offer of old notes.
You should direct questions and requests for assistance with
respect to exchange offer procedures and requests for additional
copies of this prospectus to the exchange agent addressed as
follows:
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as
exchange agent
c/o The
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Corporate Trust Reorganization Unit
480 Washington Boulevard,
27th Floor
Jersey City, New Jersey 07310
Attn: Mrs. Carolle Montreuil Processor
Phone:
212-815-5920
Facsimile:
212-298-1915
Fees and
Expenses
We will bear the expenses of soliciting tenders. The principal
solicitation is being made by mail, however, we may make
additional solicitations by telegraph, telephone or in person by
our officers and regular employees and those of our affiliates.
We have not retained any dealer-manager in connection with the
exchange offer and will not make any payments to broker-dealers
or others soliciting acceptances of the exchange offer. We will,
however, pay the exchange agent reasonable and customary fees
for its services and reimburse it for its related reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses.
Our expenses in connection with the exchange offer include:
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fees;
|
|
|
|
fees and expenses of the exchange agent and trustee;
|
|
|
|
accounting and legal fees and printing costs; and
|
|
|
|
related fees and expenses.
|
Transfer
Taxes
We will pay all transfer taxes, if any, applicable to the
exchange of old notes under the exchange offer. The tendering
holder, however, will be required to pay any transfer taxes,
whether imposed on the registered holder or any other person, if:
|
|
|
|
|
certificates representing old notes for principal amounts not
tendered or accepted for exchange are to be delivered to, or are
to be issued in the name of, any person other than the
registered holder of old notes tendered; or
|
|
|
|
a transfer tax is imposed for any reason other than the exchange
of old notes under the exchange offer.
|
45
If satisfactory evidence of payment of such taxes is not
submitted, the amount of such transfer taxes will be billed to
that tendering holder.
Holders who tender their old notes for exchange will not be
required to pay any transfer taxes. However, holders who
instruct us to register new notes in the name of, or request
that old notes not tendered or not accepted in the exchange
offer be returned to, a person other than the registered
tendering holder will be required to pay any applicable transfer
tax.
Consequences
of Failure to Exchange
Holders of old notes who do not exchange their old notes for new
notes under the exchange offer, including as a result of failing
to timely deliver old notes to the exchange agent, together with
all required documentation, will remain subject to the
restrictions on transfer of such old notes:
|
|
|
|
|
as set forth in the legend printed on the old notes as a
consequence of the issuance of the old notes pursuant to the
exemptions from, or in transactions not subject to, the
registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable
state securities laws; and
|
|
|
|
otherwise as set forth in the offering circular distributed in
connection with the private offering of the old notes.
|
In addition, you will no longer have any registration rights or
be entitled to additional interest with respect to the old notes.
In general, you may not offer or sell the old notes unless they
are registered under the Securities Act, or if the offer or sale
is exempt from registration under the Securities Act and
applicable state securities laws. Except as required by the
applicable registration rights agreement, we do not intend to
register resales of the old notes under the Securities Act.
Based on interpretations of the SEC staff, new notes issued
pursuant to the exchange offer may be offered for resale, resold
or otherwise transferred by their holders, other than any such
holder that is our affiliate within the meaning of
Rule 405 under the Securities Act, without compliance with
the registration and prospectus delivery provisions of the
Securities Act, provided that the holders acquired the new notes
in the ordinary course of the holders business and the
holders have no arrangement or understanding with respect to the
distribution of the new notes to be acquired in the exchange
offer. Any holder who tenders in the exchange offer for the
purpose of participating in a distribution of the new notes:
|
|
|
|
|
could not rely on the applicable interpretations of the
SEC; and
|
|
|
|
must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act in connection with a
secondary resale transaction.
|
After the exchange offer is consummated, if you continue to hold
any old notes, you may have difficulty selling them because
there will be fewer old notes outstanding.
Accounting
Treatment
We will record the new notes in our accounting records at the
same carrying value as the old notes, as reflected in our
accounting records on the date of exchange. Accordingly, we will
not recognize any gain or loss for accounting purposes in
connection with the exchange offer.
Other
Participation in the exchange offer is voluntary, and you should
carefully consider whether to accept. You are urged to consult
your financial and tax advisors in making your own decision on
what action to take.
We may in the future seek to acquire untendered old notes in the
open market or privately negotiated transactions, through
subsequent exchange offers or otherwise. We have no present
plans to acquire any old notes that are not tendered in the
exchange offer or to file a registration statement to permit
resales of any untendered old notes.
46
USE OF
PROCEEDS
This exchange offer is intended to satisfy our obligations under
the registration rights agreements. We will not receive any
proceeds from the exchange offer. You will receive, in exchange
for old notes tendered by you and accepted by us in the exchange
offer, new notes of the same series and in the same principal
amount. The old notes surrendered in exchange for the new notes
will be retired and cancelled and cannot be reissued.
Accordingly, the issuance of the new notes will not result in
any increase of our outstanding debt.
We used the net proceeds from the sale of the old notes of
approximately $2.4 billion together with approximately
$1.5 billion of debt under our senior secured credit
facilities to (1) repay the outstanding amount under our
old senior secured credit facilities consisting of (a) a
$1.15 billion term loan facility and (b) an
$800 million ABL facility (the Previous ABL
Facility); (2) repay all of our then outstanding
$185 million of 11.5% senior notes due
February 15, 2015; (3) repay $1.050 billion of
our 7.25% senior notes due February 15, 2015;
(4) finance a distribution to our parent company; and
(5) pay related premiums, fees, discounts and expenses.
47
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
Novelis Inc. was formed in Canada on September 21, 2004. On
January 6, 2005, Alcan transferred its rolled products
businesses to Novelis and distributed shares of Novelis to
Alcans shareholders. On May 15, 2007, we were
acquired by Hindalco through its indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary. We refer to the company prior to the Hindalco
acquisition (through May 15, 2007) as the
Predecessor, and we refer to the company after the
Hindalco acquisition (beginning on May 16, 2007) as
the Successor. On June 26, 2007, our board of
directors approved the change of our fiscal year end to March 31
from December 31.
The selected consolidated financial data of the Successor
presented below as of and for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 has been
derived from the unaudited financial statements of Novelis Inc.
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The results for the nine
months ended December 31, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire
year. The selected consolidated financial data of the Successor
presented below as of and for the years ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 and for the period May 16, 2007 through
March 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial
statements of Novelis Inc. included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The selected consolidated financial data of the
Predecessor presented below for the period April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007 has been derived from the audited
financial statements of Novelis Inc. included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
The selected consolidated financial data of the Successor
presented below as of March 31, 2008 and the selected
consolidated financial data of the Predecessor presented below
as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and as
of and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 has been derived from the following
audited financial statements of Novelis Inc. which are not
included in this prospectus: the consolidated balance sheets of
Novelis Inc. as of March 31, 2008, December 31, 2007
and March 31, 2007; the consolidated statement of
operations of Novelis Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2006; the consolidated and combined statement of operations of
Novelis Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005; and the
consolidated balance sheets of Novelis Inc. as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005.
The consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2005, include the results for the period from
January 1 to January 5, 2005, prior to our spin-off from
Alcan, in addition to the results for the period from January 6
to December 31, 2005. The financial results for the period
from January 1 to January 5, 2005 present our operations on
a carve-out accounting basis. The consolidated balance sheet as
of December 31, 2005, and the consolidated results for the
period from January 6 (the date of the spin-off from Alcan) to
December 31, 2005, present our financial position, results
of operations and cash flows as a stand-alone entity.
48
The selected consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes
thereto for the respective periods included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
|
2008(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Statement of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
8,363
|
|
|
$
|
9,849
|
|
|
$
|
2,630
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
7,583
|
|
|
|
9,336
|
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
|
|
9,276
|
|
|
|
7,213
|
|
|
|
5,066
|
|
|
|
6,628
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,139
|
|
|
|
10,127
|
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
9,931
|
|
|
|
12,345
|
|
|
|
7,946
|
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change net of tax
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
(275
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
531
|
|
|
$
|
584
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
1,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,476
|
|
|
$
|
5,792
|
|
|
$
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
$
|
7,602
|
|
|
$
|
7,748
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
|
2,603
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
4,081
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Shareholders/invested equity
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
(87
|
)
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
(220
|
)
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(703
|
)
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(3)
|
|
|
2.1
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
x
|
|
|
6.2
|
x
|
|
|
2.6x
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All income earned and cash flows generated by us, as well as the
risks and rewards of these businesses from January 1 to
January 5, 2005, were primarily attributed to us and are
included in our consolidated results for the year ended
December 31, 2005, with the exception of losses of
$43 million ($29 million net of tax) arising from the
change in fair market value of derivative contracts, primarily
with Alcan. These
mark-to-market
losses for the period from January 1 to January 5, 2005,
were recorded in the consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2005, and were recognized as a
decrease in Owners net investment. |
49
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The acquisition of Novelis by Hindalco on May 15, 2007 was
recorded in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 103, Push Down Basis of Accounting
Required in Certain Limited Circumstances
(SAB 103). In our consolidated balance
sheets, the consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
connection with the acquisition have been pushed
down to us and have been allocated to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 141,
Business Combinations (FASB 141). Due to the
impact of push down accounting, our financial statements and
certain note presentations for the year ended March 31,
2008 included elsewhere in this prospectus are presented in two
distinct periods to indicate the application of two different
bases of accounting between the periods presented: (1) the
period up to, and including, the acquisition date (April 1,
2007 through May 15, 2007, labeled Predecessor)
and (2) the period after that date (May 16, 2007
through March 31, 2008, labeled Successor). The
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus
include a black line division which indicates that the
Predecessor and Successor reporting entities shown are not
comparable. |
|
|
|
The consideration paid by Hindalco to acquire Novelis has been
pushed down to us and allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on our estimates of fair value, using
methodologies and assumptions that we believe are reasonable.
This allocation of fair value results in additional charges or
income to our post-acquisition consolidated statements of
operations. |
|
(3) |
|
Earnings consist of income from continuing operations before the
cumulative effect of accounting changes, before fixed charges
(excluding capitalized interest) and income taxes, and
eliminating undistributed income of persons owned less than 50%
by us. Fixed charges consist of interest expenses and
amortization of debt discount and expense and premium and that
portion of rental payments which is considered as being
representative of the interest factor implicit in our operating
leases. The ratios shown above are based on our consolidated and
combined financial information, which was prepared in accordance
with GAAP. Due to losses incurred in certain of the periods
presented above, the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. The table
below presents the amount of additional earnings required to
bring the fixed charge ratio to 1:1 for each such period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Months
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
(In millions)
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
Additional earnings required to bring fixed charge ratio to 1:1
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1,996
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
50
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
and References
Novelis is the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, with total shipments during that period
of 2,198 kt. We produce aluminum sheet and light gauge products
for the beverage and food can, transportation, construction and
industrial, and foil products markets. As of December 31,
2010, we had operations on four continents: North America;
South America; Asia and Europe, through 30 operating
plants, one research facility and several market-focused
innovation centers in 11 countries. In addition to aluminum
rolled products plants, our South American businesses include
bauxite mining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation
facilities. We are the only company of our size and scope
focused solely on aluminum rolled products markets and capable
of local supply of technologically sophisticated products in all
of these geographic regions. We are also the global leader in
the recycling of used aluminum beverage cans. We had net sales
and net income attributable to our common shareholder of
$8.7 billion and $405 million, respectively, for the
year ended March 31, 2010, and $7.6 billion and
$66 million, respectively, for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements
that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual
results could differ materially from those discussed in these
forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to,
those discussed below and elsewhere in this prospectus,
particularly in Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and Market Data and Risk Factors.
Background
and Basis of Presentation
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. Novelis
Inc. was formed in Canada on September 21, 2004. The
spin-off occurred on January 6, 2005 following approval by
Alcans board of directors and shareholders, and legal and
regulatory approvals. Alcan shareholders received one Novelis
common share for every five Alcan common shares held.
Acquisition
by Hindalco
On May 15, 2007, the company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to the
Arrangement at a price of $44.93 per share. The aggregate
purchase price for all of the companys common shares was
$3.4 billion and $2.8 billion of Novelis debt
was also assumed for a total transaction value of
$6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the Arrangement
on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares have been
indirectly held by Hindalco.
As discussed in Note 1 Business and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our audited
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, the
Arrangement was recorded in accordance with SAB 103.
Accordingly, in the consolidated balance sheets included
elsewhere in this prospectus, the consideration and related
costs paid by Hindalco in connection with the acquisition have
been pushed down to us and allocated to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in accordance with FASB 141.
Due to the impact of push down accounting, the companys
consolidated financial statements and certain note presentations
separate the companys presentation into two distinct
periods to indicate the application of two different bases of
accounting between the periods presented: (1) the periods
up to, and including, the May 15, 2007 acquisition date
(labeled Predecessor) and (2) the periods after
that date (labeled Successor). The financial data
included elsewhere in this prospectus include a black line
division which indicates that the Predecessor and Successor
reporting entities shown are not comparable.
Amalgamation
of AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc.
Effective September 29, 2010, in connection with an
internal restructuring transaction, pursuant to articles of
amalgamation under the Canada Business Corporations Act, we were
amalgamated (the Amalgamation)
51
with our direct parent, AV Aluminum Inc., a Canadian corporation
(AV Aluminum), to form an amalgamated corporation
named Novelis Inc., also a Canadian corporation.
As a result of the Amalgamation, we continue our corporate
existence, and the amalgamated Novelis Inc. remains liable for
all of our and AV Aluminums obligations and we continue to
own all of our respective property. Since AV Aluminum was a
holding company whose sole asset was the shares of the
pre-amalgamated
Novelis Inc., our business, management, board of directors and
corporate governance procedures following the Amalgamation are
identical to those of Novelis Inc. immediately prior to the
Amalgamation. Novelis Inc., like AV Aluminum before the
Amalgamation, remains an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of
Hindalco. We have retrospectively recast all periods presented
to reflect the amalgamated companies.
As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Amalgamation increased
our previously reported additional paid-in capital by
$33 million, and reduced our accumulated deficit by
$33 million. The Amalgamation had no impact on our
consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 or the years ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009. In addition, the Amalgamation had
no impact on our consolidated statements of cash flows for the
nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 or the years
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. As of March 31, 2008,
the Amalgamation increased our accrued expenses and other
current liabilities by $33 million and reduced our
accumulated deficit by $33 million. For the period from
May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008, the Amalgamation
increased our interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
costs by $23 million and increased our income tax provision
by $10 million, thus, reducing our net income attributable
to our common shareholder by $33 million on our
consolidated statement of operations for that period. The
Amalgamation did not change our net operating, investing or
financing activities on our consolidated statements of cash
flows for the period from May 16, 2007 through
March 31, 2008. The Amalgamation did not impact our
consolidated statements of operations or our consolidated
statements of cash flows for the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007.
Combined
Financial Results of the Predecessor and Successor
For purposes of managements discussion and analysis of the
results of operations in this prospectus, we combined the
results of operations for the period ended May 15, 2007 of
the Predecessor with the period ended March 31, 2008 of the
Successor. We believe the combined results of operations for the
year ended March 31, 2008 provide management and investors
with a more meaningful perspective on Novelis financial
and operational performance than if we did not combine the
results of operations of the Predecessor and the Successor in
this manner. Similarly, we combine the financial results of the
Predecessor and the Successor when discussing segment
information and sources and uses of cash for the year ended
March 31, 2008.
The combined results of operations are non-GAAP financial
measures, do not include any pro forma assumptions or
adjustments and should not be used in isolation or substitution
of the Predecessors and the Successors results.
Shown below are combining schedules of (1) shipments and
(2) our results of operations for periods allocable to the
Successor, the Predecessor and the combined presentation for the
year ended March 31, 2008 that we use throughout the
discussion of results from operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Shipments (In kt):
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Rolled products(1)
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
Ingot products(2)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rolled products include tolling (the conversion of
customer-owned metal). |
|
(2) |
|
Ingot products include primary ingot in Brazil, foundry products
in Korea and Europe, secondary ingot in Europe and other
miscellaneous recyclable aluminum. |
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Results of Operations (In millions)
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
10,272
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,931
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
11,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accompanying
Financial Statements
We have included financial statements for the following periods
elsewhere in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Financial Statements: the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements of the Successor as
of and for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 (the unaudited financial
statements).
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the audited consolidated financial statements of the Successor
as of and for the years ended March 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2009 and for the period May 16, 2007,
through March 31, 2008; and
|
|
|
|
the audited consolidated financial statements of the Predecessor
for the period April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007 (the
audited financial statements).
|
Highlights
Key factors that have recently impacted our business are
discussed briefly below and are discussed in further detail
throughout the Managements Discussion and Analysis and
Segment Review.
|
|
|
|
|
We reported net sales of $7.6 billion for the nine months
ended December 31, 2010, which is an increase of 22% as
compared to the same period last year when we reported net sales
of $6.3 billion. Shipments of flat rolled products totaled
2,198 kt for the nine months ended December 31, 2010, an
increase of 10% as compared to shipments of 1,992 kt for the
nine months ended December 31, 2009. Additionally, average
LME aluminum prices rose 23% as compared to the same period of
the previous year.
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow was strong for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, and we ended the period with
$848 million of liquidity and $297 million of cash on
hand. We completed refinancing transactions to raise
$4.8 billion in debt funding and returned $1.7 billion
of capital to our shareholder during the same period.
|
|
|
|
We reported pre-tax income of $201 million for the nine months
ended December 31, 2010, which includes a $37 million
loss on unrealized derivatives, a $74 million loss on early
extinguishment of debt and $35 million of restructuring
charges. Pre-tax income for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009 was $703 million, which reflects
$615 million of gains on unrealized derivatives and
$7 million of restructuring charges. Net income
attributable to our common shareholder for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 was $66 million as compared to
$406 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2009.
|
|
|
|
We reported pre-tax income of $727 million for fiscal 2010,
which includes $578 million of unrealized gains on
derivatives. The $578 million of unrealized gains includes
a $504 million reversal of previously recognized losses
upon settlement of derivatives and $74 million of
unrealized gains relating to mark to market adjustments on metal
and currency derivatives. Current year results also include
$14 million of restructuring expenses. Net income
attributable to our common shareholder for fiscal 2010 was
$405 million.
|
|
|
|
We reported a pre-tax loss of $2.2 billion for fiscal 2009,
which includes $519 million of unrealized losses on
derivatives. The prior year results also include non-cash
impairment charges of $1.5 billion, $95 million in
restructuring charges and a $122 million gain on a debt
exchange transaction. Net loss attributable to our common
shareholder for fiscal 2009 was $1.9 billion.
|
|
|
|
Shipments of flat rolled products in fiscal 2010 were down 2%
overall as compared to fiscal 2009. However, shipments in our
fourth quarter of 2010 increased in all regions as compared to
the same period a year ago. Fourth quarter increases in North
America, Europe and Asia were the most significant, with 11%,
21% and 50% increases, respectively. Shipments in South America
remained stable during the past year, as this market is heavily
focused on can sheet shipments and was not as significantly
impacted by the economic downturn.
|
Business
and Industry Climate
The aluminum rolled products market represents the global supply
of and demand for aluminum sheet, plate and foil produced either
from sheet ingot or continuously cast roll-stock in rolling
mills operated by independent aluminum rolled products producers
and integrated aluminum companies alike. According to CRU,
worldwide consumption of aluminum rolled products in 2008 was
approximately 17,304 kt. In 2009, this declined by 8.5% to
15,833 kt, reflecting the global economic environment. CRU
estimates that global consumption for rolled aluminum recovered
to approximately 18,244 kt in 2010 and will increase to 24,417
kt by 2015.
We have experienced strong end customer demand across our
regions and product categories during the three months ended
December 31, 2010. Historically, the third quarter is a
seasonally slow quarter in North America and Europe for our
business, however, the seasonality effect has been tempered by
strong customer demand during the period. During the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2010, we began to see recovery in all our
regions from the economic slowdown of the prior years. Strong
demand has continued in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 in all
our end-markets and we are operating at or near capacity in all
our regions. The global economic slowdown in 2008 and 2009
negatively impacted our sales and shipment levels as well as our
profitability, operating cash flows and liquidity. During the
second half of fiscal 2009, we experienced rapidly declining
aluminum prices and sharply lower end-customer demand. However,
beverage and food can shipments, which
54
on an annual basis, represent between 56% and 58% of our rolled
products business, stabilized during the first quarter of fiscal
2010 at levels which were only moderately below historical
levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
Key Sales and Shipment Trends
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in millions, shipments in kt)
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
3,103
|
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,939
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
|
$
|
2,420
|
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
|
$
|
2,533
|
|
|
$
|
2,524
|
|
|
$
|
2,560
|
|
Percentage increase (decrease) in net sales versus comparable
previous year period
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(37
|
)%
|
|
|
(26
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Rolled product shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
South America
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverage and food cans
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
All other rolled products
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage increase (decrease) in rolled products shipments
versus comparable previous year period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Asia
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
South America
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverage and food cans
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
All other rolled products
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
(33
|
)%
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion
Business Model
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (1) a
pass-through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market
premiums and (2) a conversion premium price on
the conversion cost to produce the rolled product which
reflects, among other factors, the competitive market conditions
for that product.
Increases or decreases in the LME price directly impact net
sales, cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization) and working capital, albeit on a lag basis. The
timing of these impacts on sales revenue and metal purchase
costs vary based on contractual arrangements with customers and
metal suppliers in each region. Certain of our sales contracts
contain fixed metal prices for sales in future periods of time,
which exposes us to the risk of changes in LME prices. In
addition, we are exposed to fluctuating metal prices on our
purchases of inventory associated with the period of time
between the pricing of our purchases of inventory and the
shipment of that inventory to our customers. Timing differences
also occur in the flow of metal costs through moving average
inventory cost values and cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization). We refer to these timing
differences collectively as metal price lag.
We also have exposure to foreign currency risk associated with
sales made in currencies that differ from those in which we are
paying our conversion costs. For example, sales in Brazil are
generally priced in US
55
dollars, but the majority of our conversion costs are paid in
Brazilian real. We discuss this foreign currency risk further
below.
LME
The average and closing prices based upon the LME for aluminum
for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
the years ended March 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
LME Prices
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum (per metric tonne, and presented in U.S.
dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing cash price as of end of period
|
|
$
|
2,461
|
|
|
$
|
2,208
|
|
|
$
|
2,288
|
|
|
$
|
1,366
|
|
|
$
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
(53
|
)%
|
Average cash price during period
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,767
|
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
2,234
|
|
|
$
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
Aluminum prices increased 8% during the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, resulting in a $9 million gain on
change in fair value of metal derivatives during the period. LME
prices increased 67% from the March 31, 2009 closing price
of $1,366 per tonne to $2,288 per tonne at March 31, 2010
which resulted in $122 million of net gains on change in
fair value of metal derivatives during fiscal 2010. After
reaching a peak of $3,292 per metric tonne in July 2008,
aluminum prices rapidly declined to a low of $1,254 per metric
tonne in February 2009, our fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
Prices have steadily increased since that time, with a closing
price of $2,461 on December 31, 2010.
Metal
Derivative Instruments
We use derivative instruments to preserve our conversion margin
and manage the timing differences associated with metal price
lag.
We enter into forward metal purchases simultaneous with the
sales contracts that contain fixed metal prices. These forward
metal purchases directly hedge the economic risk of future metal
price fluctuation associated with these contracts. The
recognition of unrealized gains and losses on metal derivative
positions typically precedes customer delivery and revenue
recognition under the related fixed forward priced contracts.
The timing difference between the recognition of unrealized
gains and losses on metal derivatives and revenue recognition
impacts income before income taxes and net income because we
have not historically elected hedge accounting for financial
reporting purposes. Gains and losses on metal derivative
contracts are not recognized in segment income until realized.
Additionally, we sell short-term LME futures contracts to reduce
our exposure to fluctuating LME prices during the period of time
for which we physically hold the inventory and to manage the
metal price lag associated with inventory cost. The majority of
our metal purchases are based on average prices for a period of
time prior to the period at which we order the metal.
Additionally, there is a period of time between when we place an
order for metal, when we receive it and when we ship finished
products to our customers. These forward metal sales directly
hedge the economic risk of future metal price fluctuations on
our inventory.
We settle derivative contracts in advance of billing and
collecting from our customers, which temporarily impacts our
liquidity position. The lag between derivative settlement and
customer collection typically ranges from 30 to 60 days.
Metal
Price Ceilings
As a result of contracts entered into by Alcan prior to our
spin-off in 2005, we had contracts that contained a ceiling over
which metal prices could not be contractually passed through to
certain customers. The last of these contracts expired on
December 31, 2009, and we entered into a new multi-year
agreement to
56
continue supplying similar volumes to the same customer. This
new agreement became effective January 1, 2010, and does
not contain a metal price ceiling.
LME prices remained below the ceiling price of this contract for
the first five months of fiscal 2010. However, due to increases
in LME prices during the month of September 2009, we were unable
to pass through $10 million of metal purchase costs
associated with sales under this contract for the nine months
ended December 31, 2009. We were unable to pass through
$10 million of metal purchase costs for the year ended
March 31, 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009 when we were
unable to pass through $176 million of metal purchase costs
associated with sales under this contract.
In connection with the allocation of purchase price (i.e., total
consideration) paid by Hindalco, we established reserves
totaling $655 million as of May 15, 2007 to record
these sales contracts with metal price ceilings at fair value.
These reserves were accreted into net sales over the term of the
underlying contracts. This accretion had no impact on cash flow.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2009, we recorded
accretion of $152 million. For fiscal 2010, 2009 and the
combined 2008, we recorded accretion of $152 million,
$233 million and $270 million, respectively. With the
expiration of the last contract with a price ceiling, the
balance of the reserve was zero at December 31, 2009.
Foreign
Exchange Impact
We operate a global business and conduct business in various
currencies around the world. Fluctuations in foreign exchange
rates impact our operating results. We recognize foreign
exchange gains and losses when business transactions are
denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of
that operation. The following table presents the exchange rates
as of the end of each period as well as the average of the
month-end exchange rates for each of the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate as of
|
|
|
Average Exchange Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
1.324
|
|
|
|
1.435
|
|
|
|
1.353
|
|
|
|
1.328
|
|
|
|
1.581
|
|
|
|
1.304
|
|
|
|
1.429
|
|
|
|
1.414
|
|
|
|
1.411
|
|
|
|
1.432
|
|
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.664
|
|
|
|
1.743
|
|
|
|
1.784
|
|
|
|
2.301
|
|
|
|
1.744
|
|
|
|
1.739
|
|
|
|
1.874
|
|
|
|
1.861
|
|
|
|
1.982
|
|
|
|
1.837
|
|
South Korean won per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
0.999
|
|
|
|
1.048
|
|
|
|
1.014
|
|
|
|
1.258
|
|
|
|
1.028
|
|
|
|
1.033
|
|
|
|
1.098
|
|
|
|
1.085
|
|
|
|
1.134
|
|
|
|
1.025
|
|
During the nine months ended December 31, 2010, the
U.S. dollar strengthened against the Euro, was relatively
flat against the Korean won and weakened against the Brazilian
real and Canadian dollar. In Europe, this resulted in foreign
exchange losses, while Asia and North America were relatively
flat. In Brazil, where the U.S. dollar is the functional
currency due to predominantly U.S. dollar selling prices,
but operating costs are primarily paid in local currency, the
weakening of the dollar against the real resulted in foreign
exchange losses.
The U.S. dollar weakened as compared to the local currency
in all regions during fiscal 2010. In Europe and Asia, the
weakening of the U.S. dollar resulted in foreign exchange
gains as these operations are recorded in local currency. In
North America and Brazil, where the U.S. dollar is the
functional currency due to predominantly U.S. dollar
selling prices and local currency operating costs, we incurred
foreign exchange losses as the U.S. dollar weakened.
In fiscal 2009, the U.S. dollar strengthened as compared to
the local currency in all regions, resulting in foreign exchange
losses in Europe and Asia as these operations are recorded in
local currency, and foreign exchanges gains in Brazil and North
America, where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency
due to predominantly U.S. dollar selling prices and local
currency operating costs.
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross-currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain operations, which
includes
57
capital expenditures. Additionally, until May 2010, we used
foreign currency contracts to hedge our foreign currency
exposure to net investment in foreign subsidiaries.
See Segment Review for each of the periods presented
below for additional discussion of the impact of foreign
exchange on the results of each region.
Results
of Operations
Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2010 Compared with the Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2009
We experienced strong demand across all our regions over the
nine months ended December 31, 2010, and were operating at
or near capacity in all regions for the past six months of that
period. Net sales for the nine months ended December 31,
2010 increased $1.4 billion, or 22%, as compared to the
nine months ended December 31, 2009 primarily as a result
of increases in volumes and LME aluminum prices. Additionally,
conversion premiums, volumes and mix of flat rolled products,
and sales of scrap and primary aluminum, all had positive
effects on our Net sales. The prior year Net sales amount
includes $152 million of non-cash accretion on can price
ceiling contracts which did not benefit the current year.
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 increased
$1.6 billion, or 31%, as compared to the nine months ended
December 31, 2009 which reflects the increased volume and
higher average LME prices, partially offset by sustained cost
cutting measures.
Additionally, we had $95 million of gains on realized
derivatives during the nine months ended December 31, 2010
as compared to $424 million of losses on realized
derivatives during the same period of the prior year. These
amounts are reported in Gain in change in fair value of
derivative instruments, net and offset negative
year-over-year
impacts of changes in metal prices, foreign currency exchange
rates and other input costs on Net sales and Cost of goods sold
(exclusive of depreciation and amortization).
Income before income taxes for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 was $201 million, a decrease of
$502 million, or 71%, compared to the $703 million
reported in the same period a year ago. The positive effects
from operations discussed above were more than offset by the
following items:
|
|
|
|
|
$37 million of losses on unrealized derivatives for the
nine months ended December 31, 2010 compared to
$615 million of gains for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009;
|
|
|
|
$74 million of loss on early extinguishment of debt related
to the refinancing of our Term Loan facility, our
7.25% Notes and our 11.5% Notes during the nine months
ended December 31, 2010;
|
|
|
|
$35 million of restructuring charges for the nine months
ended December 31, 2010 primarily as a result of the
announced shutdowns of our Bridgnorth, UK and Aratu, Brazil
facilities and the relocation of our North American headquarters
to Atlanta, US, as compared to $7 million of restructuring
charges for the same period in the prior year;
|
|
|
|
foreign exchange losses of $10 million as compared to gains
of $9 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2009; and
|
|
|
|
$11 million gain on sale of fixed assets in Brazil for the
nine months ended December 31, 2010 and a gain on the
settlement of certain tax litigation in South America of
$6 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2009.
|
We reported net income attributable to our common shareholder of
$66 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2010 as compared to $406 million for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009, primarily as a result of the factors
above. We also recorded an income tax provision of
$104 million in the nine months ended December 31,
2010, as compared to $247 million income tax provision in
the same period of the prior year.
58
Segment
Review
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions, except shipments which are in kt). For additional
financial information related to our operating segments, see
Note 15 Segment, Major Customer and Major
Supplier Information to our condensed consolidated financial
statements for the nine months ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 (Successor)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,863
|
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
$
|
1,340
|
|
|
$
|
876
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009 (Successor)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,375
|
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
$
|
1,098
|
|
|
$
|
691
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
nine months ended December 31, 2009 to nine months ended
December 31, 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment income (Successor)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Segment income nine months ended December 31,
2009
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Conversion costs(A)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Primary metal production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Other changes(B)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income nine months ended December 31,
2010
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such as
direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage, alloys
and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss. Fluctuations in
this component reflect cost efficiencies during the period as
well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(B) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research and development for all
segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of purchase
accounting and metal price ceiling contracts. Significant
fluctuations in these items are discussed below. |
North
America
Our North American operations experienced strong demand across
all sectors with favorable volumes in can, automotive and other
industrial products. Shipments in the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 increased 9% as compared to the nine
months ended December 31, 2009, as the region operated at
or near
59
capacity during the period. Net sales for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 were up $488 million, or 21%, as
compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2009 despite
the $152 million of accretion on can price ceiling
contracts included in sales for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009. This increase reflects the strong demand
previously mentioned as well as higher LME prices and improved
conversion premiums.
Segment income for the nine months ended December 31, 2010
was $323 million, up $92 million as compared to the
prior year period. This increase was driven primarily by the
volume, price and conversion premium effects discussed above, as
well as favorable operating cost performance including increased
UBC spreads. The operating cost performance was partially offset
by higher energy rates, increased labor costs and unfavorable
changes in melt loss. Other changes includes the negative effect
of the accretion of can price ceiling contracts in fiscal 2010,
offset by the effects of related derivative instruments.
Europe
Our European operations have experienced strong demand across
all sectors with the automotive sector providing particularly
strong results as it also supplies the demand for products in
Asia. Flat rolled product shipments and net sales are up 16% and
20%, respectively, as compared to the nine months ended
December 31, 2009. Capacity utilization was at or near 100%
for the
year-to-date.
Segment income for the nine months ended December 31, 2010
was $246 million, up $61 million compared to the same
period of the prior year. Higher volumes across all sectors
contributed to the increase. Segment income also increased due
to favorable metal price lag as compared to the prior year,
partially offset by unfavorable changes in foreign currency
exchange rates of the Euro, Swiss franc and British pound to the
U.S. dollar as well as an unfavorable change in melt loss,
metal premiums and discounts and a negative variance related to
our usage of coatings.
Asia
During the nine months ended December 31, 2010, the Asian
markets experienced strong demand for all product categories.
Flat rolled product shipments are up 6% as compared to the prior
year period. Sales increased $242 million, or 22%, for the
nine months ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same
period in the prior year primarily as a result of the increased
volume and higher LME prices.
Segment income for the nine months ended December 31, 2010
was $173 million, up $48 million as compared to the
prior year period due primarily to volume increases, increased
conversion premiums and improved product mix. These increases
were offset by higher conversion costs such as energy, labor and
melt loss. Foreign currency exchange rate changes had a positive
impact on segment income for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 as the US dollar to Korean won exchange
rate remained fairly stable in the current period and the Korean
won strengthened against the US dollar by 15% in the prior
period.
South
America
Total shipments for the nine months ended December 31, 2010
increased 12% to 312 kt for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in fiscal
2010, while net sales increased 27% as compared to the same
period in fiscal 2010 primarily as a result of higher LME
prices, conversion premiums and improved mix of our flat rolled
products. Demand for our flat rolled products in South America
remained strong across all our sectors.
Segment income for the nine months ended December 31, 2010
was $127 million, up $74 million as compared to the
prior year period. Segment income for the rolling business
increased $58 million primarily as a result of the factors
noted above, as well as the increased use of UBCs. These
positive effects were partially offset by the effects of foreign
exchange rates as the Brazilian real appreciated against the US
dollar. Because our Brazilian operations are a US dollar
functional entity, and local operating costs are primarily in
Brazilian real, the appreciation resulted in negative effects on
segment income. Additionally, the negative contribution from our
primary business lessened by $16 million in fiscal 2011 as
a result of higher aluminum prices.
60
Reconciliation
of segment results to Net income attributable to our common
shareholder
Costs such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense
and unrealized gains (losses) on changes in the fair value of
derivatives are not utilized by our chief operating decision
maker in evaluating segment performance. The table below
reconciles income from reportable segments to Net income
attributable to our common shareholder for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
South America
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
615
|
|
Realized gains on derivative instruments not included in segment
income
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring recoveries (charges), net
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other costs increased from $59 million to
$78 million primarily due to increases in employee costs,
including incentives, and professional fees.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt, offset by a higher principal balance for the
second half of December 2010.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we had
$37 million of losses in Unrealized gains (losses) on
change in fair value of derivative instruments, net which
consist of unrealized losses on changes in fair value of metal,
foreign currency, interest rate and energy derivatives. We
recorded $615 million of unrealized gains for the nine
months ended December 31, 2009.
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation was
$32 million of loss for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 as compared to a $31 million loss in
the nine months ended December 31, 2009. This adjustment
primarily relates to depreciation, amortization and income taxes
at our Aluminium Norf GmbH (Norf) joint venture. Income taxes
related to our equity method investments are reflected in the
carrying value of the investment and not in our consolidated
income tax provision.
Restructuring charges during the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 primarily related to the previously
announced shutdown of our Bridgnorth, UK and Aratu, Brazil
facilities and the relocation of our North American headquarters
to Atlanta, US.
61
Other income, net includes a gain of $13 million on the
sale of unused land in South America for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010. The nine month period ended
December 31, 2009 includes a gain of $6 million on the
settlement of certain tax litigation in Brazil.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we recorded a
$104 million income tax provision on our pre-tax income of
$212 million, before our equity in net income of
non-consolidated affiliates, which represented an effective tax
rate of 49%. Our effective tax rate differs from the expense at
the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following
factors: (1) an $15 million expense for exchange
remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (2) a
$30 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
those losses, (3) a $5 million benefit from
differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign effective
tax rates applied to entities in different jurisdictions, and
(4) a $2 million benefit related to decreases in
uncertain tax positions.
Year
Ended March 31, 2010 Compared with the Year Ended
March 31, 2009
For the year ended March 31, 2010, we reported net income
attributable to our common shareholder of $405 million on
net sales of $8.7 billion, compared to the year ended
March 31, 2009 when we reported net loss attributable to
our common shareholder of $1.9 billion on net sales of
$10.2 billion. The prior year results include pre-tax
impairment charges totaling $1.5 billion, which reflected
the deterioration in the global economic environment and
resulting decreases in the market capitalization of our parent
company, valuation of our publicly traded debt and a related
increase in our cost of capital.
While shipments were flat, Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization) decreased $2.1 billion, or
22%, on a sales reduction of 15%. The decrease in average metal
prices impacted both sales and costs of goods sold. The
reduction in cost of goods sold also reflects the benefit of our
previously announced restructuring actions and cost reduction
initiatives. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $43 million, or 15%, primarily due to the
increase in accrued incentive compensation in the current year
as compared to the prior year when business conditions were
declining.
The fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 also includes
$578 million in unrealized gains on derivative instruments,
as compared to unrealized losses of $519 million in the
prior year. Additionally, we recorded an income tax provision of
$262 million on our net income in fiscal 2010, as compared
to a $246 million income tax benefit in the prior year.
These items are discussed in further detail below.
Segment
Review
The tables below show selected segment financial information.
For a definition of Segment income, see Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2010 Compared with the Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2009 Segment
Review. For additional financial information related to
our operating segments. See Note 19
Segment, Geographical Area and Major Customer and Major Supplier
Information to our audited financial statements and
Note 15 Segment, Major Customer and Major
Supplier Information to our unaudited financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments, which are in kt)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,292
|
|
|
$
|
2,975
|
|
|
$
|
1,501
|
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments, which are in kt)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
year ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the year ended
March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment Income (In millions)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Conversion costs(1)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Other changes(2)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such as
direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage, alloys
and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss. Fluctuations in
this component reflect cost efficiencies during the period as
well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(2) |
|
Other changes include selling, general and administrative costs
and research and development for all segments and certain other
items which impact one or more regions, including such items as
the impact of purchase accounting and metal price ceiling
contracts. Significant fluctuations in these items are discussed
below. |
North
America
As of March 31, 2010, North America manufactured aluminum
sheet and light gauge products through 11 plants, including two
dedicated recycling facilities. Important end-use applications
include beverage cans, foil and other packaging, automotive and
other transportation applications, building products and other
industrial applications.
North America experienced a reduction in demand in the second
half of fiscal 2009 as all industry sectors were impacted by the
economic downturn. While shipments for fiscal 2010 were down 4%
as compared to fiscal 2009, fourth quarter 2010 represented an
11% increase over the same period a year ago and a 13% increase
over our seasonally low third quarter of fiscal 2010. Net sales
for fiscal 2010 were down $638 million, or 16%, as compared
to fiscal 2009 primarily reflecting lower average LME prices as
well as the reduced volumes discussed above. Prices under
certain can contracts are determined based on a six month price
average and therefore do not reflect the recent increases in LME
prices. Can shipments represent approximately 70% of our flat
rolled shipments in North America.
63
Segment income for fiscal 2010 was $320 million, up
$238 million as compared to the prior year period. Improved
conversion premiums and product mix, reductions in conversion
costs, favorable metal price lag and favorable impact of foreign
exchange all had a positive impact on segment income. Conversion
cost improvements relate to reductions in a number of cost
categories, including energy, melt loss, production labor and
repairs and maintenance as compared to the prior year period.
Other changes include a $98 million favorable impact
related to metal price ceilings contracts which expired on
December 31, 2009, partially offset by an $81 million
reduction to the net favorable impact of acquisition related
fair value adjustments and a $10 million reduction in the
benefit from used beverage cans.
To consolidate corporate functions and enhance organizational
effectiveness, we announced a plan to relocate our North
American headquarters from Cleveland, Ohio to Atlanta, Georgia,
where our executive offices are located. This move is now
substantially complete. We recorded $4 million in fiscal
2010 related to one-time termination benefits and other employee
related costs in connection with the relocation.
In response to reductions in demand in fiscal 2009, we announced
a Voluntary Separation Program (VSP) available to
salaried employees in North America and the Corporate office,
aimed at reducing staffing levels. This VSP plan was
supplemented by an Involuntary Severance Program
(ISP). Through the VSP and ISP, we eliminated
approximately 120 positions during the fourth quarter of fiscal
2009 and the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Europe
As of March 31, 2010, our European segment provided
European markets with value-added sheet and light gauge products
through 13 aluminum operating facilities, including one
dedicated recycling facility. End-use applications for this
segment include beverage and food cans, foil and other
packaging, construction and industrial products, automotive and
lithographic applications.
Europe experienced a reduction in demand in all industry sectors
with flat rolled shipments and net sales down 12% and 20%,
respectively, in fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009. While
shipments for fiscal 2010 were down compared to a year ago,
fourth quarter 2010 represented a 21% increase over the same
period a year ago and a 21% increase over our seasonally low
third quarter of fiscal 2010. Net sales for fiscal 2010 were
down $743 million, as compared to fiscal 2009 reflecting
the volume decrease as well as lower average LME prices.
Segment income for fiscal 2010 was $247 million, up
$11 million as compared to the prior year. Improved
conversion premium and product mix, reductions in conversion
costs and the favorable impact of foreign exchange more than
offset the impact of volume reduction and the negative metal
price lag. Other changes reflect a favorable impact of
$25 million from fixed forward priced contracts in fiscal
2010.
In late fiscal 2009, we began a number of restructuring actions
across Europe, including the closure of our plant in Rogerstone,
United Kingdom effective April 2009. The closure of the
Rogerstone plant resulted in the elimination of 440 positions.
Other cost reductions were implemented in 2009 and throughout
2010 through capacity and staff reductions at plants in France,
Germany, Switzerland and Italy.
Asia
As of December 31, 2010, Asia operated three manufacturing
facilities with production balanced between beverage and food
cans, foil and other packaging, industrial products (including
electronics and construction) and transportation applications.
The Asian economies, fueled by government stimulus programs,
have been recovering rapidly since our first quarter of fiscal
2010. We expect growth in Chinas economy to benefit
export-oriented neighboring countries as they participate in
demand for finished goods and infrastructure projects in China.
Flat rolled shipments are up 19% as compared to the prior year
and have been consistent each quarter this year. We expect
customer demand to continue at these levels for the near term.
Net sales were down 2% in fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009
as the decrease in the average LME more than offset volume and
conversion premium increases.
64
Segment income increased from $86 million in fiscal 2009 to
$166 million for fiscal 2010 due to improvements in volume,
conversion premiums and reductions in conversion costs,
partially offset by the unfavorable metal price lag. As shown
above in the Foreign Exchange Impact discussion, the
U.S. dollar strengthened during fiscal 2009, and weakened
during fiscal 2010, resulting in a favorable
year-over-year
foreign exchange impact in this segment.
In response to reduced demand in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2009, we eliminated 34 positions in Asia related to a voluntary
retirement program. Also during fiscal 2009, we recorded an
impairment charge of approximately $5 million in Novelis
Korea Limited (Novelis Korea), formerly Alcan Taihan
Aluminum Limited, due to the obsolescence of certain production
related fixed assets.
South
America
Our operations in South America manufacture various aluminum
rolled products, including can stock, automotive and industrial
sheet and light gauge for the beverage and food can,
construction and industrial, foil and other packaging and
transportation applications. Can shipments represent over 80% of
our flat rolled shipments in South America. As of March 31,
2010, our South American operations included two rolling plants
in Brazil along with two smelters, bauxite mines and power
generation facilities. We ceased the production of commercial
grade alumina at our Ouro Preto facility effective May 2009 as
the decline in alumina prices made alumina production
economically unfeasible at this facility. For the foreseeable
future, the plant will purchase alumina through third parties.
Flat rolled and total shipments were flat in fiscal 2010 as
compared to fiscal 2009, while net sales decreased 6% as
compared to the prior year due to lower average LME prices,
partially offset by increases in pricing.
Segment income for South America decreased $28 million as
compared to the prior year period. This decrease in segment
income is due to a $59 million decrease in the smelter
benefit compared to the prior year period and a $7 million
reduction in the benefit associated with used beverage cans,
included in Other changes in the table above. These reductions
in segment income were partially offset by improvements in
conversion premiums on new contracts and reductions in
conversion costs.
65
Reconciliation
of segment results to Net income attributable to our common
shareholder
Costs such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense
and unrealized gains (losses) on changes in the fair value of
derivatives are not utilized by our chief operating decision
maker in evaluating segment performance. The table below
reconciles segment income to Net income attributable to our
common shareholder for the years ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
South America
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other costs increased from $57 million to
$90 million primarily due to higher incentive compensation
in fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009 when business
conditions declined.
Depreciation and amortization decreased $55 million from
the prior year period primarily due to certain fixed assets that
became fully depreciated during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt. Taking into account the effect of interest
rate swaps, approximately 26% of our debt was variable rate as
of March 31, 2010.
Unrealized gains on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the mark to market accounting for changes
in the fair value of our derivatives that do not receive hedge
accounting treatment. In fiscal 2010, the $578 million of
unrealized gains consists of (i) $504 million reversal
of previously recognized losses upon settlement of derivatives
and (ii) $74 million of unrealized gains relating to
mark to market adjustments on metal and currency derivatives. We
recorded $519 million of unrealized losses in fiscal 2009.
We recorded a $1.3 billion impairment charge related to
goodwill impairment in fiscal 2009. This charge, along with a
$160 million impairment charge related to our investment in
the Norf joint venture, reflected the global economic
environment at the time and the related market increase in the
cost of capital.
The gain on extinguishment of debt related to the purchase of
our 7.25% senior notes with a principal value of
$275 million with the proceeds of an additional term loan
with a face value of $220 million and an
66
estimated fair value of $165 million. See Liquidity
and Capital Resources below for additional discussion
about the accounting for this purchase.
Restructuring charges in fiscal 2010 primarily relate to
previously announced restructuring actions initiated in fiscal
2009 related to voluntary and involuntary separation programs
for salaried employees in North America, Europe and Corporate
aimed at reducing staff levels. Fiscal 2010 also includes
$4 million related to the relocation of our North American
headquarters to Atlanta, Georgia. Restructuring charges for
fiscal 2009 includes the costs associated with the closure of
our plant in Rogerstone, United Kingdom and the related employee
and environmental costs. See also Segment Review
discussion above as well as Note 2
Restructuring Programs to our audited financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation was
$51 million for fiscal 2010 as compared to
$226 million in fiscal 2009. This adjustment typically
relates to depreciation and amortization and income taxes at our
Norf joint venture. Income taxes related to our equity method
investments are reflected in the carrying value of the
investment and not in our consolidated income tax provision. The
adjustment in fiscal 2010 also includes a non-recurring
after-tax benefit of $10 million from the refinement of our
methodology for recording depreciation and amortization on the
step up in our basis in the underlying assets of an investee.
The prior year includes a $160 million pre-tax impairment
charge related to our investment in Norf.
We have experienced significant fluctuations in income tax
expense and the corresponding effective tax rate. The primary
factors contributing to the effective tax rate differing from
the statutory Canadian rate include:
|
|
|
|
|
Our functional currency in Canada and Brazil is the
U.S. dollar and the company holds significant
U.S. dollar denominated debt in these locations. As the
value of the local currencies strengthens and weakens against
the U.S. dollar, unrealized gains or losses are created in
those locations for tax purposes, while the underlying gains or
losses are not recorded in our income statement.
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2009, Canadian legislation was enacted allowing us
to elect to determine our Canadian taxable income in
U.S. dollars. Our election was effective April 1,
2008, and such U.S. dollar taxable gains and losses no
longer exist in Canada as of that date.
|
|
|
|
We have significant net deferred tax liabilities in Brazil that
are remeasured to account for currency fluctuations as the taxes
are payable in local currency.
|
|
|
|
Our income is taxed at various statutory tax rates in varying
jurisdictions. Applying the corresponding amounts of income and
loss to the various tax rates results in differences when
compared to our Canadian statutory tax rate.
|
|
|
|
We record increases and decreases to valuation allowances
primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where
we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able
to utilize those losses.
|
For fiscal 2010, we recorded a $262 million income tax
provision on our pre-tax income of $742 million, before our
equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates,
which represented an effective tax rate of 35% Our effective tax
rate differs from the expense at the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to the following factors:
(1) $19 million expense for pre-tax foreign currency
gains or losses with no tax effect and the tax effect of
U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no
pre-tax effect, (2) a $38 million expense for exchange
remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) a
$7 million expense for the effects of enacted tax rate
changes on cumulative taxable temporary differences, (4) a
$9 million benefit from differences between the Canadian
statutory and foreign effective tax rates applied to entities in
different jurisdictions and (5) a $10 million benefit
related to a decrease in uncertain tax positions.
For fiscal 2009, we recorded a $246 million income tax
benefit on our pre-tax loss of $2.0 billion, before our
equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates,
which represented an effective tax rate of 12%. Our effective
tax rate differs from the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to the following factors:
(1) $415 million related to a non-deductible goodwill
impairment charge, (2) a $48 million benefit for
exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) a
$61 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will
67
not be able to utilize those losses, (4) a $33 million
benefit from differences between the Canadian statutory and
foreign effective tax rates applied to entities in different
jurisdictions and (5) a $2 million expense related to
an increase in uncertain tax positions.
During fiscal 2010, the statute of limitations lapsed with
respect to unrecognized tax benefits related to potential
withholding taxes and cross-border intercompany pricing of
services. As a result, we recognized a reduction in unrecognized
tax benefits of $28 million, including a decrease in
accrued interest of $5 million, recorded as a reduction to
the income tax provisions in the consolidated statement of
operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Year
Ended March 31, 2009 Compared With the Year Ended
March 31, 2008
Positive trends in the demand for aluminum products and
inflationary movement in average LME prices during the first six
months of fiscal 2009 were reversed sharply in the second half
of our fiscal year. For the year ended March 31, 2009, we
realized a net loss attributable to our common shareholder of
$1.9 billion on net sales of $10.2 billion, compared
to the year ended March 31, 2008 when we realized a Net
loss attributable to our common shareholder of $150 million
on net sales of $11.2 billion. The reduction in sales is
due to the decrease in the average LME price as well as a
reduction in demand for flat rolled products in most regions
during the last six months of fiscal 2009.
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
decreased $1.0 billion, or 10%, and stayed flat as a
percentage of net sales as compared to the fiscal 2008 period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$95 million, or 24%, primarily due to reductions in
professional fees and employee-related costs, including
incentive compensation associated with the Arrangement. The
fiscal 2009 results include non-cash asset impairment charges
totaling $1.5 billion.
Fiscal 2009 was also impacted by $519 million in non-cash
unrealized losses on derivative instruments and $95 million
in restructuring charges, as compared to $3 million in
unrealized losses for fiscal 2008. These negative factors were
partially offset by a $122 million gain on the
extinguishment of debt. We also recorded an income tax benefit
of $246 million on our net loss in fiscal 2009, as compared
to a $87 million income tax provision in fiscal 2008. These
items are discussed in further detail below.
Segment
Review (on a combined non-GAAP basis for fiscal 2008)
The tables below show selected segment financial information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments, which are in kt)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments, which are in kt)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
4,110
|
|
|
$
|
4,341
|
|
|
$
|
1,829
|
|
|
$
|
1,024
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
year ended March 31, 2008 to the year ended March 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment Income (In millions)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Conversion costs(1)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other changes(2)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such as
direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage, alloys
and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss, Fluctuations in
this component reflect cost efficiencies during the period as
well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(2) |
|
Other changes include selling, general and administrative costs
and research and development for all segments and certain other
items which impact one or more regions, including such items as
the impact of purchase accounting and metal price ceiling
contracts. Significant fluctuations in these items are discussed
below. |
North
America
Net sales for fiscal 2009 were down $180 million, or 4%, as
compared to the fiscal 2008 period due to lower volume and a
lower average LME price. While shipments were down 5% for fiscal
2009 as compared to fiscal 2008, shipments in the second half of
fiscal 2009 were down 16% as compared to the first half of the
year.
Segment income for fiscal 2009 was $82 million, down
$160 million as compared to the prior year, due to the
negative impact of metal price lag, conversion costs, volume
decreases and foreign exchange fluctuations related to our
operations in Canada. The negative impact of conversion costs
relates to increases in energy costs and freight as compared to
fiscal 2008.
Other changes reflect $11 million in acquisition-related
stock compensation expense in the fiscal 2008 period, and an
$18 million favorable impact related to metal price ceiling
contracts in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008. Selling,
general and administrative costs were down $22 million as
compared to the prior year as the cost reduction initiatives
have begun to favorably impact results. These favorable changes
were partially offset by a $23 million reduction in the net
favorable impact of acquisition-related fair value adjustments
and a $13 million reduction in the benefit associated with
recycling used beverage cans.
Europe
Flat rolled shipments and net sales decreased 15% and 14%,
respectively, in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. The volume
reduction had a $404 million unfavorable impact on net
sales, with the remaining decrease reflecting the impact of
lower LME prices and a stronger U.S. dollar. Demand for
specialty, painted and light gauge products was down for fiscal
2009 as a result of the weak construction market, as well as
reductions in demand for automotive products. Increases in
beverage can and lithographic shipments in the first six months
of fiscal 2009 were reversed in the second half of the fiscal
year, resulting in
year-over-year
declines in both sectors.
69
Segment income for fiscal 2009 was $236 million, as
compared to $273 million in the fiscal 2008 period. Volume
and foreign currency remeasurement unfavorably impacted Segment
income but these impacts were partially offset by favorable
conversion premiums, metal price lag and conversion costs. The
favorable impact of conversion costs relates to a reduction in
labor costs, partially offset by increases in energy costs as
compared to the prior year.
Other changes reflect a $13 million net favorable impact of
income and expense items associated with acquisition-related
fair value adjustments and $6 million of stock compensation
expense in the prior year.
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we announced a number of
restructuring actions across Europe, including the closure of
our plant in Rogerstone, United Kingdom effective April 30,
2009. The closure of the Rogerstone plant resulted in the
elimination of 440 positions, and we recorded approximately
$20 million in severance-related costs. We also recorded
$20 million in environmental remediation expenses and
$3 million in other exit related costs related to the
closure of this plant. We also recorded $12 million in
non-cash fixed asset impairments, an $8 million write-down
of parts and supplies, and a $3 million reduction to
reserves associated with unfavorable contracts established as
part of the Arrangement.
Asia
Total shipments and net sales decreased 13% and 16%,
respectively, in fiscal 2009 with the largest shipment
reductions in beverage can products, followed by electronics,
construction and general purpose foil products. The volume
reduction had a $242 million unfavorable impact on net
sales with the remaining decrease reflecting the impact of lower
LME prices.
The improvement in Segment income of $34 million from the
year ended March 31, 2008 to the year ended March 31,
2009 was due to the favorable impact of metal price lag,
improved conversion premiums and product mix, partially offset
by the volume decreases, increases to conversion costs and
foreign currency remeasurement. The conversion cost increases
were primarily related to increases in energy costs as compared
to the fiscal 2008 period.
In response to reduced demand, we eliminated 34 positions in
Asia in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and recorded
approximately $1 million in severance-related costs related
to a voluntary retirement program. Also, during the year ended
March 31, 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of
approximately $5 million in Novelis Korea due to the
obsolescence of certain production related fixed assets.
South
America
Total shipments increased 5% in fiscal 2009 over in fiscal 2008,
with rolled products shipments up 7%, but net sales were flat in
fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008 due to lower LME prices.
Segment income for South America decreased $22 million as
compared to fiscal 2008. Conversion costs increased due to cost
inflation for energy, alumina, alloys and hardeners. Other
changes reflect a $9 million net favorable impact of income
and expense items associated with acquisition-related fair value
adjustments, a $6 million reduction in selling, general and
administrative expenses and $3 million of stock
compensation expense in fiscal 2008. These positive impacts were
partially offset by an $11 million decrease in the smelter
benefit as the benefit from our smelter operations in South
America declines as average LME prices decrease.
On January 26, 2009, we announced that we would cease the
production of alumina at our Ouro Preto facility in May 2009.
This resulted in the reduction of approximately 290 positions,
including 150 employees and 140 contractors, and we
recorded restructuring charges totaling $2 million related
to severance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Other exit
costs include less than $1 million related to the idling of
the refinery. Other activities related to the facility,
including electric power generation and the production of
primary aluminum, will continue unaffected.
70
Reconciliation
of segment results to Net income attributable to our common
shareholder
The table below reconciles Income from reportable segments to
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder for the years
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
South America
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other expenses declined in fiscal 2009 versus
fiscal 2008 primarily due to $22 million of stock
compensation expenses associated with the Arrangement which were
recognized in fiscal 2008 and lower incentive compensation
expenses in fiscal 2009.
Depreciation and amortization increased $36 million
primarily due to the increases in basis of our property, plant
and equipment and intangible assets resulting from the
Arrangement in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt. As of March 31, 2009, approximately 29%
of our debt was variable rate.
Unrealized losses on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the
mark-to-market
accounting for changes in the fair value of our derivatives that
do not receive hedge accounting treatment. In the year ended
March 31, 2009, these unrealized losses increased primarily
attributable to falling LME prices. Our principal exposure to
LME prices is related to derivatives on fixed forward price
contracts. We hedge these contracts by purchasing aluminum
futures contracts and these contracts decrease in value in
periods of declining LME prices.
We recorded a $1.3 billion impairment charge related to
goodwill in fiscal 2009.
The gain on extinguishment of debt related to the purchase of
our 7.25% senior notes with a principal value of
$275 million using the proceeds of an additional term loan
with a face value of $220 million and an estimated fair
value of $165 million. See Liquidity and Capital
Resources below for additional discussion about the
accounting for this purchase.
71
The adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation includes
a $160 million impairment charge related to our investment
in our Norf joint venture. Excluding this impairment charge, the
adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation increased
from $43 million in fiscal 2008 to $66 million in
fiscal 2009 primarily related to our Norf joint venture due to a
change in the statutory tax rate in Germany that was reflected
in the prior year period. Income taxes related to our equity
method investments, such as Norf, are reflected in the carrying
value of the investment and not in our consolidated income tax
provision.
Other costs, net for fiscal 2009 includes a $26 million
non-cash gain on reversal of a legal accrual, as well as a
$9 million charge for a tax settlement in Brazil. Sale
transaction fees of $32 million associated with the
Arrangement were recorded in fiscal 2008.
For the year ended March 31, 2009, we recorded a
$246 million income tax benefit on our pre-tax loss of
$2.0 billion, before our equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates, which represented an effective tax
rate of 12%. Our effective tax rate differs from the benefit at
the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following
factors: (1) $415 million related to a non-deductible
goodwill impairment charge, (2) a $48 million benefit
for exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) a
$61 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
those losses, (4) a $33 million benefit from
differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign effective
tax rates applied to entities in different jurisdictions and
(5) a $2 million expense related to an increase in
uncertain tax positions.
For the year ended March 31, 2008, we recorded a
$87 million income tax provision on our pre-tax loss of
$86 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates, which represented an effective tax
rate of (101)%. Our effective tax rate differs from the benefit
at the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following
factors: (1) a $72 million provision for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) a $30 million increase for exchange remeasurement
of deferred income taxes, (3) a $18 million benefit
from the effects of enacted tax rate changes on cumulative
taxable temporary differences, (4) a $7 million
increase in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses
in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than
not that we will not be able to utilize those losses, and
(5) a $18 million increase in uncertain tax positions
recorded under the provisions of FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48).
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
See Financing Activities below and Note 6 Debt
of our unaudited financial statements included for reference
elsewhere in this document for a discussion of certain
refinancing transactions during the period. Our new debt
facilities contain certain restrictive covenants; however, we do
not feel that those covenants will restrict our ability to carry
out our plans for the business for the foreseeable future. The
first measurement period for our financial covenants is the four
quarters ending March 31, 2011. We believe we have adequate
liquidity to meet our operational and capital requirements for
the foreseeable future. Our primary sources of liquidity are
cash and cash equivalents, borrowing availability under our
revolving credit facilities and cash generated by operating
activities.
As of December 31, 2010, we had $848 million of
liquidity and $297 million of cash on hand. Our liquidity
position remained strong despite returning $1.7 billion of
capital to our shareholder as a result of our strong operating
cash flow.
During fiscal 2010, our liquidity position increased
$636 million despite continued lower levels of demand in
the automotive, construction and industrial markets and net cash
outflows to settle derivative positions. This reflected our
continued efforts to preserve liquidity through cost and capital
spending controls and effective management of working capital.
Risks associated with supplier terms, customer credit and broker
hedging capacity, were managed successfully with minimal
negative impact on our business.
72
Significant declines in the price of aluminum in the second half
of fiscal 2009 had a negative impact on our liquidity position
and increased the effect of timing issues related to the
settlement of aluminum forward contracts versus cash collections
from our customers.
Our estimated liquidity as of December 31, 2010,
March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Overdrafts
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Gross availability under the ABL Facility
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Borrowing availability limitation due to fixed charge coverage
ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity
|
|
$
|
848
|
|
|
$
|
1,026
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$297 million. Additionally, we had $573 million in
remaining availability under our ABL Facility. Borrowings under
the ABL Facility are generally based on 85% of the book value of
eligible accounts receivable; plus the lesser of (i) 75% of
the net book value of all eligible inventory or (ii) 85% of
the appraised net orderly liquidation value of all eligible
inventory; minus such reserves as the agent bank may establish
in good faith in accordance with such agent banks
permitted discretion. Under the ABL Facility, if our excess
availability, as defined therein, is less than (i) 12.5% of
the lesser of the (x) total lender commitments under the
ABL Facility at any time and (y) the then applicable
borrowing base for 30 consecutive days and
(ii) $90 million at any time, we are required to
maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. See
the section Description of Other Indebtedness
Senior Secured Credit Facilities.
As of December 31, 2010, our fixed charge coverage ratio
was greater than 2 to 1, and we are not subject to this
availability limitation.
The cash and cash equivalents balance above includes cash held
in foreign countries in which we operate. These amounts are
generally available to satisfy the obligations of the company on
a short-term basis, subject to regulatory requirements, in the
form of a dividend or inter-company loan.
Operating
Activities
Overall operating results were strong for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, reflecting the increase in volumes and
our lower fixed cost structure as a result of our prior cost
cutting measures. In conjunction with our recently completed
refinancing activities, we made $35 million of accelerated
interest payments on our old senior notes and paid
$17 million of withholding taxes associated with the return
of capital to our shareholder during the third quarter of fiscal
2011. Additionally, cash flow from operations for the nine
months ended December 31, 2010 benefited from cash receipts
of $20 million related to customer-directed derivatives, as
compared to $39 million of cash inflows for the nine months
ended December 31, 2009. However, higher working capital
balances as a result of higher LME prices during the nine months
ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the nine months
ended December 31, 2009 had a negative effect on cash flows
from operations on a comparative basis.
Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2010
significantly improved as compared to net cash used in the
fiscal 2009 due to higher net income and improved working
capital management, including favorable impacts from customer
forfaiting and extended payment terms from suppliers.
Cash flow from operations for the year ended March 31, 2010
benefitted from cash receipts of $75 million related to
customer-directed derivatives, as compared to $81 million
of cash outflow for the year ended March 31, 2009. We have
an existing beverage can sheet umbrella agreement with certain
North American bottlers (the BCS agreement).
Pursuant to the BCS agreement, an agent for the bottlers directs
the can fabricators to source a percentage of their requirements
for beverage can body, end and tab stock from us.
73
Under the BCS agreement, the bottlers agent has the right
to request that we hedge the exposure to the price the bottlers
will ultimately pay for aluminum. We treat this arrangement as a
derivative for accounting purposes. Upon receiving such
requests, we enter into corresponding derivative instruments
indexed to the LME price of aluminum with third party brokers.
We settle the positions with the brokers at maturity and net
settle the economic benefit or loss arising from the pricing
requests, which may not occur for up to 13 months.
Certain customer contracts contained a fixed metal price ceiling
beyond which the cost of aluminum could not be passed through to
the customer in prior periods. The last metal price ceiling
contract expired on December 31, 2009. During the years
ended March 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we were unable to pass
through approximately $10 million, $176 million and
$230 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs
associated with sales under these contracts. Net cash provided
by operating activities was negatively impacted by the same
amount, adjusted for timing difference between customer receipts
and vendor payments and offset partially by reduced income taxes
for the duration of these contracts.
Net cash used in operating activities for fiscal 2008 was
unfavorably impacted by one-time costs associated with or
triggered by the Arrangement including:
(1) $72 million paid in share-based compensation
payments, (2) $42 million paid for sale transaction
fees and (3) $25 million in bonus payments for the
2006 calendar year and the period from January 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007.
Dividends paid to our noncontrolling interests, primarily in our
Asia operating segment, were $18 million for the nine
months ended December 31, 2010 and $13 million,
$6 million and $8 million for fiscal 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Investing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
(132
|
)
|
|
$
|
(74
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
Net proceeds (outflow) from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Proceeds from related parties loans receivable, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(484
|
)
|
|
$
|
(484
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127
|
)
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
(470
|
)
|
|
$
|
(357
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As our liquidity position has improved, we have increased our
capital expenditure plan to include certain strategic
investments. We expect that our total annual capital
expenditures for fiscal 2011 to be between $240 and
$260 million, including approximately $53 million
related to our previously announced expansion in
South America. The majority of our capital expenditures in
fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 and the first nine months of fiscal
2011 related to projects devoted to product quality, technology,
productivity enhancement and
74
increased capacity. In response to the economic downturn, we
reduced our capital spending in the second half of fiscal 2009,
with a focus on preserving maintenance and safety and maintained
that level of spending throughout fiscal 2010 with an annual
capital expenditure of approximately $100 million. Capital
expenditures in fiscal 2008 relate primarily to the construction
of Novelis
Fusiontm
ingot casting lines in our European and Asian segments as well
as improvements to our Yeongju, Korea hot mill.
The settlement of derivative instruments resulted in an inflow
of $81 million in the nine months ended December 31,
2010 as compared to $32 million in cash inflows in the
prior year period and an outflow of $395 million in fiscal
2010 as compared to $24 million in fiscal 2009 and
$59 million in cash contributed in fiscal 2008. The net
inflow in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 and the net
outflow in fiscal 2010 were primarily related to metal
derivatives. Based on forward curves for metal, foreign
currencies, interest rates and energy as of December 31,
2010, we forecast approximately $14 million of cash
outflows related to the settlement of derivative instruments in
the fourth quarter.
The majority of proceeds from asset sales in the nine months
ended December 31, 2010 relate to asset sales in South
America and the sale of certain of our assets in Europe to
Hindalco. The majority of proceeds from asset sales in fiscal
2010 relate to asset sales in Europe. The majority of proceeds
from asset sales in fiscal 2009 and 2008 are from the sale of
land in Kingston, Ontario.
Proceeds from loans receivable, net during all periods are
primarily comprised of payments we received related to a loan
due from our non-consolidated affiliate, Norf.
Financing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by financing activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
3,985
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
3,804
|
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(896
|
)
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(2,486
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(1,010
|
)
|
|
|
(2,371
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
357
|
|
Return of capital to our common shareholder
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
(344
|
)
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
$
|
(188
|
)
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
|
$
|
(474
|
)
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old
Notes
On December 17, 2010 and in connection with the refinancing
transactions completed in December 2010, we issued
$1.1 billion aggregate principal amount of
8.375% Senior Notes due 2017 and $1.4 billion
aggregate principal amount of 8.75% Senior Notes due 2020
and the guarantees thereof. The proceeds of approximately
$2.4 billion from the issuance of the notes together with
approximately $1.5 billion under our senior secured credit
facilities were used to (1) repay the outstanding amount
under our old senior secured credit facilities
75
consisting of (a) a $1.15 billion term loan facility
and (b) an $800 million ABL facility; (2) repay
all of our then outstanding $185 million of
11.5% senior notes due February 15, 2015, as described
above; (3) repay $1.050 billion of our
7.25% senior notes due February 15, 2015, as described
above; (4) finance a distribution to our parent company;
and (5) pay related premiums, fees, discounts and expenses.
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
In connection with the offering of the old notes, we entered
into our senior secured credit facilities, which consist of
(1) the $1.5 billion six-year Term Loan Facility due
December 2016, which may be increased in minimum amounts of
$50 million per increase provided that the senior secured
net leverage ratio shall not on a proforma basis exceed 2.5 to 1
and (2) the $800 million five-year ABL Facility due
December 2015, which may be increased by an additional
$200 million. Scheduled principal amortization payments
under the Term Loan Facility are $3.75 million per calendar
quarter. Substantially all of our assets are pledged as
collateral under our senior secured credit facilities.
Approximately $1.5 billion under our senior secured credit
facilities was used on December 17, 2010 as described above
in connection with the issuance of the old notes. the See
Description of Other Indebtedness.
Short-Term
Borrowings and Lines of Credit
As of December 31, 2010, our short-term borrowings were
$121 million consisting of bank overdrafts and borrowings
under the 2010 ABL Facility. As of December 31, 2010,
$28 million of the ABL Facility was utilized for letters of
credit, and we had $573 million in remaining availability
under this revolving credit facility. The weighted average
interest rate on our total short-term borrowings was 2.74% and
1.71% as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010,
respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, we had $121 million of
outstanding letters of credit in Korea which are not related to
the ABL Facility.
Previous
Senior Secured Credit Facilities and Predecessor
Financing
On July 6, 2007, we entered into our previous senior
secured credit facilities with a syndicate of lenders led by
affiliates of UBS Securities LLC and ABN AMRO Incorporated
providing for aggregate borrowings of up to $1.76 billion,
consisting of (1) a $960 million seven-year term loan
facility that could be increased by up to $400 million
subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions (the
Previous Term Loan Facility) and (2) the
$800 million five-year multi-currency ABL facility (the
Previous ABL Facility). The proceeds from the
Previous Term Loan Facility of $960 million, drawn in full
at the time of closing, and an initial draw of $324 million
under the Previous ABL Facility were used to pay off our prior
credit facilities, pay for debt issuance costs of the previous
senior secured credit facilities and provide for additional
working capital. The Previous Term Loan Facility and the
Previous ABL Facility were repaid on December 17, 2010 with
the proceeds of the offering of the old notes and our current
senior secured credit facilities.
11.5% Senior
Notes
On August 11, 2009, we issued $185 million aggregate
principal face amount of 11.5% senior unsecured notes at an
effective rate of 12.0%. The 11.5% senior notes were issued
at a discount resulting in gross proceeds of $181 million.
All of the 11.5% senior notes were repaid pursuant to a
cash tender offer completed on December 29, 2010 in
connection with the refinancing transactions completed in
December 2010 with the proceeds from the issuance of the old
notes together with amounts under the senior secured credit
facilities.
7.25% Senior
Notes
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities. The senior
notes were priced at par, bear interest at 7.25% and mature on
February 15, 2015. In March 2009, we entered into a
transaction in which we purchased 7.25% senior notes with a
face value of $275 million with the net proceeds of an
additional floating rate term loan with a face value of
$220 million. We repurchased approximately
$1.05 billion of additional 7.25% senior notes in
connection with the
76
refinancing transactions completed in December 2010 pursuant to
a cash tender offer completed on December 29, 2010 with the
proceeds from the issuance of the notes together with amounts
under the senior secured credit facilities. $74.3 billion
of 7.25% senior notes remain outstanding as of
December 31, 2010.
Legacy
Korean Loans
In October 2007, we entered into a $100 million floating
rate loan due October 2010 to refinance an existing Korean loan.
Additionally, we immediately entered into an interest rate swap
and cross currency swap for the $100 million floating rate
loan through a 5.44% fixed rate KRW 92 billion
($100 million) loan. We repaid the $100 million
floating rate loan during October 2010.
In November 2008, we entered into a KRW 10 billion
($8 million) bank loan due May 2009. In February 2009, we
entered into a KRW 50 billion ($43 million) bank loan
due February 2010. We repaid the KRW 10 billion
($8 million) bank loan during May 2009 and the KRW
50 billion ($43 million) bank loan during February
2010.
