Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-161892
PROSPECTUS
Novelis Inc.
Offer to Exchange
Up to $185,000,000 aggregate
principal amount
of our
111/2% Senior
Notes due 2015
(which we refer to as the
new notes)
and the guarantees thereof
which have been registered
under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended,
for $185,000,000 of our
outstanding
111/2% Senior
Notes due 2015
(which we refer to as the
old notes
and, together with the new
notes, as the notes)
and the guarantees
thereof
The New
Notes:
The terms of the new notes are substantially identical to the
old notes, except that some of the transfer restrictions,
registration rights and additional interest provisions relating
to the old notes will not apply to the new notes.
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity: The new notes will mature on
February 15, 2015.
|
|
|
|
Interest: The new notes will bear interest at
the rate of 11.5% per annum. Interest on the new notes will be
payable semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of
each year, commencing February 15, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Guarantees: The new notes will be guaranteed,
fully and unconditionally and jointly and severally, on a senior
unsecured basis, by all of our existing and future Canadian and
U.S. restricted subsidiaries, certain of our existing
foreign restricted subsidiaries and our other restricted
subsidiaries that guarantee debt in the future under any credit
facilities, provided that the borrower of such debt is our
company or a Canadian or a U.S. subsidiary.
|
|
|
|
Ranking: The new notes and the guarantees will
effectively rank junior to our secured debt and the secured debt
of the guarantors (including debt under our existing senior
secured credit facilities described herein), to the extent of
the value of the assets securing that debt.
|
|
|
|
Optional Redemption: Prior to August 15,
2012, we may redeem all or a portion of the new notes by paying
a make-whole premium. Commencing August 15,
2012, we may redeem all or a portion of the new notes at
specified redemption prices. We also may redeem all of the new
notes, at any time, in the event of certain changes in Canadian
withholding taxes. In addition, prior to August 15, 2012,
we may redeem up to 35% of the new notes from the proceeds of
certain equity offerings at a specified redemption price. The
redemption prices are set forth under Description of the
Notes Optional Redemption.
|
|
|
|
The new notes will not be listed on any securities exchange or
automated quotation system.
|
The
Exchange Offer:
|
|
|
|
|
The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City
time, on January 11, 2010, (which is the 21st business day
following the date of this prospectus), unless we extend the
exchange offer in our sole and absolute discretion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The exchange offer is not subject to any conditions other than
that it not violate applicable law or any applicable
interpretation of the staff of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or the SEC.
|
|
|
|
Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of specified conditions,
we will exchange the new notes for all old notes that are
validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to the expiration of
the exchange offer.
|
|
|
|
Tenders of old notes may be withdrawn at any time before the
expiration of the exchange offer.
|
|
|
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the exchange offer.
|
The exchange offer involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 19.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus is December 10, 2009.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
Each broker-dealer that receives new notes for its own
account pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it
will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such
new notes. The letter of transmittal states that by so
acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer
will not be deemed to admit that it is an
underwriter within the meaning of the Securities
Act. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from
time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with
resales of new notes received in exchange for old notes where
such old notes were acquired by such broker-dealer as a result
of market-making activities or other trading activities. We have
agreed that, for a period of 180 days after the
consummation of the exchange offer, we will make this prospectus
available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any
such resale. See Plan of Distribution.
This prospectus incorporates important business and financial
information about the Company that is not included or delivered
with this prospectus. We will provide without charge, upon
written or oral request, to each person, including any
beneficial owner, to whom this prospectus is delivered, a copy
of all documents referred to below which have been or may be
incorporated by reference into this prospectus excluding
exhibits to those documents unless they are specifically
incorporated by reference into those documents.
In order to obtain timely delivery, you must request the
information no later than January 4, 2010, which is five
business days before the expiration date of the exchange offer.
Any such request should be directed to us at:
Corporate
Secretary
Novelis Inc.
3399 Peachtree Road, NE
Suite 1500
Atlanta, Georgia 30326
(404) 814-4200
ENFORCEABILITY
OF CERTAIN CIVIL LIABILITIES
We are incorporated in Canada under the Canada Business
Corporations Act, or the CBCA. Our registered office, as well as
a substantial portion of our assets, is located outside the
United States. Also, some of our directors, controlling persons
and officers and some of the experts named in this prospectus
reside in Canada or other jurisdictions outside the United
States and all or a substantial portion of their assets are
located outside the United States. We have agreed in the
indenture relating to the notes to accept service of process in
New York City, by an agent designated for such purpose, with
respect to any suit, action or proceeding relating to the
indenture or the notes that is brought in any federal or state
court located in New York City, and to submit to the
jurisdiction of such courts in connection with such suits,
actions or proceedings. However, it may be difficult for holders
of notes to effect service of process in the United States on
our directors, controlling persons, officers and the experts
named in this prospectus who are not residents of the United
States or to enforce against them in the United States judgments
of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil
liability provisions of the United States federal securities
laws. In addition, there is doubt as to the enforceability in
Canada against us or against our directors, controlling persons,
officers and experts named in this prospectus who are not
residents of the United States, in original actions or in
actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts, of
liabilities predicated solely upon United States federal
securities laws.
INDUSTRY
AND MARKET DATA
The data included in this prospectus regarding markets and the
industry in which we operate, including the size of certain
markets and our position and the position of our competitors
within these markets, are based on reports of government
agencies, independent industry sources such as Commodity
Research Unit International Limited (CRU), an independent
business analysis and consultancy group focused on the mining,
metals, power, cables, fertilizer and chemical sectors, and our
own estimates relying on our managements knowledge and
experience in the markets in which we operate. Our
managements knowledge and experience is based on
information obtained from our customers, distributors,
suppliers, trade and business organizations and other contacts
in the markets in which we operate. Although we believe these
sources to be reliable and these estimates to be accurate and
reasonable as of the date of this prospectus we have not
independently verified this information.
TRADEMARKS
We have proprietary rights to a number of trademarks important
to our business, including Novelis
Fusiontm.
All other trademarks or service marks referred to in this
prospectus are the property of their respective owners and are
not our property.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET
DATA
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are
based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and
projections about us and the industry in which we operate and
beliefs and assumptions made by our management. Such statements
include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies
and prospects under the headings Prospectus Summary,
Business and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Words such as expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, believe,
seek and estimate and variations of such
words and similar expressions are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees
of future performance and involve assumptions and risks and
uncertainties that are difficult to predict, including those
described below. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may
differ materially from what is expressed, implied or forecasted
in such forward-looking statements. We do not intend, and we
disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Information in this prospectus concerning our markets and
products generally includes forward-looking statements, which
are based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in
which these markets and product categories will develop. These
assumptions have been derived from information currently
available to us and to the third party industry analysts quoted
in this prospectus. This information includes, but is not
ii
limited to, product shipments and share of production. Actual
market results may differ from those predicted. We do not know
what impact any of these differences may have on our business,
results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ
from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking
statements include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash;
|
|
|
|
changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums
associated with such prices) or other materials and raw
materials we use;
|
|
|
|
the effect of metal price ceilings in certain of our sales
contracts;
|
|
|
|
the capacity and effectiveness of our metal hedging activities,
including our internal used beverage can (UBC) and
smelter hedges;
|
|
|
|
relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of,
our customers, suppliers and other stakeholders;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the
areas in which we maintain production facilities;
|
|
|
|
our ability to access financing to fund current operations and
for future capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
continuing obligations and other relationships resulting from
our spin-off from Alcan, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
changes in the relative values of various currencies and the
effectiveness of our currency hedging activities;
|
|
|
|
factors affecting our operations, such as litigation,
environmental remediation and
clean-up
costs, labor relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment
and other events;
|
|
|
|
the impact of restructuring efforts we may undertake in the
future;
|
|
|
|
economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries
in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in
duties or tariffs;
|
|
|
|
competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as
well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic
and composite materials;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions, including further
deterioration in the global economy;
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures in
the future;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our
products as well as seasonality in certain of our
customers industries;
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting
taxes, climate change, environmental, health or safety
compliance;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the
amounts we pay under our senior secured credit facilities and
other financing agreements;
|
|
|
|
the effect of taxes and changes in tax rates; and
|
|
|
|
the other factors discussed under Risk Factors.
|
The above list of factors is not exclusive. Some of these and
other factors are discussed in more detail under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Risk
Factors.
iii
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information in this
prospectus and may not contain all of the information that is
important to you. You should carefully read this entire
prospectus, including the information set forth under the
heading Risk Factors and the financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus and the related notes
thereto, before making an investment decision.
In this prospectus, unless otherwise specified or the context
indicates otherwise, the terms we, our,
us, company, Group,
Novelis and Novelis Group refer to
Novelis Inc., a company incorporated in Canada under the CBCA.
References herein to Hindalco refer to Hindalco
Industries Limited. In October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group
purchased all the outstanding shares of Alcan, Inc., which was
subsequently renamed Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. References herein to
Alcan refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
References to total shipments refer to shipments
to third parties of aluminum rolled products as well as ingot
shipments, and references to aluminum rolled products
shipments or shipments do not include ingot
shipments. All tonnages are stated in metric tonnes. One metric
tonne is equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. One kilotonne (kt) is
1,000 metric tonnes. One MMBtu is the equivalent of one
decatherm, or one million British Thermal Units. The term
aluminum rolled products is synonymous with the
terms flat rolled products and FRP
commonly used by manufacturers and third party analysts in our
industry. References to $, dollars,
United States dollars,
U.S. dollars or U.S. $ refer
to the lawful currency of the United States of America.
We were acquired by Hindalco through its indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary on May 15, 2007. Due to the impact
of push down accounting, our consolidated financial statements
separate the companys presentation into two distinct
periods to indicate the application of two different bases of
accounting between the periods presented. We refer to the
company prior to the Hindalco acquisition (through May 15,
2007) as the Predecessor, and we refer to the
company after the Hindalco acquisition (beginning on
May 16, 2007) as the Successor. In
addition, in June 2007, we changed our fiscal year-end from
December 31 to March 31 and filed a Transition Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2007.
Accordingly, in this prospectus, references to our fiscal
years mean a year ended December 31 for 2004 through 2006,
and March 31 for 2009. For comparability purposes, references to
the fiscal periods ending in 2007 and 2008 refer to the twelve
months ended March 31, 2007 (which are derived from our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2007 and the nine-month
period ended December 31, 2006) and the twelve-month
period ended March 31, 2008 (which are derived by combining
the results of operations for the period ended May 15, 2007
of the Predecessor with the period ended March 31, 2008 of
the Successor). The combined results of operations are non-GAAP
financial measures, do not include any pro forma assumptions or
adjustments and should not be used in isolation or substitution
of the Predecessors and the Successors results. We
include a reconciliation of our combined results in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Our
Company
We are the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume in fiscal year 2009, with
total shipments of approximately 2,943 kt in fiscal year 2009.
We are the only company of our size and scope focused solely on
aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local supply of
technologically sophisticated aluminum products in all of the
regions in which we operate. We are also the global leader in
the recycling of used aluminum beverage cans. We had net sales
of approximately $10.2 billion for the year ended
March 31, 2009 and approximately $4.1 billion for the
six months ended September 30, 2009.
We produce aluminum sheet and light gauge products for end-use
markets, including the beverage and food cans, construction and
industrial, foil products and transportation markets. As of
September 30, 2009, we had operations in 11 countries on
four continents: North America, Europe, Asia, and South America,
through 31 operating plants, one research facility and several
market-focused innovation centers. In addition to aluminum
rolling and recycling, our South American businesses include
bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary aluminum smelting and
power generation facilities that are integrated with our rolling
plants in Brazil.
1
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America, Europe, Asia and South America. The following charts
provide the breakdown by operating segment of our net sales and
total shipments for fiscal year 2009:
North
America
Through 11 aluminum rolled products facilities, including two
fully dedicated recycling facilities, North America
manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge products. Important
end-use markets for this segment include beverage cans,
containers and packaging, automotive and other transportation
applications, building products and other industrial
applications. The majority of North Americas efforts are
directed towards the beverage can sheet market. Recycling is
important in the manufacturing process, and we have five
facilities in North America that re-melt post-consumer
aluminum and recycled process material.
Europe
Europe produces value-added sheet and foil products through 13
operating plants, including one dedicated recycling facility.
Europe serves a broad range of aluminum rolled product end-use
markets including: beverage and food can, construction and
industrial, foil and technical products, lithographic,
automotive and other. Beverage and food represent the largest
end-use market in terms of shipment volume by Europe. Europe
also has foil packaging facilities at six locations and, in
addition to rolled product plants, has distribution centers in
Italy and France together with sales offices in several European
countries.
Asia
Asia operates three manufacturing facilities and manufactures a
broad range of sheet and light gauge products. End-use markets
include beverage and food cans, foil, electronics and
construction and industrial products. The beverage can market
represents the largest end-use market in terms of volume.
Recycling is an important part of our Korean operations, with
recycling facilities at both the Ulsan and Yeongju facilities.
South
America
South America operates two rolling plants, two primary aluminum
smelters and hydro-electric power plants, all of which are
located in Brazil. South America manufactures various aluminum
rolled products, including can stock, automotive and industrial
sheet and light gauge for the beverage and food can,
construction and industrial and transportation and packaging
end-use markets. More than 80% of our shipments for the past two
years were in the beverage and food can market. The primary
aluminum operations in South America include a mine, refinery
and smelters used by our Brazilian aluminum rolled products
operations, with any excess production being sold on the market
in the form of aluminum billets. South America generates a
portion of its own power requirements.
2
Our
Industry
The aluminum rolled products market represents the global supply
of and demand for aluminum sheet, plate and foil produced either
from sheet ingot or continuously cast roll-stock in rolling
mills operated by independent aluminum rolled products producers
and integrated aluminum companies alike.
Aluminum rolled products are semi-finished aluminum products
that constitute the raw material for the manufacture of finished
goods ranging from automotive body panels to household foil.
There are two major types of manufacturing processes for
aluminum rolled products differing mainly in the process used to
achieve the initial stage of processing:
|
|
|
|
|
hot mills that require sheet ingot, a
rectangular slab of aluminum, as starter material; and
|
|
|
|
continuous casting mills that can convert
molten metal directly into semi-finished sheet.
|
Both processes require subsequent rolling, which we call cold
rolling, and finishing steps such as annealing, coating,
leveling or slitting to achieve the desired thicknesses and
metal properties. Most customers receive shipments in the form
of aluminum coil, a large roll of metal, which can be fed into
their fabrication processes.
There are two sources of input material: (1) primary
aluminum, such as molten metal, re-melt ingot and sheet ingot;
and (2) recycled aluminum, such as recyclable material from
fabrication processes, which we refer to as recycled process
material, UBCs and other post-consumer aluminum.
Primary aluminum can generally be purchased at prices set on the
London Metal Exchange (LME), plus a premium that
varies by geographic region of delivery, form (ingot or molten
metal) and purity.
Recycled aluminum is also an important source of input material.
Aluminum is infinitely recyclable and recycling it requires only
approximately 5% of the energy needed to produce primary
aluminum. As a result, in regions where aluminum is widely used,
manufacturers and customers are active in setting up collection
processes in which UBCs and other recyclable aluminum are
collected for re-melting at purpose-built plants. Manufacturers
may also enter into agreements with customers who return
recycled process material and pay to have it re-melted and
rolled into the same product again.
The market for aluminum rolled products tends to be less subject
to demand cyclicality than the market for primary aluminum. A
significant portion of total aluminum rolled products production
is used in consumer staples, which have historically experienced
relatively stable demand characteristics. In addition, most
aluminum rolled products are priced in two components:
(1) a pass-through aluminum price component based on the
LME quotation and local market premia, plus (2) a
margin over metal or conversion charge based on the
cost to roll the product. As a result of this pricing formula
most of the raw material price risk is absorbed by the customer,
reducing the volatility of the producers profitability and
cash flows. Aluminum rolled products companies also use recycled
aluminum for a portion of their raw materials, which provides
sourcing flexibility for, and further reduces the volatility of,
input material. These factors combine to create an industry that
has lower cyclicality than the primary aluminum industry.
There has been a long-term industry trend towards lighter gauge
(thinner) rolled products, which we refer to as
downgauging, where customers request products with
similar properties using less metal in order to reduce costs and
weight. For example, aluminum rolled products producers and can
fabricators have continuously developed thinner walled cans with
similar strength as previous generation containers, resulting in
a lower cost per unit. As a result of this trend, aluminum
tonnage across the spectrum of aluminum rolled products, and
particularly for the beverage and food cans end-use market, has
declined on a per unit basis, but actual rolling machine hours
per unit have increased. Because the industry has historically
tracked growth based on aluminum tonnage shipped, we believe the
downgauging trend may contribute to an understatement of the
actual growth attributable to rolling in some end-use markets.
The aluminum rolled products industry is characterized by
economies of scale, significant capital investments required to
achieve and maintain technological capabilities and demanding
customer qualification
3
standards. The service and efficiency demands of large customers
have encouraged consolidation among suppliers of aluminum rolled
products.
While our customers tend to be increasingly global, many
aluminum rolled products tend to be produced and sold on a
regional basis. The regional nature of the markets is influenced
in part by the fact that not all mills are equipped to produce
all types of aluminum rolled products. For instance, only a few
mills in North America, Europe and Asia and only one mill in
South America produce beverage can body and end stock. In
addition, individual aluminum rolling mills generally supply a
limited range of products for end-use markets and seek to
maximize profits by producing high volumes of the highest margin
mix per mill hour given available capacity and equipment
capabilities.
Certain multi-purpose, common alloy and plate rolled products
are imported into Europe and North America from producers in
emerging markets, such as Brazil, South Africa, Russia and
China. However, at this time we believe that most of these
producers are generally unable to produce flat rolled products
that meet the quality requirements, lead times and
specifications of customers with more demanding applications. In
addition, high freight costs, import duties, inability to take
back recycled aluminum, lack of technical service capabilities
and long lead-times mean that many developing market exporters
are viewed as second-tier suppliers. Therefore, many of our
customers in the Americas, Europe and Asia do not look to
suppliers in these emerging markets for a significant portion of
their requirements.
Aluminum rolled products companies produce and sell a wide range
of aluminum rolled products, which can be grouped into four
end-use markets based upon similarities in end-use markets:
(1) beverage and food cans, (2) construction and
industrial, (3) foil products and (4) transportation.
Beverage
and Food Cans
Beverage cans are the single largest aluminum rolled products
application, accounting for approximately 23% of total worldwide
shipments in the calendar year ended December 31, 2008,
according to CRU. The beverage can end-use market is technically
demanding to supply and pricing is competitive. The
recyclability of aluminum cans enables them to be used,
collected, melted and returned to the original product form many
times, unlike steel, paper or polyethylene terephthalate plastic
(PET plastic), which deteriorate with every
iteration of recycling.
Construction
and Industrial
Construction is the largest application within this end-use
market. Aluminum rolled products developed for the construction
industry are often decorative and non-flammable, offer
insulating properties, are durable and corrosion resistant and
have a high
strength-to-weight
ratio. Aluminum siding, gutters and downspouts comprise a
significant amount of construction volume. Other applications
include doors, windows, awnings, canopies, facades, roofing and
ceilings. Industrial applications include electronics and
communications equipment, process and electrical machinery and
lighting fixtures. Uses of aluminum rolled products in consumer
durables include microwaves, coffee makers, flat screen
televisions, air conditioners, pleasure boats and cooking
utensils.
Foil
Products
Aluminum, because of its relatively light weight, recyclability
and formability, has a wide variety of uses in packaging.
Converter foil is very thin aluminum foil, plain or printed,
that is typically laminated to plastic or paper to form an
internal seal for a variety of packaging applications, including
juice boxes, pharmaceuticals, food pouches, cigarette packaging
and lid stock. Household foil includes home and institutional
aluminum foil wrap sold as a branded or generic product.
Container foil is used to produce semi-rigid containers such as
pie plates and take-out food trays.
4
Transportation
Heat exchangers, such as radiators and air conditioners, are an
important application for aluminum rolled products in the truck
and automobile categories of the transportation end-use market.
Original equipment manufacturers also use aluminum sheet with
specially treated surfaces and other specific properties for
interior and exterior applications. Alloys are being used in
transportation tanks and rigid containers that allow for safer
and more economical transportation of hazardous and corrosive
materials.
There has been recent growth in certain geographic markets in
the use of aluminum rolled products in automotive body panel
applications, including hoods, deck lids, fenders and lift
gates. We believe the recent growth in automotive body panel
applications is due in part to the lighter weight, better fuel
economy and improved emissions performance associated with these
applications.
Aluminum is also used in the construction of ships hulls
and superstructures and passenger rail cars because of its
strength, light weight, formability and corrosion resistance.
Our
Strengths
We believe that the following key strengths enable us to compete
effectively in the aluminum rolled products market:
Leading
Market Positions
We are the worlds leader in aluminum rolling, producing an
estimated 18% of the worlds flat-rolled aluminum products
in 2009. Moreover, we are the No. 1 rolled products
producer in Europe and South America and the No. 2 producer
in both North America and Asia based on shipments. In terms of
end-use markets, we believe that we are the largest global
producer of aluminum rolled products for the beverage can market
with a 40% market share based on shipments, and we are the
worlds leader in the recycling of UBCs, recycling around
39 billion UBCs per year. We also believe that we are the
worlds leader in aluminum automotive sheet based on
shipments.
International
Presence and Scale
With 31 manufacturing facilities located in 11 countries on four
continents as of September 30, 2009, we have a broad
geographical presence that we believe allows us to better serve
our increasingly global customer base as well as diversify our
sources of cash flow and offset risk across the different
regions. Our size allows us to service a wide variety of
localized and global customer needs, leverage our selling,
administrative, research and development and other general
expenses to improve margins, establish new uses for aluminum
rolled products and access the end-use markets for these
products.
High-end
Product Portfolio Mix
Over 50% of our sales are to customers in the beverage can
market. We believe the beverage can market is a high value
market and more stable than others as it is less vulnerable to
economic cycles. In the beverage can market, we go beyond simply
supplying metal: Novelis is a technical solution provider. For
example, our Global Can Technology Team offers technological
expertise and facilities, as well as technical backup and
support for our customers own innovation activities. We
provide technological services and work together with our
lithographic, electronic and automotive customers, among others,
to develop solutions to meet their requirements through our
customer solution centers in North America and Asia as well as
other market-focused innovation centers around the world.
Innovation
Leader with Proprietary Technologies
We endeavor to be at the forefront of developing next generation
technologies in the aluminum rolled products industry and
believe that we are the worlds leader in continuous
casting technology, as owner of technology relating to the two
main continuous casting processes. We have
state-of-the-art
research facilities
5
around the world with more than 200 employees dedicated to
research and development and customer technical support. Our
technological leadership has led to the design of products to
address various end-use requirements in all regions of the
world. An important innovation is our Novelis
Fusiontm
technology. Launched in 2006, Novelis
Fusiontm
is a breakthrough process that simultaneously casts multiple
alloy layers into a single aluminum rolling ingot. Novelis is
the first company to achieve commercial production of such
multi-alloy ingots. The resulting product allows alloy
combinations never before possible. For example, a customer can
now have aluminum sheet with both excellent formability and high
strength, which provides better shaping performance and the
potential to downgauge.
Long Term
Relationships with Market Leaders
We maintain strong, long-standing supply relationships with many
of our customers, which include leading global players in our
key end markets. Our major customers include: Agfa-Gevaert N.V.,
Alcans packaging business group, Anheuser-Busch Companies,
Inc., Ball Corporation, various bottlers of the
Coca-Cola
system, Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., BMW, Audi AG,
Daimler AG, Kodak Polychrome Graphics GmbH, Ford Motor Company,
Lotte Aluminum, Pactiv Corporation, Rexam Plc and Xiamen Xiashun
Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd. In fiscal 2009, approximately 45% of our
net sales were to our ten largest customers, most of whom we
have been supplying for more than 20 years. We endeavor to
gain strong customer loyalty by anticipating and meeting the
specific technical standards demanded by our customers with a
high level of quality, technical support and customer service.
Our
Business Strategy
Our primary objective is to deliver stockholder and customer
value by being the most innovative and profitable aluminum
rolled products company in the world. We intend to achieve this
objective through the following areas of focus:
Focus on
core operations and optimize our costs
We strive to be one of the lowest-cost producers of aluminum
rolled products by pursuing a standardized focus on our core
operations and through the implementation of cost-reduction and
restructuring initiatives. To achieve this objective, we have
standardized our manufacturing processes and the associated
upstream and downstream production elements and established risk
management processes in order to apply best practices in our
core operations across all of our regions. In addition, we have
implemented numerous restructuring initiatives over the last
year, including the shutdown of facilities, staff
rationalization and other activities which we believe will lead
to annualized cost savings of approximately $140 million
beginning in fiscal year 2011.
Integrate
support functions globally in order to further drive
improvements in our operations
Given our global operating footprint and customer base, we plan
to globally align our support functions, such as finance, human
resources, legal, information technology and supply chain
management. We believe that managing these support functions
centrally can accelerate executive decision-making processes,
which will allow us to adapt our manufacturing processes and
products more quickly and efficiently to respond to changing
market conditions. We think that achieving a seamless alignment
of goals, methods and metrics across the organization will
improve communication and the implementation of strategic
initiatives. Over time, we feel that these improvements will
result in enhanced operating margins and performance.
Expand
market leadership position through enhanced global and regional
capabilities
We benefit from a global manufacturing footprint, including 31
manufacturing facilities in 11 countries on four continents as
of September 30, 2009, which enables us to service
customers worldwide and provide a strong asset-based
competitive advantage. We are the only company capable of
producing technologically sophisticated, high-end products in
all four major market regions of the world. This competitive
advantage is evident in our position as the number one global
producer of beverage can sheet products based on shipments. We
are able to service large can sheet customers on a worldwide
basis, yet, through our regional operations
6
we also have the capability to adapt and cater to the regional
preferences and needs of our customers. For example, we recently
upgraded our Yeongju plant in Korea with technology and
processes developed at our other plants around the world, which
has allowed us to capture market share in the can end-use market
in Asia. Additionally, we have been able to qualify Novelis
plants in one region to provide alternative supply options and
support to customers in a different region.
Focus on
optimizing premium products to drive enhanced
profitability
We plan to continue improving our product mix and margins by
leveraging our world-class assets and technical capabilities. As
a result of the development of Novelis
Fusiontm,
we have demonstrated the required manufacturing know-how and
research and development capabilities to design, develop and
commercialize breakthrough technologies. Products like Novelis
Fusiontm
allow us to defend and enhance our strategic positioning in our
core end-user segments. Additionally, our management approach
helps us systematically identify opportunities to improve the
profitability of our operations through product portfolio
analysis. This ensures that we focus on growing in attractive
market segments, while also taking actions to exit unattractive
ones. For example, in the past three years, we have grown our
can stock shipments in all regions by an average 20%, making it
an even larger portion of our product mix, while reducing or
exiting other less attractive market segments. Through our
continued focus on operating execution, we believe we can
cost-effectively deploy proprietary technologies that will
contribute to growth and higher profitability.
Pursue
organic growth in select emerging markets
Our international presence positions us well to capture
additional growth opportunities in targeted aluminum rolled
products in emerging regions, specifically South America and
Asia. We believe South America and Asia have high growth
potential in areas such as beverage cans, industrial products,
construction and electronics. For example, our can stock
shipments have grown by 43% in South America and by 63% in Asia
from 2005 to 2008. While our manufacturing and operating
presence positions us well to capture this growth, we would
expect to make some incremental capital expenditures or
selective acquisitions to expand our capabilities in these areas.
7
Our
Corporate Structure
The following chart shows the borrowers and guarantors of our
senior secured credit facilities, the issuer and guarantors of
our outstanding 7.25% senior notes due 2015 and the notes,
and our other material debt. The outstanding debt amounts are as
of September 30, 2009. Our outstanding debt is further
described under Description of Other Indebtedness.
8
Spin-off
from Alcan
Novelis Inc. was formed in Canada on September 21, 2004. On
May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer its
rolled products businesses into a separate company and to pursue
a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The spin-off
occurred on January 6, 2005, following approval by
Alcans board of directors and shareholders and legal and
regulatory approvals. Alcan shareholders received one Novelis
common share for every five Alcan common shares held.
Acquisition
by Hindalco
On May 15, 2007, Novelis was acquired by Hindalco through
an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan of
arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93
per share. The aggregate purchase price for all of Novelis
common shares was $3.4 billion, and $2.8 billion of
Novelis debt was also assumed, for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
Corporate
Information
Our registered office is located at 191 Evans Avenue, Toronto,
Ontario, M8Z 1J5. Our principal executive offices are located at
3399 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 1500, Atlanta, Georgia 30326,
and our telephone number is
(404) 814-4200.
The URL of our website is
http://www.novelis.com.
Information on our website does not constitute part of this
prospectus, and you should rely only on the information
contained in this prospectus when making a decision as to
whether to invest in the new notes described in this
prospectus.
Hindalco
Hindalco is one of Asias largest integrated producers of
aluminum and a leading producer of copper. Hindalcos stock
is publicly traded on the Bombay Stock Exchange, the National
Stock Exchange of India Limited and the Luxembourg Stock
Exchange. Hindalco is an Indian corporation and headquartered in
Mumbai, India. Hindalco is the flagship company of the Aditya
Birla Group, a $28 billion multinational conglomerate with
operations in 25 countries.
9
The
Exchange Offer
The following summary contains basic information about the
exchange offer. For a more detailed description of the terms and
conditions of the exchange offer, please refer to the section
The Exchange Offer
|
|
|
The Exchange Offer |
|
We are offering to exchange $1,000 principal amount of the new
notes, which have been registered under the Securities Act, for
each $1,000 principal amount of the old notes, which have not
been registered under the Securities Act. We issued the old
notes on August 11, 2009. |
|
|
|
In order to exchange your old notes, you must promptly tender
them before the expiration date (as described herein). All old
notes that are validly tendered and not validly withdrawn will
be exchanged. We will issue the new notes on or promptly after
the expiration date. |
|
|
|
You may tender your old notes for exchange in whole or in part
in denominations of $2,000 and integral multiples of $1,000 in
excess thereof. |
|
Registration Rights Agreement |
|
We sold the old notes on August 11, 2009 to Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated and RBS Securities Inc., the initial purchasers.
Simultaneously with that sale, we signed a registration rights
agreement with the initial purchasers relating to the old notes
that requires us to conduct this exchange offer. |
|
|
|
You have the right under the registration rights agreement to
exchange your old notes for new notes. The exchange offer is
intended to satisfy such right. After the exchange offer is
complete, you will no longer be entitled to any exchange or
registration rights with respect to your old notes. |
|
|
|
For a description of the procedures for tendering old notes, see
the section The Exchange Offer Exchange Offer
Procedures. |
|
Consequences of Failure to Exchange |
|
If you do not exchange your old notes for new notes in the
exchange offer, you will still have the restrictions on transfer
provided in the old notes and in the indenture that governs both
the old notes and the new notes. In general, the old notes may
not be offered or sold unless registered or exempt from
registration under the Securities Act, or in a transaction not
subject to the Securities Act and applicable state securities
laws. Upon completion of the exchange offer, we will have no
further obligations to register, and we do not currently plan to
register, the old notes under the Securities Act. See the
section Risk Factors If you do not exchange
your old notes for new notes, your ability to sell your old
notes will be restricted. |
|
|
|
Expiration Date |
|
The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City
time, on January 11, 2010, unless we extend the exchange
offer in our sole and absolute discretion. In that case, the
expiration date will be the latest date and time to which we
extend the exchange offer. See the section The Exchange
Offer Expiration Date; Extensions; Amendments. |
10
|
|
|
Conditions to the Exchange Offer |
|
The exchange offer is subject to customary conditions,
including, if in our reasonable judgement: |
|
|
|
the exchange offer, or the making of any exchange by
a holder of old notes, would violate applicable law or any
applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC; or
|
|
|
|
any action or proceeding has been instituted or
threatened in writing in any court or by or before any
governmental agency with respect to the exchange offer that, in
our judgment, would reasonably be expected to impair our ability
to proceed with the exchange offer.
|
|
|
|
We may choose to waive some of these conditions. For more
information, see The Exchange Offer Conditions
to the Exchange Offer. |
|
Procedures for Tendering Old Notes |
|
If you hold old notes through The Depository Trust Company
(DTC) and wish to participate in the exchange offer,
you must comply with the Automated Tender Offer Program
procedures of DTC. See the section The Exchange
Offer Exchange Offer Procedures. If you are
not a DTC participant, you may tender your old notes by
book-entry transfer by contacting your broker, dealer or other
nominee or by opening an account with a DTC participant, as the
case may be. |
|
|
|
By accepting the exchange offer, you will represent to us that,
among other things: |
|
|
|
any new notes that you receive will be acquired in
the ordinary course of your business;
|
|
|
|
you have no arrangement or understanding with any
person or entity, including any of our affiliates, to
participate in the distribution of the new notes;
|
|
|
|
you are not our affiliate as defined in
Rule 405 under the Securities Act, or, if you are an
affiliate, you will comply with any applicable registration and
prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act;
|
|
|
|
if you are not a broker-dealer, that you are not
engaged in, and do not intend to engage in, the distribution of
the new notes; and
|
|
|
|
if you are a broker-dealer that will receive new
notes for your own account in exchange for old notes that were
acquired as a result of market-making activities, that you will
deliver a prospectus, as required by law, in connection with any
resale of the new notes.
|
|
Withdrawal Rights |
|
You may withdraw the tender of your old notes at any time before
the expiration date. To do this, you should deliver a written
notice of your withdrawal to the exchange agent according to the
withdrawal procedures described in the section The
Exchange Offer Withdrawal Rights. |
|
Exchange Agent |
|
The exchange agent for the exchange offer is The Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. The address, telephone
number and facsimile number of the exchange agent are provided
in the |
11
|
|
|
|
|
section The Exchange Offer Exchange
Agent, as well as in the letter of transmittal. |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
We will not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of the
new notes. See the section Use of Proceeds. |
|
Principal Canadian and U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences |
|
Your participation in the exchange offer generally will not be a
taxable event for Canadian or U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Accordingly, you will not recognize any taxable gain or loss or
any interest income as a result of the exchange. See the section
Principal Canadian and U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Exchange Offer. |
Summary
Description of the New Notes
The summary below describes the principal terms of the new
notes. The terms of the new notes are identical in all material
respects to the terms of the old notes, except that the
registration rights and related liquidated damages provisions
and the transfer restrictions applicable to the old notes are
not applicable to the new notes. The new notes will evidence the
same debt as the old notes and will be governed by the same
indenture. Please read the section entitled Description of
the Notes in this prospectus, which contains a more
detailed description of the terms and conditions of the new
notes.
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
Novelis Inc., a Canadian corporation. |
|
Securities Offered |
|
$185,000,000 aggregate principal amount of
111/2% senior
notes due 2015. |
|
Maturity Date |
|
The new notes will mature on February 15, 2015. |
|
Interest |
|
The new notes will bear interest at the rate of 11.5% per annum.
Interest on the new notes will be payable semi-annually in
arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing
February 15, 2010. |
|
|
|
Guarantees |
|
The new notes will be guaranteed, fully and unconditionally and
jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis, by all of
our existing and future Canadian and U.S. restricted
subsidiaries, certain of our existing foreign restricted
subsidiaries and our other restricted subsidiaries that
guarantee debt in the future under any credit facilities,
provided that the borrower of such debt is our company or a
Canadian or a U.S. subsidiary. Generally each of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries is a restricted subsidiary unless
designated as an unrestricted subsidiary by the Board of
Directors upon satisfying certain qualifications such as not
owning any stock or debt of our company or a restricted
subsidiary and having minimal assets. See Description of
Notes Certain Covenants Designation of
Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries. For the year
ended March 31, 2009 and the six months ended
September 30, 2009, our subsidiaries that will not be
guarantors of the new notes had net sales of $2.6 billion
and $1.2 billion, respectively, and, as of
September 30, 2009, those subsidiaries had assets of
$1.4 billion and debt and other liabilities of
$1.0 billion (including inter-company balances). |
|
|
|
Ranking |
|
The new notes will be: |
12
|
|
|
|
|
our senior unsecured obligations;
|
|
|
|
effectively junior in right of payment to all of our
existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of
the assets securing that debt;
|
|
|
|
effectively junior in right of payment to all debt
and other liabilities (including trade payables) of any of our
subsidiaries that do not guarantee the new notes; and
|
|
|
|
senior in right of payment to all of our future
subordinated debt.
|
|
|
|
The guarantees of each guarantor will be: |
|
|
|
senior unsecured obligations of that guarantor;
|
|
|
|
effectively junior in right of payment to all
existing and future secured debt of that guarantor to the extent
of the value of the assets securing that debt, including the
debt or guarantee of debt of that guarantor under the senior
secured credit facilities, which debt or guarantee will be
secured by the assets of that guarantor; and
|
|
|
|
senior in right of payment to all of that
guarantors future subordinated debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, we and the guarantors had
$1.3 billion of secured debt. The indenture governing the
new notes permits us, subject to specified limitations, to incur
additional debt, which may be senior debt. |
|
|
|
Optional Redemption |
|
Prior to August 15, 2012, we may, from time to time, redeem
all or any portion of the new notes by paying a special
make-whole premium specified in this prospectus
under Description of the Notes Optional
Redemption. |
|
|
|
Commencing August 15, 2012, we may, from time to time,
redeem all or any portion of the new notes at the redemption
prices specified in this prospectus under Description of
the Notes Optional Redemption. |
|
|
|
In addition, at any time and from time to time prior to
August 15, 2012, we may also redeem up to 35% of the
original aggregate principal amount of the new notes in an
amount not to exceed the amount of proceeds of one or more
equity offerings, at a price equal to 111.500% of the principal
amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the
redemption date, provided that at least 65% of the
original aggregate principal amount of the new notes issued
remains outstanding after the redemption. |
|
Additional Amounts and Tax Redemption |
|
Any payments made by us with respect to the new notes will be
made without withholding or deduction, unless required by law.
If we are required by law to withhold or deduct for taxes with
respect to a payment to the holders of new notes, we will,
subject to certain exceptions, pay the additional amount
necessary so that the net amount received by the holders of new
notes (other than certain excluded holders) after the
withholding is not less than the amount they would have received
in the absence of the withholding. |
13
|
|
|
|
|
If we are required to pay additional amounts as a result of
changes in laws applicable to tax-related withholdings or
deductions in respect of payments on the new notes but not the
guarantees, we will have the option to redeem the new notes, in
whole but not in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the new notes, plus any accrued and
unpaid interest to the date of redemption and any additional
amounts that may be then payable. |
|
Certain Covenants |
|
We will issue the new notes under an indenture among us, the
guarantors and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as trustee. The indenture governing the new notes contains
covenants that limit our ability and the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries to: |
|
|
|
incur additional debt and provide additional
guarantees;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends beyond certain amounts and make other
restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
create or permit certain liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain asset sales;
|
|
|
|
use the proceeds from the sales of assets and
subsidiary stock;
|
|
|
|
create or permit restrictions on the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other
distributions to us;
|
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries;
and
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially
all of our assets and the assets of our restricted subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
During any future period in which either Standard &
Poors Rating Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc. (Standard & Poors),
or Moodys Investors Service, Inc.
(Moodys) have assigned an investment grade
credit rating to the new notes and no default or event of
default under the indenture has occurred and is continuing, most
of the covenants, including our obligation to repurchase new
notes following certain asset sales, will be suspended. If
either of these ratings agencies then withdraws its ratings or
downgrades the ratings assigned to the new notes below the
required investment grade rating, or a default or event of
default occurs and is continuing, the suspended covenants will
again be in effect. If at any time both ratings agencies have
assigned an investment grade rating to the new notes, those
covenants, including our obligation to repurchase new notes
following certain asset sales, will terminate and no longer be
applicable regardless of any subsequent changes in the rating of
those new notes. See Description of the Notes
Certain Covenants Covenant Termination and
Suspension. |
|
|
|
These covenants are subject to a number of important limitations
and exceptions. See Description of the Notes
Certain Covenants. |
14
|
|
|
Change of Control Offer |
|
Following a change of control, we will be required to offer to
purchase all of the new notes at a purchase price of 101% of
their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, to the date of purchase. See Description of the
Notes Change of Control Offer. |
|
Transfer Restrictions |
|
The notes are not being offered for sale or exchange and may not
be offered for sale or exchange directly or indirectly in Canada
except in accordance with applicable securities laws of the
provinces and territories of Canada. We are not required, and do
not intend, to qualify by prospectus in Canada the notes, and
accordingly, the notes will be subject to restriction on resale
in Canada. |
|
Risk Factors |
|
Investing in the new notes involves substantial risks. See
Risk Factors for a description of some of the risks
you should consider before investing in the new notes. |
|
Material Income Tax Considerations |
|
You should carefully read the information under the heading
Principal Canadian and U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Exchange Offer. |
|
Original Issue Discount |
|
The old notes were issued at a discount from their stated
principal amount for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Consequently, original issue discount will be included in the
gross income of a U.S. holder of notes for U.S. federal income
tax purposes in advance of the receipt of corresponding cash
payments on the notes. See
Principal
Canadian and U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Exchange Offer Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Exchange Offer. |
15
Summary
Financial Data
We were acquired by Hindalco through its indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary on May 15, 2007. We refer to the company prior
to the Hindalco acquisition (through May 15, 2007) as
the Predecessor, and we refer to the company after
the Hindalco acquisition (beginning on May 16,
2007) as the Successor. On June 26, 2007,
our board of directors approved the change of our fiscal year
end to March 31 from December 31.
The summary consolidated financial data of the Successor
presented below as of and for the six months ended
September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 has been
derived from the unaudited financial statements of Novelis Inc.
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary consolidated
financial data of the Successor presented below as of and for
the year ended March 31, 2009, as of March 31, 2008
and for the period May 16, 2007, through March 31,
2008, has been derived from the financial statements of Novelis
Inc. included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary
consolidated financial data of the Predecessor presented below
for the period April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, for
the three months ended March 31, 2007, and for the year
ended December 31, 2006 has been derived from the financial
statements of Novelis Inc. included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The summary financial data of the Predecessor
presented below as of March 31, 2007, and December 31,
2006, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance
sheets of Novelis Inc. for such periods, which are not included
in this prospectus. The results for the six months ended
September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the entire year.
The summary consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with our financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus and the related notes thereto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
(In million, except per share share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
9,849
|
|
|
$
|
2,630
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
9,317
|
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
|
|
9,251
|
|
|
|
5,622
|
|
|
|
3,261
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,127
|
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
12,345
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
(In million, except per share share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
574
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
375
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(275
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(127
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(161
|
)
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
(87
|
)
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
(236
|
)
|
|
$
|
(390
|
)
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial and Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
x
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,792
|
|
|
$
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
$
|
10,324
|
|
|
$
|
7,754
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
17
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The acquisition of Novelis by Hindalco on May 15, 2007 was
recorded in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 103, Push Down Basis of Accounting
Required in Certain Limited Circumstances
(SAB 103). In our consolidated balance
sheets, the consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
connection with the acquisition have been pushed
down to us and have been allocated to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 141,
Business Combinations (FASB 141). Due to the
impact of push down accounting, our financial statements and
certain note presentations for the year ended March 31,
2008 included elsewhere in this prospectus are presented in two
distinct periods to indicate the application of two different
bases of accounting between the periods presented: (1) the
period up to, and including, the acquisition date (April 1,
2007 through May 15, 2007, labeled Predecessor)
and (2) the period after that date (May 16, 2007
through March 31, 2008, labeled Successor). The
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus
include a black line division which indicates that the
Predecessor and Successor reporting entities shown are not
comparable. |
|
|
|
The consideration paid by Hindalco to acquire Novelis has been
pushed down to us and allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on our estimates of fair value, using
methodologies and assumptions that we believe are reasonable.
This allocation of fair value results in additional charges or
income to our post-acquisition consolidated statements of
operations. |
|
(2) |
|
Earnings consist of income from continuing operations before the
cumulative effect of accounting changes, before fixed charges
(excluding capitalized interest) and income taxes, and
eliminating undistributed income of persons owned less than 50%
by us. Fixed charges consist of interest expenses and
amortization of debt discount and expense and premium and that
portion of rental payments which is considered as being
representative of the interest factor implicit in our operating
leases. The ratios shown above are based on our consolidated and
combined financial information, which was prepared in accordance
with GAAP. |
|
|
|
Due to losses incurred in each of the periods presented below,
the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. The table below presents
the amount of additional earnings required to bring the fixed
charge ratio to 1:1 for each respective period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional earnings required to bring fixed charge ratio to 1:1
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,996
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in the new notes involves a high degree of
risk. In addition to the other information contained in this
prospectus, prospective investors should carefully consider the
following risks before investing in the new notes. If any of the
following risks actually occur, our business, financial
condition, operating results and cash flow could be materially
adversely affected, which, in turn, could adversely affect our
ability to pay interest and principal on the new notes. The
risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements,
and our actual results may differ substantially from those
discussed in these forward-looking statements. See Special
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Market
Data.
Risks
Related to our Business and the Market Environment
Economic
conditions could continue to materially adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operations and
liquidity.
Our financial condition and results of operations depend
significantly on worldwide economic conditions. These economic
conditions have recently deteriorated significantly in many
countries and regions in which we do business and may remain
depressed for the foreseeable future. Uncertainty about current
global economic conditions poses a risk as our customers may
postpone purchases in response to tighter credit and negative
financial news, which could adversely impact demand for our
products. These and other economic factors have, and may
continue to have, a significant impact on our financial
condition and results of operations.
The current financial turmoil affecting the banking system and
financial markets and the possibility that additional financial
institutions may consolidate or go out of business has resulted
in a tightening in the credit markets, a low level of liquidity
in many financial markets and extreme volatility in fixed
income, credit, currency and equity markets. There could be a
number of follow-on effects from the credit crisis on our
business, including the insolvency of key suppliers or their
inability to obtain credit to finance development
and/or
manufacture products resulting in product delays and the
inability of customers to purchase our products or pay for
products they have already received. If conditions become more
severe or continue longer than we anticipate, or if we are
unable to adequately respond to unforeseeable changes in demand
resulting from economic conditions, our financial condition and
results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
The deterioration of global economic conditions combined with
rapidly declining aluminum prices from a peak of $3,292 per
tonne in July 2008 to $1,850 per tonne on September 30,
2009 have placed pressure on our short-term liquidity. In the
near term, our forecast indicates our liquidity position will be
tight, but adequate as we settle outstanding derivative
positions. However, our liquidity needs could increase due to
the unpredictability of current market conditions and their
potential effect on customer credit, future derivative
settlements, future sales volume, our credit, or other matters.
As a result, management has undertaken a number of activities to
generate cash in the near term as well as implement changes in
our cost structure that will benefit our liquidity in the
long-term.
In addition, we use various derivative instruments to manage the
risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates, interest
rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. The current financial
turmoil affecting the banking system and financial markets could
affect whether the counterparties to our derivative instruments
are able to honor their agreements. We may be exposed to losses
in the future if the counterparties to our derivative
instruments fail to honor their agreements. Our maximum
potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in our
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009.
Certain
of our customers are significant to our revenues, and we could
be adversely affected by changes in the business or financial
condition of these significant customers or by the loss of their
business.
Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 50%, 45%,
45%, 47%, 43% and 43% of our total net sales for the six months
ended September 30, 2009; the year ended March 31,
2009; the period from May 16, 2007, through March 31,
2008; the period from April 1, 2007, to May 15, 2007;
the three months ended March 31, 2007; and the year ended
December 31, 2006, respectively, with Rexam Plc, a leading
global
19
beverage can maker, and its affiliates representing
approximately 20%, 17%, 15%, 14%, 16% and 14% of our total net
sales in the respective periods. A significant downturn in the
business or financial condition of our significant customers
could materially adversely affect our results of operations and
cash flows. In addition, if our existing relationships with
significant customers materially deteriorate or are terminated
in the future, and we are not successful in replacing business
lost from such customers, our results of operations and cash
flows could be adversely affected. Some of the longer term
contracts under which we supply our customers, including under
umbrella agreements such as those described under
Business Our Customers, are subject to
renewal, renegotiation or re-pricing at periodic intervals or
upon changes in competitive supply conditions. Our failure to
successfully renew, renegotiate or re-price such agreements
could result in a reduction or loss in customer purchase volume
or revenue, and if we are not successful in replacing business
lost from such customers, our results of operations and cash
flows could be adversely affected. The markets in which we
operate are competitive and customers may seek to consolidate
supplier relationships or change suppliers to obtain cost
savings and other benefits.
Our
profitability and cash flows could be adversely affected by our
inability to pass through metal price increases due to metal
price ceilings in certain of our sales contracts.
Prices for metal are volatile, have been impacted by recent
structural changes in the market, and may increase from time to
time. Nearly all of our products have a price structure with two
components: (i) a pass-through aluminum price based on the
LME plus local market premiums and (ii) a conversion
premium price based on the conversion cost to produce the
rolled product and the competitive market conditions for that
product. Sales contracts representing 257 kt and 300 kt of our
fiscal 2009 and 2008 shipments, respectively, contained a
ceiling over which metal prices could not be contractually
passed through to certain customers, unless adjusted. This
negatively impacted our margins and operating cash flows when
the price we paid for metal was above the ceiling price
contained in these contracts. We calculate and report this
difference to be approximately the difference between the quoted
purchase price on the LME (adjusted for any local premiums and
for any price lag associated with purchasing or processing time)
and the metal price ceiling in our contracts. Cash flows from
operations are negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted
for any timing difference between customer receipts and vendor
payments, and offset partially by reduced income taxes.
During the years ended March 31, 2009, March 31, 2008
and March 31, 2007, we were unable to pass through
approximately $176 million, $230 million and
$460 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs
associated with sales under these contracts. For the six months
ended September 30, 2009, we were unable to pass through
$4 million of metal purchase costs associated with sales
under these contracts. Based upon current LME prices and based
on a September 30, 2009 aluminum price of $1,850 per tonne,
we estimate that we will be unable to pass through additional
aluminum purchase costs of approximately $4 million through
December 31, 2009 when these contracts expire. However, if
metal prices increase above the metal price ceiling, our margins
and operating cash flows will be negatively impacted.
Our
efforts to mitigate the risk of rising metal prices may not be
effective.
We employ the following strategies to manage and mitigate the
risk associated with metal price ceilings and rising prices that
we cannot pass through to certain customers:
|
|
|
|
|
We maximize the amount of our internally supplied metal inputs
from our smelting, refining and mining operations in Brazil and
rely on output from our recycling operations which utilize UBCs.
Both of these sources of aluminum supply have historically
provided an offsetting benefit to the metal price ceiling
contracts as these sources are typically less expensive than
purchasing aluminum from third party suppliers. We refer to
these two sources as internal hedges. To the extent
that this benefit is not as significant (or does not exist at
all) in the future, our internal hedges may not provide an
effective offset to the metal price ceiling contracts.
|
|
|
|
We generally enter into derivative instruments to hedge
projected aluminum volume requirements above our assumed
internal hedge position mitigating our exposure to further
increases in LME. As a result of these instruments, we will
continue to incur cash losses related to these contracts even if
LME remains
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
below the ceiling price. As of September 30, 2009 the fair
value of the liability associated with these derivative
instruments was $197 million. In addition, to the extent
that our exposures are not fully hedged due to the cost
associated with derivative instruments, we will be exposed to
gains and losses when changes occur in the market price of
aluminum. Alternatively, we may continue to purchase derivative
instruments at higher prices than historic levels.
|
Our
results and cash flows can be negatively impacted by timing
differences between the prices we pay under purchase contracts
and metal prices we charge our customers.
In some of our contracts there is a timing difference between
the metal prices we pay under our purchase contracts and the
metal prices we charge our customers. As a result, changes in
metal prices impact our results, since during such periods we
bear the additional cost or benefit of metal price changes,
which could have a material effect on our profitability and cash
flows.
Our
operations consume energy and our profitability and cash flows
may decline if energy costs were to rise, or if our energy
supplies were interrupted.
We consume substantial amounts of energy in our rolling
operations, cast house operations and Brazilian smelting
operations. The factors that affect our energy costs and supply
reliability tend to be specific to each of our facilities. A
number of factors could materially adversely affect our energy
position including:
|
|
|
|
|
increases in costs of natural gas;
|
|
|
|
significant increases in costs of supplied electricity or fuel
oil related to transportation;
|
|
|
|
interruptions in energy supply due to equipment failure or other
causes;
|
|
|
|
the inability to extend energy supply contracts upon expiration
on economical terms; and
|
|
|
|
the inability to pass through energy costs in certain sales
contracts.
|
If energy costs were to rise, or if energy supplies or supply
arrangements were disrupted, our profitability and cash flows
could decline.
We may
not have sufficient cash to repay indebtedness and we may be
limited in our ability to access financing for future capital
requirements, which may prevent us from increasing our
manufacturing capability, improving our technology or addressing
any gaps in our product offerings.
Although historically our cash flow from operations has been
sufficient to repay indebtedness, satisfy working capital
requirements and fund capital expenditure and research and
development requirements, in the future we may need to incur
additional debt or issue equity in order to fund these
requirements as well as to make acquisitions and other
investments. To the extent we are unable to raise new capital,
we may be unable to increase our manufacturing capability,
improve our technology or address any gaps in our product
offerings. If we raise funds through the issuance of debt, the
terms of the debt securities may impose restrictions on our
operations that have an adverse impact on our financial
condition.
A
deterioration of our financial position or a downgrade of our
ratings by a credit rating agency could increase our borrowing
costs and our business relationships could be adversely
affected.
A deterioration of our financial position or a downgrade of our
ratings for any reason could increase our borrowing costs and
have an adverse effect on our business relationships with
customers, suppliers and hedging counterparties. From time to
time, we enter into various forms of hedging activities against
currency or metal price fluctuations and trade metal contracts
on the LME. Financial strength and credit ratings are important
to the availability and pricing of these hedging and trading
activities. As a result, any downgrade of our credit ratings may
make it more costly for us to engage in these activities, and
changes to our level of indebtedness may make it more difficult
or costly for us to engage in these activities in the future.
21
Adverse
changes in currency exchange rates could negatively affect our
financial results or cash flows and the competitiveness of our
aluminum rolled products relative to other
materials.
Our businesses and operations are exposed to the effects of
changes in the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar, the euro,
the British pound, the Brazilian real, the Canadian dollar, the
Korean won and other currencies. We have implemented a hedging
policy that attempts to manage currency exchange rate risks to
an acceptable level based on managements judgment of the
appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and cost;
however, this hedging policy may not successfully or completely
eliminate the effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
results and cash flows.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in
U.S. dollars, but a portion of our earnings and
expenditures are denominated in other currencies, primarily the
euro, the Korean won and the Brazilian real. Changes in exchange
rates will result in increases or decreases in our reported
costs and earnings and may also affect the book value of our
assets located outside the U.S.
Most
of our facilities are staffed by a unionized workforce, and
union disputes and other employee relations issues could
materially adversely affect our financial results.
Approximately 70% of our employees are represented by labor
unions under a large number of collective bargaining agreements
with varying durations and expiration dates. We may not be able
to satisfactorily renegotiate our collective bargaining
agreements when they expire. In addition, existing collective
bargaining agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage
at our facilities in the future, and any such work stoppage
could have a material adverse effect on our financial results
and cash flows.
Our
operations have been and will continue to be exposed to various
business and other risks, changes in conditions and events
beyond our control in countries where we have operations or sell
products.
We are, and will continue to be, subject to financial,
political, economic and business risks in connection with our
global operations. We have made investments and carry on
production activities in various emerging markets, including
Brazil, Korea and Malaysia, and we market our products in these
countries, as well as China and certain other countries in Asia,
the Middle East and emerging markets in South America. While we
anticipate higher growth or attractive production opportunities
from these emerging markets, they also present a higher degree
of risk than more developed markets. In addition to the business
risks inherent in developing and servicing new markets, economic
conditions may be more volatile, legal and regulatory systems
less developed and predictable, and the possibility of various
types of adverse governmental action more pronounced. In
addition, inflation, fluctuations in currency and interest
rates, competitive factors, civil unrest and labor problems
could affect our revenues, expenses and results of operations.
Our operations could also be adversely affected by acts of war,
terrorism or the threat of any of these events as well as
government actions such as controls on imports, exports and
prices, tariffs, new forms of taxation, or changes in fiscal
regimes and increased government regulation in the countries in
which we operate or service customers. Unexpected or
uncontrollable events or circumstances in any of these markets
could have a material adverse effect on our financial results
and cash flows.
We
could be adversely affected by disruptions of our
operations.
Breakdown of equipment or other events, including catastrophic
events such as war or natural disasters, leading to production
interruptions in our plants could have a material adverse effect
on our financial results and cash flows. Further, because many
of our customers are, to varying degrees, dependent on planned
deliveries from our plants, those customers that have to
reschedule their own production due to our missed deliveries
could pursue claims against us. We may incur costs to correct
any of these problems, in addition to facing claims from
customers. Further, our reputation among actual and potential
customers may be harmed, resulting in a loss of business. While
we maintain insurance policies covering, among other things,
physical damage, business interruptions and product liability,
these policies would not cover all of our losses.
22
Our
goodwill and other intangible assets could become further
impaired, which may require us to take significant non-cash
charges against earnings.
We assess, at least annually and potentially more frequently,
whether the value of our goodwill and other intangible assets
has been impaired. Any impairment of goodwill or other
intangible assets as a result of such analysis would result in a
non-cash charge against earnings, which charge could materially
adversely affect our reported results of operations.
In fiscal 2009, we recorded a $1.34 billion goodwill
impairment charge due to the deterioration in the global
economic environment and the resulting decrease in both the
market capitalization of our parent company and the valuation of
our publicly traded 7.25% senior notes. Subsequent to that
impairment charge, our remaining goodwill balance as of
September 30, 2009 was $611 million, allocated to our
reporting units as follows: North America
$288 million; Europe $181 million; South
America $113 million. The fair value of the
reporting units exceeded their respective carrying amounts in
our most recent impairment test by 12% for North America, by 9%
for Europe and by 36% for South America.
A significant and sustained decline in our future cash flows, a
significant adverse change in the economic environment or slower
growth rates could result in the need to perform additional
impairment analysis in future periods. If we were to conclude
that a future write-down of goodwill or other intangible assets
is necessary, then we would record such additional charges,
which could materially adversely affect our results of
operations.
As
part of our ongoing evaluation of our operations, we may
undertake additional restructuring efforts in the future which
could in some instances result in significant severance-related
costs, environmental remediation expenses and impairment and
other restructuring charges.
We recorded restructuring charges of $95 million for the
year ended March 31, 2009 and $7 million for the year
ended March 31, 2008. During this two year period we
announced, among others, the following restructuring actions and
programs:
|
|
|
|
|
ceasing production of commercial grade alumina at our Ouro Preto
facility in Brazil;
|
|
|
|
the closure of our aluminum sheet mill in Rogerstone, South
Wales, U.K.;
|
|
|
|
a restructuring plan to streamline our operations at our Rugles
facility located in Upper Normandy, France;
|
|
|
|
a voluntary separation program for salaried employees in North
America and the corporate office aimed at reducing staff levels;
|
|
|
|
a voluntary retirement program in Asia; and
|
|
|
|
the closure of our light gauge converter products facility in
Louisville, Kentucky.
|
We may take additional restructuring actions in the future. In
particular, we expect to continue to evaluate our primary
aluminum business in light of current market conditions,
including our South American operations, which include two
rolling plants in Brazil along with two smelters, bauxite mines
and power generation facilities. Any additional restructuring
efforts could result in significant severance-related costs,
environmental remediation expenses, impairment charges,
restructuring charges and related costs and expenses, which
could adversely affect our profitability and cash flows.
We may
not be able to successfully develop and implement new technology
initiatives in a timely manner.
We have invested in, and are involved with, a number of
technology and process initiatives. Several technical aspects of
these initiatives are still unproven, and the eventual
commercial outcomes cannot be assessed with any certainty. Even
if we are successful with these initiatives, we may not be able
to deploy them in a timely fashion. Accordingly, the costs and
benefits from our investments in new technologies and the
consequent effects on our financial results may vary from
present expectations.
23
If we
fail to establish and maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting, we may have material misstatements in our
financial statements and we may not be able to report our
financial results in a timely manner.
Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to
provide a report by management in our
Form 10-K
on internal control over financial reporting, including
managements assessment of the effectiveness of such
control. Internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent
limitations, including the possibility of human error, the
circumvention or overriding of controls or fraud. Therefore,
even effective internal controls can provide only some assurance
with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of
financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our
internal controls, we may be unable to provide financial
information in a timely and reliable manner. Any such
difficulties or failure may have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and operating results.
In July 2008, we identified non-cash errors relating to our
purchase accounting for an equity method investee including
related income tax accounts. As a result of our identification
of these errors, our audit committee of our board of directors
(the Audit Committee) and management concluded on
August 1, 2008, that our previously issued consolidated
financial statements for our fiscal year ended March 31,
2008, should no longer be relied upon. Upon conducting a review
of these accounting errors, management determined that as of
March 31, 2008, we had a material weakness with respect to
the application of purchase accounting for an equity method
investee including the related income tax accounts.
Specifically, our controls did not ensure the accuracy and
validity of our purchase accounting adjustments for an equity
method investee. This control deficiency could result in a
material misstatement of our Investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates and Equity in net
(income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates in our
consolidated financial statements that would result in a
material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated
financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
Accordingly, management had determined that this control
deficiency constitutes a material weakness. This material
weakness was disclosed in our amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008, our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008, our quarterly
report on
form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2008, our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009 and our quarterly report
on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2009. This material
weakness still existed as of September 30, 2009.
If we are not able to remedy the material weakness in a timely
manner, we may not be able to provide our securityholders with
the required financial information in a timely and reliable
manner and we may incorrectly report financial information,
either of which could subject us to sanctions or investigation
by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC. In addition, there
could be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a
loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial
statements.
Loss
of our key management and other personnel, or an inability to
attract such management and other personnel, could adversely
impact our business.
We depend on our senior executive officers and other key
personnel to run our business. The loss of any of these officers
or other key personnel could materially adversely affect our
operations. Competition for qualified employees among companies
that rely heavily on engineering and technology is intense, and
the loss of qualified employees or an inability to attract,
retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees required
for the operation and expansion of our business could hinder our
ability to improve manufacturing operations, conduct research
activities successfully and develop marketable products.
Past
and future acquisitions or divestitures may adversely affect our
financial condition.
Historically, we have grown partly through the acquisition of
other businesses, including businesses acquired by Alcan in its
2000 acquisition of the Alusuisse Group Ltd. and its 2003
acquisition of Pechiney SA, both of which were integrated
aluminum companies. As part of our strategy for growth, we may
continue to pursue acquisitions, divestitures or strategic
alliances, which may not be completed or, if completed, may
24
not be ultimately beneficial to us. There are numerous risks
commonly encountered in business combinations, including the
risk that we may not be able to complete a transaction that has
been announced, effectively integrate businesses acquired or
generate the cost savings and synergies anticipated. Failure to
do so could have a material adverse effect on our financial
results.
We
could be required to make unexpected contributions to our
defined benefit pension plans as a result of adverse changes in
interest rates and the capital markets.
Most of our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit
pension plans for our employees in the U.S., the U.K. and
Canada, unfunded pension benefits in Germany and lump sum
indemnities payable to our employees in France, Italy, Korea and
Malaysia upon retirement or termination. Our pension plan assets
consist primarily of funds invested in listed stocks and bonds.
Our estimates of liabilities and expenses for pensions and other
postretirement benefits incorporate a number of assumptions,
including expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and
interest rates used to discount future benefits. Our results of
operations, liquidity or shareholders equity in a
particular period could be adversely affected by capital market
returns that are less than their assumed long-term rate of
return or a decline of the rate used to discount future benefits.
If the assets of our pension plans do not achieve assumed
investment returns for any period, such deficiency could result
in one or more charges against our earnings for that period. In
addition, changing economic conditions, poor pension investment
returns or other factors may require us to make unexpected cash
contributions to the pension plans in the future, preventing the
use of such cash for other purposes.
We
face risks relating to certain joint ventures and subsidiaries
that we do not entirely control. Our ability to generate cash
from these entities may be more restricted than if such entities
were wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Some of our activities are, and will in the future be, conducted
through entities that we do not entirely control or wholly own.
These entities include our Norf, Germany and Logan, Kentucky
joint ventures, as well as our majority-owned Korean and
Malaysian subsidiaries. Our Malaysian subsidiary is a public
company whose shares are listed for trading on the Bursa
Malaysia Securities Berhad. Under the governing documents or
agreements or securities laws applicable to or stock exchange
listing rules relative to certain of these joint ventures and
subsidiaries, our ability to fully control certain operational
matters may be limited. In addition, we do not solely determine
certain key matters, such as the timing and amount of cash
distributions from these entities. As a result, our ability to
generate cash from these entities may be more restricted than if
they were wholly-owned entities.
Hindalco
and its interests as equity holder may conflict with our
interest or your interests as holders of the notes in the
future.
Novelis is an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of Hindalco. As
a result, Hindalco may exercise control over our decisions to
enter into any corporate transaction or capital restructuring
and has the ability to approve or prevent any transaction that
requires the approval of our stockholders, regardless of whether
or not holders of the notes believe that any such transactions
are in their own best interests. The interests of Hindalco and
the actions it is able to undertake as our sole stockholder may
differ or adversely affect your interests as holders of the
notes. Hindalco may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions,
divestitures, financings or other transactions that, in its
judgment, could enhance its equity investment, even though such
transactions might involve risks to holders of the notes. For
example, Hindalco could cause us to make acquisitions that
increase the amount of indebtedness that is secured, or to sell
revenue-generating assets, impairing our ability to make
payments under the notes. Hindalco may be able to strongly
influence or effectively control our decisions as long as they
own a significant portion of our equity, even if such amount is
less than 50%. Additionally, Hindalco operates in the aluminum
industry and may from time to time acquire and hold interests in
businesses that compete, directly or indirectly, with us.
Hindalco may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be
complementary to our business, and as a result, those
acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. Hindalco
has no obligation to provide us with financing and is able to
sell their equity ownership in us at any time.
25
We
have supply agreements with Alcan for a portion of our raw
materials requirements. If Alcan is unable to deliver sufficient
quantities of these materials or if it terminates these
agreements, our ability to manufacture products on a timely
basis could be adversely affected.
The manufacture of our products requires sheet ingot that has
historically been, in part, supplied by Alcan. For the year
ended March 31, 2009, we purchased the majority of our
third party sheet ingot requirements from Alcans primary
metal group. In connection with the spin-off, we entered into
metal supply agreements with Alcan upon terms and conditions
substantially similar to market terms and conditions for the
continued purchase of sheet ingot from Alcan, which were amended
effective as of January 1, 2008. If Alcan is unable to
deliver sufficient quantities of this material on a timely basis
or if Alcan terminates one or more of these agreements, our
production may be disrupted and our net sales, profitability and
cash flows could be materially adversely affected. Although
aluminum is traded on the world markets, developing alternative
suppliers for that portion of our raw material requirements we
expect to be supplied by Alcan could be time consuming and
expensive.
Our continuous casting operations at our Saguenay Works, Canada
facility depend upon a local supply of molten aluminum from
Alcan. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009,
Alcans primary metal group supplied most of the molten
aluminum used at Saguenay Works. In connection with the
spin-off, we entered into a metal supply agreement on terms
determined primarily by Alcan for the continued purchase of
molten aluminum from Alcan. If this supply were to be disrupted,
our Saguenay Works production could be interrupted and our net
sales, profitability and cash flows materially adversely
affected.
We may
lose key rights if a change in control of our voting shares were
to occur.
Our separation agreement with Alcan provides that if we
experience a change in control in our voting shares during the
five years following the spin-off and if the entity acquiring
control does not refrain from using the Novelis assets to
compete against Alcan in the plate and aerospace products
markets, Alcan may terminate any or all of certain agreements we
currently have with Alcan. Hindalco delivered the requisite
non-compete agreement to Alcan on June 14, 2007, following
its acquisition of our common shares. However, if Hindalco were
to sell its controlling interest in Novelis before
January 6, 2010, a new acquirer would be required to
provide a similar agreement.
The termination of any of these agreements could deprive any
potential acquirer of certain services, resources or rights
necessary to the conduct of our business. Replacement of these
assets could be difficult or impossible, resulting in a material
adverse effect on our business operations, net sales,
profitability and cash flows. In addition, the potential
termination of these agreements could prevent us from entering
into future business transactions such as acquisitions or joint
ventures at terms favorable to us or at all.
Our
agreement not to compete with Alcan in certain end-use markets
may hinder our ability to take advantage of new business
opportunities.
In connection with the spin-off, we agreed not to compete with
Alcan for a period of five years from the spin-off date in the
manufacture, production and sale of certain products for use in
the plate and aerospace markets. As a result, it may be more
difficult for us to pursue successfully new business
opportunities, which could limit our potential sources of
revenue and growth.
We
face significant price and other forms of competition from other
aluminum rolled products producers, which could hurt our results
of operations and cash flows.
Generally, the markets in which we operate are highly
competitive. We compete primarily on the basis of our value
proposition, including price, product quality, ability to meet
customers specifications, range of products offered, lead
times, technical support and customer service. Some of our
competitors may benefit from greater capital resources, have
more efficient technologies, have lower raw material and energy
costs and may be able to sustain longer periods of price
competition.
26
In addition, our competitive position within the global aluminum
rolled products industry may be affected by, among other things,
the recent trend toward consolidation among our competitors,
exchange rate fluctuations that may make our products less
competitive in relation to the products of companies based in
other countries (despite the U.S. dollar-based input cost
and the marginal costs of shipping) and economies of scale in
purchasing, production and sales, which accrue to the benefit of
some of our competitors.
Increased competition could cause a reduction in our shipment
volumes and profitability or increase our expenditures, either
of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
results and cash flows.
The
end-use markets for certain of our products are highly
competitive and customers are willing to accept substitutes for
our products.
The end-use markets for certain aluminum rolled products are
highly competitive. Aluminum competes with other materials, such
as steel, plastics, composite materials and glass, among others,
for various applications, including in beverage and food cans
and automotive end-use markets. In the past, customers have
demonstrated a willingness to substitute other materials for
aluminum. For example, changes in consumer preferences in
beverage containers have increased the use of PET plastic
containers and glass bottles in recent years. These trends may
continue. The willingness of customers to accept substitutes for
aluminum products could have a material adverse effect on our
financial results and cash flows.
The
seasonal nature of some of our customers industries could
have a material adverse effect on our financial results and cash
flows.
The construction industry and the consumption of beer and soda
are sensitive to weather conditions and as a result, demand for
aluminum rolled products in the construction industry and for
can feedstock can be seasonal. Our quarterly financial results
could fluctuate as a result of climatic changes, and a prolonged
series of cold summers in the different regions in which we
conduct our business could have a material adverse effect on our
financial results and cash flows.
We are
subject to a broad range of environmental, health and safety
laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate,
and we may be exposed to substantial environmental, health and
safety costs and liabilities.
We are subject to a broad range of environmental, health and
safety laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we
operate. These laws and regulations impose increasingly
stringent environmental, health and safety protection standards
and permitting requirements regarding, among other things, air
emissions, wastewater storage, treatment and discharges, the use
and handling of hazardous or toxic materials, waste disposal
practices, the remediation of environmental contamination,
post-mining reclamation and working conditions for our
employees. Some environmental laws, such as Superfund and
comparable laws in U.S. states and other jurisdictions
worldwide, impose joint and several liability for the cost of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses, without regard to the fault or the
legality of the original conduct.
The costs of complying with these laws and regulations,
including participation in assessments and remediation of
contaminated sites and installation of pollution control
facilities, have been, and in the future could be, significant.
In addition, these laws and regulations may also result in
substantial environmental liabilities associated with divested
assets, third party locations and past activities. In certain
instances, these costs and liabilities, as well as related
action to be taken by us, could be accelerated or increased if
we were to close, divest of or change the principal use of
certain facilities with respect to which we may have
environmental liabilities or remediation obligations. Currently,
we are involved in a number of compliance efforts, remediation
activities and legal proceedings concerning environmental
matters, including certain activities and proceedings arising
under Superfund and comparable laws in U.S. states and
other jurisdictions worldwide in which we have operations,
including Brazil and certain countries in the European Union.
We have established reserves for environmental remediation
activities and liabilities where appropriate. However, the cost
of addressing environmental matters (including the timing of any
charges related thereto) cannot be predicted with certainty, and
these reserves may not ultimately be adequate, especially in
light of
27
potential changes in environmental conditions, changing
interpretations of laws and regulations by regulators and
courts, the discovery of previously unknown environmental
conditions, the risk of governmental orders to carry out
additional compliance on certain sites not initially included in
remediation in progress, our potential liability to remediate
sites for which provisions have not been previously established
and the adoption of more stringent environmental laws. Such
future developments could result in increased environmental
costs and liabilities and could require significant capital
expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, results or cash flows. Furthermore,
the failure to comply with our obligations under the
environmental laws and regulations could subject us to
administrative, civil or criminal penalties, obligations to pay
damages or other costs, and injunctions or other orders,
including orders to cease operations. In addition, the presence
of environmental contamination at our properties could adversely
affect our ability to sell property, receive full value for a
property or use a property as collateral for a loan.
Some of our current and potential operations are located or
could be located in or near communities that may regard such
operations as having a detrimental effect on their social and
economic circumstances. Environmental laws typically provide for
participation in permitting decisions, site remediation
decisions and other matters. Concern about environmental justice
issues may affect our operations. Should such community
objections be presented to government officials, the
consequences of such a development may have a material adverse
impact upon the profitability or, in extreme cases, the
viability of an operation. In addition, such developments may
adversely affect our ability to expand or enter into new
operations in such location or elsewhere and may also have an
effect on the cost of our environmental remediation projects.
We use a variety of hazardous materials and chemicals in our
rolling processes, as well as in our smelting operations in
Brazil and in connection with maintenance work on our
manufacturing facilities. Because of the nature of these
substances or related residues, we may be liable for certain
costs, including, among others, costs for health-related claims
or removal or re-treatment of such substances. Certain of our
current and former facilities incorporate asbestos-containing
materials, a hazardous substance that has been the subject of
health-related claims for occupation exposure. In addition,
although we have developed environmental, health and safety
programs for our employees, including measures to reduce
employee exposure to hazardous substances, and conduct regular
assessments at our facilities, we are currently, and in the
future may be, involved in claims and litigation filed on behalf
of persons alleging injury predominantly as a result of
occupational exposure to substances or other hazards at our
current or former facilities. It is not possible to predict the
ultimate outcome of these claims and lawsuits due to the
unpredictable nature of personal injury litigation. If these
claims and lawsuits, individually or in the aggregate, were
finally resolved against us, our results of operations and cash
flows could be adversely affected.
We may
be exposed to significant legal proceedings or
investigations.
From time to time, we are involved in, or the subject of,
disputes, proceedings and investigations with respect to a
variety of matters, including environmental, health and safety,
product liability, employee, tax, personal injury, contractual
and other matters as well as other disputes and proceedings that
arise in the ordinary course of business.
Certain of these matters are discussed in the preceding risk
factor. Any claims against us or any investigations involving
us, whether meritorious or not, could be costly to defend or
comply with and could divert managements attention as well
as operational resources. Any such dispute, litigation or
investigation, whether currently pending or threatened or in the
future, may have a material adverse effect on our financial
results and cash flows.
For example, a lawsuit was commenced against Novelis Corporation
on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC
(CCBSS) in Georgia state court. CCBSS is a
consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and
seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial
and a declaration of its rights under the agreement. The
agreement includes a most favored nations provision
regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS alleges that Novelis
Corporation breached the terms of the most favored
nations provision. The dispute will likely turn
28
on the facts that are presented to the court by the parties and
the courts finding as to how certain provisions of the
agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in
this litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material.
Novelis Corporation has filed its answer and the parties are
proceeding with discovery. See Business Legal
Proceedings.
Product
liability claims against us could result in significant costs or
negatively impact our reputation and could adversely affect our
business results and financial condition.
We are sometimes exposed to warranty and product liability
claims. There can be no assurance that we will not experience
material product liability losses arising from such claims in
the future and that these will not have a negative impact on us.
We generally maintain insurance against many product liability
risks, but there can be no assurance that this coverage will be
adequate for any liabilities ultimately incurred. In addition,
there is no assurance that insurance will continue to be
available on terms acceptable to us. A successful claim that
exceeds our available insurance coverage could have a material
adverse effect on our financial results and cash flows.
Risks
Related to the Notes
Our
substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our business and
therefore make it more difficult for us to fulfill our
obligations under the notes.
We are highly leveraged. As of September 30, 2009 we had
$2.8 billion of indebtedness outstanding. Our substantial
indebtedness and interest expense could have important
consequences to our company and holders of notes, including:
|
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to borrow additional amounts for working
capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements,
execution of our growth strategy or other general corporate
purposes;
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas
of our business because we must dedicate a substantial portion
of these funds to service our debt;
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
industry conditions;
|
|
|
|
placing us at a competitive disadvantage as compared to our
competitors that have less leverage;
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to capitalize on business opportunities and
to react to competitive pressures and adverse changes in
government regulation;
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability or increasing the costs to refinance
indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to enter into hedging transactions by
reducing the number of counterparties with whom we can enter
into such transactions as well as the volume of those
transactions.
|
Despite
the level of our indebtedness, we may still incur significantly
more indebtedness. This could further increase the risks
associated with our indebtedness.
Despite our current level of indebtedness of $2.8 billion
as of September 30, 2009 we and our subsidiaries may be
able to incur additional indebtedness of up to approximately
$300 million, including secured indebtedness, in the
future. Our level of additional indebtedness is limited by our
senior secured credit facilities, the indenture governing our
7.25% senior notes and the indenture governing the notes.
However, these restrictions are subject to a number of
qualifications and exceptions. Currently our senior secured
credit facilities consist of (a) a $1.16 billion
seven-year term loan facility maturing July 2014 (the Term
Loan Facility) and (b) an $800 million five-year
multi-currency asset-based revolving line of credit and letter
of credit facility maturing July 2012 (the ABL
Facility). If new indebtedness is added to our and our
subsidiaries current debt levels, the related risks that
we and they face would be increased and we may not be able to
meet all our debt obligations, including repayment of the notes,
in whole or in part.
29
We may
not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all our
indebtedness, including the notes, and may be forced to take
other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness,
which may not be successful.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our
debt obligations depends on our financial condition and
operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic
and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business
and other factors beyond our control. We may not be able to
maintain such a level of cash flows from operating activities
sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any,
and interest on our indebtedness, including the notes.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund
our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or
delay investments and capital expenditures, or to sell assets,
seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our
indebtedness, including the notes. Our ability to restructure or
refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital
markets and our financial condition at such time. Any
refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and
may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which
could further restrict our business operations. The terms of
existing or future debt instruments and the indentures governing
the notes may restrict us from adopting some of these
alternatives. In addition, any failure to make payments of
interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness on a
timely basis would likely result in a reduction of our credit
rating, which could harm our ability to incur additional
indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful
and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service
obligations.
The
covenants in our senior secured credit facilities, the indenture
governing our 7.25% senior notes and the indenture
governing the notes impose significant operating restrictions on
us.
The senior secured credit facilities, the indenture governing
our 7.25% senior notes and the indenture governing the
notes impose significant operating restrictions on us. These
restrictions limit our ability and the ability of our restricted
subsidiaries, among other things, to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt and provide additional guarantees;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends and make other restricted payments, including
certain investments;
|
|
|
|
create or permit certain liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain asset sales;
|
|
|
|
use the proceeds from the sales of assets and subsidiary stock;
|
|
|
|
create or permit restrictions on the ability of our restricted
subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us;
|
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions; and
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our
assets or the assets of our restricted subsidiaries.
|
In addition, under the ABL Facility, if our excess availability
under the ABL Facility is less than 10% of the lender
commitments under the ABL Facility or less than 10% of our
borrowing base, we are required to maintain a minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio of at least 1 to 1. As of
September 30, 2009, our fixed charge coverage ratio was
less than 1 to 1 and our excess availability was
$400 million, or 50% of the lender commitments under the
ABL Facility. Following the completion of the offering of the
old notes, we used approximately $81 million of the
proceeds plus additional cash on hand to repay a portion of the
outstanding amount under the ABL Facility.
30
If we
default on our obligations to pay our other indebtedness, we may
not be able to make payments on the notes.
Any default under the agreements governing our indebtedness,
including a default under our senior secured credit facilities,
that is not waived by the required lenders or holders of such
indebtedness, and the remedies sought by the holders of such
indebtedness, could prevent us from paying principal, premium,
if any, and interest on the notes and substantially decrease the
market value of the notes. If we are unable to generate
sufficient cash flow or are otherwise unable to obtain funds
necessary to meet required payments of principal, premium, if
any, and interest on our indebtedness, or if we otherwise fail
to comply with the various covenants in the agreements governing
our indebtedness, including the covenants contained in our
senior secured credit facilities, we would be in default under
the terms of the agreements governing such indebtedness. In the
event of such default:
|
|
|
|
|
the lenders under our senior secured credit facilities could
elect to terminate their commitments thereunder, declare all the
funds borrowed thereunder to be due and payable and, if not
promptly paid, institute foreclosure proceedings against our
assets;
|
|
|
|
even if those lenders do not declare a default, they may be able
to cause all of our available cash to be used to repay their
loans; and
|
|
|
|
such default could cause a cross-default or cross-acceleration
under our other indebtedness, including our 7.25% senior
notes.
|
As a result of such default and any actions the lenders may take
in response thereto, we could be forced into bankruptcy or
liquidation.
If our operating performance declines, we may in the future need
to obtain waivers from the required lenders under our senior
secured credit facilities to avoid being in default. If we
breach our covenants under our senior secured credit facilities
and seek a waiver, we may not be able to obtain a waiver from
the required lenders. If this occurs, we could be in default
under our senior secured credit facilities, the lenders could
exercise their rights, as described above, and we could be
forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.
We are
a holding company and depend on our subsidiaries to generate
sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service obligations,
including payments on the notes.
We are a holding company and a large portion of our assets is
the capital stock of our subsidiaries and the equity interests
in our joint ventures. As a holding company, we conduct
substantially all of our business through our subsidiaries and
joint ventures. Consequently, our cash flow and ability to
service our debt obligations, including the notes, are dependent
upon the earnings of our subsidiaries and joint ventures and the
distribution of those earnings to us, or upon loans, advances or
other payments made by these entities to us. The ability of
these entities to pay dividends or make other loans, advances or
payments to us will depend upon their operating results and will
be subject to applicable laws and contractual restrictions
contained in the instruments governing their debt, and we may
not exercise sufficient control to cause distributions to be
made to us. Although our senior secured credit facilities, the
indenture governing our 7.25% senior notes and the
indenture governing the notes each limits the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries to enter into consensual restrictions on
their ability to pay dividends and make other payments to us,
these limitations do not apply to our existing joint ventures or
unrestricted subsidiaries and the limitations are also subject
to important exceptions and qualifications.
The ability of our subsidiaries to generate sufficient cash flow
from operations to allow us to make scheduled payments on our
debt obligations, including the notes, will depend on their
future financial performance, which will be affected by a range
of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are
outside of our control. We cannot assure you that the cash flow
and earnings of our operating subsidiaries and the amount that
they are able to distribute to us as dividends or otherwise will
be adequate for us to service our debt obligations, including
the notes. If our subsidiaries do not generate sufficient cash
flow from operations to satisfy our debt obligations, including
payments on the notes, we may have to undertake alternative
financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our debt,
selling assets, reducing or delaying
31
capital investments or seeking to raise additional capital. We
cannot assure you that any such alternative refinancing would be
possible, that any assets could be sold, or, if sold, of the
timing of the sales and the amount of proceeds realized from
those sales, that additional financing could be obtained on
acceptable terms, if at all, or that additional financing would
be permitted under the terms of our various debt instruments
then in effect. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow
to satisfy our debt obligations, or to refinance our obligations
on commercially reasonable terms, would have an adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flow, as well as on our ability to satisfy our obligations
on the notes.
Your
right to receive payments on the notes is effectively junior in
right of payment to all existing and future secured indebtedness
of ours or the guarantors up to the value of the collateral
securing such indebtedness.
Our obligations under the notes are unsecured. The notes are
effectively junior to all existing and future secured
indebtedness of ours or the guarantors up to the value of the
collateral securing such indebtedness. For example, the notes
and the related guarantees effectively rank junior to
$1.3 billion of secured debt under our senior secured
credit facilities at September 30, 2009 (and up to an
additional $400 million available under our ABL Facility
that we may borrow thereunder from time to time), which debt is
secured by our assets and the assets of our principal
subsidiaries. Following the completion of the offering of the
old notes, we used approximately $81 million of the
proceeds plus additional cash on hand to repay a portion of the
outstanding amount under the ABL Facility. Although the
indenture contains restrictions on our ability and the ability
of our restricted subsidiaries to create or incur liens to
secure indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to important
limitations and exceptions that permit us to secure a
substantial amount of additional indebtedness. Accordingly, in
the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization
affecting us or any guarantors, your rights to receive payment
will be effectively subordinated to those of secured creditors
up to the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness.
Holders of the notes will participate ratably with all holders
of our unsecured indebtedness that is deemed to be of the same
class as the notes, and potentially with all of our other
general creditors, based upon the respective amounts owed to
each holder or creditor, in our remaining assets. In any of the
foregoing events, we cannot assure you that there will be
sufficient assets to pay amounts due on the notes. As a result,
holders of the notes may receive less, ratably, than holders of
secured indebtedness. In addition, if the secured lenders were
to declare a default with respect to their loans and enforce
their rights with respect to their collateral, there can be no
assurance that our remaining assets would be sufficient to
satisfy our other obligations, including our obligations with
respect to the notes.
Your
right to receive payments on the notes could be adversely
affected if any of our non-guarantor subsidiaries declares
bankruptcy, liquidate or reorganize.
Some, but not all, of our subsidiaries guarantee the notes. As a
result, you are creditors of only our company and our
subsidiaries that do guarantee the notes. In the case of
subsidiaries that are not guarantors, all the existing and
future liabilities of those subsidiaries, including any claims
of trade creditors, debtholders and preferred stockholders, are
effectively senior to the notes and related guarantees. Subject
to limitations in the senior secured credit facilities, the
indenture governing the 7.25% senior notes and the
indenture governing the notes, non-guarantor subsidiaries may
incur additional indebtedness in the future (and may incur other
liabilities without limitation). In the event of a bankruptcy,
liquidation or reorganization of any of our non-guarantor
subsidiaries, their creditors will generally be entitled to
payment of their claims from the assets of those subsidiaries
before any assets are made available for distribution to us. For
the year ended March 31, 2009 and the six months ended
September 30, 2009, our subsidiaries that will not be
guarantors of the notes had sales and operating revenues of
$2.6 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, and, as
of September 30, 2009, those subsidiaries had assets of
$1.4 billion and debt and other liabilities of
$1.0 billion (including inter-company balances).
We may
be unable to repurchase the notes upon a change of
control.