Unsecured
Credit Facility
In February 2009, to assist in maintaining adequate liquidity
levels, we entered into an unsecured credit facility of
$100 million (the Unsecured Credit Facility)
with a scheduled maturity date of January 15, 2015 from an
affiliate of the Aditya Birla group. See Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions. During
fiscal 2010, we drew an additional $3 million on the
Unsecured Credit Facility. As discussed above, this facility was
repaid and retired using the proceeds from the 11.5% senior
notes.
Interest
Rate Swaps
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate which impacts our
variable-rate debt. Prior to the completion of the
December 17, 2010 refinancing transactions, these swaps
were designated as cash flow hedges. Upon completion of the
refinancing transaction, our exposure to changes in the
benchmark LIBOR interest rate was limited. The 2010 Term Loan
Facility contains a floor feature of the higher of LIBOR or
150 basis points applied to a spread of 3.75%. As of
December 31, 2010, this floor feature was in effect,
changing our variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. As a result,
we ceased hedge accounting for these swaps. As of March 31,
2010, we had $520 million of interest rate swaps, of which
$510 million were designated as cash flow hedges. No
interest rate swaps were designated as of December 31, 2010.
We had a cross-currency interest rate swap in Korea to convert
our $100 million variable rate bank loan to KRW
92 billion at a fixed rate of 5.44%. On October 25,
2010, at maturity, we repaid this $100 million loan. The
swap expired concurrent with the maturity of the loan.
Issuance
of Additional Common Stock
On June 22, 2007, we issued 2,044,122 additional shares to
AV Aluminum, Inc. (our direct parent) for $44.93 per share
resulting in an additional equity contribution of
$92 million. This contribution was equal in amount to
certain payments made by Novelis related to change in control
compensation to certain employees and directors, lender fees and
other transaction costs incurred by the company.
Off-Balance
Sheet Relationships
In accordance with SEC rules, the following qualify as
off-balance sheet arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain guarantees or contracts;
|
|
|
|
a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an
unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement
that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that
entity for such assets; and
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
any obligation under a material variable interest held by the
registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing,
liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant,
or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development
services with the registrant.
|
The following discussion addresses the applicable off-balance
sheet items for our company.
Derivative
Instruments
As of December 31, 2010, we had derivative financial
instruments, as defined by ASC 815. See
Note 16 Financial Instruments and
Commodity Contracts to our audited financial statements
and Note 10 Financial Instruments and
Commodity Contracts to our unaudited financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries. The indebtedness guaranteed is for
trade accounts payable to third parties. Some of the guarantees
have annual terms while others have no expiration and have
termination notice requirements. Neither we nor any of our
subsidiaries hold any assets of any third parties as collateral
to offset the potential settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned subsidiaries in our
consolidated financial statements, all liabilities associated
with trade payables for these entities are already included in
our consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness related to our wholly-owned
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Potential Future
|
|
Carrying
|
(In millions)
|
|
Payment
|
|
Value
|
|
Wholly-owned Subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
Other
Arrangements
Forfaiting
of Trade Receivables
Novelis Korea Limited forfaits trade receivables in the ordinary
course of business. These trade receivables are typically
outstanding for 60 to 120 days. Forfaiting is a
non-recourse method to manage credit and interest rate risks.
Under this method, customers contract to pay a financial
institution. The institution assumes the risk of non-payment and
remits the invoice value (net of a fee) to us after presentation
of a proof of delivery of goods to the customer. We do not
retain a financial or legal interest in these receivables, and
they are not included in our consolidated balance sheets.
Factoring
of Trade Receivables
Our Brazilian operations factor, without recourse, certain trade
receivables that are unencumbered by pledge restrictions. Under
this method, customers are directed to make payments on invoices
to a financial institution, but are not contractually required
to do so. The financial institution pays us any invoices it has
approved for payment (net of a fee). We do not retain financial
or legal interest in these receivables, and they are not
included in our consolidated balance sheets.
78
Summary
Disclosures of Forfaited and Factored Financial
Amounts
The following tables summarize our forfaiting and factoring
amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Receivables forfeited
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Receivables factored
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfaiting expense
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Factoring expense
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Forfaited receivables outstanding
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
Factored receivables outstanding
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of forfaited receivables outstanding increased as of
December 31, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2010 as compared to March 31, 2009 primarily
due to the increase in the LME price during the respective time
periods which resulted in a larger amount of receivables
available for forfaiting, as well as tightening in the credit
markets.
Other
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in
transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities
(SPEs), which would have been established for the
purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of
December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, we are not
involved in any unconsolidated SPE transactions.
Contractual
Obligations
We have future obligations under various contracts relating to
debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases,
long-term purchase obligations, postretirement benefit plans and
uncertain tax positions. During the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, we completed a series of refinancing
transactions and completed a cash tender offer and consent
solicitation for our 7.25% Senior Notes due 2015 and our
11.50% Senior Notes due 2015. See Note 6
Debt of our unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in
this document for the disclosure of our contractually obligated
payments on our debt. There were no other significant changes to
our other contractual obligations as reported in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2010.
Return of
Capital
On December 17, 2010, we paid a dividend of
$1.7 billion to our shareholder as a return of capital.
Dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and
will depend on, among other things, our financial resources,
cash flows generated by our business, our cash requirements,
restrictions under the instruments governing our indebtedness,
being in compliance with the appropriate indentures and
covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness
that would allow us to legally pay dividends and other relevant
factors.
Environment,
Health and Safety
We strive to be a leader in environment, health and safety
(EHS). Our EHS system is aligned with ISO 14001, an
international environmental management standard, and OHSAS
18001, an international occupational
79
health and safety management standard. All of our facilities are
expected to implement the necessary management systems to
support ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 certifications. As of
December 31, 2010, all of our manufacturing facilities
worldwide were ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 certified and 30 have
an internationally recognized quality standard.
Our capital expenditures for environmental protection and the
betterment of working conditions in our facilities were
$1 million and $3 million for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and
$2 million in fiscal 2010. We expect these capital
expenditures will be approximately $3 million in fiscal
2012. In addition, expenses for environmental protection
(including estimated and probable environmental remediation
costs as well as general environmental protection costs at our
facilities) were $17 million and $27 million for the
nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
and $32 million in fiscal 2010, and are expected to be
$42 million in fiscal 2012. Generally, expenses for
environmental protection are recorded in Cost of goods sold.
However, significant remediation costs that are not associated
with on-going operations are recorded in Other (income)
expenses, net.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations and
liquidity and capital resources are based on our consolidated
financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with
GAAP. In connection with the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and
estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses,
and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates
and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other
factors we believe to be relevant at the time we prepared our
consolidated financial statements. On a regular basis, we review
the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to
ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented
fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future
events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty,
actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates,
and such differences could be material,
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in
Note 1 Business and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies to our audited financial
statements and Note 1 Business and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our
unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. We believe the following accounting policies are the
most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our
reported financial results, as they require management to make
difficult, subjective or complex judgments, and to make
estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain. We have reviewed these critical accounting policies
and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our board of
directors.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
We hold derivatives for risk management purposes and not for
trading. We use derivatives to mitigate uncertainty and
volatility caused by underlying exposures to aluminum prices,
foreign exchange rates, interest rate, and energy prices.
For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, we assess hedge
effectiveness by formally evaluating the high correlation of
changes in the fair value of the hedged item and the derivative
hedging instrument. The changes in the fair values of the
underlying hedged items are reported in other current and
noncurrent assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheet. Changes in the fair values of these derivatives and
underlying hedged items generally offset and are recorded each
period in revenue, consistent with the underlying hedged item.
For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges or net investment
hedges, we assess hedge effectiveness by formally evaluating the
high correlation of the expected future cash flows of the hedged
item and the derivative hedging instrument. The effective
portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included in OCI and
reclassified to earnings in the period in which earnings are
impacted by the hedged items or in the period that the
transaction becomes probable of not occurring. If at any time
during the life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine
that the relationship is no longer effective, the derivative
will no longer be
80
designated as a cash flow hedge and future gains or losses on
the derivative will be recognized in (Gain) loss on change in
fair value of derivative instruments.
For all derivatives designated in hedging relationships, gains
or losses representing hedge ineffectiveness or amounts excluded
from effectiveness testing are recognized in (Gain) loss on
change in fair value of derivative instruments, net in our
current period earnings.
If no hedging relationship is designated, the gains or losses
are recognized in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of
derivative instruments, net in our current period earnings. We
classify cash settlement amounts associated with these
derivatives as part of investing activities in the condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows.
The majority of our derivative contracts are valued using
industry-standard models that use observable market inputs as
their basis, such as time value, forward interest rates,
volatility factors, and current (spot) and forward market prices
for foreign exchange rates. See Note 15
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities to our audited
financial statements and Note 11 Fair
Value Measurements to our unaudited financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus for discussion on fair
value of derivative instruments.
Impairment
of Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of the identifiable net assets of acquired companies.
As a result of the Arrangement, we estimated fair value of the
identifiable net assets of acquired companies using a number of
factors, including the application of multiples and discounted
cash flow estimates. We have allocated goodwill to our operating
segments in North America, Europe and South America, which are
also reporting units for purposes of performing our goodwill
impairment testing as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
181
|
|
South America
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is not amortized; instead, it is tested for impairment
annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist.
On an ongoing basis, absent any impairment indicators, we
perform our goodwill impairment testing as of the last day of
February of each year.
We test consolidated goodwill for impairment using a fair value
approach at the reporting unit level. We use our operating
segments as our reporting units and perform our goodwill
impairment test in two steps. Step one compares the fair value
of each reporting unit (operating segment) to its carrying
amount. If step one indicates that the carrying value of the
reporting unit exceeds the fair value, the second step is
performed to measure the amount of impairment, if any.
For purposes of our step one analysis, our estimate of fair
value for each reporting unit is based on a combination of
(1) quoted market prices/relationships (the market
approach), (2) discounted cash flows (the income approach)
and (3) a stock price
build-up
approach (the
build-up
approach). The estimated fair value for each reporting unit is
within the range of fair values yielded under each approach. The
approach to determining fair value for all reporting units is
consistent given the similarity of our operations in each region.
Under the market approach, the fair value of each reporting unit
is determined based upon comparisons to public companies engaged
in similar businesses. Under the income approach, the fair value
of each reporting unit is based on the present value of
estimated future cash flows. The income approach is dependent on
a number of significant management assumptions including markets
and market share, sales volumes and prices, costs to produce,
capital spending, working capital changes and the discount rate.
We estimate future cash flows for each of our reporting units
based on our projections for the respective reporting unit.
These projected cash flows are discounted to the present value
using a weighted average cost of capital (discount rate). The
81
discount rate is commensurate with the risk inherent in the
projected cash flows and reflects the rate of return required by
an investor in the current economic conditions. For our annual
impairment test conducted in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010,
we used a discount rate of 10.3% for all reporting units, a
decrease of 1.7% from the rate used in our prior year impairment
test. An increase or decrease of 0.5% in the discount rate
impacted the estimated fair value by $25-$150 million,
depending on the relative size of the reporting unit. The
projections are based on both past performance and the
expectations of future performance and assumptions used in our
current operating plan. We use specific revenue growth
assumptions for each reporting unit, based on history and
economic conditions, ranging from 2.5% to 3.5% growth through
2015.
Under the
build-up
approach, which is a variation of the market approach, we
estimate the fair value of each reporting unit based on the
estimated contribution of each of the reporting units to
Hindalcos total business enterprise value.
We performed our annual testing for goodwill impairment as of
the last day of February 2010 and no goodwill impairment was
identified. The fair values of the reporting units exceeded
their respective carrying amounts as of February 28, 2010
by 94% for North America, by 56% for Europe and by 23% for South
America. We recorded a $1.3 billion impairment charge
related to goodwill in fiscal 2009.
Equity
Investments
We invest in a number of public and privately-held companies,
primarily through joint ventures and consortiums. If they are
not consolidated, these investments are accounted for using the
equity method and include our investment in Norf. As a result of
the Arrangement, investments in and advances to affiliates as of
May 16, 2007 were adjusted to reflect fair value.
We review equity investments for impairment whenever certain
indicators are present suggesting that the carrying value of an
investment is not recoverable. This analysis requires a
significant amount of judgment to identify events or
circumstances indicating that an equity investment may be
impaired. Once an impairment indicator is identified, we must
determine if an impairment exists, and if so, whether the
impairment is other than temporary, in which case the equity
investment would be written down to its estimated fair value.
Impairment
of Intangible Assets
Our other intangible assets of $707 million as of
December 31, 2010 consist of tradenames, technology,
customer relationships and favorable energy and supply contracts
and are amortized over 3 to 20 years. As of
December 31, 2010, we do not have any intangible assets
with indefinite useful lives. We consider the potential
impairment of these other intangibles assets in accordance with
FASB ASC (the Codification) No, 360, Property,
Plant and Equipment. For tradenames and technology, we
utilize a relief-from-royalty method. All other intangible
assets are assessed using the income approach. As a result of
these assessments, no impairment was indicated.
Impairment
of Long Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, are reviewed
for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value of the assets contained in our financial
statements may not be recoverable. When evaluating long-lived
assets for potential impairment, we first compare the carrying
value of the asset to the assets estimated future cash
flows (undiscounted and without interest charges). If the
estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of
the asset, we calculate and recognize an impairment loss. If we
recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of
the asset is based on the discounted estimated future cash flows
and will be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived
asset, the new cost basis will be depreciated over the remaining
useful life of that asset.
Our impairment loss calculations require management to apply
judgments in estimating future cash flows to determine asset
fair values, including forecasting useful lives of the assets
and selecting the discount rate that represents the risk
inherent in future cash flows. We recorded impairment charges on
long-lived assets of $l million, $18 million (including
$17 million classified as Restructuring charges, net), and
$1 million during
82
the years ended March 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. During the nine months ended December 31,
2010, we recognized a net $5 million of income related to
reversing a prior impairment charge upon receipt of cash for the
sale of previously impaired assets. We did not incur any
impairment charges during the nine months ended
December 31, 2009.
If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and
judgments used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair
values, we may be exposed to additional impairment losses that
could be material to our results of operations.
Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans
We account for our pensions and other postretirement benefits in
accordance with ASC 715, Compensation Retirement
Benefits (ASC 715). Liabilities and expense for
pension plans and other postretirement benefits are determined
using actuarial methodologies and incorporate significant
assumptions, including the rate used to discount the future
estimated liability, the long-term rate of return on plan
assets, and several assumptions related to the employee
workforce (salary increases, medical costs, retirement age, and
mortality).
The actuarial models use an attribution approach that generally
spreads the financial impact of changes to the plan and
actuarial assumptions over the average remaining service lives
of the employees in the plan. Changes in liability due to
changes in actuarial assumptions such as discount rate, rate of
compensation increases and mortality, as well as annual
deviations between what was assumed and what was experienced by
the plan are treated as gains or losses. Gains and losses are
amortized over the employee groups average future service
life. The average future service for pension plans and other
postretirement benefit plans is 11.7 and 12.2 years,
respectively. The principle underlying the required attribution
approach is that employees render service over their average
remaining service lives on a relatively smooth basis and,
therefore, the accounting for benefits earned under the pension
or non-pension postretirement benefits plans should follow the
same relatively smooth pattern.
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans we have established in the United States, Canada,
Switzerland and the United Kingdom, unfunded pension benefits
primarily in Germany, and unfunded lump sum indemnities payable
upon retirement to employees of businesses in France, Malaysia,
Italy and partially funded lump sum indemnities in South Korea,
Pension benefits are generally based on the employees
service and either on a flat rate for years of service or on the
highest average eligible compensation before retirement. Our
other postretirement benefit obligations include unfunded
healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to retired
employees in Canada, the United States and Brazil.
All net actuarial gains and losses are generally amortized over
the expected average remaining service life of the employees.
The costs and obligations of pension and other postretirement
benefits are calculated based on assumptions including the
long-term rate of return on pension assets, discount rates for
pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, expected
service period, salary increases, retirement ages of employees
and healthcare cost trend rates. These assumptions bear the risk
of change as they require significant judgment and they have
inherent uncertainties that management may not be able to
control.
The most significant assumption used to calculate pension and
other postretirement obligations is the discount rates used to
determine the present value of benefits. It is based on spot
rate yield curves and individual bond matching models for
pension and other postretirement plans in Canada and the United
States, and on published long-term high quality corporate bond
indices in other countries, at the end of each fiscal year.
Adjustments were made to the index rates based on the duration
of the plans obligations for each country. The weighted
average discount rate used to determine the pension benefit
obligation was 5.5% as of March 31, 2010, compared to 6.0%
and 5.8% for March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
weighted average discount rate used to determine the other
postretirement benefit obligation was 5.6% as of March 31,
2010, compared to 6.2% and 6.1% for March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The weighted average discount rate used to
determine the net periodic benefit cost is the rate used to
determine the benefit obligation in the previous year.
83
As of March 31, 2010, an increase in the discount rate of
0.5%, assuming inflation remains unchanged, would result in a
decrease of $100 million in the pension and other
postretirement obligations and in a decrease of $12 million
in the net periodic benefit cost. A decrease in the discount
rate of 0.5% as of March 31, 2010, assuming inflation
remains unchanged, would result in an increase of $100 million
in the pension and other postretirement obligations and in an
increase of $12 million in the net periodic benefit cost.
The calculation of the estimate of the expected return on assets
and additional discussion regarding pension and other
postretirement plans is described in Note 12
Postretirement Benefit Plans to our audited
financial statements and Note 8
Postretirement Benefit Plans to our unaudited financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The weighted
average expected return on assets was 6.7% for 2010, 6.9% for
2009 and 7.3% for 2008. The expected return on assets is a
long-term assumption whose accuracy can only be measured over a
long period based on past experience. A variation in the
expected return on assets by 0.5% as of March 31, 2010
would result in a variation of approximately $4 million in
the net periodic benefit cost.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability
method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future
tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases, In addition,
deferred tax assets are also recorded with respect to net
operating losses and other tax attribute carryforwards. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are
established when realization of the benefit of deferred tax
assets is not deemed to be more likely than not. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date.
The ultimate recovery of certain of our deferred tax assets is
dependent on the amount and timing of taxable income that we
will ultimately generate in the future and other factors such as
the interpretation of tax laws. This means that significant
estimates and judgments are required to determine the extent
that valuation allowances should be provided against deferred
tax assets. We have provided valuation allowances as of
December 31, 2010 aggregating $258 million against
such assets based on our current assessment of future operating
results, timing and nature of realizing deferred tax
liabilities, tax planning strategies and tax carrybacks.
By their nature, tax laws are often subject to interpretation.
Further complicating matters is that in those cases where a tax
position is open to interpretation, differences of opinion can
result in differing conclusions as to the amount of tax benefits
to be recognized under FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes.
ASC 740 utilizes a two-step approach for evaluating tax
positions. Recognition (Step 1) occurs when an enterprise
concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical
merits, is more likely than not to be sustained upon
examination. Measurement (Step 2) is only addressed if Step
1 has been satisfied. Under Step 2, the tax benefit is measured
as the largest amount of benefit, determined on a cumulative
probability basis that is more likely than not to be realized
upon ultimate settlement. Consequently, the level of evidence
and documentation necessary to support a position prior to being
given recognition and measurement within the financial
statements is a matter of judgment that depends on all available
evidence.
As of December 31, 2010 the total amount of unrecognized
benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income
tax rate in future periods based on anticipated settlement dates
is $39 million. Although management believes that the
estimates and judgments discussed herein are reasonable, actual
results could differ, which could result in gains or losses that
could be material.
Assessment
of Loss Contingencies
We have legal and other contingencies, including environmental
liabilities, which could result in significant losses upon the
ultimate resolution of such contingencies. Environmental
liabilities that are not
84
legal asset retirement obligations are accrued on an
undiscounted basis when it is probable that a liability exists
for past events,
We have provided for losses in situations where we have
concluded that it is probable that a loss has been or will be
incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. A
significant amount of judgment is involved in determining
whether a loss is probable and reasonably estimable due to the
uncertainty involved in determining the likelihood of future
events and estimating the financial statement impact of such
events. If further developments or resolution of a contingent
matter are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments, we
may need to recognize a significant charge in a future period
related to an existing contingency.
Recent
Changes in Accounting Standards
Recent
Changes in Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards have been adopted by us
during the twelve months ended March 31, 2010.
In June 2009, the FASB approved its Codification as the single
source of authoritative United States accounting and reporting
standards applicable for all non-governmental entities, with the
exception of the SEC and its staff. The Codification which
changes the referencing of accounting standards is effective for
interim or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
As the codification is not intended to change or alter existing
US GAAP, this standard had no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in the Accounting
Standards Update (ASU)
No. 2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU
2010-06).
ASU 2010-06
amends ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements by adding
additional disclosure requirements about items transferring into
and out of levels 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy;
adding separate disclosures about purchase, sales, issuances,
and settlements relative to level 3 measurements; and
clarifying, among other things, the existing fair value
disclosures about the level of disaggregation. This standard had
no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows, but did require certain additional
footnote disclosures.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, which
requires that an employer disclose the following information
about the fair value of plan assets: (1) how investment
allocation decisions are made, including the factors that are
pertinent to understanding of investment policies and
strategies; (2) the major categories of plan assets;
(3) the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the
fair value of plan assets; (4) the effect of fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in
plan assets for the period; and (5) significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. At initial adoption,
application of this standard would not be required for earlier
periods that are presented for comparative purposes. This
standard had no impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows, but did require certain
additional footnote disclosures.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation, which establishes accounting and reporting
standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly
identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheet
within shareholders equity, but separate from the
parents equity; (ii) the amount of condensed
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the
noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented
on the face of the consolidated statement of operations and
(iii) changes in a parents ownership interest while
the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its
subsidiary to be accounted for consistently. We adopted this
accounting standard effective April 1, 2009, and applied
this standard prospectively, except for the presentation and
disclosure requirements, which have been applied retrospectively.
The following accounting standard was adopted by us during the
nine months ended December 31, 2010.
Effective April 1, 2010, we adopted authoritative guidance
in ASU
No. 2009-17,
Consolidations: Improvements to Financial Reporting by
Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities
(ASU
No. 2009-17).
ASU
No. 2009-17
was intended (1) to address the effects on certain
provisions of the
85
accounting standard dealing with consolidation of variable
interest entities, as a result of the elimination of the
qualifying special-purpose entity concept in ASU
No. 2009-16,
Transfers and Servicing: Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets, and (2) to clarify questions about the application
of certain key provisions related to consolidation of variable
interest entities. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flow, but did require certain additional footnote disclosures.
These disclosures are included in Note 4
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities to
our unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
We have determined that recently issued accounting standards
will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flow.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing
business operations, including risks from changes in commodity
prices (primarily aluminum, electricity and natural gas),
foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates that could
impact our results of operations and financial condition. We
manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities and derivative
financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments
as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes.
Except where noted, the derivative contracts are
marked-to-market
and the related gains and losses are included in earnings in the
current accounting period.
By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve
risk, including the credit risk of non-performance by
counterparties. All derivative contracts are executed with
counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our
maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in the
accompanying December 31, 2010 condensed consolidated
balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions and the
relative costs of the instruments. The duration is always linked
to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection
between the two being regularly monitored.
Commodity
Price Risks
We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of
certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity, natural
gas and transport fuel.
Aluminum
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model that
allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the price of
aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products have a
price structure with two components: (i) a pass through
aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and
(ii) a conversion premium based on the
conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the
competitive market conditions for that product.
A key component of our conversion model is the use of derivative
instruments on projected aluminum requirements to preserve our
conversion margin. We enter into forward metal purchases
simultaneous with the sales contracts that contain fixed metal
prices. These forward metal purchases directly hedge the
economic risk of future metal price fluctuation associated with
these contracts. The recognition of unrealized gains and losses
on metal derivative positions typically precedes customer
delivery and revenue recognition under the related fixed forward
priced contracts. The timing difference between the recognition
of unrealized gains and losses on metal derivatives and
recognition of revenue impacts income (loss) before income taxes
and net income (loss). Gains and losses on metal derivative
contracts are not recognized in segment income until realized.
86
Metal price lag exposes us to potential losses in periods of
falling aluminum prices. We sell short-term LME futures
contracts to reduce our exposure to this risk. We expect the
gain or loss on the settlement of the derivative to offset the
effect of changes in aluminum prices on future product sales.
These hedges generally generate losses in periods of increasing
aluminum prices.
Sensitivities
As of December 31, 2010, we estimate that a 10% decline in
LME aluminum prices would decrease the value of our aluminum
contracts by $41 million.
Energy
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. In the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, natural gas and electricity represented
approximately 89% of our energy consumption by cost. We also use
fuel oil and transport fuel. The majority of energy usage occurs
at our casting centers, at our smelters in South America and
during the hot rolling of aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities
require relatively less energy.
We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which subjects
us to market pricing fluctuations. We seek to stabilize our
future exposure to natural gas prices through the use of forward
purchase contracts. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South
America have historically been more stable than in the
United States. As of December 31, 2010, we have a
nominal amount of forward purchases outstanding related to
natural gas.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs. In South America,
we own and operate hydroelectric facilities that meet
approximately 52% of our total electricity requirements in that
segment. Additionally, we have entered into an electricity swap
in North America to fix a portion of the cost of our electricity
requirements.
We purchase a nominal amount of heating oil forward contracts to
hedge against fluctuations in the price of our transport fuel.
Fluctuating energy costs worldwide, due to the changes in supply
and international and geopolitical events, expose us to earnings
volatility as such changes in such costs cannot immediately be
recovered under existing contracts and sales agreements, and may
only be mitigated in future periods under future pricing
arrangements.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2010, given a 10% decline in spot prices for
energy contracts ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risks
Exchange rate movements, particularly the euro, the Brazilian
real and the Korean won against the U.S. dollar, have an
impact on our operating results. In Europe, where we have
predominantly local currency selling prices and operating costs,
we benefit as the euro strengthens, but are adversely affected
as the euro weakens. In Korea, where we have local currency
selling prices for local sales and U.S. dollar denominated
selling prices for exports, we benefit slightly as the won
weakens, but are adversely affected as the won strengthens, due
to a slightly higher percentage of exports compared to local
sales. In Brazil, where we have predominately U.S. dollar
selling prices, metal costs and local currency operating costs,
we benefit as the local
87
currency weakens, but are adversely affected as the local
currency strengthens. Foreign currency contracts may be used to
hedge the economic exposures at our foreign operations.
It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures
within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the
majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either
forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in
non-functional currencies. Our most significant
non-U.S. dollar
functional currency operating segments are Europe and Asia,
which have the euro and the Korean won as their functional
currencies, respectively. South America is U.S. dollar
functional with Brazilian real transactional exposure.
We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign
operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
Shareholders equity section of the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Net sales and expenses in our
foreign operations foreign currencies are translated into
varying amounts of U.S. dollars depending upon whether the
U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens against other
currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may either
positively or negatively affect our net sales and expenses from
foreign operations as expressed in U.S. dollars.
Any negative impact of currency movements on the currency
contracts that we have entered into to hedge foreign currency
commitments to purchase or sell goods and services would be
offset by an equal and opposite favorable exchange impact on the
commitments being hedged. For a discussion of accounting
policies and other information relating to currency contracts,
see Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies and Note 10 Financial
Instruments and Commodity Contracts of our audited financial
statements.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2010, given a 10% change in rates ($ in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian real
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Korean won
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Canadian dollar
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
British pound
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Swiss franc
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Interest
Rate Risks
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate which impacts our
variable-rate debt. Prior to the completion of the
December 17, 2010 refinancing transactions, these swaps
were designated as cash flow hedges. Upon completion of the
refinancing transaction, our exposure to changes in the
benchmark LIBOR interest rate was limited. The 2010 Term Loan
Facility contains a floor feature of the higher of LIBOR or
150 basis points applied to a spread of 3.75%. As of
December 31, 2010, this floor feature was in effect,
changing our variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. Due to the
nature of fixed-rate debt, there would be no significant impact
on our interest expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase
or decrease in market rates of interest.
88
Due to the floor feature of our 2010 Term Loan Facility
mentioned above, a 10 basis point increase in the interest
rates on our outstanding variable rate debt as of
December 31, 2010 would have no impact on our annual
pre-tax income. To be above the 2010 Term Loan Facility floor
feature, as of December 31, 2010, interest rates would have
to increase by 125 basis points (bp). From time to time, we
have used interest rate swaps to manage our debt cost. In Korea,
we entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate on
various floating rate debt. See Note 6 Debt for
further information.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2010, given a 100 bps negative shift in
USD LIBOR ($ in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Interest Rate Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
(100
|
) bps
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
89
BUSINESS
Overview
We are the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, with total shipments during that period
of approximately 2,198 kt. We are the only company of our size
and scope focused solely on aluminum rolled products markets and
capable of local supply of technologically sophisticated
aluminum products in all of the regions in which we operate. We
are also the global leader in the recycling of used aluminum
beverage cans. We had net sales and net income attributable to
our common shareholder of $8.7 billion and
$405 million, respectively, for the year ended
March 31, 2010, and $7.6 billion and $66 million,
respectively, for the nine months ended December 31, 2010.
Our
History
Organization
and Description of Business
Novelis Inc. was formed in Canada on September 21, 2004. We
produce aluminum sheet and light gauge products for use in the
beverage and food can, transportation, construction and
industrial, and foil product markets. As of December 31,
2010, we had operations on four continents: North America,
Europe, Asia and South America, through 30 operating plants, one
research facility and several market-focused innovation centers
in 11 countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants,
our South American businesses include bauxite mining, primary
aluminum smelting and power generation facilities.
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
spin-off occurred on January 6, 2005, following approval by
Alcans board of directors and shareholders, and legal and
regulatory approvals. Alcan shareholders received one Novelis
common share for every five Alcan common shares held.
Acquisition
by Hindalco
On May 15, 2007, the company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to the
Arrangement at a price of $44.93 per share. The aggregate
purchase price for all of the companys common shares was
$3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed $2.8 billion of
Novelis debt for a total transaction value of
$6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the Arrangement
on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were indirectly
held by Hindalco.
Amalgamation
of AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc.
Effective September 29, 2010, in connection with an
internal restructuring transaction, pursuant to articles of
amalgamation under the Canada Business Corporations Act, we were
amalgamated (the Amalgamation) with our direct
parent AV Aluminum Inc., a Canadian corporation (AV
Aluminum), to form an amalgamated corporation named
Novelis Inc., also a Canadian corporation.
As a result of the Amalgamation, we and AV Aluminum continue our
corporate existence, and the amalgamated Novelis Inc. remains
liable for all of our and AV Aluminums obligations and we
continue to own all of our respective property. Since AV
Aluminum was a holding company whose sole asset was the shares
of the
pre-amalgamated
Novelis Inc., our business, management, board of directors and
corporate governance procedures following the Amalgamation are
identical to those of Novelis Inc. immediately prior to the
Amalgamation. Novelis Inc., like AV Aluminum before the
Amalgamation, remains an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of
Hindalco.
Our
Industry
The aluminum rolled products market represents the global supply
of and demand for aluminum sheet, plate and foil produced either
from sheet ingot or continuously cast roll-stock in rolling
mills operated by independent aluminum rolled products producers
and integrated aluminum companies alike. According to CRU,
worldwide consumption of aluminum rolled products in 2008 was
approximately 17,304 kt. In 2009, this declined by 8.5% to
15,833 kt, reflecting the global economic environment.
Furthermore, according to
90
CRU, global consumption for rolled aluminum recovered to
approximately 18,244 kt in 2010, and CRU estimates that global
consumption will increase to 24,417 kt by 2015 representing a
compound annual growth rate of 6.0% from 2010 to 2015.
Aluminum rolled products are semi-finished aluminum products
that constitute the raw material in the manufacturing of
finished goods ranging from automotive body panels to household
and converter foil. There are two major types of manufacturing
processes for aluminum rolled products differing mainly in the
process used to achieve the initial stage of processing:
|
|
|
|
|
hot mills that require sheet ingot, a
rectangular slab of aluminum, as starter material; and
|
|
|
|
continuous casting mills that can convert
molten metal directly into semi-finished sheet.
|
Both processes require subsequent rolling, which we call cold
rolling, and finishing steps such as annealing, coating,
leveling or slitting to achieve the desired thicknesses and
metal properties. Most customers receive shipments in the form
of aluminum coil, a large roll of metal, which can be fed into
their fabrication processes.
There are three sources of input material for aluminum rolled
products: (1) primary aluminum, which is primarily in the
form of standard ingot; (2) sheet ingot; and
(3) recycled aluminum, such as recyclable scrap material
from fabrication processes, which we refer to as recycled
process material, UBCs, other post-consumer aluminum and molten
metal produced from these sources.
Primary aluminum and sheet ingot can generally be purchased at
prices set on the LME, plus a premium that varies by geographic
region of delivery, form (ingot or molten metal) and purity.
Recycled aluminum is also an important source of input material.
Aluminum is infinitely recyclable with minimal metal loss, and
recycling requires approximately 5% of the energy needed to
produce primary aluminum and correspondingly emits approximately
5% of the greenhouse gas emitted by primary aluminum production.
As a result, in regions where aluminum is widely used,
manufacturers and customers are active in setting up collection
processes in which UBCs and other recyclable aluminum are
collected for remelting. Manufacturers may also enter into
agreements with customers who return recycled process material
and pay to have it remelted and rolled into the same product.
The market for aluminum rolled products tends to be less subject
to demand cyclicality than the markets for primary aluminum and
sheet ingot, which are more affected by commodity price
cyclicality. A significant share of aluminum rolled products is
used in the production of consumer staples, which have
historically experienced relatively stable demand
characteristics. In addition, most aluminum rolled products sale
contracts are priced in two components: a pass-through aluminum
price component based on the LME quotation and local market
premiums, plus a margin over metal, or conversion
charge, based on the cost to roll the product. As a result, most
of the raw material price risk is absorbed by the customer,
reducing the volatility of the producers profitability and
cash flows. Aluminum rolled products companies also use recycled
aluminum, which provides sourcing flexibility for, and further
reduces the volatility of, input material. These three factors
combine to create an industry that has lower cyclicality than
the primary aluminum industry.
There has been a long-term industry trend towards lighter gauge
(thinner) aluminum rolled products, which we refer to as
downgauging, where customers request products with
similar properties using less metal in order to reduce costs and
weight. For example, aluminum rolled products producers and can
fabricators have continuously developed thinner walled cans with
similar strength as previous generation containers, resulting in
a lower cost per unit. As a result of this trend, aluminum
tonnage across the spectrum of aluminum rolled products, and
particularly for the beverage and food cans end-use market, has
declined on a per unit basis, while actual rolling machine hours
per unit have increased. Because the industry has historically
tracked growth based on aluminum tonnage shipped, we believe the
downgauging trend may contribute to an understatement of the
actual growth of revenue attributable to rolling in some end-use
markets.
The rolled aluminum industry continues to leverage new
technology to develop aluminum alloys and products that support
broader or new commercial applications. Conventional
single-alloy products require customers to choose an alloy based
either on the required core properties such as strength or the
desired
91
surface characteristics such as extreme corrosion-resistance.
The industry typically achieves the combined characteristics of
two or three alloys with a clad process through which sheets of
metal are attached to an aluminum ingot and then rolled.
Typically the aluminum ingot provides the strength and
formability while the brazing provides other properties such as
corrosion resistance and finish.
Manufacturing
Process
The stages of the manufacturing process for aluminum rolled
products are described below.
|
|
|
RECYCLING
In the recycling process, scrap aluminum is melted, paint
and other materials are removed, and the aluminum is prepared
for the next stages of the manufacturing process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
REMELT & CASTING
The production of aluminum rolled products begins with the
melting of standard ingot, sheet ingot, recycled aluminum and
alloy elements.
The mixture is then transferred to the holding furnace where the
chemical properties are fine-tuned and the impurities are
removed.
In the casting process, molten aluminum is poured into a
water-cooled mold to form sheet ingot, and the temperature,
casting speed and water flow are carefully managed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOT ROLLING
The hot rolling process converts sheet ingot into coils with
a gauge suitable for cold rolling.
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
FINISHING
In the finishing process, cold rolled coils are processed by
tension leveling, coating and slitting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tension leveler is designed to flatten the aluminum strip by
precisely stretching it through a series of leveling rollers,
and a productive coating is applied to the aluminum through the
coil coating line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, the products are precisely cut to the specified widths
with the slitter.
|
|
|
End-use
Markets
Aluminum rolled products companies produce and sell a wide range
of aluminum rolled products, which can be grouped into four
end-use markets based upon similarities in end-use markets:
(1) beverage and food cans; (2) transportation;
(3) construction and industrial; and (4) foil
products. Within each end-use market, aluminum rolled products
are manufactured with a variety of alloy mixtures; a range of
tempers (hardness), gauges (thickness) and widths; and various
coatings and finishes. Large customers typically have customized
needs resulting in the development of close relationships with
their supplying mills and close technical development
relationships.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global End-Use Markets
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% 2009 Share
|
|
|
Can stock
|
|
|
4,018
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Foil stock
|
|
|
3,989
|
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
Industrial
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
|
|
3,656
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Transportation
|
|
|
2,247
|
|
|
|
2,104
|
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,971
|
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumption
|
|
|
17,242
|
|
|
|
17,304
|
|
|
|
15,833
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Source: CRU International Aluminum Flat Rolled Products
Quarterly Market Service, November 2010.
94
Beverage and Food Cans. Beverage and food cans
accounted for approximately 26% of total worldwide shipments in
the calendar year ended December 31, 2009, according to
market data from CRU. The beverage can end-use market is
technically demanding to supply and pricing is competitive.
Beverage and food cans is also our largest end-use market,
making up 39% of total shipments for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010. The recyclability of aluminum cans
enables them to be used, collected, melted and returned to the
original product form many times, unlike steel, paper or PET
plastic, which deteriorate with every iteration of recycling.
Aluminum beverage cans also offer advantages in fabrication
efficiency and product shelf life. Fabricators are able to
produce and fill beverage cans at very high speeds, and
non-porous aluminum cans provide longer shelf life than PET
plastic containers. Aluminum cans are light, stackable and use
space efficiently, making them convenient and cost efficient to
ship versus other container alternatives, including glass
bottles.
Downgauging and changes in can design help to reduce total costs
on a per can basis and contribute to making aluminum more
competitive with substitute materials.
Beverage can sheet is sold in coil form for the production of
can bodies, ends and tabs. The material can be ordered as
rolled, degreased, pre-lubricated, pre-treated
and/or
lacquered. Typically, can makers define their own specifications
for material to be delivered in terms of alloy, gauge, width and
surface finish.
Other applications in this end-use market include food cans and
screw caps for the beverage industry.
Transportation. The transportation end use
market accounted for approximately 11% of the worldwide aluminum
rolled products shipments in the calendar year ended
December 31, 2009, according to CRU. Heat exchangers for
trucks and automobiles, such as radiators and air conditioners,
are an important application for aluminum rolled products in the
transportation end-use market. Original equipment manufacturers
also use aluminum sheet with specially treated surfaces and
other specific properties for interior and exterior
applications. Newly developed alloys are being used in
transportation tanks and rigid containers that allow for safer
and more economical transportation of hazardous and corrosive
materials.
There has been recent growth in certain geographic markets in
the use of aluminum rolled products in automotive body panel
applications, including hoods, deck lids, fenders and lift
gates. These uses typically result from cooperative efforts
between aluminum rolled products manufacturers and their
customers that yield tailor-made solutions for specific
requirements in alloy selection, fabrication procedure, surface
quality and joining. We believe the recent growth in automotive
body panel applications is due in part to the lighter weight of
aluminum as compared to steel and other alternative materials,
which allows for better fuel economy and improved emissions
performance.
Aluminum rolled products are also used in aerospace
applications, a segment of the transportation market in which we
were not allowed to compete until January 6, 2010, pursuant
to a non-competition agreement we entered into with Alcan in
connection with the spin-off. However, aerospace-related
consumption of aluminum rolled products has historically
represented a relatively small portion of total aluminum rolled
products market shipments.
Aluminum is also used in the construction of ships hulls
and superstructures and passenger rail cars because of its
strength, light weight, formability and corrosion resistance.
Construction and Industrial (including
Electronics). Construction and industrial
applications combined account for approximately 33% of worldwide
aluminum rolled products shipments in the calendar year ended
December 31, 2009, according to CRU. Construction is the
largest application within this end-use market. Aluminum rolled
products developed for the construction industry are often
decorative and non-flammable, offer insulating properties, are
durable and corrosion resistant, and have a high
strength-to-weight
ratio. Aluminum siding, gutters, and downspouts comprise a
significant amount of construction volume. Other applications
include doors, windows, awnings, canopies, facades, roofing and
ceilings.
Aluminums ability to conduct electricity and heat and to
offer corrosion resistance makes it useful in a wide variety of
industrial applications. Industrial applications include
electronics, consumer durables, electrical machinery and
lighting fixtures. Applications of aluminum rolled products in
the electronics market include
95
panels and components for light-emitting diode (LED) televisions
and liquid crystal display (LCD) televisions, portable
personal computers and monitors as well as mobile phone cases,
CD-ROMs and metal printed circuit boards. Uses of aluminum
rolled products in consumer durables include microwaves, coffee
makers, air conditioners, pleasure boats and cooking utensils.
Another industrial application is lithographic sheet. Print
shops, printing houses and publishing groups use lithographic
sheet to print books, magazines, newspapers and promotional
literature. In order to meet the strict quality requirements of
the end-users, lithographic sheet must meet demanding
metallurgical, surface and flatness specifications.
Foil Products. Foil products accounted for
approximately 24% of worldwide aluminum rolled products
shipments in the calendar year ended December 31, 2009,
according to CRU. Aluminum, because of its relatively light
weight, recyclability and formability, has a wide variety of
uses in packaging. Converter foil is very thin aluminum foil,
plain or printed, that is typically laminated to plastic or
paper to form an internal seal for a variety of packaging
applications, including juice boxes, pharmaceuticals, food
pouches, cigarette packaging and lid stock. Customers order
coils of converter foil in a range of thicknesses from 6 microns
to 60 microns.
Household foil includes home and institutional aluminum foil
wrap sold as a branded or generic product. Known in the industry
as packaging foil, it is manufactured in thicknesses ranging
from 11 microns to 23 microns. Container foil is used to
produce semi-rigid containers such as pie plates and take-out
food trays and is usually ordered in a range of thicknesses
ranging from 60 microns to 200 microns.
Market
Structure
The aluminum rolled products industry is characterized by
economies of scale, significant capital investments required to
achieve and maintain technological capabilities and demanding
customer qualification standards. The service and efficiency
demands of large customers have encouraged consolidation among
suppliers of aluminum rolled products. Currently six producers
account for approximately 44% of the total market as outlined
below.
Source: CRU
While aluminum rolled products customers tend to be increasingly
global, many aluminum rolled products tend to be produced and
sold on a regional basis. The regional nature of the markets is
influenced in part by the fact that not all mills are equipped
to produce all types of aluminum rolled products. For instance,
only a few mills in North America, Europe and Asia, and only one
mill in South America produce beverage can body and end stock.
In addition, individual aluminum rolling mills generally supply
a limited range of products for end-use markets, and seek to
maximize profits by producing high volumes of the highest margin
mix per mill hour given available capacity and equipment
capabilities.
Certain multi-purpose, common alloy and plate rolled products
are imported into Europe and North America from producers
in emerging markets, such as Brazil, South Africa, Russia and
China. However, at this time we believe that most of these
producers are generally unable to produce flat rolled products
that
96
meet the quality requirements, lead times and specifications of
customers with more demanding applications. In addition, high
freight costs, import duties, inability to take back recycled
aluminum, lack of technical service capabilities and long
lead-times mean that many developing market exporters are viewed
as second-tier suppliers. Therefore, many of our customers in
the Americas, Europe and Asia do not look to suppliers in these
emerging markets for a significant portion of their requirements.
Globally, as well as in most regions, the industry has and will
continue to have excess capacity as a whole. However, since not
all plants and producers are equipped to make all kinds of
products, utilization rates among plants and producers differ on
a regional and global basis.
Competition
The aluminum rolled products market is highly competitive. We
face competition from a number of companies in all of the
geographic regions and end-use markets in which we operate. Our
primary competitors are as follows:
|
|
|
North America
|
|
Asia
|
|
Alcoa, Inc. (Alcoa)
|
|
Alcoa
|
Aleris International, Inc. (Aleris)
|
|
Furukawa-Sky Aluminum Corp.
|
Arco Aluminum, Inc. (a subsidiary of BP plc)
|
|
Kobe Steel Ltd.
|
Norandal Aluminum
|
|
Nanshan Aluminum
|
Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
|
|
Sumitomo Light Metal Company, Ltd.
|
Wise Metal Group LLC
|
|
Southwest Aluminum Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
South America
|
|
Alcoa
|
|
Alcoa
|
Aleris
|
|
Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio
|
Hydro A.S.A.
|
|
|
Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
|
|
|
The factors influencing competition vary by region and end-use
market, but generally we compete on the basis of our value
proposition, including price, product quality, the ability to
meet customers specifications, range of products offered,
lead times, technical support and customer service. In some
end-use markets, competition is also affected by
fabricators requirements that suppliers complete a
qualification process to supply their plants. This process can
be rigorous and may take many months to complete. As a result,
obtaining business from these customers can be a lengthy and
expensive process. However, the ability to obtain and maintain
these qualifications can represent a competitive advantage.
Aluminum rolled products companies face competition not only
from direct competitors within the industry but also from
substitute materials as fabricators and end-users have
demonstrated a willingness to choose other materials, such as
steel, plastics, composite materials and glass, among others,
over aluminum. In the beverage and food cans end-use market, the
primary competitors are glass bottles, PET plastic containers
and steel cans. In the transportation end-use market, aluminum
rolled products compete mainly with steel and composites.
Aluminum competes with wood, glass, plastic, cement and steel in
building products applications. Factors affecting competition
with substitute materials include price, ease of manufacturing,
consumer preference and performance characteristics.
Key
Factors Affecting Supply and Demand
The following factors have historically affected the supply of
aluminum rolled products:
Production Capacity. As in most manufacturing
industries with high fixed costs, production capacity has the
largest impact on supply in the aluminum rolled products
industry. In the aluminum rolled products industry, the addition
of production capacity requires large capital investments and
significant plant construction or expansion, and typically
requires long lead-time equipment orders.
97
Alternative Technology. Advances in
technological capabilities allow aluminum rolled products
producers to better align their product portfolio with industry
demand. As an example, continuous casting offers the ability to
increase capacity in smaller increments than is possible with
hot mill additions. This enables production capacity to better
adjust to small
year-over-year
increases in demand. However, the continuous casting process
results in the production of a more limited range of products.
Trade. Some trade flows occur between regions
despite shipping costs, import duties and the need for localized
customer support. Higher value-added, specialty products such as
lithographic sheets and some foils are more likely to be traded
internationally, especially if demand in certain markets exceeds
local supply. Emerging markets with low cost inputs may export
aluminum rolled products to larger, more mature markets.
Historically, products produced in emerging markets have been
less technically demanding commodity rolled aluminum products.
Accordingly, regional changes in supply, such as plant
expansions, may have some effect on the worldwide supply of
commodity aluminum rolled products.
The following factors have historically affected the demand for
aluminum rolled products:
Economic Growth. We believe that economic
growth is currently the single largest driver of aluminum rolled
products demand. In mature markets, growth in demand has
typically correlated closely with growth in industrial
production.
In emerging markets such as China, growth in demand typically
exceeds industrial production growth largely because of
expanding infrastructures, capital investments and rising
incomes that often accompany economic growth in these markets.
Substitution Trends. Manufacturers
willingness to substitute other materials for aluminum in their
products and competition from substitution materials suppliers
also affect demand. For example, in North America,
competition from PET plastic containers and glass bottles, and
changes in marketing channels and consumer preferences in
beverage containers, have, in recent years, reduced the growth
rate of aluminum can sheet in North America from the high rates
experienced in the 1970s and 1980s. Historically, despite
changes in consumer preferences, North American aluminum
beverage can shipments have remained at approximately
100 billion cans per year since 1994 according to the Can
Manufacturers Institute. For the calendar year ended
December 31, 2009, North American aluminum beverage can
shipments declined by approximately 1.3% to 99.1 billion
cans mainly due to a decline in carbonated soft drinks. North
American can stock shipments during the same period were 1,916
kt and remained virtually flat through the year ended
December 31, 2009. CRU currently estimates projected can
stock shipments of 1,905 kt for the year ending
December 31, 2010.
Demand and Commodity Price Cyclicality. A
significant share of aluminum rolled products is used in the
production of consumer staples, which have historically
experienced relatively stable demand characteristics. In
addition, most of our aluminum rolled products sale contracts
are priced in two components: a pass-through aluminum price
component based on the LME quotation and local market premium,
plus a margin over metal or conversion charge based
on the cost to roll the product. As a result, most of the raw
material price risk is absorbed by the customer, reducing the
volatility of the producers profitability and cash flows.
Aluminum rolled products companies also use recycled aluminum,
which provides sourcing flexibility for, and further reduces the
volatility of, input material. These three factors combine to
create an industry that has lower cyclicality than the primary
aluminum industry.
Downgauging. Increasing technological and
asset sophistication has enabled aluminum rolling companies to
offer consistent or even improved product strength using less
material, providing customers with a more cost-effective
product. This continuing trend reduces raw material
requirements, but also effectively increases aluminum rolled
products plant utilization rates and reduces available
capacity, because to produce the same number of units requires
more rolling hours to achieve thinner gauges. As utilization
rates increase, revenues rise as pricing tends to be based on
machine hours rather than on the volume of material rolled. On
balance, we believe that downgauging has maintained or enhanced
overall market economics for both users and producers of
aluminum rolled products.
98
Seasonality. Demand for certain aluminum
rolled products is affected by seasonal factors, such as
increases in consumption of beer and soft drinks packaged in
aluminum cans and the use of aluminum sheet used in the
construction and industrial end-use market during summer months.
We typically experience seasonal slowdowns during our third
fiscal quarter resulting in lower shipment volumes as a result
of lower end-product sales of beverages in the northern
hemisphere, declines in overall production output due primarily
to the holidays in North America and Europe, and the seasonal
downturn in construction due to weather.
Our
Strengths
We believe that the following key strengths enable us to compete
effectively in the aluminum rolled products market:
Leading
Market Positions
We are the worlds leader in aluminum rolling, producing an
estimated 16% of the worlds flat-rolled aluminum products
during the nine months ended December 31, 2010. Moreover,
we are the number one rolled products producer in Europe and
South America and the number two rolled products producer in
North America and Asia based on shipments. In terms of
end-use markets, we believe that we are the largest global
producer of aluminum rolled products for the beverage can market
with a 39% market share based on shipments, and we are the
worlds leader in the recycling of UBCs, recycling around
40 billion UBCs during fiscal 2010. We also believe that we
are the worlds leader in aluminum automotive sheet based
on shipments.
Premium
Product Portfolio Mix
We focus on high value markets that enable us to maximize
conversion premium growth and profitability rather than focusing
merely on volume growth. Our manufacturing facilities are
equipped to produce higher value product lines, including, among
others, beverage can products as well as products with
automotive body applications and components for the electronics
industry, which require highly engineered, technologically
sophisticated processes. Our conversion premium pricing model
for these higher value products also allows us to pass through
risks related to the volatility of aluminum prices by charging
LME aluminum prices plus a conversion premium price based on the
conversion cost to produce our products.
Our premium product portfolio includes stable products that are
less vulnerable to economic cycles and periods of financial
instability, such as products sold to customers in the beverage
can market, which represented 55% of our total volume of
shipments during the nine months ended December 31, 2010.
We also believe our higher value product lines have significant
growth opportunities. Globally, we anticipate continued growth
for can stock, driven by strong demand and positive consumer
preference trends in South America, Asia and Europe, moderated
only by North America, which is a more mature market. Similarly,
we expect that automotive industry growth globally, combined
with an increasing focus on fuel efficiency, will drive demand
for aluminum applications in this industry, such as auto panels,
auto trim, heat shielding and battery cases. In addition, we
believe the growth potential in the electronics sector is linked
to the focus on reducing the weight of electronics products,
reducing their energy consumption and utilizing materials that
are effective at dissipating heat generated by electronic
components, all of which create a wide range of opportunities
for aluminum products. For example, aluminum products are used
in the manufacture of products such as LED televisions, computer
monitors, notebook computers, digital cameras and mobile phones.
International
Presence and Scale
As of December 31, 2010, we are the only aluminum rolled
products company with operations on four continents. We benefit
from a global manufacturing footprint, including 30
manufacturing facilities across 11 countries, which gives us a
strong asset-based competitive advantage. We are
capable of producing highly engineered, technologically
sophisticated products across our operations to serve global
customers worldwide, as well as meet the needs of regional
customers, providing the same quality and consistency of
products at all of our plants. This highly engineered,
competitive advantage is evident in our position as the number
one global producer of beverage can sheet products. We are able
to service large can sheet customers on a
99
worldwide basis, yet, through our regional operations we also
have the capability to adapt and cater to the regional
preferences and needs of our customers.
In addition, we believe our broad geographical presence allows
us to better serve our increasingly global customer base as well
as diversify our sources of cash flow and offset risk across the
different regions. Our size allows us to meet a wide variety of
local and global customer needs, leverage our selling,
administrative, research and development and other general
expenses to improve margins, establish new uses for aluminum
rolled products and access the end-use markets for these
products. Furthermore, in periods where we are operating at or
near production capacity, our global scale gives us the
flexibility to leverage capacity across the Novelis system to
maximize total shipments to our customers.
Technology
Leader with Customer Service Focus
We endeavor to be at the forefront of developing next generation
technologies in the aluminum rolled products industry and
believe that we are the worlds leader in continuous
casting technology, as owner of technology relating to the two
main continuous casting processes. We have
state-of-the-art
research facilities around the world with more than
200 employees dedicated to research and development and
customer technical support.
Our beverage can customers require products that meet stringent
specifications, and our Can Technical Services Team is dedicated
to supporting our customers and meeting their product needs. Our
Can Technical Services Team consists of an experienced group of
technical representatives who spend time
on-site at
our customers production lines, offering technological
expertise, technical backup and support for our customers
own innovation activities. We also support our other high value
product lines by providing technological services and working
together with our automotive, electronic and lithographic
customers, among others, to develop solutions to meet their
requirements through our customer solution centers in North
America and Asia as well as other market-focused innovation
centers around the world.
Long
Term Relationships with Market Leaders
We have maintained strong, long-standing supply relationships
with many of our customers, which include leading global players
in our key end-use markets. Our major customers include:
|
|
|
Beverage and Food Cans
|
|
Transportation
|
|
Anheuser-Busch InBev
|
|
Audi Worldwide Company
|
Affiliates of Ball Corporation
|
|
BMW Group International
|
Can-Pack S.A.
|
|
Ford Motor Company
|
Various bottlers of the
Coca-Cola
System
|
|
Hyundai Motor Company
|
Crown Cork & Seal Company
|
|
Jaguar Land Rover
|
Rexam plc
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, Industrial and Other
|
|
Electronics
|
|
Agfa-Gevaert N.V.
|
|
LG
|
Amcor Limited
|
|
Samsung
|
Lotte Aluminum Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
Kodak Polychrome Graphics GmbH
|
|
|
Pactiv Corporation
|
|
|
Ryerson Inc.
|
|
|
Tetra Pak Ltd.
|
|
|
In fiscal 2010, approximately 48% of our net sales were to our
ten largest customers. We endeavor to gain strong customer
loyalty by anticipating and meeting the specific technical
standards demanded by our customers with a high level of
quality, technical support and customer service.
100
Our
Business Strategy
Our primary objective is to deliver shareholder and customer
value through the following areas of focus:
Focus
on Core Operations and Reduce our Costs
We strive to be the lowest cost producer of world-class aluminum
rolled products by pursuing a standardized focus on our core
operations globally and through the implementation of
cost-reduction and restructuring initiatives. To achieve this
objective, we have standardized our manufacturing processes and
the associated upstream and downstream production elements where
possible while still allowing the flexibility to respond to
local market demands. In addition, we have implemented numerous
restructuring initiatives, including the shutdown of facilities,
staff rationalization and other activities, all of which have
led to significant cost savings that we will benefit from for
years to come. We plan to continue to focus on maintaining our
low cost base, even as volumes increase, and intend to persist
in the implementation of ongoing initiatives to improve
operational efficiencies across our plants globally.
Pursue
Organic Growth Through Debottlenecking and Other Initiatives
Across the Novelis System
We are currently operating at or near capacity. To release
additional capacity in facilities, increase efficiency and
improve margins, we are continually evaluating debottlenecking
opportunities globally through modifications of and investments
in existing equipment and processes. We believe our
debottlenecking initiatives will release approximately 50 kt of
additional production capacity in fiscal 2011, and we anticipate
that we can release additional capacity through these efforts by
3% to 4% annually over the 2 to 3 years with minimal
capital investments.
Our international presence positions us well to capture
additional growth opportunities in targeted aluminum rolled
products. In particular, we believe Asia and South America have
high growth potential in areas such as beverage cans, industrial
products, construction and electronics. While our existing
manufacturing and operating presence positions us well to
capture this growth, we expect to make some incremental capital
expenditures or selective acquisitions to expand our
capabilities in these areas.
As part of our organic growth initiatives, we recently invested
in process optimization improvements at our Yeongju plant in
Korea by implementing technology and processes developed at our
other plants around the world, which has allowed us to
significantly increase production capacity and capture market
share in the beverage can end-use market in Asia. In addition,
in response to the growing demand for our products in South
America, in May 2010 we announced a plan to invest nearly
$300 million to expand our aluminum rolling operations in
Brazil to increase capacity by more than 50% to approximately
600 kt of aluminum sheet per year. The project is expected to be
completed by late 2012.
Focus
on Optimizing Premium Products to Drive Enhanced
Profitability
We plan to continue improving our product mix and margins by
leveraging our world-class assets and technical capabilities.
Our management approach helps us systematically identify
opportunities to improve the profitability of our operations
through product portfolio analysis. This ensures that we focus
on growing in attractive market segments, while also taking
actions to exit unattractive ones. For example, in the last four
years, we have grown our can stock shipments in total by an
average of 15% in all regions except North America, a more
mature market, where we have held a leading market position for
many years. We will continue to focus on capturing the growth in
the beverage can market worldwide as well as the automotive and
electronic markets. Through our continued focus on operating
execution, we believe we can cost effectively deploy proprietary
technologies that will contribute to growth and higher
profitability.
Operate
as One Novelis a Fully-integrated Global
Company
We intend to continue to build on our focused business model to
operate as One Novelis. The term One
Novelis refers to our goal of becoming a truly integrated,
global company driven by a singular focus. An important part of
the One Novelis concept is our highly-focused, pass-through
business model that utilizes
101
our manufacturing excellence, our risk management expertise, our
value-added conversion premium-based pricing, and
importantly our growing ability to leverage our
global assets according to a single, corporate-wide vision. We
believe this integrated approach is the foundation for the
effective execution of our strategy across the Novelis system.
We began the global alignment of our support functions, such as
risk management, finance, human resources, legal, information
technology and supply chain management in fiscal 2009. We
believe that managing these support functions centrally to
operate as One Novelis has and will continue to accelerate
executive decision-making processes, allowing us to adapt our
manufacturing processes and products more quickly and
efficiently to respond to changing market conditions. We intend
to achieve a seamless alignment of goals, methods and metrics
across the organization to improve communication and the
implementation of strategic initiatives and, ultimately, service
to our customers. These initiatives have resulted in enhanced
operating margins and performance and we believe additional
improvements are possible over time.
Our
Operating Segments
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America; Europe; Asia; and South America. The following is a
description of our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
North America. Headquartered in Atlanta,
Georgia, this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light
gauge products and operates 11 plants, including two fully
dedicated recycling facilities, in two countries. As announced
in February 2010, we moved our North American headquarters to
Atlanta, Georgia during fiscal 2011.
|
|
|
|
Europe. Headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 13 plants, including one fully-dedicated
recycling facility, in six countries.
|
|
|
|
Asia. Headquartered in Seoul, South Korea,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates three plants in two countries.
|
|
|
|
South America. Headquartered in Sao Paulo,
Brazil, this segment comprises bauxite mining, smelting
operations, power generation, carbon products, aluminum sheet
and light gauge products and operates two rolling plants in
Brazil.
|
102
The table below shows Net sales and total shipments by segment.
For additional financial information related to our operating
segments, see Note 19 Segment,
Geographical Area, Major Customer and Major Supplier
Information to our audited financial statements and
Note 15 Segment, Major Customer and Major
Supplier Information to our unaudited financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
Sales in millions
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
Shipments in kilotonnes
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales(1)
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
2,854
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
North America(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,863
|
|
|
$
|
2,375
|
|
|
$
|
3,292
|
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,664
|
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Europe(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
$
|
2,975
|
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
|
$
|
3,831
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Asia(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,340
|
|
|
$
|
1,098
|
|
|
$
|
1,501
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,612
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
South America(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
876
|
|
|
$
|
691
|
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
908
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consolidated Net sales include the results of our
non-consolidated affiliates on a proportionately consolidated
basis, which is consistent with the way we manage our business
segments. |
|
(2) |
|
Net sales by segment includes intersegment sales. |
We have highly automated, flexible and advanced manufacturing
capabilities in operating facilities around the globe. In
addition to the aluminum rolled products plants, our South
America segment operates bauxite mining, alumina refining,
hydro-electric power plants and smelting facilities. We believe
our facilities have the assets required for efficient production
and are well managed and maintained.
North
America
North America operates 11 aluminum rolled products facilities,
including two fully dedicated recycling facilities as of
December 31, 2010, and manufactures a broad range of
aluminum sheet and light gauge products. End-use markets for
this segment include beverage cans, foil and other packaging,
automotive and other transportation applications, building
products and other industrial applications.
The majority of North Americas efforts are directed
towards the beverage can market. The beverage can end-use market
is technically demanding to supply and pricing is competitive.
We believe we have a competitive advantage in this market due to
our low-cost and technologically advanced manufacturing
facilities and technical support capability. Recycling is
important in the manufacturing process and we have five
facilities in North America that re-melt post-consumer aluminum
and recycled process material. Most of the recycled material is
from UBCs and the material is cast into sheet ingot for North
Americas two can sheet production plants (at Logan,
Kentucky and Oswego, New York). In August 2009, we entered into
a UBC recycling joint venture with Alcoa to create a new
independent company, known as Evermore Recycling LLC
(Evermore Recycling). Our equity investment in
Evermore Recycling is 55.8% and Alcoas equity investment
is 44.2%. Evermore Recycling will purchase UBCs from suppliers
for recycling by us and Alcoa and is designed to create value by
increasing efficiency, building stronger supplier relationships
and increasing recycling.
103
Europe
Europe operates 13 plants, including one fully dedicated
recycling facility, as of December 31, 2010, and
manufactures a broad range of sheet and foil products. End-use
applications for this segment include beverage and food cans,
foil and other packaging, and construction and industrial
products and automotive and lithographic applications. Beverage
and food can represent the largest end-use market in terms of
shipment volume. Europe has foil and packaging facilities at six
locations and, in addition to six rolled product plants, has
distribution centers in Italy and sales offices in several
European countries. Operations include our 50% joint venture
interest in Norf, which is the worlds largest aluminum
rolling and remelt facility. Norf supplies high quality can
stock, foilstock and feeder stock for finishing at our other
European operations.
In April 2009, we closed our distribution center in France. In
March 2009, we announced the closure of our aluminum sheet mill
in Rogerstone, South Wales, U.K. The facility ceased operations
in April 2009. In December 2010, we announced the proposed
cessation of foil rolling activities and part of the packaging
business at our facility located in Bridgnorth, U.K. by the end
of April 2011.
Asia
Asia operates three manufacturing facilities as of
December 31, 2010 and manufactures a broad range of sheet
and light gauge products. End-use markets include beverage and
food cans, foil and other packaging, industrial products
(including electronics and construction) and transportation
applications. The beverage can market represents the largest
end-use market in terms of volume. Recycling is an important
part of our Korean operations with recycling facilities at both
the Ulsan and Yeongju facilities. Metal from recycled aluminum
purchases represented 30% of Asias total shipments in
fiscal 2010. In June 2008, our plant in Ulsan began the
commercial production of Novelis
Fusiontm.
We believe that Asia is well-positioned to benefit from further
economic development in China as well as other parts of Asia.
South
America
South America operates two rolling plants, a primary aluminum
smelter, bauxite mines and hydro-electric power plants as of
December 31, 2010, all of which are located in Brazil.
South America manufactures aluminum rolled products, including
can stock, automotive and industrial sheet and light gauge for
the beverage and food can, construction and industrial, foil and
other packaging and transportation end-use applications.
Beverage and food can represent the largest end-use application
in terms of shipment volume. The primary aluminum operations in
South America include mines and smelters used by our Brazilian
aluminum rolled products operations, with any excess production
being sold on the market in the form of aluminum billets. South
America generates a portion of its own power requirements. In
May 2009, we ceased the production of alumina at our Ouro Preto
facility in Brazil as the sustained decline in alumina prices
has made alumina production economically unfeasible. In light of
the current alumina and aluminum pricing environment, we closed
our Aratu facility in Candeias, Brazil in December 2010.
In response to the growing demand for our products in South
America, in May 2010 we announced a plan to invest nearly
$300 million to expand our aluminum rolling operations in
Brazil to increase the plants capacity by more than 50% to
approximately 600 kt of aluminum sheet per year. The project is
expected to be completed by late 2012.
Financial
Information About Geographic Areas
Certain financial information about geographic areas is
contained in Note 19 Segment,
Geographical Area, Major Customer and Major Supplier
Information to the audited financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Raw
Materials and Suppliers
The raw materials that we use in manufacturing include primary
aluminum, recycled aluminum, sheet ingot, alloying elements and
grain refiners. Our smelters also use alumina, caustic soda and
calcined petroleum
104
coke and resin. These raw materials are generally available from
several sources and are not generally subject to supply
constraints under normal market conditions. We also consume
considerable amounts of energy in the operation of our
facilities.
Aluminum
We obtain aluminum from a number of sources, including the
following:
Primary Aluminum Sourcing. We purchased or
tolled approximately 1,750 kt of primary aluminum in fiscal 2010
in the form of sheet ingot, standard ingot and molten metal,
approximately 50% of which we purchased from Rio Tinto Alcan.
Following our spin-off from Rio Tinto Alcan, we have continued
to purchase aluminum from Rio Tinto Alcan pursuant to metal
supply agreements. Our primary aluminum contracts with Rio Tinto
Alcan were renegotiated and the amended agreements took effect
on January 1, 2008.
Primary Aluminum Production. We produced
approximately 110 kt of our own primary aluminum requirements in
fiscal 2010 through our smelter and related facilities in Brazil.
Recycled Aluminum Products. We operate
facilities in several plants to recycle post-consumer aluminum,
such as UBCs collected through recycling programs. In addition,
we have agreements with several of our large customers where we
take recycled processed material from their fabricating activity
and re-melt, cast and roll it to re-supply them with aluminum
sheet. Other sources of recycled material include lithographic
plates, where over 90% of aluminum used is recycled, and
products with longer lifespans, like cars and buildings, which
are just starting to become high volume sources of recycled
material. We purchased or tolled approximately 1,000 kt of
recycled material inputs in fiscal 2010.
The majority of recycled material we re-melt is directed back
through can-stock plants. The net effect of all recycling
activities in terms of total shipments of rolled products is
that approximately 34% of our aluminum rolled products
production for fiscal 2010 was made with recycled material.
Energy
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. In fiscal 2010, natural gas and
electricity represented approximately 89% of our energy
consumption by cost. We also use fuel oil and transport fuel.
The majority of energy usage occurs at our casting centers, at
our smelters in South America and during the hot rolling of
aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities require relatively less
energy. We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which
subjects us to market pricing fluctuations. We have in the past
and may continue to seek to stabilize our future exposure to
natural gas prices through the purchase of derivative
instruments. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South
America have historically been more stable than in the United
States.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs.
Our South America segment has its own hydroelectric facilities
that meet approximately 27% of its total electricity
requirements. As a result of supply constraints, electricity
prices in South America have been volatile, with spot prices
increasing dramatically. We have a mixture of self-generated
electricity, long term fixed contracts and shorter term
semi-variable contracts. Although spot prices have returned to
normal levels, we may continue to face challenges renewing our
South American energy supply contracts at effective rates to
enable profitable operation of our full smelter capacity.
Others
We also have bauxite and alumina requirements. We will satisfy
some of our alumina requirements for the near term pursuant to
an alumina supply agreement we have entered into with Rio Tinto
Alcan.
105
Our
Customers
Although we provide products to a wide variety of customers in
each of the markets that we serve, we have experienced
consolidation trends among our customers in many of our key
end-use markets. In fiscal 2010, approximately 48% of our total
net sales were to our ten largest customers, most of whom we
have been supplying for more than 20 years. To address
consolidation trends, we focus significant efforts at developing
and maintaining close working relationships with our customers
and end-users. Our major customers include:
|
|
|
Beverage and Food Cans
|
|
Transportation
|
|
Anheuser-Busch InBev
|
|
Audi Worldwide Company
|
Affiliates of Ball Corporation
|
|
BMW Group International
|
Can-Pack S.A.
|
|
Ford Motor Company
|
Various bottlers of the
Coca-Cola
System
|
|
Hyundai Motor Company
|
Crown Cork & Seal Company
|
|
Jaguar Land Rover
|
Rexam plc
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, Industrial and Other
|
|
Electronics
|
|
Agfa-Gevaert N.V.
|
|
LG
|
Amcor Limited
|
|
Samsung
|
Lotte Aluminum Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
Kodak Polychrome Graphics GmbH
|
|
|
Pactiv Corporation
|
|
|
Ryerson Inc.
|
|
|
Tetra Pak Ltd.
|
|
|
In our single largest end-use market, beverage can sheet, we
sell directly to beverage makers and bottlers as well as to can
fabricators that sell the cans they produce to bottlers. In
certain cases, we also operate under umbrella agreements with
beverage makers and bottlers under which they direct their can
fabricators to source their requirements for beverage can body,
end and tab stock from us. Among these umbrella agreements is an
agreement with several North American bottlers of
Coca-Cola
branded products, including
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services. Under this agreement, we
shipped approximately 359 kt of beverage can sheet (including
tolled metal) during fiscal 2010. These shipments were made to,
and we received payment from, our direct customers, who are the
beverage can fabricators that sell beverage cans to the
Coca-Cola
associated bottlers. Under the agreement, bottlers in the
Coca-Cola
system may join this agreement by committing a specified
percentage of the can sheet required by their can fabricators to
us.
Purchases by Rexam Plc and its affiliates represented
approximately 16%, 16%, 17%, 15% and 14% of our total net sales
for the nine months ended December 31, 2010; the year ended
March 31, 2010; the year ended March 31, 2009; the
period from May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008; and
the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007,
respectively.
106
Distribution
and Backlog
We have two principal distribution channels for the end-use
markets in which we operate: direct sales to our customers and
distributors. The table below shows the percentage of our total
net sales derived from each of these channels for the periods
presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
through
|
|
through
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Direct sales as a percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
Distributor sales as a percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Direct
Sales
We supply various end-use markets all over the world through a
direct sales force that operates from individual plants or sales
offices, as well as from regional sales offices in 21 countries.
The direct sales channel typically involves very large,
sophisticated fabricators and original equipment manufacturers.
Longstanding relationships are maintained with leading companies
in industries that use aluminum rolled products. Supply
contracts for large global customers generally range from one to
five years in length and historically there has been a high
degree of renewal business with these customers. Given the
customized nature of products and in some cases, large order
sizes, switching costs are significant, thus adding to the
overall consistency of the customer base.
We also use third party agents or traders in some regions to
complement our own sales force. They provide service to our
customers in countries where we do not have local expertise. We
tend to use third party agents in Asia more frequently than in
other regions.
Distributors
We also sell our products through aluminum distributors,
particularly in North America and Europe. Customers of
distributors are widely dispersed, and sales through this
channel are highly fragmented. Distributors sell mostly
commodity or less specialized products into many end-use markets
in small quantities, including the construction and industrial
and transportation markets. We collaborate with our distributors
to develop new end-use markets and improve the supply chain and
order efficiencies.
Backlog
We believe that order backlog is not a material aspect of our
business.
Research
and Development
The table below summarizes our research and development expense
in our plants and modern research facilities, which included
mini-scale production lines equipped with hot mills, can lines
and continuous casters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
107
We conduct research and development activities at our plants in
order to satisfy current and future customer requirements,
improve our products and reduce our conversion costs. Our
customers work closely with our research and development
professionals to improve their production processes and market
options. We have approximately 200 employees dedicated to
research and development, located in many of our plants and
research center.
Our
Employees
As of March 31, 2010, we had approximately
11,600 employees. Approximately 5,300 are employed in
Europe, approximately 2,900 are employed in North America,
approximately 1,500 are employed in Asia and approximately 1,900
are employed in South America and other areas. Approximately 69%
of our employees are represented by labor unions and their
employment conditions are governed by collective bargaining
agreements. Collective bargaining agreements are negotiated on a
site, regional or national level, and are of different durations.
We experienced a work stoppage at our Korean facilities for
12 days in August 2010. While this work stoppage resulted
in a wage increase of approximately 15% for the workers at our
Korean facilities, it did not have a material impact on our
results of operations. We have not experienced a prolonged labor
stoppage in any of our principal facilities during the last
decade.
Intellectual
Property
In connection with our spin-off, Rio Tinto Alcan has assigned or
licensed to us a number of important patents, trademarks and
other intellectual property rights owned or previously owned by
Rio Tinto Alcan and required for our business. Ownership of
certain intellectual property that is used by both us and Rio
Tinto Alcan is owned by one of us, and licensed to the other.
Certain specific intellectual property rights, which have been
determined to be exclusively useful to us or which were required
to be transferred to us for regulatory reasons, have been
assigned to us with no license back to Rio Tinto Alcan.
We actively review intellectual property arising from our
operations and our research and development activities and, when
appropriate, we apply for patents in the appropriate
jurisdictions, including the United States and Canada. We
currently hold patents and patent applications on approximately
190 different items of intellectual property. While these
patents and patent applications are important to our business on
an aggregate basis, no single patent or patent application is
deemed to be material to our business.
We have applied for or received registrations for the
Novelis word trademark and the Novelis logo
trademark in approximately 50 countries where we have
significant sales or operations. Novelis uses the Aditya Birla
Rising Sun logo under license from Aditya Birla Management
Corporation Private Limited.
We have also registered the word Novelis and several
derivations thereof as domain names in numerous top level
domains around the world to protect our presence on the World
Wide Web.
108
Properties
Our executive offices are located in Atlanta, Georgia. The
following tables provide information, by operating segment,
about the plant locations, processes and major end-use
markets/applications for the aluminum rolled products, recycling
and primary metal facilities we operated during all or part of
the nine months ended December 31, 2010. The total number
of operating facilities, research facilities, and innovation
centers used by our operating segments as of December 31,
2010 are shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Research
|
|
|
Innovation
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Centers
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included above are operating facilities that we jointly own and
operate with third parties. Please see detail below:
North
America
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Berea, Kentucky
|
|
Recycling
|
|
Recycled ingot
|
Burnaby, British Columbia
|
|
Finishing
|
|
Foil containers
|
Fairmont, West Virginia
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil, HVAC material
|
Greensboro, Georgia
|
|
Recycling
|
|
Recycled ingot
|
Kingston, Ontario
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Automotive, construction/industrial
|
Logan, Kentucky(1)
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling, finishing, recycling
|
|
Can stock
|
Oswego, New York
|
|
Novelis
Fusiontm
casting, hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling, brazing, finishing
|
|
Can stock, construction/industrial, semi-finished coil,
automotive
|
Saguenay, Quebec
|
|
Continuous casting, recycling
|
|
Semi-finished coil
|
Terre Haute, Indiana
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Toronto, Ontario
|
|
Finishing
|
|
Foil, foil containers
|
Warren, Ohio
|
|
Coating
|
|
Can end stock
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We own 40% of the outstanding common shares of Logan Aluminum
Inc. (Logan), but we have made subsequent equipment
investments such that our portion of Logans total machine
hours has provided us more than 60% of Logans total
production. |
Our Oswego, New York facility operates modern equipment used for
recycling beverage cans and other scrap metals, ingot casting,
hot rolling, cold rolling and finishing. In March 2006, we
commenced commercial production using our Novelis
Fusiontm
technology able to produce a high quality ingot with
a core of one aluminum alloy, combined with one or more layers
of different aluminum alloy(s). The ingot can then be rolled
into a sheet product with different properties on the inside and
the outside, allowing previously unattainable performance for
flat rolled products and creating opportunity for new, premium
applications. Oswego produces can stock as well as building and
industrial products. Oswego also provides feedstock to our
Kingston, Ontario facility, which produces heat-treated
automotive sheet and products for construction and industrial
applications, and to our Fairmont, West Virginia facility, which
produces light gauge sheet.
Our Logan Kentucky facility is a processing joint venture
between us and Arco Aluminum Inc. (ARCO), a
subsidiary of BP plc. Our equity investment in the joint venture
is 40%, while ARCO holds the
109
remaining 60% of common shares, but we have made subsequent
equipment investments such that our portion of Logans
total machine hours provide us with more than 60% of
Logans total production. Logan, which was built in 1985,
is the newest and largest hot mill in North America. Logan
operates modern and high-speed equipment for ingot casting,
hot-rolling, cold-rolling and finishing. Logan is a dedicated
manufacturer of aluminum sheet products for the can stock market
with modern equipment, an efficient workforce and product focus.
A portion of the can end stock is coated at North Americas
Warren, Ohio facility, in addition to Logans
on-site
coating assets. Together with ARCO, we operate Logan as a
production cooperative, with each party supplying its own
primary metal inputs for transformation at the facility. The
transformed product is then returned to the supplying party at
cost. Logan does not own any of the primary metal inputs or any
of the transformed products. All of the fixed assets at Logan
are directly owned by us and ARCO in varying ownership
percentages or solely by each party. As discussed in
Note 1 Business and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies to our audited financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, our
consolidated balance sheets include our share of the assets and
liabilities of Logan.
We share control of the management of Logan with ARCO through a
board of directors with seven voting members on which we appoint
four members and ARCO appoints three members. Management of
Logan is led jointly by two executive officers who are subject
to approval by at least five members of the board of directors.
Our Saguenay, Quebec facility operates the worlds largest
continuous caster, which produces feedstock for our two foil
rolling plants located in Terre Haute, Indiana; and Fairmont,
West Virginia. The continuous caster was developed through
internal research and development and we own the process
technology. Our Saguenay facility sources molten metal under
long-term supply arrangements we have with Rio Tinto Alcan.
Our Burnaby, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario facilities
spool and package household foil products and report to our foil
business unit based in Toronto, Ontario.
Along with our recycling center in Oswego, New York, we own two
other fully dedicated recycling facilities in North America,
located in Berea, Kentucky and Greensboro, Georgia. Each offers
a modern, cost-efficient process to recycle used beverage cans
and other recycled aluminum into sheet ingot to supply our hot
mills in Logan and Oswego. Berea is the largest used beverage
can recycling facility in the world.
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Berlin, Germany
|
|
Converting
|
|
Packaging
|
Bresso, Italy
|
|
Finishing, painting
|
|
Painted sheet, architectural
|
Bridgnorth, U.K.(1)
|
|
Foil rolling, finishing, converting
|
|
Foil, packaging
|
Dudelange, Luxembourg
|
|
Continuous casting, foil rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Göttingen, Germany
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing, painting
|
|
Can end, can tab, food can, lithographic, painted sheet
|
Latchford, U.K.
|
|
Recycling
|
|
Sheet ingot from recycled metal
|
Ludenscheid, Germany
|
|
Foil rolling, finishing, converting
|
|
Foil, packaging
|
Nachterstedt, Germany
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing, painting
|
|
Automotive, can end, industrial, painted sheet, architectural
|
Norf, Germany(2)
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling
|
|
Can stock, foilstock, feeder stock for finishing operations
|
Ohle, Germany
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing, converting
|
|
Foil, packaging
|
Pieve, Italy
|
|
Continuous casting, cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Coil for Bresso, industrial
|
Rugles, France
|
|
Continuous casting, foil rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Sierre, Switzerland(3)
|
|
Novelis
Fusiontm
casting, hot rolling, cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Automotive sheet, industrial
|
110
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In December 2010, we announced the proposed cessation of foil
rolling activities and part of the packaging business at our
facility located in Bridgnorth, U.K. by the end of April 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
Operated as a 50/50 joint venture between us and Hydro Aluminum
Deutschland GmbH (Hydro). |
|
(3) |
|
We have entered into an agreement with Rio Tinto Alcan pursuant
to which Rio Tinto Alcan retains access to the plate production
capacity, which represents a significant portion of the total
production capacity of the Sierre hot mill. |
Aluminium Norf GmbH (Norf) in Germany, a
50/50
production-sharing joint venture between us and Hydro, is a
large scale, modern manufacturing hub for several of our
operations in Europe, and is the largest aluminum rolling mill
and remelting operation in the world. Norf supplies hot coil for
further processing through cold rolling to some of our other
plants, including Göttingen and Nachterstedt in Germany and
provides foilstock to our plants in Ohle and Ludenscheid in
Germany and Rugles in France. Together with Hydro, we operate
Norf as a production cooperative, with each party supplying its
own primary metal inputs for transformation at the facility. The
transformed product is then transferred back to the supplying
party on a pre-determined cost-plus basis. We own 50% of the
equity interest in Norf and Hydro owns the other 50%. We share
control of the management of Norf with Hydro through a
jointly-controlled shareholders committee. Management of
Norf is led jointly by two managing executives, one nominated by
us and one nominated by Hydro.
Our Göttingen plant has a paint line as well as lines for
can end, food and lithographic sheet. Our Nachterstedt plant
cold rolls and finishes mainly automotive sheet and can end
stock. The Pieve plant, located near Milan, Italy, mainly
produces continuous cast coil that is cold rolled into
paintstock and sent to the Bresso, Italy plant for painting and
some specialist finishing.
The Dudelange and Rugles foil plants in Luxembourg and France,
respectively, utilize continuous twin roll casting equipment and
are two of the few foil plants in the world capable of producing
6 micron foil for aseptic packaging applications. The Sierre hot
rolling plant in Switzerland, along with Nachterstedt in
Germany, are Europes leading producers of automotive sheet
in terms of shipments. Sierre also supplies plate stock to Rio
Tinto Alcan. In April 2008, we announced the commissioning of a
new aluminum casthouse in Sierre and began producing multi-alloy
sheet ingots in the plant using Novelis
Fusiontm
in August 2008.
Our recycling operation in Latchford, United Kingdom is the only
major recycling plant in Europe dedicated to used beverage cans.
European operations also include Novelis PAE in Voreppe, France,
which sells casthouse technology, including liquid metal
treatment devices, such as degassers and filters, chill sheet
ingot casters and twin roll continuous casters, in many parts of
the world.
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Bukit Raja, Malaysia(1)
|
|
Continuous casting, cold rolling, coating
|
|
Construction/industrial, heavy and light gauge foils
|
Ulsan, Korea(2)
|
|
Novelis
Fusiontm
casting, hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling, finishing
|
|
Can stock, construction/industrial, electronics, foilstock, and
recycled material
|
Yeongju, Korea(3)
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling, finishing
|
|
Can stock, construction/industrial, electronics, foilstock and
recycled material
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ownership of the Bukit Raja plant corresponds to our 58% equity
interest in Aluminum Company of Malaysia Berhad. |
|
(2) |
|
We hold a 68% equity interest in the Ulsan plant. |
|
(3) |
|
We hold a 68% equity interest in the Yeongju plant. |
111
Our Korean subsidiary, in which we hold a 68% interest, was
formed through acquisitions in 1999 and 2000. Since our
acquisitions, product capability has been developed to address
higher value and more technically advanced markets such as can
sheet.
We hold a 58% equity interest in the Aluminum Company of
Malaysia Berhad, a publicly traded company that wholly owns and
controls the Bukit Raja, Selangor light gauge rolling facility.
Unlike our production sharing joint ventures at Norf, Germany
and Logan, Kentucky, our Korean partners are financial partners
and we market 100% of the plants output.
Asia also operates recycling furnaces at both its Ulsan and
Yeongju facilities in Korea for the conversion of customer and
third party recycled aluminum. The Ulsan and Yeongju facilities
utilized used beverage cans and other recycled scrap material
for 28% of their aluminum supply during fiscal 2009. In June
2008, our plant in Ulsan began the commercial production of
Novelis
Fusiontm.
South
America
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Pindamonhangaba, Brazil
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling, finishing
|
|
Construction/industrial, can stock, foilstock, recycled ingot
|
Utinga, Brazil
|
|
Foil rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Ouro Preto, Brazil(1)
|
|
Smelting
|
|
Primary aluminum (sheet ingot and billets)
|
Aratu, Brazil(2)
|
|
Smelting
|
|
Primary aluminum (sheet ingot)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In May 2009, we ceased the production of alumina at our Ouro
Preto facility in Brazil. |
|
(2) |
|
In December 2010, we closed our Aratu facility in Brazil. |
Our Pindamonhangaba (Pinda) rolling and recycling
facility in Brazil has an integrated process that includes
recycling, sheet ingot casting, hot mill and cold mill
operations. A leased coating line produces painted products,
including can end stock. Pinda supplies foilstock to our Utinga
foil plant, which produces converter, household and container
foil.
Pinda is the largest aluminum rolling and recycling facility in
South America in terms of shipments and the only facility in
South America capable of producing can body and end stock. Pinda
recycles primarily used beverage cans, and is engaged in tolling
recycled metal for our customers. In response to the growing
demand for our products in South America, in May 2010 we
announced a plan to invest nearly $300 million to expand
our aluminum rolling operations in Pinda. The expansion will
increase the plants capacity by more than 50% to
approximately 600 kt of aluminum sheet per year. The project is
expected to come on stream in late 2012.
During fiscal 2009, we conducted bauxite mining, alumina
refining, primary aluminum smelting and hydro-electric power
generation operations at our Ouro Preto, Brazil facility. Our
owned power generation supplies approximately 60% of our smelter
needs. We also own the mining rights to bauxite reserves in the
Ouro Preto, Cataguases and Carangola regions.
In May 2009, we ceased the production of alumina at our Ouro
Preto facility in Brazil. The global economic crisis and the
recent dramatic drop in alumina prices have made alumina
production at Ouro Preto economically unfeasible. Going forward,
the plant will purchase alumina through third-parties. Other
activities related to the facility, including electric power
generation and the production of primary aluminum metal, will
continue unaffected.
In December 2010, we closed our primary aluminum smelting
operations at our Aratu facility in Candeias, Brazil.
112
Legal
Proceedings
In connection with our spin-off from Rio Tinto Alcan, we assumed
a number of liabilities, commitments and contingencies mainly
related to our historical rolled products operations, including
liabilities in respect of legal claims and environmental
matters. As a result, we may be required to indemnify Rio Tinto
Alcan for claims successfully brought against Rio Tinto Alcan or
for the defense of legal actions that arise from time to time in
the normal course of our rolled products business including
commercial and contract disputes, employee-related claims and
tax disputes (including several disputes with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding various forms of manufacturing
taxes and social security contributions). In addition to these
assumed liabilities and contingencies, we may, in the future, be
involved in, or subject to, other disputes, claims and
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business,
including some that we assert against others, such as
environmental, health and safety, product liability, employee,
tax, personal injury and other matters. Where appropriate, we
have established reserves in respect of these matters (or, if
required, we have posted cash guarantees). While the ultimate
resolution of, and liability and costs related to, these matters
cannot be determined with certainty due to the considerable
uncertainties that exist, we do not believe that any of these
pending actions, individually or in the aggregate, will
materially impair our operations or materially affect our
financial condition or liquidity. The following describes
certain environmental matters and legal proceedings relating to
our business, including those for which we assumed liability as
a result of our spin-off from Rio Tinto Alcan.
Environmental
Matters
We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also
known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions
regarding liability arising from the usage, storage, treatment
or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a number of
sites in the United States, as well as similar proceedings under
the laws and regulations of the other jurisdictions in which we
have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the
European Union. Many of these jurisdictions have laws that
impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, for the costs of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses. In addition, we are, from time to
time, subject to environmental reviews and investigations by
relevant governmental authorities.
With respect to environmental loss contingencies, we record a
loss contingency whenever such contingency is probable and
reasonably estimable. The evaluation model includes all asserted
and unasserted claims that can be reasonably identified. Under
this evaluation model, the liability and the related costs are
quantified based upon the best available evidence regarding
actual liability loss and cost estimates. Except for those loss
contingencies where no estimate can reasonably be made, the
evaluation model is fact-driven and attempts to estimate the
full costs of each claim. Management reviews the status of, and
estimated liability related to, pending claims and civil actions
on a quarterly basis. The estimated costs in respect of such
reported liabilities are not offset by amounts related to
cost-sharing between parties, insurance, indemnification
arrangements or contribution from other potentially responsible
parties unless otherwise noted.
We have established procedures for regularly evaluating
environmental loss contingencies, including those arising from
such environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we believe we have made reasonable estimates
of the costs that are likely to be borne by us for these
environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly, we have
established reserves based on our reasonable estimates for the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters. We estimate that the undiscounted remaining
clean-up
costs related to all of our known environmental matters as of
December 31, 2010 will be approximately $55 million.
Of this amount, $28 million is included in Other long-term
liabilities, with the remaining $27 million included in
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010.
Management has reviewed the environmental matters, including
those for which we assumed liability as a result of our spin-off
from Alcan Rio Tinto. As a result of this review, management has
determined that the currently anticipated costs associated with
these
113
environmental matters will not, individually or in the
aggregate, materially impact our operations or materially
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
Active
Legal Proceedings
Coca-Cola
Lawsuit. On July 8, 2010, a Georgia state
court granted Novelis Corporations motion for summary
judgment, effectively dismissing a lawsuit brought by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC
(CCBSS) against Novelis Corporation. In the lawsuit,
which was filed on February 15, 2007, CCBSS alleged that
Novelis Corporation breached the most favored
nations provision regarding certain pricing matters under
an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and
sought monetary damages and other relief. On August 6,
2010, CCBSS filed a notice of appeal with the court, and on
August 20, 2010, we filed a cross notice of appeal. We and
CCBSS have each filed appellate briefs in the case, and on
February 9, 2011, the appellate court heard oral arguments
on the briefs. We expect a ruling from the appellate court
within six months after oral arguments were heard. We have
concluded that a loss from the litigation is not probable and
therefore have not recorded an accrual. In addition, we do not
believe there is a reasonable possibility of a loss from the
lawsuit.
Brazil
Tax Matters
Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America,
as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, we had
cash deposits aggregating approximately $52 million and
$45 million, respectively, in judicial depository accounts
pending finalization of the related cases. The depository
accounts are in the name of the Brazilian government and will be
expended towards these legal proceedings or released to us,
depending on the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are
included in Other long-term assets third parties in
our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In
addition, we are involved in several disputes with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury about various forms of manufacturing taxes
and social security contributions, for which we have made no
judicial deposits but for which we have established reserves
ranging from $6 million to $136 million as of
December 31, 2010. In total, these reserves approximate
$159 million and $149 million as of December 31,
2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively, and are included in
Other long-term liabilities in our accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
On May 28, 2009, the Brazilian government passed a law
allowing taxpayers to settle certain federal tax disputes with
the Brazilian tax authorities, including disputes relating to a
Brazilian national tax on manufactured products, through an
installment program. Under the program, if a company elects to
settle a tax dispute and pay the principal amount due over a
specified payment period, the company will receive a discount on
the interest and penalties owed on the disputed tax amount.
Novelis joined the installment program in November of 2009. In
August 2010, we identified to the Brazilian government the tax
disputes we plan to settle pursuant to the installment program.
Environment,
Health and Safety
Our capital expenditures for environmental protection and the
betterment of working conditions in our facilities were
$2 million in fiscal 2010. We expect these capital
expenditures will be approximately $5 million and
$3 million in fiscal 2011 and 2012, respectively. In
addition, expenses for environmental protection (including
estimated and probable environmental remediation costs as well
as general environmental protection costs at our facilities)
were $32 million in fiscal 2010, and are expected to be
$28 million and $42 million in fiscal 2011 and 2012,
respectively. Generally, expenses for environmental protection
are recorded in Cost of goods sold. However, significant
remediation costs that are not associated with on-going
operations are recorded in Other (income) expenses, net.
114
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information for persons currently
serving as executive officers of our company. Biographical
details as of February 10, 2011 for each of our executive
officers are also set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Alexandre Almeida
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis South America
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis North America
|
Antonio Tadeu Coelho Nardocci
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Europe
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Asia
|
Eric Drummond
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer
|
Nicholas Madden
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Procurement Officer
|
Erwin Mayr
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer
|
Randal Miller
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer
|
Robert Nelson
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
|
Leslie J. Parrette, Jr.
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Compliance Officer and
Corporate Secretary
|
Karen Renner
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Information Officer
|
Philip Martens is our President and Chief Executive
Officer. Mr. Martens served as our President and Chief
Operating Officer from May 2009 to February 2011 and was
appointed President and Chief Executive Officer effective
February 3, 2011. Mr. Martens served as Senior Vice
President and President, Light Vehicle Systems, ArvinMeritor
Inc. from September 2006 to January 2009. He was also President
and CEO designate, Arvin Innovation. Prior to that, he served as
President and Chief Operating Officer of Plastech Engineered
Products from 2005 to 2006. From 1987 to 2005, he held various
engineering and leadership positions at Ford Motor Company, most
recently serving as Group Vice President of Product Creation. He
is also a member of the board of directors of Plexus Corp. since
September 2010. Mr. Martens holds a degree in mechanical
engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University and an M.B.A. from the
University of Michigan. In 2003, Mr. Martens
received a Doctorate in Automotive Engineering from Lawrence
Technological University for his extensive contributions to the
global automotive industry.
Steven Fisher is our Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. Mr. Fisher joined Novelis in February
2006 as Vice President, Strategic Planning and Corporate
Development. He was appointed Chief Financial Officer in May
2007 following the acquisition of Novelis by Hindalco.
Mr. Fisher served as Vice President and Controller for
TXU Energy, the non-regulated subsidiary of TXU Corp. from July
2005 to February 2006. Prior to joining TXU Energy,
Mr. Fisher served in various senior finance roles at
Aquila, Inc., an international electric and gas utility and
energy trading company, including Vice President, Controller and
Strategic Planning, from 2001 to 2005. He is also a member of
the board of directors of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. since
April 2009. Mr. Fisher is a graduate of the University of
Iowa in 1993, where he earned a B.B.A. in Finance and
Accounting. He is a Certified Public Accountant.
Alexandre Almeida is a Senior Vice President and
President, Novelis South America. Prior to this appointment in
August 2008, Mr. Almeida had served as Chief Financial
Officer of Novelis South America beginning in January 2005.
Formerly, he was Managing Director of Alcan Composites Brasil
Ltda. from 2003 to 2005 and was previously Chief Operating
Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Líder
Aviação (formerly Líder Taxi Aereo S.A.).
Mr. Almeida holds a degree in Metallurgical Engineering and
a Masters Degree in
115
Computer Science from Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, and
also a postgraduate degree in Finance Administration from
João Pinheiro Foundation.
Jean-Marc Germain is a Senior Vice President and
President Novelis North America. Mr. Germain was Vice
President Global Can for Novelis Inc. from January 2007 until
May 2008 when he was appointed Senior Vice President and the
President of our North American operations. He was previously
Vice President and General Manager of Light Gauge Products for
Novelis North America from September 2004 to December 2006, and
prior to that Mr. Germain held a number of senior positions
with Alcan Inc. and Pechiney S.A. From January 2004 to August
2004 he served as co-lead of the Integration Leadership Team for
the Alcan and Pechiney merger, which occurred in 2004. Prior to
that, he served as Senior Vice President & General
Manager Foil, Strip and Specialties Division for Pechiney from
September 2001 to December 2003. Before his time at Alcan and
Pechiney, Mr. Germain worked for GE Capital and
Bain & Company. Mr. Germain is a graduate from
École Polytechnique in Paris, France.
Antonio Tadeu Coelho Nardocci has served as our Senior
Vice President and President, Novelis Europe since June 2009. He
previously served as our Senior Vice President, Strategy,
Innovation and Technology from August 2008 to June 2009, and as
Senior Vice President and President of our South American
operations from February 2005 to August 2008. Prior to our
spin-off from Alcan, Mr. Nardocci held a number of
leadership positions with Alcan, most recently serving as
President of Rolled Products South America from March 2002 until
January 2005. Mr. Nardocci graduated from the University of
São Paulo in Brazil with a degree in metallurgy.
Mr. Nardocci is a member of the executive board of the
Brazilian Aluminum Association.
Thomas Walpole is a Senior Vice President and the
President, Novelis Asia. Mr. Walpole was our
Vice President and General Manager, Can Products Business
Unit from January 2005 until February 2006. Mr. Walpole
joined Alcan in 1979 and has held various senior management
roles. Mr. Walpole held international positions within
Alcan in Europe and Asia until 2004. He began as Vice President,
Sales, Marketing & Business Development for Alcan
Taihan Aluminum Ltd. and most recently was President of the
Litho/Can and Painted Products for the European region.
Mr. Walpole graduated from State University of
New York at Oswego with a B.S. in Accounting, and holds an
M.B.A. from Case Western Reserve University.
Eric Drummond has served as our Senior Vice President and
Chief People Officer since November 2009. Prior to joining our
company, he served as Vice President, Global Human Resources for
the National Basketball Association from April 2007 to November
2009. Before that, Mr. Drummond served in various
leadership positions with Ingersoll-Rand, PepsiCo, and Coors
Brewing, and The NBA. He is a member of the board of Michigan
State University and the University of Colorado.
Mr. Drummond holds a B.S., Employment and International
Relations and a Masters degree, Labor and Industrial Relations,
from Michigan State University.
Nicholas Madden is our Vice President and Chief
Procurement Officer. Prior to this role, which he assumed in
October 2006, Mr. Madden served as President of Novelis
Europes Can, Litho and Recycling business unit beginning
in October 2004. He was Vice President of Metal Management and
Procurement for Alcan Rio Tintos Rolled Products division
in Europe from December 2000 until September 2004 and was also
responsible for the secondary recycling business.
Mr. Madden holds a B.Sc. (Hons) degree in Economics and
Social Studies from University College in Cardiff, Wales.
Erwin Mayr has served as our Senior Vice President and
Chief Strategy Officer since October 2009. He previously held a
number of leadership positions within our European operations,
including Business Unit President, Advanced Rolled Products,
from 2002 until 2009. Prior to joining our company in 2002,
Mr. Mayr was an associate partner with the consulting firm
Monitor Group. Mr. Mayr earned his Ph.D., Physics from Ulm
University (Germany).
Randal P. Miller is our Vice President,
Treasurer. Prior to joining Novelis in July 2008,
Mr. Miller served as Vice President and Treasurer of
Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling from May 2006 to November
2007 where he was responsible for all treasury, banking, and
capital markets activities for Transocean and its subsidiaries.
From 2001 to 2006, Mr. Miller served as Vice President
Finance, Treasurer of
116
Aquila, Inc. Mr. Miller earned his B.S.B.A. from Iowa State
University and M.B.A from the University of Missouri
Kansas City.
Robert Nelson is our Vice President, Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer. Mr. Nelson served as the Acting
Controller of Novelis Inc. beginning in July 2008 and was
appointed Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer in November 2008. Previously, he worked for
22 years at Georgia Pacific, one of the worlds
leading manufacturers of tissue, pulp, paper, packaging, and
building products. Mr. Nelson served in a variety of
corporate and operational financial roles at Georgia Pacific,
most recently as Vice President and Controller from 2004 to
2006. Prior to that, he was Vice President Finance, Consumer
Products & Packaging. Mr. Nelson earned a degree
in Accountancy from the University of Illinois
Urbana Champaign and is a Certified Public
Accountant in the State of Georgia.
Leslie J. Parrette, Jr. rejoined our company in
October 2009 to serve as our Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Compliance Officer, and he was appointed Corporate
Secretary in February 2010. Before rejoining our company,
Mr. Parrette served as Senior Vice President, Legal Affairs
and General Counsel for WESCO International, Inc. (formerly
Westinghouse Electric Supply Co.) (electrical product
distribution) from March 2009 until October 2009. From March
2005 until March 2009, he served as our Senior Vice President,
General Counsel, Secretary and Compliance Officer. Prior to
that, Mr. Parrette served as Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary for Aquila, Inc. (gas and electric
utility; energy trading) from July 2000 until February 2005.
Mr. Parrette holds an A.B. magna cum laude, in Sociology
from Harvard College and received his J.D. from Harvard Law
School.
Karen Renner has served as our Vice President and Chief
Information Officer since October 2010, and is a member of the
Executive Committee. Prior to joining Novelis, Ms. Renner
worked at General Electric Company where she spent the last
18 years in progressively senior IT leadership roles,
including CIO of GE Digital Energy, GE Security, and GE Shared
Services/Quality. Ms. Renner earned both her undergraduate
and Masters degree in Industrial Engineering from Auburn
University as well as an M.B.A. from Georgia State University.
Our
Directors
Our Board of Directors is currently comprised of five directors.
Our directors terms will expire at each annual shareholder
meeting provided that if an election of directors is not held at
an annual meeting of the shareholders, the directors then in
office shall continue in office or until their successors shall
be elected. Biographical details as of December 31, 2010
for each of our directors are set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Director Since
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Kumar Mangalam Birla
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Askaran Agarwala
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
Director
|
D. Bhattacharya
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director and Vice Chairman of the Board
|
Clarence J. Chandran
|
|
January 6, 2005
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director
|
Donald A. Stewart
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Director
|
Mr. Kumar Mangalam Birla was elected as the Chairman
of the Board of Directors of Novelis on May 15, 2007.
Mr. Birla is the Chairman of Hindalco Industries Limited,
which is among Indias largest business houses, and an
industry leader in aluminum and copper. He is also the Chairman
of Aditya Birla Groups leading blue-chip companies viz:
Grasim, UltraTech Cement, Aditya Birla Nuvo and Idea Cellular
and globally Novelis, Aditya Birla Chemicals
(Thailand) Limited, Indo Phil Textile Mills Inc. Philippines,
etc. Mr. Birla also serves as director on the board of the
Groups international companies spanning Thailand,
Indonesia, Philippines, Egypt, and Canada. Additionally,
Mr. Birla serves on the board of the G.D.
Birla Medical Research & Education Foundation,
and is a Chancellor of the Birla Institute of
Technology & Science, Pilani. He is a member of the
London Business Schools Asia Pacific Advisory Board. He is
a part time nonofficial director on Central Board of Reserve
Bank of India. Mr. Birlas past affiliations include
service on the boards of Indian Aluminum Company Limited, Maruti
Udyog Limited, Indo Gulf Fertilisers Limited and Tata
Iron & Steel Co. Limited. Mr. Birla brings to the
board significant global leadership experience acquired through
his service as a director of numerous corporate, professional
and regulatory entities in various regions
117
of the world. Mr. Birla provides valuable insight into the
business and political conditions in which we conduct our global
operations.
Askaran Agarwala is a Director and former President of
Hindalco and former Chairman of the Business Review Council of
the Aditya Birla Group from October 2003 to March 2010. From
1982 to October 2003, he was President of Hindalco.
Mr. Agarwala serves on the Compensation Committee of the
Novelis Board of Directors. Mr. Agarwala also serves as a
director of several other companies including Udyog Services
Ltd., Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Limited formerly known as
Bihar Caustic & Chemicals Ltd., Tanfac Industries
Ltd., and Birla Insurance Advisory Services Limited. He is a
Trustee of G.D. Birla Medical Research and Education Foundation,
Vaibhav Medical and Education Foundation, Sarla Basant Birla
Memorial Trust and Aditya Vikram Birla Memorial Trust.
Mr. Agarwala has served as a director of Renusagar
Engineering & Power Services Limited, Rosa Power
Supply Company Ltd., Aditya Birla Science & Technology
Limited and Bina Power Supply Company Limited.
Mr. Agarwalas past and current service as a director
of several companies and industry associations in the metals and
manufacturing industries adds a valuable perspective to the
board. Having served as president of our parent company,
Hindalco Industries, Mr. Agarwala also brings a depth of
understanding of our business and operations.
Mr. Debnaryan Bhattacharya is Managing Director of
Hindalco Industries Ltd. Mr. Bhattacharya is
Vice Chairman of Novelis and serves on the Audit and
Compensation Committees of the Novelis Board of Directors. He is
the Chairman of Utkal Alumina International Limited and of
Aditya Birla Minerals Limited in Australia.
Mr. Bhattacharya also serves as a Director of Hindalco
Almex-Aerospace Limited and Aditya Birla Management Corporation
Private Ltd., and Pidilite Industries Limited. In addition, he
has served as a director of Aditya Birla Science &
Technology Limited. Mr. Bhattacharyas extensive
knowledge of the aluminum and metals industries provides a
valuable resource to the company in the setting and
implementation of its operating business plans as the company
considers various strategic alternatives. Mr. Bhattacharya
is an audit committee financial expert and brings to the board a
high degree of financial literacy.
Clarence J. Chandran has been a director of the company
since 2005. Mr. Chandran serves on the Compensation and
Audit Committees of the Novelis Board of Directors, and acts as
the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Chandran
serves as Chairman of The Walsingham Fund. He is a director of
Marfort Deep Sea Technologies Inc. and is a past director of
Alcan Inc. and MDS Inc. He retired as Chief Operating Officer of
Nortel Networks Corporation (communications) in 2001.
Mr. Chandran is a member of the Board of Visitors of the
Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University.
Mr. Chandran has acquired years of significant experience
through his leadership and management of companies with
international business operations. Mr. Chandran brings to
the board his deep knowledge in the areas of technology, sales
and global operations.
Donald A. Stewart is Chief Executive Officer and a
Director of Sun Life Financial Inc. and Sun Life Assurance
Company of Canada. Mr. Stewart serves on the Audit
Committee of the Novelis Board of Directors and serves as its
Chairman. Mr. Stewart also serves a director of the
Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association and is a member
of the Board of The Geneva Association. His past affiliations
include service as a director of CI Financial Corp.
Mr. Stewart brings extensive financial management and
operating experience to the board. He is the current CEO of Sun
Life, a large public company in the insurance and financial
services sector, and has held positions of increasing
responsibility in his 35 years of service at Sun Life and
its related companies.
Corporate
Governance
Holders of our securities and other interested parties may
communicate with the Board of Directors, a committee or an
individual director by writing to Novelis Inc., 3560 Lenox Road,
Suite 2000, Atlanta, GA 30326, Attention: Corporate
Secretary Board Communication. All such
communications will be compiled by the Corporate Secretary and
submitted to the appropriate director or board committee. The
Corporate Secretary will reply or take other actions in
accordance with instructions from the applicable board contact.
118
Committees
of Our Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors has established two standing committees:
the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. Each
committee is governed by its own charter.
According to their authority as set out in their charters, our
Board of Directors and each of its committees may engage outside
advisors at our expense.
Audit
Committee
Our Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee.
Messrs. Stewart, Bhattacharya and Chandran are the members
of the Audit Committee. Messrs. Stewart and Bhattacharya
have been identified as audit committee financial
experts as that term is defined in the rules and
regulations of the SEC.
Our Audit Committees main objective is to assist our Board
of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities for
the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and
independence of our independent registered public accounting
firm and the performance of both our internal audit function and
our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the
Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for,
among other matters:
|
|
|
|
|
evaluating and compensating our independent registered public
accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
making recommendations to the Board of Directors and
shareholders relating to the appointment, retention and
termination of our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
discussing with our independent registered public accounting
firm their qualifications and independence from management;
|
|
|
|
reviewing with our independent registered public accounting firm
the scope and results of their audit;
|
|
|
|
pre-approving all audit and permissible non-audit services to be
performed by our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
review areas of potential significant financial risk and the
steps taken to monitor and manage such exposures;
|
|
|
|
overseeing the financial reporting process and discussing with
management and our independent registered public accounting firm
the interim and annual financial statements that we file with
the SEC; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and monitoring our accounting principles, accounting
policies and disclosure, internal control over financial
reporting and disclosure controls and procedures.
|
Compensation
Committee
Our Compensation Committee establishes our general compensation
philosophy and oversees the development and implementation of
compensation policies and programs. It also reviews and approves
the level of
and/or
changes in the compensation of individual executive officers
taking into consideration individual performance and competitive
compensation practices. The committees specific roles and
responsibilities are set out in its charter. Our Compensation
Committee periodically reviews the effectiveness of our overall
management organization structure and succession planning for
senior management, reviews recommendations for the appointment
of executive officers, and reviews annually the development
process for high potential employees.
Code
of Conduct and Guidelines for Ethical Behavior
Novelis has adopted a Code of Conduct for the Board of Directors
and Senior Managers and maintains a Code of Ethics for Senior
Financial Officers that applies to our senior financial officers
including our principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer, or persons performing
similar functions. We also maintain a Code of Conduct that
governs all of our employees. Copies of the Code of
119
Conduct for the Board of Directors and Senior Managers and the
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers are available on
our website at www.novelis.com. We will promptly disclose any
future amendments to these codes on our website as well as any
waivers from these codes for executive officers and directors.
Copies of these codes are also available in print from our
Corporate Secretary upon request.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
This section provides a discussion of the background and
objectives of our compensation programs for senior management,
as well as a discussion of all material elements of the
compensation of each of the named executive officers for fiscal
2010 identified in the following table. The named executive
officers are determined in accordance with SEC rules and include
(1) the persons that served as our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer during any part of
fiscal 2010, and (2) the three other highest paid executive
officers that were employed on March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
Former President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis North America
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Asia
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Europe
|
Compensation
Committee and Role of Management
The Compensation Committee of our board of directors (the
Committee) has the responsibility for approving the compensation
programs for our named executive officers and making decisions
regarding specific compensation to be paid or awarded to them.
The Committee acts pursuant to a charter approved by our board,
which is reviewed annually.
Our Chief People and Communications Officer serves as the
management liaison officer for the Committee. Our human
resources and legal departments provide assistance to the
Committee in connection with administration of the
Committees responsibilities.
Our named executive officers have no direct role in setting
their own compensation. The Committee, however, normally meets
with our management team to evaluate performance against
pre-established goals and management makes recommendations to
the board regarding budgets, which affect certain goals. Our
President and Chief Operating Officer also makes recommendations
regarding compensation matters related to other named executive
officers and provides input regarding executive compensation
programs and policies generally.
Management also assists the Committee by providing information
needed or requested by the Committee (such as our performance
against budget and objectives, historic compensation,
compensation expense, our policies and programs, and peer
companies) and by providing input and advice regarding
compensation programs and policies and their impact on the
Company and its executives.
Objectives
and Design of Our Compensation Program
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract,
retain, and reward talented executives who can contribute to our
long-term success and thereby build value for our shareholder.
The program is organized around three fundamental principles:
|
|
|
|
|
Provide Total Direct Compensation Opportunities That Are
Competitive with Similar Positions at Comparable
Companies: To enable us to attract, motivate and
retain qualified executives, total direct compensation
opportunities for each executive (base pay, annual short-term
incentives and long-term incentives) are targeted at levels to
be competitive with similar positions at comparable companies.
The
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
Company strives to create a total direct compensation package
that is at the median of the peer companies described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Substantial Portion of Total Direct Compensation Should Be
at Risk Because It Is Performance-Based: We
believe executives should be rewarded for their performance.
Consequently, a substantial portion of an executives total
direct compensation should be at risk, with amounts actually
paid dependent on performance against pre-established objectives
for the individual and us. The portion of an individuals
total direct compensation that is based upon these performance
objectives should increase as the individuals business
responsibilities increase.
|
|
|
|
A Substantial Portion of Total Direct Compensation Should be
Delivered in the Form of Long-Term Performance Based
Awards: We believe a long-term stake in the
sustained performance of Novelis effectively aligns executive
and shareholder interests and provides motivation for enhancing
shareholder value. As a result, we may provide long-term
performance based awards, which are generally paid in cash.
|
The Committee recognizes that the engagement of strong talent in
critical functions may entail recruiting new executives at times
and involve negotiations with individual candidates. As a
result, the Committee may determine in a particular situation
that it is in our best interests to negotiate compensation
packages that deviate from the principles set forth above.
In fiscal 2010, the Committee and the board elected not to use
the services of a compensation consultant, but instead chose to
evaluate our compensation programs based on generally available
market data including the following:
1. Market data provided by the Hay Group (a global human
resource consulting firm) for the following peer group of
companies: Air Products, Alcan, Altria Group Philip
Morris USA, Anheuser Busch, Arcelor Mittal, Ashland Inc., Bayer,
BHP Billiton, Caterpillar, Coca Cola Enterprises Inc.,
Dow Chemical Company, Eastman Chemical, Eaton Industries
Manufacturing GmbH, Hilti Corporation, Ingersoll Rand,
Kennametal, PPG Industries, Praxair Inc., Sab Miller, Saint
Gobain and Volkswagen Group.
2. Market data provided by Hay Group for companies of size
US$1Bn+ in revenues in the sectors of Manufacturing and
Materials. This information was provided for all levels of the
organization.
3. Data from several compensation surveys published by
leading global human resources consulting firms.
Elements
of Our Compensation Program
Our compensation program consists of the following key elements:
|
|
|
|
|
Base Pay
|
|
|
|
Short-Term (Annual) Incentives
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentives
|
|
|
|
Employee Benefits
|
The Committee periodically compares the competitiveness of these
key elements to that of companies in our peer group and to the
market data provided by the Hay Group, Hewitt Associates and
other human resources consulting firms. Our general goal is to
be at or near the 50th percentile among our peer group. In
fiscal 2010, this review revealed that the total direct
compensation opportunity for our executive officers was at our
target, without significant variation by position and by element
of compensation.
Base Pay. Based on market practices, the
Committee believes it is appropriate that some portion of total
direct compensation be provided in a form that is fixed and
liquid. Base salary for our named executive officers is
generally reviewed by the Committee in the first quarter of each
fiscal year and any increases are effective on July 1. In
setting base salary, the Committee is mindful of its overall
goal for allocation of total
121
compensation to this element and the median base salary for
comparable positions at companies in our peer group and as
confirmed by additional market data.
Short-Term (Annual) Incentives. We believe
having an annual incentive opportunity is necessary to attract,
retain and reward key management. Our general philosophy is that
annual cash incentives should be based on achievement of
company-wide and business unit goals as appropriate for the
named executive officer. The Committee also retains the
discretion to adjust, up or down, annual cash incentives earned
based on the Committees subjective assessment of
individual performance. Annual incentives should be consistent
with the strategic goals set by the board, and the performance
benchmarks should be sufficiently ambitious so as to provide
meaningful incentive to our executive officers.
Annual
Incentive Plan 2009 2010
Our Committee and board, after input from management, approved
the Annual Incentive Plan
(AIP) 2009 2010 to provide
short-term incentives for fiscal 2010. The performance
benchmarks for the year were tied to four key components:
(1) Normalized Operating Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) performance;
(2) Operating Free Cash Flow performance;
(3) satisfaction of certain EHS objectives; and
(4) Individual Performance against objectives.
|
|
|
|
|
Normalized Operating EBITDA is our key financial metric
for business profitability. It is calculated by removing the
following four items from Operating EBITDA (or Segment Income as
reported in our external US GAAP financial statements):
|
(1) Metal Price Lag We remove from
Operating EBITDA the impacts from timing differences in the
pass-through of metal price changes to our customers, net of
realized derivative instruments.
(2) Re-measurement of Working Capital and Debt
We remove from Operating EBITDA the impacts from
re-measuring to current exchange rates any monetary assets and
liabilities which are denominated in a currency other than the
functional currency of the reporting unit, net of realized
derivative instruments.
(3) Purchase Accounting We remove from
Operating EBITDA the impacts from purchase accounting
amortizations, primarily related to the asset basis
step-up and
contracts which were adjusted to fair value on the date Novelis
was acquired by Hindalco.
(4) Can Price Ceilings We remove from
Operating EBITDA the impacts from sales contracts with metal
price ceilings, net of realized derivative instruments. (Note:
Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, this adjustment
will no longer be required since Novelis no longer has sales
contracts with metal price ceilings.)
The potential payout attributable to Normalized Operating EBITDA
performance could have ranged from: (1) 0% of target if
fiscal 2010 performance did not exceed the performance
threshold; (2) 100% of target if fiscal 2010 results met
the business plan target; and (3) up to a maximum of 200%
of target if fiscal 2010 results met or exceeded the high end
business plan target. For fiscal 2010, there was one
discretionary adjustment. During fiscal 2010, our South America
region increased its accounts receivable factoring programs from
a planned level of $18 million to $35 million at the
request of the corporate office. The adjustment removes the
$17 million unplanned benefit from the Operating Free Cash
Flow results, since this is a non-operational cash flow. The
related factoring expense of $0.8 million is also added
back to Normalized Operating EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Free Cash Flow is our key financial metric for
business cash generation. At a region level, it is calculated as
(1) Operating EBITDA (2) minus Capital Expenditures
(3) plus (minus) net cash inflows (outflows) for Working
Capital and Other Assets/Liabilities. For the total-company
metric, we also include net cash inflows (outflows) for
(4) Interest, (5) Taxes, (6) Dividends,
(7) Corporate Expenses, (8) Restructuring Charges and
(9) Proceeds from Asset Sales.
|
We also remove from Operating Free Cash Flow the impacts from
timing differences in the pass-through of metal price changes to
our customers, net of realized derivative instruments (which we
refer
122
to as the metal price lag) and make an adjustment to
Operating Free Cash Flow to moderate the cash flow impact of LME
prices on year end metal inventory values. Our formula varies
based on the relative positions of actual and budgeted LME
prices in the fourth quarter, as a means of aligning this
adjustment with our desired inventory management practices. The
potential payout attributable to operating free cash flow
performance could have ranged from: (1) 0% of target if
fiscal 2010 performance did not exceed the performance
threshold; (2) 100% of target if fiscal 2010 results met
the business plan target; and (3) up to 200% of target if
fiscal 2010 results met or exceeded the high end business plan
target. For fiscal 2010, there was one discretionary adjustment.
During fiscal 2010, our South America region increased its
accounts receivable factoring programs from a planned level of
$18 million to $35 million at the request of the
corporate office. The adjustment removes the $17 million
unplanned benefit from the Operating Free Cash Flow results,
since this is a non-operational cash flow.
|
|
|
|
|
EHS objectives included Recordable Case Rates, Lost Time
Injury and Illness Case Rates and certain Strategic EHS
Initiatives. The Recordable Case Rate establishes targets for
reducing the level of workplace accidents resulting in an injury
requiring more than first aid treatment. The Lost Time Injury
and Illness Case Rate establishes targets for reducing the level
of workplace injuries or illnesses resulting in lost time of one
shift or more. The Strategic EHS Initiatives establish targets
for the completion of environmental initiatives that lead to
significant reductions in water emissions, energy or waste
aligned with site specific issues, and, establish targets for
the completion of occupational health and safety initiatives
that reduce site specific risks and exposures.
|
The potential payout attributable to satisfying EHS objectives
also ranged from 0% to 200% of target and was measured against
continuous improvement targets for recordable cases and lost
time injuries and illness as well as the completion of strategic
EHS initiatives.
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance objectives are also established in
recognition of each individuals unique job
responsibilities. The potential payout attributable to
Individual Performance also ranged from 0% to 200% of target as
measured against individual performance targets.
|
The table below shows for each named executive officer, other
than Ms. Brooks who was not eligible for bonus for fiscal
2010, the target AIP bonus amount, the applicable performance
objectives and relevant weightings, target and actual
performance for each goal and the amount earned based on actual
performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement
|
|
|
|
|
as a % of
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Actual
|
|
as a % of
|
|
Bonus
|
Name
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus ($)(A)
|
|
Performance Objectives
|
|
Weighting
|
|
Performance(C)
|
|
Performance(C)
|
|
Target
|
|
Payoff ($)
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized
Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
398,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating
Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
504,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
147.9
|
%
|
|
|
27,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
18,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic
Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5.81
|
|
|
|
190.5
|
%
|
|
|
48,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,123,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized
Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
213,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
147.9
|
%
|
|
|
14,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
10,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic
Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5.81
|
|
|
|
190.5
|
%
|
|
|
25,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120.0
|
%
|
|
|
40,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement
|
|
|
|
|
as a % of
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Actual
|
|
as a % of
|
|
Bonus
|
Name
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus ($)(A)
|
|
Performance Objectives
|
|
Weighting
|
|
Performance(C)
|
|
Performance(C)
|
|
Target
|
|
Payoff ($)
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized
Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
66,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
Normalized Operating
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
231.1
|
|
|
$
|
312.3
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating
Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
Operating Free Cash
Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
105.1
|
|
|
$
|
227.3
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
84,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
0.995
|
|
|
|
192.2
|
%
|
|
|
12,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
6,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic
Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
16,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120.0
|
%
|
|
|
25,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized
Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
49,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Normalized
Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
103.3
|
|
|
$
|
159.9
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
62,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating
Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
62,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Operating Free
Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
152.5
|
|
|
$
|
229.8
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
62,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic
Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
|
12,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
|
31,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci(B)
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
42,040
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized
Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
26,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating
Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
33,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
147.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5.81
|
|
|
|
190.5
|
%
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
201,367
|
|
|
Novelis Normalized
Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
625.5
|
|
|
$
|
761.4
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
%
|
|
|
63,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe Normalized
Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
176.0
|
|
|
|
186.4
|
|
|
|
114.9
|
%
|
|
|
46,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating
Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
80,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe Operating Free
Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
122.4
|
|
|
|
135.9
|
|
|
|
124.4
|
%
|
|
|
50,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Europe EHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
%
|
|
|
12,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
161.1
|
%
|
|
|
9,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic
Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
178.5
|
%
|
|
|
14,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
20,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
All amounts earned in currencies other than U.S. dollars are
reflected in this table and in the entire Compensation
Discussion and Analysis as U.S. dollars as adjusted by the
exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
Mr. Nardocci receives AIP bonus consideration for two
months for his corporate role and for ten months for his role in
Europe. |
|
(C) |
|
Dollars ($) and Euros () in millions. |
124
In fiscal 2010, the Committee did not see the need to exercise
its discretion to adjust annual cash incentives earned under the
2010 AIP based on a subjective review of individual performance
Long-Term Incentives. The Committee believes
that a substantial portion of each executives total direct
compensation opportunity should be based on long-term
performance. The awards should align the interests of our
executives and our shareholder. The opportunity to receive
long-term incentive compensation by an executive in a given year
is generally determined by reference to the market for long-term
incentive compensation among our peer group companies group and
as confirmed by additional market data. The Committee is also
mindful of long-term incentive awards made in prior years and
takes such awards into account in determining the amount of
current-year awards.
Long-Term
Incentive Plan Fiscal 2008 Fiscal 2010
(2008 LTIP)
For the 2008 LTIP covering fiscal years 2008 through 2010, the
Committee granted awards that are cash-based awards, 80% of
which is based on economic profit performance and 20% of which
is based on EBITDA performance related to innovation projects,
which provided the best link between the interests of executives
and our shareholder.
The Committee met during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to
evaluate and approve fiscal 2010 payouts for the 2008 LTIP. The
Committee determined that maximum awards were payable for fiscal
2010 for economic profit performance and determined that awards
of 174.4% of target were payable for innovation EBITDA
performance, and, determined that no awards were payable for
cumulative economic profit performance. Ms. Brooks was not
eligible for payments under this plan for fiscal 2010.
Mr. Martens was not an employee at the time that grants
were made under this plan.
The following amounts were earned under this plan in fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eligible for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant ($)
|
|
|
Results ($)
|
|
|
Level
|
|
|
Payout ($)
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
124.8
|
%
|
|
|
336,960
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
215,000
|
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
|
|
124.8
|
%
|
|
|
160,992
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
124.8
|
%
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
124.8
|
%
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
Long-term
Incentive Plan Fiscal 2009 Fiscal 2012
(2009 LTIP)
For the 2009 LTIP covering fiscal years 2009 through 2012, the
board of directors redesigned the prior years LTIP with
the intent of providing a more direct line of sight for
participants to Company performance as measured by the increase
in the price of Hindalco shares. The 2009 LTIP was formally
approved by the directors on June 19, 2008.
Awards under the 2009 LTIP consist of performance-based stock
appreciation rights (SARs), with the value of one
SAR being equivalent to the increase in value of one Hindalco
share. The SARs will vest 25% each year for four years, subject
to performance criteria being fulfilled. The performance
criterion will be based on Operating EBIDTA performance for
Novelis each year. The vesting threshold will be 75% performance
versus target each year, at which point 75% of SARs due that
year, would vest. There would be a straight line vesting up to
100% of performance. After the SARs have vested, they can be
exercised at times decided by the employee. The value realized
is dependent on the stock price of Hindalco at the time of
exercise; however, the value will be restricted to a maximum of
2.5 times the target opportunity if the SARs are exercised
within one year of vesting. The maximum will be 3 times for SARs
exercised more than one year after vesting.
In the event a participant resigns, unvested SARs will lapse and
vested SARs must be exercised within 90 days. If an
employee retires more than one year from the date of grant, SARs
will continue to vest and must be exercised no later than the
third anniversary of retirement. In the event of death or
disability, there
125
will be immediate vesting of all SARs with one year to exercise.
Upon a change in control, there would be immediate vesting and
cash-out of SARs.
The following grants were made to our named executive officers,
except for Mr. Martens who was not an employee at the time
the grants were made, under the 2009 LTIP. Target Operating
EBITDA for fiscal 2010 was exceeded and the second tranche of
SARs will fully vest on June 19, 2010, for fiscal 2010 as
shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
2009-2012
|
|
|
|
on June 19,
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP
|
|
Number of
|
|
2010
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
SARs
|
|
Based on
|
|
SARs Forfeited/
|
Name
|
|
Grant ($)
|
|
Granted
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
Canceled
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
|
2,231,000
|
|
|
|
3,919,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,919,938
|
(A)
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
878,516
|
|
|
|
219,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
878,516
|
|
|
|
219,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
614,961
|
|
|
|
153,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
614,961
|
|
|
|
153,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
These SARs were cancelled upon Ms. Brooks termination. |
Long-term
Incentive Plan Fiscal 2010 Fiscal 2013
(2010 LTIP)
The 2010 LTIP covering fiscal years 2010 through 2013 was
approved by the board of directors on June 25, 2009. The
2010 LTIP is identical to the 2009 LTIP except that the
performance measure is Normalized Operating EBITDA instead of
Operating EBITDA.
The following grants were made to our named executive officers,
except for Ms. Brooks who was not employed at the time of
the grant, under the 2010 LTIP. Target Normalized Operating
EBITDA for fiscal 2010 was exceeded and the first tranche of
SARs will fully vest on June 25, 2010 for fiscal 2010 as
shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs Vesting on
|
|
|
|
|
2010-2013
|
|
|
|
June 25,
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP
|
|
Number of
|
|
2010
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
SARs
|
|
Based on
|
|
SARs Forfeited/
|
Name
|
|
Grant ($)
|
|
Granted
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
Canceled
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,340,005
|
|
|
|
585,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
|
|
|
153,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
|
|
|
153,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
409,501
|
|
|
|
102,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
|
|
|
153,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual
Retention Agreements July 1, 2009
On July 1, 2009 we entered into individual retention
arrangements with all named executive officers except
Mr. Martens and Ms. Brooks. The agreements provide for
cash payments to the named executive officers on July 1,
2010, July 1 2011 and July 1, 2012, unless the named
executive officer voluntarily terminates or is terminated for
cause prior to those dates. The arrangements also provide for
the grant of phantom restricted shares, with one share equal to
the value of one Hindalco share. The phantom restricted shares
will vest on July 1, 2012, unless the named executive
officer voluntarily terminates or is terminated for cause prior
to that date; provided that the maximum payout may not exceed
two times the original value of the phantom restricted shares.
126
The cash amounts payable under the retention arrangements are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1,
|
|
July 1,
|
|
July 1,
|
|
|
2010 ($)
|
|
2011 ($)
|
|
2012 ($)
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
70,067
|
|
|
|
70,067
|
|
|
|
70,067
|
|
The phantom restricted share opportunity (payable in cash) is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of Phantom
|
|
|
Original
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Value ($)
|
|
Shares
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
103,667
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
74,871
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
114,000
|
|
|
|
65,656
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
154,020
|
|
|
|
88,704
|
|
Employee
Benefits
Following our spinoff from Alcan, we adopted the Novelis Pension
Plan and the Novelis Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the
Novelis SERP), which provide benefits identical to the benefits
provided under the Alcancorp Pension Plans. Executives who were
participants in the Alcancorp Pension Plan participate in the
Novelis Pension Plan and Novelis SERP (collectively referred to
as the U.S. Pension Plan). Executives who were not
participants in the Alcancorp Pension Plan or who were hired on
or after January 1, 2005 do not participate in the
U.S. Pension Plan. Ms. Brooks and Messrs. Germain
and Walpole are all participants in the U.S. Pension Plan.
Additional Pension Benefits: In addition to
her participation in the U.S. Pension Plan described above,
Ms. Brooks will receive from us a supplemental pension
equal to the excess of the pension she would have received from
her employer prior to joining Alcan had she been covered by her
prior employers pension plan until her separation or
retirement from Novelis, over the sum of her pension from the
U.S. Pension Plan and the pension rights actually accrued
with her previous employer. The supplemental pension will be
$1,363 per month beginning at age 55 (July 1, 2014).
|
|
|
|
|
Savings Plan and Non-Qualified Defined Contribution
Plan: All U.S. based executives are eligible
to participate in our tax qualified savings plan. We match up to
4.5% of pay (up to the IRS compensation limit; $245,000 for
calendar year 2010) for participants who contribute 6% of
pay or more to the savings plan. In addition, U.S. based
executives hired on or after January 1, 2005 are eligible
to share in our discretionary contributions. Discretionary
contributions are first made to the qualified plan (up to the
IRS compensation limit) and any excess amounts are made to our
non-qualified defined contribution plan. For fiscal 2010, we
made a discretionary contribution equal to 5% of pay.
Mr. Martens and Mr. Fisher are the only named
executive officers eligible for a discretionary contribution for
the period.
|
|
|
|
Brazil Defined Contribution Pension Plan: All
Brazil employees are eligible to participate in a defined
contribution pension plan. Employees can contribute from 0-12%
of base salary. Independent of any employee contribution, the
company will contribute 0.7% of base pay up to 1 plan unit
($1,486 in 2010) and 14% (10% if hired on or after
July 1, 2003) of pay in excess of 1 plan unit.
Mr. Nardocci was the only named executive eligible for the
Brazil Pension Plan.
|
|
|
|
Perquisites: As noted in our Summary
Compensation Table, we provide our officers with certain
perquisites consistent with market practice. We do not view
perquisites as a significant element of our comprehensive
compensation structure.
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Welfare
Benefits: Executives are entitled to participate
in our employee benefit plans (including medical, dental,
disability, and life insurance benefits) on the same basis as
other employees.
|
Employment-Related
Agreements
Each of our named executive officers during fiscal 2010 was
covered by an employment or letter agreement setting forth the
general terms of his or her employment as well as various other
employment related agreements.
See Employment-Related Agreements and Certain Employee Benefit
Plans below for a discussion of these agreements.
Timing of
Compensation Decisions
The Committee develops an annual agenda to assist it in
fulfilling its responsibilities. Generally, in the first quarter
of each fiscal year, the Committee (1) reviews prior year
performance and authorizes the distribution of short-term
incentive and long-term incentive pay-outs, if any, for the
prior year, (2) establishes performance criteria for the
current year short-term incentive program, (3) reviews base
pay and annual short-term incentive targets for executives, and
(4) recommends to the board of directors the form of award
and performance criteria for the current cycle of the long-term
incentive program.
Long-term incentive awards are generally considered and approved
by the Committee during the first quarter of each fiscal year,
although the Committee may deviate from this practice when
appropriate under the circumstances.
Compensation
Risk Assessment
In fiscal 2010, the Committee reviewed the Companys
executive compensation policies and practices, and determined
that the Companys executive compensation programs are not
reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the
Company. The Committee also reviewed the Companys
compensation programs for certain design features which have
been identified by experts as having the potential to encourage
excessive risk-taking, including: (i) too much focus on
equity; (ii) compensation mix overly weighted toward annual
incentives; (iii) uncapped payouts; (iv) unreasonable
goals or thresholds; or (v) steep payout cliffs at certain
performance levels that may encourage short-term decisions to
meet payout thresholds. Based on its review, the Committee
determined that, for all employees, the Companys
non-executive compensation programs do not encourage excessive
risk and instead encourage behaviors that support sustainable
value creation.
Compensation
Committee Report
The Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing
Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on
the Committees review of and discussions with management,
the Committee recommended to the board of directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2010.
The foregoing report is provided by the following directors, who
constitute the Committee:
Mr. Clarence J. Chandran, Chairman
Mr. Debnarayan Bhattacharya
Mr. Askaran Agarwala
128
Summary
Compensation Table
The table below sets forth information regarding compensation
for our named executive officers for fiscal 2008 through 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Plan
|
|
Pension
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Value
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(A)
|
|
($)(B)
|
|
($)(C)
|
|
($)(D)
|
|
($)(E)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
2010
|
|
|
173,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,808
|
|
|
|
13,412
|
|
|
|
1,149,860
|
|
Former President and
|
|
2009
|
|
|
731,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,104
|
|
|
|
2,231,000
|
|
|
|
113,850
|
|
|
|
344,054
|
|
|
|
90,666
|
|
|
|
3,721,924
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
2008
|
|
|
672,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
896,739
|
|
|
|
10,466,761
|
|
|
|
1,096,223
|
|
|
|
97,640
|
|
|
|
92,991
|
|
|
|
13,322,926
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
2010
|
|
|
670,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,123,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,350
|
|
|
|
4,132,958
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
2010
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
911,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,428
|
|
|
|
2,142,410
|
|
Senior Vice President and
|
|
2009
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,370
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
46,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,657
|
|
|
|
1,081,602
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2008
|
|
|
334,538
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
171,780
|
|
|
|
386,927
|
|
|
|
361,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,732
|
|
|
|
1,358,152
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
2010
|
|
|
325,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
542,142
|
|
|
|
40,886
|
|
|
|
86,333
|
|
|
|
1,649,405
|
|
Senior Vice President and
|
|
2009
|
|
|
318,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,140
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
15,422
|
|
|
|
24,847
|
|
|
|
126,681
|
|
|
|
1,025,715
|
|
President of Novelis North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
2010
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
524,977
|
|
|
|
369,297
|
|
|
|
425,936
|
|
|
|
2,069,210
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
2009
|
|
|
281,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,033
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
26,177
|
|
|
|
221,833
|
|
|
|
539,251
|
|
|
|
1,470,544
|
|
and President of Novelis Asia
|
|
2008
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,752
|
|
|
|
981,865
|
|
|
|
210,890
|
|
|
|
59,765
|
|
|
|
607,032
|
|
|
|
2,347,304
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
2010
|
|
|
457,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,020
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
611,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,327
|
|
|
|
2,101,275
|
|
Senior Vice President and
President of Novelis Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
For the year ended March 31, 2010, these stock awards
represent the grant date fair value of the phantom restricted
shares granted on July 1, 2009 under the Individual
Retention Agreements. For the phantom restricted shares, the
fair value is calculated by using the market value of the
corresponding number of Hindalco shares on the date of grant. |
|
(B) |
|
For the years ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010,
includes the grant date fair value of the SARs granted under the
2009 LTIP and 2010 LTIP. For the year ended March 31, 2010
fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes value on the
date of grant of $0.8547 per SAR. Also represents the grant date
fair value of the SARs granted to Ms. Brooks under her
Separation Release Agreement. |
|
(C) |
|
For the year ended March 31, 2010, these represent awards
earned under the Novelis fiscal 2010 Annual Incentive Plan and
payments under the 2008 LTIP for fiscal 2010 results. |
|
(D) |
|
Represents the aggregate change in actuarial present value of
the named executive officers accumulated benefit under our
qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans during
fiscal 2010. Assumptions used in the calculation of these
amounts are included in Note 12 to our audited consolidated
financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2010. |
|
(E) |
|
The amounts shown in the All Other Compensation Column reflect
the values from the table below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Defined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Contribution
|
|
Group
|
|
Relocation and
|
|
|
|
Perquisites and
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
Plans
|
|
Life
|
|
Hosing Related
|
|
Child Tuition
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Payments ($)
|
|
($)(A)
|
|
Insurance ($)
|
|
Payments ($)
|
|
Reimbursement ($)
|
|
Benefits ($)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,083
|
(B)
|
|
|
13,412
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,442
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
259,672
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,261
|
(D)
|
|
|
338,350
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,417
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,349
|
(E)
|
|
|
75,428
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,244
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,252
|
|
|
|
22,381
|
(F)
|
|
|
86,333
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
421,324
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425,936
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,444
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
232,494
|
(H)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,785
|
(I)
|
|
|
353,327
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents matching contribution (and discretionary
contributions in the case of Mr. Martens and
Mr. Fisher) made to our tax qualified and non-qualified
defined contribution plans. |
129
|
|
|
(B) |
|
Includes executive flex allowance, car allowance, and other
perquisites, each of which individually had an aggregate
incremental cost less than $25,000. |
|
(C) |
|
Includes (i) home sale closing costs of $42,500;
(ii) relocation allowance of $60,000; (iii) home
purchase closing costs of $20,596; (iv) Temporary Living of
$26,345 and (v) tax payments of $110,231. |
|
(D) |
|
Includes executive flex allowance, car allowance and home
security, each of which individually had an aggregate
incremental cost less than $25,000. |
|
(E) |
|
Includes executive flex allowance, car allowance and home
security, each of which individually had an aggregate
incremental cost less than $25,000. |
|
(F) |
|
Includes executive flex allowance, car allowance and other
perquisites, each of which individually had an aggregate
incremental cost less than $25,000. |
|
(G) |
|
Includes: (i) an Expatriate Premium of $119,503;
(ii) Employer paid Korean Tax Deposit of $130,024;
(iii) Employer provided housing of $97,330;
(iv) Employer paid car/driver for Korean assignment of
$55,221; (v) travel reimbursement of $5,577;(vi) club dues
of $10,939 and (vii) tax advice of $2,730. |
|
(H) |
|
Includes: (i) an Expatriate Premium of $19,548, household
goods move of $2,313 and relocation allowances of $210,633. |
|
(I) |
|
Includes health care expenses, company car allowance and home
security each of which individually had an aggregate incremental
cost less than $25,000. |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2010
The table below sets forth information regarding grants of
plan-based awards made to our named executive officers for the
year ended March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payout
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity
|
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards(A)
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Martha Brooks
|
|
|
05/08/2009
|
(B)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672,345
|
|
|
|
1,801,168
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
06/25/2009
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
1,260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
06/25/2009
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
1,575,000
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/2009
|
(D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
06/25/2009
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
|
|
422,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
1,575,000
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/2009
|
(D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
06/25/2009
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
|
|
313,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/2009
|
(D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,000
|
|
|
|
228,000
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
06/25/2009
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,407
|
|
|
|
486,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
1,575,000
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/2009
|
(D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,020
|
|
|
|
308,040
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
This grant was made under the Novelis Annual Incentive Plan
(AIP) for the year ended March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
This grant was made under the terms of Ms. Brooks
Separation Release Agreement. |
|
(C) |
|
These grants were made under the 2010 LTIP in the form of SARs. |
|
(D) |
|
These grants were made under the individual retention agreements
in the form of phantom restricted shares. |
Employment-Related
Agreements and Certain Employee Benefit Plans
Each of our named executive officers was subject to an
employment or letter agreement during fiscal 2010. The terms of
each such agreement is summarized below.
130
Agreement
with Martha Finn Brooks
On May 8, 2009, we entered into a separation and release
agreement with Ms. Brooks, regarding the terms of her
departure from the Company. The Agreement became effective on
May 15, 2009, seven days from the date of execution.
Pursuant to the Agreement, Ms. Brooks received a goodwill
incentive consisting of 1,000,000 stock appreciation rights of
Hindalco common stock (SARs) at an exercise price of INR 60.50.
Each SAR was equivalent to one Hindalco share. The SARs, which
vested on May 8, 2009, could be exercised, in whole or in
part, at any time during a three year exercise period commencing
May 8, 2009. Ms. Brooks elected to exercise all of her
SARs on December 3, 2009 for a value of $1,801,168.
Additionally, we agreed to indemnify Ms. Brooks under our
director and officer insurance policies and released her from
future claims relating to her employment with Novelis.
Ms. Brooks was granted the goodwill incentive, in part, as
an acknowledgement that she voluntarily delayed her retirement
with the Company (a) until her successor could be
identified and (b) to facilitate an efficient leadership
transition. Additionally, as further consideration for the
goodwill incentive, Ms. Brooks: provided a release to
Novelis waiving any and all claims she may have against us;
agreed to provide continued cooperation with any pending or
future litigation, proceeding or hearing; and agreed to not
disclose any proprietary information obtained while working at
Novelis. Ms. Brooks also agreed to provide general
consulting services to Novelis for up to 10 hours a month
for a period of six months. Should she provide more than
10 hours of consulting per month, Ms. Brooks will be
paid at an hourly rate of $625 subject to a maximum of $5,000
per day.
Agreement
with Philip Martens
On April 16, 2009, the board of directors appointed Philip
Martens to succeed Ms. Brooks as President and Chief
Operating Officer, effective May 8, 2009. On that date, the
board ratified the employment agreement between Mr. Martens
and the Company dated April 11, 2009. Pursuant to this
employment agreement, Mr. Martens will receive an annual
base salary of $700,000, an annual short term target bonus
percentage of 90% of his base salary (i.e., $630,000), and an
annualized long term incentive target opportunity of $2,000,000.
However, during his first year of employment, Mr. Martens
will receive not less than 50% of the target of his annual short
term target bonus for the fiscal 2010 (i.e., $315,000).
Mr. Martens will receive benefits and perquisites
customarily provided to our executives. He will be entitled to
receive two years annual base salary and target short term
incentive opportunity (less any other severance payments) as
severance pay if he is terminated involuntarily except for
cause, death, disability, or retirement. Other severance
benefits described in his employment agreement include a lump
sum payment to assist him with post-employment medical
continuation coverage, life insurance benefits, and retirement
benefits.
As part of the employment agreement, Mr. Martens agreed to
a non-competition provision, prohibiting him from competing with
the Company during his employment and for a period of
24 months thereafter. He also agreed to not solicit
(a) the Companys customers and suppliers or
(b) its employees during his employment and for a period of
24 months thereafter.
His employment agreement also states that Mr. Martens will
receive an agreement providing employment protection in the
event of a change in control of the Company. Accordingly, the
Company and Mr. Martens entered into a Change in Control
Agreement dated as of April 16, 2009 (the CIC Agreement).
The CIC Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of
(i) April 15, 2011, unless a change in control event
occurs on or before such date, or (ii) 24 months
following the date of a change in control event. Pursuant to the
CIC Agreement, he will be entitled to the following payments if
the Company terminates his employment other than for cause, or
if he resigns for good reason, within 24 months after a
change in control event:
|
|
|
|
|
a lump sum cash amount equal to two times the sum of
(1) his annual base salary plus (2) his target short
term incentive opportunity for the calendar year in which the
change in control occurs; the lump
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
sum cash amount will be reduced by the amount of severance
payments, if any, paid or payable to him other than pursuant to
the CIC Agreement to avoid duplication of payments;
|
|
|
|
|
|
other benefits described in the CIC Agreement including a lump
sum payment to assist him with post-employment medical
continuation coverage, life insurance benefits, and retirement
benefits; and
|
|
|
|
a gross-up
reimbursement for any excise tax liability imposed by
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.
|
Such payments shall not be made if his employment terminates
because of death, disability, or retirement.
Agreement
with Steven Fisher
Mr. Fisher currently serves as our Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer (effective May 16,
2007) with a base salary of $450,000 in fiscal 2010 under
the terms of his employment agreement. Mr. Fisher is
eligible for all of our executive long-term and short-term
incentive plans and is entitled to certain executive
perquisites. He is also eligible for our broad-based employee
benefit and health plans.
Agreement
with Jean-Marc Germain
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Germain
dated April 28, 2008. He currently serves as our Senior
Vice President and President of Novelis North America (effective
May 15, 2008) with a base salary of $325,000 in fiscal
2010. Mr. Germain is eligible for all of our executive
long-term and short-term incentive plans and is entitled to
certain executive perquisites. He is also eligible for certain
tuition reimbursements for the education of his children through
the end of the 2009 2010 school year. He is also
eligible for our broad-based employee benefit and health plans.
Agreement
with Thomas Walpole
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Walpole
effective as of February 1, 2007, pursuant to which he
serves as our Senior Vice President and President of Novelis
Asia with a base salary of $285,000 in fiscal 2010. Under his
agreement, Mr. Walpole is entitled to an expatriate premium
and relocation allowance, each in amount equal to 10% of his
base salary (net after tax). Mr. Walpole is also eligible
for our executive long-term and short-term incentive plans and
certain executive perquisites as well as our broad-based
employee benefit and health plans. During the term of his Korean
assignment, Mr. Walpole is provided with a fully furnished
home which is paid for by Novelis Korea Limited and is entitled
to certain other relocation benefits the value of which is
included in the Summary Compensation Table.