Upon the occurrence of specific kinds of change of control
events, we will be required to offer to repurchase all
outstanding notes and the 7.25% senior notes. The source of
funds for any such purchase of the notes and the
7.25% senior notes will be our available cash or cash
generated from our subsidiaries operations
32
or other sources, including borrowings, sales of assets or sales
of equity. We may not be able to repurchase the notes or the
7.25% senior notes upon a change of control because we may
not have sufficient financial resources to repurchase all such
notes that are tendered upon a change of control. Accordingly,
we may not be able to satisfy our obligations to repurchase the
notes and the 7.25% senior notes unless we are able to
refinance or obtain waivers under our senior secured credit
facilities. Our failure to repurchase the notes upon a change of
control would cause a default under the indenture governing the
notes and the indenture governing our 7.25% senior notes
and a cross default under our senior secured credit facilities.
Also, we can not assure you that a repurchase of the notes
following such a change in control would be permitted pursuant
to any of our indebtedness agreements that would be in effect at
the time of such change in control, which could cause our other
indebtedness to be accelerated. Our senior secured credit
facilities provide that certain change of control events will
constitute a default that permits lenders to accelerate the
maturity of borrowings thereunder. If we cannot obtain a waiver
of such default or seek to refinance such indebtedness, this
could result in the acceleration of such indebtedness. Any
future indebtedness agreement may contain similar provisions. If
such indebtedness were to be accelerated, we may not have
sufficient funds to repurchase the notes and repay such
indebtedness.
In addition, the change of control provision and other covenants
in the indenture governing the notes do not cover all corporate
reorganizations, mergers, amalgamations or similar transactions
and may not provide you with protection in a transaction,
including a highly leveraged transaction, unless such
transaction constitutes a change of control under the indenture
governing the notes.
Most
of the covenants in the indenture will be suspended during any
future period that we have an investment grade rating from one
rating agency, and during any such period you will not have the
benefit of those covenants. In addition, certain covenants will
be terminated if we have an investment grade rating from both
rating agencies.
Most of the covenants in the indenture governing the notes, as
well as our obligation to offer to repurchase notes following
certain asset sales or upon a change of control, will be
suspended if the notes obtain an investment grade rating from
either one of Moodys or Standard & Poors
and we are not in default under the indenture. If such a
suspension occurs, the protections afforded to you by the
covenants that have been suspended will not be restored until
the investment grade rating assigned by either Moodys or
Standard & Poors, as the case may be, to the
notes should subsequently decline and as a result the notes do
not carry an investment grade rating from one rating agency. In
addition, most of these covenants, as well as our obligation to
offer to repurchase notes following certain asset sales or upon
a change of control, will be terminated permanently if at any
time the notes receive an investment grade rating from both
Moodys and Standard & Poors and we are not
in default under the indenture. If this termination occurs, the
protections afforded to you by the terminated covenants will not
be later restored, regardless of any subsequent change in the
notes ratings. See Description of the
Notes Certain Covenants Covenant
Termination and Suspension.
Changes
in our credit ratings or the financial and credit markets could
adversely affect the market prices of the notes.
The future market prices of the notes will be affected by a
number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our ratings with major credit rating agencies;
|
|
|
|
the prevailing interest rates being paid by companies similar to
us; and
|
|
|
|
the overall condition of the financial and credit markets.
|
The condition of the financial and credit markets and prevailing
interest rates have fluctuated in the past and are likely to
fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations could have an
adverse effect on the trading prices of the notes. In addition,
credit rating agencies continually revise their ratings for
companies that they follow, including us. We cannot assure you
that credit rating agencies will continue to rate the notes or
that they will maintain their ratings on the notes. The
withdrawal of a rating for a negative change in our rating could
have an adverse effect on the market prices of the notes.
33
Fraudulent
conveyance laws and other legal restrictions may permit courts
to void or subordinate our subsidiaries guarantees of the
notes in specific circumstances, which would prevent or limit
payment under the guarantees. Certain limitations contained in
the guarantees, which are designed to avoid this result, may
render the guarantees worthless.
The notes are guaranteed by a number of our subsidiaries.
Federal, state and foreign statutes may allow courts, under
specific circumstances, to void or subordinate any or all of our
subsidiaries guarantees of the notes. If any guarantees
are voided or subordinated, our noteholders might be required to
return payments received from our subsidiaries. The criteria for
application of such fraudulent conveyance and other statutes
vary, but, in general, under United States federal bankruptcy
law, comparable provisions of state fraudulent conveyance laws
and applicable Canadian federal or provincial law, a guarantee
could be set aside or subordinated if, among other things, the
guarantor, at the time it provided the guarantee:
|
|
|
|
|
incurred the guarantee with the intent of hindering, defeating,
delaying or defrauding current or future creditors or of giving
one creditor a preference over others; or
|
|
|
|
received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair
consideration for incurring the guarantee, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
was insolvent, on the eve of insolvency, or was rendered
insolvent by reason of the incurrence of the guarantee;
|
|
|
|
was engaged, or about to engage, in a business or transaction
for which the assets remaining with it constituted unreasonably
small capital to carry on such business;
|
|
|
|
intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond
its ability to pay as those debts matured; or
|
|
|
|
was a defendant in an action for money damages, or had a
judgment for money damages entered against it, if, in either
case, after final judgment the judgment was unsatisfied.
|
Under certain Canadian federal and provincial statutes, a
rebuttable presumption of the guarantors intent to prefer
one creditor or hinder another may arise depending on the period
of time that has elapsed between the assumption of the guarantee
and the date of the guarantors insolvency.
A court would likely find that a guarantor did not receive
reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for its
guarantee if such guarantor did not substantially benefit
directly or indirectly from the issuance of its guarantee. As a
general matter, value is given for an obligation if, in exchange
for the obligation, property is transferred or an antecedent
debt is secured or satisfied.
The definition and test for insolvency will vary depending upon
the law of the jurisdiction that is being applied. Generally,
however, a guarantor would be considered insolvent if, at the
time the guarantor provided the guarantee:
|
|
|
|
|
the sum of its debts and liabilities, including contingent
liabilities, was greater than its assets at fair valuation;
|
|
|
|
the present fair saleable value of its assets was less than the
amount required to pay the probable liability on its total
existing debts and liabilities, including contingent
liabilities, as they became absolute and matured; or
|
|
|
|
it could not pay its debts generally as they become due.
|
The tests for fraudulent conveyance, including the criteria for
insolvency, will vary depending upon the law of the jurisdiction
that is being applied. We cannot be sure which tests and
standards a court would apply to determine whether or not the
guarantors were solvent at the relevant time or, regardless of
the tests and standards, whether the issuance of the guarantee
would be voided or subordinated to the guarantors other
debt.
If a court were to find that the incurrence of the guarantee was
a fraudulent transfer or conveyance, the court could void the
payment obligations under such guarantee or further subordinate
such guarantee to
34
presently existing and future indebtedness of the related
guarantor, or require the holders of the notes to repay any
amounts received with respect to such guarantee.
Although each guarantee entered into by a subsidiary will
contain a provision intended to limit that guarantors
liability to the maximum amount that it could incur without
causing the incurrence of obligations under its guarantee to be
a fraudulent transfer, this provision may not be effective to
protect those guarantees from being voided under fraudulent
transfer law, or may reduce that guarantors obligation to
an amount that effectively makes its guarantee worthless.
U.S.
investors in the notes may have difficulties enforcing civil
liabilities.
We are incorporated in Canada under the CBCA. Our registered
office, as well as a substantial portion of our assets, is
located outside the United States. Also, some of our directors,
controlling persons and officers and some of the experts named
in this prospectus reside in Canada or other jurisdictions
outside the United States and all or a substantial portion of
their assets are located outside the United States. We have
agreed in the indenture governing the notes to accept service of
process in New York City, by an agent designated for such
purpose, with respect to any suit, action or proceeding relating
to the indenture or the notes that is brought in any federal or
state court located in New York City, and to submit to the
jurisdiction of such courts in connection with such suits,
actions or proceedings. However, it may be difficult for holders
of notes to effect service of process in the United States on
our directors, controlling persons, officers and the experts
named in this prospectus who are not residents of the United
States or to enforce against them in the United States judgments
of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil
liability provisions of the United States federal securities
laws. In addition, there is doubt as to the enforceability in
Canada against us or against our directors, controlling persons,
officers and experts named in this prospectus who are not
residents of the United States, in original actions or in
actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts, of
liabilities predicated solely upon United States federal
securities laws.
Canadian
bankruptcy and insolvency laws may impair the enforcement of
remedies under the notes.
The rights of the trustee under the indenture governing the
notes to enforce remedies could be significantly impaired by the
restructuring provisions of applicable Canadian federal
bankruptcy, insolvency and other restructuring legislation if
the benefit of such legislation is sought with respect to us.
For example, both the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) and
the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) contain
provisions enabling an insolvent person to obtain a stay of
proceedings against its creditors and others and to prepare and
file a proposal to be voted on by the various classes of its
affected creditors. A restructuring proposal, if accepted by the
requisite majorities of each affected class of creditors, and if
approved by the relevant Canadian court, would be binding on all
creditors within each affected class whether or not such
creditor voted to accept the proposal. Moreover, this
legislation permits the insolvent debtor to retain possession
and administration of its property, subject to court oversight,
even though it may be in default under the applicable debt
instrument during the period the stay against proceedings
remains in place.
The powers of the court under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act
(Canada) and particularly under the Companies Creditors
Arrangement Act (Canada) have been exercised broadly to protect
a restructuring entity from actions taken by creditors and other
parties. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether payments under
the notes would be made during any proceedings in bankruptcy,
insolvency or other restructuring, whether or when the trustee
for the notes could exercise its rights under the notes
indenture or whether, and to what extent, holders of notes would
be compensated for any delays in payment, if any, of principal,
interest and costs, including the fees and disbursements of the
trustee for the notes.
Risks
Related to the Exchange Offer
If you
do not exchange your old notes for new notes, your ability to
sell your old notes will be restricted.
If you do not exchange your old notes for new notes in the
exchange offer, you will continue to be subject to the
restrictions on transfer described in the legend on your old
notes. The new notes, like the old notes, will remain subject to
restrictions on resale in Canada. The restrictions on transfer
of your old notes
35
arise because we issued the old notes in a transaction not
subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act
and applicable state securities laws. In general, you may only
offer to sell the old notes if they are registered under the
Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or offered
or sold pursuant to an exemption from those requirements. If you
are still holding any old notes after the expiration date of the
exchange offer and the exchange offer has been consummated, you
will not be entitled to have those old notes registered under
the Securities Act or to any similar rights under the
registration rights agreement, subject to limited exceptions, if
applicable. After the exchange offer is completed, we will not
be required, and we do not intend, to register the old notes
under the Securities Act. In addition, if you do exchange your
old notes in the exchange offer for the purpose of participating
in a distribution of the new notes, you may be deemed to have
received restricted securities and, if so, will be required to
comply with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale
transaction. To the extent old notes are tendered and accepted
in the exchange offer, the trading market, if any, for the old
notes would be adversely affected.
Your
ability to transfer the new notes may be limited by the absence
of an active trading market, and there is no assurance that any
active trading market will develop for the new
notes.
There is no established public market for the new notes. We do
not intend to list the new notes on any securities exchange or
automated quotation system. We cannot assure you that an active
market for the new notes will develop or, if developed, that it
will continue. Historically, the market for non-investment grade
debt, such as the new notes, has been subject to disruptions
that have caused substantial volatility in the prices of
securities similar to the new notes. We cannot assure you that
the market, if any, for the new notes will be free from similar
disruptions, and any such disruptions may adversely affect the
prices at which you may sell your new notes.
The
old notes were issued with original issue discount for U.S.
federal income tax purposes and consequently the new notes will
be treated as issued with original issue discount for U.S.
federal income tax purposes.
The old notes were issued with original issue discount equal to
the excess of the stated principal amount of the notes over the
issue price. Consequently, the new notes will be treated as
issued with original issue discount for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, and U.S. holders will be required to include
original issue discount in gross income on a constant yield to
maturity basis in advance of receipt of cash payment thereof.
See Principal Canadian and U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Exchange Offer Certain U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Exchange Offer.
36
THE
EXCHANGE OFFER
Purpose
of the Exchange Offer
We have entered into a registration rights agreement with the
initial purchasers of the old notes, in which we agreed to file
a registration statement with the SEC relating to an offer to
exchange the old notes for new notes. The registration statement
of which this prospectus forms a part was filed in compliance
with this obligation. We also agreed to use our commercially
reasonable efforts to cause a registration statement to be
declared effective under the Securities Act by August 11,
2010, to offer the new notes in exchange for the old notes as
soon as practicable after the effectiveness of the registration
statement and to keep the exchange offer open for not less than
30 days after the date notice of the exchange offer is
mailed to holders of the old notes. If we do not comply with
certain of our obligations under the registration rights
agreement, we will incur additional interest expense. The new
notes will have terms substantially identical to the old notes
except that the new notes will not contain terms with respect to
transfer restrictions in the United States and registration
rights and additional interest payable for the failure to comply
with certain obligations. Old notes in an aggregate principal
amount of $185,000,000 were issued on August 11, 2009.
Under the circumstances set forth below, we will promptly file a
shelf registration statement with the SEC covering resales of
the old notes or the new notes, as the case may be, use our
commercially reasonable efforts to cause the shelf registration
statement to be declared effective under the Securities Act and
use our commercially reasonable efforts to keep the shelf
registration statement effective until the earliest of
(i) the time when the notes covered by the registration
statement can be sold pursuant to Rule 144A under the
Securities Act without any limitations,
(ii) August 11, 2011 and (iii) the date on which
all notes registered under the shelf registration statement are
disposed of in accordance therewith. These circumstances include:
|
|
|
|
|
applicable interpretations of the staff of the SEC do not permit
us to effect the exchange offer;
|
|
|
|
for any other reason we do not consummate the exchange offer by
August 11, 2010;
|
|
|
|
any initial purchaser so requests with respect to the old notes
that are not eligible to be exchanged for new notes in the
exchange offer and held by it following consummation of the
exchange offer; or
|
|
|
|
certain holders are not eligible to participate in the exchange
offer or may not resell the new notes acquired by them in the
exchange offer to the public without delivering a prospectus.
|
Each holder of old notes that wishes to exchange such old notes
for transferable new notes in the exchange offer will be
required to make the following representations:
|
|
|
|
|
any new notes to be received by it will be acquired in the
ordinary course of its business;
|
|
|
|
it has no arrangement or understanding with any person to
participate in the distribution (within the meaning of
Securities Act) of the new notes;
|
|
|
|
it is not our affiliate, as defined in Rule 405
under the Securities Act, or, if it is an affiliate, that it
will comply with applicable registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act; and
|
|
|
|
if such holder is not a broker-dealer, that it is not engaged
in, and does not intend to engage in, the distribution of the
new notes; and
|
|
|
|
if such holder is a broker-dealer that will receive new notes
for its own account in exchange for old notes that were acquired
by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or
other trading activities, that it will deliver a prospectus in
connection with any resale of such new notes.
|
In addition, each broker-dealer that receives new notes for its
own account in exchange for old notes, where such old notes were
acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making
activities or other trading activities, must, in the absence of
an exemption, comply with the registration and prospectus
delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with
secondary resales of new notes and cannot rely on the position
of the SEC staff set forth in Exxon Capital Holdings
Corporation, Morgan Stanley & Co.,
Incorporated or similar no-action letters. See Plan
of Distribution.
37
Resale of
New Notes
Based on interpretations of the SEC staff set forth in no-action
letters issued to unrelated third parties, we believe that new
notes issued in the exchange offer in exchange for old notes may
be offered for resale, resold and otherwise transferred by any
exchange note holder without compliance with the registration
and prospectus delivery provisions of the Securities Act, if:
|
|
|
|
|
such holder is not an affiliate of ours within the
meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act;
|
|
|
|
such new notes are acquired in the ordinary course of the
holders business; and
|
|
|
|
the holder does not intend to participate in the distribution of
such new notes.
|
Any holder who tenders in the exchange offer with the intention
of participating in any manner in a distribution of the new
notes:
|
|
|
|
|
cannot rely on the position of the staff of the SEC set forth in
Exxon Capital Holdings Corporation or similar
interpretive letters; and
|
|
|
|
must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act in connection with a
secondary resale transaction.
|
If, as stated above, a holder cannot rely on the position of the
staff of the SEC set forth in Exxon Capital Holdings
Corporation or similar interpretive letters, any effective
registration statement used in connection with a secondary
resale transaction must contain the selling security holder
information required by Item 507 of
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act.
This prospectus may be used for an offer to resell, for the
resale or for other retransfer of new notes only as specifically
set forth in this prospectus. With regard to broker-dealers,
only broker-dealers that acquired the old notes as a result of
market-making activities or other trading activities may
participate in the exchange offer. Each broker-dealer that
receives new notes for its own account in exchange for old
notes, where such old notes were acquired by such broker-dealer
as a result of market-making activities or other trading
activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus
in connection with any resale of the new notes. Please read the
section captioned Plan of Distribution for more
details regarding these procedures for the transfer of new
notes. We have agreed that, for a period of 180 days after
the exchange offer is consummated, we will make this prospectus
available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any
resale of the new notes.
Terms of
the Exchange Offer
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
prospectus, we will accept for exchange any old notes properly
tendered and not withdrawn prior to the expiration date. We will
issue $2,000 principal amount of new notes in exchange for each
$2,000 principal amount of old notes surrendered under the
exchange offer. We will issue $1,000 integral multiple amount of
new notes in exchange for each $1,000 integral multiple amount
of old notes surrendered under the exchange offer. Old notes may
be tendered only in denominations of $2,000 and integral
multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof.
The form and terms of the new notes will be substantially
identical to the form and terms of the old notes except the new
notes will be registered under the Securities Act, will not bear
legends restricting their transfer in the United States and will
not provide for any additional interest upon our failure to
fulfill our obligations under the registration rights agreement
to file, and cause to become effective, a registration
statement. The new notes will evidence the same debt as the old
notes. The new notes will be issued under and entitled to the
benefits of the same indenture that authorized the issuance of
the outstanding old notes. Consequently, both series of notes
will be treated as a single class of debt securities under the
indenture.
The exchange offer is not conditioned upon any minimum aggregate
principal amount of old notes being tendered for exchange.
38
As of the date of this prospectus, $185,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of the old notes are outstanding. There will be
no fixed record date for determining registered holders of old
notes entitled to participate in the exchange offer.
We intend to conduct the exchange offer in accordance with the
provisions of the registration rights agreement, the applicable
requirements of the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and the
rules and regulations of the SEC. Old notes that are not
tendered for exchange in the exchange offer will remain
outstanding and continue to accrue interest and will be entitled
to the rights and benefits such holders have under the indenture
relating to the old notes.
We will be deemed to have accepted for exchange properly
tendered old notes when we have given oral or written notice of
the acceptance to the exchange agent. The exchange agent will
act as agent for the tendering holders for the purposes of
receiving the new notes from us and delivering new notes to such
holders. Subject to the terms of the registration rights
agreement, we expressly reserve the right to amend or terminate
the exchange offer, and not to accept for exchange any old notes
not previously accepted for exchange, upon the occurrence of any
of the conditions specified below under the caption
Certain Conditions to the Exchange Offer.
Holders who tender old notes in the exchange offer will not be
required to pay brokerage commissions or fees, or transfer taxes
with respect to the exchange of old notes. We will pay all
charges and expenses, other than those transfer taxes described
below, in connection with the exchange offer. It is important
that you read the section labeled Fees and
Expenses below for more details regarding fees and
expenses incurred in the exchange offer.
Pursuant to the terms of the registration rights agreement, we
are not required to make a registered exchange offer in any
province or territory of Canada or to accept old notes
surrendered by residents of Canada in the registered exchange
offer unless the distribution of new notes pursuant to such
offer can be effected pursuant to exemptions from the
registration and prospectus requirements of the applicable
securities laws of such province or territory and, as a
condition to the exchange of the old notes pursuant to a
registered exchange offer, such holders of old notes in Canada
are required to make certain representations to us, including a
representation that they are entitled under the applicable
securities laws of such province or territory to acquire the new
notes without the benefit of a prospectus qualified under such
securities laws.
We are relying on exemptions from applicable Canadian provincial
securities laws to offer the new notes. The new notes may not be
sold directly or indirectly in Canada except in accordance with
applicable securities laws of the provinces and territories of
Canada. We are not required, and do not intend, to qualify the
new notes by prospectus in Canada, and accordingly, the new
notes will be subject to restrictions on resale in Canada.
Expiration
Date; Extensions; Amendments
The exchange offer for the old notes will expire at
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on January 11, 2010,
unless we extend the exchange offer in our sole and absolute
discretion.
In order to extend the exchange offer, we will notify the
exchange agent orally or in writing of any extension. We will
notify in writing or by public announcement the registered
holders of old notes of the extension no later than
9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the business day after
the previously scheduled expiration date.
We reserve the right, in our reasonable discretion:
|
|
|
|
|
to delay accepting for exchange any old notes in connection with
the extension of the exchange offer;
|
|
|
|
to extend the exchange offer or to terminate the exchange offer
and to refuse to accept old notes not previously accepted if any
of the conditions set forth below under
Conditions to the Exchange Offer have
not been satisfied, by giving oral or written notice of such
delay, extension or termination to the exchange agent; or
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
subject to the terms of the registration rights agreement, to
amend the terms of the exchange offer in any manner, provided
that in the event of a material change in the exchange offer,
including the waiver of a material condition, we will extend the
exchange offer period, if necessary, so that at least five
business days remain in the exchange offer following notice of
the material change.
|
Any such delay in acceptance, extension, termination or
amendment will be followed as promptly as practicable by written
notice or public announcement thereof to the registered holders
of old notes. If we amend the exchange offer in a manner that we
determine to constitute a material change, we will promptly
disclose such amendment in a manner reasonably calculated to
inform the holders of old notes of such amendment, provided that
in the event of a material change in the exchange offer,
including the waiver of a material condition, we will extend the
exchange offer period, if necessary, so that at least five
business days remain in the exchange offer following notice of
the material change. If we terminate this exchange offer as
provided in this prospectus before accepting any old notes for
exchange or if we amend the terms of this exchange offer in a
manner that constitutes a fundamental change in the information
set forth in the registration statement of which this prospectus
forms a part, we will promptly file a post-effective amendment
to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a
part. In addition, we will in all events comply with our
obligation to make prompt payment for all old notes properly
tendered and accepted for exchange in the exchange offer.
Without limiting the manner in which we may choose to make
public announcements of any delay in acceptance, extension,
termination or amendment of the exchange offer, we shall have no
obligation to publish, advertise, or otherwise communicate any
such public announcement, other than by issuing a timely press
release to a financial news service.
Conditions
to the Exchange Offer
Despite any other term of the exchange offer, we will not be
required to accept for exchange, or exchange any new notes for,
any old notes, and we may terminate the exchange offer as
provided in this prospectus before accepting any old notes for
exchange if in our reasonable judgment:
|
|
|
|
|
the exchange offer, or the making of any exchange by a holder of
old notes, would violate applicable law or any applicable
interpretation of the staff of the SEC; or
|
|
|
|
any action or proceeding has been instituted or threatened in
writing in any court or by or before any governmental agency
with respect to the exchange offer that, in our judgment, would
reasonably be expected to impair our ability to proceed with the
exchange offer.
|
In addition, we will not be obligated to accept for exchange the
old notes of any holder that has not made:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations described under Purpose of
the Exchange Offer, Exchange Offer
Procedures and Plan of Distribution; and
|
|
|
|
such other representations as may be reasonably necessary under
applicable SEC rules, regulations or interpretations to make
available to us an appropriate form for registration of the new
notes under the Securities Act.
|
We expressly reserve the right, at any time or at various times
on or prior to the scheduled expiration date of the exchange
offer, to extend the period of time during which the exchange
offer is open. Consequently, in the event we extend the period
the exchange offer is open, we may delay acceptance of any old
notes by giving written notice of such extension to the
registered holders of the old notes. During any such extensions,
all old notes previously tendered will remain subject to the
exchange offer, and we may accept them for exchange unless they
have been previously withdrawn. We will return any old notes
that we do not accept for exchange for any reason without
expense to their tendering holder promptly after the expiration
or termination of the exchange offer.
We expressly reserve the right to amend or terminate the
exchange offer on or prior to the scheduled expiration date of
the exchange offer, and to reject for exchange any old notes not
previously accepted for
40
exchange, upon the occurrence of any of the conditions to
termination of the exchange offer specified above. We will give
written notice or public announcement of any extension,
amendment, non-acceptance or termination to the registered
holders of the old notes as promptly as practicable. In the case
of any extension, such notice will be issued no later than
9:00 a.m., New York City time on the business day after the
previously scheduled expiration date.
These conditions are for our sole benefit and we may, in our
reasonable discretion, assert them regardless of the
circumstances that may give rise to them or waive them in whole
or in part at any or at various times except that all conditions
to the exchange offer must be satisfied or waived by us prior to
the expiration of the exchange offer. If we fail at any time to
exercise any of the foregoing rights, that failure will not
constitute a waiver of such right. Each such right will be
deemed an ongoing right that we may assert at any time or at
various times prior to the expiration of the exchange offer. Any
waiver by us will be made by written notice or public
announcement to the registered holders of the notes and any such
waiver shall apply to all the registered holders of the notes.
In addition, we will not accept for exchange any old notes
tendered, and will not issue new notes in exchange for any such
old notes, if at such time any stop order is threatened in
writing or in effect with respect to the registration statement
of which this prospectus constitutes a part or the qualification
of the indenture under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as
amended (the Trust Indenture Act).
Exchange
Offer Procedures
Only a holder of old notes may tender such old notes in the
exchange offer. If you are a DTC participant that has old notes
which are credited to your DTC account by book-entry and which
are held of record by DTCs nominee, as applicable, you may
tender your old notes by book-entry transfer as if you were the
record holder. Because of this, references herein to registered
or record holders include DTC.
If you are not a DTC participant, you may tender your old notes
by book-entry transfer by contacting your broker, dealer or
other nominee or by opening an account with a DTC participant,
as the case may be.
To tender old notes in the exchange offer:
|
|
|
|
|
You must comply with DTCs Automated Tender Offer Program
(ATOP) procedures described below;
|
|
|
|
The exchange agent must receive a timely confirmation of a
book-entry transfer of the old notes into its account at DTC
through ATOP pursuant to the procedure for book-entry transfer
described below, along with a properly transmitted agents
message, before the expiration date.
|
Participants in DTCs ATOP program must electronically
transmit their acceptance of the exchange by causing DTC to
transfer the old notes to the exchange agent in accordance with
DTCs ATOP procedures for transfer. DTC will then send an
agents message to the exchange agent. With respect to the
exchange of the old notes, the term agents
message means a message transmitted by DTC, received by
the exchange agent and forming part of the book-entry
confirmation, which states that:
|
|
|
|
|
DTC has received an express acknowledgment from a participant in
its ATOP that is tendering old notes that are the subject of the
book-entry confirmation;
|
|
|
|
the participant has received and agrees to be bound by the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in this
prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
we may enforce the agreement against such participant.
|
Delivery of an agents message will also constitute an
acknowledgment from the tendering DTC participant that the
representations described below in this prospectus are true and
correct.
In addition, each broker-dealer that receives new notes for its
own account in exchange for old notes, where such old notes were
acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making
activities or other trading activities, must acknowledge that it
will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such
new notes. See Plan of Distribution.
41
Guaranteed
Delivery Procedures
If you desire to tender outstanding notes pursuant to the
exchange offer and (1) time will not permit your letter of
transmittal, certificates representing such outstanding notes
and all other required documents to reach the exchange agent on
or prior to the expiration date, or (2) the procedures for
book-entry transfer (including delivery of an agents
message) cannot be completed on or prior to the expiration date,
you may nevertheless tender such notes with the effect that such
tender will be deemed to have been received on or prior to the
expiration date if all the following conditions are satisfied:
|
|
|
|
|
you must effect your tender through an eligible guarantor
institution;
|
|
|
|
a properly completed and duly executed notice of guaranteed
delivery, substantially in the form provided by us herewith, or
an agents message with respect to guaranteed delivery that
is accepted by us, is received by the exchange agent on or prior
to the expiration date as provided below; and
|
|
|
|
a book-entry confirmation of the transfer of such notes into the
exchange agent account at DTC as described above, together with
a letter of transmittal (or a manually signed facsimile of the
letter of transmittal) properly completed and duly executed,
with any signature guarantees and any other documents required
by the letter of transmittal or a properly transmitted
agents message, are received by the exchange agent within
three New York Stock Exchange, Inc. trading days after the
expiration date.
|
The notice of guaranteed delivery may be sent by hand delivery,
facsimile transmission or mail to the exchange agent and must
include a guarantee by an eligible guarantor institution in the
form set forth in the notice of guaranteed delivery.
Book-Entry
Transfer
The exchange agent will make a request to establish an account
with respect to the old notes at DTC for purposes of the
exchange offer promptly after the date of this prospectus; and
any financial institution participating in DTCs system may
make book-entry delivery of old notes by causing DTC to transfer
such old notes into the exchange agents account at DTC in
accordance with DTCs procedures for transfer.
Withdrawal
Rights
Except as otherwise provided in this prospectus, you may
withdraw your tender of old notes at any time before
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date.
To withdraw a tender of old notes in any exchange offer, the
applicable exchange agent must receive a letter or facsimile
notice of withdrawal at its address set forth below under
Exchange agent before the time indicated
above. Any notice of withdrawal must:
|
|
|
|
|
specify the name of the person who deposited the old notes to be
withdrawn;
|
|
|
|
identify the old notes to be withdrawn including the certificate
number or numbers and aggregate principal amount of old notes to
be withdrawn or, in the case of old notes transferred by
book-entry transfer, the name and number of the account at DTC
to be credited and otherwise comply with the procedures of the
relevant book-entry transfer facility; and
|
|
|
|
specify the name in which the old notes being withdrawn are to
be registered, if different from that of the person who
deposited the notes.
|
We will determine in our sole discretion all questions as to the
validity, form and eligibility, including time of receipt, of
notices of withdrawal. Our determination will be final and
binding on all parties. Any old notes withdrawn in this manner
will be deemed not to have been validly tendered for purposes of
the exchange offer. We will not issue new notes for such
withdrawn old notes unless the old notes are validly retendered.
We will return to you any old notes that you have tendered but
that we have not accepted for exchange without cost promptly
after withdrawal, rejection of tender or termination of the
exchange offer. You may
42
retender properly withdrawn old notes by following one of the
procedures described above at any time before the expiration
date.
Exchange
Agent
We have appointed The Bank of New York Mellon
Trust Company, N.A. as exchange agent for the exchange
offer of old notes.
You should direct questions and requests for assistance and
requests for additional copies of this prospectus to the
exchange agent addressed as follows:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Corporate Trust Operations
Reorganization Unit
101 Barclay Street-7 East
New York, NY 10286
Attn: Mrs. Evangeline R. Gonzales
Tele:
212-815-3738
Facsimile:
212-298-1915
Fees and
Expenses
We will bear the expenses of soliciting tenders. The principal
solicitation is being made by mail, however, we may make
additional solicitations by telegraph, telephone or in person by
our officers and regular employees and those of our affiliates.
We have not retained any dealer-manager in connection with the
exchange offer and will not make any payments to broker-dealers
or others soliciting acceptances of the exchange offer. We will,
however, pay the exchange agent reasonable and customary fees
for its services and reimburse it for its related reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses.
Our expenses in connection with the exchange offer include:
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fees;
|
|
|
|
fees and expenses of the exchange agent and trustee;
|
|
|
|
accounting and legal fees and printing costs; and
|
|
|
|
related fees and expenses.
|
Transfer
Taxes
We will pay all transfer taxes, if any, applicable to the
exchange of old notes under the exchange offer. The tendering
holder, however, will be required to pay any transfer taxes,
whether imposed on the registered holder or any other person, if:
|
|
|
|
|
certificates representing old notes for principal amounts not
tendered or accepted for exchange are to be delivered to, or are
to be issued in the name of, any person other than the
registered holder of old notes tendered; or
|
|
|
|
a transfer tax is imposed for any reason other than the exchange
of old notes under the exchange offer.
|
If satisfactory evidence of payment of such taxes is not
submitted, the amount of such transfer taxes will be billed to
that tendering holder.
Holders who tender their old notes for exchange will not be
required to pay any transfer taxes. However, holders who
instruct us to register new notes in the name of, or request
that old notes not tendered or not accepted in the exchange
offer be returned to, a person other than the registered
tendering holder will be required to pay any applicable transfer
tax.
43
Consequences
of Failure to Exchange
Holders of old notes who do not exchange their old notes for new
notes under the exchange offer, including as a result of failing
to timely deliver old notes to the exchange agent, together with
all required documentation, will remain subject to the
restrictions on transfer of such old notes:
|
|
|
|
|
as set forth in the legend printed on the old notes as a
consequence of the issuance of the old notes pursuant to the
exemptions from, or in transactions not subject to, the
registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable
state securities laws; and
|
|
|
|
otherwise as set forth in the offering circular distributed in
connection with the private offering of the old notes.
|
In addition, you will no longer have any registration rights or
be entitled to additional interest with respect to the old notes.
In general, you may not offer or sell the old notes unless they
are registered under the Securities Act, or if the offer or sale
is exempt from registration under the Securities Act and
applicable state securities laws. Except as required by the
registration rights agreement, we do not intend to register
resales of the old notes under the Securities Act. Based on
interpretations of the SEC staff, new notes issued pursuant to
the exchange offer may be offered for resale, resold or
otherwise transferred by their holders, other than any such
holder that is our affiliate within the meaning of
Rule 405 under the Securities Act, without compliance with
the registration and prospectus delivery provisions of the
Securities Act, provided that the holders acquired the new notes
in the ordinary course of the holders business and the
holders have no arrangement or understanding with respect to the
distribution of the new notes to be acquired in the exchange
offer. Any holder who tenders in the exchange offer for the
purpose of participating in a distribution of the new notes:
|
|
|
|
|
could not rely on the applicable interpretations of the
SEC; and
|
|
|
|
must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act in connection with a
secondary resale transaction.
|
After the exchange offer is consummated, if you continue to hold
any old notes, you may have difficulty selling them because
there will be fewer old notes outstanding.
Accounting
Treatment
We will record the new notes in our accounting records at the
same carrying value as the old notes, as reflected in our
accounting records on the date of exchange. Accordingly, we will
not recognize any gain or loss for accounting purposes in
connection with the exchange offer.
Other
Participation in the exchange offer is voluntary, and you should
carefully consider whether to accept. You are urged to consult
your financial and tax advisors in making your own decision on
what action to take.
We may in the future seek to acquire untendered old notes in the
open market or privately negotiated transactions, through
subsequent exchange offers or otherwise. We have no present
plans to acquire any old notes that are not tendered in the
exchange offer or to file a registration statement to permit
resales of any untendered old notes.
44
USE OF
PROCEEDS
This exchange offer is intended to satisfy our obligations under
the registration rights agreement. We will not receive any
proceeds from the exchange offer. You will receive, in exchange
for old notes tendered by you and accepted by us in the exchange
offer, new notes in the same principal amount. The old notes
surrendered in exchange for the new notes will be retired and
cancelled and cannot be reissued. Accordingly, the issuance of
the new notes will not result in any increase of our outstanding
debt.
We used the net proceeds from the sale of the old notes of
approximately $175 million to repay (1) the
outstanding amount of approximately $94 million under our
$100 million unsecured credit facility with an affiliate of
the Aditya Birla Group (the Unsecured Credit
Facility), which was scheduled to mature in January 2015
and bore interest at an annual rate of 13.00% through February
2010 and at 14.00% thereafter and (2) approximately
$81 million of the outstanding amount under the ABL
Facility, which matures in July 2012 and bears interest at a
rate depending on the type of loan, which, as of
September 30, 2009, was an annual rate of 2.09%.
45
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
Novelis Inc. was formed in Canada on September 21, 2004. On
January 6, 2005, Alcan transferred its rolled products
businesses to Novelis and distributed shares of Novelis to
Alcans shareholders. On May 15, 2007, we were
acquired by Hindalco through its indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary. We refer to the company prior to the Hindalco
acquisition (through May 15, 2007) as the
Predecessor, and we refer to the company after the
Hindalco acquisition (beginning on May 16, 2007) as
the Successor. On June 26, 2007, our board of
directors approved the change of our fiscal year end to March 31
from December 31.
The selected consolidated financial data of the Successor
presented below as of and for the six months ended
September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 has been
derived from the unaudited financial statements of Novelis Inc.
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The results for the six
months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire
year. The selected consolidated financial data of the Successor
presented below as of and for the year ended March 31,
2009, as of March 31, 2008 and for the period May 16,
2007 through March 31, 2008 has been derived from the
financial statements of Novelis Inc. included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The selected consolidated financial data of the
Predecessor presented below for the period April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007, for the three months ended
March 31, 2007, and for the year ended December 31,
2006 has been derived from the financial statements of Novelis
Inc. included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Selected financial data of the Predecessor presented below as of
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004 has been derived from the following audited financial
statements of Novelis Inc. which are not included in this
prospectus: the consolidated balance sheets for Novelis Inc. as
of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2007; the
consolidated and combined statement of operations and statement
of operations of Novelis Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2005; the combined statements of operations
and statement of operations of Novelis Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2004; the consolidated balance sheets of
Novelis Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005; and the
combined balance sheet of Novelis Inc. as of December 31,
2004.
The consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2005, include the results for the period from
January 1 to January 5, 2005, prior to our spin-off from
Alcan, in addition to the results for the period from January 6
to December 31, 2005. The combined financial results for
the period from January 1 to January 5, 2005 present our
operations on a carve-out accounting basis. The consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2005, and the consolidated
results for the period from January 6 (the date of the spin-off
from Alcan) to December 31, 2005, present our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows as a stand-alone
entity.
Our historical combined financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2004, have been derived from the accounting
records of Alcan using the historical results of operations and
historical basis of assets and liabilities of the businesses
subsequently transferred to us. Management believes the
assumptions underlying the historical combined financial
statements are reasonable. However, the historical combined
financial statements may not necessarily reflect what our
results of operations, financial position and cash flows would
have been had we been a stand-alone company during the periods
presented.
46
The selected consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with our financial statements for the respective
periods included elsewhere in this prospectus and the related
notes thereto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
|
2008(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Statement of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
7,755
|
|
|
$
|
8,363
|
|
|
$
|
9,849
|
|
|
$
|
2,630
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
6,856
|
|
|
|
7,570
|
|
|
|
9,317
|
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
|
|
9,251
|
|
|
|
5,622
|
|
|
|
3,261
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,524
|
|
|
|
8,139
|
|
|
|
10,127
|
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
12,345
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
574
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
375
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
(275
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(161
|
)
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,954
|
|
|
$
|
5,476
|
|
|
$
|
5,792
|
|
|
$
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
$
|
10,324
|
|
|
$
|
7,754
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
|
2,737
|
|
|
|
2,603
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
Shareholders/invested equity(3)
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
(87
|
)
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
(236
|
)
|
|
$
|
(390
|
)
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
|
|
(703
|
)
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(4)
|
|
|
3.8
|
x
|
|
|
2.1
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
x
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All income earned and cash flows generated by us as well as the
risks and rewards of these businesses from January 1 to
January 5, 2005, were primarily attributed to us and are
included in our consolidated results for the year ended
December 31, 2005, with the exception of losses of
$43 million ($29 million net of tax) arising from the
change in fair market value of derivative contracts, primarily
with Alcan. These
mark-to-market
losses for the period from January 1 to January 5, 2005,
were recorded in the consolidated |
47
|
|
|
|
|
statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2005, and were recognized as a decrease in Owners net
investment. |
|
(2) |
|
The acquisition of Novelis by Hindalco on May 15, 2007 was
recorded in accordance with SAB 103. In the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets, the consideration and related costs
paid by Hindalco in connection with the acquisition have been
pushed down to us and have been allocated to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in accordance with FASB
141. Due to the impact of push down accounting, our consolidated
financial statements and certain note presentations for the year
ended March 31, 2008, are presented in two distinct periods
to indicate the application of two different bases of accounting
between the periods presented: (1) the period up to, and
including, the acquisition date (April 1, 2007, through
May 15, 2007, labeled Predecessor) and
(2) the period after that date (May 16, 2007, through
March 31, 2008, labeled Successor). The
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus
include a black line division which indicates that the
Predecessor and Successor reporting entities shown are not
comparable. The consideration paid by Hindalco to acquire
Novelis has been pushed down to us and allocated to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on our estimates of fair
value. This allocation of fair value results in additional
charges or income to our post-acquisition consolidated
statements of operations. |
|
(3) |
|
Alcans investment in the Novelis businesses as of
December 31, 2004, includes the accumulated earnings of the
businesses as well as cash transfers related to cash management
functions performed by Alcan. |
|
(4) |
|
Earnings consist of income from continuing operations before the
cumulative effect of accounting changes, before fixed charges
(excluding capitalized interest) and income taxes, and
eliminating undistributed income of persons owned less than 50%
by us. Fixed charges consist of interest expenses and
amortization of debt discount and expense and premium and that
portion of rental payments which is considered as being
representative of the interest factor implicit in our operating
leases. The ratios shown above are based on our consolidated and
combined financial information, which was prepared in accordance
with GAAP. |
|
|
|
Due to losses incurred in each of the periods presented below,
the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. The table below presents
the amount of additional earnings required to bring the fixed
charge ratio to 1:1 for each respective period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional earnings required to bring fixed charge ratio to 1:1
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,996
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
and References
Novelis is the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and
light gauge products for the beverage and food can,
transportation, construction and industrial, and foil products
markets. As of September 30, 2009, we had operations in 11
countries on four continents: North America, Europe, Asia
and South America, through 31 operating plants, one research
facility and several market-focused innovation centers. In
addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary
aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that are
integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil. We are the only
company of our size and scope focused solely on aluminum rolled
products markets and capable of local supply of technologically
sophisticated products in all of these geographic regions.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements
that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual
results could differ materially from those discussed in these
forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to,
those discussed below and elsewhere in this prospectus,
particularly in Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and Market Data and Risk Factors.
Background
and Basis of Presentation
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
spin-off occurred on January 6, 2005 following approval by
Alcans board of directors and shareholders, and legal and
regulatory approvals. Alcan shareholders received one Novelis
common share for every five Alcan common shares held.
Acquisition
by Hindalco
On May 15, 2007, the company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to the
Arrangement at a price of $44.93 per share. The aggregate
purchase price for all of the companys common shares was
$3.4 billion, and $2.8 billion of Novelis debt
was also assumed for a total transaction value of
$6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the Arrangement
on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were indirectly
held by Hindalco.
As discussed in Note 1 Business and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our Audited
Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, the
Arrangement was recorded in accordance with SAB 103.
Accordingly, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets,
the consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
connection with the acquisition have been pushed
down to us and have been allocated to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in accordance with FASB 141. Due to the
impact of push down accounting, the companys consolidated
financial statements and certain note presentations separate the
companys presentation into two distinct periods to
indicate the application of two different bases of accounting
between the periods presented: (1) the periods up to, and
including, the May 15, 2007 acquisition date (labeled
Predecessor) and (2) the periods after that
date (labeled Successor). The financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus include a black line
division which indicates that the Predecessor and Successor
reporting entities shown are not comparable.
Combined
Financial Results of the Predecessor and Successor
For purposes of managements discussion and analysis of the
results of operations in this prospectus, we combined the
results of operations for the period ended May 15, 2007 of
the Predecessor with the period ended March 31, 2008 of the
Successor. We believe the combined results of operations for the
year ended March 31, 2008 provide management and investors
with a more meaningful perspective on Novelis financial
and operational performance than if we did not combine the
results of operations of the Predecessor and the
49
Successor in this manner. Similarly, we combine the financial
results of the Predecessor and the Successor when discussing
segment information and sources and uses of cash for the year
ended March 31, 2008.
The combined results of operations are non-GAAP financial
measures, do not include any pro forma assumptions or
adjustments and should not be used in isolation or substitution
of the Predecessors and the Successors results.
Shown below are combining schedules of (1) shipments and
(2) our results of operations for periods allocable to the
Successor, the Predecessor and the combined presentation for the
year ended March 31, 2008 that we use throughout the
discussion of results from operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Shipments (In kt):
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
Rolled products(1)
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
Ingot products(2)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rolled products include tolling (the conversion of
customer-owned metal). |
|
(2) |
|
Ingot products include primary ingot in Brazil, foundry products
in Korea and Europe, secondary ingot in Europe and other
miscellaneous recyclable aluminum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Results of Operations (In millions)
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
10,247
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Equity in net income of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
11,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in Fiscal Year End
On June 26, 2007, our board of directors approved the
change of our fiscal year end to March 31 from December 31.
On June 28, 2007, we filed a Transition Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 with the
SEC pursuant to
Rule 13a-10
under the Exchange Act for transition period reporting.
50
Throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Managements Discussion and Analysis), data
for all periods, except as of and for the year ended
March 31, 2007, are derived from our financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. All data as of and for
the year ended March 31, 2007 are derived from our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included
in our transition period ended March 31, 2007 and our
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2007.
Accompanying
Financial Statements
We have included financial statements for the following periods
elsewhere in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Financial Statements: the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements of the Successor as
of and for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008 (the Unaudited Financial
Statements).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the audited consolidated financial statements of the Successor
as of and for the year ended March 31, 2009, as of
March 31, 2008 and for the period May 16, 2007,
through March 31, 2008; and
|
|
|
|
the audited consolidated financial statements of the Predecessor
for the period April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, for
the three months ended March 31,2007, and for the year
ended December 31, 2006 (the Audited Financial
Statements).
|
Highlights
Key factors that have recently impacted our business are
discussed briefly below and are discussed in further detail
throughout the Managements Discussion and Analysis and
Segment Review.
|
|
|
|
|
We reported pre-tax income of $301 million for the second
quarter of fiscal 2009, as compared to pre-tax loss of
$272 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Results
include $254 million of unrealized gains on derivatives as
compared to $221 million of losses in the prior year second
quarter. The $254 million of unrealized gains includes a
$169 million reversal of previously recognized losses upon
settlement of derivatives and $85 million of unrealized
gains relating to mark to market adjustments on metal and
currency derivatives. The results for the second quarter of
fiscal 2008 also include a $26 million gain on the reversal
of a legal claim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We reported pre-tax income of $574 million for the six
months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to pre-tax
loss of $211 million for the six months ended
September 30, 2008. Results include $553 million of
unrealized gains on derivatives as compared to $201 million
of losses in the prior year. The $553 million of unrealized
gains includes a $410 million reversal of previously
recognized losses upon settlement of derivatives and
$143 million of unrealized gains relating to mark to market
adjustments on metal and currency derivatives. The results for
the six months ended September 30, 2008 also include a
$26 million gain on the reversal of a legal claim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We reported a Net loss attributable to our common shareholder of
$1.9 billion for the year ended March 31, 2009, which
includes non-cash impairment charges of $1.5 billion,
unrealized losses on derivatives instruments of
$519 million, $95 million in restructuring charges and
a $122 million gain on a debt exchange transaction,
compared to a Net loss attributable to our common shareholder of
$117 million for the corresponding period in fiscal 2008.
The prior year Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
included $45 million of stock compensation expense and
$32 million of transaction fees associated with
Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges made to goodwill and investments in
affiliates totaling $1.5 billion reflected the global
economic environment and the related market increase in the cost
of capital in fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
The unrealized loss on derivative instruments for fiscal 2009
was $519 million, compared to a $3 million loss in the
prior year period. We use derivative instruments to hedge
forecasted purchases
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
of aluminum and other commodities and related foreign currency
exposures. This loss primarily reflects the drop in the price of
aluminum during the current year from $3,292 per tonne in July
2008 to $1,365 per tonne at March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments of flat rolled products in the three and six months
ended September 30, 2009 were 8% and 12% less than the
comparable three and six month periods a year ago, which was
before the global economic slowdown. However, flat rolled
shipments for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 were up in all
regions over the first quarter of fiscal 2010, with the most
significant increases in South America and Europe. Shipments of
flat rolled products were 14% higher than the low levels
experienced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments to construction, automotive and industrial companies
were significantly impacted in the second half of fiscal 2009
and the first half of fiscal 2010 by the economic downturn while
can sheet shipments remained stable in most regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory levels were effectively managed despite slowing
business conditions. Metal inventories as of September 30,
2009 totaled 325 kt up 9% from an inventory level of 299 kt as
of March 31, 2009.
|
Business
and Industry Climate
The global economic slowdown has negatively impacted our sales
and shipment levels as well as our profitability, operating cash
flows and liquidity. During the last six months of fiscal 2009,
we experienced rapidly declining aluminum prices and sharply
lower end customer demand. However, beverage and food can
shipments, which represent between 50% and 60% of our rolled
products business, stabilized during the first quarter of fiscal
2010 at levels which are only moderately below historical
levels. The impacts were more severe in construction,
automotive and industrial markets, although conditions have now
also stabilized in those product categories. On a regional
basis, the impacts were most severe in Europe, Asia and North
America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Sales and Shipment Trends
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments which are in kt)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,103
|
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,939
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage increase (decrease) in net sales versus comparable
previous year period
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(37
|
)%
|
|
|
(26
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled product shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverage and food cans
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other rolled products
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage increase (decrease) in rolled products shipments
versus comparable previous year period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverage and food cans
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other rolled products
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
(33
|
)%
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Importantly, we have taken a number of actions to adjust our
metal intake, cut back on production and reduce costs and
discretionary spending. These actions have succeeded in
preserving adequate liquidity levels
52
while lowering our fixed cost structure to a level which allows
us to operate with positive cash flow in the current low demand
environment.
While there continues to be some level of uncertainty with
regard to the timing and pace of global economic recovery, we
are seeing signs of recovery in Asia, North America and Europe.
We expect to see gradual improvement in profitability and
liquidity levels during the remainder of fiscal 2010 and do not
believe we are exposed to significant further downside risk
versus the demand levels experienced in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009.
All of these matters are discussed in further detail in
Results of Operations and Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
Business
Model and Key Concepts
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model,
which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the
price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products
have a price structure with two components: (i) a
pass-through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market
premiums and (ii) a conversion premium price on
the conversion cost to produce the rolled product which
reflects, among other factors, the competitive market conditions
for that product.
A key component of our conversion model is the use of derivative
instruments on projected aluminum requirements to preserve our
conversion margin. We enter into forward metal purchases
simultaneous with the sales contracts that contain fixed metal
prices. These forward metal purchases directly hedge the
economic risk of future metal price fluctuation associated with
these contracts. The recognition of unrealized gains and losses
on metal derivative positions typically precedes customer
delivery and revenue recognition under the related fixed forward
priced contracts. The timing difference between the recognition
of unrealized gains and losses on metal derivatives and revenue
recognition impacts income (loss) before income taxes and net
income (loss). Gains and losses on metal derivative contracts
are not recognized in segment income until realized. We also
enter into forward metal purchases, aluminum futures and options
to hedge our exposure to rising metal prices and sales contracts
with metal price ceilings. Additionally, we sell short-term LME
futures contracts to reduce the cash flow volatility of
fluctuating metal prices associated with the metal price lag.
The average and closing prices based upon the LME for aluminum
for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and
the years ended March 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
London Metal Exchange Prices
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum (per metric tonne, and presented in U.S.
dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing cash price as of end of period
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
|
$
|
2,395
|
|
|
$
|
1,365
|
|
|
$
|
2,935
|
|
|
$
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(53.5
|
)%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Average cash price during period
|
|
$
|
1,651
|
|
|
$
|
2,865
|
|
|
$
|
2,234
|
|
|
$
|
2,624
|
|
|
$
|
2,665
|
|
|
|
(42.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(14.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
LME prices for aluminum (the LME prices) have
significantly declined since the high point of $3,292 per tonne
in July 2008. Prices closed at $1,850 per tonne on
September 30, 2009, after hitting a low of $1,254 per tonne
in February 2009. Rapid changes in LME prices have the following
impacts on our business:
|
|
|
|
|
Our products have a price structure based upon the LME price.
Increases or decreases in the LME price have a direct impact on
net sales, cost of goods sold and working capital.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We pay cash to brokers to settle derivative contracts in advance
of billing and collecting cash from our customers, which
negatively impacts our liquidity position. The lag between
derivative settlement and customer collection typically ranges
from 30 to 60 days, which temporarily reduces our liquidity
in
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
periods following declines in LME. During the six months ended
September 30, 2009, we had net outflows of
$416 million for payments related to the settlement of
derivatives.
|
LME prices have increased 36% from the March 31, 2009
closing price of $1,365 per tonne to $1,850 per tonne at
September 30, 3009 which resulted in $49 million and
$97 million of net gains on change in fair value of metal
derivatives during the three and six months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively.
Metal
Price Ceilings
We have one remaining sales contract which contains a ceiling
over which metal prices cannot be contractually passed through
to a certain customer. This contract, which expires on
December 31, 2009, negatively impacts our margins and
operating cash flows when the price we pay for metal is above
the ceiling price contained in this contract. We calculate and
report this difference to be approximately the difference
between the quoted purchase price on the LME (adjusted for any
local premiums and for any price lag associated with purchasing
or processing time) and the metal price ceiling in our
contracts. Cash flows from operations are negatively impacted by
the same amounts, adjusted for any timing difference between
customer receipts and vendor payments, and offset partially by
reduced income taxes.
We recently entered into a new multi-year agreement to continue
supplying similar volumes to the same customer upon the
expiration of the contract containing the metal price ceiling.
This new agreement becomes effective January 1, 2010, and
does not contain a metal price ceiling.
LME prices remained below the ceiling price for the first five
months of fiscal 2010. However, due to increases in LME during
the month of September 2009, we were unable to pass through
$4 million of metal purchase costs associated with sales
under this contract for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2009. For the three and six months ended
September 30, 2008 and the years ended March 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, we were unable to pass through approximately $74,
$152, $176, $230 and $460 million, respectively, of metal
purchase costs associated with sales under this contract. Based
upon a September 30, 2009 aluminum price of $1,850 and our
best estimate of shipment volumes, we estimate that we will be
unable to pass through additional aluminum purchase costs of
approximately $4 million through December 31, 2009
when this contract expires.
In periods in which we are affected by the metal price ceiling,
we employ the following actions to manage and mitigate the risks
associated with metal price ceilings and rising prices that we
cannot pass through to certain customers:
|
|
|
|
|
We maximize the amount of our internally supplied metal inputs
from our smelting, refining and mining operations in Brazil and
rely on output from our recycling operations which utilize used
beverage cans (UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply
have historically provided an offsetting benefit to the metal
price ceiling contracts. We refer to these two sources as
internal hedges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We entered into derivative instruments to hedge projected
aluminum volume requirements above our assumed internal hedge
position, mitigating our exposure to further increases in LME
prices. As a result of these instruments, we will continue to
incur cash losses related to these contracts even if LME prices
remain below the ceiling price. As of September 30, 2009
the fair value of the liability associated with these derivative
instruments was $14 million.
|
In connection with the allocation of purchase price (i.e., total
consideration) paid by Hindalco, we established reserves
totaling $655 million as of May 15, 2007 to record
these contracts at fair value. These reserves are being accreted
into net sales over the remaining lives of the underlying
contracts. This accretion has no impact on cash flow. For the
three and six months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded
accretion of $52 million and $107 million,
respectively. The three and six months ended September 30,
2008 included accretion of $61 million and
$125 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2009,
the balance of these reserves is approximately $45 million
which will be amortized into sales during the third quarter of
fiscal 2010.
54
Metal
Price Lag
On certain sales contracts we experience timing differences on
the pass through of changing aluminum prices from our suppliers
to our customers. Additional timing differences occur in the
flow of metal costs through moving average inventory cost values
and cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization). In periods of declining prices, our earnings are
negatively impacted by this timing difference while the opposite
is true in periods of rising prices. We refer to this timing
difference as metal price lag. We sell short-term
LME forward contracts to help mitigate our exposure to metal
price lag.
Certain of our sales contracts, most notably in Europe, contain
fixed metal prices for periods of time ranging from four to
36 months. We typically enter into forward metal purchases
simultaneous with these sales contracts.
Foreign
Exchange Impact
Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates also impact our operating
results. The following table presents the average of the
month-end exchange rates and changes from the prior year period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Strengthen/
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Strengthen/
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Strengthen/
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Weaken)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Weaken)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Weaken)
|
|
|
U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
1.409
|
|
|
|
1.520
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.411
|
|
|
|
1.432
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.432
|
|
|
|
1.294
|
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)%
|
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.932
|
|
|
|
1.673
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
1.982
|
|
|
|
1.837
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
1.837
|
|
|
|
2.148
|
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
South Korean won per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.115
|
|
|
|
1.028
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
1.134
|
|
|
|
1.025
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
1.025
|
|
|
|
1.135
|
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
The U.S. dollar weakened as compared to the local currency
in all regions during the three and six months ended
September 30, 2009. In Europe and Asia, the weakening of
the U.S. dollar resulted in foreign exchange gains as these
operations are recorded in local currency. In Brazil, where the
U.S. dollar is the functional currency due to predominantly
U.S. dollar selling prices and local currency operating
costs, we incurred foreign exchange losses as the
U.S. dollar weakened.
The U.S. dollar strengthened as compared to the local
currency in all regions during the year ended March 31,
2009, as compared to a weakened U.S. dollar for the year
ended March 31, 2008. In Asia, the strengthening of the
U.S. dollar resulted in foreign exchange losses as the
operations there are recorded in local currency, with a larger
portion of our liabilities denominated in the U.S. dollar,
including metal purchases and long-term debt. In Brazil, where
we have predominantly U.S. dollar selling prices and local
currency operating costs, we benefited as the U.S. dollar
strengthened during the period.
See Segment Review for each of the periods presented
below for additional discussion of the impact of foreign
exchange on the results of each region.
Results
of Operations
Six
Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared with the Six
Months Ended September 30, 2008
For the six months ended September 30, 2009, we reported
net income attributable to our common shareholder of
$338 million on net sales of $4.1 billion, compared to
the six months ended September 30, 2008 when we reported
net loss attributable to our common shareholder of
$80 million on net sales of $6.1 billion. The
reduction in sales is due to 43% lower average LME prices as
well as lower shipments of flat rolled products primarily in
Europe and North America.
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
decreased $2.4 billion, or 42%, which primarily reflects
lower metal costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased $12 million, or 7%, primarily due to reductions
in selling costs and professional fees.
55
The six months ended September 30, 2009 was impacted by
$553 million in unrealized gains on derivative instruments,
as compared to $201 million of losses in the six months
ended September 30, 2008. We also recorded an income tax
provision of $199 million in the six months ended
September 30, 2009, as compared to a $133 million
income tax benefit in the prior year. These items are discussed
in further detail below.
Segment
Review
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions, except shipments which are in kt). For additional
financial information related to our operating segments. See
Note 21 Segment, Geographical Area and
Major Customer Information to our Audited Financial
Statements and Note 15 Segment, Major
Customer and Major Supplier Information to our Unaudited
Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments which are in kt)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,589
|
|
|
$
|
1,400
|
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,343
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments which are in kt)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
|
$
|
2,315
|
|
|
$
|
968
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
six months ended September 30, 2008 to six months ended
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment Income (In millions)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Segment income six months ended September 30,
2008
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Conversion costs(1)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Other changes(2)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income six months ended September 30,
2009
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such as
direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage, alloys
and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss. Fluctuations in
this component reflect cost efficiencies during the period as
well as cost inflation (deflation). |
56
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research and development for all
segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of purchase
accounting and metal price ceiling contracts. Significant
fluctuations in these items are discussed below. |
North
America
North America experienced a reduction in demand in the six
months ended September 30, 2009 as most industry sectors
were impacted by the economic downturn. In the six months ended
September 30, 2009, shipments decreased by 12% to 512 kt as
compared to the prior year period. Net sales for the six months
ended September 30, 2009 were down $605 million, or
28%, as compared to the prior year period due to a lower average
LME price as well as lower shipments. The can business remains
relatively stable, but shipments of most other products are
below the prior year level.
Segment income for the six months ended September 30, 2009
was $132 million, up $88 million as compared to the
prior year period. Reductions in conversion costs, and improved
conversion premiums and net favorable metal price lag all had a
positive impact on segment income, more than offsetting volume
reductions. Conversion cost improvements primarily relate to
reduction in energy, melt loss, labor costs, freight and repairs
and maintenance as compared to the prior year period. Other
changes include a $18 million reduction to the net
favorable impact of acquisition related fair value adjustments,
partially offset by a $7 million reduction in selling,
general and administrative expenses and $8 million higher
benefit from used beverage cans.
Europe
Europe has also experienced a significant reduction in demand in
all industry sectors with flat rolled shipments and net sales
down 26% and 40%, respectively, compared to the prior year. The
volume reduction had a $311 million unfavorable impact on
net sales, with the remaining decrease reflecting the impact of
lower LME prices.
Segment income for the six months ended September 30, 2009
was $93 million, down from $173 million in the
comparative period of the prior year. Volume and metal price lag
unfavorably impacted segment income but these impacts were
partially offset by favorable conversion premiums, reductions in
conversion costs and foreign exchange remeasurement. The
favorable impact of conversion costs relates to decreases in
labor and energy costs, as well as a reduction in repair and
maintenance expense and freight as compared to the prior year
period.
Asia
As discussed above, we have seen a recovery in demand in Asia,
driven mostly from China and Korea, with flat rolled shipments
for the six months ended September 30, 2009 up 5% as
compared to the prior year period. We expect customer demand to
continue at these levels. Net sales decreased $260 million,
or 27%, reflecting the impact of lower LME prices.
Segment income increased to $86 million for the six months
ended September 30, 2009 from $28 million in the prior
year period due to improvements in conversion premiums,
conversion costs and foreign exchange remeasurement, partially
offset by unfavorable metal price lag. Conversion cost
improvements primarily relate to reduction in energy, labor
costs, and repairs and maintenance as compared to the prior year
period.
South
America
Total shipments increased 2% over the prior year period, with
rolled products shipments essentially flat and net sales down
23% as compared to the prior year due to lower LME prices,
partially offset by higher conversion premiums. Can shipments
represent between 80 and 85% of our flat rolled shipments in
South America and can production has been stable with shipments
constant year over year.
57
Segment income for South America decreased $48 million as
compared to the prior year period. This decrease in segment
income is due to a $51 million decrease in the smelter
benefit compared to the prior year period and a $13 million
reduction in the benefit associated with used beverage cans,
included in Other changes in the table above. The benefits from
our smelter operations in South America decline as average LME
prices decrease. While LME prices increased during the second
quarter, the average is still 43% below the prior year
comparative period. These negative impacts were partially offset
by favorable conversion premiums.
Costs such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense
and unrealized gains (losses) on changes in the fair value of
derivatives are not utilized by our chief operating decision
maker in evaluating segment performance. The table below
reconciles income from reportable segments to Net income
attributable to our common shareholder for the six months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
South America
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Corporate and other(1)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(2)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Restructuring recoveries (charges), net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corporate and other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. |
|
(2) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Income from reportable segments to Net income
attributable to our common shareholder, the proportional Segment
income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed from
Income from reportable segments, net of our share of their net
after-tax results, which is reported as equity in net (income)
loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed
consolidated statements of operations. See
Note 5 Investment in and Advances to
Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions
to our Unaudited Financial Statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus for further information about these non-consolidated
affiliates. |
58
Depreciation and amortization decreased $31 million from
the prior year period due to the reductions in depreciation on
fixed assets, primarily in Europe. Certain fair value
adjustments recorded in connection with the Arrangement were
fully amortized in the six months ended September 30, 2009.
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt. Approximately 16% of our debt was variable
rate as of September 30, 2009.
Unrealized gains on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the mark to market accounting for changes
in the fair value of our derivatives that do not receive hedge
accounting treatment. In the six months ended September 30,
2009, the $553 million of unrealized gains consists of
(1) $410 million reversal of previously recognized
losses upon settlement of these derivatives and
(2) $143 million of unrealized gains relating to mark
to market adjustments. For the six months ended
September 30, 2008 we recorded $201 million of
unrealized losses.
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation of
$33 million for the six months ended September 30,
2009 was flat as compared to $36 million in the prior year
period. This adjustment primarily relates to depreciation and
amortization and income taxes at our Aluminium Norf GmbH joint
venture. Income taxes related to our equity method investments
are reflected in the carrying value of the investment and not in
our consolidated income tax provision.
Restructuring charges in the six months ended September 30,
2009 relate to additional expenses associated with previously
announced restructuring actions in Europe. See
Note 2 Restructuring Programs to
our Unaudited Financial Statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
For the six months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded a
$199 million income tax provision on our pre-tax income of
$594 million, before our equity in net loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and noncontrolling interests, which
represented an effective tax rate of 34%. Our effective tax rate
differs from the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the
following factors: (1) $20 million expense for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) $36 million expense for exchange remeasurement of
deferred income taxes, (3) $4 million benefit from
expense/income items with no tax, (4) $9 million
benefit from differences between the Canadian statutory and
foreign effective tax rates applied to entities in different
jurisdictions and (5) $25 million benefit from a
decrease in uncertain tax positions.
For the six months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a
$133 million income tax benefit on our pre-tax loss of
$211 million, before our equity in net loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and noncontrolling interests, which
represented an effective tax rate of 63%. Our effective tax rate
differs from the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the
following factors: (1) $13 million benefit for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) $21 million benefit for exchange remeasurement of
deferred income taxes and (3) a $68 million benefit
for differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign
effective tax rates applied to entities in different
jurisdictions.
Year
Ended March 31, 2009 Compared With the Year Ended
March 31, 2008 (Twelve Months Combined
Non-GAAP)
Positive trends in the demand for aluminum products and
inflationary movement in average LME prices during the first six
months of fiscal 2009 were reversed sharply in the third fiscal
quarter of fiscal 2009 and continued into the fourth quarter.
For the year ended March 31, 2009, we realized a Net loss
attributable to our common shareholder of $1.9 billion on
net sales of $10.2 billion, compared to the year ended
March 31, 2008 when we realized a Net loss attributable to
our common shareholder of $117 million on net sales of
$11.2 billion. The reduction in sales is due to the
decrease in the average LME price as well as a reduction in
demand for flat rolled products in most regions during the last
six months of fiscal 2009.
59
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
decreased $1.0 billion, or 10%, and stayed flat as
percentage of net sales as compared to the prior year period on
an overall basis. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased $96 million, or 23%, primarily due to reductions
in professional fees and employee-related costs, including
incentive compensation associated with the Arrangement.
The current year results include non-cash asset impairment
charges totaling $1.5 billion. The impairment charges are
discussed in more detail under Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates.
The current year was also impacted by $519 million in
non-cash unrealized losses on derivative instruments and
$95 million in restructuring charges. These negative
factors were partially offset by a $122 million gain on the
extinguishment of debt. We also recorded an income tax benefit
of $246 million on our net loss, as compared to a
$77 million income tax provision in the prior year. These
items are discussed in further detail below.
Segment
Review (On a combined non-GAAP basis)
The tables below show selected segment financial information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments which are in kt)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments which are in kt)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Combined)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
4,338
|
|
|
$
|
1,818
|
|
|
$
|
994
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles changes in Segment income for the
year ended March 31, 2008 to the year ended March 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment Income (In millions)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
Volume:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Conversion costs(1)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other changes(2)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such as
direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage, alloys
and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss. Fluctuations in
this component reflect cost efficiencies during the period as
well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(2) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research and development for all
segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of purchase
accounting and metal price ceiling contracts. Significant
fluctuations in these items are discussed below. |
North
America
Net sales for fiscal 2009 were down $171 million, or 4%, as
compared to the fiscal 2008 period due to lower volume and a
lower average LME price. While shipments were down 5% for fiscal
2009 as compared to fiscal 2008, shipments in the second half of
fiscal 2009 were down 16% as compared to the first half of the
year.
Segment income for fiscal 2009 was $82 million, down
$160 million as compared to the prior year, due to the
negative impact of metal price lag, conversion costs, volume
decreases and foreign exchange fluctuations related to our
operations in Canada. The negative impact of conversion costs
relates to increases in energy costs and freight as compared to
the prior year.
Other changes reflect $11 million in acquisition-related
stock compensation expense in the prior year period, and an
$18 million favorable impact related to metal price ceiling
contracts as compared to the prior year. Selling, general and
administrative costs were down $22 million as compared to
the prior year as the cost reduction initiatives have begun to
favorably impact results. These favorable changes were partially
offset by a $23 million reduction in the net favorable
impact of acquisition-related fair value adjustments and a
$13 million reduction in the benefit associated with
recycling used beverage cans.
Europe
Flat rolled shipments and net sales decreased 15% and 14%,
respectively, compared to the prior year. The volume reduction
had a $404 million unfavorable impact on net sales, with
the remaining decrease reflecting the impact of lower LME prices
and a stronger U.S. dollar. Demand for specialty, painted
and light gauge products was down for fiscal 2009 as a result of
the weak construction market, as well as reductions in demand
for automotive products. Increases in beverage can and
lithographic shipments in the first six months of fiscal 2009
were reversed in the second half of the fiscal year, resulting
in
year-over-year
declines in both sectors.
Segment income for fiscal 2009 was $236 million, as
compared to $273 million in the comparative period of the
prior year. Volume and foreign currency remeasurement
unfavorably impacted Segment income but these impacts were
partially offset by favorable conversion premiums, metal price
lag and conversion costs. The favorable impact of conversion
costs relates to a reduction in labor costs, partially offset by
increases in energy costs as compared to the prior year.
Other changes reflect a $13 million net favorable impact of
income and expense items associated with acquisition-related
fair value adjustments and $6 million of stock compensation
expense in the prior year.
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we announced a number of
restructuring actions across Europe, including the closure of
our plant in Rogerstone, United Kingdom effective April 30,
2009. The closure of the Rogerstone plant resulted in the
elimination of 440 positions, and we recorded approximately
$20 million in severance-related costs. We also recorded
$20 million in environmental remediation expenses and
$3 million in other exit related costs related to the
closure of this plant. We also recorded $12 million in
non-cash fixed asset impairments, an $8 million write-down
of parts and supplies, and a $3 million reduction to
reserves associated with unfavorable contracts established as
part of the Arrangement.
61
Cost reductions were also implemented through capacity and staff
reductions at our Rugles, France and Ohle, Germany facilities
with severance-related costs associated with these actions
totaling $10 million in fiscal 2009.
Asia
Total shipments and net sales decreased 13% and 16%,
respectively, with the largest shipment reductions in beverage
can products, followed by electronics, construction and general
purpose foil products. The volume reduction had a
$242 million unfavorable impact on net sales with the
remaining decrease reflecting the impact of lower LME prices.
The improvement in Segment income of $34 million from the
year ended March 31, 2008 to the year ended March 31,
2009 was due to the favorable impact of metal price lag,
improved conversion premiums and product mix, partially offset
by the volume decreases, increases to conversion costs and
foreign currency remeasurement. The conversion cost increases
were primarily related to increases in energy costs as compared
to the prior year period.
In response to reduced demand, we eliminated 34 positions in
Asia in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and recorded
approximately $1 million in severance-related costs related
to a voluntary retirement program. Also, during the year ended
March 31, 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of
approximately $5 million in Novelis Korea due to the
obsolescence of certain production related fixed assets.
South
America
Total shipments increased 5% over prior year, with rolled
products shipments up 7%, but net sales increased only 1% as
compared to the prior year due to lower LME prices.
Segment income for South America decreased $22 million as
compared to the prior year period. Conversion costs increased
due to cost inflation for energy, alumina, alloys and hardeners.
Other changes reflect a $9 million net favorable impact of
income and expense items associated with acquisition-related
fair value adjustments, a $6 million reduction in selling,
general and administrative expenses and $3 million of stock
compensation expense in the prior year period. These positive
impacts were partially offset by an $11 million decrease in
the smelter benefit as the benefit from our smelter operations
in South America declines as average LME prices decrease.
On January 26, 2009, we announced that we would cease the
production of alumina at our Ouro Preto facility in May 2009.
This resulted in the reduction of approximately 290 positions,
including 150 employees and 140 contractors, and we
recorded restructuring charges totaling $2 million related
to severance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Other exit
costs include less than $1 million related to the idling of
the refinery. Other activities related to the facility,
including electric power generation and the production of
primary aluminum, will continue unaffected.
62
The table below reconciles Income from reportable segments to
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder for the years
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
South America
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Corporate and other(1)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Unrealized losses on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(2)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Restructuring recoveries (charges), net
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corporate and Other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. |
|
(2) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Income from reportable segments to net loss
attributable to our common shareholder, the proportional Segment
income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed from
Income from reportable segments, net of our share of their net
after-tax results, which is reported as equity in net (income)
loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed
consolidated statements of operations. See
Note 10 Investment in and Advances to
Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions
to our Audited Financial Statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus for further information about these non-consolidated
affiliates. |
Corporate and other expenses declined versus the prior year
primarily due to $22 million of stock compensation expenses
associated with the Arrangement which were recognized in fiscal
2008 and lower incentive compensation expenses in the current
year.
Depreciation and amortization increased $36 million
primarily due to the increases in bases of our property, plant
and equipment and intangible assets resulting from the
Arrangement in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
63
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our
variable rate debt.
Unrealized losses on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the
mark-to-market
accounting for changes in the fair value of our derivatives that
do not receive hedge accounting treatment. In the year ended
March 31, 2009, these unrealized losses increased primarily
attributable to falling LME prices. Our principal exposure to
LME prices is related to derivatives on fixed forward price
contracts. We hedge these contracts by purchasing aluminum
futures contracts and these contracts decrease in value in
periods of declining LME prices.
We recorded a $1.34 billion impairment charge related to
goodwill in fiscal 2009.
The gain on extinguishment of debt related to the purchase of
our 7.25% senior notes with a principal value of
$275 million with the proceeds of an additional term loan
with a face value of $220 million and an estimated fair
value of $165 million. See Liquidity and Capital
Resources below for additional discussion about the
accounting for this purchase.
The adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation includes
a $160 million impairment charge related to our investment
in our Norf joint venture. Excluding this impairment charge, the
adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation increased
from $43 million in fiscal 2008 to $66 million in
fiscal 2009 primarily related to our Norf joint venture due to a
change in the statutory tax rate in Germany that was reflected
in the prior year period. Income taxes related to our equity
method investments, such as Norf, are reflected in the carrying
value of the investment and not in our consolidated income tax
provision.
Other costs, net for the 2009 fiscal year includes a
$26 million non-cash gain on reversal of a legal accrual,
as well as a $9 million charge for a tax settlement in
Brazil. Sale transaction fees of $32 million associated
with the Arrangement were recorded in fiscal 2008.
For the year ended March 31, 2009, we recorded a
$246 million income tax benefit on our pre-tax loss of
$2.0 billion, before our equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates, which represented an effective tax
rate of 12%. Our effective tax rate differs from the benefit at
the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following
factors: (1) $415 million related to a non-deductible
goodwill impairment charge, (2) a $48 million benefit
for exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) a
$61 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
those losses, (4) a $33 million benefit from
differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign effective
tax rates applied to entities in different jurisdictions and
(5) a $2 million expense related to an increase in
uncertain tax positions.
For the year ended March 31, 2008, we recorded a
$77 million income tax provision on our pre-tax loss of
$63 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates, which represented an effective tax
rate of (122)%. Our effective tax rate differs from the benefit
at the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following
factors: (1) a $62 million provision for
(a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax
effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect,
(2) a $30 million increase for exchange remeasurement
of deferred income taxes, (3) a $17 million benefit
from the effects of enacted tax rate changes on cumulative
taxable temporary differences, (4) a $7 million
increase in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses
in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than
not that we will not be able to utilize those losses, and
(5) a $17 million increase in uncertain tax positions
recorded under the provisions of FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48).
Year
Ended March 31, 2008 Compared With the Year Ended
March 31, 2007 (Twelve Months Combined Non-GAAP for both
periods)
For the year ended March 31, 2008, we realized a Net loss
attributable to our common shareholder of $117 million on
net sales of $11.2 billion, as compared to the year ended
March 31, 2007 when we realized a Net loss attributable to
our common shareholder of $265 million on net sales of
$10.2 billion. The 11%
64
increase in net sales was primarily due to increases in
conversion premiums in all regions as well as $270 million
of accretion in fair value reserves associated with the metal
price ceiling contracts.
The reduction in the Net loss attributable to our common
shareholder as compared to the prior year was primarily driven
by the favorable impact of purchase accounting and increases in
conversion premiums, partially offset by increased depreciation
and amortization expense due to the acquisition by Hindalco.
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
increased $618 million, or 6%, but decreased as a
percentage of net sales as compared to the prior year period as
a result of pricing improvements across all regions, partially
offset by certain operating cost increases. Selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased slightly as a result of
reduced corporate costs, offset by increased stock compensation
associated with the Arrangement. For the year ended
March 31, 2008, we recorded income tax expense of
$77 million, as compared to a $99 million income tax
benefit. These items are discussed in further detail below.
Segment
Review (On a combined non-GAAP basis)
The tables below show selected segment financial information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments which are in kt)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Combined)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
4,338
|
|
|
$
|
1,818
|
|
|
$
|
994
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except shipments which are in kt)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,721
|
|
|
$
|
3,851
|
|
|
$
|
1,711
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,160
|
|
Shipments (kt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolled products
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,951
|
|
Ingot products
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
The following table highlights changes in Segment income for the
year ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the year ended
March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
Changes in Segment Income (In millions)
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Conversion premium and product mix
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Conversion costs(1)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Metal price lag
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Purchase accounting
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Other changes(2)
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income year ended March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Conversion costs include expenses incurred in production such as
direct and indirect labor, energy, freight, scrap usage, alloys
and hardeners, coatings, alumina and melt loss. Fluctuations in
this component reflect cost efficiencies during the period as
well as cost inflation (deflation). |
|
(2) |
|
Other changes include selling, general &
administrative costs and research & development for
all segments and certain other items which impact one or more
regions, including such items as the impact of metal price
ceiling contracts and stock compensation expense. Significant
fluctuations in these items are discussed below. |
North
America
Net sales increased in the fiscal 2008 period as compared to the
fiscal 2007 period primarily as a result of reduced exposure to
contracts with price ceilings and contract fair value accretion.
During the fiscal 2008 period, we were unable to pass through
approximately $230 million of metal purchase costs. During
the comparable period in 2007, we were unable to pass through
approximately $460 million, for a net favorable impact of
approximately $230 million. Sales in the fiscal 2008 period
were also favorably impacted by $270 million related to the
accretion of the contract fair value reserves as discussed in
Metal Price Ceilings, increases in conversion
premiums and the favorable impact of contracts priced in prior
periods.
These favorable changes in sales were partially offset by a
reduction in demand in the fiscal 2008 period as compared to the
fiscal 2007 period and a lower average LME. Rolled product
shipments were down 3% in North America in the fiscal 2008
period as compared to the fiscal 2007 period due to reduced
industrial products, light gauge and lower can volumes. The
reduction in demand led to a $165 million reduction in net
sales as compared to the prior year. The average LME was 1.5%
lower than in the prior year, which impacted sales in
North America by $88 million as compared to the prior
year.
Segment income for the fiscal 2008 period was $242 million,
an increase of $296 million as compared to the fiscal 2007
period. The reduction of
year-over-year
ceiling exposure net of derivatives losses combined with the
purchase accounting on these types of contracts favorably
impacted fiscal 2008 Segment income. These favorable items were
partially offset by increased conversion costs, the negative
impact of metal price lag, lower volume and $11 million of
stock compensation recorded as a result of the Arrangement.
Europe
Rolled product shipments were flat
year-over-year
driven by increased can volume that was offset by lower volumes
in painted and general purpose products. Demand decreased due to
lower construction activity in the European market. Ingot
product shipment increased as a result of higher scrap sales.
66
Net sales increased 13% due to a strengthening of the euro
against the U.S. dollar, higher conversion premiums and
incremental volume of ingot products. While average LME was
lower
year-over-year,
net sales increased from contracts priced in prior periods. This
contributed approximately $100 million to net sales as
compared to the prior year, but had no impact on Segment income
as the metal costs were hedged at prior period prices, which
were comparably higher.
Segment income for the fiscal 2008 period was $273 million,
as compared to $276 million in the comparable prior year
period. Segment income was favorably impacted by higher
conversion premiums, increased ingot sales and foreign currency
benefits. These positive factors were more than offset by
unfavorable metal price lag, increased conversion costs and
other changes. Other changes include a $6 million negative
impact of incremental stock compensation expense recorded as a
result of the Arrangement.
Asia
Shipments of rolled products and net sales were up a comparable
7% and 6%, respectively. Net sales increased $132 million
as a result of higher conversion premiums and increased volume,
partially offset by lower average LME during the period, which
reduced net sales by $25 million. Increases in rolled
products was due to increased demand in the can market,
partially offset by a decline in shipments in the industrial and
foil stock markets as a result of continued price pressure from
Chinese exports, driven by the difference in aluminum metal
prices on the Shanghai Futures Exchange and the LME.
Segment income decreased $20 million for the fiscal 2008
period as compared to the fiscal 2007 period. Segment income was
unfavorably impacted by conversion costs and foreign exchange,
partially offset by the benefit of increased volume and price.
Other changes include a $4 million of incremental stock
compensation expense recorded as a result of the Arrangement.
South
America
Rolled product shipments increased during the year ended
March 31, 2008 over the comparable prior year period
primarily due to an increase in can shipments driven by strong
market demand. This was slightly offset by reductions in the
industrial products market. Net sales increased primarily as a
result of increased price and volume.
Segment income for South America decreased $21 million as
compared to the prior year period as favorable trends in volume
and conversion premiums were more than offset by higher
conversion costs, metal price lag and foreign exchange
associated with the strengthening of the Brazilian real.
Conversion costs increased due to cost inflation for energy,
freight and other operating costs.
Other changes include an unfavorable impact of $13 million
related to the smelter operations, as the benefits from our
smelter operations in South America decline as average LME
prices decrease. Also included within other changes is an
$11 million unfavorable impact of lower average LME prices
and $3 million of incremental stock compensation expense
recorded as a result of the Arrangement.
67
The table below reconciles Income from reportable segments to
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder for the years
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
Europe
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
South America
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
Corporate and other(1)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Unrealized gains on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(2)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
$
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corporate and other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. |
|
(2) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile Income from reportable segments to net loss
attributable to our common shareholder, the proportional Segment
income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed from
Income from reportable segments, net of our share of their net
after-tax results, which is reported as equity in net (income)
loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed
consolidated statements of operations. See
Note 10 Investment in and Advances to
Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions
to our Audited Financial Statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus for further information about these non-consolidated
affiliates. |
Corporate and other expenses declined versus fiscal 2007
primarily through reduced spending on third party consultants at
our corporate headquarters. This improvement was partially
offset by $22 million of stock compensation expense
associated with the Arrangement which were recognized in fiscal
2008.
Depreciation and amortization increased $170 million due to
our acquisition by Hindalco. As a result of the acquisition, the
consideration paid by Hindalco was pushed down to us and
allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. As a
result, property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
increased by approximately $2.3 billion. The increase in
asset values, all of which is non-cash, is charged to
depreciation and amortization expense in future periods based on
the estimated useful lives of the individual assets.
68
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
decreased primarily due to the elimination of penalty interest
incurred in the prior year as a result of our delayed filings
with the SEC and lower interest rates on our variable rate debt
in the current year.
Unrealized losses on the change in fair value of derivative
instruments represent the
mark-to-market
accounting for changes in the fair value of our derivatives that
do not receive hedge accounting treatment. Unrealized losses for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 decreased due to LME
prices rising at the end of the period. Our principal exposure
to LME prices is related to derivatives on fixed forward price
contracts. We hedge these contracts by purchasing aluminum
futures contracts and these contracts decrease in value in
periods of declining LME.
Restructuring expenses decreased for the fiscal 2008 period as
compared the fiscal 2007 period. During the fiscal 2007 period,
we announced several restructuring programs related to our
central management and administration offices in Zurich,
Switzerland; our Neuhausen research and development center in
Switzerland; our Göttingen facility in Germany; our
facilities in Bridgnorth, U.K.; and the reorganization of our
plants in Ohle and Ludenscheid, Germany, including the closing
of two non-core business lines located within those facilities.
Additionally, we continued to incur costs relating to the
shutdown of our Borgofranco facility in Italy. We incurred
aggregate restructuring charges of approximately
$27 million in fiscal 2007 in connection with these
programs. Through March 31, 2008, these actions were
completed and no additional costs were incurred.
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
primarily through reduced spending on third party consultants at
our corporate headquarters and lower long-term incentive
compensation.
Included within other costs, net for the 2008 and 2007 periods
are sales transaction fees of $32 million associated with
the Arrangement.
For the year ended March 31, 2008, we recorded a
$77 million income tax provision for taxes on our pre-tax
loss of $63 million, before our equity in net (income) loss
of non-consolidated affiliates, which represented an effective
tax rate of (122)%. Our effective tax rate differs from the
benefit at the Canadian statutory rate due primarily to
(1) a $62 million provision for (a) pre-tax
foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect and
(b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency
gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, (2) a
$30 million provision for exchange remeasurement of
deferred income taxes, (3) a $17 million benefit from
the effects of enacted tax rate changes on cumulative taxable
temporary differences, partially offset by (4) a
$7 million increase in valuation allowances primarily
related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe
it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize
those losses and (5) a $17 million increase in
uncertain tax positions recorded under the provisions of
FIN 48.
For the year ended March 31, 2007, we recorded a
$99 million income tax benefit on our pre-tax loss of
$377 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates, which represented an effective tax
rate of 26%. Our effective tax rate is less than the benefit at
the Canadian statutory rate due primarily to a $65 million
benefit from differences between the Canadian statutory and
foreign effective tax rates applied to entities in different
jurisdictions, more than offset by (1) a $61 million
increase in valuation allowances related to tax losses in
certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than
not that we will not be able to utilize those losses,
(2) an $11 million expense from expense/income items
with no tax effect net and (3) $11 million
for (a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no
tax effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar
denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We believe we have adequate liquidity to meet our operational
and capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Our primary
sources of liquidity are available cash and cash equivalents,
borrowing availability under our ABL Facility and future cash
generated by operating activities. During the first nine months
of fiscal 2009, our liquidity position decreased by
$426 million as the global recession led to a rapid decline
in aluminum prices and end-customer demand for flat-rolled
products. However, for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and the
first six months of fiscal 2010, our business operated with
positive cash flow before
69
financing activities despite continued low levels of demand in
the automotive, construction and industrial markets and net cash
outflows to settle derivative positions. This reflects our
ongoing efforts to preserve liquidity through cost and capital
spending controls and effective management of working capital.
Risks associated with supplier terms, customer credit and broker
hedging capacity, while still present to some degree, have been
managed successfully to date with minimal negative impact on our
business. We expect our liquidity position to improve during
fiscal 2010 due primarily to reduced cash outflows for metal
derivatives and cash savings from previously-announced
restructuring programs.
Available
Liquidity
Our estimated liquidity as of September 30, 2009,
March 31, 2009, January 31, 2009 and March 31,
2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
Overdrafts
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Availability under the ABL Facility
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Borrowing availability limitation due to fixed charge coverage
ratio
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated liquidity
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our liquidity position has improved since January 31, 2009
when our estimated liquidity was $346 million as disclosed
in our third quarter
Form 10-Q.