Agreement
with Tadeu Nardocci
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Nardocci
effective as of June 8, 2009, pursuant to which he serves
as our Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Europe
with a base salary of $390,954. Under his agreement,
Mr. Nardocci is entitled to an expatriate premium in amount
equal to 10% of his base salary (net after tax).
Mr. Nardocci is also eligible for our executive long-term
and short-term incentive plans and certain executive perquisites
as well as our broad-based employee benefit and health plans.
During the term of his European assignment, Mr. Nardocci is
provided with certain other relocation benefits the value of
which is included in the Summary Compensation Table.
Change
in Control Agreements
We entered into a Change in Control Agreement with
Mr. Martens on April 16, 2009 as described above. On
June 25, 2009 we entered into substantially similar
agreements with Messrs. Fisher, Germain, Walpole and
Nardocci.
132
Severance
Compensation Agreements
On June 25, 2009, we entered into Severance Compensation
Agreements with Messrs. Fisher, Germain, Walpole and
Nardocci. Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, the
executive will be entitled to receive 18 months annual base
salary (less any other severance payments) as severance pay if
he is involuntarily terminated other than for cause, death,
disability or retirement. Additional severance benefits include
a 12-month
lump sum payment to assist with post-employment medical
continuation coverage unless eligible for retiree medical
coverage, as well as life insurance and retirement benefits for
12 months. Each agreement also contains a non-competition
and non-solicitation provision which prohibits the executive
from competing with us or soliciting our customers, suppliers or
employee for a period of 18 months following termination.
Outstanding
Equity Awards as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAR Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised SARs
|
|
Unexercised SARs
|
|
SAR Exercise
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
SAR Expiration Date
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,340,005
|
(A)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2016
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
(A)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,887
|
(B)
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
(A)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,887
|
(B)
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,501
|
(A)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,221
|
(B)
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614,251
|
(A)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
June 25, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,221
|
(B)
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
SARs issued in fiscal 2010 are payable in cash based on the
stock performance of Hindalco Industries Limited, listed on the
National Stock Exchange in Mumbai, India. Novelis is a
subsidiary of Hindalco Industries Limited. The Exercise price of
85.79 Indian Rupees converted to US$ based on the closing
exchange rate on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
SARs issued in fiscal 2009 are payable in cash based on the
stock performance of Hindalco Industries Limited, listed on the
National Stock Exchange in Mumbai, India. Novelis is a
subsidiary of Hindalco Industries Limited. The Exercise price of
60.5 Indian Rupees converted to US$ based on the closing
exchange rate on March 31, 2010. |
133
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested in 2010
The table below sets forth the information regarding stock
options that were exercised or were cancelled and paid out
during fiscal 2010 and stock awards that vested and were paid
out during fiscal 2010. Ms. Brooks exercised all of her
vested SARs on December 3, 2009. There were no other SARs
that were vested during fiscal 2010 and none available for
exercise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
Realized on
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
Realized on
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
Vesting or
|
|
Vesting or
|
Name
|
|
Cancellation
|
|
Cancellation ($)
|
|
Cancellation
|
|
Cancellation ($)
|
|
Martha Brooks
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,801,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
Benefits in Fiscal 2010
The table below sets forth information regarding the present
value as of March 31, 2010 of the accumulated benefits of
our named executive officers under our defined benefit pension
plans (both qualified and non-qualified). U.S. executives
who were hired on or after January 1, 2005 are not eligible
to participate in our defined benefit pension plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Present
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Value of
|
|
During
|
|
|
|
|
Credited
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Last
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name(A)
|
|
Service
|
|
Benefit ($) (B)
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
Novelis Pension Plan
|
|
|
6.917
|
|
|
|
158,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis SERP
|
|
|
6.917
|
|
|
|
1,001,716
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
Not eligible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
Not eligible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
Novelis Pension Plan
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
|
52,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis SERP
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
|
36,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
Novelis Pension Plan
|
|
|
30.833
|
|
|
|
961,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis SERP
|
|
|
30.833
|
|
|
|
767,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci
|
|
Not eligible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
See Compensation Discussion and Analysis Elements of
Our Compensation, Employee Benefits for a discussion of these
plans. |
|
(B) |
|
See Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended March 31, 2010, for a
discussion of the assumptions used in the calculation of these
amounts. |
|
(C) |
|
Includes an amount of $163,360 as the present value of
accumulated benefit under the Cummins Minimum Pension Guarantee
as outlined as part of Ms. Brooks employment
agreement. |
The following table shows estimated retirement benefits,
expressed as a percentage of eligible earnings, payable upon
normal retirement at age 65:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years of Service
|
|
|
10
|
|
15
|
|
20
|
|
25
|
|
30
|
|
35
|
|
U.S. Pension Plan
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
134
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation
This table summarizes the fiscal 2010 Novelis contributions and
earnings for Messrs. Martens and Fisher to the Defined
Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elective
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
Balance at Last
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Distributions
|
|
Fiscal Year End
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,542
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,630
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,579
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,630
|
|
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
This section provides an estimate of the payments and benefits
that would be paid to certain of our named executive officers,
at March 31, 2010, upon voluntary or involuntary
termination of employment. This section, however, does not
reflect any payments or benefits that would be paid to our
salaried employees generally, including for example accrued
salary and vacation pay; regular pension benefits under our
qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans; normal
distribution of account balances under our qualified and
non-qualified defined contribution plans; or normal retirement,
death or disability benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip Martens(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive ($)
|
|
|
us for Cause ($)
|
|
|
Cause ($)
|
|
|
Control ($)
|
|
|
Disability ($)
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,660,000
|
(D)
|
|
|
2,660,000
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,525
|
(F)
|
|
|
77,525
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Lump sum cash payment for continuation of health coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,310
|
(H)
|
|
|
27,310
|
(I)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,260
|
(J)
|
|
|
1,260
|
(K)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,396,095
|
|
|
|
5,396,095
|
|
|
|
2,630,000
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $53,846
at March 31, 2010). Mr. Martens was not eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2010
assuming the SARs under the 2010 LTIP valued at the target
amount. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Employment Agreement. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Employment Agreement. |
135
|
|
|
(G) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(H) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Employment Agreement, this
amount is intended to assist the executive in paying
post-employment health coverage and is equal to 12 months
times the COBRA premium rate in effect at March 31, 2010,
grossed up for applicable taxes using an assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(I) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement,
this amount is intended to assist the executive in paying
post-employment health coverage and is equal to 12 months
times the COBRA premium rate in effect at March 31, 2010,
grossed up for applicable taxes using an assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(J) |
|
The executives Employment Agreement provides that the
executive will be entitled to one additional year of coverage
under our group life insurance plan. |
|
(K) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive ($)
|
|
|
us for Cause ($)
|
|
|
Cause ($)
|
|
|
Control ($)
|
|
|
Disability ($)
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
|
|
337,500
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
336,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336,960
|
|
|
|
1,236,960
|
|
|
|
1,236,960
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
(D)
|
|
|
1,575,000
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,400
|
(F)
|
|
|
50,400
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Lump sum cash payment for continuation of health coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,310
|
(H)
|
|
|
27,310
|
(I)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
716
|
(J)
|
|
|
716
|
(K)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
674,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427,886
|
|
|
|
3,227,886
|
|
|
|
1,574,460
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $34,615
at March 31, 2010). Mr. Fisher was not eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) under LTIP Plans (2008 at actual, 2009 and 2010 at
target) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to 1.5 times the executives base
salary and would be payable pursuant to the executives
Severance Compensation Agreement. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Severance Compensation Agreement. |
|
(G) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. |
136
|
|
|
(H) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Severance Compensation
Agreement, this amount is intended to assist the executive in
paying post-employment health coverage and is equal to
12 months times the COBRA premium rate in effect at
March 31, 2010, grossed up for applicable taxes using an
assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(I) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement,
this amount is intended to assist the executive in paying
post-employment health coverage and is equal to 12 months
times the COBRA premium rate in effect at March 31, 2010,
grossed up for applicable taxes using an assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(J) |
|
The executives Severance Compensation Agreement provides
that the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
(K) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive ($)
|
|
|
us for Cause ($)
|
|
|
Cause ($)
|
|
|
Control ($)
|
|
|
Disability ($)
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
|
|
211,500
|
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
160,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,992
|
|
|
|
1,060,992
|
|
|
|
1,060,992
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,500
|
(D)
|
|
|
1,072,500
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,465
|
(F)
|
|
|
52,465
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Lump sum cash payment for continuation of health coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,310
|
(H)
|
|
|
27,310
|
(I)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516
|
(J)
|
|
|
516
|
(K)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
372,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940,033
|
|
|
|
2,425,283
|
|
|
|
1,272,242
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $25,000
at March 31, 2010). Mr. Germain was not eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) under LTIP Plans (2008 at actual, 2009 and 2010 at
target) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to 1.5 times executives base salary
and would be paid pursuant to the executives Severance
Compensation Agreement. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Severance Compensation Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table
for pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(G) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table for
pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(H) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Severance Compensation
Agreement, this amount is intended to assist the executive in
paying post-employment health coverage and is equal to
12 months times the COBRA premium rate in effect at
March 31, 2010, grossed up for applicable taxes using an
assumed tax rate of 40%. |
137
|
|
|
(I) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement,
this amount is intended to assist the executive in paying
post-employment health coverage and is equal to 12 months
times the COBRA premium rate in effect at March 31, 2010,
grossed up for applicable taxes using an assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(J) |
|
The executives Severance Compensation Agreement provides
that the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
(K) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive ($)
|
|
|
us for Cause ($)
|
|
|
Cause ($)
|
|
|
Control ($)
|
|
|
Disability ($)
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
|
|
855,860
|
|
|
|
855,860
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510,625
|
(D)
|
|
|
883,500
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,323
|
(F)
|
|
|
64,323
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
(H)
|
|
|
2,198
|
(I)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
400,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977,256
|
|
|
|
1,962,631
|
|
|
|
1,012,610
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $21,923
at March 31, 2010). Mr. Walpole was eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) under LTIP Plans (2008 at actual, 2009 and 2010 at
target) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to the benefit payable under the Novelis
Severance Pay Plan. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Severance Compensation Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table
for pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(G) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table for
pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(H) |
|
The executives Severance Compensation Agreement provides
that the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
(I) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tadeu Nardocci(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive ($)
|
|
|
us for Cause ($)
|
|
|
Cause ($)
|
|
|
Control ($)
|
|
|
Disability ($)
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
|
243,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,407
|
|
|
|
243,407
|
|
|
|
243,407
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,360
|
|
|
|
1,030,860
|
|
|
|
1,030,860
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586,432
|
(D)
|
|
|
1,251,054
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,444
|
(F)
|
|
|
88,444
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
(H)
|
|
|
1,544
|
(I)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
486,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163,187
|
|
|
|
2,615,309
|
|
|
|
1,274,267
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $45,110
at March 31, 2010). Mr. Nardocci was eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) under LTIP Plans (2008 at actual, 2009 and 2010 at
target) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to 1.5 times executives base salary
and would be paid pursuant to the executives Severance
Compensation Agreement. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Severance Compensation Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table
for pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(G) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of one additional year
of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table for
pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(H) |
|
The executives Severance Compensation Agreement provides
that the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
(I) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to one additional year of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
Director
Compensation for Directors for Fiscal 2010
The Chairman of our board of directors is entitled to receive
cash compensation equal to $250,000 per year, and the Chair of
our Audit Committee is entitled to receive $175,000 per year.
Each of our other directors is entitled to receive compensation
equal to $150,000 per year, plus an additional $5,000 if he is a
member of our Audit Committee. Directors fees are paid in
quarterly installments.
On July 8, 2008, our Chairman of the board, Mr. Birla,
informed the company that due to current and foreseeable
business conditions, he was foregoing the payment of his Novelis
director fees until further notice. On November 5, 2008,
Mr. Stewart informed the board that he was also foregoing
his Novelis director fees with effective date of July 1,
2008 until further notice. All directors, however, will continue
to receive reimbursement for
out-of-pocket
expenses associated with attending board and Committee meetings.
The table
139
below sets forth the total compensation received by our
non-employee directors for the year ended March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
Name
|
|
Paid in Cash ($)
|
|
Kumar Mangalam Birla
|
|
|
|
|
D. Bhattacharya
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
Askaran K. Agarwala
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Clarence J. Chandran
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
Donald A. Stewart
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
In fiscal 2010, only Independent Directors served on the
Committee. Clarence J. Chandran was the Chairman of the
Committee. The other Committee members during all or part of the
year were Mr. D. Bhattacharya and Mr. Askaran
Agarwala. During fiscal 2010, none of our executive officers
served as:
|
|
|
|
|
a member of the Committee (or other board committee performing
equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee,
the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose
executive officers served on our Committee;
|
|
|
|
a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers
served on our Committee; or
|
|
|
|
a member of the Committee (or other board committee performing
equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee,
the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose
executive officers served as one of our directors.
|
140
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary AV Metals Inc.
(Acquisition Sub) pursuant to a plan of arrangement (the
Arrangement) entered into on February 10, 2007
and approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on
May 14, 2007.
Subsequent to completion of the Arrangement on May 15,
2007, all of our common shares were indirectly held by Hindalco.
141
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In accordance with our Audit Committee charter, we maintain
various policies and procedures that govern related party
transactions. Pursuant to our Code of Conduct for the Board of
Directors and Senior Managers, senior managers and directors of
the company (a) must avoid any action that creates or
appears to create, a conflict of interest between their own
interest and the interest of the company, (b) cannot usurp
corporate opportunities, and (c) must deal fairly with
third parties. This policy is available on our website at
www.novelis.com. In addition, we have enacted procedures to
monitor related party transactions by (x) identifying
possible related parties through questions in our director and
officer questionnaires, (y) determining whether we receive
payments from or make payments to any of the identified related
parties, and (z) if we determine payments are made or
received, researching the nature of the interactions between the
company and the related parties and ensuring that the related
person does not have an interest in the transaction with the
company. The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and
approving the terms and conditions of all potential related
party transactions that involve the company, one of our
directors or executive officers or any of their immediate family
members.
On February 12, 2009, we entered into an unsecured
revolving credit facility of $100 million with an interest
rate of 13% and a scheduled maturity date of January 15,
2015, from a company affiliated with Hindalco. Our Chairman,
Kumar Mangalam Birla, serves as Chairman of Hindalco, and two of
our other directors, Debnaryan Bhattacharya and Askaran
Agarwala, are also directors of Hindalco; thus, we consider the
unsecured credit facility to be a related party transaction. The
largest aggregate amount of principal outstanding under the
facility was $94 million, and the amount of interest paid
with respect to the facility was $2 million. The facility
was repaid in August 2009 using proceeds from the issuance of
our 11.5% senior notes.
On December 11, 2009, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Novelis
U.K. Limited, entered into an agreement with Hindalco to sell
certain equipment previously used in the operation of our
aluminum sheet mill in Rogerstone, South Wales, U.K., which
ceased operations in April 2009. Under the equipment purchase
agreement, Hindalco paid Novelis U.K. Limited a purchase price
of $17 million, and the transaction closed in December
2010. The purchase price for the equipment was based on a
third-party valuation, and we believe the terms of this
transaction are comparable to the terms that would have been
reached with a third party on an arms-length basis.
On November 5, 2010, Novelis U.K. Limited entered into an
agreement with Hindalco to sell certain aluminum rolling
equipment previously used in the operation of our plant located
at Bridgnorth, England. The equipment purchase agreement
requires Hindalco to pay Novelis U.K. Limited a purchase price
of $2.9 million, plus certain additional dismantling costs.
The purchase price for the equipment was based on a third-party
valuation, and we believe the terms of this transaction are
comparable to the terms that would have been reached with a
third party on an arms-length basis. We expect the transaction
to be completed in the second quarter of fiscal year 2012.
Because of the relationship three of our directors have with
Hindalco, we consider the Rogerstone and Bridgnorth equipment
sales to be related party transactions.
On December 17, 2010, we completed certain refinancing
activities and paid a $1.7 billion dividend to our
shareholder as a return of capital.
142
DESCRIPTION
OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
In connection with the issuance of the old notes on
December 17, 2010, we also entered into the senior secured
credit facilities described below. Approximately
$1.5 billion under the senior secured credit facilities,
together with approximately $2.5 billion of proceeds from
the old notes, were used to (1) repay the outstanding
amount under our old senior secured credit facilities consisting
of (a) the $1.15 billion Previous Term Loan Facility
and (b) the $800 million Previous ABL facility;
(2) repay all of our then outstanding $185 million of
11.5% senior notes due February 15, 2015;
(3) repay $1.050 billion of our 7.25% senior
notes due February 15, 2015; (4) finance a
distribution to our parent company; and (5) pay related
premiums, fees, discounts and expenses.
General. Our senior secured credit facilities
consist of (1) the $1.5 billion six-year Term Loan
Facility that may be increased in minimum amounts of
$50 million per increase provided that the senior secured
net leverage ratio shall not on a proforma basis exceed 2.50 to
1 and (2) the $800 million five-year ABL Facility that
may be increased by an additional $200 million. Scheduled
principal amortization payments under the Term Loan Facility are
$3.75 million per calendar quarter. Any unpaid principal
will be due in full in December 2016. Substantially all of our
assets are pledged as collateral under our senior secured credit
facilities. Our senior secured credit facilities are also
guaranteed by substantially all of our restricted subsidiaries
that guarantee the notes.
Borrowings. Borrowings under the ABL Facility
are, subject to certain limitations, generally based on 85% of
the book value of eligible North American and certain eligible
European accounts receivable; plus up to the lesser of
(i) 75% of the net book value of all eligible North
American and U.K. inventory or (ii) 85% of the appraised
net orderly liquidation value of all eligible North American and
U.K. inventory; minus such reserves as the agent bank may
establish in good faith in accordance with such agent
banks permitted discretion.
Interest Rate and Fees. Generally, for both
the Term Loan Facility and ABL Facility, interest rates reset
periodically and interest is payable on a periodic basis
depending on the type of loan.
Under the ABL Facility, interest charged depends on the type of
loan as follows: (1) any loan categorized as an alternate
base rate (Base Rate) borrowing bears interest at an
annual rate equal to the alternate base rate (which is the
greatest of (i) the Federal Funds Rate, as published by the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, plus 0.50%, (ii) the
prime commercial lending rate of the agent bank, as established
by it from time to time and (iii) one month LIBOR plus
1.0%), plus the applicable margin; (2) Eurocurrency loans
bear interest at an annual rate equal to the adjusted LIBOR rate
for the applicable interest period, plus the applicable margin;
and (3) loans designated as Euro Interbank Offered Rate
(EURIBOR) loans bear interest annually at a rate
equal to the adjusted EURIBOR rate for the applicable interest
period, plus the applicable margin. Applicable margins under the
ABL Facility are at the levels set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Quarterly Excess Availability
|
|
Eurocurrency
|
|
EURIBOR
|
|
Base Rate
|
|
Greater than or equal to $575 million
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
Less than $575 million and equal to or greater than
$375 million
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
Less than $375 million and equal to or greater than
$175 million
|
|
|
2.75
|
%
|
|
|
2.75
|
%
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
Less than $175 million
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
Unused line fees will vary between 0.375% to 0.625% of the
unused portion of the ABL Facility and are payable monthly in
arrears.
Under the Term Loan Facility, loans characterized as Base Rate
borrowings bear interest annually at a rate equal to the
alternate base rate (which is the greatest of (w) the agent
bank prime rate, (x) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%,
(y) LIBOR for a loan denominated in dollars with a
one-month interest period and (z) 2.50% per annum) plus the
applicable margin. Loans characterized as Eurocurrency
borrowings bear
143
interest at an annual rate equal to the adjusted LIBOR rate for
the interest period in effect, plus the applicable margin. There
will be a LIBOR floor of 1.50%. Applicable margins under the
Term Loan Facility will be at the levels set forth below in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Leverage Ratio
|
|
Eurodollar Rate
|
|
Base Rate
|
|
Greater than 3.5 to 1.00
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
|
2.75
|
%
|
Equal to or less than 3.5 to 1.00
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
Prepayments. We may prepay borrowings under
the senior secured credit facilities, in whole or in part, at
any time and from time to time, if certain minimum prepayment
amounts and breakage costs are satisfied; provided that any
optional prepayment of the Term Loan Facility in connection with
a repricing amendment or refinancing through the issuance of any
lower priced debt made prior to the first anniversary of the
closing date thereof will require payment of a prepayment
premium equal to 1.0% of the principal amount of the Term Loan
Facility so prepaid or repriced. We are required to repay
borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities in the
event we receive net cash proceeds from certain asset sales, the
issuance of indebtedness not otherwise permitted under the
senior secured credit facilities, or certain casualty events
with respect to our property. In addition, we are required to
use the following percentages of excess cash flow in any given
year to repay our borrowings under the Term Loan Facility:
(a) 50% commencing with the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2012, minus voluntary prepayments during the
applicable fiscal year of the Term Loan Facility and loans under
the ABL Facility (to the extent accompanied by a permanent
reduction in commitments); provided that (i) if the
senior secured net leverage ratio is equal to or less than 1.75
to 1 and greater than 1.50 to 1, such mandatory prepayment will
be reduced to 25% of excess cash flow and (ii) if the
senior secured leverage ratio is equal to or less than 1.50 to
1, such mandatory prepayment will be reduced to 0% of excess
cash flow.
Covenants. Our senior secured credit
facilities include various customary covenants, including
limitations on our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt;
|
|
|
|
create or permit certain liens to exist;
|
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
make investments, loan and advances;
|
|
|
|
engage in mergers, amalgamations or consolidations;
|
|
|
|
make certain asset sales;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends and distributions beyond certain amounts;
|
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
prepay certain indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
amend certain agreements governing our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
create or permit restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries
to pay dividends, make other distributions to us or incur liens
on their assets;
|
|
|
|
change the business conducted by us and our subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
change our accounting policies and reporting practices;
|
|
|
|
enter into European cash pooling arrangements;
|
|
|
|
change our fiscal year; and
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with embargoed persons.
|
In addition, under the ABL Facility, if (a) our excess
availability under the ABL Facility is less than the greater of
(i) 12.5% of the lesser of (x) the total ABL Facility
commitment at any time and (y) the then applicable
borrowing base and (ii) $90 million, at any time or
(b) any event of default has occurred and is
144
continuing, we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio of at least 1.1 to 1 until (1) such excess
availability has subsequently been at least the greater of
(i) 12.5% of the lesser of (x) the total ABL Facility
commitments at such time and (y) the then applicable
borrowing base for 30 consecutive days and
(ii) $90 million and (2) no default is
outstanding during such 30 day period. As of
December 31, 2010, our excess availability under the ABL
Facility was $573 million, or 72% of the lender commitments
under the ABL Facility.
Further, under the Term Loan Facility we may not permit our
total net leverage ratio as of the last day of our four
consecutive quarters ending with any fiscal quarter to be
greater than the ratio set forth below opposite the period in
the table below during which the last day of such period occurs:
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net
|
Period
|
|
Leverage Ratio
|
|
March 30, 2011 through March 31, 2012
|
|
4.75 to 1.0
|
April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013
|
|
4.50 to 1.0
|
April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014
|
|
4.375 to 1.0
|
April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015
|
|
4.25 to 1.0
|
April 1, 2015 and thereafter
|
|
4.0 to 1.0
|
Our senior secured credit facilities also contains various
affirmative covenants, including covenants with respect to our
financial statements, litigation and other reporting
requirements, insurance, payment of taxes, employee benefits and
(subject to certain limitations) causing new subsidiaries to
pledge collateral and guaranty our obligations.
Events of Default. Our senior secured credit
facilities contain customary events of default, including
defaults with respect to:
|
|
|
|
|
a default in the payment of principal when due;
|
|
|
|
a default in the payment of interest, fees or any other amount
after a specified grace period;
|
|
|
|
a material breach of the representation or warranties;
|
|
|
|
a default in the performance of covenants, in certain cases
subject to any applicable grace period;
|
|
|
|
the failure to make any payment when due under any indebtedness
with a principal amount in excess of a specified amount;
|
|
|
|
the failure to observe any covenant or agreement that permits or
results in the acceleration of indebtedness with a principal
amount in excess of a specified amount;
|
|
|
|
certain bankruptcy events;
|
|
|
|
certain material judgments or court orders;
|
|
|
|
certain ERISA violations;
|
|
|
|
the invalidity or termination of certain loan documents or the
liens created in favor of the lenders; and
|
|
|
|
a change in control.
|
145
DESCRIPTION
OF THE NOTES
The 2017 old notes were issued and the 2017 new notes will be
issued under an indenture, dated December 17, 2010 (the
2017 Indenture), among us, as issuer, the
Subsidiary Guarantors and The Bank of New York Mellon
Trust Company, as trustee (the 2017
Trustee), and the 2020 old notes were issued and the
2020 new notes will be issued under an indenture, dated
December 17, 2010 (the 2020 Indenture
and together with the 2017 Indenture, the
Indentures), among us, as issuer, the
Subsidiary Guarantors and The Bank of New York Mellon
Trust Company, as trustee (the 2020
Trustee and together with the 2017 Trustee, the
Trustees and each, a
Trustee). Unless the context requires
otherwise, all references to the 2017 Notes in this
Description of the Notes include the 2017 old notes
and the 2017 new notes; all references to the 2020
Notes in this Description of the Notes include
the 2020 old notes and the 2020 new notes; and all references to
the Notes in this Description of the
Notes include the 2017 Notes and the 2020 Notes. The 2017
old notes and the 2017 new notes will be treated as a single
class for all purposes of the 2017 Indenture, and the 2020 old
notes and the 2020 new notes will be treated as a single class
for all purposes of the 2020 Indenture. The Indentures comply
with the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (the
Trust Indenture Act). The terms of each
series of Notes include those stated in the applicable Indenture
and those made part of the Indentures by reference to the
Trust Indenture Act.
The following description is a summary of the material
provisions of the Indentures. It does not restate the Indentures
in their entirety. You should read the applicable Indenture
because those documents, and not this description, define your
rights as a holder of the Notes. Copies of the Indentures are
available upon request to the company at the address indicated
under Where You Can Find More Information. You can
find the definitions of certain terms used in this description
under the subheading Certain Definitions. In this
description, the term Company refers only to Novelis
Inc. and not to any of its subsidiaries.
When issued, the 2017 new notes and the 2020 new notes will be
new issues of securities with no established trading market. No
assurance can be given as to the liquidity of the trading market
for the 2017 new notes or the 2020 new notes.
Principal,
Maturity and Interest
The Company is offering up to $1.1 billion aggregate
principal amount of 2017 new notes and up to $1.4 billion
aggregate principal amount of 2020 new notes in exchange for any
and all of the outstanding $1.1 billion aggregate principal
amount of 2017 old notes and any and all of the outstanding
$1.4 billion aggregate principal amount of 2020 old notes.
Subject to compliance with the limitations described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Debt, the Company may issue an unlimited principal amount
of additional 2017 Notes at later dates under the 2017 Indenture
(the 2017 Additional Notes) and an unlimited
principal amount of additional 2020 Notes at later dates under
the 2020 Indenture (the 2020 Additional Notes
and, together with the 2017 Additional Notes, the
Additional Notes). The Company can issue the
Additional Notes as part of the same series as the 2017 Notes or
the 2020 Notes, as the case may be. Any Additional Notes that
the Company issues in the future will be identical in all
respects to the 2017 Notes or the 2020 Notes, as applicable,
that the Company has issued or will issue except that Notes
issued in the future will have different issuance dates and may
have different issuance prices or transfer restrictions. The
applicable series of Notes exchanged and issued hereby and the
applicable Additional Notes subsequently issued will be treated
as a single class for all purposes under the applicable
Indenture, including waivers, amendments, redemptions and offers
to purchase. The Company will not issue any Additional Notes
unless such Additional Notes are fungible with the applicable
series of Notes being exchanged and issued hereby for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Company will issue
Notes only in fully registered form without coupons, in
denominations of $2,000 and integral multiples of $1,000.
The 2017 Notes will mature on December 15, 2017. The 2020
Notes will mature on December 15, 2020.
Interest on the Notes will accrue at a rate of 8.375% per annum
for the 2017 Notes and at a rate of 8.75% per annum for the 2020
Notes and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15
and December 15, commencing on June 15, 2011. The
Company will pay interest to those persons who were holders of
record on the June 1 or December 1 immediately preceding each
interest payment date.
146
Interest on the Notes will accrue from the date of original
issuance of the old notes or, if interest has already been paid,
from the date it was most recently paid. Interest will be
computed on the basis of a
360-day year
comprised of twelve
30-day
months.
Ranking
The Notes will be:
|
|
|
|
|
senior, unsecured obligations of the Company;
|
|
|
|
effectively junior in right of payment to all existing and
future secured debt of the Company (including the Senior Secured
Credit Facilities) to the extent of the value of the assets
securing that debt;
|
|
|
|
equal in right of payment (pari passu) with all existing
and future unsecured senior debt of the Company;
|
|
|
|
senior in right of payment to all future subordinated debt of
the Company; and
|
|
|
|
guaranteed on a senior, unsecured basis by the Subsidiary
Guarantors.
|
Most of the operations of the Company will be conducted through
its subsidiaries. Therefore, the Companys ability to
service its debt, including the Notes, will depend substantially
upon the cash flows of its subsidiaries and their ability to
distribute those cash flows to the Company as dividends, loans
or other payments. Certain laws restrict the ability of the
Companys subsidiaries to pay dividends or to make loans
and advances to it. The Companys ability to use the cash
flows of those subsidiaries to make payments on the Notes will
be limited to the extent of any such restrictions. See
Risk Factors Risks Related to the
Notes We are primarily a holding company and depend
on our subsidiaries to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our
debt service obligations, including payments on the notes.
Furthermore, in certain circumstances, bankruptcy,
fraudulent conveyance laws or other similar laws
could invalidate or limit the efficacy of the Subsidiary
Guaranties. See Risk Factors Risks Related to
the Notes Fraudulent conveyance laws and other legal
restrictions may permit courts to void or subordinate our
subsidiaries guarantees of the notes in specific
circumstances, which would prevent or limit payment under the
guarantees. Certain limitations contained in the guarantees,
which are designed to avoid this result, may render the
guarantees worthless. Any of the situations described
above could make it more difficult for the Company to service
its debt, including the Notes.
Except to the extent of any intercompany loans or other
advances, the Company only has a stockholders claim in the
assets of its subsidiaries. Its rights as a stockholder are
junior in right of payment to the valid claims of creditors of
the Companys subsidiaries against those subsidiaries.
Holders of the Notes will only be creditors of the Company and
those subsidiaries of the Company that are Subsidiary
Guarantors. In the case of subsidiaries of the Company that are
not Subsidiary Guarantors, all the existing and future
liabilities of those subsidiaries, including any claims of trade
creditors and preferred stockholders, will effectively rank
senior to the Notes.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $7.3 billion
in total consolidated debt and other liabilities (excluding
inter-company balances), of which $8.4 billion (including
inter-company balances) was debt and other liabilities of the
Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors, $1.0 billion
(including inter-company balances) of which was debt and other
liabilities of the Companys other subsidiaries and
$2.0 billion was inter-company balances. The Subsidiary
Guarantors and the Companys other subsidiaries have other
liabilities, including contingent liabilities, that may be
significant. The Indentures limit the amount of additional Debt
that the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries may Incur.
Notwithstanding these limitations, the Company and its
Subsidiaries may Incur substantial additional Debt. Debt may be
Incurred either by Subsidiary Guarantors or by the
Companys other subsidiaries.
The Notes and the Subsidiary Guaranties are unsecured
obligations of the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors,
respectively. Secured Debt of the Company and the Subsidiary
Guarantors, including their obligations under the Senior Secured
Credit Facilities, will be effectively senior to the Notes and
the Subsidiary Guaranties to the extent of the value of the
assets securing such Debt.
147
As of December 31, 2010, the outstanding secured Debt of
the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors on a consolidated
basis was $1.6 billion.
Subsidiary
Guaranties
The obligations of the Company under the Indentures, including
the repurchase obligation resulting from a Change of Control,
are guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured
basis, by: (a) all the existing Canadian Restricted
Subsidiaries and U.S. Restricted Subsidiaries of the
Company; (b) Novelis do Brasil Ltda., Novelis UK Ltd.,
Novelis Europe Holdings Limited, Novelis Aluminium Holding
Company, Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis Switzerland SA,
Novelis Technology AG, Novelis AG, Novelis PAE S.A.S., Novelis
Luxembourg S.A., Novelis Madeira, Unipessoal, Lda and Novelis
Services Limited; and (c) any other Restricted Subsidiaries
of the Company that Guarantee Debt in the future under Credit
Facilities, provided, that the borrower of such Debt is
the Company or a Canadian Restricted Subsidiary or a
U.S. Restricted Subsidiary. See
Certain Covenants Future
Subsidiary Guarantors. Each Subsidiary Guarantors
liability under its Subsidiary Guaranty is limited to the lesser
of (i) the aggregate amount of the Companys
obligations under the applicable series of Notes and the
applicable Indenture or (ii) the amount, if any, which
would not have (1) rendered the Subsidiary Guarantor
insolvent (as such term is defined in the Federal
Bankruptcy Code and in the Debtor and Creditor Law of the State
of New York) or (2) left it with unreasonably small capital
at the time its Subsidiary Guaranty with respect to the
applicable series of Notes was entered into, after giving effect
to the incurrence of existing Debt immediately before such time.
The liability of each Subsidiary Guarantor under its Subsidiary
Guaranty will also be subject to the limitations applicable
under local law, including limitations related to corporate
interest, insolvency, minimum capital requirements, financial
assistance and fraudulent conveyances. For example, Novelis
Deutschland GmbHs liability under its Subsidiary Guaranty
is limited to the extent that its net assets
(Eigenkapital) may not fall below the amount of its
stated share capital (Stammkapital) as a result of the
enforcement of the Subsidiary Guaranty, that such an enforcement
must not result in a breach of the prohibition of insolvency
causing intervention (Verbot des existenzvernichtenden
Eingriffs) or that such an enforcement must not deprive
Novelis Deutschland GmbH of the liquidity necessary to fulfill
its financial liabilities to its creditors to the extent
provided for by law. With respect to the Subsidiary Guarantors
organized under Swiss law, namely, Novelis AG, Novelis
Switzerland S.A. and Novelis Technology AG, the liability of
each such Subsidiary Guarantor under its Subsidiary Guaranty are
limited to the maximum amount of its profits and reserves
available for distribution.
The Subsidiary Guarantors currently generate most of the
Companys consolidated net sales and own most of its
consolidated assets. The subsidiaries of the Company that will
not be Subsidiary Guarantors at the consummation of this
offering represented the following approximate percentages of
(a) net sales, (b) EBITDA and (c) total assets of
the Company, on an historical consolidated basis:
|
|
|
29%
|
|
of the Companys consolidated net sales are represented by
net sales to third parties by subsidiaries that are not
Subsidiary Guarantors (for the nine months ended December
31, 2010)
|
28%
|
|
of the Companys consolidated EBITDA is represented by the
subsidiaries that are not Subsidiary Guarantors (for the
nine months ended December 31, 2010)
|
19%
|
|
of the Companys consolidated assets are owned by
subsidiaries that are not Subsidiary Guarantors (as of
December 31, 2010)
|
If the Company or a Subsidiary Guarantor, sells or otherwise
disposes of either:
(1) its ownership interest in a Subsidiary
Guarantor, or
(2) all or substantially all the assets of a Subsidiary
Guarantor,
then the Subsidiary Guarantor so sold or disposed of will be
released from all of its obligations under its Subsidiary
Guaranty. In addition, if, consistent with the requirements of
the Indentures, the Company redesignates a Subsidiary Guarantor
as an Unrestricted Subsidiary, the redesignated Subsidiary
Guarantor will be released from all its obligations under its
Subsidiary Guaranty. See Certain
Covenants
148
Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries
and Merger, Consolidation and Sale of
Property. A Subsidiary Guarantor will also be released
from all its obligations under its Subsidiary Guaranty
(i) in connection with any legal defeasance of the
applicable series of Notes, (ii) upon satisfaction and
discharge of the applicable Indenture or (iii) to the
extent such Subsidiary Guarantor is released from any and all
guarantees of Debt of the Company under the Credit Facilities.
Optional
Redemption
2017
Notes
Commencing December 15, 2013, the Company may, from time to
time, redeem all or any portion of the 2017 Notes after giving
the required notice under the 2017 Indenture at the redemption
prices set forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, to but excluding the redemption date (subject to the right
of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive
interest due on the relevant interest payment date). The
following prices are for 2017 Notes redeemed during the
12 month period commencing on December 15 of the years set
forth below, and are expressed as percentages of principal
amount:
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Redemption Price
|
|
2013
|
|
|
106.281
|
%
|
2014
|
|
|
104.188
|
%
|
2015
|
|
|
102.094
|
%
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.000
|
%
|
At any time prior to December 15, 2013, the Company may,
from time to time, redeem all or any portion of the 2017 Notes
after giving the required notice not less than 30 nor more than
60 days prior to such redemption under the 2017 Indenture
at a redemption price equal to the greater of:
(a) 100% of the principal amount of the 2017 Notes to be
redeemed, and
(b) the sum of the present values of (1) the
redemption price of the 2017 Notes at December 15, 2013 (as
set forth in the preceding paragraph) and (2) the remaining
scheduled payments of interest from the redemption date through
December 15, 2013, but excluding accrued and unpaid
interest through the redemption date, discounted to the
redemption date (assuming a 360 day year consisting of
twelve 30 day months), at the Treasury Rate plus
50 basis points,
plus, in either case, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to
but excluding the redemption date (subject to the right of
holders of record on the relevant record date to receive
interest due on the relevant interest payment date).
Any notice to holders of 2017 Notes of such a redemption shall
include the appropriate calculation of the redemption price, but
need not include the redemption price itself. The actual
redemption price, calculated as described above, shall be set
forth in an Officers Certificate delivered to the 2017
Trustee no later than two business days prior to the redemption
date unless clause (b) of the definition of
Comparable Treasury Price is applicable, in which
such Officers Certificate should be delivered on the
redemption date.
In addition, at any time and from time to time prior to
December 15, 2013, the Company may redeem up to a maximum
of 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 2017
Notes (including any Additional Notes) with the proceeds of one
or more Qualified Equity Offerings at a redemption price equal
to 108.375% of the principal amount of the 2017 Notes to be
redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the
redemption date (subject to the right of holders of record on
the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant
interest payment date); provided, that after giving
effect to any such redemption, at least 65% of the original
aggregate principal amount of the 2017 Notes (including any
Additional Notes) remains outstanding. Notice of any such
redemption shall be made within 90 days of such Qualified
Equity Offering and such redemption shall be effected upon not
less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior notice.
149
2020
Notes
Commencing December 15, 2015, the Company may, from time to
time, redeem all or any portion of the 2020 Notes after giving
the required notice under the 2020 Indenture at the redemption
prices set forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, to but excluding the redemption date (subject to the right
of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive
interest due on the relevant interest payment date). The
following prices are for 2020 Notes redeemed during the
12 month period commencing on December 15 of the years set
forth below, and are expressed as percentages of principal
amount:
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Redemption Price
|
|
2015
|
|
|
104.375
|
%
|
2016
|
|
|
102.917
|
%
|
2017
|
|
|
101.458
|
%
|
2018 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.000
|
%
|
At any time prior to December 15, 2015, the Company may,
from time to time, redeem all or any portion of the 2020 Notes
after giving the required notice not less than 30 nor more than
60 days prior to such redemption under the 2020 Indenture
at a redemption price equal to the greater of:
(a) 100% of the principal amount of the 2020 Notes to be
redeemed, and
(b) the sum of the present values of (1) the
redemption price of the 2020 Notes at December 15, 2015 (as
set forth in the preceding paragraph) and (2) the remaining
scheduled payments of interest from the redemption date through
December 15, 2015, but excluding accrued and unpaid
interest through the redemption date, discounted to the
redemption date (assuming a 360 day year consisting of
twelve 30 day months), at the Treasury Rate plus
50 basis points,
plus, in either case, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to
but excluding the redemption date (subject to the right of
holders of record on the relevant record date to receive
interest due on the relevant interest payment date).
Any notice to holders of 2020 Notes of such a redemption shall
include the appropriate calculation of the redemption price, but
need not include the redemption price itself. The actual
redemption price, calculated as described above, shall be set
forth in an Officers Certificate delivered to the 2020
Trustee no later than two business days prior to the redemption
date unless clause (b) of the definition of
Comparable Treasury Price is applicable, in which
such Officers Certificate should be delivered on the
redemption date.
In addition, at any time and from time to time prior to
December 15, 2013, the Company may redeem up to a maximum
of 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 2020
Notes (including any Additional Notes) with the proceeds of one
or more Qualified Equity Offerings at a redemption price equal
to 108.75% of the principal amount of the 2020 Notes to be
redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the
redemption date (subject to the right of holders of record on
the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant
interest payment date); provided, that after giving
effect to any such redemption, at least 65% of the original
aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Notes (including any
Additional Notes) remains outstanding. Notice of any such
redemption shall be made within 90 days of such Qualified
Equity Offering and such redemption shall be effected upon not
less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior notice.
Tax
Redemption
The Company may, at its option, at any time redeem in whole but
not in part the outstanding Notes at a redemption price equal to
100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to the redemption date (subject to the right
of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive
interest due on the relevant interest payment date) if it has
become obligated to pay any Additional Amounts (as defined
herein) in respect of the Notes as a result of:
(a) any change in or amendment to the applicable laws (or
regulations promulgated thereunder) of Canada, or
150
(b) any change in or amendment to any official position
regarding the application or interpretation of such laws or
regulations, which change or amendment is announced or is
effective on or after the Issue Date.
See Additional Amounts.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such notice of redemption will
be given (i) earlier than 90 days prior to the
earliest date on which the Company would be obliged to make such
payment of Additional Amounts and (ii) unless at the time
such notice is given, such obligation to pay such Additional
Amounts remains in effect. Before the Company publishes or mails
notice of redemption of the Notes, the Company will deliver to
the Trustee an Officers Certificate to the effect that it
cannot avoid its obligations to pay Additional Amounts by taking
reasonable measures available to it. The Company will also
deliver an opinion of independent legal counsel of recognized
standing stating that the Company would be obligated to pay
Additional Amounts as a result of a change in Tax law.
Additional
Amounts
The Indentures provide that payments made by or on behalf of the
Company under or with respect to the Notes (including any
payments by a Subsidiary Guarantor) will be made free and clear
of and without withholding or deduction for or on account of any
Taxes imposed or levied by or on behalf of a Taxing
Jurisdiction, unless the Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor is
required by law to withhold or deduct Taxes from any payment
made under or with respect to the Notes or by the interpretation
or administration thereof. If, after the Issue Date, the Company
or any Subsidiary Guarantor is so required to withhold or deduct
any amount for or on account of Taxes from any payment made
under or with respect to the Notes, the Company or such
Subsidiary Guarantor will pay to each holder of Notes that are
outstanding on the date of the required payment, such additional
amounts (the Additional Amounts) as may be
necessary so that the net amount received by such holder
(including the Additional Amounts) after such withholding or
deduction will not be less than the amount such holder would
have received if such Taxes (including Taxes on such Additional
Amounts) had not been withheld or deducted; provided,
that no Additional Amounts will be payable with respect to a
payment made to a holder of the Notes (an Excluded
holder):
(a) with which the Company or such Subsidiary Guarantor
does not deal at arms length (within the meaning of the
Income Tax Act (Canada)) at the time of making such
payment, or
(b) which is subject to such Taxes by reason of its being
connected with the relevant Taxing Jurisdiction otherwise than
by the mere acquisition, holding or disposition of the Notes or
the Subsidiary Guaranty or the receipt of payments thereunder.
The Company or such Subsidiary Guarantor will also:
(a) make such withholding or deduction, and
(b) remit the full amount deducted or withheld to the
relevant authority in accordance with applicable law.
The Company or such Subsidiary Guarantor will furnish to the
Trustee, or cause to be furnished to the Trustee, within
30 days after the date the payment of any Taxes is due
pursuant to applicable law, certified copies of tax receipts
evidencing that such payment has been made by the Company or any
such Subsidiary Guarantor or other evidence of such payment
satisfactory to the Trustee. The Trustee shall make such
evidence available upon the written request of any holder of the
Notes that are outstanding on the date of any such withholding
or deduction.
151
The Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors will indemnify and
hold harmless each holder of Notes that are outstanding on the
date of the required payment (other than an Excluded holder) and
upon written request reimburse each such holder for the amount
of:
(a) any Taxes so levied or imposed by or on behalf of a
Taxing Jurisdiction and paid by such holder as a result of
payments made under or with respect to the Notes and any
liability (including penalties, interest and expense) arising
therefrom or with respect thereto, and
(b) any Taxes (other than Taxes on such holders
profits or net income) imposed with respect to any reimbursement
under clause (a) above so that the net amount received by
such holder after such reimbursement will not be less than the
net amount such holder would have received if such reimbursement
had not been imposed.
At least 30 days prior to each date on which any payment
under or with respect to the Notes is due and payable, if the
Company or any such Subsidiary Guarantor becomes obligated to
pay Additional Amounts with respect to such payment, the Company
or such Subsidiary Guarantor will deliver to the Trustee an
Officers Certificate stating the fact that such Additional
Amounts will be payable, and the amounts so payable and will set
forth such other information as is necessary to enable the
Trustee to pay such Additional Amounts to the holders of the
Notes on the payment date. Whenever in the Indentures there is
mentioned, in any context:
(a) the payment of principal (and premium, if any),
(b) purchase prices in connection with a repurchase of
Notes,
(c) interest, or
(d) any other amount payable on or with respect to any of
the Notes,
such mention shall be deemed to include mention of the payment
of Additional Amounts provided for in this section to the extent
that, in such context, Additional Amounts are, were or would be
payable in respect thereof.
Mandatory
Redemption
The Company is not required to make any mandatory redemption or
sinking fund payments with respect to the Notes. However, under
certain circumstances, the Company may be required to offer to
purchase Notes as described under Change of
Control and Certain Covenants Limitation
on Sale and Leaseback Transactions. The Company may at any
time and from time to time purchase Notes on the open market or
otherwise.
Change of
Control Offer
Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, the Company will be
required to make an offer to each holder of Notes to repurchase
all or any part (in denominations of $2,000 or any integral
multiple of $1,000 in excess thereof) of such holders
Notes pursuant to the offer described below (the Change
of Control Offer) at a purchase price (the
Change of Control Purchase Price) equal to
101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to the repurchase date (subject to the right
of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive
interest due on the relevant interest payment date).
Within 30 days following any Change of Control, the Company
shall:
(a) cause a notice of the Change of Control Offer to be
sent at least once to the Dow Jones News Service or similar
business news service in the United States; and
(b) send, by first-class mail, with a copy to the Trustee,
to each holder of Notes, at such holders address appearing
in the Security Register, a notice stating:
(1) that a Change of Control has occurred and a Change of
Control Offer is being made pursuant to the covenant entitled
Change of Control Offer and that all Notes timely
tendered will be accepted for payment;
152
(2) the Change of Control Purchase Price and the repurchase
date, which shall be, subject to any contrary requirements of
applicable law, a business day no earlier than 30 days nor
later than 60 days from the date such notice is mailed;
(3) the circumstances and relevant facts regarding the
Change of Control (including, if applicable, information with
respect to pro forma historical income, cash flow and
capitalization after giving effect to the Change of
Control); and
(4) the procedures that holders of Notes must follow in
order to tender their Notes (or portions thereof) for payment,
and the procedures that holders of Notes must follow in order to
withdraw an election to tender Notes (or portions thereof) for
payment.
The Company will not be required to make a Change of Control
Offer following a Change of Control if a third party makes the
Change of Control Offer in the manner, at the times and
otherwise in compliance with the requirements set forth in the
Indentures applicable to a Change of Control Offer made by the
Company and purchases all Notes validly tendered and not
withdrawn under such Change of Control Offer. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained herein, a Change of Control
Offer may be made in advance of a Change of Control, subject to
one or more conditions precedent, including but not limited to
the consummation of such Change of Control, if a definitive
agreement is in place for the Change of Control at the time the
Change of Control Offer is made.
The Company will comply, to the extent applicable, with the
requirements of Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and any
other securities laws or regulations in connection with the
repurchase of Notes pursuant to a Change of Control Offer. To
the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or
regulations conflict with the provisions of this covenant, the
Company will comply with the applicable securities laws and
regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its
obligations under this covenant by virtue of such compliance.
Subject to compliance with the other covenants described in this
prospectus, the Company may, in the future, enter into certain
transactions, including acquisitions, refinancings or other
recapitalizations, that would not constitute a Change of Control
under the Indentures, but that could increase the amount of debt
outstanding at such time or otherwise affect the Companys
liquidity, capital structure or credit ratings.
The definition of Change of Control includes a phrase relating
to the sale, transfer, assignment, lease, conveyance or other
disposition of all or substantially all the Property
of the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries, considered as a
whole. Although there is a body of case law interpreting the
phrase substantially all, there is no precise
established definition of the phrase under applicable law.
Accordingly, if the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries,
considered as a whole, dispose of less than all this Property by
any of the means described above, the ability of a holder of
Notes to require the Company to repurchase its Notes may be
uncertain. In such a case, holders of the Notes may not be able
to resolve this uncertainty without resorting to legal action.
The Senior Secured Credit Facilities provide that certain of the
events that would constitute a Change of Control would also
constitute a default under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities
and entitle the lenders under those facilities to require that
such debt be repaid. Other future debt of the Company may
prohibit certain events that would constitute a Change of
Control or require such debt to be repurchased or repaid upon a
Change of Control. Moreover, if holders of Notes exercise their
right to require the Company to repurchase such Notes, the
Company could be in breach of obligations under existing and
future debt of the Company. Finally, the Companys ability
to pay cash to holders of Notes upon a repurchase may be limited
by the Companys then existing financial resources. The
Company cannot assure you that sufficient funds will be
available when necessary to make any required repurchases. The
Companys failure to repurchase Notes, as required
following a Change of Control Offer, would result in a default
under the Indentures. Such a default would, in turn, constitute
a default under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and other
existing debt of the Company and may constitute a default under
future debt as well. The Companys obligation to make an
offer to repurchase the 2017 Notes or the 2020 Notes as a result
of a Change of Control may be waived or modified
153
at any time prior to the occurrence of such Change of Control
with the written consent of the holders of at least a majority
in aggregate principal amount of such Notes. See
Amendments and Waivers.
Certain
Covenants
Covenant Suspension. If the 2017 Notes or the
2020 Notes, as the case may be, receive an Investment Grade
Rating from one of the Rating Agencies (or both Rating Agencies)
and no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is
continuing then, beginning on that day and continuing until the
Investment Grade Rating assigned by that Rating Agency (or both
Rating Agencies) to the 2017 Notes or the 2020 Notes, as the
case may be, subsequently declines as a result of which the 2017
Notes or the 2020 Notes, as the case may be, do not carry an
Investment Grade Rating from at least one Rating Agency (such
period being referred to as a Suspension Period),
the covenants set forth in this section will be suspended and
will not be applicable during that Suspension Period, except for
the covenants described under the following headings:
|
|
|
|
|
the third paragraph under Limitation on
Liens,
|
|
|
|
the second paragraph under Limitation on Sale
and Leaseback Transactions,
|
|
|
|
Designation of Restricted and
Unrestricted Subsidiaries (other than clause (x) of
the third paragraph (and such clause (x) as referred to in
the first paragraph thereunder)), and
|
|
|
|
Future Subsidiary Guarantors.
|
The Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors will also, during that
Suspension Period, remain obligated to comply with the
provisions described under Merger,
Consolidation and Sale of Property (other than
clause (e) of the first and second paragraphs thereunder).
In the event that the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries
are not subject to the suspended covenants for any Suspension
Period, and, subsequently, the applicable Rating Agency (or both
Rating Agencies) withdraws its or their ratings or downgrades
the ratings assigned to the 2017 Notes or the 2020 Notes, as the
case may be, below the required Investment Grade Ratings or a
Default or Event of Default occurs and is continuing, then the
Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries will from such time and
thereafter again be subject to the suspended covenants, and
compliance with the suspended covenants with respect to
Restricted Payments made after the time of such withdrawal,
downgrade, Default or Event of Default will be calculated in
accordance with the terms of the covenant described below under
Limitation on Restricted Payments as
though such covenant had been in effect during the entire period
of time from the Issue Date. Accordingly, Restricted Payments
made during the Suspension Period will reduce the amount
available to be made as Restricted Payments under the first
paragraph of Limitation on Restricted
Payments.
There can be no assurance that the 2017 Notes or 2020 Notes will
ever achieve an Investment Grade Rating from one or both Rating
Agencies.
Limitation on Debt. The Company shall not, and
shall not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, Incur, directly
or indirectly, any Debt unless either:
(1) such Debt is Debt of the Company or a Subsidiary
Guarantor and, after giving effect to the Incurrence of such
Debt and the application of the proceeds thereof, (x) the
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio would be greater than
2.00:1.00 and (y) no Default or Event of Default would
occur as a consequence of such Incurrence or be continuing
following such Incurrence, or
(2) such Debt is Permitted Debt.
The term Permitted Debt is defined to include the
following:
(a) (i) Debt of the Company evidenced by the 2017
Notes and the 2020 Notes and the Exchange Notes issued in
exchange for any Additional Notes and (ii) Debt of the
Subsidiary Guarantors evidenced by Subsidiary Guaranties
relating to the 2017 Notes and 2020 Notes and the Exchange Notes
issued in exchange for any Additional Notes;
154
(b) Debt of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary under
Credit Facilities, provided, that the aggregate principal
amount of all such Debt under Credit Facilities at any one time
outstanding shall not exceed $2.75 billion, which amount
shall be (i) permanently reduced by the amount of Net
Available Cash used to Repay Debt under Credit Facilities and
not subsequently reinvested in Additional Assets or used to
purchase Notes or Repay other Debt, pursuant to the covenant
described under Limitation on Asset
Sales and (ii) increased by the amount by which the
amount committed under the ABL Facility increases after the
Issue Date;
(c) Debt of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary in
respect of Capital Lease Obligations and Purchase Money Debt,
provided, that:
(1) the aggregate principal amount of such Debt does not
exceed the cost of construction, acquisition or improvement of
the Property acquired, constructed or leased together with the
reasonable costs of acquisition, and
(2) the aggregate principal amount of all Debt Incurred and
then outstanding pursuant to this clause (c) (together with all
Permitted Refinancing Debt Incurred and then outstanding in
respect of Debt previously Incurred pursuant to this clause (c))
does not exceed the greater of $400 million and 7.5% of
Consolidated Net Tangible Assets;
(d) Debt of the Company owing to and held by any Restricted
Subsidiary and Debt of a Restricted Subsidiary owing to and held
by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary; provided,
that any subsequent issue or transfer of Capital Stock or other
event that results in any such Restricted Subsidiary ceasing to
be a Restricted Subsidiary or any subsequent transfer of any
such Debt (except to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary)
shall be deemed, in each case, to constitute the Incurrence of
such Debt by the issuer thereof;
(e) Debt of a Restricted Subsidiary outstanding on the date
on which such Restricted Subsidiary is acquired by the Company
or otherwise becomes a Restricted Subsidiary (other than Debt
Incurred as consideration in, or to provide all or any portion
of the funds or credit support utilized to consummate, the
transaction or series of transactions pursuant to which such
Restricted Subsidiary became a Subsidiary of the Company or was
otherwise acquired by the Company), provided, that at the
time such Restricted Subsidiary is acquired by the Company or
otherwise becomes a Restricted Subsidiary and after giving
effect to the Incurrence of such Debt, either (x) the
Company would have been able to Incur $1.00 of additional Debt
pursuant to clause (1) of the first paragraph of this
covenant or (y) the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio
for the Company would be equal to or greater than the
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio for the Company immediately
prior to such transaction or series of transactions;
(f) Debt under Interest Rate Agreements entered into by the
Company or a Restricted Subsidiary for the purpose of limiting
interest rate risk in the ordinary course of the financial
management of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary and not
for speculative purposes, provided, that the obligations
under such agreements are directly related to payment
obligations on Debt otherwise permitted by the terms of this
covenant;
(g) Debt under Currency Exchange Protection Agreements
entered into by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary for the
purpose of limiting currency exchange rate risks directly
related to transactions entered into by the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary in the ordinary course of business and not
for speculative purposes;
(h) Debt under Commodity Price Protection Agreements
entered into by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary in the
ordinary course of the financial management of the Company or
such Restricted Subsidiary and not for speculative purposes;
(i) Debt in connection with one or more standby letters of
credit or performance bonds issued by the Company or a
Restricted Subsidiary in the ordinary course of business or
pursuant to self-insurance obligations and not in connection
with the borrowing of money or the obtaining of advances or
credit;
155
(j) Debt Incurred by a Securitization Entity in a Qualified
Securitization Transaction that is not recourse to the Company
or any Restricted Subsidiary (except for Standard Securitization
Undertakings);
(k) Debt of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary
outstanding on the Issue Date not otherwise described in
clauses (a) through (j) above;
(l) Debt of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary in an
aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time not to
exceed $350.0 million;
(m) Permitted Refinancing Debt Incurred in respect of Debt
Incurred pursuant to clause (1) of the first paragraph of
this covenant and clauses (a), (c), (e), (k), (m), and
(o) of this paragraph;
(n) Debt of Restricted Subsidiaries of the Company that are
not Subsidiary Guarantors in an aggregate principal amount
which, when taken together with all other Debt Incurred pursuant
to this clause (n) and outstanding on the date of such
Incurrence, does not exceed $150 million;
(o) Debt Incurred as consideration in, or otherwise to
consummate, the transaction pursuant to which any Person became
a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company or was otherwise acquired
by the Company; provided, that Debt outstanding pursuant
to this clause (o) (together with any Permitted Refinancing Debt
Incurred and then outstanding in respect of Debt previously
Incurred pursuant to this clause (o)) shall not at any one time
exceed $300 million;
(p) customer deposits and advance payments received in the
ordinary course of business from customers for goods purchased
in the ordinary course of business;
(q) Debt of Novelis Korea Limited or any Subsidiary or
successor thereof in an aggregate principal amount which, when
taken together with all other Debt Incurred pursuant to this
clause (q) and outstanding on the date of such Incurrence,
does not exceed $150 million;
(r) Debt owed on a short-term basis of no longer than
30 days to banks and other financial institutions Incurred
in the ordinary course of business of the Company and its
Restricted Subsidiaries with such banks or financial
institutions that arises in connection with ordinary banking
arrangements to manage cash balances of the Company and its
Restricted Subsidiaries; provided, that the amount of
such Debt outstanding pursuant to this clause (r) shall not
at any one time exceed $30.0 million;
(s) Debt of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary
consisting of (i) the financing of insurance premiums or
(ii) take-or-pay
obligations contained in supply arrangements, in each case,
Incurred in the ordinary course of business;
(t) Debt representing deferred compensation to employees of
the Company (or any direct or indirect parent of the Company)
and its Restricted Subsidiaries Incurred in the ordinary course
of business;
(u) Debt in respect of any bankers acceptance, bank
guarantees, letter of credit, warehouse receipt or similar
facilities, and reinvestment obligations related thereto,
Incurred in the ordinary course of business;
(v) Guarantees (a) incurred in the ordinary course of
business in respect of obligations of (or to) suppliers,
customers, franchisees, lessors and licensees that, in each
case, are non-Affiliates of the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries or (b) otherwise constituting Permitted
Investments;
(w) obligations of the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries in respect of commercial credit card and merchant
card services and other banking products or services provided
from time to time to the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries in connection with operating, collections, payroll,
trust, or other depository or disbursement accounts, including
automated clearinghouse,
e-payable,
electronic funds transfer, wire transfer, controlled
disbursement, overdraft, depository, information reporting,
lockbox and stop payment services; and
(x) Debt issued by the Company or any of its Restricted
Subsidiaries to any current or former officer, director or
employee of the Company, the direct or indirect parent of the
Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company (or
permitted transferees of such current or former officers,
156
directors or employees) to finance the purchase shares of, or
options to purchase shares of, common stock of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries or any direct or indirect parent entity
to the extent permitted by clause (d) of the second
paragraph of the covenant described under the caption
Restricted Payments.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this
covenant, accrual of interest, accretion or amortization of
original issue discount and the payment of interest or dividends
in the form of additional Debt, will be deemed not to be an
Incurrence of Debt for purposes of this covenant.
For purposes of determining compliance with this covenant, in
the event that an item of Debt meets the criteria of more than
one of the categories of Permitted Debt described in
clauses (a) through (x) above or is entitled to be
incurred pursuant to clause (1) of the first paragraph of
this covenant, the Company shall, in its sole discretion,
classify (and may later reclassify in whole or in part, in its
sole discretion) such item of Debt in any manner that complies
with this covenant; provided, that any Debt outstanding
under the ABL Facility and the Term Loan Facility on the Issue
Date after giving effect to the Recapitalization Transactions
shall be treated as having been incurred under clause (b)
above and such Debt shall not thereafter be permitted to be
reclassified in whole or in part; provided further, that
subject to the preceding proviso, at any time the Company could
be deemed to have Incurred any Debt pursuant to clause (1)
of the first paragraph of this covenant, all Debt shall be
automatically reclassified into Debt incurred pursuant to
clause (1) of the first paragraph of this covenant.
Limitation on Restricted Payments. The Company
shall not make, and shall not permit any Restricted Subsidiary
to make, directly or indirectly, any Restricted Payment if at
the time of, and after giving effect to, such proposed
Restricted Payment,
(a) a Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and
be continuing,
(b) the Company could not Incur at least $1.00 of
additional Debt pursuant to clause (1) of the first
paragraph of the covenant described under
Limitation on Debt, or
(c) the sum of the aggregate amount of such Restricted
Payment and all other Restricted Payments declared or made under
this paragraph, together with Restricted Payments made
pursuant to clauses (a), (d), (e), (g)(2), (g)(3), (g)(4),
(g)(5), and (l) since the Issue Date (the amount of any
Restricted Payment, if made other than in cash, to be based upon
Fair Market Value at the time of such Restricted Payment) would
exceed an amount equal to the sum of:
(1) 50% of the aggregate amount of Consolidated Net Income
accrued during the period (treated as one accounting period)
from October 1, 2010 to the end of the most recent fiscal
quarter for which financial statements have been provided (or if
the aggregate amount of Consolidated Net Income for such period
shall be a deficit, minus 100% of such deficit), plus
(2) 100% of the aggregate amount of cash contributed to the
capital of the Company following the Issue Date (other than
(i) contributions from a Restricted Subsidiary and
(ii) any Excluded Contributions); plus
(3) 100% of the Capital Stock Sale Proceeds, plus
(4) the sum of:
(A) the aggregate net cash proceeds received by the Company
or any Restricted Subsidiary from the issuance or sale after the
Issue Date of convertible or exchangeable Debt that has been
converted into or exchanged for Qualified Equity Interests of
the Company, and
(B) the aggregate amount by which Debt (other than
Subordinated Debt) of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary
is reduced on the Companys consolidated balance sheet on
or after the Issue Date upon the conversion or exchange of any
Debt issued or sold on or prior to the Issue Date that is
convertible or exchangeable for Qualified Equity Interests of
the Company,
157
excluding, in the case of clause (A) or (B):
(x) any such Debt issued or sold to the Company or a
Subsidiary of the Company or a Company Equity Plan, and
(y) the aggregate amount of any cash or other Property
distributed by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary upon any
such conversion or exchange, plus
(5) an amount equal to the sum of:
(A) the net reduction in Investments in any Person other
than the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary resulting from
dividends, repayments of loans or advances or other transfers of
Property, in each case to the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary from such Person, and
(B) the portion (proportionate to the Companys equity
interest in such Unrestricted Subsidiary) of the Fair Market
Value of the net assets of an Unrestricted Subsidiary at the
time such Unrestricted Subsidiary is designated a Restricted
Subsidiary;
provided, that the foregoing sum shall not exceed, in the
case of any Person, the amount of Investments previously made
(and treated as a Restricted Payment) by the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary in such Person.
Notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, the Company may:
(a) pay dividends or other distributions on its Capital
Stock within 60 days of the declaration thereof if, on the
declaration date, such dividends or other distributions could
have been paid in compliance with the Indenture;
provided, that at the time of such payment of such
dividend or other distributions, no other Default or Event of
Default shall have occurred and be continuing (or result
therefrom);
(b) purchase, repurchase, redeem, legally defease, acquire
or retire for value Capital Stock of the Company or Subordinated
Debt in exchange for, or out of the proceeds of the
substantially concurrent sale of, Qualified Equity Interests of
the Company or from substantially concurrent cash contributions
to the equity capital of the Company; provided, that the
Capital Stock Sale Proceeds from such exchange or sale and such
contribution shall be excluded from the calculation pursuant to
clauses (c)(2) and (c)(3) above;
(c) purchase, repurchase, redeem, legally defease, acquire
or retire for value any Subordinated Debt in exchange for, or
out of the proceeds of the substantially concurrent sale of,
Permitted Refinancing Debt;
(d) repurchase shares of, or options to purchase shares of,
common stock of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any
direct or indirect parent entity from current or former
officers, directors or employees of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or any direct or indirect parent entity (or
permitted transferees of such current or former officers,
directors or employees); provided, that the aggregate
amount of such repurchases shall not exceed
(i) $10.0 million in any calendar year prior to
completion of an underwritten initial public offering of the
Companys (or any direct or indirect parent entitys)
common stock (other than a public offering registered on
Form S-8)
or (ii) $15.0 million in any calendar year following
completion of such an initial public offering of the
Companys (or any direct or indirect parent entitys)
common stock (with unused amounts in any calendar year being
permitted to be carried over for the next two succeeding
calendar years up to a maximum of (A) $20.0 million in
the aggregate in any calendar year prior to completion of such
an initial public offering of the Companys (or any direct
or indirect parent entitys) common stock or
(B) $30.0 million in the aggregate in any calendar
year following completion of such an initial public offering of
the Companys (or any direct or indirect parent
entitys) common stock); provided further, that such
amount in any calendar year may be increased by an amount not to
exceed (x) the cash proceeds received by the Company or any
of its Restricted Subsidiaries from the sale of Qualified Equity
Interests of the Company to officers, directors or employees in
such calendar year (but such cash proceeds will then be excluded
from the calculation pursuant to clause (c)(3) above) plus
(y) the cash proceeds of key man life insurance policies in
such calendar year;
158
(e) declare and pay dividends or other distributions on the
Companys common stock (or pay dividends or other
distributions or make loans to any direct or indirect parent
entity to fund a payment of dividends or other distributions on
such entitys common stock), following the consummation of
an underwritten public offering of the Companys common
stock or the common stock of any of its direct or indirect
parent companies after the Issue Date, of up to 6% per annum of
the net cash proceeds received by or contributed to the Company
in or from any such public offering, other than public offerings
with respect common stock registered on
Form S-8;
(f) make Restricted Payments in an amount equal to the
amount of Excluded Contributions;
(g) declare and pay dividends or distributions, or make
loans to, any direct or indirect parent in amounts required for
any direct or indirect parent companies to pay, in each case
without duplication:
(1) franchise and excise taxes and other fees, taxes and
expenses required to maintain their corporate existence;
(2) customary salary, bonus and other benefits payable to
officers and employees of any direct or indirect parent company
of the Company to the extent such salaries, bonuses and other
benefits are attributable to the ownership or operation of the
Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries;
(3) general corporate operating and overhead costs and
expenses of any direct or indirect parent company of the Company
to the extent such costs and expenses are attributable to the
ownership or operation of the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries;
(4) fees and expenses, other than to Affiliates of the
Company, related to any unsuccessful equity or debt offering of
such parent entity; and
(5) Management Fees;
provided that the amount of Restricted Payments made
pursuant to clauses (1) through (5) of this
clause (g) shall not in any calendar year exceed, in the
aggregate, the greater of $20.0 million and 1.5% of the
Companys prior calendar year EBITDA;
(h) distribute, by dividend or otherwise, shares of Capital
Stock of, or Debt owed to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary
by, Unrestricted Subsidiaries (other than Unrestricted
Subsidiaries the primary assets of which are cash
and/or Cash
Equivalents);
(i) make Restricted Payments on or within 45 days of
the Issue Date contemplated by the Recapitalization Transactions
not in excess of the amount disclosed in the Offering Circular
under Offering Circular Summary The
Transactions Distribution to Return Capital to our
Parent Company;
(j) make any Restricted Payment if, at the time of the
making of such Restricted Payment, and after giving effect
thereto (including the incurrence of any Debt to finance such
payment), the Net Total Leverage Ratio of the Company would not
exceed 2.00 to 1.00;
(k) make cash payments in lieu of issuance of fractional
shares in connection with the exercise of warrants, options or
other securities convertible into or exchangeable for the
Capital Stock of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary;
(l) purchase, repurchase, redeem, legally defease, acquire
or retire for value any Subordinated Debt (i) at a purchase
price not greater than 101% of the principal amount of such
Subordinated Debt in the event of a change of control in
accordance with provisions similar to the
Change of Control covenant or
(ii) at a purchase price not greater than 100% of the
principal amount thereof in accordance with provisions similar
to the Limitation on Asset Sales
covenant; provided, that prior to or simultaneously with such
purchase, repurchase, redemption, defeasance, acquisition or
retirement, the Company has made the Change of Control Offer or
Prepayment Offer, as applicable, as provided in such covenant
with respect to the Notes and has completed the repurchase or
redemption of all Notes validly tendered for payment in
connection with such Change of Control Offer or Prepayment Offer;
159
(m) make other Restricted Payments in an aggregate amount
not to exceed $150.0 million per fiscal year beginning on
or after April 1, 2011 (with any unused amounts in respect
of any given fiscal year being permitted to be carried forward
for use in the following fiscal years); provided, that, at the
time of, and after giving effect to, any such Restricted
Payment, (i) no Default or Event of Default shall have
occurred or be continuing, (ii) the Net Total Leverage
Ratio equals or is less than 3.50 to 1.00 (provided that this
subclause (ii) shall cease to apply during any period in
which the Company is not then subject to a leverage or similar
test under Senior Secured Credit Facilities in order to make
such Restricted Payments (other than a financial maintenance
covenant that is generally applicable to the Company)) and
(iii) the Companys Total Liquidity would be greater
than $750.0 million; and
(n) make other Restricted Payments in an aggregate amount
after the Issue Date not to exceed $150.0 million.
The Indentures provide that this Limitation on
Restricted Payments covenant will not be applicable to
the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries during any period
when the Net Total Leverage Ratio equals or is less than 3.00 to
1.00 (a Restricted Payments Suspension
Period). In the event that the Company and its
Restricted Subsidiaries are not subject to this covenant for any
period as a result of the preceding sentence and, subsequently,
the Net Total Leverage Ratio increases such that it is greater
than 3.00 to 1.00 or a Default or Event of Default occurs and is
continuing, then the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries
will from such time again be subject to this covenant.
Compliance with this covenant with respect to Restricted
Payments made after the time of such increase or Default or
Event of Default and during the continuance of such
circumstances will be calculated in accordance with the terms of
this covenant as though this covenant had been in effect during
the entire period of time from the Issue Date; provided,
that any Restricted Payment made during a Restricted Payments
Suspension Period that would otherwise have been permitted under
clause (j) of the immediately preceding paragraph will be
deemed to have been made pursuant to such clause. Restricted
Payments made during a Restricted Payments Suspension Period but
while the Companys Net Total Leverage Ratio exceeds 2.00
to 1.00 will reduce the amount available to be made as
Restricted Payments under the first paragraph of this covenant.
Limitation on Liens. During any period other
than a Suspension Period (and during any period that this
paragraph shall apply when there is no election by the Company
pursuant to the following paragraph), the Company shall not, and
shall not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or
indirectly, Incur or suffer to exist, any Lien (other than
Permitted Liens) upon any of its Property (including Capital
Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary), whether owned at the Issue
Date or thereafter acquired, or any interest therein or any
income or profits therefrom, unless it has made or will make
effective provision whereby the applicable series of Notes or
the applicable Subsidiary Guaranty will be secured by such Lien
equally and ratably with (or, if such other Debt constitutes
Subordinated Debt, prior to) all other Debt of the Company or
any Restricted Subsidiary secured by such Lien for so long as
such other Debt is secured by such Lien.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Lien securing the 2017 Notes
or the 2020 Notes granted pursuant to this covenant shall be
automatically and unconditionally released and discharged upon
(a) the release by the holders of the Debt described above
of their Lien on the property or assets of the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary (including any deemed release upon payment
in full of all obligations under such Debt), (b) any sale,
exchange or transfer to any Person other than the Company or any
of its Restricted Subsidiaries of the property or assets secured
by such Lien, or of all of the Capital Stock held by the Company
or any Restricted Subsidiary in, or all or substantially all the
assets of, any Restricted Subsidiary creating such Lien in each
case in accordance with the terms of the applicable Indenture as
described under Subsidiary Guaranties or (c) a
defeasance or discharge of the applicable series of Notes in
accordance with the procedures described below under
Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance
or Satisfaction and Discharge.
During any Suspension Period, the Company may elect by written
notice to the applicable Trustee and the holders of the
applicable series of Notes to be subject to an alternative
covenant with respect to Limitation on Liens, in
lieu of the first paragraph of this Limitation on
Liens. Under this alternative covenant, the Company will
not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, create,
incur, assume or suffer to exist any Lien securing Debt (other
than Permitted Liens pursuant to clauses (c) through
(j) and (1)
160
(but disregarding the reference to clause (b) therein)
through (s) (each inclusive) of the definition of
Permitted Liens) upon (1) any Principal
Property of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary,
(2) any Capital Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary or
(3) any Debt of a Restricted Subsidiary owed to the Company
or another Restricted Subsidiary, unless all payments due under
the Indenture and the applicable series of Notes are secured on
an equal and ratable basis with (or prior to) the obligations so
secured until such time as such other obligations are no longer
secured by such lien. Notwithstanding the foregoing, during a
Suspension Period, the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries
will be permitted to create, incur, assume or suffer to exist
Liens, and renew, extend or replace such Liens, in each case
without complying with the foregoing; provided, that the
aggregate amount of all Debt of the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries outstanding at such time that is secured by these
Liens (other than (1) Debt secured solely by Permitted
Liens pursuant to clauses (c) through (j) and (1) (but
disregarding the reference to clause (b) therein) through
(s) (each inclusive) of the definition of Permitted
Liens, (2) Debt that is secured equally and ratably
with (or on a basis subordinated to) the applicable series of
Notes and (3) the applicable series of Notes) plus the
aggregate amount of all Attributable Debt of the Company and our
Restricted Subsidiaries with respect to all Sale and Leaseback
Transactions outstanding at such time (other than Sale and
Leaseback Transactions permitted by the second paragraph under
Limitation on Sale and Leaseback
Transactions), would not exceed the greater of 10% of
Consolidated Net Tangible Assets, determined based on the
consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of the end of the
most recent fiscal quarter for which financial statements have
been filed or furnished, and $400.0 million.
Limitation on Asset Sales. The Company shall
not, and shall not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly
or indirectly, consummate any Asset Sale unless:
(a) the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary receives
consideration at the time of such Asset Sale at least equal to
the Fair Market Value of the Property subject to such Asset Sale;
(b) at least 75% of the consideration paid to the Company
or such Restricted Subsidiary in connection with such Asset Sale
is in the form of any one or a combination of the following:
(i) cash, Cash Equivalents or Additional Assets,
(ii) the assumption by the purchasers of liabilities of the
Company or any Restricted Subsidiary (other than contingent
liabilities or liabilities that are by their terms subordinated
to the Notes or the applicable Subsidiary Guaranty) as a result
of which the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries are no
longer obligated with respect to such liabilities,
(iii) securities, notes or other obligations received by
the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary to the extent such
securities, notes or other obligations are converted by the
Company or such Restricted Subsidiary into cash, Cash
Equivalents or Additional Assets within 90 days of such
Asset Sale or (iv) Designated Non-Cash Consideration
received by the Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary, as
the case may be, having an aggregate Fair Market Value
(determined as of the closing date of the applicable Asset Sale
for which such Designated Non-Cash Consideration is received),
taken together with all other Designated Non-Cash Consideration
received pursuant to this clause (iv) that is at the time
outstanding, not in excess of the greater of
(x) $100.0 million and (y) 2.0% of the
Consolidated Net Tangible Assets of the Company at the time of
the receipt of such Designated Non-Cash Consideration;
(c) no Default or Event of Default would occur as a result
of such Asset Sale; and
(d) the Company delivers an Officers Certificate to
the Trustee certifying that such Asset Sale complies with the
foregoing clauses (a) and (c).
The Net Available Cash (or any portion thereof, if any) from
Asset Sales may be applied by the Company or a Restricted
Subsidiary, to the extent the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary elects (or is required by the terms of any Debt):
(a) to Repay Senior Debt of the Company or any Subsidiary
Guarantor that is secured by a Lien, which Lien is permitted by
the Indentures, or Debt of any Restricted Subsidiary that is not
a Subsidiary Guarantor (excluding, in any such case, any Debt
owed to the Company or an Affiliate of the Company);
(b) to Repay other Senior Debt of the Company or any
Subsidiary Guarantor (excluding, in any such case, any Debt owed
to the Company or an Affiliate of the Company); provided,
that to the extent the Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor
Repays Senior Debt other than the applicable series of Notes
161
pursuant to this clause (b), the Company shall either
(i) equally and ratably purchase such Notes through
open-market purchases (to the extent such purchases are at or
above 100% of the principal amount thereof) or redeem such Notes
as provided under Optional Redemption or
(ii) make an offer (in accordance with the procedures set
forth below for a Prepayment Offer) to all holders of such Notes
to purchase their Notes of such series at 100% of the principal
amount thereof, plus the amount of accrued but unpaid interest
on the amount of such Notes that would otherwise be prepaid;
(c) to reinvest in Additional Assets (including by means of
an Investment in Additional Assets by a Restricted Subsidiary
with Net Available Cash received by the Company or another
Restricted Subsidiary); or
(d) any combination of the foregoing.
Any Net Available Cash from an Asset Sale not applied in
accordance with the preceding paragraph within 365 days
from the date of the receipt of such Net Available Cash shall
constitute Excess Proceeds; provided, that a
binding commitment shall be treated as a permitted application
of Net Available Cash from the date of such commitment so long
as the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary enters into such
commitment with the good faith expectation that such Net
Available Cash will be applied to satisfy such commitment within
180 days of such commitment (an Acceptable
Commitment) and, in the event any Acceptable
Commitment is later cancelled or terminated for any reason
before the Net Available Cash is applied in connection
therewith, the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary enters into
another Acceptable Commitment (a Second
Commitment) within 180 days of such cancellation
or termination; provided further, that if any Second
Commitment is later cancelled or terminated for any reason
before such Net Available Cash are applied, then such Net
Available Cash shall constitute Excess Proceeds.
When the aggregate amount of Excess Proceeds exceeds
$25.0 million, the Company will be required to make an
offer to repurchase (the Prepayment Offer)
each series of Notes, which offer shall be in the amount of the
Allocable Excess Proceeds (rounded to the nearest $1,000), on a
pro rata basis according to principal amount (of a
minimum $2,000 or any integral multiple of $1,000 in excess
thereof) at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal
amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the
repurchase date (subject to the right of holders of record on
the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant
interest payment date), in accordance with the procedures
(including prorating in the event of oversubscription) set forth
in the Indenture. To the extent that any portion of the amount
of Net Available Cash remains after compliance with the
preceding sentence and provided, that all holders of
Notes have been given the opportunity to tender their Notes for
repurchase in accordance with the Indenture, the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary may use such remaining amount for any
purpose permitted by the Indenture, and the amount of Excess
Proceeds will be reset to zero.
The term Allocable Excess Proceeds with respect to a
series of Notes shall mean the product of:
(a) the Excess Proceeds; and
(b) a fraction,
(1) the numerator of which is the aggregate principal
amount of the applicable series of Notes outstanding on the date
of the Prepayment Offer, and
(2) the denominator of which is the sum of the aggregate
principal amount of the applicable series of Notes outstanding
on the date of the Prepayment Offer and the aggregate principal
amount of other Debt of the Company outstanding on the date of
the Prepayment Offer that is pari passu in right of
payment with the Notes and subject to terms and conditions in
respect of Asset Sales similar in all material respects to this
covenant and requiring the Company to make an offer to
repurchase such Debt at substantially the same time as the
Prepayment Offer.
Within five business days after the Company is obligated to make
a Prepayment Offer as described in the preceding paragraph, the
Company shall send a written notice, by first-class mail, to the
holders of the applicable series of Notes, accompanied by such
information regarding the Company and its Subsidiaries as the
Company in good faith believes will enable such holders to make
an informed decision with respect to
162
such Prepayment Offer. Such notice shall state, among other
things, the purchase price and the repurchase date, which shall
be, subject to any contrary requirements of applicable law, a
business day no earlier than 30 days nor later than
60 days from the date such notice is mailed.
The Company will comply, to the extent applicable, with the
requirements of Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and any
other securities laws or regulations in connection with the
repurchase of the applicable series of Notes pursuant to this
covenant. To the extent that the provisions of any securities
laws or regulations conflict with provisions of this covenant,
the Company will comply with the applicable securities laws and
regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its
obligations under this covenant by virtue thereof.
Limitation on Restrictions on Distributions from Restricted
Subsidiaries. The Company shall not, and shall
not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or indirectly,
create or otherwise cause or suffer to exist any consensual
restriction on the right of any Restricted Subsidiary to:
(a) pay dividends, in cash or otherwise, or make any other
distributions on or in respect of its Capital Stock, or pay any
Debt or other obligation owed, to the Company or any other
Restricted Subsidiary;
(b) make any loans or advances to the Company; or
(c) transfer any of its Property to the Company.
The foregoing limitations will not apply:
(1) to restrictions or encumbrances existing under or by
reason of:
(A) agreements in effect on the Issue Date (including,
without limitation, restrictions pursuant to the Notes, the
Indentures, the Subsidiary Guaranties and the Senior Secured
Credit Facilities), and any amendments, modifications,
restatements, renewals, replacements, refundings, refinancings,
increases or supplements of those agreements, provided,
that the encumbrances or restrictions contained in any such
amendments, modifications, restatements, renewals, replacements,
refundings, refinancings, increases or supplements taken as a
whole, are not materially more restrictive than the encumbrances
or restrictions contained in agreements to which they relate as
in place on the date of the Indenture,
(B) Debt or Capital Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary
existing at the time it became a Restricted Subsidiary or at the
time it merges with or into the Company or a Restricted
Subsidiary if such restriction was not created in connection
with or in anticipation of the transaction or series of
transactions pursuant to which such Restricted Subsidiary became
a Restricted Subsidiary or was acquired by the Company, and any
amendments, modifications, restatements, renewals, replacements,
refundings, refinancings, increases or supplements of those
instruments, provided, that the encumbrances or
restrictions contained in any such amendments, modifications,
restatements, renewals, replacements, refundings, refinancings,
increases or supplements, taken as a whole, are not materially
more restrictive than the encumbrances or restrictions contained
in instruments in effect on the date of acquisition,
(C) any Credit Facility of the Company permitted to be
Incurred under the Indentures; provided, that the
applicable encumbrances and restrictions contained in the
agreement or agreements governing such Credit Facility are not
materially more restrictive, taken as a whole, than those
contained in the Senior Secured Credit Facilities (with respect
to other credit agreements or other secured Debt) or the
Indentures (with respect to other indentures or other unsecured
Debt), in each case as in effect on the Issue Date;
(D) the Refinancing of Debt Incurred pursuant to an
agreement referred to in clause (1)(A), (B) or
(C) above or in clause (2)(A) or (B) below, provided
such restrictions are not materially less favorable, taken as a
whole, to the holders of Notes than those under the agreement
evidencing the Debt so Refinanced,
(E) any applicable law, rule, regulation or order,
163
(F) Permitted Refinancing Debt, provided, that the
restrictions contained in the agreements governing such
Permitted Refinancing Debt, taken as a whole, are not materially
more restrictive than those contained in the agreements
governing the Debt being refinanced,
(G) Liens securing obligations otherwise permitted to be
incurred under the provisions of the covenant described above
under the caption Limitation on Liens or
below under the caption Limitation on Sale and
Leaseback Transactions that limit the right of the debtor
to dispose of the assets subject to such Liens,
(H) customary provisions in joint venture agreements,
shareholders agreements, asset sale agreements, Sale and
Leaseback Transactions, stock sale agreements and other similar
agreements, which limitation or prohibition is applicable only
to the assets or (in the case of joint venture agreements,
shareholders agreements and other similar agreements) entity
that are the subject of such agreements,
(I) restrictions on cash or other deposits or net worth
imposed by customers or lessors under contracts or leases
entered into in the ordinary course of business,
(J) arising under Debt or other contractual requirements of
a Securitization Entity in connection with a Qualified
Securitization Transaction; provided, that such
restrictions apply only to such Securitization Entity, or
(K) any restrictions on transfer of the equity interests in
Novelis Korea Limited (NKL) or its direct parents,
4260848 Canada Inc. and 4260856 Canada Inc., imposed by any
lock-up or
listing agreement, rule or regulation in connection with any
listing or offering of equity interests in NKL.
(2) with respect to clause (c) only, to restrictions
or encumbrances:
(A) relating to Debt that is permitted to be Incurred and
secured without also securing the Notes or the applicable
Subsidiary Guaranty pursuant to the covenants described under
Limitation on Debt and
Limitation on Liens that limit the right
of the debtor to dispose of the Property securing such Debt,
(B) encumbering Property at the time such Property was
acquired by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, so long as
such restrictions relate solely to the Property so acquired and
were not created in connection with or in anticipation of such
acquisition,
(C) resulting from customary provisions restricting
subletting or assignment of leases or customary provisions in
other agreements that restrict assignment of such agreements or
rights thereunder,
(D) customary restrictions contained in any asset purchase,
stock purchase, merger or other similar agreement, pending the
closing of the transaction contemplated thereby,
(E) customary restrictions contained in joint venture
agreements and shareholders agreements entered into in
good faith, or
(F) arising or agreed to in the ordinary course of
business, not relating to any Debt, and that do not,
individually or in the aggregate, detract from the value of
Property of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary thereof in
any manner material to the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary
thereof.
Limitation on Transactions with
Affiliates. The Company shall not, and shall not
permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or indirectly,
conduct any business or enter into or suffer to exist any
transaction or series of transactions (including the purchase,
sale, transfer, assignment, lease, conveyance or exchange of any
164
Property or the rendering of any service) with, or for the
benefit of, any Affiliate of the Company (an Affiliate
Transaction), unless:
(a) the terms of such Affiliate Transaction are not
materially less favorable to the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary, as the case may be, than those that could be
obtained in a comparable arms length transaction with a
Person that is not an Affiliate of the Company;
(b) if such Affiliate Transaction involves aggregate
payments or value in excess of $20.0 million, the Board of
Directors approves such Affiliate Transaction and, in its good
faith judgment, believes that such Affiliate Transaction
complies with clause (a) of this paragraph as evidenced by
a Board Resolution promptly delivered to the Trustee; and
(c) if such Affiliate Transaction involves aggregate
payments or value in excess of $50.0 million (1) the
Board of Directors (including at least a majority of the
disinterested members of the Board of Directors) approves such
Affiliate Transaction and, in its good faith judgment, believes
that such Affiliate Transaction complies with clause (a) of
this paragraph as evidenced by a Board Resolution promptly
delivered to the Trustee, or (2) the Company obtains a
written opinion from an Independent Financial Advisor to the
effect that the consideration to be paid or received in
connection with such Affiliate Transaction is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Company and the Restricted
Subsidiaries.
Notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary may enter into or suffer to exist the
following, which shall not be deemed to be Affiliate
Transactions and therefore will not be subject to the provisions
of clauses (a), (b) and (c) above of this covenant:
(a) any transaction or series of transactions between the
Company and one or more Restricted Subsidiaries or between two
or more Restricted Subsidiaries, provided, that no more
than 25% of the total voting power of the Voting Stock (on a
fully diluted basis) of any such Restricted Subsidiary is owned
by an Affiliate of the Company (other than a Restricted
Subsidiary);
(b) any Restricted Payment permitted to be made pursuant to
the covenant described under Limitation on
Restricted Payments or any Permitted Investment (other
than Permitted Investments under clauses (b) or (c) of
the definition of Permitted Investment);
(c) any employment, compensation, benefit or
indemnification agreement or arrangement (and any payments or
other transactions pursuant thereto) entered into by the Company
or any Restricted Subsidiary in the ordinary course of business
(or that is otherwise reasonable as determined in good faith by
the board of directors of the Company or the Restricted
Subsidiary, as the case may be) with an officer, employee,
consultant or director including pursuant to stock option plans,
stock ownership plans and employee benefit plans or arrangements;
(d) loans and advances to employees made in the ordinary
course of business other than any loans or advances that would
be in violation of Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
provided, that the Dollar Equivalent of the aggregate
principal amount of such loans and advances do not exceed
$15.0 million in the aggregate at any time outstanding;
(e) any transactions between or among any of the Company,
any Restricted Subsidiary and any Securitization Entity in
connection with a Qualified Securitization Transaction, in each
case provided, that such transactions are not otherwise
prohibited by terms of the Indenture;
(f) agreements in effect on the Issue Date and any
amendments, modifications, extensions or renewals thereto that
are no less favorable to the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary than such agreements as in effect on the Issue Date;
(g) transactions with a Person that is an Affiliate of the
Company solely because the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary,
directly or indirectly, owns Capital Stock of
and/or
controls, such Person;
(h) payment of fees and expenses to directors who are not
otherwise employees of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary,
for services provided in such capacity, so long as the Board of
Directors or a duly authorized committee thereof shall have
approved the terms thereof;
165
(i) the granting and performance of registration rights for
shares of Capital Stock of the Company under a written
registration rights agreement approved by the Companys
Board of Directors or a duly authorized committee thereof;
(j) transactions with customers, clients, suppliers, joint
venture partners or purchasers or sellers of goods or services
(including pursuant to joint venture agreements) in the ordinary
course of business on terms not materially less favorable as
might reasonably have been obtained at such time from a Person
that is not an Affiliate of the Company, as determined in good
faith by the Company; and
(k) transactions with Affiliates solely in their capacity
as holders of Debt or Capital Stock of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, provided, that a significant amount of the
Debt or Capital Stock of the same class is also held by persons
that are not Affiliates of the Company and those Affiliates are
treated no more favorably than holders of the Debt or Capital
Stock generally.
Limitation on Sale and Leaseback
Transactions. During any period other than a
Suspension Period, the Company shall not, and shall not permit
any Restricted Subsidiary to, enter into any Sale and Leaseback
Transaction with respect to any Property unless:
(a) the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary would be
entitled to:
(1) Incur Debt in an amount equal to the Attributable Debt
with respect to such Sale and Leaseback Transaction pursuant to
the covenant described under Limitation on
Debt, and
(2) create a Lien on such Property securing such
Attributable Debt without also securing the Notes or the
applicable Subsidiary Guaranty pursuant to the covenant
described under Limitation on
Liens, and
(b) such Sale and Leaseback Transaction is effected in
compliance with the covenant described under
Limitation on Asset Sales.
During any Suspension Period, the Company will not, and will not
permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, enter into any Sale and
Leaseback Transaction involving any Principal Property, except
for any Sale and Leaseback Transaction involving a lease not
exceeding three years unless:
(1) the Company or that Restricted Subsidiary, as
applicable, would at the time of entering into the transaction
be entitled to incur Debt secured by a Lien on that Principal
Property in an amount equal to the Attributable Debt with
respect to such Sale and Leaseback Transaction without equally
and ratably securing the Notes; or
(2) an amount equal to the net cash proceeds of the Sale
and Leaseback Transaction is applied within 180 days to:
(a) the voluntary retirement or prepayment of any Debt of
the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary maturing more than one
year after the date incurred, and which is senior to or pari
passu in right of payment with the Notes, or
(b) the purchase of other property that will constitute
Principal Property having a value (as determined in good faith
by the Board of Directors) in an amount at least equal to the
net cash proceeds of the Sale and Leaseback Transaction; or
(3) within the
180-day
period specified in clause (2) above, the Company or that
Restricted Subsidiary, as applicable, deliver to the trustee for
cancellation Notes in an aggregate principal amount at least
equal to the net proceeds of the Sale and Leaseback Transaction.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, during any Suspension Period, the
Company and any Restricted Subsidiary may enter into Sale and
Leaseback Transactions that would not otherwise be permitted
under the limitations described in the preceding paragraph,
provided, that the sum of the aggregate amount of all
Debt of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries that is
secured by Liens (other than (1) Debt secured solely by
Permitted Liens pursuant to clauses (c) through
(j) and (1) (but disregarding the reference to
clause (b) therein) through (s) of the definition of
Permitted Liens, (2) Debt that is secured
equally and ratably with (or on a
166
basis subordinated to) the Notes and (3) the Notes) and the
aggregate amount of all Attributable Debt of the Company and its
Restricted Subsidiaries with respect to all Sale and Leaseback
Transactions outstanding at such time (other than Sale and
Leaseback Transactions permitted by the preceding paragraph)
would not exceed 10% of the Consolidated Net Tangible Assets of
the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries.
Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted
Subsidiaries. The Board of Directors may
designate any Subsidiary of the Company to be an Unrestricted
Subsidiary if:
(a) the Subsidiary to be so designated does not own any
Capital Stock or Debt of, or own or hold any Lien on any
Property of, the Company or any other Restricted
Subsidiary; and
(b) either:
(1) the Subsidiary to be so designated has total assets of
$1,000 or less, or
(2) such designation is effective immediately upon such
entity becoming a Subsidiary of the Company, or
(3) the Investment by the Company or another Restricted
Subsidiary in such Subsidiary is treated as a Restricted Payment
under the covenant described under Limitation
on Restricted Payments and such Restricted Payment is
permitted under such covenant at the time such Investment is
made.
Unless so designated as an Unrestricted Subsidiary, any Person
that becomes a Subsidiary of the Company will be classified as a
Restricted Subsidiary; provided, that such Subsidiary
shall not be designated a Restricted Subsidiary and shall be
automatically classified as an Unrestricted Subsidiary if either
of the requirements set forth in clauses (x) and
(y) of the second immediately following paragraph will not
be satisfied after giving pro forma effect to such
classification or if such Person is a Subsidiary of an
Unrestricted Subsidiary.
Except as provided in the preceding paragraph, no Restricted
Subsidiary may be redesignated as an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
Upon designation of a Restricted Subsidiary as an Unrestricted
Subsidiary in compliance with this covenant, such Restricted
Subsidiary shall, automatically and unconditionally without the
need for action by any party, be released from any Subsidiary
Guaranty previously made by such Restricted Subsidiary.
The Board of Directors may designate any Unrestricted Subsidiary
to be a Restricted Subsidiary if, immediately after giving
pro forma effect to such designation,
(x) the Company could Incur at least $1.00 of additional
Debt pursuant to clause (1) of the first paragraph of the
covenant described under Limitation on
Debt, and
(y) no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and
be continuing or would result therefrom.
Any such designation or redesignation by the Board of Directors
will be evidenced to the Trustee by filing with the Trustee a
Board Resolution giving effect to such designation or
redesignation and an Officers Certificate that:
(a) certifies that such designation or redesignation
complies with the foregoing provisions, and
(b) gives the effective date of such designation or
redesignation,
such filing with the Trustee to occur within 45 days after
the end of the fiscal quarter of the Company in which such
designation or redesignation is made (or, in the case of a
designation or redesignation made during the last fiscal quarter
of the Companys fiscal year, within 90 days after the
end of such fiscal year).
Future Subsidiary Guarantors. The Company
shall cause each Person that becomes a Restricted Subsidiary
that Guarantees Debt in the future under Credit Facilities,
provided, that the borrower of such Debt is the Company
or a Canadian Restricted Subsidiary or U.S. Restricted
Subsidiary, in each case following the Issue Date, to execute
and deliver to the Trustee a Subsidiary Guaranty at the time
such Person becomes a
167
Canadian Restricted Subsidiary or U.S. Restricted
Subsidiary or otherwise becomes obligated to become a Subsidiary
Guarantor under the Indenture.
Merger,
Consolidation and Sale of Property
The Company shall not merge, consolidate or amalgamate with or
into any other Person (other than a merger, consolidation or
amalgamation of a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary into the
Company) or sell, transfer, assign, lease, convey or otherwise
dispose of all or substantially all its Property in any one
transaction or series of transactions unless:
(a) the Company shall be the Surviving Person in such
merger, consolidation or amalgamation, or the Surviving Person
(if other than the Company) formed by such merger, consolidation
or amalgamation or to which such sale, transfer, assignment,
lease, conveyance or disposition is made shall be a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the United States, any
State thereof, the District of Columbia, Canada or any province
or territory of Canada;
(b) the Surviving Person (if other than the Company)
expressly assumes, by supplemental indenture in form
satisfactory to the applicable Trustee, executed and delivered
to the applicable Trustee by such Surviving Person, the due and
punctual payment of the principal of, and premium, if any, and
interest on, all the Notes of the applicable series, according
to their tenor, and the due and punctual performance and
observance of all the covenants and conditions of the Indenture
to be performed by the Company;
(c) in the case of a sale, transfer, assignment, lease,
conveyance or other disposition of all or substantially all the
Property of the Company, such Property shall have been
transferred as an entirety or virtually as an entirety to one
Person;
(d) immediately before and after giving effect to such
transaction or series of transactions on a pro forma
basis (and treating, for purposes of this clause (d)
and clause (e) below, any Debt that becomes, or is
anticipated to become, an obligation of the Surviving Person or
any Restricted Subsidiary as a result of such transaction or
series of transactions as having been Incurred by the Surviving
Person or such Restricted Subsidiary at the time of such
transaction or series of transactions), no Default or Event of
Default shall have occurred and be continuing;
(e) except in the case of a transaction constituting a
Permitted Holdings Amalgamation under the Senior Secured Credit
Facilities, immediately after giving effect to such transaction
or series of transactions on a pro forma basis,
(x) the Company or the Surviving Person, as the case may
be, would be able to Incur at least $1.00 of additional Debt
under clause (1) of the first paragraph of the covenant
described under Certain Covenants
Limitation on Debt or (y) the Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio of the Company or the Surviving Person, as the
case may be, is not less than immediately prior to such
transaction or series of transactions and is at least 1.75:1.00;
(f) the Company shall deliver, or cause to be delivered, to
the applicable Trustee, in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to the applicable Trustee, an Officers
Certificate and an Opinion of Counsel, each stating that such
transaction or series of transactions and the applicable
supplemental indenture, if any, in respect thereto comply with
this covenant and that all conditions precedent herein provided
for relating to such transaction or series of transactions have
been satisfied;
(g) the Company shall have delivered to the applicable
Trustee an Opinion of Counsel to the effect that the holders of
the Notes of the applicable series will not recognize income,
gain or loss for U.S. Federal income tax purposes as a
result of such transaction or series of transactions; and
(h) the Company shall have delivered to the applicable
Trustee an Opinion of Counsel to the effect that holders of the
Notes of the applicable series will not recognize income, gain
or loss for Canadian federal income tax purposes as a result of
such transaction or series of transactions.
The Company shall not permit any Subsidiary Guarantor to merge,
consolidate or amalgamate with or into any other Person (other
than a merger, consolidation or amalgamation of a Wholly Owned
Restricted
168
Subsidiary with or into the Company or such Subsidiary
Guarantor) or sell, transfer, assign, lease, convey or otherwise
dispose of all or substantially all its Property in any one
transaction or series of transactions unless:
(a) the Surviving Person (if other than such Subsidiary
Guarantor) formed by such merger, consolidation or amalgamation
or to which such sale, transfer, assignment, lease, conveyance
or disposition is made shall be a corporation, company
(including a limited liability company) or partnership organized
and existing under the laws of the United States, any State
thereof, the District of Columbia, Canada or any province or
territory of Canada, or the jurisdiction in which such
Subsidiary Guarantor was organized immediately prior to the
consummation of such transaction;
(b) the Surviving Person (if other than such Subsidiary
Guarantor) expressly assumes, by supplemental indenture in form
satisfactory to the applicable Trustee, executed and delivered
to the applicable Trustee by such Surviving Person, the due and
punctual performance and observance of all the obligations of
such Subsidiary Guarantor under its Subsidiary Guaranty;
(c) in the case of a sale, transfer, assignment, lease,
conveyance or other disposition of all or substantially all the
Property of such Subsidiary Guarantor, such Property shall have
been transferred as an entirety or virtually as an entirety to
one Person;
(d) immediately before and after giving effect to such
transaction or series of transactions on a pro forma
basis (and treating, for purposes of this clause (d)
and clause (e) below, any Debt that becomes, or is
anticipated to become, an obligation of the Surviving Person,
the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary as a result of such
transaction or series of transactions as having been Incurred by
the Surviving Person, the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary
at the time of such transaction or series of transactions), no
Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing;
(e) immediately after giving effect to such transaction or
series of transactions on a pro forma basis, (x) the
Company or the Surviving Person, as the case may be, would be
able to Incur at least $1.00 of additional Debt under
clause (1) of the first paragraph of the covenant described
under Certain Covenants Limitation
on Debt or (y) the Consolidated Interest Coverage
Ratio of the Company is not less than immediately prior to such
transaction or series of transactions and is at least
1.75:1.00; and
(f) the Company shall deliver, or cause to be delivered, to
the applicable Trustee, in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to the applicable Trustee, an Officers
Certificate and an Opinion of Counsel, each stating that such
transaction or series of transactions and such Subsidiary
Guaranty, if any, in respect thereto comply with this covenant
and that all conditions precedent herein provided for relating
to such transaction or series of transactions have been
satisfied.
The foregoing provisions of this paragraph (other than clause
(d)) shall not apply to any transaction or series of
transactions which constitute an Asset Sale if the Company has
complied with the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Asset Sales.
The Surviving Person shall succeed to, and be substituted for,
and may exercise every right and power of the Company under the
Indentures (or of the Subsidiary Guarantor under the Subsidiary
Guaranty, as the case may be), but the predecessor Company in
the case of:
(a) a sale, transfer, assignment, conveyance or other
disposition (unless such sale, transfer, assignment, conveyance
or other disposition is of all the assets of the Company as an
entirety or virtually as an entirety), or
(b) a lease,
shall not be released from any of the obligations or covenants
under the applicable Indenture, including with respect to the
payment of the applicable series of Notes.
Payments
for Consents
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its
Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, pay or cause to be paid
any consideration, whether by way of interest, fee or otherwise,
to any holder of any of the 2017
169
Notes or the 2020 Notes for or as an inducement to any consent,
waiver or amendment of any of the terms or provisions of the
applicable Indenture or the applicable series of Notes unless
such consideration is offered to be paid or is paid to all
holders of the applicable series of Notes that consent, waive or
agree to amend in the time frame set forth in the solicitation
documents relating to such consent, waiver or agreement.
SEC
Reports
The Company shall provide the Trustees and holders of Notes,
within 15 days after it files with, or furnishes to, the
SEC, copies of its annual report and of the information,
documents and other reports (or copies of such portions of any
of the foregoing as the SEC may by rules and regulations
prescribe) which the Company is required to file with the SEC
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act or is
required to furnish to the SEC pursuant to the Indentures.
Regardless of whether the Company is required to report on an
annual and quarterly basis on forms provided for such annual and
quarterly reporting pursuant to rules and regulations
promulgated by the SEC, the Indentures require the Company to
continue to file with, or furnish to, the SEC and provide the
Trustees and holders of Notes:
(a) within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year
(or such shorter period as the SEC may in the future prescribe),
an annual report containing substantially the same information
required to be contained in
Form 10-K
or
Form 20-F
(or any successor form) that would be required if the Company
were subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
(b) within 45 days after the end of each of the first
three fiscal quarters of each fiscal year (or such shorter
period as the SEC may in the future prescribe), a quarterly
report containing substantially the same information required to
be contained in
Form 10-Q
(or any successor form) that would be required if the Company
were organized in the United States and subject to the reporting
requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
provided, that the Company shall not be so obligated to
file any of the foregoing reports with the SEC if the SEC does
not permit such filings.
In the event that any direct or indirect parent company of the
Company becomes a guarantor of the 2017 Notes or the 2020 Notes,
the applicable Indenture will permit the Company to satisfy its
obligations in this covenant with respect to financial
information relating to the Company by furnishing financial
information relating to such parent; provided, that the
same is accompanied by consolidating information that explains
in reasonable detail the differences between the information
relating to such parent, on the one hand, and the information
relating to the Company, as applicable, and its Restricted
Subsidiaries on a standalone basis, on the other hand.
Events of
Default
Events of Default in respect of each series of the Notes include:
(1) failure to make the payment of any interest (including
Additional Amounts) on the such series of the Notes when the
same becomes due and payable, and such failure continues for a
period of 30 days;
(2) failure to make the payment of any principal of, or
premium, if any, on, any of the Notes of such series when the
same becomes due and payable at its Stated Maturity, upon
acceleration, redemption, optional redemption, required
repurchase or otherwise;
(3) failure to comply with the covenant described under
Merger, Consolidation and Sale of
Property;
(4) failure to comply with the covenant described under
SEC Reports, and such failure continues
for 90 days after written notice is given to the Company as
provided below:
(5) failure to comply with any other covenant or agreement
in the Notes of such series or in the applicable Indenture
(other than a failure that is the subject of the foregoing
clause (1), (2), (3) or (4)), and such failure continues
for 60 days after written notice is given to the Company as
provided below;
170
(6) a default under any Debt by the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary that results in acceleration of the
maturity of such Debt, or failure to pay any such Debt at
maturity, in an aggregate amount greater than
$100.0 million (the cross acceleration
provisions);
(7) any judgment or judgments for the payment of money in
an aggregate amount in excess of $100.0 million that shall
be rendered against the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary and
that shall not be waived, satisfied or discharged for any period
of 60 consecutive days during which a stay of enforcement shall
not be in effect (the judgment default
provisions)
(8) certain events involving bankruptcy, insolvency or
reorganization of the Company or any Significant Subsidiary (the
bankruptcy provisions); and
(9) any Subsidiary Guaranty relating to such series of
Notes ceases to be in full force and effect (other than in
accordance with the terms of such Subsidiary Guaranty) or any
Subsidiary Guarantor denies or disaffirms its obligations under
its Subsidiary Guaranty relating to such series of Notes (the
guaranty provisions).
A Default under clause (4) or clause (5) is not an
Event of Default until the applicable Trustee or the holders of
not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of the 2017
Notes or the 2020 Notes, as the case may be, then outstanding
notify the Company of the Default and the Company does not cure
such Default within the time specified after receipt of such
notice. Such notice must specify the Default, demand that it be
remedied and state that such notice is a Notice of
Default.
The Company shall deliver to each Trustee annually a statement
regarding compliance with the applicable Indenture. Upon an
Officer becoming aware of any Default or Event of Default with
respect to a series of Notes, the Company shall deliver to the
applicable Trustee within 10 days of becoming so aware,
written notice in the form of an Officers Certificate
specifying such Default or Event of Default, its status, and the
action the Company proposes to take with respect thereto.
If an Event of Default with respect to a series of Notes (other
than an Event of Default resulting from certain events involving
bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization with respect to the
Company) shall have occurred and be continuing, the applicable
Trustee or the registered holders of not less than 25% in
aggregate principal amount of Notes of such series then
outstanding may declare to be immediately due and payable the
principal amount of all the Notes of such series then
outstanding, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
acceleration. In case an Event of Default resulting from certain
events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization with respect
to the Company shall occur, such amount with respect to all the
Notes of the applicable series shall be due and payable
immediately without any declaration or other act on the part of
the applicable Trustee or the holders of the Notes of such
series. After any such acceleration, but before a judgment or
decree based on acceleration is obtained by the applicable
Trustee, the registered holders of at least a majority in
aggregate principal amount of the Notes of such series then
outstanding may, under certain circumstances, rescind and annul
such acceleration if all Events of Default, other than the
nonpayment of accelerated principal, premium or interest, have
been cured or waived as provided in the applicable Indenture.
Subject to the provisions of the applicable Indenture relating
to the duties of the applicable Trustee, in case an Event of
Default shall occur and be continuing, the applicable Trustee
will be under no obligation to exercise any of its rights or
powers under the applicable Indenture at the request or
direction of any of the holders of the Notes of such series,
unless such holders shall have offered to the applicable Trustee
reasonable indemnity. Subject to such provisions for the
indemnification of the applicable Trustee, the holders of at
least a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Notes of
such series then outstanding will have the right to direct the
time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any
remedy available to the applicable Trustee or exercising any
trust or power conferred on such Trustee with respect to the
Notes of such series. The holders of a majority in aggregate
principal amount of the Notes of such series then outstanding by
notice to the Trustee may on behalf of the holders of all of the
Notes of such series waive any existing Default or Event of
Default and its consequences under the applicable Indenture
except a continuing Default or Event of Default: (a) in the
payment of the principal or, premium, if any, or interest and
(b) in respect of a covenant or
171
provision which under the applicable Indenture cannot be
modified or amended without the consent of the holder of each
Note of such series affected thereby.
No holder of either series of Notes will have any right to
institute any proceeding with respect to the applicable
Indenture, or for the appointment of a receiver or trustee, or
for any remedy thereunder, unless:
(a) such holder has previously given to the applicable
Trustee written notice of a continuing Event of Default;
(b) the registered holders of at least 25% in aggregate
principal amount of the Notes of such series then outstanding
have made a written request and offered reasonable indemnity to
such Trustee to institute such proceeding as trustee; and
(c) such Trustee shall not have received from the
registered holders of at least a majority in aggregate principal
amount of the Notes of such series then outstanding a direction
inconsistent with such request and shall have failed to
institute such proceeding within 60 days.
However, such limitations do not apply to a suit instituted by a
holder of any Note for enforcement of payment of the principal
of, and premium, if any, or interest on, such Note on or after
the respective due dates expressed in such Note.
No
Personal Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees and
Stockholders
No director, officer, employee, incorporator, stockholder or
member of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the
Company, as such, will have any liability for any obligations
under the Notes, the Indentures, the Subsidiary Guaranties, the
registration rights agreement, or for any claim based on, in
respect of, or by reason of, such obligations or their creation.
Each holder of Notes by accepting a Note waives and releases all
such liability. The waiver and release are part of the
consideration for issuance of the Notes.
Amendments
and Waivers
Subject to certain exceptions, the Company and the applicable
Trustee with the consent of the registered holders of at least a
majority in aggregate principal amount of the applicable series
of Notes then outstanding (including consents obtained in
connection with a tender offer or exchange offer for the Notes)
may amend the applicable Indenture and such series of Notes, and
the registered holders of at least a majority in aggregate
principal amount of the applicable series of Notes outstanding
may waive any past default or compliance with any provisions of
the applicable Indenture and such series of Notes (except a
default in the payment of principal, premium, interest and
certain covenants and provisions of the applicable Indenture
which cannot be amended without the consent of each holder of an
outstanding Note of such series). However, without the consent
of each holder of an outstanding Note of the applicable series,
no amendment may, among other things,
(1) reduce the principal amount of such series of Notes
whose holders must consent to an amendment, supplement or waiver;
(2) reduce the rate of, or extend the time for payment of,
interest on, any Note of such series;
(3) reduce the principal of, or extend the Stated Maturity
of, any Note of such series;
(4) make any Note of such series payable in money other
than that stated in the Note of such series;
(5) impair the right of any holder of the Notes of such
series to receive payment of principal of, premium, if any, and
interest, on, such holders Notes on or after the due dates
therefor or to institute suit for the enforcement of any payment
on or with respect to such holders Notes or any Subsidiary
Guaranty;
(6) waive a Default or Event of Default in the payment of
principal of, premium, if any, and interest, on such Notes of
such series (except a rescission of acceleration of such Notes
by the holders of at least a
172
majority in aggregate principal amount of the Notes of such
series and a waiver of the payment default that resulted from
such acceleration);
(7) make any change in the provisions of the applicable
Indenture relating to waivers of past Defaults or the rights of
holders of such Notes to receive payments of principal of, or
interest or premium on such Notes;
(8) subordinate the Notes of such series or any Subsidiary
Guaranty to any other obligation of the Company or the
applicable Subsidiary Guarantor;
(9) release any security interest that may have been
granted in favor of the holders of the Notes of such series
other than pursuant to the terms of such security interest;
(10) reduce the premium payable upon the redemption of any
Note of such series or change the time at which any Note of such
series may be redeemed, as described under
Optional Redemption;
(11) reduce the premium payable upon a Change of Control
or, at any time after a Change of Control has occurred, change
the time at which the Change of Control Offer relating thereto
must be made or at which the Notes of such series must be
repurchased pursuant to such Change of Control Offer;
(12) at any time after the Company is obligated to make a
Prepayment Offer with the Excess Proceeds from Asset Sales,
change the time at which such Prepayment Offer must be made or
at which the Notes of such series must be repurchased pursuant
thereto;
(13) amend or modify the provisions described under
Additional Amounts;
(14) make any change in any Subsidiary Guaranty, that would
adversely affect the holders of the Notes of such series; or
(15) make any change in the preceding amendment and waiver
provisions.
The applicable Indenture and the applicable series of Notes may
be amended by the Company and the applicable Trustee without the
consent of any holder of such Notes to:
(1) cure any ambiguity, omission, defect or inconsistency;
(2) provide for the assumption by a Surviving Person of the
obligations of the Company under the applicable Indenture;
(3) provide for uncertificated Notes of such series in
addition to or in place of certificated Notes of such series
(provided, that the uncertificated Notes are issued in
registered form for purposes of Section 163(f) of the Code;
(4) add additional Guarantees with respect to the Notes of
such series or release Subsidiary Guarantors from Subsidiary
Guaranties as provided or permitted by the terms of the
applicable Indenture;
(5) secure the Notes of such series, add to the covenants
of the Company for the benefit of the holders of such Notes or
surrender any right or power conferred upon the Company;
(6) make any change that does not adversely affect the
rights of any holder of the Notes of such series;
(7) comply with any requirement of the SEC in connection
with the qualification of the Indenture under the
Trust Indenture Act;
(8) evidence or provide for a successor Trustee;
(9) provide for the issuance of Additional Notes in
accordance with the applicable Indenture;
(10) conform the text of the Indentures, the Notes or the
Subsidiary Guaranties to any provision of this Description
of the Notes to the extent that such provision in this
Description of the Notes is
173
intended to be a verbatim recitation of a provision of the
Indentures, the Notes or the Subsidiary Guaranties; or
(11) make any amendment to the provisions of the applicable
Indenture relating to the transfer and legending of Notes;
provided, that (A) compliance with the applicable
Indenture as so amended would not result in Notes being
transferred in violation of the Securities Act or any other
applicable securities law and (B) such amendment does not
materially and adversely affect the rights of holders to
transfer Notes.
The consent of the holders of the 2017 Notes or the 2020 Notes,
as the case may be, is not necessary to approve the particular
form of any proposed amendment, supplement or waiver. It is
sufficient if such consent approves the substance of the
proposed amendment, supplement or waiver. After an amendment,
supplement or waiver becomes effective, the Company is required
to mail to each registered holder of the applicable series of
Notes at such holders address appearing in the Security
Register a notice briefly describing such amendment, supplement
or waiver. However, the failure to give such notice to all
holders of the applicable series of Notes, or any defect
therein, will not impair or affect the validity of the
amendment, supplement or waiver.
Defeasance
The Company may, at its option and at any time, terminate all
its obligations under the 2017 Notes or the 2020 Notes, as the
case may be, and the applicable Indenture (legal
defeasance), except for certain obligations, including
those respecting the defeasance trust and obligations to
register the transfer or exchange of the applicable Notes, to
replace mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen Notes and to
maintain a registrar and paying agent in respect of the
applicable Notes and to pay Additional Amounts, if any. The
Company at any time also may terminate:
(1) its obligations under the covenants described under
Change of Control Offer and
Certain Covenants,
(2) the operation of the cross acceleration provisions, the
judgment default provisions, the bankruptcy provisions with
respect to Significant Subsidiaries and the guaranty provisions,
in each case described under Events of
Default above, and
(3) the limitations contained in clause (e) under the
first paragraph of, and in the second paragraph of,
Merger, Consolidation and Sale of
Property above (covenant defeasance).
The Company may exercise its legal defeasance option
notwithstanding its prior exercise of its covenant defeasance
option.
If the Company exercises its legal defeasance option, payment of
the Notes of such series may not be accelerated because of an
Event of Default with respect thereto. If the Company exercises
its covenant defeasance option, payment of the Notes of such
series may not be accelerated because of an Event of Default
specified in clauses (4), (5), (6), (7), (8) (with respect only
to Significant Subsidiaries) or (9) under
Events of Default above or because of
the failure of the Company to comply with clause (e) under
the first paragraph of, or with the second paragraph of,
Merger, Consolidation and Sale of
Property above. If the Company exercises its legal
defeasance option or its covenant defeasance option, any
collateral then securing the Notes of such series will be
released and each Subsidiary Guarantor will be released from all
its obligations under its Subsidiary Guaranty.
The legal defeasance option or the covenant defeasance option
may be exercised only if:
(a) the Company irrevocably deposits in trust with the
applicable Trustee money or U.S. Government Obligations for
the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on
the applicable series of Notes to maturity or redemption, as the
case may be;
(b) the Company delivers to the applicable Trustee a
certificate from a nationally recognized firm of independent
certified public accountants expressing their opinion that the
payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest when due
and without reinvestment on the deposited U.S. Government
Obligations
174
plus any deposited money without investment will provide cash at
such times and in such amounts as will be sufficient to pay
principal, premium, if any, and interest when due on all the
Notes of such series to be defeased to maturity or redemption,
as the case may be;
(c) 90 days pass after the deposit is made, and during
the 90-day
period, no Default described in clause (8) under
Events of Default occurs with respect to
the Company or any other Person making such deposit which is
continuing at the end of the period;
(d) no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is
continuing on the date of such deposit and after giving effect
thereto;
(e) such deposit does not constitute a default under any
other agreement or instrument binding on the Company;
(f) the Company delivers to the applicable Trustee an
Opinion of Counsel to the effect that the trust resulting from
the deposit does not constitute, or is qualified as, a regulated
investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940;
(g) in the case of the legal defeasance option, the Company
delivers to the applicable Trustee an Opinion of Counsel stating
that:
(1) the Company has received from the Internal Revenue
Service a ruling, or
(2) since the date of the applicable Indenture there has
been a change in the applicable Federal income tax law, to the
effect, in either case, that, and based thereon such Opinion of
Counsel shall confirm that, the holders of the Notes of such
series will not recognize income, gain or loss for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes as a result of such
defeasance and will be subject to U.S. Federal income tax
on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same time as
would be the case if such defeasance has not occurred;
(h) in the case of the covenant defeasance option, the
Company delivers to the applicable Trustee an Opinion of Counsel
to the effect that the holders of the Notes of such series will
not recognize income, gain or loss for U.S. Federal income
tax purposes as a result of such covenant defeasance and will be
subject to U.S. Federal income tax on the same amounts, in
the same manner and at the same times as would be the case if
such covenant defeasance had not occurred;
(i) the Company delivers to the applicable Trustee an
Opinion of Counsel to the effect that holders of the Notes of
such series will not recognize income, gain or loss for Canadian
federal tax purposes as a result of such deposit and defeasance
and will be subject to Canadian federal taxes (including
withholding taxes) on the same amounts, in the same manner and
at the same times as would be the case if such deposit and
defeasance had not occurred; and
(j) the Company delivers to the applicable Trustee an
Officers Certificate and an Opinion of Counsel, each
stating that all conditions precedent to the defeasance and
discharge of the applicable series of Notes have been complied
with as required by the applicable Indenture.
Satisfaction
and Discharge
The Company may discharge the applicable Indenture such that it
will cease to be of further effect, subject to certain
exceptions, as to all outstanding Notes of such series when:
(1) either
(a) all the Notes of such series previously authenticated
(except lost, stolen or destroyed Notes that have been replaced
or paid and Notes for whose payment money has previously been
deposited in trust or segregated and held in trust by the
Company and is thereafter repaid to the Company or discharged
from the trust) have been delivered to the Trustee for
cancellation; or
175
(b) all Notes of such series not previously delivered to
the applicable Trustee for cancellation
(A) have become due and payable, or
(B) will become due and payable at their maturity within
one year, or
(C) are to be called for redemption within one year under
arrangements satisfactory to the applicable Trustee for the
giving of notice of a redemption by the applicable
Trustee, and
in the case of (A), (B) or (C), the Company has irrevocably
deposited or caused to be deposited with the applicable Trustee
as trust funds in trust solely for the benefit of the holders,
cash in U.S. dollars, U.S. Government Obligations, or
a combination of such cash and U.S. Government Obligations,
in such amounts as will be sufficient without consideration of
any reinvestment of interest, to pay and discharge the entire
Debt on the Notes not previously delivered to the applicable
Trustee for cancellation or redemption, for principal, premium,
if any, and interest on the applicable series of Notes to the
date of deposit, in the case of Notes that have become due and
payable, or to the Stated Maturity or redemption date, as the
case may be;
(2) the Company has paid or caused to be paid all other
sums payable by it under the applicable Indenture; and
(3) if required by the applicable Trustee, the Company
delivers to the applicable Trustee an Officers Certificate
and Opinion of Counsel stating that all conditions precedent
under the applicable Indenture relating to the satisfaction and
discharge of such Indenture have been satisfied.
Foreign
Currency Equivalents
For purposes of determining compliance with any
U.S. dollar-denominated restriction or amount, the
U.S. dollar equivalent principal amount of any amount
denominated in a foreign currency will be the Dollar Equivalent
calculated on the date the Debt was incurred or other
transaction was entered into, or first committed, in the case of
revolving credit debt, provided, that if any Permitted
Refinancing Debt is incurred to refinance Debt denominated in a
foreign currency, and such refinancing would cause the
applicable U.S. dollar-denominated restriction to be
exceeded if calculated on the date of such refinancing, such
U.S. dollar-denominated restriction will be deemed not have
been exceeded so long as the principal amount of such Permitted
Refinancing Debt does not exceed the principal amount of such
Debt being refinanced. Notwithstanding any other provision in
the Indenture, no restriction or amount will be exceeded solely
as a result of fluctuations in the exchange rate of currencies.
Consent
to Jurisdiction and Service of Process
The Company will irrevocably appoint Corporation Service Company
as its agent for service of process in any suit, action or
proceeding with respect to the Indentures or the Notes brought
in any Federal or state court located in New York City and that
each of the parties submits to the jurisdiction thereof.
Enforceability
of Judgments
Since most of the Companys assets are located outside the
United States, any judgment obtained in the United States
against it, including judgments with respect to the payment of
any principal, premium, interest and Additional Amounts may not
be collectible within the United States.
The laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of
Canada applicable therein permit an action to be brought in a
court of competent jurisdiction in the Province of Ontario (an
Ontario Court) for the enforcement of the Indenture
or the Notes. An Ontario Court would recognize a judgment based
upon a final and conclusive in personam judgment of any federal
or state court of competent jurisdiction located in the City of
New York (a New York Court) for a sum certain,
obtained against the Company with respect to a claim arising out
of the Indenture or the Notes (a New York Judgment),
and would enforce such judgment in an action by a judgment
creditor (for example, the Trustee) to enforce such judgment
without reconsideration of the merits, (A) provided,
that, (i) an action to enforce the New York Judgment
must be commenced in
176
the Ontario Court within any applicable limitation period;
(ii) the Ontario Court has discretion to stay or decline to
hear an action on the New York Judgment if the New York Judgment
is under appeal or there is another subsisting judgment in any
jurisdiction relating to the same cause of action as the New
York Judgment; (iii) the Ontario Court will render judgment
only in Canadian dollars; and (iv) an action in the Ontario
Court on the New York Judgment may be affected by bankruptcy,
insolvency or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of
creditors rights generally; and (B) subject to the
following defenses, (w) the New York Judgment was
obtained by fraud or in a manner contrary to the principles of
natural justice; (x) the New York Judgment is for a claim
which under Ontario Law would be characterized as based on a
foreign revenue, expropriatory, penal law; (y) the New York
Judgment is contrary to Ontario public policy; and (z) the
New York Judgment has been satisfied or is void or voidable
under the internal laws of that foreign jurisdiction.
In addition, under the Currency Act (Canada), a Canadian Court
may only render judgment for a sum of money in Canadian
currency, and in enforcing a foreign judgment for a sum of money
in a foreign currency, a Canadian court will render its
decisions in the Canadian currency equivalent of such foreign
currency, calculated at the rate of exchange prevailing on the
date the judgment became enforceable at the place where it was
rendered.
Governing
Law
The Indentures and the Notes are governed by the laws of the
State of New York.
The
Trustees
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. is the
Trustee under each of the Indentures.
Except during the continuance of an Event of Default, the
Trustee will perform only such duties as are specifically set
forth in the Indentures. During the existence of an Event of
Default, the Trustee will exercise such of the rights and powers
vested in it under the Indentures and use the same degree of
care and skill in its exercise as a prudent person would
exercise under the circumstances in the conduct of such
persons own affairs. Subject to such provisions, the
Trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of its
rights or powers under the Indentures at the request of any
Holder of the Notes, unless such Holder shall have offered to
the Trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to it against
any loss, liability or expense.
Certain
Definitions
Set forth below is a summary of certain of the defined terms
used in the Indentures. Reference is made to the Indenture for
the full definition of all such terms as well as any other
capitalized terms used herein for which no definition is
provided. Unless the context otherwise requires, an accounting
term not otherwise defined has the meaning assigned to it in
accordance with GAAP.
ABL Facility means the asset-based lending
facility dated as of December 17, 2010 by and among the
Company, and certain of its Affiliates, Bank of America, N.A. as
administrative agent, and the several banks and other financial
institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto,
including any notes, collateral documents, and documentation and
guarantees and any appendices, exhibits or schedules to any of
the preceding, as such facility may be amended, restated,
modified or supplemented from time to time, renewed, refunded,
refinanced, restructured, replaced, repaid or extended from time
to time, whether with the original agents and lenders or other
agents and lenders, whether as an asset-based or cash flow type
facility or otherwise; provided, that for purposes of
clause (b)(ii) of the second paragraph of the covenant described
under Certain Covenants Limitation on
Debt, ABL Facility is limited to asset-based lending
facilities that limit the amount of Debt permitted to be
Incurred thereunder to a borrowing base formula based on
accounts receivable and inventory.
Additional Assets means:
(a) any Property (other than cash, Cash Equivalents and
securities) to be owned by the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary and used in a Related Business; or
177
(b) Capital Stock of a Person that becomes a Restricted
Subsidiary as a result of the acquisition of such Capital Stock
by the Company or another Restricted Subsidiary from any Person
other than the Company or an Affiliate of the Company;
provided, that, in the case of clause (b), such
Restricted Subsidiary is primarily engaged in a Related Business.
Affiliate of any specified Person means:
(a) any other Person directly or indirectly controlling or
controlled by or under direct or indirect common control with
such specified Person, or
(b) any other Person who is a director or officer of:
(1) such specified Person,
(2) any Subsidiary of such specified Person, or
(3) any Person described in clause (a) above.
For the purposes of this definition, control, when
used with respect to any Person, means the power to direct the
management and policies of such Person, directly or indirectly,
whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract
or otherwise; and the terms controlling and
controlled have meanings correlative to the
foregoing. For purposes of the covenants described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Transactions with Affiliates and
Limitation on Asset Sales and the
definition of Additional Assets only,
Affiliate shall also mean any beneficial owner of
shares representing 10% or more of the total voting power of the
Voting Stock (on a fully diluted basis) of the Company and any
Person who would be an Affiliate of any such beneficial owner
pursuant to the first sentence hereof.
Alternative Currency means any lawful
currency other than U.S. dollars that is freely
transferable into U.S. dollars.
Approved Member States means Belgium, France,
Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and
the United Kingdom.
Asset Sale means any sale, lease, transfer,
issuance or other disposition (or series of related sales,
leases, transfers, issuances or dispositions) by the Company or
any Restricted Subsidiary, including any disposition by means of
a merger, consolidation or similar transaction (each referred to
for the purposes of this definition as a
disposition), of the following:
(a) any shares of Capital Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary
(other than directors qualifying shares), or
(b) any other Property of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary outside of the ordinary course of business of the
Company or such Restricted Subsidiary,
other than, in the case of clause (a) or (b) above:
(1) any disposition by a Restricted Subsidiary to the
Company or by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary to a
Restricted Subsidiary,
(2) any disposition that constitutes a Permitted Investment
or Restricted Payment permitted by the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Restricted Payments,
(3) any disposition effected in compliance with the first
or second paragraph of the covenant described under
Merger, Consolidation and Sale of
Property),
(4) sales, transfers and other dispositions of accounts
receivable (whether now existing or arising or acquired in the
future) and any assets related thereto to a Securitization
Entity under or pursuant to a Qualified Securitization
Transaction;
(5) any sale of assets pursuant to a Sale and Leaseback
Transaction;
(6) any sale or disposition of cash or Cash Equivalents;
178
(7) foreclosures, condemnation or any similar action on
assets or the granting of Liens not prohibited by the Indenture;
(8) any sale, exchange or other disposition of any property
or equipment that has become damaged, worn out, obsolete or
otherwise unsuitable or unnecessary for use or in connection
with scheduled turnarounds, maintenance and equipment and
facility updates;
(9) the creation of a Permitted Lien and dispositions in
connection with Permitted Liens;
(10) any issuance or sale of equity interests in, or Debt
or other securities of, an Unrestricted Subsidiary; and
(11) any disposition in a single transaction or a series of
related transactions of assets for aggregate consideration of
less than $20.0 million.
Attributable Debt in respect of a Sale and
Leaseback Transaction means, at any date of determination,
(a) if such Sale and Leaseback Transaction is a Capital
Lease Obligation, the amount of Debt represented thereby
according to the definition of Capital Lease
Obligations, and
(b) in all other instances, the greater of:
(1) the Fair Market Value of the Property subject to such
Sale and Leaseback Transaction, and
(2) the present value (discounted at the interest rate
borne by the applicable series of Notes, compounded annually) of
the total obligations of the lessee for rental payments during
the remaining term of the lease included in such Sale and
Leaseback Transaction (including any period for which such lease
has been extended).
Average Life means, as of any date of
determination, with respect to any Debt or Preferred Stock, the
quotient obtained by dividing:
(a) the sum of the product of the numbers of years (rounded
to the nearest one-twelfth of one year) from the date of
determination to the dates of each successive scheduled
principal payment of such Debt or redemption or similar payment
with respect to such Preferred Stock multiplied by the amount of
such payment by (b) the sum of all such payments.
Board of Directors means the board of
directors of the Company.
Board Resolution of a Person means a copy of
a resolution certified by the secretary or an assistant
secretary (or individual performing comparable duties) of the
applicable Person to have been duly adopted by the board of
directors of such Person and to be in full force and effect on
the date of such certification.
Canadian Restricted Subsidiary means any
Restricted Subsidiary that is organized under the laws of Canada
or any province or territory thereof.
Capital Lease Obligations means any
obligation under a lease that is required to be capitalized for
financial reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP; and the
amount of Debt represented by such obligation shall be the
capitalized amount of such obligations determined in accordance
with GAAP; and the Stated Maturity thereof shall be the date of
the last payment of rent or any other amount due under such
lease prior to the first date upon which such lease may be
terminated by the lessee without payment of a penalty. For
purposes of Certain Covenants
Limitation on Liens, a Capital Lease Obligation shall be
deemed secured by a Lien on the Property being leased.
Capital Stock means, with respect to any
Person, any shares or other equivalents (however designated) of
any class of corporate stock or partnership interests or any
other participations, rights, warrants, options or other
interests in the nature of an equity interest in such Person,
including Preferred Stock, but excluding any debt security
convertible or exchangeable into such equity interest.
179
Capital Stock Equivalents means all
securities convertible into or exchangeable for Capital Stock
and all warrants, options or other rights to purchase or
subscribe for any Capital Stock, whether or not presently
convertible, exchangeable or exercisable.
Capital Stock Sale Proceeds means the
aggregate cash proceeds received by the Company from the
issuance or sale by the Company of Qualified Equity Interests
after the Issue Date, net of attorneys fees,
accountants fees, underwriters or placement
agents fees, discounts or commissions and brokerage,
consultant and other fees and expenses actually incurred in
connection with such issuance or sale and net of Taxes paid or
payable as a result thereof.
Cash Equivalents means any of the following:
(a) securities issued or fully guaranteed or insured by the
federal government of the United States, Canada, Switzerland,
any Approved Member State or any agency or sponsored entity of
the foregoing maturing within 365 days of the date of
acquisition thereof;
(b) time deposit accounts, certificates of deposit,
eurocurrency time deposits, overnight bank deposits, money
market deposits and bankers acceptances maturing within
365 days of the date of acquisition thereof and issued by a
bank or trust company organized under the laws of Canada or any
province thereof, the United States, any state thereof, the
District of Columbia, any
non-U.S. bank,
or its branches or agencies (fully protected against currency
fluctuations) that, at the time of acquisition, is rated at
least
A-2
by S&P or
P-2
by Moodys (or such similar equivalent rating by at least
one nationally recognized statistical rating
organization (as defined in Rule 436 under the
Securities Act)) or the R-2 category by the Dominion
Bond Rating Service Limited;
(c) shares of any money market fund that (i) has at
least 95% of its assets invested continuously in the types of
investments referred to in clauses (a), (b) and (f) of
this paragraph, (ii) has net assets that exceed
$500 million and (iii) is rated at least
A-2
by S&P or
P-2
by Moodys;
(d) repurchase agreements entered into by any Person with a
bank or trust company or recognized securities dealer having
capital and surplus in excess of $250,000,000 for direct
obligations issued by or fully guaranteed or insured by the
United States government or any agency or instrumentality of the
United States in which such Person shall have a perfected first
priority security interest (subject to no other Liens) and
having, on the date of purchase thereof, a fair market value of
at least 100% of the amount of the repurchase obligations;
(e) commercial paper issued by a corporation (other than an
Affiliate of the Company) with a rating at the time as of which
any Investment therein is made of
P-2
(or higher) according to Moodys or
A-2
(or higher) according to S&P (or such similar equivalent
rating by at least one nationally recognized statistical
rating organization (as defined in Rule 436 under the
Securities Act)) or in the
R-2
category by the Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited; and
(f) direct obligations (or certificates representing an
ownership interest in such obligations) of any state of the
United States or the District of Columbia or any political
subdivision or instrumentality thereof (including any agency or
instrumentality thereof) or any province of Canada (including
any agency or instrumentality thereof) maturing within
365 days of the date of acquisition thereof, provided,
that at the time of acquisition the long-term debt of such
state, province or political subdivision is rated, in the case
of a state of the United States, one of the two highest ratings
from Moodys or S&P (or such similar equivalent rating
by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating
organization (as defined in Rule 436 under the
Securities Act)), or the R-2 category by the
Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited;
provided, that, to the extent any cash is generated
through operations in a jurisdiction outside of the United
States, Canada, Switzerland or an Approved Member State, such
cash may be retained and invested in obligations of the type
described in clauses (a), (b) and (e) of this
definition to the extent that such are customarily used in such
other jurisdiction for short-term cash management purposes.
180
Change of Control means the occurrence of any
of the following events:
(a) any person or group (as such
terms are used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange
Act or any successor of the foregoing), including any group
acting for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting or
disposing of securities within the meaning of
Rule 13d-5(b)(1)
under the Exchange Act, other than a Permitted Holder, becomes
(including as a result of a merger, consolidation or
amalgamation) the ultimate beneficial owner (as
defined in
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, except that a person will be deemed to
have beneficial ownership of all shares that any
such person has the right to acquire, whether such right is
exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time),
directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the total voting power
of the Voting Stock of the Company (for purposes of this clause
(a), such person or group shall be deemed to beneficially own
any Voting Stock of a corporation held by any other corporation
(the parent corporation) so long as such
person or group beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, in
the aggregate at least a majority of the total voting power of
the Voting Stock of such parent corporation); provided,
that any transaction in which the Company becomes a subsidiary
of another person will not constitute a Change of Control unless
50% or more of the total voting power of the Voting Stock of
such person is beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by
another person or group (other than a Permitted Holder); or
(b) the sale, transfer, assignment, lease, conveyance or
other disposition, directly or indirectly (other than by way of
merger, consolidation or amalgamation) of all or substantially
all the Property of the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries,
considered as a whole to a Person (other than one or more
Permitted Holders and other than a disposition of such Property
as an entirety or virtually as an entirety to one or more Wholly
Owned Restricted Subsidiaries), shall have occurred; or
(c) the shareholders of the Company shall have approved any
plan of liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended.
Commodity Price Protection Agreement means,
in respect of a Person, any forward contract, commodity swap
agreement, commodity option agreement or other similar agreement
or arrangement designed to protect such Person against
fluctuations in commodity prices.
Company Equity Plan means any management
equity or stock option or ownership plan or any other management
or employee benefit plan of the Company or any Subsidiary of the
Company.
Comparable Treasury Issue means the
U.S. treasury security selected by an Independent
Investment Banker as having a maturity comparable to the
remaining term of the 2017 Notes or the 2020 Notes, as the case
may be, that would be utilized, at the time of selection and in
accordance with customary financial practice, in pricing new
issues of corporate debt securities of comparable maturity to
the remaining term of such Notes. Independent Investment
Banker means one of the Reference Treasury Dealers
appointed by the Trustee after consultation with the Company.
Comparable Treasury Price means, with respect
to any redemption date:
(a) the average of the bid and ask prices for the
Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed in each case as a
percentage of its principal amount) on the third business day
preceding such redemption date, as set forth in the most
recently published statistical release designated
H.15(519) (or any successor release) published by
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and which
establishes yields on actively traded U.S. treasury
securities adjusted to constant maturity under the caption
Treasury Constant Maturities, or
(b) if such release (or any successor release) is not
published or does not contain such prices on such business day,
the average of the Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations for such
redemption date.
181
Consolidated Current Liabilities means, as of
any date of determination, the aggregate amount of liabilities
of the Company and its consolidated Restricted Subsidiaries
which may properly be classified as current liabilities
(including taxes accrued as estimated), after eliminating:
(a) all intercompany items between the Company and any
Restricted Subsidiary or between Restricted
Subsidiaries, and
(b) all current maturities of long-term Debt.
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio means,
as of any date of determination, the ratio of:
(a) the aggregate amount of EBITDA for the most recent four
consecutive fiscal quarters for which financial statements have
been delivered to
(b) Consolidated Interest Expense for such four fiscal
quarters;
provided, that:
(1) if
(A) since the beginning of such period the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary has Incurred any Debt that remains
outstanding or Repaid any Debt, or
(B) the transaction giving rise to the need to calculate
the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is an Incurrence or
Repayment of Debt,
Consolidated Interest Expense for such period shall be
calculated after giving effect on a pro forma basis to
such Incurrence or Repayment as if such Debt was Incurred or
Repaid on the first day of such period, provided, that,
in the event of any such Repayment of Debt, EBITDA for such
period shall be calculated as if the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary had not earned any interest income actually earned
during such period in respect of the funds used to Repay such
Debt, and
(2) if
(A) since the beginning of such period the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary shall have made any Asset Sale or an
Investment (by merger or otherwise) in any Restricted Subsidiary
(or any Person which becomes a Restricted Subsidiary) or made an
acquisition of Property which constitutes all or substantially
all of an operating unit of a business or implemented a
restructuring,
(B) the transaction giving rise to the need to calculate
the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is such an Asset Sale,
Investment, acquisition or restructuring, or
(C) since the beginning of such period any Person (that
subsequently became a Restricted Subsidiary or was merged with
or into the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary since the
beginning of such period) shall have made such an Asset Sale,
Investment, acquisition or restructuring,
then EBITDA for such period shall be calculated after giving
pro forma effect to such Asset Sale, Investment,
acquisition or restructuring as if such Asset Sale, Investment,
acquisition or restructuring had occurred on the first day of
such period (including any pro forma expense and cost reductions
calculated in good faith by a responsible officer of the Company
as set forth in an officers certificate; provided,
that such pro forma expense and cost reductions have been
realized or are reasonably expected to be realized within
12 months of such Asset Sale, Investment, acquisition or
restructuring); provided further, that such pro forma
expense and cost reductions shall not be required to be
calculated on a basis consistent with
Regulation S-X
under the Securities Act.
If any Debt bears a floating rate of interest and is being given
pro forma effect, the interest expense on such Debt shall
be calculated as if the base interest rate in effect for such
floating rate of interest on the date of determination had been
the applicable base interest rate for the entire period (taking
into account any Interest Rate Agreement applicable to such Debt
if such Interest Rate Agreement has a remaining term in excess
of 12 months). In the event the Capital Stock of any
Restricted Subsidiary is sold during the period, the Company
shall be deemed, for purposes of clause (1) above, to have
Repaid during such period the Debt of
182
such Restricted Subsidiary to the extent the Company and its
continuing Restricted Subsidiaries are no longer liable for such
Debt after such sale. Interest on any Debt under a revolving
credit facility computed on a pro forma basis shall be
computed based on the average daily balance of such Debt during
the applicable period except as set forth in the first paragraph
of this definition. Interest on a Capital Lease Obligation shall
be deemed to accrue at an interest rate reasonably determined by
a responsible financial or accounting officer of the Company to
be the rate of interest implicit in such Capital Lease
Obligation in accordance with GAAP.
Consolidated Interest Expense means, for any
period, the total interest expense of the Company and its
consolidated Restricted Subsidiaries, plus, to the extent not
included in such total interest expense, and to the extent
Incurred by the Company or its Restricted Subsidiaries,
(a) interest expense attributable to leases constituting
part of a Sale and Leaseback Transaction and to Capital Lease
Obligations,
(b) amortization of debt discount, premium, debt issuance
cost and other financing fees, including commitment fees,
(c) capitalized interest,
(d) non-cash interest expense,
(e) commissions, discounts and other fees and charges owed
with respect to letters of credit, bankers acceptance
financing and receivables financing,
(f) net costs associated with Hedging Obligations under
Interest Rate Agreements (including amortization of fees),
(g) Disqualified Stock Dividends,
(h) Preferred Stock Dividends,
(i) interest Incurred in connection with Investments in
discontinued operations,
(j) interest accruing on any Debt of any other Person to
the extent such Debt is Guaranteed by the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary, and
(k) the cash contributions to any employee stock ownership
plan or similar trust to the extent such contributions are used
by such plan or trust to pay interest or fees to any Person
(other than the Company) in connection with Debt Incurred by
such plan or trust.
Consolidated Interest Expense for any period will also include
the proportionate interest of the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries in the total interest expense for such period of
each of the Joint Ventures, with such total interest expense to
be calculated in substantially the same manner as Consolidated
Interest Expense for the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries.
Consolidated Net Income means, for any
period, the net income (loss) of the Company and its
consolidated Restricted Subsidiaries; provided, that
there shall not be included in such Consolidated Net Income:
(a) any net income (loss) of any Person (other than the
Company) if such Person is not a Restricted Subsidiary, except
that:
(1) subject to the exclusion contained in clause (c)
below, equity of the Company and its consolidated Restricted
Subsidiaries in the net income of any such Person for such
period shall be included in such Consolidated Net Income up to
the aggregate amount of cash distributed by such Person during
such period to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary as a
dividend or other distribution (subject, in the case of a
dividend or other distribution to a Restricted Subsidiary, to
the limitations contained in clause (b) below), and
183
(2) the equity of the Company and its consolidated
Restricted Subsidiaries in a net loss of any such Person other
than an Unrestricted Subsidiary for such period shall be
included in determining such Consolidated Net Income,
(b) any net income (loss) of any Restricted Subsidiary if
such Restricted Subsidiary is subject to a prohibition, directly
or indirectly, on the payment of dividends or the making of
distributions, directly or indirectly, to the Company, to the
extent of such prohibition, except that:
(1) subject to the exclusion contained in clause (c)
below, the equity of the Company and its consolidated Restricted
Subsidiaries in the net income of any such Restricted Subsidiary
for such period shall be included in such Consolidated Net
Income up to the aggregate amount of cash distributed by such
Restricted Subsidiary during such period to the Company or
another Restricted Subsidiary as a dividend or other
distribution (subject, in the case of a dividend or other
distribution to another Restricted Subsidiary, to the limitation
contained in this clause), and
(2) the equity of the Company and its consolidated
Restricted Subsidiaries in a net loss of any such Restricted
Subsidiary for such period shall be included in determining such
Consolidated Net Income,
(c) any gain or loss realized upon the sale or other
disposition of any Property of the Company or any of its
consolidated Subsidiaries (including pursuant to any Sale and
Leaseback Transaction) that is not sold or otherwise disposed of
in the ordinary course of business (provided, that sales or
other dispositions of assets in connection with any Qualified
Securitization Transaction shall be deemed to be in the ordinary
course),
(d) any extraordinary gain or loss,
(e) the cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principles,
(f) any non-cash compensation expense realized for grants
of performance shares, stock options or other rights to
officers, directors and employees of the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary,
(g) any unrealized gain or loss resulting in such period
from Hedging Obligations,
(h) any fees, expenses, prepayment premiums or charges in
such period related to any acquisition, disposition, Investment,
Repayment of Debt, issuance of Capital Stock or Capital Stock
Equivalents, financing, recapitalization or the Incurrence of
Debt permitted to be Incurred by the applicable Indenture,
including such fees, expenses, prepayment premiums or charges
related to the Recapitalization Transactions; and
(i) the effects of adjustments in the property, plant and
equipment, inventories, goodwill, intangible assets and debt
line items in the Companys consolidated financial
statements pursuant to GAAP resulting from the application of
purchase accounting in relation to any acquisition or the
amortization or write-off of any amounts thereof, net of taxes.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of the covenant
described under Certain Covenants
Limitation on Restricted Payments only, there shall be
excluded from Consolidated Net Income any dividends, repayments
of loans or advances or other transfers of Property from
Unrestricted Subsidiaries to the Company or a Restricted
Subsidiary to the extent such dividends, repayments or transfers
increase the amount of Restricted Payments permitted under such
covenant pursuant to clause (c)(5) thereof.