In February 2009, we obtained the $100 million Unsecured
Credit Facility from an affiliate of the Aditya Birla Group. At
September 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$246 million. Additionally, we had $400 million in
remaining availability under our ABL Facility, before covenant
restrictions. Following the completion of the offering of the
old notes, we used approximately $81 million of the
proceeds plus additional cash on hand to repay a portion of the
outstanding amount under the ABL Facility.
Borrowings under the ABL Facility are generally based on 85% of
eligible accounts receivable and 65 to 70% of eligible
inventories. In addition, under the ABL Facility, if our excess
availability under the ABL Facility is less than 10% of the
lender commitments under the ABL Facility or less than 10% of
our borrowing base, we are required to maintain a minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio of at least 1 to 1 or we will be subject
to a reduction in availability under the facility. As of
September 30, 2009, our fixed charge coverage ratio was
less than 1 to 1 resulting in a reduction of availability under
our ABL Facility of $80 million.
The cash and cash equivalent balance above includes cash held in
foreign countries in which we operate. These amounts are
generally available on a short-term basis, subject to regulatory
requirements, in the form of a dividend or inter-company loan.
Near
Term Challenges
Rapidly declining aluminum prices and reductions in demand
during the second half of fiscal 2009 negatively impacted the
cash generated by operations and increased the effect of timing
issues related to our settlement of aluminum forward contracts
versus cash collection from our customers. We enter into
derivative instruments to hedge forecasted purchases and sales
of aluminum. Based on the aluminum price forward curve as of
September 30, 2009, we forecast $98 million of cash
outflows related to settlement of these derivative instruments
through the remainder of fiscal 2010. Except for
$26 million of cash outflows related to hedges of our
exposure to metal price ceilings, we expect all of these
outflows will be recovered through collection of customer
accounts receivable, typically on a 30 to 60 day lag.
Accordingly, this difference in timing places pressure on our
short-term liquidity.
70
We have an existing beverage can sheet umbrella agreement with
North American bottlers (BCS Agreement). Pursuant to
the BCS Agreement, an agent for the bottlers directs the can
fabricators to source a percentage of their requirements for
beverage can body, end and tab stock from us.
Under the BCS Agreement, the bottlers agent has the right
to request that we hedge the exposure to the price the bottlers
will ultimately pay for aluminum. We treat this arrangement as a
derivative for accounting purposes. Upon receiving such
requests, we enter into corresponding derivative instruments
indexed to the LME price of aluminum with third party brokers.
We settle the positions with the brokers at maturity and net
settle the economic benefit or loss arising from the pricing
requests, which may not occur for up to 13 months.
As of September 30, 2009, we settled a net
$118 million of derivative losses for which we had not been
reimbursed under the BCS Agreement. Based on the current forward
curve of aluminum we do not anticipate a further negative impact
on our liquidity as a result of this arrangement. We believe
that collection on these receivables is reasonably certain based
on the credit worthiness of the bottlers.
Debt
Covenants
The senior secured credit facilities, the indenture governing
our 7.25% senior notes and the indenture governing the
notes impose significant operating restrictions on us. These
restrictions limit our ability and the ability of our restricted
subsidiaries, among other things, to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt and provide additional guarantees;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends and make other restricted payments, including
certain investments;
|
|
|
|
create or permit certain liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain asset sales;
|
|
|
|
use the proceeds from the sales of assets and subsidiary stock;
|
|
|
|
create or permit restrictions on the ability of our restricted
subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us;
|
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions; and
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our
assets or the assets of our restricted subsidiaries.
|
As of September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with these
covenants.
Operating
Activities
Free cash flow (which is a non-GAAP measure) consists of:
(a) net cash provided by (used in) operating activities,
(b) plus net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities and (c) less net proceeds from sales of assets.
Management believes that Free cash flow is relevant to investors
as it provides a measure of the cash generated internally that
is available for debt service and other value creation
opportunities. However, Free cash flow does not necessarily
represent cash available for discretionary activities, as
certain debt service obligations must be funded out of Free cash
flow. Our method of calculating Free cash flow may not be
consistent with that of other companies.
In our discussion of Metal Price Ceilings, we have
disclosed that certain customer contracts contain a fixed
aluminum (metal) price ceiling beyond which the cost of aluminum
cannot be passed through to the customer, unless adjusted.
During the years ended March 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and
the six months ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008, we were unable to pass through
approximately $176 million, $230 million,
$460 million, $4 million and $152 million,
respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales
under these contracts. Net cash provided by operating activities
were negatively impacted by the same
71
amounts, adjusted for timing difference between customer
receipts and vendor payments and offset partially by reduced
income taxes. Based upon a September 30, 2009 aluminum
price of $1,850 and our best estimate of shipment volumes, we
estimate that we will be unable to pass through aluminum
purchase costs of approximately $4 million through
December 31, 2009 when this contract expires.
The following table shows the reconciliation from Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities to Free cash flow,
the ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and the change
between periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
|
$
|
(390
|
)
|
|
$
|
(236
|
)
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
$
|
(411
|
)
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
Less: Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
(340
|
)
|
|
$
|
(352
|
)
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
(423
|
)
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities for the first six
months of fiscal 2010 significantly improved as compared to net
cash used in the first six months of fiscal 2009 due to higher
net income and improved working capital management, including
favorable impacts from customer forfaiting and extended payment
terms from suppliers.
Our operations consumed cash at a higher rate during the year
ended March 31, 2009 compared to the prior year period due
to slowing business conditions and higher working capital levels
associated with rapidly changing aluminum prices and the timing
of payments made to suppliers, to brokers to settle derivative
positions and ultimate settlement with our customers. Inventory
levels were effectively managed despite slowing business
conditions. Metal inventories as of March 31, 2009 totaled
299 kt, down 22% from March 31, 2008 levels.
We have historically maintained forfaiting and factoring
arrangements in Asia and South America that provided additional
liquidity in those segments. The current economic conditions
have negatively impacted our ability to forfait our customer
receivables as well as our suppliers ability to provide
extended payment terms.
In fiscal 2008, net cash provided by operating activities
increased as a result of our reduced exposure to metal price
ceiling contracts as discussed above. For the year ended
March 31, 2008 our exposure to metal price ceilings
decreased by approximately $230 million providing
additional operating cash flow as compared to the prior year.
Net cash used in operating activities for fiscal 2008 was
unfavorably impacted by one-time costs associated with or
triggered by the Arrangement including:
(1) $72 million paid in share-based compensation
payments, (2) $42 million paid for sale transaction
fees and (3) $25 million in bonus payments for the
2006 calendar year and the period from January 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007.
Dividends paid to our noncontrolling interests, primarily in our
Asia operating segment, were $6 million, $8 million
and $10 for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The majority of our capital expenditures for fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007 have been for projects devoted to product quality,
technology, productivity enhancement and increased capacity.
Capital expenditures were
72
slightly higher in the fiscal 2008 period due, in part, to the
construction of Novelis
Fusiontm ingot
casting lines in our European and Asian segments as well as
additional planned maintenance activities, improvements to our
Yeongju, Korea hot mill and other ancillary upgrades made in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008. As a result of the overall
economic downturn, we have reduced our capital spending, with a
focus on preserving maintenance and safety in the second half of
fiscal 2009.
The settlement of derivative instruments resulted in an outflow
of $8 million and reduction to Free cash flow for the year
ended March 31, 2009 as compared to $55 million in
cash contributed in fiscal 2008 and $191 million in fiscal
2007. The net outflow for fiscal 2009 was a result of
settlements of $188 million in the fourth quarter of net
derivative liabilities. Much of the proceeds received in 2007
related to aluminum call options purchased in the prior year to
hedge against the risk of rising aluminum prices.
In 2008, Free cash flow was used primarily to increase our
overall liquidity and pay for costs associated with the Hindalco
transaction. Although our total debt increased from
March 31, 2007 by $82 million, this was more than
offset by an increase in our cash and cash equivalents of
$198 million.
Investing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
(70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(119
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
Proceeds from related parties loans receivable, net
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Net proceeds (outflow) from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
(442
|
)
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
(111
|
)
|
|
$
|
(96
|
)
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments and the
magnitude of capital expenditures were discussed above in
Operating Activities as both are included in our
definition of Free cash flow.
As a result of the overall economic downturn, we reduced our
capital spending beginning in the second half of fiscal 2009. We
expect that our total annual capital expenditures for fiscal
2010 to be between $90 and $100 million for items necessary
to maintain comparable production, quality and market position
levels (maintenance capital).
The settlement of derivative instruments resulted in an outflow
of $416 million in the six months ended September 30,
2009 as compared to $94 million in cash contributed in the
prior year period. The net outflow in fiscal 2010 was primarily
related to metal derivatives. Based on the aluminum price
forward curve as of September 30, 2009, we forecast
approximately $98 million of cash outflows related to the
settlement of metal derivative instruments through the remainder
of fiscal 2010. Except for approximately $26 million of
cash outflows related to hedges of our exposure to metal price
ceilings, we expect all of these outflows will be recovered
through collection of customer accounts receivable, typically on
a 30 to 60 day lag.
73
The majority of proceeds from asset sales in the six months
ended September 30, 2009 relate to asset sales in Europe.
The majority of proceeds from asset sales in fiscal 2009 and
2008 are from the sale of land in Kingston, Ontario. Proceeds
from sales of assets in 2007 include approximately
$34 million received from the sale of certain upstream
assets in South America.
Proceeds from loans receivable, net during all periods are
primarily comprised of payments we received related to a loan
due from our non-consolidated affiliate, Aluminium Norf GmbH.
Financing
Activities
The following table presents information regarding our Net cash
provided by financing activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
Versus
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
(896
|
)
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(1,010
|
)
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
(768
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(290
|
)
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 11, 2009, we issued the old notes. The old notes
rank equally with all of our existing and future unsecured
senior indebtedness. The old notes were issued at a discount
resulting in gross proceeds of $181 million. The net
proceeds of this offering were used to repay a portion of the
ABL Facility and $94 million outstanding under the
unsecured credit facility from an affiliate of the Aditya Birla
Group.
As of September 30, 2009, our short-term borrowings were
$177 million consisting of (1) $166 million of
short-term loans under our ABL Facility, (2) a
$4 million short-term loan in Italy and
(3) $7 million in bank overdrafts. As of
September 30, 2009, $31 million of our ABL Facility
was utilized for letters of credit and we had $400 million
in remaining availability under this revolving credit facility
before covenant related restrictions. The weighted average
interest rate on our total short-term borrowings was 2.09% and
2.75% as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009,
respectively.
In March 2009, we entered into a transaction in which we
purchased 7.25% senior notes with a face value of
$275 million with the net proceeds of an additional
floating rate term loan with a face value of $220 million.
The purchase was accounted for as a debt extinguishment and
issuance of new debt, with the new debt recorded at its
estimated fair value of $165 million.
In February 2009, to assist in maintaining adequate liquidity
levels, we entered into an unsecured credit facility of
$100 million (the Unsecured Credit Facility) with a
scheduled maturity date of January 15, 2015 from an
affiliate of the Aditya Birla group. During the six months ended
September 30, 2009, we drew an
74
additional $3 million on the Unsecured Credit Facility. As
discussed above, this facility was repaid and retired using the
proceeds from the old notes.
As proceeds from the old notes was used to repay existing debt,
our borrowing level has remained constant for the first six
months of fiscal 2010. During the first six months of fiscal
2009, we increased our short-term borrowings under the ABL
Facility to provide for general working capital requirements in
a rising aluminum price environment.
As of September 30, 2009, we had an additional
$122 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
not included in our revolving credit facility.
As a result of our acquisition by Hindalco, we were required to
refinance our existing credit facility in fiscal 2008.
Additionally, we refinanced debt in Asia due to its scheduled
maturity. See Note 12 Debt to our
Audited Financial Statements and Note 6
Debt to our Unaudited Financial Statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus for additional information
regarding our financing activities.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we also amended our
then existing senior secured credit facilities to increase their
capacity by $150 million. We used these proceeds to reduce
the outstanding balance of our then existing revolving credit
facility, thus increasing our borrowing capacity. This
additional capacity, along with $92 million of cash
received from the issuance of additional shares indirectly to
Hindalco, allowed us to fund general working capital
requirements and certain costs associated with the Arrangement
including the cash settlement of share-based compensation
arrangements and lender fees. In July 2007, we refinanced our
senior secured credit facilities, as discussed below.
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities and Predecessor Financing
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we entered into
senior secured credit facilities (Old Credit
Facilities) providing for aggregate borrowings of up to
$1.8 billion. The Old Credit Facilities consisted of
(1) a $1.3 billion seven-year senior secured term loan
B facility, bearing interest at London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) plus 1.75% (which was subject to change
based on certain leverage ratios), all of which was borrowed on
January 10, 2005, and (2) a $500 million
five-year multi-currency revolving credit and letters of credit
facility.
On April 27, 2007, our lenders consented to the sixth
amendment of our Old Credit Facilities. The amendment included
increasing the term loan B facility by $150 million. We
utilized the additional funds available under the term loan B
facility to reduce the outstanding balance of our
$500 million revolving credit facility. The additional
borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility was used
to fund working capital requirements and certain costs
associated with the Arrangement, including the cash settlement
of share-based compensation arrangements and lender fees.
Additionally, the amendment included a limited waiver of the
change of control Event of Default (as defined in the Old Credit
Facilities), which effectively extended the requirement to repay
the Old Credit Facilities to July 11, 2007.
On May 25, 2007, we entered into a Bank and Bridge
Facilities Commitment with affiliates of UBS Securities LLC and
ABN AMRO Incorporated to provide backstop assurance for the
refinancing of our existing indebtedness following the
Arrangement. The commitments from UBS Securities LLC and ABN
AMRO Incorporated, provided by the banks on a 50%-50% basis,
consisted of the following: (1) a senior secured term loan
of up to $1.06 billion; (2) a senior secured
asset-based revolving credit facility of up to $900 million
and (3) a commitment to issue up to $1.2 billion of
unsecured senior notes, if necessary. The commitment contained
terms and conditions customary for facilities of this nature.
On July 6, 2007, we entered into new senior secured credit
facilities with a syndicate of lenders led by affiliates of UBS
Securities LLC and ABN AMRO Incorporated providing for aggregate
borrowings of up to $1.76 billion, consisting of (1) a
$960 million seven-year Term Loan Facility that can be
increased by up to $400 million subject to the satisfaction
of certain conditions and (2) an $800 million
five-year multi-currency ABL Facility. The proceeds from the
Term Loan Facility of $960 million, drawn in full at the
time of closing, and an initial draw of $324 million under
the ABL Facility were used to pay off our Old Credit Facilities,
pay for debt issuance costs of the senior secured credit
facilities and provide for additional working capital.
75
Mandatory minimum principal amortization payments under the Term
Loan Facility are $2.95 million per calendar quarter. The
first minimum principal amortization payment was made on
September 30, 2007. Additional mandatory prepayments are
required to be made for certain collateral liquidations, asset
sales, debt and preferred stock issuances, equity issuances,
casualty events and excess cash flow (as defined in the senior
secured credit facilities). Any unpaid principal is due in full
on July 6, 2014.
Under the Term Loan Facility, loans characterized as alternate
base rate borrowings bear interest annually at a rate equal to
the alternate base rate (which is the greater of (a) the
base rate in effect on a given day and (b) the federal
funds effective rate in effect on a given day, plus 0.50%) plus
a margin of 1.00%. Loans characterized as Eurocurrency
borrowings bear interest at an annual rate equal to the adjusted
LIBOR rate for the interest period in effect, plus a margin of
2.00%. Generally, for both the Term Loan Facility and ABL
Facility, interest rates reset periodically, and interest is
payable on a periodic basis depending on the type of loan.
Borrowings under the ABL Facility are generally based on 85% of
eligible accounts receivable and 75% of eligible inventories.
Commitment fees ranging from 0.25% to 0.375% are based on
average daily amounts outstanding under the ABL Facility during
a fiscal quarter and are payable quarterly.
Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral under
the senior secured credit facilities. The senior secured credit
facilities are also guaranteed by substantially all of our
restricted subsidiaries that guarantee our 7.25% senior
notes and that guarantee the old notes. The senior secured
credit facilities also include customary affirmative and
negative covenants. Under the ABL Facility, if our excess
availability, as defined under the ABL Facility, is less than
10% of the lender commitments under the ABL Facility or 10% of
our borrowing base, we are required to maintain a minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1.
In March 2009, we purchased $275 million of
7.25% senior notes with the net proceeds of an additional
term loan under the Term Loan Facility with a face value of
$220 million. The additional term loan was recorded at a
fair value of $165 million determined using a discounted
cash flow model. The difference between the fair value and the
face value of the new term loan will be accreted over the life
of the term loan using the effective interest method, resulting
in additional non-cash interest expense.
As of September 30, 2009, the senior secured credit
facilities consisted of (1) the $1.16 billion
seven-year Term Loan Facility and (2) the $800 million
five-year ABL Facility.
7.25% Senior
Notes
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities. The senior
notes were priced at par, bear interest at 7.25% and mature on
February 15, 2015. The 7.25% senior notes are
guaranteed by all of our Canadian and U.S. restricted
subsidiaries, certain of our foreign restricted subsidiaries and
our other restricted subsidiaries that guarantee our senior
secured credit facilities and that guarantee the old notes.
Under the indenture that governs the 7.25% senior notes, we
are subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to
incurring additional debt and providing additional guarantees,
paying dividends beyond certain amounts and making other
restricted payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain
consolidations or mergers, and certain transactions with
affiliates.
Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing our
7.25% senior notes, we were obligated, within 30 days
of closing of the Arrangement, to make an offer to purchase the
7.25% senior notes at a price equal to 101% of their
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date
the 7.25% senior notes were purchased. Consequently, we
commenced a tender offer on May 16, 2007 to repurchase all
of the outstanding 7.25% senior notes at the prescribed
price. This offer expired on July 3, 2007 with holders of
approximately $1 million of principal presenting their
7.25% senior notes pursuant to the tender offer.
As described above, in March 2009, we entered into a transaction
in which we purchased 7.25% senior notes with a face value
of $275 million with the net proceeds of an additional
floating rate term loan with a face value of $220 million.
76
Korean
Bank Loans
In November 2004, Novelis Korea Limited (Novelis
Korea), formerly Alcan Taihan Aluminium Limited, entered
into a Korean won (KRW) 40 billion
($40 million) floating rate long-term loan due November
2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate swap to fix
the interest rate at 4.80%. In August 2007, we refinanced this
loan with a floating rate short-term borrowing in the amount of
$40 million due by August 2008. We recognized a loss on
extinguishment of debt of less than $1 million in
connection with this refinancing. Additionally, we immediately
entered into an interest rate swap and cross currency swap for
the new loan through a 3.94% fixed rate KRW 38 billion
($38 million) loan.
In December 2004, we entered into (1) a $70 million
floating rate loan and (2) a KRW 25 billion
($25 million) floating rate loan, both due in December
2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate and
cross-currency swap on the $70 million floating rate loan
through a 4.55% fixed rate KRW 73 billion
($73 million) loan and an interest rate swap on the KRW
25 billion floating rate loan to fix the interest rate at
4.45%. In October 2007, we entered into a $100 million
floating rate loan due October 2010 and immediately repaid the
$70 million loan. In December 2007, we repaid the KRW
25 billion loan from the proceeds of the $100 million
floating rate loan. Additionally, we immediately entered into an
interest rate swap and cross currency swap for the
$100 million floating rate loan through a 5.44% fixed rate
KRW 92 billion ($92 million) loan.
In November 2008, we entered into a 7.47% interest rate KRW
10 billion ($7 million) bank loan due May 2009. In
February 2009, we entered into a 3.94% interest rate KRW
50 billion ($37 million) bank loan due February 2010.
Interest
Rate Swaps
As of September 30, 2009, we had entered into interest rate
swaps to fix the variable interest rate on $920 million of
our floating rate Term Loan Facility. We are still obligated to
pay any applicable margin, as defined in our senior secured
credit facilities. Interest rates swaps related to
$400 million at an effective weighted average interest rate
of 4.0% expire March 31, 2010. In January 2009, we entered
into two interest rate swaps to fix the variable interest rate
on an additional $300 million of our floating rate Term
Loan Facility at a rate of 1.49%, plus any applicable margin.
These interest rate swaps are effective from March 31, 2009
through March 31, 2011. In April 2009, we entered into an
additional $220 million interest rate swap at a rate of
1.97%, which is effective through April 30, 2012.
We have a cross-currency interest rate swap in Korea to convert
our $100 million variable rate bank loan to KRW
92 billion at a fixed rate of 5.44%. The swap expires
October 2010, concurrent with the maturity of the loan.
As of September 30, 2009 approximately 84% of our debt was
fixed rate and approximately 16% was variable-rate.
Issuance
of Additional Common Stock
On June 22, 2007, we issued 2,044,122 additional shares to
AV Aluminum for $44.93 per share resulting in an additional
equity contribution of $92 million. This contribution was
equal in amount to certain payments made by Novelis related to
change in control compensation to certain employees and
directors, lender fees and other transaction costs incurred by
the company.
Off-Balance
Sheet Relationships
In accordance with SEC rules, the following qualify as
off-balance sheet arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
any obligation under certain guarantees or contracts;
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an
unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement
that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that
entity for such assets; and
|
|
|
|
any obligation under a material variable interest held by the
registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing,
liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant,
or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development
services with the registrant.
|
The following discussion addresses the applicable off-balance
sheet items for our company.
Derivative
Instruments
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments to manage the risks arising from
fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates, aluminum prices
and energy prices. Such instruments are used for risk management
purposes only. We may be exposed to losses in the future if the
counterparties to the contracts fail to perform. We are
satisfied that the risk of such non-performance is remote due to
our monitoring of credit exposures. Our ultimate gain or loss on
these derivatives may differ from the amount recognized in our
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions, the
relative costs of the instruments and capacity to hedge. The
duration is always linked to the timing of the underlying
exposure, with the connection between the two being regularly
monitored.
The current and noncurrent portions of derivative assets and the
current portion of derivative liabilities are presented on the
face of our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The
noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included in
Other long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum forward contracts
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
(640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Investment Hedges
We use cross currency swaps to manage our exposure to
fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and
investments in our European operations. We had cross-currency
swaps of Euro 135 million as of September 30,
2009 and March 31, 2009, designated as net investment
hedges. The effective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative is included in other comprehensive income (loss)
(OCI). Prior to the Arrangement, the effective
portion on the derivative was included in change in fair value
of effective portion of hedges, net. After the completion of the
Arrangement, the effective portion on the derivative is included
in currency translation adjustments. The ineffective portion of
gain or loss on the derivative is included in (gain) loss on
change in fair value of derivative instruments, net. We had
cross currency swaps of EUR 135 million against the
U.S. dollar outstanding as of both September 30, 2009
and March 31, 2009, respectively.
The following table summarizes the amount of gain (loss) we
recognized in OCI related to our net investment hedge
derivatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
Cash Flow
Hedges
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we have
designated as a cash flow hedge against our exposure to
fluctuating electricity prices. The effective portion of gain or
loss on the derivative is included in OCI and reclassified when
settled into (gain) loss on change in fair value of derivatives,
net in our consolidated statements of operations included
elsewhere in this prospectus. As of September 30, 2009, the
outstanding portion of this swap included 1.8 million
megawatt hours through 2017.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable-rate
debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included
in OCI and reclassified when settled into interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs in our accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. We had $910 million
and $690 million of outstanding interest rate swaps
designated as cash flow hedges as of September 30, 2009 and
March 31, 2009, respectively.
79
For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or
losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
(gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the
life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the
relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will be
de-designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if the
underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be
probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness
determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the
measures we have established at the inception of the hedge.
Gains or losses recognized to date in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) would be
immediately reclassified into current period earnings, as would
any subsequent changes in the fair value of any such derivative.
During the next 12 months we expect to realize
$23 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.
The following tables summarize the impact on AOCI and earnings
of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
(Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in
helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging
instruments. The change in fair value of these derivative
instruments is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in our consolidated statement of
operations included elsewhere in this prospectus.
80
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the LME price of aluminum. These
exposures arise from firm commitments to sell aluminum in future
periods at fixed or capped prices, the forecasted output of our
smelter operations in South America and the forecasted metal
price lag associated with firm commitments to sell aluminum in
future periods at prices based on the LME. In addition,
transactions with certain customers meet the definition of a
derivative and are recognized as assets or liabilities at fair
value on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had 225 kt
and 294 kt, respectively, of outstanding aluminum contracts not
designated as hedges.
We recognize an embedded derivative which arises from a
contractual relationship with a customer that entitles us to
pass-through the economic effect of trading positions that we
take with other third parties on our customers behalf.
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain of our operations.
As of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
outstanding currency exchange contracts with a total notional
amount of $1.5 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively,
not designated as hedges.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
interest rates associated with variable-rate debt. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
$11 million and $10 million, respectively, of
outstanding interest rate swaps that were not designated as
hedges.
We use heating oil swaps and natural gas swaps to manage our
exposure to fluctuating energy prices in North America. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
2.4 million gallons and 3.4 million gallons,
respectively, of heating oil swaps and 4.3 million MMBtus
and 3.8 million MMBtus, respectively, of natural gas that
were not designated as hedges. One MMBtu is the equivalent of
one decatherm, or one million British Thermal Units.
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in
current period earnings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
$
|
(561
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
(120
|
)
|
|
$
|
(556
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including certain
of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and Aluminium Norf GmbH, which
is a 50% owned joint venture that does not meet the requirements
for consolidation.
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. For
our majority-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness guaranteed is
for short-term loan, overdraft
81
and other debt facilities with financial institutions, which
are currently scheduled to expire during the second half of
fiscal 2010. Some of the guarantees have annual terms while
others have no expiration and have termination notice
requirements. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries or
non-consolidated affiliates holds any assets of any third
parties as collateral to offset the potential settlement of
these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements, all
liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term debt
facilities for these entities are already included in our
consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness of others as of
September 30, 2009. We did not have any obligations under
guarantees of indebtedness related to our majority-owned
subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
Potential Future
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Payment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Wholly-owned Subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
Other
Arrangements
Forfaiting
of Trade Receivables
Novelis Korea forfaits trade receivables in the ordinary course
of business. These trade receivables are typically outstanding
for 60 to 120 days. Forfaiting is a non-recourse method to
manage credit and interest rate risks. Under this method,
customers contract to pay a financial institution. The
institution assumes the risk of non-payment and remits the
invoice value (net of a fee) to us after presentation of a proof
of delivery of goods to the customer. We do not retain a
financial or legal interest in these receivables, and they are
not included in our consolidated balance sheets.
Factoring
of Trade Receivables
Our Brazilian operations factor, without recourse, certain trade
receivables that are unencumbered by pledge restrictions. Under
this method, customers are directed to make payments on invoices
to a financial institution, but are not contractually required
to do so. The financial institution pays us any invoices it has
approved for payment (net of a fee). We do not retain financial
or legal interest in these receivables, and they are not
included in our consolidated balance sheets.
Summary
Disclosures of Forfaited and Factored Financial
Amounts
The following tables summarize our forfaiting and factoring
amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Receivables forfaited
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
424
|
|
Receivables factored
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Forfaiting expense
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Factoring expense
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Forfaited receivables outstanding
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
Factored receivables outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of forfaited receivables outstanding decreased as of
March 31, 2009 as compared to March 31, 2008 primarily
due to decline in the LME price from March 31, 2008 to
March 31, 2009 which resulted in a smaller amount of
receivables available for forfaiting, as well as tightening in
the credit markets. Forfaited receivables outstanding were
$80 million as of September 30, 2009. Factored
receivables outstanding were $32 million as of
September 30, 2009.
Other
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in
transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities
(SPEs), which would have been established for the
purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we were not
involved in any unconsolidated SPE transactions.
Contractual
Obligations
We have future obligations under various contracts relating to
debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases,
long-term purchase obligations, and postretirement benefit
plans. The following table presents our estimated future
payments under contractual obligations that existed as of
March 31, 2009, based on undiscounted amounts. Our
contractual obligations as of September 30, 2009 have not
changed materially from the contractual obligations outstanding
as of March 31, 2009. The future cash flow commitments that
we may have related to derivative contracts are not estimable
and are therefore not included. Furthermore, due to the
difficulty in determining the timing of settlements, the table
excludes $61 million of uncertain tax positions. See
Note 19 Income Taxes to our Audited
Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Debt(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
2,522
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
2,318
|
|
Interest on long-term debt(2)(3)
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Capital leases(4)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Operating leases(5)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Purchase obligations(6)
|
|
|
7,205
|
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
3,121
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
Unfunded pension plan benefits(7)
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Other post-employment benefits(7)
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Funded pension plans(7)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(2)
|
|
$
|
10,931
|
|
|
$
|
2,347
|
|
|
$
|
3,635
|
|
|
$
|
1,607
|
|
|
$
|
3,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes only principal payments on our 7.25% senior notes,
Term Loan Facility, ABL Facility and notes payable to banks and
others. These amounts exclude payments under capital lease
obligations. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include principal or interest payments on the old notes
and does not give effect to the use of proceeds from the
offering of old notes. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest on our fixed rate debt is estimated using the stated
interest rate. Interest on our variable-rate debt is estimated
using the rate in effect as of March 31, 2009 and includes
the effect of current interest rate swap agreements. Actual
future interest payments may differ from these amounts based on
changes in floating interest rates or other factors or events.
These amounts include an estimate for unused commitment fees.
Excluded from these amounts are interest related to capital
lease obligations, the amortization of debt issuance and other
costs related to indebtedness. |
83
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes both principal and interest components of future
minimum capital lease payments. Excluded from these amounts are
insurance, taxes and maintenance associated with the property. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes the minimum lease payments for non-cancelable leases
for property and equipment used in our operations. We do not
have any operating leases with contingent rents. Excluded from
these amounts are insurance, taxes and maintenance associated
with the properties and equipment. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes agreements to purchase goods (including raw materials
and capital expenditures) and services that are enforceable and
legally binding on us, and that specify all significant terms.
Some of our raw material purchase contracts have minimum annual
volume requirements. In these cases, we estimate our future
purchase obligations using annual minimum volumes and costs per
unit that were in effect as of March 31, 2009. Due to
volatility in the cost of our raw materials, actual amounts paid
in the future may differ from these amounts. Excluded from these
amounts are the impact of any derivative instruments and any
early contract termination fees, such as those typically present
in energy contracts. |
|
(7) |
|
Obligations for postretirement benefit plans are estimated based
on actuarial estimates using benefit assumptions for, among
other factors, discount rates, rates of compensation increases,
and healthcare cost trends. Payments for unfunded pension plan
benefits and other post-employment benefits are estimated
through 2016. For funded pension plans, estimating the
requirements beyond fiscal 2010 is not practical, as it depends
on the performance of the plans investments, among other
factors. |
Dividends
On March 1, 2005, our board of directors approved the
adoption of a quarterly dividend on our common shares. The
following table shows information regarding dividends declared
on our common shares since our inception.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend/
|
|
|
|
Declaration Date
|
|
Record Date
|
|
Share (in $)
|
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
March 1, 2005
|
|
March 11, 2005
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
March 24, 2005
|
April 22, 2005
|
|
May 20, 2005
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
June 20, 2005
|
July 27, 2005
|
|
August 22, 2005
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
September 20, 2005
|
October 28, 2005
|
|
November 21, 2005
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
December 20, 2005
|
February 23, 2006
|
|
March 8, 2006
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
March 23, 2006
|
April 27, 2006
|
|
May 20, 2006
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
June 20, 2006
|
August 28, 2006
|
|
September 7, 2006
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
September 25, 2006
|
October 26, 2006
|
|
November 20, 2006
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
December 20, 2006
|
No dividends have been declared since October 26, 2006.
Future dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors
and will depend on, among other things, our financial resources,
cash flows generated by our business, our cash requirements,
restrictions under the instruments governing our indebtedness,
being in compliance with the appropriate indentures and
covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness
that would allow us to legally pay dividends and other relevant
factors.
Environment,
Health and Safety
We strive to be a leader in environment, health and safety
(EHS). Our EHS system is aligned with
ISO 14001, an international environmental management
standard, and OHSAS 18001, an international occupational health
and safety management standard. All of our facilities are
expected to implement the necessary management systems to
support ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 certifications. As of
September 30, 2009, all of our manufacturing facilities
worldwide were ISO 14001 certified, 31 facilities were OHSAS
18001 certified and 29 facilities have dedicated quality
improvement management systems.
Our capital expenditures for environmental protection and the
betterment of working conditions in our facilities were
$5 million in fiscal 2009. We expect these capital
expenditures will be approximately $12 million and
$13 million in fiscal 2010 and 2011, respectively. In
addition, expenses for environmental protection (including
estimated and probable environmental remediation costs as well
as general environmental
84
protection costs at our facilities) were $28 million in
fiscal 2009, and are expected to be $37 million and
$32 million in fiscal 2010 and 2011. Generally, expenses
for environmental protection are recorded in Cost of goods sold
(exclusive of depreciation and amortization). However,
significant remediation costs that are not associated with
on-going operations are recorded in Other (income) expenses, net.
Material
Weakness
Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to
provide a report by management in our
Form 10-K
on internal control over financial reporting, including
managements assessment of the effectiveness of such
control. Internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent
limitations, including the possibility of human error, the
circumvention or overriding of controls or fraud. Therefore,
even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation
of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of
our internal controls, we may be unable to provide financial
information in a timely and reliable manner. Any such
difficulties or failure may have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and operating results.
In July 2008, we identified non-cash errors relating to our
purchase accounting for an equity method investee including
related income tax accounts. As a result of our identification
of these errors, our Audit Committee and management concluded on
August 1, 2008, that our previously issued consolidated
financial statements for our fiscal year ended March 31,
2008, should no longer be relied upon. Upon conducting a review
of these accounting errors, management determined that as of
March 31, 2008, we had a material weakness with respect to
the application of purchase accounting for an equity method
investee including the related income tax accounts.
Specifically, our controls did not ensure the accuracy and
validity of our purchase accounting adjustments for an equity
method investee. This control deficiency could result in a
material misstatement of our Investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates and Equity in net
(income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates in our
consolidated financial statements that would result in a
material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated
financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
Accordingly, management has determined that this control
deficiency constitutes a material weakness. This material
weakness was disclosed in our amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008, our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008, our quarterly
report on
form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2008, our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009 and our quarterly report
on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2009. This material
weakness still existed as of September 30, 2009.
Our plan for remediating this material weakness includes the
following:
1. We conducted a full review of the purchase accounting
for the Hindalco acquisition, including a review of the
valuation approach, as well as the related accounting for equity
method investees and related income tax accounts. This review
was conducted by the Principal Financial Officer, corporate and
regional financial officers, corporate and regional tax
personnel and the Companys external valuation expert. This
aspect of our remediation plan has been completed.
2. Management re-evaluated all accounting and financial
reporting controls for purchase accounting and equity method
investees, including related income tax accounts. This aspect of
our remediation plan has been completed.
3. Training sessions were conducted for key financial and
tax personnel regarding equity method accounting and related
income tax accounting matters. This aspect of our remediation
plan has been completed.
4. Management is transitioning certain purchase accounting
responsibilities to our regional financial personnel, including
tax personnel, and developing procedures to monitor the ongoing
activity of this entity. This aspect of our remediation plan has
not yet been completed.
85
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations and
liquidity and capital resources are based on our consolidated
financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with
GAAP. In connection with the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and
estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses,
and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates
and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other
factors we believe to be relevant at the time we prepared our
consolidated financial statements. On a regular basis, we review
the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to
ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented
fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future
events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty,
actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates,
and such differences could be material.
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in
Note 1 Business and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies to our Audited Financial
Statements and Note 1 Business and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our
Unaudited Financial Statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. We believe the following accounting policies are the
most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our
reported financial results, as they require management to make
difficult, subjective or complex judgments, and to make
estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain. We have reviewed these critical accounting policies
and related disclosures with the Audit Committee.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
We use derivative instruments to manage our exposure to changes
in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, energy
prices and interest rates. Derivative instruments we use are
primarily commodity forward and option contracts, foreign
currency forward contracts and interest swaps. Our operations
and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in
commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, energy prices
and interest rates.
We are exposed to changes in aluminum prices through
arrangements where the customer has received a fixed price
commitment from us. We attempt to manage this risk by hedging
future purchases of metal required for these firm commitments.
In addition, we hedge a portion of our future production.
To the extent that these exposures are not fully hedged, we are
exposed to gains and losses when changes occur in the market
price of aluminum. Hedges of specific arrangements and future
production increase or decrease the fair value by approximately
$24 million for a 10% change in the market value of
aluminum as of September 30, 2009.
Short-term exposures to changing foreign currency exchange rates
occur due to operating cash flows denominated in foreign
currencies. We manage this risk with forward currency swap
contracts and currency exchange options. Our most significant
foreign currency exposures relate to the euro, Brazilian real
and the Korean won. We assess market conditions and determine an
appropriate amount to hedge based on pre-determined policies.
To the extent that foreign currency operating cash flows are not
fully hedged, we are exposed to foreign exchange gains and
losses. In the event that we choose not to hedge a foreign
currency cash flow, an adverse movement in rates could impact
our earnings and cash flows. A 10% instantaneous appreciation of
all foreign exchange rates against the U.S. dollar would
reduce the fair value of our currency derivatives by
approximately $75 million as of September 30, 2009.
We are exposed to changes in interest rates due to our
financing, investing and cash management activities. We may
enter into interest rate swap contracts to protect against our
exposure to changes in future interest rates, which requires
deciding how much of the exposure to hedge based on our
sensitivity to variable-rate fluctuations.
To the extent that we choose to hedge our interest costs, we are
able to avoid the impacts of changing interest rates on our
interest costs. In the event that we do not hedge a floating
rate debt a movement in
86
market interest rates could impact our interest cost. As of
September 30, 2009, a 10% change in the market interest
rate would increase or decrease the fair value of our interest
rate hedges by $1 million. A 12.5 basis point change
in market interest rates as of September 30, 2009 would
increase or decrease our unhedged interest cost on floating rate
debt by approximately $1 million.
The majority of our derivative contracts are valued using
industry-standard models that use observable market inputs as
their basis, such as time value, forward interest rates,
volatility factors, and current (spot) and forward market prices
for foreign exchange rates. See Note 17
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities to our Audited
Financial Statements and Note 11 Fair
Value Measurements to our Unaudited Financial Statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus for discussion on fair
value of derivative instruments.
Impairment
of Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of the net assets of acquired companies. As a result
of the Arrangement, we estimated fair value of goodwill using a
number of factors, including the application of multiples and
discounted cash flow estimates. We have allocated goodwill to
our operating segments in North America, Europe and South
America, which are also reporting units for purposes of
performing our goodwill impairment testing as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill as of
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
181
|
|
South America
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is not amortized; instead, it is tested for impairment
annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist.
On an ongoing basis, absent any impairment indicators, we
perform our goodwill impairment testing as of the last day of
February of each year.
We test consolidated goodwill for impairment using a fair value
approach at the reporting unit level. We use our operating
segments as our reporting units and perform our goodwill
impairment test in two steps. Step one compares the fair value
of each reporting unit (operating segment) to its carrying
amount. If step one indicates that an impairment potentially
exists, the second step is performed to measure the amount of
impairment, if any. Goodwill impairment exists when the
estimated fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value.
For purposes of our step one analysis, our estimate of fair
value for each reporting unit is based on a combination of
(1) quoted market prices/relationships (the market
approach), (2) discounted cash flows (the income approach)
and (3) a stock price
build-up
approach (the
build-up
approach). The estimated fair value for each reporting unit is
within the range of fair values yielded under each approach. The
approach to determining fair value for all reporting units is
consistent given the similarity of our operations in each region.
Under the market approach, the fair value of each reporting unit
is determined based upon comparisons to public companies engaged
in similar businesses. Under the income approach, the fair value
of each reporting unit is based on the present value of
estimated future cash flows. The income approach is dependent on
a number of significant management assumptions including markets
and market share, sales volumes and prices, costs to produce,
capital spending, working capital changes and the discount rate.
We estimate future cash flows for each of our reporting units
based on our projections for the respective reporting unit.
These projected cash flows are discounted to the present value
using a weighted average cost of capital (discount rate). The
discount rate is commensurate with the risk inherent in the
projected cash flows and reflects the rate of return required by
an investor in the current economic conditions. For impairment
tests conducted in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2009,
we used a discount rate of 12% for all reporting units, an
increase of approximately 3% from the rate used in our prior
year impairment test. An increase or decrease of 0.5% in the
discount rate impacted the estimated fair value by
$25-75 million, depending on the relative size of the
reporting unit. The projections are based on both past
performance and the projections and assumptions used
87
in our current operating plan. As such, we assumed shipments
will remain at levels experienced in our third and fourth
quarters of fiscal 2009 until the second half of fiscal 2010. We
use unique revenue growth assumptions for each reporting unit,
based on history and economic conditions, ranging from 2.5% to
3.5% growth through 2014.
Under the
build-up
approach, which is a variation of the market approach, we
estimate the fair value of each reporting unit based on the
estimated contribution of each of the reporting units to
Hindalcos total business enterprise value.
During the third fiscal quarter of 2009, we concluded that
interim impairment testing was required due to the recent
deterioration in the global economic environment and the
resulting significant decrease in both the market capitalization
of our parent company and the valuation of our publicly traded
7.25% senior notes. In the third quarter of fiscal 2009,
the result of our step one test indicated a potential impairment.
For our reporting units in North America, Europe and South
America, we proceeded to step two for the goodwill impairment
calculation in which we determined the implied fair value of the
goodwill and compared it to the carrying value of the goodwill.
We allocated the fair value of the reporting unit to all of its
assets and liabilities as if the reporting unit has been
acquired and the fair value was the price paid to acquire each
reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting
unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities is
the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill.
Step two was not performed for Asia as no goodwill has been
allocated to this reporting unit. As a result of our step two
evaluation, we recorded a $1.34 billion impairment charge
in third quarter of fiscal 2009.
We performed our annual testing for goodwill impairment as of
the last day of February 2009 and no additional goodwill
impairment was identified. As a result of improvements in our
updated projections related to timing of economic recovery, the
fair values of the reporting units exceeded their respective
carrying amounts as of February 28, 2009 by 12% for North
America, by 9% for Europe and by 36% for South America.
Equity
Investments
We invest in a number of public and privately-held companies,
primarily through joint ventures and consortiums. These
investments are accounted for using the equity method and
include our investment in Aluminium Norf GmbH. As a result of
the Arrangement, investments in and advances to affiliates as of
May 16, 2007 were adjusted to reflect fair value.
We review equity investments for impairment whenever certain
indicators are present suggesting that the carrying value of an
investment is not recoverable. This analysis requires a
significant amount of judgment to identify events or
circumstances indicating that an equity investment may be
impaired. Once an impairment indicator is identified, we must
determine if an impairment exists, and if so, whether the
impairment is other than temporary, in which case the equity
investment is written down to its estimated fair value. In
connection with the impairment testing conducted in the third
quarter of fiscal 2009 related to goodwill, we also evaluated
our investment in Norf for impairment using the income approach.
This resulted in an impairment charge of $160 million,
which is reported in equity in net (income) loss of
non-consolidated affiliates on the consolidated statement of
operations.
Impairment
of Intangible Assets
Our other intangible assets of $786 million as of
September 30, 2009 consist of tradenames, technology,
customer relationships and favorable energy and supply contracts
and are amortized over 3 years to 20 years. As of
September 30, 2009, we did not have any intangible assets
with indefinite useful lives. We consider the potential
impairment of these other intangibles assets in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. For tradenames and
technology, we utilize a relief-from-royalty method. All other
intangible assets are assessed using the income approach. As a
result of these assessments, no impairment was indicated.
88
Impairment
of Long Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, are reviewed
for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value of the assets contained in our financial
statements may not be recoverable. When evaluating long-lived
assets for potential impairment, we first compare the carrying
value of the asset to the assets estimated, future net
cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges). If the
estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of
the asset, we calculate and recognize an impairment loss. If we
recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of
the asset will be its new cost basis. For a depreciable
long-lived asset, the new cost basis will be depreciated over
the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a
previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.
Our impairment loss calculations require management to apply
judgments in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values,
including forecasting useful lives of the assets and selecting
the discount rate that represents the risk inherent in future
cash flows. We recorded impairment charges on long-lived assets
of $1 million, $18 million (including $17 million
classified as Restructuring charges, net), $1 million and
$8 million during the six months ended September 30,
2008, the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, and the
three months ended March 31, 2007, respectively. We had no
impairment charges on long-lived assets during the six months
ended September 30, 2009 and the year ended
December 31, 2006.
If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and
judgments used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair
values, we may be exposed to additional impairment losses that
could be material to our results of operations.
Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans
We account for our defined benefit pension plans and non-pension
postretirement benefit plans in accordance with FASB Statements
No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions, and
No. 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement
Benefits Other Than Pensions. Liabilities and expense for
pension plans and other postretirement benefits are determined
using actuarial methodologies and incorporate significant
assumptions, including the rate used to discount the future
estimated liability, the long-term rate of return on plan
assets, and several assumptions related to the employee
workforce (salary increases, medical costs, retirement age, and
mortality).
The actuarial models use an attribution approach that generally
spreads the financial impact of changes to the plan and
actuarial assumptions over the average remaining service lives
of the employees in the plan. Changes in liability due to
changes in actuarial assumptions such as discount rate, rate of
compensation increases and mortality, as well as annual
deviations between what was assumed and what was experienced by
the plan are treated as gains or losses. Additionally, gains and
losses are amortized over the groups average future
service. The average future service for pension plans and other
postretirement benefit plans is 12.2 and 12.7 years
respectively. The principle underlying the required attribution
approach is that employees render service over their average
remaining service lives on a relatively smooth basis and,
therefore, the accounting for benefits earned under the pension
or
non-pension
postretirement benefits plans should follow the same relatively
smooth pattern.
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans we have established in the United States, Canada,
Switzerland and the United Kingdom, unfunded pension benefits
primarily in Germany, and unfunded lump sum indemnities payable
upon retirement to employees of businesses in France, South
Korea, Malaysia and Italy. Pension benefits are generally based
on the employees service and either on a flat dollar rate
or on the highest average eligible compensation before
retirement. Our other postretirement benefit obligations include
unfunded healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to
retired employees in Canada, the United States and Brazil.
All net actuarial gains and losses are generally amortized over
the expected average remaining service life of the employees.
The costs and obligations of pension and other postretirement
benefits are calculated based on assumptions including the
long-term rate of return on pension assets, discount rates for
pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, expected
service period, salary increases, retirement ages of
89
employees and healthcare cost trend rates. These assumptions
bear the risk of change as they require significant judgment and
they have inherent uncertainties that management may not be able
to control.
The most significant assumption used to calculate pension and
other postretirement obligations is the discount rates used to
determine the present value of benefits. It is based on spot
rate yield curves and individual bond matching models for
pension and other postretirement plans in Canada and the United
States, and on published long-term high quality corporate bond
indices in other countries, at the end of each fiscal year.
Adjustments were made to the index rates based on the duration
of the plans obligations for each country. The weighted
average discount rate used to determine the pension benefit
obligation was 6.0% as of March 31, 2009, compared to 5.8%
and 5.4% for March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. The weighted average discount rate used to
determine the other postretirement benefit obligation was 6.2%
as of March 31, 2009, compared to 6.1% and 5.7% for
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
The weighted average discount rate used to determine the net
periodic benefit cost is the rate used to determine the benefit
obligation in the previous year.
As of March 31, 2009, an increase in the discount rate of
0.5%, assuming inflation remains unchanged, would result in a
decrease of $82 million in the pension and other
postretirement obligations and in a decrease of $10 million
in the net periodic benefit cost. A decrease in the discount
rate of 0.5% as of March 31, 2009, assuming inflation
remains unchanged, would result in an increase of
$82 million in the pension and other postretirement
obligations and in an increase of $10 million in the net
periodic benefit cost. The calculation of the estimate of the
expected return on assets and additional discussion regarding
pension and other postretirement plans is described in
Note 14 Postretirement Benefit
Plans to our Audited Financial Statements and
Note 8 Postretirement Benefit Plans
to our Unaudited Financial Statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The weighted average expected return on assets was
6.9% for 2009, 7.3% for 2008 and 7.3% for 2006. The expected
return on assets is a long-term assumption whose accuracy can
only be measured over a long period based on past experience. A
variation in the expected return on assets by 0.5% as of
March 31, 2009 would result in a variation of approximately
$3 million in the net periodic benefit cost.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability
method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future
tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. In addition,
deferred tax assets are also recorded with respect to net
operating losses and other tax attribute carryforwards. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are
established when realization of the benefit of deferred tax
assets is not deemed to be more likely than not. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date.
The ultimate recovery of certain of our deferred tax assets is
dependent on the amount and timing of taxable income that we
will ultimately generate in the future and other factors such as
the interpretation of tax laws. This means that significant
estimates and judgments are required to determine the extent
that valuation allowances should be provided against deferred
tax assets. We have provided valuation allowances as of
September 30, 2009 aggregating $111 million against
such assets based on our current assessment of future operating
results and these other factors.
By their nature, tax laws are often subject to interpretation.
Further complicating matters is that in those cases where a tax
position is open to interpretation, differences of opinion can
result in differing conclusions as to the amount of tax benefits
to be recognized under FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). FIN 48 utilizes a two-step
approach for evaluating tax positions. Recognition (Step
1) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position,
based solely on its technical merits, is more likely than not to
be sustained upon examination. Measurement (Step 2) is only
addressed if Step 1 has been satisfied. Under Step 2, the tax
benefit is measured as the largest amount of benefit, determined
on a cumulative probability basis that is more likely than not
to be realized upon ultimate
90
settlement. Consequently, the level of evidence and
documentation necessary to support a position prior to being
given recognition and measurement within the financial
statements is a matter of judgment that depends on all available
evidence.
As of September 30, 2009 the total amount of unrecognized
benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income
tax rate in future periods based on anticipated settlement dates
was $33 million. Although management believes that the
estimates and judgments discussed herein are reasonable, actual
results could differ, which could result in gains or losses that
could be material.
Assessment
of Loss Contingencies
We have legal and other contingencies, including environmental
liabilities, which could result in significant losses upon the
ultimate resolution of such contingencies. Environmental
liabilities that are not legal asset retirement obligations are
accrued on an undiscounted basis when it is probable that a
liability exists for past events.
We have provided for losses in situations where we have
concluded that it is probable that a loss has been or will be
incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. A
significant amount of judgment is involved in determining
whether a loss is probable and reasonably estimable due to the
uncertainty involved in determining the likelihood of future
events and estimating the financial statement impact of such
events. If further developments or resolution of a contingent
matter are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments, we
may need to recognize a significant charge in a future period
related to an existing contingency.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
approved its Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
(Codification) as the single source of authoritative United
States accounting and reporting standards applicable for all
non-governmental entities, with the exception of the SEC and its
staff. The Codification which changes the referencing of
financial standards is effective for interim or annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. As the codification is not
intended to change or alter existing US GAAP, this standard had
no impact on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 855, Subsequent
Events, (prior authoritative literature: FASB Statement
No. 165, Subsequent Events) which establishes
general standards of accounting and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. This
accounting standard requires the disclosure of the date through
which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis
for that date. This standard had no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements) which establishes
accounting and reporting standards that require: (i) the
ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than
the parent to be clearly identified and presented in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet within shareholders
equity, but separate from the parents equity;
(ii) the amount of condensed consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be
clearly identified and presented on the face of the condensed
consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes in a
parents ownership interest while the parent retains its
controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be accounted
for consistently. We adopted this accounting standard effective
April 1, 2009, and applied this standard prospectively,
except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which
have been applied retrospectively.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets) which
amends the factors that should be considered in developing the
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset. The accounting standard
also requires expanded
91
disclosure related to the determination of intangible asset
useful lives. This standard had no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, (prior authoritative
literature: FASB Staff Position
No. 107-1
and APB Opinion
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments; FASB Staff Position
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly) which
requires disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods. This codification
also provides additional guidance in determining fair value when
the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has
significantly decreased. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 320,
Investments Debt and Equity
Securities, (prior authoritative literature: FASB Staff
Position
No. 115-2
and FASB Staff Position
No. 124-2,
Recognition of Other-than-Temporary-Impairments) which
amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP for
debt and equity securities. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 805, Business
Combinations, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations;
FASB Staff Position No. 141(R)-1, Accounting for
Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business
Combination That Arise from Contingencies) (ASC
805) which establishes principles and requirements for how
the acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
This standard also requires acquirers to estimate the
acquisition-date fair value of any contingent consideration and
to recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of
contingent consideration in earnings. ASC 805 also clarifies the
initial and subsequent recognition, subsequent accounting, and
disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination. This standard requires that assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that
arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value, if the
acquisition-date fair value can be reasonably estimated. We will
apply ASC 805 prospectively to business combinations occurring
after March 31, 2009, with the exception of the accounting
for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
contingencies. This standard amends certain provisions of
preexisting tax guidance such that adjustments made to valuation
allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies
associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective
date of this business combination guidance would also apply the
provisions of this standard. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 323,
Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures,
(prior authoritative literature: Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue
No. 08-06,
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations) which
addresses questions that have arisen about the application of
the equity method of accounting for investments acquired after
the effective date of newly issued business combination
standards and non-controlling interest standards. This
accounting standard clarifies how to account for certain
transactions involving equity method investments, and is
effective on a prospective basis. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards have been issued, but
have not yet been adopted by us as of September 30, 2009,
as adoption is not required until future reporting periods.
In June 2009, the FASB issued statement No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(FASB 167). FASB 167 has not been incorporated by the
FASB into the Codification as the guidance is not yet effective
and early adoption is prohibited. FASB 167 is intended
(1) to address the effects on certain provisions of the
accounting standard dealing with consolidation of variable
interest entities, as a result of the
92
elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in
FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets, and (2) to clarify questions about
the application of certain key provisions related to
consolidation of variable interest entities, including those in
which accounting and disclosures do not always provided timely
and useful information about an enterprises involvement in
a variable interest entity. FASB 167 will be effective for
fiscal years ending after November 15, 2009. We do not
anticipate this standard will have any impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB issued FSP No. 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits) which requires that an employer
disclose the following information about the fair value of plan
assets: (1) how investment allocation decisions are made,
including the factors that are pertinent to understanding of
investment policies and strategies; (2) the major
categories of plan assets; (3) the inputs and valuation
techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets;
(4) the effect of fair value measurements using significant
unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period;
and (5) significant concentrations of risk within plan
assets. This pronouncement will be effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2009, with early application
permitted. At initial adoption, application of this standard
would not be required for earlier periods that are presented for
comparative purposes. This standard will have no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do
not apply to our operations.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing
business operations, including risks from changes in commodity
prices (primarily aluminum, electricity and natural gas),
foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, that could
impact our results of operations and financial condition. We
manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities and derivative
financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments
as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes.
Except where noted, the derivative contracts are
marked-to-market
and the related gains and losses are included in earnings in the
current accounting period.
By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve
risk, including the credit risk of non-performance by
counterparties. All derivative contracts are executed with
counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our
maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in the
accompanying September 30, 2009 condensed consolidated
balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions and the
relative costs of the instruments. The duration is always linked
to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection
between the two being regularly monitored.
Commodity
Price Risks
We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of
certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity and
natural gas.
Aluminum
Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model that
allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the price of
aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products have a
price structure with two components: (i) a pass through
aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and
(ii) a conversion premium based on the
conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the
competitive market conditions for that product.
When we enter into agreements with our customers that fix the
selling price of our products for future delivery, we are
exposed to rising aluminum prices. We may not be able to
purchase the aluminum necessary
93
to fulfill the order at the same price which we have committed
to our customer. We hedge this risk by purchasing LME futures
contracts. We expect the gain or loss on the settlement of the
derivative to offset increases or decreases in the purchase
price of aluminum. These hedges, which comprise the majority of
our aluminum derivatives, generate losses in periods of
decreasing aluminum prices.
Metal price lag exposes us to potential losses in periods of
falling aluminum prices. We sell short-term LME futures
contracts to reduce our exposure to this risk. We expect the
gain or loss on the settlement of the derivative to offset the
effect of changes in aluminum prices on future product sales.
These hedges generally generate losses in periods of increasing
aluminum prices.
In addition, we have a sales contract which contains a ceiling
over which metal prices cannot be contractually passed through
to a certain customer. As a result, we were unable to pass
through the complete increase in metal prices for sales under
this contract and this negatively impacted our margins when the
metal price was above the ceiling price. As result of falling
LME prices and based upon a September 30, 2009 aluminum
price of $1,850 per tonne, we estimate a $4 million
unfavorable revenue and cash flow impact through
December 31, 2009 when this contract expires.
We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal
prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to
metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our
internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and
mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from
our recycling operations which utilize UBCs. Both of these
sources of aluminum supply have historically provided a benefit
as these sources of metal are typically less expensive than
purchasing aluminum from third party suppliers. We refer to
these two sources as our internal hedges.
Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy
to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated
with the metal price ceilings is to purchase derivative
instruments on projected aluminum volume requirements above our
assumed internal hedge position. We purchased forward derivative
instruments to hedge our exposure to further metal price
increases.
Sensitivities
We estimate that a 10% decline in LME aluminum prices would
result in a $24 million pre-tax loss related to the change
in fair value of our aluminum contracts as of September 30,
2009.
Energy
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. In the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, natural gas and electricity represented
approximately 89% of our energy consumption by cost. We also use
fuel oil and transport fuel. The majority of energy usage occurs
at our casting centers, at our smelters in South America and
during the hot rolling of aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities
require relatively less energy.
We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which subjects
us to market pricing fluctuations. We seek to stabilize our
future exposure to natural gas prices through the use of forward
purchase contracts. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South
America have historically been more stable than in the United
States. As of September 30, 2009, we have a nominal amount
of forward purchases outstanding related to natural gas.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs. In South America,
we own and operate hydroelectric facilities that meet
approximately 25% of our total electricity requirements in that
segment. Additionally, we have entered into an electricity swap
in North America to fix a portion of the cost of our electricity
requirements.
We purchase a nominal amount of heating oil forward contracts to
hedge against fluctuations in the price of our transport fuel.
94
Fluctuating energy costs worldwide, due to the changes in supply
and international and geopolitical events, expose us to earnings
volatility as such changes in such costs cannot immediately be
recovered under existing contracts and sales agreements, and may
only be mitigated in future periods under future pricing
arrangements.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2009 given a 10% decline in spot prices for
energy contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Heating Oil
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risks
Exchange rate movements, particularly the euro, the Brazilian
real and the Korean won against the U.S. dollar, have an
impact on our operating results. In Europe, where we have
predominantly local currency selling prices and operating costs,
we benefit as the euro strengthens, but are adversely affected
as the euro weakens. In Korea, where we have local currency
selling prices for local sales and U.S. dollar denominated
selling prices for exports, we benefit slightly as the won
weakens, but are adversely affected as the won strengthens, due
to a slightly higher percentage of exports compared to local
sales. In Brazil, where we have predominately U.S. dollar
selling prices, metal costs and local currency operating costs,
we benefit as the local currency weakens, but are adversely
affected as the local currency strengthens. Foreign currency
contracts may be used to hedge the economic exposures at our
foreign operations.
It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures
within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the
majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either
forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in
non-functional currencies. Our most significant
non-U.S. dollar
functional currency operating segments are Europe and Asia,
which have the euro and the Korean won as their functional
currencies, respectively. South America is U.S. dollar
functional with Brazilian real transactional exposure.
We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign
operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
Shareholders equity section of the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Net sales and expenses in our
foreign operations foreign currencies are translated into
varying amounts of U.S. dollars depending upon whether the
U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens against other
currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may either
positively or negatively affect our net sales and expenses from
foreign operations as expressed in U.S. dollars.
Any negative impact of currency movements on the currency
contracts that we have entered into to hedge foreign currency
commitments to purchase or sell goods and services would be
offset by an equal and opposite favorable exchange impact on the
commitments being hedged. For a discussion of accounting
policies and other information relating to currency contracts,
see Note 1 Business and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies and
Note 11 Financial Instruments and
Commodity Contracts to the accompanying unaudited
financial statements.
95
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2009 given a 10% change in rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian real
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
Euro
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Korean won
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Canadian dollar
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
British pound
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Swiss franc
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Loans to and investments in European operations have been hedged
with EUR 135 million of cross-currency swaps. We
designated these as net investment hedges. While this has no
impact on our cash flows, subsequent changes in the value of
currency related derivative instruments that are not designated
as hedges are recognized in Gain (loss) on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in our condensed consolidated
statement of operations.
We estimate that a 10% increase in the value of the euro against
the US dollar would result in a $17 million potential
pre-tax loss on these derivatives as of September 30, 2009.
Interest
Rate Risks
As of September 30, 2009, approximately 84% of our debt
obligations were at fixed rates. Due to the nature of fixed-rate
debt, there would be no significant impact on our interest
expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase or decrease in
market rates of interest.
We are subject to interest rate risk related to our floating
rate debt. For every 12.5 basis point increase in the
interest rates on our outstanding variable rate debt as of
September 30, 2009, which includes $240 million of
term loan debt and other variable rate debt of
$214 million, our annual pre-tax income would be reduced by
approximately $1 million.
From time to time, we have used interest rate swaps to manage
our debt cost. In Korea, we entered into interest rate swaps to
fix the interest rate on various floating rate debt. See
Note 6 Debt to the accompanying
unaudited financial statements for further information.
Sensitivities
The following table presents the estimated potential effect on
the fair values of these derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2009 given a 10% change in the benchmark USD
LIBOR interest rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Interest Rate Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Asia
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
96
BUSINESS
Overview
We are the worlds leading aluminum rolled products
producer based on shipment volume in fiscal 2009, with total
shipments of approximately 2,943 kt in fiscal 2009. We are the
only company of our size and scope focused solely on aluminum
rolled products markets and capable of local supply of
technologically sophisticated aluminum products in all of these
geographic regions. We are also the global leader in the
recycling of used aluminum beverage cans. We had net sales of
approximately $10.2 billion for the year ended
March 31, 2009 and approximately $4.1 billion for the
six months ended September 30, 2009.
Our
History
Organization
and Description of Business
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products for end-use markets, including
beverage and food cans, construction and industrial, foil
products and transportation markets. As of September 30,
2009, we had operations in 11 countries on four continents:
North America, Europe, Asia and South America, through 31
operating plants, one research facility and several
market-focused innovation centers. In addition to aluminum
rolling and recycling, our South American businesses include
bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary aluminum smelting and
power generation facilities that are integrated with our rolling
plants in Brazil.
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
spin-off occurred on January 6, 2005, following approval by
Alcans board of directors and shareholders, and legal and
regulatory approvals. Alcan shareholders received one Novelis
common share for every five Alcan common shares held.
Acquisition
by Hindalco
On May 15, 2007, the company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to the
Arrangement at a price of $44.93 per share. The aggregate
purchase price for all of the companys common shares was
$3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed $2.8 billion of
Novelis debt for a total transaction value of
$6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the Arrangement
on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were indirectly
held by Hindalco.
Our
Industry
The aluminum rolled products market represents the global supply
of and demand for aluminum sheet, plate and foil produced either
from sheet ingot or continuously cast roll-stock in rolling
mills operated by independent aluminum rolled products producers
and integrated aluminum companies alike.
Aluminum rolled products are semi-finished aluminum products
that constitute the raw material for the manufacture of finished
goods ranging from automotive body panels to household foil.
There are two major types of manufacturing processes for
aluminum rolled products differing mainly in the process used to
achieve the initial stage of processing:
|
|
|
|
|
hot mills that require sheet ingot, a
rectangular slab of aluminum, as starter material; and
|
|
|
|
continuous casting mills that can convert
molten metal directly into semi-finished sheet.
|
Both processes require subsequent rolling, which we call cold
rolling, and finishing steps such as annealing, coating,
leveling or slitting to achieve the desired thicknesses and
metal properties. Most customers receive shipments in the form
of aluminum coil, a large roll of metal, which can be fed into
their fabrication processes.
97
There are two sources of input material: (1) primary
aluminum, such as molten metal, re-melt ingot and sheet ingot;
and (2) recycled aluminum, such as recyclable material from
fabrication processes, which we refer to as recycled process
material, UBCs and other post-consumer aluminum.
Primary aluminum can generally be purchased at prices set on the
LME, plus a premium that varies by geographic region of
delivery, form (ingot or molten metal) and purity.
Recycled aluminum is also an important source of input material.
Aluminum is infinitely recyclable and recycling it requires only
approximately 5% of the energy needed to produce primary
aluminum. As a result, in regions where aluminum is widely used,
manufacturers and customers are active in setting up collection
processes in which UBCs and other recyclable aluminum are
collected for re-melting at purpose-built plants. Manufacturers
may also enter into agreements with customers who return
recycled process material and pay to have it re-melted and
rolled into the same product again.
There has been a long-term industry trend towards lighter gauge
(thinner) rolled products, which we refer to as
downgauging, where customers request products with
similar properties using less metal in order to reduce costs and
weight. For example, aluminum rolled products producers and can
fabricators have continuously developed thinner walled cans with
similar strength as previous generation containers, resulting in
a lower cost per unit. As a result of this trend, aluminum
tonnage across the spectrum of aluminum rolled products, and
particularly for the beverage and food cans end-use market, has
declined on a per unit basis, but actual rolling machine hours
per unit have increased. Because the industry has historically
tracked growth based on aluminum tonnage shipped, we believe the
downgauging trend may contribute to an understatement of the
actual growth of revenue attributable to rolling in some end-use
markets.
End-use
Markets
Aluminum rolled products companies produce and sell a wide range
of aluminum rolled products, which can be grouped into four
end-use markets based upon similarities in end-use markets:
(1) beverage and food cans; (2) construction and
industrial; (3) foil products and (4) transportation.
Within each end-use market, aluminum rolled products are
manufactured with a variety of alloy mixtures; a range of
tempers (hardness), gauges (thickness) and widths; and various
coatings and finishes. Large customers typically have customized
needs resulting in the development of close relationships with
their supplying mills and close technical development
relationships.
Beverage and Food Cans. Beverage cans are the
single largest aluminum rolled products application, accounting
for approximately 23% of total worldwide shipments in the
calendar year ended December 31, 2008, according to market
data from CRU. Beverage and food cans is also our largest
end-use market, making up 60% and 54% of total flat rolled
product shipments for the six months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The recyclability of aluminum cans
enables them to be used, collected, melted and returned to the
original product form many times, unlike steel, paper or PET
plastic, which deteriorate with every iteration of recycling.
Aluminum beverage cans also offer advantages in fabricating
efficiency and product shelf life. Fabricators are able to
produce and fill beverage cans at very high speeds, and
non-porous aluminum cans provide longer shelf life than PET
plastic containers. Aluminum cans are light, stackable and use
space efficiently, making them convenient and cost efficient to
ship.
Downgauging and changes in can design help to reduce total costs
on a per can basis and contribute to making aluminum more
competitive with substitute materials.
Beverage can sheet is sold in coil form for the production of
can bodies, ends and tabs. The material can be ordered as
rolled, degreased, pre-lubricated, pre-treated
and/or
lacquered. Typically, can makers define their own specifications
for material to be delivered in terms of alloy, gauge, width and
surface finish.
Other applications in this end-use market include food cans and
screw caps for the beverage industry.
Construction and Industrial. Construction is
the largest application within this end-use market. Aluminum
rolled products developed for the construction industry are
often decorative and non-flammable, offer insulating properties,
are durable and corrosion resistant, and have a high
strength-to-weight
ratio. Aluminum
98
siding, gutters, and downspouts comprise a significant amount of
construction volume. Other applications include doors, windows,
awnings, canopies, facades, roofing and ceilings.
Aluminums ability to conduct electricity and heat and to
offer corrosion resistance makes it useful in a wide variety of
electronic and industrial applications. Industrial applications
include electronics and communications equipment, process and
electrical machinery and lighting fixtures. Uses of aluminum
rolled products in consumer durables include microwaves, coffee
makers, flat screen televisions, air conditioners, pleasure
boats and cooking utensils.
Another industrial application is lithographic sheet. Print
shops, printing houses and publishing groups use lithographic
sheet to print books, magazines, newspapers and promotional
literature. In order to meet the strict quality requirements of
the end-users, lithographic sheet must meet demanding
metallurgical, surface and flatness specifications.
Foil Products. Aluminum, because of its
relatively light weight, recyclability and formability, has a
wide variety of uses in packaging. Converter foil is very thin
aluminum foil, plain or printed, that is typically laminated to
plastic or paper to form an internal seal for a variety of
packaging applications, including juice boxes, pharmaceuticals,
food pouches, cigarette packaging and lid stock. Customers order
coils of converter foil in a range of thicknesses from 6 microns
to 60 microns.
Household foil includes home and institutional aluminum foil
wrap sold as a branded or generic product. Known in the industry
as packaging foil, it is manufactured in thicknesses ranging
from 11 microns to 23 microns. Container foil is used to produce
semi-rigid containers such as pie plates and take-out food trays
and is usually ordered in a range of thicknesses ranging from 60
microns to 200 microns.
Transportation. Heat exchangers, such as
radiators and air conditioners, are an important application for
aluminum rolled products in the truck and automobile categories
of the transportation end-use market. Original equipment
manufacturers also use aluminum sheet with specially treated
surfaces and other specific properties for interior and exterior
applications. Newly developed alloys are being used in
transportation tanks and rigid containers that allow for safer
and more economical transportation of hazardous and corrosive
materials.
There has been recent growth in certain geographic markets in
the use of aluminum rolled products in automotive body panel
applications, including hoods, deck lids, fenders and lift
gates. These uses typically result from co-operative efforts
between aluminum rolled products manufacturers and their
customers that yield tailor-made solutions for specific
requirements in alloy selection, fabrication procedure, surface
quality and joining. We believe the recent growth in automotive
body panel applications is due in part to the lighter weight,
better fuel economy and improved emissions performance
associated with these applications.
Aluminum rolled products are also used in aerospace
applications, a segment of the transportation market in which we
are not allowed to compete until January 6, 2010, pursuant
to a non-competition agreement we entered into with Alcan in
connection with the spin-off. However, aerospace-related
consumption of aluminum rolled products has historically
represented a relatively small portion of total aluminum rolled
products market shipments.
Aluminum is also used in the construction of ships hulls
and superstructures and passenger rail cars because of its
strength, light weight, formability and corrosion resistance.
Market
Structure
The aluminum rolled products industry is characterized by
economies of scale, significant capital investments required to
achieve and maintain technological capabilities and demanding
customer qualification standards. The service and efficiency
demands of large customers have encouraged consolidation among
suppliers of aluminum rolled products.
While our customers tend to be increasingly global, many
aluminum rolled products tend to be produced and sold on a
regional basis. The regional nature of the markets is influenced
in part by the fact that not all mills are equipped to produce
all types of aluminum rolled products. For instance, only a few
mills in North America, Europe and Asia, and only one mill in
South America produce beverage can body and end stock. In
99
addition, individual aluminum rolling mills generally supply a
limited range of products for end-use markets, and seek to
maximize profits by producing high volumes of the highest margin
mix per mill hour given available capacity and equipment
capabilities.
Certain multi-purpose, common alloy and plate rolled products
are imported into Europe and North America from producers in
emerging markets, such as Brazil, South Africa, Russia and
China. However, at this time we believe that most of these
producers are generally unable to produce flat rolled products
that meet the quality requirements, lead times and
specifications of customers with more demanding applications. In
addition, high freight costs, import duties, inability to take
back recycled aluminum, lack of technical service capabilities
and long lead-times mean that many developing market exporters
are viewed as second-tier suppliers. Therefore, many of our
customers in the Americas, Europe and Asia do not look to
suppliers in these emerging markets for a significant portion of
their requirements.
Competition
The aluminum rolled products market is highly competitive. We
face competition from a number of companies in all of the
geographic regions and end-use markets in which we operate. Our
primary competitors are as follows:
|
|
|
North America
|
|
Asia
|
|
Alcoa, Inc. (Alcoa)
|
|
Furukawa-Sky Aluminum Corp.
|
Aleris International, Inc. (Aleris)
|
|
Sumitomo Light Metal Company, Ltd.
|
Arco Aluminium, Inc. (a subsidiary of BP plc)
|
|
Southwest Aluminum Co. Ltd.
|
Norandal Aluminum
|
|
Kobe Steel Ltd.
|
Wise Metal Group LLC
|
|
Alcoa
|
Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
South America
|
|
Hydro A.S.A.
|
|
Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio
|
Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
|
|
Alcoa
|
Alcoa
|
|
|
Aleris
|
|
|
The factors influencing competition vary by region and end-use
market, but generally we compete on the basis of our value
proposition, including price, product quality, the ability to
meet customers specifications, range of products offered,
lead times, technical support and customer service. In some
end-use markets, competition is also affected by
fabricators requirements that suppliers complete a
qualification process to supply their plants. This process can
be rigorous and may take many months to complete. As a result,
obtaining business from these customers can be a lengthy and
expensive process. However, the ability to obtain and maintain
these qualifications can represent a competitive advantage.
In addition to competition from others within the aluminum
rolled products industry, we, as well as the other aluminum
rolled products manufacturers, face competition from
non-aluminum material producers, as fabricators and end-users
have, in the past, demonstrated a willingness to substitute
other materials for aluminum. In the beverage and food cans
end-use market, aluminum rolled products primary
competitors are glass, PET plastic, and in some regions, steel.
In the transportation end-use market, aluminum rolled products
compete mainly with steel and composites. Aluminum competes with
wood, plastic, cement and steel in building products
applications. Factors affecting competition with substitute
materials include price, ease of manufacture, consumer
preference and performance characteristics.
100
Key
Factors Affecting Supply and Demand
The following factors have historically affected the supply of
aluminum rolled products:
Production Capacity. As in most manufacturing
industries with high fixed costs, production capacity has the
largest impact on supply in the aluminum rolled products
industry. In the aluminum rolled products industry, the addition
of production capacity requires large capital investments and
significant plant construction or expansion, and typically
requires long lead-time equipment orders.
Alternative Technology. Advances in
technological capabilities allow aluminum rolled products
producers to better align product portfolio and supply with
industry demand. As an example, continuous casting offers the
ability to increase capacity in smaller increments than is
possible with hot mill additions. This enables production
capacity to better adjust to small
year-over-year
increases in demand. However, the continuous casting process
results in the production of a more limited range of products.
Trade. Some trade flows do occur between
regions despite shipping costs, import duties and the need for
localized customer support. Higher value-added, specialty
products such as lithographic sheet and some foils are more
likely to be traded internationally, especially if demand in
certain markets exceeds local supply. With respect to less
technically demanding applications, emerging markets with low
cost inputs may export commodity aluminum rolled products to
larger, more mature markets. Accordingly, regional changes in
supply, such as plant expansions, may have some effect on the
worldwide supply of commodity aluminum rolled products.
The following factors have historically affected the demand for
aluminum rolled products:
Economic Growth. We believe that economic
growth is currently the single largest driver of aluminum rolled
products demand. In mature markets, growth in demand has
typically correlated closely with growth in industrial
production.
In emerging markets such as China, growth in demand typically
exceeds industrial production growth largely because of
expanding infrastructures, capital investments and rising
incomes that often accompany economic growth in these markets.
Substitution Trends. Manufacturers
willingness to substitute other materials for aluminum in their
products and competition from substitution materials suppliers
also affect demand. For example, in North America, competition
from PET plastic containers and glass bottles, and changes in
marketing channels and consumer preferences in beverage
containers, have, in recent years, reduced the growth rate of
aluminum can sheet in North America from the high rates
experienced in the 1970s and 1980s. Historically, despite
changes in consumer preferences, North American aluminum
beverage can shipments have remained at approximately
100 billion cans per year since 1994 according to the Can
Manufacturers Institute. For the calendar year ended
December 31, 2008, North American aluminum beverage can
shipments have declined by approximately 2.8% to
97.4 billion cans mainly due to a decline in carbonated
soft drinks.
Downgauging. Increasing technological and
asset sophistication has enabled aluminum rolling companies to
offer consistent or even improved product strength using less
material, providing customers with a more cost-effective
product. This continuing trend reduces raw material
requirements, but also effectively increases rolled
products plant utilization rates and reduces available
capacity, because to produce the same number of units requires
more rolling hours to achieve thinner gauges. As utilization
rates increase, revenues rise as pricing tends to be based on
machine hours used rather than on the volume of material rolled.
On balance, we believe that downgauging has maintained or
enhanced overall market economics for both users and producers
of aluminum rolled products.
Seasonality. While demand for certain aluminum
rolled products is affected by seasonal factors, such as
increases in consumption of beer and soft drinks packaged in
aluminum cans and the use of aluminum sheet used in the
construction and industrial end-use market during summer months,
our presence in both the northern and southern hemispheres tends
to dampen the impact of seasonality on our business.
101
Our
Strengths
We believe that the following key strengths enable us to compete
effectively in the aluminum rolled products market:
Leading
Market Positions
We are the worlds leader in aluminum rolling, producing an
estimated 18% of the worlds flat-rolled aluminum products
in 2009. Moreover, we are the No. 1 rolled products
producer in Europe and South America and the No. 2 producer
in both North America and Asia. In terms of end markets, we
believe that we are the largest global producer of aluminum
rolled products for the beverage can market with a 40% market
share, and we are the worlds leader in the recycling of
UBCs, recycling around 39 billion UBCs per year. We also
believe that we are the worlds leader in aluminum
automotive sheet.
International
Presence and Scale
With 31 manufacturing facilities located in 11 countries on four
continents as of September 30, 2009, we have a broad
geographical presence that we believe allows us to better serve
our increasingly global customer base as well as diversify our
sources of cash flow and offset risk across the different
regions. Our size allows us to service a wide variety of
localized and global customer needs, leverage our selling,
administrative, research and development and other general
expenses to improve margins, establish new uses for aluminum
rolled products and access the end-use markets for these
products.
High-end
Product Portfolio Mix
Over 50% of our sales are to customers in the beverage can
market. We believe the beverage can market is a high value
market and more stable than others as it is less vulnerable to
economic cycles. In the beverage can market, we go beyond simply
supplying metal: Novelis is a technical solution provider. For
example, our Global Can Technology Team offers technological
expertise and facilities, as well as technical backup and
support for our customers own innovation activities. We
provide technological services and work together with our
lithographic, electronic, and automotive customers, among
others, to develop solutions to meet their requirements through
our customer solution centers in North America and Asia as well
as other market-focused innovation centers around the world.
Innovation
Leader with Proprietary Technologies
We endeavor to be at the forefront of developing next generation
technologies in the aluminum rolled products industry and
believe that we are the worlds leader in continuous
casting technology, as owner of technology relating to the two
main continuous casting processes. We have
state-of-the-art
research facilities around the world with more than
200 employees dedicated to research and development and
customer technical support. Our technological leadership has led
to the design of products to address various end-use
requirements in all regions of the world. An important
innovation is our Novelis
Fusiontm
technology. Launched in 2006, Novelis
Fusiontm
is a breakthrough process that simultaneously casts multiple
alloy layers into a single aluminum rolling ingot. Novelis is
the first company to achieve commercial production of such
multi-alloy ingots. The resulting product allows alloy
combinations never before possible. For example, a customer can
now have aluminum sheet with both excellent formability and high
strength, which provides better shaping performance and the
potential to downgauge.
Long
Term Relationships with Market Leaders
We maintain strong, long-standing supply relationships with many
of our customers, which include leading global players in our
key end markets. Our major customers include: Agfa-Gevaert N.V.,
Alcans packaging business group, Anheuser-Busch Companies,
Inc., Ball Corporation, various bottlers of the
Coca-Cola
system, Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., BMW, Audi AG,
Daimler AG, Kodak Polychrome Graphics GmbH, Ford Motor Company,
Lotte Aluminum, Pactiv Corporation, Rexam Plc and Xiamen Xiashun
Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd. In fiscal 2009, approximately 45% of our
net sales were to our ten largest customers,
102
most of whom we have been supplying for more than 20 years.
We endeavor to gain strong customer loyalty by anticipating and
meeting the specific technical standards demanded by our
customers with a high level of quality, technical support and
customer service.
Our
Business Strategy
Our primary objective is to deliver shareholder and customer
value by being the most innovative and profitable aluminum
rolled products company in the world. We intend to achieve this
objective through the following areas of focus:
Focus
on core operations and optimize our costs
We strive to be one of the lowest cost producers of aluminum
rolled products by pursuing a standardized focus on our core
operations and through the implementation of cost-reduction and
restructuring initiatives. To achieve this objective, we have
standardized our manufacturing processes and the associated
upstream and downstream production elements and established risk
management processes in order to apply best practices in our
core operations across all of our regions. In addition, we have
implemented numerous restructuring initiatives over the last
year, including the shutdown of facilities, staff
rationalization and other activities which we believe will lead
to annualized cost savings of approximately $140 million
beginning in fiscal 2011.
Integrate
support functions globally in order to further drive
improvements in our operations
Given our global operating footprint and customer base, we plan
to globally align our support functions, such as finance, human
resources, legal, information technology and supply chain
management. We believe that managing these support functions
centrally can accelerate executive decision-making processes,
which will allow us to adapt our manufacturing processes and
products more quickly and efficiently to respond to changing
market conditions. We think that achieving a seamless alignment
of goals, methods and metrics across the organization will
improve communication and the implementation of strategic
initiatives. Over time, we feel that these improvements will
result in enhanced operating margins and performance.
Expand
market leadership position through enhanced global and regional
capabilities
We benefit from a global manufacturing footprint, including 31
manufacturing facilities in 11 countries on four continents as
of September 30, 2009, which enables us to service
customers worldwide and provide a strong asset-based
competitive advantage. We are the only company capable of
producing technologically sophisticated, high-end products in
all four major market regions of the world. This competitive
advantage is evident in our position as the number one global
producer of beverage can sheet products. We are able to service
large can sheet customers on a worldwide basis, yet, through our
regional operations we also have the capability to adapt and
cater to the regional preferences and needs of our customers.
For example, we recently upgraded our Yeongju plant in Korea
with technology and processes developed at our other plants
around the world, which has allowed us to capture market share
in the can end market in Asia. Additionally, we have been able
to qualify Novelis plants in one region to provide alternative
supply options and support to customers in a different region.
Focus
on optimizing premium products to drive enhanced
profitability
We plan to continue improving our product mix and margins by
leveraging our world-class assets and technical capabilities. As
a result of the development of Novelis
Fusiontm,
we have demonstrated the required manufacturing know-how and
research and development capabilities to design, develop and
commercialize breakthrough technologies. Products like Novelis
Fusiontm
allow us to defend and enhance our strategic positioning in our
core end-user segments. Additionally, our management approach
helps us systematically identify opportunities to improve the
profitability of our operations through product portfolio
analysis. This ensures that we focus on growing in attractive
market segments, while also taking actions to exit unattractive
ones. For example, in the past three years, we have grown our
can stock shipments in all regions by an average 20%, making it
an even larger portion of our product mix, while reducing or
exiting other less
103
attractive market segments. Through our continued focus on
operating execution, we believe we can cost effectively deploy
proprietary technologies that will contribute to growth and
higher profitability.
Pursue
organic growth in select emerging markets
Our international presence positions us well to capture
additional growth opportunities in targeted aluminum rolled
products in emerging regions, specifically South America and
Asia. We believe South America and Asia have high growth
potential in areas such as beverage cans, industrial products,
construction and electronics. For example, our can stock
shipments have grown by 43% in South America and by 63% in Asia
from 2005 to 2008. While our manufacturing and operating
presence positions us well to capture this growth, we would
expect to make some incremental capital expenditures or
selective acquisitions to expand our capabilities in these areas.
Our
Operating Segments
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America; Europe; Asia and South America. The following is a
description of our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
North America. Headquartered in Cleveland,
Ohio, this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 11 plants, including two fully dedicated
recycling facilities, in two countries.
|
|
|
|
Europe. Headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and foil products and
operates 14 plants, including one dedicated recycling facility,
in six countries.
|
|
|
|
Asia. Headquartered in Seoul, South Korea,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates three plants in two countries.
|
|
|
|
South America. Headquartered in Sao Paulo,
Brazil, this segment comprises bauxite mining, aluminum smelting
operations, power generation, aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates four plants in Brazil.
|
104
The table below shows Net sales and total shipments by segment.
For additional financial information related to our operating
segments, see Note 21 Segment,
Geographical Area and Major Customer Information to our
Audited Financial Statements and Note 15
Segment, Major Customer and Major Supplier Information to
our Unaudited Financial Statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales(1)
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
2,630
|
|
|
$
|
9,849
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,589
|
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,649
|
|
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
925
|
|
|
$
|
3,691
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,400
|
|
|
$
|
2,315
|
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
|
$
|
3,829
|
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
|
$
|
3,620
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
|
$
|
968
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
1,692
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
South America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
863
|
|
Total shipments
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consolidated Net sales include the results of our
non-consolidated affiliates on a proportionately consolidated
basis, which is consistent with the way we manage our business
segments. These net sales were $12 million,
$10 million, $14 million, $5 million, and
$17 million, for the six months ended September 30,
2009, the six months ended September 30, 2008, the year
ended March 31, 2009, the period from May 16, 2007
through March 31, 2008 and for the year ended
December 31, 2006, respectively. There were less than
$1 million of net sales from our non-consolidated
affiliates in each of the periods from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007, and the three months ended
March 31, 2007. |
We have highly automated, flexible and advanced manufacturing
capabilities in operating facilities around the globe. In
addition to the aluminum rolled products plants, our South
America segment operates bauxite mining, alumina refining,
hydro-electric power plants and smelting facilities. We believe
our facilities have the assets required for efficient production
and are well managed and maintained. For a further discussion of
financial information by geographic area, refer to
Note 21 Segment, Geographical Area and
Major Customer Information to our Audited Financial
Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
North
America
Through 11 aluminum rolled products facilities, including two
fully dedicated recycling facilities as of September 30,
2009, North America manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products. Important end-use markets for this segment include
beverage cans, containers and packaging, automotive and other
transportation applications, building products and other
industrial applications.
The majority of North Americas efforts are directed
towards the beverage can sheet market. The beverage can end-use
market is technically demanding to supply and pricing is
competitive. We believe we have a competitive advantage in this
market due to our low-cost and technologically advanced
manufacturing facilities and technical support capability.
Recycling is important in the manufacturing process and we have
five facilities in North America that re-melt post-consumer
aluminum and recycled process material. Most of the recycled
material is from used beverage cans and the material is cast
into sheet ingot for North Americas two can sheet
production plants (at Logan, Kentucky and Oswego, New York).
105
In June 2008, we closed our Louisville, Kentucky plant where we
produced light gauge converter foil products.
Europe
Europe produces value-added sheet and foil products through 12
operating plants as of September 30, 2009, including one
dedicated recycling facility.
Europe serves a broad range of aluminum rolled product end-use
markets including: construction and industrial; beverage and
food can; foil and technical products; lithographic; automotive
and other. Beverage and food represent the largest end-use
market in terms of shipment volume by Europe.