Consolidated Net Tangible Assets means, as of
any date of determination, the sum of the amounts that would
appear on a consolidated balance sheet of the Company and its
consolidated Restricted Subsidiaries as the total assets (less
accumulated depreciation and amortization, allowances for
doubtful receivables, other applicable reserves and other
properly deductible items) of the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries, after giving effect to purchase accounting and
after deducting therefrom Consolidated Current Liabilities and,
to the extent otherwise included, the amounts of (without
duplication):
(a) the excess of cost over fair market value of assets or
businesses acquired;
184
(b) any revaluation or other
write-up in
book value of assets subsequent to September 30, 2010 as a
result of a change in the method of valuation in accordance with
GAAP;
(c) unamortized debt discount and expenses and other
unamortized deferred charges, goodwill, patents, trademarks,
service marks, trade names, copyrights, licenses, organization
or developmental expenses and other intangible items;
(d) minority interests in consolidated Subsidiaries held by
Persons other than the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary;
(e) treasury stock;
(f) cash or securities set aside and held in a sinking or
other analogous fund established for the purpose of redemption
or other retirement of Capital Stock to the extent such
obligation is not reflected in Consolidated Current
Liabilities; and
(g) Investments in and assets of Unrestricted Subsidiaries.
Consolidated Total Debt means, as at any date
of determination, an amount equal to the sum of (1) the
aggregate amount of all outstanding Debt of the Company and its
Restricted Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis consisting of
Debt for borrowed money, Obligations in respect of Capital Lease
Obligations and Debt obligations evidenced by promissory notes
and similar instruments and (2) the proportionate interest
of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries in all
outstanding Debt of each of the Joint Ventures consisting of
Debt for borrowed money, Obligations in respect of Capital Lease
Obligations and Debt obligations evidenced by promissory notes
and similar instruments.
Credit Facilities means one or more debt
facilities (including, without limitation, the Senior Secured
Credit Facilities), credit agreements, financings, commercial
paper facilities, note purchase agreements, indentures, or other
agreements, in each case with banks, lenders, purchasers,
investors, trustees, agents or other representatives of any of
the foregoing, providing for revolving credit loans, term loans,
receivables financing (including through the sale of receivables
or interests in receivables to such lenders or other persons or
to special purpose entities formed to borrow from such lenders
or other persons against such receivables or sell such
receivables or interests in receivables and including Qualified
Securitization Transactions), letters of credit, notes or other
borrowings or other extensions of credit, including any notes,
mortgages, guarantees, collateral documents, instruments and
agreements executed in connection therewith, in each case, as
amended, restated, modified, renewed, refunded, restated,
restructured, increased, supplemented, replaced or refinanced in
whole or in part from time to time, including any replacement,
refunding or refinancing facility or agreement that increases
the amount permitted to be borrowed thereunder or alters the
maturity thereof or adds entities as additional borrowers or
guarantors thereunder and whether by the same or any other
agent, lender, group of lenders, or otherwise.
Currency Exchange Protection Agreement means,
in respect of a Person, any foreign exchange contract, currency
swap agreement, currency option or other similar agreement or
arrangement designed to protect such Person against fluctuations
in currency exchange rates.
Debt means, with respect to any Person on any
date of determination (without duplication):
(a) the principal of and premium (if any) in respect of:
(1) debt of such Person for money borrowed, and
(2) debt evidenced by notes, debentures, bonds or other
similar instruments for the payment of which such Person is
responsible or liable;
(b) all Capital Lease Obligations of such Person and all
Attributable Debt in respect of Sale and Leaseback Transactions
entered into by such Person;
(c) all obligations of such Person representing the
deferred purchase price of Property, all conditional sale
obligations of such Person and all obligations of such Person
under any title retention agreement (but excluding trade
accounts payable arising in the ordinary course of business),
provided,
185
that any earn-out obligations shall not constitute Debt until
such obligation becomes a liability on the balance sheet of such
Person in accordance with GAAP;
(d) all obligations of such Person for the reimbursement of
any obligor on any letter of credit, bankers acceptance or
similar credit transaction (other than obligations with respect
to letters of credit securing obligations (other than
obligations described in (a) through (c) above)
entered into in the ordinary course of business of such Person
to the extent such letters of credit are not drawn upon or, if
and to the extent drawn upon, such drawing is reimbursed no
later than the third business day following receipt by such
Person of a demand for reimbursement following payment on the
letter of credit);
(e) the amount of all obligations of such Person with
respect to the Repayment of any Disqualified Stock or, with
respect to any Subsidiary of such Person, any Preferred Stock
(but excluding, in each case, any accrued dividends);
(f) all obligations of the type referred to in
clauses (a) through (e) above of other Persons and all
dividends of other Persons for the payment of which, in either
case, such Person is responsible or liable, directly or
indirectly, as obligor, guarantor or otherwise, including by
means of any Guarantee;
(g) all obligations of the type referred to in
clauses (a) through (f) above of other Persons secured
by any Lien on any Property of such Person (whether or not such
obligation is assumed by such Person), the amount of such
obligation being deemed to be the lesser of the Fair Market
Value of such Property and the amount of the obligation so
secured; and
(h) to the extent not otherwise included in this
definition, Hedging Obligations of such Person.
The amount of Debt of any Person at any date shall be the
outstanding balance, or the accreted value of such Debt in the
case of Debt issued with original issue discount, at such date
of all unconditional obligations as described above and the
maximum liability, upon the occurrence of the contingency giving
rise to the obligation, of any contingent obligations at such
date. The amount of Debt represented by a Hedging Obligation
shall be equal to:
(1) zero if such Hedging Obligation has been Incurred
pursuant to clause (f), (g) or (h) of the second
paragraph of the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Debt, or
(2) the notional amount of such Hedging Obligation if not
Incurred pursuant to such clauses.
The amount of Disqualified Stock and Preferred Stock shall be
equal to the greater of their respective voluntary or
involuntary liquidation preferences and maximum fixed repurchase
prices, in each case determined on a consolidated basis in
accordance with GAAP. For purposes hereof, the maximum
fixed repurchase price of any Disqualified Stock or
Preferred Stock that does not have a fixed repurchase price
shall be calculated in accordance with the terms of such
Disqualified Stock or Preferred Stock as if such Disqualified
Stock or Preferred Stock were purchased on any date on which
Debt shall be required to be determined pursuant to the
Indentures, and if such price is not specified in such
Disqualified Stock or Preferred Stock, such price will be the
fair market value of such Disqualified Stock or Preferred Stock,
such fair market value to be determined reasonably and in good
faith by the Company.
Default means any event which is, or after
notice or passage of time or both would be, an Event of Default.
Designated Non-Cash Consideration means the
Fair Market Value of non-cash consideration received by the
Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company in connection
with an Asset Sale that is so designated as Designated Non-Cash
Consideration pursuant to an officers certificate, setting
forth the basis of such valuation, executed by the principal
financial officer of the Company, less the amount of cash or
Cash Equivalents received in connection with a subsequent sale
of or collection on such Designated Non-Cash Consideration.
186
Disqualified Stock means any Capital Stock of
the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries that by its
terms (or by the terms of any security into which it is
convertible or for which it is exchangeable, in either case at
the option of the holder thereof) or otherwise:
(a) matures or is mandatorily redeemable pursuant to a
sinking fund obligation or otherwise,
(b) is or may become redeemable or repurchaseable at the
option of the holder thereof, in whole or in part, or
(c) is convertible or exchangeable at the option of the
holder thereof for Debt or Disqualified Stock, on or prior to,
in the case of clause (a), (b) or (c), the first
anniversary of the Stated Maturity of the Notes.
Disqualified Stock Dividends means all
dividends with respect to Disqualified Stock of the Company held
by Persons other than a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary. The
amount of any such dividend shall be equal to the quotient of
such dividend divided by the difference between one and the
maximum statutory federal income tax rate (expressed as a
decimal number between 1 and 0) then applicable to the
Company.
Dollar Equivalent of any amount means, at the
time of determination thereof, (a) if such amount is
expressed in U.S. dollars, such amount, (b) if such
amount is expressed in an Alternative Currency, the equivalent
of such amount in U.S. dollars determined by using the rate
of exchange quoted by Citigroup Global Markets Inc. in New York,
New York at 11:00 a.m. (New York time) on the date of
determination (or, if such date is not a Business Day, the last
Business Day prior thereto) to prime banks in New York for the
spot purchase in the New York currency exchange market of such
amount of U.S. dollars with such Alternative Currency and
(c) if such amount is denominated in any other currency,
the equivalent of such amount in U.S. dollars as determined
by the Trustee using any method of determination it deems
appropriate.
EBITDA means, for any period, an amount equal
to, for the Company and its consolidated Restricted Subsidiaries:
(a) the sum of Consolidated Net Income for such period, plus
(1) any provision for taxes based on income or profits,
(2) Consolidated Interest Expense,
(3) loss from extraordinary items, to the extent the same
was deducted (and not added back) in computing Consolidated Net
Income,
(4) depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses,
(5) all other non-cash expenses, charges and losses that
are not payable in cash in any subsequent period, in each case,
to the extent deducted (and not added back) in computing
Consolidated Net Income,
(6) the amount of any costs incurred in connection with the
integration of an acquisition, to the extent deducted (and not
added back) in computing Consolidated Net Income,
(7) non-recurring items or unusual charges or expenses,
severance, relocation costs or expenses, other business
optimization expenses (including costs and expenses relating to
business optimization programs), new systems design and
implementation costs, project
start-up
costs, restructuring charges or reserves, and costs related to
the closure
and/or
consolidation of facilities, or costs associated with becoming a
public company or any other costs incurred in connection with
any of the foregoing,
(8) Management Fees permitted to be paid pursuant to clause
(g)(5) of the second paragraph of the covenant described under
Limitation on Restricted Payments,
(9) any non-cash impairment charge or asset write-off, in
each case pursuant to GAAP, and the amortization of intangibles
arising pursuant to GAAP,
(10) any net after-tax losses attributable to the early
extinguishment or conversion of Debt,
187
(11) the amount of any net income (loss) attributable to
non-controlling interests deducted (and not added back) in
computing Consolidated Net Income, minus
(b) the sum of, in each case to the extent included in the
calculation of such Consolidated Net Income for such period, but
without duplication, (i) any credit for income tax,
(ii) interest income, (iii) gains from extraordinary
items, (iv) any aggregate net gain (but not any aggregate
net loss) from the sale, exchange or other disposition of
capital assets, (v) any net after-tax gains attributable to
the early extinguishment or conversion of Debt and (vi) any
other non-cash gains or other items which have been added in
determining Consolidated Net Income, including any reversal of a
charge referred to in clause (5) above by reason of a
decrease in the value of any Capital Stock or Capital Stock
Equivalent; and excluding
(c) gains and losses due solely to fluctuations in currency
values of non-current assets and liabilities and realized gains
and losses on currency derivatives related to such non-current
assets and liabilities.
Notwithstanding the foregoing clause (a), the provision for
taxes and the depreciation, amortization and non-cash items of a
Restricted Subsidiary shall be added to Consolidated Net Income
to compute EBITDA only to the extent (and in the same
proportion) that the net income of such Restricted Subsidiary
was included in calculating Consolidated Net Income.
EBITDA for any period will also include the proportionate
interest of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries in the
EBITDA for such period of each of the Joint Ventures to the
extent they are not consolidated in the financial statements of
the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries (such EBITDA for
each of the Joint Ventures to be determined (i) in
substantially the same manner and with the same additions and
subtractions as EBITDA for the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries and (ii) consistent with the presentation of
EBITDA and the related Adjustment to include proportional
consolidation line item in the Offering Circular)
(including netting any results for the Joint Ventures included
in Consolidated Net Income of the Company); provided that
EBITDA shall not include the EBITDA of any Joint Venture if such
Joint Venture is subject to a prohibition, directly or
indirectly, on the payment of dividends or the making of
distributions, directly or indirectly, to the Company, to the
extent of such prohibition.
Event of Default has the meaning set forth
under Events of Default.
Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
Exchange Notes means the notes issued in
exchange for the Notes or any Additional Notes issued pursuant
to any registration rights agreement with respect to any
Additional Notes.
Excluded Contribution means the net cash
proceeds received by the Company from contributions to its
common equity capital designated as Excluded Contributions
pursuant to an officers certificate executed by the
principal financial officer of the Company on or before the date
such capital contributions are made.
Existing Notes means the Companys
7.25% Senior Notes due 2015 and the Companys
11.5% Senior Notes due 2015
Fair Market Value means, with respect to any
Property, the price that could be negotiated in an
arms-length free market transaction, for cash, between a
willing seller and a willing buyer, neither of whom is under
undue pressure or compulsion to complete the transaction. Fair
Market Value shall be determined, except as otherwise provided,
(a) if such Property has a Fair Market Value equal to or
less than $50.0 million, by any Officer of the
Company, or
(b) if such Property has a Fair Market Value in excess of
$50.0 million, by at least a majority of the Board of
Directors and evidenced by a Board Resolution, dated within
45 days of the relevant transaction, delivered to the
Trustee.
188
GAAP means U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles as in effect on the Issue Date, including
those set forth in:
(a) the opinions and pronouncements of the Accounting
Principles Board of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants,
(b) the statements and pronouncements of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board,
(c) such other statements by such other entity as approved
by a significant segment of the accounting profession, and
(d) the rules and regulations of the SEC governing the
inclusion of financial statements (including pro forma
financial statements) in periodic reports required to be
filed pursuant to Section 13 of the Exchange Act, including
opinions and pronouncements in staff accounting bulletins and
similar written statements from the accounting staff of the SEC.
Guarantee means any obligation, contingent or
otherwise, of any Person directly or indirectly guaranteeing any
Debt of any other Person and any obligation, direct or indirect,
contingent or otherwise, of such Person:
(a) to purchase or pay (or advance or supply funds for the
purchase or payment of) such Debt of such other Person (whether
arising by virtue of partnership arrangements, or by agreements
to keep-well, to purchase assets, goods, securities or services,
to
take-or-pay
or to maintain financial statement conditions or
otherwise), or
(b) entered into for the purpose of assuring in any other
manner the obligee against loss in respect thereof (in whole or
in part);
provided, that the term Guarantee shall not
include:
(1) endorsements for collection or deposit in the ordinary
course of business, or
(2) a contractual commitment by one Person to invest in
another Person for so long as such Investment is reasonably
expected to constitute a Permitted Investment under clause (a),
(b) or (c) of the definition of Permitted
Investment.
The term Guarantee used as a verb has a
corresponding meaning. The term Guarantor shall mean
any Person Guaranteeing any obligation.
Hedging Obligation of any Person means any
obligation of such Person pursuant to any Interest Rate
Agreement, Currency Exchange Protection Agreement, Commodity
Price Protection Agreement or any other similar agreement or
arrangement.
holder means a Person in whose name a Note is
registered in the security register for the Notes.
Incur means, with respect to any Debt or
other obligation of any Person, to create, issue, incur (by
merger, conversion, exchange or otherwise), extend, assume,
Guarantee or become liable in respect of such Debt or other
obligation or the recording, as required pursuant to GAAP or
otherwise, of any such Debt or obligation on the balance sheet
of such Person (and Incurrence and
Incurred shall have meanings correlative to the
foregoing); provided, that a change in GAAP that results
in an obligation of such Person that exists at such time, and is
not theretofore classified as Debt, becoming Debt shall not be
deemed an Incurrence of such Debt; provided further, that
any Debt or other obligations of a Person existing at the time
such Person becomes a Subsidiary (whether by merger,
consolidation, acquisition or otherwise) shall be deemed to be
Incurred by such Subsidiary at the time it becomes a Subsidiary;
and provided further, that solely for purposes of
determining compliance with Certain
Covenants Limitation on Debt, amortization of
debt discount shall not be deemed to be the Incurrence of Debt,
provided, that in the case of Debt sold at a discount,
the amount of such Debt Incurred shall at all times be the
aggregate principal amount at Stated Maturity.
Independent Financial Advisor means an
investment banking firm of national standing or any third party
appraiser of national standing, provided, that such firm
or appraiser is not an Affiliate of the Company.
189
Interest Rate Agreement means, for any
Person, any interest rate swap agreement, interest rate cap
agreement, interest rate collar agreement or other similar
agreement designed to protect against fluctuations in interest
rates.
Investment by any Person means any direct or
indirect loan (other than advances to customers in the ordinary
course of business that are recorded as accounts receivable on
the balance sheet of such Person), advance or other extension of
credit or capital contribution (by means of transfers of cash or
other Property to others or payments for Property or services
for the account or use of others, or otherwise) to, or
Incurrence of a Guarantee of any obligation of, or purchase or
acquisition of Capital Stock, bonds, notes, debentures or other
securities or evidence of Debt issued by, any other Person. For
purposes of the covenants described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Restricted Payments and Designation of
Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries and the
definition of Restricted Payment, the term
Investment shall include the portion (proportionate
to the Companys equity interest in such Subsidiary) of the
Fair Market Value of the net assets of any Subsidiary of the
Company at the time that such Subsidiary is designated an
Unrestricted Subsidiary; provided, that upon a
redesignation of such Subsidiary as a Restricted Subsidiary, the
Company shall be deemed to continue to have a permanent
Investment in an Unrestricted Subsidiary of an
amount (if positive) equal to:
(a) the Companys Investment in such
Subsidiary at the time of such redesignation, less
(b) the portion (proportionate to the Companys equity
interest in such Subsidiary) of the Fair Market Value of the net
assets of such Subsidiary at the time of such redesignation.
In determining the amount of any Investment made by transfer of
any Property other than cash, such Property shall be valued at
its Fair Market Value at the time of such Investment.
Investment Grade Rating means a rating equal
to or higher than Baa3 (or the equivalent) by Moodys and
BBB- (or the equivalent) by S&P.
Issue Date means December 17, 2010.
Joint Venture shall mean each of Norf GmbH,
MiniMRF LLC (Delaware), and Consorcio Candonga (unincorporated
Brazil), in each case so long as they are not a Restricted
Subsidiary of the Company.
Lien means, with respect to any Property of
any Person, any mortgage or deed of trust, pledge,
hypothecation, assignment, deposit arrangement, security
interest, lien, charge, easement (other than any easement not
materially impairing usefulness or marketability), encumbrance,
preference, priority or other security agreement or preferential
arrangement of any kind or nature whatsoever on or with respect
to such Property (including any Capital Lease Obligation,
conditional sale or other title retention agreement having
substantially the same economic effect as any of the foregoing
or any Sale and Leaseback Transaction).
Management Fees means management, consulting,
monitoring and advisory fees and related expenses and
termination fees payable to any Affiliate of the Company
pursuant to a management agreement relating to the Company.
Moodys means Moodys Investors
Service, Inc. or any successor to the rating agency business
thereof.
Net Available Cash from any Asset Sale means
payments received therefrom in the form of cash and Cash
Equivalents (including any cash or Cash Equivalent received by
way of deferred payment of principal pursuant to a note or
installment receivable or otherwise, but only as and when
received, but excluding any other consideration received in the
form of assumption by the acquiring Person of Debt or other
obligations relating to the Property that is the subject of such
Asset Sale or received in any other form), in each case net of:
(a) all legal, title and recording tax expenses,
commissions and other fees and expenses incurred, and all
Federal, state, provincial, foreign and local taxes required to
be accrued as a liability under GAAP, as a consequence of such
Asset Sale,
190
(b) all payments made on or in respect of any Debt that is
secured by any Property subject to such Asset Sale, in
accordance with the terms of any Lien upon such Property, or
which must by its terms, or in order to obtain a necessary
consent to such Asset Sale, or by applicable law, be repaid out
of the proceeds from such Asset Sale,
(c) all distributions and other payments required to be
made to minority interest holders in Subsidiaries or joint
ventures as a result of such Asset Sale, and
(d) the deduction of appropriate amounts provided by the
seller as a reserve, in accordance with GAAP, against any
liabilities associated with the Property disposed of in such
Asset Sale and retained by the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary after such Asset Sale.
Net Senior Secured Leverage Ratio as of any
date of determination means, the ratio of (1) Consolidated
Total Debt that is secured by Liens as of such date of
determination, less the aggregate amount of Unrestricted Cash as
of such date of determination to (2) EBITDA for the most
recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which financial
statements have been delivered, with such pro forma
adjustments to EBITDA as are appropriate and consistent with
the pro forma adjustment provisions set forth in the
definition of Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio.
Net Total Leverage Ratio as of any date of
determination means, the ratio of (1) Consolidated Total
Debt as of such date of determination, less the aggregate amount
of Unrestricted Cash as of such date of determination to
(2) EBITDA for the most recently ended four full fiscal
quarters for which financial statements have been delivered,
with such pro forma adjustments to EBITDA as are
appropriate and consistent with the pro forma adjustment
provisions set forth in the definition of Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio.
Obligations means all obligations for
principal, premium, interest, penalties, fees, indemnifications,
reimbursements, damages and other liabilities payable under the
documentation governing any Debt.
Offering Circular means the confidential
preliminary offering circular dated December 6, 2010, as
supplemented by the pricing supplement dated December 10,
2010, pursuant to which the Notes are offered for sale.
Officer means the Chief Executive Officer,
the President, the Chief Financial Officer or any other
executive officer of the Company.
Officers Certificate means a
certificate, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to
the Trustee, signed by two Officers of the Company, at least one
of whom shall be the principal executive officer or principal
financial officer of the Company, and delivered to the Trustee.
Opinion of Counsel means a written opinion
from legal counsel who is reasonably acceptable to the Trustee.
The counsel may be an employee of or counsel to the Company or
the Trustee.
Permitted Holder means Hindalco Industries
Ltd. and any Affiliate and Related Person thereof. Any person or
group whose acquisition of beneficial ownership constitutes a
Change of Control in respect of which a Change of Control Offer
is made in accordance with the requirements of the Indenture (or
would result in a Change of Control Offer in the absence of the
waiver of such requirement by holders in accordance with the
Indenture) will thereafter, together with any of its Affiliates
and Related Persons, constitute additional Permitted Holders.
Permitted Investment means any Investment:
(a) in the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary;
(b) in any Person that will, upon the making of such
Investment, become a Restricted Subsidiary;
(c) in any Person if as a result of such Investment such
Person is merged or consolidated with or into, or transfers or
conveys all or substantially all its Property to, the Company or
a Restricted Subsidiary;
(d) in Cash Equivalents;
191
(e) in receivables owing to the Company or a Restricted
Subsidiary, if created or acquired in the ordinary course of
business and payable or dischargeable in accordance with
customary trade terms; provided, that such trade terms
may include such concessionary trade terms as the Company or
such Restricted Subsidiary deems reasonable under the
circumstances;
(f) consisting of payroll, travel and similar advances to
cover matters that are expected at the time of such advances
ultimately to be treated as expenses for accounting purposes and
that are made in the ordinary course of business;
(g) consisting of loans and advances to employees made in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices
of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may
be, provided, that such loans and advances do not exceed
$15.0 million in the aggregate at any one time outstanding;
(h) in stock, obligations or other securities received in
settlement of debts created in the ordinary course of business
and owing to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary or in
satisfaction of disputes or judgments;
(i) in any Person to the extent such Investment represents
the non-cash portion of the consideration received in connection
with (A) an Asset Sale consummated in compliance with the
covenant described under Certain
Covenants Limitation on Asset Sales, or
(B) any disposition of Property not constituting an Asset
Sale;
(j) in any Persons made for Fair Market Value that do not
exceed the greater of $400.0 million and 7.5% of
Consolidated Net Tangible Assets in the aggregate outstanding at
any one time;
(k) in a Securitization Entity or any Investment by a
Securitization Entity in any other Person in connection with a
Qualified Securitization Transaction provided, that any
Investment in a Securitization Entity is in the form of a
Purchase Money Note, contribution of additional receivables and
related assets or any equity interests;
(l) existing on the Issue Date;
(m) in prepaid expenses, negotiable instruments held for
collection and lease, utility and workers compensation,
performance and other similar deposits; and
(n) consisting of the licensing or contribution of
intellectual property pursuant to joint marketing arrangements
with other Person.
Permitted Liens means:
(a) Liens to secure Debt not in excess of the greater of
(1) Debt permitted to be Incurred under clause (b) of
the second paragraph of the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Debt and (2) Debt incurred pursuant to the covenant
described under Certain Covenants Limitation
on Debt provided, that, with respect to Liens securing
Debt permitted under this subclause (2), (x) no Default or
Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing at the
time of the incurrence of such Debt or after giving effect
thereto and (y) the Net Senior Secured Leverage Ratio,
calculated on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the
incurrence of such Lien, the related Debt and the application of
net proceeds therefrom, would be no greater than 3.0 to 1.0;
(b) Liens to secure Debt permitted to be Incurred under
clause (c) of the second paragraph of the covenant
described under Certain Covenants
Limitation on Debt, provided, that any such Lien
may not extend to any Property of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary, other than the Property acquired, constructed or
leased with the proceeds of such Debt, any improvements or
accessions to such Property, and any proceeds thereof;
(c) Liens for Taxes, assessments or governmental charges or
levies on the Property of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary if the same shall not at the time be delinquent or
thereafter can be paid without penalty, or are being contested
in good faith and by appropriate proceedings timely instituted
and
192
diligently pursued, provided, in each case that any
reserve or other appropriate provision that shall be required in
accordance with GAAP shall have been established with respect
thereto;
(d) deposit account banks rights of set-off, Liens of
landlords arising by statute, Liens imposed by law, such as
carriers, warehousemens and mechanics Liens
and other similar Liens, on the Property of the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary arising in the ordinary course of business
and securing payment of obligations that are not more than
60 days past due or are being contested in good faith and
by appropriate proceedings;
(e) Liens on the Property of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary Incurred in the ordinary course of business to secure
performance of obligations with respect to statutory or
regulatory requirements, performance or
return-of-money
bonds, surety bonds or other obligations of a like nature and
Incurred in a manner consistent with industry practice, in each
case which are not Incurred in connection with the borrowing of
money, the obtaining of advances or credit or the payment of the
deferred purchase price of Property and which do not in the
aggregate impair in any material respect the use of Property in
the operation of the business of the Company and the Restricted
Subsidiaries taken as a whole;
(f) Liens on Property at the time the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary acquired such Property, including any
acquisition by means of a merger or consolidation with or into
the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary; provided, that
any such Lien may not extend to any other Property of the
Company or any Restricted Subsidiary; provided further,
that such Liens shall not have been Incurred in anticipation of
or in connection with the transaction or series of transactions
pursuant to which such Property was acquired by the Company or
any Restricted Subsidiary;
(g) Liens on the Property of a Person at the time such
Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary; provided, that
any such Lien may not extend to any other Property of the
Company or any other Restricted Subsidiary that is not a direct
Subsidiary of such Person; provided further, that any
such Lien was not Incurred in anticipation of or in connection
with the transaction or series of transactions pursuant to which
such Person became a Restricted Subsidiary;
(h) pledges or deposits by the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary under workers compensation laws, unemployment
insurance laws or similar legislation, or good faith deposits in
connection with bids, tenders, contracts (other than for the
payment of Debt) or leases to which the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary is party, or deposits to secure public or
statutory obligations of the Company, or deposits for the
payment of rent or to secure liability to insurance carriers, in
each case Incurred in the ordinary course of business;
(i) utility easements, building restrictions and such other
encumbrances or charges against real Property as are of a nature
generally existing with respect to properties of a similar
character;
(j) Liens existing on the Issue Date not otherwise
described in clauses (a) through (i) above;
(k) Liens not otherwise described in clauses (a)
through (j) above on the Property of any Restricted
Subsidiary that is not a Subsidiary Guarantor to secure any Debt
permitted to be Incurred by such Restricted Subsidiary pursuant
to the covenant described under Certain
Covenants Limitation on Debt;
(l) Liens on the Property of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary to secure any Refinancing, in whole or in part, of
any Debt secured by Liens referred to in clause (b), (f), (g),
or (j) above; provided, that any such Lien shall be
limited to all or part of the same Property that secured the
original Lien (together with improvements and accessions to such
Property), and the aggregate principal amount of Debt that is
secured by such Lien shall not be increased to an amount greater
than the sum of:
(1) the outstanding principal amount, or, if greater, the
committed amount, of the Debt secured by Liens described under
clause (b), (f), (g) or (j) above, as the case may be,
at the time the original Lien became a Permitted Lien under the
Indenture, and
193
(2) an amount necessary to pay any fees and expenses,
including premiums and defeasance costs, incurred by the Company
or such Restricted Subsidiary in connection with such
Refinancing;
(m) Liens on accounts receivable and related assets
(including contract rights, bank accounts and cash reserves) of
the type specified in the definition of Qualified
Securitization Transaction transferred to or granted to a
Securitization Entity in a Qualified Securitization Transaction;
(n) encumbrances arising by reason of zoning restrictions,
easements, licenses, reservations, covenants,
rights-of-way,
utility easements, building restrictions and other similar
encumbrances on the use of real property not materially
detracting from the value of such real property or not
materially interfering with the ordinary conduct of the business
conducted and proposed to be conducted at such real property;
(o) encumbrances arising under leases or subleases of real
property that do not, in the aggregate, materially detract from
the value of such real property or interfere with the ordinary
conduct of the business conducted and proposed to be conducted
at such real property;
(p) financing statements or similar registrations with
respect to a lessors rights in and to personal property
leased to such Person in the ordinary course of such
Persons business other than through a Capital Lease;
(q) Liens in favor of customs and revenue authorities
arising as a matter of law to secure payment of customs duties
in connection with the importation of goods in the ordinary
course of business;
(r) licenses of patents, trademarks and other intellectual
property rights granted in the ordinary course of business and
not interfering in any respect with the ordinary conduct of such
Persons business;
(s) Liens arising out of conditional sale, retention,
consignment or similar arrangement, incurred in the ordinary
course of business, for the sale of goods;
(t) Liens securing Hedging Obligations so long as the
related Debt is, and is permitted to be, Incurred under the
Indentures;
(u) Liens in favor of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary;
(v) options, put and call arrangements, rights of first
refusal and similar rights relating to Investments in joint
ventures, partnerships and the like permitted to be made under
the Indentures;
(w) Liens securing judgments for the payment of money not
constituting an Event of Default under clause (7) under
Events of Default so long as such Liens
are adequately bonded and any appropriate legal proceedings that
may have been duly initiated for the review of such judgment
have not been finally terminated or the period within which such
proceedings may be initiated has not expired;
(x) (i) Liens that are contractual rights of set-off
(A) relating to the establishment of depository relations
with banks, (B) relating to pooled deposit or sweep
accounts of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to
permit satisfaction of overdraft or similar obligations and
other cash management activities incurred in the ordinary course
of business of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries
or (C) relating to purchase orders and other agreements
entered into with customers of the Company or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business and
(ii) Liens of a collection bank arising under
Section 4-210
of the Uniform Commercial Code on items in the course of
collection (Y) encumbering reasonable customary initial
deposits and margin deposits and attaching to commodity trading
accounts or other brokerage accounts incurred in the ordinary
course of business and (Z) in favor of banking institutions
arising as a matter of law or pursuant to customary account
agreements encumbering deposits (including the right of set-off)
and which are within the general parameters customary in the
banking industry and not granted in connection with the
Incurrence of Debt;
(y) Liens securing obligations of the Company or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries in respect of commercial credit card and
merchant card services and other banking products or services
provided from time to time to the Company or any of its
Restricted Subsidiaries in connection with operating,
collections, payroll, trust, or other depository or disbursement
accounts, including automated
194
clearinghouse,
e-payable,
electronic funds transfer, wire transfer, controlled
disbursement, overdraft, depository, information reporting,
lockbox and stop payment services;
(z) Liens in favor of any underwriters, depository or stock
exchange on the equity interests in NKL or its direct parents,
4260848 Canada Inc. and 4260856 Canada Inc., and any securities
accounts in which such equity interests are held in connection
with any listing or offering of equity interests in NKL; and
(aa) Liens not otherwise permitted by clauses (a)
through (z) above encumbering Property to secure Debt not
in excess of 7.5% of Consolidated Net Tangible Assets, as
determined based on the consolidated balance sheet of the
Company as of the end of the most recent fiscal quarter for
which financial statements have been filed or furnished.
Permitted Refinancing Debt means any Debt
that Refinances any other Debt, including any successive
Refinancings, so long as:
(a) such Debt is in an aggregate principal amount (or if
Incurred with original issue discount, an aggregate issue price)
not in excess of the sum of:
(1) the aggregate principal amount (or if Incurred with
original issue discount, the aggregate accreted value) then
outstanding of the Debt being Refinanced, and
(2) an amount necessary to pay any fees and expenses,
including premiums and defeasance costs, related to such
Refinancing,
(b) the Average Life of such Debt is equal to or greater
than the Average Life of the Debt being Refinanced,
(c) the Stated Maturity of such Debt is no earlier than the
Stated Maturity of the Debt being Refinanced, and
(d) the new Debt shall not be senior in right of payment to
the Debt that is being Refinanced;
provided, that Permitted Refinancing Debt shall not
include:
(x) Debt of a Subsidiary that is not a Subsidiary Guarantor
that Refinances Debt of the Company or a Subsidiary
Guarantor, or
(y) Debt of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary that
Refinances Debt of an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
Person means any individual, corporation,
company (including any limited liability company), association,
partnership, joint venture, trust, unincorporated organization,
government or any agency or political subdivision thereof or any
other entity.
Preferred Stock means any Capital Stock of a
Person, however designated, which entitles the holder thereof to
a preference with respect to the payment of dividends, or as to
the distribution of assets upon any voluntary or involuntary
liquidation or dissolution of such Person, over shares of any
other class of Capital Stock issued by such Person.
Preferred Stock Dividends means all dividends
with respect to Preferred Stock of Restricted Subsidiaries held
by Persons other than the Company or a Wholly Owned Restricted
Subsidiary. The amount of any such dividend shall be equal to
the quotient of such dividend divided by the difference between
one and the maximum statutory federal income rate (expressed as
a decimal number between 1 and 0) then applicable to the
issuer of such Preferred Stock.
Principal Property means any manufacturing
plant or facility owned by the Company
and/or one
or more Restricted Subsidiaries having a gross book value in
excess of 1.5% of the Consolidated Net Tangible Assets of the
Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries.
pro forma means, with respect to any
calculation made or required to be made pursuant to the terms
hereof, a calculation performed in accordance with
Article 11 of
Regulation S-X
promulgated under the
195
Securities Act, as interpreted in good faith by the Board of
Directors after consultation with the independent certified
public accountants of the Company, or otherwise a calculation
made in good faith by the Board of Directors after consultation
with the independent certified public accountants of the
Company, as the case may be.
Property means, with respect to any Person,
any interest of such Person in any kind of property or asset,
whether real, personal or mixed, or tangible or intangible,
including Capital Stock in, and other securities of, any other
Person. For purposes of any calculation required pursuant to the
Indenture, the value of any Property shall be its Fair Market
Value.
Purchase Money Debt means Debt:
(a) consisting of the deferred purchase price of Property,
conditional sale obligations, obligations under any title
retention agreement, other purchase money obligations and
obligations in respect of industrial revenue bonds, in each case
where the maturity of such Debt does not exceed the anticipated
useful life of the Property being financed, and
(b) Incurred to finance the acquisition, construction or
lease by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of such
Property, including additions and improvements thereto;
provided, that such Debt is Incurred within 180 days
after the acquisition, construction or lease of such Property by
the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary.
Purchase Money Note means a promissory note
evidencing a line of credit, or evidencing other Debt owed to
the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary in connection with a
Qualified Securitization Transaction, which note shall be repaid
from cash available to the maker of such note, other than
amounts required to be established as reserves, amounts paid to
investors in respect of interest, principal and other amounts
owing to such investors and amounts paid in connection with the
purchase of newly generated accounts receivable.
Qualified Equity Interests of a Person means
equity interests of such Person other than:
(1) any Disqualified Stock;
(2) any equity interests sold to a Subsidiary of such
Person or a Company Equity Plan; or
(3) any equity interests financed, directly or indirectly,
using funds borrowed from such Person, a Subsidiary of such
Person or any Company Equity Plan or contributed, extended,
advanced or guaranteed by such Person, a Subsidiary of such
Person or any Company Equity Plan.
Unless otherwise specified, Qualified Equity Interests refer to
Qualified Equity Interests of the Company.
Qualified Equity Offering means any public or
private sale of common stock of the Company or any direct or
indirect parent company of the Company (to the extent the net
cash proceeds thereof are contributed to the Company), other
than:
(1) public offerings with respect to the Companys or
any direct or indirect parent companys common stock
registered on
Form S-8; and
(2) issuances to any Subsidiary of the Company (to the
extent contributed to the Company).
Qualified Securitization Transaction means
any transaction or series of transactions that may be entered
into by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary pursuant to
which the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary may sell, convey
or otherwise transfer to a Securitization Entity or may grant a
security interest in any accounts receivable (whether now
existing or arising or acquired in the future) of the Company or
any Restricted Subsidiary, and any assets related thereto
including all collateral securing such accounts receivable, all
contracts and contract rights and all guarantees or other
obligations in respect of such accounts receivable, proceeds of
such accounts receivable, bank accounts established in
connection with such transaction or series of transactions and
other assets (including contract rights) which are customarily
transferred or in respect of which security interests are
customarily granted in connection with asset securitization
transactions involving accounts receivable, including cash
reserves comprising credit enhancement.
196
Rating Agencies means Moodys and
S&P.
Recapitalization Transactions means the
consummation of the following transactions: (1) the
entering into of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities on the
Issue Date; (2) the issuance of the Notes pursuant to the
Indentures; (3) the repayment in full of any amounts
outstanding under that certain asset-based lending facility
dated as of July 6, 2007 by and among the Company, ABN AMRO
Bank N.V. as administrative agent (as the same has been amended
from time to time); (4) the repayment in full of any
amounts outstanding under that certain term loan facility dated
as of July 6, 2007 by and among the Company, UBS AG,
Stamford Branch, as administrative agent and as collateral agent
(as the same has been amended from time to time); (5) the
consummation of the Tender Offers and any payment by the Company
(whether directly or indirectly) to the holders of Existing
Notes in exchange for Existing Notes tendered pursuant to the
Tender Offers; (6) any payment by the Company (whether
directly or indirectly) to the holders of Existing Notes in
exchange for Existing Notes not tendered pursuant to the Tender
Offers, through redemptions thereof; (7) the payment of a
one-time distribution by the Company to its direct or indirect
parent companies in an amount not to exceed the amount disclosed
in the Offering Circular; and (8) the payment of fees and
expenses in relation to the foregoing.
Reference Treasury Dealer means Citigroup
Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC,
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, RBS Securities Inc., UBS Securities LLC and their
successors and any other primary U.S. Government securities
dealer or dealers in New York City (a Primary Treasury
Dealer) selected by the Company; provided, that if
any of the foregoing cease to be a Primary Treasury Dealer, the
Company shall substitute therefor another Primary Treasury
Dealer.
Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations means,
with respect to each Reference Treasury Dealer and any
redemption date, the average, as determined by the Trustee, of
the bid and ask prices for the Comparable Treasury Issue
(expressed in each case as a percentage of its principal amount)
quoted in writing to the Trustee by such Reference Treasury
Dealer at 5:00 p.m. on the third business day preceding
such redemption date.
Refinance means, in respect of any Debt, to
refinance, extend, renew, refund or Repay, or to issue other
Debt, in exchange or replacement for, such Debt.
Refinanced and Refinancing shall have
correlative meanings.
Related Business means any business that is
related, ancillary or complementary to the businesses of the
Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries on the Issue Date.
Related Person with respect to any Permitted
Holder means:
(a) any controlling stockholder or a majority (or more)
owned Subsidiary of such Permitted Holder or, in the case of an
individual, any spouse or immediate family member of such
Permitted Holder, any trust created for the benefit of such
individual or immediate family member or such individuals
or immediate family members estate, executor,
administrator, committee or beneficiaries; or
(b) any trust, corporation, partnership or other entity,
the beneficiaries, stockholders, partners, owners or Persons
beneficially holding a majority (or more) controlling interest
of which consist of such Permitted Holder
and/or such
other Persons referred to in the immediately preceding clause
(a).
Repay means, in respect of any Debt, to
repay, prepay, repurchase, redeem, legally defease or otherwise
retire such Debt. Repayment and Repaid
shall have correlative meanings. For purposes of the covenant
described under Certain Covenants
Limitation on Asset Sales and the definition of
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio, Debt shall be
considered to have been Repaid only to the extent the related
loan commitment, if any, shall have been permanently reduced in
connection therewith.
Restricted Payment means:
(a) any dividend or distribution (whether made in cash,
securities or other Property) declared or paid on or with
respect to any shares of Capital Stock of the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary (including any payment in connection with
any merger or consolidation with or into the Company or any
Restricted
197
Subsidiary), except for (i) any dividend or distribution
that is made solely to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary
(and, if such Restricted Subsidiary is not a Wholly Owned
Restricted Subsidiary, to the other shareholders of such
Restricted Subsidiary on a pro rata basis or on a basis that
results in the receipt by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary
of dividends or distributions of greater value than it would
receive on a pro rata basis), or (ii) any dividend or
distribution payable solely in Qualified Equity Interests of the
Company;
(b) the purchase, repurchase, redemption, acquisition or
retirement for value of any Capital Stock of the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary (other than from the Company or a
Restricted Subsidiary) or any securities exchangeable for or
convertible into any such Capital Stock, including the exercise
of any option to exchange any Capital Stock (other than for or
into Qualified Equity Interests of the Company);
(c) the purchase, repurchase, redemption, acquisition or
retirement for value, prior to the date for any scheduled
maturity, sinking fund or amortization or other installment
payment, of any Subordinated Obligation (other than the
purchase, repurchase or other acquisition of any Subordinated
Obligation purchased in anticipation of satisfying a scheduled
maturity, sinking fund or amortization or other installment
obligation, in each case due within one year of the date of
acquisition); or
(d) any Investment (other than Permitted Investments) in
any Person.
Restricted Subsidiary means any Subsidiary of
the Company other than an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
S&P means Standard &
Poors Ratings Group, Inc., a division of the McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc., or any successor to the rating agency business
thereof.
Sale and Leaseback Transaction means any
direct or indirect arrangement relating to Property now owned or
hereafter acquired whereby the Company or a Restricted
Subsidiary transfers such Property to another Person and the
Company or a Restricted Subsidiary leases it from such Person.
SEC means the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Securities Act means the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.
Securitization Entity means any corporation,
company (including any limited liability company), association,
partnership, joint venture, trust, mutual fund or other business
entity to which the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary or any
other Securitization Entity transfers accounts receivable,
collections thereon and related assets) (a) which engages
in no activities other than in connection with the financing of
accounts receivable or related assets, (b) which is
designated by the Board of Directors (as provided below) as a
Securitization Entity, (c) no portion of the Debt or any
other Obligations (contingent or otherwise) of which (i) is
guaranteed by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary
(excluding guarantees of Obligations (other than the principal
of, and interest on, Debt) pursuant to Standard Securitization
Undertakings and guarantees by the Securitization Entity),
(ii) is recourse to or obligates the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary (other than the Securitization Entity) in
any way other than pursuant to Standard Securitization
Undertakings or (iii) subjects any property or asset of the
Company or any Restricted Subsidiary (other than the
Securitization Entity), directly or indirectly, contingently or
otherwise, to the satisfaction thereof, other than pursuant to
Standard Securitization Undertakings and other than any interest
in the accounts receivable and related assets being financed
(whether in the form of any equity interest in such assets or
subordinated indebtedness payable primarily from such financed
assets) retained or acquired by the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary, (d) with which none of the Company nor any
Restricted Subsidiary has any material contract, agreement,
arrangement or understanding other than those reasonably
customary for a Qualified Securitization Transaction and, in any
event, on terms no less favorable to the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary than those that might be obtained at the
time from Persons that are not Affiliates of the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary, and (e) to which none of the Company
nor any Restricted Subsidiary has any obligation to maintain or
preserve such entitys financial condition or cause such
entity to achieve certain levels of operating results. Any such
designation by the Board of Directors shall be evidenced to the
Trustee by filing with the Trustee a certified copy of the
resolution of the Board of Directors giving effect to such
designation and an Officers Certificate certifying that
such designation complied with the foregoing conditions.
198
Senior Debt of the Company means:
(a) all obligations consisting of the principal, premium,
if any, and accrued and unpaid interest (including interest
accruing on or after the filing of any petition in bankruptcy or
for reorganization relating to the Company to the extent
post-filing interest is allowed in such proceeding) in respect
of:
(1) Debt of the Company for borrowed money, and
(2) Debt of the Company evidenced by notes, debentures,
bonds or other similar instruments permitted under the Indenture
for the payment of which the Company is responsible or liable;
(b) all Capital Lease Obligations of the Company and all
Attributable Debt in respect of Sale and Leaseback Transactions
entered into by the Company;
(c) all obligations of the Company
(1) for the reimbursement of any obligor on any letter of
credit, bankers acceptance or similar credit transaction,
(2) under Hedging Obligations, or
(3) issued or assumed as the deferred purchase price of
Property and all conditional sale obligations of the Company and
all obligations under any title retention agreement permitted
under the Indenture; and
(d) all obligations of other Persons of the type referred
to in clauses (a), (b) and (c) for the payment of
which the Company is responsible or liable as Guarantor;
provided, that Senior Debt shall not include:
(A) Debt of the Company that is by its terms subordinate in
right of payment to the Notes, including any Subordinated Debt;
(B) any Debt Incurred in violation of the provisions of the
Indenture;
(C) accounts payable or any other obligations of the
Company to trade creditors created or assumed by the Company in
the ordinary course of business in connection with the obtaining
of materials or services (including Guarantees thereof or
instruments evidencing such liabilities);
(D) any liability for Federal, state, local or other taxes
owed or owing by the Company;
(E) any obligation of the Company to any Subsidiary; or
(F) any obligations with respect to any Capital Stock of
the Company.
To the extent that any payment of Senior Debt (whether by or on
behalf of the Company as proceeds of security or enforcement or
any right of setoff or otherwise) is declared to be fraudulent
or preferential, set aside or required to be paid to a trustee,
receiver or other similar party under any bankruptcy,
insolvency, receivership or similar law, then if such payment is
recovered by, or paid over to, such trustee, receiver or other
similar party, the Senior Debt or part thereof originally
intended to be satisfied shall be deemed to be reinstated and
outstanding as if such payment had not occurred.
Senior Debt of any Subsidiary Guarantor has a
correlative meaning to Senior Debt of the Company.
Senior Secured Credit Facilities means
(a) the ABL Facility, and (b) the Term Loan Facility,
as such agreements may be in effect from time to time, in each
case, as any or all of such agreements (or any other agreement
that Refinances any or all of such agreements) may be amended,
restated, modified or supplemented from time to time, or
renewed, refunded, refinanced, restructured, replaced, repaid or
extended from time to time, whether with the original agents and
lenders or other agents and lenders or otherwise, and whether
provided under the original credit agreement or one or more
other credit agreements, indentures or otherwise.
199
Significant Subsidiary means any Subsidiary
that would be a significant subsidiary of the
Company within the meaning of
Rule 1-02
under
Regulation S-X
promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act.
Standard Securitization Undertakings means
representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities entered
into by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary that are
reasonably customary in an accounts receivable securitization
transaction so long as none of the same constitute Debt, a
Guarantee (other than in connection with an obligation to
repurchase receivables that do not satisfy related
representations and warranties) or otherwise require the
provision of credit support in excess of credit enhancement
established upon entering into such accounts receivable
securitization transaction negotiated in good faith at
arms length.
Stated Maturity means, with respect to any
security, the date specified in such security as the fixed date
on which the payment of principal of such security is due and
payable, including pursuant to any mandatory redemption
provision (but excluding any provision providing for the
repurchase of such security at the option of the holder thereof
upon the happening of any contingency beyond the control of the
issuer unless such contingency has occurred).
Subordinated Debt means any Debt of the
Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor (whether outstanding on the
Issue Date or thereafter Incurred) that is subordinate or junior
in right of payment to the Notes or the applicable Subsidiary
Guaranty pursuant to a written agreement to that effect.
Subsidiary means, in respect of any Person,
any corporation, company (including any limited liability
company), association, partnership, joint venture or other
business entity of which an aggregate of 50% or more of the
total voting power of the Voting Stock is at the time owned or
controlled, directly or indirectly, by:
(a) such Person,
(b) such Person and one or more Subsidiaries of such
Person, or
(c) one or more Subsidiaries of such Person.
Subsidiary Guarantor means (a) each
existing Canadian Restricted Subsidiary and U.S. Restricted
Subsidiary; (b) Novelis do Brasil Ltda, Novelis UK Ltd.,
Novelis Europe Holdings Limited, Novelis Aluminium Holding
Company, Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis Switzerland SA,
Novelis Technology AG, Novelis AG, Novelis PAE S.A.S., Novelis
Luxembourg S.A., Novelis Madeira, Unipessoal, Lda and Novelis
Services Limited; and (c) any other Person that becomes a
Subsidiary Guarantor pursuant to the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Future
Subsidiary Guarantors or who otherwise executes and
delivers a supplemental indenture to the Trustee under each
Indenture providing for a Subsidiary Guaranty.
Subsidiary Guaranty means a Guarantee on the
terms set forth in the Indentures by a Subsidiary Guarantor of
the Companys obligations with respect to the Notes.
Surviving Person means the surviving or
successor Person formed by a merger, consolidation or
amalgamation and, for purposes of the covenant described under
Merger, Consolidation and Sale of
Property, a Person to whom all or substantially all of the
Property of the Company or a Subsidiary Guarantor is sold,
transferred, assigned, leased, conveyed or otherwise disposed.
Taxes means any present or future tax, duty,
levy, interest, assessment or other governmental charge imposed
or levied by or on behalf of any government or any political
subdivision or territory or possession of any government or any
authority or agency therein or thereof having power to tax
including any applicable penalties or additional liabilities
related thereto.
Taxing Jurisdiction means (i) with
respect to any payment made under the Notes, any jurisdiction
(or any political subdivision thereof or therein) in which the
Company, or any of its successors, is organized or resident for
tax purposes or conduct of business, or from or through which
payment is made and (ii) with respect to any payment made
by a Subsidiary Guarantor, any jurisdiction (or any political
subdivision thereof or therein) in which such Subsidiary
Guarantor is organized or resident for tax purposes or conduct
of business, or from or through which payment is made.
200
Term Loan Facility means the term loan
facility dated as of December 17, 2010 by and among the
Company, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and as
collateral agent, and the several banks and other financial
institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto,
including any notes, collateral documents, letters of credit and
documentation and guarantees and any appendices, exhibits or
schedules to any of the preceding, as such agreements may be in
effect from time to time.
Total Liquidity means Unrestricted Cash plus
available borrowings under the ABL Facility.
Treasury Rate means, with respect to any
redemption date, the rate per annum equal to the yield to
maturity of the Comparable Treasury Issue, compounded
semi-annually, assuming a price for such Comparable Treasury
Issue (expressed as a percentage of its principal amount) equal
to the Comparable Treasury Price for such redemption date.
Unrestricted Cash means, as at any date of
determination, an amount equal to the aggregate amount of all
cash and Cash Equivalents of the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries on the Companys consolidated balance sheet
that would not appear as restricted on the
Companys consolidated balance sheet, as determined in
accordance with GAAP.
Unrestricted Subsidiary means:
(a) Evermore Recycling LLC and Novelis (India) Infotech
Ltd.;
(b) any Subsidiary of the Company that is designated after
the Issue Date as an Unrestricted Subsidiary as permitted or
required pursuant to the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Designation of
Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries and is not
thereafter redesignated as a Restricted Subsidiary as permitted
pursuant thereto; and
(c) any Subsidiary of an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
U.S. Government Obligations means direct
obligations (or certificates representing an ownership interest
in such obligations) of the United States (including any agency
or instrumentality thereof) for the payment of which the full
faith and credit of the United States is pledged and which are
not callable or redeemable at the issuers option.
U.S. Restricted Subsidiary means any
Restricted Subsidiary that is organized under the laws of the
United States of America or any State thereof or the District of
Columbia.
Voting Stock of any Person means all classes
of Capital Stock or other interests (including partnership
interests) of such Person then outstanding and normally entitled
(without regard to the occurrence of any contingency) to vote in
the election of directors, managers or trustees thereof.
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary means, at
any time, a Restricted Subsidiary all the Voting Stock of which
(other than directors qualifying shares) is at such time
owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company and its other
Wholly Owned Subsidiaries.
201
BOOK-ENTRY
SETTLEMENT AND CLEARANCE
Except as set forth below, new notes will be issued in
registered, global form without interest coupons (the
Global Notes) in minimum denominations of $2,000 and
integral multiples of $1,000 in excess of $1,000. The Global
Notes will be deposited upon issuance with the applicable
Trustee as custodian for The Depository Trust Company, and
registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, in each case for
credit to an account of a direct or indirect participant in DTC
as described below.
Except as set forth below, the Global Notes may be transferred,
in whole and not in part, only to another nominee of DTC or to a
successor of DTC or its nominee. Beneficial interests in the
Global Notes may not be exchanged for notes in certificated form
except in the limited circumstances described below. See
Exchange of Global Notes for Certificated
Notes. Except in the limited circumstances described
below, owners of beneficial interests in the Global Notes will
not be entitled to receive physical delivery of notes in
certificated form. In addition, transfers of beneficial
interests in the Global Notes will be subject to the applicable
rules and procedures of DTC and its direct or indirect
participants, which may change from time to time.
Depositary
Procedures
The following description of the operations and procedures of
DTC is provided solely as a matter of convenience. These
operations and procedures are solely within the control of the
respective settlement systems and are subject to changes by
them. We take no responsibility for these operations and
procedures and urge investors to contact the system or their
participants directly to discuss these matters.
DTC has advised us that DTC is a limited-purpose trust company
organized under the laws of the State of New York, a
banking organization within the meaning of the New
York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a
clearing corporation within the meaning of the
Uniform Commercial Code and a clearing agency
registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the
Exchange Act. DTC was created to hold securities for its
participating organizations (collectively, the
participants) and to facilitate the clearance and
settlement of transactions in those securities between
participants through electronic book-entry changes in accounts
of its participants. The participants include securities brokers
and dealers (including the initial purchasers), banks, trust
companies, clearing corporations and certain other
organizations. Access to DTCs system is also available to
other entities such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust
companies that clear through or maintain a custodial
relationship with a participant, either directly or indirectly
(collectively, the indirect participants). Persons
who are not participants may beneficially own securities held by
or on behalf of DTC only through the participants or the
indirect participants. The ownership interests in, and transfers
of ownership interests in, each security held by or on behalf of
DTC are recorded on the records of the participants and indirect
participants.
DTC has also advised us that, pursuant to procedures established
by it:
(1) upon deposit of the Global Notes, DTC will credit the
accounts of participants designated by the initial purchasers
with portions of the principal amount of the Global
Notes; and
(2) ownership of these interests in the Global Notes will
be shown on, and the transfer of ownership of these interests
will be effected only through, records maintained by DTC (with
respect to the participants) or by the participants and the
indirect participants (with respect to other owners of
beneficial interests in the Global Notes).
Investors in the Global Notes who are participants in DTCs
system may hold their interests therein directly through DTC.
Investors in the Global Notes who are not participants may hold
their interests therein indirectly through organizations which
are participants in such system. All interests in a Global Note
may be subject to the procedures and requirements of DTC. The
laws of some states require that certain Persons take physical
delivery in definitive form of securities that they own.
Consequently, the ability to transfer beneficial interests in a
Global Note to such Persons will be limited to that extent.
Because DTC can act only on behalf of participants, which in
turn act on behalf of indirect participants, the ability of a
Person having beneficial interests in a Global Note to pledge
such interests to Persons that do not participate in the DTC
system, or
202
otherwise take actions in respect of such interests, may be
affected by the lack of a physical certificate evidencing such
interests.
Except as described below, owners of an interest in the
Global Notes will not have notes registered in their names, will
not receive physical delivery of notes in certificated form and
will not be considered the registered owners or
holders thereof under the applicable Indenture for
any purpose.
Payments in respect of the principal of, and interest and
premium and additional interest, if any, on a Global Note
registered in the name of DTC or its nominee will be payable to
DTC in its capacity as the registered holder under the
applicable Indenture. Under the terms of the Indentures, the
company and the Trustees will treat the Persons in whose names
the notes, including the Global Notes, are registered as the
owners of the notes for the purpose of receiving payments and
for all other purposes. Consequently, neither the company, the
Trustees nor any agent of the company or the Trustees has or
will have any responsibility or liability for:
(1) any aspect of DTCs records or any
participants or indirect participants records
relating to or payments made on account of beneficial ownership
interests in the Global Notes or for maintaining, supervising or
reviewing any of DTCs records or any participants or
indirect participants records relating to the beneficial
ownership interests in the Global Notes; or
(2) any other matter relating to the actions and practices
of DTC or any of its participants or indirect participants.
DTC has advised us that its current practice, upon receipt of
any payment in respect of securities such as the notes
(including principal and interest), is to credit the accounts of
the relevant participants with the payment on the payment date
unless DTC has reason to believe it will not receive payment on
such payment date. Each relevant participant is credited with an
amount proportionate to its beneficial ownership of an interest
in the principal amount of the relevant security as shown on the
records of DTC. Payments by the participants and the indirect
participants to the beneficial owners of notes will be governed
by standing instructions and customary practices and will be the
responsibility of the participants or the indirect participants
and will not be the responsibility of DTC, the Trustees or the
company. Neither the company nor the Trustees will be liable for
any delay by DTC or any of its participants in identifying the
beneficial owners of the notes, and the company and the Trustees
may conclusively rely on and will be protected in relying on
instructions from DTC or its nominee for all purposes.
Transfers between participants in DTC will be effected in
accordance with DTCs procedures, and will be settled in
same-day
funds.
DTC has advised the company that it will take any action
permitted to be taken by a holder of notes only at the direction
of one or more participants to whose account DTC has credited
the interests in the Global Notes and only in respect of such
portion of the aggregate principal amount of the notes as to
which such participant or participants has or have given such
direction. However, if there is an Event of Default under the
notes, DTC reserves the right to exchange the Global Notes for
legended notes in certificated form, and to distribute such
notes to its participants.
Although DTC has agreed to the foregoing procedures in order to
facilitate transfers of interests in the Global Notes among
participants, it is under no obligation to perform such
procedures, and such procedures may be discontinued or changed
at any time. Neither the company nor the Trustees nor any of
their respective agents will have any responsibility for the
performance by DTC or its participants or indirect participants
of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures
governing their operations.
Exchange
of Global Notes for Certificated Notes
A Global Note is exchangeable for Certificated Notes if:
(1) DTC (a) notifies the company that it is unwilling
or unable to continue as depositary for the Global Notes or
(b) has ceased to be a clearing agency registered under the
Exchange Act and, in each case, a successor depositary is not
appointed;
203
(2) the company, at their option, notify the applicable
Trustee in writing that they elect to cause the issuance of the
Certificated Notes; or
(3) there has occurred and is continuing a Default with
respect to the notes.
In addition, beneficial interests in a Global Note may be
exchanged for Certificated Notes upon prior written notice given
to the applicable Trustee by or on behalf of DTC in accordance
with the applicable Indenture. In all cases, Certificated Notes
delivered in exchange for any Global Note or beneficial
interests in Global Notes will be registered in the names, and
issued in any approved denominations, requested by or on behalf
of the depositary (in accordance with its customary procedures)
and will bear the applicable restrictive legend, unless that
legend is not required by applicable law.
Exchange
of Certificated Notes for Global Notes
Certificated Notes may not be exchanged for beneficial interests
in any Global Note unless the transferor first delivers to the
applicable Trustee a written certificate (in the form provided
in the applicable Indenture) to the effect that such transfer
will comply with the appropriate transfer restrictions
applicable to such notes.
Same Day
Settlement and Payment
The company will make payments in respect of the notes
represented by the Global Notes (including principal, premium,
if any, interest and additional interest, if any) by wire
transfer of immediately available funds to the accounts
specified by the Global Note holder. The company will make all
payments of principal, interest and premium and additional
interest, if any, with respect to Certificated Notes by wire
transfer of immediately available funds to the accounts
specified by the holders of the Certificated Notes or, if no
such account is specified, by mailing a check to each such
holders registered address. The notes represented by the
Global Notes are expected to be made eligible to trade in
DTCs
Same-Day
Funds Settlement System, and any permitted secondary market
trading activity in such notes will, therefore, be required by
DTC to be settled in immediately available funds. The company
expects that secondary trading in any Certificated Notes will
also be settled in immediately available funds.
204
PRINCIPAL
CANADIAN AND U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF
THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Canadian
Federal Income Taxation
Exchange
of Old Notes
A Non-Resident Holder (as defined below) will not be subject to
Canadian federal income tax as a result of the exchange of old
notes for new notes in the exchange offer.
Ownership
of New Notes
Amounts paid or credited, or deemed to be paid or credited, as,
on account or in lieu of payment of, or in satisfaction of the
principal of the new notes or premium, discount or interest on
the new notes by us to a Non-Resident Holder, including in
respect of a required offer to purchase the new notes, will be
exempt from Canadian withholding tax. However, a Non-Resident
Holder who transfers a new note to a holder resident deemed to
be resident in Canada for purposes of the Income Tax Act
(Canada) (the Tax Act) with whom the
Non-Resident Holder does not deal at arms length should
consult its own tax advisor.
No other taxes on income (including taxable capital gains) will
be payable under the Tax Act by Non-Resident Holders of the new
notes in respect of the acquisition, ownership or disposition of
the new notes.
For purposes of this section, Non-Resident Holder
means a holder who exchanges old notes for new notes in the
exchange offer and who, at all relevant times, (i) is not
and is not deemed to be a resident of Canada for purposes of the
Tax Act and any applicable income tax convention,
(ii) deals at arms length with us for purposes of the
Tax Act and (iii) holds the old notes and new notes as
capital property.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Exchange
Offer
The following discussion is a summary of material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the exchange offer
to holders of old notes, but is not a complete analysis of all
potential tax effects. The summary below is based upon the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), regulations of the Treasury Department,
administrative rulings and pronouncements of the Internal
Revenue Service and judicial decisions, all of which are subject
to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This summary does
not address all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences
that may be applicable to particular holders, including dealers
in securities, financial institutions, insurance companies and
tax-exempt organizations. In addition, this summary does not
consider the effect of any foreign, state, local, gift, estate
or other tax laws that may be applicable to a particular holder.
This summary applies only to a holder that acquired old notes at
original issue for cash and holds such old notes as a capital
asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code.
The exchange of old notes for new notes in the exchange offer
will not constitute a taxable event to holders for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. Consequently, no gain or
loss will be recognized by a holder upon receipt of a new note,
the holders holding period for the new note will include
the holders holding period for the old note exchanged
therefor, and the holders basis in the new note will be
the same as the holders basis in the old note immediately
before the exchange.
Persons considering the exchange of old notes for new notes
should consult their own tax advisors concerning the Canadian
and U.S. federal income tax consequences to them in light
of their particular situations as well as any consequences
arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
205
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
For a period of 180 days from the date on which the
exchange offer is consummated, we will promptly send additional
copies of this prospectus and any amendment or supplement to
this prospectus to any broker-dealer that requests such
documents. We have agreed to pay all expenses incident to the
exchange offer, other than commissions or concessions of any
broker-dealers and will indemnify the holders of the notes,
including any broker-dealers, against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act.
Each broker-dealer that receives new notes for its own account
pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will
deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such new
notes. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented
from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection
with resales of new notes received in exchange for old notes
where such old notes were acquired as a result of market-making
activities or other trading activities. We have agreed that, for
a period of 180 days after the date on which the exchange
offer is consummated, we will make this prospectus, as amended
or supplemented, available to any broker-dealer for use in
connection with any such resale. In addition,
until ,
2011, all dealers effecting transactions in the new notes may be
required to deliver a prospectus.
We will not receive any proceeds from any sale of new notes by
broker-dealers. New notes received by broker-dealers for their
own account pursuant to the exchange offer may be sold from time
to time in one or more transactions in the
over-the-counter
market, in negotiated transactions, through the writing of
options on the new notes or a combination of such methods of
resale, at market prices prevailing at the time of resale, at
prices related to such prevailing market prices or negotiated
prices. Any such resale may be made directly to purchasers or to
or through brokers or dealers who may receive compensation in
the form of commissions or concessions from any such
broker-dealer or the purchasers of any such new notes. Any
broker-dealer that resells new notes that were received by it
for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer and any
broker or dealer that participates in a distribution of such new
notes may be deemed to be an underwriter within the
meaning of the Securities Act and any profit on any such resale
of new notes and any commission or concessions received by any
such persons may be deemed to be underwriting compensation under
the Securities Act. The letter of transmittal states that, by
acknowledging that it will deliver and by delivering a
prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it
is an underwriter within the meaning of the
Securities Act.
For a period of 180 days after the date on which the
exchange offer is consummated we will promptly send additional
copies of this prospectus and any amendment or supplement to
this prospectus to any broker-dealer that requests such
documents in the letter of transmittal. We have agreed to pay
all expenses incident to the exchange offer (including the
expenses of one counsel for the holders of the notes) other than
commissions or concessions of any brokers or dealers and will
indemnify the holders of the notes (including any
broker-dealers) against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act.
206
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the new notes and the related guarantees in
connection with this offering will be passed upon for us by
King & Spalding LLP, Atlanta, Georgia. In rendering
its opinion, King & Spalding LLP will rely upon the
opinions of
non-U.S. local
counsel as to all matters of
non-U.S. law.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements as of and for the periods
ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, and for the
periods May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008 and
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting (which is included in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting) as of March 31, 2010 included in this
Registration Statement have been so included in reliance on the
reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as
experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports and other
information with the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to the
public on the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
To receive copies of public records not posted to the SECs
web site at prescribed rates, you may complete an online form at
http://www.sec.gov,
send a fax to
(202) 772-9337
or submit a written request to the SEC, Office of FOIA/PA
Operations, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information.
While any notes remain outstanding, we will make available
without charge, upon written or oral request, to any beneficial
owner and any prospective purchaser of notes the information
required pursuant to Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities
Act during any period in which we are not subject to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Also, we will
provide without charge, upon written or oral request, to each
person, including any beneficial owner, to whom this prospectus
is delivered, a copy of all documents referred to below which
have been or may be incorporated by reference into this
prospectus excluding exhibits to those documents unless they are
specifically incorporated by reference into those documents. Any
such request should be directed to us at:
Investor Relations
Novelis Inc.
3560 Lenox Road
Suite 2000
Atlanta, GA 30326
404-760-4164
207
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act, as amended. The Companys internal
control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the Companys
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the Company;
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the
Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the Company; and
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,
2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria
established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control Integrated Framework. Based on its
assessment, management has concluded that, as of March 31,
2010, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting was effective based on those criteria.
The effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2010 has been audited
by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
F-2
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Novelis Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as
of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income
(loss), shareholders equity and cash flows for the years
ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, and for the
period from May 16, 2007 to March 31, 2008 present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries (Successor) at March 31,
2010 and March 31, 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years ended
March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, and the period from
May 16, 2007 to March 31, 2008 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2010, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Companys management is responsible for these financial
statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions
on these financial statements and on the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
minority interests (now termed noncontrolling interests) to
conform to ASC 810, Consolidations, in fiscal year
2010.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
May 27, 2010, except for the effects of the amalgamation of
AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc. discussed in Note 1 to
the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is
December 6, 2010.
F-3
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Novelis Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders
equity and cash flows for the period from April 1, 2007 to
May 15, 2007 present fairly, in all material respects, the
results of operations and cash flows of Novelis Inc. and its
subsidiaries (Predecessor) for the period from April 1,
2007 to May 15, 2007 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We
conducted our audit of these statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
minority interests (now termed noncontrolling interests) to
conform to ASC 810, Consolidations, (ASC
810) effective in fiscal 2010 and retrospectively adjusted
the financial statements for the period April 1, 2007 to
May 15, 2007.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
June 29, 2009, except with respect to our opinion on the
consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the
retrospective application of ASC 810 discussed in
Note 1, as to which the date is August 5, 2009
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
7,213
|
|
|
|
9,276
|
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,946
|
|
|
|
12,345
|
|
|
|
9,931
|
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $4 and $2 as of
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; unlimited number of shares
authorized; 1,000 and 1,412,046 shares issued and
outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
(1,963
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of our common shareholder
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
465
|
|
|
$
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Non-cash restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments, net
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Foreign exchange remeasurement on debt
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of effects from
acquisitions and divestitures):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from related party loans receivable, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(1,009
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity of our Common Shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
(AOCI)
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
75,357,660
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
428
|
|
|
$
|
(263
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity for April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
57,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Conversion of share-based compensation plans from equity-based
plans to liability-based plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax benefit of $4
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
of $ in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 15, 2007
|
|
|
75,415,536
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
|
$
|
(360
|
)
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
F-8
Novelis
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Continued)
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
(AOCI)
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 16, 2007
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
2,657
|
|
Activity for May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumption of debt by AV Minerals in exchange for common shares
|
|
|
361,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Issuance of additional common stock
|
|
|
36,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $ in
AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax benefit of $4
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,398,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
3,639
|
|
Fiscal 2009 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Forgiveness of interest on intercompany note
|
|
|
9,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Payment of income taxes by AV Metals on behalf of Novelis
Inc.
|
|
|
4,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $ in
AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
benefit of $11 included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax benefit of $31
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,412,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
Fiscal 2010 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Share consolidation
|
|
|
(1,411,046
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $ in
AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
benefit of $5 included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax provision of
$10 included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-9
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) related to items of other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to our common
shareholder
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(2,104
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
531
|
|
|
$
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-10
Novelis
Inc.
|
|
1.
|
BUSINESS
AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein to Alcan
refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
Organization
and Description of Business
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products for the beverage and food can,
transportation, construction and industrial, and foil products
markets. As of March 31, 2010, we had operations on four
continents: North America; South America; Asia; and Europe,
through 31 operating plants and four research facilities in 11
countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our
South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina
refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation
facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil.
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
spin-off occurred on January 6, 2005, following approval by
Alcans board of directors and shareholders, and legal and
regulatory approvals. Alcan shareholders received one Novelis
common share for every five Alcan common shares held.
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock and Predecessor and Successor
Reporting
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
Our acquisition by Hindalco was recorded in accordance with the
business combination accounting standards at that time. In the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets, the consideration and
related costs paid by Hindalco in connection with the
acquisition have been pushed down to us and have
been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
Due to the impact of push down accounting, the Companys
consolidated financial statements and certain notes separate the
Companys presentation into two distinct periods to
indicate the application of two different bases of accounting
between the periods presented: (1) the periods up to, and
including, the May 15, 2007 acquisition date (labeled
Predecessor) and (2) the periods after that
date (labeled Successor). The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include a black line division
which indicates that the Predecessor and Successor reporting
entities shown are not comparable.
Amalgamation
of AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc.
Effective September 29, 2010, in connection with an
internal restructuring transaction, pursuant to articles of
amalgamation under the Canada Business Corporations Act, we were
amalgamated (the Amalgamation) with our direct
parent AV Aluminum Inc., a Canadian corporation (AV
Aluminum), to form an amalgamated corporation named
Novelis Inc., also a Canadian corporation.
As a result of the Amalgamation, we continue our corporate
existence, and the amalgamated Novelis Inc. remains liable for
all of our and AV Aluminums obligations and we continue to
own all of our respective property. Since AV Aluminum was a
holding company whose sole asset was the shares of the
pre-amalgamated
Novelis Inc. our business, management, board of directors and
corporate governance procedures following the Amalgamation are
identical to those of Novelis Inc. immediately prior to the
Amalgamation. Novelis Inc., like
F-11
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
AV Aluminum before the Amalgamation, remains an indirect,
wholly-owned subsidiary of Hindalco. We have retrospectively
recast all periods presented to reflect the amalgamated
companies.
As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Amalgamation increased
our previously reported Additional paid-in capital by
$33 million, and reduced our Accumulated deficit by
$33 million. The Amalgamation had no impact on our
consolidated statements of operations for the years ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 or our consolidated statements of
cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. As
of March 31, 2008, the Amalgamation increased our Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities by $33 million and
reduced our Accumulated deficit by $33 million. For the
period from May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008, the
Amalgamation increased our Interest expense and amortization of
debt issuance costs by $23 million and increased our Income
tax provision by $10 million, thus, reducing our Net income
attributable to our common shareholder by $33 million on
our consolidated statement of operations for that period. The
Amalgamation did not change our net operating, investing or
financing activities on our consolidated statements of cash
flows for the period from May 16, 2007 through
March 31, 2008. The Amalgamation did not impact our
consolidated statements of operations or our consolidated
statements of cash flows for the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007.