Europe also has foil packaging facilities at six locations, and
in addition to rolled product plants, has distribution centers
in Italy and France together with sales offices in several
European countries. In April 2009, we closed the distribution
center in France.
In March 2009, we announced the closure of our aluminum sheet
mill in Rogerstone, South Wales, U.K. The facility ceased
operations in April 2009.
Asia
Asia operates three manufacturing facilities as of
September 30, 2009 and manufactures a broad range of sheet
and light gauge products. End-use markets include beverage and
food cans, foil, electronics and construction and industrial
products. The beverage can market represents the largest end-use
market in terms of volume. Recycling is an important part of our
Korean operations with recycling facilities at both the Ulsan
and Yeongju facilities.
We believe that Asia is well-positioned to benefit from further
economic development in China as well as other parts of Asia.
South
America
South America operates two rolling plants, two primary aluminum
smelters, and hydro-electric power plants as of
September 30, 2009, all of which are located in Brazil.
South America manufactures various aluminum rolled products,
including can stock, automotive and industrial sheet and light
gauge for the beverage and food can, construction and industrial
and transportation and packaging end-use markets. More than 80%
of our shipments for the past two years were in the beverage and
food can market.
The primary aluminum operations in South America include a mine,
refinery and smelters used by our Brazilian aluminum rolled
products operations, with any excess production being sold on
the market in the form of aluminum billets. South America
generates a portion of its own power requirements.
In May 2009, we ceased the production of alumina at our Ouro
Preto facility in Brazil as the sustained decline in alumina
prices has made alumina production economically unfeasible. In
light of the current alumina and aluminum pricing environment,
we are evaluating our primary aluminum business.
Financial
Information About Geographic Areas
Certain financial information about geographic areas is
contained in Note 21 to the accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
March 31, 2009.
Raw
Materials and Suppliers
The raw materials that we use in manufacturing include primary
aluminum, recycled aluminum, sheet ingot, alloying elements and
grain refiners. Our smelters also use alumina, caustic soda and
calcined petroleum coke and resin. These raw materials are
generally available from several sources and are not generally
subject to supply constraints under normal market conditions. We
also consume considerable amounts of energy in the operation of
our facilities.
106
Aluminum
We obtain aluminum from a number of sources, including the
following:
Primary Aluminum Sourcing. We purchased or
tolled approximately 1,820 kt of primary aluminum in fiscal 2009
in the form of sheet ingot, standard ingot and molten metal, as
quoted on the LME, approximately 47% of which we purchased from
Alcan. Following our spin-off from Alcan, we have continued to
purchase aluminum from Alcan pursuant to the metal supply
agreements described under Business
Arrangements Between Novelis and Alcan. Our primary
aluminum contracts with Alcan were renegotiated and the amended
agreements took effect on January 1, 2008.
Primary Aluminum Production. We produced
approximately 103 kt of our own primary aluminum requirements in
fiscal 2009 through our smelter and related facilities in Brazil.
Recycled Aluminum Products. We operate
facilities in several plants to recycle post-consumer aluminum,
such as UBCs collected through recycling programs. In addition,
we have agreements with several of our large customers where we
take recycled processed material from their fabricating activity
and re-melt, cast and roll it to re-supply them with aluminum
sheet. Other sources of recycled material include lithographic
plates, where over 90% of aluminum used is recycled, and
products with longer lifespans, like cars and buildings, which
are just starting to become high volume sources of recycled
material. We purchased or tolled approximately 1,025 kt of
recycled material inputs in fiscal 2009.
The majority of recycled material we re-melt is directed back
through can-stock plants. The net effect of these activities in
terms of total shipments of rolled products is that
approximately 32% of our aluminum rolled products production for
fiscal 2009 was made with recycled material.
Energy
We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery
of our aluminum rolled products. In fiscal 2009, natural gas and
electricity represented approximately 89% of our energy
consumption by cost. We also use fuel oil and transport fuel.
The majority of energy usage occurs at our casting centers, at
our smelters in South America and during the hot rolling of
aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities require relatively less
energy. We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which
subjects us to market pricing fluctuations. We have in the past
and may continue to seek to stabilize our future exposure to
natural gas prices through the purchase of derivative
instruments. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South
America have historically been more stable than in the United
States.
A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant
to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate.
A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated
prices, which affords relatively stable costs.
Our South America segment has its own hydroelectric facilities
that meet approximately 25% of its total electricity
requirements for smelting operations. As a result of supply
constraints, electricity prices in South America have been
volatile, with spot prices increasing dramatically. We have a
mixture of self-generated electricity, long term fixed contracts
and shorter term semi-variable contracts. Although spot prices
have returned to normal levels, we may continue to face
challenges renewing our South American energy supply contracts
at effective rates to enable profitable operation of our full
smelter capacity.
Others
We also have bauxite and alumina requirements. We will satisfy
some of our alumina requirements for the near term pursuant to
the alumina supply agreement we have entered into with Alcan as
discussed below under Business Arrangements
Between Novelis and Alcan.
Our
Customers
Although we provide products to a wide variety of customers in
each of the markets that we serve, we have experienced
consolidation trends among our customers in many of our key
end-use markets. In fiscal
107
2009, approximately 45% of our total net sales were to our ten
largest customers, most of whom we have been supplying for more
than 20 years. To address consolidation trends, we focus
significant efforts at developing and maintaining close working
relationships with our customers and end-users. Our major
customers include:
|
|
|
Agfa-Gevaert N.V.
|
|
Daching Holdings Limited
|
Alcans packaging business group
|
|
Lotte Aluminum Co. Ltd.
|
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.
|
|
Kodak Polychrome Graphics GmbH
|
Affiliates of Ball Corporation
|
|
Impress
|
BMW Group
|
|
Pactiv Corporation
|
Can-Pack S.A.
|
|
Rexam Plc
|
Various bottlers of the
Coca-Cola
system
|
|
Ryerson Inc.
|
Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc.
|
|
Tetra Pak Ltd.
|
In our single largest end-use market, beverage can sheet, we
sell directly to beverage makers and bottlers as well as to can
fabricators that sell the cans they produce to bottlers. In
certain cases, we also operate under umbrella agreements with
beverage makers and bottlers under which they direct their can
fabricators to source their requirements for beverage can body,
end and tab stock from us. Among these umbrella agreements is
the an agreement with several North American bottlers of
Coca-Cola
branded products, including
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services. Under this agreement, we
shipped approximately 352 kt of beverage can sheet (including
tolled metal) during fiscal 2009. These shipments were made to,
and we received payment from, our direct customers, being the
beverage can fabricators that sell beverage cans to the
Coca-Cola
associated bottlers. Under the agreement, bottlers in the
Coca-Cola
system may join this agreement by committing a specified
percentage of the can sheet required by their can fabricators to
us.
Purchases by Rexam Plc and its affiliates represented
approximately 18%, 17%, 15%, 14%, 16%, and 14% of our total net
sales for the six months ended September 30, 2009; the year
ended March 31, 2009; the period from May 16, 2007
through March 31, 2008; the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007; the three months ended March 31,
2007; and the year ended December 31, 2006, respectively.
Distribution
and Backlog
We have two principal distribution channels for the end-use
markets in which we operate: direct sales and distributors.
Approximately 93%, 93%, 90%, 91%, 89%, and 87% of our total net
sales were derived from direct sales to our customers and
approximately 7%, 7%, 10%, 9%, 11%, and 13% of our total net
sales were derived from distributors for the six months ended
September 30, 2009; the year ended March 31, 2009; the
period from May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008; the
period from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007; the
three months ended March 31, 2007; and the year ended
December 31, 2006, respectively.
Direct
Sales
We supply various end-use markets all over the world through a
direct sales force that operates from individual plants or sales
offices, as well as from regional sales offices in 21 countries.
The direct sales channel typically involves very large,
sophisticated fabricators and original equipment manufacturers.
Longstanding relationships are maintained with leading companies
in industries that use aluminum rolled products. Supply
contracts for large global customers generally range from one to
five years in length and historically there has been a high
degree of renewal business with these customers. Given the
customized nature of products and in some cases, large order
sizes, switching costs are significant, thus adding to the
overall consistency of the customer base.
We also use third party agents or traders in some regions to
complement our own sales force. They provide service to our
customers in countries where we do not have local expertise. We
tend to use third party agents in Asia more frequently than in
other regions.
108
Distributors
We also sell our products through aluminum distributors,
particularly in North America and Europe. Customers of
distributors are widely dispersed, and sales through this
channel are highly fragmented. Distributors sell mostly
commodity or less specialized products into many end-use markets
in small quantities, including the construction and industrial
and transportation markets. We collaborate with our distributors
to develop new end-use markets and improve the supply chain and
order efficiencies.
Backlog
We believe that order backlog is not a material aspect of our
business.
Research
and Development
The table below summarizes our research and development expense
in our plants and modern research facilities, which included
mini-scale production lines equipped with hot mills, can lines
and continuous casters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
We conduct research and development activities at our plants in
order to satisfy current and future customer requirements,
improve our products and reduce our conversion costs. Our
customers work closely with our research and development
professionals to improve their production processes and market
options. We have approximately 200 employees dedicated to
research and development, located in many of our plants and
research center.
Our
Employees
As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately
11,900 employees. Approximately 5,600 are employed in
Europe, approximately 2,900 are employed in North America,
approximately 1,500 are employed in Asia and approximately 1,900
are employed in South America and other areas. Approximately 70%
of our employees are represented by labor unions and their
employment conditions are governed by collective bargaining
agreements. Collective bargaining agreements are negotiated on a
site, regional or national level, and are of different
durations. We believe that we have good labor relations in all
our operations and have not experienced a significant labor
stoppage in any of our principal operations during the last
decade.
Intellectual
Property
In connection with our spin-off, Alcan has assigned or licensed
to us a number of important patents, trademarks and other
intellectual property rights owned or previously owned by Alcan
and required for our business. Ownership of certain intellectual
property that is used by both us and Alcan is owned by one of
us, and licensed to the other. Certain specific intellectual
property rights, which have been determined to be exclusively
useful to us or which were required to be transferred to us for
regulatory reasons, have been assigned to us with no license
back to Alcan.
We actively review intellectual property arising from our
operations and our research and development activities and, when
appropriate, we apply for patents in the appropriate
jurisdictions, including the United States and Canada. We
currently hold patents and patent applications on approximately
190 different items of intellectual property. While these
patents and patent applications are important to our business on
an aggregate basis, no single patent or patent application is
deemed to be material to our business.
109
We have applied for or received registrations for the
Novelis word trademark and the Novelis logo
trademark in approximately 50 countries where we have
significant sales or operations. Novelis uses the Aditya Birla
Rising Sun logo under license from Aditya Birla Management
Corporation Private Limited.
We have also registered the word Novelis and several
derivations thereof as domain names in numerous top level
domains around the world to protect our presence on the World
Wide Web.
Properties
Our principal executive offices are located in Atlanta, Georgia.
We had 31 operating facilities, one research facility and
several market-focused innovation centers in 11 countries as of
September 30, 2009. We believe our facilities are generally
well-maintained and in good operating condition and have
adequate capacity to meet our current business needs. Our
principal properties and assets have been pledged to banks
pursuant to our senior secured credit facilities, as described
in Description of Other Indebtedness.
The following tables provide information, by operating segment,
about the plant locations, processes and major end-use
markets/applications for the aluminum rolled products, recycling
and primary metal facilities we operated during all or part of
the six months ended September 30, 2009.
North
America
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Berea, Kentucky
|
|
Recycling
|
|
Recycled ingot
|
Burnaby, British Columbia
|
|
Finishing
|
|
Foil containers
|
Fairmont, West Virginia
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil, HVAC material
|
Greensboro, Georgia
|
|
Recycling
|
|
Recycled ingot
|
Kingston, Ontario
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Automotive, construction/industrial
|
Logan, Kentucky(1)
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling, finishing, recycling
|
|
Can stock
|
Oswego, New York
|
|
Novelis Fusion(tm)
casting, hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling, finishing
|
|
Can stock, construction/industrial, semi-finished coil
|
Saguenay, Quebec
|
|
Continuous casting, recycling
|
|
Semi-finished coil
|
Terre Haute, Indiana
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Toronto, Ontario
|
|
Finishing
|
|
Foil, foil containers
|
Warren, Ohio
|
|
Coating
|
|
Can end stock
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We own 40% of the outstanding common shares of Logan Aluminum
Inc. (Logan), but we have made subsequent equipment
investments such that our portion of Logans total machine
hours has provided us more than 60% of Logans total
production. |
Our Oswego, New York facility operates modern equipment for
used beverage can recycling, ingot casting, hot rolling, cold
rolling and finishing. In March 2006, we commenced commercial
production using our Novelis
Fusiontm
technology able to produce a high quality ingot with
a core of one aluminum alloy, combined with one or more layers
of different aluminum alloy(s). The ingot can then be rolled
into a sheet product with different properties on the inside and
the outside, allowing previously unattainable performance for
flat rolled products and creating opportunity for new, premium
applications. Oswego produces can stock as well as building and
industrial products. Oswego also provides feedstock to our
Kingston, Ontario facility, which produces heat-treated
automotive sheet, and to our Fairmont, West Virginia facility,
which produces light gauge sheet.
The Logan, Kentucky facility is a processing joint venture
between us and Arco Aluminum Inc. (ARCO), a
subsidiary of BP plc. Our equity investment in the joint venture
is 40%, while ARCO holds the remaining 60% interest. Subsequent
equipment investments have provided us with more than 60% of
Logans total production. Logan, which was built in 1985,
is the newest and largest hot mill in North America. Logan
110
operates modern and high-speed equipment for ingot casting,
hot-rolling, cold-rolling and finishing. Logan is a dedicated
manufacturer of aluminum sheet products for the can stock market
with modern equipment, an efficient workforce and product focus.
A portion of the can end stock is coated at North Americas
Warren, Ohio facility, in addition to Logans
on-site
coating assets. Together with ARCO, we operate Logan as a
production cooperative, with each party supplying its own
primary metal inputs for transformation at the facility. The
transformed product is then returned to the supplying party at
cost. Logan does not own any of the primary metal inputs or any
of the transformed products. All of the fixed assets at Logan
are directly owned by us and ARCO in varying ownership
percentages or solely by each party. As discussed in
Note 1 Business and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies to our Audited Financial
Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, our
consolidated balance sheets include our share of the assets and
liabilities of Logan.
We share control of the management of Logan with ARCO through a
board of directors with seven voting members on which we appoint
four members and ARCO appoints three members. Management of
Logan is led jointly by two executive officers who are subject
to approval by at least five members of the board of directors.
Our Saguenay, Quebec facility operates the worlds largest
continuous caster, which produces feedstock for our two foil
rolling plants located in Terre Haute, Indiana; and Fairmont,
West Virginia. The continuous caster was developed through
internal research and development and we own the process
technology. Our Saguenay facility sources molten metal under
long-term supply arrangements we have with Alcan.
Our Burnaby, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario facilities
spool and package household foil products and report to our foil
business unit based in Toronto, Ontario.
Along with our recycling center in Oswego, New York, we own two
other fully dedicated recycling facilities in North America,
located in Berea, Kentucky and Greensboro, Georgia. Each offers
a modern, cost-efficient process to recycle used beverage cans
and other recycled aluminum into sheet ingot to supply our hot
mills in Logan and Oswego. Berea is the largest used beverage
can recycling facility in the world.
In August 2009 we entered into a UBC recycling joint
venture with Alcoa to create a new independent company, known as
Evermore Recycling LLC (Evermore Recycling). Our
equity investment in Evermore Recycling is 55.8% and
Alcoas equity investment is 44.2%. Evermore Recycling will
purchase UBCs from suppliers for recycling by us and Alcoa and
is designed to create value by increasing efficiency, building
stronger supplier relationships, and increasing recycling.
Evermore Recycling is initiating commercial relationships with
prospective suppliers for deliveries effective January 1,
2010.
111
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Berlin, Germany
|
|
Converting
|
|
Packaging
|
Bresso, Italy
|
|
Finishing, painting
|
|
Painted sheet, architectural
|
Bridgnorth, United Kingdom
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing, converting
|
|
Foil, packaging
|
Dudelange, Luxembourg
|
|
Continuous casting, cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Göttingen, Germany
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing, painting
|
|
Can end, lithographic, painted sheet
|
Latchford, United Kingdom
|
|
Recycling
|
|
Sheet ingot from recycled metal
|
Ludenscheid, Germany
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing, converting
|
|
Foil, packaging
|
Nachterstedt, Germany
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Automotive, industrial
|
Norf, Germany(1)
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling
|
|
Can stock, foilstock, feeder stock for finishing operations
|
Ohle, Germany
|
|
Cold rolling, finishing, converting
|
|
Foil, packaging
|
Pieve, Italy
|
|
Continuous casting, cold rolling
|
|
Coil for Bresso, industrial
|
Rugles, France
|
|
Continuous casting, cold rolling, finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Sierre, Switzerland(2)
|
|
Novelis Fusion(tm)
casting, hot rolling, cold rolling
|
|
Automotive sheet, industrial
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operated as a 50/50 joint venture between us and Hydro Aluminium
Deutschland GmbH (Hydro). |
|
(2) |
|
We have entered into an agreement with Alcan pursuant to which
Alcan retains access to the plate production capacity, which
represents a portion of the total production capacity of the
Sierre hot mill. |
Aluminium Norf GmbH (Norf) in Germany, a 50/50
production-sharing joint venture between us and Hydro, is a
large scale, modern manufacturing hub for several of our
operations in Europe, and is the largest aluminum rolling mill
and remelting operation in the world. Norf supplies hot coil for
further processing through cold rolling to some of our other
plants, including Göttingen and Nachterstedt in Germany and
provides foilstock to our plants in Ohle and Ludenscheid in
Germany and Rugles in France. Together with Hydro, we operate
Norf as a production cooperative, with each party supplying its
own primary metal inputs for transformation at the facility. The
transformed product is then transferred back to the supplying
party on a pre-determined cost-plus basis. The facilitys
capacity is shared 50/50. We own 50% of the equity interest in
Norf and Hydro owns the other 50%. We share control of the
management of Norf with Hydro through a jointly-controlled
shareholders committee. Management of Norf is led jointly
by two managing executives, one nominated by us and one
nominated by Hydro.
In March 2009, management approved the closure of our aluminum
sheet mill in Rogerstone, South Wales, U.K. The facility ceased
operations in April 2009. The Rogerstone mill in the United
Kingdom supplied Bridgnorth and other foil plants with foilstock
and produced hot coil for Nachterstedt and Pieve. In addition,
Rogerstone produced standard sheet and coil for the European
distributor market.
The Pieve plant, located near Milan, Italy, mainly produces
continuous cast coil that is cold rolled into paintstock and
sent to the Bresso, Italy plant for painting and some specialist
finishing. Göttingen also has a paint line as well as lines
for can end, food and lithographic sheet.
The Dudelange and Rugles foil plants in Luxembourg and France,
respectively, utilize continuous twin roll casting equipment and
are two of the few foil plants in the world capable of producing
6 micron foil for aseptic packaging applications from continuous
cast material. The Sierre hot rolling plant in Switzerland,
along with Nachterstedt in Germany, are Europes leading
producers of automotive sheet in terms of shipments. Sierre also
supplies plate stock to Alcan. In April 2008, we announced the
commissioning of a new aluminum casthouse in Sierre and began
producing multi-alloy sheet ingots in the plant using Novelis
Fusiontm
in August 2008.
112
Our recycling operation in Latchford, United Kingdom is the only
major recycling plant in Europe dedicated to used beverage cans.
European operations also include Novelis PAE in Voreppe, France,
which sells casthouse technology, including liquid metal
treatment devices, such as degassers and filters, chill sheet
ingot casters and twin roll continuous casters, in many parts of
the world.
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Bukit Raja, Malaysia(1)
|
|
Continuous casting, cold rolling
|
|
Construction/industrial, heavy and lightgauge foils
|
Ulsan, Korea(2)
|
|
Novelis Fusion(tm)
casting, hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling
|
|
Can stock, construction/industrial, electronics, foilstock, and
recycled material
|
Yeongju, Korea(3)
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling
|
|
Can stock, construction/industrial, electronics, foilstock and
recycled material
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ownership of the Bukit Raja plant corresponds to our 58% equity
interest in Aluminium Company of Malaysia Berhad. |
|
(2) |
|
We hold a 68% equity interest in the Ulsan plant. |
|
(3) |
|
We hold a 68% equity interest in the Yeongju plant. |
Our Korean subsidiary, in which we hold a 68% interest, was
formed through acquisitions in 1999 and 2000. Since our
acquisitions, product capability has been developed to address
higher value and more technically advanced markets such as can
sheet.
We hold a 58% equity interest in the Aluminium Company of
Malaysia Berhad, a publicly traded company that wholly owns and
controls the Bukit Raja, Selangor light gauge rolling facility.
Unlike our production sharing joint ventures at Norf, Germany
and Logan, Kentucky, our Korean partners are financial partners
and we market 100% of the plants output.
Asia also operates recycling furnaces at both its Ulsan and
Yeongju facilities in Korea for the conversion of customer and
third party recycled aluminum, including used beverage cans.
Metal from recycled aluminum purchases represented 26% of
Asias total shipments in fiscal 2009. In June 2008, our
plant in Ulsan began the commercial production of Novelis
Fusiontm.
South
America
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Plant Processes
|
|
Major End-Use Markets
|
|
Pindamonhangaba, Brazil
|
|
Hot rolling, cold rolling, recycling
|
|
Construction/industrial, can stock, foilstock, recycled ingot,
foundry ingot, forge stock
|
Utinga, Brazil
|
|
Finishing
|
|
Foil
|
Ouro Preto, Brazil(1)
|
|
Smelting
|
|
Primary aluminum (sheet ingot and billets)
|
Aratu, Brazil
|
|
Smelting
|
|
Primary aluminum (sheet ingot)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In May 2009, we ceased the production of alumina at our Ouro
Preto facility in Brazil. |
Our Pindamonhangaba (Pinda) rolling and recycling
facility in Brazil has an integrated process that includes
recycling, sheet ingot casting, hot mill and cold mill
operations. A leased coating line produces painted products,
including can end stock. Pinda supplies foilstock to our Utinga
foil plant, which produces converter, household and container
foil.
113
Pinda is the largest aluminum rolling and recycling facility in
South America in terms of shipments and the only facility in
South America capable of producing can body and end stock. Pinda
recycles primarily used beverage cans, and is engaged in tolling
recycled metal for our customers.
During fiscal 2009, we conducted bauxite mining, alumina
refining, primary aluminum smelting and hydro-electric power
generation operations at our Ouro Preto, Brazil facility. Our
owned power generation supplies approximately 25% of our smelter
needs. We also own the mining rights to bauxite reserves in the
Ouro Preto, Cataguases and Carangola regions.
In May 2009, we ceased the production of alumina at our Ouro
Preto facility in Brazil. The global economic crisis and the
recent dramatic drop in alumina prices have made alumina
production at Ouro Preto economically unfeasible. Going forward,
the plant will purchase alumina through third-parties. Other
activities related to the facility, including electric power
generation and the production of primary aluminum metal, will
continue unaffected.
We also conduct primary aluminum smelting operations at our
Aratu facility in Candeias, Brazil.
Legal
Proceedings
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we assumed a number
of liabilities, commitments and contingencies mainly related to
our historical rolled products operations, including liabilities
in respect of legal claims and environmental matters. As a
result, we may be required to indemnify Alcan for claims
successfully brought against Alcan or for the defense of legal
actions that arise from time to time in the normal course of our
rolled products business including commercial and contract
disputes, employee-related claims and tax disputes (including
several disputes with Brazils Ministry of Treasury
regarding various forms of manufacturing taxes and social
security contributions). In addition to these assumed
liabilities and contingencies, we may, in the future, be
involved in, or subject to, other disputes, claims and
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business,
including some that we assert against others, such as
environmental, health and safety, product liability, employee,
tax, personal injury and other matters. Where appropriate, we
have established reserves in respect of these matters (or, if
required, we have posted cash guarantees). While the ultimate
resolution of, and liability and costs related to, these matters
cannot be determined with certainty due to the considerable
uncertainties that exist, we do not believe that any of these
pending actions, individually or in the aggregate, will
materially impair our operations or materially affect our
financial condition or liquidity. The following describes
certain environmental matters relating to our business,
including those for which we assumed liability as a result of
our spin-off from Alcan.
Environmental
Matters
We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also
known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions
regarding liability arising from the usage, storage, treatment
or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a number of
sites in the United States, as well as similar proceedings under
the laws and regulations of the other jurisdictions in which we
have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the
European Union. Many of these jurisdictions have laws that
impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, for the costs of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses. In addition, we are, from time to
time, subject to environmental reviews and investigations by
relevant governmental authorities.
As described further in the following paragraph, we have
established procedures for regularly evaluating environmental
loss contingencies, including those arising from such
environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we believe we have made reasonable estimates
of the costs that are likely to be borne by us for these
environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly, we have
established reserves based on our reasonable estimates for the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters. We estimate that the undiscounted remaining
clean-up
costs related to all of our known environmental matters as of
September 30, 2009 will be approximately $49 million.
Of this amount,
114
$31 million is included in Other long-term
liabilities, with the remaining $18 million included
in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009.
Management has reviewed the environmental matters, including
those for which we assumed liability as a result of our spin-off
from Alcan. As a result of this review, management has
determined that the currently anticipated costs associated with
these environmental matters will not, individually or in the
aggregate, materially impair our operations or materially
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
With respect to environmental loss contingencies, we record a
loss contingency on a non-discounted basis whenever such
contingency is probable and reasonably estimable. The evaluation
model includes all asserted and unasserted claims that can be
reasonably identified. Under this evaluation model, the
liability and the related costs are quantified based upon the
best available evidence regarding actual liability loss and cost
estimates. Except for those loss contingencies where no estimate
can reasonably be made, the evaluation model is fact-driven and
attempts to estimate the full costs of each claim. Management
reviews the status of, and estimated liability related to,
pending claims and civil actions on a quarterly basis. The
estimated costs in respect of such reported liabilities are not
offset by amounts related to cost-sharing between parties,
insurance, indemnification arrangements or contribution from
other potentially responsible parties (PRPs) unless
otherwise noted.
In December 2005, the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA) issued a Notice of Violation
(NOV) to the Companys processing joint
venture, Logan, alleging violations of Logans Title V
Operating Permit, which regulates emissions of air pollutants
from the facility. In March 2006, the Kentucky Department of
Environmental Protection (KDEP) issued a separate
NOV to Logan alleging other violations of the Title V
Operating Permit. In March 2009, as a result of these
enforcement actions, Logan agreed to install new air pollution
control equipment. Logan has also agreed to settle the USEPA
NOV, including the payment of a civil penalty of $285,000. The
KDEP NOV is currently subject to a Tolling Agreement with the
state agency.
Legal
Proceedings
Coca-Cola
Lawsuits. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by CCBSS in Georgia state
court. CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
a soft toll agreement between the parties relating to the supply
of aluminum can stock, and seeks monetary damages in an amount
to be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under
the agreement. The agreement includes a most favored
nations provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS
alleges that Novelis Corporation breached the terms of the
most favored nations provision. The dispute will
likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the
parties and the courts finding as to how certain
provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS
were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would
likely be material. However, we have concluded that a loss from
the CCBSS litigation is not probable and therefore have not
recorded an accrual. In addition, we do not believe that there
is a reasonable possibility of a loss from the lawsuit based on
information available at this time. Novelis Corporation has
filed its answer and the parties are proceeding with discovery.
ARCO Aluminum Complaint. On May 24, 2007,
ARCO filed a complaint against Novelis Corporation and Novelis
Inc. in the United States District Court for the Western
District of Kentucky. ARCO and Novelis are partners in Logan, a
joint venture rolling mill located in Logan County, Kentucky. In
the complaint, ARCO alleged that its consent was required in
connection with Hindalcos acquisition of Novelis. Failure
to obtain consent, ARCO alleged, put us in default of the joint
venture agreements, thereby triggering certain provisions in
those agreements. The provisions include a reversion of the
production management at the joint venture to Logan from
Novelis, and a reduction of the board of directors of the entity
that manages the joint venture from seven members (four
appointed by Novelis and three appointed by ARCO) to six members
(three appointed by each of Novelis and ARCO). ARCO sought a
court declaration that (1) Novelis and its affiliates are
prohibited from exercising any managerial authority or control
over the joint venture, (2) Novelis interest in the
joint venture is limited to an economic interest only and
(3) ARCO has authority to act on behalf of the
115
joint venture. Alternatively, ARCO sought a reversion of the
production management function to Logan, and a change in the
composition of the board of directors of the entity that manages
the joint venture. Novelis filed its answer to the complaint on
July 16, 2007.
On July 3, 2007, ARCO filed a motion for partial summary
judgment with respect to one of the counts of its complaint
relating to the claim that Novelis breached the joint venture
agreement by not seeking ARCOs consent. On July 30,
2007, Novelis filed a motion to hold ARCOs motion for
summary judgment in abeyance (pending further discovery), along
with a demand for a jury. On February 14, 2008, the judge
issued an order granting our motion to hold ARCOs summary
judgment motion in abeyance. Following this ruling, the joint
venture continued to conduct operational, management and board
activities as normal.
On June 4, 2009, ARCO and Novelis entered into a settlement
agreement to address and resolve all matters at issue in the
lawsuit, including the Logan joint venture governance issues. On
June 24, 2009, the United States District Court for the
Western District of Kentucky issued a Stipulation and Order of
Dismissal dismissing the lawsuit with prejudice. As a result of
the settlement, among other things, Novelis will retain control
of the Logan board of directors, production management
responsibilities will revert to Logan, and certain Novelis
employees who work at Logan will become employees of Logan.
There are no remaining reserves on this matter.
Environment,
Health and Safety
We own and operate numerous manufacturing and other facilities
in various countries around the world. Our operations are
subject to environmental laws and regulations from various
jurisdictions, which govern, among other things, air emissions,
wastewater discharges, the handling, storage and disposal of
hazardous substances and wastes, the remediation of contaminated
sites, post-mining reclamation and restoration of natural
resources, and employee health and safety. Future environmental
regulations may be expected to impose stricter compliance
requirements on the industries in which we operate. Additional
equipment or process changes at some of our facilities may be
needed to meet future requirements. The cost of meeting these
requirements may be significant. Failure to comply with such
laws and regulations could subject us to administrative, civil
or criminal penalties, obligations to pay damages or other
costs, and injunctions and other orders, including orders to
cease operations.
We are involved in proceedings under the Superfund, or analogous
state provisions regarding our liability arising from the usage,
storage, treatment or disposal of hazardous substances and
wastes at a number of sites in the United States, as well as
similar proceedings under the laws and regulations of the other
jurisdictions in which we have operations, including Brazil and
certain countries in the European Union. Many of these
jurisdictions have laws that impose joint and several liability,
without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct,
for the costs of environmental remediation, natural resource
damages, third party claims, and other expenses. In addition, we
are, from time to time, subject to environmental reviews and
investigations by relevant governmental authorities.
We have established procedures for regularly evaluating
environmental loss contingencies, including those arising from
environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we also believe we have made reasonable
estimates for the costs that are likely to be ultimately borne
by us for these environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly,
we have established reserves based on our reasonable estimates
for the currently anticipated costs associated with these
environmental matters. Management has determined that the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters will not, individually or in the aggregate, materially
impair our operations or materially adversely affect our
financial condition.
We expect that our total expenditures for capital improvements
regarding environmental control facilities for the year ending
March 31, 2010 will be approximately $12 million.
116
Arrangements
Between Novelis and Alcan
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan, we entered into a
number of ancillary agreements with Alcan governing certain
terms of our spin-off as well as various aspects of our
relationship with Alcan following the spin-off. These ancillary
agreements include:
Transitional Services and Similar
Agreements. Pursuant to a collection of
approximately 130 individual transitional services agreements,
Alcan has provided to us and we have provided to Alcan, as
applicable, on an interim, transitional basis, various services,
including, but not limited to, treasury administration, selected
benefits administration functions, employee compensation and
information technology services. The agreed upon charges for
these services generally allow us or Alcan, as applicable, to
recover fully the allocated costs of providing the services,
plus all
out-of-pocket
costs and expenses plus a margin of five percent. No margin is
added to the cost of services supplied by external suppliers.
The majority of the individual service agreements, which began
on the spin-off date, terminated on or prior to
December 31, 2005. However, we had a continuing agreement
with Alcan through 2008 to use certain information technology
hosting services to support our financial accounting systems for
the Nachterstedt and Göttingen plants, which has now
expired.
Metal Supply Agreements. We and Alcan have
entered into four multi-year metal supply agreements pursuant to
which Alcan supplies us with specified quantities of re-melt
ingot, molten metal and sheet ingot in North America and Europe
on terms and conditions determined primarily by Alcan. We
believe these agreements provide us with the ability to cover
some metal requirements through a pricing formula pursuant to
our spin-off agreement with Alcan. In addition, an ingot supply
agreement in effect between Alcan and Novelis Korea Ltd. prior
to the spin-off remains in effect following the spin-off.
On February 26, 2008, we and Alcan agreed to amend and
restate four existing multi-year metal supply agreements, which
took effect as of January 1, 2008.
The amended and restated metal supply agreement for the supply
of re-melt aluminum ingot amends and restates the supply
agreement dated January 5, 2005 between the parties. This
amended agreement extends the term, establishes an annual
quantity of remelt ingot to be supplied and purchased subject to
adjustment, establishes certain delivery requirements, changes
certain pricing provisions, and revises certain payment terms,
among other standard terms and conditions.
The amended and restated molten metal supply agreement for the
supply of molten metal to the companys Saguenay Works
Facility amends and restates the supply agreement dated
January 5, 2005 between the parties. This amended agreement
changes certain pricing provisions, and revises certain payment
terms, among other standard terms and conditions.
The amended and restated metal supply agreement for the supply
of sheet ingot in North America amends and restates the supply
agreement dated January 5, 2005 between the parties. This
amended agreement extends the term, establishes an annual
quantity of sheet ingot to be supplied and purchased subject to
adjustment, changes certain pricing provisions, and revises
certain payment terms, among other standard terms and conditions.
The amended and restated metal supply agreement for the supply
of sheet ingot in Europe amends and restates the supply
agreement dated January 5, 2005 between the parties. This
amended agreement extends the term, establishes an annual
quantity of sheet ingot to be supplied and purchased subject to
adjustment, and changes certain pricing provisions, among other
standard terms and conditions.
Foil Supply Agreements. In 2005, we entered
into foil supply agreements with Alcan for the supply of foil
from our facilities located in Norf, Ludenscheid and Ohle,
Germany to Alcans packaging facility located in Rorschach,
Switzerland as well as from our facilities located in Utinga,
Brazil to Alcans packaging facility located in Maua,
Brazil. These agreements are for five-year terms during the
course of which we will supply specified percentages of
Alcans requirements for its facilities described above (in
the case of Alcans Rorschach facility, 94% in 2006, 93% in
2007, 92% in 2008 and 90% in 2009, and in the case of
Alcans Maua facility, 70% for the term of the agreement).
In addition, we will continue to supply certain of Alcans
European operations with foil under the terms of two agreements
that were in effect prior to the spin-off.
117
Alumina Supply Agreements. We have entered
into a ten-year alumina supply agreement with Alcan pursuant to
which we purchase from Alcan, and Alcan supplies to us, alumina
for our primary aluminum smelter located in Aratu, Brazil. The
annual quantity of alumina to be supplied under this agreement
is between 85 kt and 126 kt. In addition, an alumina supply
agreement between Alcan and Novelis Deutschland GmbH that was in
effect prior to the spin-off remains in effect following the
spin-off.
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information for persons currently
serving as executive officers of our company. Biographical
details as of October 31, 2009 for each of our executive
officers are also set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Philip Martens
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Erwin Mayr
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer
|
Leslie J. Parrette Jr.
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Compliance Officer
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis North America
|
Antonio Tadeu Coelho Nardocci
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Europe
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Asia
|
Alexandre Almeida
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis South America
|
Robert Virtue
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Vice President, Human Resources
|
Robert Nelson
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
|
Brenda Pulley
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Communications
|
Nick Madden
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Procurement Officer
|
Randal Miller
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer
|
Christopher Courts
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Assistant General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
Philip Martens was appointed President and Chief
Operating Officer effective May 8, 2009. Mr. Martens
most recently served as Senior Vice President and President,
Light Vehicle Systems, at ArvinMeritor Inc., a global automotive
supplier, from September 2006 to January 2009 He was also
President and CEO designate at Arvin Innovation, Inc., a global
automotive systems supplier. Prior to that, he served as
President and Chief Operating Officer of Plastech Engineered
Products, an automotive supplier, from 2005 to 2006. From 1987
to 2005, he held various engineering and leadership positions at
Ford Motor Company, a global automotive manufacturer, most
recently serving as Group Vice President of Product Creation.
Mr. Martens holds a degree in mechanical engineering from
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and an
M.B.A. from the University of Michigan. In 2003, Martens
received a Doctorate in Automotive Engineering from Lawrence
Technological University for his extensive contributions to the
global automotive industry.
Steven Fisher is our Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. Mr. Fisher joined Novelis in February
2006 as Vice President, Strategic Planning and Corporate
Development. He was appointed Chief Financial Officer in May
2007 following the acquisition of Novelis by Hindalco.
Mr. Fisher served as Vice President and Controller for TXU
Energy, the non-regulated subsidiary of TXU Corp., an energy
company, from July 2005 to February 2006. Prior to joining TXU
Energy, Mr. Fisher served in various senior finance roles
at Aquila, Inc., an international electric and gas utility and
energy trading company, including Vice
118
President, Controller and Strategic Planning, from 2001 to 2005.
He is also a member of the board of directors of Lionbridge
Technologies, a global software language company.
Mr. Fisher is a graduate of the University of Iowa in 1993,
where he earned a B.B.A. in Finance and Accounting. He is a
Certified Public Accountant.
Erwin Mayr was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief
Strategy Officer effective October 2009. Mr. Mayr
previously served as Business Unit President, Advanced Rolled
Products, for Novelis Europe from April 2007 to September 2009.
He has held leadership positions within the Novelis Europe
organization since joining the company in 2002. Previously, he
was an associate partner with the consulting firm Monitor Group.
Mr. Mayr is a graduate of Ulm University in Germany, where
he received a Doctor of Philosophy degree in Physics.
Leslie J. Parrette Jr. served as our General Counsel from
February 2005 until March 2009, and rejoined Novelis as Senior
Vice President, General Counsel and Compliance Officer in
October 2009. From March 2009 until October 2009, he served as
Senior Vice President, Legal Affairs, for Wesco International,
Inc., a Fortune 500 holding company that is a leading
distributor of electrical products and supplies. From July 2000
until February 2005, he served as Senior Vice President and
General Counsel of Aquila, Inc., an international electric and
gas utility and energy trading company. From September 2001 to
February 2005, he also served as Corporate Secretary of Aquila.
Prior to joining Aquila, Mr. Parrette was a partner in the
Kansas City-based law firm of Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin LLP
from April 1992 through June 2000. Mr. Parrette holds an
A.B., magna cum laude in Sociology from Harvard College
and received his J.D. from Harvard Law School.
Jean-Marc Germain is a Senior Vice President and the
President of our North American operations. Mr. Germain was
Vice President Global Can for Novelis Inc. from January 2007
until May 2008 when he was appointed Senior Vice President and
the President of our North American operations. He was
previously Vice President and General Manager of Light Gauge
Products for Novelis North America from September 2004 to
December 2006, and prior to that Mr. Germain held a number
of senior positions with Alcan Inc. and Pechiney S.A., which he
joined in 1998. From January 2004 to August 2004 he served as
co-lead of the Integration Leadership Team for the Alcan and
Pechiney merger, which occurred in 2004. Prior to that, he
served as Senior Vice President & General Manager
Foil, Strip and Specialties Division for Pechiney from September
2001 to December 2003. Before his time at Alcan and Pechiney,
Mr. Germain held a number of international posts for GE
Capital, General Electrics financing unit, and
Bain & Company, a global consulting firm.
Mr. Germain is a graduate from École Polytechnique in
Paris, France.
Antonio Tadeu Coelho Nardocci is our Senior Vice
President and President of our European operations. He formerly
served as Senior Vice President, Strategy, Innovation and
Technology from August 2008 to June 2009 and as the Senior Vice
President and President of our South American operations from
February 2005 to August 2008. Mr. Nardocci joined Alcan in
1980 and was the President of Rolled Products South America from
March 2002 until January 2005. Prior to that, he was a Vice
President of Rolled Products operations in Southeast Asia and
Managing Director of the Aluminium Company of Malaysia in Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia. Mr. Nardocci graduated from the
University of São Paulo in Brazil with a degree in
metallurgy. Mr. Nardocci is a member of the executive board
of the Brazilian Aluminium Association.
Thomas Walpole is a Senior Vice President and the
President of our Asian operations. Mr. Walpole was our Vice
President and General Manager, Can Products Business Unit from
January 2005 until February 2006. Mr. Walpole joined Alcan
in 1979 and has held various senior management roles.
Mr. Walpole held international positions within Alcan in
Europe and Asia until 2004. He began as Vice President, Sales,
Marketing & Business Development for Alcan Taihan
Aluminum Ltd. (now Novelis Korea) and most recently was
President of the Litho/Can and Painted Products for the European
region. Mr. Walpole graduated from State University of New
York at Oswego with a B.S. in Accounting, and holds an M.B.A.
from Case Western Reserve University.
Alexandre Almeida is a Senior Vice President and
President of our South American operations. Prior to this
appointment in August 2008, Mr. Almeida had served as Chief
Financial Officer of Novelis South America beginning in January
2005. Formerly, he was Managing Director of Alcan Composites
Brasil Ltda. from 2003 to 2005, and was previously Chief
Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Líder
Taxi Aereo S.A., a general aviation service provider in Brazil.
Mr. Almeida holds a degree in Metallurgical
119
Engineering and a Masters Degree in Computer Science from
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, and also a postgraduate
degree in Finance Administration from João Pinheiro
Foundation.
Robert Virtue is our Vice President, Human Resources.
Mr. Virtue has served several roles in our human resources
department from January 2005 through May 2006 and October 2006
to the present, including Vice President, Compensation and
Benefits; Acting Vice President, Human Resources and Director of
Compensation and Benefits. He was appointed Vice President,
Human Resources in May 2007. Prior to Novelis, he was Vice
President, Executive Compensation with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., an
international retailer, from May 2006 through October 2006. He
was Director Compensation and Benefits for American Retail Group
Inc., a retail company, from 1997 through January 2005.
Mr. Virtue also spent 15 years with British Petroleum
PLC, a global energy company, in a variety of domestic and
international human resources roles with assignments in
chemicals, coal, refining, transportation, marketing and
corporate functions. Mr. Virtue earned a B.S. in Business
from Boston University and an M.B.A. from Indiana University.
Robert Nelson is our Vice President, Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer. Mr. Nelson served as the Acting
Controller of Novelis Inc. beginning in July 2008 and was
appointed Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer in November 2008. Previously, he worked for
22 years at Georgia Pacific, one of the worlds
leading manufacturers of tissue, pulp, paper, packaging, and
building products. Mr. Nelson served in a variety of
corporate and operational financial roles at Georgia Pacific,
most recently as Vice President and Controller from 2004 to
2006. Prior to that, he was Vice President Finance, Consumer
Products & Packaging. Mr. Nelson earned a B.S. in
Accounting from the University of Illinois
Urbana-Champaign and is a Certified Public Accountant in the
State of Georgia.
Brenda Pulley is our Vice President, Corporate Affairs
and Communications. She has global responsibility for our
organizations corporate affairs and communication efforts,
which include branding, strategic internal and external
communications and government relations. Prior to our spin-off
from Alcan, Ms. Pulley was Vice President, Corporate
Affairs and Government Relations of Alcan from September 2000 to
2004. She has served as Legislative Assistant to Congressman Ike
Skelton of Missouri and to the U.S. House of
Representatives Subcommittee on Small Business, specializing in
energy, environment, and international trade issues. She also
served as Executive Director for the National Association of
Chemical Recyclers, and as Director, Federal Government
Relations for Safety-Kleen Corp., a leading provider of
environmental solutions for business. Ms. Pulley currently
serves on the Board of Directors for Keep America Beautiful.
Ms. Pulley earned her B.S. majoring in Social Science, with
a minor in Communications from Central Missouri State University.
Nick Madden is our Vice President and Chief Procurement
Officer. Prior to this role, which he assumed in October 2006,
Mr. Madden served as President of Novelis Europes
Can, Litho and Recycling business unit beginning in October
2004. He was Vice President of Metal Management and Procurement
for Alcans Rolled Products division in Europe from
December 2000 until September 2004 and was also responsible for
the secondary recycling business. Mr. Madden holds a B.Sc.
(Hons) degree in Economics and Social Studies from University
College in Cardiff, Wales.
Randal Miller is our Vice President, Treasurer. Prior to
joining Novelis in July 2008, Mr. Miller served as Vice
President and Treasurer of Transocean Offshore Deepwater
Drilling Inc., the worlds largest offshore drilling
company, from May 2006 to November 2007 where he was responsible
for all treasury, banking, capital markets and insurance risk
management activities for Transocean and its subsidiaries. From
2001 to 2006, Mr. Miller served as Vice President Finance,
Treasurer of Aquila, Inc. Mr. Miller earned his B.S.B.A.
from Iowa State University and M.B.A. from the University of
Missouri Kansas City.
Christopher Courts is our Assistant General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary. Mr. Courts joined Novelis in April
2005, and has served as Corporate Counsel and most recently
Assistant General Counsel. He was appointed Assistant General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary in March 2009. Prior to joining
Novelis, Mr. Courts was Senior Corporate Counsel at Aquila,
Inc., from 2003 to April 2005. He previously worked as an
associate for the law firm of Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
LLP. Mr. Courts has a B.B.A. in Finance from the University
of Iowa and a J.D. from the University of Iowa College of Law.
120
Our
Directors
Our Board of Directors is currently comprised of five directors.
Our directors terms will expire at each annual
shareholders meeting provided that if an election of directors
is not held at an annual meeting of the shareholders, the
directors then in office shall continue in office or until their
successors shall be elected. Biographical details as of
October 31, 2009 for each of our directors are set forth
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Director Since
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Kumar Mangalam Birla
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Askaran Agarwala
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
Director
|
D. Bhattacharya
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director and Vice Chairman of the Board
|
Clarence J. Chandran
|
|
January 6, 2005
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Director
|
Donald A. Stewart
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director
|
Kumar Mangalam Birla was elected as the Chairman of the
Board of Directors of Novelis on May 15, 2007.
Mr. Birla has served since October 1995 as the Chairman of
the Aditya Birla Group, which is among Indias largest
business houses, and includes such companies as Grasim,
Hindalco, UltraTech Cement, Aditya Birla Nuvo and Idea Cellular
and globally Novelis, Minacs, Aditya Birla Chemicals
(Thailand) Limited and Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Limited.
Mr. Birla has been a Director of the Aditya Birla Group
since November 1992. Mr. Birla serves as Chairman of all of
the Aditya Birla Groups blue-chip companies in India. He
also serves as director on the board of the Groups
international companies spanning Thailand, Indonesia,
Philippines, Egypt, and Canada. Additionally, Mr. Birla
serves on the board of the G.D. Birla Medical
Research & Education Foundation, and is a Chancellor
of Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani. He
is a member of the London Business Schools Asia Pacific
Advisory Board. He is also a member and Chairman of the Staff
Sub-Committee of Central Board of Reserve Bank of India.
Askaran Agarwala has served as a Director of Hindalco
since July 2004 and as Chairman of the Business Review Council
of the Aditya Birla Group since October 2003. From 1982 to
October 2003 he was President of Hindalco.
Mr. Agarwala serves on the Compensation Committee of the
Novelis Board of Directors. Mr. Agarwala also serves as a
director of several other companies in the Aditya Birla Group,
including Udyog Services Ltd., Bihar Caustic &
Chemicals Ltd., Tanfac Industries Ltd., and Aditya Birla
Insurance Advisory Services Limited. He is a Trustee of G.D.
Birla Medical Research and Education Foundation, Vaibhav Medical
and Education Foundation, Aditya Vikram Birla Memorial Trust and
Sarla Basant Birla Memorial Trust. Mr. Agarwala has held
the post of President of Aluminum Association of India in the
past.
D. Bhattacharya is Vice Chairman of Novelis and
serves on the Audit and Compensation Committees of the Novelis
Board of Directors. Mr. Bhattacharya has served as Managing
Director of Hindalco since October 2004 and has served as a
Director of Hindalco since April 2004. He also serves as a
Director of Aditya Birla Management Corporation Private Limited.
He is the Chairman of Utkal Alumina International Limited and of
Aditya Birla Minerals Limited in Australia.
Mr. Bhattacharya also serves as a Director of Birla
Management Centre Services Limited, Dahej Harbour and
Infrastructure Limited, Minerals & Minerals Limited
and Aditya Birla Power Company Limited and Pidilite Industries
Limited. Other positions held by Mr. Bhattacharya include
Hon. President Aluminium Association of India (AAI);
Director The Fertiliser Association of India (FAI).
Clarence J. Chandran has been a director of the company
since 2005. Since October 2009, Mr. Chandran has been
Executive Chairman of ChantRa, Inc. (energy, infrastructure, IT,
telecommunications). Mr. Chandran serves on the
Compensation and Audit Committees of the Novelis Board of
Directors, and acts as the Chairman of the Compensation
Committee. Mr. Chandra served as co-CEO and Global Managing
Partner of Namana Capital Group (investment firm) in October
2009. Mr. Chandran served as Chairman of the Chandran
Family Foundation Inc. (healthcare research and education) from
2001 to 2008. Mr. Chandran served as Chairman of Conros
Corporation (private mass market consumer products
company including LePages USA and PineMountain) from
2001 to 2006. He is a director of Marfort Deep Sea Technologies
Inc., a company which provides Turnkey design, engineering and
manufacturing of equipment for subsea field development
projects, and is a past director of Alcan Inc. and MDS Inc., a
global life sciences company. He retired as President, Business
Process Services, of CGI Group Inc. (information technology) in
2004 and retired as Chief
121
Operating Officer of Nortel Networks Corporation
(communications) in 2001. Mr. Chandran is a member of the
Duke University Board of Visitors.
Donald A. Stewart is Chief Executive Officer and a
Director of Sun Life Financial Inc. and Sun Life Assurance
Company of Canada, a leading international financial services
company. Mr. Stewart serves on the Audit Committee of the
Novelis Board of Directors and serves as its Chairman. From 1987
to 1992, Mr. Stewart held overall responsibility for Sun
Lifes information technology function. He was appointed
Chief Executive Officer of Sun Life Trust Company in
September 1992. In 1996, he was appointed President and Chief
Operating Officer, and in 1998 Chief Executive Officer of Sun
Life. Mr. Stewart also serves a director of the American
Council of Life Insurers and the Canadian Life and Health
Insurance Association.
Corporate
Governance
Holders of our 7.25% senior notes, holders of the notes
described in this prospectus and other interested parties may
communicate with the Board of Directors, a committee or an
individual director by writing to Novelis Inc., 3399 Peachtree
Road NE, Suite 1500, Atlanta, GA 30326, Attention:
Corporate Secretary Board Communication. All such
communications will be compiled by the Corporate Secretary and
submitted to the appropriate director or board committee. The
Corporate Secretary will reply or take other actions in
accordance with instructions from the applicable board contact.
Committees
of Our Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors has established two standing committees:
the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. Each
committee is governed by its own charter.
According to their authority as set out in their charters, our
Board of Directors and each of its committees may engage outside
advisors at the expense of Novelis.
Audit
Committee and Financial Experts
Our Board of Directors has a separately-designated standing
Audit Committee. Messrs. Stewart, Bhattacharya and Chandran
are the members of the Audit Committee. Mr. Stewart, an
independent director, has been identified as an audit
committee financial expert as that term is defined in the
rules and regulations of the SEC.
Our Audit Committees main objective is to assist our Board
of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities for
the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and
independence of our independent registered public accounting
firm and the performance of both our internal audit function and
our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the
Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for,
among other matters:
|
|
|
|
|
evaluating and compensating our independent registered public
accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
making recommendations to the Board of Directors and
shareholders relating to the appointment, retention and
termination of our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
discussing with our independent registered public accounting
firm their qualifications and independence from management;
|
|
|
|
reviewing with our independent registered public accounting firm
the scope and results of their audit;
|
|
|
|
pre-approving all audit and permissible non-audit services to be
performed by our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
review areas of potential significant financial risk and the
steps taken to monitor and manage such exposures;
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
overseeing the financial reporting process and discussing with
management and our independent registered public accounting firm
the interim and annual financial statements that we file with
the SEC; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and monitoring our accounting principles, accounting
policies and disclosure, internal control over financial
reporting and disclosure controls and procedures.
|
Compensation
Committee
Our Compensation Committee establishes our general compensation
philosophy and oversees the development and implementation of
compensation policies and programs. It also reviews and approves
the level of
and/or
changes in the compensation of individual executive officers
taking into consideration individual performance and competitive
compensation practices. The committees specific roles and
responsibilities are set out in its charter. Our Compensation
Committee periodically reviews the effectiveness of our overall
management organization structure and succession planning for
senior management, reviews recommendations for the appointment
of executive officers, and reviews annually the development
process for high potential employees.
Code
of Conduct and Guidelines for Ethical Behavior
Novelis has adopted a Code of Conduct for the Board of Directors
and Senior Managers and maintains a Code of Ethics for Senior
Financial Officers that applies to our senior financial officers
including our principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer, or persons performing
similar functions. We also maintain a Code of Conduct that
governs all of our employees. Copies of the Code of Conduct for
the Board of Directors and Senior Managers and the Code of
Ethics for Senior Financial Officers are available on our
website at www.novelis.com. We will promptly disclose any future
amendments to these codes on our website as well as any waivers
from these codes for executive officers and directors. Copies of
these codes are also available in print from our Corporate
Secretary upon request. Information on our website does not
constitute part of this prospectus.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
This section provides a discussion of the background and
objectives of our compensation programs for senior management,
as well as a discussion of all material elements of the
compensation of each of the named executive officers for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 identified in the
following table. The named executive officers are determined in
accordance with SEC rules and include (1) the persons that
served as our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer during any part of fiscal 2009 and
(2) the three other highest paid executive officers that
were employed on March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
Former President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
Former President of Novelis Europe
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis North America
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis Asia
|
Compensation
Committee and Role of Management
The Compensation Committee of our board of directors (the
Committee) has the responsibility for approving the
compensation programs for our named executive officers and
making decisions regarding specific compensation to be paid or
awarded to them. The Committee acts pursuant to a charter
approved by our board, which is reviewed annually.
123
Our Vice President Human Resources serves as the management
liaison officer for the Committee. Our human resources and legal
departments provide assistance to the Committee in connection
with administration of the Committees responsibilities.
Our named executive officers have no direct role in setting
their own compensation. The Committee, however, normally meets
with our President and Chief Operating Officer to evaluate
performance against pre-established goals and the President and
Chief Operating Officer makes recommendations to the board
regarding budgets, which affect certain goals. Our President and
Chief Operating Officer also makes recommendations regarding
compensation matters related to other named executive officers
and provide input regarding executive compensation programs and
policies generally.
Management also assists the Committee by providing information
needed or requested by the Committee (such as our performance
against budget and objectives, historic compensation,
compensation expense, our policies and programs, and peer
companies) and by providing input and advice regarding
compensation programs and policies and their impact on the
Company and its executives.
Objectives
and Design of Our Compensation Program
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract,
retain, and reward talented executives who can contribute to our
long-term success and thereby build value for our shareholder.
The program is organized around three fundamental principles:
|
|
|
|
|
Provide Total Direct Compensation Opportunities That Are
Competitive with Similar Positions at Comparable
Companies: To enable us to attract, motivate and
retain qualified executives, total direct compensation
opportunities for each executive (base pay, annual short-term
incentives and long-term incentives) are targeted at levels to
be competitive with similar positions at comparable companies.
The Committee strives to create a total direct compensation
package that is at the median of the peer companies described
below.
|
|
|
|
A Substantial Portion of Total Direct Compensation Should Be
at Risk Because It Is Performance-Based: We
believe executives should be rewarded for their performance.
Consequently, a substantial portion of an executives total
direct compensation should be at risk, with amounts actually
paid dependent on performance against pre-established objectives
for the individual and us. The proportion of an
individuals total direct compensation that is based upon
these performance objectives should increase as the
individuals business responsibilities increase.
|
|
|
|
A Substantial Portion of Total Direct Compensation Should be
Delivered in the Form of Long-Term Performance Based
Awards: We believe a long-term stake in the
sustained performance of Novelis effectively aligns executive
and shareholder interests and provides motivation for enhancing
shareholder value. As a result, we may provide long-term
performance based awards, which are generally paid in cash.
|
The Committee recognizes that the engagement of strong talent in
critical functions may entail recruiting new executives at times
and involve negotiations with individual candidates. As a
result, the Committee may determine in a particular situation
that it is in our best interests to negotiate compensation
packages that deviate from the principles set forth above.
In fiscal 2009, the Committee and the board, elected not to use
the services of a compensation consultant, but instead chose to
evaluate our compensation programs based on generally available
market data including the following:
1. Compensation information derived from SEC filings for
the named executive officers of the following peer group of
companies: Air Products, Ashland Inc., Ball Corporation, Bemis,
Coca Cola Enterprises Inc., Commercial Metals Company, Crown
Holdings, Cummins Inc., Eastman Chemical, Ecolab Inc.,
MeadWestvaco, Monsanto, Newell Rubbermaid, Nucor Corp., Owens
Illinois, Pactiv Corp., Parker-Hannifin, PPG Industries, Praxair
Inc., Rohm and Haas, Smurfit-Stone Container, Temple-Inland and
Worthington Industries.
124
2. Market data provided by Hay Group (a global human
resource consulting firm). This comprised of companies of size
US$1Bn+ in revenues in the sectors of Manufacturing and
Materials. This information was provided for all levels of the
organization.
3. Data from several compensation surveys published by
leading global human resources consulting firms.
Elements
of Our Compensation Program
Our compensation program consists of the following key elements:
|
|
|
|
|
Base Pay
|
|
|
|
Short-Term (Annual) Incentives
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentives
|
|
|
|
Employee Benefits
|
The Committee periodically compares the competitiveness of these
key elements to that of companies in our peer group and to the
market data provided by the Hay Group and other human resources
consulting firms. Our general goal is to be at or near the
50th percentile among our peer group. In fiscal 2009, this
review revealed that the total direct compensation opportunity
for our executive officers was at our target, without
significant variation by position and by element of compensation.
Base Pay. Based on market practices, the
Committee believes it is appropriate that some portion of total
direct compensation (generally 20% to 40%) be provided in a form
that is fixed and liquid. Base salary for our named executive
officers is generally reviewed by the Committee in the first
quarter of each fiscal year and any increases are effective on
July 1. In setting base salary, the Committee is mindful of
its overall goal for allocation of total compensation to this
element and the median base salary for comparable positions at
companies in our peer group and as confirmed by additional
market data.
Short-Term (Annual) Incentives. We believe
having an annual incentive opportunity is necessary to attract,
retain and reward key management. Our general philosophy is that
annual cash incentives should be based on achievement of
company-wide and business unit goals as appropriate for the
named executive officer. The committee also retains the
discretion to adjust, up or down, annual cash incentives earned
based on the Committees subjective assessment of
individual performance. Annual incentives should be consistent
with the strategic goals set by the board, and the performance
benchmarks should be sufficiently ambitious so as to provide
meaningful incentive to our executive officers. In the normal
circumstances, we would expect that approximately 20% of an
executive officers total direct compensation opportunity
would be attributable to short-term incentives.
Annual
Incentive Plan 2008 2009
Our Committee and board, after input from management, approved
the Annual Incentive Plan (AIP)
2008 2009 to provide short-term incentives for the
period from April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009. The
performance benchmarks for the year were tied to three key
components: (1) Operating Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) performance;
(2) Operating free cash flow performance; and
(3) satisfaction of certain Environment, Health and Safety
(EHS) objectives, including recordable case rates,
lost time rates and certain EHS-related strategic initiatives.
The Recordable Case Rate establishes targets for reducing the
level of workplace accidents resulting in an injury requiring
more than first aid treatment. The Lost Time Injury and Illness
Case Rate establishes targets for reducing the level of
workplace injuries or illnesses resulting in lost time of one
shift or more. The Strategic EHS Initiatives establish targets
for the completion of environmental initiatives that lead to
significant reductions in water emissions, energy or waste
aligned with site specific issues, and, establish targets for
the completion of occupational health and safety initiatives
that reduce site specific risks and exposures.
125
In deriving Operating EBITDA, the company first calculates
adjusted EBITDA on a segment basis, which is earnings before
(a) depreciation and amortization, (b) interest
expense and amortization of debt issuance costs,
(c) interest income, (d) income tax provision
(benefit), (e) unrealized (gains) losses on change in fair
value of derivative instruments, (f) impairment of
goodwill, (g) gain on extinguishment of debt,
(h) adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation,
(i) restructuring charges, and (j) certain other
costs. Then, the company obtains Operating EBITDA from adjusted
EBITDA with the following additional adjustments: (a) lag
between price the company pays for metal and the price charged
to our customers, (b) the
non-U.S. denominated
working capital and debt remeasurement from the changing
exchange rates, (c) ceilings on metal prices that restrict
passing costs through to certain customers and (d) certain
discretionary adjustments. In fiscal 2009, there were no
discretionary adjustments.
In deriving Operating free cash flow, the company first
calculates Free cash flow, which consists of: (a) net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities, (b) plus net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities and
(c) less net proceeds from sales of assets. The company
then obtains Operating free cash flow by the following
adjustments to Free cash flow: (a) lag between price the
company pays for metal and the price charged to our customers,
(b) ceilings on metal prices that restrict passing costs
through to certain customers, (c) LME prices on closing
metal inventory and (d) certain discretionary adjustments.
In fiscal 2009, Europe was the only Segment impacted by a
discretionary adjustment, and such adjustment related to
restructuring payments.
The potential payout attributable to operating EBITDA
performance could have ranged from: (1) 0% of target if
fiscal 2009 performance did not exceed the performance
threshold; (2) 100% of target if fiscal 2009 results met
the business plan target; and (3) up to a maximum of 200%
of target if fiscal 2009 results met or exceeded the high end
business plan target. The potential payout attributable to
operating free cash flow performance could have ranged from:
(1) 0% of target if fiscal 2009 performance did not exceed
the performance threshold; (2) 100% of target if fiscal
2009 results met the business plan target; and (3) up to
200% of target if fiscal 2009 results met or exceeded the high
end business plan target. The potential payout attributable to
satisfying EHS objectives also ranged from 0% to 200% of target
and was measured against continuous improvement targets for
recordable cases and lost time injuries and illness as well as
the completion of strategic EHS initiatives.
For each of the named executive officers, the Committee set the
weightings for the performance goals as follows: 45% based on
operating EBITDA performance; 45% based on operating free cash
flow performance; and 10% based on EHS performance. For
Ms. Brooks and Mr. Fisher, the performance goals were
based on company-wide performance. For each of the other named
executive officers, the operating EBITDA goals and operating
free cash flow goals were based one-half on company-wide
performance and one-half on regional performance, and the EHS
goal is based on regional performance.
The table below shows, for each named executive officer, the
target AIP bonus amount, the applicable performance objectives
and relevant weightings, target and actual performance for each
goal and the amount earned based on actual performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a % of
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
as a % of
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Name
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Performance Objectives
|
|
Weighting
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Payoff
|
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
|
110
|
%
|
|
$
|
825,000
|
|
|
Novelis Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
$
|
790.1 M
|
|
|
$
|
572.6 M
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
$
|
(26 M
|
)
|
|
$
|
(296.4 M)
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis EHS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
93.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
23,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic
Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
>6
|
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
$
|
66,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
113,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
$
|
337,500
|
|
|
Novelis Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
$
|
790.1 M
|
|
|
$
|
572.6 M
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
$
|
(26 M
|
)
|
|
$
|
(296.4 M)
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis EHS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
93.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,450
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a % of
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
as a % of
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Name
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Performance Objectives
|
|
Weighting
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Payoff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic
Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
>6
|
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
$
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
|
62.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
367,031
|
|
|
Novelis Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
790.1 M
|
|
|
$
|
572.6 M
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
242 M
|
|
|
|
168.5 M
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(26 M
|
)
|
|
$
|
(296.4 M)
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
151 M
|
|
|
|
159.9 M
|
|
|
|
114
|
%
|
|
$
|
94,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe EHS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
$
|
22,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
133
|
%
|
|
$
|
14,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic
Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
>6
|
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
$
|
29,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
160,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc
Germain
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
Novelis Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
790.1 M
|
|
|
$
|
572.6 M
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
240 M
|
|
|
$
|
160.3 M
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(26 M
|
)
|
|
$
|
(296.4 M)
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(87 M
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162.1M)
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America EHS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic
Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
>6
|
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
$
|
15,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
$
|
156,750
|
|
|
Novelis Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
790.1 M
|
|
|
$
|
572.6 M
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Operating EBITDA
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
129 M
|
|
|
$
|
47.4 M
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(26 M
|
)
|
|
$
|
(296.4 M)
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Operating Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
73 M
|
|
|
$
|
(143.4 M)
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia EHS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recordable Case Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
133
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lost Time Rate
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
157
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Strategic
Initiatives
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
>6
|
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2009, the Committee did not exercise its discretion to
adjust annual cash incentives earned under the 2009 AIP based on
a subjective review of individual performance.
Long-Term Incentives. The Committee believes
that a substantial portion of each executives total direct
compensation opportunity (generally 40% to 60%) should be based
on long-term performance. The awards should align the interests
of our executives and our shareholder. The opportunity to
receive long-term incentive compensation by an executive in a
given year is generally determined by reference to the market
for long-term incentive compensation among our peer group
companies group and as confirmed by additional market data. The
Committee is also mindful of long-term incentive awards made in
prior years and takes such awards into account in determining
the amount of current-year awards.
Long-Term
Incentive Plan FY 2008 FY 2010
(2008 LTIP)
The Committee determined for fiscal 2008, fiscal 2009 and fiscal
2010 to issue awards that are cash-based awards, 80% of which is
based on economic profit performance and 20% of which is based
on EBITDA performance related to innovation projects, which
currently provides the best link between the interests of
executives and our shareholder. For future long-term awards, the
Committee will consider all types of awards and will determine
at the time of each award the appropriate form of award and
performance measures to use.
127
The Committee met during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010
to evaluate and approve fiscal 2009 payout for the 2008 LTIP.
The Committee determined that no awards were earned for the
period because the performance requirements were not achieved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eligible for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-2010
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Results
|
|
|
Level
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
$
|
2,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
|
$
|
32,500
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term
Incentive Plan FY 2009 FY 2012
(2009 LTIP)
On June 19, 2008, the board of directors approved the
Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal Years
2009 2012 (the 2009 LTIP). The 2009 LTIP
has been designed to provide a direct line of sight for
participants to company performance as measured by the increase
in the price of Hindalco shares.
Awards under the 2009 LTIP consist of stock appreciation rights
(SARs), with the value of one SAR being equivalent
to the increase in value of one Hindalco share. The SARs will
vest 25% each year for four years, subject to performance
criteria being fulfilled. The performance criterion will be
based on Operating EBIDTA performance for Novelis each year. The
vesting threshold will be 75% performance versus target each
year, at which point 75% of SARs due that year, would vest.
There would be a straight line vesting up to 100% of
performance. After the SARs have vested, they can be exercised
at times decided by the employee. The value realized is
dependent on the stock price of Hindalco at the time of
exercise; however, the value will be restricted to a maximum of
2.5 times the target opportunity if the SARs are exercised
within one year of vesting. The maximum will be 3 times for SARs
exercised more than one year after vesting.
In the event a participant resigns, unvested SARs will lapse and
vested SARs must be exercised within 90 days. If an
employee retires more than one year from the date of grant, SARs
will continue to vest and must be exercised no later than the
third anniversary of retirement. In the event of death or
disability, there will be immediate vesting of all SARs with one
year to exercise. Upon a change in control, there would be
immediate vesting and cash-out of SARs.
The following grants were made to our executives based on the
2009 LTIP Plan. Operating EBITDA for fiscal year 2009
performance did not achieve the threshold, so no SARS were
vested for fiscal year 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
SARs Vesting
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Approved
|
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
SARs Forfeited/
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks(A)
|
|
$
|
2,231,000
|
|
|
|
3,919,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979,984
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
878,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,629
|
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
878,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,629
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
878,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,629
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
614,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,740
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Ms Brooks terminated her services with the Company effective
May 8, 2009 and an additional 2,939,954 SARs granted to her
were forfeited/cancelled. |
Recognition
Agreements
On September 25, 2006, we entered into recognition
agreements with all of our executives. These agreements provided
that the executive would receive a fixed number of our common
shares if he or she
128
remained employed through December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2008. Payment for the final installment of
recognition shares vesting on December 31, 2008 was made in
January 2009 in the amounts shown below and the Recognition
Agreements expired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
Name
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Received
|
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
|
14,200
|
|
|
$
|
638,006
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
$
|
128,051
|
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
$
|
184,213
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
$
|
121,311
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
157,255
|
|
Employee
Benefits
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the Novelis Pension
Plan and the Novelis Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the
Novelis SERP), which provide benefits identical to
the benefits provided under the Alcancorp plans. Executives who
were participants in the Alcancorp Pension Plan participate in
the Novelis Pension Plan and Novelis SERP (collectively referred
to as the U.S. Pension Plan). Executives who
were not participants in the Alcancorp Pension Plan or who were
hired on or after January 1, 2005 do not participate in the
U.S. Pension Plan. Ms. Brooks and Messrs. Germain
and Walpole are all participants in the U.S. Pension Plan.
Additional Pension Benefits: In addition to
her participation in the U.S. Pension Plan described above,
Ms. Brooks will receive from us a supplemental pension
equal to the excess, if any, of the pension she would have
received from her employer prior to joining Alcan had she been
covered by her prior employers pension plan until her
separation or retirement from Novelis, over the sum of her
pension from the U.S. Pension Plan and the pension rights
actually accrued with her previous employer.
|
|
|
|
|
Swiss Pension Schemes: Since our spin-off from
Alcan, we continued to participate in Alcans two pension
schemes in Switzerland: (1) the Pensionskasse Alcan Schweiz
(a defined benefit plan) and (2) the Erganzungskasse Alcan
Schweiz (a defined contribution plan). The defined benefit plan
is computed based on a participants final annual earnings
(up to a limit and less a coordination amount) and service up to
45 years. The defined contribution plan only recognizes
earnings in excess of the defined benefit earnings limit. Mr. de
Weert was the only named executive officer eligible for the
Swiss pension schemes in 2008.
|
|
|
|
Savings Plan and Non-Qualified Defined Contribution
Plan: All U.S. based executives are eligible
to participate in our tax qualified savings plan. We match up to
4.5% of pay (up to the IRS compensation limit; $245,000 for
calendar year 2009) for participants who contribute 6% of
pay or more to the savings plan. In addition, U.S. based
executives hired on or after January 1, 2005 are eligible
to share in our discretionary contributions. Discretionary
contributions are first made to the qualified plan (up to the
IRS compensation limit) and any excess amounts are made to our
non-qualified defined contribution plan. For fiscal 2009, we
made a discretionary contribution equal to 5% of pay.
Mr. Fisher was the only named executive officer eligible
for a discretionary contribution for the period.
|
|
|
|
Perquisites: As noted in our Summary
Compensation Table, we provide our officers with certain
perquisites consistent with market practice. We do not view
perquisites as a significant element of our comprehensive
compensation structure.
|
|
|
|
Health & Welfare
Benefits: Executives are entitled to participate
in our employee benefit plans (including medical, dental,
disability, and life insurance benefits) on the same basis as
other employees.
|
129
Employment-Related
Agreements
Each of our named executive officers during fiscal 2009 was
covered by an employment or letter agreement setting forth the
general terms of his or her employment as well as various other
employment related agreements.
See Employment-Related Agreements and Certain Employee Benefit
Plans below for a discussion of these agreements.
Timing of
Compensation Decisions
The Committee develops an annual agenda to assist it in
fulfilling its responsibilities. Generally, in the first quarter
of each fiscal year, the Committee (1) reviews prior year
performance and authorizes the distribution of short-term
incentive and long-term incentive pay-outs, if any, for the
prior year, (2) establishes performance criteria for the
current year short-term incentive program, (3) reviews base
pay and annual short-term incentive targets for executives, and
(4) recommends to the board of directors the form of award
and performance criteria for the current cycle of the long-term
incentive program.
Long-term incentive awards are generally considered and approved
by the Committee during the first quarter of each fiscal year,
although the Committee may deviate from this practice when
appropriate under the circumstances.
Compensation
Committee Report
The Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing
Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on
the Committees review of and discussions with management,
the Committee recommended to the board of directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009.
The foregoing report is provided by the following directors, who
constitute the Committee:
Mr. Clarence J. Chandran, Chairman
Mr. Debnarayan Bhattacharya
Mr. Askaran Agarwala
Summary
Compensation Table
The table below sets forth information regarding compensation
for our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2009, the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008
and the three month transition period ended March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Plan
|
|
Pension
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards(A)(B)
|
|
Awards(B)
|
|
Compensation(C)
|
|
Value(D)
|
|
Compensation(E)
|
|
Total
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks,
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
731,250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
211,104
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
113,850
|
|
|
$
|
344,054
|
|
|
$
|
90,666
|
|
|
$
|
1,490,924
|
|
President and
|
|
2008
|
|
|
672,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
896,739
|
|
|
|
10,466,761
|
|
|
|
1,096,223
|
|
|
|
97,640
|
|
|
|
92,991
|
|
|
|
13,322,926
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
J-M 2007
|
|
|
163,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,692,965
|
|
|
|
264,377
|
|
|
|
147,375
|
|
|
|
97,363
|
|
|
|
12,707
|
|
|
|
2,378,537
|
|
Steven Fisher,
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
425,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,370
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,575
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,657
|
|
|
$
|
581,602
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2008
|
|
|
334,538
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
171,780
|
|
|
|
386,927
|
|
|
|
361,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,732
|
|
|
|
1,358,152
|
|
Arnaud de Weert,
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
625,745
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,953
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
160,457
|
|
|
$
|
17,205
|
|
|
$
|
108,161
|
|
|
$
|
972,521
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
2008
|
|
|
674,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,123
|
|
|
|
670,448
|
|
|
|
601,043
|
|
|
|
24,801
|
|
|
|
114,236
|
|
|
|
2,331,931
|
|
and President of Novelis Europe
|
|
J-M 2007
|
|
|
158,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,202
|
|
|
|
140,621
|
|
|
|
98,750
|
|
|
|
4,219
|
|
|
|
20,203
|
|
|
|
450,995
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain,
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
318,625
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,140
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,422
|
|
|
$
|
24,847
|
|
|
$
|
126,681
|
|
|
$
|
525,715
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Novelis North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole,
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
281,250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,033
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,177
|
|
|
$
|
221,833
|
|
|
$
|
539,251
|
|
|
$
|
1,120,544
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
2008
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,752
|
|
|
|
981,865
|
|
|
|
210,890
|
|
|
|
59,765
|
|
|
|
607,032
|
|
|
|
2,347,304
|
|
and President of Novelis Asia
|
|
J-M 2007
|
|
|
66,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289,674
|
|
|
|
278,790
|
|
|
|
34,406
|
|
|
|
73,616
|
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
|
|
746,810
|
|
130
|
|
|
(A) |
|
For the year ended March 31, 2009, these stock awards
represent awards under our Recognition agreements. |
|
(B) |
|
Represents the cost recognized in our financial statements in
the applicable fiscal year calculated in accordance with
FAS 123R. Assumptions used in the calculation of these
amounts are included in Note 13 to our audited consolidated
financial statements. |
|
(C) |
|
For the year ended March 31, 2009, these represent awards
earned under the Novelis Annual Incentive Plan (AIP). |
|
(D) |
|
Represents the aggregate change in actuarial present value of
the named executive officers accumulated benefit under our
qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans during
fiscal 2009. Assumptions used in the calculation of these
amounts are included in Note 14 to our audited consolidated
financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2009. |
|
(E) |
|
The amounts shown in the All Other Compensation Column reflect
the values from the table below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
to Defined
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Relocation and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perquisites and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Contribution
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Hosing Related
|
|
|
Child Tuition
|
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Plans(A)
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Reimbursement
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,075
|
|
|
$
|
2,106
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,420
|
|
|
$
|
29,065
|
(B)
|
|
$
|
90,666
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,647
|
|
|
$
|
457
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,553
|
(B)
|
|
$
|
67,657
|
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
83,563
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,598
|
(C)
|
|
$
|
108,161
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,705
|
|
|
$
|
470
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
98,042
|
|
|
$
|
18,464
|
(B)
|
|
$
|
126,681
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,916
|
|
|
$
|
1,024
|
|
|
$
|
527,309
|
(D)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,002
|
(E)
|
|
$
|
539,251
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents matching contribution (and discretionary
contributions in the case of Mr. Fisher) made to our tax
qualified and non-qualified defined contribution plans. |
|
(B) |
|
Includes executive flex allowance, car allowance, tax advice and
home security, each of which individually had an aggregate
incremental cost less than $25,000. |
|
(C) |
|
Includes executive flex allowance and car allowance, each of
which individually had an aggregate incremental cost less than
$25,000. |
|
(D) |
|
Includes: (i) an Expatriate Premium of $153,346;
(ii) Employer paid Korean Tax Deposit of $166,492;
(iii) Employer provided housing of $119,544;
(iv) Employer paid car/driver for Korean assignment of
$64,091; (v) travel reimbursement of $23,543 and
(vi) club dues of $293. |
|
(E) |
|
Includes car allowance and tax advice, each of which
individually had an aggregate incremental cost less than $25,000. |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2009
The table below sets forth information regarding grants of
plan-based awards made to our named executive officers for the
year ended March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payout
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity
|
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards(A)
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards(B)
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target ($)
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
|
11/19/2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
825,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,650,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,231,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,693,000
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
11/19/2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
337,500
|
|
|
$
|
675,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,500,000
|
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
|
11/19/2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
367,031
|
|
|
$
|
734,062
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,500,000
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
11/19/2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
$
|
390,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,500,000
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
11/19/2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
156,750
|
|
|
$
|
313,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
This grant was made under the Novelis Annual Incentive Plan
(AIP) for the year ended March 31, 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
This grant was made under the 2009 LTIP in the form of SARs. |
131
Employment-Related
Agreements and Certain Employee Benefit Plans
Each of our named executive officers was subject to an
employment or letter agreement during fiscal 2009. The terms of
each such agreement is summarized below.
Agreement
with Martha Finn Brooks
We entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Brooks
dated November 8, 2004. Pursuant to this agreement, she
served as our President and Chief Operating Officer with a base
salary of $750,000 in fiscal 2009. Ms. Brooks was eligible
for all of our executive long-term and short-term incentive
plans and is entitled to certain executive perquisites. She was
also eligible for our broad-based employee benefit and health
plans. We also agreed to reimburse Ms. Brooks for certain
expenses that she may incur in connection with private school
tuition costs for her children in grades one through twelve. As
part of her May 2, 2002 employment agreement with Alcan, we
guaranteed that the total combined qualified and non-qualified
pension benefits Ms. Brooks receives under the Novelis,
Alcan and Cummins (her former employer) pension plans will not
be less than the pension benefit that she would have received if
she remained covered by the Cummins Pension Plan from
October 16, 1986, until her retirement/termination with us.
On May 8, 2009, we entered into a separation and release
agreement with Ms. Brooks, regarding the terms of her
departure from the Company. The Agreement became effective on
May 15, 2009, seven days from the date of execution.
Pursuant to the Agreement, Ms. Brooks will receive a
goodwill incentive consisting of 1,000,000 stock appreciation
rights of Hindalco common stock (SARs) at an
exercise price of INR 60.50. Each SAR shall be equivalent to one
Hindalco share. The SARs, which vested on May 8, 2009, may
be exercised, in whole or in part, at any time during a three
year exercise period commencing May 8, 2009. Any
unexercised SARs shall lapse at the end of the exercise period.
The value of one SAR will be the increase in the price of one
Hindalco share from the exercise price subject to a maximum
price of INR 143.75. The value shall be paid in cash to
Ms. Brooks within two weeks of each exercise. Additionally,
we agreed to indemnify Ms. Brooks under our director and
officer insurance policies and released her from future claims
relating to her employment with Novelis.
Ms. Brooks was granted the goodwill incentive, in part, as
an acknowledgement that she voluntarily delayed her retirement
with the Company (a) until her successor could be
identified and (b) to facilitate an efficient leadership
transition. Additionally, as further consideration for the
goodwill incentive, Ms. Brooks: provided a release to
Novelis waiving any and all claims she may have against us;
agreed to provide continued cooperation with any pending or
future litigation, proceeding or hearing; and agreed to not
disclose any proprietary information obtained while working at
Novelis. Ms. Brooks also agreed to provide general
consulting services to Novelis for up to 10 hours a month
for a period of six months. Should she provide more than
10 hours of consulting per month, Ms. Brooks will be
paid at an hourly rate of $625 subject to a maximum of $5,000
per day.
Agreement
with Philip Martens
On April 16, 2009, the board of directors appointed Philip
Martens to succeed Ms. Brooks as President and Chief
Operating Officer, effective May 8, 2009. On that date, the
board ratified the employment agreement between Mr. Martens
and the Company dated April 11, 2009. Pursuant to this
employment agreement, Mr. Martens will receive an annual
base salary of $700,000, an annual short term target bonus
percentage of 90% of his base salary (i.e., $630,000), and an
annualized long term incentive target opportunity of $2,000,000.
However, during his first year of employment, Mr. Martens
will receive not less than 50% of the target of his annual short
term target bonus for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010
(i.e., $315,000).
Mr. Martens will receive benefits and perquisites
customarily provided to our executives. He will be entitled to
receive two years annual base salary and target short term
incentive opportunity (less any other severance payments) as
severance pay if he is terminated involuntarily except for
cause, death, disability, or retirement. Other severance
benefits described in his employment agreement include a lump
sum payment to
132
assist him with post-employment medical continuation coverage,
life insurance benefits, and retirement benefits.
As part of the employment agreement, Mr. Martens agreed to
a non-competition provision, prohibiting him from competing with
the Company during his employment and for a period of
24 months thereafter. He also agreed to not solicit
(a) the Companys customers and suppliers or
(b) its employees during his employment and for a period of
24 months thereafter.
His employment agreement also states that Mr. Martens
will receive an agreement providing employment protection in the
event of a change in control of the Company. Accordingly, the
Company and Mr. Martens entered into a Change in
Control Agreement dated as of April 16, 2009 (the CIC
Agreement). The CIC Agreement will terminate upon the
earlier of (i) April 15, 2011, unless a change in
control event occurs on or before such date, or (ii)
24 months following the date of a change in control event.
Pursuant to the CIC Agreement, he will be entitled to the
following payments if the Company terminates his employment
other than for cause, or if he resigns for good reason, within
24 months after a change in control event:
|
|
|
|
|
a lump sum cash amount equal to two times the sum of
(1) his annual base salary plus (2) his target short
term incentive opportunity for the calendar year in which the
change in control occurs; the lump sum cash amount will be
reduced by the amount of severance payments, if any, paid or
payable to him other than pursuant to the CIC Agreement to avoid
duplication of payments;
|
|
|
|
other benefits described in the CIC Agreement including a lump
sum payment to assist him with post-employment medical
continuation coverage, life insurance benefits, and retirement
benefits; and
|
|
|
|
a
gross-up
reimbursement for any excise tax liability imposed by
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.
|
Such payments shall not be made if his employment terminates
because of death, disability, or retirement.
Agreement
with Steven Fisher
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Fisher
dated January 17, 2006. He currently serves as our Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (effective
May 16, 2007) with a base salary of $450,000 in fiscal
2009. Mr. Fisher is eligible for all of our executive
long-term and short-term incentive plans and is entitled to
certain executive perquisites. He is also eligible for our
broad-based employee benefit and health plans.
Agreement
with Arnaud de Weert
Mr. de Weert became our Senior Vice President and President of
Novelis Europe effective May 1, 2006. Pursuant to his
employment agreement, he was entitled to a base salary of
$587,250 in fiscal 2009 (435,000 Euros converted to
U.S. Dollars at the March 31, 2009 exchange rate of
1.35 U.S. Dollars per Euro) and was eligible for short-term
and long-term incentives. Mr. de Weert also participated in our
broad-based employee benefit programs and received other
executive perquisites. We also agreed to reimburse Mr. de Weert
for certain expenses that he may have incurred in connection
with his relocation to Zurich. Mr. de Weerts agreement
also provided for a minimum of twelve months severance upon his
involuntary termination of employment.
On June 8, 2009, the Company announced that Antonio Tadeu
Coelho Nardocci was named President, Novelis Europe, effective
immediately. Mr. Nardocci succeeds Arnaud de Weert, who is
leaving the company on August 31, 2009 to pursue new
opportunities.
Agreement
with Jean-Marc Germain
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Germain
dated April 28, 2008. He currently serves as our Senior
Vice President and President of Novelis North America (effective
May 15, 2008) with a base salary of $325,000 in fiscal
2009. Mr. Germain is eligible for all of our executive
long-term and short-term incentive plans and is entitled to
certain executive perquisites. Mr. Germains agreement
provides for eighteen months severance upon his involuntary
termination except for cause. He is also eligible for certain
tuition
133
reimbursements for the education of his children through the end
of the 2009 2010 school year. He is also eligible
for our broad-based employee benefit and health plans.
Agreement
with Thomas Walpole
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Walpole
effective as of February 1, 2007, pursuant to which he
serves as our Senior Vice President and President of Novelis
Asia with a base salary of $285,000 in fiscal 2009. Under his
agreement, Mr. Walpole is entitled to an expatriate premium
and relocation allowance, each in amount equal to 10% of his
base salary (net after tax). Mr. Walpole is also eligible
for our executive long-term and short-term incentive plans and
certain executive perquisites as well as our broad-based
employee benefit and health plans. During the term of his Korean
assignment, Mr. Walpole is provided with a fully furnished
home which is paid for by Novelis Korea Limited and is entitled
to be reimbursed for one personal trip to the United States
during the year for himself and his family members.
Change
in Control Agreements
We entered into change in control agreements on
September 26, 2006 with all of our named executive
officers, except for Mr. Germain. These agreements expired
on May 15, 2009. We entered into new, and similar,
agreements with Messrs. Fisher, Germain and Walpole on
June 25, 2009.
Long-term
Incentive Plan (LTIP) FY 2009 FY
2012
On June 19, 2008, the board of directors approved the
Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan for Fiscal Years
2009 2012 (2009 LTIP). The 2009 LTIP has been
designed to provide a clear line of sight for participants to
company performance as measured by the increase in the price of
Hindalco shares.
Awards under the 2009 LTIP will consist of stock appreciation
rights (SARs), with the value of one SAR equivalent to the
increase in value of one Hindalco share. The SARs will vest 25%
each year for four years, subject to performance criteria being
fulfilled. The performance criterion will be based on Operating
EBIDTA performance for Novelis each year. The vesting threshold
will be 75% performance versus target each year, at which point
75% of SARs due that year, would vest. There would be a straight
line vesting up to 100% of performance. After the SARs have
vested, they can be exercised anytime by the employee. The
upside so realized would be dependent on the stock price of
Hindalco at the time of exercise; however, the upside would be
restricted to a maximum of 2.5 times the proportionate target
opportunity if the SARs are exercised within one year of
vesting. The maximum will be 3 times for SARs exercised more
than one year after vesting.
In the event a participant resigns, unvested SARs will lapse and
vested SARs must be exercised within 90 days. If an
employee retires more than one year from the date of grant, SARs
will continue to vest and must be exercised no later than the
third anniversary of retirement. In the event of death or
disability, there will be immediate vesting of all SARs with one
year to exercise. Upon a change in control, there would be
immediate vesting and cash-out of SARs.
The following table presents the 2009 LTIP target amounts for
our principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
and our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
LTIP Target
|
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
$
|
2,231,000
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested in 2009
The table below sets forth the information regarding stock
options that were exercised or were cancelled and paid out
during fiscal 2009 and stock awards that vested and were paid
out during fiscal 2009.
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Realized on
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Realized on
|
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
Vesting or
|
|
|
Vesting or
|
|
Name
|
|
Cancellation
|
|
|
Cancellation
|
|
|
Cancellation(A)
|
|
|
Cancellation
|
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
14,200
|
|
|
$
|
638,006
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
$
|
128,051
|
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
$
|
184,213
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
$
|
121,311
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
157,255
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents values for Recognition Awards. |
Outstanding
Equity Awards as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAR Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised SARs
|
|
|
Unexercised SARs
|
|
|
SAR Exercise
|
|
|
SAR
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Price(A)
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,939,954
|
(B)
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,887
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,887
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,887
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,221
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
June 19, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
SARs issued are payable in cash based on the stock performance
of Hindalco Industries Limited, listed on the National Stock
Exchange in Mumbai, India. Novelis is a subsidiary of Hindalco
Industries Limited. The Exercise price of 60.5 Indian Rupees
converted to US$ based on an exchange rate of 1US$=INR 52.17
which was the closing exchange rate on March 31, 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
Ms Brooks terminated her services with the Company effective
May 8, 2009 and an additional 2,939,954 SARs granted to her
were forfeited /cancelled. |
Pension
Benefits in Fiscal 2009
The table below sets forth information regarding the present
value as of March 31, 2009 of the accumulated benefits of
our named executive officers under our defined benefit pension
plans (both qualified and non-qualified). U.S. executives
who were hired on or after January 1, 2005 are not eligible
to participate in our defined benefit pension plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Present
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Value of
|
|
During
|
|
|
|
|
Credited
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Last
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name(A)
|
|
Service
|
|
Benefit(B)
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks
|
|
Novelis Pension Plan
|
|
|
6.667
|
|
|
$
|
125,445
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis SERP
|
|
|
6.667
|
|
|
|
744,392
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher
|
|
Not eligible
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
Pensionskasse Alcan Schweiz
|
|
|
2.917
|
|
|
$
|
55,659
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain
|
|
Novelis Pension Plan
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
$
|
27,726
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis SERP
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
19,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole
|
|
Novelis Pension Plan
|
|
|
29.833
|
|
|
$
|
766,967
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis SERP
|
|
|
29.833
|
|
|
|
592,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
See Compensation Discussion and Analysis Elements of
Our Compensation, Employee Benefits for a discussion of these
plans. |
135
|
|
|
(B) |
|
See Note 15 to our audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended March 31, 2009, for a
discussion of the assumptions used in the calculation of these
amounts. |
|
(C) |
|
Includes an amount of $126,589 as the present value of
accumulated benefit under the Cummins Minimum Pension Guarantee
as outlined as part of Ms. Brooks employment
agreement. |
The following table shows estimated retirement benefits,
expressed as a percentage of eligible earnings, payable upon
normal retirement at age 65:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years of Service
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plan
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
Swiss Pension Scheme
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
This section provides an estimate of the payments and benefits
that would be paid to certain of our named executive officers,
at March 31, 2009, upon voluntary or involuntary
termination of employment. This section, however, does not
reflect any payments or benefits that would be paid to our
salaried employees generally, including for example accrued
salary and vacation pay; regular pension benefits under our
qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans; normal
distribution of account balances under our qualified and
non-qualified defined contribution plans; or normal retirement,
death or disability benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martha Finn Brooks(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
us for Cause
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
$
|
825,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
825,000
|
|
|
$
|
825,000
|
|
|
$
|
825,000
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
(D)
|
|
|
3,150,000
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,861
|
(F)
|
|
|
|
|
Lump sum cash payment for continuation of health coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,948
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,997
|
(H)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
825,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,325,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,420,806
|
|
|
$
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $57,692
at March 31, 2009). Ms. Brooks was not eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2008 through March 31, 2009. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2009. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to 200% of executives annual base
salary and would be paid pursuant to the executives
Employment Agreement. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of two additional
years of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table for
pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2009. |
136
|
|
|
(G) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement,
this amount is intended to assist the executive in paying
post-employment health coverage and is equal to 24 months
times the COBRA premium rate in effect at March 31, 2009,
grossed up for applicable taxes using an assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(H) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to two additional years of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Fisher(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
us for Cause
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
$
|
337,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
337,500
|
|
|
$
|
337,500
|
|
|
$
|
337,500
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,250
|
(D)
|
|
|
1,575,000
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,800
|
(F)
|
|
|
|
|
Lump sum cash payment for continuation of health coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,948
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,432
|
(H)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
337,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
393,750
|
|
|
$
|
2,064,680
|
|
|
$
|
337,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $34,615
at March 31, 2009). Mr. Fisher was not eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2008 through March 31, 2009. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2009. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to the benefit payable under the Novelis
Severance Pay Plan. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of two additional
years of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(G) |
|
Pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement,
this amount is intended to assist the executive in paying
post-employment health coverage and is equal to 24 months
times the COBRA premium rate in effect at March 31, 2009,
grossed up for applicable taxes using an assumed tax rate of 40%. |
|
(H) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to two additional years of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arnaud de Weert(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
us for Cause
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
$
|
367,031
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
367,031
|
|
|
$
|
367,031
|
|
|
$
|
367,031
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685,125
|
(D)
|
|
|
1,908,563
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,793
|
(F)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
367,031
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,052,156
|
|
|
$
|
2,489,387
|
|
|
$
|
367,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $45,173
at March 31, 2009). Mr. de Weert was not eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2008 through March 31, 2009. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2009. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to 14 months of executives
annual base salary and would be paid pursuant to the
executives Employment Agreement. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of two additional
years of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table for
pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Marc Germain(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
us for Cause
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
780,000
|
(D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
975,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $25,000
at March 31, 2009). Mr. Germain was not eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2008 through March 31, 2009. |
138
|
|
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2009. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to 18 months of executives
annual base salary and target bonus and would be paid pursuant
to the executives Employment Agreement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Walpole(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Connection with
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
Termination by
|
|
|
us without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
Type of Payment
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
us for Cause
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentive Pay(B)
|
|
$
|
156,750
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
156,750
|
|
|
$
|
156,750
|
|
|
$
|
156,750
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486,875
|
(D)
|
|
|
883,500
|
(E)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,619
|
(F)
|
|
|
|
|
Continued group life insurance coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,352
|
(G)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
156,750
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
643,625
|
|
|
$
|
1,313,221
|
|
|
$
|
156,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In addition to the estimated payments set forth in this table,
the executive would be eligible for payments or benefits that
would be paid to our salaried employees generally upon
termination of employment (including, for example, earned but
unpaid base salary and accrued vacation (approximately $21,923
at March 31, 2009). Mr. Walpole was eligible for
retirement on March 31, 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts represent 100% of the executives target
short-term incentive opportunity for the period April 1,
2008 through March 31, 2009. |
|
(C) |
|
These amounts represent the amount of Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) that would have been earned as of March 31, 2009. |
|
(D) |
|
This amount is equal to the benefit payable under the Novelis
Severance Pay Plan. |
|
(E) |
|
This amount is equal to two times the sum of executives
base salary and target short-term incentive and would be paid
pursuant to the executives Change in Control Agreement. |
|
(F) |
|
This amount is equal to the present value of two additional
years of benefit accrual under our qualified and non-qualified
retirement plans and is payable pursuant to the executives
Change in Control Agreement. See the Pension Benefits table for
pension benefits accrued as of March 31, 2009. |
|
(G) |
|
The executives Change in Control Agreement provides that
the executive will be entitled to two additional years of
coverage under our group life insurance plan. |
Director
Compensation for Directors for the Period
April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009
The Chair of our board of directors is entitled to receive cash
compensation equal to $250,000 per year, and the Chair of our
Audit Committee is entitled to receive $175,000 per year. Each
of our other directors is entitled to receive compensation equal
to $150,000 per year, plus an additional $5,000 if he is a
member of our Audit Committee. Directors fees are paid in
quarterly installments.
On July 8, 2008, our Chairman of the board, Mr. Birla,
informed the company that due to current and foreseeable
business conditions, he was foregoing the payment of his Novelis
director fees until further notice. On November 5, 2008,
Mr. Stewart informed the board that he was also foregoing
his Novelis director fees with effective date of July 1,
2008 until further notice. All directors, however, will continue
to receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses associated
with attending board and committee meetings. The table below
sets forth the total compensation received by our non-employee
directors for the year ended March 31, 2009.
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
Name
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Kumar Mangalam Birla
|
|
$
|
62,500
|
|
D. Bhattacharya
|
|
$
|
155,000
|
|
Askaran K. Agarwala
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
Clarence J. Chandran
|
|
$
|
155,000
|
|
Donald A. Stewart
|
|
$
|
|
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
In fiscal 2009, only Independent Directors served on the
Committee. Clarence J. Chandran was the Chairman of the
Committee. The other Committee members during all or part of the
year were Mr. D. Bhattacharya and Mr. Askaran
Agarwala. No member of our Committee had any relationship with
us requiring disclosure under Item 404 of SEC
Regulation S-K.
During fiscal 2008, none of our executive officers served as:
|
|
|
|
|
a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee
performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such
committee, the entire Board of Directors) of another entity, one
of whose executive officers served on our Committee;
|
|
|
|
a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers
served on our Committee; or
|
|
|
|
a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee
performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such
committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity, one
of whose executive officers served as one of our directors.
|
140
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary AV Metals Inc.
(Acquisition Sub) pursuant to a plan of arrangement (the
Arrangement) entered into on February 10, 2007
and approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on
May 14, 2007.
Subsequent to completion of the Arrangement on May 15,
2007, all of our common shares were indirectly held by Hindalco.
141
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In accordance with our Audit Committee charter, our Audit
Committee is responsible for reviewing the terms of our Code of
Conduct for the Board of Directors and Senior Managers, which
includes disclosure requirements applicable to our senior
managers and our directors relating to conflicts of interest.
Accordingly, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing
and approving the terms and conditions of all transactions that
involve the Company, one of our directors or executive officers
or any of their immediate family members. On February 11,
2009, the Board of Directors authorized us to enter into the
Unsecured Credit Facility of $100 million with a scheduled
maturity date of January 15, 2015 from a company affiliated
with the Aditya Birla group. Our Chairman, Kumar Mangalam Birla,
also serves as Chairman of the Aditya Birla group; thus, we
consider the Unsecured Credit Facility to be a related party
transaction. On August 11, 2009 we repaid in full and
terminated the Unsecured Credit Facility with a portion of the
proceeds of the offering of the old notes. For each advance
under the Unsecured Credit Facility, interest was payable
quarterly at a rate of 13% per annum prior to the first
anniversary of the advance and 14% per annum thereafter. We paid
$1,410,728.21 in interest under the Unsecured Credit facility
and the largest aggregate amount of principal outstanding under
the Unsecured Credit Facility was $94,306,922.59. We have not
entered into any other related party transactions since
March 31, 2008 that meet the requirements for disclosure in
this prospectus.
See Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance Board of Directors and Corporate
Governance Matters for additional information regarding
the independence of our Board of Directors.
We maintain various policies and procedures that govern related
party transactions. Pursuant to our Code of Conduct for the
Board of Directors and Senior Managers, senior managers and
directors of the Company (a) must avoid any action that
creates or appears to create, a conflict of interest between
their own interest and the interest of the Company,
(b) cannot usurp corporate opportunities, and (c) must
deal fairly with third parties. This policy is available on our
website at www.novelis.com. In addition, we have enacted
procedures to monitor related party transactions by
(x) identifying possible related parties through questions
in our director and officer questionnaires, (y) determining
whether we receive payments from or make payments to any of the
identified related parties, and (z) if we determine
payments are made or received, researching the nature of the
interactions between the Company and the related parties and
ensuring that the related person does not have an interest in
the transaction with the related party.
142
DESCRIPTION
OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
General. Our senior secured credit facilities
consist of (1) the $1.16 billion seven-year Term Loan
Facility that can be increased by up to $180 million
subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and
(2) the $800 million five-year ABL Facility. Following
the completion of the offering of the old notes, we used
approximately $81 million of the proceeds plus additional
cash on hand to repay a portion of the outstanding amount under
the ABL Facility. Mandatory minimum principal amortization
payments under the Term Loan Facility are $2.95 million per
calendar quarter. Any unpaid principal is due in full on
July 6, 2014. Substantially all of our assets are pledged
as collateral under the senior secured credit facilities. The
senior secured credit facilities are also guaranteed by
substantially all of our restricted subsidiaries that guarantee
our 7.25% senior notes and that guarantee the old notes.
Borrowings. Borrowings under the ABL Facility
are generally based on 85% of eligible accounts receivable and
75% of eligible inventories.
Interest Rate and Fees. Generally, for both
the Term Loan Facility and ABL Facility, interest rates reset
periodically and interest is payable on a periodic basis
depending on the type of loan.
Under the ABL Facility, interest charged depends on the type of
loan as follows: (1) any U.S. swingline loan or any
loan categorized as an alternate base rate (ABR)
borrowing will bear interest at an annual rate equal to the
alternate base rate (which is the greater of (a) the base
rate in effect on a given day and (b) the federal funds
effective rate in effect on a given day, plus 0.50%), plus the
applicable margin; (2) Eurocurrency loans will bear
interest at an annual rate equal to the adjusted LIBOR rate for
the applicable interest period, plus the applicable margin;
(3) loans designated as Canadian base rate borrowings will
bear an annual interest rate equal to the Canadian base rate
(CAPRIME), plus the applicable margin;
(4) loans designated as bankers acceptances (BA) rate loans
will bear interest at the average discount rate offered for
bankers acceptances for the applicable BA interest period,
plus 0.05%, plus the applicable margin, and (5) loans
designated as Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR)
loans will bear interest annually at a rate equal to the
adjusted EURIBOR rate for the applicable interest period, plus
the applicable margin. Applicable margins under the ABL Facility
depend upon excess availability levels calculated on a quarterly
basis and range from (0.25%) to 1.75%.
Commitment fees ranging from 0.25% to 0.375% are based on
average daily amounts outstanding under the ABL Facility during
a fiscal quarter and are payable quarterly.
Under the Term Loan Facility, loans characterized as ABR
borrowings bear interest annually at a rate equal to the
alternate base rate (which is the greater of (a) the base
rate in effect on a given day and (b) the federal funds
effective rate in effect on a given day, plus 0.50%) plus a
margin of 1.00%. Loans characterized as Eurocurrency borrowings
bear interest at an annual rate equal to the adjusted LIBOR rate
for the interest period in effect, plus a margin of 2.00%.
Interest Rate Swaps. As of September 30,
2009, we had entered into interest rate swaps to fix the
variable interest rate on $920 million of our floating rate
Term Loan Facility. We are still obligated to pay any applicable
margin, as defined in senior secured credit facilities. Interest
rate swaps related to $400 million at an effective weighted
average interest rate of 4.0% expire March 31, 2010. In
January 2009, we entered into two interest rate swaps to fix the
variable interest rate on an additional $300 million of our
floating Term Loan Facility at a rate of 1.49%, plus any
applicable margin. These interest rate swaps are effective from
March 31, 2009 through March 31, 2011. In
April 2009, we entered into an additional $220 million
interest rate swap at a rate of 1.97%, which is effective
through April 30, 2012.
As of September 30, 2009, we have an interest rate swap in
Korea on our $100 million bank loan through a 5.44% fixed
rate KRW 92 billion ($92 million) loan. The interest
rate swap expires in October 2010.
Prepayments. We may prepay borrowings under
the senior secured credit facilities, in whole or in part, at
any time and from time to time, if certain minimum prepayment
amounts and currency requirements are
143
satisfied. We are required to repay borrowings under the senior
secured credit facilities in certain circumstances in the event
we receive net cash proceeds from certain collateral
liquidations, asset sales, the issuance of indebtedness
preferred stock or common stock not otherwise permitted under
the senior secured credit facilities, or damage or destruction
to our property. In addition, we are required to use either 25%
or 50% of our excess cash flow in any given year to repay our
borrowings under the Term Loan Facility.
Covenants. The senior secured credit
facilities include various customary covenants, including
limitations on our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt;
|
|
|
|
create or permit certain liens to exist;
|
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
make investments, loan and advances;
|
|
|
|
engage in mergers, amalgamations or consolidations;
|
|
|
|
make certain asset sales;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends and distributions beyond certain amounts;
|
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
prepay certain indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
amend certain agreements governing our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
create or permit restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries
to pay dividends, make other distributions to us or incur liens
on their assets;
|
|
|
|
issue preferred shares or stock of subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
change the business conducted by us and our subsidiaries.
|
In addition, under the ABL Facility, if our excess availability
under the ABL Facility is less than 10% of the lender
commitments under the ABL Facility or less than 10% of our
borrowing base, we are required to maintain a minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio of at least 1 to 1. As of
September 30, 2009, our fixed charge coverage ratio was
less than 1 to 1 and our excess availability was
$400 million, or 50% of the lender commitments under the
ABL Facility. Following the completion of the offering of the
old notes, we used approximately $81 million of the
proceeds plus additional cash on hand to repay a portion of the
outstanding amount under the ABL Facility.
The senior secured credit facilities also contains various
affirmative covenants, including covenants with respect to our
financial statements, litigation and other reporting
requirements, insurance, payment of taxes, employee benefits,
hedging transactions and causing new subsidiaries to pledge
collateral and guaranty our obligations.
Events of Default. The senior secured credit
facilities contain customary events of default, including
defaults with respect to:
|
|
|
|
|
a default in the payment of principal when due;
|
|
|
|
a default in the payment of interest, fees or any other amount
after a specified grace period;
|
|
|
|
a material breach of the representation or warranties;
|
|
|
|
a default in the performance of covenants;
|
|
|
|
the failure to make any payment when due under any indebtedness
with a principal amount in excess of a specified amount;
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
the failure to observe any covenant or agreement that permits or
results in the acceleration of indebtedness with a principal
amount in excess of a specified amount;
|
|
|
|
certain bankruptcy events;
|
|
|
|
certain material judgments or court orders;
|
|
|
|
certain ERISA violations;
|
|
|
|
the invalidity or termination of certain loan documents or the
liens created in favor of the lenders; and
|
|
|
|
a change in control.
|
7.25% Senior
Notes
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior notes. The senior notes were priced
at par, bear interest at 7.25% and mature on February 15,
2015. The 7.25% senior notes are guaranteed by all of our
Canadian and U.S. restricted subsidiaries, certain of our
foreign restricted subsidiaries and our other restricted
subsidiaries that guarantee our senior secured credit facilities
and that guarantee the old notes. The 7.25% senior notes
are unsecured. As discussed above, in March 2009, we purchased
7.25% senior notes with a principal value of
$275 million with the net proceeds of an additional
floating rate term loan with a face value of $220 million
and estimated fair value of $165 million.
Under the indenture that governs the 7.25% senior notes, we
are subject to certain restrictive covenants that are
substantially similar to the covenants in the indenture
governing the old notes.
145
DESCRIPTION
OF THE NOTES
The company issued the old notes and will issue the new notes
under the indenture dated as of August 11, 2009 (the
Indenture), among the company, the Subsidiary
Guarantors and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as trustee (the Trustee). Unless the context
otherwise requires, all references to the Notes in
this Description of the Notes include the old notes
and the new notes. The old notes and the new notes will be
treated as a single class for all purposes of the Indenture. The
Indenture complies with the Trust Indenture Act. The terms
of the Notes include those stated in the Indenture and those
made part of the Indenture by reference to the
Trust Indenture Act.
The following description is a summary of the material
provisions of the Indenture. It does not restate the Indenture
in its entirety. You should read the Indenture because that
document, and not this description, defines your rights as a
holder of the Notes. Copies of the Indenture are available upon
request to the company at the address indicated under
Where You Can Find More Information. You can find
the definitions of certain terms used in this description under
the subheading Certain Definitions. In this
description, the term Company refers only to Novelis
Inc. and not to any of its subsidiaries.
Principal,
Maturity and Interest
The Company is offering to exchange, upon the terms and subject
to the conditions of this prospectus and the accompanying letter
of transmittal, the new notes for all of the outstanding old
notes. In addition, subject to compliance with the limitations
described under Certain Covenants
Limitation on Debt, the Company can issue an unlimited
principal amount of additional Notes at later dates under the
same Indenture (the Additional Notes). The Company
can issue the Additional Notes as part of the same series or as
an additional series. Any Additional Notes that the Company
issues in the future will be identical in all respects to the
Notes, except that Notes issued in the future will have
different issuance dates and may have different issuance prices.
The Company will issue Notes only in fully registered form
without coupons, in denominations of $2,000 and integral
multiples of $1,000.
The Notes will mature on February 15, 2015.
Interest on the Notes will accrue at a rate of 11.5% per annum
and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and
August 15, commencing on February 15, 2010. The
Company will pay interest to those persons who were holders of
record on the February 1 or August 1 immediately preceding each
interest payment date.
Interest on the Notes will accrue from the date of original
issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it
was most recently paid. Interest will be computed on the basis
of a 360-day
year comprised of twelve
30-day
months.
The interest rate on the Notes will increase if:
(1) the Company does not file within the required time
period either:
(A) a registration statement to allow for an exchange
offer or
(B) a resale shelf registration statement for the Notes;
(2) one of the registration statements referred to above is
not declared effective within the required time period;
(3) the exchange offer referred to above is not consummated
or the resale shelf registration statement referred to above is
not declared effective within the required time period; or
(4) certain other conditions are not satisfied.
Any additional interest payable as a result of any such event is
referred to as Special Interest and all references
to interest in this description include any Special Interest
that becomes payable.
146
Ranking
The Notes are:
|
|
|
|
|
senior, unsecured obligations of the Company;
|
|
|
|
effectively junior in right of payment to all existing and
future secured debt of the Company (including the Senior Secured
Credit Facilities) to the extent of the value of the assets
securing that debt;
|
|
|
|
equal in right of payment (pari passu) with all existing
and future unsecured senior debt of the Company;
|
|
|
|
senior in right of payment to all future subordinated debt of
the Company; and
|
|
|
|
guaranteed on a senior, unsecured basis by the Subsidiary
Guarantors.
|
As of September 30, 2009, the Company and its subsidiaries
on a consolidated basis, had $2.8 billion of senior debt
outstanding, none of which would have been subordinated to the
Notes or the Subsidiary Guaranties.
Most of the operations of the Company will be conducted through
its subsidiaries. Therefore, the Companys ability to
service its debt, including the Notes, will depend substantially
upon the cash flows of its subsidiaries and their ability to
distribute those cash flows to the Company as dividends, loans
or other payments. Certain laws restrict the ability of the
Companys subsidiaries to pay dividends or to make loans
and advances to it. The Companys ability to use the cash
flows of those subsidiaries to make payments on the Notes will
be limited to the extent of any such restrictions. Furthermore,
in certain circumstances, bankruptcy, fraudulent
conveyance laws or other similar laws could invalidate or
limit the efficacy of the Subsidiary Guaranties. Any of the
situations described above could make it more difficult for the
Company to service its debt, including the Notes.
Except to the extent of any intercompany loans or other
advances, the Company only has a stockholders claim in the
assets of its subsidiaries. Its rights as a stockholder are
junior in right of payment to the valid claims of creditors of
the Companys subsidiaries against those subsidiaries.
Holders of the Notes will only be creditors of the Company and
those subsidiaries of the Company that are Subsidiary
Guarantors. In the case of subsidiaries of the Company that are
not Subsidiary Guarantors, all the existing and future
liabilities of those subsidiaries, including any claims of trade
creditors and preferred stockholders, will effectively rank
senior to the Notes.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had $5.7 billion
in total consolidated debt and other liabilities (excluding
inter-company balances), of which $6.9 billion (including
inter-company balances) was debt and other liabilities of the
Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors, $1.0 billion
(including inter-company balances) of which was debt and other
liabilities of the Companys other subsidiaries and
$2.1 billion was inter-company balances. The Subsidiary
Guarantors and the Companys other subsidiaries have other
liabilities, including contingent liabilities, that may be
significant. The Indenture limits the amount of additional Debt
that the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries may Incur.
Notwithstanding these limitations, the Company and its
Subsidiaries may Incur substantial additional Debt. Debt may be
Incurred either by Subsidiary Guarantors or by the
Companys other subsidiaries.
The Notes and the Subsidiary Guaranties are unsecured
obligations of the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors,
respectively. Secured Debt of the Company and the Subsidiary
Guarantors, including their obligations under the Senior Secured
Credit Facilities, is effectively senior to the Notes and the
Subsidiary Guaranties to the extent of the value of the assets
securing such Debt.
As of September 30, 2009, the outstanding secured Debt of
the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors on a consolidated
basis was $1.3 billion.
See Risk Factors We are a holding company and
depend on our subsidiaries to generate sufficient cash flow to
meet our debt service obligations, including payments on the
notes, Fraudulent conveyance laws and
other legal restrictions may permit courts to void or
subordinate our subsidiaries guarantees of the
147
notes in specific circumstances, which would prevent or limit
payment under the guarantees. Certain limitations contained in
the guarantees, which are designed to avoid this result, may
render the guarantees worthless
Subsidiary
Guaranties
The obligations of the Company under the Indenture, including
the repurchase obligation resulting from a Change of Control,
are guaranteed, fully and unconditionally and jointly and
severally, on a senior unsecured basis, by: (a) all the
existing and all future Canadian Restricted Subsidiaries and
U.S. Restricted Subsidiaries of the Company;
(b) Novelis do Brasil Ltda., Novelis UK Ltd., Novelis
Europe Holdings Limited, Novelis Aluminium Holding Company,
Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis Switzerland SA, Novelis
Technology AG, Novelis AG, Novelis PAE S.A.S., Novelis
Luxembourg S.A., Novelis Madeira, Unipessoal, Lda and Novelis
Services Limited; and (c) any other Restricted Subsidiaries
of the Company that Guarantee Debt in the future under Credit
Facilities, provided that the borrower of such Debt is
the Company or a Canadian Restricted Subsidiary or a
U.S. Restricted Subsidiary. See
Certain Covenants Future
Subsidiary Guarantors. Each Subsidiary Guarantor is
100% owned by the Company within the meaning of
Rule 3-10(h)(i) of Regulation S-X. Each Subsidiary
Guarantors liability under its Subsidiary Guaranty is
limited to the lesser of (i) the aggregate amount of the
Companys obligations under the Notes and the Indenture or
(ii) the amount, if any, which would not have
(1) rendered the Subsidiary Guarantor insolvent
(as such term is defined in the Federal Bankruptcy Code and in
the Debtor and Creditor Law of the State of New York) or
(2) left it with unreasonably small capital at the time its
Subsidiary Guaranty with respect to the Notes was entered into,
after giving effect to the incurrence of existing Debt
immediately before such time. The liability of each Subsidiary
Guarantor under its Subsidiary Guaranty will also be subject to
the limitations applicable under local law, including
limitations related to insolvency, minimum capital requirements
and fraudulent conveyances. For example, with respect to Novelis
Deutschland GmbH, its liability under its Subsidiary Guaranty is
limited to the extent that its net assets (Eigenkapital)
may not fall below the amount of its stated share capital
(Stammkapital) as a result of the enforcement of the
Subsidiary Guaranty and that such an enforcement must not result
in a breach of the prohibition of insolvency causing
intervention (Verbot des existenzvernichtenden Eingriffs)
by depriving Novelis Deutschland GmbH of the liquidity necessary
to fulfill its financial liabilities to its creditors. With
respect to the Subsidiary Guarantors organized under Swiss law,
namely, Novelis AG, Novelis Switzerland S.A. and Novelis
Technology AG, the liability of each such Subsidiary Guarantor
under its Subsidiary Guaranty is limited to the maximum amount
of its profits and reserves available for distribution.
The Subsidiary Guarantors currently generate most of the
Companys consolidated net sales and own most of its
consolidated assets. The subsidiaries of the Company that are
not Subsidiary Guarantors represented the following approximate
percentages of (a) net sales, (b) EBITDA and
(c) total assets of the Company, on an historical
consolidated basis:
|
|
|
25%
|
|
of the Companys consolidated net sales are represented by
net sales to third parties by subsidiaries that are not
Subsidiary Guarantors (for the six months ended
September 30, 2009)
|
20%
|
|
of the Companys consolidated EBITDA is represented by the
subsidiaries that are not Subsidiary Guarantors (for the
six months ended September 30, 2009)
|
15%
|
|
of the Companys consolidated assets are owned by
subsidiaries that are not Subsidiary Guarantors (as of
September 30, 2009)
|
If the Company or a Subsidiary Guarantor, sells or otherwise
disposes of either:
(1) its ownership interest in a Subsidiary
Guarantor, or
(2) all or substantially all the assets of a Subsidiary
Guarantor,
then the Subsidiary Guarantor so sold or disposed of will be
released from all of its obligations under its Subsidiary
Guaranty. In addition, if, consistent with the requirements of
the Indenture, the Company redesignates a Subsidiary Guarantor
as an Unrestricted Subsidiary, the redesignated Subsidiary
Guarantor will be released from all its obligations under its
Subsidiary Guaranty. See Certain
Covenants
148
Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries
and Merger, Consolidation and Sale of
Property. A Subsidiary Guarantor will also be released
from all its obligations under its Subsidiary Guaranty in
connection with any legal defeasance of the Notes or upon
satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture.
Optional
Redemption
Commencing August 15, 2012, the Company may, from time to
time, redeem all or any portion of the Notes after giving the
required notice under the Indenture at the redemption prices set
forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to but
excluding the redemption date (subject to the right of holders
of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on
the relevant interest payment date). The following prices are
for Notes redeemed during the periods set forth below, and are
expressed as percentages of principal amount:
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Redemption Price
|
|
|
August 15, 2012 through February 14, 2013
|
|
|
108.625
|
%
|
February 15, 2013 through February 14, 2014
|
|
|
105.750
|
%
|
February 15, 2014 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.000
|
%
|
At any time prior to August 15, 2012, the Company may, from
time to time, redeem all or any portion of the Notes after
giving the required notice under the Indenture at a redemption
price equal to the greater of:
(a) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be
redeemed, and
(b) the sum of the present values of (1) the
redemption price of the Notes at August 15, 2012 (as set
forth in the preceding paragraph) and (2) the remaining
scheduled payments of interest from the redemption date through
August 15, 2012, but excluding accrued and unpaid interest
through the redemption date, discounted to the redemption date
(assuming a 360 day year consisting of twelve 30 day
months), at the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points,
plus, in either case, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to
but excluding the redemption date (subject to the right of
holders of record on the relevant record date to receive
interest due on the relevant interest payment date).
Any notice to holders of Notes of such a redemption shall
include the appropriate calculation of the redemption price, but
need not include the redemption price itself. The actual
redemption price, calculated as described above, shall be set
forth in an Officers Certificate delivered to the Trustee
no later than two business days prior to the redemption date
unless clause (b) of the definition of Comparable
Treasury Price is applicable, in which such Officers
Certificate should be delivered on the redemption date.
In addition, at any time and from time to time prior to
August 15, 2012, the Company may redeem up to a maximum of
35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the Notes
(including any Additional Notes) with the proceeds of one or
more Public Equity Offerings at a redemption price equal to
111.500% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date
(subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant
record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest
payment date); provided, however, that after
giving effect to any such redemption, at least 65% of the
original aggregate principal amount of the Notes (including any
Additional Notes) remains outstanding. Notice of any such
redemption shall be made within 90 days of such Public
Equity Offering and such redemption shall be effected upon not
less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior notice.
Tax
Redemption
The Company may, at its option, at any time redeem in whole but
not in part the outstanding Notes at a redemption price equal to
100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to the redemption date (subject to the right
of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive
interest due on
149
the relevant interest payment date) if it has become obligated
to pay any Additional Amounts (as defined herein) in respect of
the Notes as a result of:
(a) any change in or amendment to the laws (or regulations
promulgated thereunder) of any Taxing Jurisdiction, or
(b) any change in or amendment to any official position
regarding the application or interpretation of such laws or
regulations, which change or amendment is announced or is
effective on or after the Issue Date.
See Additional Amounts.
Additional
Amounts
The Indenture provides that payments made by or on behalf of the
Company under or with respect to the Notes will be made free and
clear of and without withholding or deduction for or on account
of any Taxes imposed or levied by or on behalf of a Taxing
Jurisdiction, unless the Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor is
required by law to withhold or deduct Taxes from any payment
made under or with respect to the Notes or by the interpretation
or administration thereof. If, after the Issue Date, the Company
or any Subsidiary Guarantor is so required to withhold or deduct
any amount for or on account of Taxes from any payment made
under or with respect to the Notes, the Company or such
Subsidiary Guarantor will pay to each holder of Notes that are
outstanding on the date of the required payment, such additional
amounts (the Additional Amounts) as may be necessary
so that the net amount received by such holder (including the
Additional Amounts) after such withholding or deduction will not
be less than the amount such holder would have received if such
Taxes had not been withheld or deducted; provided that no
Additional Amounts will be payable with respect to a payment
made to a holder of the Notes (an Excluded holder):
(a) with which the Company or such Subsidiary Guarantor
does not deal at arms length (within the meaning of the
Income Tax Act (Canada)) at the time of making such
payment, or
(b) which is subject to such Taxes by reason of its being
connected with the relevant Taxing Jurisdiction otherwise than
by the mere acquisition, holding or disposition of the Notes or
the Subsidiary Guaranty or the receipt of payments thereunder.
The Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors will also:
(a) make such withholding or deduction, and
(b) remit the full amount deducted or withheld to the
relevant authority in accordance with applicable law.
The Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors will furnish to the
Trustee, or cause to be furnished to the Trustee, within
30 days after the date the payment of any Taxes is due
pursuant to applicable law, certified copies of tax receipts
evidencing that such payment has been made by the Company or any
such Subsidiary Guarantor or other evidence of such payment
satisfactory to the Trustee. The Trustee shall make such
evidence available upon the written request of any holder of the
Notes that are outstanding on the date of any such withholding
or deduction.
The Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors will indemnify and
hold harmless each holder of Notes that are outstanding on the
date of the required payment (other than an Excluded holder) and
upon written request reimburse each such holder for the amount
of:
(a) any Taxes so levied or imposed by or on behalf of a
Taxing Jurisdiction and paid by such holder as a result of
payments made under or with respect to the Notes and any
liability (including penalties, interest and expense) arising
therefrom or with respect thereto, and
(b) any Taxes (other than Taxes on such holders
profits or net income) imposed with respect to any reimbursement
under clause (a) above so that the net amount received by
such holder after such
150
reimbursement will not be less than the net amount such holder
would have received if such reimbursement had not been imposed.
At least 30 days prior to each date on which any payment
under or with respect to the Notes is due and payable, if the
Company or any such Subsidiary Guarantor becomes obligated to
pay Additional Amounts with respect to such payment, the Company
or such Subsidiary Guarantor will deliver to the Trustee an
Officers Certificate stating the fact that such Additional
Amounts will be payable, and the amounts so payable and will set
forth such other information as is necessary to enable the
Trustee to pay such Additional Amounts to the holders of the
Notes on the payment date. Whenever in the Indenture there is
mentioned, in any context:
(a) the payment of principal (and premium, if any),
(b) purchase prices in connection with a repurchase of
Notes,
(c) interest, or
(d) any other amount payable on or with respect to any of
the Notes,
such mention shall be deemed to include mention of the payment
of Additional Amounts provided for in this section to the extent
that, in such context, Additional Amounts are, were or would be
payable in respect thereof.
Sinking
Fund
There will be no mandatory sinking fund payments for the Notes.
Change of
Control Offer
Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, the Company will be
required to make an offer to each holder of Notes to repurchase
all or any part (of $2,000 or any integral multiple of $1,000 in
excess thereof) of such holders Notes pursuant to the
offer described below (the Change of Control Offer)
at a purchase price (the Change of Control Purchase
Price) equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date
(subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant
record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest
payment date).
Within 30 days following any Change of Control, the Company
shall:
(a) cause a notice of the Change of Control Offer to be
sent at least once to the Dow Jones News Service or similar
business news service in the United States; and
(b) send, by first-class mail, with a copy to the Trustee,
to each holder of Notes, at such holders address appearing
in the Security Register, a notice stating:
(1) that a Change of Control has occurred and a Change of
Control Offer is being made pursuant to the covenant entitled
Change of Control Offer and that all Notes timely
tendered will be accepted for payment;
(2) the Change of Control Purchase Price and the repurchase
date, which shall be, subject to any contrary requirements of
applicable law, a business day no earlier than 30 days nor
later than 60 days from the date such notice is mailed;
(3) the circumstances and relevant facts regarding the
Change of Control (including, if applicable, information with
respect to pro forma historical income, cash flow and
capitalization after giving effect to the Change of
Control); and
(4) the procedures that holders of Notes must follow in
order to tender their Notes (or portions thereof) for payment,
and the procedures that holders of Notes must follow in order to
withdraw an election to tender Notes (or portions thereof) for
payment.
The Company will not be required to make a Change of Control
Offer following a Change of Control if a third party makes the
Change of Control Offer in the manner, at the times and
otherwise in compliance with
151
the requirements set forth in the Indenture applicable to a
Change of Control Offer made by the Company and purchases all
Notes validly tendered and not withdrawn under such Change of
Control Offer.
The Company will comply, to the extent applicable, with the
requirements of Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and any
other securities laws or regulations in connection with the
repurchase of Notes pursuant to a Change of Control Offer. To
the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or
regulations conflict with the provisions of this covenant, the
Company will comply with the applicable securities laws and
regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its
obligations under this covenant by virtue of such compliance.
Subject to compliance with the other covenants described in this
prospectus, the Company could, in the future, enter into certain
transactions, including acquisitions, refinancings or other
recapitalizations, that would not constitute a Change of Control
under the Indenture, but that could increase the amount of debt
outstanding at such time or otherwise affect the Companys
liquidity, capital structure or credit ratings.
Holders of Notes may not be entitled to require us to purchase
their notes in certain circumstances involving a significant
change in the composition of our board of directors, including
in connection with a proxy contest where our board of directors
does not approve a dissident slate of directors but approves
them as continuing directors, even if our board of directors
initially opposed the directors.
The definition of Change of Control includes a phrase relating
to the sale, transfer, assignment, lease, conveyance or other
disposition of all or substantially all the Property
of the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries, considered as a
whole. Although there is a body of case law interpreting the
phrase substantially all, there is no precise
established definition of the phrase under applicable law.
Accordingly, if the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries,
considered as a whole, dispose of less than all this Property by
any of the means described above, the ability of a holder of
Notes to require the Company to repurchase its Notes may be
uncertain. In such a case, holders of the Notes may not be able
to resolve this uncertainty without resorting to legal action.
The Senior Secured Credit Facilities provide that certain of the
events that would constitute a Change of Control would also
constitute a default under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities
and entitle the lenders under those facilities to require that
such debt be repaid. Other future debt of the Company may
prohibit certain events that would constitute a Change of
Control or require such debt to be repurchased or repaid upon a
Change of Control. Moreover, if holders of Notes exercise their
right to require the Company to repurchase such Notes, the
Company could be in breach of obligations under existing and
future debt of the Company. Finally, the Companys ability
to pay cash to holders of Notes upon a repurchase may be limited
by the Companys then existing financial resources. The
Company cannot assure you that sufficient funds will be
available when necessary to make any required repurchases. The
Companys failure to repurchase Notes, as required
following a Change of Control Offer, would result in a default
under the Indenture. Such a default would, in turn, constitute a
default under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and other
existing debt of the Company and may constitute a default under
future debt as well. The Companys obligation to make an
offer to repurchase the Notes as a result of a Change of Control
may be waived or modified at any time prior to the occurrence of
such Change of Control with the written consent of the holders
of at least a majority in aggregate principal amount of the
Notes. See Amendments and Waivers.
Certain
Covenants
Covenant Termination and Suspension. The
Indenture provides that the covenants set forth in this section
will be applicable to the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries unless the Company reaches Investment Grade Status.
After the Company has reached Investment Grade Status, and
notwithstanding that the Company may later cease to have an
Investment Grade Rating from either or both of the Rating
Agencies, the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries will be
under no obligation to comply with the covenants set forth in
this section, except for the covenants described under the
following headings:
|
|
|
|
|
the second paragraph under Limitation on
Liens,
|
|
|
|
the second paragraph under Limitation on Sale
and Leaseback Transactions,
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted
Subsidiaries (other than clause (x) of the third
paragraph (and such clause (x) as referred to in the first
paragraph thereunder)), and
|
|
|
|
Future Subsidiary Guarantors.
|
The Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors will also, upon
reaching Investment Grade Status, remain obligated to comply
with the provisions described under Merger,
Consolidation and Sale of Property (other than
clause (e) of the first and second paragraphs thereunder).
If, prior to the Company reaching Investment Grade Status, the
Notes receive an Investment Grade Rating from one of the Rating
Agencies and no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is
continuing then, beginning on that day and continuing until the
Investment Grade Rating assigned by that Rating Agency to the
Notes subsequently decline as a result of which the Notes do not
carry an Investment Grade Rating from at least one Rating Agency
(such period being referred to as a Suspension
Period), the covenants set forth in the Indenture, except
for those specifically listed above, will be suspended and will
not be applicable during that Suspension Period.
In the event that the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries
are not subject to the suspended covenants for any period of
time as a result of the preceding paragraph and, subsequently,
the Rating Agency withdraws its ratings or downgrades the
ratings assigned to the Notes below the required Investment
Grade Ratings or a Default or Event of Default occurs and is
continuing, then the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries
will from such time and thereafter again be subject to the
suspended covenants, and compliance with the suspended covenants
with respect to Restricted Payments made after the time of such
withdrawal, downgrade, Default or Event of Default will be
calculated in accordance with the terms of the covenant
described below under Limitation on Restricted
Payments as though such covenant had been in effect during
the entire period of time from the Issue Date.
There can be no assurance that the Notes will ever achieve an
Investment Grade Rating from one or both Ratings Agencies.
Limitation on Debt. The Company shall not, and
shall not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, Incur, directly
or indirectly, any Debt unless, after giving effect to the
application of the proceeds thereof, no Default or Event of
Default would occur as a consequence of such Incurrence or be
continuing following such Incurrence and either:
(1) such Debt is Debt of the Company or a Subsidiary
Guarantor and, after giving effect to the Incurrence of such
Debt and the application of the proceeds thereof, the
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio would be greater than
2.00:1.00, or
(2) such Debt is Permitted Debt.
The term Permitted Debt is defined to include the
following:
(a) (i) Debt of the Company evidenced by the old notes
and the new notes issued in exchange for such old notes and in
exchange for any Additional Notes and (ii) Debt of the
Subsidiary Guarantors evidenced by Subsidiary Guaranties
relating to the old notes and the new notes issued in exchange
for such old notes and in exchange for any Additional Notes;
(b) Debt of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary under
Credit Facilities, provided that the aggregate principal amount
of all such Debt under Credit Facilities at any one time
outstanding shall not exceed $2.1 billion, which amount
shall be permanently reduced by the amount of Net Available Cash
used to Repay Debt under Credit Facilities and not subsequently
reinvested in Additional Assets or used to purchase Notes or
Repay other Debt, pursuant to the covenant described under
Limitation on Asset Sales;
153
(c) Debt of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary in
respect of Capital Lease Obligations and Purchase Money Debt,
provided that:
(1) the aggregate principal amount of such Debt does not
exceed the cost of construction, acquisition or improvement of
the Property acquired, constructed or leased together with the
reasonable costs of acquisition, and
(2) the aggregate principal amount of all Debt Incurred and
then outstanding pursuant to this clause (c) (together with all
Permitted Refinancing Debt Incurred and then outstanding in
respect of Debt previously Incurred pursuant to this clause (c))
does not exceed 5% of Consolidated Net Tangible Assets;
(d) Debt of the Company owing to and held by any Wholly
Owned Restricted Subsidiary and Debt of a Restricted Subsidiary
owing to and held by the Company or any Wholly Owned Restricted
Subsidiary; provided, however, that any subsequent
issue or transfer of Capital Stock or other event that results
in any such Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary ceasing to be a
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary or any subsequent transfer of
any such Debt (except to the Company or a Wholly Owned
Restricted Subsidiary) shall be deemed, in each case, to
constitute the Incurrence of such Debt by the issuer thereof;
(e) Debt of a Restricted Subsidiary outstanding on the date
on which such Restricted Subsidiary is acquired by the Company
or otherwise becomes a Restricted Subsidiary (other than Debt
Incurred as consideration in, or to provide all or any portion
of the funds or credit support utilized to consummate, the
transaction or series of transactions pursuant to which such
Restricted Subsidiary became a Subsidiary of the Company or was
otherwise acquired by the Company), provided that at the time
such Restricted Subsidiary is acquired by the Company or
otherwise becomes a Restricted Subsidiary and after giving
effect to the Incurrence of such Debt, the Company would have
been able to Incur $1.00 of additional Debt pursuant to
clause (1) of the first paragraph of this covenant;
(f) Debt under Interest Rate Agreements entered into by the
Company or a Restricted Subsidiary for the purpose of limiting
interest rate risk in the ordinary course of the financial
management of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary and not
for speculative purposes, provided that the obligations under
such agreements are directly related to payment obligations on
Debt otherwise permitted by the terms of this covenant;
(g) Debt under Currency Exchange Protection Agreements
entered into by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary for the
purpose of limiting currency exchange rate risks directly
related to transactions entered into by the Company or such
Restricted Subsidiary in the ordinary course of business and not
for speculative purposes;
(h) Debt under Commodity Price Protection Agreements
entered into by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary in the
ordinary course of the financial management of the Company or
such Restricted Subsidiary and not for speculative purposes;
(i) Debt in connection with one or more standby letters of
credit or performance bonds issued by the Company or a
Restricted Subsidiary in the ordinary course of business or
pursuant to self-insurance obligations and not in connection
with the borrowing of money or the obtaining of advances or
credit;
(j) Debt Incurred by a Securitization Entity in a Qualified
Securitization Transaction that is not recourse to the Company
or any Restricted Subsidiary (except for Standard Securitization
Undertakings);
(k) Debt of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary
outstanding on the Issue Date not otherwise described in
clauses (a) through (j) above (including in such
clauses (a) through (j), but not limited to, any Debt
Incurred under Credit Facilities prior to the Issue Date), other
than Debt Incurred after February 3, 2005 pursuant to
Section 4.09(2)(l) of the Existing Indenture;
(l) Debt of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary in an
aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time not to
exceed $150.0 million; and
154
(m) Permitted Refinancing Debt Incurred in respect of Debt
Incurred pursuant to clause (1) of the first paragraph of
this covenant and clauses (a), (c) and (k) above.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this
covenant, accrual of interest, accretion or amortization of
original issue discount and the payment of interest or dividends
in the form of additional Debt, will be deemed not to be an
Incurrence of Debt for purposes of this covenant.
For purposes of determining compliance with this covenant, in
the event that an item of Debt meets the criteria of more than
one of the categories of Permitted Debt described in
clauses (a) through (m) above or is entitled to be
incurred pursuant to clause (l) of the first paragraph of
this covenant, the Company shall, in its sole discretion,
classify (and may later reclassify in whole or in part, in its
sole discretion) such item of Debt in any manner that complies
with this covenant; provided, however, that any incurrence of
Debt under Credit Facilities prior to the Issue Date shall be
treated as having been incurred under clause (b) above.
Limitation on Restricted Payments. The Company
shall not make, and shall not permit any Restricted Subsidiary
to make, directly or indirectly, any Restricted Payment if at
the time of, and after giving effect to, such proposed
Restricted Payment,
(a) a Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and
be continuing,
(b) the Company could not Incur at least $1.00 of
additional Debt pursuant to clause (1) of the first
paragraph of the covenant described under
Limitation on Debt, or
(c) the sum of the aggregate amount of such Restricted
Payment and all other Restricted Payments declared or made since
February 3, 2005 (the amount of any Restricted Payment, if
made other than in cash, to be based upon Fair Market Value at
the time of such Restricted Payment) would exceed an amount
equal to the sum of:
(1) 50% of the aggregate amount of Consolidated Net Income
accrued during the period (treated as one accounting period)
from January 1, 2005 to the end of the most recent fiscal
quarter for which financial statements have been provided (or if
the aggregate amount of Consolidated Net Income for such period
shall be a deficit, minus 100% of such deficit), plus
(2) 100% of the Capital Stock Sale Proceeds, plus
(3) the sum of:
(A) the aggregate net cash proceeds received by the Company
or any Restricted Subsidiary from the issuance or sale after
February 3, 2005 of convertible or exchangeable Debt that
has been converted into or exchanged for Capital Stock (other
than Disqualified Stock) of the Company, and
(B) the aggregate amount by which Debt (other than
Subordinated Debt) of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary
is reduced on the Companys consolidated balance sheet on
or after February 3, 2005 upon the conversion or exchange
of any Debt issued or sold on or prior to February 3, 2005
that is convertible or exchangeable for Capital Stock (other
than Disqualified Stock) of the Company,
excluding, in the case of clause (A) or (B):
(x) any such Debt issued or sold to the Company or a
Subsidiary of the Company or an employee stock ownership plan or
trust established by the Company or any such Subsidiary for the
benefit of their employees, and
(y) the aggregate amount of any cash or other Property
distributed by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary upon any
such conversion or exchange, plus
(4) an amount equal to the sum of:
(A) the net reduction in Investments in any Person other
than the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary resulting from
dividends, repayments of loans or advances or other transfers of
Property, in each case to the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary from such Person, and
155
(B) the portion (proportionate to the Companys equity
interest in such Unrestricted Subsidiary) of the Fair Market
Value of the net assets of an Unrestricted Subsidiary at the
time such Unrestricted Subsidiary is designated a Restricted
Subsidiary;
provided, however, that the foregoing sum shall
not exceed, in the case of any Person, the amount of Investments
previously made (and treated as a Restricted Payment) by the
Company or any Restricted Subsidiary in such Person.
Notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, the Company may:
(a) pay dividends on its Capital Stock within 60 days
of the declaration thereof if, on the declaration date, such
dividends could have been paid in compliance with the Indenture;
provided, however, that at the time of such
payment of such dividend, no other Default or Event of Default
shall have occurred and be continuing (or result therefrom);
provided further, however, that such dividend shall be included
in the calculation of the amount of Restricted Payments;
(b) purchase, repurchase, redeem, legally defease, acquire
or retire for value Capital Stock of the Company or Subordinated
Debt in exchange for, or out of the proceeds of the
substantially concurrent sale of, Capital Stock of the Company
(other than Disqualified Stock and other than Capital Stock
issued or sold to a Subsidiary of the Company or an employee
stock ownership plan or trust established by the Company or any
such Subsidiary for the benefit of their employees);
provided, however, that
(1) such purchase, repurchase, redemption, legal
defeasance, acquisition or retirement shall be excluded in the
calculation of the amount of Restricted Payments, and
(2) the Capital Stock Sale Proceeds from such exchange or
sale shall be excluded from the calculation pursuant to clause
(c)(2) above; and
(c) purchase, repurchase, redeem, legally defease, acquire
or retire for value any Subordinated Debt in exchange for, or
out of the proceeds of the substantially concurrent sale of,
Permitted Refinancing Debt; provided, however,
that such purchase, repurchase, redemption, legal defeasance,
acquisition or retirement shall be excluded in the calculation
of the amount of Restricted Payments;
(d) repurchase shares of, or options to purchase shares of,
common stock of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries from
current or former officers, directors or employees of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries (or permitted transferees of
such current or former officers, directors or employees);
provided, however, that the aggregate amount of
such repurchases shall not exceed $10.0 million in any
calendar year and such repurchases shall be included in the
calculation of the amount of Restricted Payments; and
(e) make other Restricted Payments in an aggregate amount
after February 3, 2005 not to exceed $75.0 million.
Limitation on Liens. Prior to the Notes
achieving Investment Grade Status and during any period other
than a Suspension Period (and during any period that this
paragraph shall apply when there is no election by the Company
pursuant to the following paragraph), the Company shall not, and
shall not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or
indirectly, Incur or suffer to exist, any Lien (other than
Permitted Liens) upon any of its Property (including Capital
Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary), whether owned at the Issue
Date or thereafter acquired, or any interest therein or any
income or profits therefrom, unless it has made or will make
effective provision whereby the Notes or the applicable
Subsidiary Guaranty will be secured by such Lien equally and
ratably with (or, if such other Debt constitutes Subordinated
Debt, prior to) all other Debt of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary secured by such Lien for so long as such other Debt
is secured by such Lien.
After the Notes achieve Investment Grade Status and during any
Suspension Period, the Company may elect by written notice to
the Trustee and the holders of the Notes to be subject to an
alternative covenant with respect to Limitation on
Liens, in lieu of the preceding paragraph. Under this
alternative covenant, the Company will not, and will not permit
any Restricted Subsidiary to, create, incur, assume or suffer to
exist any Lien securing Debt (other than Permitted Liens
pursuant to clauses (c) through (j) and (l) (but
disregarding
156
the reference to clause (b) therein) through (s) (each
inclusive) of the definition of Permitted Liens)
upon (1) any Principal Property of the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary, (2) any Capital Stock of a
Restricted Subsidiary or (3) any Indebtedness of a
Restricted Subsidiary owed to the Company or another Restricted
Subsidiary, unless all payments due under the Indenture and the
Notes are secured on an equal and ratable basis with (or prior
to) the obligations so secured until such time as such other
obligations are no longer secured by such lien. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, after the Notes achieve Investment Grade Status
and during a Suspension Period, the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries will be permitted to create, incur, assume or
suffer to exist Liens, and renew, extend or replace such Liens,
in each case without complying with the foregoing; provided that
the aggregate amount of all Debt of the Company and its
Restricted Subsidiaries outstanding at such time that is secured
by these Liens (other than (1) Debt secured solely by
Permitted Liens pursuant to clauses (c) through
(j) and (l) (but disregarding the reference to
clause (b) therein) through (s) (each inclusive) of the
definition of Permitted Liens, (2) Debt that is
secured equally and ratably with (or on a basis subordinated to)
the Notes and (3) the Notes) plus the aggregate amount of
all Attributable Debt of the Company and our Restricted
Subsidiaries with respect to all Sale and Leaseback Transactions
outstanding at such time (other than Sale and Leaseback
Transactions permitted by the second paragraph under
Limitation on Sale and Leaseback
Transactions), would not exceed the greater of 10% of
Consolidated Net Tangible Assets, determined based on the
consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of the end of the
most recent fiscal quarter for which financial statements have
been filed or furnished, and $400,000,000.
Limitation on Asset Sales. The Company shall
not, and shall not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly
or indirectly, consummate any Asset Sale unless:
(a) the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary receives
consideration at the time of such Asset Sale at least equal to
the Fair Market Value of the Property subject to such Asset Sale;
(b) at least 75% of the consideration paid to the Company
or such Restricted Subsidiary in connection with such Asset Sale
is in the form of any one or a combination of the following:
(i) cash, Cash Equivalents or Additional Assets,
(ii) the assumption by the purchasers of liabilities of the
Company or any Restricted Subsidiary (other than contingent
liabilities or liabilities that are by their terms subordinated
to the Notes or the applicable Subsidiary Guaranty) as a result
of which the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries are no
longer obligated with respect to such liabilities, or
(iii) securities, notes or other obligations received by
the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary to the extent such
securities, notes or other obligations are converted by the
Company or such Restricted Subsidiary into cash, Cash
Equivalents or Additional Assets within 90 days of such
Asset Sale;
(c) no Default or Event of Default would occur as a result
of such Asset Sale; and
(d) the Company delivers an Officers Certificate to
the Trustee certifying that such Asset Sale complies with the
foregoing clauses (a) and (c).
The Net Available Cash (or any portion thereof, if any) from
Asset Sales may be applied by the Company or a Restricted
Subsidiary, to the extent the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary elects (or is required by the terms of any Debt):
(a) to Repay Senior Debt of the Company or any Subsidiary
Guarantor or Debt of any Restricted Subsidiary that is not a
Subsidiary Guarantor (excluding, in any such case, any Debt owed
to the Company or an Affiliate of the Company); or
(b) to reinvest in Additional Assets (including by means of
an Investment in Additional Assets by a Restricted Subsidiary
with Net Available Cash received by the Company or another
Restricted Subsidiary).
Any Net Available Cash from an Asset Sale not applied in
accordance with the preceding paragraph within 365 days
from the date of the receipt of such Net Available Cash or that
is not segregated from the general funds of the Company for
investment in identified Additional Assets in respect of a
project that shall have been commenced and for which binding
contractual commitments have been entered into prior to the end
of such
365-day
period and that shall not have been completed or abandoned,
shall constitute Excess
157
Proceeds; provided, however, that the amount
of any Net Available Cash that ceases to be so segregated as
contemplated above and any Net Available Cash that is segregated
in respect of a project that is abandoned or completed shall
also constitute Excess Proceeds at the time any such
Net Available Cash ceases to be so segregated or at the time the
relevant project is so abandoned or completed, as applicable;
provided further, however, that the amount of any
Net Available Cash that continues to be segregated for
investment and that is not actually reinvested within
twenty-four months from the date of the receipt of such Net
Available Cash shall also constitute Excess Proceeds.
When the aggregate amount of Excess Proceeds exceeds
$25.0 million, the Company will be required to make an
offer to repurchase (the Prepayment Offer) the
Notes, which offer shall be in the amount of the Allocable
Excess Proceeds (rounded to the nearest $1,000), on a pro
rata basis according to principal amount (of a minimum
$2,000 or any integral multiple of $1,000 in excess thereof) at
a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date
(subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant
record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest
payment date), in accordance with the procedures (including
prorating in the event of oversubscription) set forth in the
Indenture. To the extent that any portion of the amount of Net
Available Cash remains after compliance with the preceding
sentence and provided that all holders of Notes have been
given the opportunity to tender their Notes for repurchase in
accordance with the Indenture, the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary may use such remaining amount for any purpose
permitted by the Indenture, and the amount of Excess Proceeds
will be reset to zero.
The term Allocable Excess Proceeds shall mean the
product of:
(a) the Excess Proceeds; and
(b) a fraction,
(1) the numerator of which is the aggregate principal
amount of the Notes outstanding on the date of the Prepayment
Offer, and
(2) the denominator of which is the sum of the aggregate
principal amount of the Notes outstanding on the date of the
Prepayment Offer and the aggregate principal amount of other
Debt of the Company outstanding on the date of the Prepayment
Offer that is pari passu in right of payment with the Notes and
subject to terms and conditions in respect of Asset Sales
similar in all material respects to this covenant and requiring
the Company to make an offer to repurchase such Debt at
substantially the same time as the Prepayment Offer.
Within five business days after the Company is obligated to make
a Prepayment Offer as described in the preceding paragraph, the
Company shall send a written notice, by first-class mail, to the
holders of Notes, accompanied by such information regarding the
Company and its Subsidiaries as the Company in good faith
believes will enable such holders to make an informed decision
with respect to such Prepayment Offer. Such notice shall state,
among other things, the purchase price and the repurchase date,
which shall be, subject to any contrary requirements of
applicable law, a business day no earlier than 30 days nor
later than 60 days from the date such notice is mailed.
The Company will comply, to the extent applicable, with the
requirements of Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and any
other securities laws or regulations in connection with the
repurchase of Notes pursuant to this covenant. To the extent
that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations
conflict with provisions of this covenant, the Company will
comply with the applicable securities laws and regulations and
will not be deemed to have breached its obligations under this
covenant by virtue thereof.
Limitation on Restrictions on Distributions from Restricted
Subsidiaries. The Company shall not, and shall
not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or indirectly,
create or otherwise cause or suffer to exist any consensual
restriction on the right of any Restricted Subsidiary to:
(a) pay dividends, in cash or otherwise, or make any other
distributions on or in respect of its Capital Stock, or pay any
Debt or other obligation owed, to the Company or any other
Restricted Subsidiary;
158
(b) make any loans or advances to the Company or any other
Restricted Subsidiary; or
(c) transfer any of its Property to the Company or any
other Restricted Subsidiary.
The foregoing limitations will not apply:
(1) to restrictions or encumbrances existing under or by
reason of:
(A) agreements in effect on the Issue Date (including,
without limitation, restrictions pursuant to the Notes, the
Indenture, the Subsidiary Guaranties and the Senior Secured
Credit Facilities), and any amendments, modifications,
restatements, renewals, replacements, refundings, refinancings,
increases or supplements of those agreements, provided that the
encumbrances or restrictions contained in any such amendments,
modifications, restatements, renewals, replacements, refundings,
refinancings, increases or supplements taken as a whole, are not
materially more restrictive than the encumbrances or
restrictions contained in agreements to which they relate as in
place on the date of the Indenture,
(B) Debt or Capital Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary
existing at the time it became a Restricted Subsidiary or at the
time it merges with or into the Company or a Restricted
Subsidiary if such restriction was not created in connection
with or in anticipation of the transaction or series of
transactions pursuant to which such Restricted Subsidiary became
a Restricted Subsidiary or was acquired by the Company, and any
amendments, modifications, restatements, renewals, replacements,
refundings, refinancings, increases or supplements of those
instruments, provided that the encumbrances or restrictions
contained in any such amendments, modifications, restatements,
renewals, replacements, refundings, refinancings, increases or
supplements, taken as a whole, are not materially more
restrictive than the encumbrances or restrictions contained in
instruments in effect on the date of acquisition,
(C) the Refinancing of Debt Incurred pursuant to an
agreement referred to in clause (1)(A) or (B) above or in
clause (2)(A) or (B) below, provided such restrictions are
not materially less favorable, taken as a whole to the holders
of Notes than those under the agreement evidencing the Debt so
Refinanced,
(D) any applicable law, rule, regulation or order,
(E) Permitted Refinancing Debt, provided that the
restrictions contained in the agreements governing such
Permitted Refinancing Debt, taken as a whole, are not materially
more restrictive than those contained in the agreements
governing the Debt being refinanced,
(F) Liens securing obligations otherwise permitted to be
incurred under the provisions of the covenant described above
under the caption Limitation on Liens or
below under the caption Limitation on Sale and
Leaseback Transactions that limit the right of the debtor
to dispose of the assets subject to such Liens,
(G) customary provisions limiting or prohibiting the
disposition or distribution of assets or property in joint
venture agreements, asset sale agreements, Sale and Leaseback
Transactions, stock sale agreements and other similar agreements
entered into in the ordinary course of business, which
limitation or prohibition is applicable only to the assets that
are the subject of such agreements,
(H) restrictions on cash or other deposits or net worth
imposed by customers or lessors under contracts or leases
entered into in the ordinary course of business, or
(I) arising under Debt or other contractual requirements of
a Securitization Entity in connection with a Qualified
Securitization Transaction; provided that such restrictions
apply only to such Securitization Entity, and
(2) with respect to clause (c) only, to restrictions
or encumbrances:
(A) relating to Debt that is permitted to be Incurred and
secured without also securing the Notes or the applicable
Subsidiary Guaranty pursuant to the covenants described under
159
Limitation on Debt and
Limitation on Liens that limit the right
of the debtor to dispose of the Property securing such Debt,
(B) encumbering Property at the time such Property was
acquired by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, so long as
such restrictions relate solely to the Property so acquired and
were not created in connection with or in anticipation of such
acquisition,
(C) resulting from customary provisions restricting
subletting or assignment of leases or customary provisions in
other agreements that restrict assignment of such agreements or
rights thereunder,
(D) customary restrictions contained in any asset purchase,
stock purchase, merger or other similar agreement, pending the
closing of the transaction contemplated thereby, or
(E) customary restrictions contained in joint venture
agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business in
good faith.
Limitation on Transactions with
Affiliates. The Company shall not, and shall not
permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or indirectly,
conduct any business or enter into or suffer to exist any
transaction or series of transactions (including the purchase,
sale, transfer, assignment, lease, conveyance or exchange of any
Property or the rendering of any service) with, or for the
benefit of, any Affiliate of the Company (an Affiliate
Transaction), unless:
(a) the terms of such Affiliate Transaction are no less
favorable to the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the
case may be, than those that could be obtained in a comparable
arms length transaction with a Person that is not an
Affiliate of the Company;
(b) if such Affiliate Transaction involves aggregate
payments or value in excess of $20.0 million, the Board of
Directors approves such Affiliate Transaction and, in its good
faith judgment, believes that such Affiliate Transaction
complies with clause (a) of this paragraph as evidenced by
a Board Resolution promptly delivered to the Trustee; and
(c) if such Affiliate Transaction involves aggregate
payments or value in excess of $50.0 million (1) the
Board of Directors (including at least a majority of the
disinterested members of the Board of Directors) approves such
Affiliate Transaction and, in its good faith judgment, believes
that such Affiliate Transaction complies with clause (a) of
this paragraph as evidenced by a Board Resolution promptly
delivered to the Trustee, or (2) the Company obtains a
written opinion from an Independent Financial Advisor to the
effect that the consideration to be paid or received in
connection with such Affiliate Transaction is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Company and the Restricted
Subsidiaries.
Notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary may enter into or suffer to exist the
following, which shall not be deemed to be Affiliate
Transactions and therefore will not be subject to the provisions
of clauses (a), (b) and (c) above of this covenant:
(a) any transaction or series of transactions between the
Company and one or more Restricted Subsidiaries or between two
or more Restricted Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of
business, provided that no more than 10% of the total
voting power of the Voting Stock (on a fully diluted basis) of
any such Restricted Subsidiary is owned by an Affiliate of the
Company (other than a Restricted Subsidiary);
(b) any Restricted Payment permitted to be made pursuant to
the covenant described under Limitation on
Restricted Payments or any Permitted Investment;
(c) any employment, compensation, benefit or
indemnification agreement or arrangement (and any payments or
other transactions pursuant thereto) entered into by the Company
or any Restricted Subsidiary in the ordinary course of business
(or that is otherwise reasonable as determined in good faith by
the board of directors of the Company or the Restricted
Subsidiary, as the case may be) with an officer, employee,
consultant or director and any transactions pursuant to stock
option plans, stock ownership plans and employee benefit plans
or arrangements;
160
(d) loans and advances to employees made in the ordinary
course of business other than any loans or advances that would
be in violation of Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
provided that the Dollar Equivalent of the aggregate
principal amount of such loans and advances do not exceed
$15.0 million in the aggregate at any time outstanding;
(e) any transactions between or among any of the Company,
any Restricted Subsidiary and any Securitization Entity in
connection with a Qualified Securitization Transaction, in each
case provided that such transactions are not otherwise
prohibited by terms of the Indenture;
(f) agreements in effect on the Issue Date and any
amendments, modifications, extensions or renewals thereto that
are no less favorable to the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary than such agreements as in effect on the Issue Date;
(g) transactions with a Person that is an Affiliate of the
Company solely because the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary
owns Capital Stock of
and/or
controls, such Person;
(h) payment of fees and expenses to directors who are not
otherwise employees of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary,
for services provided in such capacity, so long as the Board of
Directors or a duly authorized committee thereof shall have
approved the terms thereof;
(i) the granting and performance of registration rights for
shares of Capital Stock of the Company under a written
registration rights agreement approved by the Companys
Board of Directors as a duly authorized committee
thereof; and
(j) transactions with Affiliates solely in their capacity
as holders of Debt or Capital Stock of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, provided that a significant amount of the Debt or
Capital Stock of the same class is also held by persons that are
not Affiliates of the Company and those Affiliates are treated
no more favorably than holders of the Debt or Capital Stock
generally.
Limitation on Sale and Leaseback
Transactions. Prior to the Notes achieving
Investment Grade Status and during any period other than a
Suspension Period, the Company shall not, and shall not permit
any Restricted Subsidiary to, enter into any Sale and Leaseback
Transaction with respect to any Property unless:
(a) the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary would be
entitled to:
(1) Incur Debt in an amount equal to the Attributable Debt
with respect to such Sale and Leaseback Transaction pursuant to
the covenant described under Limitation on
Debt, and
(2) create a Lien on such Property securing such
Attributable Debt without also securing the Notes or the
applicable Subsidiary Guaranty pursuant to the covenant
described under Limitation on
Liens, and
(b) such Sale and Leaseback Transaction is effected in
compliance with the covenant described under
Limitation on Asset Sales.
After the Notes achieve Investment Grade Status or during any
Suspension Period, the Company will not, and will not permit any
Restricted Subsidiary to, enter into any Sale and Leaseback
Transaction involving any Principal Property, except for any
Sale and Leaseback Transaction involving a lease not exceeding
three years unless:
(1) the Company or that Restricted Subsidiary, as
applicable, would at the time of entering into the transaction
be entitled to incur Debt secured by a Lien on that Principal
Property in an amount equal to the Attributable Debt with
respect to such Sale and Leaseback Transaction without equally
and ratably securing the Notes; or
161
(2) an amount equal to the net cash proceeds of the Sale
and Leaseback Transaction is applied within 180 days to:
(a) the voluntary retirement or prepayment of any Debt of
the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary maturing more than one
year after the date incurred, and which is senior to or pari
passu in right of payment with the Notes, or
(b) the purchase of other property that will constitute
Principal Property having a value (as determined in good faith
by the Board of Directors) in an amount at least equal to the
net cash proceeds of the Sale and Leaseback Transaction; or
(3) within the
180-day
period specified in clause (2) above, the Company or that
Restricted Subsidiary, as applicable, deliver to the trustee for
cancellation Notes in an aggregate principal amount at least
equal to the net proceeds of the Sale and Leaseback Transaction.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, after the Notes achieve
Investment Grade Status or during any Suspension Period, the
Company and any Restricted Subsidiary may enter into Sale and
Leaseback Transactions that would not otherwise be permitted
under the limitations described in the preceding paragraph,
provided that the sum of the aggregate amount of all Debt of the
Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries that is secured by Liens
(other than (1) Debt secured solely by Permitted Liens
pursuant to clauses (c) through (j) and (l) (but
disregarding the reference to clause (b) therein) through
(s) of the definition of Permitted Liens,
(2) Debt that is secured equally and ratably with (or on a
basis subordinated to) the Notes and (3) the Notes) and the
aggregate amount of all Attributable Debt of the Company and its
Restricted Subsidiaries with respect to all Sale and Leaseback
Transactions outstanding at such time (other than Sale and
Leaseback Transactions permitted by the preceding paragraph)
would not exceed 10% of the Consolidated Net Tangible Assets of
the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries.
Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted
Subsidiaries. The Board of Directors may
designate any Subsidiary of the Company to be an Unrestricted
Subsidiary if:
(a) the Subsidiary to be so designated does not own any
Capital Stock or Debt of, or own or hold any Lien on any
Property of, the Company or any other Restricted
Subsidiary; and
(b) either:
(1) the Subsidiary to be so designated has total assets of
$1,000 or less, or
(2) such designation is effective immediately upon such
entity becoming a Subsidiary of the Company, or
(3) the Investment by the Company or another Restricted
Subsidiary in such Subsidiary is treated as a Restricted Payment
under the covenant described under Limitation
on Restricted Payments and such Restricted Payment is
permitted under such covenant at the time such Investment is
made.
Unless so designated as an Unrestricted Subsidiary, any Person
that becomes a Subsidiary of the Company will be classified as a
Restricted Subsidiary; provided, however, that
such Subsidiary shall not be designated a Restricted Subsidiary
and shall be automatically classified as an Unrestricted
Subsidiary if either of the requirements set forth in
clauses (x) and (y) of the second immediately
following paragraph will not be satisfied after giving pro
forma effect to such classification or if such Person is a
Subsidiary of an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
Except as provided in the preceding paragraph, no Restricted
Subsidiary may be redesignated as an Unrestricted Subsidiary,
and neither the Company nor any Restricted Subsidiary shall at
any time be directly or indirectly liable for any Debt that
provides that the holder thereof may (with the passage of time
or notice or both) declare a default thereon or cause the
payment thereof to be accelerated or payable prior to its Stated
Maturity upon the occurrence of a default with respect to any
Debt, Lien or other obligation of any Unrestricted Subsidiary
(including any right to take enforcement action against such
Unrestricted Subsidiary). Upon designation of a Restricted
Subsidiary as an Unrestricted Subsidiary in compliance with this
covenant,
162
such Restricted Subsidiary shall, by execution and delivery of a
supplemental indenture in form satisfactory to the Trustee, be
released from any Subsidiary Guaranty previously made by such
Restricted Subsidiary.
The Board of Directors may designate any Unrestricted Subsidiary
to be a Restricted Subsidiary if, immediately after giving
pro forma effect to such designation,
(x) the Company could Incur at least $1.00 of additional
Debt pursuant to clause (1) of the first paragraph of the
covenant described under Limitation on
Debt, and
(y) no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and
be continuing or would result therefrom.
Any such designation or redesignation by the Board of Directors
will be evidenced to the Trustee by filing with the Trustee a
Board Resolution giving effect to such designation or
redesignation and an Officers Certificate that:
(a) certifies that such designation or redesignation
complies with the foregoing provisions, and
(b) gives the effective date of such designation or
redesignation,
such filing with the Trustee to occur within 45 days after
the end of the fiscal quarter of the Company in which such
designation or redesignation is made (or, in the case of a
designation or redesignation made during the last fiscal quarter
of the Companys fiscal year, within 90 days after the
end of such fiscal year).
Future Subsidiary Guarantors. The Company
shall cause each Person that becomes (a) a Canadian
Restricted Subsidiary or U.S. Restricted Subsidiary or
(b) a Restricted Subsidiary that Guarantees Debt in the
future under Credit Facilities, provided that the borrower of
such Debt is the Company or a Canadian Restricted Subsidiary or
U.S. Restricted Subsidiary, in each case following the
Issue Date, to execute and deliver to the Trustee a Subsidiary
Guaranty at the time such Person becomes a Canadian Restricted
Subsidiary or U.S. Restricted Subsidiary or otherwise
becomes obligated to become a Subsidiary Guarantor under the
Indenture.
Merger,
Consolidation and Sale of Property
The Company shall not merge, consolidate or amalgamate with or
into any other Person (other than a merger of a Wholly Owned
Restricted Subsidiary into the Company) or sell, transfer,
assign, lease, convey or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all its Property in any one transaction or series
of transactions unless:
(a) the Company shall be the Surviving Person in such
merger, consolidation or amalgamation, or the Surviving Person
(if other than the Company) formed by such merger, consolidation
or amalgamation or to which such sale, transfer, assignment,
lease, conveyance or disposition is made shall be a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the United States, any
State thereof, the District of Columbia, Canada or any province
or territory of Canada;
(b) the Surviving Person (if other than the Company)
expressly assumes, by supplemental indenture in form
satisfactory to the Trustee, executed and delivered to the
Trustee by such Surviving Person, the due and punctual payment
of the principal of, and premium, if any, and interest on, all
the Notes, according to their tenor, and the due and punctual
performance and observance of all the covenants and conditions
of the Indenture to be performed by the Company;
(c) in the case of a sale, transfer, assignment, lease,
conveyance or other disposition of all or substantially all the
Property of the Company, such Property shall have been
transferred as an entirety or virtually as an entirety to one
Person;
(d) immediately before and after giving effect to such
transaction or series of transactions on a pro forma
basis (and treating, for purposes of this clause (d)
and clause (e) below, any Debt that becomes, or is
anticipated to become, an obligation of the Surviving Person or
any Restricted Subsidiary as a result of such transaction or
series of transactions as having been Incurred by the Surviving
Person or such Restricted Subsidiary at the time of such
transaction or series of transactions), no Default or Event of
Default shall have occurred and be continuing;
163
(e) except in the case of a transaction constituting a
Permitted Holdings Amalgamation under the Senior Secured Credit
Facilities, immediately after giving effect to such transaction
or series of transactions on a pro forma basis, the Company or
the Surviving Person, as the case may be, would be able to Incur
at least $1.00 of additional Debt under clause (1) of the
first paragraph of the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Debt;
(f) the Company shall deliver, or cause to be delivered, to
the Trustee, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to
the Trustee, an Officers Certificate and an Opinion of
Counsel, each stating that such transaction or series of
transactions and the supplemental indenture, if any, in respect
thereto comply with this covenant and that all conditions
precedent herein provided for relating to such transaction or
series of transactions have been satisfied;
(g) the Company shall have delivered to the Trustee an
Opinion of Counsel to the effect that the holders of the Notes
will not recognize income, gain or loss for U.S. Federal
income tax purposes as a result of such transaction or series of
transactions and will be subject to U.S. Federal income tax
on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as
would be the case if the transaction or series of transactions
had not occurred; and
(h) the Company shall have delivered to the Trustee an
Opinion of Counsel to the effect that holders of the Notes will
not recognize income, gain or loss for Canadian federal,
provincial or territorial income tax purposes as a result of
such transaction or series of transactions and will be subject
to Canadian federal, provincial or territorial income taxes
(including withholding taxes) on the same amounts, in the same
manner and at the same times as would be the case if such
transaction or series of transactions had not occurred.
The Company shall not permit any Subsidiary Guarantor to merge,
consolidate or amalgamate with or into any other Person (other
than a merger of a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary into the
Company or such Subsidiary Guarantor) or sell, transfer, assign,
lease, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all
its Property in any one transaction or series of transactions
unless:
(a) the Surviving Person (if other than such Subsidiary
Guarantor) formed by such merger, consolidation or amalgamation
or to which such sale, transfer, assignment, lease, conveyance
or disposition is made shall be a corporation, company
(including a limited liability company) or partnership organized
and existing under the laws of the United States, any State
thereof, the District of Columbia or Canada or any province or
territory of Canada;
(b) the Surviving Person (if other than such Subsidiary
Guarantor) expressly assumes, by supplemental indenture in form
satisfactory to the Trustee, executed and delivered to the
Trustee by such Surviving Person, the due and punctual
performance and observance of all the obligations of such
Subsidiary Guarantor under its Subsidiary Guaranty;
(c) in the case of a sale, transfer, assignment, lease,
conveyance or other disposition of all or substantially all the
Property of such Subsidiary Guarantor, such Property shall have
been transferred as an entirety or virtually as an entirety to
one Person;
(d) immediately before and after giving effect to such
transaction or series of transactions on a pro forma basis (and
treating, for purposes of this clause (d) and
clause (e) below, any Debt that becomes, or is anticipated
to become, an obligation of the Surviving Person, the Company or
any Restricted Subsidiary as a result of such transaction or
series of transactions as having been Incurred by the Surviving
Person, the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary at the time of
such transaction or series of transactions), no Default or Event
of Default shall have occurred and be continuing;
(e) immediately after giving effect to such transaction or
series of transactions on a pro forma basis, the Company would
be able to Incur at least $1.00 of additional Debt under
clause (1) of the first paragraph of the covenant described
under Certain Covenants Limitation
on Debt;
(f) the Company shall deliver, or cause to be delivered, to
the Trustee, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to
the Trustee, an Officers Certificate and an Opinion of
Counsel, each stating
164
that such transaction or series of transactions and such
Subsidiary Guaranty, if any, in respect thereto comply with this
covenant and that all conditions precedent herein provided for
relating to such transaction or series of transactions have been
satisfied;
(g) the Company shall have delivered to the Trustee an
Opinion of Counsel to the effect that the holders of the Notes
will not recognize income, gain or loss for U.S. Federal
income tax purposes as a result of such transaction or series of
transactions and will be subject to U.S. Federal income tax
on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as
would be the case if such transaction or series of transactions
had not occurred; and
(h) the Company shall have delivered to the Trustee an
Opinion of Counsel to the effect that holders of the Notes will
not recognize income, gain or loss for Canadian federal,
provincial or territorial income tax purposes as a result of
such transaction or series of transactions and will be subject
to Canadian federal, provincial or territorial income taxes
(including withholding taxes) on the same amounts, in the same
manner and at the same times as would be the case if such
transaction or series of transactions had not occurred.
The foregoing provisions of this paragraph (other than clause
(d)) shall not apply to any transaction or series of
transactions which constitute an Asset Sale if the Company has
complied with the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Asset Sales.
The Surviving Person shall succeed to, and be substituted for,
and may exercise every right and power of the Company under the
Indenture (or of the Subsidiary Guarantor under the Subsidiary
Guaranty, as the case may be), but the predecessor Company in
the case of:
(a) a sale, transfer, assignment, conveyance or other
disposition (unless such sale, transfer, assignment, conveyance
or other disposition is of all the assets of the Company as an
entirety or virtually as an entirety), or
(b) a lease,
shall not be released from any of the obligations or covenants
under the Indenture, including with respect to the payment of
the Notes.
Payments
for Consents
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its
Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, pay or cause to be paid
any consideration, whether by way of interest, fee or otherwise,
to any holder of any Notes for or as an inducement to any
consent, waiver or amendment of any of the terms or provisions
of the Indenture or the Notes unless such consideration is
offered to be paid or is paid to all holders of the Notes that
consent, waive or agree to amend in the time frame set forth in
the solicitation documents relating to such consent, waiver or
agreement.
SEC
Reports
The Company shall provide the Trustee and holders of Notes,
within 15 days after it files with, or furnishes to, the
SEC, copies of its annual report and of the information,
documents and other reports (or copies of such portions of any
of the foregoing as the SEC may by rules and regulations
prescribe) which the Company is required to file with the SEC
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act or is
required to furnish to the SEC pursuant to the Indenture.
Regardless of whether the Company is required to report on an
annual and quarterly basis on forms provided for such annual and
quarterly reporting pursuant to rules and regulations
promulgated by the SEC, the Indenture requires the Company to
continue to file with, or furnish to, the SEC and provide the
Trustee and holders of Notes:
(a) within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year
(or such shorter period as the SEC may in the future prescribe),
an annual report containing substantially the same information
required to be contained in
Form 10-K
or
Form 20-F
(or any successor form) that would be required if the Company
were subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
165
(b) within 45 days after the end of each of the first
three fiscal quarters of each fiscal year (or such shorter
period as the SEC may in the future prescribe), a quarterly
report containing substantially the same information required to
be contained in
Form 10-Q
(or any successor form) that would be required if the Company
were organized in the United States and subject to the reporting
requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
provided, however, that the Company shall not be
so obligated to file any of the foregoing reports with the SEC
if the SEC does not permit such filings.
Events of
Default
Events of Default in respect of the Notes include:
(1) failure to make the payment of any interest (including
Additional Amounts) or Special Interest, if any, on the Notes
when the same becomes due and payable, and such failure
continues for a period of 30 days;
(2) failure to make the payment of any principal of, or
premium, if any, on, any of the Notes when the same becomes due
and payable at its Stated Maturity, upon acceleration,
redemption, optional redemption, required repurchase or
otherwise;
(3) failure to comply with the covenant described under
Merger, Consolidation and Sale of
Property;
(4) failure to comply with any other covenant or agreement
in the Notes or in the Indenture (other than a failure that is
the subject of the foregoing clause (1), (2) or (3)), and
such failure continues for 60 days after written notice is
given to the Company as provided below;
(5) a default under any Debt by the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary that results in acceleration of the
maturity of such Debt, or failure to pay any such Debt at
maturity, in an aggregate amount greater than $50.0 million
(the cross acceleration provisions);
(6) any judgment or judgments for the payment of money in
an aggregate amount in excess of $50.0 million that shall
be rendered against the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary and
that shall not be waived, satisfied or discharged for any period
of 60 consecutive days during which a stay of enforcement shall
not be in effect (the judgment default provisions);
(7) certain events involving bankruptcy, insolvency or
reorganization of the Company or any Significant Subsidiary (the
bankruptcy provisions);
(8) any Subsidiary Guaranty ceases to be in full force and
effect (other than in accordance with the terms of such
Subsidiary Guaranty) or any Subsidiary Guarantor denies or
disaffirms its obligations under its Subsidiary Guaranty (the
guaranty provisions); and
(9) any security interest securing the Notes or any
Subsidiary Guaranty that may be granted after the Issue Date
pursuant to the terms of the Indenture shall, at any time,
(A) cease to be in full force and effect for any reason
other than in accordance with its terms or the satisfaction in
full of all obligations under the Indenture and discharge of the
Indenture or (B) be declared invalid or unenforceable or
the Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor shall assert, in any
pleading in any court of competent jurisdiction, that any such
security interest is invalid or unenforceable (the security
default provisions).
A Default under clause (4) is not an Event of Default until
the Trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in aggregate
principal amount of the Notes then outstanding notify the
Company of the Default and the Company does not cure such
Default within the time specified after receipt of such notice.
Such notice must specify the Default, demand that it be remedied
and state that such notice is a Notice of Default.
The Company shall deliver to the Trustee annually a statement
regarding compliance with the Indenture. Upon an Officer
becoming aware of any Default or Event of Default, the Company
shall deliver to the Trustee,
166
within 10 days of becoming so aware, written notice in the
form of an Officers Certificate specifying such Default or
Event of Default, its status, and the action the Company
proposes to take with respect thereto.
If an Event of Default with respect to the Notes (other than an
Event of Default resulting from certain events involving
bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization with respect to the
Company) shall have occurred and be continuing, the Trustee or
the registered holders of not less than 25% in aggregate
principal amount of the Notes then outstanding may declare to be
immediately due and payable the principal amount of all the
Notes then outstanding, plus accrued and unpaid interest,
including Special Interest, if any to the date of acceleration.
In case an Event of Default resulting from certain events of
bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization with respect to the
Company shall occur, such amount with respect to all the Notes
shall be due and payable immediately without any declaration or
other act on the part of the Trustee or the holders of the
Notes. After any such acceleration, but before a judgment or
decree based on acceleration is obtained by the Trustee, the
registered holders of at least a majority in aggregate principal
amount of the Notes then outstanding may, under certain
circumstances, rescind and annul such acceleration if all Events
of Default, other than the nonpayment of accelerated principal,
premium or interest, have been cured or waived as provided in
the Indenture.
Subject to the provisions of the Indenture relating to the
duties of the Trustee, in case an Event of Default shall occur
and be continuing, the Trustee will be under no obligation to
exercise any of its rights or powers under the Indenture at the
request or direction of any of the holders of the Notes, unless
such holders shall have offered to the Trustee reasonable
indemnity. Subject to such provisions for the indemnification of
the Trustee, the holders of at least a majority in aggregate
principal amount of the Notes then outstanding will have the
right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any
proceeding for any remedy available to the Trustee or exercising
any trust or power conferred on the Trustee with respect to the
Notes. The holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount
of the Notes then outstanding by notice to the Trustee may on
behalf of the holders of all of the Notes waive any existing
Default or Event of Default and its consequences under the
Indenture except a continuing Default or Event of Default:
(a) in the payment of the principal or, premium, if any, or
interest, including Special Interest, if any, and (b) in
respect of a covenant or provision which under the Indenture
cannot be modified or amended without the consent of the holder
of each Note affected thereby.