Consolidation
Policy
Our consolidated financial statements include the assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of all wholly-owned
subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise
control and entities in which we have a controlling financial
interest or are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. We
eliminate all significant intercompany accounts and transactions
from our consolidated financial statements.
We use the equity method to account for our investments in
entities that we do not control, but where we have the ability
to exercise significant influence over operating and financial
policies. Consolidated net income (loss) attributable to our
common shareholder includes our share of the net earnings
(losses) of these entities. The difference between consolidation
and the equity method impacts certain of our financial ratios
because of the presentation of the detailed line items reported
in the consolidated financial statements for consolidated
entities, compared to a two-line presentation of equity method
investments and net losses.
We use the cost method to account for our investments in
entities that we do not control and for which we do not have the
ability to exercise significant influence over operating and
financial policies. These investments are recorded at the lower
of their cost or fair value.
Use of
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP) requires us to make estimates
and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures
of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. The principal areas of
judgment relate to (1) the fair value of derivative
financial instruments; (2) impairment of goodwill;
(3) impairments of long lived assets, intangible assets and
equity investments; (4) actuarial assumptions related to
pension and other postretirement benefit plans; (5) income
tax reserves and valuation allowances and (6) assessment of
loss contingencies, including environmental and litigation
reserves. Future events and their effects cannot be predicted
with certainty, and accordingly, our accounting estimates
require the exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used
in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements will
change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as
additional information is obtained and as our operating
environment changes. We evaluate and update our assumptions and
estimates on an ongoing basis and may employ outside experts to
assist in our evaluations. Actual results could differ from the
estimates we have used.
F-12
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Risks
and Uncertainties
We are exposed to a number of risks in the normal course of our
operations that could potentially affect our financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows.
Laws
and regulations
We operate in an industry that is subject to a broad range of
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. These laws and regulations
impose increasingly stringent environmental, health and safety
protection standards and permitting requirements regarding,
among other things, air emissions, wastewater storage, treatment
and discharges, the use and handling of hazardous or toxic
materials, waste disposal practices, the remediation of
environmental contamination, post-mining reclamation and working
conditions for our employees. Some environmental laws, such as
the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, also known as CERCLA or
Superfund, and comparable state laws, impose joint and several
liability for the cost of environmental remediation, natural
resource damages, third party claims, and other expenses,
without regard to the fault or the legality of the original
conduct.
The costs of complying with these laws and regulations,
including participation in assessments and remediation of
contaminated sites and installation of pollution control
facilities, have been, and in the future could be, significant.
In addition, these laws and regulations may also result in
substantial environmental liabilities associated with divested
assets, third party locations and past activities. In certain
instances, these costs and liabilities, as well as related
action to be taken by us, could be accelerated or increased if
we were to close, divest of or change the principal use of
certain facilities with respect to which we may have
environmental liabilities or remediation obligations. Currently,
we are involved in a number of compliance efforts, remediation
activities and legal proceedings concerning environmental
matters, including certain activities and proceedings arising
under U.S. Superfund and comparable laws in other
jurisdictions where we have operations.
We have established reserves for environmental remediation
activities and liabilities where appropriate. However, the cost
of addressing environmental matters (including the timing of any
charges related thereto) cannot be predicted with certainty, and
these reserves may not ultimately be adequate, especially in
light of potential changes in environmental conditions, changing
interpretations of laws and regulations by regulators and
courts, the discovery of previously unknown environmental
conditions, the risk of governmental orders to carry out
additional compliance on certain sites not initially included in
remediation in progress, our potential liability to remediate
sites for which provisions have not been previously established
and the adoption of more stringent environmental laws. Such
future developments could result in increased environmental
costs and liabilities and could require significant capital
expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial position or results of operations or cash
flows. Furthermore, the failure to comply with our obligations
under the environmental laws and regulations could subject us to
administrative, civil or criminal penalties, obligations to pay
damages or other costs, and injunctions or other orders,
including orders to cease operations. In addition, the presence
of environmental contamination at our properties could adversely
affect our ability to sell a property, receive full value for a
property or use a property as collateral for a loan.
Some of our current and potential operations are located or
could be located in or near communities that may regard such
operations as having a detrimental effect on their social and
economic circumstances. Environmental laws typically provide for
participation in permitting decisions, site remediation
decisions and other matters. Concern about environmental justice
issues may affect our operations. Should such community
objections be presented to government officials, the
consequences of such a development may have a material adverse
impact upon the profitability or, in extreme cases, the
viability of an operation. In addition, such developments may
adversely affect our ability to expand or enter into new
operations in such location or elsewhere and may also have an
effect on the cost of our environmental remediation projects.
F-13
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We use a variety of hazardous materials and chemicals in our
rolling processes, as well as in our smelting operations in
Brazil and in connection with maintenance work on our
manufacturing facilities. Because of the nature of these
substances or related residues, we may be liable for certain
costs, including, among others, costs for health-related claims
or removal or re-treatment of such substances. Certain of our
current and former facilities incorporate asbestos-containing
materials, a hazardous substance that has been the subject of
health-related claims for occupation exposure. In addition,
although we have developed environmental, health and safety
programs for our employees, including measures to reduce
employee exposure to hazardous substances, and conduct regular
assessments at our facilities, we are currently, and in the
future may be, involved in claims and litigation filed on behalf
of persons alleging injury predominantly as a result of
occupational exposure to substances at our current or former
facilities. It is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome
of these claims and lawsuits due to the unpredictable nature of
personal injury litigation. If these claims and lawsuits,
individually or in the aggregate, were finally resolved against
us, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows
could be adversely affected.
Materials
and labor
In the aluminum rolled products industry, our raw materials are
subject to continuous price volatility. We may not be able to
pass on the entire cost of the increases to our customers or
offset fully the effects of higher raw material costs, other
than metal, through productivity improvements, which may cause
our profitability to decline. In addition, there is a potential
time lag between changes in prices under our purchase contracts
and the point when we can implement a corresponding change under
our sales contracts with our customers. As a result, we could be
exposed to fluctuations in raw materials prices, including
metal, since, during the time lag period, we may have to
temporarily bear the additional cost of the change under our
purchase contracts, which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Significant price increases may result in our customers
substituting other materials, such as plastic or glass, for
aluminum or switch to another aluminum rolled products producer,
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
We consume substantial amounts of energy in our rolling
operations, our cast house operations and our Brazilian smelting
operations. The factors that affect our energy costs and supply
reliability tend to be specific to each of our facilities. A
number of factors could materially adversely affect our energy
position including, but not limited to: (a) increases in
the cost of natural gas; (b) increases in the cost of
supplied electricity or fuel oil related to transportation;
(c) interruptions in energy supply due to equipment failure
or other causes and (d) the inability to extend energy
supply contracts upon expiration on economical terms. A
significant increase in energy costs or disruption of energy
supplies or supply arrangements could have a material adverse
impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
Approximately 69% of our employees are represented by labor
unions under a large number of collective bargaining agreements
with varying durations and expiration dates. We may not be able
to satisfactorily renegotiate our collective bargaining
agreements when they expire. In addition, existing collective
bargaining agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage
at our facilities in the future, and any such work stoppage
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
Geographic
markets
We are, and will continue to be, subject to financial,
political, economic and business risks in connection with our
global operations. We have made investments and carry on
production activities in various emerging markets, including
Brazil, Korea and Malaysia, and we market our products in these
countries, as well as China and certain other countries in Asia.
While we anticipate higher growth or attractive production
opportunities from these emerging markets, they also present a
higher degree of risk than more developed markets. In addition
to the business risks inherent in developing and servicing new
markets, economic
F-14
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
conditions may be more volatile, legal and regulatory systems
less developed and predictable, and the possibility of various
types of adverse governmental action more pronounced. In
addition, inflation, fluctuations in currency and interest
rates, competitive factors, civil unrest and labor problems
could affect our revenues, expenses and results of operations.
Our operations could also be adversely affected by acts of war,
terrorism or the threat of any of these events as well as
government actions such as controls on imports, exports and
prices, tariffs, new forms of taxation, or changes in fiscal
regimes and increased government regulation in the countries in
which we operate or service customers. Unexpected or
uncontrollable events or circumstances in any of these markets
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
Other
risks and uncertainties
In addition, refer to Note 15 Fair Value of
Assets and Liabilities and Note 18 Commitments
and Contingencies for a discussion of financial instruments and
commitments and contingencies.
Reclassifications
and adjustments
Certain reclassifications of the prior period amounts and
presentation have been made to conform to the presentation
adopted for the current period. In order to present the impact
of all customer-directed derivatives and associated trading
activities as operating activities on the consolidated
statements of cash flows, we corrected our presentation by
reclassifying this activity from investing activities to
operating activities. This resulted in a reduction to operating
cash flow and an increase to investing cash flow of
approximately $16 million and $4 million for the year
ended March 31, 2009 and the period from May 16, 2007
through March 31, 2008, respectively. This reclassification
did not have any impact on total cash or on the balance sheet,
income statement or related disclosures.
For the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the period
from May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008, and the
period from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, we
reclassified $23 million, $25 million,
$21 million and $4 million, respectively, from
Selling, general and administrative expenses to Costs of goods
sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization).
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we identified an
immaterial error in our consolidated annual and interim
financial statements included in previously filed
Forms 10-Q
and
Forms 10-K
for fiscal 2008 and 2009. The error relates to deferred income
taxes recorded in connection with purchase accounting in South
America. We believe the correction of this error to be both
quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial to our annual
results for fiscal 2010 or to any of our previously issued
financial statements. As a result, we did not adjust any prior
period amounts. There was no impact to Income (loss) before
income taxes and noncontrolling interests or cash flows from
operating activities for any periods. We reflected the
correction of this error in the interim financial statements for
the second quarter of 2010. As of and for the year ended
March 31, 2010, the impact of the correction was an
increase to goodwill of $29 million, an increase to
deferred tax liabilities of $25 million and a reduction of
our income tax expense of $4 million. Due to the fact that
our South American subsidiaries are US dollar functional, the
deferred tax liabilities fluctuate with changes in the exchange
rate. This fluctuation is recorded as an increase or decrease to
income tax expense.
In the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2009, we
reclassified $19 million from Property, plant and
equipment, net to Intangible assets, net related capitalized
software. The reclassification had no impact on total assets,
total liabilities, total equity, net income (loss) or cash flows
as previously presented.
F-15
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue
recognition
We recognize sales when the revenue is realized or realizable,
and has been earned. We record sales when a firm sales agreement
is in place, delivery has occurred and collectability of the
fixed or determinable sales price is reasonably assured.
We recognize product revenue, net of trade discounts and
allowances, in the reporting period in which the products are
shipped and the title and risk of ownership pass to the
customer. We generally ship our product to our customers FOB
(free on board) destination point. Our standard terms of
delivery are included in our contracts of sale, order
confirmation documents and invoices. We sell most of our
products under contracts based on a conversion
premium, which is subject to periodic adjustments based on
market factors. As a result, the aluminum price risk is largely
absorbed by the customer. In situations where we offer customers
fixed prices for future delivery of our products, we may enter
into derivative instruments for all or a portion of the cost of
metal inputs to protect our profit on the conversion of the
product. In addition, through December 31, 2009, certain of
our sales contracts provided for a ceiling over which metal
prices could not be contractually passed through to the
customer. We partially mitigate the risk of this metal price
exposure through the purchase of derivative instruments.
We record tolling revenue when the revenue is realized or
realizable, and has been earned. Tolling refers to the process
by which certain customers provide metal to us for conversion to
rolled product. We do not take title to the metal and, after the
conversion and return shipment of the rolled product to the
customer, we charge them for the value-added conversion cost and
record these amounts in Net sales.
Shipping and handling amounts we bill to our customers are
included in Net sales and the related shipping and handling
costs we incur are included in Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization).
Cost
of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization)
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
includes all costs associated with inventories, including the
procurement of materials, the conversion of such materials into
finished product, and the costs of warehousing and distributing
finished goods to customers. Material procurement costs include
inbound freight charges as well as purchasing, receiving,
inspection and storage costs. Conversion costs include the costs
of direct production inputs such as labor and energy, as well as
allocated overheads from indirect production centers and plant
administrative support areas. Warehousing and distribution
expenses include inside and outside storage costs, outbound
freight charges and the costs of internal transfers.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include selling,
marketing and advertising expenses; salaries, travel and office
expenses of administrative employees and contractors; legal and
professional fees; software license fees; and bad debt expenses.
Cash
and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes investments that are highly
liquid and have maturities of three months or less when
purchased. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents
approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of
these instruments.
We maintain amounts on deposit with various financial
institutions, which may, at times, exceed federally insured
limits. However, management periodically evaluates the
credit-worthiness of those institutions, and we have not
experienced any losses on such deposits.
F-16
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accounts
receivable
Our accounts receivable are geographically dispersed. We do not
obtain collateral relating to our accounts receivable. We do not
believe there are any significant concentrations of revenues
from any particular customer or group of customers that would
subject us to any significant credit risks in the collection of
our accounts receivable. We report accounts receivable at the
estimated net realizable amount we expect to collect from our
customers.
Additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts are made by
means of the provision for doubtful accounts. We write-off
uncollectible accounts receivable against the allowance for
doubtful accounts after exhausting collection efforts.
For each of the periods presented, we performed an analysis of
our historical cash collection patterns and considered the
impact of any known material events in determining the allowance
for doubtful accounts. In performing the analysis, the impact of
any adverse changes in general economic conditions was
considered, and for certain customers we reviewed a variety of
factors including: past due receivables; macro-economic
conditions; significant one-time events and historical
experience. Specific reserves for individual accounts may be
established due to a customers inability to meet their
financial obligations, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings
or the deterioration in a customers operating results or
financial position. As circumstances related to customers
change, we adjust our estimates of the recoverability of the
accounts receivable.
Derivative
Instruments
We utilize derivative instruments to manage our exposure to
changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and
interest rates. The fair values of all derivative instruments
are recognized as assets or liabilities at the balance sheet
date. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are
recognized as (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net and included in our consolidated statements of
operations or included in Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) (AOCI) on our consolidated balance sheet, depending on
the nature or use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for
hedge accounting treatment under the provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 815, Derivatives and Hedging.
Gains and losses on derivative instruments qualifying as cash
flow hedges are included, to the extent the hedges are
effective, in AOCI, until the underlying transactions are
recognized as gains or losses and included in our consolidated
statements of operations. Gains and losses on derivative
instruments used as hedges of our net investment in foreign
operations are included, net of taxes, to the extent the hedges
are effective, in AOCI as part of the cumulative translation
adjustment (CTA). The ineffective portions of cash flow hedges
and hedges of net investments in foreign operations, if any, are
recognized as gains or losses and included in our consolidated
statements of operations, in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in the current period.
Inventories
We carry our inventories at the lower of their cost or market
value, reduced by reserves for excess and obsolete items. We use
the average cost method to determine cost.
Property,
plant and equipment
We record land, buildings, leasehold improvements and machinery
and equipment at cost. We record assets under capital lease
obligations at the lower of their fair value or the present
value of the aggregate future minimum lease payments as of the
beginning of the lease term. We depreciate our assets using the
straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful
life of the assets or the lease term, excluding any lease
renewals, unless the lease renewals are reasonably assured. As a
result of the Arrangement, land,
F-17
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
building, leasehold improvements and machinery and equipment as
of May 16, 2007 were adjusted to reflect fair value.
The ranges of estimated useful lives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
30 to 40
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
7 to 20
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2 to 25
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
3 to 10
|
|
Equipment under capital lease obligations
|
|
|
6 to 15
|
|
As noted above, our machinery and equipment have useful lives of
2 to 25 years. Most of our large scale machinery, including
hot mills, cold mills, continuous casting mills, furnaces and
finishing mills have useful lives of
15-25 years.
Supporting machinery and equipment, including automation and
work rolls, have useful lives of 2-15 years.
Maintenance and repairs of property and equipment are expensed
as incurred. We capitalize replacements and improvements that
increase the estimated useful life of an asset, and when
material, we capitalize interest on major construction and
development projects while in progress.
We retain fully depreciated assets in property and accumulated
depreciation accounts until we remove them from service. In the
case of sale, retirement or disposal, the asset cost and related
accumulated depreciation balances are removed from the
respective accounts, and the resulting net amount, after
consideration of any proceeds, is included as a gain or loss in
Other (income) expenses, net in our consolidated statements of
operations.
We account for operating leases under the provisions of
ASC 840, Leases. These pronouncements require us to
recognize escalating rents, including any rent holidays, on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease for those lease
agreements where we receive the right to control the use of the
entire leased property at the beginning of the lease term.
Goodwill
We account for goodwill under the guidance in ASC 805 and
ASC 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other
(ASC 350).
We test goodwill for impairment using a fair value approach at
the reporting unit level. We use our operating segments as our
reporting units. We test for impairment at least annually during
the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, unless some triggering
event occurs that would require an impairment assessment.
We use the present value of estimated future cash flows to
establish the estimated fair value of our reporting units as of
the testing dates. This approach includes many assumptions
related to future growth rates, discount factors and tax rates,
among other considerations. Changes in economic and operating
conditions impacting these assumptions could result in goodwill
impairment in future periods. When available and as appropriate,
we use comparative market multiples to corroborate the estimated
fair value. If the carrying amount of a reporting units
goodwill were to exceed its estimated fair value, the second
step of the impairment test must be performed in order to
determine the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step
compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill
with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying
amount of the reporting units goodwill exceeds its implied
fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount
equal to that excess in Impairment of goodwill in our
consolidated statements of operations.
F-18
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
When a business within a reporting unit is disposed of, goodwill
is allocated to the gain or loss on disposition using the
relative fair value methodology of ASC 350.
Long-Lived
Assets and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with ASC 350, we amortize the cost of
intangible assets over their respective estimated useful lives
to their estimated residual value.
Under the guidance in ASC 360, Property, Plant and
Equipment, we assess the recoverability of long-lived assets
(excluding goodwill) and definite-lived intangible assets,
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that we may
not be able to recover the assets carrying amount. We
measure the recoverability of assets to be held and used by a
comparison of the carrying amount of the asset (groups) to the
expected, undiscounted future net cash flows to be generated by
that asset (groups), or, for identifiable intangible assets, by
determining whether the amortization of the intangible asset
balance over its remaining life can be recovered through
undiscounted future cash flows. The amount of impairment of
identifiable intangible assets is based on the present value of
estimated future cash flows. We measure the amount of impairment
of other long-lived assets (excluding goodwill) as the amount by
which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of
the asset, which is generally determined as the present value of
estimated future cash flows or as the appraised value.
Impairments of long-lived assets have been included in
Restructuring charges, net and Other income (expense), net in
the consolidated statement of operations.
If the carrying amount of an intangible asset were to exceed its
fair value, we would recognize an impairment charge in Other
(income) expenses, net in our consolidated statements of
operations. No impairments of other intangible assets have been
identified during any of the periods presented.
We continue to amortize long-lived assets to be disposed of
other than by sale. We carry long-lived assets to be disposed of
by sale in our consolidated balance sheets at the lower of net
book value or the fair value less cost to sell, and we cease
depreciation.
Investment
in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates
Management assesses the potential for
other-than-temporary
impairment of our equity method and cost method investments. We
consider all available information, including the recoverability
of the investment, the earnings and near-term prospects of the
affiliate, factors related to the industry, conditions of the
affiliate, and our ability, if any, to influence the management
of the affiliate. We assess fair value based on valuation
methodologies, as appropriate, including the present value of
estimated future cash flows, estimates of sales proceeds, and
external appraisals. If an investment is considered to be
impaired and the decline in value is other than temporary, we
record an appropriate write-down.
Guarantees
We account for certain guarantees in accordance with
ASC 460, Guarantees (ASC 460). ASC 460 requires
that a guarantor recognize a liability for the fair value of
obligations undertaken at the inception of a guarantee.
Financing
Costs and Interest Income
We amortize financing costs and premiums, and accrete discounts,
over the remaining life of the related debt using the
effective interest amortization method. The related
income or expense is included in Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs in our consolidated
statements of operations. We record discounts or premiums as a
direct deduction from, or addition to, the face amount of the
financing.
F-19
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC
820), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. ASC 820 also applies to measurements under
other accounting pronouncements, such as ASC 825, Financial
Instruments (ASC 825) that require or permit fair value
measurements. ASC 825 requires disclosures of the fair
value of financial instruments. Our financial instruments
include: cash and cash equivalents; certificates of deposit;
accounts receivable; accounts payable; foreign currency, energy
and interest rate derivative instruments; cross-currency swaps;
metal option and forward contracts; related party notes
receivable and payable; letters of credit; short-term borrowings
and long-term debt.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, certificates
of deposit, accounts receivable, accounts payable and current
related party notes receivable and payable approximate their
fair value because of the short-term maturity and highly liquid
nature of these instruments. The fair value of our letters of
credit is deemed to be the amount of payment guaranteed on our
behalf by third party financial institutions. We determine the
fair value of our short-term borrowings and long-term debt based
on various factors including maturity schedules, call features
and current market rates. We also use quoted market prices, when
available, or the present value of estimated future cash flows
to determine fair value of short-term borrowings and long-term
debt. When quoted market prices are not available for various
types of financial instruments (such as currency, energy and
interest rate derivative instruments, swaps, options and forward
contracts), we use standard pricing models with market-based
inputs, which take into account the present value of estimated
future cash flows.
Pensions
and Postretirement Benefits
We account for our pensions and other postretirement benefits in
accordance with ASC 715, Compensation
Retirement Benefits (ASC 715). ASC 715 requires us to
recognize the funded status of our benefit plans as a net asset
or liability, with an offsetting adjustment to AOCI in
shareholders equity. The funded status is calculated as
the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the
benefit obligation. Prior to and including the three months
ended March 31, 2007, we used a December 31 measurement
date for our pension and postretirement plans. As a result of
our acquisition by Hindalco and the application of push down
accounting, our pension and postretirement plans were remeasured
as of May 16, 2007. For the years ended March 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008, we used March 31 as the measurement date.
We use standard actuarial methods and assumptions to account for
our pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Pension and
postretirement benefit obligations are actuarially calculated
using managements best estimates of expected service
periods, salary increases and retirement ages of employees.
Pension and postretirement benefit expense includes the
actuarially computed cost of benefits earned during the current
service period, the interest cost on accrued obligations, the
expected return on plan assets based on fair market value and
the straight-line amortization of net actuarial gains and losses
and adjustments due to plan amendments. Generally, all net
actuarial gains and losses are amortized over the expected
average remaining service lives of plan participants.
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans in the U.S., Canada, Switzerland and the U.K., unfunded
pension plans in Germany, and unfunded lump sum indemnities in
France, South Korea, Malaysia and Italy. Our other
postretirement obligations include unfunded healthcare and life
insurance benefits provided to retired employees in Canada, the
U.S. and Brazil.
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Affiliates
These financial statements reflect the retrospective application
of ASC 810, Consolidations (ASC 810), subparagraph
10-65-1,
Transition Related to FASB Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
F-20
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB
No. 51, and No. 164,
Not-for-Profit
Entities: Mergers and Acquisitions for all periods
presented. ASC 810 establishes accounting and reporting
standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly
identified and presented in the condensed consolidated balance
sheet within shareholders equity, but separate from the
parents equity; (ii) the amount of consolidated net
income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling
interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of
the consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes
in a parents ownership interest while the parent retains
its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be
accounted for consistently.
Our consolidated financial statements include all assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of less-than- 100%-owned
affiliates that we control or for which we are the primary
beneficiary. We record a noncontrolling interest for the
allocable portion of income or loss to which the noncontrolling
interest holders are entitled based upon their ownership share
of the affiliate. Distributions made to the holders of
noncontrolling interests are charged to the respective
noncontrolling interest balance.
Losses attributable to the noncontrolling interest in an
affiliate may exceed our interest in the affiliates
equity. The excess, and any further losses attributable to the
noncontrolling interest, shall be attributed to those interests.
The noncontrolling interest shall continue to be attributed its
share of losses even if that attribution results in a deficit
noncontrolling interest balance. As of March 31, 2010, we
have no such losses.
Environmental
Liabilities
We record accruals for environmental matters when it is probable
that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the
liability can be reasonably estimated, based on current law and
existing technologies. We adjust these accruals periodically as
assessment and remediation efforts progress or as additional
technical or legal information become available. Accruals for
environmental liabilities are stated at undiscounted amounts.
Environmental liabilities are included in our consolidated
balance sheets in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
and Other long-term liabilities, depending on their short- or
long-term nature. Any receivables for related insurance or other
third party recoveries for environmental liabilities are
recorded when it is probable that a recovery will be realized
and are included in our consolidated balance sheets in Prepaid
expenses and other current assets.
Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and
clean-up are
charged to expense. Estimated future incremental operations,
maintenance and management costs directly related to remediation
are accrued in the period in which such costs are determined to
be probable and estimable.
Litigation
Reserves
ASC 450, Contingencies (ASC 450), requires that we
accrue for loss contingencies associated with outstanding
litigation, claims and assessments for which management has
determined it is probable that a loss contingency exists and the
amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We expense
professional fees associated with litigation claims and
assessments as incurred.
Income
Taxes
We provide for income taxes using the asset and liability method
as required by ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740). This
approach recognizes the amount of income taxes payable or
refundable for the current year, as well as deferred tax assets
and liabilities for the future tax consequence of events
recognized in the consolidated financial statements and income
tax returns. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
adjusted to recognize the effects of changes in tax laws or
enacted tax rates. Under ASC 740, a valuation allowance is
required when it is more likely than not that some portion of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Realization is
dependent on generating sufficient taxable income through
various sources.
F-21
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Share-Based
Compensation
In accordance with ASC 718, Compensation
Stock Compensation (ASC 718), we
recognize compensation expense for a share-based award over an
employees requisite service period based on the
awards grant date fair value, subject to adjustment.
We adopted ASC 718 using the modified prospective method,
which requires companies to record compensation cost beginning
with the effective date based on the requirements of
ASC 718 for all share-based payments granted after the
effective date of ASC 718. All awards granted to employees
prior to the effective date of ASC 718 that remained
unvested at the adoption date continued to be expensed over the
remaining service period. Additionally, we determined that all
of our compensation plans settled in cash are considered
liability based awards. As such, liabilities for awards under
these plans are required to be measured at each reporting date
until the date of settlement. The Black-Scholes model was used
to determine the fair value of these awards.
Cash flows resulting from tax benefits for deductions in excess
of compensation cost recognized are classified within financing
cash flows.
Foreign
Currency Translation
In accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters
(ASC 830), the assets and liabilities of foreign operations,
whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar
(located in Europe and Asia), are translated to
U.S. dollars at the period end exchange rates and revenues
and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the
period. Differences arising from the translation of assets and
liabilities are included in the currency translation adjustment
(CTA) component of AOCI. If there is a reduction in our
ownership in a foreign operation, the relevant portion of the
CTA is recognized in Other (income) expenses, net.
For all operations, the monetary items denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency are remeasured at period-end
exchange rates and transaction gains and losses are included in
Other (income) expenses, net in our consolidated statements of
operations. Non-monetary items are remeasured at historical
rates.
Research
and Development
We incur costs in connection with research and development
programs that are expected to contribute to future earnings, and
charge such costs against income as incurred. Research and
development costs consist primarily of salaries and
administrative costs.
Restructuring
Activities
Restructuring charges, net include employee severance and
benefit costs, impairments of assets, and other costs associated
with exit activities. We apply the provisions of ASC 420,
Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations (ASC 420) relating
to one-time termination benefits. Severance costs accounted for
under ASC 420 are recognized when management with the
proper level of authority has committed to a restructuring plan
and communicated those actions to employees. Impairment losses
are based upon the estimated fair value less costs to sell, with
fair value estimated based on existing market prices for similar
assets. Other exit costs include environmental remediation costs
and contract termination costs, primarily related to equipment
and facility lease obligations. At each reporting date, we
evaluate the accruals for restructuring costs to ensure the
accruals are still appropriate.
F-22
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Customer
Directed Derivatives
We classify all customer directed derivatives and associated
trading activities as operating activities in our consolidated
statement of cash flows. Cash flows provided by (used in), from
such derivatives, totaled $75 million and
$(81) million in the years ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively, and $9 million for the period from
May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008, respectively.
There were no customer directed derivatives in the period from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards have been adopted by us
during the twelve months ended March 31, 2010.
In June 2009, the FASB approved its Codification as the single
source of authoritative United States accounting and reporting
standards applicable for all non-governmental entities, with the
exception of the SEC and its staff. The Codification which
changes the referencing of accounting standards is effective for
interim or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
As the codification is not intended to change or alter existing
US GAAP, this standard had no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in the Accounting
Standards Update (ASU)
No. 2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU
2010-06).
ASU 2010-06
amends ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements by adding
additional disclosure requirements about items transferring into
and out of levels 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy;
adding separate disclosures about purchase, sales, issuances,
and settlements relative to level 3 measurements; and
clarifying, among other things, the existing fair value
disclosures about the level of disaggregation. This standard had
no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows, but did require certain additional
footnote disclosures.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, which
requires that an employer disclose the following information
about the fair value of plan assets: (1) how investment
allocation decisions are made, including the factors that are
pertinent to understanding of investment policies and
strategies; (2) the major categories of plan assets;
(3) the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the
fair value of plan assets; (4) the effect of fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in
plan assets for the period; and (5) significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. At initial adoption,
application of this standard would not be required for earlier
periods that are presented for comparative purposes. This
standard had no impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows, but did require certain
additional footnote disclosures.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation, which establishes accounting and reporting
standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly
identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheet
within shareholders equity, but separate from the
parents equity; (ii) the amount of condensed
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the
noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented
on the face of the consolidated statement of operations and
(iii) changes in a parents ownership interest while
the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its
subsidiary to be accounted for consistently. We adopted this
accounting standard effective April 1, 2009, and applied
this standard prospectively, except for the presentation and
disclosure requirements, which have been applied retrospectively.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards have been issued, but
have not yet been adopted by us as of March 31, 2010, as
adoption is not required until future reporting periods.
F-23
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2009-17,
Consolidations: Improvements to Financial Reporting by
Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. ASU
No. 2009-17
is intended (1) to address the effects on certain
provisions of the accounting standard dealing with consolidation
of variable interest entities, as a result of the elimination of
the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in ASU
No. 2009-16,
Transfers and Servicing: Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets, and (2) to clarify questions about
the application of certain key provisions related to
consolidation of variable interest entities, including those in
which accounting and disclosures do not always provide timely
and useful information about an enterprises involvement in
a variable interest entity. ASU
No. 2009-17
will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2009. We do not anticipate this standard will
have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations and cash flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do
not apply to our operations.
|
|
2.
|
RESTRUCTURING
PROGRAMS
|
Restructuring charges, net for fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 of
$14 million and $95 million, respectively, includes
$2 million and $22 million, respectively, of non-cash
charges discussed in greater detail below. The following table
summarizes our restructuring accrual activity by region (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
April 1, 2007 to May 15, 2007 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 15, 2007
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 to March 31, 2008 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Fiscal 2009 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions, net
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Fiscal 2010 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
In the second half of fiscal 2009, we initiated a number of
restructuring actions throughout Europe to reduce labor and
overhead costs through capacity and staff reductions. Most
significantly, in March 2009, we announced the closure of our
aluminum sheet mill in Rogerstone, South Wales, U.K. Operations
ceased in April 2009, resulting in the elimination of 440
positions. The total amount expected to be incurred in
F-24
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
connection with this closure is $63 million, of which
$60 million was recorded in the fiscal 2009. We recorded an
additional $3 million of net costs related to on-going
maintenance of the Rogerstone facility, write-down of additional
plant assets and adjustments of reserves established in fiscal
2009. The components of restructuring charges related to
Rogerstone for the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are
as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Severance related costs
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Environmental remediation expense
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Fixed asset impairments(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Write-down of parts, supplies and scrap(A)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Reduction of reserve associated with unfavorable contract(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
These non-cash items are not included in the restructuring
provision table above but have been reflected as reductions to
the respective balance sheet accounts. |
Also in March 2009, we announced plans to streamline operations
at plants in France and Germany. At our facility in Rugles,
located in Upper Normandy, France, we eliminated approximately
80 positions. The facility continues the operation of its three
major processes, including continuous casting, foil rolling, and
finishing. For the year ended March 31, 2009, we recorded
$9 million in severance-related costs. We also recorded
$1 million in severance costs at our Ohle, Germany facility
related to the elimination of 13 positions.
In fiscal 2010, we made additional staff reductions at plants in
Italy, Switzerland and Germany, resulting in additional one-time
terminations charges of $4 million. We also incurred
$4 million of environmental and other costs at our
Borgofranco facility, which was closed in March 2006.
For the year ended March 31, 2010, we made the following
payments relating to restructuring programs in Europe:
$30 million in severance payments, $10 million in
payments for environmental remediation and $6 million of
other payments.
North
America
In March 2008, management approved the closure of our light
gauge converter products facility in Louisville, Kentucky. The
closure was intended to bring the capacity of our North American
operations in line with local market demand. As a result of the
closure, we recognized approximately $5 million in
restructuring charges during the quarter ended March 31,
2008. Our Louisville facility closed in June 2008.
In November 2008, we announced a Voluntary Separation Program
(VSP) available to salaried employees in North America and the
Corporate office aimed at reducing staff levels. This VSP
supplemented a pre-existing Involuntary Severance Program (ISP).
We eliminated approximately 120 positions and recorded
$16 million in severance-related costs for the VSP and ISP
programs for the year ended March 31, 2009. This program
continued into fiscal 2010, with an additional $1 million
in severance costs recorded under the voluntary and involuntary
separation programs.
To consolidate corporate functions and enhance organizational
effectiveness, we announced a plan to relocate our North
American headquarters from Cleveland, Ohio to Atlanta, Georgia,
where the Companys corporate offices are located. This
move is expected to occur over the next six months with a
completion date
F-25
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
no later than December 31, 2010. We recorded
$4 million in fiscal 2010 for severance charges
representing one-time termination benefits under our existing
separation program.
We made $11 million in severance payments related to the
fiscal 2009 plan for the year ended March 31, 2010.
South
America
In January 2009, we announced that we would cease production of
alumina at our Ouro Preto facility in Brazil effective May 2009.
The global economic crisis and the dramatic drop in alumina
prices made alumina production at Ouro Preto economically
unfeasible. For the foreseeable future, the Ouro Preto facility
will purchase alumina through third-parties. Approximately 290
positions were eliminated at Ouro Preto, including
150 employees and 140 contractors. For the year ended
March 31, 2009, we recorded approximately $2 million
in severance-related costs. Other exit costs include less than
$1 million related to the idling of the refinery. Other
activities related to the facility, including electric power
generation and the production of primary aluminum, will continue
unaffected.
We made $1 million in severance payments and
$1 million in payments related to other exit costs. We
reduced the remaining $1 million reserve related to
severance in the third quarter. In December 2009, we completed
all restructuring actions initiated in fiscal 2009.
Asia
In February 2009, we recorded approximately $1 million in
severance-related costs related to a voluntary retirement
program in Asia which eliminated 34 positions. Also, during the
year ended March 31, 2009, we recorded an impairment charge
of approximately $5 million in Novelis Korea due to the
obsolescence of certain production related fixed assets. These
impairment charge is not included in the restructuring provision
table above but was reflected as reductions to the respective
balance sheet account.
Accounts receivable consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
1,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,002
|
|
Other accounts receivable
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable third parties
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts third parties
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
Other accounts receivable related parties
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
1,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts is managements best
estimate of probable losses inherent in the accounts receivable
balance. Management determines the allowance based on known
uncollectible accounts, historical experience and other
currently available evidence. As of March 31, 2010 and
2009, our allowance for doubtful accounts represented
approximately 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively, of gross accounts
receivable.
F-26
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Additions
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Charged to
|
|
Recovered/
|
|
Foreign Exchange
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
Expense
|
|
(Written-Off)
|
|
and Other
|
|
End of Period
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through
May 15, 2007
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through
March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Forfaiting
and Factoring of Trade Receivables
Novelis Korea Ltd. forfaits trade receivables
in the ordinary course of business. These trade receivables are
typically outstanding for 60 to 120 days. Forfaiting is a
non-recourse method to manage credit and interest rate risks.
Under this method, customers contract to pay a financial
institution. The institution assumes the risk of non-payment and
remits the invoice value (net of a fee) to us after presentation
of a proof of delivery of goods to the customer. We do not
retain a financial or legal interest in these receivables, and
they are excluded from the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. Forfaiting expenses are included in Selling, general and
administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of
operations.
Our Brazilian operations factor, without recourse, certain trade
receivables that are unencumbered by pledge restrictions. Under
this method, customers are directed to make payments on invoices
to a financial institution, but are not contractually required
to do so. The financial institution pays us any invoices it has
approved for payment (net of a fee). We do not retain financial
or legal interest in these receivables, and they are excluded
from the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Factoring
expenses are included in Selling, general and administrative
expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
Summary
Disclosures of Financial Amounts
The following tables summarize amounts relating to our
forfaiting and factoring activities (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
Receivables forfaited
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Receivables factored
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Forfaiting expense
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Factoring expense
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Forfaited receivables outstanding
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
Factored receivables outstanding
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
F-27
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventories consist of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
1,083
|
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property, plant and equipment, net, consists of the following
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Land and property rights
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
|
|
2,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
|
|
3,432
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
2,632
|
|
|
$
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, there were $242 million of fully
depreciated assets included in our consolidated balance sheet.
Due to the assignment of new fair values as a result of the
Arrangement, we had no fully depreciated assets included in our
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2009.
Total depreciation expense is shown in the table below (in
millions). Capitalized interest related to construction of
property, plant and equipment was immaterial in the periods
presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
impairments
During the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we recorded
$1 million of impairment charges in each period, which are
included in Other (income) expense, net on the consolidated
statement of operations. During the year ended March 31,
2009, we also recorded impairment charges totaling
$17 million related to assets in Europe and Asia which have
been included in Restructuring charges, net on the consolidated
statement of operations (see Note 2
Restructuring Programs).
During the period from May 16, 2007 through March 31,
2008, we recorded an impairment charge of $1 million in
Novelis Italy due to the obsolescence of certain production
related fixed assets.
F-28
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Leases
We lease certain land, buildings and equipment under
non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates
through 2015, and we lease assets in Sierre, Switzerland
including a
15-year
capital lease through 2020 from Alcan. Operating leases
generally have five to ten-year terms, with one or more renewal
options, with terms to be negotiated at the time of renewal.
Various facility leases include provisions for rent escalation
to recognize increased operating costs or require us to pay
certain maintenance and utility costs.
The following table summarizes rent expense included in our
consolidated statements of operations (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Rent expense
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2010, for our
operating and capital leases having an initial or remaining
non-cancelable lease term in excess of one year are as follows
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Capital Lease
|
|
Year Ending March 31,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
2012
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2013
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2014
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2015
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: interest portion on capital lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal obligation on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The future minimum lease payments for capital lease obligations
exclude $3 million of unamortized fair value adjustments
recorded as a result of the Arrangement (see
Note 10 Debt).
Assets and related accumulated amortization under capital lease
obligations as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Assets under capital lease obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale
of assets
There were no material sales of fixed assets during the years
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
F-29
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Asset
Retirement Obligations
The following is a summary of our asset retirement obligation
activity. The period-end balances are included in Other
long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
6.
|
GOODWILL
AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
The following tables summarize the changes in our goodwill (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 Successor
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount(A)
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
1,148
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(860
|
)
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
181
|
|
South America
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,922
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 Successor
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount(A)
|
|
|
Adjustments(C)
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
1,149
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(860
|
)
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
181
|
|
South America
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents goodwill balance, net of prior period accumulated
adjustments and excluding accumulated impairments. |
|
(B) |
|
See Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, Reclassifications and Adjustments. |
|
(C) |
|
For the year ended March 31, 2009, non-impairment
adjustments include: (1) an adjustment in North America for
final payment related to the transfer of pension plans in Canada
for employees who elected to transfer their past service to
Novelis and (2) adjustments in Europe related to tax audits. |
F-30
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of intangible assets were as follows (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 Successor
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 Successor
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
Technology and software
|
|
|
13 years
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
163
|
|
Customer-related intangible assets
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
416
|
|
Favorable energy supply contract
|
|
|
9.5 years
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
Other favorable contracts
|
|
|
3.3 years
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
949
|
|
|
$
|
(200
|
)
|
|
$
|
749
|
|
|
$
|
937
|
|
|
$
|
(131
|
)
|
|
$
|
806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our favorable energy supply contract and other favorable
contracts are amortized over their estimated useful lives using
methods that reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits
are expected to be consumed. All other intangible assets are
amortized using the straight-line method.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets is as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Total Amortization expense related to intangible assets
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Less: Amortization expense related to intangible assets included
in Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization)(A)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets included in
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Relates to amortization of favorable energy and other supply
contracts. |
Estimated total amortization expense related to intangible
assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as
follows (in millions). Actual amounts may differ from these
estimates due to such factors as customer turnover, raw material
consumption patterns, impairments, additional intangible asset
acquisitions and other events.
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
2012
|
|
|
58
|
|
2013
|
|
|
58
|
|
2014
|
|
|
58
|
|
2015
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
7.
|
CONSOLIDATION
OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
|
We have a variable interest in Logan Aluminum, Inc. (Logan) and
have concluded that we are the primary beneficiary. As a result,
this entity is consolidated pursuant to ASC 810,
Consolidation, in all periods presented. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
F-31
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Logan
Organization and Operations
In 1985, Alcan purchased an interest in Logan to provide tolling
services jointly with ARCO Aluminum, Inc. (ARCO). Logan produces
approximately one-third of the can sheet utilized in the
U.S. can sheet market. According to the joint venture
agreements between Alcan and ARCO, Alcan owned 40 shares of
Class A common stock and ARCO owned 60 shares of
Class B common stock in Logan. Each share provides its
holder with one vote, regardless of class. However, Class A
shareholders have the right to select four directors, and
Class B shareholders have the right to select three
directors. Generally, a majority vote is required for the Logan
board of directors to take action. In connection with our
spin-off from Alcan in January 2005, Alcan transferred all of
its rights and obligations under a joint venture agreement and
subsequent ancillary agreements (collectively, the JV
Agreements) to us.
Logan processes metal received from Novelis and ARCO and charges
the respective partner a fee to cover expenses. Logan has no
equity and relies on the regular reimbursement of costs and
expenses by Novelis and ARCO to fund its operations. This
reimbursement is considered a variable interest as it
constitutes a form of financing of the activities of Logan.
Other than these contractually required reimbursements, we do
not provide other additional support to Logan. Logans
creditors do not have recourse to our general credit.
Primary
Beneficiary
A variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called
the primary beneficiary. Upon consolidation, the primary
beneficiary generally must initially record all of the
VIEs assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests at
fair value. Generally, the primary beneficiary is the reporting
enterprise with a variable interest in the entity that is
obligated to absorb the majority (greater than 50%) of the
VIEs expected loss.
Based upon a previous restructuring program, Novelis acquired
the right to use the excess capacity at Logan. To utilize this
capacity, we installed and have sole ownership of a cold mill at
the Logan facility which enabled us to have the ability to take
the majority share of production and costs. These facts qualify
Novelis as Logans primary beneficiary under ASC 810.
Carrying
Value
The following table summarizes the carrying value and
classification on our consolidated balance sheets of assets and
liabilities owned by the Logan joint venture and consolidated
under ASC 810 (in millions). There are significant other assets
used in the operations of Logan that are not part of the joint
venture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
Net carrying value
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
F-32
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
INVESTMENT
IN AND ADVANCES TO NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES AND RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
The following table summarizes the ownership structure and our
ownership percentage of the non-consolidated affiliates in which
we have an investment as of March 31, 2010, and which we
account for using the equity method. We do not control our
non-consolidated affiliates, but have the ability to exercise
significant influence over their operating and financial
policies. We have no material investments that we account for
using the cost method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Affiliate Name
|
|
Ownership Structure
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Consorcio Candonga
|
|
Unincorporated Joint Venture
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
MiniMRF LLC
|
|
Limited Liability Company
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
The following table summarizes our share of the condensed
assets, liabilities and equity of our equity method affiliates.
The results include the unamortized fair value adjustments
relating to our non-consolidated affiliates due to the
Arrangement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes our share of the condensed
results of operations of our equity method affiliates. These
results include the incremental depreciation and amortization
expense that we record in our equity method accounting as a
result of fair value adjustments we made to our investments in
non-consolidated affiliates due to the Arrangement. These
results also include the $160 million impairment charge to
reduce the carrying value of our investment in Aluminium Norf
GmbH for the year ended March 31, 2009. The results for the
year ended March 31, 2010 also include a $10 million
after tax benefit from the refinement of our methodology for
recording depreciation and amortization on the
step-up in
our basis in the underlying assets of an investee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Costs, expenses and provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(172
|
)
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
are transactions and balances arising from business we conduct
with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we classify as
related party transactions and balances. The following table
describes the nature and amounts of transactions that we had
with related parties (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Purchases of tolling services, electricity and inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH(A)
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Consorcio Candonga(B)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases from related parties
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH(C)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We purchase tolling services (the conversion of customer-owned
metal) from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We obtain electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our operations
in South America. |
|
(C) |
|
We earn interest income on a loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
The following table describes the period-end account balances
that we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as
related party balances in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Accounts receivable(A)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Other long-term receivables(A)
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Accounts payable(B)
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The balances represent current and non-current portions of a
loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH and
electricity from Consorcio Candonga. |
F-34
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
ACCRUED
EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consists of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Current portion of fair value of can ceiling contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Rates(A)
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term borrowings
|
|
|
1.71
|
%
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
2.25
|
%(C)
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
11.5% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
11.50
|
%
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
2.27
|
%(C)
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
813
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due December 2019 (Swiss francs (CHF)
50 million)
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF
2 million)
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
1.25
|
%(C)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Bank loan, due February 2010 (Korean won (KRW) 50 billion)
|
|
|
4.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Bank loan, due May 2009 (KRW 10 billion)
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due December 2011 through December 2012
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,682
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
2,671
|
|
|
|
2,742
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
Less: Short term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion third
parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,491
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,480
|
|
|
$
|
2,419
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured credit facility related party, due January
2015
|
|
|
13.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Interest rates are as of March 31, 2010 and exclude the
effects of accretion/amortization of fair value adjustments as a
result of the Arrangement and the debt exchange completed in
fiscal 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
Debt existing at the time of the Arrangement was recorded at
fair value. Additional floating rate Term Loan with a face value
of $220 million issued in March 2009 was recorded at a fair
value of $165 million. Additional 11.5% Senior Notes
with a face value of $185 million issued in August 2009
were recorded at fair value of $181 million (see
11.5% Senior Notes below). |
|
(C) |
|
Excludes the effect of related interest rate swaps and the
effect of accretion of fair value. |
F-35
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Principal repayments of our total debt over the next five years
and thereafter (excluding unamortized fair value adjustments and
using rates of exchange as of March 31, 2010 for our debt
denominated in foreign currencies) are as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending March 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
2012
|
|
|
16
|
|
2013
|
|
|
16
|
|
2014
|
|
|
16
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
Our senior secured credit facilities consist of (1) a
$1.15 billion seven year term loan facility maturing July
2014 (Term Loan Facility) and (2) an $800 million
five-year multi-currency asset-backed revolving credit line and
letter of credit facility (ABL Facility). The senior secured
credit facilities include certain affirmative and negative
covenants. Under the ABL Facility, if our excess availability,
as defined under the borrowing, is less than 10% of the lender
commitments under the ABL Facility, we are required to maintain
a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. Substantially
all of our assets are pledged as collateral under the senior
secured credit facilities.
11.5% Senior
Notes
On August 11, 2009, Novelis Inc. issued $185 million
aggregate principal face amount of 11.5% senior unsecured
notes at an effective rate of 12.0% (11.5% Senior Notes).
The 11.5% Senior Notes were issued at a discount resulting
in gross proceeds of $181 million. The net proceeds of this
offering were used to repay a portion of the ABL Facility and
$96 million outstanding under an unsecured credit facility
from an affiliate of the Aditya Birla Group.
The 11.5% Senior Notes rank equally with all of our
existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness, and are
guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis,
by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
all of our existing and future Canadian and U.S. restricted
subsidiaries,
|
|
|
|
certain of our existing foreign restricted subsidiaries and
|
|
|
|
our other restricted subsidiaries that guarantee debt in the
future under any credit facilities, provided that the borrower
of such debt is our company or a Canadian or a
U.S. subsidiary.
|
The 11.5% Senior Notes contain certain covenants and events
of default, including limitations on certain restricted
payments, the incurrence of additional indebtedness and the sale
of certain assets. As of March 31, 2010, we were compliant
with these covenants. Interest on the 11.5% Senior Notes is
payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year and commenced
on February 15, 2010. The notes will mature on
February 15, 2015. On January 12, 2010, we consummated
the exchange offer required by the registration rights agreement
related to the 11.5% Senior Notes.
7.25% Senior
Notes
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities. The senior
notes were priced at par, bear interest at 7.25% and mature on
February 15, 2015. The
F-36
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
7.25% senior notes are guaranteed by all of our Canadian
and U.S. restricted subsidiaries, certain of our foreign
restricted subsidiaries and our other restricted subsidiaries
that guarantee our senior secured credit facilities and that
guarantee the old notes.
Under the indenture that governs the 7.25% senior notes, we
are subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to
incurring additional debt and providing additional guarantees,
paying dividends beyond certain amounts and making other
restricted payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain
consolidations or mergers, and certain transactions with
affiliates.
Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing our
7.25% senior notes, we were obligated, within 30 days
of closing of the Arrangement, to make an offer to purchase the
7.25% senior notes at a price equal to 101% of their
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date
the 7.25% senior notes were purchased. Consequently, we
commenced a tender offer on May 16, 2007 to repurchase all
of the outstanding 7.25% senior notes at the prescribed
price. This offer expired on July 3, 2007 with holders of
approximately $1 million of principal presenting their
7.25% senior notes pursuant to the tender offer.
In March 2009, we entered into a transaction in which we
purchased 7.25% senior notes with a face value of
$275 million with the net proceeds of an additional
floating rate term loan with a face value of $220 million.
Short-Term
Borrowings and Lines of Credit
As of March 31, 2010, our short-term borrowings were
$75 million consisting of (1) $61 million of
short-term loans under our ABL Facility and (2) $14 million in
bank overdrafts. As of March 31, 2010, $17 million of
our ABL Facility was utilized for letters of credit and we had
$603 million in remaining availability under this revolving
credit facility.
As of March 31, 2010, we had an additional
$138 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
not included in the ABL Facility. The weighted average interest
rate on our total short-term borrowings was 1.71% and 2.75% as
of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Interest
Rate Swaps
As of March 31, 2010, we have interest rate swaps to fix
the variable LIBOR interest rate on $520 million of our
floating rate Term Loan Facility. We are still obligated to pay
any applicable margin, as defined in our senior secured credit
facilities. Interest rate swaps related to $400 million at
an effective weighted average interest rate of 4.0% expired
March 31, 2010. In January 2009, we entered into two
interest rate swaps to fix the variable LIBOR interest rate on
an additional $300 million of our floating Term Loan
facility at a rate of 1.49%, plus any applicable margin. These
interest rate swaps are effective from March 31, 2009
through March 31, 2011. In April 2009, we entered into an
additional $220 million interest rate swap at a rate of
1.97%, which is effective through April 30, 2012.
We have a cross-currency interest rate swap in Korea to convert
our $100 million variable rate bank loan to KRW
92 billion at a fixed rate of 5.44%. The swap expires
October 2010, concurrent with the maturity of the loan.
As of March 31, 2010 approximately 74% of our debt was
fixed rate and approximately 26% was variable-rate.
Korean
Bank Loans
In December 2004, we entered into (1) a $70 million
floating rate loan and (2) a KRW 25 billion
($25 million) floating rate loan, both due in December
2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate and cross
currency swap on the $70 million floating rate loan through
a 4.55% fixed rate KRW 73 billion
F-37
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($73 million) loan and an interest rate swap on the KRW
25 billion floating rate loan to fix the interest rate at
4.45%. In October 2007, we entered into a $100 million
floating rate loan due October 2010 and immediately repaid the
$70 million loan. In December 2007, we repaid the KRW
25 billion loan from the proceeds of the $100 million
floating rate loan. Additionally, we immediately entered into an
interest rate swap and cross currency swap for the
$100 million floating rate loan through a 5.44% fixed rate
KRW 92 billion ($92 million) loan.
We repaid a KRW 10 billion ($8 million) bank loan
during May 2009 and a KRW 50 billion ($43 million)
bank loan during February 2010.
Capital
Lease Obligations
In December 2004, we entered into a fifteen-year capital lease
obligation with Alcan for assets in Sierre, Switzerland, which
has an interest rate of 7.5% and fixed quarterly payments of CHF
0.8 million, which is equivalent to $0.8 million at
the exchange rate as of March 31, 2010.
In September 2005, we entered into a six-year capital lease
obligation for equipment in Switzerland which has an interest
rate of 2.49% and fixed monthly payments of CHF
0.1 million, which is equivalent to $0.1 million at
the exchange rate as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
11.
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Share-Based
Compensation Expense
Total compensation expense for active and inactive plans related
to share-based awards for the respective periods is presented in
the tables below (in millions). These amounts are included in
Selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated
statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Active Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan 2009
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan 2010
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition Awards(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
One-half of the outstanding Recognition Awards vested on
December 31, 2007. The remaining outstanding Recognition
Awards vested on December 31, 2008. |
F-38
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Inactive Plans(A):
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock options)
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock appreciation rights)
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
Stock Price Appreciation Unit Plan
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Deferred Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Awards
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Total Shareholder Returns Performance Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inactive Plants Total Share-Based Compensation
Expense
|
|
$
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
As a result of the Arrangement, all of our share-based
compensation awards that were active as of May 15, 2007
(except for our Recognition Awards) were accelerated to vest,
cancelled and settled in cash. |
Active
Plans
Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan
In June 2009, our board of directors authorized the Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2010 FY 2013 (2010 LTIP)
covering the performance period from April 1, 2009 through
March 31, 2013. The terms of the 2010 LTIP are the same as
the Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2009 FY 2012
(2009 LTIP) approved in June 2008. Under the 2010 LTIP, phantom
stock appreciation rights (SARs) are to be granted to certain of
our executive officers and key employees. The SARs will vest at
the rate of 25% per year, subject to performance criteria (see
below) and expire seven years from their grant date. Each SAR is
to be settled in cash based on the difference between the market
value of one Hindalco share on the date of grant and the market
value on the date of exercise, where market values are
denominated in Indian rupees and converted to the
participants payroll currency at the time of exercise. The
amount of cash paid is limited to (i) 2.5 times the target
payout if exercised within one year of vesting or (ii) 3
times the target payout if exercised after one year of vesting.
The SARs do not transfer any shareholder rights in Hindalco to a
participant. The SARs are classified as liability awards and are
remeasured at fair value each reporting period until the SARs
are settled.
The performance criterion for vesting is based on the actual
overall Novelis operating earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, as adjusted (adjusted Operating
EBITDA) compared to the target adjusted Operating EBITDA
established and approved each fiscal year. The minimum threshold
for vesting each year is 75% of each annual target adjusted
Operating EBITDA, at which point 75% of the SARs for that period
would vest, with an equal pro rata amount of SARs vesting
through 100% achievement of the target. Given that the
performance criterion is based on an earnings target in a future
period for each fiscal year, the grant date of the awards for
accounting purposes is generally not established until the
performance criterion has been defined. Accordingly, each of the
four tranches associated with the 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP is
deemed granted when the earnings target is determined.
F-39
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The tables below show the SARs activity under our 2010 LTIP and
2009 LTIP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD in
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
14,169,492
|
(A)
|
|
|
87.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(489,061
|
)
|
|
|
85.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
13,680,431
|
|
|
|
87.68
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD in
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
20,606,906
|
(A)
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
6.22
|
|
|
|
(B
|
)
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(9,235,507
|
)
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
11,371,399
|
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents total SARs approved by the Board of Directors for
grant. As noted above, due to the performance criterion based on
a future earnings target, the amount deemed granted for
accounting purposes is limited to the individual tranches
subject to an established earnings target, which includes the
current and prior fiscal years. |
|
(B) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is zero as the market value of a
share of Hindalco stock was less than the SAR exercise price. |
The fair value of each SAR is based on the difference between
the fair value of a long call and a short call option. The fair
value of each of these call options was determined using the
Black-Scholes valuation method. We used historical stock price
volatility data of Hindalco on the Bombay Stock Exchange to
determine expected volatility assumptions. The fair value of
each SAR under the 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP was estimated as of
March 31, 2010 using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
53.50 - 59.10%
|
|
45.17 - 60.80%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
56.13%
|
|
54.78%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.74%
|
|
0.74%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
6.86 - 7.44%
|
|
4.67 - 6.72%
|
Expected life
|
|
3.24 - 4.74 years
|
|
0.63 - 3.00 years
|
The fair value of the SARs is being recognized over the
requisite performance and service period of each tranche,
subject to the achievement of any performance criterion. Since
the performance criteria for fiscal years 2011 through 2013 have
not yet been established and therefore, measurement periods for
SARs relating to those periods have not yet commenced, no
compensation expense for those tranches has been recorded for
the year ended March 31, 2010. No SARs were exercisable at
March 31, 2010.
F-40
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with her separation from the Company, we issued
1,000,000 SARs at an exercise price of 60.50 Indian Rupees to
our former President and Chief Operating Officer. We recorded
$2 million of compensation expense in the third quarter for
fiscal 2010 associated with the exercise of these options on
December 3, 2009 which is not included in the shared based
compensation table above.
Unrecognized compensation expense related to the non-vested SARs
(assuming all future performance criteria are met) is
$17 million which is expected to be realized over a
weighted average period of 3.51 years.
Recognition
Awards
In September 2006, we entered into Recognition Agreements and
granted Recognition Awards to certain executive officers and
other key employees (Executives) to retain and reward them for
continued dedication towards corporate objectives. Under the
terms of these agreements, Executives who remained continuously
employed by us through the vesting dates of December 31,
2007 and December 31, 2008 were entitled to receive
one-half of their total Recognition Awards on each vesting date.
The number of Recognition Awards payable under the agreements
varied by Executive. As a result of the Arrangement, the
Recognition Awards changed from an equity-based to a
liability-based plan using the $44.93 per common share
transaction price as the per share value. This change resulted
in additional share-based compensation expense of
$1.3 million during the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007.
One-half of the outstanding Recognition Awards vested on
December 31, 2007, and were settled for approximately
$3 million in cash in January 2008. The remaining
outstanding Recognition Awards vested on December 31, 2008,
and were settled for approximately $2 million in cash in
January 2009.
Inactive
Plans
As previously mentioned, as a result of the Arrangement, all of
our share-based compensation awards (except for our Recognition
Awards) were accelerated to vest, cancelled and settled in cash
using the $44.93 purchase price per common share paid by
Hindalco in the transaction. The following tables summarize the
activity and assumptions used to estimate fair value of the
material cancelled plans.
Novelis
2006 Incentive Plan
In October 2006, our shareholders approved the Novelis 2006
Incentive Plan (2006 Incentive Plan) to effectively replace the
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005 and Stock Price Appreciation
Unit Plan (both described below). Under the 2006 Incentive Plan,
up to an aggregate number of 7,000,000 shares of Novelis
common stock were authorized to be issued in the form of stock
options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted shares,
restricted share units, performance shares and other share-based
incentives.
2006
Stock Options
In October 2006, our board of directors authorized a grant of an
aggregate of 885,170 seven-year non-qualified stock options
under the 2006 Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $25.53 to
certain of our executive officers and key employees.
F-41
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Prior to the Arrangement, the fair value of our premium and
non-premium options was estimated using the following
assumptions for the year ended December 31, 2006, the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and the period from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007
(Predecessor):
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
42.20 to 46.40%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
44.30%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.16%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.68 to 4.71%
|
Expected life
|
|
1.00 to 4.75 years
|
As a result of the Arrangement, 825,850 premium and non-premium
options under the 2006 Incentive Plan were accelerated to vest
and were settled in cash for approximately $16 million.
Stock
Appreciation Rights
In October 2006, our board of directors authorized a grant of
381,090 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) under the 2006
Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $25.53 to certain of our
executive officers and key employees.
The fair value of premium and non-premium SARs under the 2006
Incentive Plan was estimated using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
40.70 to 44.70%
|
|
40.80 to 45.40%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
42.70%
|
|
43.10%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
None
|
|
0.14%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.51 to 4.59%
|
|
4.67 to 4.71%
|
Expected life
|
|
0.57 to 4.32 years
|
|
0.83 to 4.57 years
|
As a result of the Arrangement, 378,360 premium and non-premium
SARs were accelerated to vest and were settled in cash for
approximately $7 million.
Novelis
Conversion Plan of 2005
In January 2005, our board of directors adopted the Novelis
Conversion Plan of 2005 (the Conversion Plan) to allow for
1,372,663 Alcan stock options held by employees of Alcan who
became our employees following our spin-off from Alcan to be
replaced with options to purchase 2,723,914 of our common shares.
The fair value of each option was estimated using the following
assumptions for the year ended December 31, 2006, the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and the period from April 1
through May 15, 2007:
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
30.30%
|
Weighted-average volatility
|
|
30.30%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
1.56%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.88 to 3.73%
|
Expected life
|
|
0.70 to 5.70 years
|
As a result of the Arrangement, 563,651 options were accelerated
to vest with a total fair value of approximately $4 million
and a total of 1,238,183 options were settled in cash using the
$44.93 purchase price per common share paid by Hindalco in the
transaction for approximately $29 million.
F-42
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFIT PLANS
|
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans in the U.S., Canada, Switzerland and the U.K.; unfunded
pension plans in Germany; unfunded lump sum indemnities in
France, Malaysia and Italy; and partially funded lump sum
indemnities in South Korea. Our other postretirement obligations
(Other Benefits, as shown in certain tables below) include
unfunded healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to
retired employees in Canada, the U.S. and Brazil.
Some of our employees participated in defined benefit plans that
were previously managed by Alcan in Canada and the U.K. In
Switzerland, we continue to participate in the Rio Tinto Alcan
defined benefit and defined contribution plans. The pension
asset transfers of $49 million and $94 million and the pension
liability transfers of $48 million and $95 million for fiscal
years 2009 and 2008, respectively, relate to pension transfers
from Alcan.
Employer
Contributions to Plans
For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to
provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to date,
and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over
periods of 15 years or less. We also participate in savings
plans in Canada and the U.S., as well as defined contribution
pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, Italy,
Switzerland, Malaysia and Brazil. We contributed the following
amounts to all plans, including the Rio Tinto Alcan plans that
cover our Swiss employees (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Funded pension plans
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Unfunded pension plans
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Savings and defined contribution pension plans
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal year 2011, we expect to contribute
$41 million to our funded pension plans, $12 million
to our unfunded pension plans and $18 million to our
savings and defined contribution plans.
Investment
Policy and Asset Allocation
The companys overall investment strategy is to achieve a
mix of approximately 50% of investments for long-term growth
(equities, real estate) and 50% for near-term benefit payments
(debt securities, other) with a wide diversification of asset
categories, investment styles, fund strategies and fund
managers. Since most of the defined benefit plans are closed to
new entrants, we expect this strategy to gradually shift more
investments toward near-term benefit payments.
Each of our funded pension plans is governed by an Investment
Fiduciary, who establishes an investment policy appropriate for
the pension plan. The Investment Fiduciary is responsible for
selecting the asset allocation for each plan, monitoring
investment managers, monitoring returns versus benchmarks and
F-43
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
monitoring compliance with the investment policy. The targeted
allocation ranges by asset class, and the actual allocation
percentages for each class are listed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate as of
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
Allocation Ranges
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
35 - 60
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
35 - 55
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
Real estate
|
|
|
0 - 25
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
0 - 15
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Benefit
Obligations, Fair Value of Plan Assets, Funded Status and
Amounts Recognized in Financial Statements
The following tables present the change in benefit obligation,
change in fair value of plan assets and the funded status for
pension and other benefits (in millions), including the Swiss
Pension Plan effective May 16, 2007. Other Benefits in the
tables below include unfunded healthcare and life insurance
benefits provided to retired employees in Canada, Brazil and the
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members contributions
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amendments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers/mergers
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailments/termination benefits
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Currency (gains) losses
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,154
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of funded plans
|
|
$
|
976
|
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
$
|
680
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of unfunded plans
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,154
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers/mergers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailments/termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Currency (gains) losses
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of funded plans
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of unfunded plans
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members contributions
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers/mergers
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency gains (losses)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status at end of period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets less the benefit obligation of funded plans
|
|
$
|
(171
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(189
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of unfunded plans
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(349
|
)
|
|
$
|
(167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As included on consolidated balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(349
|
)
|
|
$
|
(167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The postretirement amounts recognized in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), before tax effects, are presented
in the table below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total postretirement amounts recognized in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss (income)
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated amounts that will be amortized from Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost
in fiscal 2011 are $10 million for pension benefits and
$ million for other postretirement benefits,
primarily related to net actuarial loss.
Accumulated
Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation
and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with an
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets as of
March 31, 2010 and 2009 are presented in the table below
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
847
|
|
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
615
|
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
F-46
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future
Benefit Payments
Expected benefit payments to be made during the next ten fiscal
years are listed in the table below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
2012
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
2013
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
2014
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
2015
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
2016 through 2019
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components
of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the respective
periods are listed in the table below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actuarial losses
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior service cost
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment/settlement losses
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Proportionate share of non-consolidated affiliates
deferred pension costs, net of tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit costs recognized
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actuarial losses
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment/termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit costs recognized
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Actuarial
Assumptions and Sensitivity Analysis
The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations and net periodic benefit costs for the respective
periods are listed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
In selecting the appropriate discount rate for each plan, we
generally used a country-specific, high-quality corporate bond
index, adjusted to reflect the duration of the particular plan.
In the U.S. and Canada, the discount rate was calculated by
matching the plans projected cash flows with similar
duration high-quality corporate bonds to develop a present
value, which was then interpolated to develop a single
equivalent discount rate.
In estimating the expected return on assets of a pension plan,
consideration is given primarily to its target allocation, the
current yield on long-term bonds in the country where the plan
is established, and the historical risk premium of equity or
real estate over long-term bond yields in each relevant country.
The approach is consistent with the principle that assets with
higher risk provide a greater return over the long-term. The
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 6.8% in
fiscal 2011.
We provide unfunded healthcare and life insurance benefits to
our retired employees in Canada, the U.S. and Brazil, for
which we paid $7 million in each period for the years ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively; $6 million for
the period from May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008;
and $1 million for the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007. The assumed healthcare cost trend
used for measurement purposes is 7.5% for fiscal 2011,
decreasing gradually to 5% in 2015 and remaining at that level
thereafter.
F-48
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A change of one percentage point in the assumed healthcare cost
trend rates would have the following effects on our other
benefits (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% Increase
|
|
|
1% Decrease
|
|
|
Sensitivity Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on service and interest costs
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Effect on benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
In addition, we provide post-employment benefits, including
disability, early retirement and continuation of benefits
(medical, dental, and life insurance) to our former or inactive
employees, which are accounted for on the accrual basis in
accordance ASC No. 712, Compensation Retirement
Benefits. Other long-term liabilities on our consolidated
balance sheets includes $19 million and $20 million as
of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for these
benefits.
Fair
Value of Plan Assets
The following pension plan assets are measured and recognized at
fair value on a recurring basis (in millions). Please see
Note 15 Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
for description of the fair value hierarchy. The US pension plan
assets are invested exclusively in commingled funds and
classified in Level 2. The foreign pension plan assets are
invested in both direct investments (Levels 1 and
2) and commingled funds (Level 2).
US
Pension Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Cap Equity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
Small/Mid Cap Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
International Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Pension Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
CURRENCY
LOSSES (GAINS)
|
The following currency losses (gains) are included in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net (gain) loss on change in fair value of currency derivative
instruments(A)
|
|
$
|
(72
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
Net (gain) loss on remeasurement of monetary assets and
liabilities(B)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net currency (gain) loss
|
|
$
|
(87
|
)
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in Other (income) expenses, net. |
The following currency gains (losses) are included in AOCI, net
of tax (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment beginning
of period
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment end of
period
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS AND COMMODITY CONTRACTS
|
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments to manage the risks arising from
fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates, aluminum prices
and energy prices. Such instruments are used for risk management
purposes only. We may be exposed to losses in the future if the
counterparties to the contracts fail to perform. We are
satisfied that the risk of such non-performance is remote due to
our monitoring of credit exposures. Our ultimate gain or loss on
these derivatives may differ from the amount recognized in the
accompanying March 31, 2010 consolidated balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions, the
relative costs of the instruments and capacity to hedge. The
duration is always linked to the timing of the underlying
exposure, with the connection between the two being regularly
monitored.
The current and noncurrent portions of derivative assets and the
current portion of derivative liabilities are presented on the
face of our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The
noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included in
Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
F-50
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 are
as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
(640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net
Investment Hedges
We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to
fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and
investments in our European operations. We had cross-currency
swaps of Euro 135 million as of March 31, 2010
and 2009, designated as net investment hedges. The effective
portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is
included in Other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI). Prior to
the Arrangement, the effective portion on the derivative was
included in Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges,
net. After the completion of the Acquisition, the effective
portion on the derivative is included in Currency translation
adjustments. The ineffective portion of gain or loss on the
derivative is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of
derivative instruments, net.
The following table summarizes the amount of gain (loss) we
recognized in OCI related to our net investment hedge
derivatives (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
Cash Flow
Hedges
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we designated as
a cash flow hedge of our exposure to fluctuating electricity
prices. The effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative
is included in OCI and is reclassified when we recognize the
underlying exposure into (Gain) loss on change in fair value of
derivatives, net in our accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. As of March 31, 2010, the outstanding portion
of this swap includes 1.6 million megawatt hours through
2017.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable-rate
debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included
in OCI and reclassified when settled into Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs in our accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. We had $510 million
and $690 million of outstanding interest rate swaps
designated as cash flow hedges as of March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or
losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the
life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the
relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will no
longer be designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if
the underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be
probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness
determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the
criteria we established at the inception of the hedge. Gains or
losses recognized to date in AOCI would be immediately
reclassified into current period earnings, as would any
subsequent changes in the fair value of any such derivative.
During the next twelve months we expect to realize
$14 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.
F-52
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the impact on AOCI and earnings
of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and Amount
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and Amount
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and Amount
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in
helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging
instruments. The change in fair value of these derivative
instruments is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations.
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the London Metal Exchange (LME) price of
aluminum. These exposures arise from firm commitments to sell
aluminum in future periods at fixed prices, the forecasted
output of our smelter operations in South America and the
forecasted metal price lag associated with firm commitments to
sell aluminum in future periods at prices based on the LME. As
of March 31, 2010 and 2009, we had 55 kt and 180 kt,
respectively, of outstanding aluminum contracts not designated
as hedges. We classify cash settlement amounts associated with
these derivatives as part of investing activities in the
consolidated statements of cash flows.
For certain customers, we enter into contractual relationships
that entitle us to pass-through the economic effect of trading
positions that we take with other third parties on our
customers behalf. We recognize a derivative position with
both the customer and the third party for these types of
contracts and we classify cash
F-53
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
settlement amounts associated with these derivatives as part of
operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash
flows.
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross-currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain operations. As of
March 31, 2010 and 2009, we had outstanding currency
exchange contracts with a total notional amount of
$1.4 billion that were not designated as hedges.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
interest rates associated with variable-rate debt. As of
March 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $10 million of
outstanding interest rate swaps that were not designated as
hedges.
We use heating oil swaps and natural gas swaps to manage our
exposure to fluctuating energy prices in North America. As of
March 31, 2010 we had no outstanding heating oil swaps that
were not designated as hedges. As of March 31, 2009, we had
3.4 million gallons of heating oil swaps that were not
designated as hedges. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, we had
4.2 million MMBTUs and 3.8 million MMBTUs,
respectively, of natural gas swaps that were not designated as
hedges. One MMBTU is the equivalent of one decatherm, or one
million British Thermal Units.
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) associated
with the change in fair value of derivative instruments
recognized in earnings (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
(561
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
(556
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
FAIR
VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
|
We record certain assets and liabilities, primarily derivative
instruments, on our consolidated balance sheets at fair value.
We also disclose the fair values of certain financial
instruments, including debt and loans receivable, which are not
recorded at fair value. Our objective in measuring fair value is
to estimate an exit price in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. We consider factors
such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and nonperformance risk,
including our own nonperformance risk, in measuring fair value.