No holder of Notes will have any right to institute any
proceeding with respect to the Indenture, or for the appointment
of a receiver or trustee, or for any remedy thereunder, unless:
(a) such holder has previously given to the Trustee written
notice of a continuing Event of Default;
(b) the registered holders of at least 25% in aggregate
principal amount of the Notes then outstanding have made a
written request and offered reasonable indemnity to the Trustee
to institute such proceeding as trustee; and
(c) the Trustee shall not have received from the registered
holders of at least a majority in aggregate principal amount of
the Notes then outstanding a direction inconsistent with such
request and shall have failed to institute such proceeding
within 60 days.
However, such limitations do not apply to a suit instituted by a
holder of any Note for enforcement of payment of the principal
of, and premium, if any, or interest, including Special
Interest, if any, on, such Note on or after the respective due
dates expressed in such Note.
No
Personal Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees and
Stockholders
No director, officer, employee, incorporator, stockholder or
member of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the
Company, as such, will have any liability for any obligations
under the Notes, the Indenture, the Subsidiary Guaranties, the
registration rights agreement, or for any claim based on, in
respect of, or by reason of, such obligations or their creation.
Each holder of Notes by accepting a Note waives and releases all
such liability. The waiver and release are part of the
consideration for issuance of the Notes.
167
Amendments
and Waivers
Subject to certain exceptions, the Company and the Trustee with
the consent of the registered holders of at least a majority in
aggregate principal amount of the Notes then outstanding
(including consents obtained in connection with a tender offer
or exchange offer for the Notes) may amend the Indenture and the
Notes, and the registered holders of at least a majority in
aggregate principal amount of the Notes outstanding may waive
any past default or compliance with any provisions of the
Indenture and the Notes (except a default in the payment of
principal, premium, interest, including Special Interest, if
any, and certain covenants and provisions of the Indenture which
cannot be amended without the consent of each holder of an
outstanding Note). However, without the consent of each holder
of an outstanding Note, no amendment may, among other things,
(1) reduce the principal amount of Notes whose holders must
consent to an amendment, supplement or waiver;
(2) reduce the rate of, or extend the time for payment of,
interest, including Special Interest, if any, on, any Note;
(3) reduce the principal of, or extend the Stated Maturity
of, any Note, or alter the provisions with respect to the
redemption of the Notes;
(4) make any Note payable in money other than that stated
in the Note;
(5) impair the right of any holder of the Notes to receive
payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest,
including Special Interest, if any, on, such holders Notes
on or after the due dates therefor or to institute suit for the
enforcement of any payment on or with respect to such
holders Notes or any Subsidiary Guaranty;
(6) waive a Default or Event of Default in the payment of
principal of, premium, if any, and interest, including Special
Interest, if any, on such Notes (except a rescission of
acceleration of such Notes by the holders of at least a majority
in aggregate principal amount of the Notes and a waiver of the
payment default that resulted from such acceleration);
(7) make any change in the provisions of the Indenture
relating to waivers of past Defaults or the rights of holders of
such Notes to receive payments of principal of, or interest or
premium or Special Interest, if any, on such Notes;
(8) subordinate the Notes or any Subsidiary Guaranty to any
other obligation of the Company or the applicable Subsidiary
Guarantor;
(9) release any security interest that may have been
granted in favor of the holders of the Notes other than pursuant
to the terms of such security interest;
(10) reduce the premium payable upon the redemption of any
Note or change the time at which any Note may be redeemed, as
described under Optional Redemption and
Additional Amounts;
(11) reduce the premium payable upon a Change of Control
or, at any time after a Change of Control has occurred, change
the time at which the Change of Control Offer relating thereto
must be made or at which the Notes must be repurchased pursuant
to such Change of Control Offer;
(12) at any time after the Company is obligated to make a
Prepayment Offer with the Excess Proceeds from Asset Sales,
change the time at which such Prepayment Offer must be made or
at which the Notes must be repurchased pursuant thereto;
(13) amend or modify the provisions described under
Additional Amounts;
(14) make any change in any Subsidiary Guaranty, that would
adversely affect the holders of the Notes; or
(15) make any change in the preceding amendment and waiver
provisions.
168
The Indenture and the Notes may be amended by the Company and
the Trustee without the consent of any holder of the Notes to:
(1) cure any ambiguity, omission, defect or inconsistency;
(2) provide for the assumption by a Surviving Person of the
obligations of the Company under the Indenture, provided, that
the Company delivers to the Trustee:
(A) an Opinion of Counsel to the effect that holders of the
Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes as a result of such
assumption by a successor corporation and will be subject to
U.S. Federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same
manner and at the same times as would be the case if such
assumption had not occurred, and
(B) an Opinion of Counsel to the effect that holders of the
Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for Canadian
federal, provincial or territorial income tax purposes as a
result of such assumption by a successor corporation and will be
subject to Canadian federal, provincial or territorial income
taxes (including withholding taxes) on the same amounts, in the
same manner and at the same times as would be the case if such
assumption had not occurred;
(3) provide for uncertificated Notes in addition to or in
place of certificated Notes (provided that the uncertificated
Notes are issued in registered form for purposes of Section
163(f) of the Code, or in a manner such that the uncertificated
Notes are described in Section 163(f)(2)(B) of the Code);
(4) add additional Guarantees with respect to the Notes or
release Subsidiary Guarantors from Subsidiary Guaranties as
provided or permitted by the terms of the Indenture;
(5) secure the Notes, add to the covenants of the Company
for the benefit of the holders of the Notes or surrender any
right or power conferred upon the Company;
(6) make any change that does not adversely affect the
rights of any holder of the Notes;
(7) comply with any requirement of the SEC in connection
with the qualification of the Indenture under the
Trust Indenture Act;
(8) evidence or provide for a successor Trustee; or
(9) provide for the issuance of Additional Notes in
accordance with the Indenture.
The consent of the holders of the Notes is not necessary to
approve the particular form of any proposed amendment,
supplement or waiver. It is sufficient if such consent approves
the substance of the proposed amendment, supplement or waiver.
After an amendment, supplement or waiver becomes effective, the
Company is required to mail to each registered holder of the
Notes at such holders address appearing in the Security
Register a notice briefly describing such amendment, supplement
or waiver. However, the failure to give such notice to all
holders of the Notes, or any defect therein, will not impair or
affect the validity of the amendment, supplement or waiver.
Defeasance
The Company may, at its option and at any time, terminate all
its obligations under the Notes and the Indenture (legal
defeasance), except for certain obligations, including
those respecting the defeasance trust and obligations to
register the transfer or exchange of the Notes, to replace
mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen Notes and to maintain a
registrar and paying agent in respect of the Notes and to pay
Additional Amounts, if any. The Company at any time also may
terminate:
(1) its obligations under the covenants described under
Change of Control Offer and
Certain Covenants,
(2) the operation of the cross acceleration provisions, the
judgment default provisions, the bankruptcy provisions with
respect to Significant Subsidiaries and the guaranty provisions,
in each case described under Events of
Default above, and
169
(3) the limitations contained in clause (e) under the
first paragraph of, and in the second paragraph of,
Merger, Consolidation and Sale of
Property above (covenant defeasance).
The Company may exercise its legal defeasance option
notwithstanding its prior exercise of its covenant defeasance
option.
If the Company exercises its legal defeasance option, payment of
the Notes may not be accelerated because of an Event of Default
with respect thereto. If the Company exercises its covenant
defeasance option, payment of the Notes may not be accelerated
because of an Event of Default specified in clause (4) (with
respect to the covenants described under
Certain Covenants), (5), (6), (7) (with
respect only to Significant Subsidiaries), (8) or
(9) under Events of Default above
or because of the failure of the Company to comply with
clause (e) under the first paragraph of, or with the second
paragraph of, Merger, Consolidation and Sale
of Property above. If the Company exercises its legal
defeasance option or its covenant defeasance option, any
collateral then securing the Notes will be released and each
Subsidiary Guarantor will be released from all its obligations
under its Subsidiary Guaranty.
The legal defeasance option or the covenant defeasance option
may be exercised only if:
(a) the Company irrevocably deposits in trust with the
Trustee money or U.S. Government Obligations for the
payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest,
including Special Interest, if any, on the Notes to maturity or
redemption, as the case may be;
(b) the Company delivers to the Trustee a certificate from
a nationally recognized firm of independent certified public
accountants expressing their opinion that the payments of
principal, premium, if any, and interest when due and without
reinvestment on the deposited U.S. Government Obligations
plus any deposited money without investment will provide cash at
such times and in such amounts as will be sufficient to pay
principal, premium, if any, and interest when due on all the
Notes to be defeased to maturity or redemption, as the case may
be;
(c) 90 days pass after the deposit is made, and during
the 90-day
period, no Default described in clause (7) under
Events of Default occurs with respect to
the Company or any other Person making such deposit which is
continuing at the end of the period;
(d) no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is
continuing on the date of such deposit and after giving effect
thereto;
(e) such deposit does not constitute a default under any
other agreement or instrument binding on the Company;
(f) the Company delivers to the Trustee an Opinion of
Counsel to the effect that the trust resulting from the deposit
does not constitute, or is qualified as, a regulated investment
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940;
(g) in the case of the legal defeasance option, the Company
delivers to the Trustee an Opinion of Counsel stating that:
(1) the Company has received from the Internal Revenue
Service a ruling, or
(2) since the date of the Indenture there has been a change
in the applicable Federal income tax law, to the effect, in
either case, that, and based thereon such Opinion of Counsel
shall confirm that, the holders of the Notes will not recognize
income, gain or loss for U.S. Federal income tax purposes
as a result of such defeasance and will be subject to
U.S. Federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same
manner and at the same time as would be the case if such
defeasance has not occurred;
(h) in the case of the covenant defeasance option, the
Company delivers to the Trustee an Opinion of Counsel to the
effect that the holders of the Notes will not recognize income,
gain or loss for U.S. Federal income tax purposes as a
result of such covenant defeasance and will be subject to
170
U.S. Federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same
manner and at the same times as would be the case if such
covenant defeasance had not occurred;
(i) the Company delivers to the Trustee an Opinion of
Counsel to the effect that holders of the Notes will not
recognize income, gain or loss for Canadian federal, provincial
or territorial tax purposes as a result of such deposit and
defeasance and will be subject to Canadian federal, provincial
or territorial taxes (including withholding taxes) on the same
amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would be
the case if such deposit and defeasance had not
occurred; and
(j) the Company delivers to the Trustee an Officers
Certificate and an Opinion of Counsel, each stating that all
conditions precedent to the defeasance and discharge of the
Notes have been complied with as required by the Indenture.
Satisfaction
and Discharge
The Company may discharge the Indenture such that it will cease
to be of further effect, except as to surviving rights of
registration of transfer or exchange of the Notes, as to all
outstanding Notes when:
(1) either
(a) all the Notes previously authenticated (except lost,
stolen or destroyed Notes that have been replaced or paid and
Notes for whose payment money has previously been deposited in
trust or segregated and held in trust by the Company and is
thereafter repaid to the Company or discharged from the trust)
have been delivered to the Trustee for cancellation; or
(b) all Notes not previously delivered to the Trustee for
cancellation
(A) have become due and payable, or
(B) will become due and payable at their maturity within
one year, or
(C) are to be called for redemption within one year under
arrangements satisfactory to the Trustee for the giving of
notice of a redemption by the Trustee, and
in the case of (A), (B) or (C), the Company has irrevocably
deposited or caused to be deposited with the Trustee as trust
funds in trust solely for the benefit of the holders, cash in
U.S. dollars, U.S. Government Obligations, or a
combination of such cash and U.S. Government Obligations,
in such amounts as will be sufficient without consideration of
any reinvestment of interest, to pay and discharge the entire
Debt on the Notes not previously delivered to the Trustee for
cancellation or redemption, for principal, premium, if any, and
interest and Special Interest, if any, on the Notes to the date
of deposit, in the case of Notes that have become due and
payable, or to the Stated Maturity or redemption date, as the
case may be;
(2) the Company has paid or caused to be paid all other
sums payable by it under the Indenture; and
(3) if required by the Trustee, the Company delivers to the
Trustee an Officers Certificate and Opinion of Counsel
stating that all conditions precedent under the Indenture
relating to the satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture have
been satisfied.
Foreign
Currency Equivalents
For purposes of determining compliance with any
U.S. dollar-denominated restriction or amount, the
U.S. dollar equivalent principal amount of any amount
denominated in a foreign currency will be the Dollar Equivalent
calculated on the date the Debt was incurred or other
transaction was entered into, or first committed, in the case of
revolving credit debt, provided that if any Permitted
Refinancing Debt is incurred to refinance Debt denominated in a
foreign currency, and such refinancing would cause the
applicable U.S. dollar-denominated restriction to be
exceeded if calculated on the date of such refinancing, such
U.S. dollar-denominated restriction will be deemed not have
been exceeded so long as the principal amount of such Permitted
Refinancing Debt does not exceed the principal amount of such
Debt being refinanced.
171
Notwithstanding any other provision in the Indenture, no
restriction or amount will be exceeded solely as a result of
fluctuations in the exchange rate of currencies.
Consent
to Jurisdiction and Service of Process
The Company will irrevocably appoint Corporation Service Company
as its agent for service of process in any suit, action or
proceeding with respect to the Indenture or the Notes brought in
any Federal or state court located in New York City and that
each of the parties submits to the jurisdiction thereof.
Enforceability
of Judgments
Since most of the Companys assets are located outside the
United States, any judgment obtained in the United States
against it, including judgments with respect to the payment of
any principal, premium, interest, including Special Interest,
and Additional Amounts may not be collectible within United
States.
The laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of
Canada applicable therein permit an action to be brought in a
court of competent jurisdiction in the Province of Ontario (an
Ontario Court) for the enforcement of the Indenture
or the Notes. An Ontario Court would give a judgment based upon
a final and conclusive in personam judgment of any federal or
state court located in the City of New York (a New York
Court) for a sum certain, obtained against the Company
with respect to a claim arising out of the Indenture or the
Notes (a New York Judgment), without reconsideration
of the merits, (A) provided that, (i) an action to
enforce the New York Judgment must be commenced in the Ontario
Court within any applicable limitation period; (ii) the
Ontario Court has discretion to stay or decline to hear an
action on the New York Judgment if the New York Judgment is
under appeal or there is another subsisting judgment in any
jurisdiction relating to the same cause of action as the New
York Judgment; (iii) the Ontario Court will render judgment
only in Canadian dollars; and (iv) an action in the Ontario
Court on the New York Judgment may be affected by bankruptcy,
insolvency or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of
creditors rights generally; and (B) subject to the
following defenses, (w) the New York Judgment was obtained
by fraud or in a manner contrary to the principles of natural
justice; (x) the New York Judgment is for a claim which
under Ontario Law would be characterized as based on a foreign
revenue, expropriatory, penal law; (y) the New York
Judgment is contrary to Ontario public policy; and (z) the
New York Judgment has been satisfied or is void or voidable
under the internal laws of that foreign jurisdiction.
In addition, under the Currency Act (Canada), a Canadian Court
may only render judgment for a sum of money in Canadian
currency, and in enforcing a foreign judgment for a sum of money
in a foreign currency, a Canadian court will render its
decisions in the Canadian currency equivalent of such foreign
currency, calculated at the rate of exchange prevailing on the
date the judgment became enforceable at the place where it was
rendered.
Governing
Law
The Indenture and the Notes are governed by the laws of the
State of New York.
The
Trustee
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. is the
Trustee under the Indenture.
Except during the continuance of an Event of Default, the
Trustee will perform only such duties as are specifically set
forth in the Indenture. During the existence of an Event of
Default, the Trustee will exercise such of the rights and powers
vested in it under the Indenture and use the same degree of care
and skill in its exercise as a prudent person would exercise
under the circumstances in the conduct of such persons own
affairs. Subject to such provisions, the Trustee will be under
no obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers under the
Indenture at the request of any Holder of the Notes, unless such
Holder shall have offered to the Trustee security and indemnity
satisfactory to it against any loss, liability or expense.
172
Certain
Definitions
Set forth below is a summary of certain of the defined terms
used in the Indenture. Reference is made to the Indenture for
the full definition of all such terms as well as any other
capitalized terms used herein for which no definition is
provided. Unless the context otherwise requires, an accounting
term not otherwise defined has the meaning assigned to it in
accordance with GAAP.
Additional Assets means:
(a) any Property (other than cash, Cash Equivalents and
securities) to be owned by the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary and used in a Related Business; or
(b) Capital Stock of a Person that becomes a Restricted
Subsidiary as a result of the acquisition of such Capital Stock
by the Company or another Restricted Subsidiary from any Person
other than the Company or an Affiliate of the Company; provided,
however, that, in the case of clause (b), such Restricted
Subsidiary is primarily engaged in a Related Business.
Affiliate of any specified Person means:
(a) any other Person directly or indirectly controlling or
controlled by or under direct or indirect common control with
such specified Person, or
(b) any other Person who is a director or officer of:
(1) such specified Person,
(2) any Subsidiary of such specified Person, or
(3) any Person described in clause (a) above.
For the purposes of this definition, control, when
used with respect to any Person, means the power to direct the
management and policies of such Person, directly or indirectly,
whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract
or otherwise; and the terms controlling and
controlled have meanings correlative to the
foregoing. For purposes of the covenants described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Transactions with Affiliates and
Limitation on Asset Sales and the
definition of Additional Assets only,
Affiliate shall also mean any beneficial owner of
shares representing 10% or more of the total voting power of the
Voting Stock (on a fully diluted basis) of the Company and any
Person who would be an Affiliate of any such beneficial owner
pursuant to the first sentence hereof.
Alternative Currency means any lawful
currency other than U.S. dollars that is freely
transferable into U.S. dollars.
Approved Member States means Belgium, France,
Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and
the United Kingdom.
Asset Sale means any sale, lease, transfer,
issuance or other disposition (or series of related sales,
leases, transfers, issuances or dispositions) by the Company or
any Restricted Subsidiary, including any disposition by means of
a merger, consolidation or similar transaction (each referred to
for the purposes of this definition as a
disposition), of the following:
(a) any shares of Capital Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary
(other than directors qualifying shares), or
(b) any other Property of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary outside of the ordinary course of business of the
Company or such Restricted Subsidiary,
other than, in the case of clause (a) or (b) above:
(1) any disposition by a Restricted Subsidiary to the
Company or by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary to a Wholly
Owned Restricted Subsidiary,
173
(2) any disposition that constitutes a Permitted Investment
or Restricted Payment permitted by the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Restricted Payments,
(3) any disposition effected in compliance with the first
or second paragraph of the covenant described under
Merger, Consolidation and Sale of
Property),
(4) any sale of accounts receivable and related assets
(including contract rights) of the type specified in the
definition of Qualified Securitization Transaction
to or by a Securitization Entity for the fair market value
thereof,
(5) any sale of assets pursuant to a Sale and Leaseback
Transaction, provided that neither the Company nor any
Restricted Subsidiary shall, nor shall they permit any of their
respective Subsidiaries to, become or remain liable as lessee or
guarantor or other surety with respect to any operating lease,
unless the aggregate amount of all rents paid or accrued under
all such operating leases does not exceed $25.0 million in
any fiscal year;
(6) any sale or disposition of cash or Cash Equivalents;
(7) the granting of Liens not prohibited by the
Indenture; and
(8) any disposition in a single transaction or a series of
related transactions of assets for aggregate consideration of
less than $10.0 million.
Attributable Debt in respect of a Sale and
Leaseback Transaction means, at any date of determination,
(a) if such Sale and Leaseback Transaction is a Capital
Lease Obligation, the amount of Debt represented thereby
according to the definition of Capital Lease
Obligations, and
(b) in all other instances, the greater of:
(1) the Fair Market Value of the Property subject to such
Sale and Leaseback Transaction, and
(2) the present value (discounted at the interest rate
borne by the Senior Notes, compounded annually) of the total
obligations of the lessee for rental payments during the
remaining term of the lease included in such Sale and Leaseback
Transaction (including any period for which such lease has been
extended).
Average Life means, as of any date of
determination, with respect to any Debt or Preferred Stock, the
quotient obtained by dividing:
(a) the sum of the product of the numbers of years (rounded
to the nearest one-twelfth of one year) from the date of
determination to the dates of each successive scheduled
principal payment of such Debt or redemption or similar payment
with respect to such Preferred Stock multiplied by the amount of
such payment by (b) the sum of all such payments.
Board of Directors means the board of
directors of the Company.
Board Resolution of a Person means a copy of
a resolution certified by the secretary or an assistant
secretary (or individual performing comparable duties) of the
applicable Person to have been duly adopted by the board of
directors of such Person and to be in full force and effect on
the date of such certification.
Canadian Restricted Subsidiary means any
Restricted Subsidiary that is organized under the laws of Canada
or any province thereof.
Capital Lease Obligations means any
obligation under a lease that is required to be capitalized for
financial reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP; and the
amount of Debt represented by such obligation shall be the
capitalized amount of such obligations determined in accordance
with GAAP; and the Stated Maturity thereof shall be the date of
the last payment of rent or any other amount due under such
lease prior to the first date upon which such lease may be
terminated by the lessee without payment of a penalty. For
purposes of Certain Covenants
Limitation on Liens, a Capital Lease Obligation shall be
deemed secured by a Lien on the Property being leased.
174
Capital Stock means, with respect to any
Person, any shares or other equivalents (however designated) of
any class of corporate stock or partnership interests or any
other participations, rights, warrants, options or other
interests in the nature of an equity interest in such Person,
including Preferred Stock, but excluding any debt security
convertible or exchangeable into such equity interest.
Capital Stock Equivalents means all
securities convertible into or exchangeable for Capital Stock
and all warrants, options or other rights to purchase or
subscribe for any Capital Stock, whether or not presently
convertible, exchangeable or exercisable.
Capital Stock Sale Proceeds means the
aggregate cash proceeds received by the Company from the
issuance or sale (other than to a Subsidiary of the Company or
an employee stock ownership plan or trust established by the
Company or any such Subsidiary for the benefit of their
employees) by the Company of its Capital Stock (other than
Disqualified Stock) after February 3, 2005, net of
attorneys fees, accountants fees, underwriters
or placement agents fees, discounts or commissions and
brokerage, consultant and other fees and expenses actually
incurred in connection with such issuance or sale and net of
Taxes paid or payable as a result thereof.
Cash Equivalents means any of the following:
(a) securities issued or fully guaranteed or insured by the
federal government of the United States, Canada, Switzerland,
any Approved Member State or any agency of the foregoing
maturing within 365 days of the date of acquisition thereof;
(b) time deposit accounts, certificates of deposit,
eurocurrency time deposits, overnight bank deposits, money
market deposits and bankers acceptances maturing within
365 days of the date of acquisition thereof and issued by a
bank or trust company organized under the laws of Canada or any
province thereof, the United States, any state thereof, the
District of Columbia, any
non-U.S. bank,
or its branches or agencies (fully protected against currency
fluctuations) that, at the time of acquisition, is rated at
least
A-1
by S&P or
P-1
by Moodys (or such similar equivalent rating by at least
one nationally recognized statistical rating
organization (as defined in Rule 436 under the
Securities Act)) or the R-1 category by the Dominion
Bond Rating Service Limited and has capital, surplus and
undivided profits aggregating in excess of $500 million;
(c) shares of any money market fund that (i) has at
least 95% of its assets invested continuously in the types of
investments referred to in clauses (a) and (b) above,
(ii) has net assets that exceed $500 million and
(iii) is rated at least
A-1
by S&P or
P-1
by Moodys;
(d) repurchase obligations with a term of not more than
30 days for underlying securities of the types described in
clause (a) entered into with:
(1) a bank meeting the qualifications described in
clause (b) above, or
(2) any primary government securities dealer reporting to
the Market Reports Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York;
(e) commercial paper issued by a corporation (other than an
Affiliate of the Company) with a rating at the time as of which
any Investment therein is made of
P-1
(or higher) according to Moodys or
A-1
(or higher) according to S&P (or such similar equivalent
rating by at least one nationally recognized statistical
rating organization (as defined in Rule 436 under the
Securities Act)) or in the R-1 category by the
Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited; and
(f) direct obligations (or certificates representing an
ownership interest in such obligations) of any state of the
United States or the District of Columbia or any political
subdivision or instrumentality thereof (including any agency or
instrumentality thereof) or any province of Canada (including
any agency or instrumentality thereof) for the payment of which
the full faith and credit of such state or province is pledged
and maturing within 365 days of the date of acquisition
thereof, provided that the long-term debt of such state,
province or political subdivision is rated, in the case of a
state of the United States, one of the two highest ratings from
Moodys or S&P (or such similar equivalent rating by
at least
175
one nationally recognized statistical rating
organization (as defined in Rule 436 under the
Securities Act)), or the R-1 category by the
Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited;
provided, however, that, to the extent any cash is
generated through operations in a jurisdiction outside of the
United States, Canada, Switzerland or an Approved Member State,
such cash may be retained and invested in obligations of the
type described in clauses (a), (b) and (e) of this
definition to the extent that such obligations have a credit
rating equal to the sovereign rating of such jurisdiction.
Change of Control means the occurrence of any
of the following events:
(a) any person or group (as such
terms are used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange
Act or any successor of the foregoing), including any group
acting for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting or
disposing of securities within the meaning of
Rule 13d-5(b)(1)
under the Exchange Act, other than a Permitted Holder, becomes
the beneficial owner (as defined in
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, except that a person will be deemed to
have beneficial ownership of all shares that any
such person has the right to acquire, whether such right is
exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time),
directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the total voting power
of the Voting Stock of the Company (for purposes of this clause
(a), such person or group shall be deemed to beneficially own
any Voting Stock of a corporation held by any other corporation
(the parent corporation) so long as such person or
group beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, in the
aggregate at least a majority of the total voting power of the
Voting Stock of such parent corporation); or
(b) the sale, transfer, assignment, lease, conveyance or
other disposition, directly or indirectly, of all or
substantially all the Property of the Company and the Restricted
Subsidiaries, considered as a whole (other than a disposition of
such Property as an entirety or virtually as an entirety to a
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary), shall have occurred, or the
Company merges, consolidates or amalgamates with or into any
other Person or any other Person merges, consolidates or
amalgamates with or into the Company, in any such event pursuant
to a transaction in which the outstanding Voting Stock of the
Company is reclassified into or exchanged for cash, securities
or other Property, other than any such transaction where:
(1) the outstanding Voting Stock of the Company is
reclassified into or exchanged for other Voting Stock of the
Company or for Voting Stock of the Surviving Person, and
(2) the holders of the Voting Stock of the Company
immediately prior to such transaction own, directly or
indirectly, not less than a majority of the Voting Stock of the
Company or the Surviving Person immediately after such
transaction; or
(c) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals
who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board of
Directors (together with any new directors whose election or
appointment by such Board or whose nomination for election by
the shareholders of the Company was approved by a vote of not
less than three-fourths of the directors then still in office
who were either directors at the beginning of such period or
whose election or nomination for election was previously so
approved) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority
of the Board of Directors then in office; or
(d) the shareholders of the Company shall have approved any
plan of liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended.
Commodity Price Protection Agreement means,
in respect of a Person, any forward contract, commodity swap
agreement, commodity option agreement or other similar agreement
or arrangement designed to protect such Person against
fluctuations in commodity prices.
Comparable Treasury Issue means the
U.S. treasury security selected by an Independent
Investment Banker as having a maturity comparable to the
remaining term of the Notes that would be utilized, at the time
of selection and in accordance with customary financial
practice, in pricing new issues of corporate debt
176
securities of comparable maturity to the remaining term of such
Notes. Independent Investment Banker means one of
the Reference Treasury Dealers appointed by the Trustee after
consultation with the Company.
Comparable Treasury Price means, with respect
to any redemption date:
(a) the average of the bid and ask prices for the
Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed in each case as a
percentage of its principal amount) on the third business day
preceding such redemption date, as set forth in the most
recently published statistical release designated
H.15(519) (or any successor release) published by
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and which
establishes yields on actively traded U.S. treasury
securities adjusted to constant maturity under the caption
Treasury Constant Maturities, or
(b) if such release (or any successor release) is not
published or does not contain such prices on such business day,
the average of the Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations for such
redemption date.
Consolidated Current Liabilities means, as of
any date of determination, the aggregate amount of liabilities
of the Company and its consolidated Restricted Subsidiaries
which may properly be classified as current liabilities
(including taxes accrued as estimated), after eliminating:
(a) all intercompany items between the Company and any
Restricted Subsidiary or between Restricted
Subsidiaries, and
(b) all current maturities of long-term Debt.
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio means,
as of any date of determination, the ratio of:
(a) the aggregate amount of EBITDA for the most recent four
consecutive fiscal quarters ending at least 45 days prior
to such determination date to
(b) Consolidated Interest Expense for such four fiscal
quarters;
provided, however, that:
(1) if
(A) since the beginning of such period the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary has Incurred any Debt that remains
outstanding or Repaid any Debt, or
(B) the transaction giving rise to the need to calculate
the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is an Incurrence or
Repayment of Debt,
Consolidated Interest Expense for such period shall be
calculated after giving effect on a pro forma basis to such
Incurrence or Repayment as if such Debt was Incurred or Repaid
on the first day of such period, provided that, in the
event of any such Repayment of Debt, EBITDA for such period
shall be calculated as if the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary had not earned any interest income actually earned
during such period in respect of the funds used to Repay such
Debt, and
(2) if
(A) since the beginning of such period the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary shall have made any Asset Sale or an
Investment (by merger or otherwise) in any Restricted Subsidiary
(or any Person which becomes a Restricted Subsidiary) or an
acquisition of Property which constitutes all or substantially
all of an operating unit of a business,
(B) the transaction giving rise to the need to calculate
the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is such an Asset Sale,
Investment or acquisition, or
(C) since the beginning of such period any Person (that
subsequently became a Restricted Subsidiary or was merged with
or into the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary since the
beginning of such period) shall have made such an Asset Sale,
Investment or acquisition,
177
then EBITDA for such period shall be calculated after giving pro
forma effect to such Asset Sale, Investment or acquisition as if
such Asset Sale, Investment or acquisition had occurred on the
first day of such period.
If any Debt bears a floating rate of interest and is being given
pro forma effect, the interest expense on such Debt shall be
calculated as if the base interest rate in effect for such
floating rate of interest on the date of determination had been
the applicable base interest rate for the entire period (taking
into account any Interest Rate Agreement applicable to such Debt
if such Interest Rate Agreement has a remaining term in excess
of 12 months). In the event the Capital Stock of any
Restricted Subsidiary is sold during the period, the Company
shall be deemed, for purposes of clause (1) above, to have
Repaid during such period the Debt of such Restricted Subsidiary
to the extent the Company and its continuing Restricted
Subsidiaries are no longer liable for such Debt after such sale.
Consolidated Interest Expense means, for any
period, the total interest expense of the Company and its
consolidated Restricted Subsidiaries, plus, to the extent not
included in such total interest expense, and to the extent
Incurred by the Company or its Restricted Subsidiaries,
(a) interest expense attributable to leases constituting
part of a Sale and Leaseback Transaction and to Capital Lease
Obligations,
(b) amortization of debt discount and debt issuance cost,
including commitment fees,
(c) capitalized interest,
(d) non-cash interest expense,
(e) commissions, discounts and other fees and charges owed
with respect to letters of credit and bankers acceptance
financing,
(f) net costs associated with Hedging Obligations
(including amortization of fees),
(g) Disqualified Stock Dividends,
(h) Preferred Stock Dividends,
(i) interest Incurred in connection with Investments in
discontinued operations,
(j) interest accruing on any Debt of any other Person to
the extent such Debt is Guaranteed by the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary, and
(k) the cash contributions to any employee stock ownership
plan or similar trust to the extent such contributions are used
by such plan or trust to pay interest or fees to any Person
(other than the Company) in connection with Debt Incurred by
such plan or trust.
Consolidated Net Income means, for any
period, the net income (loss) of the Company and its
consolidated Restricted Subsidiaries; provided, however, that
there shall not be included in such Consolidated Net Income:
(a) any net income (loss) of any Person (other than the
Company) if such Person is not a Restricted Subsidiary, except
that:
(1) subject to the exclusion contained in clause (c)
below, equity of the Company and its consolidated Restricted
Subsidiaries in the net income of any such Person for such
period shall be included in such Consolidated Net Income up to
the aggregate amount of cash distributed by such Person during
such period to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary as a
dividend or other distribution (subject, in the case of a
dividend or other distribution to a Restricted Subsidiary, to
the limitations contained in clause (b) below), and
(2) the equity of the Company and its consolidated
Restricted Subsidiaries in a net loss of any such Person other
than an Unrestricted Subsidiary for such period shall be
included in determining such Consolidated Net Income,
178
(b) any net income (loss) of any Restricted Subsidiary if
such Restricted Subsidiary is subject to restrictions, directly
or indirectly, on the payment of dividends or the making of
distributions, directly or indirectly, to the Company, except
that:
(1) subject to the exclusion contained in clause (c)
below, the equity of the Company and its consolidated Restricted
Subsidiaries in the net income of any such Restricted Subsidiary
for such period shall be included in such Consolidated Net
Income up to the aggregate amount of cash distributed by such
Restricted Subsidiary during such period to the Company or
another Restricted Subsidiary as a dividend or other
distribution (subject, in the case of a dividend or other
distribution to another Restricted Subsidiary, to the limitation
contained in this clause), and
(2) the equity of the Company and its consolidated
Restricted Subsidiaries in a net loss of any such Restricted
Subsidiary for such period shall be included in determining such
Consolidated Net Income,
(c) any gain or loss realized upon the sale or other
disposition of any Property of the Company or any of its
consolidated Subsidiaries (including pursuant to any Sale and
Leaseback Transaction) that is not sold or otherwise disposed of
in the ordinary course of business (provided that sales or other
dispositions of assets in connection with any Qualified
Securitization Transaction shall be deemed to be in the ordinary
course),
(d) any extraordinary gain or loss,
(e) the cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principles, and
(f) any non-cash compensation expense realized for grants
of performance shares, stock options or other rights to
officers, directors and employees of the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary, provided that such shares, options
or other rights can be redeemed at the option of the holder only
for Capital Stock of the Company (other than Disqualified Stock).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of the covenant
described under Certain Covenants
Limitation on Restricted Payments only, there shall be
excluded from Consolidated Net Income any dividends, repayments
of loans or advances or other transfers of Property from
Unrestricted Subsidiaries to the Company or a Restricted
Subsidiary to the extent such dividends, repayments or transfers
increase the amount of Restricted Payments permitted under such
covenant pursuant to clause (c)(4) thereof.
Consolidated Net Tangible Assets means, as of
any date of determination, the sum of the amounts that would
appear on a consolidated balance sheet of the Company and its
consolidated Restricted Subsidiaries as the total assets (less
accumulated depreciation and amortization, allowances for
doubtful receivables, other applicable reserves and other
properly deductible items) of the Company and its Restricted
Subsidiaries, after giving effect to purchase accounting and
after deducting therefrom Consolidated Current Liabilities and,
to the extent otherwise included, the amounts of (without
duplication):
(a) the excess of cost over fair market value of assets or
businesses acquired;
(b) any revaluation or other
write-up in
book value of assets subsequent to December 31, 2004 as a
result of a change in the method of valuation in accordance with
GAAP;
(c) unamortized debt discount and expenses and other
unamortized deferred charges, goodwill, patents, trademarks,
service marks, trade names, copyrights, licenses, organization
or developmental expenses and other intangible items;
(d) minority interests in consolidated Subsidiaries held by
Persons other than the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary;
(e) treasury stock;
(f) cash or securities set aside and held in a sinking or
other analogous fund established for the purpose of redemption
or other retirement of Capital Stock to the extent such
obligation is not reflected in Consolidated Current
Liabilities; and
179
(g) Investments in and assets of Unrestricted Subsidiaries.
Credit Facilities means, with respect to the
Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, one or more debt or
commercial paper facilities with banks or other institutional
lenders (including the Senior Secured Credit Facilities) or
indentures, in each case, providing for revolving credit loans,
term loans, receivables or inventory financing (including
through the sale of receivables or inventory to such lenders or
to special purpose, bankruptcy remote entities formed to borrow
from such lenders against such receivables or inventory) or
trade letters of credit, in each case together with any
Refinancings thereof.
Currency Exchange Protection Agreement means,
in respect of a Person, any foreign exchange contract, currency
swap agreement, currency option or other similar agreement or
arrangement designed to protect such Person against fluctuations
in currency exchange rates.
Debt means, with respect to any Person on any
date of determination (without duplication):
(a) the principal of and premium (if any) in respect of:
(1) debt of such Person for money borrowed, and
(2) debt evidenced by notes, debentures, bonds or other
similar instruments for the payment of which such Person is
responsible or liable;
(b) all Capital Lease Obligations of such Person and all
Attributable Debt in respect of Sale and Leaseback Transactions
entered into by such Person;
(c) all obligations of such Person representing the
deferred purchase price of Property, all conditional sale
obligations of such Person and all obligations of such Person
under any title retention agreement (but excluding trade
accounts payable arising in the ordinary course of business);
(d) all obligations of such Person for the reimbursement of
any obligor on any letter of credit, bankers acceptance or
similar credit transaction (other than obligations with respect
to letters of credit securing obligations (other than
obligations described in (a) through (c) above)
entered into in the ordinary course of business of such Person
to the extent such letters of credit are not drawn upon or, if
and to the extent drawn upon, such drawing is reimbursed no
later than the third business day following receipt by such
Person of a demand for reimbursement following payment on the
letter of credit);
(e) the amount of all obligations of such Person with
respect to the Repayment of any Disqualified Stock or, with
respect to any Subsidiary of such Person, any Preferred Stock
(but excluding, in each case, any accrued dividends);
(f) all obligations of the type referred to in
clauses (a) through (e) above of other Persons and all
dividends of other Persons for the payment of which, in either
case, such Person is responsible or liable, directly or
indirectly, as obligor, guarantor or otherwise, including by
means of any Guarantee;
(g) all obligations of the type referred to in
clauses (a) through (f) above of other Persons secured
by any Lien on any Property of such Person (whether or not such
obligation is assumed by such Person), the amount of such
obligation being deemed to be the lesser of the Fair Market
Value of such Property and the amount of the obligation so
secured; and
(h) to the extent not otherwise included in this
definition, Hedging Obligations of such Person.
The amount of Debt of any Person at any date shall be the
outstanding balance, or the accreted value of such Debt in the
case of Debt issued with original issue discount, at such date
of all unconditional obligations as described above and the
maximum liability, upon the occurrence of the contingency giving
rise to the obligation, of any contingent obligations at such
date. The amount of Debt represented by a Hedging Obligation
shall be equal to:
(1) zero if such Hedging Obligation has been Incurred
pursuant to clause (f), (g) or (h) of the second
paragraph of the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Debt, or
(2) the notional amount of such Hedging Obligation if not
Incurred pursuant to such clauses.
180
Default means any event which is, or after
notice or passage of time or both would be, an Event of Default.
Disqualified Stock means any Capital Stock of
the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries that by its
terms (or by the terms of any security into which it is
convertible or for which it is exchangeable, in either case at
the option of the holder thereof) or otherwise:
(a) matures or is mandatorily redeemable pursuant to a
sinking fund obligation or otherwise,
(b) is or may become redeemable or repurchaseable at the
option of the holder thereof, in whole or in part, or
(c) is convertible or exchangeable at the option of the
holder thereof for Debt or Disqualified Stock, on or prior to,
in the case of clause (a), (b) or (c), the first
anniversary of the Stated Maturity of the Notes.
Disqualified Stock Dividends means all
dividends with respect to Disqualified Stock of the Company held
by Persons other than a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary. The
amount of any such dividend shall be equal to the quotient of
such dividend divided by the difference between one and the
maximum statutory federal income tax rate (expressed as a
decimal number between 1 and 0) then applicable to the
Company.
Dollar Equivalent of any amount means, at the
time of determination thereof, (a) if such amount is
expressed in U.S. dollars, such amount, (b) if such
amount is expressed in an Alternative Currency, the equivalent
of such amount in U.S. dollars determined by using the rate
of exchange quoted by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC in New
York, New York at 11:00 a.m. (New York time) on the date of
determination (or, if such date is not a Business Day, the last
Business Day prior thereto) to prime banks in New York for the
spot purchase in the New York currency exchange market of
such amount of U.S. dollars with such Alternative Currency
and (c) if such amount is denominated in any other
currency, the equivalent of such amount in U.S. dollars as
determined by the Trustee using any method of determination it
deems appropriate.
EBITDA means, for any period, an amount equal
to, for the Company and its consolidated Restricted Subsidiaries:
(a) the sum of Consolidated Net Income for such period, plus
(1) any provision for taxes based on income or profits,
(2) Consolidated Interest Expense,
(3) loss from extraordinary items,
(4) depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses,
(5) all other non-cash expenses, charges and losses that
are not payable in cash in any subsequent period, and
(6) non-recurring cash restructuring expenses, charges and
losses, minus
(b) the sum of, in each case to the extent included in the
calculation of such Consolidated Net Income for such period, but
without duplication, (i) any credit for income tax,
(ii) interest income, (iii) gains from extraordinary
items, (iv) any aggregate net gain (but not any aggregate
net loss) from the sale, exchange or other disposition of
capital assets and (v) any other non-cash gains or other
items which have been added in determining Consolidated Net
Income, including any reversal of a change referred to in
clause (5) above by reason of a decrease in the value of
any Capital Stock or Capital Stock Equivalent.
Notwithstanding the foregoing clause (a), the provision for
taxes and the depreciation, amortization and non-cash items of a
Restricted Subsidiary shall be added to Consolidated Net Income
to compute EBITDA only to the extent (and in the same
proportion) that the net income of such Restricted Subsidiary
was included in calculating Consolidated Net Income and only if
a corresponding amount would be permitted at the date of
determination to be dividended to the Company by such Restricted
Subsidiary without prior approval (that has not been obtained),
pursuant to the terms of its charter and all agreements,
instruments, judgments, decrees,
181
orders, statutes, rules and governmental regulations applicable
to such Restricted Subsidiary or its shareholders.
Event of Default has the meaning set forth
under Events of Default.
Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
Existing Indenture means the Indenture
relating to the Senior Notes, dated as of February 3, 2005,
between the Company, the guarantors parties thereto and The Bank
of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, as
amended from time to time.
Fair Market Value means, with respect to any
Property, the price that could be negotiated in an
arms-length free market transaction, for cash, between a
willing seller and a willing buyer, neither of whom is under
undue pressure or compulsion to complete the transaction. Fair
Market Value shall be determined, except as otherwise provided,
(a) if such Property has a Fair Market Value equal to or
less than $50.0 million, by any Officer of the
Company, or
(b) if such Property has a Fair Market Value in excess of
$50.0 million, by at least a majority of the Board of
Directors and evidenced by a Board Resolution, dated within
45 days of the relevant transaction, delivered to the
Trustee.
GAAP means U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles as in effect on February 3, 2005,
including those set forth in:
(a) the opinions and pronouncements of the Accounting
Principles Board of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants,
(b) the statements and pronouncements of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board,
(c) such other statements by such other entity as approved
by a significant segment of the accounting profession, and
(d) the rules and regulations of the SEC governing the
inclusion of financial statements (including pro forma financial
statements) in periodic reports required to be filed pursuant to
Section 13 of the Exchange Act, including opinions and
pronouncements in staff accounting bulletins and similar written
statements from the accounting staff of the SEC.
Guarantee means any obligation, contingent or
otherwise, of any Person directly or indirectly guaranteeing any
Debt of any other Person and any obligation, direct or indirect,
contingent or otherwise, of such Person:
(a) to purchase or pay (or advance or supply funds for the
purchase or payment of) such Debt of such other Person (whether
arising by virtue of partnership arrangements, or by agreements
to keep-well, to purchase assets, goods, securities or services,
to
take-or-pay
or to maintain financial statement conditions or
otherwise), or
(b) entered into for the purpose of assuring in any other
manner the obligee against loss in respect thereof (in whole or
in part);
provided, however, that the term
Guarantee shall not include:
(1) endorsements for collection or deposit in the ordinary
course of business, or
(2) a contractual commitment by one Person to invest in
another Person for so long as such Investment is reasonably
expected to constitute a Permitted Investment under clause (a),
(b) or (c) of the definition of Permitted
Investment.
The term Guarantee used as a verb has a
corresponding meaning. The term Guarantor shall mean
any Person Guaranteeing any obligation.
182
Hedging Obligation of any Person means any
obligation of such Person pursuant to any Interest Rate
Agreement, Currency Exchange Protection Agreement, Commodity
Price Protection Agreement or any other similar agreement or
arrangement.
holder means a Person in whose name a Note is
registered in the Security Register.
Incur means, with respect to any Debt or
other obligation of any Person, to create, issue, incur (by
merger, conversion, exchange or otherwise), extend, assume,
Guarantee or become liable in respect of such Debt or other
obligation or the recording, as required pursuant to GAAP or
otherwise, of any such Debt or obligation on the balance sheet
of such Person (and Incurrence and
Incurred shall have meanings correlative to the
foregoing); provided, however, that a change in GAAP that
results in an obligation of such Person that exists at such
time, and is not theretofore classified as Debt, becoming Debt
shall not be deemed an Incurrence of such Debt; provided
further, however, that any Debt or other obligations of a Person
existing at the time such Person becomes a Subsidiary (whether
by merger, consolidation, acquisition or otherwise) shall be
deemed to be Incurred by such Subsidiary at the time it becomes
a Subsidiary; and provided further, however, that solely for
purposes of determining compliance with
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Debt, amortization of debt discount shall not be deemed to
be the Incurrence of Debt, provided that in the case of Debt
sold at a discount, the amount of such Debt Incurred shall at
all times be the aggregate principal amount at Stated Maturity.
Independent Financial Advisor means an
investment banking firm of national standing or any third party
appraiser of national standing, provided that such firm or
appraiser is not an Affiliate of the Company.
Interest Rate Agreement means, for any
Person, any interest rate swap agreement, interest rate cap
agreement, interest rate collar agreement or other similar
agreement designed to protect against fluctuations in interest
rates.
Investment by any Person means any direct or
indirect loan (other than advances to customers in the ordinary
course of business that are recorded as accounts receivable on
the balance sheet of such Person), advance or other extension of
credit or capital contribution (by means of transfers of cash or
other Property to others or payments for Property or services
for the account or use of others, or otherwise) to, or
Incurrence of a Guarantee of any obligation of, or purchase or
acquisition of Capital Stock, bonds, notes, debentures or other
securities or evidence of Debt issued by, any other Person. For
purposes of the covenants described under
Certain Covenants Limitation on
Restricted Payments and Designation of
Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries and the
definition of Restricted Payment, the term
Investment shall include the portion (proportionate
to the Companys equity interest in such Subsidiary) of the
Fair Market Value of the net assets of any Subsidiary of the
Company at the time that such Subsidiary is designated an
Unrestricted Subsidiary; provided, however, that upon a
redesignation of such Subsidiary as a Restricted Subsidiary, the
Company shall be deemed to continue to have a permanent
Investment in an Unrestricted Subsidiary of an
amount (if positive) equal to:
(a) the Companys Investment in such
Subsidiary at the time of such redesignation, less
(b) the portion (proportionate to the Companys equity
interest in such Subsidiary) of the Fair Market Value of the net
assets of such Subsidiary at the time of such redesignation.
In determining the amount of any Investment made by transfer of
any Property other than cash, such Property shall be valued at
its Fair Market Value at the time of such Investment.
Investment Grade Rating means a rating equal
to or higher than Baa3 (or the equivalent) by Moodys and
BBB- (or the equivalent) by S&P.
Investment Grade Status shall be deemed to
have been reached on the date that the Notes have an Investment
Grade Rating from both Rating Agencies.
Issue Date means the date on which the old
notes were issued pursuant to the Indenture.
Lien means, with respect to any Property of
any Person, any mortgage or deed of trust, pledge,
hypothecation, assignment, deposit arrangement, security
interest, lien, charge, easement (other than any
183
easement not materially impairing usefulness or marketability),
encumbrance, preference, priority or other security agreement or
preferential arrangement of any kind or nature whatsoever on or
with respect to such Property (including any Capital Lease
Obligation, conditional sale or other title retention agreement
having substantially the same economic effect as any of the
foregoing or any Sale and Leaseback Transaction).
Moodys means Moodys Investors
Service, Inc. or any successor to the rating agency business
thereof.
Net Available Cash from any Asset Sale means
cash payments received therefrom (including any cash payments
received by way of deferred payment of principal pursuant to a
note or installment receivable or otherwise, but only as and
when received, but excluding any other consideration received in
the form of assumption by the acquiring Person of Debt or other
obligations relating to the Property that is the subject of such
Asset Sale or received in any other non-cash form), in each case
net of:
(a) all legal, title and recording tax expenses,
commissions and other fees and expenses incurred, and all
Federal, state, provincial, foreign and local taxes required to
be accrued as a liability under GAAP, as a consequence of such
Asset Sale,
(b) all payments made on or in respect of any Debt that is
secured by any Property subject to such Asset Sale, in
accordance with the terms of any Lien upon such Property, or
which must by its terms, or in order to obtain a necessary
consent to such Asset Sale, or by applicable law, be repaid out
of the proceeds from such Asset Sale,
(c) all distributions and other payments required to be
made to minority interest holders in Subsidiaries or joint
ventures as a result of such Asset Sale, and
(d) the deduction of appropriate amounts provided by the
seller as a reserve, in accordance with GAAP, against any
liabilities associated with the Property disposed of in such
Asset Sale and retained by the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary after such Asset Sale.
Obligations means all obligations for
principal, premium, interest, penalties, fees, indemnifications,
reimbursements, damages and other liabilities payable under the
documentation governing any Debt.
Officer means the Chief Executive Officer,
the President, the Chief Financial Officer or any other
executive officer of the Company.
Officers Certificate means a
certificate, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to
the Trustee, signed by two Officers of the Company, at least one
of whom shall be the principal executive officer or principal
financial officer of the Company, and delivered to the Trustee.
Opinion of Counsel means a written opinion
from legal counsel who is reasonably acceptable to the Trustee.
The counsel may be an employee of or counsel to the Company or
the Trustee.
Permitted Holder means Hindalco Industries
Ltd. and any Affiliate and Related Person thereof. Any person or
group whose acquisition of beneficial ownership constitutes a
Change of Control in respect of which a Change of Control Offer
is made in accordance with the requirements of the Indenture (or
would result in a Change of Control Offer in the absence of the
waiver of such requirement by holders in accordance with the
Indenture) will thereafter, together with any of its Affiliates
and Related Persons, constitute additional Permitted Holders.
Permitted Investment means any Investment by
the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary in:
(a) the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary;
(b) any Person that will, upon the making of such
Investment, become a Restricted Subsidiary;
(c) any Person if as a result of such Investment such
Person is merged or consolidated with or into, or transfers or
conveys all or substantially all its Property to, the Company or
a Restricted Subsidiary;
(d) Cash Equivalents;
184
(e) receivables owing to the Company or a Restricted
Subsidiary, if created or acquired in the ordinary course of
business and payable or dischargeable in accordance with
customary trade terms; provided, however, that
such trade terms may include such concessionary trade terms as
the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary deems reasonable under
the circumstances;
(f) payroll, travel and similar advances to cover matters
that are expected at the time of such advances ultimately to be
treated as expenses for accounting purposes and that are made in
the ordinary course of business;
(g) loans and advances to employees made in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practices of the Company
or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, provided that
such loans and advances do not exceed $15.0 million in the
aggregate at any one time outstanding;
(h) stock, obligations or other securities received in
settlement of debts created in the ordinary course of business
and owing to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary or in
satisfaction of judgments;
(i) any Person to the extent such Investment represents the
non-cash portion of the consideration received in connection
with (A) an Asset Sale consummated in compliance with the
covenant described under Certain
Covenants Limitation on Asset Sales, or
(B) any disposition of Property not constituting an Asset
Sale;
(j) any Persons made for Fair Market Value that do not
exceed 5% of Consolidated Net Tangible Assets in the aggregate
outstanding at any one time;
(k) a Securitization Entity or any Investment by a
Securitization Entity in any other Person in connection with a
Qualified Securitization Transaction provided that any
Investment in a Securitization Entity is in the form of a
Purchase Money Note, contribution of additional receivables and
related assets or any equity interests; and
(l) other Investments made for Fair Market Value that do
not exceed $20.0 million in the aggregate outstanding at
any one time.
Permitted Liens means:
(a) Liens to secure Debt permitted to be Incurred under
clause (b) of the second paragraph of the covenant
described under Certain Covenants
Limitation on Debt;
(b) Liens to secure Debt permitted to be Incurred under
clause (c) of the second paragraph of the covenant
described under Certain Covenants
Limitation on Debt, provided that any such Lien may not
extend to any Property of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary, other than the Property acquired, constructed or
leased with the proceeds of such Debt and any improvements or
accessions to such Property;
(c) Liens for taxes, assessments or governmental charges or
levies on the Property of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary if the same shall not at the time be delinquent or
thereafter can be paid without penalty, or are being contested
in good faith and by appropriate proceedings timely instituted
and diligently pursued, provided that any reserve or other
appropriate provision that shall be required in accordance with
GAAP shall have been established with respect thereto;
(d) Deposit account banks rights of set-off, Liens of
landlords arising by statute, Liens imposed by law, such as
carriers, warehousemens and mechanics Liens
and other similar Liens, on the Property of the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary arising in the ordinary course of business
and securing payment of obligations that are not more than
60 days past due or are being contested in good faith and
by appropriate proceedings;
(e) Liens on the Property of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary Incurred in the ordinary course of business to secure
performance of obligations with respect to statutory or
regulatory requirements, performance or
return-of-money
bonds, surety bonds or other obligations of a like nature and
Incurred in a manner consistent with industry practice, in each
case which are not Incurred in
185
connection with the borrowing of money, the obtaining of
advances or credit or the payment of the deferred purchase price
of Property and which do not in the aggregate impair in any
material respect the use of Property in the operation of the
business of the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries taken as
a whole;
(f) Liens on Property at the time the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary acquired such Property, including any
acquisition by means of a merger or consolidation with or into
the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary; provided, however,
that any such Lien may not extend to any other Property of the
Company or any Restricted Subsidiary; provided further, however,
that such Liens shall not have been Incurred in anticipation of
or in connection with the transaction or series of transactions
pursuant to which such Property was acquired by the Company or
any Restricted Subsidiary;
(g) Liens on the Property of a Person at the time such
Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary; provided,
however, that any such Lien may not extend to any other
Property of the Company or any other Restricted Subsidiary that
is not a direct Subsidiary of such Person; provided further,
however, that any such Lien was not Incurred in anticipation of
or in connection with the transaction or series of transactions
pursuant to which such Person became a Restricted Subsidiary;
(h) pledges or deposits by the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary under workers compensation laws, unemployment
insurance laws or similar legislation, or good faith deposits in
connection with bids, tenders, contracts (other than for the
payment of Debt) or leases to which the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary is party, or deposits to secure public or
statutory obligations of the Company, or deposits for the
payment of rent, in each case Incurred in the ordinary course of
business;
(i) utility easements, building restrictions and such other
encumbrances or charges against real Property as are of a nature
generally existing with respect to properties of a similar
character;
(j) Liens existing on the Issue Date not otherwise
described in clauses (a) through (i) above, other than
Liens created after February 3, 2005 that were permitted
liens pursuant to clause (t) of the definition of
Permitted Liens set forth in the Existing Indenture;
(k) Liens not otherwise described in clauses (a)
through (j) above on the Property of any Restricted
Subsidiary that is not a Subsidiary Guarantor to secure any Debt
permitted to be Incurred by such Restricted Subsidiary pursuant
to the covenant described under Certain
Covenants Limitation on Debt;
(l) Liens on the Property of the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary to secure any Refinancing, in whole or in part, of
any Debt secured by Liens referred to in clause (b), (f), (g),
or (j) above; provided, however, that any such Lien shall
be limited to all or part of the same Property that secured the
original Lien (together with improvements and accessions to such
Property), and the aggregate principal amount of Debt that is
secured by such Lien shall not be increased to an amount greater
than the sum of:
(1) the outstanding principal amount, or, if greater, the
committed amount, of the Debt secured by Liens described under
clause (b), (f), (g) or (j) above, as the case may be,
at the time the original Lien became a Permitted Lien under the
Indenture, and
(2) an amount necessary to pay any fees and expenses,
including premiums and defeasance costs, incurred by the Company
or such Restricted Subsidiary in connection with such
Refinancing;
(m) Liens on accounts receivable and related assets
(including contract rights) of the type specified in the
definition of Qualified Securitization Transaction
transferred to a Securitization Entity in a Qualified
Securitization Transaction;
(n) encumbrances arising by reason of zoning restrictions,
easements, licenses, reservations, covenants,
rights-of-way,
utility easements, building restrictions and other similar
encumbrances on the use of real property not materially
detracting from the value of such real property or not
materially interfering with the ordinary conduct of the business
conducted and proposed to be conducted at such real property;
186
(o) encumbrances arising under leases or subleases of real
property that do not, in the aggregate, materially detract from
the value of such real property or interfere with the ordinary
conduct of the business conducted and proposed to be conducted
at such real property;
(p) financing statements with respect to a lessors
rights in and to personal property leased to such Person in the
ordinary course of such Persons business other than
through a Capital Lease;
(q) Liens in favor of customs and revenue authorities
arising as a matter of law to secure payment of customs duties
in connection with the importation of goods in the ordinary
course of business;
(r) licenses of patents, trademarks and other intellectual
property rights granted in the ordinary course of business and
not interfering in any respect with the ordinary conduct of such
Persons business;
(s) Liens arising out of conditional sale, retention,
consignment or similar arrangement, incurred in the ordinary
course of business, for the sale of goods; and
(t) Liens not otherwise permitted by clauses (a)
through (s) above encumbering Property having an aggregate
Fair Market Value not in excess of 5% of Consolidated Net
Tangible Assets, as determined based on the consolidated balance
sheet of the Company as of the end of the most recent fiscal
quarter for which financial statements have been filed or
furnished.
Permitted Refinancing Debt means any Debt
that Refinances any other Debt, including any successive
Refinancings, so long as:
(a) such Debt is in an aggregate principal amount (or if
Incurred with original issue discount, an aggregate issue price)
not in excess of the sum of:
(1) the aggregate principal amount (or if Incurred with
original issue discount, the aggregate accreted value) then
outstanding of the Debt being Refinanced, and
(2) an amount necessary to pay any fees and expenses,
including premiums and defeasance costs, related to such
Refinancing,
(b) the Average Life of such Debt is equal to or greater
than the Average Life of the Debt being Refinanced,
(c) the Stated Maturity of such Debt is no earlier than the
Stated Maturity of the Debt being Refinanced, and
(d) the new Debt shall not be senior in right of payment to
the Debt that is being Refinanced;
provided, however, that Permitted Refinancing Debt
shall not include:
(x) Debt of a Subsidiary that is not a Subsidiary Guarantor
that Refinances Debt of the Company or a Subsidiary
Guarantor, or
(y) Debt of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary that
Refinances Debt of an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
Person means any individual, corporation,
company (including any limited liability company), association,
partnership, joint venture, trust, unincorporated organization,
government or any agency or political subdivision thereof or any
other entity.
Preferred Stock means any Capital Stock of a
Person, however designated, which entitles the holder thereof to
a preference with respect to the payment of dividends, or as to
the distribution of assets upon any voluntary or involuntary
liquidation or dissolution of such Person, over shares of any
other class of Capital Stock issued by such Person.
Preferred Stock Dividends means all dividends
with respect to Preferred Stock of Restricted Subsidiaries held
by Persons other than the Company or a Wholly Owned Restricted
Subsidiary. The amount of any such dividend shall be equal to
the quotient of such dividend divided by the difference between
one and the
187
maximum statutory federal income rate (expressed as a decimal
number between 1 and 0) then applicable to the issuer of
such Preferred Stock.
Principal Property means any manufacturing
plant or facility owned by the Company
and/or one
or more Restricted Subsidiaries having a gross book value in
excess of 1.5% of the Consolidated Net Tangible Assets of the
Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries.
pro forma means, with respect to any
calculation made or required to be made pursuant to the terms
hereof, a calculation performed in accordance with
Article 11 of
Regulation S-X
promulgated under the Securities Act, as interpreted in good
faith by the Board of Directors after consultation with the
independent certified public accountants of the Company, or
otherwise a calculation made in good faith by the Board of
Directors after consultation with the independent certified
public accountants of the Company, as the case may be.
Property means, with respect to any Person,
any interest of such Person in any kind of property or asset,
whether real, personal or mixed, or tangible or intangible,
including Capital Stock in, and other securities of, any other
Person. For purposes of any calculation required pursuant to the
Indenture, the value of any Property shall be its Fair Market
Value.
Public Equity Offering means an underwritten
public offering of common stock of the Company pursuant to an
effective registration statement under the Securities Act.
Purchase Money Debt means Debt:
(a) consisting of the deferred purchase price of Property,
conditional sale obligations, obligations under any title
retention agreement, other purchase money obligations and
obligations in respect of industrial revenue bonds, in each case
where the maturity of such Debt does not exceed the anticipated
useful life of the Property being financed, and
(b) Incurred to finance the acquisition, construction or
lease by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of such
Property, including additions and improvements thereto;
provided, however, that such Debt is Incurred
within 180 days after the acquisition, construction or
lease of such Property by the Company or such Restricted
Subsidiary.
Purchase Money Note means a promissory note
evidencing a line of credit, or evidencing other Debt owed to
the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary in connection with a
Qualified Securitization Transaction, which note shall be repaid
from cash available to the maker of such note, other than
amounts required to be established as reserves, amounts paid to
investors in respect of interest, principal and other amounts
owing to such investors and amounts paid in connection with the
purchase of newly generated accounts receivable.
Qualified Securitization Transaction means
any transaction or series of transactions that may be entered
into by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary pursuant to
which the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary may sell, convey
or otherwise transfer pursuant to customary terms to (a) a
Securitization Entity (in the case of a transfer by the Company
or any Restricted Subsidiary) and (b) any other Person (in
the case of transfer by a Securitization Entity), or may grant a
security interest in any accounts receivable (whether now
existing or arising or acquired in the future) of the Company or
any Restricted Subsidiary, and any assets related thereto
including all collateral securing such accounts receivable, all
contracts and contract rights and all guarantees or other
obligations in respect of such accounts receivable, proceeds of
such accounts receivable and other assets (including contract
rights) which are customarily transferred or in respect of which
security interests are customarily granted in connection with
asset securitization transactions involving accounts receivable.
Rating Agencies means Moodys and
S&P.
Reference Treasury Dealer means Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated, RBS Securities Inc. and their successors and any
other primary U.S. Government securities dealer or dealers
in New York City (a Primary Treasury Dealer)
selected by the Company; provided,
188
however, that if any of the foregoing cease to be a
Primary Treasury Dealer, the Company shall substitute therefor
another Primary Treasury Dealer.
Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations means,
with respect to each Reference Treasury Dealer and any
redemption date, the average, as determined by the Trustee, of
the bid and ask prices for the Comparable Treasury Issue
(expressed in each case as a percentage of its principal amount)
quoted in writing to the Trustee by such Reference Treasury
Dealer at 5:00 p.m. on the third business day preceding
such redemption date.
Refinance means, in respect of any Debt, to
refinance, extend, renew, refund or Repay, or to issue other
Debt, in exchange or replacement for, such Debt.
Refinanced and Refinancing shall have
correlative meanings.
Related Business means any business that is
related, ancillary or complementary to the businesses of the
Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries on the Issue Date.
Related Person with respect to any Permitted
Holder means:
(a) any controlling stockholder or a majority (or more)
owned Subsidiary of such Permitted Holder or, in the case of an
individual, any spouse or immediate family member of such
Permitted Holder, any trust created for the benefit of such
individual or such individuals estate, executor,
administrator, committee or beneficiaries; or
(b) any trust, corporation, partnership or other entity,
the beneficiaries, stockholders, partners, owners or Persons
beneficially holding a majority (or more) controlling interest
of which consist of such Permitted Holder
and/or such
other Persons referred to in the immediately preceding clause
(a).
Repay means, in respect of any Debt, to
repay, prepay, repurchase, redeem, legally defease or otherwise
retire such Debt. Repayment and Repaid
shall have correlative meanings. For purposes of the covenant
described under Certain Covenants
Limitation on Asset Sales and the definition of
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio, Debt shall be
considered to have been Repaid only to the extent the related
loan commitment, if any, shall have been permanently reduced in
connection therewith.
Restricted Payment means:
(a) any dividend or distribution (whether made in cash,
securities or other Property) declared or paid on or with
respect to any shares of Capital Stock of the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary (including any payment in connection with
any merger or consolidation with or into the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary), except for (i) any dividend or
distribution that is made solely to the Company or a Restricted
Subsidiary (and, if such Restricted Subsidiary is not a Wholly
Owned Restricted Subsidiary, to the other shareholders of such
Restricted Subsidiary on a pro rata basis or on a basis that
results in the receipt by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary
of dividends or distributions of greater value than it would
receive on a pro rata basis), or (ii) any dividend or
distribution payable solely in shares of Capital Stock (other
than Disqualified Stock) of the Company;
(b) the purchase, repurchase, redemption, acquisition or
retirement for value of any Capital Stock of the Company or any
Restricted Subsidiary (other than from the Company or a
Restricted Subsidiary) or any securities exchangeable for or
convertible into any such Capital Stock, including the exercise
of any option to exchange any Capital Stock (other than for or
into Capital Stock of the Company that is not Disqualified
Stock);
(c) the purchase, repurchase, redemption, acquisition or
retirement for value, prior to the date for any scheduled
maturity, sinking fund or amortization or other installment
payment, of any Subordinated Obligation (other than the
purchase, repurchase or other acquisition of any Subordinated
Obligation purchased in anticipation of satisfying a scheduled
maturity, sinking fund or amortization or other installment
obligation, in each case due within one year of the date of
acquisition); or
(d) any Investment (other than Permitted Investments) in
any Person.
189
Restricted Subsidiary means any Subsidiary of
the Company other than an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
S&P means Standard &
Poors Ratings Group, Inc., a division of the McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc., or any successor to the rating agency business
thereof.
Sale and Leaseback Transaction means any
direct or indirect arrangement relating to Property now owned or
hereafter acquired whereby the Company or a Restricted
Subsidiary transfers such Property to another Person and the
Company or a Restricted Subsidiary leases it from such Person.
SEC means the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Securities Act means the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.
Securitization Entity means any wholly owned
Subsidiary of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary (or
another Person in which the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary
make an Investment and to which the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary transfers accounts receivable and related assets)
(a) which engages in no activities other than in connection
with the financing of accounts receivable or related assets,
(b) which is designated by the Board of Directors (as
provided below) as a Securitization Entity, (c) no portion
of the Debt or any other Obligations (contingent or otherwise)
of which (i) is guaranteed by the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary (excluding guarantees of Obligations (other than the
principal of, and interest on, Debt) pursuant to Standard
Securitization Undertakings and guarantees by the Securitization
Entity), (ii) is recourse to or obligates the Company or
any Restricted Subsidiary (other than the Securitization Entity)
in any way other than pursuant to Standard Securitization
Undertakings or (iii) subjects any property or asset of the
Company or any Restricted Subsidiary (other than the
Securitization Entity), directly or indirectly, contingently or
otherwise, to the satisfaction thereof, other than pursuant to
Standard Securitization Undertakings and other than any interest
in the accounts receivable and related assets being financed
(whether in the form of any equity interest in such assets or
subordinated indebtedness payable primarily from such financed
assets) retained or acquired by the Company or any Restricted
Subsidiary, (d) with which none of the Company nor any
Restricted Subsidiary has any material contract, agreement,
arrangement or understanding other than those customary for a
Qualified Securitization Transaction and, in any event, on terms
no less favorable to the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary
than those that might be obtained at the time from Persons that
are not Affiliates of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary,
and (e) to which none of the Company nor any Restricted
Subsidiary has any obligation to maintain or preserve such
entitys financial condition or cause such entity to
achieve certain levels of operating results. Any such
designation by the Board of Directors shall be evidenced to the
Trustee by filing with the Trustee a certified copy of the
resolution of the Board of Directors giving effect to such
designation and an Officers Certificate certifying that
such designation complied with the foregoing conditions.
Senior Debt of the Company means:
(a) all obligations consisting of the principal, premium,
if any, and accrued and unpaid interest (including interest
accruing on or after the filing of any petition in bankruptcy or
for reorganization relating to the Company to the extent
post-filing interest is allowed in such proceeding) in respect
of:
(1) Debt of the Company for borrowed money, and
(2) Debt of the Company evidenced by notes, debentures,
bonds or other similar instruments permitted under the Indenture
for the payment of which the Company is responsible or liable;
(b) all Capital Lease Obligations of the Company and all
Attributable Debt in respect of Sale and Leaseback Transactions
entered into by the Company;
(c) all obligations of the Company
(1) for the reimbursement of any obligor on any letter of
credit, bankers acceptance or similar credit transaction,
(2) under Hedging Obligations, or
190
(3) issued or assumed as the deferred purchase price of
Property and all conditional sale obligations of the Company and
all obligations under any title retention agreement permitted
under the Indenture; and
(d) all obligations of other Persons of the type referred
to in clauses (a), (b) and (c) for the payment of
which the Company is responsible or liable as Guarantor;
provided, however, that Senior Debt shall not
include:
(A) Debt of the Company that is by its terms subordinate in
right of payment to the Notes, including any Subordinated Debt;
(B) any Debt Incurred in violation of the provisions of the
Indenture;
(C) accounts payable or any other obligations of the
Company to trade creditors created or assumed by the Company in
the ordinary course of business in connection with the obtaining
of materials or services (including Guarantees thereof or
instruments evidencing such liabilities);
(D) any liability for Federal, state, local or other taxes
owed or owing by the Company;
(E) any obligation of the Company to any Subsidiary; or
(F) any obligations with respect to any Capital Stock of
the Company.
To the extent that any payment of Senior Debt (whether by or on
behalf of the Company as proceeds of security or enforcement or
any right of setoff or otherwise) is declared to be fraudulent
or preferential, set aside or required to be paid to a trustee,
receiver or other similar party under any bankruptcy,
insolvency, receivership or similar law, then if such payment is
recovered by, or paid over to, such trustee, receiver or other
similar party, the Senior Debt or part thereof originally
intended to be satisfied shall be deemed to be reinstated and
outstanding as if such payment had not occurred.
Senior Debt of any Subsidiary Guarantor has a
correlative meaning to Senior Debt of the Company.
Senior Notes means the Companys
7.25% Senior Notes due 2015.
Senior Secured Credit Facilities means
(a) the asset-based lending facility dated as of
July 6, 2007 by and among the Company, ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
as administrative agent, and the several banks and other
financial institutions or entities from time to time parties
thereto, including any notes, collateral documents, and
documentation and guarantees and any appendices, exhibits or
schedules to any of the preceding, and (b) the term loan
facility dated as of July 6, 2007 by and among the Company,
UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative agent and as
collateral agent, and the several banks and other financial
institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto,
including any notes, collateral documents, letters of credit and
documentation and guarantees and any appendices, exhibits or
schedules to any of the preceding, as such agreements may be in
effect from time to time, in each case, as any or all of such
agreements (or any other agreement that Refinances any or all of
such agreements) may be amended, restated, modified or
supplemented from time to time, or renewed, refunded,
refinanced, restructured, replaced, repaid or extended from time
to time, whether with the original agents and lenders or other
agents and lenders or otherwise, and whether provided under the
original credit agreement or one or more other credit
agreements, indentures or otherwise.
Significant Subsidiary means any Subsidiary
that would be a significant subsidiary of the
Company within the meaning of
Rule 1-02
under
Regulation S-X
promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act.
Special Interest means the additional
interest, if any, to be paid on the Notes.
Standard Securitization Undertakings means
representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities entered
into by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary that are
reasonably customary in an accounts receivable securitization
transaction so long as none of the same constitute Debt, a
Guarantee or otherwise require the provision of credit support.
Stated Maturity means, with respect to any
security, the date specified in such security as the fixed date
on which the payment of principal of such security is due and
payable, including pursuant to any
191
mandatory redemption provision (but excluding any provision
providing for the repurchase of such security at the option of
the holder thereof upon the happening of any contingency beyond
the control of the issuer unless such contingency has occurred).
Subordinated Debt means any Debt of the
Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor (whether outstanding on the
Issue Date or thereafter Incurred) that is subordinate or junior
in right of payment to the Notes or the applicable Subsidiary
Guaranty pursuant to a written agreement to that effect.
Subsidiary means, in respect of any Person,
any corporation, company (including any limited liability
company), association, partnership, joint venture or other
business entity of which an aggregate of 50% or more of the
total voting power of the Voting Stock is at the time owned or
controlled, directly or indirectly, by:
(a) such Person,
(b) such Person and one or more Subsidiaries of such
Person, or
(c) one or more Subsidiaries of such Person.
Subsidiary Guarantor means (a) each
Canadian Restricted Subsidiary and U.S. Restricted
Subsidiary; (b) Novelis do Brasil Ltda, Novelis UK Ltd.,
Novelis Europe Holdings Limited, Novelis Aluminium Holding
Company, Novelis Deutschland GmbH, Novelis Switzerland SA,
Novelis Technology AG, Novelis AG, Novelis PAE S.A.S., Novelis
Luxembourg S.A., Novelis Madeira, Unipessoal, Lda and Novelis
Services Limited; and (c) any other Person that becomes a
Subsidiary Guarantor pursuant to the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Future
Subsidiary Guarantors or who otherwise executes and
delivers a supplemental indenture to the Trustee providing for a
Subsidiary Guaranty.
Subsidiary Guaranty means a Guarantee on the
terms set forth in the Indenture by a Subsidiary Guarantor of
the Companys obligations with respect to the Notes.
Surviving Person means the surviving Person
formed by a merger, consolidation or amalgamation and, for
purposes of the covenant described under
Merger, Consolidation and Sale of
Property, a Person to whom all or substantially all of the
Property of the Company or a Subsidiary Guarantor is sold,
transferred, assigned, leased, conveyed or otherwise disposed.
Taxes means any present or future tax, duty,
levy, interest, assessment or other governmental charge imposed
or levied by or on behalf of any government or any political
subdivision or territory or possession of any government or any
authority or agency therein or thereof having power to tax.
Taxing Jurisdiction means (i) with
respect to any payment made under the Notes, any jurisdiction
(or any political subdivision thereof or therein) in which the
Company, or any of its successors, are organized or resident for
tax purposes or conduct of business, or from or through which
payment is made and (ii) with respect to any payment made
by a Subsidiary Guarantor, any jurisdiction (or any political
subdivision thereof or therein) in which such Subsidiary
Guarantor is organized or resident for tax purposes or conduct
of business, or from or through which payment is made.
Treasury Rate means, with respect to any
redemption date, the rate per annum equal to the yield to
maturity of the Comparable Treasury Issue, compounded
semi-annually, assuming a price for such Comparable Treasury
Issue (expressed as a percentage of its principal amount) equal
to the Comparable Treasury Price for such redemption date.
Unrestricted Subsidiary means:
(a) any Subsidiary of the Company that is designated after
the Issue Date as an Unrestricted Subsidiary as permitted or
required pursuant to the covenant described under
Certain Covenants Designation of
Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries and is not
thereafter redesignated as a Restricted Subsidiary as permitted
pursuant thereto; and
(b) any Subsidiary of an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
192
U.S. Government Obligations means direct
obligations (or certificates representing an ownership interest
in such obligations) of the United States (including any agency
or instrumentality thereof) for the payment of which the full
faith and credit of the United States is pledged and which are
not callable or redeemable at the issuers option.
U.S. Restricted Subsidiary means any
Restricted Subsidiary that is organized under the laws of the
United States of America or any State thereof or the
District of Columbia.
Voting Stock of any Person means all classes
of Capital Stock or other interests (including partnership
interests) of such Person then outstanding and normally entitled
(without regard to the occurrence of any contingency) to vote in
the election of directors, managers or trustees thereof.
Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary means, at
any time, a Restricted Subsidiary all the Voting Stock of which
(other than directors qualifying shares) is at such time
owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company and its other
Wholly Owned Subsidiaries.
193
BOOK-ENTRY
SETTLEMENT AND CLEARANCE
Except as set forth below, new notes will be issued in
registered, global form, without interest coupons (the
Global Notes) in minimum denominations of $2,000 and
integral multiples of $1,000 in excess of $1,000. Upon issuance,
each of the global notes will be deposited with the trustee as
custodian for DTC and registered in the name of Cede &
Co., as nominee of DTC.
Except as set forth below, the Global Notes may be transferred,
in whole and not in part, only to another nominee of DTC or to a
successor of DTC or its nominee. Beneficial interests in the
Global Notes may not be exchanged for notes in certificated form
except in the limited circumstances described below. See
Exchange of Global Notes for Certificated
Notes. Except in the limited circumstances described
below, owners of beneficial interests in the Global Notes will
not be entitled to receive physical delivery of notes in
certificated form. In addition, transfers of beneficial
interests in the Global Notes will be subject to the applicable
rules and procedures of DTC and its direct or indirect
participants, which may change from time to time.
Depositary
Procedures
The following description of the operations and procedures of
DTC is provided solely as a matter of convenience. These
operations and procedures are solely within the control of the
respective settlement systems and are subject to changes by
them. We take no responsibility for these operations and
procedures and urge investors to contact the system or their
participants directly to discuss these matters.
DTC has advised us that DTC is a limited-purpose trust company
organized under the laws of the State of New York, a
banking organization within the meaning of the New
York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a
clearing corporation within the meaning of the
Uniform Commercial Code and a clearing agency
registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the
Exchange Act. DTC was created to hold securities for its
participating organizations (collectively, the
participants) and to facilitate the clearance and
settlement of transactions in those securities between
participants through electronic book-entry changes in accounts
of its participants. The participants include securities brokers
and dealers (including the initial purchasers), banks, trust
companies, clearing corporations and certain other
organizations. Access to DTCs system is also available to
other entities such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust
companies that clear through or maintain a custodial
relationship with a participant, either directly or indirectly
(collectively, the indirect participants). Persons
who are not participants may beneficially own securities held by
or on behalf of DTC only through the participants or the
indirect participants. The ownership interests in, and transfers
of ownership interests in, each security held by or on behalf of
DTC are recorded on the records of the participants and indirect
participants.
DTC has also advised us that, pursuant to procedures established
by it:
(1) upon deposit of the Global Notes, DTC will credit the
accounts of participants designated by the initial purchasers
with portions of the principal amount of the Global
Notes; and
(2) ownership of these interests in the Global Notes will
be shown on, and the transfer of ownership of these interests
will be effected only through, records maintained by DTC (with
respect to the participants) or by the participants and the
indirect participants (with respect to other owners of
beneficial interests in the Global Notes).
Investors in the Global Notes who are participants in DTCs
system may hold their interests therein directly through DTC.
Investors in the Global Notes who are not participants may hold
their interests therein indirectly through organizations which
are participants in such system. All interests in a Global Note
may be subject to the procedures and requirements of DTC. The
laws of some states require that certain Persons take physical
delivery in definitive form of securities that they own.
Consequently, the ability to transfer beneficial interests in a
Global Note to such Persons will be limited to that extent.
Because DTC can act only on behalf of participants, which in
turn act on behalf of indirect participants, the ability of a
Person having beneficial interests in a Global Note to pledge
such interests to Persons that do not participate in the DTC
system, or
194
otherwise take actions in respect of such interests, may be
affected by the lack of a physical certificate evidencing such
interests.
Except as described below, owners of an interest in the
Global Notes will not have notes registered in their names, will
not receive physical delivery of notes in certificated form and
will not be considered the registered owners or
holders thereof under the Indenture for any
purpose.
Payments in respect of the principal of, and interest and
premium and additional interest, if any, on a Global Note
registered in the name of DTC or its nominee will be payable to
DTC in its capacity as the registered holder under the
Indenture. Under the terms of the Indenture, the company and the
Trustee will treat the Persons in whose names the notes,
including the Global Notes, are registered as the owners of the
notes for the purpose of receiving payments and for all other
purposes. Consequently, neither the company, the Trustee nor any
agent of the company or the Trustee has or will have any
responsibility or liability for:
(1) any aspect of DTCs records or any
participants or indirect participants records
relating to or payments made on account of beneficial ownership
interests in the Global Notes or for maintaining, supervising or
reviewing any of DTCs records or any participants or
indirect participants records relating to the beneficial
ownership interests in the Global Notes; or
(2) any other matter relating to the actions and practices
of DTC or any of its participants or indirect participants.
DTC has advised us that its current practice, upon receipt of
any payment in respect of securities such as the notes
(including principal and interest), is to credit the accounts of
the relevant participants with the payment on the payment date
unless DTC has reason to believe it will not receive payment on
such payment date. Each relevant participant is credited with an
amount proportionate to its beneficial ownership of an interest
in the principal amount of the relevant security as shown on the
records of DTC. Payments by the participants and the indirect
participants to the beneficial owners of notes will be governed
by standing instructions and customary practices and will be the
responsibility of the participants or the indirect participants
and will not be the responsibility of DTC, the Trustee or the
company. Neither the company nor the Trustee will be liable for
any delay by DTC or any of its participants in identifying the
beneficial owners of the notes, and the company and the Trustee
may conclusively rely on and will be protected in relying on
instructions from DTC or its nominee for all purposes.
Transfers between participants in DTC will be effected in
accordance with DTCs procedures, and will be settled in
same-day
funds.
DTC has advised the company that it will take any action
permitted to be taken by a holder of notes only at the direction
of one or more participants to whose account DTC has credited
the interests in the Global Notes and only in respect of such
portion of the aggregate principal amount of the notes as to
which such participant or participants has or have given such
direction. However, if there is an Event of Default under the
notes, DTC reserves the right to exchange the Global Notes for
legended notes in certificated form, and to distribute such
notes to its participants.
Although DTC has agreed to the foregoing procedures in order to
facilitate transfers of interests in the Global Notes among
participants, it is under no obligation to perform such
procedures, and such procedures may be discontinued or changed
at any time. Neither the company nor the Trustee nor any of
their respective agents will have any responsibility for the
performance by DTC or its participants or indirect participants
of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures
governing their operations.
Exchange
of Global Notes for Certificated Notes
A Global Note is exchangeable for Certificated Notes if:
(1) DTC (a) notifies the company that it is unwilling
or unable to continue as depositary for the Global Notes or
(b) has ceased to be a clearing agency registered under the
Exchange Act and, in each case, a successor depositary is not
appointed;
195
(2) the company, at their option, notify the Trustee in
writing that they elect to cause the issuance of the
Certificated Notes; or
(3) there has occurred and is continuing a Default with
respect to the notes.
In addition, beneficial interests in a Global Note may be
exchanged for Certificated Notes upon prior written notice given
to the Trustee by or on behalf of DTC in accordance with the
Indenture. In all cases, Certificated Notes delivered in
exchange for any Global Note or beneficial interests in Global
Notes will be registered in the names, and issued in any
approved denominations, requested by or on behalf of the
depositary (in accordance with its customary procedures) and
will bear the applicable restrictive legend unless that legend
is not required by applicable law.
Exchange
of Certificated Notes for Global Notes
Certificated Notes may not be exchanged for beneficial interests
in any Global Note unless the transferor first delivers to the
Trustee a written certificate (in the form provided in the
Indenture) to the effect that such transfer will comply with the
appropriate transfer restrictions applicable to such notes.
Same Day
Settlement and Payment
The company will make payments in respect of the notes
represented by the Global Notes (including principal, premium,
if any, interest and additional interest, if any) by wire
transfer of immediately available funds to the accounts
specified by the Global Note holder. The company will make all
payments of principal, interest and premium and additional
interest, if any, with respect to Certificated Notes by wire
transfer of immediately available funds to the accounts
specified by the holders of the Certificated Notes or, if no
such account is specified, by mailing a check to each such
holders registered address. The notes represented by the
Global Notes are expected to be made eligible to trade in
DTCs
Same-Day
Funds Settlement System, and any permitted secondary market
trading activity in such notes will, therefore, be required by
DTC to be settled in immediately available funds. The company
expect that secondary trading in any Certificated Notes will
also be settled in immediately available funds.
196
PRINCIPAL
CANADIAN AND U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF
THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Canadian
Federal Income Taxation
Exchange
of Old Notes
A Non-Resident Holder (as defined below) will not be subject to
Canadian federal income tax as a result of the exchange of old
notes for new notes in the exchange offer.
Ownership
of New Notes
Amounts paid or credited, or deemed to be paid or credited, as,
on account or in lieu of payment of, or in satisfaction of the
principal of the new notes or premium, discount or interest on
the new notes by us to a Non-Resident Holder, including in
respect of a required offer to purchase the new notes, will be
exempt from Canadian withholding tax. However, a Non-Resident
Holder who transfers a new note to a holder resident or deemed
to be resident in Canada for purposes of the Income Tax
Act (Canada) (the Tax Act) with whom the
Non-Resident Holder does not deal at arms length should
consult its own tax advisor.
No other taxes on income (including taxable capital gains) will
be payable under the Tax Act by Non-Resident Holders of the new
notes in respect of the acquisition, ownership or disposition of
the new notes.
For purposes of this section, Non-Resident Holder
means a holder who exchanges old notes for new notes in the
exchange offer and who, at all relevant times, (i) is not
and is not deemed to be a resident of Canada for purposes of the
Tax Act and any applicable income tax convention,
(ii) deals at arms length with us for purposes of the
Tax Act and (iii) holds the old notes and new notes as
capital property.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Exchange
Offer
The following discussion is a summary of material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the exchange offer
to holders of old notes, but is not a complete analysis of all
potential tax effects. The summary below is based upon the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), regulations of the Treasury Department,
administrative rulings and pronouncements of the Internal
Revenue Service and judicial decisions, all of which are subject
to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This summary does
not address all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences
that may be applicable to particular holders, including dealers
in securities, financial institutions, insurance companies and
tax-exempt organizations. In addition, this summary does not
consider the effect of any foreign, state, local, gift, estate
or other tax laws that may be applicable to a particular holder.
This summary applies only to a holder that acquired old notes at
original issue for cash and holds such old notes as a capital
asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code.
The exchange of old notes for new notes in the exchange offer
will not constitute a taxable event to holders for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. Consequently, no gain or
loss will be recognized by a holder upon receipt of a new note,
the holders holding period for the new note will include
the holders holding period for the old note exchanged
therefor, and the holders basis in the new note will be
the same as the holders basis in the old note immediately
before the exchange. Likewise, because the old notes were issued
with original issue discount (which U.S. holders must
accrue and include in income prior to the receipt of cash
attributable to such income), such discount will carry over to
the new notes.
Persons considering the exchange of old notes for new notes
should consult their own tax advisors concerning the Canadian
and U.S. federal income tax consequences to them in light
of their particular situations as well as any consequences
arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
197
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
For a period of 180 days from the date on which the
exchange offer is consummated, we will promptly send additional
copies of this prospectus and any amendment or supplement to
this prospectus to any broker-dealer that requests such
documents. We have agreed to pay all expenses incident to the
exchange offer, other than commissions or concessions of any
broker-dealers and will indemnify the holders of the notes,
including any broker-dealers, against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act.
Each broker-dealer that receives new notes for its own account
pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will
deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such new
notes. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented
from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection
with resales of new notes received in exchange for old notes
where such old notes were acquired as a result of market-making
activities or other trading activities. We have agreed that, for
a period of 180 days after the date on which the exchange
offer is consummated, we will make this prospectus, as amended
or supplemented, available to any broker-dealer for use in
connection with any such resale. In addition,
until ,
2009, all dealers effecting transactions in the new notes may be
required to deliver a prospectus.
We will not receive any proceeds from any sale of new notes by
broker-dealers. New notes received by broker-dealers for their
own account pursuant to the exchange offer may be sold from time
to time in one or more transactions in the
over-the-counter
market, in negotiated transactions, through the writing of
options on the new notes or a combination of such methods of
resale, at market prices prevailing at the time of resale, at
prices related to such prevailing market prices or negotiated
prices. Any such resale may be made directly to purchasers or to
or through brokers or dealers who may receive compensation in
the form of commissions or concessions from any such
broker-dealer or the purchasers of any such new notes. Any
broker-dealer that resells new notes that were received by it
for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer and any
broker or dealer that participates in a distribution of such new
notes may be deemed to be an underwriter within the
meaning of the Securities Act and any profit on any such resale
of new notes and any commission or concessions received by any
such persons may be deemed to be underwriting compensation under
the Securities Act. The letter of transmittal states that, by
acknowledging that it will deliver and by delivering a
prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it
is an underwriter within the meaning of the
Securities Act.
For a period of 180 days after the date on which the
exchange offer is consummated we will promptly send additional
copies of this prospectus and any amendment or supplement to
this prospectus to any broker-dealer that requests such
documents in the letter of transmittal. We have agreed to pay
all expenses incident to the exchange offer (including the
expenses of one counsel for the holders of the notes) other than
commissions or concessions of any brokers or dealers and will
indemnify the holders of the notes (including any
broker-dealers) against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act.
198
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the new notes and the related guarantees will be
passed upon for us by King & Spalding LLP, Atlanta,
Georgia. In rendering its opinion, King & Spalding LLP will
rely upon the opinions of
non-U.S.
local counsel as to all matters of
non-U.S. law.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements as of and for the year
ended March 31, 2009; as of March 31, 2008; for the
periods May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008 and
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007; the three months
ended March 31, 2007; and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 included in this Prospectus and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting (which is included in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting as of March 31, 2009 included in the Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009) have been so
included in reliance on the reports (which contain an
explanatory paragraph relating to the Companys
retrospective application of SFAS No. 160 and an
adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting) of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, given on the
authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports and other
information with the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to the
public on the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
You may also read and copy any documents we file with the SEC at
the SECs public reference room at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can request copies of
these documents by writing to the SEC and paying a fee for the
copying cost. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for more information about the operation of the public reference
rooms.
While any notes remain outstanding, we will make available
without charge, upon written or oral request, to any beneficial
owner and any prospective purchaser of notes the information
required pursuant to Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities
Act during any period in which we are not subject to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Also, we will
provide without charge, upon written or oral request, to each
person, including any beneficial owner, to whom this prospectus
is delivered, a copy of all documents referred to below which
have been or may be incorporated by reference into this
prospectus excluding exhibits to those documents unless they are
specifically incorporated by reference into those documents. Any
such request should be directed to us at:
Corporate Secretary
Novelis Inc.
3399 Peachtree Road, NE
Suite 1500
Atlanta, Georgia 30326
(404) 814-4200
199
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the year ended March 31,
2009 (Successor), the period from May 16, 2007 to
March 31, 2008 (Successor), the period from April 1,
2007 to May 15, 2007 (Predecessor), the three months ended
March 31, 2007 (Predecessor) and the year ended
December 31, 2006 (Predecessor)
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
year ended March 31, 2009 (Successor), the period from
May 16, 2007 to March 31, 2008 (Successor), the period
from April 1, 2007 to May 15, 2007 (Predecessor), the
three months ended March 31, 2007 (Predecessor) and the
year ended December 31, 2006 (Predecessor)
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders
Equity for the year ended March 31, 2009 (Successor), the
period from May 16, 2007 to March 31, 2008
(Successor), the period from April 1, 2007 to May 15,
2007 (Predecessor), the three months ended March 31, 2007
(Predecessor) and the year ended December 31, 2006
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
F-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Loss) for the year ended March 31, 2009 (Successor), the
period from May 16, 2007 to March 31, 2008
(Successor), the period from April 1, 2007 to May 15,
2007 (Predecessor), the three months ended March 31, 2007
(Predecessor) and the year ended December 31, 2006
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-102
|
|
F-1
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Novelis Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as
of March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity, cash flows, and comprehensive income (loss) for the year
ended March 31, 2009 and the period from May 16, 2007
to March 31, 2008 present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries
(Successor) at March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for the
year ended March 31, 2009 and the period from May 16,
2007 to March 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Also in our opinion, the Company did not maintain, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) because a
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting
with respect to the application of purchase accounting for an
equity method investee including related income tax accounts
existed as of that date. A material weakness is a deficiency, or
a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over
financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility
that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The material weakness referred to above is described in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting (not presented herein) appearing under Item 9A of
Novelis Inc.s 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We considered this material weakness in determining the nature,
timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the
2009 consolidated financial statements, and our opinion
regarding the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on
those consolidated financial statements. The Companys
management is responsible for these financial statements, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting included in managements report
referred to above. Our responsibility is to express opinions on
these financial statements and on the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that
F-2
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
minority interests (now termed noncontrolling interests) to
conform to SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160), effective
April 1, 2009 and retrospectively adjusted the financial
statements as of March 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the year
ended March 31, 2009 and the period from May 16, 2007
to March 31, 2008.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Atlanta, GA
June 29, 2009 (except with respect to our opinion on the
consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the
retrospective application of SFAS No. 160, as to which
the date is August 5, 2009).
F-3
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Novelis Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders/invested equity, cash flows, and
comprehensive income (loss) for the periods from April 1,
2007 to May 15, 2007, and January 1, 2007 to
March 31, 2007, and the year ended December 31, 2006
present fairly, in all material respects, the results of
operations and cash flows of Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries
(Predecessor) for the periods from April 1, 2007 to
May 15, 2007, and January 1, 2007 to March 31,
2007, and for the year ended December 31, 2006 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans
effective December 31, 2006.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
minority interests (now termed noncontrolling interests) to
conform to SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160), effective
April 1, 2009 and retrospectively adjusted the financial
statements for the periods from April 1, 2007 to
May 15, 2007, and January 1, 2007 to March 31,
2007, and the year ended December 31, 2006.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Atlanta, GA
June 29, 2009 (except with respect to our opinion on the
consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the
retrospective application of SFAS No. 160, as to which
the date is August 5, 2009).
F-4
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
2,630
|
|
|
$
|
9,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
9,251
|
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
9,317
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,345
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
10,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $2 and $1 as of
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
|
|
3,446
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
3,357
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
2,560
|
|
related party
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
7,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; unlimited number of shares
authorized; 77,459,658 shares issued and outstanding as of
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of our common shareholder
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
|
$
|
(274
|
)
|
Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Non-cash Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments, net
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Foreign exchange remeasurement on debt
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of effects from
acquisitions and divestitures):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Disposal of business, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Proceeds from related party loans receivable, net
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
F-7
Novelis
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(1,009
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-8
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity of our Common Shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
(AOCI)
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
74,005,649
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
592
|
|
Fiscal 2006 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with stock plans
|
|
|
134,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Spin-off settlement and post-closing adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax provision of $4
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
of $ in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in minimum pension liability, net of tax provision of $4
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Initial impact of adopting Financial Accounting Standards
Board
Statement No. 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Dividends on common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
74,140,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
Activity for Three Months Ended March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Issuance of common stock from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,217,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Windfall tax benefit on share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $ in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
provision of $4 included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss, net of tax provision of $1
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
75,357,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
(Continued)
F-9
Novelis
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY (Continued)
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity of our Common Shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings/
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
(AOCI)
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity for April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
57,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Conversion of share-based compensation plans from equity-based
plans to liability-based plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax benefit of $4
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
of $ in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 15, 2007
|
|
|
75,415,536
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
|
$
|
(360
|
)
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 16, 2007
|
|
|
75,415,536
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,405
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
3,557
|
|
Activity for May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Issuance of additional common stock
|
|
|
2,044,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $ in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax benefit of $4
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
Fiscal 2009 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $ in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
benefit of $11 included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax benefit of $31
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-10
Novelis
Inc.
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
|
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
May 15,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of
hedges, net
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) related to items of other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to our common
shareholder
|
|
|
(2,104
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-11
Novelis
Inc.
|
|
1.
|
BUSINESS
AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein to Alcan
refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
Organization
and Description of Business
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products for the beverage and food can,
transportation, construction and industrial, and foil products
markets. As of March 31, 2009, we had operations on four
continents: North America; South America; Asia; and Europe,
through 32 operating plants and four research facilities in 11
countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our
South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina
refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation
facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil.
On May 18, 2004, Alcan announced its intention to transfer
its rolled products businesses into a separate company and to
pursue a spin-off of that company to its shareholders. The
spin-off occurred on January 6, 2005, following approval by
Alcans board of directors and shareholders, and legal and
regulatory approvals. Alcan shareholders received one Novelis
common share for every five Alcan common shares held.
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock and Predecessor and Successor
Reporting
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
Our acquisition by Hindalco was recorded in accordance with
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 103, Push Down Basis
of Accounting Required in Certain Limited Circumstances
(SAB 103). In the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets, the consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in
connection with the acquisition have been pushed
down to us and have been allocated to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 141, Business
Combinations (FASB 141). Due to the impact of push down
accounting, the Companys consolidated financial statements
and certain note presentations separate the Companys
presentation into two distinct periods to indicate the
application of two different bases of accounting between the
periods presented: (1) the periods up to, and including,
the May 15, 2007 acquisition date (labeled
Predecessor) and (2) the periods after that
date (labeled Successor). The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include a black line division
which indicates that the Predecessor and Successor reporting
entities shown are not comparable.
Change
in Fiscal Year End
On June 26, 2007, our board of directors approved the
change of our fiscal year end to March 31 from December 31.
On June 28, 2007, we filed a Transition Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant
to
Rule 13a-10
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for transition period
reporting. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements
present our financial position as of March 31, 2009 and
2008, and the results of our operations, cash flows and changes
in shareholders equity for the year ended March 31,
2009; the periods from May 16, 2007 through March 31,
2008 and from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007; the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and the year ended
December 31, 2006.
F-12
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Consolidation
Policy
Our consolidated financial statements include the assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of all wholly-owned
subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise
control, entities in which we have a controlling financial
interest or are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. We
eliminate all significant intercompany accounts and transactions
from our financial statements.
We use the equity method to account for our investments in
entities that we do not control, but where we have the ability
to exercise significant influence over operating and financial
policies. Consolidated net income (loss) attributable to our
common shareholder includes our share of the net earnings
(losses) of these entities. The difference between consolidation
and the equity method impacts certain of our financial ratios
because of the presentation of the detailed line items reported
in the consolidated financial statements for consolidated
entities, compared to a two-line presentation of equity method
investments and net losses.
We use the cost method to account for our investments in
entities that we do not control and for which we do not have the
ability to exercise significant influence over operating and
financial policies. These investments are recorded at the lower
of their cost or fair value.
Use of
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (GAAP) requires us to make estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. The principal areas of
judgment relate to (1) the fair value of derivative
financial instruments; (2) impairment of goodwill;
(3) impairments of long lived assets, intangible assets and
equity investments; (4) actuarial assumptions related to
pension and other postretirement benefit plans; (5) income
tax reserves and valuation allowances and (6) assessment of
loss contingencies, including environmental and litigation
reserves. Future events and their effects cannot be predicted
with certainty, and accordingly, our accounting estimates
require the exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used
in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements will
change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as
additional information is obtained and as our operating
environment changes. We evaluate and update our assumptions and
estimates on an ongoing basis and may employ outside experts to
assist in our evaluations. Actual results could differ from the
estimates we have used.
Risks
and Uncertainties
We are exposed to a number of risks in the normal course of our
operations that could potentially affect our financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows.
Laws
and regulations
We operate in an industry that is subject to a broad range of
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. These laws and regulations
impose increasingly stringent environmental, health and safety
protection standards and permitting requirements regarding,
among other things, air emissions, wastewater storage, treatment
and discharges, the use and handling of hazardous or toxic
materials, waste disposal practices, the remediation of
environmental contamination, post-mining reclamation and working
conditions for our employees. Some environmental laws, such as
the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, also known as CERCLA or
Superfund, and comparable state laws, impose joint and several
liability for the cost of environmental remediation, natural
resource damages, third party claims, and other expenses,
without regard to the fault or the legality of the original
conduct.
F-13
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The costs of complying with these laws and regulations,
including participation in assessments and remediation of
contaminated sites and installation of pollution control
facilities, have been, and in the future could be, significant.
In addition, these laws and regulations may also result in
substantial environmental liabilities associated with divested
assets, third party locations and past activities. In certain
instances, these costs and liabilities, as well as related
action to be taken by us, could be accelerated or increased if
we were to close, divest of or change the principal use of
certain facilities with respect to which we may have
environmental liabilities or remediation obligations. Currently,
we are involved in a number of compliance efforts, remediation
activities and legal proceedings concerning environmental
matters, including certain activities and proceedings arising
under U.S. Superfund and comparable laws in other
jurisdictions where we have operations.
We have established reserves for environmental remediation
activities and liabilities where appropriate. However, the cost
of addressing environmental matters (including the timing of any
charges related thereto) cannot be predicted with certainty, and
these reserves may not ultimately be adequate, especially in
light of potential changes in environmental conditions, changing
interpretations of laws and regulations by regulators and
courts, the discovery of previously unknown environmental
conditions, the risk of governmental orders to carry out
additional compliance on certain sites not initially included in
remediation in progress, our potential liability to remediate
sites for which provisions have not been previously established
and the adoption of more stringent environmental laws. Such
future developments could result in increased environmental
costs and liabilities and could require significant capital
expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial position or results of operations or cash
flows. Furthermore, the failure to comply with our obligations
under the environmental laws and regulations could subject us to
administrative, civil or criminal penalties, obligations to pay
damages or other costs, and injunctions or other orders,
including orders to cease operations. In addition, the presence
of environmental contamination at our properties could adversely
affect our ability to sell a property, receive full value for a
property or use a property as collateral for a loan.
Some of our current and potential operations are located or
could be located in or near communities that may regard such
operations as having a detrimental effect on their social and
economic circumstances. Environmental laws typically provide for
participation in permitting decisions, site remediation
decisions and other matters. Concern about environmental justice
issues may affect our operations. Should such community
objections be presented to government officials, the
consequences of such a development may have a material adverse
impact upon the profitability or, in extreme cases, the
viability of an operation. In addition, such developments may
adversely affect our ability to expand or enter into new
operations in such location or elsewhere and may also have an
effect on the cost of our environmental remediation projects.
We use a variety of hazardous materials and chemicals in our
rolling processes, as well as in our smelting operations in
Brazil and in connection with maintenance work on our
manufacturing facilities. Because of the nature of these
substances or related residues, we may be liable for certain
costs, including, among others, costs for health-related claims
or removal or re-treatment of such substances. Certain of our
current and former facilities incorporate asbestos-containing
materials, a hazardous substance that has been the subject of
health-related claims for occupation exposure. In addition,
although we have developed environmental, health and safety
programs for our employees, including measures to reduce
employee exposure to hazardous substances, and conduct regular
assessments at our facilities, we are currently, and in the
future may be, involved in claims and litigation filed on behalf
of persons alleging injury predominantly as a result of
occupational exposure to substances at our current or former
facilities. It is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome
of these claims and lawsuits due to the unpredictable nature of
personal injury litigation. If these claims and lawsuits,
individually or in the aggregate, were finally resolved against
us, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows
could be adversely affected.
F-14
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Materials
and labor
In the aluminum rolled products industry, our raw materials are
subject to continuous price volatility. We may not be able to
pass on the entire cost of the increases to our customers or
offset fully the effects of higher raw material costs, other
than metal, through productivity improvements, which may cause
our profitability to decline. In addition, there is a potential
time lag between changes in prices under our purchase contracts
and the point when we can implement a corresponding change under
our sales contracts with our customers. As a result, we could be
exposed to fluctuations in raw materials prices, including
metal, since, during the time lag period, we may have to
temporarily bear the additional cost of the change under our
purchase contracts, which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Significant price increases may result in our customers
substituting other materials, such as plastic or glass, for
aluminum or switch to another aluminum rolled products producer,
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
We consume substantial amounts of energy in our rolling
operations, our cast house operations and our Brazilian smelting
operations. The factors that affect our energy costs and supply
reliability tend to be specific to each of our facilities. A
number of factors could materially adversely affect our energy
position including, but not limited to: (a) increases in
the cost of natural gas; (b) increases in the cost of
supplied electricity or fuel oil related to transportation; (c)
interruptions in energy supply due to equipment failure or other
causes and (d) the inability to extend energy supply
contracts upon expiration on economical terms. A significant
increase in energy costs or disruption of energy supplies or
supply arrangements could have a material impact on our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Approximately 70% of our employees are represented by labor
unions under a large number of collective bargaining agreements
with varying durations and expiration dates. We may not be able
to satisfactorily renegotiate our collective bargaining
agreements when they expire. In addition, existing collective
bargaining agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage
at our facilities in the future, and any such work stoppage
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
Geographic
markets
We are, and will continue to be, subject to financial,
political, economic and business risks in connection with our
global operations. We have made investments and carry on
production activities in various emerging markets, including
Brazil, Korea and Malaysia, and we market our products in these
countries, as well as China and certain other countries in Asia.
While we anticipate higher growth or attractive production
opportunities from these emerging markets, they also present a
higher degree of risk than more developed markets. In addition
to the business risks inherent in developing and servicing new
markets, economic conditions may be more volatile, legal and
regulatory systems less developed and predictable, and the
possibility of various types of adverse governmental action more
pronounced. In addition, inflation, fluctuations in currency and
interest rates, competitive factors, civil unrest and labor
problems could affect our revenues, expenses and results of
operations. Our operations could also be adversely affected by
acts of war, terrorism or the threat of any of these events as
well as government actions such as controls on imports, exports
and prices, tariffs, new forms of taxation, or changes in fiscal
regimes and increased government regulation in the countries in
which we operate or service customers. Unexpected or
uncontrollable events or circumstances in any of these markets
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
Other
risks and uncertainties
In addition, refer to Note 17 Fair Value of
Assets and Liabilities and Note 20 Commitments
and Contingencies for a discussion of financial instruments and
commitments and contingencies.
F-15
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of the prior period amounts and
presentation have been made to conform to the presentation
adopted for the current period.
The following reclassifications and presentation changes were
made to the prior periods consolidated balance sheet and
consolidated statements of operations to conform to the current
period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on
total assets, total shareholders equity, net income (loss)
attributable to our common shareholder or cash flows as
previously presented:
|
|
|
|
|
The current portion of liabilities related to the Fair value of
derivative instruments were reclassified from Accrued expenses
and other current liabilities to a separate line item.
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, net were reclassified from Other (income)
expenses, net to a separate line item.
|
|
|
|
Interest income was reclassified from Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs to a separate line item.
|
|
|
|
Sale transaction fees were reclassified from a separate line
item to Other (income) expense, net.
|
In the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2008, we
reclassified $6 million from Current deferred income tax
assets, $2 million from Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities, and $53 million from Long-term deferred income
tax liabilities to Goodwill due to a misclassification on the
opening balance sheet of the Successor company. The impact of
this reclassification increased total assets and total
liabilities by $55 million, but had no effect on total
shareholders equity, net income (loss) attributable to our
common shareholder or cash flows as previously presented and is
not considered material to the March 31, 2008 financial
statements.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize sales when the revenue is realized or realizable,
and has been earned. We record sales when a firm sales agreement
is in place, delivery has occurred and collectibility of the
fixed or determinable sales price is reasonably assured.
We recognize product revenue, net of trade discounts and
allowances, in the reporting period in which the products are
shipped and the title and risk of ownership pass to the
customer. We generally ship our product to our customers FOB
(free on board) destination point. Our standard terms of
delivery are included in our contracts of sale, order
confirmation documents and invoices. We sell most of our
products under contracts based on a conversion
premium, which is subject to periodic adjustments based on
market factors. As a result, the aluminum price risk is largely
absorbed by the customer. In situations where we offer customers
fixed prices for future delivery of our products, we may enter
into derivative instruments for all or a portion of the cost of
metal inputs to protect our profit on the conversion of the
product. In addition, certain of our sales contracts provide for
a ceiling over which metal prices cannot contractually be passed
through to our customers, unless adjusted. We partially mitigate
the risk of this metal price exposure through the purchase of
derivative instruments.
We record tolling revenue when the revenue is realized or
realizable, and has been earned. Tolling refers to the process
by which certain customers provide metal to us for conversion to
rolled product. We do not take title to the metal and, after the
conversion and return shipment of the rolled product to the
customer, we charge them for the value-added conversion cost and
record these amounts in Net sales.
Shipping and handling amounts we bill to our customers are
included in Net sales and the related shipping and handling
costs we incur are included in Cost of goods sold (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization).
F-16
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cost
of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization)
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
includes all costs associated with inventories, including the
procurement of materials, the conversion of such materials into
finished product, and the costs of warehousing and distributing
finished goods to customers. Material procurement costs include
inbound freight charges as well as purchasing, receiving,
inspection and storage costs. Conversion costs include the costs
of direct production inputs such as labor and energy, as well as
allocated overheads from indirect production centers and plant
administrative support areas. Warehousing and distribution
expenses include inside and outside storage costs, outbound
freight charges and the costs of internal transfers.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include selling,
marketing and advertising expenses; salaries, travel and office
expenses of administrative employees and contractors; legal and
professional fees; software license fees; and bad debt expenses.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes investments that are highly
liquid and have maturities of three months or less when
purchased. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents
approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of
these instruments.
We maintain amounts on deposit with various financial
institutions, which may, at times, exceed federally insured
limits. However, management periodically evaluates the
credit-worthiness of those institutions, and we have not
experienced any losses on such deposits.
Accounts
Receivable
Our accounts receivable are geographically dispersed. We do not
obtain collateral relating to our accounts receivable. We do not
believe there are any significant concentrations of revenues
from any particular customer or group of customers that would
subject us to any significant credit risks in the collection of
our accounts receivable. We report accounts receivable at the
estimated net realizable amount we expect to collect from our
customers.
Additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts are made by
means of the provision for doubtful accounts. We write-off
uncollectible accounts receivable against the allowance for
doubtful accounts after exhausting collection efforts.
For each of the periods presented, we performed an analysis of
our historical cash collection patterns and considered the
impact of any known material events in determining the allowance
for doubtful accounts. In performing the analysis, the impact of
any adverse changes in general economic conditions was
considered, and for certain customers we reviewed a variety of
factors including: past due receivables; macro-economic
conditions; significant one-time events and historical
experience. Specific reserves for individual accounts may be
established due to a customers inability to meet their
financial obligations, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings
or the deterioration in a customers operating results or
financial position. As circumstances related to customers
change, we adjust our estimates of the recoverability of the
accounts receivable.
Derivative
Instruments
We utilize derivative instruments to manage our exposure to
changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and
interest rates. The fair values of all derivative instruments
are recognized as assets or liabilities at the balance sheet
date. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are
recognized as (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net and included in our consolidated statements of
F-17
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
operations or included in Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) (AOCI) on our consolidated balance sheet, depending on
the nature or use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for
hedge accounting treatment under the provisions of FASB
Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities (FASB 133), as amended.
Gains and losses on derivative instruments qualifying as cash
flow hedges are included, to the extent the hedges are
effective, in AOCI, until the underlying transactions are
recognized as gains or losses and included in our consolidated
statements of operations. Gains and losses on derivative
instruments used as hedges of our net investment in foreign
operations are included, net of taxes, to the extent the hedges
are effective, in AOCI as part of the cumulative translation
adjustment (CTA). The ineffective portions of cash flow hedges
and hedges of net investments in foreign operations, if any, are
recognized as gains or losses and included in our consolidated
statements of operations, in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in the current period.
Inventories
We carry our inventories at the lower of their cost or market
value, reduced by reserves for excess and obsolete items. We use
the average cost method to determine cost.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
We report land, buildings, leasehold improvements and machinery
and equipment at cost. We report assets under capital lease
obligations at the lower of their fair value or the present
value of the aggregate future minimum lease payments as of the
beginning of the lease term. We depreciate our assets using the
straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful
life of the assets or the lease term, excluding any lease
renewals, unless the lease renewals are reasonably assured. As a
result of the Arrangement, land, building, leasehold
improvements and machinery and equipment as of May 16, 2007
were adjusted to reflect fair value.
The ranges of estimated useful lives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
30 to 40
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
7 to 20
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
5 to 25
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
3 to 10
|
|
Equipment under capital lease obligations
|
|
|
6 to 15
|
|
As noted above, our machinery and equipment have useful lives of
5 to 25 years. Most of our large scale machinery, including
hot mills, cold mills, continuous casting mills, furnaces and
finishing mills have useful lives of
15-25 years.
Supporting machinery and equipment, including automation and
work rolls, have useful lives of 5-15 years.
Maintenance and repairs of property and equipment are expensed
as incurred. We capitalize replacements and improvements that
increase the estimated useful life of an asset, and when
material, we capitalize interest on major construction and
development projects while in progress.
We retain fully depreciated assets in property and accumulated
depreciation accounts until we remove them from service. In the
case of sale, retirement or disposal, the asset cost and related
accumulated depreciation balances are removed from the
respective accounts, and the resulting net amount, less any
proceeds, is included as a gain or loss in Other (income)
expenses, net in our consolidated statements of operations.
F-18
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We account for operating leases under the provisions of FASB
Statement No. 13, Accounting for Leases (FASB 13),
and FASB Technical
Bulletin No. 85-3,
Accounting for Operating Leases with Scheduled Rent
Increases. These pronouncements require us to recognize
escalating rents, including any rent holidays, on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease for those lease
agreements where we receive the right to control the use of the
entire leased property at the beginning of the lease term.
Goodwill
We account for goodwill under the guidance in FASB Statement
No. 141, Business Combinations (FASB 141) and
FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (FASB 142).
We test goodwill for impairment using a fair value approach at
the reporting unit level. We use our operating segments as our
reporting units. We test for impairment at least annually during
the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, unless some triggering
event occurs that would require an impairment assessment. In
accordance with FASB 142, we concluded that events had occurred
and circumstances had changed during our third quarter of fiscal
2009 requiring us to perform an interim period goodwill
impairment test. See Note 3 Impairment of
Goodwill and Investment in Affiliate.
We use the present value of estimated future cash flows to
establish the estimated fair value of our reporting units as of
the testing dates. This approach includes many assumptions
related to future growth rates, discount factors and tax rates,
among other considerations. Changes in economic and operating
conditions impacting these assumptions could result in goodwill
impairment in future periods. When available and as appropriate,
we use comparative market multiples to corroborate the estimated
fair value. If the carrying amount of a reporting units
goodwill were to exceed its estimated fair value, we would
recognize an impairment charge in Impairment of goodwill in our
consolidated statements of operations.
When a business within a reporting unit is disposed of, goodwill
is allocated to the gain or loss on disposition using the
relative fair value methodology of FASB 142.
Long-Lived
Assets and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with FASB 142, we amortize the cost of intangible
assets over their respective estimated useful lives to their
estimated residual value.
Under the guidance in FASB Statement No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we
assess the recoverability of long-lived assets (excluding
goodwill) and definite-lived intangible assets, whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that we may not be able to
recover the assets carrying amount. We measure the
recoverability of assets to be held and used by a comparison of
the carrying amount of the asset (groups) to the expected,
undiscounted future net cash flows to be generated by that asset
(groups), or, for identifiable intangible assets, by determining
whether the amortization of the intangible asset balance over
its remaining life can be recovered through undiscounted future
cash flows. The amount of impairment of identifiable intangible
assets is based on the present value of estimated future cash
flows. We measure the amount of impairment of other long-lived
assets (excluding goodwill) as the amount by which the carrying
value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, which is
generally determined as the present value of estimated future
cash flows or as the appraised value. Impairments of long-lived
assets have been included in Restructuring charges, net and
Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statement of
operations.
If the carrying amount of an intangible asset were to exceed its
fair value, we would recognize an impairment charge in Other
(income) expenses, net in our consolidated statements of
operations. No impairments of other intangible assets have been
identified during any of the periods presented.
F-19
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We continue to amortize long-lived assets to be disposed of
other than by sale. We carry long-lived assets to be disposed of
by sale in our consolidated balance sheets at the lower of net
book value or the fair value less cost to sell, and we cease
depreciation.
Investment
in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates
Management assesses the potential for
other-than-temporary
impairment of our equity method and cost method investments. We
consider all available information, including the recoverability
of the investment, the earnings and near-term prospects of the
affiliate, factors related to the industry, conditions of the
affiliate, and our ability, if any, to influence the management
of the affiliate. We assess fair value based on valuation
methodologies, as appropriate, including the present value of
estimated future cash flows, estimates of sales proceeds, and
external appraisals. If an investment is considered to be
impaired and the decline in value is other than temporary, we
record an appropriate write-down.
Guarantees
We account for certain guarantees in accordance with FASB
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45).
FIN 45 requires that a guarantor recognize a liability for
the fair value of obligations undertaken at the inception of a
guarantee.
Financing
Costs and Interest Income
We amortize financing costs and premiums, and accrete discounts,
over the remaining life of the related debt using the
effective interest amortization and straight-line
methods. The related income or expense is included in Interest
expense and amortization of debt issuance costs in our
consolidated statements of operations. We record discounts or
premiums as a direct deduction from, or addition to, the face
amount of the financing.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(FASB 157), defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. FASB 157 also applies to measurements
under other accounting pronouncements, such as FASB Statement
No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FASB 107) that require or permit fair
value measurements. FASB 107 requires disclosures of the
fair value of financial instruments. Our financial instruments
include: cash and cash equivalents; certificates of deposit;
accounts receivable; accounts payable; foreign currency, energy
and interest rate derivative instruments; cross-currency swaps;
metal option and forward contracts; related party notes
receivable and payable; letters of credit; short-term borrowings
and long-term debt.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, certificates
of deposit, accounts receivable, accounts payable and current
related party notes receivable and payable approximate their
fair value because of the short-term maturity and highly liquid
nature of these instruments. The fair value of our letters of
credit is deemed to be the amount of payment guaranteed on our
behalf by third party financial institutions. We determine the
fair value of our short-term borrowings and long-term debt based
on various factors including maturity schedules, call features
and current market rates. We also use quoted market prices, when
available, or the present value of estimated future cash flows
to determine fair value of short-term borrowings and long-term
debt. When quoted market prices are not available for various
types of financial instruments (such as currency, energy and
interest rate derivative instruments, swaps, options and forward
contracts), we use standard pricing models with market-based
inputs, which take into account the present value of estimated
future cash flows.
F-20
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Pensions
and Postretirement Benefits
We account for our pensions and other postretirement benefits in
accordance with FASB Statements No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans (FASB 158), No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions, and No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
than Pensions. We adopted FASB 158 for the year ended
December 31, 2006. FASB 158 requires us to recognize the
funded status of our benefit plans as a net asset or liability,
with an offsetting adjustment to AOCI in shareholders
equity. The funded status is calculated as the difference
between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit
obligation. Prior to and including the three months ended
March 31, 2007, we used a December 31 measurement date for
our pension and postretirement plans. As a result of our
acquisition by Hindalco and the application of push down
accounting, our pension and postretirement plans were remeasured
as of May 16, 2007. For the years ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, we used March 31 as the measurement date.
We use standard actuarial methods and assumptions to account for
our pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Pension and
postretirement benefit obligations are actuarially calculated
using managements best estimates of expected service
periods, salary increases and retirement ages of employees.
Pension and postretirement benefit expense includes the
actuarially computed cost of benefits earned during the current
service period, the interest cost on accrued obligations, the
expected return on plan assets based on fair market value and
the straight-line amortization of net actuarial gains and losses
and adjustments due to plan amendments. Generally, all net
actuarial gains and losses are amortized over the expected
average remaining service lives of plan participants.
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans in the U.S., Canada, Switzerland and the U.K., unfunded
pension plans in Germany, and unfunded lump sum indemnities in
France, South Korea, Malaysia and Italy. Our other
postretirement obligations include unfunded healthcare and life
insurance benefits provided to retired employees in Canada, the
U.S. and Brazil.
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Affiliates
These financial statements reflect the retrospective application
of FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements (FASB 160) for all
periods presented. FASB 160 establishes accounting and reporting
standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly
identified and presented in the condensed consolidated balance
sheet within shareholders equity, but separate from the
parents equity; (ii) the amount of consolidated net
income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling
interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of
the consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes
in a parents ownership interest while the parent retains
its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be
accounted for consistently.
Our consolidated financial statements include all assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of less-than- 100%-owned
affiliates that we control or for which we are the primary
beneficiary. We record a noncontrolling interest for the
allocable portion of income or loss to which the noncontrolling
interest holders are entitled based upon their ownership share
of the affiliate. Distributions made to the holders of
noncontrolling interests are charged to the respective
noncontrolling interest balance.
Losses attributable to the noncontrolling interest in an
affiliate may exceed our interest in the affiliates
equity. The excess, and any further losses attributable to the
noncontrolling interest, shall be attributed to those interests.
The noncontrolling interest shall continue to be attributed its
share of losses even if that attribution results in a deficit
noncontrolling interest balance. As of March 31, 2009, we
have no such losses.
F-21
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Environmental
Liabilities
We record accruals for environmental matters when it is probable
that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the
liability can be reasonably estimated, based on current law and
existing technologies. We adjust these accruals periodically as
assessment and remediation efforts progress or as additional
technical or legal information become available. Accruals for
environmental liabilities are stated at undiscounted amounts.
Environmental liabilities are included in our consolidated
balance sheets in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
and Other long-term liabilities, depending on their short- or
long-term nature. Any receivables for related insurance or other
third party recoveries for environmental liabilities are
recorded when it is probable that a recovery will be realized
and are included in our consolidated balance sheets in Prepaid
expenses and other current assets.
Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and
clean-up are
charged to expense. Estimated future incremental operations,
maintenance and management costs directly related to remediation
are accrued in the period in which such costs are determined to
be probable and estimable.
Litigation
Reserves
FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies,
requires that we accrue for loss contingencies associated
with outstanding litigation, claims and assessments for which
management has determined it is probable that a loss contingency
exists and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We
expense professional fees associated with litigation claims and
assessments as incurred.
Income
Taxes
We provide for income taxes using the asset and liability method
as required by FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes (FASB 109). This approach recognizes the amount
of income taxes payable or refundable for the current year, as
well as deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax
consequence of events recognized in the consolidated financial
statements and income tax returns. Deferred income tax assets
and liabilities are adjusted to recognize the effects of changes
in tax laws or enacted tax rates. Under FASB 109, a valuation
allowance is required when it is more likely than not that some
portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Realization is dependent on generating sufficient future taxable
income.
Share-Based
Compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement No. 123
(Revised), Share-Based Payment (FASB 123(R)), which is a
revision to FASB Statement No. 123. FASB 123(R) requires
the recognition of compensation expense for a share-based award
over an employees requisite service period based on the
awards grant date fair value, subject to adjustment.
We adopted FASB 123(R) using the modified prospective method,
which requires companies to record compensation cost beginning
with the effective date based on the requirements of FASB 123(R)
for all share-based payments granted after the effective date.
All awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of
FASB 123(R) that remain unvested at the adoption date will
continue to be expensed over the remaining service period.
Additionally, we determined that all of our compensation plans
settled in cash are considered liability based awards. As such,
liabilities for awards under these plans are required to be
measured at each reporting date until the date of settlement.
Various valuation methods were used to determine the fair value
of these awards.
Cash flows resulting from tax benefits for deductions in excess
of compensation cost recognized are classified within financing
cash flows.
F-22
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Foreign
Currency Translation
In accordance with FASB Statement No. 52, Foreign
Currency Translation, the assets and liabilities of foreign
operations, whose functional currency is other than the
U.S. dollar (located in Europe and Asia), are translated to
U.S. dollars at the period end exchange rates and revenues
and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the
period. Differences arising from the translation of assets and
liabilities are included in the currency translation adjustment
(CTA) component of accumulated other comprehensive income. If
there is a reduction in our ownership in a foreign operation,
the relevant portion of the CTA is recognized in Other (income)
expenses, net.
For all operations, the remeasurement of monetary items
denominated in currencies other than the functional currency
produce transaction gains and losses. For these operations, the
monetary items denominated in currencies other than the
functional currency are remeasured at period exchange rates and
transaction gains and losses are included in Other (income)
expenses, net in our consolidated statements of operations.
Non-monetary items are remeasured at historical rates.
Research
and Development
We incur costs in connection with research and development
programs that are expected to contribute to future earnings, and
charge such costs against income as incurred. Research and
development costs consist primarily of salaries and
administrative costs.
Restructuring
Activities
Restructuring charges, net include employee severance and
benefit costs, impairments of assets, and other costs associated
with exit activities. We apply the provisions of FASB Statement
No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or
Disposal Activities (FASB 146) relating to one-time
termination benefits. Severance costs accounted for under FASB
146 are recognized when management with the proper level of
authority has committed to a restructuring plan and communicated
those actions to employees. Impairment losses are based upon the
estimated fair value less costs to sell, with fair value
estimated based on existing market prices for similar assets.
Other exit costs include environmental remediation costs and
contract termination costs, primarily related to equipment and
facility lease obligations. At each reporting date, we evaluate
the accruals for restructuring costs to ensure the accruals are
still appropriate.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards have been adopted by us
during the twelve months ended March 31, 2009.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we adopted FASB
Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133 (FASB 161). FASB 161 changes the
disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging
activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced
disclosures about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for under FASB 133 and its related
interpretations and (iii) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect an entitys financial position,
results of operations and cash flows. This standard had no
impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we adopted FASB
Staff Position (FSP)
No. FAS 140-4
and FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)-8 (FIN 46(R)-8),
Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers
of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities.
FIN 46(R)-8 calls for enhanced disclosures by public
entities about interests in variable interest entities (VIE) and
provides users of the financial statements
F-23
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
with greater transparency about an enterprises involvement
with variable interest entities. This FSP had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operation and cash
flows.
On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (FASB 159). FASB 159 permits entities to choose
to measure financial instruments and certain other assets and
liabilities at fair value on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis (the fair value option) with changes in fair
value reported in earnings each reporting period. The fair value
option enables some companies to reduce the volatility in
reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without applying the complex hedge
accounting requirements under FASB 133, to achieve similar
results. We previously recorded our derivative contracts and
hedging activities at fair value in accordance with FASB 133. We
did not elect the fair value option for any other financial
instruments or certain other financial assets and liabilities
that were not previously required to be measured at fair value.
On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (FASB 157), as it relates to
financial assets and financial liabilities. On October 10,
2008, we adopted FASB Staff Position
FAS 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the
Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP
FAS 157-3).
The FSP clarifies the application of FASB 157 in a market that
is not active and provides an example to illustrate key
considerations in determining the fair value of a financial
asset when the market for that financial asset is not active.
FSP
FAS 157-3
is effective for prior periods for which financial statements
have not been issued. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operation and cash
flows. See Note 17 Fair Value of Assets
and Liabilities regarding our adoption of this standard.
On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Staff Position
No. FIN 39-1,
Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39, (FSP
FIN 39-1).
FSP
FIN 39-1
amends FASB Statement No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts
Related to Certain Contracts, by permitting entities that
enter into master netting arrangements as part of their
derivative transactions to offset in their financial statements
net derivative positions against the fair value of amounts (or
amounts that approximate fair value) recognized for the right to
reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash
collateral under those arrangements. Our adoption of this
standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards have been issued, but
have not yet been adopted by us as of March 31, 2009, as
adoption is not required until future reporting periods.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 107-1
(FSP
FAS 107-1)
and APB Opinion
28-1 (APB
28-1),
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments. FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
amends FASB 107 and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim
Financial Reporting, to require disclosures about the fair
value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods.
FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
will be effective for interim reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009. As FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
only require enhanced disclosures, they will have no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operation and
cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP
FAS 157-4).
FSP
FAS 157-4
provides additional guidance in accordance with FASB
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume
and level of activity for the asset or liability has
significantly decreased. FSP
FAS 157-4
will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. This standard will have no
impact our consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 115-2
(FSP
FAS 115-2)
and FASB Staff Position
No. 124-2
(FSP
FAS 124-2),
Recognition of
Other-than-Temporary-Impairments.
FSP
FAS No. 115-2
and FSP
FAS No. 124-2
amends the
other-than-temporary
impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt and equity
F-24
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
securities. FSP
FAS No. 115-2
and FSP
FAS No. 124-2
will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. This standard will have no
impact our consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits (FSP No. 132(R)-1). FSP
No. 132(R)-1 requires that an employer disclose the
following information about the fair value of plan assets:
1) how investment allocation decisions are made, including
the factors that are pertinent to understanding of investment
policies and strategies; 2) the major categories of plan
assets; 3) the inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure the fair value of plan assets; 4) the effect of
fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on
changes in plan assets for the period; and 5) significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. FSP No. 132(R)-1
will be effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009, with early application permitted. At
initial adoption, application of FSP No. 132(R)-1 would not
be required for earlier periods that are presented for
comparative purposes. This standard will have no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
In November 2008, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issued
Issue
No. 08-06,
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations
(EITF 08-06).
EITF 08-6
address questions that have arisen about the application of the
equity method of accounting for investments acquired after the
effective date of both FASB 141(R) and FASB Statement
No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements.
EITF 08-06
clarifies how to account for certain transactions involving
equity method investments.
EITF 08-6
is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited.
This standard will have no impact our consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP
FAS 142-3).
FSP
FAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing the
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB 142. FSP
FAS 142-3
also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination
of intangible asset useful lives. FSP
FAS 142-3
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We have not yet commenced
evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP
FAS 142-3
on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141
(Revised), Business Combinations (FASB 141(R)). FASB
141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the
acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
FASB 141(R) also requires acquirers to estimate the
acquisition-date fair value of any contingent consideration and
to recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of
contingent consideration in earnings. We will be required to
apply this new standard prospectively to business combinations
occurring after March 31, 2009, with the exception of the
accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and
acquired tax contingencies. FASB 141(R) amends certain
provisions of FASB 109 such that adjustments made to valuation
allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies
associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective
date of FASB 141(R) would also apply the provisions of FASB
141(R). Early adoption is prohibited.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do
not apply to our operations.
We believe we have adequate liquidity to meet our operational
and capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Our primary
sources of liquidity are available cash and cash equivalents,
borrowing
F-25
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
availability under our revolving credit facility and future cash
generated by operating activities. During the first nine months
of fiscal 2009, our liquidity position decreased significantly
as the global recession led to a rapid decline in aluminum
prices and end-customer demand for flat-rolled products.
However, we believe aluminum prices have stabilized and that
there is limited risk of further significant volume declines in
fiscal 2010 due to the volume of our sales into the beverage can
sheet market. We had stable liquidity in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009 and expect to operate with positive cash flow in
2010, despite continued low levels of demand and net cash
outflows to settle derivative positions. This reflects our
ongoing efforts to preserve liquidity through cost and capital
spending controls and effective management of working capital.
Risks associated with supplier terms, customer credit and broker
hedging capacity, while still present to some degree, have been
managed to date with minimal negative impact on our business.
Although there can be no assurances that further deterioration
in global market conditions would not negatively impact our
liquidity in 2010, we believe that our liquidity position will
improve during fiscal 2010, due primarily to expected reduced
cash outflows for metal derivatives and cash savings from
previously-announced restructuring programs.
|
|
3.
|
IMPAIRMENT
OF GOODWILL AND INVESTMENT IN AFFILIATE
|
In accordance with FASB 142, we evaluate the carrying value of
goodwill for potential impairment annually during the fourth
quarter of each fiscal year or on an interim basis if an event
occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the fair value
of a reporting unit is likely to be below its carrying value.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we concluded that
interim impairment testing was required due to the recent
deterioration in the global economic environment and the
resulting significant decrease in both the market capitalization
of our parent company and the valuation of our publicly traded
7.25% Senior Notes.
We test consolidated goodwill for impairment using a fair value
approach at the reporting unit level. We use our operating
segments as our reporting units and perform our goodwill
impairment test in two steps. Step one compares the fair value
of each reporting unit (operating segment) to its carrying
amount. If step one indicates that an impairment potentially
exists, the second step is performed to measure the amount of
impairment, if any. Goodwill impairment exists when the
estimated fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value.
Quarter
Ended December 31, 2008 Impairment Testing
For purposes of our step one analysis, our estimate of fair
value of each reporting unit is based on a combination of
(1) quoted market prices/relationships (the market
approach), (2) discounted cash flows (the income approach)
and (3) a stock price
build-up
approach (the
build-up
approach). Under the market approach, the fair value of each
reporting unit was determined based upon comparisons to public
companies engaged in similar businesses. Under the income
approach, the fair value of each reporting unit was based on the
present value of estimated future cash flows. The income
approach is dependent on a number of significant management
assumptions including estimated demand in each geographic
market, future LME prices and the discount rate. The discount
rate is commensurate with the risk inherent in the projected
cash flows and reflects the rate of return required by an
investor in the current economic conditions. Under the
build-up
approach, which is a variation of the market approach, we
estimated the fair value of each reporting unit based on the
estimated contribution of each of the reporting units to
Hindalcos total business enterprise value. The estimated
fair value for each reporting unit was within the range of fair
values yielded under each approach. The result of our step one
test indicated a potential impairment.
For our reporting units in North America, Europe and South
America, we proceeded to step two for the goodwill impairment
calculation in which we determined the implied fair value of the
goodwill and compared it to the carrying value of the goodwill.
We allocated the fair value of the reporting unit to all of its
assets and liabilities as if the reporting unit has been
acquired and the fair value was the price paid to acquire each
reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting
unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and
F-26
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
liabilities is the implied fair value of the reporting
units goodwill. Step two was not performed for Asia as no
goodwill has been allocated to this reporting unit.
As a result of our step two evaluation, we recorded a
$1.34 billion impairment charge in the quarter ended
December 31, 2008. We finalized our interim goodwill
impairment test in the fourth quarter which resulted in no
adjustment to the charge as recorded.
We also evaluated the carrying value of our investment in
Aluminium Norf GmbH for impairment. This resulted in an
impairment charge of $160 million, which is reported in
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates on
the consolidated statement of operations.
Year
End Impairment Testing
Our annual goodwill impairment test was performed in the fourth
quarter and no additional impairment was identified. The table
below summarizes goodwill by reporting unit (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Reporting Unit
|
|
2008(A)
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
1,149
|
|
|
$
|
(860
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
181
|
|
South America
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
$
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
See Note 1 Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies (Reclassifications) for discussion of
goodwill balance reclassification at March 31, 2008. |
|
(B) |
|
Other adjustments include: (1) an adjustment in North
America for final payment related to the transfer of pension
plans in Canada for employees who elected to transfer their past
service to Novelis during the quarter ended June 30, 2008
and (2) adjustments in Europe related to tax audits during
the year ended March 31, 2009. |
F-27
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
RESTRUCTURING
PROGRAMS
|
The following table summarizes the restructuring activity by
region (in millions). Restructuring charges, net on the
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
March 31, 2009 of $95 million include $22 million
of non-cash charges related to restructuring actions in Europe
and Asia, discussed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions (recoveries), net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
April 1, 2007 to May 15, 2007 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions (recoveries), net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of May 15, 2007
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 to March 31, 2008 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions (recoveries), net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Fiscal 2009 Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions (recoveries), net
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Adjustments other
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended March 31, 2009 Restructuring Activities
Europe
In March 2009, we announced the closure of our aluminum sheet
mill in Rogerstone, South Wales, U.K. Operations ceased in
April 2009, resulting in the elimination of 440 positions.
The total amount expected to be incurred in connection with this
action is $63 million, of which $60 million was
recorded in the year ended March 31, 2009. Included within
the $60 million recorded for the year ended March 31,
2009 was the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Severance related costs
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Environmental remediation expense
|
|
|
20
|
|
Fixed asset impairments(A)
|
|
|
12
|
|
Write-down of parts and supplies(A)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Reduction of reserve associated with unfavorable contract(A)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
These restructuring charges are not included in the
restructuring provision table above but have been reflected as
reductions to the respective balance sheet accounts. |
F-28
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
While no significant payments have been made related to this
facility closure as of March 31, 2009, we expect all severance
and other exit costs to be paid within one year. Environmental
liabilities are projected to be settled through April 2011.
In March 2009, we announced a restructuring plan to streamline
our operations at our Rugles facility located in Upper Normandy,
France, which eliminates approximately 80 positions. The
facility will continue operation of its five major processes,
including continuous casting, breakdown/foilstock, rolling,
grinding and finishing. For the year ended March 31, 2009,
we recorded $9 million in severance-related costs.
In March 2009, we recorded $1 million in severance costs at
our Ohle, Germany facility related to the elimination of 13
positions.
North
America
In November 2008, we announced a Voluntary Separation Program
(VSP) available to salaried employees in North America and the
Corporate office aimed at reducing staff levels. This VSP
supplemented a pre-existing Involuntary Severance Program (ISP).
We eliminated approximately 120 positions for the year ended
March 31, 2009, and recorded $16 million in
severance-related costs for the VSP and ISP programs.
South
America
In January 2009, we announced that we will cease production of
alumina at our Ouro Preto facility in Brazil effective May 2009.
The global economic crisis and the recent dramatic drop in
alumina prices have made alumina production at Ouro Preto
economically unfeasible. For the foreseeable future, the Ouro
Preto facility will purchase alumina through third-parties.
Approximately 290 positions were eliminated at Ouro Preto,
including 150 employees and 140 contractors. For the year
ended March 31, 2009, we recorded approximately
$2 million in severance-related costs. Other exit costs
include less than $1 million related to the idling of the
refinery. Other activities related to the facility, including
electric power generation and the production of primary
aluminum, will continue unaffected.
Asia
In February 2009, we recorded approximately $1 million in
severance-related costs related to a voluntary retirement
program in Asia which eliminated 34 positions. Also, during the
year ended March 31, 2009, we recorded an impairment charge
of approximately $5 million in Novelis Korea due to the
obsolescence of certain production related fixed assets. These
restructuring charges are not included in the restructuring
provision table above but have been reflected as reductions to
the respective balance sheet account.
Year
Ended March 31, 2008 Restructuring Activities
North
America
In March 2008, management approved the closure of our light
gauge converter products facility in Louisville, Kentucky. The
closure is intended to bring the capacity of our North American
operations in line with local market demand. As a result of the
closure, we recognized approximately $5 million in
restructuring charges during the quarter ended March 31,
2008. Our Louisville facility closed in June 2008.
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2007 Restructuring
Activities
Europe
In March 2007, management approved the proposed restructuring of
our facilities in Bridgnorth, U.K. These proposed actions were
intended to bring the capacity of our U.K. operations in line
with local market demand and to reduce the cost of our U.K.
operations. Certain production lines were shut down in the U.K.
and volume was relocated to other European plants. For the three
months ended March 31, 2007, we
F-29
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recognized approximately $8 million each in impairment
charges on long-lived assets in the U.K. that will no longer be
used and severance costs.
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 Restructuring
Activities
Europe
In December 2006, we announced several restructuring actions at
our facilities in the U.K., Germany, France and Italy. These
actions are intended to streamline the management of these
operations. We incurred $2 million in severance-related
costs through December 31, 2006 in connection with these
programs. We incurred no additional costs related to these
programs and we completed all actions by March 2008.
In August 2006, we announced a restructuring of our European
central management and administration activities in Zurich,
Switzerland to reduce overhead costs and streamline support
functions. In addition, we exited our Neuhausen research and
development center in Switzerland. Through March 31, 2008,
we completed this action and incurred costs of approximately
$4 million.
In July 2006, we announced restructuring actions at our
Goettingen facility in Germany to reduce overhead administrative
costs and streamline functions. We incurred approximately
$5 million related primarily to severance costs through
December 31, 2006. As of March 31, 2009, we have
completed this action and have not incurred significant
additional costs.
In March 2006, we announced the restructuring of our European
operations, with the reorganization of our plants in Ohle and
Ludenscheid, Germany, including the closing of two non-core
business lines located within those facilities. In connection
with the reorganization of our Ohle and Ludenscheid plants, we
incurred costs of approximately $5 million during the year
ended December 31, 2006. We do not anticipate future costs
related to these programs to be significant and expect all
obligations to be fulfilled by December 2011.
North
America
In December 2006, we announced the closing of our Montreal
planning office. We incurred approximately $1 million of
severance-related costs through December 31, 2006. Through
March 31, 2008, we completed this action and incurred no
additional costs.
Accounts receivable consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
1,002
|
|
|
$
|
1,160
|
|
Other accounts receivable
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable third parties
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts third parties
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
Other accounts receivable related parties
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
1,074
|
|
|
$
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts is managements best
estimate of probable losses inherent in the accounts receivable
balance. Management determines the allowance based on known
uncollectible accounts,
F-30
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
historical experience and other currently available evidence. As
of March 31, 2009 and 2008, our allowance for doubtful
accounts represented approximately 0.2% and 0.1%, respectively,
of gross accounts receivable.
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
Recovered/
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
(Written-Off)
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Forfaiting
of Trade Receivables
Novelis Korea Ltd. forfaits trade receivables in the ordinary
course of business. These trade receivables are typically
outstanding for 60 to 120 days. Forfaiting is a
non-recourse method to manage credit and interest rate risks.
Under this method, customers contract to pay a financial
institution. The institution assumes the risk of non-payment and
remits the invoice value (net of a fee) to us after presentation
of a proof of delivery of goods to the customer. We do not
retain a financial or legal interest in these receivables, and
they are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. Forfaiting expenses are included in Selling, general and
administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of
operations.
Factoring
of Trade Receivables
Our Brazilian operations factor, without recourse, certain trade
receivables that are unencumbered by pledge restrictions. Under
this method, customers are directed to make payments on invoices
to a financial institution, but are not contractually required
to do so. The financial institution pays us any invoices it has
approved for payment (net of a fee). We do not retain financial
or legal interest in these receivables, and they are not
included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Factoring expenses are included in Selling, general and
administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of
operations.
Summary
Disclosures of Financial Amounts
The following tables summarize amounts relating to our
forfaiting and factoring activities (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Receivables forfaited
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
424
|
|
Receivables factored
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
Forfaiting expense
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Factoring expense
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
F-31
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Forfaited receivables outstanding
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
Factored receivables outstanding
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Inventories consist of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property, plant and equipment, net, consists of the following
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Land and property rights
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,544
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(741
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the assignment of new fair values as a result of the
Arrangement, we have no fully depreciated assets included in our
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Total depreciation expense is shown in the table below (in
millions). Capitalized interest related to construction of
property, plant and equipment was immaterial in the periods
presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Asset
impairments
During the year ended March 31, 2009, we recorded
$1 million of impairment charges, which is included in
Other (income) expense, net on the consolidated statement of
operations. We also recorded impairment charges totaling
$17 million related to assets in Europe and Asia which have
been included in Restructuring charges, net on the consolidated
statement of operations (see Note 4
Restructuring Programs).
During the period from May 16, 2007 through March 31,
2008, we recorded an impairment charge of $1 million in
Novelis Italy due to the obsolescence of certain production
related fixed assets.
Leases
We lease certain land, buildings and equipment under
non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates
through 2015, and we lease assets in Sierre, Switzerland
including a
15-year
capital lease through 2020 from Alcan. Operating leases
generally have five to ten-year terms, with one or more renewal
options, with terms to be negotiated at the time of renewal.
Various facility leases include provisions for rent escalation
to recognize increased operating costs or require us to pay
certain maintenance and utility costs.
The following table summarizes rent expense included in our
consolidated statements of operations (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Rent expense
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2009, for our
operating and capital leases having an initial or remaining
non-cancelable lease term in excess of one year are as follows
(in millions). The future minimum lease payments for capital
lease obligations exclude $3 million of unamortized fair
value adjustments recorded as a result of the Arrangement (see
Note 12 Debt in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Capital Lease
|
|
Year Ending March 31,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
2011
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2012
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2013
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2014
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: interest portion on capital lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal obligation on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets and related accumulated amortization under capital lease
obligations as of March 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Assets under capital lease obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale
of assets
There were no material sales of fixed assets during the year
ended March 31, 2009. During March 2008, we sold land at
our Kingston facility in Ontario, Canada for $5 million. No
gain or loss was recognized on the sale. During the year ended
December 31, 2006, we sold our rights to develop and
operate two hydroelectric power plants in South America and
recorded a pre-tax gain of approximately $11 million,
included in Other (income) expenses, net in our
consolidated statements of operations.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
The following is a summary of our asset retirement obligation
activity. The period-end balances are included in Other
long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation as of December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Liability incurred
|
|
|
1
|
|
Liability settled
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
14
|
|
Liability incurred
|
|
|
|
|
Liability settled
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation as of May 15, 2007
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation as of May 16, 2007
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
Liability incurred
|
|
|
|
|
Liability settled
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation as of March 31, 2008
|
|
|
16
|
|
Liability incurred
|
|
|
|
|
Liability settled
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of intangible assets were as follows (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 Successor
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 Successor
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
Customer-related intangible assets
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
Favorable energy supply contract
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
9.5 years
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
9.5 years
|
|
Other favorable contracts
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3.3 years
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3.3 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
(114
|
)
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
|
17.2 years
|
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
888
|
|
|
|
17.2 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our favorable energy supply contract and other favorable
contracts are amortized over their estimated useful lives using
methods that reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits
are expected to be consumed. All other intangible assets are
amortized using the straight-line method.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets is as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Total Amortization expense related to intangible assets
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Less: Amortization expense related to intangible assets included
in Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization)(A)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets included in
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Relates to amortization of favorable energy and other supply
contracts. |
Estimated total amortization expense related to intangible
assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as
follows (in millions). Actual amounts may differ from these
estimates due to such factors as customer turnover, raw material
consumption patterns, impairments, additional intangible asset
acquisitions and other events.
F-35
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
2011
|
|
|
55
|
|
2012
|
|
|
54
|
|
2013
|
|
|
54
|
|
2014
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
9.
|
CONSOLIDATION
OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
|
We have a variable interest in Logan Aluminum, Inc. (Logan) and
have concluded that we are the primary beneficiary. As a result,
this entity is consolidated pursuant to FASB Interpretation
No. 46 (Revised), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities (FIN 46(R)) in all periods presented. All
significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated.
Logan
Organization and Operations
In 1985, Alcan purchased an interest in Logan to provide tolling
services jointly with ARCO Aluminum, Inc. (ARCO). Logan produces
approximately one-third of the can sheet utilized in the
U.S. can sheet market. According to the joint venture
agreements between Alcan and ARCO, Alcan owned 40 shares of
Class A common stock and ARCO owned 60 shares of
Class B common stock in Logan. Each share provides its
holder with one vote, regardless of class. However, Class A
shareholders have the right to select four directors, and
Class B shareholders have the right to select three
directors. Generally, a majority vote is required for the Logan
board of directors to take action. In connection with our
spin-off from Alcan in January 2005, Alcan transferred all of
its rights and obligations under a joint venture agreement and
subsequent ancillary agreements (collectively, the JV
Agreements) to us.
Logan processes metal received from Novelis and ARCO and charges
the respective partner a fee to cover expenses. Logan has no
equity and relies on the regular reimbursement of costs and
expenses by Novelis and ARCO to fund its operations. This
reimbursement is considered a variable interest as it
constitutes a form of financing of the activities of Logan.
Other than these contractually required reimbursements, we do
not provide other additional support to Logan. We are obligated
to absorb a majority of the risk of loss; however, Logans
creditors do not have recourse to our general credit.
Primary
Beneficiary
A variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called
the primary beneficiary. Upon consolidation, the primary
beneficiary generally must initially record all of the
VIEs assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests at
fair value. Generally, the primary beneficiary is the reporting
enterprise with a variable interest in the entity that is
obligated to absorb the majority (greater than 50%) of the
VIEs expected loss.
Based upon a previous restructuring program, Novelis acquired
the right to use the excess capacity at Logan. To utilize this
capacity, we installed and have sole ownership of a cold mill at
the Logan facility which enabled us have the ability to take the
majority share of production and costs. These facts qualify
Novelis as Logans primary beneficiary under FIN 46(R).
F-36
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Carrying
Value
The following table summarizes the carrying value and
classification on our consolidated balance sheets of assets and
liabilities owned by the Logan joint venture and consolidated
under FIN 46(R) (in millions). There are significant other
assets used in the operations of Logan that are not part of the
joint venture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(112
|
)
|
Net carrying value
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
10.
|
INVESTMENT
IN AND ADVANCES TO NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES AND RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
The following table summarizes the ownership structure and our
ownership percentage of the non-consolidated affiliates in which
we have an investment as of March 31, 2009, and which we
account for using the equity method. We do not control our
non-consolidated affiliates, but have the ability to exercise
significant influence over their operating and financial
policies. We have no material investments that we account for
using the cost method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Affiliate Name
|
|
Ownership Structure
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Consorcio Candonga
|
|
Unincorporated Joint Venture
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
MiniMRF LLC
|
|
Limited Liability Company
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Deutsche Aluminium Verpackung Recycling GmbH
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
France Aluminium Recyclage S.A.
|
|
Public Limited Company
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
In September 2007, we completed the dissolution of EuroNorca
Partners, and we received approximately $2 million upon the
completion of liquidation proceedings. No gain or loss was
recognized on the liquidation.
In November 2006, we sold the common and preferred shares of our
25% interest in Petrocoque S.A. Industria e Comercio
(Petrocoque) to the other shareholders of Petrocoque. Prior to
the sale, we accounted for Petrocoque using the equity method of
accounting. The results of operations of Petrocoque through the
date of sale are included in the table below.
The following table summarizes the condensed assets, liabilities
and equity of our equity method affiliates (on a 100% basis, in
millions) on a historical basis of accounting. The results do
not include the unamortized fair value adjustments relating to
our non-consolidated affiliates due to the Arrangement. As of
March 31,
F-37
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2009 and 2008, there were $551 million and
$766 million, respectively, of unamortized fair value
adjustments recorded in Investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
718
|
|
|
$
|
869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Third parties
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
718
|
|
|
$
|
869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the condensed results of
operations of our equity method affiliates (on a 100% basis, in
millions) on a historical basis of accounting. These results do
not include the incremental depreciation and amortization
expense that we record in our equity method accounting, which
arises as a result of the amortization of fair value adjustments
we made to our investments in non-consolidated affiliates due to
the Arrangement. These results also do not include the
$160 million impairment charge to reduce the
carrying value of our investment in Aluminium Norf GmbH for
the year ended March 31, 2009. (See Note 3
Impairment of Goodwill and Investment in Affiliate.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
Costs, expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below summarizes our incremental depreciation and
amortization expense on our equity method investments due to the
Arrangement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Incremental depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
Tax benefit(A)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental depreciation and amortization expense, net
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The tax benefits for the period from May 16, 2007 through
March 31, 2008 includes tax benefits associated with
amortization and a statutory tax rate change recorded as part of
our equity method accounting |
F-38
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
for these investments. There were no such statutory tax rate
changes in the other period noted in the table above. |
Included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
are transactions and balances arising from business we conduct
with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we classify as
related party transactions and balances. The following table
describes the nature and amounts of transactions that we had
with related parties (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Purchases of tolling services, electricity and inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH(A)
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
Consorcio Candonga(B)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Petrocoque S.A. Industria e Comercio(C)
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases from related parties
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH(D)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We purchase tolling services (the conversion of customer-owned
metal) from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We obtain electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our operations
in South America. |
|
(C) |
|
We purchased calcined-coke from Petrocoque for use in our
smelting operations in South America. As previously discussed,
we sold our interest in Petrocoque in November 2006. They are
not considered a related party in periods subsequent to November
2006. |
|
(D) |
|
We earn interest income on a loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
n.a. not applicable see (C).
The following table describes the period-end account balances
that we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as
related party balances in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Accounts receivable(A)
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
Other long-term receivables(A)
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
Accounts payable(B)
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The balances represent current and non-current portions of a
loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
(B) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH and
electricity from Consorcio Candonga. |
F-39
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
ACCRUED
EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are comprised of
the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
Accrued settlement of legal claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Current portion of fair value of unfavorable sales contracts
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Debt consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Rates(A)
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion third
parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,124
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
1,171
|
|
|
$
|
1,399
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
3.21
|
%(C)
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
3.21
|
%(C)
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due December 2019 (Swiss francs (CHF)
51 million)
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 3 million)
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
5.44
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Bank loan, due February 2010 (Korean won (KRW) 50 billion)
|
|
|
3.94
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due May 2009 (KRW 10 billion)
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loans, due September 2010 through June 2011 (KRW
308 million)
|
|
|
3.24
|
%(D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due April 2009 through December 2012
|
|
|
0.61
|
%(D)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion third
parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,419
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,417
|
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
2,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion related
party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured credit facility related party, due January
2015
|
|
|
13.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Interest rates are as of March 31, 2009 and exclude the
effects of accretion/amortization of fair value adjustments as a
result of the Arrangement. |
|
(B) |
|
Debt existing at the time of the Arrangement was recorded at
fair value. Additional floating rate Term Loan with a face value
of $220 million issued in March 2009 was recorded at a fair
value of $165 million. See discussion below. |
F-41
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(C) |
|
Excludes the effect of related interest rate swaps and the
effect of accretion of fair value. |
|
(D) |
|
Weighted average interest rate. |
Principal repayment requirements for our total debt over the
next five years and thereafter (excluding unamortized fair value
adjustments and using rates of exchange as of March 31,
2009 for our debt denominated in foreign currencies) are as
follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending March 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
2011
|
|
|
116
|
|
2012
|
|
|
16
|
|
2013
|
|
|
16
|
|
2014
|
|
|
15
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior
Notes
On February 3, 2005, we issued $1.4 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured debt securities (Senior
Notes). The Senior Notes were priced at par, bear interest at
7.25% and mature on February 15, 2015.
As a result of the Arrangement, the Senior Notes were recorded
at their fair value of $1.474 billion based on their market
price of 105.25% of $1,000 face value per bond as of
May 14, 2007. The incremental fair value of
$74 million is being amortized over the remaining life of
the Senior Notes as an offset to interest expense using the
effective interest amortization method.
Under the indenture that governs the Senior Notes, we are
subject to certain restrictive covenants applicable to incurring
additional debt and providing additional guarantees, paying
dividends beyond certain amounts and making other restricted
payments, sales and transfers of assets, certain consolidations
or mergers, and certain transactions with affiliates.
In March 2009, we recognized a $122 million pre-tax gain on
the extinguishment of debt as part of a debt restructuring
action. We exchanged Senior Notes with a principal value of
$275 million for additional floating rate Term Loan with a
face value of $220 million and estimated fair value of
$165 million. In accordance with
EITF 96-19,
Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of
Debt Instruments, the exchange was accounted for as a debt
extinguishment and issuance of new debt, with the fair value of
the Term Loan used to determine the gain on extinguishment. The
carrying value of the Senior Notes used in the gain calculation
includes $12 million representing the pro rata allocation
of the remaining unamortized fair value adjustment that was
established in connection with the Arrangement.
Credit
Agreements
On July 6, 2007, we entered into new senior secured credit
facilities with a syndicate of lenders led by affiliates of UBS
and ABN AMRO (Credit Agreements) providing for aggregate
borrowings of up to $1.76 billion. The Credit Agreements
consist of (1) a $960 million seven-year Term Loan
facility (Term Loan facility) and (2) an $800 million
five year multi-currency asset-based revolving credit line and
letter of credit facility (ABL facility).
Under the ABL facility, interest charged is dependent on the
type of loan as follows: (1) any swingline loan or any loan
categorized as an ABR borrowing will bear interest at an annual
rate equal to the alternate
F-42
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
base rate (which is the greater of (a) the base rate in
effect on a given day and (b) the federal funds effective
rate in effect on a given day, plus 0.50%) plus the applicable
margin; (2) Eurocurrency loans will bear interest at an
annual rate equal to the adjusted LIBOR rate for the applicable
interest period, plus the applicable margin; (3) loans
designated as Canadian base rate borrowings will bear an annual
interest rate equal to the Canadian base rate (CAPRIME), plus
the applicable margin; (4) loans designated as bankers
acceptances (BA) rate loans will bear interest at the average
discount rate offered for bankers acceptances for the
applicable BA interest period, plus the applicable margin and
(5) loans designated as Euro Interbank Offered Rate
(EURIBOR) loans will bear interest annually at a rate equal to
the adjusted EURIBOR rate for the applicable interest period,
plus the applicable margin. Applicable margins under the ABL
facility depend upon excess availability levels calculated on a
quarterly basis.
Generally, for both the Term Loan facility and ABL facility,
interest rates reset every three months and interest is payable
on a monthly, quarterly, or other periodic basis depending on
the type of loan.
The proceeds from the Term Loan facility of $960 million,
drawn in full at the time of closing, and an initial draw of
$324 million under the ABL facility were used to pay off
our old senior secured credit facility, pay for debt issuance
costs of the Credit Agreements and provide for additional
working capital. Mandatory minimum principal amortization
payments under the Term Loan facility are $2.4 million per
calendar quarter. Additional mandatory prepayments are required
to be made for certain collateral liquidations, asset sales,
debt and preferred stock issuances, equity issuances, casualty
events and excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit
Agreements). Any unpaid principal is due in full on July 6,
2014.
Under the Term Loan facility, loans characterized as alternate
base rate (ABR) borrowings bear interest annually at a rate
equal to the alternate base rate (which is the greater of
(a) the base rate in effect on a given day and (b) the
federal funds effective rate in effect on a given day, plus
0.50%) plus the applicable margin. Loans characterized as
Eurocurrency borrowings bear interest at an annual rate equal to
the adjusted LIBOR rate for the interest period in effect, plus
the applicable margin.
Borrowings under the ABL facility are generally based on 85% of
eligible accounts receivable and 70% to 75% of eligible
inventories. Commitment fees ranging from 0.25% to 0.375% are
based on average daily amounts outstanding under the ABL
facility during a fiscal quarter and are payable quarterly.
The Credit Agreements include customary affirmative and negative
covenants. Under the ABL facility, if our excess availability,
as defined under the borrowing, is less than $80 million,
we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1 to 1. As of March 31, 2009, our fixed charge
coverage ratio is less than 1 to 1, resulting in a reduction of
availability under our ABL facility of $80 million.
Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral under
the Credit Agreements.
As discussed above, in March 2009, we issued an additional Term
Loan with a face value of $220 million in exchange for
$275 million of Senior Notes. The additional Term Loan was
recorded at a fair value of $165 million determined using a
discounted cash flow model. The difference between the fair
value and the face value of the new Term Loan will be accreted
over the life of the Term Loan using the effective interest
method, resulting in additional non-cash interest expense.
Interest
Rate Swaps
As of March 31, 2009, we had entered into interest rate
swaps to fix the variable LIBOR interest rate on
$700 million of our floating rate Term Loan facility. We
are still obligated to pay any applicable margin, as defined in
our Credit Agreements. Interest rate swaps related to
$400 million at an effective weighted average interest rate
of 4.0% expire March 31, 2010. In January 2009, we entered
into two interest rate swaps to fix the variable LIBOR interest
rate on an additional $300 million of our floating Term
Loan facility at a rate of 1.49%, plus any applicable margin.
These interest rate swaps are effective from March 31, 2009
through March 31, 2011.
F-43
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of March 31, 2009 approximately 71% of our debt was
fixed rate and approximately 29% was variable-rate.
Unsecured
Credit Facility
In February 2009, to assist in maintaining adequate liquidity
levels, we entered into an unsecured credit facility of
$100 million (the Unsecured Credit Facility) with a
scheduled maturity date of January 15, 2015 from an
affiliate of the Aditya Birla group. Any advance of the
Unsecured Credit Facility is deemed to be a permanent reduction
of the loan and any part of the loan which is repaid may not be
re-borrowed. For each advance under the credit facility,
interest is payable quarterly at a rate of 13% per annum prior
to the first anniversary of the advance and 14% per annum
thereafter, until the earlier of repayment or maturity.
Under the Unsecured Credit Facility, we are subject to certain
negative covenants applicable to the restriction of prepayments
of other indebtedness and to certain modification of our Credit
Agreements and 7.25% Senior Notes.
As of March 31, 2009, we have drawn down $91 million
of this facility.
Short-Term
Borrowings and Lines of Credit
As of March 31, 2009, our short-term borrowings were
$264 million consisting of (1) $231 million of
short-term loans under our ABL facility, (2) a
$9 million short-term loan in Italy, (3) a
$22 million short-term loan in Korea and
(4) $2 million in bank overdrafts. As of
March 31, 2009, $42 million of our ABL facility was
utilized for letters of credit and we had $233 million in
remaining availability under this revolving credit facility
before the covenant related restriction discussed above.
As of March 31, 2009, we had an additional $92 million
outstanding under letters of credit in Korea not included in our
revolving credit facility. The weighted average interest rate on
our total short-term borrowings was 2.75% and 4.12% as of
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Korean
Bank Loans
In December 2004, we entered into (1) a $70 million
floating rate loan and (2) a KRW 25 billion
($25 million) floating rate loan, both due in December
2007. We immediately entered into an interest rate and cross
currency swap on the $70 million floating rate loan through
a 4.55% fixed rate KRW 73 billion ($73 million) loan
and an interest rate swap on the KRW 25 billion floating
rate loan to fix the interest rate at 4.45%. In October 2007, we
entered into a $100 million floating rate loan due October
2010 and immediately repaid the $70 million loan. In
December 2007, we repaid the KRW 25 billion loan from the
proceeds of the $100 million floating rate loan.
Additionally, we immediately entered into an interest rate swap
and cross currency swap for the $100 million floating rate
loan through a 5.44% fixed rate KRW 92 billion
($92 million) loan.
In November 2008, we entered into a 7.47% interest rate KRW
10 billion ($7 million) bank loan due May 2009. In
February 2009, we entered into a 3.94% interest rate KRW
50 billion ($37 million) bank loan due February 2010.
Capital
Lease Obligations
In December 2004, we entered into a fifteen-year capital lease
obligation with Alcan for assets in Sierre, Switzerland, which
has an interest rate of 7.5% and fixed quarterly payments of CHF
1.7 million, which is equivalent to $1.5 million at
the exchange rate as of March 31, 2009.
F-44
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In September 2005, we entered into a six-year capital lease
obligation for equipment in Switzerland which has an interest
rate of 2.49% and fixed monthly payments of CHF
0.1 million, which is equivalent to $0.1 million at
the exchange rate as of March 31, 2009.
|
|
13.
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Share-Based
Compensation Expense
Total share-based compensation expense for active and inactive
plans for the respective periods, including amounts related to
the cumulative effect of an accounting change (exclusive of
income taxes) from adopting FASB Statement No. 123(R) on
January 1, 2006, is presented in the table below (in
millions). These amounts are included in Selling, general and
administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of
operations. For the year ended March 31, 2009, total
compensation expense related to share-based awards was less than
$1 million, and therefore are not included in the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Active Plans(A):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition Awards(B)
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inactive Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock options)
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock appreciation rights)
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Stock Price Appreciation Unit Plan
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Deferred Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Awards
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Total Shareholder Returns Performance Plan
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inactive Plants Total Share-Based Compensation
Expense
|
|
|
n.a.
|
|
|
|
$
|
43.7
|
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
In June 2008, our board of directors authorized the 2009 Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan. As of March 31, 2009, only the 2009
Novelis Long-term Incentive Plan remained active; however, there
was no share-based compensation expense related to this plan in
any period reflected in the table above or for the year ended
March 31, 2009. |
|
(B) |
|
One-half of the outstanding Recognition Awards vested on
December 31, 2007. The remaining outstanding Recognition Awards
vested on December 31, 2008. As of March 31, 2009, the
Recognition Awards were inactive. |
n.a. Not applicable as plan was cancelled as a result of the
Arrangement
Effect of
Acquisition by Hindalco
As a result of the Arrangement, all of our share-based
compensation awards (except for our Recognition Awards) were
accelerated to vest, cancelled and settled in cash using the
$44.93 purchase price per common share paid by Hindalco in the
transaction. We made aggregate cash payments (including
applicable payroll-
F-45
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
related taxes) totaling $72 million to plan participants
following consummation of the Arrangement, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/Units
|
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
|
|
Settled
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock options)
|
|
|
825,850
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Novelis 2006 Incentive Plan (stock appreciation rights)
|
|
|
378,360
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005
|
|
|
1,238,183
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Stock Price Appreciation Unit Plan
|
|
|
299,873
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Deferred Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
109,911
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Novelis Founders Performance Awards
|
|
|
180,400
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense resulting from the accelerated vesting of
plan awards, totaling $45 million is included in Selling,
general and administrative expenses in our consolidated
statement of operations for the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007. We also recorded a $7 million
reduction to Additional paid-in capital during the period from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007 for the conversion
of certain of our share-based compensation plans from
equity-based to liability-based plans.
2009
Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan
In June 2008, our board of directors authorized the Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2009 FY 2012 (2009 LTIP)
covering the performance period from April 1, 2008 through
March 31, 2012. Under the 2009 LTIP, stock appreciation
rights (SARs) are to be granted to certain of our executive
officers and key employees. The SARs will vest at the rate of
25% per year (every June 19th) subject to performance criteria
(see below), and expire seven years from the date the plan was
authorized by the board. Each SAR is to be settled in cash based
on the difference between the market value of one Hindalco share
on the date of grant compared to the date of exercise, converted
from Indian rupees to the participants payroll currency at
the time of exercise. The amount of cash paid would be limited
to (i) 2.5 times the target payout if exercised within one
year of vesting or (ii) 3 times the target payout if
exercised after one year of vesting. The SARs do not transfer
any shareholder rights in Hindalco to a participant. SARs that
do not vest as a result of failure to achieve a performance
criterion will be cancelled. Generally, all vested SARs expire
90 days after termination of employment, except (1) in
the case of death or disability, when any unvested SARs will
vest immediately and expire within one year and (2) in the
case of retirement, when, if retirement occurs more than one
year from the grant date, the SARs would continue to vest and
expire three years following retirement. All awards vest upon a
change in control of the Company (as defined in the 2009 LTIP).
The performance criterion for vesting is based on the actual
overall Novelis Operating Earnings before Interest,
Depreciation, Amortization and Taxes (Operating EBITDA, as
defined in the 2009 LTIP) compared to the target Operating
EBITDA established and approved each fiscal year. The minimum
threshold for vesting each year is 75% of each annual target
Operating EBITDA, at which point 75% of the SARs for that period
would vest, with an equal pro rata amount of SARs vesting
through 100% achievement of the target. This performance
condition has no impact on the fair value of the SARs.
In October 2008, our board of directors approved an amendment to
the 2009 LTIP. The design elements of the amended 2009 LTIP are
largely unchanged from the original 2009 LTIP. However, the
amended 2009 LTIP now specifies that (a) the plan shall be
administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors, (b) all payments shall be made in cash upon
exercise (less applicable withholdings), and (c) the
Compensation Committee has the authority to make adjustments in
the number and price of SARs covered by the plan in order to
prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of employees that
would otherwise result
F-46
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
from a change in the capital structure of the Company (e.g.,
dividends, stock splits, rights issuances, reorganizations,
liquidation of assets, etc.).
In November 2008, grants totaling 21,534,619 SARs at an exercise
price of 60.50 Indian Rupees ($1.23 at the December 31,
2008 exchange rate) per SAR were made to our executive officers
and key employees. For the year ended March 31, 2009, there
were 1,168,426 SARs forfeited.
At March 31, 2009, for outstanding SARs, the average
remaining contractual term is 6.22 years and the aggregate
intrinsic value is zero as the market value of a share of
Hindalco stock was less than the SAR exercise price. No SARs
were exercisable at March 31, 2009.
The fair value of each SAR is based on the difference between
the fair value of a long call and a short call option. The fair
value of each of these call options was determined using the
Black-Scholes valuation method. We used historical stock price
volatility data of Hindalco on the Bombay Stock Exchange to
determine expected volatility assumptions. The annual expected
dividend yield is based on Hindalco dividend payments of $0.04
(1.85 Indian Rupees) per year. Risk-free interest rates are
based on treasury yields in India, consistent with the expected
remaining lives of the SARs. Because we do not have a sufficient
history of SAR exercise or cancellation, we estimated the
expected remaining life of the SARs based on an extension of the
simplified method as prescribed by Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment
(SAB 107).
The fair value of each SAR under the 2009 LTIP was estimated as
of March 31, 2009 using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
47.60 - 54.49%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
50.87%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
3.55%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
6.21 - 6.72%
|
Expected life
|
|
3.22 - 4.72 years
|
The fair value of the SARs is being recognized over the
requisite performance and service period of each tranche,
subject to the achievement of any performance criterion. No
compensation expense for this performance period has been
recorded in the year ended March 31, 2009 as annual
performance criterion were not met. Additionally, since the
performance criteria for the fiscal years 2010 to 2012 have not
yet been established and therefore, no measurement periods have
commenced, no expense has been recorded for those tranches in
the year ended March 31, 2009.
Unrecognized compensation expense related to the non-vested SARs
(assuming all future performance criteria are met except for the
2009 performance period) of $3 million is expected to be
realized over a weighted average period of 4.2 years.
Recognition
Awards
In September 2006, we entered into Recognition Agreements and
granted Recognition Awards to certain executive officers and
other key employees (Executives) to retain and reward them for
continued dedication towards corporate objectives. Under the
terms of these agreements, Executives who remained continuously
employed by us through the vesting dates of December 31,
2007 and December 31, 2008 were entitled to receive
one-half of their total Recognition Awards on each vesting date.
The number of Recognition Awards payable under the agreements
varied by Executive. As a result of the Arrangement, the
Recognition Awards changed from an equity-based to a
liability-based plan using the $44.93 per common share
transaction price as the per share value. This change resulted
in additional share-based compensation expense of
$1.3 million during the period from April 1, 2007
through May 15, 2007.
F-47
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
One-half of the outstanding Recognition Awards vested on
December 31, 2007, and were settled for approximately
$3 million in cash in January 2008. The remaining
outstanding Recognition Awards vested on December 31, 2008,
and were settled for approximately $2 million in cash in
January 2009.
Inactive
Plans
As previously mentioned, as a result of the Arrangement, all of
our share-based compensation awards (except for our Recognition
Awards) were accelerated to vest, cancelled and settled in cash
using the $44.93 purchase price per common share paid by
Hindalco in the transaction. The following tables summarizes the
activity and assumptions used to estimate fair value of the
cancelled plans.
Novelis
2006 Incentive Plan
In October 2006, our shareholders approved the Novelis 2006
Incentive Plan (2006 Incentive Plan) to effectively replace the
Novelis Conversion Plan of 2005 and Stock Price Appreciation
Unit Plan (both described below). Under the 2006 Incentive Plan,
up to an aggregate number of 7,000,000 shares of Novelis
common stock were authorized to be issued in the form of stock
options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted shares,
restricted share units, performance shares and other share-based
incentives.
2006
Stock Options
In October 2006, our board of directors authorized a grant of an
aggregate of 885,170 seven-year non-qualified stock options
under the 2006 Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $25.53 to
certain of our executive officers and key employees.
Prior to the Arrangement, the fair value of our premium and
non-premium options was estimated using the following
assumptions for the year ended December 31, 2006, the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and the period from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007
(Predecessor):
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
42.20 to 46.40%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
44.30%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.16%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.68 to 4.71%
|
Expected life
|
|
1.00 to 4.75 years
|
As a result of the Arrangement, 825,850 premium and non-premium
options under the 2006 Incentive Plan were accelerated to vest
and were settled in cash for approximately $16 million.
Stock
Appreciation Rights
In October 2006, our board of directors authorized a grant of
381,090 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) under the 2006
Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $25.53 to certain of our
executive officers and key employees.
F-48
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of premium and non-premium SARs under the 2006
Incentive Plan was estimated using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
40.70 to 44.70%
|
|
40.80 to 45.40%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
42.70%
|
|
43.10%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
None
|
|
0.14%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.51 to 4.59%
|
|
4.67 to 4.71%
|
Expected life
|
|
0.57 to 4.32 years
|
|
0.83 to 4.57 years
|
As a result of the Arrangement, 378,360 premium and non-premium
SARs were accelerated to vest and were settled in cash for
approximately $7 million.
Novelis
Conversion Plan of 2005
In January 2005, our board of directors adopted the Novelis
Conversion Plan of 2005 (the Conversion Plan) to allow for
1,372,663 Alcan stock options held by employees of Alcan who
became our employees following our spin-off from Alcan to be
replaced with options to purchase 2,723,914 of our common shares.
The fair value of each option was estimated using the following
assumptions for the year ended December 31, 2006, the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and the period from April 1
through May 15, 2007:
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
30.30%
|
Weighted-average volatility
|
|
30.30%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
1.56%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.88 to 3.73%
|
Expected life
|
|
0.70 to 5.70 years
|
As a result of the Arrangement, 563,651 options were accelerated
to vest with a total fair value of approximately $4 million
and a total of 1,238,183 options were settled in cash using the
$44.93 purchase price per common share paid by Hindalco in the
transaction for approximately $29 million.
Stock
Price Appreciation Unit Plan
Prior to the spin-off, some Alcan employees who later
transferred to Novelis held Alcan stock price appreciation units
(SPAUs). These units entitled them to receive cash equal to the
excess of the market value of an Alcan common share on the
exercise date of a SPAU over the market value of an Alcan common
share on its grant date.
The fair value of each SPAU was estimated using the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
38.20 to 40.80%
|
|
36.20 to 40.30%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
39.31%
|
|
39.32%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
None
|
|
0.14%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.51 to 4.56%
|
|
4.67 to 4.80%
|
Expected life
|
|
2.25 to 4.37 years
|
|
2.37 to 4.37 years
|
F-49
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As a result of the Arrangement, 201,495 SPAUs were accelerated
to vest and 299,873 SPAUs were settled in cash using the $44.93
per common share purchase price paid by Hindalco in the
transaction for approximately $7 million.
Deferred
Share Unit Plan for Non-Executive Directors
In January 2005, Novelis established the Deferred Share Unit
Plan for Non-Executive Directors under which non-executive
directors would receive 50% of their compensation payable in the
form of directors deferred share units (DDSUs) and the
other 50% in the form of either cash, additional DDSUs or a
combination of these two (at the election of each non-executive
director).
As a result of the Arrangement, 109,911 DDSUs were settled in
cash using the $44.93 purchase price per common share paid by
Hindalco in the transaction for approximately $5 million.