We use observable market inputs wherever possible. To the extent
that observable market inputs are
F-54
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
not available, our fair value measurements will reflect the
assumptions we used. We grade the level of the inputs and
assumptions used according to a three-tier hierarchy:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities
that we have the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which
there is little or no market data, which require us to develop
our own assumptions based on the best information available as
what market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability.
The following section describes the valuation methodologies we
used to measure our various financial instruments at fair value,
including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy
in which each instrument is generally classified:
Derivative
Contracts
For certain of our derivative contracts whose fair values are
based upon trades in liquid markets, such as aluminum forward
contracts and options, valuation model inputs can generally be
verified and valuation techniques do not involve significant
judgment. The fair values of such financial instruments are
generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
The majority of our derivative contracts are valued using
industry-standard models that use observable market inputs as
their basis, such as time value, forward interest rates,
volatility factors, and current (spot) and forward market prices
for foreign exchange rates. We generally classify these
instruments within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Such
derivatives include interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps,
foreign currency forward contracts and certain energy-related
forward contracts (e.g., natural gas).
We classify derivative contracts that are valued based on models
with significant unobservable market inputs as Level 3 of
the valuation hierarchy. These derivatives include certain of
our energy-related forward contracts (e.g., electricity) and
certain foreign currency forward contracts. Models for these
fair value measurements include inputs based on estimated future
prices for periods beyond the term of the quoted prices.
For Level 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy, where
appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors such as
liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit considerations
(nonperformance risk).
As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the company did not have any
Level 1 financial instruments.
The following tables present our derivative assets and
liabilities which are measured and recognized at fair value on a
recurring basis classified under the appropriate level of the
fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(545
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Level 2 Instruments
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
(644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Level 3 Instruments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
(160
|
)
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognized unrealized gains of $2 million related to
Level 3 financial instruments that were still held as of
March 31, 2010. These unrealized gains are included in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net.
The following table presents a reconciliation of fair value
activity for Level 3 derivative contracts on a net basis
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
Instruments(A)
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in earnings(B)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in Other comprehensive
income (loss)(C)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Net transfers from Level 3 to Level 2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in earnings(B)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in Other comprehensive
income (loss)(C)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Net transfers from Level 3 to Level 2
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents derivative assets net of derivative liabilities. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(C) |
|
Included in Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges,
net. |
F-56
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Financial
Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value
The table below presents the estimated fair value of certain
financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis (in millions). The table excludes short-term
financial assets and liabilities for which we believe carrying
value approximates fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables from related parties
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt third parties (excluding short term
borrowings)
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
Total debt related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
F-57
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
16.
|
OTHER
(INCOME) EXPENSES, NET
|
Other (income) expenses, net is comprised of the following (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Exchange (gains) losses, net
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claims(A)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on Brazilian tax settlement
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposals of property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We recognized a $26 million gain on the reversal of a
previously recorded legal accrual upon settlement during the
year ended March 31, 2009. |
We are subject to Canadian and United States federal, state, and
local income taxes as well as other foreign income taxes. The
domestic (Canada) and foreign components of our Income (loss)
before income taxes (and after removing our Equity in net
(income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates) are as follows (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Domestic (Canada)
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
Foreign (all other countries)
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income (loss) before equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
$
|
742
|
|
|
$
|
(1,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the Income tax provision (benefit) are as
follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Current provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic (Canada)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign (all other countries)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic (Canada)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Foreign (all other countries)
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
(246
|
)
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-58
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our
effective tax rates are shown below (in millions, except
percentages).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Pre-tax income (loss) before equity in net (income) loss on
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
$
|
742
|
|
|
$
|
(1,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Statutory tax rate
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) at the Canadian statutory rate
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
(619
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) for taxes on income (loss) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange translation items
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Tax credits and other allowances
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense (income) items not subject to tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Enacted tax rate changes
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax rate differences on foreign earnings
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
(246
|
)
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
922
|
%
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our effective tax rate differs from the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to the following factors: (1) non-deductible
impairment of goodwill; (2) pre-tax foreign currency gains
or losses with no tax effect and the tax effect of
U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no
pre-tax effect, which is shown above as exchange translation
items; (3) the remeasurement of deferred income taxes due
to foreign currency changes, which is shown above as exchange
remeasurement of deferred income taxes; (4) changes in
valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain
jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that
we will not be able to utilize those losses; (5) the
effects of enacted tax rate changes on cumulative taxable
temporary differences; (6) differences between the Canadian
statutory and foreign effective tax rates applied to entities in
different jurisdictions shown above as tax rate differences on
foreign earnings and (7) increases or decreases in
uncertain tax positions recorded under the provisions of
ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740).
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan we entered into a tax
sharing and disaffiliation agreement that provides
indemnification if certain factual representations are breached
or if certain transactions are undertaken or certain actions are
taken that have the effect of negatively affecting the tax
treatment of the spin-off. It further governs the disaffiliation
of the tax matters of Alcan and its subsidiaries or affiliates
other than us, on the one hand, and us and our subsidiaries or
affiliates, on the other hand. In this respect it allocates
taxes accrued prior to the spin-off and after the spin-off as
well as transfer taxes resulting therefrom. It also allocates
obligations for filing tax returns and the management of certain
pending or future tax contests and creates mutual collaboration
obligations with respect to tax matters.
We enjoy the benefits of favorable tax holidays in various
jurisdictions; however, the net impact of these tax holidays on
our income tax provision (benefit) is immaterial.
F-59
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes recognize the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the carrying
amounts used for income tax purposes, and the impact of
available net operating loss (NOL) and tax credit carryforwards.
These items are stated at the enacted tax rates that are
expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or
recovered.
Our deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax
liabilities are as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions not currently deductible for tax purposes
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
Tax losses/benefit carryforwards, net
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
Inventory valuation reserves
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,023
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,023
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
Less: Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASC 740 requires that we reduce our deferred income tax assets
by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of the
available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or a
portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. After
consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative,
management concluded that it is more likely than not that we
will not realize a portion of our deferred tax assets and that
valuation allowances of $223 million and $228 million
were necessary as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
as described below.
As of March 31, 2010, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $368 million (tax effected)
and tax credit carryforwards of $36 million, which will be
available to offset future taxable income and tax liabilities,
respectively. The carryforwards began expiring in 2010 with some
amounts being carried forward indefinitely. As of March 31,
2010, valuation allowances of $88 million and
$17 million had been recorded against net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, respectively, where
it appeared more likely than not that such benefits will not be
realized. The net operating loss carryforwards are predominantly
in the U.S., the U.K., Canada, France, Italy, Luxembourg and
Brazil.
As of March 31, 2009, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $354 million (tax effected)
and tax credit carryforwards of $36 million, which will be
available to offset future taxable income and tax liabilities,
respectively. The carryforwards begin expiring in 2009 with some
amounts being carried forward indefinitely. As of March 31,
2009, valuation allowances of $117 million and
$17 million had been
F-60
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recorded against net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit
carryforwards, respectively, where it appeared more likely than
not that such benefits will not be realized. The net operating
loss carryforwards are predominantly in the U.S., the U.K.,
Canada, France, Italy, and Luxembourg.
Our valuation allowance decreased $5 million (net) during
the year ended March 31, 2010. Although realization is not
assured, management believes it is more likely than not that all
the remaining net deferred tax assets will be realized. In the
near term, the amount of deferred tax assets considered
realizable could be reduced if we do not generate sufficient
taxable income in certain jurisdictions.
We have undistributed earnings in our foreign subsidiaries. For
those subsidiaries where the earnings are considered to be
permanently reinvested, no provision for Canadian income taxes
has been recorded. Upon repatriation of those earnings, in the
form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to both
Canadian income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign
taxes paid) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign
countries. For those subsidiaries where the earnings are not
considered permanently reinvested, taxes have been provided as
required. The determination of the unrecorded deferred income
tax liability for temporary differences related to investments
in foreign subsidiaries and foreign corporate joint ventures
that are considered to be permanently reinvested is not
considered practicable.
Tax
Uncertainties
As of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, the total
amount of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would
affect the effective income tax rate in future periods based on
anticipated settlement dates is $39 million and
$46 million, respectively. It is reasonably possible that
the expiration of the statutes of limitations or examinations by
taxing authorities will result in a decrease in the unrecognized
tax benefits of $1 million related to cross-border
intercompany pricing of services rendered in various
jurisdictions by March 31, 2011.
Separately, we are awaiting a court ruling regarding the
utilization of certain operating losses. We anticipate that it
is reasonably possible that this ruling will result in a
$14 million decrease in unrecognized tax benefits by
March 31, 2011 related to this matter. We have fully funded
this contingent liability through a judicial deposit, which is
included in Other long-term assets third parties
since January 2007.
Tax authorities are currently examining certain of our tax
returns for fiscal years 2004 through 2008. We are evaluating
potential adjustments and we do not anticipate that settlement
of the examinations will result in a material payout. With few
exceptions, tax returns for all jurisdictions for all tax years
before 2003 are no longer subject to examination by taxing
authorities.
During the year ended March 31, 2010, the statute of
limitations lapsed with respect to unrecognized tax benefits
related to potential withholding taxes and cross-border
intercompany pricing of services. As a result, we recognized a
reduction in unrecognized tax benefits of $28 million,
including a decrease in accrued interest of $5 million,
recorded as a reduction to the income tax provisions in the
consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income
(loss).
Our continuing practice and policy is to record potential
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
our Income tax provision (benefit). As of March 31, 2010
and March 31, 2009, we had $14 million and
$12 million accrued for potential interest on income taxes,
respectively. For the periods from May 16, 2007 through
March 31, 2008; and from April 1, 2007 through
May 15, 2007, our Income tax provision included a charge
for an additional $5 million and $0.4 million of
potential interest, respectively.
F-61
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current period
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions based on tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions based on tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statute Lapses
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes Payable
Our consolidated balance sheets include income taxes payable of
$70 million and $85 million as of March 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively. Of these amounts, $25 million and
$33 million are reflected in Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities as of March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
|
18.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we assumed a number
of liabilities, commitments and contingencies mainly related to
our historical rolled products operations, including liabilities
in respect of legal claims and environmental matters. As a
result, we may be required to indemnify Alcan for claims
successfully brought against Alcan or for the defense of legal
actions that arise from time to time in the normal course of our
rolled products business including commercial and contract
disputes, employee-related claims and tax disputes (including
several disputes with Brazils Ministry of Treasury
regarding various forms of manufacturing taxes and social
security contributions). In addition to these assumed
liabilities and contingencies, we may, in the future, be
involved in, or subject to, other disputes, claims and
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business,
including some that we assert against others, such as
environmental, health and safety, product liability, employee,
tax, personal injury and other matters. Where appropriate, we
have established reserves in respect of these matters (or, if
required, we have posted cash guarantees). While the ultimate
resolution of, and liability and costs related to, these matters
cannot be determined with certainty due to the considerable
uncertainties that exist, we do not believe that any of these
pending actions, individually or in the aggregate, will
materially impair our operations or materially affect our
financial condition or liquidity. The following describes
certain legal proceedings relating to our business, including
those for which we assumed liability as a result of our spin-off
from Alcan.
Legal
Proceedings
Coca-Cola
Lawsuit. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in Georgia
state court. CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
the most favored nations provision regarding certain
pricing matters under an aluminum can stock supply agreement
between the parties, and seeks monetary damages in an amount to
be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under the
agreement. The dispute will likely turn on the facts that are
presented to the court by the parties and the courts
finding as to how certain
F-62
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS
were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would
likely be material. However, we have concluded that a loss from
the CCBSS litigation is not probable and therefore have not
recorded an accrual. In addition, we do not believe there is a
reasonable possibility of a loss from the lawsuit based on
information available at this time. Novelis Corporation and
CCBSS have filed motions for summary judgment, and each party
has filed a response to the other partys motion. No trial
date has been set.
Environmental
Matters
We own and operate numerous manufacturing and other facilities
in various countries around the world. Our operations are
subject to environmental laws and regulations from various
jurisdictions, which govern, among other things, air emissions,
wastewater discharges, the handling, storage and disposal of
hazardous substances and wastes, the remediation of contaminated
sites, post-mining reclamation and restoration of natural
resources, and employee health and safety. Future environmental
regulations may be expected to impose stricter compliance
requirements on the industries in which we operate. Additional
equipment or process changes at some of our facilities may be
needed to meet future requirements. The cost of meeting these
requirements may be significant. Failure to comply with such
laws and regulations could subject us to administrative, civil
or criminal penalties, obligations to pay damages or other
costs, and injunctions and other orders, including orders to
cease operations. We expect that our total expenditures for
capital improvements regarding environmental control facilities
for the year ending March 31, 2011 will be approximately
$5 million.
We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also
known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions
regarding liability arising from the usage, storage, treatment
or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a number of
sites in the United States, as well as similar proceedings under
the laws and regulations of the other jurisdictions in which we
have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the
European Union. Many of these jurisdictions have laws that
impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, for the costs of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses. In addition, we are, from time to
time, subject to environmental reviews and investigations by
relevant governmental authorities.
With respect to environmental loss contingencies, we record a
loss contingency whenever such contingency is probable and
reasonably estimable. The evaluation model includes all asserted
and unasserted claims that can be reasonably identified. Under
this evaluation model, the liability and the related costs are
quantified based upon the best available evidence regarding
actual liability loss and cost estimates. Except for those loss
contingencies where no estimate can reasonably be made, the
evaluation model is fact-driven and attempts to estimate the
full costs of each claim. Management reviews the status of, and
estimated liability related to, pending claims and civil actions
on a quarterly basis. The estimated costs in respect of such
reported liabilities are not offset by amounts related to
cost-sharing between parties, insurance, indemnification
arrangements or contribution from other potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) unless otherwise noted.
As described further in the following paragraph, we have
established procedures for regularly evaluating environmental
loss contingencies, including those arising from such
environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we believe we have made reasonable estimates
of the costs that are likely to be borne by us for these
environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly, we have
established reserves based on our reasonable estimates for the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters. We estimate that the undiscounted remaining
clean-up
costs related to all of our known environmental matters as of
March 31, 2010 will be approximately $54 million. Of
this amount, $38 million is included in Other long-term
liabilities, with the remaining $16 million included in
Accrued expenses and other
F-63
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet as of
March 31, 2010. Management has reviewed the environmental
matters, including those for which we assumed liability as a
result of our spin-off from Rio Tinto Alcan. As a result of this
review, management has determined that the currently anticipated
costs associated with these environmental matters will not,
individually or in the aggregate, materially impact our
operations or materially adversely affect our financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Brazil
Tax Matters
Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America,
as of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, we had cash
deposits aggregating approximately $45 million and
$30 million, respectively, in judicial depository accounts
pending finalization of the related cases. The depository
accounts are in the name of the Brazilian government and will be
expended towards these legal proceedings or released to us,
depending on the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are
included in Other long-term assets third parties in
our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In
addition, we are involved in several disputes with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury about various forms of manufacturing taxes
and social security contributions, for which we have made no
judicial deposits but for which we have established reserves
ranging from $7 million to $123 million as of
March 31, 2010. In total, these reserves approximate
$149 million and $135 million, as of March 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively, and are included in Other long-term
liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
On May 28, 2009, the Brazilian government passed a law
allowing taxpayers to settle certain federal tax disputes with
the Brazilian tax authorities, including disputes relating to a
Brazilian national tax on manufactured products, through an
installment program. Under the program, if a company elects to
settle a tax dispute and pay the principal amount due over a
specified payment period (e.g., 60, 120 or 180 months), the
company will receive a discount on the interest and penalties
owed on the disputed tax amount. Novelis joined the installment
program in November of 2009 and notified the Brazilian
government of its election to settle certain federal tax
disputes pursuant to the program. On May 3, 2010, the
Brazilian government enacted legislation permitting us to select
a payment period under the installment program, and we will make
our formal selection in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011.
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including certain
of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and Aluminium Norf GmbH, which
is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint venture that does not meet
the requirements for consolidation.
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no
expiration and have termination notice requirements. Neither we
nor any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds
any assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the
potential settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements, all
liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term debt
facilities for these entities are already included in our
consolidated balance sheets.
F-64
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness as of March 31, 2010 (in
millions). We did not have obligations under guarantees of
indebtedness related to our majority-owned subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
Carrying
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Future Payment
|
|
Value
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
|
|
19.
|
SEGMENT,
GEOGRAPHICAL AREA, MAJOR CUSTOMER AND MAJOR SUPPLIER
INFORMATION
|
Segment
Information
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America; Europe; Asia and South America.
The following is a description of our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
North America. Headquartered in Cleveland,
Ohio, this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 11 plants, including two fully dedicated
recycling facilities, in two countries.
|
|
|
|
Europe. Headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 13 plants, including one recycling
facility, in six countries.
|
|
|
|
Asia. Headquartered in Seoul, South Korea,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates three plants in two countries.
|
|
|
|
South America. Headquartered in Sao Paulo,
Brazil, this segment comprises bauxite mining, alumina refining,
smelting operations, power generation, carbon products, aluminum
sheet and light gauge products and operates four plants in
Brazil.
|
Net sales and expenses are measured in accordance with the
policies and procedures described in Note 1
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
For Segment income purposes we only include the impact of the
derivative gains or losses to the extent they are settled in
cash (i.e., realized) during that period.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments based on Segment income. Segment income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment income as earnings before (a) depreciation and
amortization; (b) interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs; (c) interest income; (d) unrealized
gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net; (e) impairment of goodwill;
(f) impairment charges on long-lived assets (other than
goodwill); (g) gain on extinguishment of debt;
(h) noncontrolling interests share;
(i) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Segment income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting (described below);
(k) restructuring charges, net; (k) gains or losses on
disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses, net;
(l) other costs, net; (m) litigation settlement, net
of insurance recoveries; (n) sale transaction fees;
(o) provision or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and
(p) cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax.
F-65
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Adjustment to eliminate proportional
consolidation. The financial information for our
segments includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile the financial information for the segments shown in
the tables below to the GAAP-based measure, we must remove our
proportional share of each line item that we included in the
segment amounts. See Note 8 Investment in and
Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
Transactions for further information about these
non-consolidated affiliates.
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions).
Selected
Segment Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,292
|
|
|
$
|
2,975
|
|
|
$
|
1,501
|
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
384
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
262
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
101
|
|
Total assets as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,726
|
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
(192
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
439
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
Total assets as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
$
|
1,296
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(234
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,664
|
|
|
$
|
3,831
|
|
|
$
|
1,612
|
|
|
$
|
908
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
375
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
Total assets as of March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,957
|
|
|
$
|
4,355
|
|
|
$
|
1,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,485
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
(199
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
F-66
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
The following table shows the reconciliation from income from
reportable segments to Net income (loss) attributable to our
common shareholder (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
Europe
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
South America
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Corporate and other(A)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net(B)
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Corporate and other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. It also includes realized gains
(losses) on corporate derivative instruments. |
|
(B) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net represents the portion of gains (losses) that
were not settled in cash during the period. Total realized and
unrealized gains (losses) |
F-67
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
are shown in the table below and are included in the aggregate
each period in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net on our consolidated statements of operations. |
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Realized gains (losses) included in Segment income
|
|
$
|
(385
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative instruments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
(556
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographical
Area Information
We had 31 operating facilities in 11 countries as of
March 31, 2010. The tables below present Net sales and
Long-lived assets by geographical area (in millions). Net sales
are attributed to geographical areas based on the origin of the
sale. Long-lived assets are attributed to geographical areas
based on asset location and exclude investments in and advances
to our non-consolidated affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,134
|
|
|
$
|
3,685
|
|
|
$
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
Asia and Other Pacific
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net sales
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-68
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,736
|
|
|
$
|
1,902
|
|
Asia and Other Pacific
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
3,992
|
|
|
$
|
4,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information
about Major Customers and Primary Supplier
The table below shows our net sales to Rexam Plc (Rexam) and
Anheuser-Busch InBev (Anheuser-Busch), our two largest
customers, as a percentage of total Net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Rexam
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Anheuser-Busch
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Rio Tinto Alcan is our primary supplier of metal inputs,
including prime and sheet ingot. The table below shows our
purchases from Alcan as a percentage of our total combined metal
purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Purchases from Alcan as a percentage of total combined metal
purchases in kt(A)(B)
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchased approximately 50% of prime and sheet ingot and
molten metal from Alcan for the year end March 31, 2010. |
|
|
20.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
|
AOCI consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
Fair value of effective portion of hedges
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Pension and other benefits
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AOCI
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-69
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows non-cash investing and financing
activities related to the Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities related to the Agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
(1,344
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(1,625
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
Debt
|
|
|
66
|
|
The table below presents select operating results (in millions)
and dividends per common share information by period.
F-70
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
|
$
|
2,420
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
1,734
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
2,147
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-71
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,103
|
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,939
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
2,837
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(1,823
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
GUARANTOR INFORMATION
|
In connection with the issuance of our 7.25% Senior Notes
and our 11.5% Senior Notes, certain of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries, which are 100% owned within the meaning of
Rule 3-10(h)(1)
of
Regulation S-X,
provided guarantees. These guarantees are full and unconditional
as well as joint and several. The guarantor subsidiaries (the
Guarantors) are comprised of the majority of our businesses in
Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Brazil, Portugal, Luxembourg and
Switzerland, as well as certain businesses in Germany. Certain
Guarantors may be subject to restrictions on their ability to
distribute earnings to Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The remaining
subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not
guarantors of the Senior Notes.
The following information presents condensed consolidating
statements of operations, balance sheets and statements of cash
flows of the Parent, the Guarantors, and the Non-Guarantors.
Investments include investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net assets
of divisions included in the Parent, and have been presented
using the equity method of accounting.
F-72
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
$
|
6,906
|
|
|
$
|
2,468
|
|
|
$
|
(1,550
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
5,850
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
(1,550
|
)
|
|
|
7,213
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
175
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
6,387
|
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
|
|
(1,154
|
)
|
|
|
7,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
727
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
465
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
(396
|
)
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-73
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,186
|
|
|
$
|
8,421
|
|
|
$
|
2,647
|
|
|
$
|
(2,077
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
7,704
|
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
|
|
(2,077
|
)
|
|
|
9,276
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,890
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
10,431
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
(3,967
|
)
|
|
|
12,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
|
|
(2,010
|
)
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
(1,773
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,773
|
)
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,890
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-74
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,300
|
|
|
$
|
8,266
|
|
|
$
|
2,701
|
|
|
$
|
(2,302
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
7,525
|
|
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
|
(2,302
|
)
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
214
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
8,113
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
(2,219
|
)
|
|
|
9,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-75
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
(227
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-76
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(1,045
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
197
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
(1,057
|
)
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,998
|
)
|
|
|
709
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(1,139
|
)
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,914
|
|
|
$
|
6,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
(4,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
110
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
436
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
(1,057
|
)
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
(2,198
|
)
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
1,818
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
(2,167
|
)
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of our common shareholder
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
1,689
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
(1,998
|
)
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
1,689
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(1,998
|
)
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,914
|
|
|
$
|
6,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
(4,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-77
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(601
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
719
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
5,036
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(1,858
|
)
|
|
|
(1,963
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of our common shareholder
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-78
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-79
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
(123
|
)
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
(223
|
)
|
|
$
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-80
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,009
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-81
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(181
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-82
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
6,628
|
|
|
|
5,066
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Equity in net (gain) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-83
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $6 and $4 as of
December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,026
|
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Long-term deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,748
|
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
4,060
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
Long-term deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,326
|
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; unlimited number of shares
authorized; 1,000 shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,830
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,492
|
)
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Novelis shareholders equity
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
7,748
|
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-84
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
Equity in net loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Foreign exchange remeasurement of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets, third parties
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets, related parties
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Proceeds from related party loans receivable, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Net proceeds (outflow) from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, third parties
|
|
|
3,985
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Principal payments, third parties
|
|
|
(2,486
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Principal payments, related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Return of capital to our common shareholder
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends, noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-85
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc. Shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(AOCI)
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,530
|
|
|
$
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
2,010
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax provision of
$ million included in Accumulated other
comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of cash flow hedges,
net of tax provision of $11 included in Accumulated other
comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax provision of $6
included in Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Return of capital to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,830
|
|
|
$
|
(1,492
|
)
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-86
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Net change in fair value of effective portion of cash flow hedges
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income before income tax effect
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Income tax provision related to items of other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-87
|
|
1.
|
BUSINESS
AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc. and became Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. References
herein to Rio Tinto Alcan refer to Rio Tinto Alcan
Inc.
Description
of Business and Basis of Presentation
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products where the end-use destination of
the products includes the beverage and food can, transportation,
construction and industrial, and foil products markets. As of
December 31, 2010, we had operations on four continents:
North America, Europe, Asia and South America, through 30
operating plants, one research facility and several
market-focused innovation centers in 11 countries. In addition
to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, primary aluminum smelting and
power generation facilities.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2010 filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on May 27,
2010. Management believes that all adjustments necessary for the
fair statement of results, consisting of normally recurring
items, have been included in the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for the interim periods
presented.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (US GAAP) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. The principal areas
of judgment relate to (1) the fair value of derivative
financial instruments; (2) impairment of goodwill;
(3) impairments of long-lived assets, intangible assets and
equity investments; (4) actuarial assumptions related to
pension and other postretirement benefit plans; (5) income
tax reserves and valuation allowances and (6) assessment of
loss contingencies, including environmental, litigation and
other tax reserves.
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
Amalgamation
of AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc.
Effective September 29, 2010, in connection with an
internal restructuring transaction, pursuant to articles of
amalgamation under the Canadian Business Corporations Act, we
were amalgamated (the Amalgamation) with our direct
parent AV Aluminum Inc., a Canadian corporation (AV Aluminum),
to form an amalgamated corporation named Novelis Inc., also a
Canadian corporation.
As a result of the Amalgamation, we and AV Aluminum continue our
corporate existence, the amalgamated Novelis Inc. remains liable
for all of our and AV Aluminums obligations and we
continue to own all of
F-88
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
our respective property. Since AV Aluminum was a holding company
whose sole asset was the shares of the
pre-amalgamated
Novelis, our business, management, board of directors and
corporate governance procedures following the Amalgamation are
identical to those of Novelis immediately prior to the
Amalgamation. Novelis Inc., like AV Aluminum, remains an
indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Hindalco. We have
retrospectively recast all periods presented to reflect the
amalgamated companies.
As of March 31, 2010, the Amalgamation increased the
Companys previously reported Additional paid-in capital by
$33 million, and reduced Accumulated deficit by
$33 million. The Amalgamation had no impact on our
condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine
months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 or our condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Consolidation
Policy
Our consolidated financial statements include the assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of all wholly-owned
subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise
control and entities in which we have a controlling financial
interest or are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. We
eliminate all significant intercompany accounts and transactions
from our consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
and Adjustment
Certain reclassifications of prior period amounts and
presentation have been made to conform to the presentation
adopted for the current period.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2009, we
reclassified $17 million, respectively, from Selling,
general and administrative expenses to Costs of goods sold
(exclusive of depreciation and amortization) to conform to the
current year presentation.
In the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31,
2010, we reclassified $3 million of capitalized software
from Property, plant and equipment, net to Intangible assets.
The reclassification had no impact on total assets, total
liabilities, total equity, net income (loss) or cash flows as
previously reported.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
Effective April 1, 2010, we adopted authoritative guidance
in the Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
No. 2009-17,
Consolidations: Improvements to Financial Reporting by
Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. ASU
No. 2009-17
was intended (1) to address the effects on certain
provisions of the accounting standard dealing with consolidation
of variable interest entities, as a result of the elimination of
the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in ASU
No. 2009-16,
Transfers and Servicing: Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets, and (2) to clarify questions about
the application of certain key provisions related to
consolidation of variable interest entities. This standard had
no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flow, but did require certain additional
footnote disclosures. These disclosures are included in
Note 4 Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
We have determined that recently issued accounting standards
will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flow.
F-89
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
RESTRUCTURING
PROGRAMS
|
Restructuring charges, net of $35 million on the condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, includes $7 million of items that
were not reflected in the movement of the restructuring accrual,
as they affected other accounts. The following table summarizes
our restructuring accrual activity by region (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
Provisions, net
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
During the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we
announced that our foil rolling activities and part of our
packaging business at our Bridgnorth, England facility will
cease operation by April 2011. The closure and subsequent
consolidation of the business into other plants in our European
system aims to improve the competitiveness of the companys
overall foil and packaging production system in response to
over-capacity in the European foil market and increasing
competition from manufacturers in low-cost countries. We
recorded $17 million of restructuring expense during the
current period for employee termination, asset impairment and
certain contract termination costs for this site, of which
$5 million were non-cash items not reflected in the
restructuring accrual table above.
We recorded a $10 million gain on asset sales to Hindalco
related to the previously announced closure of our Rogerstone
facility. Also, we recorded an additional $5 million of
restructuring expense for severance and environmental costs
related to restructuring actions initiated in prior years at
other European plants. For the nine months ended
December 31, 2010, we made $4 million in severance
payments and $3 million in payments for environmental
remediation.
North
America
We recorded $11 million of restructuring expense for the
nine months ended December 31, 2010, related to the
relocation of our North American headquarters from Cleveland to
Atlanta, and made $14 million in payments related to this
move.
South
America
We recorded $8 million of restructuring expense for the
current period for employee termination, contract termination
and certain environmental remediation costs related to the
closure of our primary aluminum smelter at Aratu, Brazil. The
closure was in response to high operating costs and lack of
competitive priced energy supply. The closure affected
approximately 300 workers and was completed by December 31,
2010.
Corporate
We recorded $5 million of restructuring expense for the
nine months ended December 31, 2010, related to lease
termination costs incurred in the relocation of our Corporate
headquarters to a new facility in Atlanta and $1 million in
other contract termination fees. The $5 million of lease
termination costs includes a $1 million deferred credit on
the former facility.
F-90
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Inventories consisted of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
1,301
|
|
|
$
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
CONSOLIDATION
OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (VIE)
|
The entity that has a controlling financial interest in a VIE is
referred to as the primary beneficiary and consolidates the VIE.
Prior to March 31, 2010, the primary beneficiary was the
entity that would absorb a majority of the economic risks and
rewards of the VIE based on an analysis of projected
probability-weighted cash flows. In accordance with the new
accounting guidance on consolidation of VIEs effective
April 1, 2010 (see Note 1), an entity is deemed to
have a controlling financial interest and is the primary
beneficiary of a VIE if it has both the power to direct the
activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the
VIEs economic performance and an obligation to absorb
losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially
be significant to the VIE.
We have a joint interest in Logan Aluminum Inc. (Logan) with
ARCO Aluminum, Inc. (ARCO). Logan processes metal received from
Novelis and ARCO and charges the respective partner a fee to
cover expenses. Logan is thinly capitalized and relies on the
regular reimbursement of costs and expenses by Novelis and ARCO
to fund its operations. This reimbursement is considered a
variable interest as it constitutes a form of financing of the
activities of Logan. Other than these contractually required
reimbursements, we do not provide other material support to
Logan. Logans creditors do not have recourse to our
general credit.
Novelis has a majority voting right on Logans board of
directors and has the ability to direct the majority of
Logans production operations. We also have the ability to
take the majority share of production and associated costs.
These facts qualify Novelis as Logans primary beneficiary
and this entity is consolidated for all periods presented. All
significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated.
F-91
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table summarizes the carrying value and
classification of assets and liabilities owned by the Logan
joint venture and consolidated on our condensed consolidated
balance sheets (in millions). There are significant other assets
used in the operations of Logan that are not part of the joint
venture, as they are directly owned and consolidated by Novelis
or ARCO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENT
IN AND ADVANCES TO NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES AND RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
The following table summarizes our share of the condensed
results of operations of our equity method affiliates. These
results include the incremental depreciation and amortization
expense that we record in our equity method accounting as a
result of fair value adjustments made to our investments in
non-consolidated affiliates due to the Arrangement.
Included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements are transactions and balances arising from business
we conduct with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we
classify as related party transactions and balances. The
following table also describes the nature and amounts of
significant transactions that we had with our non-consolidated
affiliates (in millions). The results for the nine months ended
F-92
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
December 31, 2009 also include a $10 million after tax
benefit from the refinement of our methodology of recording
depreciation and amortization on the step up in our basis in the
underlying assets of an investee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
Costs, expenses and provisions for taxes on income
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH (Norf)
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We earned less than $1 million of interest income on a loan
due from Norf during each of the periods presented in the table
above.
The following table describes the period-end account balances
that we had with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as
related party balances in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets (in millions). We had no other
material related party balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Other long-term receivables
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
On December 17, 2010, we paid a dividend of
$1.7 billion to our shareholder as a return of capital.
F-93
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Debt consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Rates(A)
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Third party debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term borrowings
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due December 2016
|
|
|
5.25
|
%
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
|
%(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
8.375% Senior Notes, due December 2017
|
|
|
8.375
|
%
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.75% Senior Notes, due December 2020
|
|
|
8.75
|
%
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
|
%(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
7.25
|
%(C)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
|
%(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
813
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due December 2019 (Swiss francs (CHF)
46 million)
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 1 million)
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due December 2011 through November 2015
|
|
|
4.16
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,247
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
4,202
|
|
|
|
2,682
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
2,671
|
|
Less: Short term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion third
parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,105
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,060
|
|
|
$
|
2,491
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Interest rates are as of December 31, 2010 and exclude the
effects of related interest rate swaps and
accretion/amortization of fair value adjustments as a result of
the Arrangement, the debt exchange completed in fiscal 2009 and
the Refinancing completed in December 2010. |
|
(B) |
|
Debt existing at the time of the Arrangement was recorded at
fair value. Additional floating rate Term Loan with a face value
of $220 million issued in March 2009 was recorded at a fair
value of $165 million. 11.5% Senior Notes with a face
value of $185 million issued in August 2009 were recorded
at a fair value of $181 million. In connection with the
refinancing transaction of our prior secured term loan with the
new 2010 Term Loan Facility, a portion of these historical fair
value adjustments were allocated to the 2010 Term Loan Facility. |
F-94
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
(C) |
|
On December 17, 2010, we completed a series of refinancing
transactions which resulted in the repayment of the total
principal amount of the floating rate Term Loan Facility due
July 2014, the total outstanding principal amount of the
11.5% Senior Notes due February 2015 and
$1,050 million of aggregate principal amount of
7.25% Senior Notes due 2015. See Refinancing
below for additional discussion. |
Principal repayment requirements for our total debt over the
next five years and thereafter (excluding unamortized fair value
adjustments and using rates of exchange as of December 31,
2010 for our debt denominated in foreign currencies) are as
follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
20
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
20
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
20
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
95
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinancing
During the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we
commenced a cash tender offer and consent solicitations for our
7.25% Senior Notes due 2015 (the
7.25% Notes) and our 11.50% Senior Notes
due 2015 (the 11.50% Notes,). The entire
$185 million aggregate outstanding principal amount of the
11.50% Notes was tendered and redeemed. Of the
$1,124 million aggregate principal amount of the
7.25% Notes, $74 million was not redeemed and is
expected to remain outstanding through maturity in February
2015. The 7.25% Notes that remain outstanding no longer
contain substantially all of the restrictive covenants and
certain events of default originally included in the indenture
for the 7.25% Notes.
On December 17, 2010 we completed a series of refinancing
transactions. The refinancing transactions consisted of the sale
of $1.1 billion in aggregate principal amount of
8.375% Senior Notes Due 2017 (the 2017 Notes)
and $1.4 billion in aggregate principal amount of
8.75% Senior Notes Due 2020 (the 2020 Notes and
together with the 2017 Notes, the Notes) and a new
$1.5 billion secured term loan credit facility (the
2010 Term Loan Facility).
The proceeds from the refinancing transactions were used to
repay our prior secured term loan credit facility, to fund our
tender offers and related consent solicitations for our
7.25% Senior Notes and our 11.50% Senior Notes and to
pay premiums, fees and expenses associated with the refinancing.
In addition, a portion of the proceeds were used to fund a
distribution of $1.7 billion as a return of capital to our
shareholder.
In addition, we replaced our existing $800 million asset
based loan (ABL) facility with a new
$800 million ABL facility (the 2010 ABL
Facility). We refer to the 2010 Term Loan Facility and the
2010 ABL Facility collectively as our new senior secured
credit facilities.
We paid tender premiums, fees and other costs of
$174 million associated with the refinancing transactions,
including fees paid to lenders, arrangers, and outside
professionals such as attorneys and rating agencies. In
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting
Standards Codification Number 470 Debt, we performed an
analysis to determine whether the old debt had been extinguished
or modified. This analysis determines the treatment of fees paid
in connection with the transaction and any existing unamortized
fees, discounts and fair value adjustments associated with the
old debt. As a result of that analysis, we recorded a Loss on
early extinguishment of debt of $74 million. The remaining
new fees and
F-95
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
existing unamortized fees, discounts and fair value adjustments
associated with the old debt of $125 million were
capitalized and will be amortized as an increase to interest
expense over the term of the related debt.
2017
Notes and 2020 Notes
Interest on the Notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of
each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. The Notes will
mature on December 15, 2017 and 2020, respectively. Upon a
change of control, we must offer to purchase the Notes at 101%
of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the
purchase date.
The Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and rank equally
with all of our existing and future unsecured senior
indebtedness. The Notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally,
on a senior unsecured basis, by all of our existing and future
Canadian and U.S. restricted subsidiaries, certain of our
existing foreign restricted subsidiaries and our other
restricted subsidiaries that guarantee debt in the future under
any credit facilities, provided that the borrower of such debt
is a Canadian or a U.S. subsidiary (the
Guarantors). The Notes and the guarantees
effectively rank junior to our secured debt and the secured debt
of the guarantors (including debt under our new senior secured
credit facilities), to the extent of the value of the assets
securing that debt.
Prior to December 15, 2013 in the case of the 2017 Notes
and prior to December 15, 2015 in the case of the 2020
Notes, the Company, at its option and from time to time, may
redeem all or a portion of the Notes by paying a
make-whole premium calculated under the Indenture.
At any time on or after December 15, 2013 in the case of
the 2017 Notes and on or after December 15, 2015 in the
case of the 2020 Notes, the Company, at its option and from time
to time, may redeem all or a portion of the applicable Notes.
The redemption prices for the Notes are calculated based on a
percentage of the principal amount of the Notes being redeemed,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption
date, and are dependent on the date on which the Notes are
redeemed. These percentages range from between 100.000% and
106.281% in the case of the 2017 Notes and from between 100.000%
and 104.375% in the case of the 2020 Notes. At any time prior to
December 15, 2013, the Company may also redeem up to 35% of
the original aggregate principal amount of each series of the
Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings, at a
redemption price equal to 108.375% of the principal amount of
the Notes being redeemed (in the case of the 2017 Notes) and
108.75% of the principal amount of the Notes being redeemed (in
the case of the 2020 Notes), plus, in each case, accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, provided that
at least 65% of the original aggregate principal amount of the
applicable series of Notes issued remains outstanding after the
redemption.
The Notes contain customary covenants and events of default that
will limit our ability and, in certain instances, the ability of
certain of our subsidiaries to (1) incur additional debt
and provide additional guarantees, (2) pay dividends beyond
certain amounts and make other restricted payments,
(3) create or permit certain liens, (4) make certain
asset sales, (5) use the proceeds from the sales of assets
and subsidiary stock, (6) create or permit restrictions on
the ability of certain of the Companys subsidiaries to pay
dividends or make other distributions to the Company,
(7) engage in certain transactions with affiliates,
(8) enter into sale and leaseback transactions,
(9) designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries and
(10) consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially
all of the our assets and the assets of certain of our
subsidiaries. During any future period in which either
Standard & Poors Ratings Group, Inc., a division
of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. or Moodys Investors
Service, Inc. have assigned an investment grade credit rating to
the Notes and no default or event of default under the Indenture
has occurred and is continuing, most of the covenants will be
suspended.
F-96
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Registration
Rights Agreements
The Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the Securities Act), but include
registration rights. The Notes were sold to qualified
institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A and, outside the
United States, pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities
Act.
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, Novelis Inc. and
the Guarantors entered into registration rights agreements,
dated as of December 17, 2010, with the initial purchasers
of the Notes (the Registration Rights Agreements),
obligating us to:
|
|
|
|
|
use reasonable effort to file a registration statement with
respect to an exchange offer within 180 days after the
issue date of the Notes and cause the registration statement to
be declared effective under the Securities Act within
365 days after the issue date of the Notes;
|
|
|
|
commence the exchange offer as soon as practicable after the
effectiveness of the registration statement; and
|
|
|
|
keep the exchange offer open for not less than 30 days
after the date notice of the exchange offer is mailed to the
holders of the Notes.
|
If we fail to satisfy its obligations under the Registration
Rights Agreements we may be required to pay additional interest
on the Notes.
New
Senior Secured Credit Facilities
Our new senior secured credit facilities consist of (1) the
$1.5 billion six-year 2010 Term Loan Facility that may be
increased in minimum amounts of $50 million per increase
provided that the senior secured net leverage ratio shall not,
on a proforma basis, exceed 2.5 to 1 and (2) the
$800 million five-year New ABL Facility that may be
increased by an additional $200 million. Scheduled
principal amortization payments under the 2010 Term Loan
Facility are $3.75 million per calendar quarter. Any unpaid
principal will be due in full in December 2016. Borrowings under
the 2010 ABL Facility are subject to certain limitations,
generally based on 85% of the book value of eligible North
American and certain eligible European accounts receivable; plus
up to the lesser of (i) 75% of the net book value of all
eligible North American and U.K. inventory or (ii) 85% of
the appraised net orderly liquidation value of all eligible
North American and U.K. inventory; minus such reserves as the
agent bank may establish in good faith in accordance with such
agent banks permitted discretion. Substantially all of our
assets are pledged as collateral under the new senior secured
credit facilities. The new senior secured credit facilities are
guaranteed by substantially all of our restricted subsidiaries
that guarantee the Notes. Generally, for both the 2010 Term Loan
Facility and 2010 ABL Facility, interest rates reset
periodically and interest is payable on a periodic basis
depending on the type of loan. We may prepay borrowings under
the new senior secured credit facilities, if certain minimum
prepayment amounts and breakage costs are satisfied.
The new senior secured credit facilities include various
customary covenants and events of default, including limitations
on our ability to 1) make certain restricted payments,
2) incur additional indebtedness, 3) sell certain
assets, 4) enter into sale and leaseback transactions,
5) make investments, loans and advances, 6) pay
dividends and distributions beyond certain amounts,
7) engage in mergers, amalgamations or consolidations,
8) engage in certain transactions with affiliates, and
9) prepay certain indebtedness. In addition, under the New
ABL Facility, if (a) our excess availability under the New
ABL Facility is less than the greater of (i) 12.5% of the
lesser of (x) the total New ABL Facility commitment at any
time and (y) the then applicable borrowing base and
(ii) $90 million, at any time or (b) any event of
default has occurred and is continuing, we are required to
maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.1
to 1 until (1) such excess availability has subsequently
been at least the greater of (i) 12.5% of the lesser of
(x) the total New ABL Facility commitments at such time and
(y) the then applicable borrowing base for 30 consecutive
F-97
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
days and (ii) $90 million and (2) no default is
outstanding during such 30 day period. As of
December 31, 2010 our excess availability under the New ABL
Facility was $573 million, or 72% of the lender commitments.
Further, under the New Term Loan Facility we may not permit our
total net leverage ratio as of the last day of our four
consecutive quarters ending with any fiscal quarter to be
greater than the ratio set forth below opposite the period in
the table below during which the last day of such period occurs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net
|
|
Period
|
|
Leverage Ratio
|
|
|
March 30, 2011 through March 31, 2012
|
|
|
4.75 to 1.0
|
|
April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013
|
|
|
4.50 to 1.0
|
|
April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014
|
|
|
4.375 to 1.0
|
|
April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015
|
|
|
4.25 to 1.0
|
|
April 1, 2015 and thereafter
|
|
|
4.0 to 1.0
|
|
The new senior secured credit facilities also contains various
affirmative covenants, including covenants with respect to our
financial statements, litigation and other reporting
requirements, insurance, payment of taxes, employee benefits and
(subject to certain limitations) causing new subsidiaries to
pledge collateral and guaranty our obligations. As of
December 31, 2010, we were compliant with these covenants.
Short-Term
Borrowings and Lines of Credit
As of December 31, 2010, our short-term borrowings were
$121 million consisting of bank overdrafts and borrowings
under the 2010 ABL Facility. As of December 31, 2010,
$28 million of the ABL Facility was utilized for letters of
credit, and we had $573 million in remaining availability
under this revolving credit facility. The weighted average
interest rate on our total short-term borrowings was 2.74% and
1.71% as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010,
respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, we had $121 million of
outstanding letters of credit in Korea which are not related to
the ABL Facility.
Interest
Rate Swaps
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate which impacts our
variable-rate debt. Prior to the completion of the
December 17, 2010 refinancing transactions, these swaps
were designated as cash flow hedges. Upon completion of the
refinancing transaction, our exposure to changes in the
benchmark LIBOR interest rate was limited. The 2010 Term Loan
Facility contains a floor feature of the higher of LIBOR or
150 basis points applied to a spread of 3.75%. As of
December 31, 2010, this floor feature was in effect,
changing our variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. As a result,
we ceased hedge accounting for these swaps. As of March 31,
2010, we had $520 million of interest rate swaps, of which
$510 million were designated as cash flow hedges. No
interest rate swaps were designated as of December 31, 2010.
We had a cross-currency interest rate swap in Korea to convert
our $100 million variable rate bank loan to KRW
92 billion at a fixed rate of 5.44%. On October 25,
2010, at maturity, we repaid this $100 million loan. The
swap expired concurrent with the maturity of the loan.
F-98
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
The board of directors has authorized three long term incentive
plans as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2009 FY 2012
(2009 LTIP) was authorized in June 2008. Under the 2009 LTIP,
phantom stock appreciation rights (SARs) were granted to certain
of our executive officers and key employees.
|
|
|
|
The Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2010 FY 2013
(2010 LTIP) was authorized in June 2009. Under the 2010 LTIP,
SARs were granted to certain of our executive officers and key
employees.
|
|
|
|
The Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2011- FY 2014 (2011
LTIP) was authorized in May 2010. The 2011 LTIP provides for
SARs and phantom restricted stock units (RSUs).
|
Under all three plans, SARs vest at the rate of 25% per year,
subject to performance criteria and expire seven years from
their grant date. Each SAR is to be settled in cash based on the
difference between the market value of one Hindalco share on the
date of grant and the market value on the date of exercise,
subject to a maximum payout as defined by the plan. The RSUs
under the 2011 LTIP vest in full three years from the grant date
and are not subject to performance criteria. The payout on the
RSUs is limited to three times the grant price.
Total compensation expense related to the long term incentive
plans for the respective periods is presented in the table below
(in millions). These amounts are included in Selling, general
and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated
statements of operations. As the performance criteria for fiscal
years 2012, 2013 and 2014 have not yet been established,
measurement periods for SARs relating to those periods have not
yet commenced. As a result, only compensation expense for vested
and current year SARs has been recorded for the nine months
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
2011 LTIP
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation expense
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tables below show the RSUs activity under our 2011 LTIP and
the SARs activity under our 2011 LTIP, 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value (USD
|
|
2011 LTIP
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
|
RSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
905,704
|
|
|
|
147.78
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(7,140
|
)
|
|
|
147.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
898,564
|
|
|
|
147.78
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-99
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD
|
|
2011 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
7,114,877
|
|
|
|
147.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(56,088
|
)
|
|
|
147.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
7,058,789
|
|
|
|
147.78
|
|
|
|
6.40
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
13,680,431
|
|
|
|
87.68
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
32,278
|
|
|
|
125.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,965,238
|
)
|
|
|
86.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(635,894
|
)
|
|
|
85.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
11,111,577
|
|
|
|
88.45
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
11,371,399
|
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,637,230
|
)
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(718,626
|
)
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
9,015,543
|
|
|
|
60.50
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each SAR is based on the difference between
the fair value of a long call and a short call option. The fair
value of each of these call options was determined using the
Monte Carlo Simulation model. We used historical stock price
volatility data of Hindalco on the National Stock Exchange of
India to determine expected volatility assumptions. The fair
value of each SAR under the 2011 LTIP, 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP
was estimated as of December 31, 2010 using the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 LTIP
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
7.54 7.83%
|
|
7.55 7.84%
|
|
7.17 7.44%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.55%
|
|
0.55%
|
|
0.55%
|
Volatility
|
|
48.39%
|
|
51.25%
|
|
52.91%
|
Time interval (in years)
|
|
0.004
|
|
0.004
|
|
0.004
|
The fair value of the SARs is being recognized over the
requisite performance and service period of each tranche,
subject to the achievement of any performance criterion. As of
December 31, 2010, 3,570,835 SARs were exercisable.
F-100
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Unrecognized compensation expense related to the non-vested SARs
(assuming all future performance criteria are met) is
$31 million which is expected to be realized over a
weighted average period of 2.34 years. Unrecognized
compensation expense related to the RSUs is
$4 million and will be recognized over the vesting period
of three years.
|
|
8.
|
POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFIT PLANS
|
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans in the U.S., Canada, Switzerland and the U.K.; unfunded
pension plans in Germany; unfunded lump sum indemnities in
France, Malaysia and Italy; and partially funded lump sum
indemnities in South Korea. Our other postretirement obligations
(Other Benefits, as shown in certain tables below) include
unfunded healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to
retired employees in Canada, the U.S. and Brazil.
Components of net periodic benefit cost for all of our
significant postretirement benefit plans are shown in the tables
below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Amortization losses
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 6.8% in
fiscal 2011.
Employer
Contributions to Plans
For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to
provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to-date,
and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over
periods of 15 years or less. We also participate in savings
plans in Canada and the U.S., as well as defined contribution
pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, Italy,
Switzerland, Malaysia and Brazil. We contributed the following
amounts to all plans, including the Rio Tinto Alcan plans that
cover our employees (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Funded pension plans
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Unfunded pension plans
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Savings and defined contribution pension plans
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-101
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
During the remainder of fiscal 2011, we expect to contribute an
additional $8 million to our funded pension plans,
$3 million to our unfunded pension plans and
$5 million to our savings and defined contribution plans.
|
|
9.
|
CURRENCY
(GAINS) LOSSES
|
The following currency (gains) losses are included in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net gain on change in fair value of currency derivative
instruments(A)
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
Net (gain) loss on remeasurement and transaction gains or
losses(B)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net currency gain
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in Other (income) expense, net. |
The following currency translation gains (losses) are included
in Accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCI), net of tax and
Noncontrolling interests (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment beginning
of period
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment end of
period
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS AND COMMODITY CONTRACTS
|
We hold derivatives for risk management purposes and not for
trading. We use derivatives to mitigate uncertainty and
volatility caused by underlying exposures to aluminum prices,
foreign exchange rates, interest rate, and energy prices.
For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, we assess hedge
effectiveness by formally evaluating the high correlation of
changes in the fair value of the hedged item and the derivative
hedging instrument. The changes in the fair values of the
underlying hedged items are reported in other current and
noncurrent assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheet. Changes in the fair values of these derivatives and
underlying hedged items generally offset and are recorded each
period in revenue, consistent with the underlying hedged item.
For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges or net investment
hedges, we assess hedge effectiveness by formally evaluating the
high correlation of the expected future cash flows of the hedged
item and the derivative hedging instrument. The effective
portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included in OCI and
reclassified to earnings in the period in which earnings are
impacted by the hedged items or in the period that the
transaction becomes probable of not occurring. If at any time
during the life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine
that the relationship is no longer effective, the derivative
will no longer be designated as a cash flow hedge and future
gains or losses on the derivative will be recognized in (Gain)
loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments.
F-102
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
For all derivatives designated in hedging relationships, gains
or losses representing hedge ineffectiveness or amounts excluded
from effectiveness testing are recognized in (Gain) loss on
change in fair value of derivative instruments, net in our
current period earnings.
If no hedging relationship is designated, the gains or losses
are recognized in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of
derivative instruments, net in our current period earnings. We
classify cash settlement amounts associated with these
derivatives as part of investing activities in the condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows.
The gross fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010
are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Fair value hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-103
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included
in Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. |
Aluminum
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the London Metal Exchange (LME) price of
aluminum. These exposures arise from firm commitments to sell
aluminum in future periods at fixed prices, the forecasted
output of our smelter operations in South America and the
forecasted metal price lag associated with firm commitments to
sell aluminum in future periods at prices based on the LME.
We identify and designate certain aluminum forward contracts as
fair value hedges of the metal price risk associated with fixed
price sales commitments that qualify as firm commitments. Price
risk arises due to fluctuating aluminum prices between the time
the sales order is committed and the time the order is shipped.
No derivative gains or losses were recognized in Revenue and no
changes in the fair value of designated hedged items were
recorded as of December 31, 2010. We had 26 kt of
outstanding aluminum forward contracts designated as fair value
hedges as of December 31, 2010. No aluminum forward
contracts were designated as fair value hedges as of
March 31, 2010.
We identify and designate certain aluminum forward purchase
contracts as cash flow hedges of the metal price risk associated
with our future metal purchases that vary based on changes in
the LME price of aluminum. Price risk exposure arises from
commitments to sell aluminum in future periods at fixed price.
We had 132 kt of outstanding aluminum forward contracts
designated as cash flow hedges as of December 31, 2010. No
aluminum forward contracts were designated as cash flow hedges
as of March 31, 2010.
We have also entered into certain aluminum derivative contracts
to minimize metal price risk that have not been identified and
designated in hedging relationships. As of December 31,
2010 and March 31, 2010, we had 86 kt and 55 kt,
respectively, of outstanding aluminum contracts not designated
as hedges.
F-104
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Energy
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we designated as
a cash flow hedge of our exposure to fluctuating electricity
prices. As of December 31, 2010, the outstanding portion of
this swap includes a total of 1.5 million megawatt hours
through 2017.
We use natural gas swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
energy prices in North America. As of December 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2010, we had 5.9 million MMBTUs and
4.2 million MMBTUs, respectively, of natural gas swaps that
were not designated as hedges. One MMBTU is the equivalent of
one decatherm, or one million British Thermal Units.
Interest
Rate
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate which impacts our
variable-rate debt.
Prior to the completion of the December 17, 2010
refinancing transactions (see footnote 6 Debt),
these swaps were designated as cash flow hedges. Upon completion
of the refinancing transaction, our exposure to changes in the
benchmark LIBOR interest rate was limited. We ceased hedge
accounting for these swaps and released all Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (AOCI) into current period earnings. We had
$510 million of outstanding interest rate swaps designated
as cash flow hedges as of March 31, 2010. No interest rate
swaps were designated as cash flow hedges as of
December 31, 2010.
We had $520 million and $10 million of outstanding
interest rate swaps that were not designated in hedging
relationships as of December 31, 2010 and March 31,
2010, respectively.
Foreign
Currency
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross-currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain operations.
We use foreign currency contracts to hedge expected future
foreign currency transactions, which include capital
expenditures. These contracts cover the same periods as known or
expected exposures, generally not exceeding five years. We had
$213 million of outstanding foreign currency forwards
designated as cash flow hedges as of December 31, 2010. No
foreign currency contracts were designated as cash flow hedges
as of March 31, 2010.
We use foreign currency contracts to hedge our foreign currency
exposure to net investment in foreign subsidiaries. In May 2010,
we terminated all such hedges. Prior to termination, we
recognized a gain of $18 million in OCI for the nine months
ended December 31, 2010. A realized net loss of
$3 million remains in AOCI. We recognized losses of
$19 million in OCI for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, we had
outstanding currency exchange contracts with a total notional
amount of $1.8 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively,
which were not designated as hedges.
Other
For certain customers, we enter into contractual relationships
that entitle us to pass-through the economic effect of trading
positions that we take with other third parties on our
customers behalf. We recognize a derivative position with
both the customer and the third party for these types of
contracts and we classify cash settlement amounts associated
with these derivatives as part of operating activities in the
condensed
F-105
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
consolidated statements of cash flows. These derivatives expired
in February 2010 with the last cash settlement occurring in
October 2010.
During the next twelve months, we expect to reclassify
$28 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges from AOCI into Net income (loss). The maximum period over
which we have hedged our exposure to cash flow variability is
through 2017.
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) associated
with the change in fair value of derivative instruments
recognized in earnings (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Interest Rate swaps
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain recognized
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes realized and unrealized gains
(losses) associated with the change in fair value of derivative
instruments recognized in earnings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses) included in segment income
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
(424
|
)
|
Realized gain on other derivatives not in segment income
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-106
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table summarizes the impact on AOCI and earnings
of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense) on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
(Ineffective
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Portion and
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
from AOCI into
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(Expense)
|
|
|
Effectiveness
|
|
|
|
Derivative (Effective
|
|
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
Testing)
|
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Reclassified from AOCI
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
into Earnings
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Hedging Relationships
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs(A)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
All AOCI related to interest rate swaps was released upon
refinancing and de-designation. Gains or losses are released
through (Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net. |
|
|
11.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
We record certain assets and liabilities, primarily derivative
instruments and the hedged item in a fair value hedge
relationship, on our condensed consolidated balance sheets at
fair value. We also disclose the fair values of certain
financial instruments, including debt and loans receivable,
which are not recorded at fair value. Our objective in measuring
fair value is to estimate the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
We consider factors such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and
nonperformance risk, including our own nonperformance risk, in
measuring fair value. We use observable market inputs wherever
possible. To the extent that observable market inputs are not
available, our fair value measurements will reflect the
assumptions we use. We grade the level of our fair value
measures according to a three-tier hierarchy:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities that
we have the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Assets and liabilities valued based on
inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1
that are observable for similar instruments, either directly or
indirectly.
Level 3 Assets and liabilities valued based on
significant unobservable inputs for which there is little or no
market data, which require us to develop our own assumptions
based on the best information available as what market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
F-107
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following section describes the valuation methodologies we
used to measure our various financial instruments at fair value,
including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy
in which each instrument is generally classified:
Derivative
Contracts
The majority of our derivative contracts are valued using
industry-standard models that use observable market inputs as
their basis, such as time value, forward interest rates,
volatility factors, and current (spot) and forward market
prices. Valuation model inputs can generally be verified and
valuation techniques do not involve significant judgment. We
generally classify these instruments within Level 2 of the
valuation hierarchy. Such derivatives include interest rate
swaps, cross-currency swaps, foreign currency forward contracts,
aluminum forward contracts and options, and certain
energy-related forward contracts (e.g., natural gas).
We classify derivative contracts that are valued based on models
with significant unobservable market inputs as Level 3 of
the valuation hierarchy. These derivatives include certain of
our energy-related forward contracts (e.g., electricity) and
commodity location premium contracts. Models for these fair
value measurements include inputs based on estimated future
prices for periods beyond the term of the quoted prices.
For Level 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy, where
appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors such as
liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit considerations
(nonperformance risk).
As of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, we did not
have any Level 1 derivative contracts.
The following tables present our derivative assets and
liabilities which are measured and recognized at fair value on a
recurring basis classified under the appropriate level of the
fair value hierarchy (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Level 2 Instruments
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Level 3 Instruments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
(130
|
)
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognized unrealized losses of $1 million during the
nine months ended December 31, 2010 related to Level 3
financial instruments that were still held as of
December 31, 2010. These unrealized losses are included in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net.
F-108
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table presents a reconciliation of fair value
activity for Level 3 derivative contracts on a net basis
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
Instruments(A)
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in earnings(B)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in Other comprehensive
income (loss)(C)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Net transfers from Level 3 to Level 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents derivative assets net of derivative liabilities. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(C) |
|
Included in Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges,
net. |
Financial
Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value
The table below presents the estimated fair value of certain
financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis (in millions). The table excludes short-term
financial assets and liabilities for which we believe carrying
value approximates fair value. We value long-term debt using
market
and/or
broker ask prices when available. When not available, we use a
standard credit adjusted discounted cash flow model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables from related parties
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt third parties (excluding short term
borrowings)
|
|
$
|
4,081
|
|
|
$
|
4,132
|
|
|
$
|
2,596
|
|
|
$
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
12.
|
OTHER
(INCOME) EXPENSE, NET
|
Other (income) expense, net is comprised of the following (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net (gain) loss on currency remeasurement and transaction gains
or losses
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
Gain on the reversal of accrued legal claims
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on tax litigation settlement in Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our
effective tax rates is as follows (in millions, except
percentages).
F-109
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Pre-tax income before equity in net income of non-consolidated
affiliates and noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian statutory tax rate
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision at the Canadian statutory rate
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Increase (decrease) for taxes on income resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange translation items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expense (income) items not subject to tax
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Tax rate differences on foreign earnings
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Uncertain tax positions, net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, we had a net deferred tax
liability of $524 million. This amount includes gross
deferred tax assets of approximately $689 million and a
valuation allowance of $258 million. This valuation
allowance is recorded in various jurisdictions, and it is
reasonably possible that our estimates of future taxable income
may change within the next 12 month, resulting in a change
to the valuation allowance.
|
|
14.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan Inc., we assumed a
number of liabilities, commitments and contingencies mainly
related to our historical rolled products operations, including
liabilities in respect of legal claims and environmental
matters. As a result, we may be required to indemnify Rio Tinto
Alcan for claims successfully brought against Alcan or for the
defense of legal actions that arise from time to time in the
normal course of our rolled products business including
commercial and contract disputes, employee-related claims and
tax disputes (including several disputes with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding various forms of manufacturing
taxes and social security contributions). In addition to these
assumed liabilities and contingencies, we may, in the future, be
involved in, or subject to, other disputes, claims and
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business,
including some that we assert against others, such as
environmental, health and safety, product liability, employee,
tax, personal injury and other matters. Where appropriate, we
have established reserves in respect of these matters (or, if
required, we have posted cash guarantees). While the ultimate
resolution of, and liability and costs related to, these matters
cannot be determined with certainty due to the considerable
uncertainties that exist, we do not believe that any of these
pending actions, individually or in the aggregate, will
materially impair our operations or materially affect our
financial condition or liquidity. The following describes
certain legal proceedings relating to our business, including
those for which we assumed liability as a result of our spin-off
from Alcan Inc.
Legal
Proceedings
Coca-Cola
Lawsuit. On July 8, 2010, a Georgia state
court granted Novelis Corporations motion for summary
judgment, effectively dismissing a lawsuit brought by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) against
Novelis Corporation. In the lawsuit, which was filed on
February 15, 2007,
F-110
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
CCBSS alleged that Novelis Corporation breached the most
favored nations provision regarding certain pricing
matters under an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the
parties, and sought monetary damages and other relief. On
August 6, 2010, CCBSS filed a notice of appeal with the
court, and on August 20, 2010, we filed a cross notice of
appeal. We and CCBSS have each filed appellate briefs in the
case, and on February 9, 2011, the appellate court heard
oral arguments on the briefs. We expect a ruling from the
appellate court within six months after oral arguments were
heard. We have concluded that a loss from the litigation is not
probable and therefore have not recorded an accrual. In
addition, we do not believe there is a reasonable possibility of
a loss from the lawsuit.
Environmental
Matters
We own and operate numerous manufacturing and other facilities
in various countries around the world. Our operations are
subject to environmental laws and regulations from various
jurisdictions, which govern, among other things, air emissions,
wastewater discharges, the handling, storage and disposal of
hazardous substances and wastes, the remediation of contaminated
sites, post-mining reclamation and restoration of natural
resources, and employee health and safety. Future environmental
regulations may be expected to impose stricter compliance
requirements on the industries in which we operate. Additional
equipment or process changes at some of our facilities may be
needed to meet future requirements. The cost of meeting these
requirements may be significant. Failure to comply with such
laws and regulations could subject us to administrative, civil
or criminal penalties, obligations to pay damages or other
costs, and injunctions and other orders, including orders to
cease operations.
We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also
known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions
regarding liability arising from the usage, storage, treatment
or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a number of
sites in the United States, as well as similar proceedings under
the laws and regulations of the other jurisdictions in which we
have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the
European Union. Many of these jurisdictions have laws that
impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, for the costs of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses. In addition, we are, from time to
time, subject to environmental reviews and investigations by
relevant governmental authorities.
With respect to environmental loss contingencies, we record a
loss contingency whenever such contingency is probable and
reasonably estimable. The evaluation model includes all asserted
and unasserted claims that can be reasonably identified. Under
this evaluation model, the liability and the related costs are
quantified based upon the best available evidence regarding
actual liability loss and cost estimates. Except for those loss
contingencies where no estimate can reasonably be made, the
evaluation model is fact-driven and attempts to estimate the
full costs of each claim. Management reviews the status of, and
estimated liability related to, pending claims and civil actions
on a quarterly basis. The estimated costs in respect of such
reported liabilities are not offset by amounts related to
cost-sharing between parties, insurance, indemnification
arrangements or contribution from other potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) unless otherwise noted.
We have established procedures for regularly evaluating
environmental loss contingencies, including those arising from
such environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we believe we have made reasonable estimates
of the costs that are likely to be borne by us for these
environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly, we have
established reserves based on our reasonable estimates for the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters. We estimate that the undiscounted remaining
clean-up
costs related to all of our known environmental matters as of
December 31, 2010 will be approximately $55 million.
Of this amount, $28 million is included in Other long-term
liabilities, with the remaining $27 million included in
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our condensed
F-111
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010.
Management has reviewed the environmental matters, including
those for which we assumed liability as a result of our spin-off
from Alcan Inc. As a result of this review, management has
determined that the currently anticipated costs associated with
these environmental matters will not, individually or in the
aggregate, materially impact our operations or materially
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
Brazil
Tax Matters
Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America,
as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, we had
cash deposits aggregating approximately $52 million and
$45 million, respectively, in judicial depository accounts
pending finalization of the related cases. The depository
accounts are in the name of the Brazilian government and will be
expended towards these legal proceedings or released to us,
depending on the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are
included in Other long-term assets third parties in
our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In
addition, we are involved in several disputes with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury about various forms of manufacturing taxes
and social security contributions, for which we have made no
judicial deposits but for which we have established reserves
ranging from $6 million to $136 million as of
December 31, 2010. In total, these reserves approximate
$159 million and $149 million as of December 31,
2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively, and are included in
Other long-term liabilities in our accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
On May 28, 2009, the Brazilian government passed a law
allowing taxpayers to settle certain federal tax disputes with
the Brazilian tax authorities, including disputes relating to a
Brazilian national tax on manufactured products, through an
installment program. Under the program, if a company elects to
settle a tax dispute and pay the principal amount due over a
specified payment period, the company will receive a discount on
the interest and penalties owed on the disputed tax amount.
Novelis joined the installment program in November of 2009. In
August 2010, we identified to the Brazilian government the tax
disputes we plan to settle pursuant to the installment program.
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries. The indebtedness guaranteed is for
trade accounts payable to third parties. Some of the guarantees
have annual terms while others have no expiration and have
termination notice requirements. Neither we nor any of our
subsidiaries hold any assets of any third parties as collateral
to offset the potential settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned subsidiaries in our
consolidated financial statements, all liabilities associated
with trade payables for these entities are already included in
our consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness related to our wholly-owned
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
Carrying
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Future Payment
|
|
Value
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
F-112
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
SEGMENT,
MAJOR CUSTOMER AND MAJOR SUPPLIER INFORMATION
|
Segment
Information
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America, Europe, Asia and South America.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments based on Segment income. Segment income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment income as earnings before (a) depreciation and
amortization; (b) interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs; (c) interest income; (d) unrealized
gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net; (e) impairment of goodwill;
(f) impairment charges on long-lived assets (other than
goodwill); (g) gain on extinguishment of debt;
(h) noncontrolling interests share;
(i) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Segment income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting;
(j) restructuring charges, net; (k) gains or losses on
disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses, net;
(l) other costs, net; (m) litigation settlement, net
of insurance recoveries; (n) sale transaction fees;
(o) provision or benefit for taxes on income (loss); and
(p) cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax.
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions).
Selected
Segment Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
America
|
|
Europe
|
|
Asia
|
|
America
|
|
and Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,599
|
|
|
$
|
2,897
|
|
|
$
|
926
|
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(208
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,748
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,726
|
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
(192
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
America
|
|
Europe
|
|
Asia
|
|
America
|
|
and Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,863
|
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
$
|
1,340
|
|
|
$
|
876
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
307
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
Europe
|
|
Asia
|
|
America
|
|
and Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,375
|
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
$
|
1,098
|
|
|
$
|
691
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
285
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
74
|
|
F-113
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table shows the reconciliation from income from
reportable segments to Net income attributable to our common
shareholder (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
South America
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Corporate and other(A)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
615
|
|
Realized gains on derivative instruments not included in segment
income(B)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(C)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Corporate and other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. |
|
(B) |
|
Realized gains on derivative instruments not included in segment
income represents realized gains on foreign currency derivatives
related to capital expenditures for our previously announced
expansion in South America. |
|
(C) |
|
The financial information for our segments includes the segment
income of our non-consolidated affiliates on a proportionately
consolidated basis, which is consistent with the way we manage
our business segments. However, under US GAAP, these
non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using the equity
method of accounting. Therefore, in order to reconcile the
financial information for the segments shown in the tables above
to the relevant US GAAP-based measures, we must include our
proportion of the remaining income statement items that are not
included in segment income above. See Note 5
Investment in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and
Related Party Transactions for further information about these
non-consolidated affiliates. |
F-114
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Information
about Major Customers and Primary Supplier
The table below shows our net sales to Rexam Plc (Rexam) and
Anheuser-Busch InBev (Anheuser-Busch), our two largest
customers, as a percentage of total Net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Rexam
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Anheuser-Busch
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Rio Tinto Alcan is our primary supplier of metal inputs,
including prime and sheet ingot. The table below shows our
purchases from Rio Tinto Alcan as a percentage of total combined
metal purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Purchases from Rio Tinto Alcan as a percentage of total
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
16.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of the following
(in millions and net of tax).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
Fair value of effective portion of cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Pension and other benefits
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
Income taxes paid, net
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
17.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
GUARANTOR INFORMATION
|
In connection with the issuance of our 7.25% Notes, 2017
Notes and 2020 Notes, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries,
which are 100% owned within the meaning of
Rule 3-10(h)(1)
of
Regulation S-X,
provided guarantees. These guarantees are full and unconditional
as well as joint and several. The guarantor subsidiaries (the
Guarantors) are comprised of the majority of our businesses in
Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Brazil, Portugal, Luxembourg and
Switzerland, as well as certain businesses in Germany and
France. Certain Guarantors may be subject to restrictions on
their ability to distribute earnings to Novelis Inc. (the
Parent). The remaining subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) of the
Parent are not guarantors of the Notes.
The following information presents condensed consolidating
statements of operations, balance sheets and statements of cash
flows of the Parent, the Guarantors, and the Non-Guarantors.
Investments include investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net assets
of divisions included in the Parent, and have been presented
using the equity method of accounting.
F-115
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
775
|
|
|
$
|
6,142
|
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
|
$
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
5,407
|
|
|
|
1,981
|
|
|
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
|
6,628
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
125
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Loss on early debt extinguishment
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
5,964
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
(1,332
|
)
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
201
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
97
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-116
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
4,936
|
|
|
$
|
1,780
|
|
|
$
|
(1,061
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
(1,061
|
)
|
|
|
5,066
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
131
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
4,427
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
703
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
456
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
(380
|
)
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-117
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(935
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
168
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
2,282
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
3,026
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,773
|
)
|
|
|
683
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(1,097
|
)
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,738
|
|
|
$
|
6,340
|
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
(4,816
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
45
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
441
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
1,774
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
(943
|
)
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
4,017
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,060
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
(1,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,488
|
|
|
|
3,918
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
(2,043
|
)
|
|
|
7,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,830
|
|
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owners net
investment
|
|
|
(1,492
|
)
|
|
|
2,529
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
(2,931
|
)
|
|
|
(1,492
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Novelis shareholders equity
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
(2,773
|
)
|
|
|
250
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
(2,773
|
)
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,738
|
|
|
$
|
6,340
|
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
(4,816
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-118
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(1,045
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
197
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
(1,057
|
)
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,998
|
)
|
|
|
709
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(1,139
|
)
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,914
|
|
|
$
|
6,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
(4,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
110
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
436
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
(1,057
|
)
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
(2,198
|
)
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
1,818
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
(2,167
|
)
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of our common shareholder
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
1,689
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
(1,998
|
)
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
1,689
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(1,998
|
)
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,914
|
|
|
$
|
6,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
(4,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-119
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(673
|
)
|
|
$
|
839
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, third parties
|
|
|
3,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,985
|
|
Principal payments, third parties
|
|
|
(1,527
|
)
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,486
|
)
|
Related parties borrowings, net
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return of capital
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
Dividends noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
(913
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-120
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, third parties
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Principal payments, third parties
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Related parties borrowings, net
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Dividends noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-121