Novelis
Founders Performance Awards
In March 2005 (as amended and restated in March 2006 and
February 2007), Novelis established a plan to reward certain key
executives with Performance Share Units (PSUs) if Novelis common
share price improvement targets were achieved within specific
time periods. There were three equal tranches of PSUs, and each
had a specific share price improvement target.
The share price improvement targets for the first tranche were
achieved and 180,350 Performance Share Units (PSUs) were awarded
on June 20, 2005. For the year ended December 31,
2005, 1,650 PSUs were forfeited and 178,700 remained
outstanding. In March 2006, 46,850 PSUs were forfeited and
131,850 PSUs were ultimately paid out. The liability for the
first tranche was accrued over its term, was valued on
March 24, 2006, and was paid in April 2006 in the aggregate
amount of approximately $3 million.
The fair value of each PSUs was estimated using the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
37.00%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
37.00%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.14%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.75%
|
Expected life (derived service periods)
|
|
0.93 to 1.23 years
|
As a result of the Arrangement, the second and third tranches
(represented by 94,450 and 85,950 PSUs, respectively) were
settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price per common share
paid by Hindalco in the transaction for approximately
$8 million.
Total
Shareholder Returns Performance Plan
Some Alcan employees who transferred to Novelis were entitled to
receive cash awards under the Alcan Total Shareholder Returns
Performance Plan (TSR). In January 2005, the accrued awards for
all of the TSR participants were converted into 452,667 Novelis
restricted share units (RSUs). In October 2005, an aggregate of
$7 million was paid to employees who held RSUs that had
vested on September 30, 2005. In October 2006, 120,949 RSUs
and related dividends outstanding were paid to employees in the
aggregate amount of $3 million.
F-50
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFIT PLANS
|
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans in the U.S., Canada, Switzerland and the U.K., unfunded
pension plans in Germany, and unfunded lump sum indemnities in
France, South Korea, Malaysia and Italy. Our other
postretirement obligations (Other Benefits, as shown in certain
tables below) include unfunded healthcare and life insurance
benefits provided to retired employees in Canada, the
U.S. and Brazil.
Some of our employees participated in defined benefit plans that
were previously managed by Alcan in the U.S., Canada, the U.K.
and Switzerland. These benefits are generally based on the
employees years of service and the highest average
eligible compensation before retirement.
For the period January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2009,
the following occurred related to existing Alcan pension plans
covering our employees:
a) In the U.K., former Alcan employees who participated in
the British Alcan RILA Plan in 2005 began participating in the
Novelis U.K. pension plan effective January 1, 2006. Of the
approximate 575 Novelis employees who had participated in the
British Alcan RILA plan, 208 employees elected to transfer
their past service to the Novelis U.K. pension plan. Novelis
made a payment of $7 million to the British Alcan RILA plan
in November 2006 to pay the statutory withdrawal liability. In
October 2007, we completed the transfer of U.K. plan assets and
liabilities from Alcan to Novelis. Plan liabilities assumed
exceeded plan assets received by $4 million. We made an
additional contribution of approximately $2 million to the
plan in February 2008.
b) In Canada, former Alcan employees who participated in
the Alcan Pension Plan (Canada) began participating in the NPP
(Canada) effective January 1, 2005. Of the approximate
680 employees who had participated in the Alcan plan,
420 employees elected to transfer their past service to the
Novelis Plan. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we
completed the transfer of plan assets and liabilities from Alcan
to Novelis. Plan assets received exceeded plan liabilities
assumed by $1 million. We recorded the $1 million
difference between transferred plan assets and liabilities as an
adjustment to Goodwill.
c) In the U.S., former non-union Alcan employees who
participated in the Alcancorp Pension Plan had their pension
liabilities transferred to the Novelis Pension Plan effective
January 1, 2006. Plan liabilities exceeded plan assets
received by $22 million on the transfer date.
d) In Switzerland, we have been a participating employer in
the Alcan Swiss Pension Plan since January 1, 2005. Our
employees are participating in this plan indefinitely (subject
to Alcan approval and provided we make the required pension
contributions). Effective May 16, 2007, we changed our
treatment of our participation in the Alcan Swiss Pension Plan
from a multi-employer plan to a single-employer plan; thus,
Novelis share of plan assets, liabilities, contributions
and expenses are included in this note.
F-51
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Employer
Contributions to Plans
For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to
provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to date,
and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over
periods of 15 years or less. We also participate in savings
plans in Canada and the U.S., as well as defined contribution
pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, Italy,
Switzerland, Malaysia and Brazil. We contributed the following
amounts to all plans, including the Alcan plans that cover our
employees (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Funded pension plans
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
Unfunded pension plans
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Savings and defined contribution pension plans
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal year 2010, we expect to contribute
$52 million to our funded pension plans, $14 million
to our unfunded pension plans and $16 million to our
savings and defined contribution plans.
Investment
Policy and Asset Allocation
Each of our funded pension plans is governed by an Investment
Fiduciary, who establishes an investment policy appropriate for
the pension plan. The Investment Fiduciary is responsible for
selecting the asset allocation for each plan, monitoring
investment managers, monitoring returns versus benchmarks and
monitoring compliance with the investment policy. The targeted
allocation ranges by asset class, and the actual allocation
percentages for each class are listed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate as of
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
Allocation Ranges
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
35 - 70
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
25 - 60
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Real estate
|
|
|
0 - 25
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
0 - 15
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
F-52
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Benefit
Obligations, Fair Value of Plan Assets, Funded Status and
Amounts Recognized in Financial Statements
The following tables present the change in benefit obligation,
change in fair value of plan assets and the funded status for
pension and other benefits (in millions), including the Swiss
Pension Plan effective May 16, 2007. Other Benefits in the
tables below include unfunded healthcare and life insurance
benefits provided to retired employees in Canada, Brazil and the
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Change in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
$
|
877
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Members contributions
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Transfers/mergers
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Curtailments/ termination benefits
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Currency (gains) losses
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
$
|
877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of funded plans
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
$
|
680
|
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
Benefit obligation of unfunded plans
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
$
|
877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-53
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Transfers/mergers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Curtailments/termination benefits
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gains) losses
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Currency (gains) losses
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of funded plans
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of unfunded plans
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Change in fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
|
$
|
568
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Members contributions
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Transfers/mergers
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Currency gains (losses)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
|
$
|
568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status at end of period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets less the benefit obligation of funded plans
|
|
$
|
(189
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefit obligation of unfunded plans
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(267
|
)
|
|
$
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As included on consolidated balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term assets third parties
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(267
|
)
|
|
$
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The postretirement amounts recognized in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), before tax effects, are presented
in the table below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total postretirement amounts recognized in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss (income)
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated amounts that will be amortized from Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost
in fiscal 2010 are $10 million for pension benefits and
$1 million for other postretirement benefits, primarily
related to net actuarial loss.
Accumulated
Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation
and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with an
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets as of
March 31, 2009 and 2008 are presented in the table below
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
F-55
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future
Benefit Payments
Expected benefit payments to be made during the next ten fiscal
years are listed in the table below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
2011
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
2012
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
2013
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
2014
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
2015 through 2019
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components
of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the respective
periods are listed in the table below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actuarial losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
prior service cost
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Curtailment/settlement losses
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Proportionate share of non-consolidated affiliates
deferred pension costs, net of tax
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit costs recognized
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actuarial losses
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Curtailment/termination benefits
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit costs recognized
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 6.7% in
fiscal 2010.
Actuarial
Assumptions and Sensitivity Analysis
The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations and net periodic benefit costs for the respective
periods are listed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
Average compensation growth
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
F-57
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In selecting the appropriate discount rate for each plan, we
generally used a country-specific, high-quality corporate bond
index, adjusted to reflect the duration of the particular plan.
In the U.S. and Canada, the discount rate was calculated by
matching the plans projected cash flows with similar
duration high-quality corporate bonds to develop a present
value, which was then interpolated to develop a single
equivalent discount rate.
In estimating the expected return on assets of a pension plan,
consideration is given primarily to its target allocation, the
current yield on long-term bonds in the country where the plan
is established, and the historical risk premium of equity or
real estate over long-term bond yields in each relevant country.
The approach is consistent with the principle that assets with
higher risk provide a greater return over the long-term.
We provide unfunded healthcare and life insurance benefits to
our retired employees in Canada, the U.S. and Brazil, for
which we paid $7 million for the year ended March 31,
2009, $6 million for the period from May 16, 2007
through March 31, 2008, $1 million for the period from
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, $2 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
$8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
assumed healthcare cost trend used for measurement purposes is
7.5% for fiscal 2010, decreasing gradually to 5% in 2014 and
remaining at that level thereafter.
A change of one percentage point in the assumed healthcare cost
trend rates would have the following effects on our other
benefits (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% Increase
|
|
|
1% Decrease
|
|
|
Sensitivity Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on service and interest costs
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Effect on benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
In addition, we provide post-employment benefits, including
disability, early retirement and continuation of benefits
(medical, dental, and life insurance) to our former or inactive
employees, which are accounted for on the accrual basis in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 112, Employers
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits. Other long-term
liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets includes
$20 million and $23 million as of March 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively, for these benefits.
F-58
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
CURRENCY
LOSSES (GAINS)
|
The following currency losses (gains) are included in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net (gain) loss on change in fair value of currency derivative
instruments(A)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Net (gain) loss on remeasurement of monetary assets and
liabilities(B)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net currency (gain) loss
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net.
|
|
(B) |
|
Included in Other (income) expenses, net.
|
The following currency gains (losses) are included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI), net of tax
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment beginning
of
period
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment end of
period
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS AND COMMODITY CONTRACTS
|
In conducting our business, we use various derivative and
non-derivative instruments to manage the risks arising from
fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates, aluminum prices
and energy prices. Such instruments are used for risk management
purposes only. We may be exposed to losses in the future if the
counterparties to the contracts fail to perform. We are
satisfied that the risk of such non-performance is remote due to
our monitoring of credit exposures. Our ultimate gain or loss on
these derivatives may differ from the amount recognized in the
accompanying March 31, 2009 consolidated balance sheet.
The decision of whether and when to execute derivative
instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary
from period to period depending on market conditions, the
relative costs of the instruments and capacity to hedge. The
duration is always linked to the timing of the underlying
exposure, with the connection between the two being regularly
monitored.
The current and noncurrent portions of derivative assets and the
current portion of derivative liabilities are presented on the
face of our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The
noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included in
Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
F-59
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 are
as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
(640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(184
|
)
|
|
$
|
(184
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
$
|
(201
|
)
|
|
$
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net
Investment Hedges
We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to
fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and
investments in our European operations. We have designated these
as net investment hedges. The effective portion of gain or loss
on the fair value of the derivative is included in Other
comprehensive income (loss) (OCI). Prior to the Arrangement, the
effective portion on the derivative was included in Change in
fair value of effective portion of hedges, net. After the
completion of the Acquisition, the effective portion on the
derivative is included in Currency translation adjustments. The
ineffective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is
included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. We had cross-currency swaps of
Euro 135 million against the U.S. dollar
outstanding as of March 31, 2009.
The following table summarizes the amount of gain (loss) we
recognized in OCI related to our net investment hedge
derivatives (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
Cash Flow
Hedges
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we have
designated as a cash flow hedge against our exposure to
fluctuating electricity prices. The effective portion of gain or
loss on the derivative is included in OCI and reclassified into
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivatives, net in our
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of
March 31, 2009, the outstanding portion of this swap
includes 20,888 megawatt hours through 2017.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable-rate
debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included
in OCI and reclassified into Interest expense and amortization
of debt issuance costs in our accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. We had $690 million of
outstanding interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges
as of March 31, 2009.
For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or
losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the
life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the
relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will be
de-designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if the
underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be
probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness
determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the
measures we have established at the inception of the hedge.
Gains or losses recognized to date in AOCI would be immediately
reclassified into current period earnings, as would any
subsequent changes in the fair value of any such derivative.
During the next twelve months we expect to realize
$13 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.
F-61
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the impact on AOCI and earnings
of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedge (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and Amount
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and Amount
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the London Metal Exchange (LME) price of
aluminum. These exposures arise from firm commitments to sell
aluminum in future periods at fixed or capped prices, the
forecasted output of our smelter operations in South America and
the forecasted metal price lag associated with firm commitments
to sell aluminum in future periods at prices based on the LME.
In addition, transactions with certain customers meet the
definition of a derivative under FASB 133 and are recognized as
assets or liabilities at fair value on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. As of March 31, 2009, we had
294 kilotonnes (kt) of outstanding aluminum contracts not
designated as hedges.
We recognize a derivative position which arises from a
contractual relationship with a customer that entitles us to
pass-through the economic effect of trading positions that we
take with other third parties on our customers behalf.
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross-currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain of our operations.
As of March 31, 2009, we had outstanding currency exchange
contracts with a total notional amount of $1.4 billion not
designated as hedges.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
interest rates associated with variable-rate debt. As of
March 31, 2009, we had $10 million of outstanding
interest rate swaps that were not designated as hedges.
We use heating oil swaps and natural gas swaps to manage our
exposure to fluctuating energy prices in North America. As of
March 31, 2009, we had 3.4 million gallons of heating
oil swaps and 3.8 million MMBtus of natural gas that
were not designated as hedges.
F-62
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in
helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging
instruments under FASB 133. The change in fair value of these
derivative instruments is included in (Gain) loss on change in
fair value of derivative instruments, net in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations.
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in
current period earnings (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
(561
|
)
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
(556
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.
|
FAIR
VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
|
FASB 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited
exceptions. Additionally, FASB 157 amended FASB 107,
Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(FASB 107), and as such, we follow FASB 157 in determination
of FASB 107 fair value disclosure amounts. The disclosures
required under FASB 157 and FASB 107 are included in this note.
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used
for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value and for
estimating fair value for financial instruments not previously
recorded at fair value.
FASB
157 Instruments
Our adoption of FASB 157 on April 1, 2008 resulted in
(1) a gain of $1 million, which is included in (Gain)
loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments, net in
our consolidated statement of operations, (2) a
$1 million decrease to the fair value of effective portion
of hedges included in Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) and (3) a $29 million increase to the foreign
currency translation adjustment included in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). These adjustments are primarily due
to the inclusion of nonperformance risk (i.e., credit spreads)
in our valuation models related to certain of our cross-currency
swap derivative instruments (see Note 16
Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts).
FASB 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price)
in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. FASB 157 is the single source in GAAP for the
definition of fair value, except for the fair value of leased
property as defined in FASB 13, for purposes of lease
classification or measurement. FASB 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant
assumptions developed based on market data obtained from
independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an
entitys own assumptions about market
F-63
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
participant assumptions developed based on the best information
available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair
value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the
highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the
lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three
levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB 157 are described
as follows:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities
that we have the ability to access at the measurement date;
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which
there is little or no market data, which require us to develop
our own assumptions based on the best information available as
what market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability.
The following section describes the valuation methodologies we
used to measure our various financial instruments at fair value,
including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy
in which each instrument is generally classified:
Derivative
contracts
For certain of our derivative contracts whose fair values are
based upon trades in liquid markets, such as aluminum forward
contracts and options, valuation model inputs can generally be
verified and valuation techniques do not involve significant
judgment. The fair values of such financial instruments are
generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
The majority of our derivative contracts are valued using
industry-standard models that use observable market inputs as
their basis, such as time value, forward interest rates,
volatility factors, and current (spot) and forward market prices
for foreign exchange rates. We generally classify these
instruments within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Such
derivatives include interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps,
foreign currency forward contracts and certain energy-related
forward contracts (e.g., natural gas).
We classify derivative contracts that are valued based on models
with significant unobservable market inputs as Level 3 of
the valuation hierarchy. These derivatives include certain of
our energy-related forward contracts (e.g., electricity) and
certain foreign currency forward contracts. Models for these
fair value measurements include inputs based on estimated future
prices for periods beyond the term of the quoted prices.
FASB 157 requires that for Level 2 and 3 of the fair value
hierarchy, where appropriate, valuations are adjusted for
various factors such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit
considerations (nonperformance risk).
The following table presents our assets and liabilities that are
measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis
classified under the appropriate level of the fair value
hierarchy as of March 31, 2009 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
Liabilities Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(644
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(688
|
)
|
Financial instruments classified as Level 3 in the fair
value hierarchy represent derivative contracts (primarily
energy-related and certain foreign currency forward contracts)
in which at least one significant
F-64
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
unobservable input is used in the valuation model. We incurred
$26 million of unrealized losses related to Level 3
financial instruments that were still held as of March 31,
2009. These unrealized losses are included in (Gain) loss on
change in fair value of derivative instruments, net.
The following table presents a reconciliation of fair value
activity for Level 3 derivative contracts on a net basis
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
Instruments(A)
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in earnings(B)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Net realized/unrealized (losses) included in Other comprehensive
income (loss)(C)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Net transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents derivative assets net of derivative liabilities. |
|
(B) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
(C) |
|
Included in Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges,
net. |
FASB
107 Instruments
The table below is a summary of fair value estimates as of
March 31, 2009 and 2008, for financial instruments, as
defined by FASB 107, excluding short-term financial assets and
liabilities, for which carrying amounts approximate fair value,
and excluding financial instruments recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis (FASB 157 instruments) (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables from related parties
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
Unsecured credit facility related party, due January
2015
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due December 2019 (CHF 51 million)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 3 million)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
F-65
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Bank loan, due February 2010 (KRW 50 billion)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due May 2009 (KRW 10 billion)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loans, due September 2010 through June 2011 (KRW
308 million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due April 2009 through December 2012
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Financial commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
18.
|
OTHER
(INCOME) EXPENSES, NET
|
Other (income) expenses, net is comprised of the following (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Exchange (gains) losses, net
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claims(A)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian tax settlement(B)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Gain on sale of equity interest in non-consolidated affiliate(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Gain on sale of rights to develop and operate hydroelectric
power plants(D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Losses on disposals of property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Sale transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We recognized a $26 million gain on the reversal of a
previously recorded legal accrual upon settlement in September
2008. |
|
(B) |
|
Interest and penalty on Brazilian tax settlement. See
Note 20 Commitments and Contingencies
(Brazil Tax Matters).
|
|
(C) |
|
In November 2006, we sold the common and preferred shares of our
25% interest in Petrocoque to the other shareholders of
Petrocoque for approximately $20 million. We recognized a
pre-tax gain of approximately $15 million. |
|
(D) |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2006, we sold our rights to develop
and operate two hydroelectric power plants in South America and
recorded a pre-tax gain of approximately $11 million. |
F-66
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We are subject to Canadian and United States federal, state, and
local income taxes as well as other foreign income taxes. The
domestic (Canada) and foreign components of our Income (loss)
before provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) (and after
removing our Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated
affiliates) are as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Domestic (Canada)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
Foreign (all other countries)
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income (loss) before equity in net (income) loss on
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
$
|
(1,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the Income tax provision (benefit) are as
follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Current provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic (Canada)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Foreign (all other countries)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic (Canada)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Foreign (all other countries)
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(246
|
)
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-67
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our
effective tax rates are shown below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Pre-tax income (loss) before equity in net (income) loss on
non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
$
|
(1,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Statutory tax rate
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) at the Canadian statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(619
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) for taxes on income (loss) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible goodwill impairment
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange translation items
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Tax credits and other allowances
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense (income) items not subject to tax
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Enacted tax rate changes
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax rate differences on foreign earnings
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(246
|
)
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
228
|
%
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our effective tax rate differs from the Canadian statutory rate
primarily due to the following factors: (1) non-deductible
impairment of goodwill; (2) pre-tax foreign currency gains
or losses with no tax effect and the tax effect of
U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no
pre-tax effect, which is shown above as exchange translation
items; (3) the remeasurement of deferred income taxes due
to foreign currency changes, which is shown above as exchange
remeasurement of deferred income taxes; (4) changes in
valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain
jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that
we will not be able to utilize those losses; (5) the
effects of enacted tax rate changes on cumulative taxable
temporary differences; (6) differences between the Canadian
statutory and foreign effective tax rates applied to entities in
different jurisdictions shown above as tax rate differences on
foreign earnings and (7) increases in uncertain tax
positions recorded under the provisions of FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48).
In connection with our spin-off from Alcan we entered into a tax
sharing and disaffiliation agreement that provides
indemnification if certain factual representations are breached
or if certain transactions are undertaken or certain actions are
taken that have the effect of negatively affecting the tax
treatment of the spin-off. It further governs the disaffiliation
of the tax matters of Alcan and its subsidiaries or affiliates
other than us, on the one hand, and us and our subsidiaries or
affiliates, on the other hand. In this respect it allocates
taxes
F-68
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
accrued prior to the spin-off and after the spin-off as well as
transfer taxes resulting therefrom. It also allocates
obligations for filing tax returns and the management of certain
pending or future tax contests and creates mutual collaboration
obligations with respect to tax matters.
We enjoy the benefits of favorable tax holidays in various
jurisdictions; however, the net impact of these tax holidays on
our income tax provision (benefit) is immaterial.
Deferred
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes recognize the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the carrying
amounts used for income tax purposes, and the impact of
available net operating loss (NOL) and tax credit carryforwards.
These items are stated at the enacted tax rates that are
expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or
recovered.
Our deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax
liabilities are as follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions not currently deductible for tax purposes
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
Tax losses/benefit carryforwards, net
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
|
$
|
613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
Inventory valuation reserves
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
Less: Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
$
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FASB 109 requires that we reduce our deferred income tax assets
by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of the
available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or a
portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. After
consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative,
management concluded that it is more likely than not that we
will not realize a portion of our deferred tax assets and that
valuation allowances of $228 million and $160 million
were necessary as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
as described below.
As of March 31, 2009, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $354 million (tax effected)
and tax credit carryforwards of $36 million, which will be
available to offset future taxable income and tax liabilities,
respectively. The carryforwards begin expiring in 2009 with some
amounts being carried forward indefinitely. As of March 31,
2009, valuation allowances of $117 million and
$17 million had been recorded against net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, respectively, where
it appeared
F-69
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
more likely than not that such benefits will not be realized.
The net operating loss carryforwards are predominantly in the
U.S., the U.K., Canada, France, Italy, and Luxembourg.
As of March 31, 2008, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $269 million (tax effected)
and tax credit carryforwards of $42 million, which will be
available to offset future taxable income and tax liabilities,
respectively. The carryforwards began expiring in 2008 with some
amounts being carried forward indefinitely. As of March 31,
2008, valuation allowances of $103 million and
$21 million had been recorded against net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, respectively, where
it appeared more likely than not that such benefit will not be
realized. The net operating loss carryforwards are predominantly
in the U.S., the U.K., Canada, France, and Italy.
Our valuation allowance increased $68 million (net) during
the year ended March 31, 2009. Of this amount,
$61 million was charged to expense.
Although realization is not assured, we believe that it is more
likely than not that the remaining deferred income tax assets
will be realized. In the near-term, the amount of deferred tax
assets considered realizable could be reduced if we do not
generate sufficient taxable income in certain jurisdictions.
We have undistributed earnings in our foreign subsidiaries. For
those subsidiaries where the earnings are considered to be
permanently reinvested, no provision for Canadian income taxes
has been provided. Upon repatriation of those earnings, in the
form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to both
Canadian income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign
taxes paid) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign
countries. For those subsidiaries where the earnings are not
considered permanently reinvested, taxes have been provided as
required. The determination of the unrecorded deferred income
tax liability for temporary differences related to investments
in foreign subsidiaries and foreign corporate joint ventures
that are considered to be permanently reinvested is not
considered practicable.
During the year ended March 31, 2009, Canadian legislation
was enacted allowing us to elect to calculate and pay our
Canadian tax liability in U.S. dollars. Our election is
effective April 1, 2008, and due to a full valuation
allowance against our net deferred tax asset position in Canada,
the election has an immaterial effect on our deferred income tax
assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2009.
Tax
Uncertainties
Adoption
of FASB Interpretation No. 48
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48) which clarifies the accounting for income
taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax
position is required to meet before being recognized in the
financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition. Upon adoption of FIN 48 as of January 1,
2007, we increased our reserves for uncertain tax positions by
$1 million. We recognized the increase as a cumulative
effect adjustment to Shareholders equity, as an increase
to our Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit).
Including this adjustment, reserves for uncertain tax positions
totaled $46 million as of January 1, 2007.
As of March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, the total
amount of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would
affect the effective income tax rate in future periods based on
anticipated settlement dates is $46 million and
$44 million, respectively. Of the March 31, 2009
amount, it is reasonably possible that the expiration of the
statutes of limitations or examinations by taxing authorities
will result in a decrease in the unrecognized tax benefits of
$25 million related to potential withholding taxes and
cross-border intercompany pricing of services rendered in
various jurisdictions by March 31, 2010.
Separately, we are awaiting a court ruling regarding the
utilization of certain operating losses. We anticipate that it
is reasonably possible that this ruling will result in a
$10 million decrease in unrecognized
F-70
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
tax benefits by March 31, 2010 related to this matter. We
have fully funded this contingent liability through a judicial
deposit, which is included in Other long-term assets
third parties since January 2007.
Tax authorities are currently examining certain of our tax
returns for fiscal years 2004 through 2008. We are evaluating
potential adjustments and we do not anticipate that settlement
of the examinations will result in a material payout. With few
exceptions, tax returns for all jurisdictions for all tax years
before 2003 are no longer subject to examination by taxing
authorities.
During the year ended March 31, 2009, taxing authorities in
Germany concluded their audit of the tax years
1999-2003.
As a result of the settlement, we reduced our unrecognized tax
benefits by $10 million, including cash payments to taxing
authorities of $6 million and a reduction to Goodwill of
$4 million.
Our continuing practice and policy is to record potential
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
our Income tax provision (benefit). As of March 31, 2009
and March 31, 2008, we had $12 million and
$14 million accrued for potential interest on income taxes,
respectively. For the periods from May 16, 2007 through
March 31, 2008; from April 1, 2007 through
May 15, 2007 and for the three months ended March 31,
2007, our Income tax provision included a charge for an
additional $5 million, $0.4 million and
$1 million of potential interest, respectively.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current period
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions based on tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Reductions based on tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statute Lapses
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes Payable
Our consolidated balance sheets include income taxes payable of
$85 million and $96 million as of March 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively. Of these amounts, $33 million and
$35 million are reflected in Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities as of March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
F-71
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
20.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Primary
Supplier
Alcan is our primary supplier of metal inputs, including prime
and sheet ingot. The table below shows our purchases from Alcan
as a percentage of our total combined metal purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Predecessor
|
Purchases from Alcan as a percentage of total combined prime and
sheet ingot purchases in kt(A)
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is
equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds. |
Legal
Proceedings
Coca-Cola
Lawsuit. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in Georgia
state court. CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
a soft toll agreement between the parties relating to the supply
of aluminum can stock, and seeks monetary damages in an amount
to be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under
the agreement. The agreement includes a most favored
nations provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS
alleges that Novelis Corporation breached the terms of the
most favored nations provision. The dispute will
likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the
parties and the courts finding as to how certain
provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS
were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would
likely be material. However, we have concluded that a loss from
the CCBSS litigation is not probable and therefore have not
recorded an accrual. In addition, we do not believe that there
is a reasonable possibility of a loss from the lawsuit based on
information available at this time. Novelis Corporation has
filed its answer and the parties are proceeding with discovery.
ARCO Aluminum Complaint. On May 24, 2007,
Arco Aluminum Inc. (ARCO) filed a complaint against Novelis
Corporation and Novelis Inc. in the United States District Court
for the Western District of Kentucky. ARCO and Novelis are
partners in a joint venture rolling mill located in Logan
County, Kentucky. In the complaint, ARCO alleged that its
consent was required in connection with Hindalcos
acquisition of Novelis. Failure to obtain consent, ARCO alleged,
put us in default of the joint venture agreements, thereby
triggering certain provisions in those agreements. The
provisions include a reversion of the production management at
the joint venture to Logan Aluminum from Novelis, and a
reduction of the board of directors of the entity that manages
the joint venture from seven members (four appointed by Novelis
and three appointed by ARCO) to six members (three appointed by
each of Novelis and ARCO).
ARCO sought a court declaration that (1) Novelis and its
affiliates are prohibited from exercising any managerial
authority or control over the joint venture,
(2) Novelis interest in the joint venture is limited
to an economic interest only and (3) ARCO has authority to
act on behalf of the joint venture. Alternatively, ARCO sought a
reversion of the production management function to Logan
Aluminum, and a change in the composition of the board of
directors of the entity that manages the joint venture. Novelis
filed its answer to the complaint on July 16, 2007.
On July 3, 2007, ARCO filed a motion for partial summary
judgment with respect to one of the counts of its complaint
relating to the claim that Novelis breached the joint venture
agreement by not seeking ARCOs consent. On July 30,
2007, Novelis filed a motion to hold ARCOs motion for
summary judgment in abeyance
F-72
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(pending further discovery), along with a demand for a jury. On
February 14, 2008, the judge issued an order granting our
motion to hold ARCOs summary judgment motion in abeyance.
Following this ruling, the joint venture continued to conduct
operational, management and board activities as normal.
On June 4, 2009, ARCO and Novelis entered into a settlement
agreement to address and resolve all matters at issue in the
lawsuit, including the Logan Joint Venture governance issues. On
June 22, 2009, the parties requested an order from the
United States District Court for the Western District of
Kentucky to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice. As a result of
the settlement, among other things, Novelis will retain control
of the Logan board of directors, production management
responsibilities will revert to Logan, and certain Novelis
employees who work at Logan will become employees of Logan.
There are no remaining reserves on this matter.
Environmental
Matters
The following describes certain environmental matters relating
to our business.
We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also
known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions
regarding liability arising from the usage, storage, treatment
or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a number of
sites in the United States, as well as similar proceedings under
the laws and regulations of the other jurisdictions in which we
have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the
European Union. Many of these jurisdictions have laws that
impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, for the costs of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses. In addition, we are, from time to
time, subject to environmental reviews and investigations by
relevant governmental authorities.
As described further in the following paragraph, we have
established procedures for regularly evaluating environmental
loss contingencies, including those arising from such
environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we believe we have made reasonable estimates
of the costs that are likely to be borne by us for these
environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly, we have
established reserves based on our reasonable estimates for the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters. We estimate that the undiscounted remaining
clean-up
costs related to all of our known environmental matters as of
March 31, 2009 will be approximately $52 million. Of
this amount, $38 million is included in Other long-term
liabilities, with the remaining $14 million included in
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2009. Management
has reviewed the environmental matters, including those for
which we assumed liability as a result of our spin-off from
Alcan. As a result of this review, management has determined
that the currently anticipated costs associated with these
environmental matters will not, individually or in the
aggregate, materially impair our operations or materially
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
With respect to environmental loss contingencies, we record a
loss contingency on whenever such contingency is probable and
reasonably estimable. The evaluation model includes all asserted
and unasserted claims that can be reasonably identified. Under
this evaluation model, the liability and the related costs are
quantified based upon the best available evidence regarding
actual liability loss and cost estimates. Except for those loss
contingencies where no estimate can reasonably be made, the
evaluation model is fact-driven and attempts to estimate the
full costs of each claim. Management reviews the status of, and
estimated liability related to, pending claims and civil actions
on a quarterly basis. The estimated costs in respect of such
reported liabilities are not offset by amounts related to
cost-sharing between parties, insurance, indemnification
arrangements or contribution from other potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) unless otherwise noted.
F-73
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Butler Tunnel Site. Novelis Corporation was a
party in a 1989 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
lawsuit before the U.S. District Court for the Middle
District of Pennsylvania involving the Butler Tunnel Superfund
site, a third-party disposal site. In May 1991, the court
granted summary judgment against Novelis Corporation for alleged
disposal of hazardous waste. After unsuccessful appeals, Novelis
Corporation paid the entire judgment plus interest.
The EPA filed a second cost recovery action against Novelis
Corporation seeking recovery of expenses associated with the
installation of an early warning and response system for
potential future releases from the Butler Tunnel site. In
January 2008, Novelis Corporation and the Department of Justice,
on behalf of the EPA, entered into a consent decree whereby
Novelis Corporation agreed to pay approximately $2 million
in three installments in settlement of its liability with the
U.S. government. This settlement has been fully paid.
Prior to the execution of the Novelis Corporation consent
decree, the EPA entered into consent decrees with the other
Butler Tunnel PRPs to finance and construct the early warning
and response system. On October 30, 2008, the trustee for
the PRPs provided a detailed analysis of the past and future
costs associated with the implementation of the early warning
system and advised us of their intention to file a contribution
action against us.
On February 3, 2009, Butler Tunnel PRPs and Novelis
Corporation entered into a settlement agreement resolving the
contribution claims. On March 5, 2009, pursuant to these
agreements, Novelis Corporation remitted its settlement payment
of past costs in the amount of approximately $1 million. As
part of the settlement, Novelis became a member of the PRP
group. Accordingly, Novelis bears an allocated share of certain
future costs in the approximate annual amount of $75,000 between
2009 and 2018 related to the costs to complete and maintain the
early warning and response system at the Butler Tunnel site.
Accordingly, Novelis Corporation has established a reserve of
$742,000 for these payments through 2018.
In December 2005, the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA) issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) to the
Companys subsidiary, Logan Aluminum, Inc. (Logan),
alleging violations of Logans Title V Operating
Permit, which regulates emissions of air pollutants from the
facility. In March 2006, the Kentucky Department of
Environmental Protection (KDEP) issued a separate NOV to Logan
alleging other violations of the Title V Operating Permit.
In March 2009, as a result of these enforcement actions, Logan
agreed to install new air pollution control equipment. Logan has
also agreed to settle the USEPA NOV, including the payment of a
civil penalty of $285,000. The KDEP NOV is currently subject to
a Tolling Agreement with the state agency.
Brazil
Tax Matters
Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America,
as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, we had cash deposits
aggregating approximately $30 million and $36 million,
respectively, in judicial depository accounts pending
finalization of the related cases. The depository accounts are
in the name of the Brazilian government and will be expended
towards these legal proceedings or released to us, depending on
the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are included in
Other long-term assets third parties in our
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we are
involved in several disputes with Brazils Ministry of
Treasury about various forms of manufacturing taxes and social
security contributions, for which we have made no judicial
deposits but for which we have established reserves ranging from
$6 million to $118 million as of March 31, 2009.
In total, these reserves approximate $135 million as of
March 31, 2009 and are included in Other long-term
liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
On May 28, 2009, the Brazilian government passed a law
allowing taxpayers to settle certain federal tax disputes with
the Brazilian tax authorities, including disputes relating to a
Brazilian national tax on manufactured products, through an
installment program. Pursuant to the installment plan, companies
can elect
F-74
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
to (a) pay the principal amount of the disputed tax amounts
over a near-term period (e.g., 1-60 monthly installments)
and receive a
35-45%
discount on the interest and
80-100%
discount on the penalties owed, (b) pay the principal and
interest over a medium-term period (e.g.,
60-120 monthly
installments) and receive a
30-35%
discount on the interest and
70-80%
discount on the penalties owed, or (c) pay the full amount
of the disputed tax amounts, including interest and penalties,
over a longer-term period (e.g.,
120-180 monthly
installments) and receive a
25-30%
discount on the interest and
60-70%
discount on the penalties owed. Novelis has already joined the
installment plan. However, we will announce (a) the amount
of the tax disputes that will be settled and (b) the number
of installments elected once the Ministry of Treasury enacts the
final installment plan regulations.
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including certain
of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and Aluminium Norf GmbH, which
is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint venture that does not meet
the requirements for consolidation under FIN 46(R).
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no
expiration and have termination notice requirements. Neither we
nor any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds
any assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the
potential settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements, all
liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term debt
facilities for these entities are already included in our
consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness as of March 31, 2009 (in
millions). We did not have obligations under guarantees of
indebtedness related to our majority-owned subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
Carrying
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Future Payment
|
|
Value
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
|
|
21.
|
SEGMENT,
GEOGRAPHICAL AREA AND MAJOR CUSTOMER INFORMATION
|
Segment
Information
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America; Europe; Asia and South America.
Corporate and Other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. It also includes realized gains
(losses) on corporate derivative instruments, consolidating and
other elimination accounts.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments, based on Segment income, in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information. Segment income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment income as earnings before (a) depreciation
F-75
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and amortization; (b) interest expense and amortization of
debt issuance costs; (c) interest income;
(d) unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of
derivative instruments, net; (e) impairment of goodwill;
(f) impairment charges on long-lived assets (other than
goodwill); (g) gain on extinguishment of debt;
(h) noncontrolling interests share;
(i) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Segment income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting;
(k) restructuring charges, net; (k) gains or losses on
disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses, net;
(l) other costs, net; (m) litigation settlement, net
of insurance recoveries; (n) sale transaction fees;
(o) income tax provision (benefit) (p) cumulative
effect of accounting change, net of tax.
Net sales and expenses are measured in accordance with the
policies and procedures described in Note 1
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
For Segment income purposes we only include the impact of the
derivative gains or losses to the extent they are settled in
cash (i.e., realized) during that period.
The following is a description of our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
North America. Headquartered in Cleveland,
Ohio, this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 11 plants, including two fully dedicated
recycling facilities, in two countries.
|
|
|
|
Europe. Headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates 14 plants, including one recycling
facility, in six countries.
|
|
|
|
Asia. Headquartered in Seoul, South Korea,
this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge
products and operates three plants in two countries.
|
|
|
|
South America. Headquartered in Sao Paulo,
Brazil, this segment comprises bauxite mining, alumina refining,
smelting operations, power generation, carbon products, aluminum
sheet and light gauge products and operates four plants in
Brazil.
|
Adjustment to Eliminate Proportional
Consolidation. The financial information for our
segments includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile the financial information for the segments shown in
the tables below to the GAAP-based measure, we must remove our
proportional share of each line item that we included in the
segment amounts. See Note 10 Investment in and
Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
Transactions for further information about these
non-consolidated affiliates.
F-76
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions).
Selected
Segment Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,718
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
439
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
Total assets as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
$
|
1,296
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(234
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,655
|
|
|
$
|
3,828
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
375
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
Total assets as of March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,957
|
|
|
$
|
4,355
|
|
|
$
|
1,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,485
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
(199
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
925
|
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,630
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
F-77
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,691
|
|
|
$
|
3,620
|
|
|
$
|
1,692
|
|
|
$
|
863
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,849
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
233
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
116
|
|
F-78
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table shows the reconciliation from income from
reportable segments to Net loss attributable to our common
shareholder (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
South America
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Corporate and other(A)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net(B)
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges on long-lived assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(C)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Loss on disposals of assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Other costs, net(D)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-79
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Corporate and other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. It also includes realized gains
(losses) on corporate derivative instruments. |
|
(B) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net represents the portion of gains (losses) that
were not settled in cash during the period. Total realized and
unrealized gains (losses) are shown in the table below and are
included in the aggregate each period in (Gain) loss on change
in fair value of derivative instruments, net on our consolidated
statements of operations. |
|
(C) |
|
Our financial information for our segments (including Segment
income) includes the results of our
non-consolidated
affiliates on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is
consistent with the way we manage our business segments.
However, under GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are
accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Therefore,
in order to reconcile Income from reportable segments to Net
loss, the proportional Segment income of these non-consolidated
affiliates is removed from Income from reportable segments, net
of our share of their net after-tax results, which is reported
as Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates on
our consolidated statements of operations. The adjustment to
eliminate proportional consolidation for the year ended
March 31, 2009 includes a $160 million impairment
charge related to our investment in Norf. See
Note 10 Investment in and Advances to
Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions for
further information about these non-consolidated affiliates. |
|
(D) |
|
Other costs, net for the year ended March 31, 2009 include
a $26 million non-cash gain on reversal of a legal accrual,
as well as a $9 million charge for a tax settlement in Brazil.
Sales transaction fees of $32 million were recorded in both
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and the period
April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007. In the year ended
December 31, 2006, Other costs, net includes a $15 million
gain on sale of equity interest in non-consolidated affiliates
and an $11 million gain on sale of rights to develop and operate
hydroelectric power plants (see Note 18 Other
(Income) Expenses, net). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
(Gains) losses on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and included in Segment income
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
$
|
(249
|
)
|
Realized on corporate derivative instruments
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains) losses on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-80
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Geographical
Area Information
We had 32 operating facilities in 11 countries as of
March 31, 2009. The tables below present Net sales and
Long-lived assets by geographical area (in millions). Net sales
are attributed to geographical areas based on the origin of the
sale. Long-lived assets are attributed to geographical areas
based on asset location and exclude investments in and advances
to our non-consolidated affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,685
|
|
|
$
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
$
|
3,474
|
|
Asia and Other Pacific
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
2,263
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net sales
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
2,630
|
|
|
$
|
9,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,902
|
|
|
$
|
2,566
|
|
Asia and Other Pacific
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
4,168
|
|
|
$
|
6,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major
Customer Information
All of our operating segments had Net sales to Rexam Plc
(Rexam), our largest customer. The table below shows our net
sales to Rexam as a percentage of total Net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
April 1, 2007
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Net sales to Rexam as a percentage of total net sales
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-81
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
22.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
|
The following table shows non-cash investing and financing
activities related to the Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities related to the Acquisition of Novelis Common
Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
(1,344
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(1,625
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
Debt
|
|
|
66
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) consists of
the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Fair value of effective portion of hedges
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other benefits
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AOCI
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we identified errors
in our interim financial statements included in previously filed
fiscal 2009
Form 10-Qs.
We deemed the correction of these errors to be both
quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial after consideration
of SEC Staff Accounting Bulleting (SAB) No. 99,
Materiality, as well as SEC SAB No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements (SAB 108). These adjustments will be
reflected when the affected periods are presented in future
interim reports. The following summarizes these immaterial
errors:
|
|
|
|
|
We identified that a customer sales contract included certain
terms which, when elected by the customer, result in the
recognition of a derivative under FASB 133. As changes in the
valuation of the derivative associated with this arrangement
were not previously recognized in our financial statements, the
amounts previously reported in (Gain) loss on change in fair
value of derivative instruments, net were misstated for the
quarters ended June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2008 by $1 million, $(4) million and
$(8) million, respectively. This error increased
(decreased) previously reported net income (loss) attributable
to our common shareholder by $(1) million, $2 million
and $5 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2008,
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
We determined that there was an error in our valuation of
certain of our cross-currency swap derivative instruments. As a
result, the amounts previously reported in (Gain) loss on change
in fair value of derivative instruments, net were misstated for
the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2008 by $4 million and $(1) million, respectively.
This error increased (decreased) previously reported net income
(loss) attributable to our common shareholder by
$(3) million and $1 million for the quarters ended
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
F-82
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table below presents select operating results (in millions)
and dividends per common share information by period. Certain
reclassifications of prior period quarterly amounts have been
made to conform to the presentation adopted for the current year
as discussed in Note 1. Also, the quarterly results below
reflect the correction of the aforementioned errors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(A)
|
|
|
2008(A)
|
|
|
2008(A)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,103
|
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,939
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(1,823
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-83
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1. 2007
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007(B)
|
|
|
2007(B)
|
|
|
2007(B)
|
|
|
2008(B)
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,630
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,547
|
|
|
$
|
2,821
|
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
|
$
|
2,862
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
2,555
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
2,577
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments ,
net
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
123
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
GUARANTOR INFORMATION
|
In connection with the issuance of our Senior Notes and the old
notes, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, which are
100% owned within the meaning of
Rule 3-10(h)(i) of Regulation S-X, provided guarantees of
the Senior Notes and the old notes. The guarantors of the Senior
Notes and the old notes are the same. These guarantees are full
and unconditional as well as joint and several. The guarantor
subsidiaries (the Guarantors) comprise the majority of our
businesses in Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Brazil and
Switzerland, as well as certain businesses in Germany. Certain
Guarantors may be subject to restrictions on their ability to
distribute earnings to Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The remaining
subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not
guarantors of the Senior Notes.
The following information presents consolidating statements of
operations, consolidating balance sheets and condensed
consolidating statements of cash flows of the Parent, the
Guarantors and the Non-Guarantors. Investments include
investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates as
well as investments in net assets of divisions included in the
Parent, and have been presented using the equity method of
accounting.
F-84
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,186
|
|
|
$
|
8,421
|
|
|
$
|
2,647
|
|
|
$
|
(2,077
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
7,679
|
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
|
|
(2,077
|
)
|
|
|
9,251
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt, net
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,890
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
10,431
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
(3,967
|
)
|
|
|
12,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
|
|
(2,010
|
)
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
(1,773
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,773
|
)
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,890
|
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-85
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,300
|
|
|
$
|
8,266
|
|
|
$
|
2,701
|
|
|
$
|
(2,302
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
7,504
|
|
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
|
(2,302
|
)
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
191
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
8,113
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
(2,219
|
)
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-86
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
(227
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-87
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
378
|
|
|
$
|
2,228
|
|
|
$
|
723
|
|
|
$
|
(699
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments ,
net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-88
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,572
|
|
|
$
|
8,340
|
|
|
$
|
2,822
|
|
|
$
|
(2,885
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
|
|
2,670
|
|
|
|
(2,885
|
)
|
|
|
9,317
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
221
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments ,
net
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,838
|
|
|
|
8,460
|
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
|
10,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(275
|
)
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-89
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(601
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
719
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
5,036
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(1,858
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of our common shareholder
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-90
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONSOLIDATING
BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008 Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(810
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
203
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
2,618
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
(823
|
)
|
|
|
3,446
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,357
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
3,629
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3,629
|
)
|
|
|
946
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(1,480
|
)
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,771
|
|
|
$
|
8,824
|
|
|
$
|
2,074
|
|
|
$
|
(5,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
148
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
704
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
2,350
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
(793
|
)
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,560
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
5,715
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
(2,303
|
)
|
|
|
7,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
3,075
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
(3,639
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of our common shareholder
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
(3,629
|
)
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
(3,629
|
)
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
5,771
|
|
|
$
|
8,824
|
|
|
$
|
2,074
|
|
|
$
|
(5,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-91
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2009
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
(139
|
)
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
(223
|
)
|
|
$
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-92
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2007 Through March 31, 2008
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,009
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-93
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(181
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(230
|
)
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-94
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55
|
)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Windfall tax benefit on share-based compensation
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-95
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Disposal of business, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Proceeds from (advances on) loans receivable, net
related parties
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Premiums paid to purchase derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
(1,760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,247
|
)
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preference shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
common shareholders
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Net receipts from Alcan
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-96
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
3,261
|
|
|
|
5,622
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
120
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-97
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $4 and $2 as of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,769
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,754
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; unlimited number of shares
authorized; 77,459,658 shares issued and outstanding as of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Novelis shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
7,754
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-98
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
120
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments, net
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange remeasurement of debt
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Proceeds from related party loans receivable, net
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Net proceeds (outflow) from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, third parties
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, related parties
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments, third parties
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Principal payments, related parties
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
263
|
|
Dividends, noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-99
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc. Shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
(AOCI)
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
1,509
|
|
Net income attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax provision of $6
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net of tax
benefit of $2 included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits, net of tax provision of $2
included in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Noncontrolling interests cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
77,459,658
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-100
Novelis
Inc.
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges, net
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Postretirement benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension and other benefits
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
Income tax provision related to items of other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
(140
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-101
Novelis
Inc.
|
|
1.
|
BUSINESS
AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
References herein to Novelis, the
Company, we, our, or
us refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless
the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein
to Hindalco refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In
October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding
shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein to Rio Tinto
Alcan refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.
Description
of Business and Basis of Presentation
Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and
its subsidiaries, is the worlds leading aluminum rolled
products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum
sheet and light gauge products where the end-use destination of
the products includes the beverage and food can, transportation,
construction and industrial, and foil products markets. As of
September 30, 2009, we had operations on four continents:
North America; Europe; Asia and South America, through 31
operating plants, one research facility and several
market-focused innovation centers in 11 countries. In addition
to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American
businesses include bauxite mining, primary aluminum smelting and
power generation facilities that supply our rolling plants in
Brazil.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009 filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 29,
2009, and updated on
Form 8-K
filed August 5, 2009 to reflect the revised presentation of
noncontrolling interests. Management believes that all
adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results,
consisting of normally recurring items, have been included in
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for
the interim periods presented. Further, in connection with the
preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements,
the Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet
date of September 30, 2009 through November 3, 2009,
the date these financial statements were issued.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. The principal areas of judgment
relate to (1) the fair value of derivative financial
instruments; (2) impairment of goodwill;
(3) impairments of long lived assets, intangible assets and
equity investments; (4) actuarial assumptions related to
pension and other postretirement benefit plans; (5) income
tax reserves and valuation allowances and (6) assessment of
loss contingencies, including environmental and litigation
reserves.
Acquisition
of Novelis Common Stock
On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco
through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan
of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share.
The aggregate purchase price for all of the Companys
common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed
$2.8 billion of Novelis debt for a total transaction
value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the
Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were
indirectly held by Hindalco.
Consolidation
Policy
Our consolidated financial statements include the assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses of all wholly-owned
subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise
control and entities in which we have a controlling financial
interest or are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. We
eliminate all significant intercompany accounts and transactions
from our financial statements.
F-102
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
In August 2009, we announced the formation of a joint venture
entity, Evermore Recycling LLC (Evermore), to procure used
beverage cans in North America. We own 55.8% of this limited
liability corporation and have consolidated the results
effective August 11, 2009. The results of Evermore were
immaterial for the three and six months ended September 30,
2009.
Reclassifications
and Adjustment
Certain reclassifications of prior period amounts and
presentation have been made to conform to the presentation
adopted for the current period.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we identified an
immaterial error in our consolidated annual and interim
financial statements included in previously filed
Forms 10-Q
and
Forms 10-K
for fiscal 2008 and 2009. The error relates to deferred income
taxes recorded in connection with purchase accounting in South
America. We believe the correction of this error to be both
quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial to our projected
annual results for fiscal 2010 or to any of our previously
issued financial statements. As a result, we did not adjust any
prior period amounts. There was no impact to income (loss)
before income taxes and noncontrolling interest share or cash
flows from operating activities for any periods. We have
reflected the correction of this error in the interim financial
statements for the second quarter of 2010. As of and for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, the impact of the
correction was an increase to goodwill of $29 million, an
increase to deferred tax liabilities of $25 million and a
reduction of our income tax expense of $4 million. Due to
the fact that our South American subsidiaries are US dollar
functional, the deferred tax liabilities fluctuate with changes
in the exchange rate and are recorded as increases or decreases
to income tax expense.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards have been adopted by us
during the six months ended September 30, 2009.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
approved its Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
(Codification) as the single source of authoritative United
States accounting and reporting standards applicable for all
non-governmental entities, with the exception of the SEC and its
staff. The Codification which changes the referencing of
financial standards is effective for interim or annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. As the codification is not
intended to change or alter existing US GAAP, this standard had
no impact on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 855, Subsequent
Events, (prior authoritative literature: FASB Statement
No. 165, Subsequent Events) which establishes
general standards of accounting and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. This
accounting standard requires the disclosure of the date through
which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis
for that date. This standard had no impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements) which establishes
accounting and reporting standards that require: (i) the
ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than
the parent to be clearly identified and presented in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet within shareholders
equity, but separate from the parents equity;
(ii) the amount of condensed consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be
clearly identified and presented on the face of the condensed
consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes in a
parents ownership interest while the parent retains its
controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be accounted
for consistently. We adopted this accounting standard effective
April 1, 2009, and applied this standard prospectively,
except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which
have been applied retrospectively.
F-103
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets) which
amends the factors that should be considered in developing the
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset. The accounting standard
also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination
of intangible asset useful lives. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, (prior authoritative
literature: FASB Staff Position
No. 107-1
and APB Opinion
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments; FASB Staff Position
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly) which
requires disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods. This codification
also provides additional guidance in determining fair value when
the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has
significantly decreased. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 320,
Investments Debt and Equity
Securities, (prior authoritative literature: FASB Staff
Position
No. 115-2
and FASB Staff Position
No. 124-2,
Recognition of
Other-than-Temporary-Impairments)
which amends the
other-than-temporary
impairment guidance in GAAP for debt and equity securities. This
standard had no impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 805, Business
Combinations, (prior authoritative literature: FASB
Statement No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations;
FASB Staff Position No. 141(R)-1, Accounting for
Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business
Combination That Arise from Contingencies) (ASC
805) which establishes principles and requirements for how
the acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
This standard also requires acquirers to estimate the
acquisition-date fair value of any contingent consideration and
to recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of
contingent consideration in earnings. ASC 805 also clarifies the
initial and subsequent recognition, subsequent accounting, and
disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination. This standard requires that assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that
arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value, if the
acquisition-date fair value can be reasonably estimated. We will
apply ASC 805 prospectively to business combinations occurring
after March 31, 2009, with the exception of the accounting
for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
contingencies. This standard amends certain provisions of
preexisting tax guidance such that adjustments made to valuation
allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies
associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective
date of this business combination guidance would also apply the
provisions of this standard. This standard had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We adopted the authoritative guidance in ASC 323,
Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures,
(prior authoritative literature: Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue
No. 08-06,
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations) which
addresses questions that have arisen about the application of
the equity method of accounting for investments acquired after
the effective date of newly issued business combination
standards and non-controlling interest standards. This
accounting standard clarifies how to account for certain
transactions involving equity method investments, and is
effective on a prospective basis. This standard had no impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
F-104
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards have been issued, but
have not yet been adopted by us as of September 30, 2009,
as adoption is not required until future reporting periods.
In June 2009, the FASB issued statement No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FASB
167). FASB 167 has not been incorporated by the FASB into the
Codification as the guidance is not yet effective and early
adoption is prohibited. FASB 167 is intended (1) to address
the effects on certain provisions of the accounting standard
dealing with consolidation of variable interest entities, as a
result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose
entity concept in FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for
Transfers of Financial Assets, and (2) to clarify
questions about the application of certain key provisions
related to consolidation of variable interest entities,
including those in which accounting and disclosures do not
always provided timely and useful information about an
enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity.
FASB 167 will be effective for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2009. We do not anticipate this standard will
have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations and cash flows.
In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, (prior
authoritative literature: FASB issued FSP No. 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits) which requires that an employer
disclose the following information about the fair value of plan
assets: (1) how investment allocation decisions are made,
including the factors that are pertinent to understanding of
investment policies and strategies; (2) the major
categories of plan assets; (3) the inputs and valuation
techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets;
(4) the effect of fair value measurements using significant
unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period;
and (5) significant concentrations of risk within plan
assets. This pronouncement will be effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2009, with early application
permitted. At initial adoption, application of this standard
would not be required for earlier periods that are presented for
comparative purposes. This standard will have no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We have determined that all other recently issued accounting
standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do
not apply to our operations.
|
|
2.
|
RESTRUCTURING
PROGRAMS
|
There were no new restructuring actions initiated during fiscal
2010. Restructuring charges of $6 million on the condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended
September 30, 2009, consisted of the following:
(1) $3 million in costs related to our Rogerstone
facility, (2) $1 million in additional severance costs
related to our Rugles facility and (3) $2 million in
other items at other European facilities.
The following table summarizes our restructuring accrual
activity by region (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
Provisions (recoveries), net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Impact of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-105
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Europe
Restructuring charges in the table above includes
$1 million in additional severance costs at our Rugles
facility, $1 million of environmental costs at our Borgo
Franco plant and $1 million of other costs related
primarily to the Rogerstone plant closure and the exit of
certain activities at our Rugles and Ohle plants.
We made the following payments relating to preexisting
restructuring programs in Europe: $24 million in severance
payments, $7 million in payments for environmental
remediation and $2 million of other payments related
primarily to contract terminations.
At our Rogerstone facility, we also incurred a $2 million
charge related to the write down of parts and supplies and
approximately $1 million of on-going maintenance expense
related to the shut-down. The $2 million write down is not
included in the table above as it was reflected as a reduction
to the appropriate balance sheet accounts. We expect to incur
approximately $1 million in additional maintenance expenses
at our Rogerstone facility through the end of fiscal 2010.
North
America
We made $6 million in severance payments related to the
voluntary and involuntary separation programs initiated in the
third quarter of fiscal 2009.
South
America
We made $1 million in severance payments and
$1 million in payments related to other exit costs.
Inventories consist of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
CONSOLIDATION
OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
|
We have a variable interest in Logan Aluminum, Inc. (Logan).
Based upon a previous restructuring program, Novelis acquired
the right to use the excess capacity at Logan. To utilize this
capacity, we installed and have sole ownership of a cold mill at
the Logan facility which enabled us to have the ability to take
the majority share of production and costs. These facts qualify
Novelis as Logans primary beneficiary and this entity is
consolidated for all periods presented. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
F-106
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table summarizes the carrying value and
classification of assets and liabilities owned by the Logan
joint venture and consolidated on our condensed consolidated
balance sheets (in millions). There are significant other assets
used in the operations of Logan that are not part of the joint
venture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
(142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
Net carrying value
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
5.
|
INVESTMENT
IN AND ADVANCES TO NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES AND RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
The following table summarizes the condensed results of
operations of our equity method affiliates (on a 100% basis, in
millions) on a historical basis of accounting. These results do
not include the incremental depreciation and amortization
expense that we record in our equity method accounting, which
arises as a result of the amortization of fair value adjustments
we made to our investments in non-consolidated affiliates due to
the Arrangement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
Costs, expenses and provisions for taxes on income
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below summarizes our incremental depreciation and
amortization expense on our equity method investments due to the
Arrangement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Incremental depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental depreciation and amortization expense, net
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements are transactions and balances arising from business
we conduct with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we
classify as related party transactions and balances. We earned
less than $1 million of interest income on a loan due from
Aluminium
F-107
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Norf GmbH during each of the periods presented in the table
below. The following table describes the nature and amounts of
significant transactions that we had with these non-consolidated
affiliates (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Purchases of tolling services and electricity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH(A)
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
Consorcio Candonga(B)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases from related parties
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
|
|
(B) |
|
We obtain electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our operations
in South America. |
The following table describes the period-end account balances
that we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as
related party balances in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets (in millions). We have no other
material related party balances with these non-consolidated
affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Accounts receivable(A)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Other long-term receivables(A)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Accounts payable(B)
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The balances represent current and non-current portions of a
loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH. |
|
|
|
(B) |
|
We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH and
electricity from Consorcio Candonga. |
F-108
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Debt consists of the following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Rates(A)
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Adjustments(B)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Third party debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term borrowings
|
|
|
2.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
11.50
|
%
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
2.25
|
%(C)
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan Facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
2.27
|
%(C)
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
813
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due December 2019 (Swiss francs (CHF)
50 million)
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 2 million)
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
3.00
|
%(C)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Bank loan, due February 2010 (Korean won (KRW) 50 billion)
|
|
|
3.81
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Bank loan, due May 2009 (KRW 10 billion)
|
|
|
7.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due December 2011 through December 2012
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,835
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
2,822
|
|
|
|
2,742
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
Less: Short term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion third
parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,600
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,596
|
|
|
$
|
2,419
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured credit facility related party, due January
2015
|
|
|
13.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Interest rates are as of September 30, 2009 and exclude the
effects of accretion/amortization of fair value adjustments as a
result of the Arrangement and the debt exchange completed in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. |
|
|
|
(B) |
|
Debt existing at the time of the Arrangement was recorded at
fair value. Additional floating rate Term Loan with a face value
of $220 million issued in March 2009 was recorded at a fair
value of $165 million. Additional 11.5% Senior Note
with a face value of $185 million issued in August 2009 was
recorded at fair value of $181 million (see
11.5% Senior Notes below). |
|
|
|
(C) |
|
Excludes the effect of related interest rate swaps and the
effect of accretion of fair value. |
F-109
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Principal repayment requirements for our total debt over the
next five years and thereafter (excluding unamortized fair value
adjustments and using rates of exchange as of September 30,
2009 for our debt denominated in foreign currencies) are as
follows (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
116
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
16
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
16
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5% Senior
Notes
On August 11, 2009, Novelis Inc. issued $185 million
aggregate principal face amount of 11.5% senior unsecured
notes at an effective rate of 12.0% (11.5% Senior Notes).
The 11.5% Senior Notes were issued at a discount resulting
in gross proceeds of $181 million. The net proceeds of this
offering were used to repay a portion of the ABL Facility and
$96 million outstanding under the unsecured credit facility
from an affiliate of the Aditya Birla Group.
The 11.5% Senior Notes rank equally with all of our
existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness, and are
guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis,
by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
all of our existing and future Canadian and U.S. restricted
subsidiaries,
|
|
|
|
|
|
certain of our existing foreign restricted subsidiaries and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our other restricted subsidiaries that guarantee debt in the
future under any credit facilities, provided that the borrower
of such debt is our company or a Canadian or a
U.S. subsidiary.
|
The 11.5% Senior Notes contain certain covenants and events
of default, including limitations on certain restricted
payments, the incurrence of additional indebtedness and the sale
of certain assets. As of September 30, 2009, we are
compliant with these covenants. Interest on the
11.5% Senior Notes is payable on February 15 and August 15
of each year, commencing on February 15, 2010. The notes
will mature on February 15, 2015.
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
Our senior secured credit facilities consist of (1) a
$1.16 billion seven year term loan facility maturing July
2014 (Term Loan facility) and (2) an $800 million
five-year multi-currency asset-backed revolving credit line and
letter of credit facility (ABL Facility). The senior secured
credit facilities include certain affirmative and negative
covenants. Under the ABL Facility, if our excess availability,
as defined under the borrowing, is less than $80 million,
we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1 to 1. As of September 30, 2009, our fixed charge
coverage ratio is less than 1 to 1, resulting in a reduction of
availability under the ABL Facility of $80 million.
Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral under
the senior secured credit facilities.
Short-Term
Borrowings and Lines of Credit
As of September 30, 2009, our short-term borrowings were
$177 million consisting of (1) $166 million of
short-term loans under the ABL Facility, (2) a
$4 million short-term loan in Italy and
(3) $7 million in bank
F-110
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
overdrafts. As of September 30, 2009, $31 million of
the ABL Facility was utilized for letters of credit and we had
$400 million in remaining availability under the ABL
Facility before covenant related restrictions. The weighted
average interest rate on our total short-term borrowings was
2.09% and 2.75% as of September 30, 2009 and March 31,
2009, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009, we had an additional
$122 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea
not included in the ABL Facility.
Interest
Rate Swaps
As of September 30, 2009, we have interest rate swaps to
fix the variable LIBOR interest rate on $920 million of our
floating rate Term Loan facility. We are still obligated to pay
any applicable margin, as defined in our senior secured credit
facilities. Interest rate swaps related to $400 million at
an effective weighted average interest rate of 4.0% expire
March 31, 2010. In January 2009, we entered into two
interest rate swaps to fix the variable LIBOR interest rate on
an additional $300 million of our floating Term Loan
facility at a rate of 1.49%, plus any applicable margin. These
interest rate swaps are effective from March 31, 2009
through March 31, 2011. In April 2009, we entered into an
additional $220 million interest rate swap at a rate of
1.97%, which is effective through April 30, 2012.
We have a cross-currency interest rate swap in Korea to convert
our $100 million variable rate bank loan to KRW
92 billion at a fixed rate of 5.44%. The swap expires
October 2010, concurrent with the maturity of the loan.
As of September 30, 2009 approximately 84% of our debt was
fixed rate and approximately 16% was variable rate.
|
|
7.
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Total compensation expense related to share-based awards for the
respective periods is presented in the table below (in
millions). These amounts are included in Selling, general and
administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements
of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Novelis Long-Tem Incentive Plan 2009
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Novelis Long-Tem Incentive Plan 2010
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation expense
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan
In June 2009, our board of directors authorized the Novelis
Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2010 FY 2013 (2010 LTIP)
covering the performance period from April 1, 2009 through
March 31, 2013. The terms of the 2010 LTIP are the same as
the Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2009 FY 2012
(2009 LTIP) approved in June 2008. Under the 2010 LTIP, phantom
stock appreciation rights (SARs) are to be granted to certain of
our executive officers and key employees. The SARs will vest at
the rate of 25% per year, subject to performance criteria (see
below) and expire seven years from their grant date. Each SAR is
to be settled in cash based on the difference between the market
value of one Hindalco share on the date of grant and the market
value on the date of exercise, where market values are
denominated in Indian rupees and converted to the
participants payroll currency at the time of exercise. The
amount of cash paid is limited to (i) 2.5 times the target
payout if exercised within one year of vesting or (ii) 3
times the target payout if exercised after one
F-111
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
year of vesting. The SARs do not transfer any shareholder rights
in Hindalco to a participant. The SARs are classified as
liability awards and are remeasured at fair value each reporting
period until the SARs are settled.
The performance criterion for vesting is based on the actual
overall Novelis operating earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, as adjusted (adjusted Operating
EBITDA) compared to the target adjusted Operating EBITDA
established and approved each fiscal year. The minimum threshold
for vesting each year is 75% of each annual target adjusted
Operating EBITDA, at which point 75% of the SARs for that period
would vest, with an equal pro rata amount of SARs vesting
through 100% achievement of the target. Given that the
performance criterion is based on an earnings target in a future
period for each fiscal year, the grant date of the awards for
accounting purposes is generally not established until the
performance criterion has been defined. Accordingly, each of the
four tranches associated with the 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP is
deemed granted when the earnings target is determined.
The tables below show the SARs activity under our 2010 LTIP and
2009 LTIP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B
|
)
|
Granted
|
|
|
13,459,711
|
(A)
|
|
|
85.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
13,459,711
|
|
|
|
85.79
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value (USD
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
(in Indian Rupees)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
20,606,906
|
(A)
|
|
|
60.05
|
|
|
|
6.22
|
|
|
|
(B
|
)
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(9,041,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
11,565,111
|
|
|
|
60.05
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents total SARs approved by the Board of Directors for
grant. As noted above, due to the performance criterion based on
a future earnings target, the amount deemed granted for
accounting purposes is limited to the individual tranches
subject to an established earnings target, which includes the
current and prior fiscal years. |
|
|
|
(B) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is zero as the market value of a
share of Hindalco stock was less than the SAR exercise price. |
The fair value of each SAR is based on the difference between
the fair value of a long call and a short call option. The fair
value of each of these call options was determined using the
Black-Scholes valuation method. We used historical stock price
volatility data of Hindalco on the Bombay Stock Exchange to
F-112
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
determine expected volatility assumptions. The fair value of
each SAR under the 2010 LTIP and 2009 LTIP was estimated as of
September 30, 2009 using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 LTIP
|
|
2009 LTIP
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
49.9 56.4%
|
|
54.0 57.1%
|
Weighted average volatility
|
|
53.0%
|
|
55.9%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
1.05%
|
|
1.05%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
6.8 7.1%
|
|
6.61 6.93%
|
Expected life
|
|
3.7 5.2 years
|
|
3.2 4.2 years
|
The fair value of the SARs is being recognized over the
requisite performance and service period of each tranche,
subject to the achievement of any performance criterion. Since
the performance criteria for fiscal years 2011 through 2013 have
not yet been established and therefore, measurement periods for
SARs relating to those periods have not yet commenced, no
compensation expense for those tranches has been recorded for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. No SARs were
exercisable at September 30, 2009.
Unrecognized compensation expense related to the non-vested SARs
(assuming all future performance criteria are met) is
$14 million which is expected to be realized over a
weighted average period of 4.16 years.
|
|
8.
|
POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFIT PLANS
|
Our pension obligations relate to funded defined benefit pension
plans in the U.S., Canada, Switzerland and the U.K., unfunded
pension plans in Germany, and unfunded lump sum indemnities in
France, South Korea, Malaysia and Italy. Our other
postretirement obligations (Other Benefits, as shown in certain
tables below) include unfunded healthcare and life insurance
benefits provided to retired employees in Canada, the
U.S. and Brazil.
Components of net periodic benefit cost for all of our
significant postretirement benefit plans are shown in the tables
below (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Amortization (gains) losses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Curtailment/settlement losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Amortization (gains) losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Curtailment/settlement losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-113
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 6.7% in
fiscal 2010.
Employer
Contributions to Plans
For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to
provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to date,
and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over
periods of 15 years or less. We also participate in savings
plans in Canada and the U.S., as well as defined contribution
pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, Italy,
Switzerland, Malaysia and Brazil. We contributed the following
amounts to all plans, including the Rio Tinto Alcan plans, that
cover our employees (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Funded pension plans
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Unfunded pension plans
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Savings and defined contribution pension plans
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the remainder of fiscal 2010, we expect to contribute an
additional $33 million to our funded pension plans,
$6 million to our unfunded pension plans and
$9 million to our savings and defined contribution plans.
|
|
9.
|
CURRENCY
(GAINS) LOSSES
|
The following currency (gains) losses are included in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net (gain) loss on change in fair value of currency derivative
instruments(A)
|
|
$
|
(51
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Net (gain) loss on remeasurement of monetary assets and
liabilities(B)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
|
|
(B) |
|
Included in Other (income) expenses, net. |
The following currency gains (losses) are included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
March 31,2009
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment beginning
of period
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment end of
period
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-114
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS AND COMMODITY CONTRACTS
|
The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity
contracts as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009
are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Net Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent(A)
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative fair value
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
(640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
The noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included
in Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. |
F-115
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Net
Investment Hedges
We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to
fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and
investments in our European operations. We had cross-currency
swaps of Euro 135 million as of September 30,
2009 and March 31, 2009, designated as net investment
hedges. The effective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative is included in Other comprehensive income (loss)
(OCI), as a part of Currency translation adjustments. The
ineffective portion of gain or loss on derivatives is included
in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net.
For our currency exchange contracts designated as net investment
hedges, we recognized a $5 million loss and a
$21 million loss in OCI for the three months and six months
ended September 30, 2009, respectively. We recognized gains
of $81 and $120 million in OCI for the three and six months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Cash Flow
Hedges
We own an interest in an electricity swap which we have
designated as a cash flow hedge of our exposure to fluctuating
electricity prices. The effective portion of gain or loss on the
derivative is included in OCI and reclassified when settled into
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivatives, net in our
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. As
of September 30, 2009, the outstanding portion of this swap
includes 1.8 million megawatt hours through 2017.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in
the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable-rate
debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included
in OCI and reclassified when settled into Interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs in our accompanying
condensed consolidated statements of operations. We had
$910 million and $690 million of outstanding interest
rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges as of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or
losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the
life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the
relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will no
longer be designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if
the underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be
probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness
determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the
measures we have established at the inception of the hedge.
Gains or losses recognized to date in AOCI would be immediately
reclassified into current period earnings, as would any
subsequent changes in the fair value of any such derivative.
During the next twelve months we expect to realize
$23 million in effective net losses from our cash flow
hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our
exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.
F-116
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table summarizes the impact on AOCI and earnings
of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in
helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging
instruments. The change in fair value of these derivative
instruments is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value
of derivative instruments, net in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our
exposure to changes in the London Metal Exchange (LME) price of
aluminum. These exposures arise from firm commitments to sell
aluminum in future periods at fixed or capped prices, the
forecasted output of our smelter operations in South America and
the forecasted metal price lag associated with firm commitments
to sell aluminum in future periods at prices based on the LME.
In addition, transactions with certain customers meet the
definition of a derivative under US GAAP and are recognized as
assets or liabilities at fair value on the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30,
2009 and March 31, 2009, we had 225 kilotonnes (kt) and 294
kt, respectively, of outstanding aluminum contracts not
designated as hedges.
We recognize a derivative position which arises from a
contractual relationship with a customer that entitles us to
pass-through the economic effect of trading positions that we
take with other third parties on our customers behalf.
We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross-currency
swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These
exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm
commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of certain operations. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
outstanding currency exchange contracts with a total notional
amount of $1.5 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively,
not designated as hedges.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating
interest rates associated with variable-rate debt. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
$11 million and $10 million, respectively, of
outstanding interest rate swaps that were not designated as
hedges.
We use heating oil swaps and natural gas swaps to manage our
exposure to fluctuating energy prices in North America. As of
September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
2.4 million gallons and 3.4 million gallons,
respectively, of heating oil swaps and 4.3 million MMBTUs
and 3.8 million MMBTUs, respectively, of natural gas that
were not designated as hedges. One MMBTU is the equivalent of
one decatherm, or one million British Thermal Units.
F-117
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in
earnings (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum contracts
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
Currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Energy contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity swap
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
We record certain assets and liabilities, primarily derivative
instruments, on our balance sheet at fair value. We also
disclose the fair values of certain financial instruments,
including debt and loans receivable, that are not recorded at
fair value. Our objective in measuring fair value is to estimate
an exit price in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. We consider factors such
as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and nonperformance risk,
including our own nonperformance risk, in measuring fair value.
We use observable market inputs wherever possible. To the extent
that observable market inputs are not available, our fair value
measurements will reflect the assumptions we used. We grade the
level of the inputs and assumptions used according to a
three-tier hierarchy:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities that
we have the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which there is
little or no market data, which require us to develop our own
assumptions based on the best information available as what
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The following assets and liabilities are measured and recognized
at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Level 1(A)
|
|
Level 2(B)
|
|
Level 3(C)
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
Liabilities Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Level 1(A)
|
|
Level 2(B)
|
|
Level 3(C)
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
Liabilities Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(644
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(688
|
)
|
F-118
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
We measure the fair value of the majority of our derivative
contracts using industry-standard models that use observable
market inputs as their basis, such as time value, forward
interest rates, volatility factors, and current (spot) and
forward market prices for foreign exchange rates. We generally
classify these instruments within Level 2 of the valuation
hierarchy. Such derivatives include interest rate swaps,
cross-currency swaps, foreign currency forward contracts and
certain energy-related forward contracts, including natural gas
and heating oil contracts.
We classify the following derivative instruments in Level 3
of the valuation hierarchy. We have a highly customized
electricity contract in a geographic region for which no active
market exists. We value this contract using the observable
market prices of similar contracts for nearby regions. We adjust
these prices to account for geographical differences and
structural differences in the terms of the contract. We also
classify as Level 3 certain foreign exchange forward
contracts between the USD and the BRL, and the USD and the KRW,
for which the remaining time to maturity on the forward contract
extends beyond the terms of quoted market prices.
We incurred unrealized losses of $5 million related to
Level 3 financial instruments that were still held as of
September 30, 2009. These unrealized losses are included in
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net.
The following table presents a reconciliation of fair value
activity for Level 3 derivative contracts on a net basis
(in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
Instruments(A)
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
Net realized/unrealized gains included in earnings(B)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Net realized/unrealized gains included in Other comprehensive
income(C)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
7
|
|
Net transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Represents derivative assets net of derivative liabilities. |
|
|
|
(B) |
|
Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net. |
|
|
|
(C) |
|
Included in Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges,
net. |
F-119
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Financial
Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value
The table below presents the estimated fair value of certain
financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis (in millions). The table excludes short-term
financial assets and liabilities for which we believe carrying
value approximates fair value. The fair value of our letters of
credit is based on the availability under such credit agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 ,2009
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables from related parties
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelis Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.50% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Unsecured credit facility related party, due January
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Novelis Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due December 2019 (CHF 50 million)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 2 million)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Novelis Korea Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan, due October 2010
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Bank loan, due February 2010 (KRW 50 billion)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Bank loan, due May 2009 (KRW 10 billion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt, due December 2011 through December 2012
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Financial commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
12.
|
OTHER
(INCOME) EXPENSES, NET
|
Other (income) expenses, net is comprised of the following (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Exchange (gains) losses, net
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
(Gain) loss on reversal of accrued legal claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Gain on tax litigation settlement in Brazil
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-120
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
A reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our
effective tax rates is as follows (in millions, except
percentages).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Pre-tax income before equity in net loss of non-consolidated
affiliates and noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian statutory tax rate
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision at the Canadian statutory rate
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) for taxes on income (loss) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange translation items
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Expense (income) items not subject to tax
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Enacted statutory tax rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Tax rate differences on foreign earnings
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
Uncertain tax positions, net
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
|
$
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, we had a net deferred tax
liability of $488 million, including deferred tax assets of
approximately $403 million for net operating loss and tax
credit carryforwards. The carryforwards begin expiring in 2010
with some amounts being carried forward indefinitely. As of
September 30, 2009, valuation allowances of
$111 million had been recorded against net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, where it appeared
more likely than not that such benefits will not be realized.
Realization is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income
prior to expiration of the tax attribute carryforwards. Although
realization is not assured, management believes it is more
likely than not that all the remaining net deferred tax assets
will be realized. In the near term, the amount of deferred tax
assets considered realizable could be reduced if we do not
generate sufficient taxable income in certain jurisdictions.
During the six months ended September 30, 2009, the statute
of limitations lapsed with respect to unrecognized tax benefits
related to potential withholding taxes and cross-border
intercompany pricing of services. As a result, we recognized a
reduction in unrecognized tax benefits of $28 million,
including a decrease in accrued interest of $5 million,
recorded as a reduction to the income tax provision in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations.
|
|
14.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Legal
Proceedings
Coca-Cola
Lawsuit. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis
Corporation on February 15, 2007 by
Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in Georgia
state court. CCBSS is a consortium of
Coca-Cola
bottlers across the United States, including
Coca-Cola
Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
a soft toll agreement between the parties relating to the supply
of aluminum can stock, and seeks monetary damages in an amount
to be determined at trial and a declaration of
F-121
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
its rights under the agreement. The agreement includes a
most favored nations provision regarding certain
pricing matters. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached
the terms of the most favored nations provision. The
dispute will likely turn on the facts that are presented to the
court by the parties and the courts finding as to how
certain provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. If
CCBSS were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages
would likely be material. However, we have concluded that a loss
from the CCBSS litigation is not probable and therefore have not
recorded an accrual. In addition, we do not believe that there
is a reasonable possibility of a loss from the lawsuit based on
information available at this time. Novelis Corporation has
filed its answer and the parties are proceeding with discovery.
Environmental
Matters
The following describes certain environmental matters relating
to our business.
We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also
known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions
regarding liability arising from the usage, storage, treatment
or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a number of
sites in the United States, as well as similar proceedings under
the laws and regulations of the other jurisdictions in which we
have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the
European Union. Many of these jurisdictions have laws that
impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, for the costs of
environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party
claims, and other expenses. In addition, we are, from time to
time, subject to environmental reviews and investigations by
relevant governmental authorities.
As described further in the following paragraph, we have
established procedures for regularly evaluating environmental
loss contingencies, including those arising from such
environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we
have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss
contingencies, and we believe we have made reasonable estimates
of the costs that are likely to be borne by us for these
environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly, we have
established reserves based on our reasonable estimates for the
currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental
matters. We estimate that the undiscounted remaining
clean-up
costs related to all of our known environmental matters as of
September 30, 2009 will be approximately $49 million.
Of this amount, $31 million is included in Other long-term
liabilities, with the remaining $18 million included in
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009.
Management has reviewed the environmental matters, including
those for which we assumed liability as a result of our spin-off
from Rio Tinto Alcan. As a result of this review, management has
determined that the currently anticipated costs associated with
these environmental matters will not, individually or in the
aggregate, materially impair our operations or materially
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
With respect to environmental loss contingencies, we record a
loss contingency whenever such contingency is probable and
reasonably estimable. The evaluation model includes all asserted
and unasserted claims that can be reasonably identified. Under
this evaluation model, the liability and the related costs are
quantified based upon the best available evidence regarding
actual liability loss and cost estimates. Except for those loss
contingencies where no estimate can reasonably be made, the
evaluation model is fact-driven and attempts to estimate the
full costs of each claim. Management reviews the status of, and
estimated liability related to, pending claims and civil actions
on a quarterly basis. The estimated costs in respect of such
reported liabilities are not offset by amounts related to
cost-sharing between parties, insurance, indemnification
arrangements or contribution from other potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) unless otherwise noted.
F-122
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Brazil
Tax Matters
Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America,
as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had
cash deposits aggregating approximately $44 million and
$30 million, respectively, in judicial depository accounts
pending finalization of the related cases. The depository
accounts are in the name of the Brazilian government and will be
expended towards these legal proceedings or released to us,
depending on the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are
included in Other long-term assets third parties in
our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In
addition, we are involved in several disputes with Brazils
Ministry of Treasury about various forms of manufacturing taxes
and social security contributions, for which we have made no
judicial deposits but for which we have established reserves
ranging from $8 million to $121 million as of
September 30, 2009. In total, these reserves approximate
$142 million as of September 30, 2009 and are included
in Other long-term liabilities in our accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet.
On May 28, 2009, the Brazilian government passed a law
allowing taxpayers to settle certain federal tax disputes with
the Brazilian tax authorities, including disputes relating to a
Brazilian national tax on manufactured products, through an
installment program. Pursuant to the installment plan, companies
can elect to (a) pay the principal amount of the disputed
tax amounts over a near-term period (e.g., 1-60 monthly
installments) and receive a
35-45%
discount on the interest and
80-100%
discount on the penalties owed, (b) pay the principal and
interest over a medium-term period (e.g.,
60-120 monthly
installments) and receive a
30-35%
discount on the interest and
70-80%
discount on the penalties owed, or (c) pay the full amount
of the disputed tax amounts, including interest and penalties,
over a longer-term period (e.g.,
120-180 monthly
installments) and receive a
25-30%
discount on the interest and
60-70%
discount on the penalties owed. Novelis joined the installment
plan and now has until November 30, 2009 to choose, in
addition to IPI repayment terms, the tax disputes that it will
elect to settle.
Guarantees
of Indebtedness
We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our
subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including certain
of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and Aluminium Norf GmbH, which
is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint venture that does not meet
the requirements for consolidation.
In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness
guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some
of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no
expiration and have termination notice requirements. Neither we
nor any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds
any assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the
potential settlement of these guarantees.
Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries in our condensed consolidated financial statements,
all liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term
debt facilities for these entities are already included in our
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The following table discloses information about our obligations
under guarantees of indebtedness of others as of
September 30, 2009 (in millions). We did not have any
obligations under guarantees of indebtedness related to our
majority-owned subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Type of Entity
|
|
Future Payment
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred
to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar
arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets.
F-123
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
SEGMENT,
MAJOR CUSTOMER AND MAJOR SUPPLIER INFORMATION
|
Segment
Information
Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of
aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our
customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical
areas and are organized under four operating segments: North
America, Europe, Asia and South America.
Adjustment to Eliminate Proportional
Consolidation. The financial information for our
segments includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates
on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent
with the way we manage our business segments. However, under
GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to
reconcile the financial information for the segments shown in
the tables below to the relevant GAAP-based measures, we must
remove our proportional share of each line item that we included
in the segment amounts. See Note 5 Investment
in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party
Transactions for further information about these
non-consolidated affiliates.
We measure the profitability and financial performance of our
operating segments based on Segment income. Segment income
provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in
line with our portfolio approach to risk management. We define
Segment income as earnings before (a) depreciation and
amortization; (b) interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs; (c) interest income; (d) unrealized
gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net; (e) impairment of goodwill;
(f) impairment charges on long-lived assets (other than
goodwill); (g) gain on extinguishment of debt;
(h) noncontrolling interests share;
(i) adjustments to reconcile our proportional share of
Segment income from non-consolidated affiliates to income as
determined on the equity method of accounting;
(k) restructuring charges, net; (k) gains or losses on
disposals of property, plant and equipment and businesses, net;
(l) other costs, net; (m) litigation settlement, net
of insurance recoveries; (n) sale transaction fees;
(o) provision or benefit for taxes on income (loss) and
(p) cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax.
The tables below show selected segment financial information (in
millions).
Selected
Segment Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
|
$
|
881
|
|
|
$
|
1,422
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
(308
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,745
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
$
|
1,296
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(234
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,589
|
|
|
$
|
1,400
|
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
192
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Results
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Proportional
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
America
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
|
$
|
2,315
|
|
|
$
|
968
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
223
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
F-124
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table shows the reconciliation from income from
reportable segments to Net income attributable to our common
shareholder (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
South America
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Corporate and other(A)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net(B)
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Restructuring recoveries (charges), net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other costs, net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Corporate and other includes functions that are managed directly
from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development
and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human
resources and finance matters. These expenses have not been
allocated to the regions. It also includes realized gains
(losses) on corporate derivative instruments. |
|
|
|
(B) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net represents the portion of gains (losses) that
were not settled in cash during the period. Total realized and
unrealized gains (losses) are shown in the table below and are
included in the aggregate each period in (Gain) loss on change
in fair value of derivative instruments, net on our condensed
consolidated statements of operations. |
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses) included in segment income
|
|
$
|
(402
|
)
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative instruments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative
instruments, net
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-125
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
Information
about Major Customers and Primary Supplier
The table below shows our net sales to Rexam Plc (Rexam) and
Anheuser-Busch Companies (Anheuser-Busch), our two largest
customers, as a percentage of total Net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Rexam
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Anheuser-Busch
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Rio Tinto Alcan is our primary supplier of metal inputs,
including prime and sheet ingot. The table shows our purchases
from Rio Tinto Alcan as a percentage of our total combined
primary metal purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Purchases from Rio Tinto Alcan as a percentage of total
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
16.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the
following (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
Fair value of effective portion of hedges
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Pension and other benefits
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
|
17.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
GUARANTOR INFORMATION
|
In connection with the issuance of our 7.25% Senior Notes
and the old notes, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries,
which are 100% owned within the meaning of
Rule 3-10(h)(1)
of
Regulation S-X,
provided guarantees. These guarantees are full and unconditional
as well as joint and several. The guarantor subsidiaries (the
Guarantors) are comprised of the majority of our businesses in
Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Brazil, Portugal, Luxembourg and
Switzerland, as well as certain businesses in Germany. Certain
Guarantors may be subject to restrictions on their ability to
distribute earnings to Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The remaining
subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not
guarantors of the 7.25% Senior Notes or the old notes.
The following information presents condensed consolidating
statements of operations, balance sheets and statements of cash
flows of the Parent, the Guarantors, and the Non-Guarantors.
Investments include investment in and advances to
non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net assets
of divisions included in the Parent, and have been presented
using the equity method of accounting.
F-126
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
3,277
|
|
|
$
|
1,157
|
|
|
$
|
(679
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
2,622
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
3,261
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
87
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
2,857
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
574
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
375
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
(305
|
)
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-127
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
|
$
|
1,603
|
|
|
$
|
(1,389
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown below)
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
4,741
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
(1,389
|
)
|
|
|
5,622
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
5,223
|
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to our common shareholder
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-128
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
171
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
(907
|
)
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,769
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,993
|
)
|
|
|
764
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(1,220
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,940
|
|
|
$
|
6,516
|
|
|
$
|
1,420
|
|
|
$
|
(4,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
428
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
(907
|
)
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
(1,220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,057
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
(2,129
|
)
|
|
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owners net
investment
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
(2,122
|
)
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Novelis shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
(1,993
|
)
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,940
|
|
|
$
|
6,516
|
|
|
$
|
1,420
|
|
|
$
|
(4,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-129
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(601
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
719
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
516
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
5,036
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owners net
investment
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(1,858
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Novelis shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,308
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
1,282
|
|
|
$
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-130
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
(78
|
)
|
|
$
|
464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt third party
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt related party
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Principal payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-131
Novelis
Inc.
NOTES TO
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited) (Continued)
NOVELIS
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(272
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(109
|
)
|
|
$
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Proceeds from loans receivable, net related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
related parties
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in
foreign currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-132